Abstract
The present study comprehensively investigates the practical and intrinsic predictability of the sea surface temperature (SST) in the Northern Tropical Atlantic (NTA) based on the 138-year-long coupled hindcasts with a recently developed seasonal ensemble prediction system. This system can yield skillful deterministic predictions for the prominent warm and cold events at least 6 months ahead. Notably, it excels in providing probabilistic predictions for below- and above-normal events rather than for neutral events. The predictability of SST in the NTA undergoes remarkable seasonal variation with two peaks of predictability targeted at April and October regardless of the lead time. Various sources of predictability for these target months are revealed. For the target month of April, the preceding remote forcing from the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in the tropical Pacific Ocean combined with local signal results in the phase locking of the SST variation and seasonality of signal component over the NTA. This ultimately contributes to the high predictability targeted at April. However, From the perspective of potential predictability of the predictability targeted at October, which has been rarely mentioned in previous studies. It is also encouraging that, similar to the Indian Ocean Dipole, ENSO and the signal-to-noise ratio of the system mainly contribute to predictability beyond persistence at long lead times for the spring SST in the NTA. This indicates that potential future ENSO improvements may leave much room for improvement in the current SST prediction in the NTA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Tropical sea surface temperature (SST) variation plays an important role in regulating atmospheric general circulation to generate global climatic, ecological, and socioeconomic impacts (Saji and Yamagata 2002; McPhaden et al. 2006; Xie and Carton 2004; Yadav et al. 2018; Wang 2019). Skillful seasonal climate predictions primarily originate from atmospheric responses to those slow varying oceanic boundary thermal forcing (Tippett et al. 2004). Therefore, issuing timely and accurate predictions for several major ocean–atmosphere coupled modes, such as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), are major goals of operational short-term climate prediction, and could provide many beneficial implications for various uses, from climate disaster management to the energy sector. At present, current climate models can provide effective predictions of ENSO and IOD events at 6–24 months (Chen et al. 2004; Barnston et al. 2012; Luo et al. 2016; Tang et al. 2018; Ren et al. 2019; Ham et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2022a,b; Sun et al. 2023; Zhou and Zhang 2023) and 3–7 months (Luo et al. 2005; Zhao and Hendon 2010; Zhu et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2017; Wu and Tang 2019; Zhao et al. 2019, 2020; Liu et al. 2021; Song et al. 2022a, b, c), respectively. Moreover, a series of ENSO and IOD predictability studies have been well conducted, focusing on prediction error growth dynamics, predictability variation on multiple time scales, intrinsic limit of predictability, etc. (Duan and Mu 2006; Mu et al. 2007; Hou et al. 2018; Feng et al. 2017; Feng and Duan 2019; Hou et al. 2019; Hu et al. 2019; Zhou et al. 2020; Xu et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2022a, b, c; Song et al. 2022a, b). These predictability studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of the predictability of ENSO and IOD and promoted the development of seasonal climate prediction.
In contrast to the Pacific and Indian Oceans, prediction and predictability studies of ocean–atmosphere coupled modes in the Atlantic Ocean began to come to light later. Until the 1970s, the influence of the Atlantic Ocean on climate variability received increasing attention (Xie and Carton 2004). The SST variability in the Atlantic Ocean not only impacts the weather and climate over the surrounding continents (Giannini et al. 2003; Sutton and Hodson 2005; O’Reilly et al. 2016) but also has the potential to regulate the climate over the Pacific Ocean (Rodriguez et al. 2009; Ham et al. 2013; Exarchou et al. 2021; Ruprich et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2024), Indian Ocean (Barimalala et al. 2012; Wang 2019) and Asia (Kucharsk and Joshi 2017; Sun et al. 2017, 2019; Yadav et al. 2018). Therefore, skillful prediction of the Atlantic SST variability is crucial for climate prediction in the surrounding regions, which has profound socioeconomic implications. However, relatively little attention has been given to investigating seasonal predictability specifically in the Atlantic Ocean over the past decades. The prediction of the Atlantic climate has only recently emerged as a high-profile activity (Hurrell et al. 2006). A number of statistical and dynamic models have been employed for SST prediction in the Atlantic sector (Chang et al. 1998; Collins et al. 2006; Stockdale et al. 2006; Hu and Huang 2007; Wang and Chang 2008; Hu et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2016; Li et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2021).
However, previous studies have mainly demonstrated the actual prediction skill of SST in the Atlantic Ocean, while the potential predictability has seldom been considered, and mainly concentrated on the decadal scale (Collins et al. 2006; Msadek et al. 2010). When we speak of predictability, two concepts should be kept in mind. One is practical predictability, and the other is intrinsic predictability. The former is often referred to as the actual prediction skill, which quantifies the accuracy of current predictions by the best-known model against actual observations and can be measured with either deterministic or probabilistic metrics. The latter is also referred to as potential predictability, which indicates the upper limit of the prediction skill if the optimal procedure were used (Lorenz 1996; Tang et al. 2018). Perfect model experiment (Collins et al. 2006; Msadek et al. 2010) is always employed to quantify the potential predictability, in which the prediction and the corresponding “observation” are both from the model integration. Therefore, ensemble retrospective/hindcast forecasts based on state-of-the-art coupled models are powerful tools for promoting our understanding of predictability both from practical and intrinsic perspectives. Current predictability studies focused on the Atlantic sector are mainly based on hindcast forecasts over the past few decades only (Chang et al. 1998; Collins et al. 2006; Stockdale et al. 2006; Hu and Huang 2007; Wang and Chang 2008; Hu et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2016; Li et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2021). Such relatively limited data available may be problematic for reliably measuring the predictability and can potentially lead to precluding statistically robust conclusions. Recently, we performed a long-term retrospective prediction with the Community Earth System Model (CESM; Liu et al. 2022a), which provides a unique opportunity to explore a wide range of predictability problems regarding the Atlantic climate, especially for the potential predictability. In this study, we employed this retrospective ensemble forecast covering the 1880–2017 period to comprehensively investigate the Atlantic SST predictability. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: in Sect. 2, we present a detailed description of the retrospective forecasts and measurement metrics used. In Sects. 3 and 4, practical and intrinsic predictability traits, respectively, are described. Finally, we provide a summary and in-depth discussion of the findings in Sect. 5.
