Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative condition characterised by a progressive loss of motor neurons controlling voluntary muscle activity. The disease manifests through a variety of motor dysfunctions related to the extent of damage and loss of neurons at different anatomical locations. Despite extensive research, it remains unclear why some motor neurons are especially susceptible to the disease, while others are affected less or even spared. In this article, we review the neurobiological mechanisms, neurochemical profiles, and morpho-functional characteristics of various motor neuron groups and types of motor units implicated in their differential exposure to degeneration. We discuss specific cell-autonomous (intrinsic) and extrinsic factors influencing the vulnerability gradient of motor units and motor neuron types to ALS, with their impact on disease manifestation, course, and prognosis, as revealed in preclinical and clinical studies. We consider the outstanding challenges and emerging opportunities for interpreting the phenotypic and mechanistic variability of the disease to identify targets for clinical interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
ALS spectrum
Motor neurons (MNs) are a specialised cell type of the central nervous system (CNS) supporting motor functions through coordinated activation of skeletal and visceral muscles. Accordingly, functional deficit in MNs due to intoxication, trauma, stroke, or degeneration leads to weakness and atrophy of muscles with motor impairments. Due to their control of vital processes and functions, injury and loss of MNs can lead to life-threatening muscular paralysis, with respiratory failure marking the end point of lethal cases. As a unique cell type, MNs can be affected by a specific group of neurodegenerative conditions (Goutman et al. 2022). This family of rare diseases includes spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), progressive bulbar palsy (PBL), primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which are the most prevalent degenerative disease of MNs. Affecting 2–3 persons per 100,000, over ~ 90% of ALS cases are idiopathic with no identifiable cause, while the remaining ~ 10% run in families and are associated with genetic aberrations (Kiernan et al. 2011; Goutman et al. 2022).
While generally considered a disease of MNs, there is growing recognition of ALS as a multisystem disorder (Swinnen and Robberecht 2014; Grossman 2019). The composite nature of the disease is supported not only by the fact that a significant proportion of ALS patients develop a frontotemporal, extrapyramidal, cerebellar as well as multiple visceral and non-motor dysfunctions (Swinnen and Robberecht 2014; Strong et al. 2017; Masrori and Van Damme 2020), but also by variations of the disease amongst distinct cultural, geographical, and genetic groups (Swinnen and Robberecht 2014; Gajdusek and Salazar 1982; Plato et al. 2003; Chio et al. 2013). Indeed, after age and sex adjustments, ALS incidents amongst African, Asian, and Hispanic ethnicity are significantly lower than in non-Hispanic Caucasians (Alappat 2007; Marin et al. 2017; Collaborators 2018). A comparison of ALS incidents in European countries shows the highest rates in Finland, while Italy has the lowest (Collaborators 2018; Alappat 2007; Marin et al. 2017). Mounting data also suggest significant effects of gender, occupation, and physical exercise on the prevalence, trajectory, and severity of ALS (Julian et al. 2021; McCombe and Henderson 2010). Finally, environmental, and genetic factors appear to influence the progression and prognosis of the disease, with racially heterogeneous or admixed populations with ALS living longer than homogeneous White or Black (Collaborators 2018; Kiernan et al. 2011).
Most cases of ALS set on with muscle weakness and spasticity in the limbs, indicating a predominantly spinal form of the disease, which shows a survival median of 3–5 years, while in ~ 20% of cases, the onset is bulbar, leading to speech and swallowing problems with the worst prognosis, yielding an average survival of ~ 2 years (Swinnen and Robberecht 2014; Kiernan et al. 2011). The causes and mechanisms of the differences in the prevalence of ALS in different groups and the site of the onset and severity of motor phenotype remain unclear, with multiple players emerging in the contribution (Ingre et al. 2015; Su et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2022; Kiernan et al. 2021; Ragagnin et al. 2019). As detailed in the following, multiple characteristics of MNs, including their intrinsic excitability, synaptic connections, and chemical microenvironment, seem to be at play, which not only provide clues for the phenotypic variability of ALS and elucidate the multisystem characteristics of the disease, but may also facilitate translational research and potential therapeutic interventions.
Heterogeneity of MNs and their vulnerability gradient to ALS
MNs is an umbrella term describing a heterogeneous population of neurons which supports and coordinates a wide range of somatic and visceral motor activities throughout the entire body axis. In addition to the general division of MNs into cerebral (upper) and bulbospinal (lower), there are remarkable morphological and physiological differences between MNs organised in various functional groups (Stifani 2014; Ragagnin et al. 2019; Fitzpatrick 2001; Baczyk et al. 2022a). Specifically, the lower MNs of the brain stem and spinal cord subdivide into three groups: (1) somatic, (2) special visceral, and (3) general visceral (Fitzpatrick 2001). With soma in the anterior horn of the spinal cord and motor nuclei of III, IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X and XII cranial nerves in the brainstem, somatic MNs are specialised further into α-, β- and γ-MN types (Fitzpatrick 2001; Stifani 2014; Baczyk et al. 2022a). The large α-MNs control the bulk of force-generating elements of skeletal muscles of the body (Stifani 2014). Working as functional assemblies, they drive and coordinate the voluntary contraction of specific muscle groups and control the general muscular tone and activity. Two other MN types, which control the tonus and strength of muscle contraction, are (1) β-MNs innervating intrafusal and extrafusal fibres of muscle spindles, and (2) γ-MNs responsible for tuning the sensitivity of muscle stretching via innervation of intrafusal spindles (Fitzpatrick 2001; Scott et al. 2001; Burke et al. 1971). Special and general visceral MNs, on the other hand, are responsible for innervation of specialised muscle groups, with the former controlling the facial expression, mastication, swallowing, and phonation through cranial nerves, and the latter regulating the tonus of the cardiac and smooth muscles of the visceral organs, through synapsing on neurons of autonomic ganglia, which in turn controls the muscle activity of the inner organs (Fitzpatrick 2001; Scott et al. 2001).
The structural and functional differences of various MN types reflect their evolutionary specialisation as part of motor units supporting different functions (Mendell 2005; Henneman et al. 1965; Button et al. 2007; Gardiner 1993) (Fig. 1). As a critical constituent of motor activity, the motor unit comprises MN with a group of muscle fibres innervated by its axon via specialised connections known as neuromuscular junctions (NMJ). Based on the strength–contraction characteristics and energetic requirements of the muscle fibres, motor units organise into fast-twitch fatiguable (FF), fast-twitch fatigue-resistant (FR) and fatigue-resistant slow-twitch (S) types (Burke et al. 1971; Ragagnin et al. 2019; Burke 1999). The activity of FF muscle fibres relies largely on glycolytic (anaerobic) energy production and is the primary generator of strong muscular contractions controlled by fast-firing α-MNs, which have larger sizes and thick myelinated axons. These units typically contain over 300–500 muscle fibres, with their number in big muscles of the trunk and limbs reaching up to 2000 (Burke et al. 1974, 1971; Burke and Tsairis 1973). Distinctly, the activity of motor units with FR fibres relies on the supply of combined glycolytic and oxidative (aerobic) energy, involving fewer muscle fibres and generating weaker, fatigue-resistant contraction (Highstein et al. 1982; Picard et al. 2012). The third motor unit type is formed primarily of 200 or fewer S-type fibres generating weak but sustained contraction, with fibre activity largely reliant on energy supply by oxidative metabolism, capable of maintaining muscle contraction for an hour and longer (Burke 1999; Picard et al. 2012). The specialisation of MNs to drive the activity of muscle fibres with different characteristics and functional role appears to be of prime relevance to their vulnerability to ALS (Comley et al. 2015, 2016; Nijssen et al. 2017; Pun et al. 2006). Although multiple factors are at play in setting the gradient of MN sensitivity to neurodegeneration, they are tentatively divided into neuronal (intrinsic and extrinsic) and non-neuronal, with the latter mediated largely by paracrine effects of neuromodulators and trophic factors released from muscle fibres, supporting glia and immune cells.
