Abstract
Cardiovascular tissue engineering (CVTE) aims to create living tissues, with the ability to grow and remodel, as replacements for diseased blood vessels and heart valves. Despite promising results, the (long-term) functionality of these engineered tissues still needs improvement to reach broad clinical application. The functionality of native tissues is ensured by their specific mechanical properties directly arising from tissue organization. We therefore hypothesize that establishing a native-like tissue organization is vital to overcome the limitations of current CVTE approaches. To achieve this aim, a better understanding of the growth and remodeling (G&R) mechanisms of cardiovascular tissues is necessary. Cells are the main mediators of tissue G&R, and their behavior is strongly influenced by both mechanical stimuli and cell–cell signaling. An increasing number of signaling pathways has also been identified as mechanosensitive. As such, they may have a key underlying role in regulating the G&R of tissues in response to mechanical stimuli. A more detailed understanding of mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling may thus be crucial to advance CVTE, as it could inspire new methods to control tissue G&R and improve the organization and functionality of engineered tissues, thereby accelerating clinical translation. In this review, we discuss the organization and biomechanics of native cardiovascular tissues; recent CVTE studies emphasizing the obtained engineered tissue organization; and the interplay between mechanical stimuli, cell behavior, and cell–cell signaling. In addition, we review past contributions of computational models in understanding and predicting mechano-regulated tissue G&R and cell–cell signaling to highlight their potential role in future CVTE strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide and represent a major economic and social burden to society due to healthcare expenditures and productivity losses (Timmis et al. 2020; Virani et al. 2020). Many cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary artery disease or calcified aortic valve disease, often require surgical interventions to replace or repair blood vessels or heart valves. The current blood vessel replacement options, namely autologous vessels and synthetic vascular grafts, have several limitations. Autologous vessels (e.g., saphenous veins) have limited availability and poor functionality in patients with systemic vascular diseases (Harskamp et al. 2013; Hess et al. 2014; McNichols et al. 2021). Synthetic grafts are often associated with the occurrence of thrombosis and poor patency rate, particularly for small-diameter vessels (Eslami et al. 2001; Haruguchi and Teraoka 2003; Sarkar et al. 2006; Pashneh-Tala et al. 2016). Current replacement options for diseased heart valves can be classified as mechanical or bioprosthetic, and are associated with several drawbacks as well. Mechanical valves are susceptible to thromboembolic complications and require life-long anticoagulation treatment (Zilla et al. 2008; Lim et al. 2017). Bioprosthetic valves are prone to structural degeneration, which is generally associated with additional valve replacements, especially for young patients (Welke et al. 2011; Head et al. 2017). Most importantly, none of these blood vessel and heart valve replacements are able to grow or remodel to accommodate changing conditions and functional requirements. This is a great limitation especially for pediatric patients, who inevitably outgrow their replacement and therefore require multiple reoperations.
Cardiovascular tissue engineering (CVTE) can potentially overcome the limitations of current replacements. This field aims to create living replacements that can grow, repair, remodel and thereby provide lifetime functionality (Langer and Vacanti 1993). In the classical CVTE paradigm, cells are isolated from the patient and seeded onto a scaffold material within a bioreactor, to form a native-like tissue that is then implanted into the patient. More recently, also other approaches have been proposed that bypass the in vitro cell culture phase, and solely rely on the regenerative capacity of the body to induce neotissue formation directly at the functional site (Lee et al. 2014; Wissing et al. 2017). Due to the presence of living cells, such engineered tissues have the intrinsic ability to grow and adapt in response to changing demands.
Despite some promising examples (Sutherland et al. 2005; Hoerstrup et al. 2006; McAllister et al. 2009; Hibino et al. 2010; Talacua et al. 2015), there is still a need for improvement because the capacity of tissue-engineered blood vessels (TEBVs) and heart valves (TEHVs) to grow and adapt to changing circumstances is still largely unknown, and the remodeling processes after the implantation are still poorly understood. In addition, TEBVs and TEHVs do not always exhibit proper long-term functionality. The main functional problems of these tissues after implantation are, for example, related to stenosis, thrombus formation, and calcification (Gottlieb et al. 2010; Schmidt et al. 2010; Tara et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2016; Sugiura et al. 2016). In addition, suboptimal mechanical properties of TEHVs may lead to the progressive development of valve insufficiency or even tissue rupture (Flanagan et al. 2009; Weber et al. 2013; Syedain et al. 2015; Reimer et al. 2017). The function of cardiovascular tissues is strongly correlated with their biomechanical properties (Fung 1993; Nerem 2000; Sacks et al. 2009), which are in turn directly determined by their (physiological) tissue organization. Therefore, we hypothesize that establishing a native-like tissue organization is necessary for overcoming the limitations of current CVTE constructs, which can only be achieved in a controllable manner when the growth and remodeling (G&R) mechanisms of (engineered) cardiovascular tissues are adequately understood.
Cells are the main drivers of G&R. Cell behavior is intrinsically determined by cell–cell signaling pathways and can be manipulated via external factors such as mechanical cues (Bukoreshtliev et al. 2013; Han et al. 2018). For example, mechanical cues strongly affect cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and matrix synthesis, all processes that are strongly related to tissue G&R (Humphrey 2006). However, the underlying biological mechanisms are still scarcely elucidated. Recent studies have highlighted an increasing number of mechanoresponsive characteristics of cell–cell signaling pathways (Hiepen et al. 2020; Stassen et al. 2020). Therefore, mechano-mediated cell–cell signaling could explain the link between mechanical cues and cell behavior that determines G&R. Fully unraveling this interplay between mechanics and cell–cell signaling could open new possibilities to control cellular behavior in CVTE, with the purpose to induce functional G&R, by tuning both mechanical cues and cell–cell signaling pathways. Our review focuses on cell–cell signaling in vascular and valvular cells and does not consider other signaling phenomena, such as those involving inflammatory cells. In short, an enhanced understanding of mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling and the resulting increased ability to control cell behavior and tissue G&R may be utilized to optimize CVTE and improve the functional organization of engineered tissues.
Within this review, we will highlight the potential key role of mechano-mediated cell–cell signaling pathways in CVTE and the future directions in this field. In particular, we will first discuss the relationship between tissue organization, biomechanics, and function of native vessels and heart valves. Thereafter, we will discuss the obtained tissue organization in previous CVTE studies, together with their limitations. Next, we will focus on the interplay between cellular behavior, mechanical cues, and cell–cell signaling to identify the potential role of mechano-regulation of signaling pathways in G&R of TEBVs and TEHVs. Throughout the review, we will also emphasize the past and future contributions of computational models in advancing understanding and predicting tissue G&R, cell–cell signaling, and CVTE strategies. Finally, we will conclude with a description of the challenges that remain to be addressed in CVTE and present an outlook on future directions. We focus on both blood vessels and heart valves because they are similar from a tissue engineering perspective, as they share many of the methods and techniques adopted in this field, as well as many of the limitations and challenges we still face. In addition, the G&R of both these tissues are affected by mechanical stimuli and cell–cell signaling pathways and the computational models we discuss can generally be applied to both tissues.
2 The organization and structure of cardiovascular tissues
2.1 Tri-laminar structure in native blood vessels
The vasculature is comprised of a network of blood vessels, going from arteries to veins, where each type has a specific structure and function. Arteries enable the transport of blood away from the heart toward arterioles and capillaries, where the chemical and metabolic exchange between blood and tissues occurs. In turn, blood is transported back to the heart through venules and then larger veins. In terms of general structure, both arteries and veins are composed of three layers, known as tunica intima, tunica media, and tunica adventitia (Fig. 1c). Each of them exhibits unique structural and functional features.
The tunica intima is the inner layer of blood vessels. This layer is composed of a single layer of endothelial cells (ECs), lining the vascular wall, and a basal lamina. Large arteries also present a subendothelial area, between the basal lamina and internal elastic lamina, which separates the tunica intima from the tunica media. ECs in the inner arterial layer are oriented along the axis of the vessel wall, which corresponds to the direction of blood flow (Langille and Adamson 1981). These cells act as the first barrier separating blood from the surrounding tissue. As such, ECs play crucial roles in various cardiovascular processes, including vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, coagulation, and inflammation (Cines et al. 1998). Moreover, in response to mechanical cues (Awolesi et al. 1995; Topper et al. 1996), ECs secrete mediators to control vasoconstriction (Yanagisawa et al. 1988) and vasodilation (Furchgott and Zawadzki 1980), which are crucial processes for regulating blood pressure and flow. ECs also produce the components of the basal lamina to which they adhere. The basal lamina supports the (EC) layer and acts as selectively permeable barrier to regulate the passage of molecules between tissue layers (Arends and Lieleg 2016). It is mainly composed of laminin, collagen IV, perlecan, and nidogen (Fox et al. 1991; Battaglia et al. 1992; Hopf et al. 1999). Similarly, ECs also produce the components of the subendothelial area that lies between the basal and elastic laminae, which contains microfibrils and collagen fibers (Gerrity and Cliff 1972; Davis 1993) and serves as an anchor for the ECs to the elastic lamina. In humans, this area also contains intimal smooth muscle cells (Schwartz et al. 1995). It is not yet clear if these cells are trapped in this area during development or if they have a specific key function, such as in the development of atherosclerosis.
The tunica media is the middle layer of blood vessels. It is composed of several layers of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), elastin sheets (lamellae), a network of elastic fibers, collagen fibers, and layers of several other extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. In large arteries, the media is separated from the adventitia by an external elastic lamina. VSMCs are responsible for the production and the organization of ECM in the media layer. Enclosed within elastin lamellae and surrounded by collagen fibers and proteoglycan-rich ECM, VSMCs are aligned in the direction of collagen fiber bundles (Dingemans et al. 2000; O’Connell et al. 2008), which are oriented in the tunica media at an angle of approximately 30° with respect to the circumferential direction (Holzapfel 2006). The elastin lamellae are protruded by thin elastin fibers, to which the VSMCs adhere. VSMCs play important roles in blood vessel function, development, and homeostasis. These cells maintain the vascular tone through cell contraction and relaxation. Furthermore, VSMCs generally express a differentiated quiescent phenotype in healthy homeostatic vessels, and they can change phenotype towards a migratory and proliferative state upon biological and mechanical stimuli (Owens et al. 2004). This ability to switch phenotypes is key to regulate the G&R of the vessel wall.
Finally, the tunica adventitia is the outermost layer of the vessel wall. It consists of a collagen-rich ECM and a variety of cell types including fibroblasts, progenitor cells, and immunomodulatory cells (Stenmark et al. 2013). The adventitia gives stability and strength to the vessel and connects the vessels to the surrounding tissues. It also provides nutrients and oxygen to the cells in the vessel wall, and it enables the removal of waste products through a network of small vessels called vasa vasorum (Wolinsky and Glagov 1967). Fibroblasts are the most abundant cell type in the adventitia. These cells produce the adventitial ECM and remodel the ECM in response to stress or injury (Stenmark et al. 2013). Collagen type I and type III constitute a major part of ECM in the adventitia (Howard and Macarak 1989). The main role of these collagen fibers, which are mainly axially aligned in the adventitia (Holzapfel 2006) and present a highly nonlinear stiffness, is to prevent the vessel wall from rupture at high blood pressures.
2.2 Tri-laminar structure in native heart valves
The main function of heart valves is to maintain the unidirectionality of blood flow during the cardiac cycle. The atrioventricular mitral and tricuspid valves allow blood flow from the atria to the ventricles in diastole and prevent backflow from the ventricles during systole. The semilunar aortic and pulmonary valves separate the ventricles from the aorta and pulmonary artery, respectively, and open during systole to allow blood flow from the ventricles to the arteries. The architecture and localized distribution of the ECM are crucial for the physiological function of the heart valves. In general, the belly region of semilunar heart valves has a trilaminar structure composed of an organized ECM and interspersed valvular interstitial cells (VICs), covered by a monolayer of valvular endothelial cells (VECs) on both sides of the leaflets (Schoen 2008) (Fig. 1d). The commissures where the leaflets come together have a monolayer and fibrous structure (Misfeld and Sievers 2007). The first two layers in the belly region in heart valves are known as the fibrosa and spongiosa. The third layer is called ventricularis in semilunar valves and atrialis in atrioventricular valves. The atrioventricular valves exhibit both a ventricularis on the ventricular side and an atrialis on the atrial side (Gross and Kugel 1931; Sacks et al. 2019).
The fibrosa is located close to the outflow surface of the valves. It is mainly composed of circumferentially oriented fibrillar collagen (Latif et al. 2005; Ayoub et al. 2018). This dense network of collagen fibers provides strength to the valve (Sauren et al. 1980; Kodigepalli et al. 2020). The ventricularis layer of semilunar valves and the atrialis layer of atrioventricular valves face the inflow side and are mainly composed of radially oriented elastic fibers that facilitate tissue movement by providing extension and subsequently recoil of the valve tissue (Vesely 1998). The spongiosa is the middle layer and mainly contains glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and proteoglycans which interconnect the collagen and elastin fibers. This layer is histologically distinct, but if it is a functionally distinct layer is still under debate (Eckert et al. 2013; Buchanan and Sacks 2014).
The two main cell populations in heart valves are VICs and VECs. VICs are embedded through all three layers of the leaflets, while VECs line the surfaces of the valves. VICs are responsible for matrix maintenance, synthesis, and remodeling (Latif et al. 2005). They are highly plastic and can express various phenotypes upon injury or alterations in mechanical state. In mature heart valves, VICs are mainly quiescent to maintain the physiological valve function and homeostasis (Aikawa et al. 2006) and can be activated for valve remodeling (Liu et al. 2007a). VECs also have important roles in physiological functioning of the valves. For example, VECs regulate platelet adhesion and coagulation, act as a functional barrier between the blood and the valve tissue, and interact with the VICs to regulate their phenotypes (Butcher and Nerem 2007). VECs have different gene expression profiles and obtain different morphologies on different sides of the valves; they are elongated and flattened on the ventricular side and cuboidal on the arterial side of the semilunar valves. This difference in shape is related to the presence of high- and low-shear forces, respectively (Maron and Hutchins 1974).
2.3 Similarities and differences in tri-laminar structure of vessels and valves
Blood vessels and heart valves both have a trilaminar architecture and layer-specific ECM organization which are crucial for ensuring proper functionality. Both tissues contain one (predominantly) fibrous layer, the tunica adventitia and the fibrosa, which provide functional strength. The cells in the inner layer of both tissues, VSMCs and VICs, are quiescent and nonproliferative in the homeostatic state and can alter their phenotype to regulate vascular and valvular remodeling, respectively. However, the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and myosin heavy chain is elevated in quiescent VSMCs, whereas these proteins are markers of activated VICs (Liu et al. 2007a). Important to note, however, is that even though VICs do have some contractile properties, they are more fibroblast-like cells, compared to VSMCs (Filip et al. 1986; Latif et al. 2015). Each organizational layer of blood vessels includes different cell types with different functions, whereas the VICs are interspersed throughout all layers of the valves, and VECs cover the blood-contacting surfaces of the valves. In addition, the morphology of ECs and VECs is different based on their differential response to shear stress (Butcher et al. 2004). ECs align parallel to the flow, while VECs align perpendicular to flow. These differences in composition are due to the different functions of vascular and valvular tissues.
2.4 Cardiovascular tissue biomechanics and functional organization
Each component and organizational feature of native blood vessels and heart valves contributes to ensuring proper tissue functionality under hemodynamic loading conditions. In this section, we discuss the specific hemodynamic loads acting on blood vessels and heart valves, the resulting mechanical stimuli experienced by each tissue, and the functional organization adopted by each tissue to optimally accommodate these mechanical stimuli.
2.4.1 Blood vessel biomechanics
Blood flowing through the vessels exerts a frictional force acting on the inside of the vessel, which is called wall shear stress (Fig. 1a). Blood flow also exerts pulsating pressure onto the blood vessels, causing them to dilate which results in cyclic stress and strain in the vascular wall, both in the circumferential and the axial directions (Fig. 1a). The high elasticity and extensibility of elastin (Davis 1995) in the media layer allow the blood vessel to expand during systole, reducing the resistance to blood flow, and recoil during diastole, maintaining a pressure gradient required to drive the blood through the rest of the vasculature (Humphrey 2002; Cocciolone et al. 2018). Meanwhile, the much stiffer collagen fibers give the vessel strength and resilience to protect against excessive strains. The helical organization of collagen fibers in the media layer (Sect. 2.1) ensures that the vessel can withstand loads in both circumferential and axial directions (Holzapfel et al. 2000). The collagen fibers in the adventitia are initially coiled and only become elastically stretched and start bearing load at high pressures. Under these circumstances, their relatively high stiffness becomes dominant in the tissue mechanical response. This way, the collagen fibers act as a protective sheath that allows normal dilation of the wall but prevents over-dilation and rupture (Holzapfel et al. 2000; Humphrey 2002). In addition to blood pressure, active contraction of smooth muscle cells, mediating vasoconstriction and vasodilation, also contributes to the circumferential stress and strain in the vascular wall. Moreover, residual stress (and pre-stretch) is present within the tissue even when external loads have been removed. This residual stress is hypothesized to arise during development as a result of elastin fibers being extended due to somatic growth after the fibers have reached maturity (Davis 1995; Cardamone et al. 2009). Moreover, collagen fibers incorporated into the tissue at a preferred deposition stretch might also contribute to the establishment of residual stresses (Humphrey and Rajagopal 2002; Cardamone et al. 2009). From a functional point of view, it has been suggested that residual stress ensures the uniformity of strain and/or stress throughout the vessel wall (Fung 1991; Destrade et al. 2012) and thereby facilitates the establishment of mechanical homeostasis.
2.4.2 Heart valve biomechanics
A similar correlation between components and mechanical function can be observed in native heart valves, which are similarly subjected to mechanical loads due to the cyclic expulsion of blood from the heart. In particular, heart valve leaflets are subjected to wall shear stress throughout the entire cardiac cycle; bending as a result of the opening and closing of the leaflets; and pressure when the leaflets are closed (Fig. 1b). As a result of bending and pressure, heart valve leaflets experience stress and strain in both the circumferential and radial directions (Fig. 1b). During bending, stresses and strains are heterogeneous across the leaflet layers (Sacks et al. 2009). The high flexibility of radially organized elastin fibers in the ventricularis enables the leaflets to open and close by bending easily and provides the main restorative force (Vesely 1997). Collagen fibers in the ventricularis become more recruited upon closing of the leaflets, resulting in a more compliant tissue in the opened state to allow large extensions and a stiffer tissue in the closed state to limit further extension (Vesely and Noseworthy 1992; Vesely 1997). Thus, they exhibit a similar protective role as in the adventitia layer of blood vessel. In the closed configuration, circumferential collagen fibers in the fibrosa provide the valves with the tensile strength required to resist the blood pressure (Sacks et al. 2009; Ayoub et al. 2016). The high stiffness of these collagen fibers limits deformations when the valves are closed to maintain coaptation (Schoen and Levy 1999; Sacks et al. 2009). Taken together, the combined organization and alignment of collagen and elastin make the valve leaflets very pliable in the unloaded state, enabling efficient opening and closing, and very stiff in the loaded state, ensuring proper valve closure. Finally, the main function of the components in the spongiosa appears to be absorbing shear stress to enable the ventricularis and fibrosa to move relative to each other during bending and pressurization (Schoen and Levy 1999; Sacks et al. 2009).
