Abstract
Background
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have received considerable attention as ideal biomarkers for kidney diseases. Most reports have focused on urinary EVs, that are mainly derived from the cells in the urinary tract. However, the detection and the application of kidney-derived EVs in plasma remains uncertain.
Methods
We examined the kidney-derived small EVs (sEVs) in plasma that were supposedly released from renal mesangial and glomerular endothelial cells, using clinical samples from healthy controls and patients with kidney transplants. Plasma from healthy controls underwent ultracentrifugation, followed by on-bead flow cytometry, targeting α8 integrin, an antigen-specific to mesangial cells. To confirm the presence of kidney-derived sEVs in peripheral blood, plasma from ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients was ultracentrifuged, followed by western blotting for donor blood type antigens.
Results
Immunohistochemistry and immunoelectron microscopy confirmed α8 integrin expression in kidney mesangial cells and their sEVs. The CD9-α8 integrin double-positive sEVs were successfully detected using on-bead flow cytometry. Western blot analysis further revealed transplanted kidney-derived sEVs containing blood type B antigens in non-blood type B recipients, who had received kidneys from blood type B donors. Notably, a patient experiencing graft kidney loss exhibited diminished signals of sEVs containing donor blood type antigens.
Conclusion
Our findings demonstrate the potential usefulness of kidney-derived sEVs in plasma in future research for kidney diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Renal biopsy is an important diagnostic technique providing nephrologists with information for managing patients with kidney diseases. Nonetheless, certain risks are associated with this procedure [1]. The establishment of a diagnostic method that does not require renal biopsy is thus desirable, leading to increased attention to non-invasive liquid biopsy [2].
Recently, studies have focused on extracellular vesicles (EVs) as potential biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis [3, 4]. EVs contain mRNAs, miRNAs, and proteins derived from the cells from which they originate, and analyzing them may reveal the state of the cells of their origin. In kidney diseases, the majority of reports focus on urine samples as a source of EVs [5, 6]. Urine is an ideal biological sample to obtain information regarding cells located in the urinary tract, including the renal tubule, ureter, or bladder. There exists a subset of urinary EVs, enriched with aquaporin-2, a marker indicative of tubular cells [7]. However, for investigating endothelial or mesangial cells, which are separated from the urinary space by a tight basement membrane [8], plasma-derived EVs would be another source of examination.
Currently, it is not yet clear how EVs differ between the outer and inner spaces of the basement membrane, specifically between urinary EVs and plasma EVs. Studies analyzing the proteome of urinary EVs have shown that while most of the proteins present in these vesicles are expressed in the genitourinary system [9, 10], there is also evidence suggesting the existence of extrarenal sources [11]. In terms of disease biomarkers, most research on urinary EVs is associated with genitourinary diseases [12], and only few studies discuss their connection with other diseases [13, 14]. In our previous studies using in vitro systems, we showed that tubular-derived EVs cannot pass through the basement membrane under normal conditions [15]. Considering the tight barrier formed by the basement membrane, it can be inferred that there is a certain difference between the EVs of glomerular and those of the exterior lumen. Although plasma-derived EVs can be a mixture of EVs from various organs, they may offer an additional option for investigating kidney conditions related to mesangial and glomerular endothelial cells.
On-bead flow cytometry can detect EVs containing kidney-specific antigens among vesicles from diverse sources [4, 16, 17]. In this study, we detected the signals of plasma-derived EVs containing markers for mesangial cells. Then, we demonstrated the presence of kidney-derived EVs in peripheral blood using an ABO-incompatible kidney transplant. Our findings may contribute to future research on plasma-derived EV-based biomarkers for kidney diseases.
Materials and methods
Study participants
We enrolled seven kidney transplant recipients and 10 healthy volunteers from the Nagoya Kidney Disease Registry (NKDR). Kidney histology studies were conducted using biopsy specimens obtained from the NKDR. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki (revised in Brazil, 2013) and was approved by Nagoya University’s Ethics Committee (approval number: 2010-1135-4).
Plasma sample collection
From participants, 7 mL blood was collected in EDTA-coated tubes and centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were aliquoted and stored at − 80 °C until analysis.
