Abstract
Karst areas contain valuable groundwater resources and high biodiversity, but are particularly vulnerable to climate change and human impacts. Land-use change is the cause and consequence of global environmental change. The releases of the Climate Change Initiative-Land Cover (CCI-LC) and World Karst Aquifer Map (WOKAM) datasets have made it possible to explore global land-use changes in karst areas. This paper firstly analyses the global karst land-use distribution in 2020, as well as the land-use transition characteristics between 1992 and 2020. Then, two indicators, proportion of land-use change and dominant type of land-use change, are proposed to identify the spatial characteristics of land-use change in global karst areas. Finally, three examples of land-use change in karst areas are analyzed in detail. Land-use types and proportions of the global karst areas from large to small are as follows: forest (31.78%), bare area (27.58%), cropland (19.02%), grassland (10.87%), shrubland (7.21%), wetland (1.67%), ice and snow (1.16%) and urban (0.71%). The total area of global karst land-use change is 1.30 million km2, about 4.85% of global karst surface. The land-use change trend of global karst is dominated by afforestation, supplemented by scattered urbanization and agricultural reclamation. The tropical climate has a higher intensity of land-use change. Regions of agricultural reclamation are highly consistent with the population density. These results reflect the impact of human activities and climate change on land-use changes in global karst areas, and serve as a basis for further research and planning of land resource management.
Résumé
Les zones karstiques contiennent de précieuses ressources en eaux souterraines et une grande biodiversité, mais elles sont particulièrement vulnérables au changement climatique et aux effets de l′activité humaine. Le changement d′occupation des sols est la cause et la conséquence du changement environnemental mondial. La publication d’ensembles de données de l’initiative du Changement Climatique et de la couverture terrestre (CCI-LC) et de la carte mondiale des aquifères karstiques (WOKAM) a permis d′étudier les changements d′utilisation des sols dans les zones karstiques. Cet article analyse tout d′abord la répartition mondiale de l′utilisation des terres karstiques en 2020, ainsi que les caractéristiques de la transition de l′utilisation des terres entre 1992 et 2020. Ensuite, deux indicateurs, la proportion de changement d′utilisation des terres et le type dominant de changement d′utilisation des terres, sont proposés pour identifier les caractéristiques spatiales du changement d′utilisation des terres dans les zones karstiques mondiales. Enfin, trois exemples de changement d′utilisation des sols dans les zones karstiques sont analysés en détail. Les types d′utilisation des sols et les proportions des zones karstiques mondiales, de la plus grande à la plus petite, sont les suivants: forêts (31.78%), zones dénudées (27.58%), terres cultivées (19.02%), prairies (10.87%), zones arbustives (7.21%), zones humides (1.67%), glace et neige (1.16%) et zones urbaines (0.71%). La superficie totale des changements d′utilisation des sols karstiques est de 1.30 million de km², soit environ 4.85% de la surface karstique mondiale. La tendance du changement d′utilisation des sols du karst à l’échelle mondiale est dominée par le reboisement, complété par une urbanisation dispersée et une récupération agricole. Le climat tropical présente une plus grande intensité de changement d′affectation des sols. Les régions de mise en valeur agricole correspondent fortement à la densité de la population. Ces résultats reflètent l′impact des activités humaines et du changement climatique sur les modifications de l′utilisation des sols dans les zones karstiques à l’échelle mondiale et servent de base pour de futurs travaux de recherche et à la planification de la gestion des ressources foncières.
Zusammenfassung
Karstgebiete weisen wertvolle Grundwasserressourcen und eine hohe Artenvielfalt auf, sind jedoch besonders anfällig für den Klimawandel und menschliche Einflüsse. Landnutzungswandel ist Ursache und Folge von globalen Umweltveränderungen. Die Veröffentlichung von Daten wie denen des Land-Cover-Projektes der Climate Change Initiative (CCI-LC) der europäischen Weltraumbehörde ESA und der World Karst Aquifer Map (WOKAM) hat es ermöglicht, weltweite Landnutzungsveränderungen in Karstgebieten zu untersuchen. In dieser Arbeit wird zunächst die globale Verteilung der Nutzung von Karstlandschaften im Jahr 2020 untersucht, sowie die Charakteristika von Landnutzungsübergängen zwischen 1992 und 2020 analysiert. Dann werden zwei Indikatoren vorgeschlagen, um die räumlichen Merkmale von Landnutzungsveränderungen in globalen Karstgebieten zu identifizieren: Der Anteil von Landnutzungsveränderungen und der dominante Typ von Landnutzungsveränderungen. Schließlich werden drei Beispiele für Landnutzungsveränderungen in Karstgebieten im Detail analysiert. Die Landnutzungstypen und ihre Anteile der globalen Karstgebiete (in abnehmender Größe) sind: Wald (31.78%), kahle Flächen (27.58%), Ackerland (19.02%), Grasland (10.87%), Strauchland (7.21%), Feuchtgebiete (1.67%), Eis und Schnee (1.16%) und urbanes Gebiet (0.71%). Die Gesamtfläche der globalen Landnutzungsveränderungen in Karstgebieten beträgt 1.3 Millionen km², etwa 4.85% der globalen Karstfläche. Der Trend des Landnutzungswandels in den weltweiten Karstgebieten wird von Aufforstung dominiert, ergänzt durch vereinzelte Urbanisierung und landwirtschaftliche Rekultivierung. Die tropischen Klimazonen weisen eine höhere Intensität von Landnutzungsveränderungen auf. Regionen mit landwirtschaftlicher Rekultivierung stimmen weitgehend mit der Bevölkerungsdichte überein. Diese Ergebnisse spiegeln den Einfluss menschlicher Aktivitäten und des Klimawandels auf Landnutzungsveränderungen in globalen Karstgebieten wider und dienen als Grundlage für weitere Forschung und Planung im Bereich des Landressourcenmanagements.
