Abstract
Background
Data on humoral immune response to standard COVID-19 vaccination are scarce in adolescent patients and lacking for children below 12 years of age with chronic kidney disease including kidney transplant recipients.
Methods
We therefore investigated in this retrospective two-center study (DRKS00024668; registered 23.03.2021) the humoral immune response to a standard two-dose mRNA vaccine regimen in 123 CKD patients aged 5–30 years. A live-virus assay was used to assess the serum neutralizing activity against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant.
Results
Children aged 5–11 years had a comparable rate and degree of immune response to adolescents despite lower vaccine doses (10 µg vs. 30 µg BNT162b2). Treatment with two (odds ratio 9.24) or three or more (odds ratio 17.07) immunosuppressants was an independent risk factor for nonresponse. The immune response differed significantly among three patient cohorts: 48 of 77 (62.3%) kidney transplant recipients, 21 of 26 (80.8%) patients on immunosuppressive therapy, and 19 of 20 (95.0%) patients with chronic kidney disease without immunosuppressive therapy responded. In the kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppressive regimens comprising mycophenolate mofetil, an eGFR of < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and female sex were independent risk factors for nonresponse. Two of 18 (11.1%) and 8 of 16 (50.0%) patients with an anti-S1-RBD IgG of 100–1411 and > 1411 BAU/mL, respectively, showed a neutralization activity against the omicron variant.
Conclusion
A standard mRNA vaccine regimen in immunosuppressed children and adolescents with kidney disease elicits an attenuated humoral immune response with effective live virus neutralization against the omicron variant in approximately 10% of the patients, underlying the need for omicron-adapted vaccination.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Studies in adults have shown the attenuated immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients on immunosuppressive medication including kidney transplant recipients (KTR) [1]. After a standard two-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, both the rate of seroconversion and the magnitude of humoral immune response were lower than in healthy individuals [2]. A third and fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccine is currently recommended in these patients, because it substantially increases the rate of vaccine responders.
In the meantime, vaccination against COVID-19 was also approved for children and adolescents. However, data on vaccine response in adolescent patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on immunosuppressive therapy are scarce and mostly from single-center studies. To date, the available seven studies on adolescents comprise only 146 KTR with variable seropositivity rates between 44 and 86% [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. None of them report data on neutralization activity against the BA.1 variant (omicron). Furthermore, data on vaccine response in immunosuppressed children aged 5–11 years only refer to four KTR [8] and four solid organ transplant recipients [9]. This age group is of particular interest as children younger than 12 receive 10 µg BNT162b2 vs. the 30 µg for older children and adolescents [10].
We therefore hypothesized that (i) the immune response after standard COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 5–11 years is inferior to that in adolescents and young adults, (ii) the immune response to standard COVID-19 vaccination in pediatric KTR and patients with CKD on immunosuppressive medication is attenuated compared to CKD patients without immunosuppressive medication, and (iii) the neutralization activity against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant using a live virus assay is only present in a minority of patients after standard COVID-19 vaccination.
Methods
Study design
This is a two-center retrospective observational cohort study to assess the humoral immune response including live virus neutralization against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant after standard COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in children, adolescents, and young adults with CKD at the University Children’s Hospitals in Heidelberg and Cologne, Germany. Inclusion criteria were the following: (i) CKD with or without immunosuppressive therapy, (ii) age ≥ 5 years, (iii) at least two vaccinations with an approved COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, and (iv) at least one analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies reactive to the receptor-binding domain of the S1 glycoprotein (anti-S1-RBD) after the second vaccination. Vaccinations were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations regarding dose and time schedule (two vaccine doses within a 3-week interval). Study participants with a medical history of SARS-CoV-2 infection or antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein (indicative of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection) before or at the time of sample collection were excluded from the analysis.
Participants were recruited between April 2021 and April 2022. Blood was drawn at a median interval of 34 days (IQR 22.0–63.0) after administration of the second vaccine dose. As recommended, a third vaccine dose was proposed to all patients with failed seropositivity 4 weeks after two doses and in severely immunocompromised patients ≥ 12 years of age 6 months after the standard vaccination [11].
This study was approved by the respective ethics committees of the University of Heidelberg (S-201/2021) and Cologne (22–1242-retro) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients and/or their representative(s) gave informed written consent prior to participation, with consent or assent from patients as appropriate for their age. The study is registered at the German Registry for Clinical Studies (identifier: DRKS00024668). The study was designed, analyzed, and reported according to the STROBE guidelines (https://www.strobe-statement.org).
Patients
Demographic and clinical data were extracted from electronical medical records. Kidney function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) according to the modified Schwartz formula [12]. The intensity of immunosuppressive therapy was assessed by pediatric Vasudev score [13]. The following three patient cohorts were investigated: (i) KTR on immunosuppressive therapy, (ii) patients with CKD on immunosuppressive therapy, and (iii) patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication. CKD is defined according to KDIGO as abnormalities of kidney structure or function present for > 3 months [14].
Binding antibody assay
To analyze the serological response to COVID-19 vaccination, we measured the level of IgG binding the receptor-binding domain of the S1 glycoprotein (anti-S1-RBD). Blood samples were analyzed using the ADVIA Centaur sCOVG assay kit (11,207,377; Siemens) at the Siemens ADVIA Centaur in Heidelberg and the SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay (06S6132; Abbott) at Alinity I (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, United States) in Cologne. The assays were performed, and cut-offs for seropositivity were defined according to the manufacturer’s instructions and as described previously [15, 16]. To convert measured indices to the WHO international standard binding antibody units per milliliter (BAU/mL), a factor of 21.8 (Heidelberg) and 0.142 (Cologne) was used. Thirty-six samples were analyzed with both assays, and the anti-S1-RBD-IgG level (BAU/mL) correlated between the assays (Spearman r = 0.98; 95% CI 0.96–0.99; P < 0.001).
