Abstract
Key message
Pre-germination requirements are not accurately predicted by seed traits of size and mass. However, small-seeded species show high germination and slow early seedling growth rates.
Abstract
Deforestation in the tropics is one of the greatest biodiversity crises of the Anthropocene. In response, tropical countries such as Colombia have committed to restoring degraded lands and reconnecting forest fragments. To contribute to this mission, we evaluated how easy-to-measure seed functional traits predicted germination requirements and early seedling growth rates (RGRs) for 11 tree species native to the Andean-Amazon piedmont region. Pre-sowing treatments followed a 3 × 3 factorial design: three light conditions (full, partial, and no light) and three pre-germination treatments (hot water, abrasion, and control). A cluster analysis grouped species into three groups driven chiefly by highly correlated variables of seed size and mass. However, species within and among functional groups differed in their response to pre-germination treatments. One exception includes the small-seeded species group responding with little-to-no germination to the absence of light. Since functional traits were highly correlated, we used Principal Component Regression (PCR) to predict germination metrics (germination percentage, velocity, and vigor) and RGRs. The multivariate trait axis of seed size and seed mass measurements (PC1) correlated negatively with germination metrics and positively with RGRs. Our results highlight the challenges associated with using easy-to-measure functional traits to deduce the most effective pre-sowing treatment. Other more relevant functional traits can be measured in lab, but a shotgun approach to testing pre-germination treatments may be more cost-effective. High germination in small-sized seed species highlights the early-successional niche these species occupy, but reduced RGR may represent a tradeoff associated with having relatively few resources stored in seed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The destruction of tropical forests constitutes a massive extinction crisis in some of the world’s most biodiverse regions (Giam 2017; Keenan et al. 2015; Wright and Muller-Landau 2006). In the neotropics, deforestation and forest fragmentation are driven primarily by the demand for cattle pasture (De Sy et al. 2019). In Colombia, considered one of the world’s 12 “megadiverse” countries, this is no exception, but also driven by illegal mining, oil extraction, land appropriation, illicit crops, and expansion of urban centers (Armenteras et al. 2006; Etter et al. 2008; Romero et al. 2009). Despite being one of the few neotropical countries with a national restoration plan, Colombia is inarguably far from reaching a breakeven point as its annual deforestation rate is nearly 200,000 ha compared to approximately 5000 ha in regeneration (Ceccon and Martínez-Garza 2016; DANE and IDEAM 2021; MinAmbiente 2015). Reaching that breakeven point requires a multifaceted approach to restoration actions that is specific to land use histories, tailored to local socioeconomic needs, and well-informed by ecology and natural history.
Ecological restoration is a solutions-based approach to land degradation and forest fragmentation that in combination with the sciences of conservation and sustainability can protect and restore biodiversity while fostering increased local socioeconomic resilience (Gann et al. 2019). Within the ecological restoration toolbox there are two approaches for intervention: passive (also referred to as natural regeneration), which specifically involves stopping the source of disturbance, and active (also referred to as assisted regeneration), which involves the implementation of actions to reestablish or increase the abundance of organisms, species, or populations. Choosing between the approaches requires an evaluation of the potential for natural regeneration (Chazdon and Guariguata 2016). Within the active intervention toolbox, one common approach is planting trees to ameliorate seed dispersal and seedling establishment limitations following designs that enhance landscape connectivity (de la Peña-Domene and Martínez-Garza 2018; Rey Benayas et al. 2008). Crucial to the creation of these plantings is information on seed germination requirements of native tree species. With this study, we contribute ecological knowledge on 11 species native to the Colombian Amazon that have potential for restoration, and we evaluate how seed structural traits predict seed responses to pre-germination and light treatments as well as seedling performance.
Seeds of tropical species exhibit an extraordinary array of shapes, dormancy mechanisms, and longevities, which influence their effective propagation (Vázquez-Yanes and Orozco-Segovia 1993). This great variation in form and function is due to the predominance of biotic-dispersal of tropical tree seeds along with the history of coevolutionary forces that have shaped distinctive plant–animal relationships (Howe and Smallwood 1982). The variety of niches that plant species can fill throughout ecological succession is also a relevant factor (Rüger et al. 2020). Generally speaking, biotically dispersed seeds exhibit enhanced germination after gut passage, often as a consequence of the mechanical and/or chemical abrasion of the seed coat (Izhaki and Safriel 1990; Traveset 1998; Traveset et al. 2001), although some simply and only from the removal of the pulp (Jordaan et al. 2011). To mimic the beneficial effects of gut passage on germination, a range of mechanical, chemical, and hormonal pre-germination treatments have been developed with variable success and with substantial interspecific variation (Mousavi et al. 2011). Part of this variation is explained by how seed dormancy and germination are often also regulated by proteins and hormones in a seed’s light signaling pathway, which induce germination when access to light meets sufficient thresholds, again with great interspecific variation (Yang et al. 2020). Light-sensitive seeds generally are small and produced by species that fill niches with abundant light, such as those present in canopy gaps (Dalling et al. 2005), but small seeds that respond only to mechanical or chemical treatments have also been reported (Acuña and Garwood 1987). Moreover, some small-seeded species also occur in late-successional niches with low light (de Souza and Válio 2001). Since generalizations on the seed germination requirements of tropical species are seldom flawless, this presents a significant challenge for restoration projects that require tree planting.
Having accurate predictors of germination requirements and seedling performance would improve the likelihood of success during the early stages of restoration, and these predictors could be functional traits that are part of a species’ strategy for growth, reproduction, and survival (Violle et al. 2007). For example, for planted seedlings in a restoration experiment in Veracruz, México, leaf dry mass content was a good predictor of seedling survival in pastures (Martínez-Garza et al. 2013). For germination and seedling performance, potential seed functional traits include but are not limited to seed size, seed mass, and seed coat thickness. Small-seeded species tend to have higher germination percentages and rates and greater RGRs than larger-seeded species (Murali 1997; Poorter and Rose 2005), but here too are there exceptions to the rule (Deb and Sundriyal 2017). As for seed coats, a thick seed coat is better adapted for passage through the digestive tract than a thin one. (Traveset 1998). Thus, thick-coated species are more likely to benefit from pre-germination treatments than thin-coated seeds. Larger seeds tend to also have thicker seed coats and are less dependent on light for germination than small seeds (Milberg et al. 2000; Pearson et al. 2002).