Intrinsic factors influencing MN vulnerability to neurodegeneration of ALS
MNs of different motor units show distinct activity characteristics influenced by their intrinsic properties, such as the size and morphology, consortium of ion channels and transporters with their regulation, and mechanisms governing intracellular Ca2+ dynamics (Button et al. 2007; Gardiner 1993; Henneman et al. 1965; Highstein et al. 1982; Manuel and Zytnicki 2019; Russo and Hounsgaard 1999; Ruegsegger et al. 2016; Baczyk et al. 2022b). The differences in the size of dendritic tree set the electrical capacitance of MNs and rheobase, while the collection of ion channels supporting firing activity and shaping post-discharge recovery defines kinetics, frequency and duration of their output to muscle fibres (Henneman et al. 1965; Gardiner 1993; Baczyk et al. 2022b). In general, MNs of S units with higher intrinsic excitability and compact dendritic trees respond more readily to depolarising inputs (Burke et al. 1982; Cullheim et al. 1987; Kernell and Zwaagstra 1981). Autopsy reports of ALS patients show that surviving MNs of the spinal cord have, on average, smaller soma and possibly higher intrinsic excitability (Kawamura et al. 1981; Dengler et al. 1990). Accordingly, more excitable and in average smaller MNs of oculomotor, trochlear and abducens nuclei innervating ocular muscles are largely spared in ALS until the end stage of the disease (Gizzi et al. 1992; Okamoto et al. 1993), permitting eye-tracking devices as communication tools for fully paralysed patients (Caligari et al. 2013). Likewise, MNs of Onuf’s nucleus innervating striatal muscles of the pelvic bed with lower rheobase and higher intrinsic excitability (Hochman et al. 1991; Sasaki 1991) remain relatively intact in advanced ALS patients (Iwata and Hirano 1978; Mannen et al. 1977, 1982). While these findings are in line with greater sensitivity of large spinal cord MNs to ALS and better survival of MNs of small motor units, the effects of disease-related neuronal shrinkage and counting bias introduced by ALS-resistant smaller intrafusal MNs in autopsy samples should be cautiously considered.
With regard to MN excitability and resistance to ALS degeneration, mechanisms controlling intracellular Ca2+ dynamics by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria, and differential expression of Ca2+ binding proteins are of particular interest (Grosskreutz et al. 2010; Leal and Gomes 2015; Verma et al. 2022a; Wainger et al. 2014) (Fig. 2). With reported higher levels of calbindin D28k and parvalbumin in ALS-resistant MNs (Alexianu et al. 1994; Comley et al. 2015), tight regulation of intracellular Ca2+ dynamics is considered protective for MNs (Grosskreutz et al. 2010; Verma et al. 2022a). In this context, the differential expression of ER chaperones calreticulin and SIL1 has raised considerable interest (Bernard-Marissal et al. 2012, 2015; Filezac de L'Etang et al. 2015; Ragagnin et al. 2019). While the former is a multifunctional Ca2+-binding protein, regulating its signalling activity and controlling the export of proteins from ER, the latter tunes the ER response to stressors and related secretory mechanisms. With both expressed in high amounts in ALS-resistant MNs, their level gradually declines with disease progression in preclinical models, while targeted overexpression of Ca2+ binding proteins in ALS MNs extended their survival and increased the life span of experimental mice (Nijssen et al. 2017). Longitudinal analysis and comparison of three SOD1 models (G93A, G85R and hSOD1) with different developmental onset and progression of motor deficit and MN degeneration showed a positive correlation of the ER stress response with the disease manifestation and loss of MNs (Saxena et al. 2009). MNs with higher vulnerability to degeneration exhibited stronger ER stress response judged on the expression of stress markers from early stages of development. While in ALS, both vulnerable and resistant MNs showed a developmental increase in ubiquitin signals, those with higher susceptibility to degeneration showed stronger stress response associated with microglia activation (Baczyk et al. 2022b; Saxena et al. 2009). Saxena and co-workers suggested a mechanistic relationship between the excitability and intrinsic neuroprotection mechanisms of FF motor units, with enhancing MN activity triggering neuroprotective response of MNs in SOD1 mice, while reducing excitability accelerating neurodegeneration and motor decline (Saxena et al. 2013). This mechanism seems to be negatively regulated by metabotropic cholinergic drive through ER stress response and mTOR activation (Saxena et al. 2013; Baczyk et al. 2022b).
Another intrinsic factor considered in the context of the selective vulnerability of MNs to ALS is matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP9) (Kaplan et al. 2014; Spiller et al. 2019). This Zn2+-activated protease is functionally related to various cell surface proteins, including integrins, TrkA and TrkB receptors, and plays essential roles in neurodevelopment and synaptic plasticity (Verslegers et al. 2013; Vafadari et al. 2016) and regulation of axonal myelination and pruning (Reinhard et al. 2015). MMP9 polymorphisms are among the principal risk factors for sporadic ALS (Zawislak et al. 2009; Pabian-Jewula and Rylski 2023), with results of postmortem studies of ALS patients showing MMP9 levels ~ 2.5-fold lower in the oculomotor nucleus as compared to lumbar MNs (Brockington et al. 2013). Accordingly, Kaplan and co-workers reported higher expression of MMP9 in ALS-vulnerable MNs of the SOD1 mouse model, with its overexpression in wild-type MNs sufficient to trigger axonal dieback (Kaplan et al. 2014). Likewise, targeted expression of osteopontin in α-MNs, which is known to enhance MMP9 production through activation of the αv33 integrin receptor, promoted the degeneration of FR/S MNs in the SOD1 mouse model (Morisaki et al. 2016). In agreement with these findings, lowering MMP9 levels or its genetic removal was shown to extend the survival of MNs (Kaplan et al. 2014; Kiaei et al. 2007) with protective effects in SOD1 and TDP-43 ALS mice (Lorenzl et al. 2006; Kaplan et al. 2014; Spiller et al. 2019).
Extrinsic neuronal factors influencing MN vulnerability to neurodegeneration of ALS
In addition to differences in the intrinsic properties, various functional groups of MNs are under differential influence by their synaptic inputs and neurochemical microenvironment. Synaptic and non-synaptic membrane currents not only regulate the development and integration of MN in functional networks, but also play an essential role in their survival and plasticity (Kalb and Hockfield 1992; Stegenga and Kalb 2001; Inglis et al. 2000; Ovsepian and Vesselkin 2006, 2014). Similar to the described intrinsic effects, synaptic activity in MNs influences their vulnerability to ALS (Nijssen et al. 2017). Several groups have demonstrated that changes in the balance of excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) drives are of crucial importance to neurodegeneration in ALS, with the E/I ratio highest in FF MNs—the most vulnerable neuron type (Nijssen et al. 2017; Kanai et al. 2012). Increase in excitatory synaptic drive as a contributor to ALS is supported by overall loss of excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) in the motor cortex and spinal cord of ALS patients, which could lead to glutamate excitotoxicity (Rothstein et al. 1995). The balance of E/I synaptic inputs and parameters of the excitatory drive are essential regulators of Ca2+ dynamics in MNs and other neuron types, which, if disrupted, could lead to impairments of signalling, causing abnormal activity of neurons with cytotoxicity and cell death (Van Den Bosch et al. 2006; Leal and Gomes 2015; Ovsepian and Friel 2008). The inherently lower Ca2+ buffering of ALS-sensitive MNs is aggravated by high expression of Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors (AMPAR) comprising the unedited glutamate receptor 2 (GluR2) subunit (Grosskreutz et al. 2010; Van Den Bosch et al. 2006; Greig et al. 2000; Zanganeh et al. 2022) (Fig. 2). With over 1/3 of AMPAR being permeable for Ca2+, the larger Ca2+ influx strains the ER and mitochondrial calcium buffering of MNs and increases the risks of cell stress and degeneration (Greig et al. 2000). Notably, the level of edited GluR2 transcripts in ALS-resistant oculomotor neurons of brain autopsies is significantly higher (Brockington et al. 2013). Although the total transcript level of GluR2 in the spinal cord of ALS patients is comparable to that in healthy, post-translational editing fails in almost half of all transcripts, leading to an increase in the level of Ca2+-permeable AMPAR with enhanced AMPAR-mediated Ca2+ currents (Kwak and Kawahara 2005). In support of the contribution of unedited GluR2 to the vulnerability gradient of MNs to ALS, the Ca2+ current mediated by AMPAR of oculomotor MNs is smaller as compared to that in large spinal cord MNs (Brockington et al. 2013). A recent analysis showed that experimental manipulations of the expression of GluR2 gene and RNA could tune the sensitivity of MNs in the SOD1 mouse model of ALS (Zanganeh et al. 2022).
