Abstract
Copper is an essential but potentially harmful trace element involved in many enzymatic processes that require redox chemistry. Cellular copper homeostasis in mammals is predominantly maintained by posttranslational regulation of copper import and export through the copper import proteins hCTR1 and hCTR2 and the copper exporters ATP7A and ATP7B. Regulation of copper uptake and export is achieved by modulation of transporter expression, copper-dependent and copper-independent trafficking of the different transporters, posttranslational modifications, and interacting proteins. In this review we systematically discuss the contribution of these different mechanisms to the regulation of copper transport.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Copper homeostasis is a strictly regulated process that balances the cellular need with the potential toxic nature of copper. Copper is a transition metal that can switch from the oxidized cupric (Cu2+) to the reduced cuprous (Cu+) form by accepting or donating an electron. Owing to this redox activity, copper is an essential cofactor in many enzymatic pathways, including respiratory oxidation, neurotransmitter synthesis, iron metabolism, and pigmentation. This same redox activity can catalyze the Fenton reaction, yielding harmful reactive oxygen species. The necessity of copper homeostasis is clearly illustrated by two genetic disorders in humans in which the cellular copper-export machinery is severely impaired. The genes encoding the homologous copper-transporting P1B-type ATPases ATP7A and ATP7B are mutated in the fatal X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder Menkes disease (OMIM 309400) and the hepatolenticular copper-overload disorder Wilson disease (OMIM 277900), respectively. Mutation of ATP7A or ATP7B results in cellular copper accumulation, but Menkes disease and Wilson disease have very different clinical presentations owing to tissue-specific expression of these genes.
To maintain cellular copper homeostasis within narrow boundaries, cells have evolved intricate and essentially conserved systems of copper import, intracellular distribution, and copper export. Copper import in mammals is primarily mediated by the copper transporter (CTR) family of proteins that comprises the homologous CTR1 and CTR2. CTR1 is absolutely required for dietary copper absorption and is essential for cellular copper uptake [1–7]. Cellular copper export is equally important and is dependent on ATP7A and ATP7B [8–12]. In contrast to other organisms, hardly any transcriptional regulation of genes primarily involved in copper homeostasis exists in mammalian cells [13], and it is commonly accepted that regulation of copper homeostasis occurs predominantly by posttranslational mechanisms. We systematically discuss here the posttranslational regulation of copper homeostasis in mammalian cells. We focus on the regulation of copper import and export with respect to transporter protein structure, copper-dependent and copper-independent trafficking, and the role of posttranslational modifications and interacting proteins.
Structure–function relationship of copper-transporting P-type ATPases
Cellular copper export is dependent on the expression of ATP7A or ATP7B [9, 10, 14–18]. ATP7A and ATP7B have dual functions depending on the cellular copper status. As trans Golgi network (TGN)-resident proteins, they mediate copper transport into the biosynthetic pathway for subsequent incorporation in cuproenzymes. After relocalization to the plasma membrane or to vesicles at the cell periphery under conditions of copper overload, these proteins are essential for cellular copper export [9, 10, 14–18].
ATP7A and ATP7B share approximately 54% homology. The overall topology of ATP7A and ATP7B is comparable. ATP7A and ATP7B have eight transmembrane helices and their amino termini and carboxy termini protrude into the cytosol (Fig. 1). The copper-transporting P-type ATPases contain several specific motifs that are essential for copper transport. Six metal binding domains (MBDs) are present in the amino-terminal domain of ATP7B and ATP7A, each comprising the typical Met-Xaa-Cys-Xaa2-Cys (MXCXXC) copper-binding sites (Fig. 1). Structural analysis by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray spectroscopy revealed that these MBDs adopt a conserved βαββαβ ferredoxin fold [19–24]. These copper-binding sites are surface-exposed and thus accessible for copper binding. To enable copper translocation across the membrane, P-type ATPases have a metal binding site (M-domain) in the transmembrane helices [25]. Copper coordination in the M-domain is essential for ATPase-dependent copper transport, and therefore three transmembrane helices contain invariant residues that coordinate copper in the M-domain (Fig. 1); the Cys-Pro-Cys (CPC) motif in helix 6 [24], the Asp-Tyr (YN) motif in helix 7, and the Met-Xaa-Xaa-Ser (MxxS) motif in helix 8 coordinate copper in the M-domain [26–28]. Copper export by ATP7A and ATP7B is essentially dependent on the cyclic ATP hydrolysis activity [25]. ATP7A and ATP7B have several conserved motifs that are essential for their ATPase activity. These include the nucleotide-binding domain (N-domain), the phosphorylation domain (P-domain), and the actuator domain (A-domain) (Fig. 1).
Structure–function relationship of the copper-uptake proteins CTR1 and CTR2
CTR proteins are highly conserved members of the solute carrier superfamily expressed in eukaryotic cells. The human genome encodes two CTRs (hCTR1, SLC31A1; and hCTR2, SLC31A2). hCTR1 was identified as a high-affinity CTR by functional complementation of a yeast strain deficient in high-affinity copper uptake [29–32]. The characterization of CTR1 as a high-affinity CTR marked the start of extensive studies on the structure, function, and cellular localization of the CTR protein family [2, 6, 7, 33–42]. Overexpression of hCTR1 in several cell lines results in a substantial, specific, and saturable induction of cellular copper import with a K m of approximately 1–5 μM [7, 35, 39]. Ctr1 knockout mice died during midgestation, indicating an essential role for Ctr1 in embryonic development [2, 4]. Interestingly, Ctr1+/− mice that survived the embryonic stages displayed copper deficiencies in brain tissue, indicating that Ctr1 is indispensable for copper transport in mammals [2]. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts isolated from Ctr1 knockout mice have a substantial defect in copper uptake and copper incorporation into cuproenzymes [3]. Finally, analysis of conditional knockout mice that lack Ctr1 expression specifically in hepatocytes or in intestinal epithelial cells revealed a relatively minor contribution of Ctr1 to liver copper uptake [43], but an essential role for Ctr1 in intestinal copper uptake [5]. hCTR2 was only recently characterized as a functional CTR that mediates copper uptake with relatively low affinity compared with hCTR1 [6, 7].