Here, we measured six seed functional traits and evaluated their potential as predictors of germination, germination requirements, and RGRs of 11 species. In addition, we grouped these species by their functional traits using cluster analysis to determine which if any generalizations can be made. Seeds were given pre-germination treatments (hot water immersion, sandpaper abrasion, or control) and then incubated in full, partial, or no light. We predicted that functional groups would vary in their response to pre-germination and light treatments, with small-seeded functional groups responding the best to increased access to light, and large-seeded functional groups responding the best to pre-germination treatments. We also predicted that germination metrics (germination percentage, velocity of germination, and germination vigor) and RGRs would correlate negatively with seed size.
Methods
Study species
The 11 species selected for this study are all native to the humid tropical forests department of Caquetá, Colombia, which is part of the Andean-Amazon piedmont region. Species were selected based on socioecological value and sufficient seed availability and include: Miconia minutiflora Bonpl. (Melastomataceae), Miconia tomentosa Rich. (Melastomataceae), Vismia baccifera L. (Hypericaceae), Piper aduncum L. (Piperaceae), Piptocoma discolor Kunth (Asteraceae), Ochroma pyramidale Cav. ex Lam. (Malvaceae), Apeiba membranacea Spruce ex Benth. (Tiliaceae), Cecropia engleriana Snethl. (Urticaceae), Ormosia nobilis var. santaremnensis Tul. (Fabaceae), Cedrelinga cateniformis Ducke (Fabaceae), and Minquartia guianensis Aubl. (Oleaceae).
Experimental design
Seeds used in this study were collected from fruiting trees growing in a set of chronosequence plots in Caquetá, Colombia established in 2017 by the Amazonian Scientific Institute (SINCHI). For each species, a total of 810 seeds were collected and divided up into 27 aluminum germination trays (30 seeds per tray) except for M. guianensis (15 seeds per tray) and C. cateniformis (6 seeds per tray) due to seed scarcity. The germination experiment was set up as a 3 × 3 factorial design using two independent variables (light and pre-germination treatments) with three levels each creating nine variable combinations. Each variable combination had three replicates (9 × 3 = 27 trays per species). For pre-germination, seeds were either placed in a hot water bath at 80 °C for 1 min, abraded using sandpaper to wear off the seed coat, or left without pre-germination treatment (control). However, abrasion by sandpaper was only possible for four species (A. membranacea, O. pyramidale, O. nobilis, and C. engleriana) due to seeds being too small, too thin a seed coat, or having a porous seed coat. Seeds were slightly buried in peat substrate and placed in an incubator (Climacell 707 EVO) set to 86% relative humidity, a photoperiod with 12 h of light per day, and alternating temperatures of 25 °C, 30 °C, and 33 °C every eight hours, with the higher temperatures occurring during light hours. Light treatments were created from seed tray placement in the incubator; trays closest to LED lights (36 W) on the highest level belonged to the full light treatment while trays farthest from the light on the bottom level belonged to the no light treatment, and those in between belonged to the partial light treatment. Seeds were watered with distilled water every 2 days.
As functional traits, we measured length (mm), width (mm), height (mm), wet mass (mg), dry mass (mg), and seed coat thickness (mm) from an additional 216 seeds. For small-seeded species (M. minutiflora, M tomentosa, V. baccifera, P. aduncum, P. discolor, and C. engleriana), seeds were weighed together by tray and divided by the number of seeds. Seed coat thickness was measured using a handheld digimatic QuantuMike Mitutoyo micrometer with 0.001 mm resolution. Prior to measurement, seeds were cut longitudinally and had their endosperm and embryo extracted to isolate the seed coat. A seventh trait, seed moisture content, was determined by weighing seeds before and after they were dried in a Riossa® oven at 130 °C for 17 h in, but the precision of measurements for small-seeded species was limited, so moisture content was excluded from analyses.
Data collection
For each species, we calculated germination percentage (PG%) which corresponds to the percent of germinated seeds, coefficient of velocity of germination (CVG) which corresponds to the average number of seeds that germinated within a 20-day period, and germination vigor (GV) which corresponds to the percent successful establishment of seedlings. Seedlings were harvested after 15 days of growth (15 plants per species, five from each light treatment) to measure their final seedling length, stem length, root length, and stem diameter (all mm). We then calculate relative growth rates (RGRs) for each of these measurements by dividing the measured values by 15. For reasons unknown, RGR data for M. tomentosa were missing at the time for data analysis. Since plants were haphazardly selected for harvest, we do not analyze the effect of pre-germination or light treatment on RGRs.
Statistical analysis
To group the 11 species into functional groups we used a hierarchal cluster analysis with Ward’s method on a Gower’s similarity index of the six seed structural traits (Gower 1971). Three functional groups were determined, largely by their seed size, and named as such: “Small-Seeded Functional Group”, “Medium-Seeded Functional Group”, and “Large-Seeded Functional Group”, or SSFG, MSFG, and LSFG, respectively (Fig. 1). To compare functional groups by their seed functional traits. we used Kruskal–Wallis and Conover post-hoc tests; non-parametric tests were used here as none of the seed functional traits showed homoscedasticity. We also used a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to visualize the partitioning of the three functional groups by their seed structural traits. To evaluate the effects and interactions of light intensity and pre-germination treatments on the germination metrics (PG%, CVG, and GV), we used linear and generalized models for each response variable. For PG%, we used a linear model. For CVG and VM, we used generalized models using the gamma family (logit link for CVG, inverse for GV) where we added a constant of 0.05 to all values as the gamma distribution does not accept non-positive numbers. When interactions were significant, we created new models to evaluate effects by factor level. p-values obtained by installing the package ‘lmerTest’ (Bates et al. 2015).
To determine if the seed functional traits influenced germination and relative growth rates, we used principal component regression (PCR) with linear models. We chose PCR as a method to deal with the high collinearity between the seed structural traits (VIF < 10). Since they come from separate datasets, tray germination metrics were randomly matched to individual seeds and their corresponding trait values for each species to evaluate the relationship between traits and germination. For RGRs, because seedlings were not harvested from each tray, there was no direct correspondence between a seed tray and RGRs; so we calculated averages for each principal component and RGRs by species and light treatment to obtain a single dataframe on the same scale. Pearson’s correlations were calculated to evaluate how the response variables correlated with the principal components. All statistical tests were carried out using R (R Core Team 2021).
