Abstract
Spindle cell lesions of the breast comprise a heterogeneous group of lesions, ranging from reactive and benign processes to aggressive malignant tumours. Despite their rarity, they attract the attention of breast pathologists due to their overlapping morphological features and diagnostic challenges, particularly on core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens. Pathologists should recognise the wide range of differential diagnoses and be familiar with the diverse morphological appearances of these lesions to make an accurate diagnosis and to suggest proper management of the patients. Clinical history, immunohistochemistry, and molecular assays are helpful in making a correct diagnosis in morphologically challenging cases. In this review, we present our approach for the diagnosis of breast spindle cell lesions, highlighting the main features of each entity and the potential pitfalls, particularly on CNB. Breast spindle cell lesions are generally classified into two main categories: bland-appearing and malignant-appearing lesions. Each category includes a distinct list of differential diagnoses and a panel of immunohistochemical markers. In bland-appearing lesions, it is important to distinguish fibromatosis-like spindle cell metaplastic breast carcinoma from other benign entities and to distinguish fibromatosis from scar tissue. The malignant-appearing category includes spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma, stroma rich malignant phyllodes tumour, other primary and metastatic malignant spindle cell tumours of the breast, including angiosarcoma and melanoma, and benign mimics such as florid granulation tissue and nodular fasciitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The component cells of the breast show a high degree of phenotypic plasticity with multiple lines of differentiation resulting in the diverse morphology that is observed in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic breast tissue [1,2,3,4,5]. The origin of spindle cell lesions of the breast (BSCLs) is highly variable and represents multiple lineages. The proliferation of myoepithelial cells [6] and the stromal cells of the breast may result in the formation of BSCLs. All soft tissue SCLs can occur in the breast and BSCLs may also arise from non-breast specific tissue, including skin, deep fascia, underlying muscle, and bone [7, 8]. Breast carcinoma cells may undergo trans-differentiation with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) resulting in spindle cell metaplasia of neoplastic epithelial cells mimicking mesenchymal stromal cells. The recognition of their epithelial nature or histogenesis relies on the demonstration of epithelial cell characteristics. This includes the presence of structures that indicate epithelial origin including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive breast carcinoma (IBC), no special type (NST), special type, or malignant squamous components, and/or demonstration of epithelial marker expression, including cytokeratin (CK), E-cadherin, and MUC1, on immunohistochemistry (IHC) [9, 10]. Malignant BSCLs that are positive for CK IHC are categorised as invasive carcinomas (metaplastic, “mesenchymal-like”, spindle cell carcinoma). Metastatic tumours to the breast may also assume a spindle cell morphology.
BSCLs encompass a broad range of pathological entities that may be benign, locally aggressive, or malignant. Accurate diagnosis is of crucial importance to ensure appropriate management. The morphological overlap between some of these lesions can lead to misinterpretation or misdiagnosis of benign and malignant entities, particularly in the limited material present in a core needle biopsy (CNB). Ancillary techniques including IHC and molecular assays are often helpful in such cases. Pathologists need to be familiar with the diverse morphological appearances of the different entities, the range of differential diagnoses, and the optimal IHC panels in the various scenarios (Table 1). In this review, we present our approach for the evaluation of BSCLs, highlighting the main features of each entity and the potential pitfalls particularly on CNB. BSCLs can be classified according to history/presentation, lesion size, component cells, interstitial matrix, margin configuration, IHC profile, molecular alterations, or clinical behaviour. We advocate the classification of BSCLs into bland-appearing and malignant-appearing lesions, according to the cytomorphological features of the component cells, with a differential diagnosis and IHC approach for each group that takes into account the morphological overlap and includes both benign and malignant entities [11]. For example, in the group of bland-appearing lesions, it is important to distinguish fibromatosis-like spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma (MBC) from benign entities. The malignant-appearing lesions category includes spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma, stroma rich malignant phyllodes tumour (PT), other primary malignancies e.g. angiosarcoma, metastatic malignant spindle cell tumours of the breast e.g. melanoma and non-malignant entities including nodular fasciitis and florid granulation tissue.
Bland-appearing spindle cell lesions
Fibromatosis-like metaplastic breast carcinoma
The most important challenge in the diagnosis of bland-appearing BSCLs is the exclusion of fibromatosis-like MBC [11,12,13,14] (Table 2). This rare tumour shows the unusual combination of spindle cell metaplasia of malignant breast epithelial cells and bland cytological features with minimal nuclear pleomorphism and scarce mitotic activity. Distinction from fibromatosis and other bland-appearing BSCLs may be difficult particularly on CNB also due to similar growth pattern on imaging. These tumours typically lack an in situ component and do not show other features of conventional type low-grade IBC. Regressive changes including stromal fibrosis, sclerosis, collagenisation, and inflammatory cell infiltrate with lymphoid follicles are commonly seen. Fibromatosis-like MBC may be associated with sclerosing lesions such as papillary lesions or radial scars, making diagnosis even more challenging, particularly in the early stages of evolution. This entity is one of the rare breast lesions in which a diagnosis of malignancy may rely solely on the demonstration of CK expression on IHC despite the absence of definite morphological features of malignancy (Fig. 1). In contrast to fibromatosis-like MBC, low-/intermediate-grade spindle cell MBC displays cytological atypia sufficient for a diagnosis of malignancy and distinction from fibromatosis. In low-grade adenosquamous MBC, the neoplastic elements comprise tubules, epithelioid clusters, and squamous structures with distinct morphology and immunoprofile whereas the accompanying spindle cell population is typically reactive stromal/fibroblastic type. Dwyer and Clark [12] indicated that squamous or glandular epithelial elements may be seen in fibromatosis-like MBC but these should be a minor component accounting for less than 5% of the total tumour area.
Although fibromatosis is a locally aggressive lesion that was traditionally excised after CNB diagnosis, the current trend is to adopt a more conservative observational approach [13, 15]. Surgical excision is associated with a high rate of re-excision (33–46%) and the rate of local recurrence (9–15%) is not significantly lower than in the active surveillance group (watch-and-wait approach; 12%) [13, 14]. Therefore, the distinction of fibromatosis from fibromatosis-like MBC, particularly on CNB, is of crucial importance. Recognition of focal cytological atypia and areas of epithelioid differentiation on morphology (e.g. plump cells with slightly abundant cytoplasm arranged singly or in small clusters) or on IHC assist accurate diagnosis of fibromatosis-like MBC. Although not specific, a prominent inflammatory cell infiltrate with lymphoid follicles may be seen. We have also observed that nuclear spacing, observed in the long fascicles of fibromatosis, is typically lacking in fibromatosis-like MBC. It is our experience that breast fibromatosis does not show cytological atypia and a bland-appearing spindle cell lesion with even a mild degree of cytological atypia, particularly with dark hyperchromatic pleomorphic nuclei, should raise the suspicion of fibromatosis-like MBC. Pleomorphic “open face” nuclei can be seen in nodular fasciitis, but other features help to accurately distinguish this from other lesions.