2 Data and methodology
2.1 Data
The retrospective forecasts analyzed in this study were extracted from our recently developed ensemble prediction system based on the CESM (Liu et al. 2022a). The long-term hindcast retrospective forecasts lasting 12 months were initialized each January 1st, April 1st, July 1st, and October 1st from 1880–2017 by assimilating the sea temperature at depths above 500 m and wind at heights below 500 hPa with nudging simulation coupled CESM (Song et al. 2022c). Regarding oceanic data, we employed the monthly Simple Ocean Data Assimilation version 2.2.4 (SODA 2.2.4; Carton and Giese 2008) and the Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS; Behringer and Xue 2004) datasets before and after 1983, respectively. The nudging coefficient for the sea temperature varies from about 10 days at the surface to about 140 days at 500 m. Regarding atmospheric data, six hourly ERA-20C reanalysis (Stickler et al. 2014) and ERA-interim reanalysis data points (Berrisford et al. 2011) were used before and after 1983, respectively. The nudging coefficients for the wind are uniformly (6 h) below 500 hPa and 0 above 500 hPa. In a given start month, 20 ensemble members generated by the climatically relevant singular vector (Kleeman et al. 2003) were produced to represent the influence of the uncertainty in the subsurface ocean temperature on the SST forecasts. More details of our nudging scheme and ensemble construction can be found in Song et al. (2022c) and Liu et al. (2022a).
To eliminate the influence of the decadal variation of the climatology states, the prediction and observation anomalies were defined as the departure from the climatology of the corresponding running 20-year period. In this study, “one month lead forecast” denotes the monthly mean forecast conducted from the initial conditions at the first day of one month to the current month itself. For example, the one month lead forecast for January 1st initial conditions is the monthly mean forecast for January. We also employed the partial correlation to exclude the influence of the ENSO signal and used the effective number of degrees of freedom to test the statistical significance of the correlation coefficients between two high auto-correlate variables, such as SST in this study. The merged monthly SSTs from the SODA and GODAS datasets before and after 1983 were utilized to evaluate the actual prediction skill.
2.2 Methodology
2.2.1 Deterministic prediction metrics
We employed the anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) and root mean square error (RMSE) to measure the deterministic prediction skill. These are defined as:
where \(x\) is the variable of interest. \(p\) and \(o\) denote the anomalous ensemble mean prediction and observation, \(i\) and \(t\) indicate the initial condition and lead month, and \(N\) is the total number of predictions.
2.2.2 Probabilistic prediction metrics
To evaluate the probabilistic skill, we employed the commonly used Brier skill score (BSS; Wilks 2011) and ranked probability skill score (RPSS, Epstein 1969). Following previous studies (Yang et al. 2016, 2018; Liu et al. 2018; 2022b), we split the probability density distribution of the data from 1880 to 2017 to define above-normal (upper 1/3 tercile), neutral (middle 1/3 tercile), and below-normal (lower 1/3 tercile) events. BSS here measures the performance of the probabilistic prediction for each category event, and RPSS represents the weighted average of the BSS for all event categories (Bradley and Schwartz 2011). These are defined based on Brier score (BS, Wilks 2011) and ranked probability score (RPS, Epstein 1969):
where \(N\) denotes the total number of initial conditions. \({N}_{k}\), \({\overline{p} }_{k}\) and \({\overline{o} }_{k}\) are number, the average forecast probability and corresponding observed frequency at \(k\) th probability bin, which divided from 0.1 to 1.0 with intervals of 0.1, respectively. \(\overline{o }\) is the climatological probability of an event.
where \({p}_{j}(i,t)\) and \({o}_{j}(i,t)\) are the forecast probability and observed frequency of the \(j\) th category event for the \(i\) th initial condition at lead time of \(t\).
Based on the BS and RPS, and taking the climatology as the reference forecast, BSS and RPSS can be defined as:
Positive BSS and RPSS mean better prediction than climatology. BSS consists of two terms, the resolution (\(BS{S}_{RES}\)) and the reliability (\(BS{S}_{REL}\)). The former measures the extra information captured by the forecast system when the occurrence of the event is different from the climate state. The latter quantifies the ability of forecast probability to represent the corresponding observed frequency.
Regarding the potential predictability, we used an information-based measure, namely, the relative entropy (RE), which quantifies the additional information from the predicted distributions over the climatological distribution (Kleeman 2002). As the above two distributions of seasonal variables (including SST) are approximately Gaussian, RE may be expressed as:
where \({\sigma }_{p}^{2}\), \({\sigma }_{c}^{2}\), \({\mu }_{p}\) and \({\mu }_{c}\) are the ensemble variance, climatological variance, ensemble mean, and climatological mean, respectively. RE can be divided into the signal component (SC, the first term of Eq. 7) and dispersion component (DC, the last three terms of Eq. 7). SC measures the additional information between the climatological and prediction means, while DC indicates a reduction in the climatological uncertainty from the prediction.
