Abstract
Background/objectives
The phase 3 REGAIN study and its open-label extension demonstrated the efficacy of the complement C5 inhibitor eculizumab in patients with treatment-refractory, acetylcholine receptor antibody–positive generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). The aim of the ELEVATE study was to assess the effectiveness of eculizumab in clinical practice in adults with MG in the United States.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was conducted in adults with MG who initiated eculizumab treatment between October 23, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Outcomes assessed before and during eculizumab treatment using a pre- versus post-treatment study design included Myasthenia Gravis–Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total scores; minimal symptom expression (MSE); physician impression of clinical change; minimal manifestation status (MMS); and concomitant medication use.
Results
In total, 119 patients were included in the study. A significant reduction was observed in mean MG-ADL total score, from 8.0 before eculizumab initiation to 5.4 at 3 months and to 4.7 at 24 months after eculizumab initiation (both p < 0.001). At 24 months after eculizumab initiation, MSE was achieved by 19% of patients. MMS or better was achieved by 30% of patients at 24 months. Additionally, 64% of patients receiving prednisone at eculizumab initiation had their prednisone dosage reduced during eculizumab treatment and 13% discontinued prednisone; 32% were able to discontinue nonsteroidal immunosuppressant therapy.
Discussion
Eculizumab treatment was associated with sustained improvements in MG-ADL total scores through 24 months in adults with MG. Prednisone dosage was reduced in approximately two-thirds of patients, suggesting a steroid-sparing effect for eculizumab.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare, chronic autoimmune disease characterized by debilitating muscle weakness and fatigue. Common symptoms experienced by patients with gMG may include ptosis, diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, dyspnea, head drop, limb weakness, exertional muscle fatigue, and aching muscles [1,2,3,4], all of which negatively affect a patient’s ability to live a normal life.
The current international consensus guidance of MG experts includes use of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine as first-line treatment for most patients with gMG [5]. For patients with an inadequate response to pyridostigmine, corticosteroids or nonsteroidal immunosuppressant therapies (NSISTs) are recommended (including azathioprine, ciclosporin, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, and tacrolimus) [5, 6]. However, chronic use of corticosteroids is associated with a range of adverse effects, including development or worsening of conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and osteoporosis [7, 8]. An important treatment goal in gMG is to minimize corticosteroid use while maintaining symptom control [7, 9]; therefore, once patients achieve optimal clinical status, the daily dosage of corticosteroids should be tapered to the minimal effective dosage [6, 7, 9,10,11]. The consensus guidance also recommends that the treatment goal for patients with gMG should be achievement of minimal manifestation status (MMS; defined as having no symptoms or functional limitations from MG despite having some weakness on examination of some muscles) or better, as determined by the patient’s physician, with no more than grade 1 medication-related adverse effects according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [5, 12]. The patient-reported Myasthenia Gravis–Activities of Daily Living (MG–ADL) scale is commonly used in clinical practice to monitor the effect of treatment for MG; expanding on this measure, Vissing and colleagues developed the concept of minimal symptom expression (MSE) as a treatment target, with one definition of MSE being an MG-ADL total score of 0 or 1 [13].
Eculizumab (Soliris®, Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, MA, USA) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to human terminal complement protein C5, inhibiting its cleavage into C5a and C5b [14,15,16]. This prevents formation of the complement membrane attack complexes that architecturally damage the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction [14,15,16]. In the phase 3 REGAIN clinical trial (NCT01997229), patients with refractory acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody–positive (Ab+) gMG who were treated with eculizumab for 26 weeks experienced clinically meaningful improvements in activities of daily living, muscle strength, functional ability, and quality of life [17]. The sustained efficacy and long-term safety of eculizumab were subsequently demonstrated in the REGAIN open-label extension (OLE; NCT02301624) [18]. Both eculizumab and the longer-acting C5 inhibitor ravulizumab have been approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adults with AChR Ab+ gMG in the US.
The aim of the present study (REal-worLd Eculizumab EffectiVeness and ImpAct of DisconTinuation on US PatiEnt Outcomes in Myasthenia Gravis [ELEVATE]) was to examine treatment patterns and effectiveness of eculizumab in clinical practice for US patients with MG. Here we report baseline demographic data and findings from the study relating to symptom improvement and reduction in use of corticosteroids and NSISTs.
Methods
Study design
ELEVATE was an observational, retrospective, multisite medical chart review study conducted in the US. Data were collected from physicians in the Cardinal Health Neurology Provider Extended Network and other providers who were known to prescribe eculizumab, comprising both community practices and academic centers. Physicians abstracted their patients’ electronic medical record data for the study.