Results
Seed functional traits
The three functional groups differed significantly in their seed structural traits, supporting the separation into three groups by the hierarchal cluster analysis (Kruskal–Wallis: p < 0.001; Fig. 2). Post hoc Conover tests showed statistically significant differences all around (p < 0.05) except for seed height (mm) between MSFG and LSFG (t = 0.715, p = 0.475) and a marginally significant difference in seed coat thickness between SSFG and MSFG (t = 1.69, p = 0.93). The large-seeded functional group represented by a single species, M. guianensis, showed the highest values for all six structural traits, followed by MSFG and lastly by SSFG with the smallest values.
Germination experiment
We found a significant interaction between functional groups and pre-germination treatment on all three response variables (PG%: F2,219 = 2.142, p = 0.096; VG: χ2 = 27.278, p < 0.001; GV: χ2 = 24.007, p < 0.001; Fig. 3) and no significant interactions between functional group and light treatment (PG%: F2,219 = 1.187, p = 0.318; VG: χ2 = 2.155, p = 0.707; GV: χ2 = 3.792, p = 0.435).
For germination percentage, pre-germination treatment had a significant effect for the MSFG (F2,36 = 9.734, p = 0.001) and marginally significant effect in SSFG (F2,162 = 2.406, p = 0.093). Within ES, abrasion showed a significantly higher germination percentage than hot water (t = 1.99, p = 0.048) or control groups (t = 1.984, p = 0.049). Within MSFG, the control group showed a lower germination percentage than the ones that received abrasion (t = 4.176, p < 0.001) and hot water treatments (t = 2.93, p = 0.005). Abrasion showed a marginally higher germination percentage than the hot water treatment (t = 1.784, p = 0.082). Evaluated by pre-germination treatment, within the control group the SSFG group had a higher germination percentage (vs MSFG: t = 4.293, p < 0.001; vs LSFG: t = 2.237, p = 0.028). MSFG and LSFG did not differ in germination percentage (t = 0.617, p = 0.028; Online Resource 1a). Light treatments also differed significantly in germination percentage (F2,219 = 6.299, p = 0.002). Germination percentage was lowest when there was no light (vs partial: t = 2.751, p = 0.006; vs full: t = 3.103, p = 0.002) but did not differ between partial and full light treatments (t = 0.352, p = 0.725; Fig. 4A).
For the velocity of germination, pre-germination treatment had significant effects in MSFG (χ2 = 85.733, p < 0.001) and LSFG (χ2 = 9.046, p = 0.003) and marginally significant effects in SSFG (χ2 = 4.936, p = 0.085). Within ES, abrasion had higher germination velocity than control (t = 2.115, p = 0.036) but neither differed from the hot water treatment (t = 1.43, p = 0.155 and t = 0.927, p = 0.355, respectively). Within MSFG, abrasion and hot water showed no difference in germination velocity (t = 0.221, p = 0.826) but both had higher values than the control (t = 8.596, p < 0.001 and t = 10.798, p < 0.001, respectively). Within LS, the control showed a higher germination velocity (x̄ = 0.74) than the hot water group (x̄ = 0.33; t = 3.040, p = 0.008). The large-seeded functional group did not include an abrasion pre-germination treatment. Evaluated by pre-germination treatment, velocity of germination in control and abrasion treatments was lower between SSFG and MSFG (t = 3.04, p = 0.03; t = 4.591, p = 0.039, respectively; Online Resource 1b). Light treatments did not have a significant effect on velocity of germination (χ2 = 0.839, p = 0.657; Fig. 4B).
For the germination vigor, pre-germination treatment had significant effects in MSFG (χ2 = 85.015, p < 0.001) and LSFG (χ2 = 11.087, p = 0.003) and marginally significant effects in SSFG (χ2 = 4.696, p = 0.096). Within ES, abrasion had marginally higher germination vigor than hot water (t = 1.864, p = 0.064) and control groups (t = 1.837, p = 0.068). Abrasion and hot water did not differ (t = 0.46, p = 0.646). Within MSFG, hot water resulted in the highest germination vigor (vs abrasion: t = 2.744, p = 0.009; vs control: t = 12.056, p < 0.001) followed by abrasion (vs control: 7.1, p < 0.001). Within LS, the control showed higher germination vigor than the hot water group (t = 3.45, p = 0.003). Evaluated by pre-germination treatment, germination vigor within the abrasion treatment was marginally higher in SSFG over MSFG (t = 4.591, p = 0.067; Online Resource 1c). Light treatments did not have a significant effect on germination vigor (χ2 = 1.158, p = 0.56; Fig. 4C).
Species-specific responses on germination percentage
Within SS, species differed in how germination percentage was affected by pre-germination and light treatments (F9,114 = 4.979, p < 0.001; F14,114 = 3.801, p < 0.001). Within MSFG, species differed in how they responded to pre-germination (F2,30 = 16.426, p < 0.001) but not to light treatments (F2,30 = 1.418, p = 0.258). A species-specific list of the conditions that elicited the highest germination percentage for each species is provided in Table 1. A full breakdown of species-specific treatment differences and pairwise comparisons within treatments is provided in Online Resource 3.
Principal component analysis
In the PCA, PC1 accounted for 74.24% of the variation and placed SSFG and LSFG at opposite sides and MSFG in the middle (Fig. 5). The highest eigenvectors in PC1 were length (− 0.46), width (− 0.44), height (− 0.41), wet mass (− 0.42), and dry mass (− 0.42). PC2 explained an additional 16.5% of the variation with seed coat thickness having by far the highest eigenvector (0.922). The MSFG functional group exhibited the greatest range in PC2 largely due to the difference in seed coat thickness between the two MSFG species, C. cateniformis and O. nobilis. Similarly, LSFG exhibited the least range in PC2 due to inappreciable variance (se = 0) in the seed coat thickness of the sole species that represents it, M. guianensis.
Principal component regression on germination and relative growth rates
For the PCR, we used as predictor variable the first components of the PCA, which accounted for most of the cumulative variation (74.24%). For interpretation and based on the eigenvector values (Table 2), PC1 is understood to represent the seed structural traits of seed length, seed width, seed height, wet seed mass, and dry seed mass. PC2 largely represented seed coat thickness and accounted for an additional 16.5% of the variation. However, to obtain the predictor value of seed coat thickness by itself, and because seed coat thickness is not as correlated with other seed functional traits, we used the seed coat variable itself as a predictor. To prevent pseudoreplication due to negligible variance in seed coat thickness values within species we split the dataset by pre-germination treatment, calculated average values by species, and applied Pearson’s correlations.