Resumen
Las zonas kársticas contienen valiosos recursos de aguas subterráneas y una gran biodiversidad, pero son especialmente vulnerables al cambio climático y al impacto humano. El cambio en el uso del suelo es causa y consecuencia del cambio medioambiental global. La publicación de los conjuntos de datos Climate Change Initiative-Land Cover (CCI-LC) y World Karst Aquifer Map (WOKAM) ha permitido explorar los cambios globales en el uso del suelo en las zonas kársticas. Este documento analiza en primer lugar la distribución mundial del uso del suelo kárstico en 2020, así como las características de la transición del uso del suelo entre 1992 y 2020. A continuación, se proponen dos indicadores, la proporción de cambio de uso del suelo y el tipo dominante de cambio de uso del suelo, para identificar las características espaciales del cambio de uso del suelo en las zonas kársticas mundiales. Por último, se analizan en detalle tres ejemplos de cambio de uso del suelo en zonas kársticas. Los tipos de uso del suelo y las proporciones de las zonas kársticas mundiales de grandes a pequeñas son los siguientes: bosque (31.78%), zona desnuda (27.58%), tierras de cultivo (19.02%), pastizales (10.87%), matorrales (7.21%), humedales (1.67%), hielo y nieve (1.16%) y zonas urbanas (0.71%). El área total de cambio de uso del suelo kárstico mundial es de 1.30 millones de km², aproximadamente el 4.85% de la superficie kárstica mundial. La tendencia del cambio de uso del suelo en el karst mundial está dominada por la forestación, complementada por la urbanización dispersa y la recuperación agrícola. El clima tropical presenta una mayor intensidad de cambio de uso del suelo. Las regiones de recuperación agrícola coinciden en gran medida con la densidad de población. Estos resultados reflejan el impacto de las actividades humanas y el cambio climático en los cambios de uso del suelo en las zonas kársticas mundiales, y sirven de base para futuras investigaciones y la planificación de la gestión de los recursos del suelo.
摘要
喀斯特地区蕴含着宝贵的地下水资源和较高的生物多样性,但特别容易受到气候变化和人类活动的影响。土地利用变化是全球环境变化的原因也是结果。气候变化倡议-土地覆盖(CCI-LC)和世界岩溶含水层图(WOKAM)数据集的发布为探索全球岩溶地区土地利用变化提供了可能。首先,本文分析了2020年全球喀斯特地区的土地利用分布,以及1992 - 2020年间土地利用转型特征。其次,提出了土地利用变化的比例和土地利用变化的主要类型两个指标,以识别全球喀斯特地区土地利用变化的空间特征。最后,对岩溶地区土地利用变化的三个实例进行了详细分析。全球岩溶区土地利用类型及其占比从大到小依次为:森林(31.78%)、裸地(27.58%)、农田(19.02%)、草地(10.87%)、灌丛(7.21%)、湿地(1.67%)、冰雪覆盖区域(1.16%)和城镇(0.71%)。全球岩溶土地利用变化总面积为130万km²,约占全球岩溶表面积的4.85%。全球喀斯特土地利用变化趋势以人工造林为主,辅以分散的城市化和农业开垦。热带气候地区具有较高的土地利用变化强度。农垦区域与人口密度高度一致。这些结果反映了人类活动和气候变化对全球喀斯特地区土地利用变化的影响,为进一步研究和规划土地资源管理提供了依据。
Resumo
As áreas cársticas contêm recursos hídricos subterrâneos valiosos e alta biodiversidade, mas são particularmente vulneráveis às mudanças climáticas e aos impactos humanos. A mudança no uso da terra é a causa e a consequência da mudança ambiental global. Os lançamentos dos conjuntos de dados Iniciativa sobre a Mudança Climática-Cobertura da Terra (CCI-LC) e Mapa Mundi dos Aquíferos Cársticos (WOKAM) tornaram possível explorar mudanças globais no uso da terra em áreas cársticas. Este artigo analisa primeiramente a distribuição cárstica global do uso da terra em 2020, bem como as características de transição do uso da terra entre 1992 e 2020. Em seguida, dois indicadores, proporção de mudança no uso da terra e tipo dominante de mudança no uso da terra, são propostos para identificar as características espaciais da mudança de uso da terra em áreas cársticas globais. Finalmente, três exemplos de mudança de uso da terra em áreas cársticas são analisados em detalhes. Os tipos de uso da terra e as proporções das áreas cársticas globais, de grandes a pequenas, são as seguintes: floresta (31.78%), área nua (27.58%), terra cultivada (19.02%), campestre (10.87%), arbustiva (7.21%), área húmida (1.67%), gelo e neve (1.16%) e urbana (0.71%). A área total de mudança de uso da terra cárstica global é de 1.30 milhão de km², cerca de 4.85% da superfície cárstica global. A tendência de mudança do uso da terra do carste global é dominada pelo reflorestamento, complementado pela urbanização dispersa e recuperação agrícola. O clima tropical tem uma maior intensidade de mudança no uso da terra. Regiões de recuperação agrícola são altamente consistentes com a densidade populacional. Esses resultados refletem o impacto das atividades humanas e das mudanças climáticas nas mudanças de uso da terra em áreas cársticas globais e servem como base para pesquisas e planejamento adicionais de gestão de recursos terrestres.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Land-use change is an important component (Foley et al. 2005; Turner et al. 2013) and one of the key drivers (Ward et al. 2000) of global environmental change, and it is the result of a combination of driving factors under the human-land relationship (Liu et al. 2003; Meyfroidt et al. 2013). At the same time, land use also has a close relationship to population migration and economic conditions (DeFries 2013); thus, the assessment of land-use changes is important for the effective planning and management of resources. In recent decades, large-scale anthropogenic land-use changes have led to profound changes in the water cycle and have significantly affected the water resources and ecosystem, which in turn have caused changes in groundwater quality and quantity (Grimm et al. 2008; Winkler et al. 2021).
