Abstract
Purpose
The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) is associated with adverse perinatal outcome (APO) in low-risk pregnancies near term. A Doppler parameter, which also includes information from the uterine vessels could potentially improve detection of subclinical placental dysfunction. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) related to APO prediction in low-risk term pregnancies in > 40 + 0 weeks.
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort study. All low-risk pregnancies in which feto-maternal Doppler was examined from 40 + 0 weeks and an appropriate for gestational age fetus was present were included. ROC (receiver operating characteristic curves) analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of CPUR. The presence of at least one of the following outcome parameters was defined as composite APO (CAPO): operative delivery (OD) due to intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, umbilical cord arterial pH ≤ 7.15, 5 min APGAR ≤ 7.
Results
A total of n = 114 cases were included. Mean gestational age at examination and delivery were 40 + 3 weeks and 40 + 6 weeks, respectively. Overall, CAPO occurred in 38 of 114 cases (33.3%). ROC analyses showed a significant association of CPUR (AUC = 0.67, p = 0.004) and CPR (AUC = 0.68, p = 0.002) with CAPO. Additionally, CPUR (AUC = 0.64, p = 0.040) showed a predictive value for OD due to IFC.
Conclusion
The CPUR in > 40 + 0 weeks showed a predictive value for CAPO and OD due to IFC in low-risk pregnancies. However, the extent to which CPUR can be used to optimize delivery management warrants further investigations in prospective interventional studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) is a potential marker of placental dysfunction including fetal as well as maternal Doppler information in one ratio. The CPUR in >40+0 weeks showed a mild predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome and operative delivery due to intrapartum fetal compromise in low-risk pregnancies. |
Introduction
Feto-maternal Doppler sonography has achieved a high status in diagnosis, therapy, and monitoring of high-risk pregnancies in prenatal medicine. Especially the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), the ratio of pulsatility index (PI) of middle cerebral artery (MCA) and umbilical artery (UA) has become the focus of current studies in recent years as a marker of fetal well-being and an adverse perinatal outcome (APO) in appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. However, the CPR includes only fetal Doppler information and shows a moderate predictive power regarding APO [9, 10].
Evaluation of uterine Doppler ultrasound in the third trimester in low-risk AGA fetuses demonstrated a significant association with uteroplacental dysfunction in form of an increased uterine vascular resistance (mean uterine artery PI: mUtA‐PI) and fetal cerebral blood flow redistribution (“brain-sparing”) reflected by low CPR values [1]. Similarly, recent published data on the role of uterine Doppler in low-risk term pregnancies in early labor showed an association between raised mUtA-PI with an higher incidence of obstetric intervention due to fetal distress [11]. Hence, a Doppler parameter combining all these information from the uterine, placental, and fetal vessels could potentially improve detection of subclinical placental dysfunction (PD) at term compared to CPR even more [12].
The cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR: CPR/mUtA-PI) is a poorly studied parameter, which includes fetal as well as maternal Doppler information. The idea of integrating the maternal Doppler ultrasound information into APO risk assessment gave the occasion to first studies, which investigate the role of CPUR in AGA and small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses [13,14,15]. This gain in information could lead to a better APO prediction in low-risk term pregnancies. In planning the optimal time of delivery for pregnancies beyond 40 + 0 weeks, in which PD plays a decisive role, and in achieving a better perinatal outcome, CPUR could be a useful tool.
The aim of this work is to investigate the performance of CPUR for APO prediction in low-risk pregnancies beyond 40 + 0 weeks of gestation.
Methods
Study population
This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Low-risk pregnancies in which feto-maternal Doppler was examined from 40 + 0 weeks and an AGA–fetus (estimated fetal weight ≥ 10th and < 90 percentile) was present were included. Data were obtained between September 2019 and December 2021. Cases with the evidence of chromosomal or morphological anomalies, twin pregnancies, or other conditions with possible effect on fetal hemodynamics such as pre-eclampsia or endocrine disorders (e.g. maternal diabetes) were excluded from analysis. All term pregnancies were monitored and treated (offer of induction of labor at 41 + 0 weeks of gestation, indication for induction of labor at 41 + 3 weeks of gestation at the latest) following the recommendations of national guidelines [16].
Feto-maternal Doppler assessment
Feto-maternal Doppler examinations were performed using a Voluson E10 and E8 (GE Medical Systems, Solingen, NRW, Germany) with a 2–8 MHz convex probe including umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI and mean uterine artery (mUtA) PI in all cases. Doppler measurements were performed by trained operators of our institution of prenatal diagnostics and obstetrics following the recommendations of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and national guidelines [17, 18]. CPR was calculated as MCA-PI/UA-PI. mUtA-PI was calculated as the average PI of right and left uterine arteries (UtA). CPUR was calculated as CPR/mUtA-PI. Mean UtA-PI was defined as abnormal when it was > 95th centile [19]. CPR was defined as abnormal when it was < 5th centile [20]. In case of more than one Doppler examination, the closest examination to delivery was included.