The importance of E/I balance in influencing the vulnerability gradient for MNs in ALS is also showcased by studies of inhibitory synaptic inputs. ALS patients display cortical hyperexcitability that is thought to arise from E/I imbalance in MNs therein. The underlying mechanisms of this change remain unclear, but ALS patients appear to have lower expression of GABAA receptors (GABAAR) in the motor cortex and a generally lower efficacy of inhibitory inputs (Petri et al. 2003; Nieto-Gonzalez et al. 2011). In FF MNs of rat spinal cord, inhibitory postsynaptic currents are predominantly glycinergic (Lorenzo et al. 2006), whereas in oculomotor MNs of the same model, the inhibitory synaptic drive is mediated mainly by GABAAR (Brockington et al. 2013; Comley et al. 2015; Lorenzo et al. 2006). Congruously, in ALS patients, the expression of GABAAR α-subunit is significantly higher in oculomotor MNs as compared to those of the spinal cord and remains unchanged until the end stage of the disease, suggesting its contribution to the greater resilience of the former to neurodegeneration (Hedlund et al. 2010; Comley et al. 2015). Detailed analysis with comparison of the subunit composition, expression pattern, density, and localisation of inhibitory receptors in ALS-sensitive (trigeminal, facial and hypoglossal) and ALS-resistant (oculomotor, trochlear and abducens) MNs of cranial nerves in rats revealed a significant correlation between the subunit composition of GABAAR, glycine/GABAAR ratios and frequency of extra-synaptic versus synaptic GABAAR with the degree of vulnerability of MNs to degeneration (Lorenzo et al. 2006; Nijssen et al. 2017). These differences contrast the relatively uniform density of gephyrin cluster and synaptic glycinergic receptors levels measured in the same motor nuclei (Lorenzo et al. 2006), with GlyR reported to be significantly reduced in the spinal cord of ALS patients (Hayashi et al. 1981). In this context, it is important to note that ALS-resistant MNs of Onuf’s nucleus do not receive recurrent inhibitory inputs, which in ALS-sensitive MNs are glycinergic (Sasaki 1994; Schellino et al. 2020).
In addition to the E/I ratio, growing data supports the non-autonomous effects of neuropeptides and neurotrophic factors on the vulnerability of MNs to ALS. This premise has been supported by reports demonstrating ALS-resistant MNs in Onuf’s nucleus receiving dense innervations by enkephalin-, somatostatin-, CGRP-, neuropeptide Y- and neurokinin-positive terminals, as well as thyrotropin-releasing hormone-positive axons (Schellino et al. 2020; Gibson et al. 1988; Katagiri et al. 1988; Pullen et al. 1997). The strong neuropeptide and neurotrophic drives have been suggested to render MNs of Onuf’s nucleus comparable to neurons of the autonomic nervous system, which also have a higher resistance to ALS (Schellino et al. 2020). Notably, the protective effect of neuropeptides on Onuf’s MNs is ALS specific, as they succumb to neurodegenerative conditions affecting parasympathetic neurons, such as Fabry’s disease, multiple systems atrophy, Shy–Drager syndrome and Parkinson's disease (Schellino et al. 2020).
Non-neuronal effects influencing MN vulnerability to neurodegeneration of ALS
Unlike any other neuron type in CNS, MNs extend their axons to reach target muscles at the periphery, forming highly specialised synaptic connections beyond the defence line of the blood–brain barriers. This unique arrangement not only makes MNs subject to retrograde influence by an array of trophic factors and messengers produced at the periphery by muscle fibres, Schwann and satellite cells, but also exposes them to a range of pathogens, toxins and environmental factors (Henderson et al. 1993; Ovsepian et al. 2019, 2016; Cain et al. 2019; Sleigh et al. 2019). Considerable data suggests NMJ as the site of the onset of MN degeneration (Dadon-Nachum et al. 2011; Tsitkanou et al. 2019), with the mediators and mechanisms of peripheral effects on MN vulnerability to ALS remaining elusive.
Evidence from preclinical models and developmental studies indicate protective and neuroplastic effects of several trophic factors and metabolites released by muscles (Tovar et al. 2014; Saini et al. 2021; Taylor et al. 2007) (Fig. 2). Multiple reports showed an inverse correlation between the propensity of the axon terminal sprouting and plasticity in muscle with the vulnerability of source MNs to ALS (Frey et al. 2000; Seijffers et al. 2014; Verma et al. 2022b; Pun et al. 2006). A pioneering work by Pun and collaborators showed that in SOD1G93A and SOD1G85R ALS models, axons of FF MNs deteriorate long before the onset of motor symptoms, while axons of FR MNs break down with the onset of motor deficit (Pun et al. 2006). The impairment of MN axons leads to stalling synaptic vesicles at the presynaptic terminal of NMJ with a buildup of apoptotic marker BC12a1-a, which can be alleviated by ciliary neurotrophic factor. The authors conclude that the vulnerability of MNs to ALS is selective and predictable and might be related to the mechanisms of remodelling of presynaptic terminals at NMJ (Pun et al. 2006). In support of these findings, the overexpression of the activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) in muscles of ALS mice stimulated the sprouting of axon terminals and delayed the onset of MN neurodegeneration (Seijffers et al. 2014). Overexpression of ephrin receptor A4 (EPHA4) in MNs, on the other hand, impairs the reinnervation of NMJs (Van Hoecke et al. 2012) with EPHA4 level changes in the blood of patients correlating with the onset of clinical ALS (Van Hoecke et al. 2012). In SOD1 mice, haploinsufficiency of EprA4 extended MN survival and increased NMJ formation, whereas, in TDP43 mice, it rescued axonopathy (Van Hoecke et al. 2012). Surprisingly, overexpression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactive 1-alpha (PGC-1α), known to regulate muscle fibre types and their response to metabolic demands while increasing the oxidative capacity of myotubes and fatigue resistance, did not affect the onset of ALS signs or alter the survival of transgenic mice (Da Cruz et al. 2012). It is interesting to note that the level of neuromuscular activity with activity-dependent reprograming of FF motor units to less forceful, slower FR types could reduce their vulnerability to ALS (Gordon et al. 2010). In a partially denervated hind limb muscle of SOD1 mice, the rapid age-dependent decline in fast twitching muscles associates with significantly higher number of type IIA and type IID/X fibres attributed to FR slower units with higher resistance to ALS (Gordon et al. 2010).
Studies of paracrine effects of glial cells on MN survival in ALS suggested their likely influence (Philips and Rothstein 2014; Valori et al. 2014; Takahashi 2023) (Fig. 2). The removal of astrocytes in SOD1 mice, for instance, increased their survival without effects on the disease onset, while overexpression of SOD1G93A in astrocytes has toxic effects on MNs (Yamanaka et al. 2008; Yamanaka and Komine 2018). The relevance of these mechanisms to the vulnerability of various MN groups of ALS patients remains to be shown. Likewise, the depletion of mutant SOD1 from microglia resulted in an extended life span of mice with slower disease progression (Boillee et al. 2006; Christoforidou et al. 2020). The mechanisms underlying the protective effects of microglia in ALS remain to be elucidated. Interestingly, there have been no reports of the influence of oligodendroglia and Schwann cells on the endurance of ALS MNs of humans, even though during development, these cells play a crucial role in MN differentiation and functional integration (Lee et al. 2012; Horner et al. 2021). In animal models, unlike astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes, where suppression of mutated SOD1G37R can confer protection on MNs, downregulation of this protein in Schwann cells accelerated the progression in ALS phenotype without effects on the onset of motor impairments (Lobsiger et al. 2009). This response could be partly due to attenuation in IGF-1 effects in the MN axons, leading to the reduction of the capacity of MNs to regenerate and form new contacts with muscle fibres. It is noteworthy that Schwann cells of axon terminals innervating different populations of muscle fibre show different levels of axon-repellent Semaphorin 3A, with postnatal, regenerative and paralysis-induced remodelling of neuromuscular connection accompanied by increased expression of this protein on FF muscle fibres (De Winter et al. 2006). Based on the semaphorin 3A expression analysis by terminal Schwann cells in the SOD1 mouse model, the authors suggest that it suppresses terminal sprouting under stress and contributes to their early and selective loss in ALS (De Winter et al. 2006). On the same note, grafts of bone marrow mononuclear cells in the muscles of SOD1 ALS and muscle-deficient mouse models yielded GDNF-dependent protective effects, manifested in better NMJ stability and extended MN survival (Pastor et al. 2013; Rando et al. 2018). In the context of long-range retrograde effects of muscles on the viability of motor units, it is worth noting that MNs of Onuf’s nucleus are under the protective influence of testosterone of target bulbospongiosus muscles, with its deficiency leading to the death of MNs (Schellino et al. 2020; Little et al. 2009). These findings agree with the results of an earlier study showing that castration can cause retardation of Onuf’s MNs and a reduction in size (Vercelli and Cracco 1990).