Cell culture
Normal human mesangial cells (NHMCs; CC-2559) were obtained from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland) and cultured in a supplemented mesangial basal medium (CC-3147, CC-4146) [18]. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs; C-12200) were sourced from PromoCell (Heidelberg, Germany) and grown in an endothelial cell growth medium kit (C-22110) [19]. Before EV isolation, cells were cultured in a medium containing EV-depleted FBS.
Isolation of small EVs
To isolate small EVs (sEVs), plasma (0.4 mL) was centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min, mixed with 11 mL of PBS, and then filtered through a 0.22 µm filter (FJ25BSCPS002AL01; GVS S.p.A., Bologna, Italy) To isolate sEVs for western blotting (WB) of α8 integrin (ITGA8), 5 mL of plasma was used. Cell culture supernatant (35 mL) containing EV-depleted FBS was also centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min and subsequently filtered using the same 0.22 µm filter. The samples underwent ultracentrifugation at 175,000×g for 2 h using SW 32Ti rotor and Optima L-100Xp (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) [20, 21]. sEVs for immunoprecipitation had a pre-enrichment ultracentrifugation step before anti-CD63 antibody screening. For further analyses, the pellet was re-suspended in PBS, ultracentrifuged for washing, and then re-suspended for downstream procedures.
Transmission electron microscopy
Beads or sEVs were placed on a carbon film-coated grid (645; Nisshin EM, Tokyo, Japan) and negatively stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 1 min. The samples were observed under a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400 Plus; JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Nanoparticle tracking analysis
Nanoparticle tracking was conducted using NanoSight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern Worcestershire, UK). sEVs were diluted in 1000 µL of PBS with the following settings: camera level at 13, detection threshold at 5, and analysis temperature at 25 °C. Particle counts were converted to per mL of plasma.
Protein quantification
Protein quantification used the Dot-it-Spot-it assay (Uppsala Biomedical Centre, Uppsala, Sweden). sEVs were re-suspended in Laemmli buffer (161-0737; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). A diluted sample was applied to a nitrocellulose membrane, dried, and scanned. ImageJ (version 1.53) [22] analyzed the scans, measuring dot thickness. The Rodbard model determined sample concentrations using a standard curve.
Western blot analysis
WB was performed for CD9, FLOT-1, and blood type B antigen. sEVs in Laemmli buffer were treated with 2-mercaptoethanol (21417-52; Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for FLOT-1 and blood type B antigen, then heated at 95 °C, separated using SDS-PAGE. and transferred onto Immobilon-P PVDF membranes (IPVH00010; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Blots were blocked, then incubated with primary antibodies: anti-CD9 (1:1000 dilution; MEX001-6, MBL, Tokyo, Japan), anti-CD63 (1:1000 dilution; MEX002-6, MBL), anti-FLOT-1 (1:5000 dilution; ab133497, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-ITGA8, 1:1000 dilution, sc-365798, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), and anti-blood type B antigen (1:200 dilution; 448-03802, Fujifilm Wako, Osaka, Japan). Following washes, membranes were exposed to HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies: streptavidin (1:10,000 dilution; ab7403, Abcam), anti-rabbit IgG (1:4000 dilution; 111-035-144, Fujifilm), and anti-Mouse (1:20,000 dilution; 315-035-048; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), in Can Get Signal Solution 2 (NKB-301; TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). Blots were visualized with Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (WBKLS0500; Merck) or SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (34095; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Histology
Kidney samples were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 1 µm. Following deparaffinization, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were carried out as described previously [23]. For immunohistochemistry, sections were blocked using 10% normal goat serum (03953-66; Nacalai Tesque) and then stained with primary antibodies: anti-blood type A antigen (111006; Ortho, Raritan, NJ), anti-blood type B antigen (112003; Ortho), and anti-ITGA8 (NBP1-86519; Novus Biologicals). Secondary antibodies used were goat anti-mouse (424131; Nichirei Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan) and goat anti-rabbit (424141; Nichirei Bioscience), with visualization using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (415171; Nichirei Bioscience). For immunofluorescence, sections were blocked using Blocking one histo (06349-64; Nacalai Tesque) and then stained with primary antibodies: anti-CD31 (ab28364; Abcam), anti-B (112003; Ortho), anti-Nephrin (GP-N2; PROGEN, Germany), anti-platelet-derived growth factor