3 Practical predictability
3.1 Overall performance
Figure 1 shows the AAC of SST in the Atlantic Ocean against the corresponding observations with the lead time. Obviously, the ACC skill varies with the region and lead time. For the 1-month lead prediction, the ACC skills are generally higher than 0.5 in the whole basin. Beyond a 3-month lead, the ACC skills rapidly deteriorated in most regions of the domain, except for some areas in the northern tropical Atlantic (NTA). This indicates that the most predictable region is located in the NTA within the Atlantic sector on the seasonal scale. Therefore, the following discussion focuses on the NTA unless otherwise specified. To further explore the predictability in this region, we defined the regionally averaged (5–20°N, 20–80°W) SST anomalies over the NTA as the NTA SST index (NTASI) to quantify the SST variability in this region. Figure 2 shows the evolution of the ACC and RMSE of the NTASI with the lead time. For all lead times, the predictions notably exceeded the persistence forecasts in terms of both the ACC and RMSE, and high ACC corresponds to low RMSE. These superiorities enlarge with increasing lead time. This indicates that our ensemble prediction system performed reasonably well and could yield skillful SST predictions in the NTA at least 6 months ahead when 0.5 is chosen as a criterion to determine the effectiveness of the ACC. Figure 3 shows the predicted time series of the NTASI at different lead times (blue line) with the corresponding observations (red line). At first glance, the model generally captured the prominent warm and cold events in the NTA and yielded skillful predictions at a 6-month lead. At a 2-month lead, the predictions were quite consistent with the observations. With increasing lead time, however, there was a substantial deterioration in the agreement between the ensemble mean predictions and observations with a tendency to underestimate the amplitude of the SST variability in the NTA.
Except for the deterministic skill, we also assessed the probabilistic predictions of the NTASI. Figure 4a shows that the BSS skill for below-normal, neutral and above-normal events varied with the lead time. A positive BSS indicates a skillful probabilistic prediction, while a negative BSS suggests that the model prediction is inferior to the climatological forecast. A larger BSS value represents a greater improvement in model probabilistic predictions with respect to the climatological forecasts, which benefits from the contributions of the high resolution (Fig. 4b) component and low reliability (Fig. 4c) term. Overall, our ensemble system attained a better performance for below- and above-normal events, especially for the latter. It could provide skillful probabilistic predictions for below- and above-normal events 6 and 8 months ahead, respectively. Regarding below- and above-normal events, the resolution component sharply decreased with increasing lead time, while there was little fluctuation in the reliability component month to month. This suggests that the variation in the resolution component dominates the decrease in the probabilistic prediction ability. However, the BSS of neutral events was negative for all lead times, indicating that the probabilistic prediction is inferior to the climatological forecast. This suggests that the predictive information may primarily originate from below- and above-normal events, which can provide a large predictable signal. This is further examined in the next section.
3.2 Seasonal variation
The SST variability over the NTA exhibited the characteristics of phase locking. The standard deviation of the observed NTASI varied month to month, with a maximum amplitude in March–April-May (Fig. 5a). Figure 5b shows the ACC of the NTASI as a function of the target month and lead time. It is noticeable that the ACCs are still larger than 0.5 even at a 7-month lead in the target month of April, while they are smaller at a 4 or 5-month lead in the other target months. A similar feature was also observed in the RPSS skill of the NTASI (Fig. 5c). Skillful probabilistic predictions (RPSS > 0) could be made at least 10 months ahead in the target month of April over the shorter lead times in the other target months. The seasonal variation in the deterministic and probabilistic skills is further consistent with the phase locking of the SST variability over the NTA rather than the seasonality of corresponding persistence skill (Fig. 5d). This indicated that the predictability of the NTA SST is not only originate from the persistence of local SST and may be related to the lagged influence of ENSO and its seasonality. Generally, ENSO reaches its peak phase in winter and has the potential to regulate the SST variability over the NTA, with the maximum influence at a lag of approximately one season and corresponding to the peak amplitude of the SST variation in this region (Carton and Huang 1994; Enfield and Mayer 1997; Latif and Grötzner 2000; Chiang and Sobel 2002; Wang 2002; Chang et al. 2003; Huang 2004; Tourre and White 2005; Hu and Huang 2007; Ding and Li 2011; Hu et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2021). This will be further examined in the next section.
4 Intrinsic predictability
4.1 Overall performance
The actual prediction skill quantifies the ability of the current model to predict the future evolution of the system against corresponding observations, which can be influenced by a combination of errors due to the initial conditions and model formulation. The estimation of potential predictability metrics does not make use of observations, which assume model to be perfect and eliminate consideration of the errors resulting from model formulation. Therefore, the potential predictability is considered to be a useful indicator for the actual prediction skill (Tang et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2018). The potential predictability of SST over the NTA was measured via information-based framework metrics and is determined by a combination of SC and DC. Figure 6 shows the variations in RE, SC and DC as a function of the initial condition and lead time. It is apparent that RE and SC significantly varied among the different initial conditions and decreased with increasing lead time, while DC exhibited a relatively smooth variation among initial conditions and sharply decreased after 2 lead months. Generally, the large SC generally depended on a few events with large amplitudes, as shown in Fig. 2, suggesting that such events could provide strong initial signals for the corresponding predictions and often provide a large RE and high predictability. Figure 7 further reveals that SC was significantly correlated with RE (Fig. 7a), with a correlation coefficient of 0.89. In contrast to the favorable relationship between SC and RE, however, DC was much less related to RE (Fig. 7b). This indicates that strong events associated with abundant initial predictable signals contain much additional information that resides in each prediction. Accordingly, these events typically correspond to a large SC and dominate the interannual variation in RE.