Implications of differential MN vulnerability to ALS for clinical translation
In addition to gaining mechanistic insights into the pathobiology of ALS, research into the differential vulnerability of motor units has important implications for unveiling therapeutic targets and avenues for the protection and rescue of motor functions. Because of the limited access to degenerating MN in the human nervous system, most concepts and strategies used in translational studies of ALS have relied on data from animal models of familial variants of ALS (Mead et al. 2023; Perrin 2014). With their numerous advantages in recapitulating specific features of familial ALS, genetic models fall short of capturing the complexity of familial and sporadic variants, with the latter comprising over 90% of ALS cases (Todd and Petrucelli 2022). For instance, cytoplasmic aggregations of TDP-43 DNA/RNA binding protein observed in TDP-43 mice, which represent the hallmark of degenerating human MNs, are not observed in SOD1 and FUS (fused in sarcoma) mouse models (Vance et al. 2009; Mackenzie et al. 2007). Another limitation of the TDP-43 model is that under physiological conditions, its level is tightly autoregulated, while in transgenic models, the expression of TDP-43 is pathologically enhanced (Tsao et al. 2012). Therefore, the TDP-43 toxicity in preclinical models may not fully capture the features of ALS proteinopathy with effects on MNs (de Boer et al. 2020; Tsao et al. 2012). Histopathological analysis of the most common genetic subtype of ALS linked with expansion of GGGGCC hexanucleotide in the C9orf72 gene, in addition to cytoplasmic TDP-43 aggregates, shows p62-positive deposits formed by pathological dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs), which is absent in other ALS models (Ramos-Campoy et al. 2018; Mead et al. 2023). Although the implications of these differences for replicating the disease phenotype and mechanisms of neurodegeneration in ALS remain unclear, their unsought effects on the stability and survival of motor units cannot be ruled out.
The discrepancies in the histopathological profiles of preclinical models suggest significant methodological limitations and call for cross-model validation of MN vulnerability data, which have been mainly obtained in SOD1 studies (Baczyk et al. 2022b; Nijssen et al. 2017). They also indicate potential flaws in the therapeutic strategies relying on preclinical data, with a pervasive impact on clinical translation. With over 60 compounds currently in clinical trials and many more tested over the recent two decades, progress in developing disease-modifying therapies has been frustratingly slow, with only three drugs of limited efficacy authorized for use (Mead et al. 2023). Nevertheless, it is reassuring that the approved drugs target pathological mechanisms inferred from preclinical studies. Indeed, the first and the most widely utilised anti-ALS drug, riluzole, inhibits voltage-gated Na+ channels and suppresses the presynaptic release of glutamate (Bensimon et al. 1994). A decrease in glutamatergic drive in MNs reinstates the E/I balance in hyperexcitable networks, restores Ca2+ homeostasis, and alleviates the ER stress (Bellingham 2011). The second pharmacotherapy approved for ALS, edaravone, augments mitochondrial functions with antioxidant effects, slowing down MN failure and countering the disability progression (Witzel et al. 2022). Finally, the most recently FDA-approved therapy, AMX0035, is a proprietary oral combination of two drugs already in use, sodium phenylbutyrate and tauroursodeoxycholic acid, with beneficial effects attributed to suppression of mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and mitigation of ER stress (Mitsumoto et al. 2022; Paganoni et al. 2020). The intersection of the action mechanisms of anti-ALS therapies with those inferred in MN degeneration by preclinical studies warrant systematic analysis and cross-model validation of the effects of anti-ALS therapies on the vulnerability of motor units in multiple models. Likewise, it would be interesting to investigate the response of different motor unit types to therapeutic leads currently in phase II/III trials with antioxidant (RT001, AP-101), anti-amyloidogenic (ION-363, Tofersen) and anti-inflammatory (Ibadilast, BLZ-945) effects.
Summary and future directions
ALS is the most prevalent degenerative disease of MNs, with no existing cure or treatment to halt neuronal loss or reverse the decline of motor functions available. Although the breakdown of motor units and associated functional decline represent principal hallmarks of the disease and the prime cause of mortality, there is considerable variability in clinical phenotypes attributed primarily to the anatomical location, extent and functions of affected MNs (Fig. 3). Notably, the clinical phenotypes of ALS may extend beyond impairements of voluntary motor activities, involving frontotemporal, extrapyramidal and cerebellar impairments, as well as autonomic dysfunctions.
Throughout this article, we revisited molecular and cellular mechanisms implicated in the differential vulnerability of MNs to ALS and discussed factors contributing to the extent of motor decline with neurodegeneration. Analysis of the sensitivity of motor units, in addition to cell-autonomous effects, has uncovered various extrinsic neuronal and non-neuronal factors, supporting the composite nature of the disease. The complex interplay of these effects with genetic, regulatory and environmental factors seems to shape the multifaceted phenotypes of ALS and determine the trajectory of its progression and prognosis. It is important to note that, like other neurodegenerative proteinopathies, ALS shows prion-like propagation of misfolded TDP-43, SOD1 and FUS proteins throughout the CNS, driving the feed-forward cascade effects and evolution of clinical symptoms. These features, along with numerous factors shaping the differential vulnerability of MNs, may underlie the multisystem features of ALS with a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes.
Notwithstanding significant mechanistic advances in the pathobiology of ALS, the progress in developing disease-modifying pharmacotherapies has been very slow. The recent arrival of precision therapeutic tools and gene editing technologies inspires optimism for translational breakthroughs in the foreseeable future through genetic reprogramming, transcriptome interference and cell therapy to pave the way for the protection of MNs and rescue their functions (Amado and Davidson 2021; Ovsepian and Waxman 2023). Together with improved animal models and patient-derived tissue studies, these advances should not only enhance our understanding of the limits of MNs, but also expose their reserves to overcome the challenges imposed by ALS.
Data availability
This article contains no primary data. All illustrative material presented in this study is original and can be used per the Open Access Policy and Publisher’s guidelines.