Although fibromatosis-like MBC is associated with an excellent prognosis as compared with other MBCs, [16, 17] local recurrence may occur and occasional metastases have been reported [18]. In the study by Gobbi et al. [16], 8 of 18 patients with fibromatosis-like MBC, with available clinical follow-up, developed local recurrence. Seven of these 8 patients had been treated with excisional biopsy alone with no statistically significant difference in outcome identified in the recurrent tumour group compared to patients with non-recurrent tumours. Therefore, these authors concluded that recurrences were likely to be directly related to inadequate local excision. In our practice, we have observed, on review, that many large-sized spindle cell MBCs diagnosed as fibromatosis-like MBC contained foci of moderate cytological atypia, which may explain the reported metastases in some series [17]. Therefore, it is important to recognise that no definitive conclusion regarding the biological behaviour of fibromatosis-like MBC can be made because most case series are limited by small sample size, the morphological overlap between this entity and other types of spindle cell MBC, variable clinical follow-up intervals, and differences in treatment regimens. Currently, these tumours are managed in accordance with protocols for other low-grade conventional type IBCs and systemic chemotherapy is not recommended for pure early-stage tumours. These tumours have a low potential for lymph node metastasis [18] but sentinel lymph node sampling is required for staging.
The remaining bland-appearing BSCLs can be classified according to the nature or histogenesis of the proliferating cells as follows:
Lesions of fibroblastic/myofibroblastic origin
These include fibromatosis [19], nodular fasciitis [20,21,22], scar/reactive spindle cell nodules [23], myofibroblastoma [24], solitary fibrous tumour [25, 26], inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour [27], and cellular pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) [28] (Tables 2 and 3).
Fibromatosis of the breast is a rare locally aggressive or benign mesenchymal transformation of connective tissue origin, usually originating from the fascia of pectoral muscles or Cooper’s ligaments [19, 29,30,31,32]. The distinction of fibromatosis from fibromatosis-like MBC or other BSCLs of the breast is difficult on clinical and radiological examination and histologic assessment is essential for a definite diagnosis. Although breast fibromatosis is typically diffusely infiltrative with entrapped fat at the periphery, the lesional cell nuclei are bland and characteristically spaced (Fig. 2). Lymphocytes are often present at the periphery. On IHC, fibromatosis cells typically display β-catenin nuclear staining and smooth muscle actin (SMA) cytoplasmic staining and lack immunoreactivity of CKs, p63, and CD34. Although β-catenin nuclear staining is a characteristic feature of fibromatosis, focal weak nuclear staining of β-catenin may be seen in some (23%) spindle cell MBCs [33].
Nodular fasciitis is a rapidly growing reactive/benign self-limiting mass-forming breast lesion that may be tender or painful. It is composed of a clonal proliferation of bland-appearing stellate fibroblasts arranged in a loose fascicular to a storiform pattern (tissue culture-like or feathery growth pattern) (Fig. 3). The cellularity is variable and the extracellular matrix ranges from myxoid to collagenous. Extravasated red blood cells are often present, and mitoses may be frequent but without abnormal forms. Nodular fasciitis can be differentiated from spindle cell MBC by its characteristic clinical and histological features and by IHC which demonstrates actin positivity and lack CKs and p63 immunoreactivity [11].
Scar is one of the most common bland-appearing BSCLs of the breast and accurate identification is facilitated by a history of trauma or previous surgery and recognition of additional accompanying features including fat necrosis, haemosiderin deposition, foamy macrophages, and foreign body giant cells. A reactive spindle cell nodule is likely to represent an exuberant reparative process (i.e. young scar) (Fig. 4). It may reach a large size and be associated with fibro-sclerotic breast lesions. Some mature scars mimic fibromatosis or fibromatosis-like MBC, particularly on CNB. In doubtful cases, lack of expression of CKs, p63, CD34, and nuclear β-catenin on IHC helps to confirm a diagnosis of a scar. Scar may express SMA and have a similar IHC profile to nodular fasciitis. The latter is distinguished by its typical clinical history of rapid growth, superficial location, and characteristic morphology.
Myofibroblastoma of the breast, a tumour showing myofibroblastic differentiation without epithelial features, may simulate spindle cell MBC and other BSCLs of the breast [34]. It has been described mainly in men; however, this lesion occurs in women as well. The morphology varies but typically shows fascicular growth of spindle cells with bands of intervening collagen fibres, devoid of breast ducts and lobules (Fig. 5). It may be cellular, shows amianthoid fibers, and often contains a variable adipocytic component. The combination of ER, CD34, SMA, and desmin expression and loss of Rb expression is characteristic of myofibroblastoma. PR, CD10, CD99, and Bcl2 may also be positive. Unlike spindle cell MBC, myofibroblastoma lacks expression of p63 and CKs [11].
Solitary fibrous tumour (SFT) is a rare BSCL of uncertain origin that tends to retain its typical morphology. It is variably cellular and is composed of round to spindle-shaped cells with little cytoplasm, often arranged in a short storiform pattern (patternless distribution), traversed by eosinophilic bands of collagen, and thin-walled branching blood vessels (Fig. 6). SFT is characterised by diffuse and strong IHC expression of STAT6 [35], in addition to CD34, CD99, and Bcl2.
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the breast is distinct from post-operative myofibroblastic repair reaction and traumatic fat necrosis which may also be mistaken for spindle cell MBC [11, 36]. It usually presents as a painless, circumscribed, firm mass. CK positivity, particularly on CNB, may lead to an erroneous diagnosis of spindle cell MBC. However, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour has a significant inflammatory component dominated by plasma cells intermingled with fascicles of bland-appearing spindle cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and ovoid or tapering nuclei. IHC may also show expression of SMA and ALK1 is positive in approximately 60% of cases. p63, desmin, S100, and CD34 are negative.
Cellular PASH is rare and is typically positive for CD34 and PR and is variably positive for actin and desmin. It displays the characteristic pseudo-vascular channels, at least focally, lined by spindle-shaped myofibroblasts which simulate endothelial cells (Fig. 7) but are negative for other endothelial cell markers including CD31 and D2-40 [37].
Lesions of myoepithelial cell origin
Adenomyoepithelioma with a spindle cell pattern and cellular spindle forms of sclerosing adenosis display characteristic morphology and are usually diagnosed on H&E. In doubtful cases, IHC highlights the dual epithelial and myoepithelial cell population and assists diagnosis.
Lesions of intralobular stromal cell origin
Although usually of borderline or malignant nature, stroma-rich phyllodes tumour (PT) may present a bland cytological appearance and is included in the differential diagnosis of bland-appearing BSCLs. Recognition of epithelial clefts may facilitate diagnosis. It is our experience that stroma-rich PT with a bland SCL appearance is typical CD34 positive. CD34-negative stroma is usually seen in high-grade PT.