For germination percentage, PC1 showed a significant but weak and negative correlation (t = 3.148, p = 0.002, r = − 0.221; Fig. 6A). Light and pre-germination treatments accounted for 0.17% and 7.76% of the residual variance, respectively. For germination velocity, PC1 showed a significant but weak and negative correlation (t = 2.714, p = 0.007, r = − 0.192; Fig. 6B). Light and pre-germination treatments accounted for 0% and 7.16% of the residual variance, respectively. For germination vigor, PC1 showed a marginally significant, negative, and weak correlation (t = 1.912, p = 0.057, r = − 0.134; Fig. 6C). Light and pre-germination treatments accounted for 0% and 3.07% of the residual variance, respectively. Seed coat thickness did not correlate significantly with the germination metrics (PG%: t = 0.853, p = 0.416, r = − 0.274; CVG: t = 0.642, p = 0.537, r = − 0.209; vs. GV: t = 0.441, p = 0.67, r = − 0.145). Split by pre-germination treatment, there were no statistically significant or marginally significant correlations (p < 0.1).
PC1 showed a moderately strong and positive correlation with RGRTotal Length (t = 6.167, p < 0.001, r = 0.594; Fig. 7A), RGRStem (t = 2.902, p = 0.009, r = 0.537; Fig. 7B), and a weak but still positive correlation with RGRRoot (t = 2.927, p = 0.008, r = 0.477; Fig. 7C). PC1 did not correlate significantly with RGRDiameter (t = 1.662, p = 0.111, r = 0.311; Fig. 7D). Seed coat thickness did not correlate significantly or marginally significantly with any of the RGRs (vs. total length: t = 0.536, p = 0.620, r = 2.59; vs. stem: t = 1.721, p = 0.160, r = 0.652; vs. root: t = 1.286, p = 0.268, r = 0.541); vs. diameter: t = 1.26, p = 0.277, r = 0.532).
Discussion
The 11 tropical tree species included in this study clustered into three groups, driven chiefly by highly correlated variables of seed size and mass. Despite grouping, species within functional groups differed in how they responded to pre-germination and light treatments. The multivariate trait axis of seed size and seed mass measurements (PC1) proved to be strong predictors of germination metrics and relative growth rates.
Seed functional traits and pre-sowing treatments
Strong correlations among our measured seed functional traits are not surprising—seeds tend to be heavier with an increase in size, and large seeds tend to have thicker coats than small seeds (Pearson et al. 2002). However, as previous studies have extensively documented, seed size and its correlated variables are not sufficient to predict the best pre-germination treatment because seed dormancy can occur for a variety of reasons across seeds of similar size (Ashraf and Foolad 2005; Mousavi et al. 2011; Zalamea et al. 2018). The only generalization backed by previous studies is that small-seeded species are more dependent on light for germination than large-seeded species (Milberg et al. 2000). In our study, functional groups did not differ in their germination response to light treatments. However, when split by functional groups, the SSFG group did show lower germination percentage in the absence of light while MSFG and LSFG did not (Online Resource 2). Not all SSFG species responded to the light treatment, suggesting exceptions to the rule, but in the case of C. engleriana, it was the access to light that permitted the abrasion and hot water treatments to influence germination percentage (Online Resource 3). Vismia baccifera and O. pyramidale also showed higher germination percentage when seeds had access to partial or full light. Lack of response to light by other small-seeded species reflects either the absence of the proper pre-germination treatments or lack of photosensitivity.
Responses to pre-germination treatment in other species varied greatly. For ES, abrasion yielded higher germination metrics than the control, but our conclusions on abrasion are limited by the minority of species that received this treatment—only C. engleriana actually showed a significant difference between abrasion and control, and only when seeds were under partial or full light. Hot water and control treatments showed similar germination percentage, but split by species, hot water yielded higher germination percentage for O. pyramidale and a lower germination percentage for M. minutiflora. The congeneric M. tomentosa showed similar germination percentages between hot water and control groups, underscoring the challenges associated with predicting dormancy-breaking mechanisms from functional seed traits. In MSFG it is clear that pre-germination treatments increase germination, but the two species differed starkly in which method actually had an effect (hot water for C. cateniformis and abrasion for O. nobilis). In LSFG, germination of seeds treated with hot water did not differ much from the control group, but since LSFG in our study is represented by a single species, we cannot extrapolate beyond M. guianensis. Similarly, as MSFG is represented by two species, we are limited in how their responses to pre-germination and light treatments can be extrapolated. Future studies that attempt to use functional traits to predict germination requirements should select traits based on the different kinds of dormancies that are present in seeds.
Predicting germination and relative growth rates
The principal component regression on germination metrics showed that germination decreased with increasing seed size and mass, supporting our hypothesis. This result is supported by previous studies showing small seeds germinating faster than large seeds (Murali 1997). High germination percentages and rates are an adaptation often seen in gap-specialist and early-successional species (Denslow 1980). Since small-seeded species also reach reproductive maturity earlier and have higher annual seed output than large-seeded species (Moles et al. 2004), small seeds tend to characterize the seed bank in canopy gaps (Dalling et al. 1998). The tradeoff with seed size becomes apparent during seedling establishment when seedlings of small-seeded species exhibit a higher mortality rate than larger-sized species (Moles and Westoby 2004). In our study, all small-sized species are or belong to genera that predominate with early-successionals, but not all small-sized species are gap-specialists, early-successionals, or light-demanding species (Dalling et al. 2005). Thus, while seed functional traits of size and mass present a good model for predicting germination, exceptions to the model should be anticipated.
The principal component regression on RGRs showed that RGRs increased with increasing seed size and mass (except for in stem diameter), contradicting our hypothesis. A meta-analysis of 23 studies conducted by Poorter and Rose (2005) found that RGRs and seed mass correlated negatively, emphasizing the shade-tolerance and slow-growth strategy of large-seeded species. However, the authors point out that part of the slow-growth strategy of large-seeded species rests on their hypogeal germination, where cotyledons remain belowground (Ibarra-Manríquez et al. 2001). In our study, the species with largest seed size (M. guianensis) had cryptocotylar epigeal germination with reserve storage cotyledons, which while not photosynthetic still differs from other large-seeded species. Other studies have also reported a fast-growth rate for M. guianensis in its other life stages (Hunter 1991; Nebel 2000). Minquartia guianensis might be an exception to the rule described by Poorter and Rose (2005).