receptor Β (PDGFRB; sc-374573; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-ITGA8 (NBP1-86519; Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO). Secondary antibodies applied were Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (A21428; Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor Plus 647-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (A32787; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-guinea pig IgG (A-11073; Thermo Fisher Scientific), goat anti-mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 488 (115-545-166; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). For immunofluorescence of ITGA8 in NHMCs and HUVECs, cells were fixed, then stained using mouse anti-human ITGA8 (sc-365798; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (61-6511; Invitrogen). Images were obtained using BZ-X800 microscopy (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
Immunoelectron microscopy of sEVs from cultured NHMCs
sEVs from NHMC and HUVEC supernatants cultured in EV-depleted FBS were extracted under standard centrifugation conditions. Using Exosome-human CD63 Isolation/Detection Reagent (10606D; Thermo Fisher Scientific), the sEVs were captured with anti-CD63 antibody-coated beads. These were fixed in formalin for 10 min, then stained for ITGA8 (human integrin α8 antibody clone 481709: MAB6194; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or a control antibody. The secondary reaction utilized horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat F(ab′)2 fragment anti-mouse IgG (Histofine, Nichirei Bioscience). Following 1% glutaraldehyde fixation and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine incubation, the samples underwent post-fixation in osmium tetroxide alcohol dehydration and were observed under an electron microscope (JEM-1400 Plus).
Immunoprecipitation using anti-CD63 antibody with sEVs derived from human plasma
Antibody-conjugated magnetic beads were prepared using anti-CD63 antibody (MEX002-6; MBL), isotype control antibody (400304; BioLegend, San Diego, CA), and ExoCap streptavidin Kit (MEX-SA; MBL). Per the manufacturer’s instructions, 1000 µg of beads were coupled with 5 µg of biotinylated antibody at room temperature for 1 h, utilizing 50 µg of beads per reaction. Isolated sEVs (250 µL) combined with 250 µL treatment buffer were added to these beads and incubated at 4 °C overnight with rotation. After magnetically separating and washing thrice, the beads were re-suspended in a suitable buffer for further analysis.
Immunoprecipitation using anti-blood type B antigen antibody with sEVs derived from human plasma
Five microliters of anti-blood type B antigen antibody (448-03802, Fujifilm Wako) or its isotype control antibody (14-4752-82; eBioscience, San Diego, CA) were added to the isolated sEVs. The samples were then incubated overnight at 4 °C, followed by the addition of protein L magnetic beads (88849; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After washing, the supernatants were removed using magnetic separation, and the sEVs captured by the antibody-conjugated beads were detached from the magnetic beads using glycine–HCl (pH 2.5) for 10 min. The sEVs in the supernatant were subsequently collected and neutralized by adding Tris–HCl (pH 9.0). The collected sEVs were used for downstream analysis.
On-bead flow cytometry analysis of sEVs
Using 10 µg of the previously prepared 50 µg beads, on-bead flow cytometry was performed. Detection antibodies were prepared in 0.1% BSA/PBS: anti-CD9-FITC (1:200; MEX001-4, MBL), isotype control for CD9 mouse IgG2a-FITC (1:200; 076-4, MBL), anti-ITGA8-Alexa Fluor 488 (1:200; FAB6194G, R&D Systems), and its isotype control mouse IgG2b-Alexa Fluor 488 (1:66.7; IC004G, R&D Systems). After supernatant removal, the bead-bound sEVs were incubated with these antibodies at 4 °C for 30 min in darkness, with gentle agitation. Post-incubation, samples underwent two washes with PBS on a magnetic stand, then were re-suspended in 250 µL PBS for flow cytometry on a BD FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Data was analyzed using FlowJo v10.8.1 (BD Biosciences), and the fluorescent signals were counted as mean fluorescent intensity (MFI).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Python 3.8.3 (Python Software Foundation, Wilmington, DE), and box plots were constructed using the “seaborn” module. Comparisons were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
Characterization of EVs isolated using ultracentrifugation
We isolated sEVs from human plasma using ultracentrifugation. In electron microscopy, the extracted particles were round or cup-shaped and satisfied the previously reported characteristics of sEVs (Fig. 1A) [15]. Nanoparticle tracking analysis revealed that the median concentration of isolated sEVs was 5.13 × 109 particles per mL of plasma (Fig. 1B, C). In the protein assay, the median amount of protein in sEVs was 21.2 µg/mL plasma (Fig. 1D). WB analysis showed that the classical sEV markers, FLOT-1 and CD9, were positive in sEVs (Fig. 1E).