The index date was defined as the date of initiation of eculizumab treatment for MG. The pre-index period included the 24 months preceding eculizumab initiation; the post-index period was from the initiation of eculizumab until 24 months of follow-up or discontinuation, whichever occurred first.
Patient inclusion criteria
Eligible patients were adults (age ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of MG at the index date, who initiated commercially available eculizumab between October 23, 2017 (FDA approval date for patients with AChR Ab+ gMG), and December 31, 2019. Patients were currently or previously managed within a participating provider’s practice at the time of data collection (i.e., provider could report on complete diagnosis/treatment details, including treatment prescribed by other physicians, and inpatient treatment). No exclusion criteria were specified; refractory status was not an inclusion/exclusion criterion.
Clinical outcomes
MG-ADL total scores were collected at the last assessment before eculizumab initiation and at approximately 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation. The MG-ADL total scores over time were also analyzed in the subsets of patients who reduced or discontinued their prednisone dosage. The proportion of patients who achieved MSE (MG-ADL total score of 0 or 1) was calculated based on available MG-ADL data.
Physician impression of clinical change at the most recent assessment before eculizumab initiation, at initiation, and at approximately 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation was assessed via a question in the data collection form: “Please indicate your (physician) impression of how your patient’s MG has changed over time with Soliris (eculizumab),” to which physicians could respond “worsened,” “unchanged,” or “improved.” For patients whose physicians reported an improvement in MG symptoms, achievement of MMS (defined as above) or better was reported if applicable.
Concomitant medication use
The proportions of patients receiving concomitant therapies at the time of eculizumab initiation, and who had reduced or discontinued their prednisone dosage during eculizumab treatment, were determined. Median times to prednisone or NSIST dosage reduction or discontinuation during eculizumab treatment were calculated.
Statistical analysis
Outcomes were summarized for the period before eculizumab initiation (up to 2 years) and the period during eculizumab treatment (up to 2 years). Univariate analyses compared mean clinical outcome scores before and at different timepoints after eculizumab initiation using paired t tests and chi-squared tests (Fisher’s exact test was applied where the sample size was fewer than five patients). Bonferroni corrections were not made for multiple comparisons. Median time to prednisone or NSIST dosage reduction or discontinuation was calculated using Kaplan–Meier methodology. A two-sided α value of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.
Results
Provider/practice characteristics
Fourteen experienced neurologists or neuromuscular specialists from 14 different sites, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) time in practice of 18.5 (10.0) years, provided patient-level data for the study. Half of the providers were from academic centers (Table 1).
Study population
In total, 119 patients with a diagnosis of MG were included in the ELEVATE study (Table 2); 60% of the patients were women and 16% were Black/African American. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 50.5 (20.7) years, with a bimodal distribution by sex: 43.4 (19.1) years and 61.0 (18.5) years for women and men, respectively. The mean (SD) age of patients at eculizumab initiation was 57.7 (17.7) years (Table 3). In general, men received eculizumab earlier after diagnosis than did women (mean time after diagnosis: 6.6 vs. 8.8 years, respectively).
In this clinical practice setting, despite the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification at initiation of eculizumab therapy being recorded as Class I disease in 10% of patients (Table 3), 93% were recorded as having generalized disease involvement (i.e., gMG) at eculizumab initiation. Seven patients (6%) were recorded as having ocular MG; however, although three of these patients were recorded as having MGFA Class I disease, one as having Class II disease, and one as having Class IVa disease, two did not have a reported classification. MGFA classification data were missing for almost one-third (29%) of the study population.
Testing for AChR antibodies was performed in 118 of 119 patients (99%); a positive AChR antibody test result was reported in 97% of patients (Table 3). A history of thymoma was reported in 16 patients (13%), of whom 14 (12%) had had a thymectomy. Five patients (4%) were pregnant at the time of eculizumab initiation. As per the eculizumab US prescribing information (USPI) [19], 92% of patients received meningococcal vaccination ≥14 days before initiating eculizumab (Table 3). At the time of eculizumab initiation, the majority of patients (52%) had Medicare health insurance coverage and 45% had commercial insurance.
The majority of patients (83%) had comorbidities at eculizumab initiation, the most common of which were hypertension (35%), diabetes (24%) and cardiovascular disease (21%) (Online resource 1). By 24 months after eculizumab initiation, seven patients (6%) had died and three (3%) had been lost to follow-up. No meningococcal infections were reported in the study population.
Mean (SD) MG-ADL total score was 8.0 (3.8) before eculizumab initiation (median 8.0, interquartile range [IQR] 5.0; data available for 92 patients [77%]).