Lesions of smooth muscle origin
Leiomyoma and low-grade leiomyosarcoma may arise from the smooth muscle of the breast24. They usually maintain characteristic morphology and IHC evidence of smooth muscle differentiation, strongly positive for smooth muscle markers and negative for CD34, p63, and CKs. Leiomyoma usually involves the nipple region but is occasionally seen within the breast parenchyma.
Lesions of nerve sheath origin
Neurofibroma and schwannoma may rarely occur in the breast and are diagnosed on morphology with IHC if required.
Other BSCLs
Some rare examples of hamartoma show prominent myoid differentiation that may result in spindle cell morphology. Spindle cell and atypical lipomas that can occur in the breast may rarely simulate other spindle cell tumours. Cellular variants of angiolipoma of the breast may simulate spindle cell MBC and even angiosarcoma [38, 39].
Although low-grade angiosarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) and low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and myofibroblastic sarcoma typically show bland cytological features, these tumours show distinct architectural features sufficient for their identification.
Immunohistochemistry
IHC is a useful ancillary tool in the diagnosis of bland-appearing BSCLs as outlined above. It is best to use a panel of antibodies, to maintain a broad differential diagnosis and to interpret the findings in the light of morphology and clinical context. No IHC marker is completely sensitive or specific and pathologist should not attach undue significance to any individual marker. When spindle cell MBC is in the differential diagnosis, it is important to use a panel of antibodies against epithelial markers, including both low and high molecular weight CKs as no individual antibody stains all MBCs [10, 40]. Most fibromatosis-like MBCs show positivity for high molecular weight and broad-spectrum CKs and p63. Some may show only show focal (or no) immunoreactivity for CKs, but these variants often express p63. Myoepithelial/myoid markers including SMA and smooth muscle myosin heavy change (SMMHC), and vimentin may be positive in MBC so a diagnosis of MBC is not excluded but may help to differentiate other lesions (Tables 2 and 3). Nuclear β-catenin is observed in most fibromatoses but may be seen in some MBCS which should be excluded using CK and p63 IHC. CD34 is negative in fibromatosis-like MBC and fibromatosis but is typically positive in PASH, stroma-rich PT, myofibroblastoma, and solitary fibrous tumour.
Molecular pathology
Mutations at exon 3 of the β-catenin gene (CTNNB1) have been reported in fibromatosis of the breast [41], with a high level of nuclear β-catenin IHC staining identified in > 80% of lesions [41, 42]. These mutations, with the nuclear expression of β-catenin, assist the distinction of breast fibromatosis from morphologically similar reactive and neoplastic processes [43]. Although mutations in CTNNB1 were not identified in PTs or MBCs [33], nuclear β-catenin is common in benign and malignant PTS and may be seen in up to 23% of MBCs [33]. CTNNB1 and APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene mutations are mutually exclusive. APC mutations are detected in approximately 11% of breast fibromatosis [44].
Partial monosomy of 13q and 16q with deletion of the 13q14 region, harbouring RB and FKHR, has been reported in > 50% of myofibroblastomas [45]. Rearrangements affecting 13q and 16q typically occur in spindle cell lipomas [46]. These alterations have not been detected in SFT [47]. In nodular fasciitis, a balanced translocation t(17;22)(p13;q13), resulting in MYH9–USP6 fusion has been identified [22]. Using copy number analysis, Takano et al. [48] have demonstrated that low-grade fibromatosis-like MBCs are characterised by low genomic instability and do not share copy number aberrations with other types of MBC. They suggest that this entity is a unique tumour subtype with a genotype that reflects its apparent homogeneous morphology and phenotype [48].
Malignant-appearing breast spindle cell lesions
The most important, and probably the most common, lesion in this category is spindle cell MBC (Table 4). Tumours may be pure SCLs, comprising a mesenchymal-like malignant spindle cell proliferation, or mixed with a squamous or conventional IBC component [49, 50]. The spindle cell component shows a fascicular, storiform, or haphazard growth pattern, usually with an infiltrative border. Cytological atypia is moderate or marked and mitotic figures are usually easily identified. Foci of necrosis may be present. Heterologous elements such as chondrosarcomatous and osteosarcomatous components are seen in some MBCs and may also be seen in malignant PT. In these tumours, additional features including architectural clefting with the formation of cystic spaces, IHC with emphasis on CD34 and cytokeratin expression, and the co-existence of DCIS or IBC are used to differentiate these two entities. In mixed spindle cell MBC, a gradual transition between the spindle cell and epithelioid (adenocarcinomatous) components is an important finding as some tumours lack CK expression in the spindle cell component while retaining it in the epithelioid component. Spindle cell MBCs, pure and mixed, are graded using the Nottingham grading system [51] according to the highest-grade component. They are typically hormone receptor and HER2-neu negative (triple negative). Spindle cell MBCs tend to pursue an aggressive clinical course with high metastatic potential [49].
The presence of a recognisable carcinomatous component in mixed spindle cell MBC renders the diagnosis relatively straightforward. In contrast, the diagnosis of pure spindle cell MBC with no obvious morphological evidence of epithelial differentiation is often challenging, even in surgical specimens. Thorough sampling and diligent examination of the histological sections may reveal small foci of in situ or conventional IBC (Fig. 8). Demonstration of epithelial differentiation using CK IHC greatly assists the diagnosis.
The differential diagnosis of a malignant-appearing BSCL includes stroma-rich malignant PT; metastases, most notably metastatic sarcoma, malignant melanoma [11]; lymphoma, primary breast sarcoma, in particular angiosarcoma (Table 4); and benign mimics including florid scar/granulation tissue and nodular fasciitis. The latter two conditions are described above. High-grade malignant myoepithelial BSCLs, such as those arising in adenomyoepithelioma, are rare and frequently show a mixed epithelial and myoepithelial immunophenotype. These are best regarded as MBCs arising in a background of adenomyoepithelioma [52]. Pure malignant spindle cell myoepithelioma with a predominant myoepithelial immunophenotype and a component of benign myoepithelioma is extremely rare.
Stroma-rich malignant PT [53] may present as a pure BSCL particularly on CNB in which only the stromal component is represented. A thorough sampling of excision specimens is advised to identify relevant diagnostic architectural components and to distinguish this entity from spindle cell MBC. The presence of epithelial clefts is pathognomonic of malignant PT. CD34 is a useful marker and although expression is less strong in high grade/malignant PT, the majority of malignant PTs show some degree of CD34 positivity, a feature not seen in MBC. CD10 has been reported in 32–50% of borderline and malignant PTs and its expression has also been reported in some high-grade spindle cell MBCs. [54, 55] It is also important to be aware that, although p63 and CK are frequently expressed by MBC, expression of these markers may be reduced in high-grade tumours and focal expression can be seen in the stroma of some malignant PTs [56, 57].