Karst aquifers make important contributions to the water supply of many regions, cities and countries; about 678 million people or 9.2% of the world’s population rely on freshwater from karst aquifers (Stevanović 2019). While karst aquifers are essential for water supply, karst areas provide a variety of habitats for many species, including numerous rare and endemic plant and animal species (Goldscheider 2019). At the same time, the karst groundwater system is closely related to the external surface where there can be rapid transformation, so karst aquifers are particularly vulnerable to land-use change and difficult to manage (Nguyet and Goldscheider 2006; Parise et al. 2015; Panagopoulos and Giannika 2022). With the development of the economy and the expansion of population, human behavior, such as the expansion of cropland, will gradually increase the stress on karst aquifers in terms of groundwater quality and quantity (Hartmann et al. 2014)—for example, the pressure on groundwater quantity caused by the intensification of agriculture and the pressure on groundwater quality caused by the application of pesticides and fertilizers (Foley et al. 2011). At the same time, urbanization is a strong trend of economic development. This trend will inevitably lead to the expansion of urban land use and the growth of urban population. In the process of urbanization, these changes in land use and landscape patterns are the most obvious changes in the karst surface area (Lambin et al. 2001).
Numerous institutions have released global land-use data products that are inconsistent in scale and classification (Grekousis et al. 2015)—e.g., the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme’s Data and Information System land-use cover (IGBP DISCover; Loveland et al. 2000), Global Land Cover 2000 (GLC2000; Bartholome and Belward 2005), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer LAND-COVER (LC) dataset (MCD12; Friedl et al. 2010), GLOBCOVER and Global Map-Global LC dataset (GLCNMO; Tateishi et al. 2011), GlobalLand 30 (Chen et al. 2015). These global land-use products by different institutions are limited by inconsistencies in resolution, time scale and classification systems, making it challenging to compare and combine the data. Difficulties in accurately assessing the impacts of land-use changes and making decisions about land and resource management can result from a lack of clear understanding of trends and patterns (Fuchs et al. 2013; Winkler et al. 2021). To resolve these issues, it is crucial for institutions to adopt a standardized approach to land-use data collection and analysis, using consistent scales and classification systems.
The World Karst Aquifer Map (WOKAM) was completed in 2017, providing a comprehensive description of the global distribution of karst features (Chen et al. 2017b). This release of data offers valuable insights into the distribution of karst aquifers across the world. Moreover, since most of the global karst areas are discontinuous regions (Chen et al. 2017a), land-use analysis in karst regions requires a high resolution relative to global class datasets. The European Space Agency (ESA) released the Climate Change Initiative – Land Cover dataset (CCI-LC; Bontemps et al. 2013) of global land use with a resolution of 300 m and multi-year time series. The CCI-LC dataset allows one to derive absolute areas and areal changes between land uses (Li et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2018).
Most previous studies on karst water resources have only considered land-use change at the catchment scale (Sonter et al. 2014; Misra and Balaji 2015; Chen et al. 2021a, b). It is essential to quantify and understand the spatiotemporal dynamics of global karst land-use change. Such assessment could provide more comprehensive data for global karst change analysis, and contribute to the awareness of ecological or environmental change by quantifying global karst land-use change characteristics, allowing for a better understanding of global karst land-use change.
This study aims to quantify the spatiotemporal dynamics of land-use change in karst regions at a global scale based on various global geographical information systems (GIS) datasets. It represents the first attempt to combine CCI-LC data and WOKAM data from 1992 to 2020 to identify and quantify the distribution patterns and land-use changes in global karst regions (Goldscheider et al. 2020). The research content of this article is as follows:
-
1.
Summary of the general situation of land-use distribution in global karst areas
-
2.
For each land-use type, analysis of the area changes between 1992 and 2020 and quantification of the global land-use transition
-
3.
Identification of the spatiotemporal dynamics of global karst land-use change
Materials and methods
This project was undertaken using ArcGIS Desktop by ESRI (version 10.8), the coordinate system is Robinson projection, longitude of central meridian 11 °E, spheroid WGS84. The legends, values and areas mentioned in this paper refer to land use on global karst.
Data source and reclassification system
The European Space Agency released the year-by-year global land-use dataset from 1992 to 2015 (Bontemps et al. 2013; Defourny et al. 2017). Since 2016, the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) has released land cover data for 2016–2020, which are consistent with the global map series produced from 1992–2015 (Defourny et al. 2021). This dataset is the longest global land-use dataset in time series and is ideal for exploring large-scale land-use changes. The accuracy of this database is 74.1% (Defourny et al. 2017).