Experimental limitations and errors
Our study is limited to 11 tree species from one of the most biodiverse regions in the country and the world (Romero et al. 2009), so extrapolations from our results should be done with care. Further details should be taken into consideration: (i) conclusions on the effect of manually abrading the seed coat with sandpaper are limited to the species this treatment was applied to, namely: Apeiba membranacea, O. pyramidale, O. nobilis, and C. engleriana. Future studies should attempt physical scarification using heated needles, small cement mixers filled with rocks, or other suggested methods (Ashraf and Foolad 2005; Rudolf and Owston, 2003). (ii) Despite the use of a micrometer, the lack of intraspecies variance in seed coat thickness suggests that this tool was not used to its most accurate potential. We refer to Pearson et al. (2002) for more accurate reports of seed coat thickness for some of our study species. (iii) Measurements of seed mass for small-seeded species are estimates obtained by measuring multiple seeds at once on a mass balance and dividing by seed abundance—due to the lack of accuracy, we did not use seed moisture content as one of our functional seed traits despite its potential as predictor of seed and seedling performance. (iv) Seeds were not tested for viability prior to germination trials. (v) The selection of seedlings for harvest, while balanced by light treatment (5 each), was not randomly conducted, preventing us from evaluating the effect of any of the pre-sowing treatments on RGRs. (vi) RGRs were calculated after 15 days of growth and therefore only represent early seedling growth.
Potential for restoration
Species selection for restoration purposes should take into consideration: (i) seed availability and available pre-sowing treatments, (ii) species abilities to ameliorate dispersal and establishment limitations, and (iii) socioeconomic value or ecosystem services. From our study, we can make some recommendations for restoration in the Andean-Amazon piedmont region of Colombia.
Cecropia engleriana (SSFG) is a medium-sized tree species (15 m tall) that reaches reproductive maturity early. Cecropia trees attract a wide variety of generalist dispersal agents, so including them in restoration greatly alleviate dispersal limitation early on (Howe 2016, 2017; Martínez-Garza et al. 2013). Cecropia spp. do not provide much canopy cover and thus are unlikely to shelter recruiting seedlings from desiccation, so we recommend planting it in conjunction with fast-growing tree species that yield dense and wide canopies. For germination, we recommend plenty of light and a pre-germination treatment (hot water or abrasion).
Ochroma pyramidale (SSFG) is a fast-growing, evergreen canopy tree species (30 m tall). As a wind-dispersed species, this species’ fruit does not provide sustenance for dispersers, but its flowers are consumed by members of the Psittacidae family (Lee et al. 2014). In addition, its fast growth and broad canopy shelter recruiting seedlings and prevent the establishment of recalcitrant understory layers by invasive species (Douterlungne et al. 2013). Wood harvested from O. pyramidale has a myriad of commercial uses in Colombia due to its light weight, resilience, and floatability (Fuentes and Arango 2005). We recommend planting in conjunction with Cecropia to provide shelter for recruiting seedlings. Seeds of this species germinate well in full light after a hot water treatment.
Apeiba membranacea (SSFG) is a fast-growing, medium-sized tree species (15 m tall). Saplings of A. membranacea are hardy, capable of establishing successfully in soil disturbed by petroleum extractions (Villacís et al. 2016). The fruits of A. membranacea and related species are consumed and dispersed by monkeys, highlighting its potential for reducing dispersal limitation by larger, arboreal animals (Stevenson 2005; Wehncke et al. 2003). Use for lumber from A. membranacea is limited due to its low wood density but is still used for boards and general carpentry (Fuentes and Arango 2005; Montero et al. 2016). Seeds are harvested and used as brilliantine and hair tonic due to their oil content (Salazar and Soihet 2001). This species germinates fairly well regardless of pre-sowing treatment, a pattern also found by Pearson et al. (2002). In fact, its seeds are capable of germinating within the fruit capsule (Montero et al. 2016). We recommend planting to attract a greater diversity of dispersal agents and maintain a mid-canopy layer.
Cedrelinga cateniformis (MSFG) is a slow-growing, canopy tree species (50 m tall). Like A. membranacea, this species’ saplings establish and grow well in soil disturbed by petroleum extractions (Villacís et al. 2016). As a legume, C. cateniformis can help restore soil nutrients through its symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing, Gram-negative Rhizobium bacteria (Phillips 1980). Cedrelinga cateniformis is used for general construction, plywood, boxes, and more (Fuentes and Arango 2005). Indigenous people of the Colombian Amazon use the wood to make canoes and the bark to extract camphor, a terpenoid with medicinal and pest deterrent properties. Although wind-dispersed, its seeds are consumed by spider monkeys (Saimiri spp.) and Psittacids (Montero et al. 2016). We recommend the use of a hot water treatment to germinate this species’ seeds and planting it in conjunction with fast-growing species.
Miconia minutiflora (SSFG) is a shrub and small tree species (15 m tall) that reaches reproductive maturity early. This species is known for its “big bang flowering” where shrubs flower synchronically for 2–3 days attracting a myriad and overabundance of pollinating insect species (Mori and Pipoly 1984). Its fruits are consumed and seeds are dispersed by a variety of small birds and mammals (Messeder et al. 2021). Miconia minutiflora has been used traditionally as a medicinal plant, with a recent study showing how its leaf methanol extract has anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive properties (Gatis-Carrazzoni et al. 2019). We recommend germinating without pre-germination treatment and planting to attract dispersers and pollinators. Sautu et al. (2006) recommend simply separating seeds from the fleshy fruit under water.
Miconia tomentosa (SSFG) is a shrub and small tree species (13 m tall) that reaches reproductive maturity early. Fruits of M. tomentosa are consumed and presumably dispersed by the critically endangered Caquetá Titi Monkey (Plecturocebus caquetensis) (Acero-Murcia et al. 2018). The fruit of M. tomentosa is considered an unconventional food plant (UFP) in Caquetá, which describes native, underutilized or not cultivated species with potential as a food resource (Cárdenas et al. 2012). We recommend germinating with plenty of light and planting it to provide food for the Caquetá Titi monkey and other native species.
Minquartia guianensis (LSFG) is a canopy tree species (30 m tall) with unusually fast growth (Nebel 2000). Faster growth rates are also reported in saplings and young trees relative to a pioneer tree species (Hunter 1991). In our study, seedlings of this species also had the fastest growth. The fruit of M. guianensis is dispersed by monkeys (Alouatta spp. and Aletes spp.), pacas (Cuniculus paca), and agoutis (Dasyprocta punctata), highlighting its potential for reducing dispersal limitation by mammals (Hunter 1991; Julliot, 1997). The fruit of M. guianensis is considered an UFP (Cárdenas et al. 2012). Timber from this species has a long history of use in construction and the tree canopy is described as evergreen, full, and bushy that protects seedlings from desiccation (Hunter 1991). In our study M. guianensis showed higher germination velocity and vigor in the control treatment compared to seeds given a hot water treatment, but the difference between the two is small. According to Flores (1994), as long as humidity is high and stable, seeds will germinate in both shade and direct sunlight.