Live virus neutralization assay
In a sub-cohort of patients with an anti-S1-RBD IgG of ≥ 100 BAU/mL and sufficient serum available, the functional neutralizing activity against the omicron (BA.1) variant was tested using a live virus neutralization assay. For the neutralization assay, the virus was isolated from a nasal swab and expanded in a culture of VeroE6 cells by superinfection of VeroE6 from the initial outgrowth culture [17]. Whole genome sequencing of the isolated virus was performed through Illumina sequencing. The virus spike amino acid sequence is identical to the omicron variant BA.1.17.2 (EPI_ISL_13237863). As previously described [18], serum samples were serially diluted (1:10, 1:50, 1:250, 1:1250, 1:6250, and 1:31,250) and mixed with 100 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose) of live virus. The virus-serum mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Thereafter, 50 μL of a Vero E6 cell suspension (250,000 cells/mL) was added to each sample dilution. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 4 days before microscopically determining virus-related cytopathic effects (CPE) such as cell rounding, detachment, degeneration, and syncytium formation. Wells with a clear cytopathic effect of more than 10% of that of the virus control well (cells plus virus) were determined as positive (no detectable neutralizing activity). Wells with no CPE were classified as negative (detectable neutralizing activity).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism Version 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Continuous variables are given as median and interquartile range (IQR). Binary or categorical variables are given as absolute (n) and relative frequencies (%). Differences in continuous variables between more than two groups were compared by Kruskal–Wallis test and between two groups including specific sample pairs for stochastic dominance by Mann–Whitney U test with Holm–Bonferroni correction. Differences in binary or categorical variables were assessed by chi-squared tests. To investigate the predictive value of risk factors for lacking seroconversion, a multiple binary logistic regression analysis, with the predictors age category (5.0–11.9, 12.0–17.9, and ≥ 18 years), eGFR (≤ or > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), sex (male or female), and number of immunosuppressive agents (0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3) for the whole study cohort (model 1) and immunosuppressive regimen (calcineurin inhibitor [CNI] with [i] mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], [ii] azathioprine, [iii] everolimus, or [iv] CNI or everolimus with a steroid) for the subgroup analysis of KTR (model 2), was performed. No imputation was performed. The correlation of anti-S1-RBD IgG level to live virus neutralization titer was calculated with Spearman’s rho. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to define a cut-off anti-S1-RBD IgG level to predict any neutralization (ID50 ≥ 1:10) with at least 80% sensitivity and highest specificity possible. No a priori formulated hypotheses were tested; therefore, all P values and confidence intervals (CI) are reported as descriptive measures.
Results
Patient characteristics
We included 123 patients (45 females, 36.6%) from two tertiary pediatric nephrology centers (Fig. 1). The median age was 14.1 years (range 5–30). Forty-three of the 123 patients (35.0%) were in the age category of 5–11 years with a median age of 8.5 years (IQR 7–10). All of them received the Biontech/Pfizer vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty™) containing a dosage of 10 µg according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The group of patients aged 12–17 years comprised 47 patients (38.2%) with a median age of 15.0 years (IQR 13–16); all received BNT162b2 (30 µg per injection). We included a group of 33 young adults with a median age of 20.4 years (IQR 19–23) treated in our pediatric centers; 30 received BNT162b2 (30 µg per injection), two patients received the Moderna vaccine elasomeran (Spikevax™, 100 µg per injection), and one patient received Biontech/Pfizer for their first dose and Moderna for the second dose. None of the patients had a serious adverse event (death, life-threatening hospitalization [initial or prolonged], disability or permanent damage, or required intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage) as defined by the FDA [19].
Three patient cohorts were investigated: KTR (n = 77), patients with CKD on immunosuppressive medication due to other indications (n = 26), and, for comparison, patients with CKD without immunosuppressive therapy (n = 20). Details on patient characteristics including age, sex, eGFR, and immunosuppressive medication are given in Table 1.
Humoral immune response against standard COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and risk factors for non-response
A positive SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1-RBD antibody response after a standard two-dose mRNA vaccine regimen was detected in 88 patients (71.5%) (Fig. 1). The time interval between the second vaccination and blood sampling was not different between responders and nonresponders (34.5 [IQR 22.0–65.5] days vs. 31.0 [IQR 20.5–42.5] days, P = 0.473). The humoral immune response differed significantly (P = 0.008) among the three patient cohorts: 48 of 77 (62.3%) KTR, 21 of 26 (80.8%) patients with CKD on immunosuppressive medication, and 19 of 20 (95%) patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication responded (Table 1). The only nonresponder in the CKD cohort was a patient on hemodialysis with multiple co-morbidities (microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type 1). The anti-S1-RBD IgG level was ninefold lower (P < 0.001) in KTR (117 [IQR 0–769] BAU/mL) as compared to the patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication (1046 [IQR 470–2735] BAU/mL) (Fig. 2a).
We included the following four factors with a potential impact on anti-SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in the multiple binary logistic regression analysis: age category, sex, eGFR, and number of immunosuppressive agents (Table 2). Children aged 5–11 years receiving a vaccine dose of 10 µg BNT162b2 had a comparable rate and degree of immune response as adolescents and young adults receiving a vaccine dose of 30 µg BNT162b2. Compared to the patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication (no immunosuppressive therapy), treatment with two (OR 9.24; 95% CI 1.61–175.7) or three or more immunosuppressive agents (OR 17.07; 95% CI 2.91–328.0) was an independent risk factor for nonresponse, and the magnitude of humoral immune response was impaired in these patients (Fig. 2b).