Eculizumab use
The most frequent reason given by physicians for initiating eculizumab was inadequate control of symptoms with previous or current therapy (82%) (Fig. 1a). During the study period, most patients (n = 97; 82%) were treated with eculizumab for at least 1 year (Fig. 1b). At last follow-up after eculizumab initiation, 88% (96/109 patients with data) were still receiving eculizumab. Of the 119 patients treated with eculizumab, 108 (91%) received it per the USPI with no dosage modifications; six (5%) had their dosing interrupted temporarily (i.e., missed ≤ 2 doses), four (3%) received fewer infusions (longer interval between doses), and one (1%) received more infusions (shorter interval between doses). Twenty patients (17%) discontinued eculizumab therapy (i.e., missed ≥3 consecutive doses) (Online resource 2).
Eculizumab effectiveness
MG symptoms
In patients who received eculizumab per the USPI and had MG-ADL assessments (n = 84), the mean MG-ADL total score at 3 months (5.4) was statistically significantly improved (p < 0.001) compared with the mean total score at eculizumab initiation (8.0), and this was sustained through 24 months of eculizumab treatment (4.7 at 24 months) (Fig. 2a). A similar pattern of improvement in MG-ADL scores was seen in a subset of patients whose prednisone dosage was reduced after eculizumab initiation (Fig. 2b) and in those who discontinued prednisone (n = 9; data not shown).
Only 4% (3/84) of patients had achieved MSE in the 2-year period before eculizumab initiation. After eculizumab initiation, the proportion of patients receiving the approved USPI dosage who achieved MSE increased to 24% (12/51) at 3 months, 33% (19/57) at 6 months, and 31% (18/58) at 12 months; it was 19% (7/37) at 24 months (Fig. 3a).
Physician impression of clinical change
Physicians reported that MG improved after initiating eculizumab in most patients. By 3 months after initiating eculizumab, MG had improved in 74% of patients compared with 14% in the period up to 2 years before eculizumab initiation, and the proportion was maintained at 70% through 24 months of eculizumab treatment (Fig. 3b).
Minimal manifestation status
MMS or better was achieved in a numerically higher proportion of patients receiving eculizumab at 6 months (46/108, 43%), 12 months (35/97, 36%), and 24 months (14/47, 30%) after initiation compared with before eculizumab initiation (6/119, 5%) (Fig. 3c).
Concomitant medication use
At the time of eculizumab initiation, 69 patients (58%) were receiving prednisone and 60 (50%) were receiving NSISTs (Fig. 4a). Overall, 67% of those receiving prednisone were receiving >10 mg/day; 33% were receiving >20 mg/day (Fig. 4b). Of patients receiving prednisone at the time of eculizumab initiation, 64% (44/69) were able to reduce their prednisone dosage during eculizumab treatment (Fig. 4c); of those, 52% (23/44) were able to decrease their dosage to ≤10 mg/day. In addition, 13% of patients (9/69) discontinued prednisone. Dosage data were missing for 17/44 patients (39%) who were known to have reduced their prednisone use. Median (IQR) time to prednisone dosage reduction and discontinuation was 4.9 (8.4) months and 2.8 (10.7) months, respectively (Fig. 4d). In total, 5% of patients (3/60) receiving NSISTs at the time of eculizumab initiation had their NSIST dosage reduced, and 32% of patients (19/60) discontinued NSIST during eculizumab treatment. Median (IQR) time to NSIST dosage reduction was 11.3 (11.2) months; median (IQR) time to NSIST discontinuation was 4.8 (10.5) months.
Discussion
This retrospective chart review demonstrated the benefits associated with eculizumab treatment in routine clinical practice in patients with MG in the US, with regard to improvement in disease symptoms and reduction in the use of concomitant prednisone and NSISTs.
Of the quantitative clinical outcome assessments examined, sufficient data for analysis were available for MG-ADL total scores only. In the study population, a statistically significant and clinically meaningful (i.e., ≥2 points) [20] reduction in MG-ADL total score was observed at 3 months after eculizumab initiation and sustained through 24 months. These data are consistent with those reported in other studies of eculizumab treatment in patients with gMG in clinical practice. Several retrospective chart reviews and case-series studies in patients with AChR Ab+ gMG (mostly defined as being treatment refractory) in the US, Canada, and Japan have reported rapid and sustained clinically meaningful responses to eculizumab [8, 21,22,23,24,25]. A larger, post-marketing surveillance study in Japan reported sustained improvements in MG-ADL scores through 1 year of eculizumab treatment, including in patients with a history of thymoma [26, 27]. An analysis of clinical practice data from a US gMG registry found that MG-ADL scores improved by at least 3 points in 64% of patients treated with eculizumab for a mean of approximately 1.8 years [28]. In addition, a recent case-series review of seven patients in the US with refractory gMG reported that patients who had stopped or changed their work/school hours after MG diagnosis were able to return to work/school after eculizumab initiation [22]. Overall, these real-world effectiveness results are comparable with results seen in REGAIN [17] and its OLE [18], which demonstrated sustained efficacy of eculizumab through 3 years.