The CCI-LC legend contains 36 land cover classes. These categories are defined using the Land Cover Classification System (LCCS) developed by FAO (Di Gregorio 2005). This work reclassified the CCI-LC types to general types for clarity in analysis, referring to a general classification system (Gong et al. 2013). The original 36 classification and reclassification criteria are shown in Table 1.
Spatial change characterization
Land-use-transition analysis can describe the quantitative information of land-use changes, but this analysis cannot analyze the spatial information of land-use changes. Given the fine resolution of CCI-LC, the land-use analysis at the world level will become too fragmented to capture variation characteristics. This work aggregates the original 300-m resolution into 10 km × 10 km cells (Li et al. 2018; Nowosad et al. 2019). This scale provides high resolution, enough to include meaningful feature analysis within each cell.
Each 10 km × 10 km grid contains multiple small grids of 300 m × 300 m. Here, the ‘Statistics’ function of ArcGIS software is used to calculate the changed area and the most dominant type of land-use change in each 10 km × 10 km grid. This paper proposes the ratio of the area of land-use change to the grid area of 10 km × 10 km, that is, the intensity of land-use change of each cell (Aldwaik and Pontius 2012). The calculation method is as follows:
Land-use change over time is measured by the difference in land use between the initial and final time (Nowosad et al. 2019). This work aims to explore the land-use change over the longest available period of time in the ESA dataset, that is, the 1992 and 2020 maps as the first- and last-time steps. The map was eventually classified into five levels, with percent change indicating the intensity of land-use change. A percentage above 30% is classified as “high change”, a percentage between 15 and 30% is classified as “moderate high change”, and a percentage between 5 and 15% is classified as “moderate change”.
Results and discussion
Global karst land-use distribution map in 2020
The CCI-LC map in 2020 (reclassified according to Table 1) is combined with the WOKAM global karst area distribution map, as shown in Fig. 1. Figures 1 and 2 show the global karst land-use distribution map and proportion of each land-use type in 2020, respectively. About 8.54 million km2 (31.78%) of the karst area is forest, which is also the land-use type with the largest proportion of global karst areas. Broadleaved forests are about 3.12 million km2, accounting for 11.59%, whereby most are located in tropical climate zones—Southeast Asia, Latin America and Central Africa—and are mainly determined by climatic conditions (high temperature and precipitation). The area of needle-leaved forests is 4.25 million km2 (15.82%), mainly distributed in the cold climate regions distributed in northern Russia and Canada, where the population density is very low (less than 20 people per km2). About 7.41 million km2 (27.58%) of the global karst area is bare land, and the most widespread bare land is distributed in the Arabian Peninsula and North Africa. Most of these areas have arid climates, where there are high temperatures combined with less rain. About 1.94 million km2 (7.21%) are shrubland, which are distributed with bare land in the arid climate zone. Shrubs were suitable for revegetation in harsh karst areas because of high tolerance to severe drought compared to trees (Liu et al. 2011). Around 5.11 million km2 (19.02%) of karst land is covered with cropland. Cropland is mainly distributed in the temperate climate areas, which is relatively warm with high precipitation amounts and seasonality. Rainfed cropland is mainly distributed in Europe, the eastern United States and other regions, with an area of about 3.42 million km2 (12.71%). Irrigated cropland is about 0.21 million km2 (0.79%). Although the area of irrigated cropland is relatively small, it represents managed landscapes with the highest agricultural inputs (Václavík et al. 2013). Concentrated irrigated agricultural areas are in regions such as China, Egypt and India. Grassland (10.87%) has less precipitation and is distributed in the central United States and Central Asia. The urban area is about 0.19 million km2, accounting for about 0.71%. Urban areas with high-density population are scattered throughout the world.
Global change patterns
Land-use area change
The results of analysis of the area change of each land-use type over the 29-year period, from 1992 to 2020, are shown in Fig. 3 (numbers are in 103 km2). Before 2000, the total amount of cropland increased, and then decreased year by year until 2017, followed by a minor increase from 2017 until 2018 and a stable period until 2020. Cropland referred to in the figure is the sum of rainfed cropland, irrigated cropland and mixed cropland. Globally, cropland area has been maintained at 5.11 million km2, and two-thirds of the area is rainfed cropland. About half of the forests are needle-leaved forests, and after 2017 the area of needle-leaved forests has decreased sharply, accompanied by mixed forests that have been increasing over time. Such a sharp decline may be due to the classification of remote sensing data; some areas were classified as needle-leaved before 2017, and then classified as mixed forest, but overall, forest is on the rise. The bare area shows a shrinking trend of 0.09 million km2, about the size of Portugal. In contrast, the urban area increases gradually during the 28 years from 1992 to 2020, with an increase of 0.10 million km2, which is about the size of the country of Iceland.
Land-use transition
Figure 4 illustrates land-use transition processes quantitatively between different types of global karst areas from 1992 to 2020. Net change shows the difference in areas of land use between 1992 and 2020 (see Table 2). Except for the category of snow and ice, all other land-use types experienced varying degrees of change in global karst area. Permanent snow and ice remained constant over the 29-year period (0.31 million km2), mainly distributed in northern Canada and the Tibetan Plateau. This conclusion is different from that of Li et al. (2019), which may be due to different databases or data accuracy.