Metastases to the breast may mimic high-grade spindle cell MBC. The combination of unusual morphology, triple-negative status, and multiple or bilateral lesions is a clue to the diagnosis. Solitary metastases are more likely to be mistaken for high-grade triple-negative spindle cell MBC—the so-called triple-negative trap. Tumours that metastasise to the breast that may show spindle cell morphology include leiomyosarcoma and sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Careful evaluation of morphology and clinical history together with judicious use of IHC helps to clarify the diagnosis. Melanoma may assume a spindle cell appearance, but the component cells usually retain some pigment and are positive for the typical IHC markers, melan-A, HMB-45, SOX10, and S100. Lymphoma of the breast may be primary or secondary and unilateral or bilateral. Although more likely to be mistaken for solid invasive lobular carcinoma, it may also resemble spindle cell MBC and should be included in the differential diagnosis. IHC assists diagnosis and accurate subtyping.
Primary breast angiosarcoma, although relatively rare, is the most common primary sarcoma to affect the breast. This may develop spontaneously but is more usually seen in patients who have received radiotherapy to the affected breast. Angiosarcoma of the breast displays a range of morphological appearances ranging from low-grade lesions with well-developed, interconnecting, vascular spaces to poorly differentiated tumours with little or no distinguishing features on H&E. Tumour cells are positive with a range of endothelial markers including CD31, CD34, D2-40, and ERG [58]. CK positivity may be seen in angiosarcoma, mainly in the epithelioid variant [59] which is not included in the differential diagnosis of BSCL. Angiosarcoma is negative for CD10 which may occasionally be seen in MBC. Other primary sarcomas that may affect the breast are exceedingly rare and include leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, dendritic cell sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour. Their histological features and immunoprofiles are similar to those arising at other sites. Apart from the well-established subtypes of sarcoma such as angiosarcoma and malignant PT, several studies have reported a large number of undifferentiated primary breast sarcomas that are purported to arise from the mesenchymal tissue of the breast [9]. These have been variously designated as breast sarcoma, not otherwise specified (currently undifferentiated/unclassified sarcoma), fibrosarcoma, and myxofibrosarcoma [60,61,62]. Categorisation appears to have been based on lack of expression of epithelial differentiation or other specific markers and are essentially diagnoses of exclusion. In our opinion, most of these tumours are likely to represent poorly differentiated MBC or malignant PT that lacked residual characteristic diagnostic features (see below).
Categorisation of a malignant SCL with no specific morphological, IHC, or molecular characteristics
Categorisation of a malignant SCL with no specific morphological, IHC, or molecular characteristics of a particular diagnostic entity poses significant challenges for the pathologist particularly with regard to management implications. The current lack of consensus may result in different treatment strategies for patients in different centres. There is accumulating evidence that conventional IBCs may lack expression of one or more CKs or show only very limited expression of a single CK marker [63,64,65]. These findings support the concept of spindle cell MBC with loss of a range of CKs [10, 40, 66,67,68,69,70]. Some sarcomas also express CKs [71] and accurate diagnosis of these tumours is based on other morphological, IHC and/or molecular features. CK immunoreactivity (positive or negative) is, therefore, not irrefutable evidence in support of a carcinomatous or sarcomatous nature which may represent extremes of a spectrum of differentiation. Furthermore, the diagnostic assays used to characterise these poorly differentiated mesenchymal appearing breast lesions are not entirely specific or sensitive. Molecular assays, including next-generation sequencing (NGS), may help to refine diagnosis but the significance of many of the detected genetic alterations is yet to be confirmed [72]. In practice, it is our approach that, following exclusion of all other possible diagnoses included in the list of differential diagnosis, a CK-negative malignant-appearing BSCL is most appropriately categorised and managed as spindle cell MBC using similar protocols to those used in the treatment of triple-negative IBC-NST [9].
Molecular pathology
The pathogenesis of spindle cell MBC and the mechanisms underlying the spindle cell transformation of neoplastic breast epithelial cells are poorly understood. Theories explaining the phenotypic diversity of MBC include a hypothesis that the initial oncogenic events occur in a multipotent progenitor or stem cell with myoepithelial characteristics from which these tumours develop [73]. This is supported by the morphological appearances of spindle cell MBC [74, 75], the expression of several myoepithelial-associated markers [68] and the results of gene expression profiling (GEP) studies [76]. Others have hypothesized that oncogenic events transform normal breast epithelial cells into primitive carcinoma cells that undergo epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). This results in the transformation of an epithelial/carcinomatous tumour into a sarcomatous/spindle cell tumour, giving MBC its characteristic mesenchymal-like morphology [77]. The EMT theory has also been supported by GEP studies of MBC, which have reported de-regulation of genes encoding proteins of cellular adhesion, motility, migration, and extracellular matrix formation [78]. Gene signatures reflecting EMT include upregulation of the EMT triggers Snail, Twist, and transforming growth factor-β, and downregulation of E-cadherin, the salient feature reflecting EMT occurrence [79]. In line with this finding, it was reported that E-cadherin loss had an inverse relationship with nuclear Snail expression in metaplastic chondroid cells in a series of MBCs [80]. In addition, IHC for Snail has been reported as a sensitive, but not specific, diagnostic marker of MBC, as it is also seen in other BSCLs, including PT and myofibroblastoma [81]. Currently, data supporting both hypotheses exist and continue to evolve, and there is no consensus regarding the underlying pathogenesis of MBC. Microarray-based GEP studies have demonstrated that MBC is part of basal-like triple-negative IBC-NST at the transcriptome level [76]. In MBC, identical p53 mutations were identified in the morphologically distinct carcinomatous and sarcomatous components, suggesting that p53 mutation is an early event and is maintained during tumour progression, supporting the monoclonal origin of both components [82, 83]. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression has been reported in up to 80% of MBCs, with substantial proportions of these cases showing EGFR amplification [84, 85]. Although the mechanisms for EGFR overexpression are largely unknown [86], and no activating mutations in EGFR have been found in MBC [84], Gilbert et al. demonstrated that a high copy number of EGFR is primarily attributable to aneusomy, which was particularly found in tumours with spindle cell or squamous differentiation [87].
Molecular studies of PT, including gene sequencing analysis, showed MED12 exon 2 somatic mutations in the stroma of borderline and malignant PTs in 65% and 40% respectively [88,89,90,91,92]. Other MED12 wild-type malignant PTs likely possess alternative driver mutations. There is also evidence that de novo malignant PT may develop through the acquisition of genetic alterations targeting other cancer genes. Somatic mutations in PIK3CA, RARA, FLNA, SETD2, and KMT2D have been identified in PTs, with borderline and malignant lesions acquiring additional aberrations in cancer-associated genes such as TP53, RB1, EGFR, and NF1 [91,92,93,94]. Regions of intra-tumoural heterogeneity within malignant PT appear to exhibit increasing numbers of mutations in parallel with morphological attributes of increasing cellularity and nuclear pleomorphism. Recent work has correlated prevalence of TERT promoter mutations with increasing malignancy in fibro-epithelial lesions, suggesting a mechanistic role for TERT alterations in the progression of these tumours [94,95,96,97]. RARA mutations, albeit in lower frequency, are also often found in PTs [93]. In a recent targeted deep sequencing and copy number variation (CNV) analysis of recurrently mutated genes in PT [98], five of the six pure primary breast sarcomas (non-angiosarcoma) (83%) cases showed genetic alterations in the TERT gene, mutations in the MED12 gene (67%), BCOR gene (67%), and KMT2D gene (50%) in contrast to primary breast angiosarcomas (0% had mutations or copy number alterations in these genes).