In conclusion, the organization of blood vessels and heart valves is tightly linked with the mechanical loads that they experience. Both the layered structure and alignment of fibers in these tissues ensure proper tissue function under physiological loading conditions. In particular, collagen fibers are the main load-bearing components and essential for providing strength, while elastin is crucial for ensuring flexibility. Therefore, inducing a proper tissue organization and adequate distribution and alignment of elastin and collagen fibers within engineered cardiovascular tissues is of paramount importance for the functionality of these tissues. In addition, cellular infiltration and cell-mediated G&R are critical to ensure a proper ECM turnover and adaptive capabilities of the tissue.
3 Growth and remodeling in cardiovascular tissue engineering
3.1 In vitro cardiovascular tissue engineering
In vitro CVTE aims at creating functional cardiovascular tissues outside the body that can be subsequently implanted to replace diseased or malformed cardiovascular tissues. When following this in vitro approach, (preferentially autologous) cells are seeded onto a scaffold and afterward subjected to biochemical and mechanical stimuli within a bioreactor in order to induce tissue formation prior to implantation (Langer and Vacanti 1993). Many strategies have been proposed to construct functional tissues in vitro. Most of them can be broadly categorized based on the used scaffold type, such as synthetic materials (e.g., polyglycolide, poly-L-lactide, poly(ester-urethane)urea), natural materials (e.g., fibrin, collagen), and decellularized biological matrices (Pashneh-Tala et al. 2016; Goins et al. 2019), although some strategies do not require scaffolds but only supports (e.g., in the case of sheet-based tissue engineering) (L’Heureux et al. 1998). In this section, we discuss the final tissue organization, in terms of cellular and ECM distribution, obtained with in vitro cardiovascular tissue engineering approaches.
3.1.1 Organization in in vitro tissue-engineered blood vessels
Decellularized native matrices
Decellularized native matrices have often been used as scaffold material for the in vitro creation of TEBVs, as they immediately provide an optimal ECM organization and corresponding mechanical properties. In this approach, vascular tissue is harvested from an allogeneic or xenogeneic donor and decellularized by using biological agents, chemical agents, or physical methods (Crapo et al. 2011). Autologous cells are then seeded onto the preserved ECM. The tissue construct is subsequently cultured in vitro and, ultimately, implanted into the host. Animal studies have shown that this approach can yield confluent EC layers in the intima of the engineered vessels, surrounded by layers of VSMCs in the media (Kaushal et al. 2001; Cho et al. 2005; Tillman et al. 2012). Since the decellularization process generally preserves collagen fibers, the internal and external elastin lamina, and the dense elastic layers in the media, the trilaminar organization of native blood vessels is generally present also in these engineered tissues. In agreement with the concept that organization corresponds to function, clinical studies following this strategy demonstrated promising functionality of such constructs implanted as portal veins of pediatric patients (Olausson et al. 2012, 2014). However, the scarce availability of donor homografts and risks of zoonotic infections from xenografts present substantial limitations in terms of the potential for large-scale clinical translation.
Synthetic and natural scaffolds
Polymeric scaffolds with a synthetic material represent a valid alternative to decellularized matrices, as they in principle have an unlimited availability and they still offer the possibility to control scaffold properties toward native-like features. The commonly used synthetic polymers for vascular tissue engineering applications include polyglycolide (PGA), poly-L-lactide (PLLA), and poly(ester-urethane)urea (PEUU) (Niklason et al. 1999; Shinoka et al. 2005; Hoerstrup et al. 2006; Nieponice et al. 2010). In vitro TEBVs using synthetic scaffolds to substitute large arteries in the low-pressure circulation, e.g., the pulmonary artery or inferior vena cava, usually exhibit a cellular organization with a luminal EC layer and medial VSMC layers similar to native tissues (Shinoka et al. 1998; Watanabe et al. 2001; Hoerstrup et al. 2006; Cummings et al. 2012). Moreover, there are no observed scaffold traces. In addition, elastic fibers have been observed in the medial layer (Shinoka et al. 1998; Watanabe et al. 2001; Hoerstrup et al. 2006; Cummings et al. 2012), although sometimes lower in content compared to native levels (Hoerstrup et al. 2006; Cummings et al. 2012). On the other hand, the collagen content and structure in these constructs is similar to native tissues (Shinoka et al. 1998; Watanabe et al. 2001; Hoerstrup et al. 2006). The native-like cell and ECM structure in these studies correspond to adequate functionality. Pre-clinical studies with large-diameter vessel implantations have demonstrated promising functionality of the engineered blood vessels up to 80–100-week follow-up (Hoerstrup et al. 2006; Cummings et al. 2012). Clinical studies with pediatric patients have also demonstrated that grafts are mostly patent 10 years after implantation (Shinoka et al. 2005; Hibino et al. 2010; Shoji and Shinoka 2018). Despite these encouraging results, it should be noted that these engineered vessels had a large diameter. As such, they were less susceptible to neointimal hyperplasia and thrombus formation compared to small-diameter grafts, and they were implanted in a relatively low-pressure circulation. Thus, translating this success into small-diameter and high-pressure vessels is a challenge that still needs to be overcome (Mirensky et al. 2009).
Polymeric synthetic and natural scaffold-based approaches of small-diameter constructs are mostly successful in achieving a native-like cellular organization, but they cannot yet obtain a native-like ECM organization. In general, in vivo studies have shown that the luminal surface of these TEBVs is always covered by an EC monolayer (Niklason et al. 1999; Swartz et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2007b; Iwasaki et al. 2008; He et al. 2010; Koch et al. 2010; Nieponice et al. 2010; Soletti et al. 2010). This may not be surprising, since ECs are generally seeded onto the lumen of the tubular constructs already during the in vitro stage (Niklason et al. 1999; Swartz et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2007b; Koch et al. 2010). Dynamic preconditioning in vitro also helps to achieve a layered VSMC organization in the tunica media, with a circumferential orientation of VSMCs (Niklason et al. 1999; Seliktar et al. 2000; Iwasaki et al. 2008; He et al. 2010; Koch et al. 2010; Nieponice et al. 2010; Schutte et al. 2010). In vitro culture also promotes collagen formation (Niklason et al. 1999; Swartz et al. 2005; Buttafoco et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2007b; Iwasaki et al. 2008; He et al. 2010; Koch et al. 2010; Nieponice et al. 2010; Soletti et al. 2010). Circumferentially aligned collagen fibers have been observed in vitro and in vivo, although not predominantly localized in the outer layers of engineered vessels (Swartz et al. 2005; Iwasaki et al. 2008; He et al. 2010; Nieponice et al. 2010). However, a native-like elastin content and the establishment of cohesive elastin sheet formation in the middle layer have not been achieved yet (Swartz et al. 2005; Koch et al. 2010), despite attempts with multi-layered synthetic scaffolds that slightly improved elastin deposition and organization (Iwasaki et al. 2008; He et al. 2010). Therefore, these constructs should be improved especially in terms of elastin content and elastin organization.
Cell-sheet approach
Another method to create in vitro TEBVs consists of forming tubular grafts without using a scaffold or a supporting matrix. The rationale of this approach is to solely use cultured cells to construct TEBVs without the addition of a scaffolding material (L’Heureux et al. 1998). In this approach, cell sheets corresponding to the different vessel layers are rolled around a mandrel, which is removed after tissue maturation. Sheet-based tissue engineering has been adopted in preclinical and clinical studies with high success rates (L’Heureux et al. 1998, 2006; McAllister et al. 2009). The preclinical studies have shown that, when such grafts are implanted as arterial replacements, they exhibit the native-like trilayer organization in terms of cells and ECM. Furthermore, their burst pressure is comparable with the native vessels, due to presence of a similar ECM organization (L’Heureux et al. 1998, 2006). In agreement with their native-like composition, it has been shown that the grafts can be functional and patent in the long-term (L’Heureux et al. 2006). The clinical studies have shown that this method can achieve good functionality after up to 20 months, even when patients have underlying pathologies (McAllister et al. 2009; Wystrychowski et al. 2014). Overall, these studies show that establishing a native-like tissue organization is correlated with good long-term functionality. A major drawback of the overall approach, however, is that the in vitro culture procedure is often time-consuming, expensive, and logistically challenging.
3.1.2 Organization in in vitro tissue-engineered heart valves
Compared to in vitro vascular tissue engineering, attempts at establishing a native-like tissue organization in in vitro tissue-engineered heart valves have been less successful so far.
Decellularized native matrices
Similar to vessels, decellularization of allogeneic or xenogeneic tissues, combined with seeding of autologous cells, has been adopted to tissue engineer heart valves in vitro. With this approach, valve tissue is formed in vitro, which is then implanted into the host (Boccafoschi et al. 2015). Decellularized native matrices seeded with cells already have a native-like ECM organization at the start of the in vitro culture period (Schenke-Layland et al. 2003; Cushing et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2006; Lichtenberg et al. 2006; Dohmen et al. 2007). This approach in fact preserves the collagen and elastin content of the valve leaflets and thus the trilaminar organization of the valves. However, active myofibroblast-like cells have been observed throughout the thickness of the leaflets in the explants, as well as incomplete endothelialization and thickening of the leaflets (Steinhoff et al. 2000; Kim et al. 2006). These outcomes could be related to the type of cells seeded and the use of relatively short follow-up times. Despite these imperfections, clinical studies using decellularized allografts and xenografts seeded with autologous cells have shown good hemodynamic performance and functionality (Cebotari et al. 2006; Dohmen et al. 2007, 2011). Still, the availability of allografts is limited, and zoonotic risks of xenografts are still present. In addition, there is an uncertainty regarding the G&R capacity of TEHVs from decellularized native matrices because of the limited potential for cell infiltration (Weber et al. 2013).
Synthetic and natural scaffolds
To avoid the risk of xenogeneic diseases and limited supply of allografts, biodegradable synthetic and natural scaffolds are used as an alternative (Fioretta et al. 2018). This approach has shown that ECs generally cover the leaflet surfaces of TEHVs (Hoerstrup et al. 2000; Sodian et al. 2000a, 2010; Sutherland et al. 2005; Flanagan et al. 2009), although an incomplete EC layer has also been reported in vitro and in vivo (Flanagan et al. 2007; Schmidt et al. 2010). Cells found in the internal layers of the leaflet are often α-SMA positive, as opposed to the cells in healthy native leaflets (Hoerstrup et al. 2000, 2002; Flanagan et al. 2007, 2009; Schmidt et al. 2010; Sodian et al. 2010; Weber et al. 2011, 2012). On the other hand, Sutherland et al. have reported that α-SMA-positive cells have been detected throughout the leaflets at the time of tissue implantation, and these cells have localized at the subendothelial layer, similar to native leaflets, after 8 months in vivo (Sutherland et al. 2005). This observation could be associated with the use of longer follow-up times compared to other studies.
Dynamic loading increases the tissue formation and ECM remodeling in TEHVs (Engelmayr et al. 2006; Eckert et al. 2011; D’Amore et al. 2016). Particularly, the combination of cyclic flexure and laminar flow, which better mimics the physiological mechanical conditions, accelerates the tissue formation compared to applying either cyclic flexure or laminar flow (Engelmayr et al. 2006). Moreover, ECM production is promoted by cyclic strain up to a certain threshold (30%) from which a decrease in production is observed with a further increase in strain up to 50% (D’Amore et al. 2016). However, the total amount of ECM produced by cells in TEHV is often less compared to the ECM content in native counterparts (Shinoka et al. 1995; Breuer et al. 1996; Hoerstrup et al. 2002; Sodian et al. 2010). In addition, there are also still several challenges with respect to mimicking the native ECM organization. In particular, collagen is often deposited in both the outer layers of engineered leaflets instead of only the fibrosa layer (Sodian et al. 2000b, a; Neidert and Tranquillo 2006; Flanagan et al. 2007, 2009; Schmidt et al. 2010; Weber et al. 2011). Furthermore, despite their general abundance, GAGs are not always localized in the middle layer (Sodian et al. 2000a; Flanagan et al. 2007). Finally, elastin has only rarely been observed (Sutherland et al. 2005; Sodian et al. 2010) and usually has not been synthesized in vitro or in vivo studies using polymeric scaffolds (Sodian et al. 2000b, a; Stock et al. 2000; Hoerstrup et al. 2002; Neidert and Tranquillo 2006; Flanagan et al. 2007, 2009; Schmidt et al. 2010; Weber et al. 2011).
The lack of a native-like organization often leads to a gradual loss of functionality after implantation. The main complications that have resulted in TEHV failure are leaflet shortening, regurgitation, and stenosis (Stock et al. 2000; Sodian et al. 2000a; Gottlieb et al. 2010; Schmidt et al. 2010; Weber et al. 2011). In addition, even though the scaffold changes substantially from its initial state (Eckert et al. 2011), remnants of synthetic scaffold material have still been detected in some studies after explantation of engineered tissues (Sodian et al. 2000a; Schmidt et al. 2010), which creates a potential risk of calcification (Sugiura et al. 2017). Natural scaffolds, on the other hand, have often provided insufficient mechanical strength (Neidert and Tranquillo 2006; Flanagan et al. 2007, 2009) and are generally subjected to high degrees of compaction.
3.1.3 General limitations of in vitro cardiovascular tissue engineering
The main limitations of in vitro CVTE are the length, costs, and logistic challenges associated with the in vitro culture procedure (L’Heureux et al. 1998; Tremblay et al. 2014). Upscaling the production of in vitro engineered tissues to meet clinical demands is another significant challenge that is difficult to resolve (Niklason and Lawson 2020). Finally, in vitro engineered cardiovascular tissues often lack a native-like tissue organization which strongly correlates with reduced tissue functionality. Alternative tissue engineering approaches not relying on in vitro cell culture have been recently introduced to overcome (part of) these challenges, as outlined in the next section.
3.2 In situ cardiovascular tissue engineering
To overcome the limitations of in vitro tissue engineering approaches discussed in the previous section, much attention has recently been shifted toward the in situ tissue engineering approach. In situ tissue engineering is defined as the regeneration of tissues from a readily available scaffold that is implanted directly at the functional site in the body (Mol et al. 2009; Wissing et al. 2017; Bouten et al. 2018). This method relies on the presence of a resorbable scaffold temporarily taking over the tissue function, while host cells repopulate the scaffold and form new autologous tissue (Mol et al. 2009; Roh et al. 2010; Wissing et al. 2017; Bouten et al. 2018). The choice of scaffold material is of utmost importance. It may either consist of synthetic polymers (Khosravi et al. 2015; Kluin et al. 2017) or be obtained by decellularizing a xenograft, allograft, or in vitro tissue-engineered matrix (TEM) (Dijkman et al. 2012; Goecke et al. 2018; Wolkers and Hilfiker 2021). To ensure immediate availability, these decellularized scaffolds can be procured ahead of time and safely stored for long periods of time (Dijkman et al. 2012; Goecke et al. 2018; Wolkers and Hilfiker 2021). Scaffolds are usually acellular before implantation, although they may also be pre-seeded right before surgery (“on-the-fly”) (Hibino et al. 2011; Harrington et al. 2011). The decellularization process aims to reduce the immunogenicity of the decellularized xenografts, allografts, and TEMs (Goldstein et al. 2000; da Costa et al. 2005; Dijkman et al. 2012). Nevertheless, an immunological response is sometimes still observed due to incomplete decellularization or the residual presence of active inflammatory stimuli, especially in xenografts (Simon et al. 2003; Kasimir et al. 2006; Filippo et al. 2013). Synthetic scaffolds present the additional advantage of being highly tailorable in terms of material and microstructural properties, providing better reproducibility than grafts cultured in vitro (Breuer et al. 2004; Capulli et al. 2016; Fioretta et al. 2020). Finally, in situ tissue engineering does not require patient-specific cells in contrast to in vitro methods, as TEMs can be cultured using readily available cell sources (Reimer et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2019). Based on our definition of in situ tissue engineering, autografts fall outside the scope of the current review. Interested readers are referred to the following recent review articles on this topic: (Mazine et al. 2018; Nappi et al. 2020a, 2020b). To provide a current overview of the tissue organization that is achieved in in situ engineered tissues, we discuss some recent results of studies highlighting the composition and organization of in situ TEBVs and TEHVs. In particular, we focus our attention on recellularization, matrix synthesis, and the structure and distribution of cells and matrix components in the neotissue. Tables 1 and 2 give an overview of the characteristics of these studies and their main findings in terms of tissue organization.
3.2.1 Organization in in situ tissue-engineered blood vessels
Cellular repopulation
A key aspect in achieving a functional neotissue is the realization of proper repopulation of the scaffold with host cells. Cells infiltrate the scaffolds gradually (Tara et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Khosravi et al. 2016; Kirkton et al. 2019), typically from the transmural and transanastomotic sides in rodent models (Talacua et al. 2015). However, it has been shown that infiltration from the circulation is also possible (Row et al. 2015; Talacua et al. 2015). This may be particularly useful for engineering longer vascular grafts in humans, where transanastomotic infiltration is rare (Talacua et al. 2015). Many studies indeed report the presence of host cells in explanted grafts. For example, they are generally well populated by ECs, resulting in the formation of an extensive endothelial layer (Fig. 1e) (Zhu et al. 2015; Tara et al. 2015; Talacua et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2016; Syedain et al. 2016; Marosfoi et al. 2017; Kirkton et al. 2019) which has been shown to develop progressively over time (Zhu et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Marosfoi et al. 2017). The newly formed endothelium is often similar to native tissue, with aligned ECs (Zhu et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2016) and a cobble-stone cell shape (Zhu et al. 2015). In addition to ECs, the presence of VSMCs is also very common in in situ TEBVs (Fig. 1e) (Row et al. 2015; Zhu et al. 2015; Tara et al. 2015; Talacua et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2016; Khosravi et al. 2016; Sugiura et al. 2016, 2017). These VSMCs often display a mature, contractile phenotype (Zhu et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2016; Khosravi et al. 2016; Syedain et al. 2016; Kirkton et al. 2019). This mature phenotype seems to develop gradually over time, and several studies have shown a phenotypic switch taking place from undifferentiated, synthetic VSMCs to differentiated, contractile VSMCs (Zhu et al. 2015; Kirkton et al. 2019). Interestingly, very few studies seem to report on the presence of fibroblasts, which are present in the adventitia layer of native blood vessels. This aspect deserves more attention due to the role of fibroblasts in ECM production and remodeling (Sect. 2.1).