In the ELEVATE study, the proportion of patients with MSE increased after eculizumab initiation. This is in accordance with the REGAIN OLE outcomes, in which the proportion of patients with MSE in the group that switched from placebo to open-label eculizumab increased within 4 weeks after switching, to reach a level similar to that in the group who received eculizumab throughout the study [18].
Physicians’ impressions of change in disease status following eculizumab initiation indicated that improvements had occurred in approximately three-quarters of patients when assessed at 3 months and were sustained for the duration of treatment through 24 months. Physician impression of change has been shown to be significantly correlated with the change in patient-reported MG-ADL score, which reflects patients’ own assessments of the impact of their symptoms on their daily activities in the past 7 days [29]. Thus, the observed improvements in disease status after eculizumab initiation are consistent with the statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in mean MG-ADL total scores.
A task force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the MGFA developed the concept of post-intervention status (MGFA-PIS) in 2000 to evaluate MG outcomes after initiation of treatment in routine clinical practice and clinical trials [12]. The MGFA-PIS assesses changes in clinical status and category of remission achieved (complete stable, pharmacologic, or with minimal manifestations of disease) based on the patient’s treatment and the physician’s assessment of the patient’s functional weakness over time [12]. In the current study, the proportion of patients who achieved MMS or better increased after eculizumab initiation (from 5% before initiation to 43% at 6 months after initiation). This result is comparable with an analysis of MGFA-PIS in patients treated with eculizumab during REGAIN, which showed that 37% of patients had achieved MMS or better at Week 26 [30]. Rapid improvements in MGFA-PIS were also noted in a small US chart review study in patients with AChR Ab+ gMG who were treated with eculizumab [25]. A decrease in the proportion of patients who achieved MMS or better was observed at 12 and 24 months compared with 6 months after eculizumab initiation in the current study; the reason for this is unclear but may reflect the smaller number of patients with available data at those time points, possibly partly due to discontinuation by patients whose symptoms improved.
Reduction in the burden of concomitant medication, particularly corticosteroids, is an important treatment goal based on minimizing the risks of adverse effects of these agents [6, 9], which include diabetes, hypertension, and osteoporosis [7, 8]. In the current study, almost two-thirds of patients treated with prednisone reduced their prednisone dosage while being treated with eculizumab; at least 32 patients (46%) were able to decrease their dosage to ≤10 mg/day (including nine patients who discontinued prednisone). This finding is consistent with previous and ongoing clinical practice studies that have reported a reduction in daily oral corticosteroid dose after eculizumab initiation [8, 24,25,26, 31]. It is also comparable with results from the REGAIN OLE, which reported that 47.9% of patients who used prednisone during the OLE decreased and/or stopped their prednisone [32]. An additional key finding in the current study was that the improvement in MG-ADL total scores over time was maintained in the subset of patients whose prednisone dosage had been reduced. The data indicate that, in the current study, the median time to corticosteroid discontinuation was shorter than that for dosage reduction. The reason for this is not clear but might be due to differences in dosages between these two subgroups: a higher proportion (78%) of patients who discontinued steroids than those who reduced their dosage (54%) were receiving <20 mg/day while being treated with eculizumab. The dosage may have impacted the time to discontinuation: those patients receiving higher dosages may have been gradually tapered down toward discontinuation.
Use of NSISTs is also associated with adverse effects, including increased susceptibility to serious infections, a wide range of deleterious systemic effects (such as nephrotoxicity, neuropathy, and hypomagnesemia), and increased long-term risk of malignancy [33, 34]. In the current study, approximately one-third of patients discontinued NSISTs during eculizumab treatment. Overall, the data presented here from US clinical practice supplement evidence from the REGAIN OLE that eculizumab reduces the treatment burden associated with corticosteroids and NSISTs and has steroid-sparing benefits [32].