4.2 Seasonal variation
As shown in Fig. 8, the potential predictability also exhibited significant seasonality. However, the seasonality in SC obviously differs from that of DC. Compared to that in the other target months, SC gradually declined in the target month of April. In contrast, significant phase locking of DC occurred around early autumn. It is straightforward to understand the above discrepancy. Both SC and DC can contribute to the predictability. SC represents the additional information of the initial signal of the prediction system compared with the climatological mean. The SST variance over the NTA reaches its peak time around April, which corresponds to a maximum amplitude of initial signal and SC. Therefore, SC plays a dominant role during the SST variance at its peak time. DC captures the reduction in the uncertainty in ensemble predictions compared with the climatology prediction, which works more effectively when the initial signal is relatively low. In the NTA, SST variance reach its valley time around October, which can and provide limited predictive signal and the mainly predictability is rooted in the reduction of the predictive uncertainty. Comparing Figs. 5 and 8, it can reveal that the phase locking of the actual prediction skill around April is determined by SC, while the seasonality in DC contributes to the second peak of the actual prediction skill around early autumn. This seasonality is radically different from that of the ENSO (Liu et al. 2022a) and IOD (Song et al. 2022a), which are dominant by SC.
4.3 Source of predictability
One emphasis of predictability studies is the exploration of the possible source of predictability. The following question naturally arises: what accounts for the predictability of SST over the NTA? As described based on the above results and previous literature (Kleeman 2002; Yang et al. 2012; Saha et al. 2016; Pillai et al. 2018), the inherent signals in the initial conditions can provide predictability of slow-varying climatic modes. Here, we first focus on the relationship between the potential predictability (RE) of SST over the NTA and the SST signal in the initial conditions. According to Eq. (7) and the results in Figs. 6 and 7, the RE is dominated by the SC, which is related to the square of the ensemble mean and independent of the sign of the ensemble prediction mean (Tang et al. 2007; Yang et al. 2012; Song et al. 2022a, b). So we employ the square of SSTA instead of the SSTA itself to address the strength of the SST signal.
Firstly, we investigate the correlation between the observed SSTA at 1, 4, 7, and 10 lead months (Fig. 9a-d) with NTASI targeted at April. In the observation, the local and the remote forcing from the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans are all significantly correlated with the peak phase of SST variation over the NTA. However, the significant effect of the Indian Oceans has almost disappeared and the local forcing over the NTA is still maintained after excluding the ENSO signal in each lead month (Figs. 9e-h). This indicates that the influence of the Indian Ocean mainly originated from the effect of ENSO (Song et al. 2022a, b) and the local forcing in the NTA is partly independent of ENSO. Therefore, we further explore correlations of the observed preceding NTASI and Niño 3.4 index with the NTASI of April, respectively (Fig. 10a). Before April, ENSO always reaches its peak phase in the preceding winter, and its lagged influence on the flowing April SST variation over NTA lasts in its whole development phase via two possible ways: the PNA pattern or the Walker and Hadley circulations. Both have the potential to regulate the Atlantic subtropical high, and the associated anomalous northeast trade winds resulting in the NTA SST anomalies by affecting the latent heat flux (Wang 2002; Xie and Carton 2004). Although the influence of preceding ENSO on the SST variation in April always exists, the influence of the local signal suppresses the contribution of ENSO in the short lead months. Figure 11 shows the correlation between the SST signal in the initial conditions and RE of SST over the NTA targeted at April, when the SST variation over the NTA reaches its peak phase. Consistent with the relative contributions of the ENSO and the local forcing in the observation, the predictability of SST over the NTA mainly depends on the local signal over the NTA at 1-month lead. As the lead time increases, the local influence of the NTA declines, and the effects from the tropical Pacific Ocean gradually emerge. Beyond a 7-month lead, the main predictability of SST over the NTA in April was mainly determined by the preceding ENSO signal. This further indicated that the high predictability of SST over the NTA in April was due to the combined influences of the local signal and the preceding remote forcing from the tropical Pacific Ocean. Regarding the prediction at long lead times, the predictability of SST over the NTA targeted at April mainly benefited from the contribution of the preceding ENSO forcing.
We also assess the predictability source of the SST variation over the NTA targeted at October, when the SST variation over the NTA reaches its minimum value. Due to the weak variance of ENSO in its transition phase, the influence of the ENSO on the flowing October SST variation in NTA is limited (Figs. Figure 10b and 12). In addition, the persistence of the local signal of NTA before October is higher than that before April (Fig. 10b). Therefore, local signal makes more contribution to the SST variation in October over NTA than ENSO at all lead months in the observation. Correspondingly, the local signal was notable at 1, 4 and 7 lead months in the correlation maps between the SST signal in the initial conditions and the RE targeted at October (Fig. 13), which provide the main predictability source of SST in October over the NTA. Compared with the results of April, there were weak initial signals to provide the additional information for SST prediction in October over the NTA as the lead time was increased. The aforementioned results revealed that the predictability of SST over the NTA is jointly influenced by the local signal and preceding remote forcing from the tropical Pacific Ocean. The seasonality in the lagged influences of the tropical Pacific Ocean on the SST variation over the NTA leads to a high predictability targeted at April.