ECM formation
The infiltrating cells have displayed the ability to deposit collagen and elastin fibers in both synthetic and decellularized scaffolds (Fig. 1e) (Row et al. 2015; Zhu et al. 2015; Tara et al. 2015; Talacua et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2016; Khosravi et al. 2016; Sugiura et al. 2016; Syedain et al. 2016). This deposition of matrix components may be influenced by a variety of factors. For example, pre-seeding decellularized xenografts with VSMCs enhanced collagen deposition in a sheep model (Row et al. 2015), while cyclic stretching increased elastin production in a mouse model (Tara et al. 2015), confirming the importance of mechanical stimuli in regulating tissue G&R. The collagen content in TEBVs is often extensive and similar to or higher than native levels (Tara et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Khosravi et al. 2016; Syedain et al. 2016). The elastin content, on the other hand, is generally lower than or similar to that of native vessels (Fig. 1e) (Tara et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2016; Syedain et al. 2016), indicating that achieving proper elastin deposition might be more challenging. This may be partly explained by the fact that elastin turnover in adults is much slower than collagen turnover (Langille 1993; Cocciolone et al. 2018), so adult host cells may not be able to produce elastin at the same rate as collagen. Finally, it is worth noting that our current understanding of tissue organization in TEHVs is limited as many studies do not take this aspect into consideration. This presents an additional complication in the search for improved functionality of TEHVs.
Functionality and complications
As may be expected from the generally favorable cellular repopulation and abundant presence of matrix components, recent studies on in situ TEBVs have generally been successful, resulting in patent and functional grafts (Khosravi et al. 2015, 2016; Row et al. 2015; Tara et al. 2015; Talacua et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Yang et al. 2016; Sugiura et al. 2016). However, some complications still occasionally occur, such as aneurysm formation (Tara et al. 2015), graft rupture (Tara et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2016), thrombosis (Yang et al. 2016; Sugiura et al. 2016), and calcification (Yang et al. 2016; Khosravi et al. 2016; Sugiura et al. 2017). Some of these issues emphasize the key importance of an appropriate scaffold degradation profile, as scaffolds degrading too slowly have been associated with calcification (Khosravi et al. 2016; Sugiura et al. 2017), and scaffold breakdown occurring too quickly can result in aneurysms and graft rupture if it is not balanced by sufficient neotissue formation (Tara et al. 2015).
Consistent with the generally favorable functionality, recent in situ TEBVs have presented many signs of advanced organization resembling that of native vessels. For example, a tri-laminar organization has been shown in both a pre-clinical murine model (Yang et al. 2016) and in a clinical setting (Kirkton et al. 2019). In addition, a medial layer with organized VSMCs has been observed in several studies (Row et al. 2015; Talacua et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2016; Kirkton et al. 2019) as well as the presence of circumferentially aligned VSMCs (Row et al. 2015; Zhu et al. 2015; Koobatian et al. 2016; Syedain et al. 2016; Kirkton et al. 2019). A circumferential alignment has also been observed for collagen fibers (Zhu et al. 2015; Talacua et al. 2015) and elastin fibers (Yang et al. 2016), which is similar to the native situation in the media layer.
3.2.2 Organization in in situ tissue-engineered heart valves
Cellular repopulation
Repopulation of in situ TEHVs generally seems less extensive and more variable compared to in situ TEBVs (Fig. 1f). For example, varying degrees of endothelial layer formation have been observed in TEHV leaflets. A few studies reported an extensive or complete endothelial layer (Zafar et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Emmert et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2018), but unfortunately moderate endothelialization is more common (Tudorache et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Goecke et al. 2018; Fioretta et al. 2020; van Rijswijk et al. 2020). Interestingly, limited endothelial coverage is seen mostly toward the tips of the leaflets, while the base is more extensively populated (Fig. 1f) (Syedain et al. 2015; Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Fioretta et al. 2020). This suggests that the formation of endothelial layers starts from the leaflet base, closer to the native tissue, and progresses toward the tip. This theory is supported by the observation that endothelial coverage seems to improve over time, both when comparing multiple time points within the same studies (Zafar et al. 2015; Kluin et al. 2017; van Rijswijk et al. 2020), and when comparing endothelialization across studies with different follow-up times (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Zafar et al. 2015; Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018; Goecke et al. 2018; Fioretta et al. 2020; van Rijswijk et al. 2020). However, complete endothelialization has been reported as early as after 16 weeks (Motta et al. 2018), while an incomplete coverage has been observed even after 20 months (Tudorache et al. 2016), thereby demonstrating that strong variability in outcomes can occur and further understanding and improvement are therefore needed.
Repopulation of TEHVs with other cell types is similarly variable and different degrees have been observed, from limited and partial repopulation (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Coyan et al. 2019; van Rijswijk et al. 2020) to extensive repopulation (Zafar et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Kluin et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018; Goecke et al. 2018; Fioretta et al. 2020). Nevertheless, apart from rare exceptions (Kluin et al. 2017), the DNA content of TEHVs is often still lower than that of native valves (Syedain et al. 2015; Emmert et al. 2018). Despite signs of repopulation progressing with time (Zafar et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018), there are examples, very similar to those mentioned for endothelialization, that show extensive repopulation occurring after relatively short follow-up times (Syedain et al. 2015; Goecke et al. 2018; Fioretta et al. 2020) and limited repopulation in more long-term studies (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016), independent of the adopted procedure. This indicates that achieving a more complete cellularization is not just a matter of time and suggests that there may be some cellular mechanisms underlying this process that are not yet fully understood and appreciated. Finally, cellular repopulation seems to be less prominent in decellularized xenografts and allografts compared to decellularized TEMs and synthetic grafts (Weber et al. 2013; Theodoridis et al. 2015; Zafar et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Kluin et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018; Goecke et al. 2018; Coyan et al. 2019; Fioretta et al. 2020; van Rijswijk et al. 2020).
The cells found in the interstitium of TEHVs are typically identified as α-SMA-positive cells, such as myofibroblasts and smooth muscle cells (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Goecke et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2018; van Rijswijk et al. 2020), although fibroblast cells have also been observed (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Miller et al. 2016). Spatial heterogeneity of these cells in TEHVs is common and does not seem to be correlated with methodology. There is a clear trend of a higher repopulation on the ventricular side of the valve compared to the pulmonary or aortic side (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Goecke et al. 2018), as well as a higher cell density in the base and middle of the leaflets compared to the tip (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2016; Goecke et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2018, 2019). This latter finding suggests a dominant role for cellular infiltration from the valve root into the leaflets. However, a few studies using decellularized TEMs have reported a more uniform cellular distribution from leaflet base to tip (Reimer et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018). In the study of Reimer et al. (2017) this was achieved after a relatively short follow-up time of 22 weeks, suggesting that infiltrating cells may also originate from the blood. Interestingly, cells were partially absent from the lamina fibrosa of pulmonary valves in some studies (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Goecke et al. 2018). Altogether, these results indicate that the cellular distribution in TEHVs is often dissimilar to native valves and that the underlying mechanisms are still largely unknown.
ECM formation
In addition to cellular repopulation, it is important to consider the presence and distribution of matrix components, as these are key contributors to tissue function (Sect. 2.4). Collagen is the most abundant matrix component in all studies that have analyzed the matrix composition (Zafar et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Kluin et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018; Goecke et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2018; Lintas et al. 2018; Fioretta et al. 2020; van Rijswijk et al. 2020). However, collagen content has been observed to reach native levels only occasionally (Kluin et al. 2017; Motta et al. 2018) and is often reported as more limited or at lower levels compared to the native situation (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Kluin et al. 2017; Goecke et al. 2018; Fioretta et al. 2020), indicating room for improvement. Nevertheless, as synthetic grafts do not possess any initial collagen, the presence of collagen fibers in these grafts at least provides evidence of in situ deposition of collagen (Kluin et al. 2017; Fioretta et al. 2020). This is supported by various studies with decellularized grafts that have found an increase in collagen content in the explanted graft or the presence of procollagen molecules (Syedain et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018). On the other hand, only a few studies have confirmed in situ deposition of elastin in TEHVs (Reimer et al. 2017; Kluin et al. 2017; Fioretta et al. 2020), although its presence has been shown on many occasions in studies using decellularized scaffolds (Zafar et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Hennessy et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018; Goecke et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2018; Lintas et al. 2018). Even when present, the elastin content is nevertheless only sparse and lower compared to native levels (Reimer et al. 2017; Motta et al. 2018; Lintas et al. 2018; van Rijswijk et al. 2020). Furthermore, in contrast to the spatial distribution of cells in leaflets, clear trends in the distribution of matrix components cannot easily be identified. Only a few studies report more collagen and elastin presence near the base, and decreasing amounts toward the tip (Kluin et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018). Also, a higher matrix content is sometimes seen on either the arterial (Kluin et al. 2017) or ventricular (Goecke et al. 2018; Motta et al. 2018) side of the leaflet of a pulmonary valve.
Tissue organization
A layered organization of (part of) the leaflets is seen only occasionally (Zafar et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Lintas et al. 2018) and is usually absent in in situ TEHVs (Zafar et al. 2015; Reimer et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; van Rijswijk et al. 2020). In some cases, the presence of a layered structure only represents the maintenance of the original matrix architecture in decellularized xeno- and allografts (Tudorache et al. 2016; Lintas et al. 2018), while in situ layer formation from a synthetic scaffold is reported very rarely (Kluin et al. 2017). Interestingly, in the study of Emmert et al. (2018), one explant displayed a more advanced native-like tri-laminar organization, while other explants lacked such a layered structure and showed, for example, collagen fibers that were less aligned compared to native valves. Other signs of native-like remodeling are occasionally found in TEHVs as well, such as a dense collagen layer on the arterial side (Theodoridis et al. 2015) and elastin presence on the ventricular side of the leaflet (Motta et al. 2018). Nevertheless, a suboptimal organization which does not resemble the native conditions appears to be more common. For example, a number of studies report the presence of collagen or elastin on both sides of the leaflet simultaneously (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Reimer et al. 2017; Kluin et al. 2017; Goecke et al. 2018) or the presence of both collagen and elastin together on the same side of the leaflet (Fig. 1f) (Reimer et al. 2017; Kluin et al. 2017). Both these observations represent an unphysiological organization. Generally, these aspects of unphysiological tissue organization seem to occur independent of the applied procedure and follow-up time (Table 2).
Functionality and complications
Overall, in situ heart valve tissue engineering has delivered promising results. An example is the good in vivo performance of engineered pulmonary valve replacements in sheep for up to one year starting from a synthetic scaffold (Kluin et al. 2017) or decellularized TEM (Emmert et al. 2018). However, various complications have been reported as well, which may interfere with optimal and long-term valve functionality. One of the most prominent issues is the progressive development of regurgitation, with moderate to severe cases reported frequently (Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Kluin et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017; Miyazaki et al. 2017; Soliman et al. 2017; Motta et al. 2018; Lintas et al. 2018; van Rijswijk et al. 2020). Interestingly, there is also quite some variability within experimental groups, with often only one or a few TEHVs developing moderate to severe regurgitation (Zafar et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Kluin et al. 2017; Miyazaki et al. 2017; Soliman et al. 2017; Lintas et al. 2018). On a few occasions, the regurgitation worsened over time, potentially due to adverse remodeling (Syedain et al. 2015; Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Motta et al. 2018). The related issue of leaflet retraction is also still common in recent studies (Tudorache et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Hennessy et al. 2017) and an important factor compromising valve functionality (Weber et al. 2013; Driessen-Mol et al. 2014; Syedain et al. 2015; Reimer et al. 2017). Calcification is another problem that has been regularly observed in in situ TEHVs (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Zafar et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2016; Reimer et al. 2017; Emmert et al. 2018; Fioretta et al. 2020; van Rijswijk et al. 2020). Other complications such as stenosis (Tudorache et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2016; van Rijswijk et al. 2020) and thrombosis (Tudorache et al. 2016; Fioretta et al. 2020) are much less common and only occur occasionally.
3.3 Challenges in cardiovascular tissue engineering
Despite the promising results obtained via in vitro and in situ approaches, several challenges remain to be overcome. Except for TEBVs exposed to low-pressure conditions (Hibino et al. 2010; Wystrychowski et al. 2014; Lawson et al. 2016), clinical translation of CVTE technologies has been limited. A possible factor that is slowing down the clinical translation is the significant outcome variability of engineered tissues, between and within studies (Visser et al. 2021) (Sect. 3.2.2). For example, both extensive cellular repopulation in short follow-up times and limited repopulation in longer periods have been reported in studies involving in situ TEHVs (Theodoridis et al. 2015; Syedain et al. 2015; Tudorache et al. 2016; Goecke et al. 2018; Fioretta et al. 2020). Similarly, engineered tissues of experimental groups within the same studies often showed different functionality, despite adopting the same procedure in all cases (Zafar et al. 2015; Kluin et al. 2017; Miyazaki et al. 2017; Soliman et al. 2017; Lintas et al. 2018).
Many TEBVs and TEHVs have not only been suboptimal and variable in terms of function, but also with regard to tissue organization. The problems in tissue organization are related to ECM deposition and suboptimal layer formation. In particular, elastin deposition in TEBVs and TEHVs is usually lower compared to their native counterparts (Fig. 1e—f). Specifically, elastin deposition has been almost absent in in vitro TEHVs. A completely native-like organization of ECM components has also not been obtained so far, which may provide an explanation for the observed compromised functionality of TEBVs and TEHVs (Sodian et al. 2000a; Schmidt et al. 2010; Reimer et al. 2017; Kluin et al. 2017). A common issue for both in vitro and in situ TEHVs is also the presence of α-SMA-positive cells, mainly associated with activated VICs (Liu et al. 2007a). These active myofibroblast-like cells continuously proliferate, migrate, remodel ECM, and produce cytokines, which may result in pathological cases such as calcification and leaflet retraction (Jian et al. 2003; Walker et al. 2004; Rutkovskiy et al. 2017). It is not yet clear whether and how the α-SMA-positive cell population can decrease over time to reach homeostasis in engineered valves. Overall, unphysiological cell activities and ECM properties negatively affect the functionality of engineered tissues, which in turn limits the potential for clinical translation.
The outcomes of the studies reviewed in Sects. 3.1 and 3.2 are likely dependent on many factors including the species and implant sites. For example, the animal models used in in situ TEBV studies are mainly mice and rat (Table 1), whereas larger animals like sheep are used in in situ TEHV studies (Table 2). Therefore, the responses might be species-specific. In addition, it is not clear to what extent these animal models are optimal for testing the G&R of TEBV and TEHV and translating the findings into clinical applications.
Another challenge is to show that TEBVs and TEHVs can actually adapt to changing demands, such as in case of somatic growth. Although there are a few studies reporting that TEBVs can grow in diameter (Shinoka et al. 2005; Hoerstrup et al. 2006; Hibino et al. 2010; Syedain et al. 2016), the capacity of TEBVs and TEHVs to grow and adapt is still largely unknown. In addition, the findings in adult models cannot easily be translated in pediatric application because of age-related differences, for example in regenerative capacity and hormone profiles (Ponzi et al. 2020).
To overcome current limitations and improve the organization and function of TEBVs and TEHVs, we need a better and more mechanistic understanding of cardiovascular G&R. A mechanistic understanding and ability to predict G&R can ultimately help us to control the development of engineered tissues and achieve functional tissue organization.
3.4 Computational growth and remodeling models
Given the variability in outcome of experimental studies on CVTE, and the suboptimal tissue organization that is often still obtained (Sects. 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3), there is a clear need for a more detailed understanding of the G&R of engineered cardiovascular tissues to guide future studies. Here, we define growth as changes in tissue mass and remodeling as changes in tissue structure and/or material properties. Computational models are particularly suited to increase our understanding of tissue G&R, as they are capable of systematically testing hypotheses and thereby providing key insights into some of the mechanisms underlying tissue G&R. In addition, these models may be used to predict tissue G&R, enabling researchers to optimize tissue engineering protocols in a more time- and cost-effective way compared to using empirical trial-and-error approaches alone. In this section, we discuss several computational G&R models and highlight how mechanical stimuli can drive the G&R of blood vessels and heart valves. We also discuss the potential application of G&R models to understand and improve CVTE.
3.4.1 Collagen remodeling models
Collagen is the main load-bearing component of cardiovascular tissues. The orientation and degree of anisotropy of collagen fibers are therefore key in determining the tissue mechanical behavior. Consequently, many computational remodeling models have focused mainly on predicting collagen alignment and understanding the mechanisms responsible for collagen remodeling. Early phenomenological models hypothesized that collagen fibers align along or in between the directions of principal stress or strain, which enabled them to successfully predict the collagen organization in heart valves and arteries (Driessen et al. 2003, 2004, 2005, 2008; Boerboom et al. 2003; Baek et al. 2006; Kuhl et al. 2007; Hariton et al. 2007). In more recent studies, models of collagen remodeling have been developed that accounted for the effects of cell behavior, such as contractility and cell alignment, to unravel the underlying biological mechanisms (Loerakker et al. 2014, 2016; Soares et al. 2014; Ristori et al. 2018a). These models suggest that collagen remodeling is driven by mechanical stimuli both directly, via the influence of strain, and indirectly, via mechano-mediated cell behavior. Additionally, it has been predicted that mechanical stimuli provided by hemodynamic loading dominate the cell-mediated collagen remodeling process in TEHVs implanted in the aortic position, whereas the influence of contractility was predicted to be more important for TEHVs implanted in the pulmonary position (Loerakker et al. 2016). To simulate long-term collagen remodeling in heart valves, the influence of topographical stimuli was included in a more recent study as well (Ristori et al. 2018a, 2018b). Simulations with this model revealed that cell traction and reorientation in response to mechanical stimuli can potentially explain the emergence of an anisotropic collagen organization in fetal heart valves, while the coalignment of collagen fibers with cells seems vital for maintaining and reinforcing the adopted collagen organization over time (Ristori et al. 2018a). Taken together, these modeling results suggest a clear and fundamental role for mechano-mediated cellular activity in the process of collagen remodeling in cardiovascular tissues.
3.4.2 Tissue growth and remodeling models
In addition to tissue remodeling, many models also incorporate tissue growth. To model the biological growth of a material, two theories are generally adopted, both of which are rooted in continuum mechanics. The first is often referred to as the theory of kinematic growth and was first conceptualized by Skalak et al. (1981; 1982) and later formalized by Rodriguez et al. (1994). According to this theory, growth can be modeled by splitting the deformation of a material into an irreversible growth part, which is typically stress-free, and a reversible elastic part, which does generate stresses. In particular, a multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient tensor into a growth tensor and an elastic tensor is usually adopted. The elastic tensor ensures compatibility of the resulting configuration, gives rise to residual stresses, and accounts for elastic deformations resulting from externally applied loads. Whereas this kinematic growth theory generally focuses on the consequences of G&R, the theory of constrained mixtures, developed by Humphrey and Rajagopal (2002), places more emphasis on the physiological process of G&R. In the latter theory, biological tissues are modeled as a mixture of different constituents (e.g., collagen fibers, elastin, cells) and G&R is simulated by accounting for the production and removal of individual constituents. These constituents may each possess distinct mechanical properties, production and removal rates, and evolving stress-free configurations. Nevertheless, once they are deposited into the tissue, they are assumed to deform together with the tissue as a whole. The theory of constrained mixtures is especially relevant for providing an increased understanding into the G&R of engineered tissues as underlying mechanisms can be accommodated more easily when experimental data are available (Gleason and Humphrey 2005; Humphrey et al. 2007). However, this approach is computationally much more expensive compared to the kinematic growth theory.