α8 integrin (ITGA8) expressed in sEVs derived from renal mesangial cells
Next, we examined whether we could detect kidney-derived sEVs expressing kidney-specific antigens in the peripheral blood using on-bead flow cytometry. Among the kidney cells, we focused on mesangial cells because they are located in the intravascular area that is not separated from the bloodstream by a basement membrane. We examined several markers for mesangial cells [24, 25], and then focused on ITGA8 as a mesangial cell marker [26, 27]. We confirmed ITGA8 expression in mesangial region in a human renal biopsy specimen using immunohistochemistry (Fig. 2A, B). In addition, we detected co-expression of ITGA8 with PDGFRB, which is primarily expressed in mesangial cells in the kidney, through immunofluorescence (Fig S1). Furthermore, ITGA8 was positively identified in a primary culture of NHMCs using immunofluorescence staining in vitro (Fig. 2C). We performed electron and immunoelectron microscopies on sEVs from the NHMC supernatant to evaluate ITGA8 expression in sEVs from mesangial cells. In immunoelectron microscopy, antibodies conjugated with HRP that bind to ITGA8 induced the precipitation of DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine), leading to a dense deposition on the surface of sEVs. Compared to that in non-antibody-conjugated beads (Fig. 2D), sEVs obtained from HUVECs were observed on anti-CD63 antibody-coated beads, a general marker for EVs, but without DAB deposition (Fig. 2E). In fact, such deposition was only observed on the surface of sEVs isolated from the NHMCs (Fig. 2F, G).
Evaluation of ITGA8-positive sEVs in plasma
ITGA8-positive sEVs in human plasma were quantified using on-bead flow cytometry. CD63 antibody-conjugated magnetic beads were used to capture plasma sEVs. We visualized on-bead plasma-derived sEVs using electron microscopy (Fig. 3A). In addition, ITGA8 presence in sEVs isolated from the plasma of the healthy control was confirmed using WB (Fig. 3B). Following the reaction with the fluorescent antibody, we quantified the MFI of the on-bead sEVs. Representative flow cytometry images are shown in Fig. 3C and D. We performed on-bead flow cytometry on 10 healthy control (HC) plasma samples and successfully detected signals of CD63-CD9 and CD63-ITGA8 double-positive sEVs (Fig. 3E, F).
Kidney-derived sEVs isolated from the plasma of kidney transplantation recipients
To investigate whether kidney-derived sEVs can be identified in peripheral blood, we analyzed plasma sEVs from patients who underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplants, utilizing the presence of donor blood type antigens as markers for kidney origin. In such situations, sEVs carrying the type B antigens in the peripheral blood of type A recipients were considered to originate from the donor kidney (Fig. 4A). First, we examined the presence of ABO antigens in renal biopsy specimens acquired from kidney transplant recipients. In transplanted kidneys from blood type A recipients who received kidneys from blood type B donors, type B antigens were positive in glomerular endothelial cells, while type A antigens were observed in circulating red blood cells (Fig S2A). Contrarily, both antigens were negative in the renal parenchyma of blood type A recipients who received kidneys from blood type O donors (Fig S2B). In immunofluorescent staining, type B antigens were co-stained with CD31, an endothelial cell marker, in the peritubular capillary and the glomerular endothelial cells (Fig. 4B, C). These results indicated that the ABO blood type antigens in donor kidneys were maintained on the kidney endothelial cells after kidney transplantation.
Subsequently, after confirming that blood type B antigens are present on sEVs of HC, using immunoprecipitation with anti-blood type B antigen antibody-conjugated magnetic beads followed by WB analysis (Fig S3A, B), we isolated sEVs from the plasma of non-blood type B recipients who had received kidneys from blood type B donors. We then examined whether blood type B antigens were detected in the protein assay. WB analysis of sEVs derived from three non-blood type B recipients who received blood type B kidneys revealed the appearance of multiple bands of 75–250 kDa (Fig. 4D). This result was consistent with the finding of a previous study, which reported that blood antigens derived from kidney lysate were present as multiple proteins within 60–270 kDa on WB analysis [28]. Furthermore, these bands appeared soon after kidney transplantation when the donor blood type was B and the recipient blood type was O (Fig. 4E). In summary, WB analysis showed that kidney-derived ABO blood type antigens were present at detectable levels in sEVs from the peripheral blood.