Studies in yeast and mammalian cells revealed that CTR proteins are integral membrane proteins, which contain three transmembrane helices. Extensive experimental evidence supports the topological model described in Fig. 2 [37, 39, 40, 44]. The carboxy terminus protrudes in the cytosol, whereas the amino terminus is located at the extracytoplasmic side of the membrane. The amino terminus of CTR1 contains a number of conserved methionine and histidine residues, arranged in so-called Mets motifs. These motifs likely contribute the sulfhydryl ligands that coordinate copper for subsequent transport. Whereas only the penultimate methionine in these motifs is absolutely required for copper transport, their presence highly increases copper transport affinity [41]. In contrast, CTR2 lacks these Mets-motifs with the exception of the penultimate methionine, providing an explanation for the reduced affinity compared with CTR1. The amino terminus of hCTR1 is substituted with N- and O-linked oligosaccharides [37, 45]. The function of the N-linked glycosylation is not completely clear, whereas the O-linked glycans are possibly involved in the stability of the protein [45].
Biochemical analysis and electron microscopic crystallography revealed that hCTR1 subunits assemble as homo-oligomeric complexes comprising three hCTR1 subunits [7, 33, 34, 37, 39]. Homo-oligomerization may involve mutual interactions of the amino termini of hCTR1, as was suggested by yeast-two-hybrid experiments [37]. A cysteine residue in the carboxy terminus [36] and a Gly-Xaa3-Gly sequence in the second transmembrane helix [33, 34] have also been implicated in hCTR1 oligomerization. Together, these data support the notion that multiple domains within CTR1 proteins contribute to the formation of oligomeric transporters. Electron microscopy analysis of protein crystals comprising recombinant hCTR1 reconstituted in native phospholipid bilayers permitted determination of the structure of the hCTR1 oligomer at approximately 6-Å resolution. These studies revealed that hCTR1 forms compact trimeric complexes containing nine transmembrane helices [33, 34]. Experiments using hCTR2 indicated that oligomerization is a general characteristic of human CTR proteins [7]. These data suggest that oligomerization of hCTR1 is required for functional high-affinity copper transport activity by permitting the formation of copper-permeable channels necessary for copper uptake. Formation of such channels would permit copper transport by coordination of copper by a series of six methionine residues buried within the transmembrane helices of the CTR trimer. Finally, the cytoplasmic carboxy-terminal domain of hCTR1 contains a conserved His-Cys-His motif, which may generate the thermodynamic energy that drives copper import and which may prevent unregulated entry of “free” copper into the cytosol.
Posttranslational regulation of copper transport
Regulation of subcellular localization and copper-dependent protein trafficking
Under basal (low-copper) conditions, ATP7A and ATP7B display a characteristic perinuclear localization [9, 11, 46], which has been identified as the TGN by immunogold electron microscopy [47]. Endogenous as well as overexpressed ATP7A and ATP7B were detected in the TGN in a wide variety of polarized and nonpolarized cell types under basal copper conditions, both in vitro and in vivo [9, 11, 12, 14, 47–62]. In ATP7A, a putative TGN-targeting signal was identified within transmembrane helix 3 [54]. A certain degree of homology within this region is present between ATP7A and ATP7B, but it is currently unknown whether transmembrane helix 3 in ATP7B contains a similar TGN-targeting signal. Recent studies localized ATP7B to tight junctions in hepatocytes, where it might be involved in paracellular copper transport [63]. Taken together, the general consensus is that ATP7A and ATP7B are localized in the TGN under basal copper conditions. Incorporation of copper into nascent cuproenzymes such as ceruloplasmin in the TGN is dependent on expression of ATP7A and ATP7B, which is consistent with the localization of ATP7A and ATP7B in the TGN [64].
In most of these studies, copper-dependent localization of ATP7A and ATP7B to post-Golgi vesicles or to the plasma membrane was observed. This copper-dependent relocalization of copper-transporting P-type ATPases is metal-specific, fast, does not require de novo protein synthesis, and is reversible. Although ATP7A and ATP7B both traffic in response to copper, their destination is clearly different. Under high-copper conditions, ATP7B displays overlap with the apical membrane in several polarized hepatic cell lines [12, 51, 53], whereas others observed that ATP7B does not traffic preferentially to the plasma membrane but traffics to post-Golgi vesicles instead [9, 46, 52, 65, 66]. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments have illustrated copper-dependent trafficking of ATP7B in hepatocytes [12, 51, 53, 67]. It appears that copper-induced trafficking of ATP7B is a cell-type-specific phenomenon. Barnes et al. [68] demonstrated that copper-induced trafficking of endogenously expressed ATP7B in kidney-derived HEK293T cells, MDCK cells, Cos-7 cells, or primary kidney cells was perturbed, whereas copper-dependent trafficking of ATP7A did take place in these same cell types. Reversible copper-dependent trafficking of ATP7A to the plasma membrane or post-Golgi vesicles in nonpolarized cells [11, 54–58] and specifically towards the basolateral membrane in polarized cells [59–62, 69, 70] was observed.