References
Alappat JJ (2007) Ethnic variation in the incidence of ALS: a systematic review. Neurology 69(7):711. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000285431.01005.67. (author reply 711-712)
Alexianu ME, Ho BK, Mohamed AH, La Bella V, Smith RG, Appel SH (1994) The role of calcium-binding proteins in selective motoneuron vulnerability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 36(6):846–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410360608
Amado DA, Davidson BL (2021) Gene therapy for ALS: a review. Mol Ther 29(12):3345–3358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.04.008
Baczyk M, Manuel M, Roselli F, Zytnicki D (2022a) Diversity of mammalian motoneurons and motor units. Adv Neurobiol 28:131–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07167-6_6
Baczyk M, Manuel M, Roselli F, Zytnicki D (2022b) From physiological properties to selective vulnerability of motor units in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Adv Neurobiol 28:375–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07167-6_15
Bellingham MC (2011) A review of the neural mechanisms of action and clinical efficiency of riluzole in treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: what have we learned in the last decade? CNS Neurosci Ther 17(1):4–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2009.00116.x
Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Meininger V (1994) A controlled trial of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ALS/Riluzole Study Group. N Engl J Med 330(9):585–591. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199403033300901
Bernard-Marissal N, Moumen A, Sunyach C, Pellegrino C, Dudley K, Henderson CE, Raoul C, Pettmann B (2012) Reduced calreticulin levels link endoplasmic reticulum stress and Fas-triggered cell death in motoneurons vulnerable to ALS. J Neurosci 32(14):4901–4912. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5431-11.2012
Bernard-Marissal N, Sunyach C, Marissal T, Raoul C, Pettmann B (2015) Calreticulin levels determine onset of early muscle denervation by fast motoneurons of ALS model mice. Neurobiol Dis 73:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.09.009
Boillee S, Yamanaka K, Lobsiger CS, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Kassiotis G, Kollias G, Cleveland DW (2006) Onset and progression in inherited ALS determined by motor neurons and microglia. Science 312(5778):1389–1392. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123511
Brockington A, Ning K, Heath PR, Wood E, Kirby J, Fusi N, Lawrence N, Wharton SB, Ince PG, Shaw PJ (2013) Unravelling the enigma of selective vulnerability in neurodegeneration: motor neurons resistant to degeneration in ALS show distinct gene expression characteristics and decreased susceptibility to excitotoxicity. Acta Neuropathol 125(1):95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-012-1058-5
Burke RE (1999) Revisiting the notion of “motor unit types.” Prog Brain Res 123:167–175
Burke RE, Tsairis P (1973) Anatomy and innervation ratios in motor units of cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol 234(3):749–765. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010370
Burke RE, Levine DN, Zajac FE 3rd (1971) Mammalian motor units: physiological-histochemical correlation in three types in cat gastrocnemius. Science 174(4010):709–712. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.174.4010.709
Burke RE, Levine DN, Salcman M, Tsairis P (1974) Motor units in cat soleus muscle: physiological, histochemical and morphological characteristics. J Physiol 238(3):503–514. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010540
Burke RE, Dum RP, Fleshman JW, Glenn LL, Lev-Tov A, O’Donovan MJ, Pinter MJ (1982) A HRP study of the relation between cell size and motor unit type in cat ankle extensor motoneurons. J Comp Neurol 209(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902090103
Button DC, Kalmar JM, Gardiner K, Cahill F, Gardiner PF (2007) Spike frequency adaptation of rat hindlimb motoneurons. J Appl Physiol (1985) 102(3):1041–1050. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01148.2006
Cain MD, Salimi H, Diamond MS, Klein RS (2019) Mechanisms of pathogen invasion into the central nervous system. Neuron 103(5):771–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.015
Caligari M, Godi M, Guglielmetti S, Franchignoni F, Nardone A (2013) Eye tracking communication devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: impact on disability and quality of life. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 14(7–8):546–552. https://doi.org/10.3109/21678421.2013.803576
Chio A, Logroscino G, Traynor BJ, Collins J, Simeone JC, Goldstein LA, White LA (2013) Global epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review of the published literature. Neuroepidemiology 41(2):118–130. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351153
Christoforidou E, Joilin G, Hafezparast M (2020) Potential of activated microglia as a source of dysregulated extracellular microRNAs contributing to neurodegeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuroinflamm 17(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01822-4
Collaborators GBDMND (2018) Global, regional, and national burden of motor neuron diseases 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 17(12):1083–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30404-6
Comley L, Allodi I, Nichterwitz S, Nizzardo M, Simone C, Corti S, Hedlund E (2015) Motor neurons with differential vulnerability to degeneration show distinct protein signatures in health and ALS. Neuroscience 291:216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.02.013
Comley LH, Nijssen J, Frost-Nylen J, Hedlund E (2016) Cross-disease comparison of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and spinal muscular atrophy reveals conservation of selective vulnerability but differential neuromuscular junction pathology. J Comp Neurol 524(7):1424–1442. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23917
Cullheim S, Fleshman JW, Glenn LL, Burke RE (1987) Membrane area and dendritic structure in type-identified triceps surae alpha motoneurons. J Comp Neurol 255(1):68–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902550106
Da Cruz S, Parone PA, Lopes VS, Lillo C, McAlonis-Downes M, Lee SK, Vetto AP, Petrosyan S, Marsala M, Murphy AN, Williams DS, Spiegelman BM, Cleveland DW (2012) Elevated PGC-1alpha activity sustains mitochondrial biogenesis and muscle function without extending survival in a mouse model of inherited ALS. Cell Metab 15(5):778–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.03.019
Dadon-Nachum M, Melamed E, Offen D (2011) The “dying-back” phenomenon of motor neurons in ALS. J Mol Neurosci 43(3):470–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-010-9467-1
de Boer EMJ, Orie VK, Williams T, Baker MR, De Oliveira HM, Polvikoski T, Silsby M, Menon P, van den Bos M, Halliday GM, van den Berg LH, Van Den Bosch L, van Damme P, Kiernan MC, van Es MA, Vucic S (2020) TDP-43 proteinopathies: a new wave of neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 92(1):86–95. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-322983
De Winter F, Vo T, Stam FJ, Wisman LA, Bar PR, Niclou SP, van Muiswinkel FL, Verhaagen J (2006) The expression of the chemorepellent Semaphorin 3A is selectively induced in terminal Schwann cells of a subset of neuromuscular synapses that display limited anatomical plasticity and enhanced vulnerability in motor neuron disease. Mol Cell Neurosci 32(1–2):102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2006.03.002
Dengler R, Konstanzer A, Kuther G, Hesse S, Wolf W, Struppler A (1990) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—macro-EMG and twitch forces of single motor units. Muscle Nerve 13(6):545–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880130612
Filezac de L’Etang A, Maharjan N, Cordeiro Brana M, Ruegsegger C, Rehmann R, Goswami A, Roos A, Troost D, Schneider BL, Weis J, Saxena S (2015) Marinesco-Sjogren syndrome protein SIL1 regulates motor neuron subtype-selective ER stress in ALS. Nat Neurosci 18(2):227–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3903
Fitzpatrick D (2001) Lower motor neuron circuits and motor control: overview. In: Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D (eds) Neuroscience. NCBI Bookshelf, Bethesda
Frey D, Schneider C, Xu L, Borg J, Spooren W, Caroni P (2000) Early and selective loss of neuromuscular synapse subtypes with low sprouting competence in motoneuron diseases. J Neurosci 20(7):2534–2542. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-07-02534.2000
Gajdusek DC, Salazar AM (1982) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and parkinsonian syndromes in high incidence among the Auyu and Jakai people of West New Guinea. Neurology 32(2):107–126. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.32.2.107
Gardiner PF (1993) Physiological properties of motoneurons innervating different muscle unit types in rat gastrocnemius. J Neurophysiol 69(4):1160–1170. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1160
Gibson SJ, Polak JM, Katagiri T, Su H, Weller RO, Brownell DB, Holland S, Hughes JT, Kikuyama S, Ball J et al (1988) A comparison of the distributions of eight peptides in spinal cord from normal controls and cases of motor neurone disease with special reference to Onuf’s nucleus. Brain Res 474(2):255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(88)90440-4
Gizzi M, DiRocco A, Sivak M, Cohen B (1992) Ocular motor function in motor neuron disease. Neurology 42(5):1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.42.5.1037