Subgroup analysis on kidney transplant recipients
An analysis of the subgroup of 77 KTR confirmed that seroconversion (Table 3) and relative anti-S1-RBD IgG levels (Fig. 3a) were not significantly different among age categories. Transplantation-related factors (donor source and time since transplantation) or primary kidney diseases were not associated with significantly different seroconversion rates (Table 3).
In the multiple binary logistic regression analysis (Table 4), which included the potential risk factors age category, sex, eGFR, and immunosuppressive regimen, female sex was associated with a 3.11-fold (95% CI 1.05–10.0, P = 0.046) higher risk for lacking humoral immune response. An eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 increased the risk of humoral nonresponse by a factor of 3.44 (95% CI 1.16–11.4, P = 0.032). The different immunosuppressive regimens were also identified as independent risk factors (P = 0.041) for lacking a vaccine response: patients on a CNI-based immunosuppressive regimen in conjunction with MMF (with or without steroids) had a higher risk than patients on a CNI-regimen in conjunction with everolimus (with or without steroids) (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.02–0.72, P = 0.029) or azathioprine (with or without steroids) (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01–0.62, P = 0.037). The magnitude of humoral immune response was numerically lower in females compared to males (22.8 [IQR 0–236.9] BAU/mL vs. 186.4 [IQR 0–1411] BAU/mL, P = 0.091) (Fig. 3b) and significantly lower in patients on a CNI-based immunosuppressive regimen in conjunction with MMF compared to patients on a CNI-based immunosuppressive regimen in conjunction with azathioprine (14.6 [IQR 0–470.6] BAU/mL vs. 1081.4 [IQR 149.7–3990] BAU/mL, P = 0.045) (Fig. 3d).
Impact of a third vaccination on humoral immune response in kidney transplant recipients
Of the 35 humoral nonresponders after the second vaccination, 29 were KTR, of whom 15 received a third vaccination (Fig. 1). After the third vaccination, eight of 15 (53.3%) previous nonresponders (seronegative KTR) mounted antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, but the magnitude of humoral immune response was lower than in those with a response after two vaccinations (anti-S1-RBD IgG 120.1 [IQR, 50.8–340.6] BAU/mL vs. 506.2 [IQR 144.7–1583] BAU/mL, P = 0.036) (Supplementary Fig. 1). The seven patients without a humoral immune response after three vaccinations either received an immunosuppressive regimen containing MMF or had an inherited T-cell deficiency (Supplementary Table 1).
We also evaluated the impact of a third vaccine dose on participants with a positive humoral response after the second vaccine dose. Of 56 humoral responders ≥ 12 years of age, 30 (53.6%) received a third vaccination, of whom 25 (83.3%) were KTR (median age 16.8 [IQR 15–18] years). Twenty-three of 25 (92.0%) KTR mounted a higher immune response after the third compared to the second vaccine dose with a median 3.4-fold (IQR 1.7–6.1) increase (anti-S1-RBD IgG 2617 [IQR 621.2–4629] BAU/mL vs. 586.6 [IQR 180.9–1573] BAU/mL, P < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant
In 34 patients with a BAU of ≥ 100/mL and available serum samples, we determined the serum neutralizing activity against the SARS-COV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant using a live virus neutralization assay (Fig. 1). Ten of the 34 patients (29.4%) showed a neutralizing activity against the omicron variant. Any live virus neutralization was detected in 4 of 18 (22.2%) KTR, 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients with CKD on immunosuppressive therapy, and 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication (Fig. 4a). The majority (60.0%) of patients with neutralizing activity showed neutralization at the lowest dilution of 1:10. Neutralizing activity at a higher dilution (1:250) was identified in only one patient who also had the highest anti-S1-RBD IgG of 10,077 BAU/mL. There was a significant positive correlation between the anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG titer and the corresponding neutralizing activity (R = 0.714, P < 0.001).
A ROC curve analysis of relative anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-RBD IgG levels for discrimination of neutralizing serum samples (ID50 ≥ 1:10) was performed to define a relative anti-S1-RBD IgG level that has at least 80% sensitivity and highest possible specificity to predict the neutralization of the omicron variant (ROC-AUC 0.74; 95% CI 0.54–0.95, P = 0.028) (Supplementary Fig. 3). The optimal cut-off was 1411 BAU/mL (sensitivity 80%, specificity 66.7%). Fifty percent of the patients above and only 11% of the patients below this cut-off had any neutralization activity; relative neutralization titers differed significantly (P = 0.012) between the two groups (Fig. 4b).
As live virus neutralization was only determined in patients with a BAU of ≥ 100/mL, we extrapolated the finding from the ROC curve analysis to the entire patient cohort (n = 123) (Table 1). We assumed that an anti-S1-RBD-IgG level > 1411/mL (entire cohort [n = 32], KTR [n = 16], CKD with [n = 7] and without [n = 9] immunosuppressive medication) is associated with neutralization activity in 50% of the patients. Hence, approximately 13.0% of the entire patient cohort and 10.4% of KTR, 13.5% of the patients with CKD on immunosuppressive medication, and 22.5% of the patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication can be estimated to have a serum neutralizing activity against the omicron variant after a standard two-dose mRNA vaccine regimen.