General consideration in the assessment of BSCLs
A thorough approach to the assessment of BSCLs incorporates consideration of the clinical presentation and any relevant clinical history, knowledge of the radiological findings, careful appraisal of morphology (current and previous if relevant), and judicious use of IHC and molecular testing while maintaining a broad differential diagnosis. For example, a history of a rapidly growing nodule in superficial breast tissue together with tissue culture like appearances and extravasation of red blood cells (RBCs) should lead to consideration of a diagnosis of nodular fasciitis. IHC may be used to confirm the diagnosis and to exclude MBC. Nuclear β-catenin positivity in lesional BSCL cells should not be considered pathognomonic of fibromatosis unless fibromatosis-like MBC has been excluded by confirming lack of expression of CKs and p63. In malignant-appearing BSCL, a history of conventional-type IBC treated with radiotherapy raises the possibility of post-irradiation primary breast sarcoma. However, if the prior BC in the affected or contralateral breast was a spindle cell MBC or included a spindle cell component, the lesion is likely to represent a recurrence. In difficult cases, IHC will usually clarify the diagnosis. Osseous or chondrosarcomatous differentiation is more likely to be a component of malignant PT or MBC with heterologous elements rather than a primary osteosarcoma or a chondrosarcoma of the breast [99]. A previous history of soft tissue sarcoma, metastatic sarcomatoid tumour, including sarcomatoid renal cell or squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma [100] may help to narrow the differential diagnosis.
Diagnosis of BSCLs on core needle biopsy
Benign-appearing SCLs with clear evidence of CK and p63 expression should be considered malignant (fibromatosis-like MBC) and a B5b diagnosis should be rendered, which necessitates complete excision with sentinel node biopsy. The UK NHSBSP and RCPath guidelines recommend categorising benign-appearing BSCLs that lack defining features on morphology or IHC on CNB as B3 (lesions of uncertain malignant potential [101,102,103]). This is generally accompanied by a recommendation for further tissue sampling or excision for a definite diagnosis and to exclude the possibility of fibromatosis-like MBC. However, if the diagnosis of fibromatosis is confirmed on CNB, diagnostic biopsy/excision is discouraged to avoid leaving lesional tissue behind as multiple surgical interventions are associated with a higher recurrence rate (see above). A conservative approach or therapeutic excision (excision with margins) is recommended [13, 14, 104]. Myofibroblastoma, nodular fasciitis, and SFT are benign lesions which may be difficult to definitively diagnose on CNB and a B3 categorisation is also recommended [101, 102]. In our experience, scar is the most common BSCL encountered on CNB. Diagnosis is often straightforward, assisted by the presence of inflammation, haemosiderin-laden macrophages or fat necrosis and the lesion can be categorized as B2 (benign) [101]. In mature scars, these features may be absent, and the differential diagnosis may include fibromatosis and other benign lesions. Clinical history and correlation with radiology may be helpful but, in doubtful cases, a B3 designation may be most appropriate. Distinguishing fibrous tissue reaction related to the previous CNB from the actual BSCL in the excision specimen can be facilitated by reviewing the CNB slides.
At the malignant end of the spectrum, spindle cell MBC is the most common diagnosis. A malignant diagnosis (B5b [101]) can be made if the spindle cell lesion shows definite (significant) atypia and/or evidence of epithelial differentiation on morphology or IHC. However, focal epithelial differentiation based purely on IHC should be interpreted with caution and a broad differential diagnosis, including malignant PT and metastases, considered. The categorisation of malignant PT and metastatic tumours in CNB is not well defined. Some authors suggested a B5d category for such malignant tumours [105] but this is not widely accepted and a B5b category with free text explanation in the report is recommended. The IHC panel in such cases should include epithelial differentiation markers, including multiple low and high molecular weight CKs, and other diagnostic markers such as CD34 and S100 to assist the exclusion of other entities. Occasionally, the features are clearly malignant, but a specific diagnosis is not possible. In such cases, the difficulty in categorisation should be stated in the report and a definite diagnosis should be attempted on the surgical specimen. The opinion of a specialist soft tissue pathologist may also be helpful.
In conclusion, BSCLs constitute a broad spectrum of morphologically overlapping entities, ranging from benign/reactive processes to aggressive malignant tumours with different management strategies. BSCLs can generally be classified as bland-appearing and malignant-appearing lesions. In addition to the morphology, clinical history and IHC are most helpful in their diagnosis. Molecular assays may help in the diagnosis of some lesions, but they are not available in most laboratories. It is important to consider a wide differential diagnosis and to have a structured approach with focussed IHC panels. It is essential to distinguish low-grade spindle cell MBC from other “benign” entities in view of the prognostic and management implications. Many BSCLs are diagnosed as B3 on CNB and require careful multidisciplinary review.