5 Summary and discussion
The SST variation over the Atlantic Ocean has the potential to regulate the weather and climate worldwide (Xie and Carton 2004; Hurrell et al. 2006). Therefore, skillful prediction of SST over the Atlantic Ocean has tremendous social and economic implications. However, our knowledge of the predictability of the Atlantic SST and the related dynamic mechanism is limited relative to the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Based on long-term retrospective forecasts with the CESM, we comprehensively and thoroughly investigated the seasonal predictability of the Atlantic SST from both practical and intrinsic predictability perspectives. From the perspective of potential predictability, we focused in depth on two problems that have rarely been mentioned in the previous research. One is what is the dominant factor that controlling the seasonal variation of predictability over the NTA. The other is to identify the seasonality difference of the predictability source between peak and trough periods of the SST variation over NTA.
Overall, the most predictable region was located in the NTA within the Atlantic sector on the seasonal to interannual scales. Our ensemble prediction system could reasonably capture the prominent warm and cold events in the NTA and yield skillful deterministic predictions at least 6 months ahead. It could provide better probabilistic predictions for below- and above-normal events than for neutral events. This occurs because below- and above-normal events generally exhibit high intensities, which provide immense additional predictive information. Naturally, these events are typically associated with a large SC that dominates the variation in RE and corresponds to a high actual prediction skill.
In addition, there was a remarkable seasonality in the predictability of the SST variation over the NTA. Interestingly, this seasonal variation in predictability is not well consistent with the seasonality of the corresponding persistence skill, indicating that the predictability of NTA SST is not only contributed by the persistence of local SST. The phase locking of the SST variation over the NTA corresponded to the significant seasonality in SC, which led to the high predictability targeted at April regardless of the lead time. Taking this a step further, the high predictability in April was jointly influenced by the local signal over the NTA and preceding remote forcing from the tropical Pacific Ocean. The local signal was notable at a short lead time, while the preceding remote forcing from the tropical Pacific Ocean was more prominent at a long lead time. This coincides with the previous result that the predictability of IOD beyond persistence at long lead times is mostly controlled by ENSO predictability and the signal-to-noise ratio of the Indo-Pacific climate system (Zhao et al. 2019, 2020). In contrast, the predictability targeted at October was mainly dominated by the local influence over the NTA and stemmed from the contribution of DC, which was higher given a relatively low initial signal. Notably, the difference in the lagged influences of the tropical Pacific Ocean on the SST variation over the NTA between April and October led to the phase locking of the SST variation and its predictability.
Increasing attention has been focused on the prediction and predictability of climate modes over the Atlantic sector. A number of climate centers have adopted this problem as a high-profile activity and begun routinely issuing seasonal predictions of the Atlantic climate. However, despite only moderate success, it is encouraging that there exists much room for improvement in current prediction of SST over the NTA. Further scientific advances regarding this problem crucially depend on our ability to fully realize the potential of seasonal Atlantic predictions. Potential efforts for three aspects can be expected. One is the design of a sustained observation system that can provide the key state variables and effectively use these data via intelligent assimilation methods. The other is the reduction in the model bias and improvement in the model performance by considering the interactions among ocean basins. In addition, the booming method of machine learning has achieved remarkable success in the seasonal prediction of the SST in the Indo-Pacific Ocean (Ham et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2021; Sun et al. 2023; Zhou et al. 2023). Therefore, the application of machine learning is expected to greatly enhance the accuracy of seasonal prediction of SST in the NTA. Beyond the issues outlined above, another overarching challenge facing the climate community is that SST over the Atlantic sector also exhibits obvious variability on the decadal scale (Karspeck et al. 2015; Yeager and Robson 2017; Yeager et al. 2018; Buckley et al. 2019; Yeager 2020). It is of primary importance to advance our understanding of the predictability of the Atlantic sector on a decadal scale. In terms of this issue, an in-depth systematic investigation is underway.
Data availability
Reanalysis datasets of ocean temperature analyzed during the current study are available in https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/godas-ncep-global-ocean-data-assimilation system and http://iridl.ldeo.columbia.edu/SOURCES/.CARTON-GIESE/.SODA/.v2p2p4/. The atmospheric reanalysis datasets are provided by the ECMWF at https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/browse-reanalysis-datasets. The results of the long term hindcast experiment using CESM will be available in the website https://github.com/XunshuS/CESM-138-year-NTA-hindcast when the paper is published.