Discussion
The main result of this study is that a standard COVID-19 mRNA vaccine regimen in immunosuppressed pediatric KTR and CKD patients elicits an attenuated humoral immune response, which confirms our hypothesis: only 62.3% of KTR and 80.8% of the CKD patients on immunosuppressive therapy did respond compared to 95% of the patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication. Also, the magnitude of humoral immune response in KTR was ninefold lower than in the patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication; treatment with two or three or more immunosuppressants was an independent risk factor for nonresponse. The seropositivity rate of 62.3% in KTR is comparable to the pooled data on seropositivity rate of 57.5% from seven published studies (n = 146 KTR) on adolescents and young adults [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. It is higher than the pooled seropositivity rate of 45% in older adult solid organ transplant recipients (mean age > 50 years) [1]. Hence, young age appears to be associated with better humoral immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.
So far, there is only one study that published data on 4 KTR [8] and one study on 4 solid organ transplant recipients under the age of 12 years [9]. The current study is the first study that describes the humoral immune response to a standard two-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccine regimen in children with a functioning kidney transplant in comparison with CKD with and without immunosuppressive therapy below the age of 12 years. In contrast to our hypothesis, we observed that these patients have a comparable rate and degree of immune response as the adolescents and young adults. The younger children received a vaccine dose (10 µg BNT162b2) threefold lower than that administered to the adolescents and adults (30 µg BNT162b2). However, whether this also applies for omicron-adapted booster vaccinations cannot be easily extrapolated and should be evaluated.
Risk factors for nonresponse to a standard two-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccine regimen were the number of immunosuppressive agents and, in KTR, an immunosuppressive regimen containing MMF. The latter observation is consistent with the data obtained in adolescent [4, 7] and adult [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] KTR. It is currently being investigated in adults whether the transient halt of MMF therapy increases the rate of vaccine responders without an undue risk of kidney allograft rejection [28, 29]. However, severe COVID-19 in pediatric patients on immunosuppressive therapy is rare [30,31,32]. This is especially true for the currently predominant omicron variants that are associated with less severe disease than the previous variants [33]. Whether MMF withdrawal might also play a role in pediatric populations depends on the further evolution of the pandemic.
Interestingly, in our study, female sex was associated with increased risk of humoral nonresponse (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.02–9.48). This observation is consistent with the finding of a recent meta-analysis [1] on adults that females have a slightly increased risk of nonresponse to a standard two-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccine regimen. The precise biological mechanism of this sex difference remains to be elucidated.
The correlate of protection after COVID-19 vaccination is currently being debated [34, 35]. Commercially available serological assays to determine seropositivity and relative anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels are used in clinical practice to determine seroconversion and humoral immune response to guide the decision on which patients at risk should receive additional vaccinations beyond the standard vaccine regimen. These assays were designed to detect antibodies directed against the SARS-CoV-2 wild-type strain; the currently used cut-off values for seropositivity do not reflect the actual protection against variants of concern. We therefore analyzed serum live virus neutralization against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant in a subset of patients. We observed that only a small subset of children and adolescents with CKD showed any live virus neutralization against omicron. An anti-S1-RBD-IgG of > 1411/mL was associated with at least 50% probability of any neutralization activity. When extrapolating these data to the entire patient cohort, approximately 10% of KTR, 13% of the patients with CKD on immunosuppressive medication, and 23% of the patients with CKD without immunosuppressive medication can be estimated to have a serum neutralization activity against the omicron variant after a standard two-dose mRNA vaccine regimen. This is the first study that reports data on live virus neutralization in children after kidney transplantation or on immunosuppressive therapy due to other chronic kidney diseases. The data are consistent with observations on adult KTR that the majority of humoral immune responders insufficiently neutralize variants of concern and especially omicron even after a third COVID-19 vaccination [36, 37]. Therefore, an omicron-adapted vaccination regimen is urgently needed. An adapted BA.4/5 spike protein bivalent booster vaccine was authorized by the FDA [38] and EMA [39] in August and September 2022 for adults and children older than 12 years, and children aged 5–11 years were included by the FDA in October [40].
In our study, approximately 50% of previous nonresponders showed a humoral immune response to a third vaccination. The magnitude of humoral immune response was lower than in those with a response after two vaccinations. A recent meta-analysis on adult solid organ transplant recipients reported a pooled seroconversion rate of 63% after the third vaccine dose compared to the 45% after the second dose [1]. Strategies to optimize vaccine response in nonresponders are currently being evaluated on adults. They may comprise the combination of different vaccine types to a heterologous vaccination regimen, for example, vector vaccine priming followed by mRNA vaccine boosting [41,42,43]. However, non-mRNA vaccines are also based on SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and not recommended and approved for children.
Our study has limitations. Although live virus neutralization assays are considered the current gold standard to determine actual neutralization titers and test results correlate well with protection from SARS-CoV-2 infections [44], absolute cut-off values for protection from symptomatic infection or severe disease especially for new emerging variants have not been established for most assays including ours. We cannot exclude the possibility of asymptomatic infections for those infected during the vaccination schedule and especially for those with failed seroconversion or seroreversion of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. Given such high rates of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection we are now seeing, it will be interesting to study in the future the vaccine response in those with prior infection. Another limitation is missing data on cellular immunity. Some studies on KTR observed T-cell responses to be developing in greater frequency than humoral responses [41, 45, 46]. However, T-cell assays are less standardized among different laboratories and more resource-intensive, and the clinical interpretation is difficult. Recent studies on healthy subjects [47] and patients on immunosuppressive medication [48, 49] including kidney [23, 50] and liver [51] transplant recipients have shown a strong correlation between anti-S1-RBD antibodies and SARS-CoV-2-specific IFN-γ and functional T-cell responses. Thus, it appears feasible to use anti-S1-RBD IgG data as a surrogate parameter for assessment of immunity after COVID-19 vaccination.