Specific targeting of ATP7B towards the apical membrane is dependent on an ATP7B-specific sequence, F37AFDNVGYE45, and disruption of this motif results in basolateral targeting [71] (Fig. 1). This sequence motif is absent in ATP7A, and overexpression of ATP7A in hepatocytes results in basolateral localization [70]. Deletion of an ATP7A-specific PDZ-domain in the carboxy terminus of ATP7A results in apical localization of ATP7A in hepatocytes [70]. Apparently, these motifs are required for trafficking to distinct membranes.
Retrograde transport of ATP7A and ATP7B back to the TGN is induced by restoring copper concentrations to basal levels [65]. A dileucine sequence in the carboxy-terminal tail of ATP7A is required for retrograde transport to the TGN [72–74]. This dileucine motif might induce classic clathrin-dependent endocytosis of ATP7A [75], but contradicting observations showed that endocytosis of ATP7A is also clathrin-independent [75, 76]. Apparently, other sequences contribute to the retrograde transport of ATP7A. ATP7B has a comparable trileucine motif in its carboxy-terminal tail (Fig. 1). Mutation of the trileucine in ATP7B does not result in retention at the plasma membrane, but ATP7B is constitutively localized in post-Golgi vesicles instead [76]. Thus, the dileucine/trileucine clearly functions in retrograde transport of ATP7A and ATP7B.
Copper transport activity strongly correlates with copper-induced trafficking of both ATP7A and ATP7B. Mutation of the CPC copper-binding site in the transmembrane region prevents copper binding and copper-induced relocalization [70, 77, 78], but results in a constitutive localization in post-Golgi vesicles, concomitant with increased phosphorylation of the invariant D1027 in the P-domain in ATP7B [57]. Furthermore, mutation D1027 in ATP7B abolishes copper-induced trafficking from the TGN to post-Golgi vesicles [52]. In contrast, mutation of the TGEA motif results in localization of ATP7A in post-Golgi vesicles and this localization is no longer affected by changes in copper concentrations [78]. More importantly, combining the TGEA mutation with deletion of the six amino-terminal MBDs and the CPC motif in ATP7B cannot reverse the peripheral localization [52]. Apparently, copper-dependent localization of copper-transporting P-type ATPases is dependent on the progression through the different conformational stages associated with the catalytic cycle.
hCTR1 is predominantly localized in intracellular organelles, but a smaller or larger proportion of hCTR1 is exposed on the plasma membrane depending on the cell type (Fig. 3) [38, 39, 79]. The subcellular localization of hCTR1 is regulated by extracellular copper concentrations. In steady-state conditions, hCTR1 constitutively cycles between intracellular organelles and the plasma membrane [38]. The cell surface pool of hCTR1 is rapidly internalized and subsequently degraded in response to high copper concentrations (200 μM CuCl2) [40]. This is dependent on the Mets motifs in the amino terminus of hCTR1 [44]. This forms a putative regulatory mechanism to prevent toxic copper accumulation in the cell. In contrast, hCTR2 is exclusively localized in endosomes and lysosomes, and its localization is not affected by changes in the extracellular copper concentration [7].
Comparison of hCTR1 and hCTR2 revealed highly conserved dileucine motifs in their cytoplasmic loops, whereas hCTR2 has an additional dileucine motif in its carboxy terminus (Fig. 1). Furthermore, hCTR1 contains a putative Tyr-Xaa2-(hydrophobic amino acid) internalization motif in its cytoplasmic loop: Tyr-Asn-Ser-Met (Fig. 2) [80]. Conformational changes induced by copper binding might expose these motifs to the endocytosis machinery, resulting in subsequent internalization. The two dileucine motifs in hCTR2 might strengthen the internalization potential of hCTR2, which could imply that hCTR2 only transiently appears at the plasma membrane followed by immediate internalization into the endocytic pathway. The contribution of these motifs to the subcellular localization requires further investigation.
Copper-independent regulation of hCTR1, ATP7A and ATP7B trafficking, and protein expression
Stimuli other than copper affect the localization of copper transport proteins in different tissues. Activation of the NMDA receptor by glutamate in hippocampal neurons results in reversible and copper-independent trafficking of ATP7A from the TGN to neuronal processes [81]. This results in glutamate-dependent copper excretion, which prevents neuronal cell death owing to NMDA-receptor activation [82]. Another tissue-specific copper-independent localization pathway is present in melanocytes. These cells require copper transport into melanosomes, where the cuproenzyme tyrosinase mediates maturation of promelanin into melanin (pigment). After synthesis, tyrosinase incorporates copper in the TGN, but the enzyme loses bound copper during progression to the endocytic compartments. Interestingly, ATP7A is partially localized to melanosomes [83]. Hence, copper-independent localization of ATP7A to melanosomes ascertains organelle-specific tyrosinase activity. Copper transport in macrophages is regulated in an oxygen-dependent manner. Hypoxia induces ATP7A protein expression and trafficking of ATP7A from the TGN to post-Golgi vesicles in a copper-dependent manner [84]. Furthermore, hCTR1 protein expression and copper uptake are induced by hypoxia. During hypoxia, copper delivery to Cu/Zn dismutase (SOD1) and to COX1, a subunit of cytochrome c oxidase, is inhibited, whereas more copper is incorporated into ceruloplasmin in the secretory pathway by ATP7A [84]. Apparently, hypoxia results in an increased copper uptake and a redistribution of copper to different compartments in the cell to adapt to cellular need. The latter strongly suggests that copper uptake, distribution, and export are coordinately regulated (Fig. 3).