References
Barnston AG, Tippett MK, L’Heureux ML, Li S, DeWitt DG (2012) Skill of real-time seasonal ENSO model predictions during 2002–11: is our capability increasing? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:631–651
Barimalala R, Bracco A, Kucharski F (2012) The representation of the South Tropical Atlantic teleconnection to the Indian Ocean in the AR4 coupled models. Clim Dyn 38:1147–1166
Behringer D, Xue Y (2004) Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation system at NCEP: The Pacific Ocean. In Eighth symposium on integrated observing and assimilation systems for atmosphere, oceans, and land surface, AMS 84th annual meeting, pp 11–15. https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/70720.pdf
Berrisford P, Kallberg P, Kobayashi et al (2011) The ERA–Interim archive version 2.0. European Centre for Medium–Range Weather Forecasts ERA Tech Rep 1:23
Bradley AA, Schwartz SS (2011) Summary verification measures and their interpretation for ensemble forecasts. Mon Weather Rev 139:3075–3089
Buckley MW, DelSole T, Lozier MS, Li L (2019) Predictability of North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature and Upper-Ocean Heat Content. J Clim 32:3005–3023
Carton JA, Huang B (1994) Warm events in the tropical Atlantic. J Phys Oceanogr 24:888–903
Carton JA, Giese B (2008) A reanalysis of ocean climate using simple ocean data assimilation SODA. Mon Weather Rev 136:2999–3017
Chang P, Ji L, Li H, Penland C, Matrosova L (1998) Prediction of tropical Atlantic sea surface temperature. Geophys Res Lett 25:1193–1196
Chang P, Saravanan R, Ji L (2003) Tropical Atlantic seasonal predictability: The roles of El Niño remote influence and thermodynamic air-sea feedback. Geophys Res Lett 30:1501
Chen D, Cane MA, Kaplan A, Zebiak SE, Huang D (2004) Predictability of El Niño over the past 148 years. Nature 428:733–736
Chen HC, Jin FF, Jiang L (2021) The Phase-Locking of Tropical North Atlantic and the Contribution of ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 48:e2021GL095610
Chiang JC, Sobel AH (2002) Tropical tropospheric temperature variations caused by ENSO and their influence on the remote tropical climate. J Clim 15:2616–2631
Collins M, Botzet M, Carril AF, Drange H, Jouzeau A, Latif M, Masina S, Otteraa OH, Pohlmann H, Sorteberg A, Sutton R, Terray L (2006) Interannual to decadal climate predictability in the North Atlantic: a multimodel-ensemble study. J Clim 19:1195–1203
Ding R, Li J (2011) Winter Persistence Barrier of Sea Surface Temperature in the Northern Tropical Atlantic Associated with ENSO. J Clim 24:2285–2299
Duan W, Mu M (2006) Investigating decadal variability of El Nino-Southern Oscillation asymmetry by conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. J Geophys Res Oceans 111:C7
Enfield DB, Mayer DA (1997) Tropical Atlantic sea surface temperature variability and its relation to El Niñ-Southern Oscillation. J Geophys Res Oceans 102:929–945
Exarchou E, Ortega P, Rodríguez-Fonseca B, Losada T, Polo I, Prodhomme C (2021) Impact of equatorial Atlantic variability on ENSO predictive skill. Nat Commun 12:1612
Epstein ES (1969) A scoring system for probability forecasts of ranked categories. J Appl Meteorol 8:985–987
Feng R, Duan W, Mu M (2017) Estimating observing locations for advancing beyond the winter predictability barrier of Indian Ocean dipole event predictions. Clim Dyn 48:1173–1185
Feng R, Duan W (2019) Indian Ocean Dipole-related Predictability Barriers Induced by Initial Errors in the Tropical Indian Ocean in a CGCM. Adv Atmos Sci 36:658–668
Giannini A, Saravanan R, Chang P (2003) Oceanic forcing of Sahel rainfall on interannual to interdecadal time scales. Science 302:1027–1030
Ham YG, Kug JS, Park JY, Jin FF (2013) Sea surface temperature in the north tropical Atlantic as a trigger for El Niño/Southern Oscillation events. Nat Geosci 6:112–116
Ham YG, Kim JH, Luo JJ (2019) Deep learning for multi-year ENSO forecasts. Nature 573:568–572
Hou Z, Li J, Ding R, Feng J, Duan W (2018) The application of nonlinear local Lyapunov vectors to the Zebiak-Cane model and their performance in ensemble prediction. Clim Dyn 51:283–304
Hou M, Duan W, Zhi X (2019) Season-dependent predictability barrier for two types of El Niño revealed by an approach to data analysis for predictability. Clim Dyn 53:5561–5581
Hu ZZ, Huang B (2007) The predictive skill and the most predictable pattern in the tropical Atlantic: The effect of ENSO. Mon Weather Rev 135:1786–1806
Hu ZZ, Kumar A, Huang B, Wang W, Zhu J, Wen C (2013) Prediction skill of monthly SST in the North Atlantic Ocean in NCEP Climate Forecast System version 2. Clim Dyn 40:2745–2759
Hu JY, Duan WS, Zhou Q (2019) Season-dependent predictability and error growth dynamics for La Niña predictions. Clim Dyn 53:1063–1076
Huang B (2004) Remotely forced variability in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Clim Dyn 23:133–152
Hurrell JW, Visbeck M, Busalacchi A, Clarke RA et al (2006) Atlantic Climate Variability and Predictability: A CLIVAR Perspective. J Clim 19:5100–5121. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3902.1
Karspeck A, Yeager S, Danabasoglu G, Teng H (2015) An evaluation of experimental decadal predictions using CCSM4. Clim Dyn 44:907–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2212-7
Kleeman R (2002) Measuring dynamical prediction utility using relative entropy. J Atmos Sci 59:2057–2072
Kleeman R, Tang YM, Moore A (2003) The calculation of climatically relevant singular vectors in the presence of weather noise. J Atmos Sci 60:2856–2867