The total global karst area that experienced land-use changes from 1992 to 2020 is 1.30 million km2, which means that almost 4.85% of the global karst surface has changed. Overall, the most frequent land-use changes occurred between cropland and forest; the largest land-use-change types were ‘cropland to forest’ and ‘forest to cropland’ with 0.20 million km2 and 0.18 million km2, respectively, accounting for 29.39% of all land-use changes on karst.
The total area of forest expansion is 17,400 km2, with forest gains mainly coming from the annual growth of mixed forest (an increase of 0.10 million km2). For broadleaved forests, the main gross loss was to mixed cropland and rainfed cropland amounting to 0.08 million and 0.04 million km2, respectively. For needle-leaved forests, the main loss was to shrubland (0.05 million km2), mixed forests (0.04 million km2) and mixed cropland (0.02 million km2).
Urbanization has received considerable attention due to economic development and dense population (Kalnay and Cai 2003). Globally, the area of change in urban areas is relatively small compared to other land-use changes. Urban areas have increased by 0.10 million km2, accounting for 7.73% of the gross total global land-use change. The net increase in urban areas mainly comes from the conversion of cropland and grassland, amounting to 0.07 million and 0.01 million km2, respectively. Cropland loss was mainly to forests and urban areas. In addition to turning cropland to forests, urban encroachment on cropland is also a key cause of cropland loss (Winfield 1973), indicating that the urban expansion caused by anthropogenic land usage from 1992 to 2020 was significant in the global karst regions.
Grassland also had an obvious transition to bare land; the loss of bare land cover was mainly to grassland (0.10 million km2), rainfed cropland (0.03 million km2) and needle-leaved forests (0.02 million km2). The gain of bare areas was mainly coming from grasslands (0.06 million km2) and needle-leaved forests (0.02 million km2). Despite a gross bare-area gain of 0.09 million km2, the larger gross loss (1.85 million km2) results in a net loss of 0.09 million km2, which shows that grassland restoration is discernible in the karst area.
Spatial land-use change identification
Intensity of land-use change
In order to identify the spatial distribution of land-use change characteristics, the proportion of land-use change within each grid cell is calculated here according to Eq. (1). The spatial pattern of the proportion of land-use change in the global karst area is shown in Fig. 5. In all, 38.49% of the grid is ′no change′, mainly distributed in northern North America, northern Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. The areas with more than 15% land-use change are mainly distributed in regions such as eastern North America, Central Europe and Southeast Asia, accounting for 9.92% of all karst areas, while areas with more than 30% land-use changes are distributed in Central America, Central Africa and South Asia, accounting for 2.70% of the total karst proportion. The tropical climate has a higher proportion of land-use change, and most of the regions with land-use change proportion of more than 30% are within this climate region.
Spatial distribution of the dominant type of land-use change
A variety of land-use change types occur in the global karst region from 1992 to 2020 within one cell. Figure 6 shows the distribution of the dominant type of land-use change. Land-use change usually has a high degree of spatial heterogeneity, which indicates that land-use change is related to local climatic factors and land-use planning, etc. (Liu et al. 2018).
Contrary to the prevailing view of global forest area decline, afforestation is the most common type of land-use change in global karst areas (Song et al. 2018), mainly distributed in North America, the east and west coasts of Africa, and southwest China. These shifts are related to changes in factors such as the ‘Returning Farmland to Forest’ program supported by local governments (Liu et al. 2015) or economically beneficial tree planting (Laikre et al. 2010; Hansen et al. 2013). Afforestation will improve the vegetation cover and decrease the loss of water and soil due to agricultural practices (Sahin and Hall 1996). This situation implies a greening trend due to a more suitable environment or increased precipitation in some areas (Song et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2016).
Over the past few decades, agricultural reclamation areas have existed due to the expansion of cropland areas driven by growing populations (Tilman et al. 2011). Regions that contain significant cropland expansion are Southeast Asia, Central Asia, and Central North America, as well as sporadic locations such as Latin America and Africa. Agricultural reclamation regions are highly consistent with the population density in karst regions (Goldscheider et al. 2020). In northern Africa, bare areas and shrublands encompassing several regions have been transformed into cropland expansion. In comparison, the southern region of Africa is mostly characterized by a conversion of forest into cropland.
The urbanization process leads to a range of environment-related issues (Lambin et al. 2001; Brown and Vivas 2005), including soil erosion, desertification, and water scarcity, etc. (Wang and Fang 2011). Urban expansion has occurred mainly in Central and Eastern Europe, the eastern regions of the USA, and sporadically in eastern China and the Arabian Peninsula. The most important land-use change involved in urban expansion is from rainfed cropland around the city.
Intense human activities have resulted in the karst rocky desertification landscape with extensive exposed bedrock, severe soil loss, shallow soil layers, and discontinuous soil coverage (Chen et al. 2021a, b). The main desertification areas of global karst areas are in the Tibetan Plateau, eastern North America and Central Russia. Among them, the karst areas in North America are dominated by the transformation from forest into shrubland, while in Tibet and Russia, grassland is mainly degraded into bare area.
Detailed analyses of land-use change in three sample areas
The karst regions of south-central Europe, eastern North America and southwest China are the three major karst concentrations in the world (Yuan 1999). In this study, locations with a large proportion of land-use change in the global karst concentration area are selected as samples: in the eastern United States (A), southeastern Spain (B) and central south China (C). A location map of the selected sample areas, and the corresponding proportions of land-use change and the dominant type of land-use change maps, are shown in Fig. 7.