We routinely determine the CPR in low-risk pregnancies during full term (39 + 0–41 + 0 weeks) in our department. In the case of a CPR abnormality (< 5th centile) between 40 + 0 and 41 + 0, we understand this as a risk factor for perinatal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we discuss induction of labor with the patients in informed consent on the basis of the current evidence for CPR in the low-risk collective (and even on data from the ARRIVE study [21] independent of the CPR). From 41 + 0 we clearly recommend the induction of labor in the event of CPR abnormalities (also here based on the SWEPIS study [22] independent of the CPR).
Statistical analysis
IBM SPSS statistics (Version 27.0 for Windows) was used for statistical analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of CPUR, CPR and mUtA-PI with respect to the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcome (APO). The presence of at least one of the following APO parameters was defined as composite APO (CAPO):
-
Emergency operative delivery (OD) due to intrapartum fetal compromise (IFC).
-
Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
-
Umbilical cord arterial pH ≤ 7.15.
-
5 min APGAR ≤ 7.
The diagnosis of IFC was made based on abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns and/or pH value ≤ 7.20 of fetal blood sampling (scalp). Abnormal FHR was defined as a pathological cardiotocography (CTG) according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria [23]. OD was defined as cesarean section (CS) or instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD). A threshold value for CPUR above which a CAPO was achieved was deliberately omitted, since too few cases were available for this purpose. To detect possible associations between APO criteria and the used Doppler parameters linear regression analysis using Pearson correlation were performed. Unstandardized regression coefficient b was reported. All accomplished statistical tests were performed with a significance level of 0.05. The data were validated by using double data entry. Descriptive statistics are presented as means ± 1 standard deviation.
Results
This study included n = 114 low-risk pregnancies, which were examined after 40 + 0 weeks of gestation. Mean time of examination was 40 + 3 weeks of gestation. Mean time of delivery was 40 + 6 weeks of gestation. All included Doppler measurements were complete, allowing calculation of CPUR. Overall, CAPO occurred in 34 of 114 cases (33.3%). APO-frequencies and baseline characteristics of the study cohort are displayed in Table 1.
ROC analyses showed a significant association of CPUR (AUC = 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.78, p = 0.004) and CPR (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI 0.57–0.78, p = 0.002) with CAPO. mUtA-PI (AUC = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45–0.68, p = 0.280) showed no significant association with CAPO. Considering the predictive value of CPUR, CPR and mUtA-PI for the individual APO indices, only in the case of CPUR (AUC = 0.64, 95% CI 0.50–0.77, p = 0.040) a significant predictive value for OD for IFC could be demonstrated. No association could be demonstrated for any other APO criteria. The results of ROC are displayed in Table 2 as well as Figs 1 and 2.
Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between CPUR, CPR as well as mUtA-PI and umbilical arterial pH. CPUR achieved the highest correlation coefficient here (b = 3.52; p = 0.005). Figure S1 shows the graphical representation of the linear regression analyses. The corresponding numerical representation can be found in Table S1.
Discussion
The aim of the study was to investigate the performance of CPUR regarding APO prediction in low-risk pregnancies at term compared to the established feto-maternal Doppler indices CPR and mUtA-PI. We observed a significant association of low CPUR and CPR with CAPO, although the overall predictive power of CPR and CPUR was mild. No significant advantage of CPUR compared to CPR in the overall CAPO prediction rate could be found. A predictive value of CPUR regarding OD for IFC could be demonstrated. Linear relationship between the Doppler parameters studied (CPUR, CPR and mUtA-PI) and umbilical arterial pH value could be observed.
Systematic meta-analyses already confirmed the association between low CPR and APO in low-risk pregnancies. However, corresponding to our results, an overall mild APO prediction rate was reported [9, 10]. The optimal cut-off value in defining CPR pathology is currently discussed (< 5th centile, < 10th centile, < 20th centile, multiple of the median, < 1.1) as well as the best time of CPR measurement [7,8,9, 24].
The idea of integrating the maternal side of the placenta into the feto-placental Doppler-based APO risk assessment built the foundation stone for first studies that examined the role of CPUR in high- and low-risk pregnancies [13,14,15]. Inclusion of mUtA-PI in the CPR to examine feto-placental unit might improve the APO prediction.