Kucharski F, Joshi MK (2017) Influence of tropical South Atlantic sea-surface temperatures on the Indian summer monsoon in CMIP5 models. Q J R Meteorol Soc 143:1351–1363
Latif M, Grötzner A (2000) The equatorial Atlantic oscillation and its response to ENSO. Clim Dyn 16:213–218
Lee DE, Chapman D, Henderson N, Chen C, Cane MA (2016) Multilevel vector autoregressive prediction of sea surface temperature in the north tropical Atlantic Ocean and the Caribbean Sea. Clim Dyn 47:95–106
Li X, Bordbar MH, Latif M, Park W, Harlaß J (2020) Monthly to seasonal prediction of tropical Atlantic sea surface temperature with statistical models constructed from observations and data from the Kiel Climate Model. Clim Dyn 54:1829–1850
Liu T, Tang YM, Yang DJ, Cheng YJ, Song XS, Hou ZL et al (2018) The relationship among probabilistic, deterministic and potential skills in predicting the ENSO for the past 161 years. Clim Dyn 53:6947–6960
Liu T, Song XS, Tang YM, Shen ZQ, Tan XX (2022a) ENSO Predictability over the Past 137 Years Based on a CESM Ensemble Prediction System. J Clim 35:763–777
Liu T, Song XS, Tang YM (2022b) The predictability study of the two flavors of ENSO in the CESM model from 1881 to 2017. Clim Dyn 59:3343–3358
Liu T, Tang YM, Wang C, Song X (2022) Probabilistic prediction of ENSO over the past 137 years using the CESM model. J Geophys Res Oceans 127:e2022JC019127
Liu HF, Tang YM, Chen D, Lian T (2017) Predictability of the Indian Ocean dipole in the coupled models. Clim Dyn 48:1–20
Liu J, Tang Y, Wu Y, Li T, Wang Q, Chen D (2021) Forecasting the Indian Ocean Dipole with deep learning techniques. Geophys Res Lett 48:e2021GL094407
Lorenz EN (1996) Predictability: A Problem Partly Solved. Proceedings on Seminar on Predictability 1:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617652.004
Luo JJ, Masson S, Behera S, Shingu S, Yamagata T (2005) Seasonal climate predictability in a coupled OAGCM using a different approach for ensemble forecasts. J Clim 18:4474–4497
Luo JJ, Lee JY, Yuan CX, Sasaki W, Masso S, Behera SK et al (2016) Current status of intraseasonal–seasonal-to-interannual prediction of the IndoPacific climate. In: Behera SK, Yamagata T (eds) Indo-Pacific Climate Variability and Predictability. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 63–107
Msadek R, Dixon KW, Delworth TL, Hurlin W (2010) Erratum: assessing the predictability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation and associated fingerprints. Geophys Res Lett 37:L23609
McPhaden MJ, Zebiak SE, Glantz MH (2006) ENSO as an integrating concept in Earth science. Science 314:1740–1745
Mu M, Xu H, Duan W (2007) A kind of initial errors related to “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events in Zebiak-Cane model. Geophys Res Lett 34:3709
O’Reilly CH, Huber M, Woollings T, Zanna L (2016) The signature of low-frequency oceanic forcing in the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. Geophys Res Lett 43:2810–2818
Pillai PA, Rao SA, Das RS, Salunke K, Dhakate A (2018) Potential predictability and actual skill of boreal summer tropical SST and Indian summer monsoon rainfall in CFSv2-T382: Role of initial SST and teleconnections. Clim Dyn 51:493–510
Rodríguez-Fonseca B, Polo I, García-Serrano J, Losada T, Mohino E, Mechoso CR, Kucharski F (2009) Are Atlantic Niños enhancing Pacific ENSO events in recent decades? Geophys Res Lett 36:L20705
Ren H, Wu Y, Bao Q et al (2019) China multi-model ensemble prediction system version 1.0 (CMMEv1.0) and its application to flood-season prediction in 2018. J Meteorol 33:540–552
Ruprich-Robert Y, Moreno-Chamarro E, Levine X, Bellucci A, Cassou C, Castruccio F et al (2021) Impacts of Atlantic multidecadal variability on the tropical Pacific: a multi-model study. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci 4:33
Saji NH, Yamagata T (2002) Structure of SST and surface wind variability during Indian Ocean dipole mode events: COADS observations. J Clim 16:2735–2751
Saha SK, Pokhrel S, Salunke K, Dhakate A, Chaudhari HS, Rahaman H et al (2016) Potential predictability of Indian summer monsoon rainfall in NCEP CFSv2. J Adv Model Earth Syst 8:96–120
Song XS, Tang YM, Liu T, Li XJ (2022a) Predictability of Indian Ocean Dipole over 138 years using a CESM ensemble-prediction system. J Geophys Res Oceans 127:e2021JC018210
Song XS, Tang YM, Li XJ, Liu T (2022b) Decadal variation of predictability of the Indian Ocean Dipole during 1880–2017 using an ensemble prediction system. J Clim 35(17):5759–5771
Song XS, Li XJ, Zhang SW, Li Y, Chen XR, Tang YM, Chen D (2022c) A new nudging scheme for the current operational climate prediction system of the National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center of China. Acta Oceanol Sin 41:51–64
Stickler A, Brönnimann S, Valente MA, Sterin JBA, Jourdain S, Dee D et al (2014) ERA-CLIM: Historical surface and upper-air data for future reanalyses. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95:1419–1430
Stockdale TN, Balmaseda MA, Vidard A (2006) Tropical Atlantic SST prediction with coupled ocean–atmosphere GCMs. J Clim 19:6047–6061
Sutton RW, Hodson DLR (2005) Atlantic Ocean forcing of North American and European summer climate. Science 309:115–118
Sun C, Li JP, Ding RQ, Jin Z (2017) Cold season Africa-Asia multidecadal teleconnection pattern and its relation to the Atlantic multidecadal variability. Clim Dyn 48:3903–3918
Sun C, Li JP, Kucharski F, Kang IS, Jin FF, Wang KC, Wang C, Ding RQ, Xie F (2019) Recent acceleration of Arabian Sea warming induced by the Atlantic-western Pacific trans-basin multidecadal variability. Geophys Res Lett 46:1662–1671