3.4.3 Effects of mechanical stimuli
By implementing these theories, computational models have confirmed that mechanical stimuli play a fundamental role in tissue G&R and helped uncover several underlying mechanisms. For example, for arteries, simulations have shown that stress correlates better with growth than strain (Taber and Humphrey 2001). This suggests that arterial growth may be stress-regulated, a hypothesis that has been adopted by many subsequent theoretical studies (Humphrey and Rajagopal 2003; Gleason and Humphrey 2005; Baek et al. 2006, 2007; Kuhl et al. 2007; Valentín et al. 2009, 2011; Valentín and Humphrey 2009). Furthermore, both intramural stresses and wall shear stresses can contribute to tissue G&R in these models. The latter can drive tissue remodeling via vasoactive molecules that regulate matrix turnover (Valentín et al. 2009). In addition, shear stresses sensed by VSMCs arising from interstitial flow have also been shown to affect G&R (reviewed in Shi and Tarbell 2011) and have been modeled in a number of studies (Tada and Tarbell 2000, 2002). More specifically, it is likely not stress itself but rather deviations in stress from a homeostatic target value that drive G&R of arterial tissue, as shown by multiple studies simulating the adaptation of arteries in response to altered pressure and/or flow (e.g., due to hypertension) (Humphrey and Rajagopal 2003; Gleason and Humphrey 2005; Valentín et al. 2009; Valentín and Humphrey 2009; Karšaj et al. 2010). Nevertheless, it still remains uncertain whether stress or some other quantity acts as a target variable for mechanical homeostasis, thereby driving tissue G&R (Eichinger et al. 2021). Similar mechanisms have successfully been applied to model arterial adaptation after balloon angioplasty or stenting (Kuhl et al. 2007), as well as the progression of arterial diseases such as cerebral aneurysm (Baek et al. 2006; Cyron et al. 2014) and vasospasm (Baek et al. 2007; Humphrey et al. 2007). The model of Rachev et al. (2011) revealed more details by considering radial variations in arterial G&R and showed that local deviations in stresses can control remodeling and induce a heterogeneous distribution of collagen and elastin in the arterial wall. In addition to stress, material stiffness is also an important determinant of G&R and simulations have suggested that anisotropic stiffness induces anisotropic growth in arteries, resulting in a preference of the material to grow in the direction of the lowest stiffness (Braeu et al. 2019).
3.4.4 Applications in cardiovascular tissue engineering
To illustrate the benefits of adopting G&R models in tissue engineering applications, we discuss a few inspiring examples from the literature. G&R models have, for instance, been employed to perform parametric studies with the aim of optimizing the properties of synthetic scaffolds for tissue-engineered vascular grafts (Courtney et al. 2006a; Engelmayr and Sacks 2006a; Miller et al. 2015; Szafron et al. 2017a, 2019). This enabled the prediction of several sets of parameter values that result in favorable conditions, such as minimal compliance mismatch between the scaffold and host tissue (Miller et al. 2015; Szafron et al. 2019), as well as some specific techniques that may be employed to prevent high stiffness deviations during graft development which are detrimental to tissue outcome (Miller et al. 2015). In addition, it was shown that cells infiltrating the core of a bi-layered vascular graft were often stress-shielded, which could lead to a decreased matrix production and compromised mechanical integrity of the neovessel (Szafron et al. 2017b). Other models have helped researchers to design scaffolds for heart valve tissue engineering with a favorable degree of fiber anisotropy resulting in similar mechanical properties to native tissues (Courtney et al. 2006b; Engelmayr and Sacks 2006b). This was achieved by numerically predicting the mechanical properties of these scaffolds based on fiber orientation. More key aspects of neotissue development were captured by the model of Best et al. (2019), which suggested that improving the properties of newly formed collagen reduces the likelihood of dilation and graft rupture, while the stiffness and degradation profile of scaffolds have little effect. Furthermore, Szafron and Khosravi et al. (2018) simulated both mechano-driven and immuno-driven growth of neovessels, suggesting that mechano-driven growth alone is not enough to explain the experimentally observed development of vascular grafts, and that a delayed and moderate immune response is desirable. Finally, computational modeling was able to successfully predict the performance and remodeling of TEHVs and motivated the design of scaffolds which resulted in favorable valves with significantly improved long-term in vivo functionality (Loerakker et al. 2013; Emmert et al. 2018).
The examples in this section demonstrate the ability of computational G&R models to increase our understanding of G&R of vessels and valves and to guide and optimize tissue engineering protocols. These models have consistently identified mechanical stimuli as one of the major driving factors for the G&R of cardiovascular tissues, and a clear trend toward more mechanistic modeling is observed. It is important to note that many of the models discussed in this section have been validated qualitatively by comparing model outcomes to experimental or clinical observations. Nevertheless, more thorough quantitative validation is needed in many cases to ensure the accuracy and robustness of these models. Most of these models have not yet focused on integrating cell–cell signaling, despite this being an important mechanism for cell behavior and tissue G&R. The inclusion of cell–cell signaling may open new possibilities to guide and optimize the organization of engineered tissues. Therefore, further efforts are needed to unravel the underlying mechano-mediated biological mechanisms, such as cell behavior and cell–cell signaling, and incorporate these into computational frameworks.
4 The effects of mechanical cues on cell behavior
Mechanical cues have important roles in the regulation of cellular processes that are responsible for vascular and valvular G&R (Taber 2001; Humphrey 2006; Humphrey et al. 2014). Cardiovascular cells respond to both dynamic mechanical cues arising from the hemodynamic loading conditions acting on cardiovascular tissues and static mechanical cues such as the stiffness of the microenvironment (reviewed in Chaudhuri et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020). Due to the dynamic nature of the cardiovascular system, in this section, we discuss the experimental findings that show how dynamic mechanical cues, particularly stress and strain, affect the behavior of vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells, as well as valvular endothelial and interstitial cells. Particular attention is given to the effects of stress and strain on cellular processes that are important for G&R, such as cell orientation, ECM synthesis and organization, proliferation, and apoptosis. Cell migration is another important cellular process that is essential for obtaining proper recellularization of the implanted grafts. Cell migration is mechano-regulated as well, as extensively reviewed elsewhere (Li et al. 2005; Chi et al. 2014; Campinho et al. 2020).
4.1 Vascular endothelial cells
ECs lining the luminal surface of blood vessels are exposed to shear stress due to blood flow and circumferential cyclic strain resulting from the pulsatile blood pressure. The blood flow is usually unidirectional and laminar, with a mean wall shear stress of 1–2 Pa (10–20 dynes/cm2) in the straight sections of arteries and 0.1–0.6 Pa (1–6 dynes/cm2) in veins (Roux et al. 2020). Yet, spatial variations in wall shear stress are also observed, especially in regions with curvatures and bifurcations. Cells in large arteries also experience cyclic circumferential stress of around 100–150 kPa at mean arterial pressure, resulting in 10–15% strain (van Haaften et al. 2017). These strain levels are not the same as what the cells feel locally. This is the reason why in in vitro studies, 5–10% strain is considered physiological, while 20% strain and higher magnitudes are considered pathological (Charbonier et al. 2019). Both shear stress and cyclic strain are important direct regulators of EC morphology and physiological function. Prolonged changes in these mechanical cues alter EC morphology and function, which in turn causes vascular abnormalities such as intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis (GimbroneJr and García-Cardeña 2016).
ECs primarily sense the shear stress through a thin glycocalyx layer that coats their luminal membrane. Glycocalyx also acts as a mechanotransducer of shear stress to the endothelial cytoskeleton and initiator of the biochemical responses (Tarbell et al. 2005; Weinbaum et al. 2007). Animal studies have indicated that vascular ECs orient in the direction of blood flow, and that this orientation is not uniform in arterial branches where the flow is turbulent (Langille and Adamson 1981; Nerem et al. 1981). These observations have been corroborated by in vitro experiments providing more controlled flow environments. Specifically, compared to static conditions, ECs exposed to steady laminar flow in vitro have been shown to elongate, obtain an ellipsoid shape (Dewey et al. 1981), and align in the direction of flow (Dewey 1984; Levesque and Nerem 1985). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that ECs reorganize the actin and myosin stress fibers (Dewey 1984) as well as the underlying ECM (Wechezak et al. 1985; Thoumine et al. 1995a) in the direction of flow. Pulsatile laminar flow appears to have the same effect on EC alignment and actin fiber organization compared to steady laminar flow conditions (Helmlinger et al. 1991). The morphological changes and the reorganization of the cytoskeleton and ECM depend on the applied levels of shear stress and the time of exposure (Franke et al. 1984). Increasing the levels of shear stress and exposure time upregulates actin fiber formation and organization, resulting in better aligned ECs in the direction of flow. On the other hand, such an orientation and ECM reorganization are not observed under oscillatory shear stress (Helmlinger et al. 1991; Thoumine et al. 1995b) and multidirectional shear stress (Mohamied et al. 2015; Ghim et al. 2018). Interestingly, ECs exposed to oscillatory shear stress and multidirectional shear stress are randomly oriented and demonstrate a similar cobblestone morphology as in static conditions.
Shear stress also influences the proliferation and apoptosis of vascular ECs. Steady laminar shear stress with higher magnitudes than physiological levels and pulsatile shear stress inhibit DNA synthesis and EC proliferation by inhibiting the transition from the G0/G1 toward the S phase in the cell cycle (Levesque et al. 1990; Akimoto et al. 2000). Low levels of steady laminar flow, on the other hand, lead to similar EC proliferation compared to no flow conditions. (Dewey et al. 1981; Akimoto et al. 2000). Laminar shear stress also suppresses apoptosis (Kaiser et al. 1997, 1999, Dimmeler et al. 1996). On the contrary, the absence of laminar shear stress triggers EC apoptosis in organ cultures and in freshly isolated ECs cultured in vitro (Kaiser et al. 1997, 1999), thereby showing the importance of laminar shear stress for EC survival. In contrast to the results obtained with laminar flow, turbulent flow appears to increase EC proliferation and apoptosis (Dardik et al. 2005). This proliferation effect is independent from applied shear stress levels and exposure time (Davies et al. 1986). Overall, these results show that physiological levels of laminar flow inhibit EC proliferation and apoptosis, promoting homeostasis in the vessel wall, while sub-physiological levels of laminar shear stress and turbulent shear stress promote EC proliferation and apoptosis. This could be correlated with plaque formation and atherosclerosis development (Zarins et al. 1983; Cunningham and Gotlieb 2005).
Cyclic strain is another mechanical cue affecting vascular EC proliferation and apoptosis. However, current literature studies are inconsistent with respect to the specific effect of strain on EC proliferation. This inconsistency might be caused by differences in cell sources, cyclic strain levels, and exposure time between studies. For example, Sumpio et al. (Sumpio et al. 1987) reported that bovine aortic ECs increased DNA synthesis and proliferation when exposed to 10% cyclic strain at 0.05 Hz after 1 day compared to static conditions, while Woodell et al. (Woodell et al. 2003) reported that application of 4% cyclic strain at 0.1 Hz for 4 h decreased DNA synthesis in bovine aortic ECs. In addition, rabbit aortic ECs have been shown to decrease cell proliferation and DNA synthesis when exposed to 18% cyclic strain, but demonstrated an increase in cell proliferation at 24% and 27% cyclic strain compared to unloaded samples (Upchurch et al. 1997), suggesting that the effect of cyclic strain on EC proliferation is not necessarily monotonic. Further systematic studies are therefore necessary to determine and understand how strain regulates EC proliferation. With regard to apoptosis, experiments have indicated that 6% and 10% cyclic strain protects ECs from apoptosis induced by TNF-α and serum depletion (Haga et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2003). However, 20% cyclic strain appeared not to have the same effect (Liu et al. 2003). These findings suggest that physiological levels of cyclic strain protect arterial ECs from apoptosis, while pathological levels promote cell apoptosis.
Regarding cell morphology, ECs elongate and orient perpendicular to the direction of stretch (Wang et al. 2001; Moretti et al. 2004), which is accompanied by the alignment of microtubules (Ives et al. 1986). In addition, ECs form actin stress fibers in response to cyclic strain (Sumpio et al. 1988a) and (re)orient these filaments and their cell shape perpendicular to the stretch direction (Dartsch and Betz 1989, Yoshigi et al. 2003), which is known as a strain avoidance response (Buck 1980; De and Safran 2008; Hsu et al. 2009). This (re)orientation response to cyclic stretch is consistent with the vessel structure and the (re)orientation response to shear stress. Strain in the vessel wall is circumferential; hence, the tendency of ECs to (re)orient in directions perpendicular to the applied cyclic strain leads to EC alignment in the axial direction of the vascular wall, which agrees with the preferred direction of ECs due the presence of shear stress. Therefore, both shear stress and strain seem to act together in aligning ECs in the direction of flow.
The possible synergistic effects of both shear stress and strain on the orientation of ECs are supported by in vitro studies. When pulsatile shear stress and uniaxial cyclic strain are applied together to ECs, the elongation and alignment of ECs in the direction of shear stress and perpendicular to cyclic strain is enhanced (Zhao et al. 1995). In particular, actin stress fibers become thicker and more aligned when compared to the individual application of each stimulus. In another study, fluid shear stress alone had the largest effect on cell elongation followed by the shear stress and biaxial cyclic strain together (Meza et al. 2016). However, the differences in outcome of these studies might be related to the levels of shear stress and the direction of cyclic strain (uniaxial or biaxial), since it is known that equibiaxial strain does not cause an alignment (Meza et al. 2016; Sinha et al. 2016). In addition, when the cells are exposed to anisotropic biaxial strain and shear stress simultaneously, the alignment response of ECs is dominated by anisotropic strain when the shear stress levels are lower than physiological levels, whereas physiological levels of shear stress dominate the alignment response (Sinha et al. 2016). Therefore, it seems that different levels of shear stress determine the strain-mediated EC alignment.
4.2 Vascular smooth muscle cells
VSMCs can express different phenotypes related to vascular G&R. VSMCs generally display a quiescent contractile phenotype in healthy adult vessels. Upon changes in hemodynamic conditions and biochemical stimuli, VSMCs can switch to a synthetic phenotype that is characterized by increased proliferation and ECM deposition (Owens et al. 2004). VSMCs are located in the tunica media and are predominantly exposed to cyclic circumferential stress and strain resulting from the pulsatile blood flow (Anwar et al. 2012). This mechanical stress is thought to regulate vascular G&R by affecting VSMC orientation, proliferation, apoptosis, and phenotype, as well as VSMC-mediated ECM synthesis and degradation.
Many in vitro two-dimensional cell culture studies have shown that VSMCs demonstrate a strain avoidance response by aligning perpendicular to the direction of uniaxial cyclic stretch (Sumpio and Banes 1988; Kanda et al. 1992; Standley et al. 2002; Chen et al. 2003; Li et al. 2003). This alignment response is faster and stronger for higher strain magnitudes and frequencies (Kanda et al. 1992; Liu et al. 2008), corresponding to physiological conditions. Moreover, VSMCs reorient toward a random organization again if they are subjected to static conditions after 48 h of stretch, showing that the alignment response is reversible (Standley et al. 2002). Cell orientation is also influenced by structural cues such as collagen and scaffold fibers (Guido and Tranquillo 1993; Fioretta et al. 2014), patterned substrates (Ray et al. 2017; Buskermolen et al. 2020), and grooved geometries (Lamers et al., 2010). This phenomenon is known as contact guidance (Dunn and Heath 1976). Its effects on cellular orientation are extensively reviewed elsewhere (Tamiello et al. 2016; Leclech and Villard 2020).
Cyclic strain also affects ECM synthesis. In fact, it has been shown that strain increases the production of collagen and fibronectin in VSMCs (Leung et al. 1976; Sumpio et al. 1988b; O’Callaghan and Williams 2000; Stanley et al. 2000). This synthesis dependence seems to require long-term exposure to strain, as it takes 4 to 5 days to become apparent (Sumpio 1988c, O’Callaghan 2000). Higher magnitudes of strain increase this response (O’Callaghan 2000), while variations in strain frequency do not affect the results (Leung et al. 1976; Sumpio et al. 1988b). Cyclic strain also increases matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity, particularly MMP-2 (O’Callaghan and Williams 2000; Grote et al. 2003; Seo et al. 2013). MMP-2 is known to enable vascular remodeling by degrading the existing ECM, while the new ECM is being synthesized and organized (Galis and Khatri 2002). The increase in MMP-2 production has also been validated in vivo with a rat model of aortic banding (Liu et al. 2015). The pressure overload via banding upregulated MMP-2 activity as well as the production of collagen I and III. Overall, these results suggest that cyclic strain promotes ECM synthesis and degradation in VSMCs.
The observed effects of cyclic strain on VSMC apoptosis have been rather consistent. Specifically, it has been shown that this mechanical stimulus increases apoptosis in VSMCs independent of strain magnitude, direction, and cell source (Sotoudeh et al. 2002; Wernig et al. 2003; Morrow et al. 2005; Su et al. 2006; Guha et al. 2011; Cheng et al. 2012; Song et al. 2012a). On the other hand, VSMCs have shown a heterogeneous response to strain in terms of proliferation. Determining the causes of such variability is challenging. For example, cyclic strain increases proliferation in rabbit aortic and bovine aortic SMCs compared to static conditions (Birukov et al. 1995; Li et al. 2003; Chahine et al. 2012), while it decreases the proliferation of porcine aortic SMCs (Sumpio and Banes 1988). These findings suggest that the response of VSMCs might be species-specific; however, this hypothesis is not consistent with the variation that can for example be seen by investigating the cyclic strain responses of rat and human VSMCs. In human aortic SMCs, it has been reported that cyclic strain can either increase (Song et al. 2012a) or have no effect on proliferation (O’Callaghan and Williams 2000) compared to static cases. Similarly, for rat VSMCs, some studies reported that cyclic strain increases proliferation compared to unloaded samples (Wilson et al. 1993; Standley et al. 1999; Song et al. 2012b), while others reported the opposite (Chapman et al. 2000; Morrow et al. 2005; Guha et al. 2011) at similar magnitudes of strain but different time points. These disagreements do not appear to depend on the application of equibiaxial versus uniaxial strain (Standley et al. 1999; Chapman et al. 2000; Morrow et al. 2005; Song et al. 2012a). Therefore, further studies are necessary to identify the parameters affecting the proliferation response of VSMCs. For example, future studies might investigate if these variations are caused by differences in terms of blood vessel location in the arterial tree or different media supplements.