In conclusion, a standard mRNA vaccine regimen in pediatric KTR and children and adolescents with CKD on immunosuppressive therapy elicits an attenuated humoral immune response. Children aged 5–11 years receiving a lower vaccine dose have a comparable rate and degree of immune response as adolescents. Risk factors for nonresponse comprise the number of immunosuppressive agents and, in KTR, a regimen containing MMF, an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and female sex. Live virus neutralization against the omicron variant is achieved in approximately 10% of pediatric CKD patients with immunosuppression. This underlines the need for omicron-adapted bivalent booster vaccination for adults and children ≥ 5 years of age, as currently recommended by the CDC [52].
Data availability
De-identified data will be made available upon publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the goals of the approved proposal. Proposals should be submitted to sandra.habbig@uk-koeln.de.
References
Manothummetha K, Chuleerarux N, Sanguankeo A, Kates OS, Hirankarn N, Thongkam A, Dioverti-Prono MV, Torvorapanit P, Langsiri N, Worasilchai N, Moonla C, Plongla R, Garneau WM, Chindamporn A, Nissaisorakarn P, Thaniyavarn T, Nematollahi S, Permpalung N (2022) Immunogenicity and risk factors associated with poor humoral immune response of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in recipients of solid organ transplant: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 5:e226822
Benning L, Morath C, Bartenschlager M, Nusshag C, Kalble F, Buylaert M, Schaier M, Beimler J, Klein K, Grenz J, Reichel P, Hidmark A, Ponath G, Tollner M, Reineke M, Rieger S, Tonshoff B, Schnitzler P, Zeier M, Susal C, Bartenschlager R, Speer C (2022) Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in kidney transplant recipients after standard COVID-19 vaccination. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 17:98–106
Haskin O, Ashkenazi-Hoffnung L, Ziv N, Borovitz Y, Dagan A, Levi S, Koren G, Hamdani G, Levi-Erez D, Landau D, Alfandary H (2021) Serological response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in adolescent and young adult kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 105:e226–e233
Crane C, Phebus E, Ingulli E (2022) Immunologic response of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in adolescent kidney transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 37:449–453
Qin CX, Auerbach SR, Charnaya O, Danziger-Isakov LA, Ebel NH, Feldman AG, Hsu EK, McAteer J, Mohammad S, Perito ER, Thomas AM, Chiang TPY, Garonzik-Wang JM, Segev DL, Mogul DB (2022) Antibody response to 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 22:669–672
Ma AL, Leung D, Chan EY, Chim S, Cheng S, Ho FT, Lai WM, Tong PC, Lee MH, Wong WH, Chan SM, Rosa Duque J, Peiris JSM, Lau YL (2022) Antibody responses to 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pediatric patients with kidney diseases. Kidney Int 101:1069–1072
Cirillo L, Citera F, Mazzierli T, Becherucci F, Terlizzi V, Lodi L, Buti E, Romagnani P (2022) Response to third dose of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in adolescent and young adult kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 106:e386–e387
Crane C, Phebus E, Ingulli E (2022) Antibody response to 2- and 3-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05661-8
Bratic JS, Gans HA, Chen SF, Banaei N, Johnston EM, Sear K, Samreth S, Nadimpalli SS (2022) Pediatric solid organ transplant recipients demonstrate robust cell-mediated and humoral responses to three doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Am J Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17195
Stevens KI, Frangou E, Shin JIl, Anders H-J, Bruchfeld A, Schönermarck U, Hauser T, Westman K, Fernandez-Juarez GM, Floege J, Goumenos D, Turkmen K, van Kooten C, McAdoo SP, Tesar V, Segelmark M, Geetha D, Jayne DRW, Kronbichler A; Immunonephrology Working Group (IWG) of the European Renal Association (ERA) and the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS) (2022) Perspective on COVID-19 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases: consensus statements from the ERA-IWG and EUVAS. Nephrol Dial Transplant 37:1400–1410
Robert Koch-Institut (2022) Epidemiologisches Bulletin 01/2022. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2022/01/Art_01.html. Accessed 22 October 2022
Schwartz GJ, Munoz A, Schneider MF, Mak RH, Kaskel F, Warady BA, Furth SL (2009) New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:629–637
Hocker B, Schneble L, Murer L, Carraro A, Pape L, Kranz B, Oh J, Zirngibl M, Dello Strologo L, Buscher A, Weber LT, Awan A, Pohl M, Bald M, Printza N, Rusai K, Peruzzi L, Topaloglu R, Fichtner A, Krupka K, Koster L, Bruckner T, Schnitzler P, Hirsch HH, Tonshoff B (2019) Epidemiology of and risk factors for BK polyomavirus replication and nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients: an international CERTAIN registry study. Transplantation 103:1224–1233
Stevens PE, Levin A (2013) Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 158:825–830
Stich M, Elling R, Renk H, Janda A, Garbade SF, Müller B, Kräusslich H-G, Fabricius D, Zernickel M, Meissner P, Huzly D, Grulich-Henn J, Haddad A, Görne T, Spielberger B, Fritsch L, Nieters A, Hengel H, Dietz AN, Stamminger T, Ganzenmueller T, Ruetalo N, Peter A, Remppis J, Iftner T, Jeltsch K, Waterboer T, Franz AR, Hoffmann GF, Engel C, Debatin K-M, Tönshoff B, Henneke P (2021) Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in households with children, Southwest Germany, May-August 2020. Emerg Infect Dis 27:3009–3019