References
Hennessy BT, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Stemke-Hale K, Gilcrease MZ, Krishnamurthy S, Lee JS, Fridlyand J et al (2009) Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics. Cancer Res 69:4116–4124
van Deurzen CH, Lee AH, Gill MS, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Jager A, Ellis IO, Rakha EA (2011) Metaplastic breast carcinoma: tumour histogenesis or dedifferentiation? J Pathol 224:434–437
Wang X, Mori I, Tang W, Yang Q, Nakamura M, Nakamura Y, Sato M et al (2001) Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: p53 analysis identified the same point mutation in the three histologic components. Mod Pathol 14:1183–1186
Kaufman MW, Marti JR, Gallager HS, Hoehn JL (1984) Carcinoma of the breast with pseudosarcomatous metaplasia. Cancer 53:1908–1917
Lim E, Vaillant F, Wu D, Forrest NC, Pal B, Hart AH, Asselin-Labat ML et al (2009) Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat Med 15:907–913
Balachander N, Masthan KM, Babu NA, Anbazhagan V (2015) Myoepithelial cells in pathology. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 7:S190–S193
Tse GM, Tan PH, Lui PC, Putti TC (2008) Spindle cell lesions of the breast–the pathologic differential diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109:199–207
Magro G, Michal M, Bisceglia M (2001) Benign spindle cell tumors of the mammary stroma: diagnostic criteria, classification, and histogenesis. Pathol Res Pract 197:453–466
Rakha EA, Quinn CM, Foschini MP, Munoz Martin M, Dabbs DJ, Lakhani S, Varga Z et al (2021) Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast without evidence of epithelial differentiation: a diagnostic approach for management. Histopathology 78:759–771
Rakha EA, Coimbra ND, Hodi Z, Juneinah E, Ellis IO, Lee AH (2017) Immunoprofile of metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. Histopathology 70:975–985
Rakha EA, Aleskandarany MA, Lee AH, Ellis IO (2016) An approach to the diagnosis of spindle cell lesions of the breast. Histopathology 68:33–44
Dwyer JB, Clark BZ (2015) Low-grade fibromatosis-like spindle cell carcinoma of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 139:552–557
Duazo-Cassin L, Le Guellec S, Lusque A, Chantalat E, Lae M, Terrier P, Coindre JM et al (2019) Breast desmoid tumor management in France: toward a new strategy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 176:329–335
Boland MR, Nugent T, Nolan J, O’Mahony J, O’Keeffe S, Gillham CC, Maguire A et al (2021) Fibromatosis of the breast: a 10-year multi-institutional experience and review of the literature. Breast Cancer 28:168–174
Turner B, Alghamdi M, Henning JW, Kurien E, Morris D, Bouchard-Fortier A, Schiller D et al (2019) Surgical excision versus observation as initial management of desmoid tumors: A population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:699–703
Gobbi H, Simpson JF, Borowsky A, Jensen RA, Page DL (1999) Metaplastic breast tumors with a dominant fibromatosis-like phenotype have a high risk of local recurrence. Cancer 85:2170–2182
Sneige N, Yaziji H, Mandavilli SR, Perez ER, Ordonez NG, Gown AM, Ayala A (2001) Low-grade (fibromatosis-like) spindle cell carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 25:1009–1016
Victoor J, Bourgain C, Vander Borght S, Vanden Bempt I, De Rop C, Floris G (2020) Fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Diagn Pathol 15:20
Wargotz ES, Norris HJ, Austin RM, Enzinger FM (1987) Fibromatosis of the breast. A clinical and pathological study of 28 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 11:38–45
Torngren S, Frisell J, Nilsson R, Wiege M (1991) Nodular fasciitis and fibromatosis of the female breast simulating breast cancer. Case reports Eur J Surg 157:155–158
Dahlstrom J, Buckingham J, Bell S, Jain S (2001) Nodular fasciitis of the breast simulating breast cancer on imaging. Australas Radiol 45:67–70
Erickson-Johnson MR, Chou MM, Evers BR, Roth CW, Seys AR, Jin L, Ye Y et al (2011) Nodular fasciitis: a novel model of transient neoplasia induced by MYH9-USP6 gene fusion. Lab Invest 91:1427–1433
Gobbi H, Tse G, Page DL, Olson SJ, Jensen RA, Simpson JF (2000) Reactive spindle cell nodules of the breast after core biopsy or fine-needle aspiration. Am J Clin Pathol 113:288–294
Magro G (2008) Mammary myofibroblastoma: a tumor with a wide morphologic spectrum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1813–1820
Magro G, Sidoni A, Bisceglia M (2000) Solitary fibrous tumour of the breast: distinction from myofibroblastoma. Histopathology 37:189–191
Damiani S, Miettinen M, Peterse JL, Eusebi V (1994) Solitary fibrous tumour (myofibroblastoma) of the breast. Virchows Arch 425:89–92
Chetty R, Govender D (1997) Inflammatory pseudotumor of the breast. Pathology 29:270–271
Virk RK, Khan A (2010) Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:1070–1074
Amourak S, Alaoui FF, Jayi S, Chaara H, Melhouf MA (2015) Desmoid fibromatosis of the breast: a case report on and a review of the literature. Pan Afr Med J 21:88
Ebrahim L, Parry J, Taylor DB (2014) Fibromatosis of the breast: a pictorial review of the imaging and histopathology findings. Clin Radiol 69:1077–1083
Ali M, Fayemi AO, Braun EV, Remy R (1979) Fibromatosis of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 3:501–505
Hanna WM, Jambrosic J, Fish E (1985) Aggressive fibromatosis of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 109:260–262
Lacroix-Triki M, Geyer FC, Lambros MB, Savage K, Ellis IO, Lee AH, Reis-Filho JS (2010) beta-catenin/Wnt signalling pathway in fibromatosis, metaplastic carcinomas and phyllodes tumours of the breast. Mod Pathol 23:1438–1448
Wargotz ES, Weiss SW, Norris HJ (1987) Myofibroblastoma of the breast. Sixteen cases of a distinctive benign mesenchymal tumor. Am J Surg Pathol 11:493–502
Magro G, Angelico G, Righi A, Benini S, Salvatorelli L, Palazzo J (2018) Utility of STAT6 and 13q14 deletion in the classification of the benign spindle cell stromal tumors of the breast. Hum Pathol 81:55–64
Sari A, Yigit S, Peker Y, Morgul Y, Coskun G, Cin N (2011) Inflammatory pseudotumor of the breast. Breast J 17:312–314
Ibrahim RE, Sciotto CG, Weidner N (1989) Pseudoangiomatous hyperplasia of mammary stroma. Some observations regarding its clinicopathologic spectrum. Cancer 63:1154–60
Kahng HC, Chin NW, Opitz LM, Pahuja M, Goldberg SL (2002) Cellular angiolipoma of the breast: immunohistochemical study and review of the literature. Breast J 8:47–49
Yu GH, Fishman SJ, Brooks JS (1993) Cellular angiolipoma of the breast. Mod Pathol 6:497–499
Dunne B, Lee AH, Pinder SE, Bell JA, Ellis IO (2003) An immunohistochemical study of metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma, phyllodes tumor and fibromatosis of the breast. Hum Pathol 34:1009–1015
Abraham SC, Reynolds C, Lee JH, Montgomery EA, Baisden BL, Krasinskas AM, Wu TT (2002) Fibromatosis of the breast and mutations involving the APC/beta-catenin pathway. Hum Pathol 33:39–46
Xu W, Kimelman D (2007) Mechanistic insights from structural studies of beta-catenin and its binding partners. J Cell Sci 120:3337–3344