Mother-to-fetus transport of copper in placental trophoblasts is dependent on ATP7A as well as ATP7B [62, 69, 85]. Interestingly, several hormones regulate expression and localization of these proteins. Estrogen and insulin result in upregulation of ATP7A messenger RNA and protein expression [69]. These hormones induce copper-independent trafficking of ATP7A from the TGN to the basolateral membrane (fetal side of the cell). At the same time, stimulation with these hormones results in decreased ATP7B protein expression, and retention of ATP7B in the TGN to prevent copper excretion at the apical (maternal) side of the membrane. A minor increase in hCTR1 protein expression was observed in JEG-3 placental cells after stimulation with estrogen or progesterone. hCTR1 is localized at the lateral membranes of polarized JEG-3 cells, but no clear changes in localization are observed in response to hormone treatment [61]. In contrast, lactogenic hormones trigger ATP7B relocalization to the apical membrane (milk side) in mammary tissue, which results in copper export to the milk [60]. Treatment with prolactin results in increased copper excretion into the milk by basolateral localization of CTR1 and ATP7A [59]. These observations suggest that localization of copper transport proteins is regulated in a coordinated manner in mammary gland tissue.
Copper transport is tightly correlated to resistance to a group of cytotoxic platinum drugs that are used in cancer treatment, such as cisplatin. Cisplatin enters the cell in an hCTR1-dependent manner [86, 87], and expression of hCTR1 is downregulated by cisplatin. Cisplatin also regulates its own export by modulating expression of ATP7A and ATP7B. Increased expression of ATP7A and ATP7B correlates with decreased sensitivity to cisplatin [88, 89].
Regulation of copper transport by protein–protein interactions
Protein–protein interactions as a potential way to regulate activity of the different copper transport proteins have attracted much recent attention. Protein–protein interactions are known to manipulate protein localization, degradation, and posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination and many other processes. In addition, protein–protein interactions themselves are regulated by posttranslational modifications. Copper binding to ATP7A and ATP7B forms a key event in the catalytic cycle. An essential step in ATP7A- and ATP7B-dependent copper transport is copper delivery by the copper chaperone ATOX1 [90–93]. The importance of ATOX1 in mammalian biology is clearly illustrated by the Atox1 knockout mice that displayed a copper deficiency phenotype similar to Menkes disease [90]. ATOX1 contains an MBD with significant homology and similar fold compared with the MBDs of ATP7A and ATP7B [94], enabling copper-dependent dimerization of these motifs [95] and copper transfer between the copper-binding sites of ATOX1 and the copper-transporting P-type ATPases. The interaction between ATOX1 and ATP7A or ATP7B is essential for copper translocation and for copper-dependent trafficking of ATP7A and ATP7B [10, 11, 48, 55–58, 70, 77, 78, 91, 92, 96–100]. ATOX1 interacts with all MBDs in vitro in a copper-dependent manner [101], but the different MBDs are not equally involved in the regulation of copper-transporting P-type ATPases.
ATOX1-dependent copper delivery to the amino-terminal MBDs in ATP7A and ATP7B was long thought to be the mechanism of copper delivery into the copper-binding sites in the M-domain. Arguello and Gonzalez-Guerrero [102] recently postulated a novel theory in which the amino-terminal MBDs regulate ATPase activity. Copper delivery to the amino-terminal MBDs by ATOX1 disrupts the interaction of the amino terminus and the N-domain. This enables ATP binding to the N-domain and allows ATOX1 to deliver copper to the copper-binding sites in the M-domain, thereby stimulating copper translocation by these ATPases [103]. ATOX1 also interacts with the immunophillin FKBP52 [104], a protein involved in protein trafficking, but the exact mechanisms by which FKBP52 attenuates its role in the copper excretion pathway need to be further characterized.
Recently, two novel ATP7B-interacting proteins were identified by yeast-two-hybrid analyses [105–107]. First, glutaredoxin displays a copper-dependent interaction with ATP7A and ATP7B [106], and this interaction is dependent on the availability of the MBDs in the amino terminus. Glutaredoxins are involved in keeping cysteine thiols in a reduced state. This may be a mechanism to keep the cysteines in the MXCXXC motifs available for copper binding by preventing the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds that are not accessible for copper coordination [106]. Second, the amino terminus of ATP7B interacts with the dynactin subunit p62 in a copper-dependent manner [105]. The dynactin complex is involved in mobilization of organelles along microtubules [108], suggesting that this interaction may be involved in copper-dependent relocalization of ATP7B. Of note, copper-independent interaction with the carboxy terminus of ATP7A and the PDZ-domain containing protein ATPase-interacting PDZ protein was recently described [107]. These proteins are involved in membrane trafficking, but their function in ATP7A regulation is currently unclear.