The phenotype of VSMCs is also affected by cyclic strain. Specific phenotypic markers such as α-SMA, calponin, smooth muscle protein 22-alpha, and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain have been used to determine the contractile phenotype of VSMCs (Owens et al. 2004). Cyclic strain has been reported to both upregulate (Reusch et al. 1996; Tock et al. 2003; Yao et al. 2014) and downregulate (Butcher et al. 2006; Hu et al. 2014; Rodríguez et al. 2015; Wan et al. 2015) the expression of contractile proteins compared to static controls. An upregulation in contractile marker expression could be associated with lower strain magnitudes (Tock et al. 2003) and higher frequencies applied (Yao et al. 2014) with regard to the studies showing a downregulation in contractile marker expression (Butcher et al. 2006; Hu et al. 2014; Rodríguez et al. 2015). The differences in applied strain directions, exposure time, cell types, and surface coatings should also be taken into account. In addition, the mechanisms involved in the phenotypic switch of VSMCs via mechanical stimulation should be further investigated.
4.3 Valvular endothelial cells
VECs have different orientation responses compared to vascular ECs. VECs cover the surface of valve leaflets and are exposed to shear stress and strain in circumferential and radial directions. Despite this duality in terms of mechanical stimuli, studies have mainly focused on the effect of shear stress on VEC behavior. In vivo observations have shown that VECs align circumferentially on both sides of aortic valve leaflets, hence perpendicular to flow (Deck 1986). In agreement with that, in vitro studies have shown that VECs align perpendicular to unidirectional laminar flow (Mahler 2014) and parallel to uniaxial strain (Balachandran et al. 2011), differently than vascular ECs (Butcher et al. 2004). This differential alignment response is thought to depend on different spatial arrangements of focal adhesion proteins and different signaling pathways activated in VECs versus vascular ECs.
Increasing evidence also suggests that there are differences in VECs in terms of morphology, gene and protein expression, and mechanical properties based on their location ( aortic versus ventricular side of the valve leaflet) (Holliday et al. 2011; Bischoff and Aikawa 2011; Miragoli et al. 2014; Mongkoldhumrongkul et al. 2018). VECs on the ventricular side of the leaflets are more elongated and flattened compared to the cuboidal shape of VECs on the aortic side (Maron and Hutchins 1974; Bischoff and Aikawa 2011). Moreover, VECs on the ventricular surface are relatively stiffer than the VECs on the aortic surface, which might be related to the presence of high and unidirectional shear stress on the ventricular side and low oscillatory shear stress on the aortic side of the valve in vivo (Miragoli et al. 2014). In addition, an increase in collagen and GAG production on the aortic side caused by oscillatory flow cannot be replicated by applying an identical flow pattern to the ventricular side of the valve (Mongkoldhumrongkul et al. 2018). Thus, VECs located on different sides of the valves respond differently to shear stress. The mechanosensitive mechanisms regulating these different responses should be further investigated.
4.4 Valvular interstitial cells
VICs are located throughout the three layers of the valve leaflets. VICs exhibit a high degree of phenotypic plasticity. Quiescent VICs are generally found in healthy adult tissues and are characterized by low proliferation levels, ECM synthesis, and remodeling. These cells can switch phenotype toward activated VICs, which are characterized by increased proliferation, as well as ECM production and remodeling (Rabkin-Aikawa et al. 2004). A maladaptive activation of VICs can result in an osteoblastic differentiation, which is mainly associated with valve dysfunction (Liu et al. 2007a). This phenotypic activation is characterized by increased α-SMA (Liu et al. 2007a; Latif et al. 2015). Cyclic strain regulates the phenotypic activation of VICs, in such a way that increasing the strain magnitude increases α-SMA expression, thus VIC activation (Ferdous et al. 2013; Ayoub et al. 2017). The activation of VICs with pathological strain levels (15%) is also related to osteogenic gene expression and calcification (Balachandran et al. 2010; Ferdous et al. 2013). Physiological strain levels (10%), on the contrary, maintain tissue homeostasis (Ferdous et al. 2013; Ayoub et al. 2017; Bogdanova et al. 2018).
VICs are highly sensitive to the magnitude, direction, and the duration of strain. For example, cell proliferation and apoptosis increase in VICs with the magnitude of cyclic stretch they are exposed to (Balachandran et al. 2009, 2012). The nuclear aspect ratio of mitral VICs, which is a metric of cell deformation, increases with increasing strain (Ayoub et al. 2017, 2021). In addition, increasing anisotropy of biaxial cyclic strain also upregulates proliferation and apoptosis (Gould et al. 2012). In terms of ECM synthesis and remodeling, VICs respond to cyclic strain by increasing total collagen synthesis, depending on the magnitude and duration of stretch (Balachandran et al. 2006, 2009, 2012; Ku et al. 2006; Ayoub et al. 2017). In particular, when physiological (10%) and pathological strain levels (20% and 30%) are compared, it can be seen that physiological strain levels maintain the remodeling activity with respect to the homeostatic conditions, while pathological strain levels increase collagen production and MMP expression (Balachandran et al. 2009; Ayoub et al. 2017). VICs exposed to cyclic anisotropic biaxial strain generally align perpendicular to the first principal strain direction, which also aligns the collagen fibers (Gould et al. 2012). On the other hand, GAG synthesis has been reported to decrease (Gupta et al. 2009) or not change (Ayoub et al. 2017) with applying 10% strain compared to static conditions, but increases at pathological strain levels (30%) (Ayoub et al. 2017). Elastin levels do not change upon applying 10% cyclic stretch (Balachandran et al. 2006; Ayoub et al. 2017) and decrease with 30% strain (Ayoub et al. 2017).
In summary, mechanical cues that are applied on vascular and valvular cells differently affect cellular processes responsible for cardiovascular G&R (Fig. 2). Understanding these relationships is important for regulating remodeling and organization in the context of CVTE. It is clear that vascular ECs align parallel to flow and VSMCs align perpendicular to the direction of stretch, which is consistent with the vessel wall structure and the applied hemodynamic loads. VECs show a different orientation response than vascular ECs by aligning perpendicular to flow. The alignment of the cells in response to mechanical cues is in accordance with the alignment of their microtubules and stress fibers. Laminar shear stress is needed to maintain vascular homeostasis, while oscillatory shear stress increases EC proliferation and apoptosis, thereby potentially promoting G&R (Humphrey 2006). With regard to VSMCs, even though strain is known to increase VSMC apoptosis, understanding how VSMC proliferation and phenotypic switches are regulated by strain requires further investigation as previous experimental observations have been inconsistent. Increased mechanistic understanding of how vascular and valvular cells regulate cardiovascular G&R and incorporating these insights into scaffold designs will allow more control over tissue formation and therefore better TEBV and TEHV functionality.
5 Mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling pathways
Apart from the influence of mechanical cues on tissue G&R (Sect. 3.4) and cell behavior (chapter 4), cell behavior is also strongly influenced by cell–cell signaling. An increasing number of these signaling pathways have been identified as mechanosensitive. Cell–cell signaling might therefore be a key underlying mechanism regulating the G&R of tissues in response to mechanical stimuli. This is relevant in the context of tissue engineering, as an increased understanding of these mechanisms could enable us to identify ways of controlling tissue G&R and cell behavior and thereby improve tissue engineering outcomes. In this section, we review mechanosensitive juxtacrine signaling pathways, in which direct cell–cell contact is required, and mechanosensitive paracrine signaling pathways, occurring at larger length scales. In particular, we focus our attention on signaling pathways that are known to be both mechanosensitive and important in the development of cardiovascular tissues.
5.1 Notch signaling
Notch is an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway involved in cell fate determination in most tissues of the human body. In mammals, the pathway consists of four receptors (Notch1 to Notch4), two Jagged ligands (Jagged1 and Jagged2), and three Delta-like ligands (Dll1, Dll3, and Dll4). All receptors and ligands are presented on the cell membranes, requiring direct cell–cell contact for signaling to occur. Notch is activated when a ligand of one cell binds to a receptor of a neighboring cell, which results in the proteolytic cleavage of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) in the receiving cell (Fig. 3a). NICD then translocates to the nucleus where it acts as a cofactor for transcription of Notch target genes. Receptors can bind not only to ligands from a neighboring cell (trans-interactions) but also to ligands from the same cell (cis-interactions). This latter phenomenon is generally thought to have an inhibitory effect (Sprinzak et al. 2010), although recent reports affirm that it can also lead to Notch activation (Nandagopal et al. 2019).
Notch signaling plays an essential role in the development of almost all tissues of the human body (Artavanis-Tsakonas et al. 1995; Gridley 2007; Rostama et al. 2014). It is a main regulator of cell fate decisions, proliferation, apoptosis, boundary formation, and regeneration (Gridley 2007; de la Pompa 2009; MacGrogan et al. 2018). It is therefore not surprising that the Notch pathway is also crucially involved in both the development and homeostasis of the cardiovascular system (Iso et al. 2003; Gridley 2007; de la Pompa 2009; Baeten and Lilly 2017; MacGrogan et al. 2018). In the vasculature, Notch signaling regulates angiogenesis, EC migration and proliferation, barrier function, arterial-venous specification of both ECs and VSMCs, and modulation of the VSMC phenotype (Iso et al. 2003; Gridley 2007; Phng and Gerhardt 2009; Baeten and Lilly 2017; Polacheck et al. 2017; Mack et al. 2017). During cardiac development, the Notch pathway controls the proliferation and differentiation of cardiomyocytes, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, trabeculation, and the formation and morphogenesis of cardiac valves (de la Pompa 2009; MacGrogan et al. 2018).
One of the primary features of the Notch pathway is its ability to establish patterns in cell populations by regulating cell differentiation (Collier et al. 1996; Hamada et al. 2014; Shaya et al. 2017; Corson et al. 2017). Via Notch signaling, cells can instruct their immediate neighbors to adopt either a different or a similar phenotype. These processes are called lateral inhibition and lateral induction, respectively, and rely on negative and positive feedback loops. In the case of lateral inhibition, Notch activation results in the downregulation of ligand expression in signal receiving cells, preventing them from becoming signal sending cells themselves, thus creating patterns of alternating signal sending and receiving cells in the cell population (Sjöqvist and Andersson 2019). During lateral induction, on the other hand, Notch activation promotes ligand expression in receiving cells, enabling them to send signals to their neighbors, resulting in a cascade of Notch activation in which all cells adopt a similar phenotype (Sjöqvist and Andersson 2019). These processes may be one of the reasons for Notch ubiquity in organisms, as they enable the transmission of local stimuli to larger length scales in a versatile and controlled fashion.
Increasing evidence suggests that the Notch pathway is influenced by a wide variety of external bio-chemo-mechanical stimuli. Examples include interactions with ECM components, crosstalk with other signaling pathways, mechanical cues, and pathological cues such as hypoxia and hyperglycemia (reviewed in LaFoya et al. 2016). At the same time, Notch activity impacts these stimuli by regulating cell behavior. Therefore, the Notch pathway may serve not only as a facilitator of direct cell–cell communication, but also as an integrator of micro-environmental cues (LaFoya et al. 2016). This makes the Notch pathway an interesting factor to consider in the context of tissue engineering, as it potentially allows us to steer signaling interactions by manipulating these stimuli and thereby control tissue G&R. In the following paragraphs, we describe the effects of mechanical stimuli on Notch signaling. For a more detailed description of the molecular mechanisms underlying Notch mechanotransduction, we refer the reader to one of our recent reviews (Stassen et al. 2020).
5.1.1 Effects of mechanical stimuli on Notch signaling in ECs
Shear stress on vascular ECs resulting from blood flow is an important regulator of Notch signaling (Fig. 3a). An increase in Notch activation is generally seen in response to shear stress in human ECs from different locations in the vascular tree (Polacheck et al. 2017; Fang et al. 2017; Mack et al. 2017) as well as in bovine (Wang et al. 2007) and murine (Tu et al. 2014) ECs. Results are less conclusive, however, when the receptor and ligand specific responses to shear stress are investigated. Upregulation of Notch1 (Tu et al. 2014; Jahnsen et al. 2015; Mack et al. 2017) and Dll4 (Tu et al. 2014; Jahnsen et al. 2015; Polacheck et al. 2017; Fang et al. 2017; Driessen et al. 2018) in shear stressed ECs are common. Other Notch-related proteins that are known to respond to shear stress are Notch2 (Wang et al. 2007), Notch4 (Tu et al. 2014; Jahnsen et al. 2015; Fang et al. 2017), Dll1 (Wang et al. 2007; Tu et al. 2014; Jahnsen et al. 2015; Fang et al. 2017), Jagged1 (Fang et al. 2017; Driessen et al. 2018), and Jagged2 (Fang et al. 2017). These are typically upregulated upon exposure to shear stress, although in some cases also downregulated. For a more detailed overview of the effects of mechanical stimuli on Notch signaling, see Table 3. These differential outcomes may be explained by variations in cell type, shear stress magnitude, and exposure time. Indeed, the shear stress response of Notch signaling is known to depend on both the magnitude (Jahnsen et al. 2015; Fang et al. 2017) and exposure time (Mack et al. 2017; Driessen et al. 2018) of shear stress. An interesting example is the study by Fang et al. (2017) who showed that Notch activation in human umbilical vein ECs increased with increasing shear stress up to a critical value, after which it decreased with increasing shear stress, resulting in an inverse V-shaped profile. Interestingly, this critical value of shear stress at which Notch activation is maximal, corresponds well to the physiological value in arterial ECs. This suggests an important role for shear stress-induced Notch signaling in arterial remodeling, as the activation of Notch near this critical shear stress value promoted EC cycle arrest and subsequent arterial specification (Fang et al. 2017).
Shear stress is not the only mechanical stimulus experienced by vascular ECs, as they are also subjected to cyclic stress and strain (Sect. 2.4). The effect of cyclic strain on the Notch pathway in ECs has been studied by Morrow et al. (2007), who cultured human umbilical vein ECs exposed to a cyclic strain of up to 10% for 24 h. They reported a time-dependent response, characterized by an initial upregulation in the levels of Notch1 and Notch4 mRNA and intracellular domain, followed by a return to baseline values after 24 h. This temporal increase in Notch activation appeared to be sufficient to enhance the angiogenic activity in ECs.
5.1.2 Effects of mechanical stimuli on Notch signaling in VSMCs
While most of the research on unraveling the interplay between Notch signaling and mechanical stimuli has been focused on ECs, some efforts have also been made to reveal the effects of mechanical cues on Notch signaling in VSMCs. The results show a remarkable contrast with ECs, as mechanical stimuli seem to cause a decrease in the expression of Notch pathway proteins in VSMCs (Fig. 3a). Morrow et al. (2005) reported a reduction in the mRNA expression of Notch1, Notch3, Jagged1, and downstream targets in VSMCs subjected to cyclic strain. The downregulation of Notch1 and target gene Hes5 was shown to depend on both the amplitude of cyclic strain and the duration of exposure. Interestingly, this downregulation was accompanied by inhibited proliferation and enhanced apoptosis of VSMCs, suggesting a regulatory role for Notch signaling in strain-induced VSMC behavior. Similar results were obtained more recently by Loerakker et al. (2018), who found a downregulation in gene expression of Notch3, Jagged1, and downstream targets proportional to the magnitude of the applied cyclic strain. On the other hand, no effects were observed in the expression of Notch1, Notch2, and Dll1. See Table 3 for a more detailed overview.
5.2 Eph-ephrin signaling
Eph receptors are part of a large family of receptor tyrosine kinases and transduce signals by binding to ephrin ligands. There are 14 Eph receptors and 8 ephrin ligands (Flanagan and Vanderhaeghen 1998), classified into subclasses A and B (Gale et al. 1996). In general, EphA and EphB receptors interact with ephrin-A and ephrin-B ligands, respectively (Gale et al. 1996), although there are some exceptions (Gale et al. 1996; Himanen et al. 2004). Similar to the Notch pathway, cell–cell contact between adjacent cells is generally required to activate the Eph-ephrin pathway (Davis et al. 1994), as both ligand and receptor are membrane-bound. Longer-distance signaling has also been observed through cell protrusions (Cayuso et al. 2016) or exosomes (Gong et al. 2016). Eph-ephrin binding can result in signal transduction into the receptor-expressing cell (forward signaling), into the ligand-expressing cell (reverse signaling) or into both cells (bi-directional signaling) (Kania and Klein 2016; Niethamer and Bush 2019). This range of signaling modes makes the Eph-ephrin pathway very versatile, and it is involved in various processes in almost all tissues and organs (Kania and Klein 2016; Niethamer and Bush 2019). Its main roles are associated with cell migration (Krull et al. 1997; Arthur et al. 2011), and tissue segregation and boundary formation (Xu et al. 1999; Cooke et al. 2005; Rohani et al. 2011, 2014). In the cardiovascular system, Eph-ephrin signaling is key for the establishment of boundaries between arterial and venous cells, termed arterial-venous specification (Tallquist et al. 1999; Adams 2003; Aitsebaomo et al. 2008; Michaelis 2014; Kania and Klein 2016). Additionally, the Eph-ephrin pathway has been connected to angiogenesis (Tallquist et al. 1999; Michaelis 2014), vascular morphogenesis (Adams et al. 2001), the regulation of vessel tone (Wu et al. 2012), and the migration, adhesion, and proliferation of ECs (Michaelis 2014).
The expression of Eph receptors and ephrin ligands in the vasculature is influenced by mechanical cues, and this mechanosensitivity mainly impacts arterial-venous specification. For example, Xue et al. (2017) found that culturing murine endothelial progenitor cells on stiff substrates enhanced the expression of ephrin-B2, associated with an arterial fate, and attenuated the expression of EphB4, associated with a venous fate, compared to soft substrates. This indicates that the stiffness of the micro-environment might modulate arterial-venous specification via Eph-ephrin signaling. They identified the Ras/Mek pathway as the main mechanotransduction mechanism and regulator of ephrin-B2 and EphB4. In addition to stiffness, shear stress has also been revealed as a mechanoregulator of Eph and ephrin expression. To study the remodeling of a vein graft used as an arterial bypass, human saphenous veins were exposed to arterial levels of shear stress ex vivo, resulting in a decrease in EphB4 expression (Berard et al. 2013; Model et al. 2014). Interestingly, the expression of ephrin-B2 showed no significant difference upon application of arterial shear stress alone (Berard et al. 2013; Model et al. 2014) and only decreased when the pressure was also increased to arterial levels (Berard et al. 2013). These results indicate that arterial shear stress alone causes a loss of venous identity in these cells, without inducing a gain in arterial identity. It is important to note that, despite the clear effects of shear stress on Eph-ephrin regulation, it is not clear whether EphB4 and ephrin-B2 are direct mechanosensors to shear stress, or whether they are downstream components of a larger mechanotransduction cascade (Model et al. 2014), which would be similar to the stiffness-dependent regulation of ephrin-B2 and EphB4 governed by Ras/Mek signaling (Xue et al. 2017).