Ormosia nobilis (MSFG) is a canopy tree species (30 m tall). The Ormosia genus has seeds with a bright red coat that deceives avian dispersers into ingesting them, mistaking them for a fleshy fruit (Foster and Delay 1998). Some propose that rather than deception there is mutualism, whereby large-bodied birds purposefully consume Ormosia seeds as gizzard grid substitutes (Peres and van Roosmalen, 1996). Seeds are also used by the Emberá-Katío indigenous group of Caquetá for handicrafts (Frausin et al. 2008). As a legume, O. nobilis can help restore soil nutrients through its symbiosis with N-fixing bacteria (Phillips 1980). We recommend germinating using abrasion and planting this species to attract seed-dispersing fauna and to nitrify soils.
Piper aduncum (SSFG) is a shrubby tree species (7 m tall) with fast-growth that reaches reproductive maturity early. Seeds of this species germinate well regardless of pre-sowing treatment, which likely facilitates its successful invasion of the forests of Papua New Guinea (Hartemink 2010). Piper aduncum is dispersed by a variety of bird and bat species (Hartemink 2010). Essential oils extracted from P. aduncum have antifungal properties and impressive repellent activity against mosquitos (Aedes aegypti) (Guerrini et al. 2009; Misni et al. 2008). While its RGR was low in our experiment, more long-term experiments show 0.33 cm d−1 growth rates for 2-month-old saplings (Susanto et al. 2018). We recommend planting this species to attract dispersers early on.
Piptocoma discolor (SSFG) is a fast-growing canopy tree species. This species showed the lowest germination percentages and was largely unresponsive to pre-sowing treatments. However, a study by Mendoza et al. (2005) showed a 95% germination without any pre-germination treatment within 30 days. Furthermore, a study by Stimm et al. (2008) found that P. discolor seedlings take almost a quarter of a year to emerge. It is likely that seeds in our study were viable but required more time for their germination. In Ecuador there is a strong market for the timber from this species to make pallets and crates for fruit transport and could be potentially developed in Caquetá (Erazo et al. 2013). We recommend germinating P. discolor seeds with the expectation that they will take a long time to germinate and planting it to secure a full canopy.
Vismia baccifera (SSFG) is a small tree and shrub species (14 m tall) that reaches reproductive maturity early. Its fruit is dispersed by spider monkeys and frugivorous bats (Chapman 1989; Kelm et al. 2008). Vismia baccifera is used in the Amazon as a medicinal plant and recent studies have unraveled how its leaf extract can be used to treat tumor growths (Trepiana et al. 2018). Its lumber is also used for general carpentry and construction (Bonilla Céspedes and Calderón Falla 2016). We recommend germinating V. baccifera with plenty of light and planting it as a mid-canopy species.
Conclusion
Seed size and seed mass are good indicators of germination performance and seedling growth, but the positive correlation with RGR is likely due to the unusual seedling growth of M. guianensis as large-seeded species typically show slow-growth rates (Poorter and Rose 2005). The tradeoff in RGR and germination observed between M. guianensis and the smaller-seeded species is possibly explained by differences in the resources stored in the seeds and the type of germination (hypogeal vs epigeal). Stakeholders in restoration using these species should consider these tradeoffs during seeding and seedling growth stages of restoration. Pre-sowing treatment effects differed greatly among species with similar seed size and seed coat thickness, indicating that for the purpose of restoration, the application of pre-sowing treatments to seeds should not be determined based on these traits.
Author contribution statement
MNNG, CHR, and LLRF contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and data analysis were conducted by MNNG for her Master’s thesis. LCBL revised the data analysis for publication and drafted the manuscript. LLRF and CHR provided comments on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data and code availability
The datasets analyzed for the current study and the code used are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Acero-Murcia A, Almario LJ, García J, Defler TR, López R (2018) Diet of the Caquetá Titi (Plecturocebus caquetensis) in a disturbed forest fragment in Caquetá, Colombia. Prim Conserv 32:1–17
Acuña PI, Garwood NC (1987) Efecto de la luz y de la escarificación en la germinación de las semillas de cinco especies de árboles tropicales secundarios. Rev Biol Trop 35:203–207
Armenteras D, Rudas G, Rodriguez N, Sua S, Romero M (2006) Patterns and causes of deforestation in the Colombian Amazon. Ecol Ind 6:353–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.014
Ashraf M, Foolad M (2005) Pre-sowing seed treatment—a shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Adv Agron 88:223–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(05)88006-x
Bates D, Máchler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using {lme4}. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bonilla Céspedes HD, Calderón Falla KSC (2016) Propiedades físicas y mecánicas de la madera de la especie Sangre gallina Vismia baccifera (L) Triana & Planch procedente del Bajo Calima, municipio de Buenaventura. Facultad de Ingeniería Forestal, Trabajo de Grado. Universidad del Tolima, Tolima
Cárdenas D, Marín N, Castaño N (2012) Plantas alimenticias no convencionales en la Amazonia colombiana y anotaciones sobre otras plantas alimenticias. Colombia Amazónica 5:59–81
Ceccon E, Martínez-Garza C (2016) Experiencias mexicanas en la restauración de los ecosistemas. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias; Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos; Ciudad de México, México.