Gordon T, Tyreman N, Li S, Putman CT, Hegedus J (2010) Functional over-load saves motor units in the SOD1-G93A transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis 37(2):412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2009.10.021
Goutman SA, Hardiman O, Al-Chalabi A, Chio A, Savelieff MG, Kiernan MC, Feldman EL (2022) Recent advances in the diagnosis and prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 21(5):480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00465-8
Greig A, Donevan SD, Mujtaba TJ, Parks TN, Rao MS (2000) Characterization of the AMPA-activated receptors present on motoneurons. J Neurochem 74(1):179–191. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0740179.x
Grosskreutz J, Van Den Bosch L, Keller BU (2010) Calcium dysregulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Calcium 47(2):165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2009.12.002
Grossman M (2019) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder. Nat Rev Neurol 15(1):5–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0103-y
Hayashi H, Suga M, Satake M, Tsubaki T (1981) Reduced glycine receptor in the spinal cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 9(3):292–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410090313
Hedlund E, Karlsson M, Osborn T, Ludwig W, Isacson O (2010) Global gene expression profiling of somatic motor neuron populations with different vulnerability identify molecules and pathways of degeneration and protection. Brain 133(Pt 8):2313–2330. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq167
Henderson CE, Camu W, Mettling C, Gouin A, Poulsen K, Karihaloo M, Rullamas J, Evans T, McMahon SB, Armanini MP et al (1993) Neurotrophins promote motor neuron survival and are present in embryonic limb bud. Nature 363(6426):266–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/363266a0
Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO (1965) Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol 28(3):599–620. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.599
Highstein SM, Karabelas A, Baker R, McCrea RA (1982) Comparison of the morphology of physiologically identified abducens motor and internuclear neurons in the cat: a light microscopic study employing the intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol 208(4):369–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902080407
Hochman S, Fedirchuk B, Shefchyk SJ (1991) Membrane electrical properties of external urethral and external anal sphincter somatic motoneurons in the decerebrate cat. Neurosci Lett 127(1):87–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(91)90901-5
Horner SJ, Couturier N, Bruch R, Koch P, Hafner M, Rudolf R (2021) hiPSC-derived schwann cells influence myogenic differentiation in neuromuscular cocultures. Cells 10(12):3292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123292
Inglis FM, Zuckerman KE, Kalb RG (2000) Experience-dependent development of spinal motor neurons. Neuron 26(2):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81164-2
Ingre C, Roos PM, Piehl F, Kamel F, Fang F (2015) Risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Epidemiol 7:181–193. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S37505
Iwata M, Hirano A (1978) Sparing of the Onufrowicz nucleus in sacral anterior horn lesions. Ann Neurol 4(3):245–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410040309
Julian TH, Glascow N, Barry ADF, Moll T, Harvey C, Klimentidis YC, Newell M, Zhang S, Snyder MP, Cooper-Knock J, Shaw PJ (2021) Physical exercise is a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Convergent evidence from Mendelian randomisation, transcriptomics and risk genotypes. EBioMedicine 68:103397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103397
Kalb RG, Hockfield S (1992) Activity-dependent development of spinal cord motor neurons. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 17(3):283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(92)90020-m
Kanai K, Shibuya K, Sato Y, Misawa S, Nasu S, Sekiguchi Y, Mitsuma S, Isose S, Fujimaki Y, Ohmori S, Koga S, Kuwabara S (2012) Motor axonal excitability properties are strong predictors for survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83(7):734–738. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2011-301782
Kaplan A, Spiller KJ, Towne C, Kanning KC, Choe GT, Geber A, Akay T, Aebischer P, Henderson CE (2014) Neuronal matrix metalloproteinase-9 is a determinant of selective neurodegeneration. Neuron 81(2):333–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.009
Katagiri T, Kuzirai T, Nihei K, Honda K, Sasaki H, Polak JM (1988) Immunocytochemical study of Onuf’s nucleus in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Jpn J Med 27(1):23–28. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine1962.27.23
Kawamura Y, Dyck PJ, Shimono M, Okazaki H, Tateishi J, Doi H (1981) Morphometric comparison of the vulnerability of peripheral motor and sensory neurons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 40(6):667–675. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-198111000-00008
Kernell D, Zwaagstra B (1981) Input conductance axonal conduction velocity and cell size among hindlimb motoneurones of the cat. Brain Res 204(2):311–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(81)90591-6
Kiaei M, Kipiani K, Calingasan NY, Wille E, Chen J, Heissig B, Rafii S, Lorenzl S, Beal MF (2007) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 regulates TNF-alpha and FasL expression in neuronal, glial cells and its absence extends life in a transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp Neurol 205(1):74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.01.036
Kiernan MC, Vucic S, Cheah BC, Turner MR, Eisen A, Hardiman O, Burrell JR, Zoing MC (2011) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet 377(9769):942–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61156-7
Kiernan MC, Vucic S, Talbot K, McDermott CJ, Hardiman O, Shefner JM, Al-Chalabi A, Huynh W, Cudkowicz M, Talman P, Van den Berg LH, Dharmadasa T, Wicks P, Reilly C, Turner MR (2021) Improving clinical trial outcomes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 17(2):104–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-020-00434-z
Kwak S, Kawahara Y (2005) Deficient RNA editing of GluR2 and neuronal death in amyotropic lateral sclerosis. J Mol Med (berl) 83(2):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-004-0599-z
Leal SS, Gomes CM (2015) Calcium dysregulation links ALS defective proteins and motor neuron selective vulnerability. Front Cell Neurosci 9:225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00225
Lee Y, Morrison BM, Li Y, Lengacher S, Farah MH, Hoffman PN, Liu Y, Tsingalia A, Jin L, Zhang PW, Pellerin L, Magistretti PJ, Rothstein JD (2012) Oligodendroglia metabolically support axons and contribute to neurodegeneration. Nature 487(7408):443–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11314
Little CM, Coons KD, Sengelaub DR (2009) Neuroprotective effects of testosterone on the morphology and function of somatic motoneurons following the death of neighboring motoneurons. J Comp Neurol 512(3):359–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21885
Lobsiger CS, Boillee S, McAlonis-Downes M, Khan AM, Feltri ML, Yamanaka K, Cleveland DW (2009) Schwann cells expressing dismutase active mutant SOD1 unexpectedly slow disease progression in ALS mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(11):4465–4470. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813339106
Lorenzl S, Narr S, Angele B, Krell HW, Gregorio J, Kiaei M, Pfister HW, Beal MF (2006) The matrix metalloproteinases inhibitor Ro 28–2653 [correction of Ro 26–2853] extends survival in transgenic ALS mice. Exp Neurol 200(1):166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.01.026
Lorenzo LE, Barbe A, Portalier P, Fritschy JM, Bras H (2006) Differential expression of GABAA and glycine receptors in ALS-resistant vs. ALS-vulnerable motoneurons: possible implications for selective vulnerability of motoneurons. Eur J Neurosci 23(12):3161–3170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04863.x
Mackenzie IR, Bigio EH, Ince PG, Geser F, Neumann M, Cairns NJ, Kwong LK, Forman MS, Ravits J, Stewart H, Eisen A, McClusky L, Kretzschmar HA, Monoranu CM, Highley JR, Kirby J, Siddique T, Shaw PJ, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ (2007) Pathological TDP-43 distinguishes sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with SOD1 mutations. Ann Neurol 61(5):427–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21147
Mannen T, Iwata M, Toyokura Y, Nagashima K (1977) Preservation of a certain motoneurone group of the sacral cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: its clinical significance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40(5):464–469. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.40.5.464
Mannen T, Iwata M, Toyokura Y, Nagashima K (1982) The Onuf’s nucleus and the external anal sphincter muscles in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Shy-Drager syndrome. Acta Neuropathol 58(4):255–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00688606
Manuel M, Zytnicki D (2019) Molecular and electrophysiological properties of mouse motoneuron and motor unit subtypes. Curr Opin Physiol 8:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2018.11.008
Marin B, Boumediene F, Logroscino G, Couratier P, Babron MC, Leutenegger AL, Copetti M, Preux PM, Beghi E (2017) Variation in worldwide incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 46(1):57–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw061
Masrori P, Van Damme P (2020) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical review. Eur J Neurol 27(10):1918–1929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14393