5.3 TGF-β superfamily signaling
In addition to juxtacrine signaling, cells can communicate over longer distances via paracrine signaling. Cells can produce a signal via the secretion of paracrine factors that can diffuse over relatively short distances to induce changes in nearby cells. Paracrine factors bind to their corresponding receptors of the signal receiving cell and initiate a series of reactions called signal transduction cascades within the receiving cell, changing its behavior (Gilbert 2010). Paracrine signaling pathways are important regulators of cardiovascular development and homeostasis. A well-established member of paracrine signaling, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily signaling, is known to be mechanosensitive in vessels and valves (Li et al. 2019; Souilhol et al. 2020; Hiepen et al. 2020). In addition, it is involved in the regulation of cell behavior via crosstalking with other signaling pathways (Tang et al. 2010; Martin-Garrido et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2016). In this section, we discuss the mechanosensitive regulation of TGF-β superfamily signaling and its implications for vascular and valvular G&R.
In mammals there are at least thirty ligands of the TGF-β superfamily, including three TGF-β ligands (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3) and bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) (Schmierer and Hill 2007). The transmembrane receptors of the TGF-β superfamily are categorized as type I and type II receptors based on their structural differences. In the canonical pathway, each ligand of the TGF-β superfamily binds to a specific combination of type I and type II receptors to initiate signaling and activate the SMAD family of transcription factors (Heldin et al. 1997). Once the ligands bind to the receptors, type II receptors phosphorylate the intracellular domain of type I receptors, which in turn phosphorylates receptor-regulated SMAD (R-SMAD) proteins. Phosphorylated R-SMAD proteins form a complex with SMAD4, and this complex translocates into the nucleus where it acts as a transcription factor to regulate the expression of target genes (Fig. 3b).
Both TGF-β and BMP ligands activate similar mechanisms; however, the receptors that they bind to, and the associated phosphorylated R-SMAD proteins, are different. Type I and type II receptors of TGF-β ligands are TβR-I/ALK5 and TβR-II, whereas those of BMP ligands are BMPR-IA/ALK3, BMPR-IB/ALK6, ActR-I/ALK2; BMPR-II, ActR-II, ActR-IIB (Shi and Massagué 2003). In addition, the binding of TGF-β ligands to specific receptors causes the phosphorylation of SMAD2 and SMAD3, whereas SMAD1 and SMAD5 are phosphorylated when BMP ligands bind. Nevertheless, despite these differences, both SMAD2/3 and SMAD1/5 generate a complex with SMAD4 (Heldin et al. 1997).
TGF-β superfamily signaling is a highly conserved pathway that controls a diverse set of cellular processes, such as cell growth, differentiation, cell fate determination, matrix production, and apoptosis. It has important roles in pattern formation during development, tissue remodeling, and homeostasis (Heldin et al. 1997; Shi and Massagué 2003). In the cardiovascular system, TGF-β superfamily signaling is, for example, necessary for endothelial–mesenchymal transformation for cardiac cushion formation, angiogenesis, VSMC recruitment to the vessels, EC and VSMC proliferation and migration, VSMC differentiation, vascular stabilization, and cardiovascular homeostasis (Dickson et al. 1995; Oshima et al. 1996; Bonyadi et al. 1997; Galvin et al. 2000; Nakajima et al. 2000; Carvalho et al. 2007; Ramsauer and D’Amore 2007; Chen et al. 2009). Dysregulation of TGF-β superfamily signaling is associated with the development of several cardiovascular anomalies, including atherosclerosis, aneurysms, cardiac fibrosis, and calcification of the valves (Jian et al. 2003; Loeys et al. 2006; Gomez et al. 2009; Van De Laar et al. 2011).
TGF-β and BMP signaling are influenced by mechanical cues (Fig. 3b). Laminar shear stress significantly increases TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 gene and protein expression in vascular ECs compared to static conditions (Ohno et al. 1995; Cucina et al. 1998; Song et al. 2000; Negishi et al. 2001; Walshe et al. 2013). In addition, ECs release TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 upon the application of shear stress. The effect of the released TGF-β1 on VSMC behavior is not clear. For instance, it has been shown that TGF-β1 inhibits VSMC growth and migration by downregulating DNA synthesis and causing a cell-cycle arrest (Owens et al. 1988; Morisaki et al. 1991; Halloran et al. 1995; Cucina et al. 1998; Seay et al. 2005). On the other hand, an effect of TGF-β1 on VSMC proliferation has also been reported (Stouffer and Owens 1994; Schulick et al. 1998; Suwanabol et al. 2012; Calvier et al. 2017). In addition, the TGF-β1 released by ECs under low-shear (pathological) stress conditions does not participate in the paracrine control of VSMCs (Qi et al. 2011). Both SMAD-dependent and SMAD-independent TGF-β signaling pathways are responsible for regulating the VSMC behavior, and the exact mechanisms for controlling the cell behavior are still unclear.
Oscillatory shear stress upregulates BMP4, leading to proliferation and the secretion of inflammatory adhesion molecules in vascular ECs (Sorescu et al. 2003; Zhou et al. 2013). In agreement with this, arterial ECs increase BMP4 expression at sites of disturbed flow compared to sites of laminar flow (Chang et al. 2007). Other findings suggest a link between shear stress-dependent BMP activation and disease development. For example, BMP2 and BMP4 are expressed in ECs of atherosclerotic plaques (Dhore et al. 2001), while they are absent in healthy segments of human arteries (Zhou et al. 2012). VSMCs exposed to cyclic strain increase TGF-β1 mRNA and protein expression compared to static controls (O’Callaghan and Williams 2000; Mata-Greenwood et al. 2003, 2005), which in turn upregulates ECM production in VSMCs via an autocrine mechanism (O’Callaghan and Williams 2000). Cyclic strain also increases the production of TGF-β by vascular ECs (Baker et al. 2008; Dong et al. 2019). Interestingly, strain-induced endothelial TGF-β signaling controls VSMC proliferation via an autocrine feedback mechanism (Baker et al. 2008). In particular, autocrine TGF-β signaling in ECs regulates perlecan secretion in response to strain, which in turn inhibits the proliferation of VSMCs.
In valvular tissues, low and oscillatory shear stress upregulates TGF-β1, BMP4, and inflammatory gene expression in VECs (Sucosky et al. 2009; Mahler et al. 2014). These results are in accordance with the higher levels of SMAD1 and SMAD5, which are activated by BMP signaling, in human calcified aortic valves compared to healthy valves (Ankeny et al. 2011). In addition, cyclic strain increases BMP2, BMP4, and TGF-β1 expression in aortic VICs in a stretch magnitude-dependent manner, while the lowest expression has been detected at physiological strain levels (Ferdous et al. 2013). Pathological levels of strain are also associated with increased cellular apoptosis in VICs and valve calcification via BMP signaling (Balachandran et al. 2010). Overall, mechanical stimuli are important mediators of paracrine TGF-β and BMP signaling in cardiovascular homeostasis and disease. Shear stress and strain upregulate TGF-β in vascular ECs to regulate VSMC growth, and low and oscillatory shear stress upregulate BMP expression in ECs and VECs, related to the occurrence of pathologies. Strain-dependent changes in TGF-β and BMP signaling also alter VSMC and VIC behavior. Thus, the interplay between mechanical cues and TGF-β superfamily signaling is an important regulator of vascular and valvular cell behavior, which could be a target for improving and controlling engineered cardiovascular tissues.
5.4 Computational cell–cell signaling models
Computational models that describe juxtacrine and paracrine signaling generally aim at gaining a more complete and detailed understanding of the mechanisms of various signaling pathways. In this section, we discuss models for Notch signaling, Eph-ephrin signaling, and TGF-β signaling, with a special emphasis on models that incorporate the impact of these signaling pathways on tissue G&R.
5.4.1 Notch signaling models
Numerous computational models for Notch signaling have been developed to understand and predict Notch-regulated cell fate decisions and distributions (Binshtok and Sprinzak 2018). They generally employ a set of ordinary differential equations that describes the time evolution of Notch pathway components, such as receptors and ligands, by accounting for their production, degradation, and interactions. Given the key role of Notch in tissue patterning, most Notch signaling models have focused on understanding the signaling dynamics underlying different patterns. Model complexity has increased over the years by considering an increasing number of biological phenomena.
Early models have shown that fine-grained patterns of cells with alternating phenotypes, also known as “salt-and-pepper” patterns, can be obtained from both Notch lateral inhibition and cis-inhibition (Collier et al. 1996; Sprinzak et al. 2010, 2011). Recall from Sect. 5.1 that Notch lateral inhibition is a mechanism in which cells instruct their immediate neighbors to adopt a different phenotype, which requires regulation of Notch components at the gene transcriptional level, resulting from Notch trans-activation (Collier et al. 1996). Cis-inhibition, on the other hand, simply arises from the mutual inhibition of ligands and receptors within the same cell (Sprinzak et al. 2010). When coupled with trans-interactions, cis-inhibition enriches and accelerates pattern formation (Sprinzak et al. 2010, 2011; Formosa-Jordan and Ibañes 2014) and facilitates sharp tissue boundary formation (Sprinzak et al. 2011). More intricate cell patterns, such as cell clusters, stripes, and labyrinths, can be modeled by considering long-range cell–cell signaling occurring through filopodia (Chen et al. 2014; Vasilopoulos and Painter 2016; Hadjivasiliou et al. 2016). Other models have considered the influence of other cell properties such as cell division and migration (Hunter et al. 2016; Tóth et al. 2017) or cell geometry and contact area (Khait et al. 2016; Akanuma et al. 2016; Shaya et al. 2017; Guisoni et al. 2017) on Notch signaling. These studies revealed, for example, that Notch signaling can regulate the timing of cell differentiation and division to create more ordered patterning (Hunter et al. 2016) and that contact area and cell size can bias cell fate decisions (Shaya et al. 2017). In addition to patterning of static cells, lateral inhibition models can be adopted to study dynamic processes, such as angiogenesis (Bentley et al. 2008, 2009, 2014; Jakobsson et al. 2010; Vega et al. 2020) and the development of multicellular structures (Mulberry and Edelstein-Keshet 2020). Whereas these lateral inhibition models mostly focus on interactions between Notch and Delta, a number of models have also included other ligands, such as Jagged (Petrovic et al. 2014; LeBon et al. 2014; Boareto et al. 2015a, 2015b). This inclusion of Jagged enables the simulation of lateral induction, in which Notch signaling induces neighboring cells to adopt similar fates (Sect. 5.1).
Some Notch models are now considering mechanical stimuli as an influential feature of the cellular environment (Riahi et al. 2015; Loerakker et al. 2018; van Engeland et al. 2019; Ristori et al. 2020). Building on the model of Boareto et al. (2015b), for example, a recent model was used to investigate Notch signaling in the arterial wall by simulating Notch interactions between ECs and VSMCs (Loerakker et al. 2018). The experimentally derived influence of strain on the synthesis of Notch components in VSMCs (Sect. 5.1), and the correlation between Notch activation and VSMC phenotypes, was incorporated into the Notch model. Importantly, with these additions, the model could predict the homeostatic thickness of several types of native human arteries. This suggests that Notch mechanosensitivity may be a key regulator in the establishment and maintenance of arterial homeostasis and highlights the important role of the interplay between mechanical stimuli and cell–cell signaling in tissue G&R. These examples illustrate that computational Notch models enable the prediction and understanding of some crucial aspects of tissue G&R, such as cell patterning, division, and phenotype, thereby emphasizing the potential of adopting such models in future tissue engineering studies to improve tissue organization.
5.4.2 Eph-ephrin signaling models
Given the crucial role of Eph-ephrin signaling in boundary formation (Sect. 5.2), it is not surprising that computational models for Eph-ephrin signaling have mainly focused on this phenomenon (Wong et al. 2010; Aharon et al. 2014; Taylor et al. 2017). These models typically adopt agent-based formulations and simulate cell segregation, clustering, and patterning by accounting for differences in adhesive and repulsive properties between cell populations, which are assumed to be regulated by Eph-ephrin signaling (Wong et al. 2010; Aharon et al. 2014; Taylor et al. 2017).
For example, Wong et al. (2010) showed that differential adhesion between cell populations in the intestinal crypt is crucial for sharp boundary formation and the positioning and migration of cells. Eph-ephrin signaling in the model regulates cell adhesion properties phenomenologically, with interactions between Eph and ephrin decreasing the adhesion strength of cells. A similar approach was adopted by Aharon et al. (2014), who simulated a net force of attraction and repulsion between cells, where attraction is attenuated when Eph-ephrin interactions take place. The model predicts segregation of initially intermingled cell populations resulting from differences in adhesive properties, in good agreement with experimental results (Aharon et al. 2014).
Together, these models show that the complexity of Eph-ephrin signaling can be captured well by computational models, enabling accurate simulation of cell segregation and boundary formation. Nevertheless, computational models of Eph-ephrin still lack the consideration of mechanics as an influential factor on signaling dynamics. For example, changes in Eph and ephrin content have been shown to be regulated by mechanical stimuli (Sect. 5.2). As cell adhesive properties are directly linked to Eph and ephrin content (Wong et al. 2010) and signal strength (Aharon et al. 2014) in the respective models, this suggests that mechanical cues may have an important effect on cell adhesion and consequently on cell segregation and migration, which is worth investigating in future studies.
5.4.3 TGF-β signaling models
Computational models of TGF-β signaling can be developed following different strategies. Some models operate on a single cell level and are concerned mainly with the molecular dynamics of the pathway itself (Zi et al. 2012; Nicklas and Saiz 2013; Vizan et al. 2013). A second type of model focuses on tissue-level consequences of TGF-β signaling, which is more relevant in the context of tissue G&R and will therefore be the main topic of this subsection. These models assume that TGF-β regulates the production of tissue components, such as collagen (Aparício et al. 2016; Marino et al. 2017; Keshavarzian et al. 2018, 2019; Khosravi et al. 2020; Irons and Humphrey 2020; Irons et al. 2021). Two main approaches are typically adopted by these models: i) a rule-based or logic-based approach (Keshavarzian et al. 2018, 2019; Irons and Humphrey 2020; Irons et al. 2021) or ii) a system of differential equations to describe the kinetics of signaling molecules (Aparício et al. 2016; Marino et al. 2017; Khosravi et al. 2020). In these models, TGF-β signaling is often part of a more extensive network of signaling pathways and molecules, such as matrix metalloproteinase, platelet derived growth factors, and interleukins (Aparício et al. 2016; Marino et al. 2017; Keshavarzian et al. 2018, 2019; Khosravi et al. 2020; Irons and Humphrey 2020; Irons et al. 2021). Similar to the computational G&R models discussed in Sect. 3.4, these models are typically validated only qualitatively by comparing the simulation results to experimental findings and quantitative validation is a crucial next step in future studies (Aparício et al. 2016; Keshavarzian et al. 2018, 2019; Irons and Humphrey 2020; Irons et al. 2021). Finally, it is important to note that these models typically assume that the characteristic timescale of cell–cell signaling is much smaller than that of tissue G&R (Marino et al. 2017; Irons and Humphrey 2020; Irons et al. 2021).
Using such as modeling approach, Marino et al. (2017) simulated pathophysiological arterial remodeling as a result of increased macrophage activity. This suggested a protective role of TGF-β signaling as it reduced MMP-driven matrix degradation and promoted VSMC-driven matrix deposition to approximately re-establish homeostatic conditions (Marino et al. 2017). Hence, the model was able to capture the role of paracrine signaling in arterial remodeling and describe its consequences for tissue structure and mechanics. However, this model did not account for the direct influence of tissue mechanics on the cell–cell signaling pathways. Mechanical stimuli were included in two recent TGF-β signaling models of G&R (Khosravi et al. 2020; Irons and Humphrey 2020), extending the modeling capabilities and increasing the range of scenarios that can be simulated. Importantly, Khosravi et al. (2020) simulated the in vivo development of a neovessel from a polymeric scaffold by describing tissue production as a function of scaffold design and pharmacological interventions. The simulation results suggest that treatment with TGF-β inhibitors can improve the vessel’s patency and reduce the risk of compliance mismatch by suppressing the immune response and reducing the production of stiff collagen (Khosravi et al. 2020).
While these models (Khosravi et al. 2020; Irons and Humphrey 2020) account for the effects of mechanical stimuli on cell–cell signaling, these stimuli are fully prescribed. The models do not include feedback in the other direction, from the altered mechanical state of the tissue to cell–cell signaling. Such a feedback mechanism may be critical for capturing long-term tissue G&R and the effects of sustained chemical or mechanical perturbations. This was demonstrated by the study of Irons et al. (2021) in which their previous signaling model (Irons and Humphrey 2020) was coupled to a constrained mixture model for G&R (see Sect. 3.4). This allows continuous feedback between tissue-level mechanics and cell-level signaling activity and enables the simulation of tissue remodeling in response to sustained changes in blood pressure or flow (Irons and Humphrey 2020). Other models have also included feedback between tissue mechanics and cell–cell signaling (Aparício et al. 2016; Keshavarzian et al. 2018, 2019), which similarly enabled them to investigate long-term G&R, in these cases in the context of aneurysm development (Aparício et al. 2016) and in vitro tissue engineering (Keshavarzian et al. 2019). These models also elucidate the role of TGF-β in these processes. In particular, TGF-β signaling was shown to stabilize aneurysm development by inducing fibroblasts to increase collagen production (Aparício et al. 2016) and a decrease in TGF-β signaling was demonstrated to significantly slow down the growth of a tissue-engineered vascular graft (Keshavarzian et al. 2019).
Together, these models have increased our understanding of the role of TGF-β signaling in G&R of cardiovascular tissues by enabling us to study TGF-β signaling in scenarios that have not been investigated experimentally and predict resulting cell and tissue behavior in previously unexplored conditions. They have also demonstrated the value of adopting computational approaches in CVTE, for example by simulating the role of cell–cell signaling in neotissue development to identify beneficial pharmacological interventions (Khosravi et al. 2020). Furthermore, they have shown that incorporating the effects of mechanical stimuli on cell–cell signaling, such as TGF-β, can provide a key mechanistic explanation of mechano-regulated tissue G&R, especially when bi-directional feedback between tissue mechanics and cell–cell signaling is included.