The ELEVATE patient population was clinically and demographically more diverse than that of the phase 3 REGAIN study [17]. Whereas no Black/African American patients were randomized to the eculizumab arm in REGAIN, 16% of patients in ELEVATE were Black/African American, which is more reflective of the current US population [35]. Additionally, 10% of patients were reported to have MGFA Class I disease, which was an exclusion criterion in the REGAIN study, and 13% had a history of thymoma (including patients who had undergone thymectomy), whereas patients with thymoma, thymic neoplasms, or thymectomy were excluded from REGAIN. In ELEVATE, 3% of patients were AChR Ab-negative, in contrast to the REGAIN population in which patients were exclusively AChR Ab+. Also of note, patients evaluated in the ELEVATE study may have had MG defined by their physicians as “refractory” or “nonrefractory”; refractory status was not an inclusion/exclusion criterion for the study as it is not a condition of the MG indication in the USPI [19]. This is in contrast to the REGAIN study population, which enrolled patients with gMG defined by the study protocol as being refractory to treatment [17]. The mean ages at diagnosis and at eculizumab initiation were somewhat higher in patients in the ELEVATE study than in REGAIN. The disease and demographic characteristics of patients included in this study may not be consistent with those of the study population in REGAIN so comparison of outcomes between the studies should be interpreted with caution; however, the findings from ELEVATE provide evidence that eculizumab is effective in a broad population with MG.
Overall, the findings presented here provide evidence from clinical practice that eculizumab is effective across a spectrum of patients who have MG with varying characteristics and medical histories. A phase 3 clinical trial of ravulizumab (CHAMPION MG, NCT03920293) confirmed the efficacy and good safety profile of complement C5 inhibitors [36, 37], and a recently reported postmarketing surveillance study of eculizumab across three indications (paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, and AChR Ab+ gMG) in over 1000 patients in Japan over a period of more than 10 years has confirmed the safety profile of eculizumab in clinical practice to be consistent with that in clinical trials [38]. An ongoing registry study (NCT04202341) will provide further information on the use of both eculizumab and ravulizumab in clinical practice [28, 31] for the treatment of AChR Ab+ gMG.
The results reported here are based on medical record data from a large sample of patients treated with eculizumab, drawn from a wide range of practice settings and geographic locations in the US. Longitudinal data on clinical outcomes are reported over multiple timepoints through 24 months. Additionally, the pre- versus post-eculizumab study design reduced the effects of patient heterogeneity because the patients served as their own controls.
This study has several limitations: patients had variable follow-up periods at the time of data cut-off; MGFA classification data were missing in almost one-third of patients; and the endpoint of MSE has not yet been formally validated as an outcome measure in patients with MG. In particular, MG-ADL scores were not available for all patients at all timepoints: some patients had shorter follow-up times. Additionally, although 82% of patients were still receiving eculizumab after 1 year (Fig. 1b), MG-ADL scores were not recorded in a considerable number of patients; the reasons for lack of assessment are not known. Limited data were available for other clinical outcomes, including Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (5% of patients), Myasthenia Gravis Composite score (13%), and the revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Questionnaire (29%); thus, these assessments were not analyzed. This study confirms that such instruments are less frequently applied than the MG-ADL scale in clinical practice [39, 40]; however, their application would provide a more comprehensive assessment of treatment effectiveness. The study did not include a comparator group (for example, patients receiving standard care); the pre/post study design permitted outcomes to be compared before and during eculizumab treatment, but did not control for longitudinal variation in other factors. Other limitations include those inherent in retrospective medical chart reviews: data were abstracted from electronic medical records, and as such were limited to what was recorded in consultations and were subject to variation between healthcare providers and timepoints. Although causal relationships between treatment and outcomes cannot be established from this study, the results support those of the rigorous clinical trial and of other real-world studies of eculizumab.
Conclusions
In this study of US clinical practice, patients with MG treated with eculizumab experienced clinically meaningful and sustained improvements (up to 2 years) in their MG-ADL total scores. Physicians were able to reduce the prednisone dosage in two-thirds of patients, and this subset of patients experienced improvements in MG-ADL scores that were maintained and similar to those seen in the overall population, suggesting the potential for eculizumab treatment to have steroid-sparing effects. Almost one-third of patients receiving NSIST at the time of eculizumab initiation were able to discontinue NSIST during eculizumab treatment. Overall, despite differences in study design, these data from clinical practice are in accordance with findings from the phase 3 REGAIN study and its OLE, and with other real-world studies, in demonstrating the sustained benefit of eculizumab in the treatment of patients with MG.