In a population of n = 347 patients, Macdonald et al. reported for the first time that the CPUR was the strongest indicator for a late mild placental dysfunction and predicted more cases of FGR (birth weight < 3rd centile) compared to the CPR and/or mUtA‐PI by itself [13]. A multicenter prospective study showed that in low-risk pregnancies (n = 804) at term, there was a six-fold increase in the rate of OD for IFC as well as a higher rate of APO in cases with a low CPUR, even though the predictive power of the CPUR was only moderate [14]. Morales-Rosello et al., however, could not observe an added predictive value of the CPUR with regard to APO when compared to the CPR between 34 + 0 and 41 + 0 weeks in a low-risk population (n = 891) [15].
According to the results of Dall’Asta et al. [14], the remaining placental reserve capacity at term, which might be represented by CPUR at best, could play a crucial role in the prediction of APO and OD for IFC in low-risk pregnancies. Uterine contractions during labor and the subsequent compression of the uterine arteries physiologically reduces the uteroplacental perfusion by up to 60% [25]. Hence, the antenatal placental function is crucial when it comes to the adequate fetal response to this physiological stress situation [12].
Looking at the progress made in the field of fetal monitoring, the examination methods (evaluation of fetal heart rate patterns, measuring amniotic fluid volume, estimating fetal weight) routinely used at full (39 + 0–40 + 6) or late (41 + 0–41 + 6) term [26] may be insufficient to detect subclinical PD [12]. Accordingly, the systematic investigation of established and novel Doppler indices in full and late term is important, although our results show a comparatively low predictive power of the CPUR regarding CAPO and OD for IFC. Recent data concerning the role of feto-maternal Doppler ultrasound in low-risk pregnancies and its association with APO, raise the question of whether abnormal Doppler indices, especially in the late-term situation (41 + 0–41 + 6), can or even should be cause for the recommendation of labor induction (not only an offer [16]) at 41 + 0 weeks of gestation (even in the case of normal amniotic fluid volume and CTG as well as an proven AGA-fetus) [12]. This is to be seen in particular against the background of the data of large randomized controlled trials on perinatal morbidity and mortality after induction of labor in the full and late-term period (vs. expectant management) [21, 22]. Hence, if feto-maternal Doppler ultrasound is routinely used as part of fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies at late term, an appropriate patient counseling and participative form of decision-making should be applied when deciding on the timing of labor induction [12].
There are several limitations of our study. As this is a retrospective observational study, the clinical consequence of a decreased CPUR like induction of labor and its influence on perinatal outcome, is not investigated. Thus, whether a change in CPUR is timely to achieve a reduction in the rate of emergency deliveries remains unresolved. Furthermore, the results need to be approved in prospective studies with increased numbers of cases. In particular, cerebral Doppler including MCA-PI measurement has been discussed as observer dependent [27]. Therefore, it would be desirable to have data of confirmed cerebro-placental-uterine Doppler pathology within 24 h to avoid false-positive results, especially when timing of delivery is based on this finding. We were not able to generate a threshold value for CPUR above which a CAPO was achieved, since too few cases were available for this purpose. Finally, there are (to our knowledge) no gestational age dependent percentile curves of the CPUR yet, which makes it difficult to give a clear statement about pathology and physiology.
In fact, the CAPO rate is comparatively high. In the differentiated consideration of the individual CAPO parameters, this is mainly due to the umbilical cord pH value and the NICU rate. We do not have an exact reason for this. However, we have chosen the inclusion criteria very strictly as we excluded women with conditions that may affect fetomaternal hemodynamics, especially such as those with maternal diabetes, pre-eclampsia or small-for-gestational age fetus.
A strength of the study is that, to our best knowledge, it is the first to examine CPUR in comparison to CPR in a clearly defined full-term collective (> 40 + 0 weeks). However, CPUR (similar to CPR) proved to be a poor predictor of adverse outcome. In order to integrate the CPUR into everyday clinical practice, published CPUR reference values and prospective evidence of a significant advantage in its use in the question of the ideal time of labor induction are required. The CPUR in > 40 + 0 weeks showed a mild predictive value for APO and OD due to IFC in low-risk pregnancies. However, the extent to which the CPUR (in comparison to the CPR) can be used to optimize delivery management based on its predictive value for OD for IFC warrants further investigations in prospective interventional studies.