In conclusion, the studies discussed in this section demonstrate that computational signaling models can increase our understanding of cell–cell signaling in the context of various aspects of tissue G&R, such as cell patterning, differentiation, proliferation, migration, and matrix production. The incorporation of mechanical stimuli in some recent Notch models and various TGF-β models has emphasized the importance of mechanics in tissue G&R and increased our understanding of underlying cell–cell signaling mechanisms and how we can manipulate these to achieve more organized and functional engineered tissues. In addition to the models focusing on blood vessels discussed here, interest in modeling the complex mechano-regulated signaling network of VICs is also growing (Howsmon and Sacks 2021). We therefore propose that more signaling models should include the effects of mechanical cues and that cell–cell signaling should be considered more in mechanical G&R models. This would begin to satisfy the need of a more mechanistic description of G&R, observed in Sect. 3.4. In addition, attention should be given to including bi-directional feedback mechanisms between mechanics at the tissue scale and signaling activity at the cell scale, which are currently absent from most models. This feedback could enable long-term processes to be simulated, as demonstrated by several models (Aparício et al. 2016; Keshavarzian et al. 2019; Irons et al. 2021). Together, these two additions would provide a more detailed description of signaling dynamics and increase the range of behavior that can be modeled. This is valuable for CVTE as it may enable the identification of techniques to control tissue G&R and the resulting outcome of engineered tissues.
6 Summary and future perspectives
Cardiovascular tissue engineering aims to regenerate functional blood vessels and heart valves, either in vitro or in situ, to treat various cardiovascular diseases. Despite promising results, this approach has not yet found wide-spread clinical application. The main limitations preventing this include the considerable variability between study outcomes, with some cases exhibiting suboptimal functionality, especially long-term, leading to various complications. In addition, the adaptive capabilities of TEBVs and TEHVs have not been clearly demonstrated yet. Our incomplete understanding of the processes and mechanisms underlying the G&R of engineered cardiovascular tissues hinders the discovery of solutions to overcome these limitations. The wide array of available materials, approaches, and techniques further complicates the search for optimal outcomes. Importantly, while native blood vessels and heart valves display a highly organized and layered structure, crucial to accommodate the hemodynamic loads and ensure functionality, this level of organization is often not seen in engineered blood vessels and heart valves. The importance of tissue organization for native tissues, together with the suboptimal organization of engineered cardiovascular tissues, leads to the hypothesis that the current limitations of CVTE may be overcome by achieving a more native-like organization. To this aim, the G&R processes of cardiovascular engineered tissues need to be better understood and guided.
The main mediator of tissue G&R is cell behavior, which refers to processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, migration, differentiation, and ECM synthesis. It is well accepted that cell behavior is highly influenced by mechanical stimuli in cardiovascular tissues (chapter 4). However, the underlying biological mechanisms of this mechano-regulation are still largely unclear. Cell–cell signaling pathways have also been shown to be sensitive to mechanical stimuli (Sects. 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3), which makes them a promising candidate to form the link between mechanical stimuli and cell behavior, and consequently provide a biological explanation for mechano-mediated G&R of cardiovascular tissues.
Collectively, the studies that we have discussed in chapters 4 and 5 reveal that cell–cell signaling and cell behavior are highly context-specific and often remarkably sensitive to changes in the type, magnitude, and duration of mechanical stimuli. This shows that cell behavior is very versatile and highly tuned to the cells’ local environment and mechanical stimuli to which they are exposed. It also shows that cells are part of sophisticated regulatory systems, with sensitive mechanical feedback loops, which play a vital role in tissue G&R and, particularly, in establishing and maintaining tissue homeostasis. To investigate and understand this complex network with variable cell responses in future tissue engineering studies and computational models, a systems biology approach and context-specific experimental data are required. In addition, models should be sufficiently flexible to describe G&R for a wide range of environmental conditions.
As reviewed in chapter 3, the limitations of current tissue-engineered constructs can probably be overcome, or at least reduced, by improving tissue G&R to establish a more native-like tissue organization. Given the strong effects of mechanical stimuli on cell–cell signaling pathways (Sects. 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3) and cellular behavior (chapter 4), we propose that mechano-regulation of cell–cell signaling is an important factor to consider in future tissue engineering studies. In particular, by investigating mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling, a more detailed understanding of the mechanisms underlying mechano-mediated G&R of blood vessels and heart valves can be obtained. This knowledge can reveal novel methods to control tissue G&R via direct or indirect interventions in the signaling pathways (Fig. 4b). Such an increased level of control over tissue G&R in concert with the development of predictive computational models of cell-mediated G&R would enable the identification of promising changes to tissue engineering protocols that can improve tissue organization and associated function, and subsequently accelerate clinical translation.
Deliberate manipulations of signaling pathways have already been recognized as an attractive strategy for tissue engineering (Carlson 2007; Zohorsky and Mequanint 2020). For example, scaffolds could be biologically activated with signaling molecules or growth factors to artificially induce or inhibit cell–cell signaling interactions in infiltrating cells and thereby control cell behavior to mediate tissue G&R. It has been shown that various signaling molecules, such as TGF-β and Notch pathway ligands, can be immobilized onto biomaterial surfaces (Mann et al. 2001; Carlson 2007; Putti et al. 2019a, 2019b; Zohorsky and Mequanint 2020). This technique has already been adopted by several studies to promote the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (Wen et al. 2014; Dishowitz et al. 2014) and epithelial stem cells (Beckstead et al. 2006) using immobilized Jagged ligands. This Jagged-induced differentiation was critical for continued tissue development, thereby demonstrating the potential of signaling manipulations for future tissue engineering approaches.
Alternatively, the mechanosensitivity of cell–cell signaling pathways could be utilized to indirectly control signaling activity, and consequent tissue G&R, by influencing the mechanical stimuli that cells are subjected to (Fig. 4b). This method is particularly suitable for in vitro tissue engineering, due to the high level of control over mechanical conditions achieved with various techniques (Huang and Niklason 2014). In the context of in situ tissue engineering, variations in scaffold geometry and material properties may be adopted to alter the hemodynamic loads presented to the cells in vivo (Loerakker et al. 2013; Wu et al. 2020; Tarrahi et al. 2020). For clinical translation, this indirect method may be preferred over direct manipulation from a regulatory perspective, as it does not require any active biological materials. Nevertheless, before such methods can successfully be applied in CVTE, some challenges might need to be addressed first. So far, many studies have investigated isolated signaling pathways or a limited selection of signaling pathways. To account for a more comprehensive influence of cell–cell signaling, it may be necessary to understand complex mechano-regulated signaling networks and crosstalk between different pathways. This requires increased research efforts in this area, for example to uncover how mechanical stimuli affect multiple pathways simultaneously by regulating certain shared downstream processes.
The consideration of mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling pathways in future CVTE studies will increase the already large number of variables in CVTE, which means that relying on experimental trial-and-error approaches alone quickly becomes impractical. There is, therefore, a clear need for a more systematic approach that enables efficient optimization of scaffold designs and CVTE protocols to identify the most promising combinations of parameters. We stress that computational modeling should be adopted in CVTE to complement the existing range of experimental strategies. Computational models have already been developed to enable the optimization of scaffold properties for tissue engineering of both blood vessels (Miller et al. 2015; Szafron et al. 2019) and heart valves (Loerakker et al. 2013; Emmert et al. 2018). Moreover, computational models have been successfully adopted to predict tissue G&R (Sect. 3.4) and unravel some of the complexities of cell–cell signaling pathways (Sect. 5.4). Combining these two types of models represents a coupling between biomechanics and systems biology and is an attractive opportunity for future studies, as it might enable the transition from a largely phenomenological description of tissue G&R to a more mechanistic one, motivated by cell–cell signaling pathways (Fig. 4a). The resulting framework would thus be able to both predict tissue G&R and describe some of the underlying mechanisms, thereby enabling the simulation of the signaling manipulations discussed in the previous paragraphs (Fig. 4b). This would at least partly answer the need for more biologically motivated G&R models that has previously been recognized (Miller et al. 2015; Szafron et al. 2018; Irons and Humphrey 2020; Irons et al. 2021). A compelling recent example is the study by Irons et al. (2021), in which a logic-based signaling model was coupled to a constrained mixture model for G&R which enables the modeling of bi-directional feedback between cell–cell signaling and tissue mechanics to improve our understanding of the role of signaling in G&R. The current model has been applied to simulate tissue G&R in response to hypertension, but similar models could in the future be used to study targeted manipulations of signaling pathways in CVTE.
6.1 Remaining challenges
To inform these biologically motivated computational models, there is a clear need for more quantitative experimental data on the interplay between mechanical stimuli and cell–cell signaling, and the role of this interplay in tissue G&R. These data would also be highly valuable to quantitatively validate many of the models which are currently only validated qualitatively. In addition, there is a lack of tools to study signaling in real time in complex physiological environments, limiting the availability of data. For example, many of the in vitro signaling studies that are discussed in Sects. 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 have used relatively simple mechanical conditions and only considered a limited number of time points. There is therefore a need for more real-time experimental data on signaling between cells that are subjected to more complex mechanical stimuli, such as anisotropic stress and strain. These conditions have been shown to have an important effect on cell behavior (chapter 4) and are more representative of the in vivo conditions of cells.
Including such complex biological behavior in computational models will inherently increase the number of model parameters. This can result in a higher uncertainty and difficulties regarding parameter estimation and model validation, especially considering the limited availability of experimental data. It therefore calls for a careful balance between complexity and simplicity in computational models, which should be tailored to specific research questions. Moreover, more complex models are associated with higher computational costs, especially when more complex geometries such as heart valves are modeled. This may require the development of more efficient computational techniques. Examples of such techniques implemented in previous studies include an analytical approximation of a stress fiber remodeling law (Ristori et al. 2016) and homogenized (Cyron et al. 2016) or time-independent (Latorre and Humphrey 2018) versions of the constrained mixture model for tissue G&R.
Challenges that remain in the field of cardiovascular tissue engineering and limit clinical translation include a large variability in outcome, suboptimal tissue function and organization, and the question whether engineered tissues can grow and adapt to changing demands, as discussed in Sect. 3.3. Moreover, some fundamental questions, for example regarding how cells repopulate an implanted scaffold, remain to be answered. An additional factor that plays a vital role in tissue regeneration is inflammation, which has been shown to be related to several cell–cell signaling pathways in the cardiovascular system, such as Notch and TGF-β signaling (Bartekova et al. 2018; Li and Kong 2020). This suggests that it may be important to consider the influence of cell–cell signaling on the inflammatory processes in future tissue engineering studies.
6.2 Conclusion
In conclusion, mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling pathways may be a crucial link to explain the interplay between mechanical cues, cell behavior, and tissue G&R. An increased understanding of these cell–cell signaling pathways may be leveraged to improve the tissue organization and associated function of tissue-engineered blood vessels and heart valves, for example by activating scaffold surfaces with signaling molecules to induce or inhibit signaling interactions. We therefore propose that mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling is an important factor to consider in future CVTE studies. Computational models incorporating both tissue G&R and mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling pathways can provide an efficient tool to understand and predict how the interplay between mechanical cues and cell–cell signaling gives rise to certain tissue organizations. This will allow us to identify promising sets of scaffold parameters and tissue engineering protocols to reduce the vast experimental search space for obtaining a functional organization of engineered cardiovascular tissues.
Abbreviations
- BMP:
-
Bone morphogenic protein
- CVTE:
-
Cardiovascular tissue engineering
- Dll:
-
Delta-like ligand
- EC:
-
Endothelial cell
- ECM:
-
Extracellular matrix
- G&R:
-
Growth and remodeling
- MMP::
-
Matrix metalloproteinase
- NICD:
-
Notch intracellular domain
- VEC:
-
Valvular endothelial cell
- VIC:
-
Valvular interstitial cell
- VSMC:
-
Vascular smooth muscle cell
- TEHV:
-
Tissue-engineered heart valve
- TEBV:
-
Tissue-engineered blood vessel
- TEM:
-
Tissue-engineered matrix
- TGF-β:
-
Transforming growth factor-β
- GAG:
-
Glycosaminoglycan
- α-SMA:
-
α-Smooth muscle actin
References
Adams RH (2003) Molecular control of arterial-venous blood vessel identity. J Anat 202:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00137.x
Adams RH, Diella F, Hennig S et al (2001) The cytoplasmic domain of the ligand EphrinB2 is required for vascular morphogenesis but not cranial neural crest migration. Cell 104:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00191-X
Aharon R, Janes PW, Burgess AW et al (2014) A mathematical model for Eph/Ephrin-directed segregation of intermingled cells. PLoS ONE 9:e111803. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111803
Aikawa E, Whittaker P, Farber M et al (2006) Human semilunar cardiac valve remodeling by activated cells from fetus to adult: Implications for postnatal adaptation, pathology, and tissue engineering. Circulation 113:1344–1352. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.591768
Aitsebaomo J, Portbury AL, Schisler JC, Patterson C (2008) Brothers and sisters. Circ Res 103:929–939. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.184937
Akanuma T, Chen C, Sato T et al (2016) Memory of cell shape biases stochastic fate decision-making despite mitotic rounding. Nat Commun 7:11963. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11963
Akimoto S, Mitsumata M, Sasaguri T, Yoshida Y (2000) Laminar shear stress inhibits vascular endothelial cell proliferation by inducing cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(Sdi1/Cip/Waf1). Circ Res 86:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.86.2.185
Ankeny RF, Thourani VH, Weiss D et al (2011) Preferential activation of SMAD1/5/8 on the fibrosa endothelium in calcified human aortic valves—association with low BMP antagonists and SMAD6. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020969
Anwar MA, Shalhoub J, Lim CS et al (2012) The effect of pressure-induced mechanical stretch on vascular wall differential gene expression. J Vasc Res 49:463–478. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339151
Aparício P, Thompson MS, Watton PN (2016) A novel chemo-mechano-biological model of arterial tissue growth and remodelling. J Biomech 49:2321–2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.04.037
Arends F, Lieleg O (2016) Biophysical properties of the basal lamina: a highly selective extracellular matrix. In: Travascio F (ed) Composition and Function of the Extracellular Matrix in the Human Body, 1st edn. IntechOpen, pp 203–221
Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Matsuno K, Fortini M (1995) Notch signaling. Science 80(268):225–232. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7716513
Arthur A, Zannettino A, Panagopoulos R et al (2011) EphB/ephrin-B interactions mediate human MSC attachment, migration and osteochondral differentiation. Bone 48:533–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.10.180
Awolesi MA, Sessa WC, Sumpio BE (1995) Cyclic strain upregulates nitric oxide synthase in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 96:1449–1454. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI118181
Ayoub S, Ferrari G, Gorman RC et al (2016) Heart valve biomechanics and underlying mechanobiology. Compr Physiol 6(4):1743–1780. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c150048
Ayoub S, Lee CH, Driesbaugh KH et al (2017) Regulation of valve interstitial cell homeostasis by mechanical deformation: implications for heart valve disease and surgical repair. J R Soc Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0580
Ayoub S, Tsai KC, Khalighi AH, Sacks MS (2018) The three-dimensional microenvironment of the mitral valve: insights into the effects of physiological loads. Cell Mol Bioeng 11:291–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-018-0529-8
Ayoub S, Howsmon DP, Lee CH, Sacks MS (2021) On the role of predicted in vivo mitral valve interstitial cell deformation on its biosynthetic behavior. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 20:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01373-w
Baek S, Rajagopal KR, Humphrey JD (2006) A theoretical model of enlarging intracranial fusiform aneurysms. J Biomech Eng 128:142–149. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2132374
Baek S, Valentín A, Humphrey JD (2007) Biochemomechanics of cerebral vasospasm and its resolution: II. constitutive relations and model simulations. Ann Biomed Eng 35:1498–1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-007-9322-x
Baeten JT, Lilly B (2017) Notch signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells. Adv Pharmacol 78:351–382
Baker AB, Ettenson DS, Jonas M et al (2008) Endothelial cells provide feedback control for vascular remodeling through a mechanosensitive autocrine TGF-β signaling pathway. Circ Res 103:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.179465
Balachandran K, Konduri S, Sucosky P et al (2006) An ex vivo study of the biological properties of porcine aortic valves in response to circumferential cyclic stretch. Ann Biomed Eng 34:1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9167-8
Balachandran K, Sucosky P, Jo H, Yoganathan AP (2009) Elevated cyclic stretch alters matrix remodeling in aortic valve cusps: implications for degenerative aortic valve disease. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol 296:756–764. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00900.2008
Balachandran K, Sucosky P, Jo H, Yoganathan AP (2010) Elevated cyclic stretch induces aortic valve calcification in a bone morphogenic protein-dependent manner. Am J Pathol 177:49–57. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.090631
Balachandran K, Alford PW, Wylie-Sears J et al (2011) Cyclic strain induces dual-mode endothelial–mesenchymal transformation of the cardiac valve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:19943–19948. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106954108
Balachandran K, Hussain S, Yap CH et al (2012) Elevated cyclic stretch and serotonin result in altered aortic valve remodeling via a mechanosensitive 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent pathway. Cardiovasc Pathol 21:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2011.07.005
Bartekova M, Radosinska J, Jelemensky M, Dhalla NS (2018) Role of cytokines and inflammation in heart function during health and disease. Heart Fail Rev 23:733–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-018-9716-x
Battaglia C, Mayer U, Aumailley M, Timpl R (1992) Basement-membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan binds to laminin by its heparan sulfate chains and to nidogen by sites in the protein core. Eur J Biochem 208:359–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17195.x
Beckstead BL, Santosa DM, Giachelli CM (2006) Mimicking cell–cell interactions at the biomaterial–cell interface for control of stem cell differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 79A:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30760
Bentley K, Gerhardt H, Bates PA (2008) Agent-based simulation of notch-mediated tip cell selection in angiogenic sprout initialisation. J Theor Biol 250:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.015
Bentley K, Mariggi G, Gerhardt H, Bates PA (2009) Tipping the balance: robustness of tip cell selection, migration and fusion in angiogenesis. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000549
Bentley K, Franco CA, Philippides A et al (2014) The role of differential VE-cadherin dynamics in cell rearrangement during angiogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 16:309–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2926
Berard X, Déglise S, Alonso F et al (2013) Role of hemodynamic forces in the ex vivo arterialization of human saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg 57:1371–1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.041
Best CA, Szafron JM, Rocco KA et al (2019) Differential outcomes of venous and arterial tissue engineered vascular grafts highlight the importance of coupling long-term implantation studies with computational modeling. Acta Biomater 94:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.063
Binshtok U, Sprinzak D (2018) Modeling the notch response. In: Borggrefe T, Giaimo B (eds) Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Springer, Cham, pp 79–98
Birukov KG, Shirinsky VP, Stepanova OV et al (1995) Stretch affects phenotype and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Cell Biochem 144:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00944392
Bischoff J, Aikawa E (2011) Progenitor cells confer plasticity to cardiac valve endothelium. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 4:710–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-011-9312-0