Chapman CA (1989) Primate seed dispersal: the fate of dispersed seeds. Biotropica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388705
Chazdon RL, Guariguata MR (2016) Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48:716–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12381
Dalling J, Hubbell SP, Silvera K (1998) Seed dispersal, seedling establishment and gap partitioning among tropical pioneer trees. J Ecol 86:674–689. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00298.x
Dalling JW, Forget P, Lambert J, Hulme P, Wall S (2005) The fate of seed banks: factors influencing seed survival for light-demanding species in moist tropical forests. Seed fate: predation, dispersal and seedling establishment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851998060.0031
DANE, IDEAM (2021) Cuenta ambiental y económica de Bosques (CAE-B) 2012–2018, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
de la Peña-Domene M, Martínez-Garza C (2018) Integrating density into dispersal and establishment limitation equations in tropical forests. Forests 9:570. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9090570
de Souza RP, Válio I (2001) Seed size, seed germination, and seedling survival of Brazilian tropical tree species differing in successional status. Biotropica 33:447–457. https://doi.org/10.1646/0006-3606(2001)033[0447:sssgas]2.0.co;2
De Sy V, Herold M, Achard F, Avitabile V, Baccini A, Carter S, Clevers JGPW, Lindquist E, Pereira M, Verchot L (2019) Tropical deforestation drivers and associated carbon emission factors derived from remote sensing data. Environ Res Lett 14:094022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3dc6
Deb P, Sundriyal R (2017) Effect of seed size on germination and seedling fitness in four tropical rainforest tree species. Indian J for 40:313–322. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2017-6jbcpr
Denslow JS (1980) Gap partitioning among tropical rainforest trees. Biotropica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388156
Douterlungne D, Thomas E, Levy-Tacher SI, Paynter Q (2013) Fast-growing pioneer tree stands as a rapid and effective strategy for bracken elimination in the Neotropics. J Appl Ecol 50:1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12077
Erazo G, Izurieta J, Cronkleton P, Larson A, Putzel L (2013) The use of pigüe (Piptocoma discolor) by smallholders in Napo, Ecuador: sustainable management of a pioneer timber species for local livelihoods. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) 24:1–6. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/004307
Etter A, McAlpine C, Possingham H (2008) Historical patterns and drivers of landscape change in Colombia since 1500: a regionalized spatial approach. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 98:2–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600701733911
Flores E (1994) Minquartia Guianensis Árboles y Semillas Del Neotrópico/trees and Seeds from the Neotropics 3:1–26
Foster MS, Delay LS (1998) Dispersal of mimetic seeds of three species of Ormosia (LeguminosaeJ. Trop Ecol 14:389–411. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467498000303
Frausin G, Trujillo E, Correa MA, Gonzalez VH (2008) Seeds used in handicrafts manufactured by an Emberá-Katío indigenous population displaced by violence in Colombia. Caldasia 30:315–323
Fuentes RLA, Arango AL (2005) Manual para la identificación de maderas que se comercializan en el departamento del Tolima. Ibagué Colombia. Corporación Autónoma Regional del Tolima CORTOLIMA y Facultad de Ingeniería Forestal de la Universidad del Tolima
Gann GD, McDonald T, Walder B, Aronson J, Nelson CR, Jonson J, Hallett JG, Eisenberg C, Guariguata MR, Liu J (2019) International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Restor Ecol 27:S1–S46. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035
Gatis-Carrazzoni ASS, Mota FVB, Leite TCC, de Oliveira TB, da Silva SC, Bastos IVA, de Souza Maia MB, Pereira PS, Neto PPM, de Oliveira Chagas EC (2019) Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activities of the leaf methanol extract of Miconia minutiflora (Bonpl.) DC. and characterization of compounds by UPLC-DAD-QTOF-MS/MS. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 392:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-018-1561-x
Giam X (2017) Global biodiversity loss from tropical deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:5775–5777. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706264114
Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528823
Guerrini A, Sacchetti G, Rossi D, Paganetto G, Muzzoli M, Andreotti E, Tognolini M, Maldonado ME, Bruni R (2009) Bioactivities of Piper aduncum L. and Piper obliquum Ruiz & Pavon (Piperaceae) essential oils from eastern Ecuador. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 27:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2008.08.002
Hartemink A (2010) The invasive shrub Piper aduncum in Papua New Guinea: a review. J Trop for Sci 22:202–213
Howe HF (2016) Making dispersal syndromes and networks useful in tropical conservation and restoration. Glob Ecol Conserv 6:152–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2016.03.002
Howe HF (2017) Fruit-eating birds in experimental plantings in Southern Mexico. J Trop Ecol 33:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467416000596
Howe HF, Smallwood J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:201–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001221
Hunter JR (1991) Observations on the growth, ecology and uses of Minquartia guianensis, a humid tropical tree. Intern Tree Crops 6:221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01435698.1991.9752889
Ibarra-Manríquez G, Martínez Ramos M, Oyama K (2001) Seedling functional types in a lowland rain forest in Mexico. Am J Bot 88:1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.2307/3558356
Izhaki I, Safriel U (1990) The effect of some Mediterranean scrubland frugivores upon germination patterns. J Ecol 78:56–65
Jordaan LA, Johnson SD, Downs CT (2011) The role of avian frugivores in germination of seeds of fleshy-fruited invasive alien plants. Biol Invasions 13:1917–1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0013-z
Julliot C (1997) Impact of seed dispersal by red howler monkeys Alouatta seniculus on the seedling population in the understorey of tropical rain forest. J Ecol 85:431–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960567
Keenan RJ, Reams GA, Achard F, de Freitas JV, Grainger A, Lindquist E (2015) Dynamics of global forest area: results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. For Ecol Manag 352:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.014
Kelm DH, Wiesner KR, von Helversen O (2008) Effects of artificial roosts for frugivorous bats on seed dispersal in a neotropical forest pasture mosaic. Conserv Biol 22:733–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00925.x
Lee AT, Brightsmith DJ, Vargas MP, Leon KQ, Mejia AJ, Marsden SJ (2014) Diet and geophagy across a western Amazonian parrot assemblage. Biotropica 46:322–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12099
Martínez-Garza C, Bongers F, Poorter L (2013) Are functional traits good predictors of species performance in restoration plantings in tropical abandoned pastures? For Ecol Manag 303:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.046
Mendoza E, Fay J, Dirzo R (2005) A quantitative analysis of forest fragmentation in Los Tuxtlas, southeast Mexico: patterns and implications for conservation. Rev Chil De Hist Nat 78:451–467. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-078x2005000300008
Messeder JVS, Silveira FA, Cornelissen TG, Fuzessy LF, Guerra TJ (2021) Frugivory and seed dispersal in a hyperdiverse plant clade and its role as a keystone resource for the Neotropical fauna. Ann Bot 127:577–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa189
Milberg P, Andersson L, Thompson K (2000) Large-seeded species are less dependent on light for germination than small-seeded ones. Seed Sci Res 10:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0960258500000118
MinAmbiente (2015) Plan Nacional de Restauración: Restauración ecológica, rehabilitación y recuperación de áreas disturbadas In: Sostenible MdAyD (ed), Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