Kidney-derived sEVs and kidney function in transplant recipients
Given the potential of plasma kidney-derived sEVs to mirror the state of a transplanted kidney, we analyzed sEVs possessing the blood type B antigen over time. Patient 6 underwent kidney transplantation due to gout nephropathy and demonstrated preserved graft kidney function (Fig. 5A). In WB analysis, the bands representing the antigens of the transplanted kidney showed stable patterns (Fig. 5B). Conversely, patient 7, who had end-stage renal disease resulting from IgA nephropathy, experienced graft loss after transplantation due to a recurrence of IgA nephropathy (Fig. 5C). Although WB is semi-quantitative, the bands in plasma-derived sEVs, representing their graft antigens, were diminished with the loss of transplanted kidney function (Fig. 5D).
Discussion
In this study, we gained new insights into kidney-derived sEVs in the plasma. First, we demonstrated that we could detect the signals of plasma-derived sEVs containing mesangial cell marker, ITGA8. Second, by examining sEVs from patients who underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, we confirmed that the plasma contains detectable levels of sEVs originating from the kidney with the potential for biomarker use.
Mesangial or glomerular endothelial cells are separated from the urinary space by a tight basement membrane (pore size: 2.5–2.8 nm) [8]. Reportedly, sEVs in systemic circulation enter the urine [13]. Theoretically, under physiological conditions, sEVs with a diameter of 50–140 nm may have difficulty passing through the glomerular basement membrane into the urine [8, 15].
Thus, we believed that kidney-derived sEVs from the peripheral blood could be an alternative approach for kidney research. Since almost all types of cells are thought to produce sEVs and release them into circulation [29], developing a method to identify kidney-derived sEVs in blood is of great importance. For cancer-derived EVs, epithelial cell surface molecules including EPCAM were effective markers of pancreatic cancer [30], while endothelial cell-derived EVs with CD31 and CD146 represented atherosclerotic disease markers [31]. To detect sEVs of renal origin, we focused on mesangial cells and one of their surface markers, ITGA8, a candidate marker for mesangial sEVs. ITGA8 expression was observed in vascular smooth muscle cells, alveolar myofibroblasts, and renal mesangial cells [26]. Although ITGA8 expression is not limited to mesangial cells, the above studies indicated that focusing on a subset of EVs might improve the utility. In this study, ITGA8 was expressed both in mesangial cells on renal biopsy and in sEVs from cultured human mesangial cells (Fig. 2B, C, G, and Fig S1). We detected ITGA8 in sEVs from plasma using on-bead flow cytometry. We speculate that some ITGA8-positive plasma-derived sEVs came from kidney mesangial cells and could be utilized for liquid biopsy to detect kidney diseases.
Subsequently, by examining plasma sEVs from patients who underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, we demonstrated that the renal tissues produced detectable levels of sEVs in the circulation. Compared to that by cancer cells, general cells release fewer EVs into circulation [30]. We examined blood samples from patients who underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation to confirm whether kidney-derived sEVs were detectable in the peripheral blood. We identified sEVs carrying donor blood type antigens, indicating their origin from transplanted kidneys. The patient with a history of kidney injury appeared to have diminished sEVs containing donor blood type antigens. This result is consistent with the previous findings, which employed donor-specific human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) to detect kidney-specific EVs in kidney transplant recipients [31, 32]. While previous studies have employed techniques such as fluorescent nanoparticle detectors or flow cytometry for nano-sized particles [28, 29], our study has demonstrated the possibility of using WB, which can be conducted in any laboratory setting. Further, compared to HLAs, blood type antigens are primarily expressed on endothelial cells (Fig. 4B, C). This could potentially lead to the different property of sEVs with blood type antigens as biomarkers compared to that in HLA-EVs. The reason for the observed decrease in donor-derived sEVs in patients with renal impairment remains unclear. Reportedly, injured transplanted tissues gradually get replaced by recipient-derived cells, leading to tissue chimerism [33]. This progressive decline in donor-derived cells could be one of the explanations for the diminished donor-derived signals.