Sample area A is in the Eastern United States. The USA is the second largest karst water consumer, where approximately 50 million people (Stevanović 2019) are supplied with drinking water from karst. Sample area A is located in the eastern United States, on the borders of Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, most of which rely on karst groundwater. The map shows an area within the state of Indiana where the proportion of land-use change exceeds 30%. The dominant type of land-use change is cropland to urban, indicating that urban expansion is significant in Indiana and Ohio (Lawler et al. 2014). Large-scale urban expansion will lead to the depletion of natural vegetation within protected areas (Martinuzzi et al. 2015). The area south of the sample shows not only urban expansion, but also forest deforestation and agricultural reclamation.
Sample area B is located in southeastern Spain, Valencia and its northern regions. The main land-use change type is intense afforestation and agricultural reclamation, with urbanization around the cities. In the central and southern parts, this area of agriculture is dense rainfed cropland, and the main land use is bare area. Trends in land-use change also include the expansion of irrigated crop systems (Serra et al. 2014). Urban expansion in the northern part mainly comes from urban encroachment on cropland. The gradual conversion of traditional agriculture into forestry or intensive farming has been driven by agricultural and socio-economic policies (Hewitt and Escobar 2011).
Sample area C is located in central south China, which has a large continuous distribution of ecologically fragile karst areas (Jiang et al. 2014; Bai et al. 2013). At the same time, there are vegetation degradation and rocky desertification in the karst region of South China (Liao et al. 2018). Sample area C shows the highest proportion of land-use change among the three samples. The most common type of land-use change is forest to cropland as well as a shrubland-to-cropland type of change. Land policy has promoted cropland expansion (Peng et al. 2011), which is associated with dense population in the southwestern karst areas of China. Agriculture in the region is dominated by irrigated cropland and mixed cropland which will lead to erosion in karst areas (Liu et al. 2014).
Conclusion
This paper represents the first attempt to combine two global datasets for analysis and comparison. The study utilized CCI-LC data and WOKAM data from 1992 to 2020 to identify and quantify land-use changes and distribution patterns in global karst areas. The availability of these datasets describing the global karst distribution and land-use change has enabled the first quantification of land-use change in karst regions at a global scale. The main findings and conclusions can be summarized as follows:
In 2020, around 8.54 million km2 (31.78%) of the global karst areas are forest, about half of which is needle-leaved forest. About 5.11 million km2 (19.02%) of karst areas are covered with cropland, which can be further divided into rainfed cropland (12.71%), irrigated cropland (0.79%) and mixed cropland (5.52%). Bare areas and grasslands accounted for 27.58% and 10.87%, respectively. The urban area is 0.19 million km2 (0.71%).
The area of land-use changes in global karst areas from 1992 to 2020 is 1.30 million km2, which means that almost 4.85% of the global karst surface has changed. Most of the changes occurred in the conversion between forest and cropland, accounting for 29.39% of all land-use changes on karst. The net increase in urban areas is 0.1 million km2, with most of the expansion coming from rainfed croplands. In contrast, the bare areas and shrublands have been shrinking by about 0.09 million and 0.05 million km2, respectively.
This paper proposes two indicators—land-use-change proportion and a dominant type of land-use change—in 10 km × 10 km cells to identify the characteristics of land-use change in karst regions. The areas with more than 15% land-use change are mainly distributed in eastern North America, Central Europe and Southeast Asia, accounting for 9.92% of all karst areas. The tropical climate regions have a higher proportion of land-use change. In addition, when exploring the characteristics of land-use change in global karst areas, it is found that the land-use change is dominated by forest expansion, accompanied by sporadic urbanization and agricultural reclamation. These agricultural reclamation regions are highly consistent with higher population density, mainly concentrated in China, Europe and North America.
These results reflect the current status and distribution of global karst land use, showing land-use transition over the last 29 years. Continuous satellite observation will provide a basis of evidence for understanding land use and its change at the global scale. Human activities and climate change directly or indirectly affected land use. Traces of land-use change by human activities have been found in large areas of every continent. It is necessary to pay continuous attention to the impact of karst land use on karst groundwater resources.