Misni N, Sulaiman S, Othman H (2008) The repellent activity of Piper aduncum Linn (Family: Piperaceae) essential oil against Aedes aegypti using human volunteers. J Trop Med Parasitol 31:63–69
Moles AT, Westoby M (2004) Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. J Ecol 92:372–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00884.x
Moles AT, Falster DS, Leishman MR, Westoby M (2004) Small-seeded species produce more seeds per square metre of canopy per year, but not per individual per lifetime. J Ecol 92:384–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00880.x
Montero A, Barrera I, Giraldo B, Lucena B (2016) Fichas técnicas de especies de uso forestal y agroforestal de la Amazonía Colombiana. Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Bogota D.C., Colombia
Mori SA, Pipoly JJ (1984) Observations on the big bang flowering of Miconia minutiflora (Melastomataceae). Brittonia 36:337–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/2806595
Mousavi SR, Rezaei M, Mousavi A (2011) A general overview on seed dormancy and methods of breaking it. Adv Environ Biol 5:3333–3337
Murali K (1997) Patterns of seed size, germination and seed viability of tropical tree species in southern India. Biotropica 29:271–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00428.x
Nebel G (2000) Minquartia guianensis Aubl.: Uso, Ecología y Manejo en Forestería y Agroforestería. Folia Amazónica 10:201–223
Pearson TRH, Burslem DFRP, Mullins CE, Dalling JW (2002) Germination ecology of neotropical pioneers: interacting effects of environmental conditions and seed size. Ecology 83:2798–2807. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2798:geonpi]2.0.co;2
Peres CA, van Roosmalen MG (1996) Avian dispersal of" mimetic seeds" of Ormosia lignivalvis by terrestrial granivores: deception or mutualism? Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546248
Phillips DA (1980) Efficiency of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 31:29–49
Poorter L, Rose SA (2005) Light-dependent changes in the relationship between seed mass and seedling traits: a meta-analysis for rain forest tree species. Oecologia 142:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1732-y
R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rey Benayas JM, Bullock JM, Newton AC (2008) Creating woodland islets to reconcile ecological restoration, conservation, and agricultural land use. Front Ecol Environ 6:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1890/070057
Romero M, Cabrera E, Ortiz N (2009) Informe sobre el estado de la biodiversidad en Colombia 2007–2008: Piedemonte orinoquense, sabanas y bosques asociados al norte del río Guaviare. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Rudolf P, Owston P (2003) Woody Plant Seed Manual. USDA Forest Service. Agriculture Handbook 727. United States Department of Agriculture, pp 1–1241
Rüger N, Condit R, Dent DH, DeWalt SJ, Hubbell SP, Lichstein JW, Lopez OR, Wirth C, Farrior CE (2020) Demographic trade-offs predict tropical forest dynamics. Science 368:165–168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz4797
Salazar R, Soihet C (2001) Manejo de semillas de 75 especies forestales de América Latina. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica
Sautu A, Baskin JM, Baskin CC, Condit R (2006) Studies on the seed biology of 100 native species of trees in a seasonal moist tropical forest, Panama, Central America. For Ecol Manag 234:245–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.006
Stevenson P (2005) Potential keystone plant species for the frugivore community at Tinigua Park, Colombia. In: Dew JL, Boubli JP (eds) Tropical Fruits and Frugivores. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 37–57
Stimm B, Beck E, Günter S, Aguirre N, Cueva E, Mosandl R, Weber M (2008) Reforestation of abandoned pastures: seed ecology of native species and production of indigenous plant material. In: Beck E, Bendix J, Kottke I, Makeschin F, Reinhard M (eds) Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador, vol 198. Springer, Berlin, pp 417–429
Susanto D, Suwinarti W, Amirta R (2018) Seed germination and cuttings growth of Piper aduncum. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol 144. IOP Publishing, p 012018
Traveset A (1998) Effect of seed passage through vertebrate frugivores’ guts on germination: a review. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 1:151–190. https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00057
Traveset A, Riera N, Mas RE (2001) Passage through bird guts causes interspecific differences in seed germination characteristics. Funct Ecol 15:669–675. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00561.x
Trepiana J, Ruiz-Larrea MB, Ruiz-Sanz JI (2018) Unraveling the in vitro antitumor activity of Vismia baccifera against HepG2: role of hydrogen peroxide. Heliyon 4:e00675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00675
Vázquez-Yanes C, Orozco-Segovia A (1993) Patterns of seed longevity and germination in the tropical rainforest. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 24:69–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.000441
Villacís J, Armas C, Hang S, Casanoves F (2016) Selection of adequate species for degraded areas by oil-exploitation industry as a key factor for recovery forest in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Land Degrad Dev 27:1771–1780. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2511
Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x
Wehncke EV, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Dalling JW (2003) Seed dispersal patterns produced by white-faced monkeys: implications for the dispersal limitation of neotropical tree species. J Ecol 91:677–685. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00798.x
Wright SJ, Muller-Landau HC (2006) The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica 38:287–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00154.x
Yang L, Liu S, Lin R (2020) The role of light in regulating seed dormancy and germination. J Integr Plant Biol 62:1310–1326. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13001
Zalamea PC, Dalling JW, Sarmiento C, Arnold AE, Delevich C, Berhow MA, Ndobegang A, Gripenberg S, Davis AS (2018) Dormancy-defense syndromes and tradeoffs between physical and chemical defenses in seeds of pioneer species. Ecology 99:1988–1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2419
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Universidad de la Amazonia, and the Amazonian Scientific Research Institute SINCHI for institutional support throughout the development of this research. Our research formed part of the SINCHI macroproject (contract N°178) “Restauración de áreas disturbadas por implementación de sistemas productivos agropecuarios en el departamento del Caquetá”, convened June 2013. We are grateful to Armando Sterling Cuellar for his guidance during data collection. Field and lab work would not have been possible without the help of Edna Esperanza Ospina Sánchez, Gentil Andrés Rodríguez, and Laura Carolina Murcia Cruz.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Colombia Consortium. This research is part of the “Restauración de Áreas Disturbadas por Implementación de Sistemas Productivos Agropecuarios en zonas de Alta Intervención en el Caquetá” project, funded by Fondo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Inovación FCTeI—SGR, Contract 60/2013, Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Gobernación del Caquetá, Universidad de la Amazonía, Asociación de Reforestadores y Cultivadores de Caucho del Caquetá ASOHECA, and the Federación Departamental de Ganaderos del Caquetá FEDEGANCA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Research involving human and animal participants
Our study did not involve human participants or animals.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Guzmán, M.N.N., Beltrán, L.C., Rodriguez, C.H. et al. Functional seed traits as predictors of germination and seedling growth for species with potential for restoration in Caquetá, Colombia. Trees 37, 947–961 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-023-02396-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-023-02396-3