Kim T, Jung EA, Song JY, Roh JH, Choi JS, Kwon JE, Kang SY et al (2012) Prevalence of the CTNNB1 mutation genotype in surgically resected fibromatosis of the breast. Histopathology 60:347–356
Norkowski E, Masliah-Planchon J, Le Guellec S, Trassard M, Courreges JB, Charron-Barra C, Terrier P et al (2020) Lower rate of CTNNB1 mutations and higher rate of APC mutations in desmoid fibromatosis of the breast: a series of 134 tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 44:1266–1273
Magro G, Righi A, Casorzo L, Antonietta T, Salvatorelli L, Kacerovska D, Kazakov D et al (2012) Mammary and vaginal myofibroblastomas are genetically related lesions: fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis shows deletion of 13q14 region. Hum Pathol 43:1887–1893
Pauwels P, Sciot R, Croiset F, Rutten H, Van den Berghe H, Dal Cin P (2000) Myofibroblastoma of the breast: genetic link with spindle cell lipoma. J Pathol 191:282–285
Fritchie KJ, Carver P, Sun Y, Batiouchko G, Billings SD, Rubin BP, Tubbs RR et al (2012) Solitary fibrous tumor: is there a molecular relationship with cellular angiofibroma, spindle cell lipoma, and mammary-type myofibroblastoma? Am J Clin Pathol 137:963–970
Takano EA, Hunter SM, Campbell IG, Fox SB (2015) Low-grade fibromatosis-like spindle cell carcinomas of the breast are molecularly exiguous. J Clin Pathol 68:362–367
Rakha EA, Tan PH, Varga Z, Tse GM, Shaaban AM, Climent F, van Deurzen CH et al (2015) Prognostic factors in metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a multi-institutional study. Br J Cancer 112:283–289
Bellino R, Arisio R, D’Addato F, Attini R, Durando A, Danese S, Bertone E et al (2003) Metaplastic breast carcinoma: pathology and clinical outcome. Anticancer Res 23:669–673
Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F, Dabbs DJ, Decker T, Eusebi V, Fox SB et al (2010) Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res 12:207
Lakhani SR, Hayes M, Eusebi V (2012) Adenomyoepithelioma and adenomyoepithelioma with carcinoma. In: Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the breast, 4th edn. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 122–123
Sinn HP, Kreipe H (2013) A brief overview of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumors, 4th Edition, Focusing on Issues and Updates from the 3rd Edition. Breast Care (Basel) 8:149–54
Tse GM, Tsang AK, Putti TC, Scolyer RA, Lui PC, Law BK, Karim RZ et al (2005) Stromal CD10 expression in mammary fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumours. J Clin Pathol 58:185–189
Tsai WC, Jin JS, Yu JC, Sheu LF (2006) CD10, actin, and vimentin expression in breast phyllodes tumors correlates with tumor grades of the WHO grading system. Int J Surg Pathol 14:127–131
Chia Y, Thike AA, Cheok PY, Yong-Zheng Chong L, Man-Kit Tse G, Tan PH (2012) Stromal keratin expression in phyllodes tumours of the breast: a comparison with other spindle cell breast lesions. J Clin Pathol 65:339–347
Cimino-Mathews A, Sharma R, Illei PB, Vang R, Argani P (2014) A subset of malignant phyllodes tumors express p63 and p40: a diagnostic pitfall in breast core needle biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1689–1696
Machado I, Giner F, Lavernia J, Cruz J, Traves V, Requena C, Llombart B et al (2021) Angiosarcomas: histology, immunohistochemistry and molecular insights with implications for differential diagnosis. Histol Histopathol 36:3–18
Hart J, Mandavilli S (2011) Epithelioid angiosarcoma: a brief diagnostic review and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 135:268–272
Zelek L, Llombart-Cussac A, Terrier P, Pivot X, Guinebretiere JM, Le Pechoux C, Tursz T et al (2003) Prognostic factors in primary breast sarcomas: a series of patients with long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol 21:2583–2588
Hartel PH, Bratthauer G, Hartel JV, Fanburg-Smith JC (2011) Primary malignant fibrous histiocytoma (myxofibrosarcoma/pleomorphic sarcoma not otherwise specified) of the breast: clinicopathologic study of 19 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol 15:407–413
Terrier P, Terrier-Lacombe MJ, Mouriesse H, Friedman S, Spielmann M, Contesso G (1989) Primary breast sarcoma: a review of 33 cases with immunohistochemistry and prognostic factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 13:39–48
Abd El-Rehim DM, Pinder SE, Paish CE, Bell J, Blamey RW, Robertson JF, Nicholson RI et al (2004) Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma. J Pathol 203:661–671
Chu PG, Weiss LM (2002) Keratin expression in human tissues and neoplasms. Histopathology 40:403–439
Hashmi AA, Naz S, Hashmi SK, Hussain ZF, Irfan M, Bakar SMA, Faridi N et al (2018) Cytokeratin 5/6 and cytokeratin 8/18 expression in triple negative breast cancers: clinicopathologic significance in South-Asian population. BMC Res Notes 11:372
Carter MR, Hornick JL, Lester S, Fletcher CD (2006) Spindle cell (sarcomatoid) carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 29 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 30:300–309
Chhieng C, Cranor M, Lesser ME, Rosen PP (1998) Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast with osteocartilaginous heterologous elements. Am J Surg Pathol 22:188–194
Leibl S, Gogg-Kammerer M, Sommersacher A, Denk H, Moinfar F (2005) Metaplastic breast carcinomas: are they of myoepithelial differentiation?: immunohistochemical profile of the sarcomatoid subtype using novel myoepithelial markers. Am J Surg Pathol 29:347–353
Leibl S, Moinfar F (2006) Mammary NOS-type sarcoma with CD10 expression: a rare entity with features of myoepithelial differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 30:450–456
McCart Reed AE, Kalaw E, Nones K, Bettington M, Lim M, Bennett J, Johnstone K et al (2019) Phenotypic and molecular dissection of metaplastic breast cancer and the prognostic implications. J Pathol 247:214–227
Wei S, Henderson-Jackson E, Qian X, Bui MM (2017) Soft tissue tumor immunohistochemistry update: illustrative examples of diagnostic pearls to avoid pitfalls. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141:1072–1091
Chang HY, Koh VCY, Md Nasir ND, Ng CCY, Guan P, Thike AA, Teh BT et al (2020) MED12, TERT and RARA in fibroepithelial tumours of the breast. J Clin Pathol 73:51–56
Santiago Perez JT, Perez Vazquez MR (2005) Rivera Valdespino Ade L, Gil Valdes D: [Carcinosarcoma of the breast: a tumour with controversial histogenesis]. Clin Transl Oncol 7:255–257
Wada H, Enomoto T, Tsujimoto M, Nomura T, Murata Y, Shroyer KR (1998) Carcinosarcoma of the breast: molecular-biological study for analysis of histogenesis. Hum Pathol 29:1324–1328
Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Paredes J, Silva P, Pereira EM, Maeda SA, de Carvalho LV et al (2003) Novel and classic myoepithelial/stem cell markers in metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 11:1–8
Weigelt B, Kreike B, Reis-Filho JS (2009) Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like breast cancers: a genomic profiling analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:273–280
Osako T, Horii R, Ogiya A, Iijima K, Iwase T, Akiyama F (2009) Histogenesis of metaplastic breast carcinoma and axillary nodal metastases. Pathol Int 59:116–120