There are some limitations to this study. First, the sample size was small. Second, investigations of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation were performed only for blood type B. In our preliminary investigation, the anti-type B antibody displayed greater sensitivity and specificity than did anti-A antibodies; hence, the study participants were limited to recipients who received the kidney from blood type B donors.
In conclusion, we demonstrated the method of detecting sEVs with antigens related to mesangial cells and that plasma contains sEVs originating from the kidney in sufficient amounts for downstream analysis. Our study adds important information to the existing literature on sEVs and their role in disease diagnosis and treatment.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Halimi J-M, Gatault P, Longuet H, Barbet C, Bisson A, Sautenet B, et al. Major bleeding and risk of death after percutaneous native kidney biopsies: a French nationwide cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15:1587–94.
Blanco-Domínguez R, Sánchez-Díaz R, de la Fuente H, Jiménez-Borreguero LJ, Matesanz-Marín A, Relaño M, et al. A novel circulating microRNA for the detection of acute myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2014–27.
Shao H, Chung J, Balaj L, Charest A, Bigner DD, Carter BS, et al. Protein typing of circulating microvesicles allows real-time monitoring of glioblastoma therapy. Nat Med. 2012;18:1835–40.
Melo SA, Luecke LB, Kahlert C, Fernandez AF, Gammon ST, Kaye J, et al. Glypican-1 identifies cancer exosomes and detects early pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2015;523:177–82.
Moon P-G, Lee J-E, You S, Kim T-K, Cho J-H, Kim I-S, et al. Proteomic analysis of urinary exosomes from patients of early IgA nephropathy and thin basement membrane nephropathy. Proteomics. 2011;11:2459–75.
Feng Y, Lv L-L, Wu W-J, Li Z-L, Chen J, Ni H-F, et al. Urinary exosomes and exosomal CCL2 mRNA as biomarkers of active histologic injury in IgA nephropathy. Am J Pathol. 2018;188:2542–52.
Miyazawa Y, Mikami S, Yamamoto K, Sakai M, Saito T, Yamamoto T, et al. AQP2 in human urine is predominantly localized to exosomes with preserved water channel activities. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22:782–8.
Simeone P, Bologna G, Lanuti P, Pierdomenico L, Guagnano MT, Pieragostino D, et al. Extracellular vesicles as signaling mediators and disease biomarkers across biological barriers. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2514.
Zhu Q, Cheng L, Deng C, Huang L, Li J, Wang Y, et al. The genetic source tracking of human urinary exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA [Internet]. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108876118.
Svenningsen P, Sabaratnam R, Jensen BL. Urinary extracellular vesicles: origin, role as intercellular messengers and biomarkers; efficient sorting and potential treatment options. Acta Physiol. 2020;228: e13346.
Wang S, Kojima K, Mobley JA, West AB. Proteomic analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles reveal biomarkers for neurologic disease. EBioMedicine. 2019;45:351–61.
Street JM, Koritzinsky EH, Glispie DM, Star RA, Yuen PST. Urine exosomes: an emerging trove of biomarkers. Adv Clin Chem. 2017;78:103–22.
Cheng Y, Wang X, Yang J, Duan X, Yao Y, Shi X, et al. A translational study of urine miRNAs in acute myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53:668–76.
Li Y, Zhang Y, Qiu F, Qiu Z. Proteomic identification of exosomal LRG1: a potential urinary biomarker for detecting NSCLC. Electrophoresis. 2011;32:1976–83.
Borges FT, Melo SA, Özdemir BC, Kato N, Revuelta I, Miller CA, et al. TGF-β1-containing exosomes from injured epithelial cells activate fibroblasts to initiate tissue regenerative responses and fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24:385–92.
Clayton A, Court J, Navabi H, Adams M, Mason HJA, et al. Analysis of antigen presenting cell derived exosomes, based on immuno-magnetic isolation and flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2001;247:163–74.
Theodoraki M-N, Yerneni SS, Hoffmann TK, Gooding WE, Whiteside TL. Clinical significance of PD-L1+ exosomes in plasma of head and neck cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:896–905.
Ardaillou N, Hagege J, Nivez MP, Ardaillou R, Schlondorff D. Vasoconstrictor-evoked prostaglandin synthesis in cultured human mesangial cells. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:F240–6.