References
Khalil AA, Morales-Rosello J, Morlando M et al (2015) Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol 213(54):e1-54.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.024
Khalil A, Morales-Rosello J, Khan N et al (2017) Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:606 e1-606.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.005
Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M et al (2015) Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio: pH in term fetuses with low CPR. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 45:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14647
Sirico A, Diemert A, Glosemeyer P et al (2018) Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight: CPR adjusted for EFW. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51:381–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17458
Bligh LN, Alsolai AA, Greer RM et al (2018) Cerebroplacental ratio thresholds measured within 2 weeks before birth and risk of Cesarean section for intrapartum fetal compromise and adverse neonatal outcome: CPR for prediction of Cesarean section and neonatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 52:340–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17542
Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P et al (2013) Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208(124):e1-124.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.016
Ortiz JU, Graupner O, Karge A et al (2021) Does gestational age at term play a role in the association between cerebroplacental ratio and operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100:1910–1916. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14222
Ortiz JU, Graupner O, Flechsenhar S et al (2021) Prognostic value of cerebroplacental ratio in appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses before induction of labor in late-term pregnancies. Ultraschall Med Eur J Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1399-8915
VollgraffHeidweiller-Schreurs CA, De Boer MA, Heymans MW et al (2018) Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51:313–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18809
Dunn L, Sherrell H, Kumar S (2017) Review: systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Placenta 54:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2017.02.006
Dall’Asta A, Ghi T, Rizzo G et al (2020) VP54.03: uterine artery Doppler assessment in early labour in uncomplicated term pregnancy and prediction of adverse outcome: prospective multicentre study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 56:305–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23254
Graupner O, Kuschel B, Axt-Fliedner R et al (2022) New markers for placental dysfunction at term—potential fore more. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 82(07):719–726
MacDonald TM, Hui L, Robinson AJ et al (2019) Cerebral-placental-uterine ratio as novel predictor of late fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 54:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20150
Dall’Asta A, Ghi T, Rizzo G et al (2020) VP5404: cerebral-placental uterine ratio assessment in early labour in low-risk term pregnancy and prediction of adverse outcome: prospective multicentre study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 56:305–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23255
Morales-Roselló J, Buongiorno S, Loscalzo G et al (2020) Does uterine doppler add information to the cerebroplacental ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at the end of pregnancy? Fetal Diagn Ther 47:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499483
Kehl S, Hösli I, Pecks U et al (2021) Induction of labour. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k, AWMF registry No. 015–088, December 2020). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 81:870–895. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1519-7713
Bhide A, Acharya G, Baschat A et al (2021) ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): use of Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 58:331–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23698
Faber R, Heling K-S, Steiner H et al (2019) Doppler sonography during pregnancy—DEGUM quality standards and clinical applications (Part 1). Ultraschall Med Eur J Ultrasound 40:319–325. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0800-8596
Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S et al (2008) Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:128–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5315
Ciobanu A, Wright A, Syngelaki A et al (2019) Fetal medicine foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 53:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20157
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM et al (2018) Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 379:513–523. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800566
Wennerholm UB, Saltvedt S, Wessberg A et al (2019) Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6131
Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E et al (2015) FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet 131:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020
DeVore GR (2015) The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.024
Janbu T, Neshetm B-T (1987) Uterine artery blood velocities during contractions in pregnancy and labour related to intrauterine pressure. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 94:1150–1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02314.x
Spong CY (2013) Defining “Term” pregnancy: recommendations from the defining “Term” pregnancy workgroup. JAMA 309:2445. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.6235
Figueras F, Fernandez S, Eixarch E et al (2006) Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index: reliability at different sampling sites. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:809–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2816
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
OG and MM share first authorship. Both authors contributed equally to this study. OG contributed substantially to conception of the work, data interpretation, writing/editing of the manuscript and critical revision of the manuscript. MM contributed substantially to conception of the work, data acquisition, data interpretation, statistical analysis and drafting/writing of the manuscript. LL contributed to data acquisition and critical revision of the manuscript. SKP contributed to data acquisition as well as critical revision of the manuscript. JC contributed to data acquisition and critical revision of the manuscript. CF contributed to data acquisition as well as critical revision of the manuscript. CE contributed substantially to design of the work, data acquisition, data interpretation, editing of the manuscript as well as critical revision of the manuscript and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
Study was approved of the institutional review board/ Ethics Committee and the institutes Center for Translational & Clinical Research (CTC-A) of RWTH Aachen University. CTC-A-number: 21-390.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
404_2022_6733_MOESM1_ESM.tif
Supplementary file1 (TIF 20777 KB) Graphical results of linear regression analysis for CPR, CPUR and mUtA-PI with arterial umbilical pH. CPR cerebroplacental ratio, CPUR cerebroplacental-uterine ratio, mUtA-PI mean uterine artery pulsatility index
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Graupner, O., Meister, M., Lecker, L. et al. Role of the cerebro-placental-uterine ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk pregnancies at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308, 849–855 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06733-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06733-8