References
Aldwaik SZ, Pontius RG Jr (2012) Intensity analysis to unify measurements of size and stationarity of land changes by interval, category, and transition. Landsc Urban Plan 106(1):103–114
Bai XY, Wang SJ, Xiong KN (2013) Assessing spatial-temporal evolution processes of karst rocky desertification land: indications for restoration strategies. Land Degrad Dev 24(1):47–56
Bartholome E, Belward AS (2005) GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. Int J Remote Sens 26(9):1959–1977
Bontemps S, Defourny P, Radoux J, Van Bogaert E, Lamarche C, Achard F, Mayaux P, Boettcher M, Brockmann C, Kirches G, Zülkhe M, Kalogirou V, Seifert FM, Arino O (2013). Consistent global land cover maps for climate modelling communities: current achievements of the ESA’s land cover CCI. In: Proceedings of the ESA living planet symposium, vol 13, Edinburgh, September 2013, pp 9–13
Brown MT, Vivas MB (2005) Landscape development intensity index. Environ Monit Assess 101(1):289–309
Chen J, Chen J, Liao A, Cao X, Chen L, Chen X, He C, Han G, Peng S, Lu M, Zhang W, Tong X, Mills J (2015) Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: a POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 103:7–27
Chen F, Wang S, Bai X, Liu F, Zhou D, Tian Y, Luo G, Li Q, Wu L, Zheng C, Xiao J, Qian Q, Cao Y, Li H, Wang M, Yang Y (2021a) Assessing spatial-temporal evolution processes and driving forces of karst rocky desertification. Geocarto Int 36(3):262–280
Chen W, Zhang X, Huang Y (2021b) Spatial and temporal changes in ecosystem service values in karst areas in southwestern China based on land use changes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:45724–45738
Chen Z, Auler AS, Bakalowicz M, Drew D, Griger F, Hartmann J, Jiang G, Moosdorf N, Richts A, Stevanovic Z, Veni G, Goldscheider N (2017a) The world karst aquifer mapping project: concept, mapping procedure and map of Europe. Hydrogeol J 25(3):771–785
Chen Z, Goldscheider N, Auler AS, Bakalowicz M, Broda S, Drew D, Hartmann J, Jiang G, Moosdorf N, Richts A, Stevanovic Z, Veni G, Dumont A, Aureli A, Clos P, Krombholz M (2017b) World Karst Aquifer Map (WHYMAP WOKAM). BGR, IAH, KIT, UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.25928/b2.21_sfkq-r406
Defourny P, Bontemps S, Lamarche C, Brockmann C, Boettcher M, Wevers J, Kirches G (2017) Land Cover CCI: product user guide version 2.0. http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/. Accessed June 2013
Defourny P, Lamarche C, Marissiaux Q, Brockmann C, Boettcher M, Kirches G (2021) Product user guide and specification, ICDR Land Cover 2016-2020. Ref. D5.3.1_PUGS_ICDR_LC_v2.1.x_PRODUCTS_v1.1. https://datastore.copernicus-climate.eu/documents/satellite-land-cover/D5.3.1_PUGS_ICDR_LC_v2.1.x_PRODUCTS_v1.1.pdf. Accessed June 2013
DeFries R (2013) Why forest monitoring matters for people and the planet. In: Global forest monitoring from Earth observation, Routledge, London, pp 1–14
Di Gregorio A (2005) Land cover classification system: classification concepts and user manual: LCCS, vol 2. FAO, Rome
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574
Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DP (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478(7369):337–342
Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley A, Huang X (2010) MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens Environ 114(1):168–182
Fuchs R, Herold M, Verburg PH, Clevers JG (2013) A high-resolution and harmonized model approach for reconstructing and analysing historic land changes in Europe. Biogeosciences 10(3):1543–1559
Goldscheider N (2019) A holistic approach to groundwater protection and ecosystem services in karst terrains. Carbon Evapor 34(4):1241–1249
Goldscheider N, Chen Z, Auler AS, Bakalowicz M, Broda S, Drew D, Hartmann J, Jiang G, Moosdorf N, Stevanovic Z, Veni G (2020) Global distribution of carbonate rocks and karst water resources. Hydrogeol J 28(5):1661–1677
Gong P, Wang J, Yu L, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Liang L, Niu Z, Huang X, Fu H, Liu S, Li C, Li X, Fu W, Liu C, Xu Y, Wang X, Cheng Q, Hu L, Yao W, Zhang H, Zhu P, Zhao Z, Zhang H, Zheng Y, Ji L, Zhang Y, Chen H, Yan A, Guo J, Yu L, Wang L, Liu X, Shi T, Zhu M, Chen Y, Yang G, Tang P, Xu B, Giri C, Clinton N, Zhu Z, Chen J, Chen J (2013) Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int J Remote Sens 34(7):2607–2654
Grekousis G, Mountrakis G, Kavouras M (2015) An overview of 21 global and 43 regional land-cover mapping products. Int J Remote Sens 36(21):5309–5335
Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319(5864):756–760
Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, Kommareddy A, Egorovl A, Chini L, Justice CO, Townshend JRD (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342(6160):850–853
Hartmann A, Goldscheider N, Wagener T, Lange J, Weiler M (2014) Karst water resources in a changing world: review of hydrological modeling approaches. Rev Geophys 52(3):218–242
Hewitt R, Escobar F (2011) The territorial dynamics of fast-growing regions: unsustainable land use change and future policy challenges in Madrid, Spain. Appl Geogr 31(2):650–667
Jiang Z, Lian Y, Qin X (2014) Rocky desertification in Southwest China: impacts, causes, and restoration. Earth Sci Rev 132:1–12
Kalnay E, Cai M (2003) Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature 423(6939):528–531
Laikre L, Schwartz MK, Waples RS, Ryman N, GeM Working Group (2010) Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals. Trends Ecol Evol 25(9):520–529
Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skanes H, Steffent W, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Chang 11(4):261–269
Lawler JJ, Lewis DJ, Nelson E, Plantinga AJ, Polasky S, Withey JC, Helmers DP, Martinuzzi S, Pennington D, Radeloff VC (2014) Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(20):7492–7497