Affeldt P, Koehler FC, Brensing KA, Adam V, Burian J, Butt L, Gies M, Grundmann F, Hinrichs S, Johannis W, Kalisch N, Meyer-Delpho M, Oehm S, Platen E, Schöler C, Heger E, Steger G, Stippel D, Ziegelhöfer A, Benzing T, Klein F, Kurschat C, Müller R-U, Cristanziano VD (2022) Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients. Microorganisms 10:4
Vanshylla K, Di Cristanziano V, Kleipass F, Dewald F, Schommers P, Gieselmann L, Gruell H, Schlotz M, Ercanoglu MS, Stumpf R, Mayer P, Zehner M, Heger E, Johannis W, Horn C, Suarez I, Jung N, Salomon S, Eberhardt KA, Gathof B, Fatkenheuer G, Pfeifer N, Eggeling R, Augustin M, Lehmann C, Klein F (2021) Kinetics and correlates of the neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. Cell Host Microbe 29:917-929.e4
Eberhardt KA, Dewald F, Heger E, Gieselmann L, Vanshylla K, Wirtz M, Kleipass F, Johannis W, Schommers P, Gruell H, Brensing KA, Muller RU, Augustin M, Lehmann C, Koch M, Klein F, Di Cristanziano V (2021) Evaluation of a new spike (S)-protein-based commercial immunoassay for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Microorganisms 9:733
Food and Drug Administration (2016) What is a serious adverse event? https://www.fda.gov/safety/reporting-serious-problems-fda/what-serious-adverse-event. Accessed 27 October 2022
Kantauskaite M, Muller L, Kolb T, Fischer S, Hillebrandt J, Ivens K, Andree M, Luedde T, Orth HM, Adams O, Schaal H, Schmidt C, Konigshausen E, Rump LC, Timm J, Stegbauer J (2022) Intensity of mycophenolate mofetil treatment is associated with an impaired immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 22:634–639
Rozen-Zvi B, Yahav D, Agur T, Zingerman B, Ben-Zvi H, Atamna A, Tau N, Mashraki T, Nesher E, Rahamimov R (2021) Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine among kidney transplant recipients: a prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 27:1173.e1-1173.e4
Sanders JF, Bemelman FJ, Messchendorp AL, Baan CC, van Baarle D, van Binnendijk R, Diavatopoulos DA, Frolke SC, Geers D, GeurtsvanKessel CH, den Hartog G, van der Heiden M, Imhof C, Kho MML, Koopmans MPG, Malahe SRK, Mattheussens WB, van der Molen R, van Mourik D, Remmerswaal EBM, Rots N, Vart P, de Vries RD, Gansevoort RT, Hilbrands LB, Reinders MEJ, RECOVAC Collaborators (2022) The RECOVAC immune-response study: the immunogenicity, tolerability, and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease, on dialysis, or living with a kidney transplant. Transplantation 106:821–834
Stumpf J, Siepmann T, Lindner T, Karger C, Schwobel J, Anders L, Faulhaber-Walter R, Schewe J, Martin H, Schirutschke H, Barnett K, Huther J, Muller P, Langer T, Pluntke T, Anding-Rost K, Meistring F, Stehr T, Pietzonka A, Escher K, Cerny S, Rothe H, Pistrosch F, Seidel H, Paliege A, Beige J, Bast I, Steglich A, Gembardt F, Kessel F, Kroger H, Arndt P, Sradnick J, Frank K, Klimova A, Mauer R, Grahlert X, Anft M, Blazquez-Navarro A, Westhoff TH, Stervbo U, Tonn T, Babel N, Hugo C (2021) Humoral and cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in renal transplant versus dialysis patients: a prospective, multicenter observational study using mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Lancet Reg Health Eur 9:100178
Hod T, Ben-David A, Olmer L, Levy I, Ghinea R, Mor E, Lustig Y, Rahav G (2021) Humoral response of renal transplant recipients to the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine using both RBD IgG and neutralizing antibodies. Transplantation 105:e234–e243
Grupper A, Rabinowich L, Schwartz D, Schwartz IF, Ben-Yehoyada M, Shashar M, Katchman E, Halperin T, Turner D, Goykhman Y, Shibolet O, Levy S, Houri I, Baruch R, Katchman H (2021) Reduced humoral response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients without prior exposure to the virus. Am J Transplant 21:2719–2726
Ducloux D, Colladant M, Chabannes M, Bamoulid J, Courivaud C (2021) Factors associated with humoral response after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in kidney transplant patients. Clin Kidney J 14:2270–2272
Debska-Slizien A, Slizien Z, Muchlado M, Kubanek A, Piotrowska M, Dabrowska M, Tarasewicz A, Chamienia A, Biedunkiewicz B, Renke M, Tylicki L (2021) Predictors of humoral response to mRNA COVID19 vaccines in kidney transplant recipients: a longitudinal study-the COViNEPH project. Vaccines (Basel) 9:1165
Regele F, Heinzel A, Hu K, Raab L, Eskandary F, Fae I, Zelzer S, Bohmig GA, Bond G, Fischer G, Oberbauer R, Reindl-Schwaighofer R (2022) Stopping of mycophenolic acid in kidney transplant recipients for 2 weeks peri-vaccination does not increase response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-a non-randomized, controlled pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne) 9:914424
Schrezenmeier E, Rincon-Arevalo H, Jens A, Stefanski AL, Hammett C, Osmanodja B, Koch N, Zukunft B, Beck J, Oellerich M, Pross V, Stahl C, Choi M, Bachmann F, Liefeldt L, Glander P, Schutz E, Bornemann-Kolatzki K, Lopez Del Moral C, Schrezenmeier H, Ludwig C, Jahrsdorfer B, Eckardt KU, Lachmann N, Kotsch K, Dorner T, Halleck F, Sattler A, Budde K (2022) Temporary antimetabolite treatment hold boosts SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-specific humoral and cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients. JCI Insight 7:e157836