Jaffe EA, Nachman RL, Becker CG, Minick CR. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. J Clin Investig. 1973;52:2745–56.
Alvarez ML, Khosroheidari M, Kanchi Ravi R, DiStefano JK. Comparison of protein, microRNA, and mRNA yields using different methods of urinary exosome isolation for the discovery of kidney disease biomarkers. Kidney Int. 2012;82:1024–32.
Baranyai T, Herczeg K, Onódi Z, Voszka I, Módos K, Marton N, et al. Isolation of exosomes from blood plasma: qualitative and quantitative comparison of ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography methods. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0145686.
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.
Kato N, Kosugi T, Sato W, Ishimoto T, Kojima H, Sato Y, et al. Basigin/CD147 promotes renal fibrosis after unilateral ureteral obstruction. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:572–9.
Hartner A, Schöcklmann H, Pröls F, Müller U, Sterzel RB. Alpha8 integrin in glomerular mesangial cells and in experimental glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 1999;56:1468–80.
Scindia Y, Deshmukh U, Thimmalapura P-R, Bagavant H. Anti-alpha8 integrin immunoliposomes in glomeruli of lupus-susceptible mice: a novel system for delivery of therapeutic agents to the renal glomerulus in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3884–91.
Schnapp LM, Breuss JM, Ramos DM, Sheppard D, Pytela R. Sequence and tissue distribution of the human integrin alpha 8 subunit: a beta 1-associated alpha subunit expressed in smooth muscle cells. J Cell Sci. 1995;108(Pt 2):537–44.
Lu Y, Ye Y, Yang Q, Shi S. Single-cell RNA-sequence analysis of mouse glomerular mesangial cells uncovers mesangial cell essential genes. Kidney Int. 2017;92:504–13.
Tasaki M, Yoshida Y, Miyamoto M, Nameta M, Cuellar LM, Xu B, et al. Identification and characterization of major proteins carrying ABO blood group antigens in the human kidney. Transplantation. 2009;87:1125–33.
Chahar HS, Bao X, Casola A. Exosomes and their role in the life cycle and pathogenesis of RNA viruses. Viruses. 2015;7:3204–25.
Brinton LT, Sloane HS, Kester M, Kelly KA. Formation and role of exosomes in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:659–71.
Vallabhajosyula P, Korutla L, Habertheuer A, Yu M, Rostami S, Yuan C-X, et al. Tissue-specific exosome biomarkers for noninvasively monitoring immunologic rejection of transplanted tissue. J Clin Investig. 2017;127:1375–91.
Woud WW, Hesselink DA, Hoogduijn MJ, Baan CC, Boer K. Direct detection of circulating donor-derived extracellular vesicles in kidney transplant recipients. Sci Rep. 2022;12:21973.
Lagaaij EL, Cramer-Knijnenburg GF, van Kemenade FJ, van Es LA, Bruijn JA, van Krieken JH. Endothelial cell chimerism after renal transplantation and vascular rejection. Lancet. 2001;357:33–7.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Norihiko Suzuki, Ryoko Sakamoto, Naoko Asano, and Yuriko Sawa for providing technical assistance; Hiroshi I. Suzuki for critical reading of the manuscript and valuable suggestions; the Division for Medical Research Engineering, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, for the use of an SW 32Ti swinging-bucket rotor (Beckman Coulter), Optima L-100Xp (Beckman Coulter), a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400 Plus; JEOL Ltd), BZ-X800 (Keyence), NanoSight NS300 (Malvern Panalytical), and BD FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences); Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing; and the members of the Suzuki, Kadomatsu, and Maruyama laboratories for their discussion and assistance.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Nagoya University. This work was supported by Nagoya University Hospital Funding for Clinical Research (716922; https://www2.nu-camcr.org/dam-e/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study was designed by SK and NK. Experiments, data collection, and statistical analysis were performed by SK, HK, YF, YN, ST, and NK. SK and NK wrote the manuscript and AT, YS, KM, SS, KF, TI, TK, SM, and KK edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical standards
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya University (approval number: 2010-1135-4). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Komatsu, S., Kato, N., Kitai, H. et al. Detecting and exploring kidney-derived extracellular vesicles in plasma. Clin Exp Nephrol 28, 617–628 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02464-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02464-z