Data availability
Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease will consider requests for disclosure of clinical study participant-level data provided that participant privacy is assured through methods like data de-identification, pseudonymization, or anonymization (as required by applicable law), and if such disclosure was included in the relevant study informed consent form or similar documentation. Qualified academic investigators may request participant-level clinical data and supporting documents (statistical analysis plan and protocol) pertaining to Alexion-sponsored studies. Further details regarding data availability and instructions for requesting information are available in the Alexion Clinical Trials Disclosure and Transparency Policy at https://www.alexionclinicaltrialtransparency.com. Link to Data Request Form: https://contactazmedical.astrazeneca.com/content/astrazeneca-champion/us/en/amp-form.html.
References
Dresser L, Wlodarski R, Rezania K, Soliven B (2021) Myasthenia gravis: epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Clin Med 10:2235. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112235
Gilhus NE, Tzartos S, Evoli A, Palace J, Burns TM, Verschuuren J (2019) Myasthenia gravis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5:30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0079-y
Howard JF Jr (2018) Myasthenia gravis: the role of complement at the neuromuscular junction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1412:113–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13522
Melzer N, Ruck T, Fuhr P, Gold R, Hohlfeld R, Marx A, Melms A, Tackenberg B, Schalke B, Schneider-Gold C, Zimprich F, Meuth SG, Wiendl H (2016) Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of myasthenia gravis: a supplement to the Guidelines of the German Neurological Society. J Neurol 263:1473–1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8045-z
Sanders DB, Wolfe GI, Benatar M, Evoli A, Gilhus NE, Illa I, Kuntz N, Massey JM, Melms A, Murai H, Nicolle M, Palace J, Richman DP, Verschuuren J, Narayanaswami P (2016) International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: executive summary. Neurology 87:419–425. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000002790
Narayanaswami P, Sanders DB, Wolfe G, Benatar M, Cea G, Evoli A, Gilhus NE, Illa I, Kuntz NL, Massey J, Melms A, Murai H, Nicolle M, Palace J, Richman D, Verschuuren J (2021) International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: 2020 update. Neurology 96:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011124
Farmakidis C, Pasnoor M, Dimachkie MM, Barohn RJ (2018) Treatment of myasthenia gravis. Neurol Clin 36:311–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2018.01.011
Johnson S, Katyal N, Narula N, Govindarajan R (2021) Adverse side effects associated with corticosteroid therapy: a study in 39 patients with generalized myasthenia gravis. Med Sci Monit 27:e933296. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.933296
Sharshar T, Porcher R, Demeret S, Tranchant C, Gueguen A, Eymard B, Nadaj-Pakleza A, Spinazzi M, Grimaldi L, Birnbaum S, Friedman D, Clair B (2021) Comparison of corticosteroid tapering regimens in myasthenia gravis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 78:426–433. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.5407
Murai H (2015) Japanese clinical guidelines for myasthenia gravis: putting into practice. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol 6:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen3.12180
Wiendl H, Meisel A (2022) Diagnostik und Therapie myasthener Syndrome, S2k-Leitlinie. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. https://www.awmf.org/service/awmf-aktuell/diagnostik-und-therapie-myasthener-syndrome
Jaretzki A, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM, Kaminski HJ, Keesey JC, Penn AS, Sanders DB (2000) Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Ann Thorac Surg 70:327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01595-2
Vissing J, Jacob S, Fujita KP, O’Brien F, Howard JF (2020) ‘Minimal symptom expression’ in patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody–positive refractory generalized myasthenia gravis treated with eculizumab. J Neurol 267:1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09770-y
Rollins SA, Sims PJ (1990) The complement-inhibitory activity of CD59 resides in its capacity to block incorporation of C9 into membrane C5b–9. J Immunol 144:3478–3483
Thomas TC, Rollins SA, Rother RP, Giannoni MA, Hartman SL, Elliott EA, Nye SH, Matis LA, Squinto SP, Evans MJ (1996) Inhibition of complement activity by humanized anti-C5 antibody and single-chain Fv. Mol Immunol 33:1389–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-5890(96)00078-8
Rother RP, Rollins SA, Mojcik CF, Brodsky RA, Bell L (2007) Discovery and development of the complement inhibitor eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Nat Biotechnol 25:1256–1264. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1344
Howard JF Jr, Utsugisawa K, Benatar M, Murai H, Barohn RJ, Illa I, Jacob S, Vissing J, Burns TM, Kissel JT, Muppidi S, Nowak RJ, O’Brien F, Wang JJ, Mantegazza R, REGAIN Study Group (2017) Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody–positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 16:976–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30369-1
Muppidi S, Utsugisawa K, Benatar M, Murai H, Barohn RJ, Illa I, Jacob S, Vissing J, Burns TM, Kissel JT, Nowak RJ, Andersen H, Casasnovas C, de Bleecker JL, Vu TH, Mantegazza R, O’Brien FL, Wang JJ, Fujita KP, Howard JF Jr, Regain Study Group (2019) Long-term safety and efficacy of eculizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 60:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26447