McCombe PA, Henderson RD (2010) Effects of gender in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Gend Med 7(6):557–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genm.2010.11.010
Mead RJ, Shan N, Reiser HJ, Marshall F, Shaw PJ (2023) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a neurodegenerative disorder poised for successful therapeutic translation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 22(3):185–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-022-00612-2
Mendell LM (2005) The size principle: a rule describing the recruitment of motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 93(6):3024–3026. https://doi.org/10.1152/classicessays.00025.2005
Mitsumoto H, Kasarskis EJ, Simmons Z (2022) Hastening the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000200799
Morisaki Y, Niikura M, Watanabe M, Onishi K, Tanabe S, Moriwaki Y, Okuda T, Ohara S, Murayama S, Takao M, Uchida S, Yamanaka K, Misawa H (2016) Selective expression of osteopontin in ALS-resistant motor neurons is a critical determinant of late phase neurodegeneration mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-9. Sci Rep 6:27354. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27354
Nieto-Gonzalez JL, Moser J, Lauritzen M, Schmitt-John T, Jensen K (2011) Reduced GABAergic inhibition explains cortical hyperexcitability in the wobbler mouse model of ALS. Cereb Cortex 21(3):625–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq134
Nijssen J, Comley LH, Hedlund E (2017) Motor neuron vulnerability and resistance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol 133(6):863–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-017-1708-8
Okamoto K, Hirai S, Amari M, Iizuka T, Watanabe M, Murakami N, Takatama M (1993) Oculomotor nuclear pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol 85(5):458–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230482
Ovsepian SV, Friel DD (2008) The leaner P/Q-type calcium channel mutation renders cerebellar Purkinje neurons hyper-excitable and eliminates Ca2+–Na+ spike bursts. Eur J Neurosci 27(1):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05998.x
Ovsepian SV, Vesselkin NP (2006) Serotonergic modulation of synaptic transmission and action potential firing in frog motoneurons. Brain Res 1102(1):71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.035
Ovsepian SV, Vesselkin NP (2014) Wiring prior to firing: the evolutionary rise of electrical and chemical modes of synaptic transmission. Rev Neurosci 25(6):821–832. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2014-0037
Ovsepian SV, Waxman SG (2023) Gene therapy for chronic pain: emerging opportunities in target-rich peripheral nociceptors. Nat Rev Neurosci 24(4):252–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00673-7
Ovsepian SV, O’Leary VB, Ntziachristos V, Dolly JO (2016) Circumventing brain barriers: nanovehicles for retroaxonal therapeutic delivery. Trends Mol Med 22(11):983–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2016.09.004
Ovsepian SV, O’Leary VB, Ayvazyan NM, Al-Sabi A, Ntziachristos V, Dolly JO (2019) Neurobiology and therapeutic applications of neurotoxins targeting transmitter release. Pharmacol Ther 193:135–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.08.016
Pabian-Jewula S, Rylski M (2023) Does the functional polymorphism-1562C/T of MMP-9 gene influence brain disorders? Front Cell Neurosci 17:1110967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2023.1110967
Paganoni S, Macklin EA, Hendrix S, Berry JD, Elliott MA, Maiser S, Karam C, Caress JB, Owegi MA, Quick A, Wymer J, Goutman SA, Heitzman D, Heiman-Patterson T, Jackson CE, Quinn C, Rothstein JD, Kasarskis EJ, Katz J, Jenkins L, Ladha S, Miller TM, Scelsa SN, Vu TH, Fournier CN, Glass JD, Johnson KM, Swenson A, Goyal NA, Pattee GL, Andres PL, Babu S, Chase M, Dagostino D, Dickson SP, Ellison N, Hall M, Hendrix K, Kittle G, McGovern M, Ostrow J, Pothier L, Randall R, Shefner JM, Sherman AV, Tustison E, Vigneswaran P, Walker J, Yu H, Chan J, Wittes J, Cohen J, Klee J, Leslie K, Tanzi RE, Gilbert W, Yeramian PD, Schoenfeld D, Cudkowicz ME (2020) Trial of Sodium Phenylbutyrate-Taurursodiol for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. N Engl J Med 383(10):919–930. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1916945
Pastor D, Viso-Leon MC, Botella-Lopez A, Jaramillo-Merchan J, Moraleda JM, Jones J, Martinez S (2013) Bone marrow transplantation in hindlimb muscles of motoneuron degenerative mice reduces neuronal death and improves motor function. Stem Cells Dev 22(11):1633–1644. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2012.0487
Perrin S (2014) Preclinical research: make mouse studies work. Nature 507(7493):423–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/507423a
Petri S, Krampfl K, Hashemi F, Grothe C, Hori A, Dengler R, Bufler J (2003) Distribution of GABAA receptor mRNA in the motor cortex of ALS patients. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62(10):1041–1051. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/62.10.1041
Philips T, Rothstein JD (2014) Glial cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp Neurol 262(Pt B):111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.05.015
Picard M, Hepple RT, Burelle Y (2012) Mitochondrial functional specialization in glycolytic and oxidative muscle fibers: tailoring the organelle for optimal function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 302(4):C629-641. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00368.2011
Plato CC, Garruto RM, Galasko D, Craig UK, Plato M, Gamst A, Torres JM, Wiederholt W (2003) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and parkinsonism-dementia complex of Guam: changing incidence rates during the past 60 years. Am J Epidemiol 157(2):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf175
Pullen AH, Tucker D, Martin JE (1997) Morphological and morphometric characterisation of Onuf’s nucleus in the spinal cord in man. J Anat 191(Pt 2):201–213. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19120201.x
Pun S, Santos AF, Saxena S, Xu L, Caroni P (2006) Selective vulnerability and pruning of phasic motoneuron axons in motoneuron disease alleviated by CNTF. Nat Neurosci 9(3):408–419. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1653
Ragagnin AMG, Shadfar S, Vidal M, Jamali MS, Atkin JD (2019) Motor neuron susceptibility in ALS/FTD. Front Neurosci 13:532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00532
Ramos-Campoy O, Avila-Polo R, Grau-Rivera O, Antonell A, Clarimon J, Rojas-Garcia R, Charif S, Santiago-Valera V, Hernandez I, Aguilar M, Almenar C, Lopez-Villegas D, Bajo L, Pastor P, Van der Zee J, Llado A, Sanchez-Valle R, Gelpi E (2018) Systematic screening of ubiquitin/p62 aggregates in cerebellar cortex expands the neuropathological phenotype of the C9orf72 expansion mutation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 77(8):703–709. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nly047
Rando A, Pastor D, Viso-Leon MC, Martinez A, Manzano R, Navarro X, Osta R, Martinez S (2018) Intramuscular transplantation of bone marrow cells prolongs the lifespan of SOD1(G93A) mice and modulates expression of prognosis biomarkers of the disease. Stem Cell Res Ther 9(1):90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0843-z
Reinhard SM, Razak K, Ethell IM (2015) A delicate balance: role of MMP-9 in brain development and pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental disorders. Front Cell Neurosci 9:280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00280
Rothstein JD, Van Kammen M, Levey AI, Martin LJ, Kuncl RW (1995) Selective loss of glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 38(1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410380114
Ruegsegger C, Maharjan N, Goswami A, Filezac de L’Etang A, Weis J, Troost D, Heller M, Gut H, Saxena S (2016) Aberrant association of misfolded SOD1 with Na(+)/K(+)ATPase-alpha3 impairs its activity and contributes to motor neuron vulnerability in ALS. Acta Neuropathol 131(3):427–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1510-4
Russo RE, Hounsgaard J (1999) Dynamics of intrinsic electrophysiological properties in spinal cord neurones. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 72(4):329–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6107(99)00011-5
Saini J, Faroni A, Reid AJ, Mouly V, Butler-Browne G, Lightfoot AP, McPhee JS, Degens H, Al-Shanti N (2021) Cross-talk between motor neurons and myotubes via endogenously secreted neural and muscular growth factors. Physiol Rep 9(8):e14791. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14791
Sasaki M (1991) Membrane properties of external urethral and external anal sphincter motoneurones in the cat. J Physiol 440:345–366. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018712
Sasaki M (1994) Morphological analysis of external urethral and external anal sphincter motoneurones of cat. J Comp Neurol 349(2):269–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903490209
Saxena S, Cabuy E, Caroni P (2009) A role for motoneuron subtype-selective ER stress in disease manifestations of FALS mice. Nat Neurosci 12(5):627–636. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2297
Saxena S, Roselli F, Singh K, Leptien K, Julien JP, Gros-Louis F, Caroni P (2013) Neuroprotection through excitability and mTOR required in ALS motoneurons to delay disease and extend survival. Neuron 80(1):80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.027
Schellino R, Boido M, Vercelli A (2020) The dual nature of Onuf’s nucleus: neuroanatomical features and peculiarities, in health and disease. Front Neuroanat 14:572013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2020.572013