One of the other ATP7B-interacting proteins that recently attracted attention is COMMD1. COMMD1 was characterized as the protein that was deleted in Bedlington terriers affected by hereditary copper toxicosis [109–111]. The exact function of COMMD1 in copper metabolism is currently unknown. Although it has been reported that COMMD1 binds Cu2+ [112], a direct and copper-independent interaction between the amino terminus of ATP7B and COMMD1 has been characterized [113, 114]. Transient knockdown of COMMD1 by RNA interference results in increased cellular copper levels in HEK293T cells [115–117]. Together, these data suggest that ATP7B and COMMD1 cooperate in cellular copper export, which might be the underlying defect in Bedlington terriers affected by copper toxicosis. Interestingly, the interaction between COMMD1 and ATP7B is markedly increased when Wilson-disease-associated mutations of ATP7B are present [114, 118]. These mutations are associated with misfolding, mislocalization of ATP7B to the endoplasmic reticulum, and decreased protein expression due to increased proteasomal degradation. COMMD1 has been implicated in regulation of protein stability of components of the NF-κB and HIF1 signaling pathways [119–122]. These observations suggest that COMMD1 may affect copper homeostasis by regulating the stability of newly synthesized ATP7B.
With the exception of homo-oligomerization of CTR1, no interacting proteins have been identified for the CTR proteins, but it is speculated that CTR-mediated copper transport is coupled to protein-interaction-dependent transfer of copper to cytoplasmic proteins such as the known copper chaperones. In addition, copper-responsive internalization of CTR1 from the plasma membrane likely involves interacting proteins.
Regulation of copper transport by posttranslational modifications
Signal transduction pathways that confer transient posttranslational protein modifications, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination, dictate the expression, localization, stability, and function of many proteins. Degradation of newly synthesized ATP7B can be partly inhibited by inhibitors of proteasomal degradation, suggesting that ATP7B expression is regulated by polyubiquitination [114]. To date, no ubquitination sites have directly been characterized in ATP7A or ATP7B. Internalization of Ctr1p in Saccharomyces ceriviseae requires ubiquitination of two carboxy-terminal lysine residues (Lys340 and Lys345) of Ctr1p [123]. However, these lysine residues are not conserved, and the role of ubiquitination on trafficking of mammalian CTR1 remains elusive. In analogy with other membrane proteins, it is likely that trafficking and degradation are regulated by specific monoubiquitination or polyubiquitination [124].
Phosphorylation of ATP7B, in a manner distinct from the transient phosphorylation of the invariant D1027 during the catalytic cycle, has been described and correlated with localization of ATP7B to the periphery of the cell [125]. This hyperphosphorylation of ATP7B appears dependent on copper and on the presence of an intact amino terminus [125, 126]. In contrast, copper depletion results in dephosphorylation of ATP7B and concomitant retrograde trafficking of ATP7B to the TGN [125]. The kinase responsible for this phosphorylation event is currently unknown, but it is tempting to speculate that coupling of protein phosphorylation to copper binding at the amino-terminal domains of copper-transporting P-type ATPases comprises the mechanism by which the amino terminus regulates protein function and localization in a copper-dependent way. Alternatively, it is also possible that copper-initiated signal transduction pathways exist and result in phosphorylation of ATP7A or ATP7B. Furthermore, a basal phosphorylation site that is independent of copper was characterized, and involves serine residues in the carboxy-terminal Ser796-Tyr1384 region of ATP7B [125, 126]. The function of basal phosphorylation is currently unknown, but it may be involved in interactions with proteins either to retain ATP7B in the TGN or to modulate copper transport activity.
Recently, several novel serine phosphorylation sites have been identified in the amino terminus and carboxy terminus of ATP7A. Phosphorylation of Ser1342 and Ser1469 is essential for copper-dependent trafficking from the TGN to the plasma membrane [127]. However, copper-dependent trafficking per se is not affected by mutations in these sites, suggesting that these serines possibly regulate direction of trafficking. These sites are strongly conserved in ATP7B, suggesting that regulation of trafficking by copper-dependent phosphorylation is conserved. These observations mark an important step forward in our understanding of regulation of copper ATPases by phosphorylation. Interestingly, some of these phosphorylation sites are in close proximity to the PDZ-domain in ATP7A and the dileucine/trileucine motif involved in internalization. It is tempting to speculate that phosphorylation at these sites modulates specific protein–protein interactions at these different motifs, and thereby affects cellular localization. In conclusion, identification of the exact phosphorylation sites, the consequences of phosphorylation and the kinases responsible will greatly enhance our understanding of regulation of ATP7B function. In addition, there is great demand for identification of other potential posttranslational modifications of copper-transporting P-type ATPases.
Conclusions
The regulation of ATP7A- and ATP7B-dependent copper translocation and the regulation of the spatial distribution of copper transport proteins in cells have been intensively studied during the past few decades. The copper-dependent trafficking of ATP7A and ATP7B is correlated to their catalytic activity, but hardly any information is available on the mechanisms that facilitate this relocalization. The regulated trafficking to specific organelles and membranes in the cell requires posttranslational modifications and protein–protein interactions to direct these proteins to their specific destinations. The catalytic activity of ATP7A and ATP7B is regulated by intermolecular and intramolecular interactions comprising the amino termini and N-domains of ATP7A, ATP7B, and ATOX1. However, the contribution of copper-dependent phosphorylation to catalytic activity remains elusive. With the current development of high-throughput proteomics and high-throughput imaging systems much is to be expected in the further characterization of protein modification and the effects on copper transport, transporter localization, and regulation. Especially for the copper-import proteins hCTR1 and hCTR2, understanding of their regulation, modifications, and interacting proteins is required.