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (2024) Soliris prescribing information. https://alexion.com/Documents/Soliris_USPI.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2024
Muppidi S (2012) The myasthenia gravis-specific activities of daily living profile. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1274:114–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06817.x
Dodig D, Genge A, Selchen D, Freedman MS (2023) Complement inhibition in myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Can J Neurol Sci 50:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2021.508
Kang SA, Sweeney M, Govindarajan R (2022) Academic and employment status in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis treated with eculizumab: a case series. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 23:210–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/CND.0000000000000391
Levine TD (2019) Safety of an abbreviated transition period when switching from intravenous immunoglobulin to eculizumab in patients with treatment-refractory myasthenia gravis: a case series. Am J Case Rep 20:965–970. https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.916424
Oyama M, Okada K, Masuda M, Shimizu Y, Yokoyama K, Uzawa A, Kawaguchi N, Ikeguchi R, Hoshino Y, Hatano T, Ozawa Y, Nakahara J, Aizawa H, Kitagawa K, Hattori N, Kuwabara S, Murai H, Suzuki S (2020) Suitable indications of eculizumab for patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 13:1756286420904207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286420904207
Suh J, Clarke V, Amato AA, Guidon AC (2022) Safety and outcomes of eculizumab for acetylcholine receptor-positive generalized myasthenia gravis in clinical practice. Muscle Nerve 66:348–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27656
Murai H, Suzuki S, Fukamizu Y, Osawa T, Kikui H, Utsugisawa K (2022) Safety and effectiveness of eculizumab in Japanese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: analysis of 1-year postmarketing surveillance. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol 13:280–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen3.12716
Murai H, Suzuki S, Hasebe M, Fukamizu Y, Rodrigues E, Utsugisawa K (2021) Safety and effectiveness of eculizumab in Japanese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 14:17562864211001996. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864211001995
Greene E, Cutter G, Muppidi S, Juel V, Rodrigues E, Korideck H, Howard JF Jr (2023) Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) response to eculizumab treatment in patients from the generalized myasthenia gravis registry (P1-5.020). Neurology 100:2071. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000202295
Muppidi S, Wolfe GI, Conaway M, Burns TM (2011) MG-ADL: still a relevant outcome measure. Muscle Nerve 44:727–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.22140
Mantegazza R, Wolfe GI, Muppidi S, Wiendl H, Fujita KP, O’Brien FL, Booth HDE, Howard JF Jr, REGAIN Study Group (2021) Post-intervention status in patients with refractory myasthenia gravis treated with eculizumab during REGAIN and its open-label extension. Neurology 96:e610–e618. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011207
Pulley M, Macwan S, Nowak R, Mozaffar T, Rodrigues E, Korideck H, Werneburg B, Narayanaswami P (2023) Change in concomitant therapies for generalized myasthenia gravis in patients receiving eculizumab: a retrospective analysis of registry data (P1-5.002). Neurology 100:2183. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000202372
Nowak RJ, Muppidi S, Beydoun SR, O’Brien FL, Yountz M, Howard JF Jr (2020) Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy use in eculizumab-treated adults with generalized myasthenia gravis during the REGAIN open-label extension study. Front Neurol 11:556104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.556104
Lascano AM, Lalive PH (2021) Update in immunosuppressive therapy of myasthenia gravis. Autoimmun Rev 20:102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102712
Menon D, Barnett C, Bril V (2020) Novel treatments in myasthenia gravis. Front Neurol 11:538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00538
US Census Bureau (2022) Population estimates: quick facts. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/. Accessed 25 July 2023
Vu T, Meisel A, Mantegazza R, Annane D, Katsuno M, Aguzzi R, Enayetallah A, Beasley KN, Rampal N, Howard JF Jr (2022) The terminal complement inhibitor ravulizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody–positive generalized myasthenia gravis. NEJM Evid 1:EVIDoa2100066. https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2100066
Meisel A, Annane D, Vu T, Mantegazza R, Katsuno M, Aguzzi R, Frick G, Gault L, Howard JF Jr (2023) Long-term efficacy and safety of ravulizumab in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody–positive generalized myasthenia gravis: results from the phase 3 CHAMPION MG open-label extension. J Neurol 270:3862–3875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11699-x
Nishimura JI, Kawaguchi T, Ito S, Murai H, Shimono A, Matsuda T, Fukamizu Y, Akiyama H, Hayashi H, Nakano T, Maruyama S (2023) Real-world safety profile of eculizumab in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, or generalized myasthenia gravis: an integrated analysis of post-marketing surveillance in Japan. Int J Hematol 118:419–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-023-03630-x
Meisel A, Saccà F, Spillane J, Vissing J (2024) Expert consensus recommendations for improving and standardising the assessment of patients with generalised myasthenia gravis. Eur J Neurol 31:e16280. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16280