Sun M, Chen L, Li T, Luo JJ (2023) CNN-Based ENSO Forecasts With a Focus on SSTA Zonal Pattern and Physical Interpretation. Geophys Res Lett 50(20):e2023GL105175
Tang YM, Lin H, Derome J, Tippett MK (2007) A predictability measure applied to seasonal predictions of the arctic oscillation. J Clim 20:4733–4750
Tang YM, Kleeman R, Moore AM (2008) Comparison of Information-based Measures of Forecast Uncertainty in Ensemble ENSO Prediction. J Clim 21:230–247
Tang YM, Zhang RH, Liu T, Duan WS, Yang DJ, Zheng F et al (2018) Progress in ENSO prediction and predictability study. Natl Sci Rev 5:826–839
Tippett MK (2004) Measuring the potential utility of seasonal climate predictions. Geophys Res Lett 3:L22201
Tourre YM, White WB (2005) Evolution of the ENSO signal over the tropical Pacific-Atlantic domain. Geophys Res Lett 32:L07605
Wang C (2002) Atlantic climate variability and its associated atmospheric circulation cells. J Clim 15:1516–1536
Wang C (2019) Three-ocean interactions and climate variability: A review and perspective. Clim Dyn 53:5119–5136
Wang FM, Chang P (2008) A linear stability analysis of coupled tropical Atlantic variability. J Clim 21:2421–2436
Wang R, Chen L, Li T, Luo JJ (2021) Atlantic Niño/Niña Prediction Skills in NMME Models. Atmosphere 12:803
Wang R, He J, Luo JJ, Chen L (2024) Atlantic warming enhances the influence of Atlantic Niño on ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 51(8):e2023GL108013
Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. International Geophysics Series, 3rd edn. Academic Press, pp 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385022-5.00008-7
Wu YL, Tang YM (2019) Seasonal predictability of the tropical Indian Ocean SST in the North American multimodel ensemble. Clim Dyn 53:3361–3372
Xie SP, Carton JA (2004) Tropical Atlantic Variability: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Impacts. American Geophysical Union (AGU), pp 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1029/147GM07
Xu H, Chen L, Duan WS (2021) Optimally growing initial errors of El Niño events in the CESM. Clim Dyn 56:3739–3815
Yadav RK, Gangiredla S, Chowdary JS (2018) Atlantic Niño modulation of the Indian summer monsoon through Asian jet. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci 1:23
Yang DJ, Tang YM, Zhang YC, Yang XQ (2012) Information-based potential predictability of the Asian summer monsoon in a coupled model. J Geophys Res 117:3119
Yang DJ, Yang XQ, Xie Q, Zhang Y, Ren X, Tang YM (2016) Probabilistic versus deterministic skill in predicting the western North Pacific-East Asian summer monsoon variability with multimodel ensembles. J Geophys Res Atmos 121:1079–1103
Yang DJ, Yang XQ, Ye D, Sun X, Fang J, Chu C et al (2018) On the relationship between probabilistic and deterministic skills in dynamical seasonal climate prediction. J Geophys Res Atmos 123:5261–5283
Yeager S (2020) The abyssal origins of North Atlantic decadal predictability. Clim Dyn 55:2253–2271
Yeager SG, Robson JI (2017) Recent Progress in Understanding and Predicting Atlantic Decadal Climate Variability. Curr Clim Change Rep 3:112–127
Yeager SG, Danabasoglu G, Rosenbloom NA et al (2018) Predicting Near-Term Changes in the Earth System: A Large Ensemble of Initialized Decadal Prediction Simulations Using the Community Earth System Model. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 99:1867–1886. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0098.1
Zhao M, Hendon HH (2010) Representation and prediction of the Indian Ocean dipole in the POAMA seasonal forecast model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 135(639):337–352
Zhao S, Jin F-F, Stuecker MF (2019) Improved Predictability of the Indian Ocean Dipole Using Seasonally Modulated ENSO Forcing Forecasts. Geophys Res Lett 46:9980–9990
Zhao S, Stuecker MF, Jin F-F et al (2020) Improved Predictability of the Indian Ocean Dipole Using a Stochastic Dynamical Model Compared to the North American Multimodel Ensemble Forecast. Wea Forecasting 35:379–399
Zhang W, Jiang F, Stuecker MF, Jin FF, Timmermann A (2021) Spurious north tropical Atlantic precursors to El Niño. Nat Commun 12:3096
Zhou Q, Duan W, Hu J (2020) Exploring sensitive area in the tropical Indian Ocean for El Niño prediction: implication for targeted observation. J Oceanol Limnol 38:1602–1615
Zhou L, Zhang RH (2023) A self-attention–based neural network for three-dimensional multivariate modeling and its skillful ENSO predictions. Sci Adv 9:eadf2827
Zhu J, Huang B, Kumar A, Kinter JL (2015) Seasonality in prediction skill and predictable pattern of tropical Indian Ocean SST. J Clim 28:7962–7984
Funding
This research was jointly supported by the the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (SML2021SP310), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (4227901), Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, MNR (QNYC2101), South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (LTO2209), and the Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (311021001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ting Liu, and Chunzai Wang and Jiao Yang contributed to the conception of the study; Ting Liu and Xunshu Song performed the experiment and the data analyses. Ting Liu, and Chunzai Wang wrote the manuscript; Jiayu Zheng and Yonghan Wen helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, T., Wang, C., Yang, J. et al. Investigating the seasonal SST Predictability in the Northern Tropical Atlantic Ocean in an ensemble prediction system. Clim Dyn 62, 7889–7904 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07312-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07312-0