Scott W, Stevens J, Binder-Macleod SA (2001) Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications. Phys Ther 81(11):1810–1816
Seijffers R, Zhang J, Matthews JC, Chen A, Tamrazian E, Babaniyi O, Selig M, Hynynen M, Woolf CJ, Brown RH Jr (2014) ATF3 expression improves motor function in the ALS mouse model by promoting motor neuron survival and retaining muscle innervation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(4):1622–1627. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314826111
Sleigh JN, Rossor AM, Fellows AD, Tosolini AP, Schiavo G (2019) Axonal transport and neurological disease. Nat Rev Neurol 15(12):691–703. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0257-2
Spiller KJ, Khan T, Dominique MA, Restrepo CR, Cotton-Samuel D, Levitan M, Jafar-Nejad P, Zhang B, Soriano A, Rigo F, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM (2019) Reduction of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) protects motor neurons from TDP-43-triggered death in rNLS8 mice. Neurobiol Dis 124:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2018.11.013
Stegenga SL, Kalb RG (2001) Developmental regulation of N-methyl-d-aspartate- and kainate-type glutamate receptor expression in the rat spinal cord. Neuroscience 105(2):499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00143-9
Stifani N (2014) Motor neurons and the generation of spinal motor neuron diversity. Front Cell Neurosci 8:293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00293
Strong MJ, Abrahams S, Goldstein LH, Woolley S, McLaughlin P, Snowden J, Mioshi E, Roberts-South A, Benatar M, HortobaGyi T, Rosenfeld J, Silani V, Ince PG, Turner MR (2017) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): revised diagnostic criteria. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 18(3–4):153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2016.1267768
Su WM, Cheng YF, Jiang Z, Duan QQ, Yang TM, Shang HF, Chen YP (2021) Predictors of survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a large meta-analysis. EBioMedicine 74:103732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103732
Swinnen B, Robberecht W (2014) The phenotypic variability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 10(11):661–670. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.184
Takahashi K (2023) Microglial heterogeneity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 82(2):140–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlac110
Taylor AR, Gifondorwa DJ, Newbern JM, Robinson MB, Strupe JL, Prevette D, Oppenheim RW, Milligan CE (2007) Astrocyte and muscle-derived secreted factors differentially regulate motoneuron survival. J Neurosci 27(3):634–644. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4947-06.2007
Todd TW, Petrucelli L (2022) Modelling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in rodents. Nat Rev Neurosci 23(4):231–251. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00564-x
Tovar YRLB, Ramirez-Jarquin UN, Lazo-Gomez R, Tapia R (2014) Trophic factors as modulators of motor neuron physiology and survival: implications for ALS therapy. Front Cell Neurosci 8:61. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00061
Tsao W, Jeong YH, Lin S, Ling J, Price DL, Chiang PM, Wong PC (2012) Rodent models of TDP-43: recent advances. Brain Res 1462:26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.031
Tsitkanou S, Lindsay A, Della Gatta P (2019) The role of skeletal muscle in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a ‘dying-back’ or ‘dying-forward’ phenomenon? J Physiol 597(23):5527–5528. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP278835
Vafadari B, Salamian A, Kaczmarek L (2016) MMP-9 in translation: from molecule to brain physiology, pathology, and therapy. J Neurochem 139(Suppl 2):91–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13415
Valori CF, Brambilla L, Martorana F, Rossi D (2014) The multifaceted role of glial cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 71(2):287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1429-7
Van Den Bosch L, Van Damme P, Bogaert E, Robberecht W (2006) The role of excitotoxicity in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1762(11–12):1068–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.05.002
Van Hoecke A, Schoonaert L, Lemmens R, Timmers M, Staats KA, Laird AS, Peeters E, Philips T, Goris A, Dubois B, Andersen PM, Al-Chalabi A, Thijs V, Turnley AM, van Vught PW, Veldink JH, Hardiman O, Van Den Bosch L, Gonzalez-Perez P, Van Damme P, Brown RH Jr, van den Berg LH, Robberecht W (2012) EPHA4 is a disease modifier of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in animal models and in humans. Nat Med 18(9):1418–1422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2901
Vance C, Rogelj B, Hortobagyi T, De Vos KJ, Nishimura AL, Sreedharan J, Hu X, Smith B, Ruddy D, Wright P, Ganesalingam J, Williams KL, Tripathi V, Al-Saraj S, Al-Chalabi A, Leigh PN, Blair IP, Nicholson G, de Belleroche J, Gallo JM, Miller CC, Shaw CE (2009) Mutations in FUS, an RNA processing protein, cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 6. Science 323(5918):1208–1211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165942
Vercelli A, Cracco C (1990) Effects of prepubertal castration on the spinal motor nucleus of the ischiocavernosus muscle of the rat. Cell Tissue Res 262(3):551–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305252
Verma M, Lizama BN, Chu CT (2022a) Excitotoxicity, calcium and mitochondria: a triad in synaptic neurodegeneration. Transl Neurodegener 11(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-021-00278-7
Verma S, Khurana S, Vats A, Sahu B, Ganguly NK, Chakraborti P, Gourie-Devi M, Taneja V (2022b) Neuromuscular junction dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mol Neurobiol 59(3):1502–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-021-02658-6
Verslegers M, Lemmens K, Van Hove I, Moons L (2013) Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 as promising benefactors in development, plasticity and repair of the nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 105:60–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.03.004
Wainger BJ, Kiskinis E, Mellin C, Wiskow O, Han SS, Sandoe J, Perez NP, Williams LA, Lee S, Boulting G, Berry JD, Brown RH Jr, Cudkowicz ME, Bean BP, Eggan K, Woolf CJ (2014) Intrinsic membrane hyperexcitability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient-derived motor neurons. Cell Rep 7(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.019
Witzel S, Maier A, Steinbach R, Grosskreutz J, Koch JC, Sarikidi A, Petri S, Gunther R, Wolf J, Hermann A, Prudlo J, Cordts I, Lingor P, Loscher WN, Kohl Z, Hagenacker T, Ruckes C, Koch B, Spittel S, Gunther K, Michels S, Dorst J, Meyer T, Ludolph AC, German Motor Neuron Disease N (2022) Safety and Effectiveness of Long-term Intravenous Administration of Edaravone for Treatment of Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 79(2):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4893
Yamanaka K, Komine O (2018) The multi-dimensional roles of astrocytes in ALS. Neurosci Res 126:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2017.09.011
Yamanaka K, Chun SJ, Boillee S, Fujimori-Tonou N, Yamashita H, Gutmann DH, Takahashi R, Misawa H, Cleveland DW (2008) Astrocytes as determinants of disease progression in inherited amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Neurosci 11(3):251–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2047
Yang T, Wei Q, Li C, Cao B, Ou R, Hou Y, Zhang L, Gu X, Liu K, Lin J, Cheng Y, Jiang Z, Yang J, Kang S, Zhang M, Xiao Y, Zhao B, Chen Y, Chen X, Shang H (2022) Spatial-temporal pattern of propagation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and effect on survival: a cohort study. Eur J Neurol 29(11):3177–3186. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15527
Zanganeh PF, Barton SK, Lim K, Qian EL, Crombie DE, Bye CR, Turner BJ (2022) Alpha-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate receptor and RNA processing gene dysregulation are early determinants of selective motor neuron vulnerability in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Commun 4(2):fcac081. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac081
Zawislak D, Borratynska A, Tomik B, Pera J, Gryz-Kurek E, Szczudlik A (2009) The C(-1562)T polymorphism of the MMP-9 gene and the risk of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurol Neurochir Pol 43(2):121–125
Funding
SVO: Innovation Fund Award 2022 from the University of Greenwich; VBO: Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine Research Program COOPERATIO-207036; Medical Diagnostics and Basic Medical Sciences in ‘Medical Genetics’; SM: Generalitat Valenciana (GVA: Prometeo/2018/041); MINECO/AEI/ERDF, EU, Spanish State Research Agency, and the European Union via the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)—“Una manera de hacer Europa” (SAF2017-83702-R); Instituto de Salud Carlos III (“RD16/001/0010”, co-funded by ERDF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.V.O., V.B.O. and S.M. wrote the manuscript. S.V.O. prepared the figures. All authors reviewed and approved the final submission.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ovsepian, S.V., O’Leary, V.B. & Martinez, S. Selective vulnerability of motor neuron types and functional groups to degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: review of the neurobiological mechanisms and functional correlates. Brain Struct Funct 229, 1–14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-023-02728-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-023-02728-6