References
Kuo YM, Gybina AA, Pyatskowit JW, Gitschier J, Prohaska JR (2006) J Nutr 136:21–26
Kuo YM, Zhou B, Cosco D, Gitschier J (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6836–6841
Lee J, Petris MJ, Thiele DJ (2002) J Biol Chem 277:40253–40259
Lee J, Prohaska JR, Thiele DJ (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6842–6847
Nose Y, Kim BE, Thiele DJ (2006) Cell Metab 4:235–244
Bertinato J, Swist E, Plouffe LJ, Brooks SP, L’Abbe MR (2008) Biochem J 409:731–740
van den Berghe PV, Folmer DE, Malingré HE, van Beurden E, Klomp AE, van de Sluis B, Merkx M, Berger R, Klomp LW (2007) Biochem J 407:49–59
Holzer AK, Manorek GH, Howell SB (2006) Mol Pharmacol 70:1390–1394
Hung IH, Suzuki M, Yamaguchi Y, Yuan DS, Klausner RD, Gitlin JD (1997) J Biol Chem 272:21461–21466
Payne AS, Gitlin JD (1998) J Biol Chem 273:3765–3770
Petris MJ, Mercer JF, Culvenor JG, Lockhart P, Gleeson PA, Camakaris J (1996) EMBO J 15:6084–6095
Roelofsen H, Wolters H, Van Luyn MJ, Miura N, Kuipers F, Vonk RJ (2000) Gastroenterology 119:782–793
Muller P, van Bakel H, van de Sluis B, Holstege F, Wijmenga C, Klomp LW (2007) J Biol Inorg Chem 12:495–507
La Fontaine SL, Firth SD, Camakaris J, Englezou A, Theophilos MB, Petris MJ, Howie M, Lockhart PJ, Greenough M, Brooks H, Reddel RR, Mercer JF (1998) J Biol Chem 273:31375–31380
Camakaris J, Petris MJ, Bailey L, Shen P, Lockhart P, Glover TW, Barcroft C, Patton J, Mercer JF (1995) Hum Mol Genet 4:2117–2123
Katano K, Safaei R, Samimi G, Holzer A, Rochdi M, Howell SB (2003) Mol Pharmacol 64:466–473
La Fontaine S, Firth SD, Lockhart PJ, Brooks H, Parton RG, Camakaris J, Mercer JF (1998) Hum Mol Genet 7:1293–1300
Voskoboinik I, Greenough M, La Fontaine S, Mercer JF, Camakaris J (2001) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 281:966–970
Banci L, Bertini I, Ciofi-Baffoni S, Chasapis CT, Hadjiliadis N, Rosato A (2005) FEBS J 272:865–871
Banci L, Bertini I, Del Conte R, D’Onofrio M, Rosato A (2004) Biochemistry 43:3396–3403
DeSilva TM, Veglia G, Opella SJ (2005) Proteins 61:1038–1049
Jensen PY, Bonander N, Karlsson BG, Horn N, Tumer Z, Farver O (1998) J Inherit Metab Dis 21:195–198
Jones CE, Daly NL, Cobine PA, Craik DJ, Dameron CT (2003) J Struct Biol 143:209–218
Myari A, Hadjiliadis N, Fatemi N, Sarkar B (2004) J Inorg Biochem 98:1483–1494
Kuhlbrandt W (2004) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:282–295
Arguello JM, Eren E, Gonzalez-Guerrero M (2007) Biometals 20:233–248
Gonzalez-Guerrero M, Arguello JM (2008) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5992–5997
Mandal AK, Yang Y, Kertesz TM, Arguello JM (2004) J Biol Chem 279:54802–54807
Dancis A, Yuan DS, Haile D, Askwith C, Eide D, Moehle C, Kaplan J, Klausner RD (1994) Cell 76:393–402
Kampfenkel K, Kushnir S, Babiychuk E, Inze D, Van Montagu M (1995) J Biol Chem 270:28479–28486
Knight SA, Labbe S, Kwon LF, Kosman DJ, Thiele DJ (1996) Genes Dev 10:1917–1929
Zhou B, Gitschier J (1997) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7481–7486
Aller SG, Eng ET, De Feo CJ, Unger VM (2004) J Biol Chem 279:53435–53441
Aller SG, Unger VM (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3627–3632
Eisses JF, Kaplan JH (2002) J Biol Chem 277:29162–29171
Eisses JF, Kaplan JH (2005) J Biol Chem 280:37159–37168
Klomp AE, Juijn JA, van der Gun LT, van den Berg IE, Berger R, Klomp LW (2003) Biochem J 370:881–889
Klomp AE, Tops BB, Van Denberg IE, Berger R, Klomp LW (2002) Biochem J 364:497–505
Lee J, Peña MM, Nose Y, Thiele DJ (2002) J Biol Chem 277:4380–4387
Petris MJ, Smith K, Lee J, Thiele DJ (2003) J Biol Chem 278:9639–9646
Puig S, Lee J, Lau M, Thiele DJ (2002) J Biol Chem 277:26021–26030
Puig S, Thiele DJ (2002) Curr Opin Chem Biol 6:171–180
Kim H, Son HY, Bailey SM, Lee J (2009) Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 296(2):G356–G364
Guo Y, Smith K, Lee J, Thiele DJ, Petris MJ (2004) J Biol Chem 279:17428–17433
Maryon EB, Molloy SA, Kaplan JH (2007) J Biol Chem 282:20376–20387
Yamaguchi Y, Heiny ME, Suzuki M, Gitlin JD (1996) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:14030–14035
Huster D, Hoppert M, Lutsenko S, Zinke J, Lehmann C, Mossner J, Berr F, Caca K (2003) Gastroenterology 124:335–345