Lien HC, Hsiao YH, Lin YS, Yao YT, Juan HF, Kuo WH, Hung MC et al (2007) Molecular signatures of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast by large-scale transcriptional profiling: identification of genes potentially related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncogene 26:7859–7871
Taube JH, Herschkowitz JI, Komurov K, Zhou AY, Gupta S, Yang J, Hartwell K et al (2010) Core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition interactome gene-expression signature is associated with claudin-low and metaplastic breast cancer subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:15449–15454
Gwin K, Wheeler DT, Bossuyt V, Tavassoli FA (2010) Breast carcinoma with chondroid differentiation: a clinicopathologic study of 21 triple negative (ER-, PR-, Her2/neu-) cases. Int J Surg Pathol 18:27–35
Nassar A, Sookhan N, Santisteban M, Bryant SC, Boughey JC, Giorgadze T, Degnim A (2010) Diagnostic utility of snail in metaplastic breast carcinoma. Diagn Pathol 5:76
Geyer FC, Weigelt B, Natrajan R, Lambros MB, de Biase D, Vatcheva R, Savage K et al (2010) Molecular analysis reveals a genetic basis for the phenotypic diversity of metaplastic breast carcinomas. J Pathol 220:562–573
Lien HC, Lin CW, Mao TL, Kuo SH, Hsiao CH, Huang CS (2004) p53 overexpression and mutation in metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: genetic evidence for a monoclonal origin of both the carcinomatous and the heterogeneous sarcomatous components. J Pathol 204:131–139
Reis-Filho JS, Pinheiro C, Lambros MB, Milanezi F, Carvalho S, Savage K, Simpson PT et al (2006) EGFR amplification and lack of activating mutations in metaplastic breast carcinomas. J Pathol 209:445–453
Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Carvalho S, Simpson PT, Steele D, Savage K, Lambros MB et al (2005) Metaplastic breast carcinomas exhibit EGFR, but not HER2, gene amplification and overexpression: immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis. Breast Cancer Res 7:R1028–R1035
Cooper CL, Karim RZ, Selinger C, Carmalt H, Lee CS, O’Toole SA (2013) Molecular alterations in metaplastic breast carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 66:522–528
Gilbert JA, Goetz MP, Reynolds CA, Ingle JN, Giordano KF, Suman VJ, Blair HE et al (2008) Molecular analysis of metaplastic breast carcinoma: high EGFR copy number via aneusomy. Mol Cancer Ther 7:944–951
Ng CC, Tan J, Ong CK, Lim WK, Rajasegaran V, Nasir ND, Lim JC et al (2015) MED12 is frequently mutated in breast phyllodes tumours: a study of 112 cases. J Clin Pathol 68:685–691
Lim WK, Ong CK, Tan J, Thike AA, Ng CC, Rajasegaran V, Myint SS et al (2014) Exome sequencing identifies highly recurrent MED12 somatic mutations in breast fibroadenoma. Nat Genet 46:877–880
Lozada JR, Burke KA, Maguire A, Pareja F, Lim RS, Kim J, Gularte-Merida R et al (2017) Myxoid fibroadenomas differ from conventional fibroadenomas: a hypothesis-generating study. Histopathology 71:626–634
Yoshida M, Sekine S, Ogawa R, Yoshida H, Maeshima A, Kanai Y, Kinoshita T et al (2015) Frequent MED12 mutations in phyllodes tumours of the breast. Br J Cancer 112:1703–1708
Piscuoglio S, Murray M, Fusco N, Marchio C, Loo FL, Martelotto LG, Schultheis AM et al (2015) MED12 somatic mutations in fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumours of the breast. Histopathology 67:719–729
Tan J, Ong CK, Lim WK, Ng CC, Thike AA, Ng LM, Rajasegaran V et al (2015) Genomic landscapes of breast fibroepithelial tumors. Nat Genet 47:1341–1345
Liu SY, Joseph NM, Ravindranathan A, Stohr BA, Greenland NY, Vohra P, Hosfield E et al (2016) Genomic profiling of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals aberrations in FGFR1 and PI-3 kinase/RAS signaling pathways and provides insights into intratumoral heterogeneity. Mod Pathol 29:1012–1027
Piscuoglio S, Geyer FC, Burke KA, Murray MP, Ng CK, Mota A, Marchio C et al (2016) Massively parallel sequencing analysis of synchronous fibroepithelial lesions supports the concept of progression from fibroadenoma to phyllodes tumor. NPJ Breast Cancer 2:16035
Garcia-Dios DA, Levi D, Shah V, Gillett C, Simpson MA, Hanby A, Tomlinson I et al (2018) MED12, TERT promoter and RBM15 mutations in primary and recurrent phyllodes tumours. Br J Cancer 118:277–284
Otsuji K, Sasaki T, Tanabe M, Seto Y (2021) Droplet-digital PCR reveals frequent mutations in TERT promoter region in breast fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumours, irrespective of the presence of MED12 mutations. Br J Cancer 124:466–473
Lim SZ, Ng CCY, Rajasegaran V, Guan P, Selvarajan S, Thike AA, Nasir N et al (2019) Genomic profile of breast sarcomas: a comparison with malignant phyllodes tumours. Breast Cancer Res Treat 174:365–373
Rakha EA, Tan PH, Shaaban A, Tse GM, Esteller FC, van Deurzen CH, Purnell D et al (2013) Do primary mammary osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma exist? A review of a large multi-institutional series of malignant matrix-producing breast tumours. Breast 22:13–18
Bacchi CE, Wludarski SC, Ambaye AB, Lamovec J, Salviato T, Falconieri G (2013) Metastatic melanoma presenting as an isolated breast tumor: a study of 20 cases with emphasis on several primary mimickers. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137:41–49
Non-operative Diagnosis Subgroup of the National Coordinating Group for Breast Screening Pathology (2001) Guidelines for non-operative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. NHSBSP Publication, Sheffield, p 50
Lee AHS, Carder P, Deb R, Howe M, Willson R, Stephenson T, Cooke J et al (2016) Guidelines for non-operative diagnostic procedures and reporting in breast cancer screening. The Royal College of Pathologists, London, UK. Document G150
Hoda SA, Rosen PP (2004) Observations on the pathologic diagnosis of selected unusual lesions in needle core biopsies of breast. Breast J 10:522–527
Colombo C, Miceli R, Le Pechoux C, Palassini E, Honore C, Stacchiotti S, Mir O et al (2015) Sporadic extra abdominal wall desmoid-type fibromatosis: surgical resection can be safely limited to a minority of patients. Eur J Cancer 51:186–192
Andreu FJ, Saez A, Sentis M, Rey M, Fernandez S, Dinares C, Tortajada L et al (2007) Breast core biopsy reporting categories–an internal validation in a series of 3054 consecutive lesions. Breast 16:94–101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Emad Rakha drafted and finalised the manuscript. Cecily Quinn, Edi Brogi, and Isabella Castellano critically reviewed and finalised the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version.
This is a review article on already existing literature data. No ethical approval was required. The study does not involve humans and/or animals for which specific approval by the ethics committee and/or informed consent is required.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rakha, E.A., Brogi, E., Castellano, I. et al. Spindle cell lesions of the breast: a diagnostic approach. Virchows Arch 480, 127–145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03162-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03162-x