Marlais M, Wlodkowski T, Al-Akash S, Ananin P, Bandi VK, Baudouin V, Boyer O, Vasquez L, Govindan S, Hooman N, Ijaz I, Loza R, Melgosa M, Pande N, Pape L, Saha A, Samsonov D, Schreuder MF, Sharma J, Siddiqui S, Sinha R, Stewart H, Tasic V, Tonshoff B, Twombley K, Upadhyay K, Vivarelli M, Weaver DJ, Woroniecki R, Schaefer F, Tullus K (2020) COVID-19 in children treated with immunosuppressive medication for kidney diseases. Arch Dis Child 106:798–801
Sinha R, Marlais M, Sarkar S, Obukhova V, Lucchetti L, Vasudevan A, Chacon Jaimes DC, Weaver DJ Jr, Stanczyk M, Lopez-Gonzalez M, Schaefer F, Tullus K (2022) Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on use of rituximab among children with difficult nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Res 92:3–5
Angeletti A, Trivelli A, Magnasco A, Drovandi S, Sanguineri F, Santaniello M, Ferrando G, Forno R, Cipresso G, Tripodi G, Riella LV, Cravedi P, Ghiggeri GM (2020) Risk of COVID-19 in young kidney transplant recipients. Results from a single-center observational study. Clin Transplant 34:e13889
Butt AA, Dargham SR, Loka S, Shaik RM, Chemaitelly H, Tang P, Hasan MR, Coyle PV, Yassine HM, Al-Khatib HA, Smatti MK, Kaleeckal AH, Latif AN, Zaqout A, Almaslamani MA, Al Khal A, Bertollini R, Abou-Samra AB, Abu-Raddad LJ (2022) Coronavirus disease 2019 disease severity in children infected with the omicron variant. Clin Infect Dis 75:e361–e367
Fowlkes AL, Yoon SK, Lutrick K, Gwynn L, Burns J, Grant L, Phillips AL, Ellingson K, Ferraris MV, LeClair LB, Mathenge C, Yoo YM, Thiese MS, Gerald LB, Solle NS, Jeddy Z, Odame-Bamfo L, Mak J, Hegmann KT, Gerald JK, Ochoa JS, Berry M, Rose S, Lamberte JM, Madhivanan P, Pubillones FA, Rai RP, Dunnigan K, Jones JT, Krupp K, Edwards LJ, Bedrick EJ, Sokol BE, Lowe A, McLeland-Wieser H, Jovel KS, Fleary DE, Khan SM, Poe B, Hollister J, Lopez J, Rivers P, Beitel S, Tyner HL, Naleway AL, Olsho LEW, Caban-Martinez AJ, Burgess JL, Thompson MG, Gaglani M (2022) Effectiveness of 2-dose BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) mRNA vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among children aged 5–11 years and adolescents aged 12–15 Years - PROTECT cohort, July 2021-February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 71:422–428
Andrews N, Stowe J, Kirsebom F, Toffa S, Rickeard T, Gallagher E, Gower C, Kall M, Groves N, O’Connell AM, Simons D, Blomquist PB, Zaidi A, Nash S, IwaniBinti Abdul Aziz N, Thelwall S, Dabrera G, Myers R, Amirthalingam G, Gharbia S, Barrett JC, Elson R, Ladhani SN, Ferguson N, Zambon M, Campbell CNJ, Brown K, Hopkins S, Chand M, Ramsay M, Lopez Bernal J (2022) Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant. N Engl J Med 386:1532–1546
Benning L, Morath C, Bartenschlager M, Kim H, Reineke M, Beimler J, Buylaert M, Nusshag C, Kalble F, Reichel P, Tollner M, Schaier M, Klein K, Benes V, Rausch T, Rieger S, Stich M, Tonshoff B, Weidner N, Schnitzler P, Zeier M, Susal C, Hien Tran T, Bartenschlager R, Speer C (2022) Neutralizing antibody response against the B.1.617.2 (delta) and the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variants after a third mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 22:1873–1883
Kumar D, Hu Q, Samson R, Ferreira VH, Hall VG, Ierullo M, Majchrzak-Kita B, Hardy W, Gingras AC, Humar A (2022) Neutralization against omicron variant in transplant recipients after three doses of mRNA vaccine. Am J Transplant 22:2089–2093
Food and Drug Administration (2022) Coronavirus (COVID-19) update: FDA authorizes Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech Bivalent COVID-19 vaccines for use as a booster dose. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-moderna-pfizer-biontech-bivalent-covid-19-vaccines-use. Accessed 31 August 2022
European Medicines Agency (2022) Adapted vaccine targeting BA.4 and BA.5 omicron variants and original SARS-CoV-2 recommended for approval. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/adapted-vaccine-targeting-ba4-ba5-omicron-variants-original-sars-cov-2-recommended-approval. Accessed 12 September 2022
Food and Drug Administration (2022) Coronavirus (COVID-19) update: FDA authorizes Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech Bivalent COVID-19 Vaccines for use as a booster dose in younger age groups. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-moderna-and-pfizer-biontech-bivalent-covid-19-vaccines. Accessed 12 October 2022
Schmidt T, Klemis V, Schub D, Schneitler S, Reichert MC, Wilkens H, Sester U, Sester M, Mihm J (2021) Cellular immunity predominates over humoral immunity after homologous and heterologous mRNA and vector-based COVID-19 vaccine regimens in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 21:3990–4002
Masset C, Ville S, Garandeau C, Le Borgne F, Letellier T, Cantarovich D, Meurette A, Guillot-Gueguen C, Bentoumi-Loaec M, Giral M, Dantal J, Blancho G (2022) Observations on improving COVID-19 vaccination responses in kidney transplant recipients: heterologous vaccination and immunosuppression modulation. Kidney Int 101:642–645
Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Heinzel A, Mayrdorfer M, Jabbour R, Hofbauer TM, Merrelaar A, Eder M, Regele F, Doberer K, Spechtl P, Aschauer C, Koblischke M, Paschen C, Eskandary F, Hu K, Ohler B, Bhandal A, Kleibenbock S, Jagoditsch RI, Reiskopf B, Heger F, Bond G, Bohmig GA, Strassl R, Weseslindtner L, Indra A, Aberle JH, Binder M, Oberbauer R (2022) Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response 4 weeks After homologous vs heterologous third vaccine dose in kidney transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 182:165–171
Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, Schlub TE, Wheatley AK, Juno JA, Subbarao K, Kent SJ, Triccas JA, Davenport MP (2021) Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med 27:1205–1211
Hall VG, Ferreira VH, Ierullo M, Ku T, Marinelli T, Majchrzak-Kita B, Yousuf A, Kulasingam V, Humar A, Kumar D (2021) Humoral and cellular immune response and safety of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 21:3980–3989
Bertrand D, Hamzaoui M, Lemee V, Lamulle J, Hanoy M, Laurent C, Lebourg L, Etienne I, Lemoine M, Le Roy F, Nezam D, Plantier JC, Boyer O, Guerrot D, Candon S (2021) Antibody and T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 32:2147–2152
Agrati C, Castilletti C, Goletti D, Meschi S, Sacchi A, Matusali G, Bordoni V, Petrone L, Lapa D, Notari S, Vanini V, Colavita F, Aiello A, Agresta A, Farroni C, Grassi G, Leone S, Vaia F, Capobianchi MR, Ippolito G, Puro V, On Behalf Of The Inmi Covid-Vaccine Study G (2021) Coordinate induction of humoral and spike specific T-cell response in a cohort of Italian health care workers receiving BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Microorganisms 9:1315
Picchianti-Diamanti A, Aiello A, Lagana B, Agrati C, Castilletti C, Meschi S, Farroni C, Lapa D, Najafi Fard S, Cuzzi G, Cimini E, Grassi G, Vanini V, Di Rosa R, Salemi S, Nalli G, Salmi A, Repele F, Altera AMG, Maffongelli G, Palazzolo C, Vita S, Leone S, Puro V, Capobianchi MR, Ippolito G, Nicastri E, Goletti D (2021) immunosuppressivetherapies differently modulate humoral- and T-cell-specific responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Front Immunol 12:740249
Tortorella C, Aiello A, Gasperini C, Agrati C, Castilletti C, Ruggieri S, Meschi S, Matusali G, Colavita F, Farroni C, Cuzzi G, Cimini E, Tartaglia E, Vanini V, Prosperini L, Haggiag S, Galgani S, Quartuccio ME, Salmi A, Repele F, Altera AMG, Cristofanelli F, D’Abramo A, Bevilacqua N, Corpolongo A, Puro V, Vaia F, Capobianchi MR, Ippolito G, Nicastri E, Goletti D, INMI COVID-19 Vaccine Study Group (2022) Humoral- and T-cell-specific immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients With MS using different disease-modifying therapies. Neurology 98:e541–e554
Yanis A, Haddadin Z, Spieker AJ, Waqfi D, Rankin DA, Talj R, Thomas L, Birdwell KA, Ezzell L, Blair M, Eason J, Varjabedian R, Warren CM, Nochowicz CH, Olson EC, Simmons JD, Yoder S, Guy M, Thomsen I, Chappell JD, Kalams SA, Halasa NB (2022) Humoral and cellular immune responses to the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine among a cohort of solid organ transplant recipients and healthy controls. Transpl Infect Dis 24:e13772
D’Offizi G, Agrati C, Visco-Comandini U, Castilletti C, Puro V, Piccolo P, Montalbano M, Meschi S, Tartaglia E, Sorace C, Leone S, Lapa D, Grassi G, Goletti D, Ippolito G, Vaia F, Ettorre GM, Lionetti R (2022) Coordinated cellular and humoral immune responses after two-dose SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccination in liver transplant recipients. Liver Int 42:180–186
Centers for Disease Control (2022) Stay Up to date with COVID-19 vaccines including boosters. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html. Accessed 14 October 2022
Acknowledgements
We are especially indebted to all the patients who participated in this study. We thank the following recruiting physicians and nurses for the data and sample collection: Annette Mechler, Lisa Eifler, Angela Bagorda, Rasmus Ehren, Britta Höcker, Katharina Hoffmann, Barbara Galata, Christina Taylan, and Joanna Sladowska. We thank Kai Krupka for the database assistance. We thank Sabine Bönisch-Schmidt, Iris Arnold, Markus Zorn, and Maike Wirtz for the support in laboratory analyses.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research through “Forschungsnetzwerk der Universitätsmedizin zu COVID-19” (“NaFoUniMedCovid19 “ (FKZ: 01KX2021; COVIM 2.0).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MS, BT, LTW, LB, JD, CS, SH, and SoH conceived and designed the study. MS, BT, SH, and SoH collected and analyzed the data and drafted the first version of the manuscript. VC and EH performed the laboratory analysis and established the live virus assay. MTR and SR recruited the patients and acquired the data. SG and KB performed the statistical analysis and played an important role in interpreting the results.
All the authors revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, approved the final version of the manuscript as submitted, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
LTW and SH participated in an advisory board and received a compensation from BioNTech. All the other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stich, M., Di Cristanziano, V., Tönshoff, B. et al. Humoral immune response and live-virus neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in children and young adults with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 38, 1935–1948 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05806-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05806-9