Forbes JR, Cox DW (2000) Hum Mol Genet 9(13):1927–1935
Yang XL, Miura N, Kawarada Y, Terada K, Petrukhin K, Gilliam T, Sugiyama T (1997) Biochem J 326(3):897–902
La Fontaine S, Theophilos MB, Firth SD, Gould R, Parton RG, Mercer JF (2001) Hum Mol Genet 10:361–370
Bartee MY, Lutsenko S (2007) Biometals 20:627–637
Cater MA, La Fontaine S, Shield K, Deal Y, Mercer JF (2006) Gastroenterology 130:493–506
Guo Y, Nyasae L, Braiterman LT, Hubbard AL (2005) Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 289:G904–G916
Francis MJ, Jones EE, Levy ER, Ponnambalam S, Chelly J, Monaco AP (1998) Hum Mol Genet 7:1245–1252
Goodyer ID, Jones EE, Monaco AP, Francis MJ (1999) Hum Mol Genet 8:1473–1478
Huster D, Lutsenko S (2003) J Biol Chem 278:32212–32218
Cater MA, La Fontaine S, Mercer JF (2007) Biochem J 401:143–153
Strausak D, La Fontaine S, Hill J, Firth SD, Lockhart PJ, Mercer JF (1999) J Biol Chem 274:11170–11177
Kelleher SL, Lönnerdal B (2006) Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 291:R1181–R1191
Michalczyk A, Bastow E, Greenough M, Camakaris J, Freestone D, Taylor P, Linder M, Mercer J, Ackland ML (2008) J Histochem Cytochem 56:389–399
Hardman B, Manuelpillai U, Wallace EM, Monty JF, Kramer DR, Kuo YM, Mercer JF, Ackland ML (2006) Placenta 27:968–977
Hardman B, Michalczyk A, Greenough M, Camakaris J, Mercer J, Ackland L (2007) Cell Physiol Biochem 20:1073–1084
Hernandez S, Tsuchiya Y, García-Ruiz JP, Lalioti V, Nielsen S, Cassio D, Sandoval IV (2008) Gastroenterology 134:1215–1223
Fleming RE, Gitlin JD (1990) J Biol Chem 265:7701–7707
Schaefer M, Hopkins RG, Failla ML, Gitlin JD (1999) Am J Physiol 276:G639–G646
Suzuki M, Gitlin JD (1999) Pediatr Int 41:436–442
Schaefer M, Gitlin JD (1999) Am J Physiol 276:G311–G314
Barnes N, Bartee MY, Braiterman L, Gupta A, Ustiyan V, Zuzel V, Kaplan JH, Hubbard AL, Lutsenko S (2009) Traffic 10(6):767–779
Hardman B, Michalczyk A, Greenough M, Camakaris J, Mercer JF, Ackland ML (2007) Biochem J 402:241–250
Greenough M, Pase L, Voskoboinik I, Petris MJ, O’Brien AW, Camakaris J (2004) Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287:C1463–C1471
Braiterman L, Nyasae L, Guo Y, Bustos R, Lutsenko S, Hubbard A (2009) Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 296(2):G433–G444
Francis MJ, Jones EE, Levy ER, Martin RL, Ponnambalam S, Monaco AP (1999) J Cell Sci 112(11):1721–1732
Petris MJ, Camakaris J, Greenough M, LaFontaine S, Mercer JF (1998) Hum Mol Genet 7:2063–2071
Petris MJ, Mercer JF (1999) Hum Mol Genet 8:2107–2115
Lane C, Petris MJ, Benmerah A, Greenough M, Camakaris J (2004) Biometals 17:87–98
Cobbold C, Coventry J, Ponnambalam S, Monaco AP (2003) Hum Mol Genet 12:1523–1533
Mercer JF, Barnes N, Stevenson J, Strausak D, Llanos RM (2003) Biometals 16:175–184
Petris MJ, Voskoboinik I, Cater M, Smith K, Kim BE, Llanos RM, Strausak D, Camakaris J, Mercer JF (2002) J Biol Chem 277:46736–46742
Zimnicka AM, Maryon EB, Kaplan JH (2007) J Biol Chem 282:26471–26480
Wilde A, Dempsey C, Banting G (1994) J Biol Chem 269:7131–7136
Schlief ML, Craig AM, Gitlin JD (2005) J Neurosci 25:239–246
Schlief ML, West T, Craig AM, Holtzman DM, Gitlin JD (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14919–14924
Setty SR, Tenza D, Sviderskaya EV, Bennett DC, Raposo G, Marks MS (2008) Nature 454:1142–1146
White C, Kambe T, Fulcher YG, Sachdev SW, Bush AI, Fritsche K, Lee J, Quinn TP, Petris MJ (2009) J Cell Sci 122:1315–1321
Richardson DR, Suryo Rahmanto Y (2007) Biochem J 402:e1–e3
Holzer AK, Samimi G, Katano K, Naerdemann W, Lin X, Safaei R, Howell SB (2004) Mol Pharmacol 66:817–823
Ishida S, Lee J, Thiele DJ, Herskowitz I (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:14298–14302
Safaei R, Otani S, Larson BJ, Rasmussen ML, Howell SB (2008) Mol Pharmacol 73:461–468
Samimi G, Varki NM, Wilczynski S, Safaei R, Alberts DS, Howell SB (2003) Clin Cancer Res 9:5853–5859
Hamza I, Faisst A, Prohaska J, Chen J, Gruss P, Gitlin JD (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6848–6852
Hamza I, Prohaska J, Gitlin JD (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1215–1220
Hamza I, Schaefer M, Klomp LW, Gitlin JD (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:13363–13368