Barnett C, Herbelin L, Dimachkie MM, Barohn RJ (2018) Measuring clinical treatment response in myasthenia gravis. Neurol Clin 36:339–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2018.01.006
Acknowledgements
Research funding for this study and funding for open-access fees was provided by Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease. The authors thank the investigators, study staff, and patients who made this study possible. They also thank Sivani Paskaradevan (formerly Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease), Korie Handwerger, and Adrian Kielhorn (both Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease) for critical review of the manuscript; Hsing-Ting Yu and Jill Kaufman (both Cardinal Health) for their contributions to project management and data acquisition, respectively; Bela Bapat (formerly Cardinal Health) for help with study design; and Harlen Hays, Parisa Asgarisabet, Prathamesh D. Pathak, and Sonali Dharurkar (Cardinal Health) for help with data analysis. Medical writing assistance in developing the manuscript under the authors’ direction was provided by Julie Ponting of Piper Medical Communications, funded by Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
Ali A. Habib: acquisition of data, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content. Andrew J. Klink: study concept, study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content. Srikanth Muppidi: study concept, study design, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content. Anju Parthan: study concept, study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content. S. Chloe Sader: study concept, study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content. Alexandrina Balanean: study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content. Ajeet Gajra: study concept, study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content. Richard J. Nowak: study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content. James F. Howard Jr: study design, acquisition of data, data interpretation, and drafting/revision of the article for content.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Ali A. Habib has served as a medical advisor and speaker on behalf of Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, and argenx; he has received research support from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, and Cabaletta Bio; and has received research support and honoraria from argenx, UCB, Pfizer, Genentech, Viela Bio/Horizon, Sanofi, Immunovant Inc., and Regeneron. Andrew J. Klink is a salaried employee of and owns stock in Cardinal Health, which received funding from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease for work performed on this study. Srikanth Muppidi has served on advisory board meetings for Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, argenx, Horizon Therapeutics, and Ra Pharmaceuticals (now UCB). Anju Parthan was an employee of Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease and owned stock in AstraZeneca at the time the study was conducted and analyzed. S. Chloe Sader is an employee of Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease and owns stock in AstraZeneca. Alexandrina Balanean is a salaried employee of Cardinal Health, which received funding from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease for work performed on this study. Ajeet Gajra was a salaried employee of and owned stock in Cardinal Health (which received funding from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease for work performed on this study) at the time the study was conducted. Richard J. Nowak has received research support from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, argenx, Genentech, Grifols, Immunovant, Inc., Momenta Pharmaceuticals, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), Ra Pharmaceuticals (now UCB), and Viela Bio Inc. (now Horizon Therapeutics); and consultancy fees from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, argenx, Cour Pharmaceuticals, Grifols, Immunovant, Inc., Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Ra Pharmaceuticals (now UCB), Roivant Sciences, and Viela Bio (now Horizon Therapeutics). James F. Howard Jr. has received research support (paid to institution) from Ad Scientiam, Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, argenx, Cartesian Therapeutics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA), the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, the National Institutes of Health (including the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases), NMD Pharma, PCORI, and UCB Pharma; honoraria from Alexion AstraZeneca Rare Disease, argenx, Biohaven Ltd, Biologix Pharma, CheckRare CME, F. Hoffman-LaRoche, Horizon Therapeutics (now Amgen), Medscape CME, Merck EMD Serono, NMD Pharma, Novartis Pharma, PeerView CME, Physicians’ Education Resource (PER) CME, PlatformQ CME, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi US, UCB Pharma, and Zai Labs; and non-financial support from Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, argenx, Toleranzia AB, UCB Pharma, and Zai Labs.
Ethics approval
The study was reviewed by the Western Institutional Review Board and determined exempt from requiring ethical approval on the basis that only secondary data were collected; that data included only the necessary protected health information to conduct the study (e.g., treatment dates, date of death); and that all data were reported in aggregate.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Habib, A.A., Klink, A.J., Muppidi, S. et al. United States clinical practice experience with eculizumab in myasthenia gravis: symptoms, function, and immunosuppressant therapy use. J Neurol 271, 6114–6126 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12569-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12569-w