Li W, MacBean N, Ciais P, Defourny P, Lamarche C, Bontemps S, Houghton RA, Peng S (2018) Gross and net land cover changes in the main plant functional types derived from the annual ESA CCI land cover maps (1992–2015). Earth Syst Sci Data 10(1):219–234
Li YJ, Ding YJ, Shangguan DH, Wang RJ (2019) Regional differences in global glacier retreat from 1980 to 2015. Adv Clim Chang Res 10(4):203–213
Liao C, Yue Y, Wang K, Fensholt R, Tong X, Brandt M (2018) Ecological restoration enhances ecosystem health in the karst regions of southwest China. Ecol Ind 90:416–425
Liu CC, Liu YG, Guo K, Li GQ, Zheng YR, Yu LF, Yang R (2011) Comparative ecophysiological responses to drought of two shrub and four tree species from karst habitats of southwestern China. Trees 25(3):537–549
Liu J, Liu M, Zhuang D, Zhang Z, Deng X (2003) Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in China during 1995–2000. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 46(4):373–384
Liu L, Xu X, Liu J, Chen X, Ning J (2015) Impact of farmland changes on production potential in China during 1990–2010. J Geog Sci 25(1):19–34
Liu X, Yu L, Si Y, Zhang C, Lu H, Yu C, Gong P (2018) Identifying patterns and hotspots of global land cover transitions using the ESA CCI Land Cover dataset. Remote Sens Lett 9(10):972–981
Liu Y, Huang X, Yang H, Zhong T (2014) Environmental effects of land-use/cover change caused by urbanization and policies in Southwest China Karst area: a case study of Guiyang. Habitat Int 44:339–348
Loveland TR, Reed BC, Brown JF, Ohlen DO, Zhu Z, Yang LW, Merchant JW (2000) Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sens 21(6–7):1303–1330
Martinuzzi S, Radeloff VC, Joppa LN, Hamilton CM, Helmers DP, Plantinga AJ, Lewis DJ (2015) Scenarios of future land use change around United States’ protected areas. Biol Cons 184:446–455
Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF, Erb KH, Hertel TW (2013) Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(5):438–444
Misra A, Balaji R (2015) A study on the shoreline changes and land-use/land-cover along the South Gujarat coastline. Proc Eng 116:381–389
Nguyet VT, Goldscheider N (2006) A simplified methodology for mapping groundwater vulnerability and contamination risk, and its first application in a tropical karst area, Vietnam. Hydrogeol J 14(8):1666–1675
Nowosad J, Stepinski TF, Netzel P (2019) Global assessment and mapping of changes in mesoscale landscapes: 1992–2015. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 78:332–340
Panagopoulos A, Giannika V (2022) Comparative techno-economic and environmental analysis of minimal liquid discharge (MLD) and zero liquid discharge (ZLD) desalination systems for seawater brine treatment and valorization. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 53:102477
Parise M, Closson D, Gutiérrez F, Stevanović Z (2015) Anticipating and managing engineering problems in the complex karst environment. Environ Earth Sci 74(12):7823–7835
Peng J, Xu YQ, Cai YL, Xiao HL (2011) The role of policies in land use/cover change since the 1970s in ecologically fragile karst areas of Southwest China: a case study on the Maotiaohe watershed. Environ Sci Policy 14(4):408–418
Sahin V, Hall MJ (1996) The effects of afforestation and deforestation on water yields. J Hydrol 178(1–4):293–309
Serra P, Vera A, Tulla AF, Salvati L (2014) Beyond urban–rural dichotomy: exploring socioeconomic and land-use processes of change in Spain (1991–2011). Appl Geogr 55:71–81
Song XP, Hansen MC, Stehman SV, Potapov PV, Tyukavina A, Vermote EF, Townshend JR (2018) Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature 560(7720):639–643
Sonter LJ, Moran CJ, Barrett DJ, Soares-Filho BS (2014) Processes of land use change in mining regions. J Clean Prod 84:494–501
Stevanović Z (2019) Karst waters in potable water supply: a global scale overview. Environ Earth Sci 78(23):1–12
Tateishi R, Uriyangqai B, Al-Bilbisi H, Ghar MA, Tsend-Ayush J, Kobayashi T, Kasimu A, Hoan NT, Shalaby A, Alsaaideh B, Enkhzaya T, Gegentana SHP (2011) Production of global land cover data–GLCNMO. Int J Digit Earth 4(1):22–49
Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(50):20260–20264
Turner BL, Janetos AC, Verbug PH, Murray AT (2013) Land system architecture: using land systems to adapt and mitigate global environmental change (No. PNNL-SA-93482). Pacific Northwest National Lab, Richland, WA
Václavík T, Lautenbach S, Kuemmerle T, Seppelt R (2013) Mapping global land system archetypes. Glob Environ Chang 23(6):1637–1647
Wang J, Fang C (2011) Growth of urban construction land: progress and prospect. Prog Geogr 30(11):1440–1448
Ward D, Phinn SR, Murray AT (2000) Monitoring growth in rapidly urbanizing areas using remotely sensed data. Prof Geogr 52(3):371–386
Winfield D (1973) Function minimization by interpolation in a data table. IMA J Appl Math 12(3):339–347
Winkler K, Fuchs R, Rounsevell M, Herold M (2021) Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated. Nat Commun 12(1):1–10
Yuan D (1999) Progress in the study on karst processes and carbon cycle (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci 14(5)
Zhu Z, Piao S, Myneni RB, Huang M, Zeng Z, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Arneth A, Cao C, Cheng L, Kato E, Koven C, Li Y, Lian X, Liu Y, Liu R, Mao J, Pan Y, Peng S, Peñuelas J, Poulter B, Pugh TAM, Stocker BD, Viovy N, Wang X, Wang Y, Xiao Z, Yang H, Zaehle S, Zeng N (2016) Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat Clim Chang 6(8):791–795
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Jiawen Zhang is funded by the China Scholarship Council (202008220139).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher′s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Liesch, T., Chen, Z. et al. Global analysis of land-use changes in karst areas and the implications for water resources. Hydrogeol J 31, 1197–1208 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02650-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02650-5