Klomp LW, Lin SJ, Yuan DS, Klausner RD, Culotta VC, Gitlin JD (1997) J Biol Chem 272:9221–9226
Arnesano F, Banci L, Bertini I, Cantini F, Ciofi-Baffoni S, Huffman DL, O’Halloran TV (2001) J Biol Chem 276:41365–41376
van Dongen EM, Klomp LW, Merkx M (2004) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 323:789–795
Cater MA, Forbes J, La Fontaine S, Cox D, Mercer JF (2004) Biochem J 380:805–813
Forbes JR, Hsi G, Cox DW (1999) J Biol Chem 274:12408–12413
Larin D, Mekios C, Das K, Ross B, Yang AS, Gilliam TC (1999) J Biol Chem 274:28497–28504
Strausak D, Howie MK, Firth SD, Schlicksupp A, Pipkorn R, Multhaup G, Mercer JF (2003) J Biol Chem 278:20821–20827
Voskoboinik I, Mar J, Strausak D, Camakaris J (2001) J Biol Chem 276:28620–28627
Yatsunyk LA, Rosenzweig AC (2007) J Biol Chem 282:8622–8631
Arguello JM, Gonzalez-Guerrero M (2008) Structure 16:833–834
Tsivkovskii R, MacArthur BC, Lutsenko S (2001) J Biol Chem 276:2234–2242
Sanokawa-Akakura R, Dai H, Akakura S, Weinstein D, Fajardo JE, Lang SE, Wadsworth S, Siekierka J, Birge RB (2004) J Biol Chem 279:27845–27848
Lim CM, Cater MA, Mercer JF, La Fontaine S (2006) J Biol Chem 281:14006–14014
Lim CM, Cater MA, Mercer JF, La Fontaine S (2006) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 348:428–436
Stephenson SE, Dubach D, Lim CM, Mercer JF, La Fontaine S (2005) J Biol Chem 280:33270–33279
Schroer TA (2004) Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:759–779
van de Sluis B, Kole S, van Wolferen M, Holmes NG, Pearson PL, Rothuizen J, van Oost BA, Wijmenga C (2000) Mamm Genome 11:455–460
van De Sluis B, Rothuizen J, Pearson PL, van Oost BA, Wijmenga C (2002) Hum Mol Genet 11:165–173
van de Sluis BJ, Breen M, Nanji M, van Wolferen M, de Jong P, Binns MM, Pearson PL, Kuipers J, Rothuizen J, Cox DW, Wijmenga C, van Oost BA (1999) Hum Mol Genet 8:501–507
Narindrasorasak S, Kulkarni P, Deschamps P, She YM, Sarkar B (2007) Biochemistry 46:3116–3128
Tao TY, Liu F, Klomp L, Wijmenga C, Gitlin JD (2003) J Biol Chem 278:41593–41596
de Bie P, van de Sluis B, Burstein E, van de Berghe PV, Muller P, Berger R, Gitlin JD, Wijmenga C, Klomp LW (2007) Gastroenterology 133:1316–1326
Burstein E, Ganesh L, Dick RD, van De Sluis B, Wilkinson JC, Klomp LW, Wijmenga C, Brewer GJ, Nabel GJ, Duckett CS (2004) EMBO J 23:244–254
Maine GN, Mao X, Muller PA, Komarck CM, Klomp LW, Burstein E (2009) Biochem J 417:601–609
Spee B, Arends B, van Wees AM, Bode P, Penning LC, Rothuizen J (2007) Anim Genet 38:168–170
van den Berghe PVE, Stapelbroek JM, Krieger E, de Bie P, van de Graaf SFJ, de Groot REA, van Beurden E, Spijker E, Houwen RHJ, Berger R, Klomp LWJ (2009) Hepatology (early view)
Burstein E, Hoberg JE, Wilkinson AS, Rumble JM, Csomos RA, Komarck CM, Maine GN, Wilkinson JC, Mayo MW, Duckett CS (2005) J Biol Chem 280:22222–22232
de Bie P, van de Sluis B, Klomp L, Wijmenga C (2005) J Hered 96:803–811
Maine GN, Mao X, Komarck CM, Burstein E (2007) EMBO J 26:436–447
van de Sluis B, Muller P, Duran K, Chen A, Groot AJ, Klomp LW, Liu PP, Wijmenga C (2007) Mol Cell Biol 27:4142–4156
Liu J, Sitaram A, Burd CG (2007) Traffic 8:1375–1384
Piper RC, Luzio JP (2007) Curr Opin Cell Biol 19:459–465
Vanderwerf SM, Cooper MJ, Stetsenko IV, Lutsenko S (2001) J Biol Chem 276:36289–36294
Vanderwerf SM, Lutsenko S (2002) Biochem Soc Trans 30:739–741
Veldhuis NA, Valova VA, Gaeth AP, Palstra N, Hannan KM, Michell BJ, Kelly LE, Jennings I, Kemp BE, Pearson RB, Robinson PJ, Camakaris J (2009) Int J Biochem Cell Biol. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2009.06.008
Acknowledgments
NWO Program Grant 912.04.106 and NWO ALW Grant 817.02.022 to L.W.J.K are acknowledged.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article will be printed in the upcoming Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry special issue Cell Biology of Copper.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
van den Berghe, P.V.E., Klomp, L.W.J. Posttranslational regulation of copper transporters. J Biol Inorg Chem 15, 37–46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-009-0592-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-009-0592-7