Boareto M, Jolly MK, Ben-Jacob E, Onuchic JN (2015a) Jagged mediates differences in normal and tumor angiogenesis by affecting tip-stalk fate decision. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:E3836–E3844. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511814112
Boareto M, Jolly MK, Lu M et al (2015b) Jagged-Delta asymmetry in Notch signaling can give rise to a Sender/Receiver hybrid phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:E402–E409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416287112
Boccafoschi F, Botta M, Fusaro L et al (2015) Decellularized biological matrices: an interesting approach for cardiovascular tissue repair and regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 11:1648–1657. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2103
Boerboom RA, Driessen NJB, Bouten CVC et al (2003) Finite element model of mechanically induced collagen fiber synthesis and degradation in the aortic valve. Ann Biomed Eng 31:1040–1053. https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1603749
Bogdanova M, Kostina A, Enayati KZ et al (2018) Inflammation and mechanical stress stimulate osteogenic differentiation of human aortic valve interstitial cells. Front Physiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01635
Bonyadi M, Rusholme SAB, Cousins FM et al (1997) Mapping of a major genetic modifier of embryonic lethality in TGFβ1 knockout mice. Nat Genet 15:207–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0297-207
Bouten CVC, Smits AIPM, Baaijens FPT (2018) Can we grow valves inside the heart? perspective on material-based in situ heart valve tissue engineering. Front Cardiovasc Med 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00054
Braeu FA, Aydin RC, Cyron CJ (2019) Anisotropic stiffness and tensional homeostasis induce a natural anisotropy of volumetric growth and remodeling in soft biological tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 18:327–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1084-x
Breuer CK, Shin’oka T, Tanel RE et al (1996) Tissue engineering lamb heart valve leaflets. Biotechnol Bioeng 50:562–567
Breuer CK, Mettler BA, Anthony T et al (2004) Application of tissue-engineering principles toward the development of a semilunar heart valve substitute. Tissue Eng 10:1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1725
Buchanan RM, Sacks MS (2014) Interlayer micromechanics of the aortic heart valve leaflet. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13:813–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0536-6
Buck RC (1980) Reorientation response of cells to repeated stretch and recoil of the substratum. Exp Cell Res 127:470–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(80)90456-5
Bukoreshtliev NV, Haase K, Pelling AE (2013) Mechanical cues in cellular signalling and communication. Cell Tissue Res 352:77–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-012-1531-4
Buskermolen ABC, Ristori T, Mostert D et al (2020) Cellular contact guidance emerges from gap avoidance. Cell Rep Phys Sci 1:100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.XCRP.2020.100055
Butcher JT, Nerem RM (2007) Valvular endothelial cells and the mechanoregulation of valvular pathology. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362:1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2127
Butcher JT, Penrod AM, García AJ, Nerem RM (2004) Unique morphology and focal adhesion development of valvular endothelial cells in static and fluid flow environments. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24:1429–1434. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000130462.50769.5a
Butcher JT, Barrett BC, Nerem RM (2006) Equibiaxial strain stimulates fibroblastic phenotype shift in smooth muscle cells in an engineered tissue model of the aortic wall. Biomaterials 27:5252–5258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.040
Buttafoco L, Engbers-Buijtenhuijs P, Poot AA et al (2006) Physical characterization of vascular grafts cultured in a bioreactor. Biomaterials 27:2380–2389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.017
Calvier L, Chouvarine P, Legchenko E et al (2017) PPARγ links BMP2 and TGFβ1 pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells, regulating cell proliferation and glucose metabolism. Cell Metab 25:1118-1134.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.011
Campinho P, Vilfan A, Vermot J (2020) Blood flow forces in shaping the vascular system: a focus on endothelial cell behavior. Front Physiol 11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00552
Capulli AK, MacQueen LA, Sheehy SP, Parker KK (2016) Fibrous scaffolds for building hearts and heart parts. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 96:83–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.020
Cardamone L, Valentín A, Eberth JF, Humphrey JD (2009) Origin of axial prestretch and residual stress in arteries. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 8:431–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-008-0146-x
Carlson ME (2007) Notch signaling pathway and tissue engineering. Front Biosci 12:5143. https://doi.org/10.2741/2554
Carvalho RLC, Itoh F, Goumans MJ et al (2007) Compensatory signalling induced in the yolk sac vasculature by deletion of TGFβ receptors in mice. J Cell Sci 120:4269–4277. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.013169
Cayuso J, Dzementsei A, Fischer JC et al (2016) EphrinB1/EphB3b coordinate bidirectional epithelial-mesenchymal interactions controlling liver morphogenesis and laterality. Dev Cell 39:316–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.10.009
Cebotari S, Lichtenberg A, Tudorache I et al (2006) Clinical application of tissue engineered human heart valves using autologous progenitor cells. Circulation 114:132–137. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001065
Chahine MN, Dibrov E, Blackwood DP, Pierce GN (2012) Oxidized LDL enhances stretch-induced smooth muscle cell proliferation through alterations in nuclear protein import. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 90:1559–1568. https://doi.org/10.1139/y2012-141
Chang K, Weiss D, Suo J et al (2007) Bone morphogenic protein antagonists are coexpressed with bone morphogenic protein 4 in endothelial cells exposed to unstable flow in vitro in mouse aortas and in human coronary arteries: Role of bone morphogenic protein antagonists in inflammation and at. Circulation 116:1258–1266. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.683227
Chapman GB, Durante W, Hellums JD, Schafer AI (2000) Physiological cyclic stretch causes cell cycle arrest in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol - Hear Circ Physiol 278:748–754. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.3.h748
Charbonier FW, Zamani M, Huang NF (2019) Endothelial cell mechanotransduction in the dynamic vascular environment. Adv Biosyst 3:1800252. https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201800252
Chaudhuri O, Cooper-White J, Janmey PA et al (2020) Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature 584:535–546. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2
Chen Q, Li W, Quan Z, Sumpio BE (2003) Modulation of vascular smooth muscle cell alignment by cyclic strain is dependent on reactive oxygen species and P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Vasc Surg 37:660–668. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2003.95
Chen Q, Chen H, Zheng D et al (2009) Smad7 is required for the development and function of the heart. J Biol Chem 284:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M807233200
Chen JS, Gumbayan AM, Zeller RW, Mahaffy JM (2014) An expanded notch-delta model exhibiting long-range patterning and incorporating MicroRNA regulation. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003655
Chen P, Qin L, Li G et al (2016) Smooth muscle FGF / TGF β cross talk regulates atherosclerosis progression. EMBO Mol Med 8:712–728. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201506181
Cheng WP, Wang BW, Chen SC et al (2012) Mechanical stretch induces the apoptosis regulator PUMA in vascular smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res 93:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvr280
Chi Q, Yin T, Gregersen H et al (2014) Rear actomyosin contractility-driven directional cell migration in three-dimensional matrices: a mechanochemical coupling mechanism. J R Soc Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.1072
Cho SW, Lim SH, Kim IK et al (2005) Small-diameter blood vessels engineered with bone marrow-derived cells. Ann Surg 241:506–515. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000154268.12239.ed
Cines DB, Pollak ES, Buck CA et al (1998) Endothelial cells in physiology and in the pathophysiology of vascular disorders. Blood 91:3527–3561
Cocciolone AJ, Hawes JZ, Staiculescu MC et al (2018) Elastin, arterial mechanics, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol 315:H189–H205. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00087.2018
Collier JR, Monk NAM, Maini PK, Lewis JH (1996) Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: a mathematical model of delta-notch intercellular signalling. J R Soc Interface 183:429–446
Cooke JE, Kemp HA, Moens CB (2005) EphA4 is required for cell adhesion and rhombomere-boundary formation in the zebrafish. Curr Biol 15:536–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.019
Corson F, Couturier L, Rouault H et al (2017) Self-organized Notch dynamics generate stereotyped sensory organ patterns in Drosophila. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai7407
Courtney T, Sacks M, Stankus J et al (2006) Design and analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds that mimic soft tissue mechanical anisotropy. Biomaterials 27:3631–3638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.024
Coyan GN, D’Amore A, Matsumura Y et al (2019) In vivo functional assessment of a novel degradable metal and elastomeric scaffold-based tissue engineered heart valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 157:1809–1816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.128
Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF (2011) An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 32:3233–3243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057
Cucina A, Sterpetti AV, Borrelli V et al (1998) Shear stress induces transforming growth factor-beta1 release by arterial endothelial cells. Surgery 123:212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(98)70260-0
Cummings I, George S, Kelm J et al (2012) Tissue-engineered vascular graft remodeling in a growing lamb model: expression of matrix metalloproteinases. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 41:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.077
Cunningham KS, Gotlieb AI (2005) The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Lab Investig 85(1):9–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700215
Cushing MC, Jaeggli MP, Masters KS et al (2005) Serum deprivation improves seeding and repopulation of acellular matrices with valvular interstitial cells. J Biomed Mater Res—Part A 75:232–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30412
Cyron CJ, Wilson JS, Humphrey JD (2014) Mechanobiological stability: a new paradigm to understand the enlargement of aneurysms? J R Soc Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0680
Cyron CJ, Aydin RC, Humphrey JD (2016) A homogenized constrained mixture (and mechanical analog) model for growth and remodeling of soft tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15:1389–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-016-0770-9
D’Amore A, Soares JS, Stella JA et al (2016) Large strain stimulation promotes extracellular matrix production and stiffness in an elastomeric scaffold model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 62:619–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.005
da Costa FDA, Dohmen PM, Duarte D et al (2005) Immunological and echocardiographic evaluation of decellularized versus cryopreserved allografts during the Ross operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.057
Dardik A, Chen L, Frattini J et al (2005) Differential effects of orbital and laminar shear stress on endothelial cells. J Vasc Surg 41:869–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.020
Dartsch PC, Betz E (1989) Response of cultured endothelial cells to mechanical stimulation. Basic Res Cardiol 84:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01907974
Davies PF, Remuzzi A, Gordon EJ et al (1986) Turbulent fluid shear stress induces vascular endothelial cell turnover in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:2114–2117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.7.2114
Davis EC (1993) Endothelial cell connecting filaments anchor endothelial cells to the subjacent elastic lamina in the developing aortic intima of the mouse. Cell Tissue Res 272:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302726
Davis EC (1995) Elastic lamina growth in the developing mouse aorta. J Histochem Cytochem 43:1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/43.11.7560894
Davis S, Gale N, Aldrich T et al (1994) Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 266:816–819. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7973638
de la Pompa JL (2009) Notch signaling in cardiac development and disease. Pediatr Cardiol 30:643–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-008-9368-z
De R, Safran SA (2008) Dynamical theory of active cellular response to external stress. Phys Rev E—Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.031923
Deck JD (1986) Endothelial cell orientation on aortic valve leaflets. Cardiovasc Res 20:760–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/20.10.760
Destrade M, Liu Y, Murphy JG, Kassab GS (2012) Uniform transmural strain in pre-stressed arteries occurs at physiological pressure. J Theor Biol 303:93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.03.010
Dewey CF (1984) Effects of fluid flow on living vascular cells. J Biomech Eng 106:31–35. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138453
Dewey CF, Bussolari SR, Gimbrone MA, Davies PF (1981) The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. J Biomech Eng 103:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138276
Dhore CR, Cleutjens JPM, Lutgens E et al (2001) Differential expression of bone matrix regulatory proteins in human atherosclerotic plaques. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21:1998–2003. https://doi.org/10.1161/hq1201.100229
Dickson MC, Martin JS, Cousins FM et al (1995) Defective haematopoiesis and vasculogenesis in transforming growth factor-β1 knock out mice. Development 121:1845–1854
Dijkman PE, Driessen-Mol A, Frese L et al (2012) Decellularized homologous tissue-engineered heart valves as off-the-shelf alternatives to xeno- and homografts. Biomaterials 33:4545–4554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.015
Dimmeler S, Haendeler J, Rippmann V, Nehls M, Zeiher AM (1996) Shear stress inhibits apoptosis of human endothelial cells. FEBS Lett 399(1–2):71–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01289-6
Dingemans KP, Teeling P, Lagendijk JH, Becker AE (2000) Extracellular matrix of the human aortic media: an ultrastructural histochemical and immunohistochemical study of the adult aortic media. Anat Rec 258:1–14
Dishowitz MI, Zhu F, Sundararaghavan HG et al (2014) Jagged1 immobilization to an osteoconductive polymer activates the Notch signaling pathway and induces osteogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 102:1558–1567. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34825
Dohmen PM, Lembcke A, Holinski S et al (2007) Mid-term clinical results using a tissue-engineered pulmonary valve to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract during the ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 84:729–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.072
Dohmen PM, Lembcke A, Holinski S et al (2011) Ten years of clinical results with a tissue-engineered pulmonary valve. Ann Thorac Surg 92:1308–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.009
Dong G, Huang X, Jiang S et al (2019) Simvastatin mitigates apoptosis and transforming growth factor-beta upregulation in stretch-induced endothelial cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6026051
Driessen NJB, Boerboom RA, Huyghe JM et al (2003) Computational analyses of mechanically induced collagen fiber remodeling in the aortic heart valve. J Biomech Eng 125:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1590361
Driessen NJB, Wilson W, Bouten CVC, Baaijens FPT (2004) A computational model for collagen fibre remodelling in the arterial wall. J Theor Biol 226:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.08.004
Driessen NJB, Bouten CVC, Baaijens FPT (2005) Improved prediction of the collagen fiber architecture in the aortic heart valve. J Biomech Eng 127:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1865187
Driessen NJB, Cox MAJ, Bouten CVC, Baaijens FPT (2008) Remodelling of the angular collagen fiber distribution in cardiovascular tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 7:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-007-0078-x
Driessen RCH, Stassen OMJA, Sjöqvist M et al (2018) Shear stress induces expression, intracellular reorganization and enhanced Notch activation potential of Jagged1. Integr Biol 10:719–726. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8IB00036K
Driessen-Mol A, Emmert MY, Dijkman PE et al (2014) Transcatheter implantation of homologous “off-the-shelf” tissue-engineered heart valves with self-repair capacity. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:1320–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.082
Dunn GA, Heath JP (1976) A new hypothesis of contact guidance in tissue cells. Exp Cell Res 101:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(76)90405-5
Eckert CE, Mikulis BT, Gottlieb D et al (2011) Three-dimensional quantitative micromorphology of pre- and post-implanted engineered heart valve tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 39:205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0162-8
Eckert CE, Fan R, Mikulis B et al (2013) On the biomechanical role of glycosaminoglycans in the aortic heart valve leaflet. Acta Biomater 9:4653–4660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.09.031
Eichinger JF, Haeusel LJ, Paukner D et al (2021) Mechanical homeostasis in tissue equivalents: a review. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 20:833–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01433-9
Emmert MY, Schmitt BA, Loerakker S et al (2018) Computational modeling guides tissue-engineered heart valve design for long-term in vivo performance in a translational sheep model. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aan4587
Engelmayr GC, Sacks MS (2006) A structural model for the flexural mechanics of nonwoven tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomech Eng 128:610–622. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2205371
Engelmayr GC, Sales VL, Mayer JE, Sacks MS (2006) Cyclic flexure and laminar flow synergistically accelerate mesenchymal stem cell-mediated engineered tissue formation: Implications for engineered heart valve tissues. Biomaterials 27:6083–6095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.045
Eslami MH, Gangadharan SP, Belkin M et al (2001) Monocyte adhesion to human vein grafts: a marker for occult intraoperative injury? J Vasc Surg 34:923–929. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.118590
Fang JS, Coon BG, Gillis N et al (2017) Shear-induced Notch-Cx37-p27 axis arrests endothelial cell cycle to enable arterial specification. Nat Commun 8:2149. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01742-7
Ferdous Z, Jo H, Nerem RM (2013) Strain magnitude-dependent calcific marker expression in valvular and vascular cells. Cells Tissues Organs 197:372–383. https://doi.org/10.1159/000347007
Filip DA, Radu A, Simionescu M (1986) Interstitial cells of the heart valves possess characteristics similar to smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 59:310–320. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.59.3.310
Filippo N, Paola A, Laura I (2013) Biocompatibility evaluation criteria for novel xenograft materials: distribution and quantification of remnant nucleic acid and alpha-gal epitope. J Stem Cell Res Ther. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7633.S6-009
Fioretta ES, Simonet M, Smits AIPM et al (2014) Differential response of endothelial and endothelial colony forming cells on electrospun scaffolds with distinct microfiber diameters. Biomacromol 15:821–829. https://doi.org/10.1021/BM4016418
Fioretta ES, Dijkman PE, Emmert MY, Hoerstrup SP (2018) The future of heart valve replacement: recent developments and translational challenges for heart valve tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12:e323–e335. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2326
Fioretta ES, Lintas V, Mallone A et al (2020) Differential leaflet remodeling of bone marrow cell pre-seeded versus nonseeded bioresorbable transcatheter pulmonary valve replacements. JACC Basic Transl Sci 5:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.09.008
Flanagan JG, Vanderhaeghen P (1998) THE ephrins and eph receptors in neural development. Annu Rev Neurosci 21:309–345. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.309
Flanagan TC, Cornelissen C, Koch S et al (2007) The in vitro development of autologous fibrin-based tissue-engineered heart valves through optimised dynamic conditioning. Biomaterials 28:3388–3397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.012
Flanagan TC, Sachweh JS, Frese J et al (2009) In vivo remodeling and structural characterization of fibrin-based tissue-engineered heart valves in the adult sheep model. Tissue Eng—Part A 15:2965–2976. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0018
Formosa-Jordan P, Ibañes M (2014) Competition in notch signaling with cis enriches cell fate decisions. PLoS ONE 9:e95744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095744
Fox JW, Mayer U, Nischt R et al (1991) Recombinant nidogen consists of three globular domains and mediates binding of laminin to collagen type IV. EMBO J 10:3137–3146. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04875.x
Franke RP, Gräfe M, Schnittler H et al (1984) Induction of human vascular endothelial stress fibres by fluid shear stress. Nature 307:648–649. https://doi.org/10.1038/307648a0
Fung YC (1991) What are the residual stresses doing in our blood vessels? Ann Biomed Eng 19:237–249
Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues, 2nd edn. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, USA
Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV (1980) The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature 288:373–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/288373a0
Gale NW, Holland SJ, Valenzuela DM et al (1996) Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis known family of RTKs with at least 13 distinct members family display dynamic and spatially restricted expres. Neuron 17:9–19
Galis ZS, Khatri JJ (2002) Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly—PubMed. Circ Res 90:251–262
Galvin KM, Donovan MJ, Lynch CA et al (2000) A role for Smad6 in development and homeostasis of the cardiovascular system. Nat Genet 24:171–174. https://doi.org/10.1038/72835
Gerrity RG, Cliff WJ (1972) The aortic tunica intima in young and aging rats. Exp Mol Pathol 16:382–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4800(72)90012-3
Ghim M, Pang KT, Arshad M et al (2018) A novel method for segmenting growth of cells in sheared endothelial culture reveals the secretion of an anti-inflammatory mediator. J Biol Eng 12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-018-0107-6
Gilbert SF (ed) (2010) Cell-cell communication in development. In: Developmental biology, 9th edn. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, pp 69–119
GimbroneJr MA, García-Cardeña G (2016) Endothelial cell dysfunction and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 118:620–636. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306301
Gleason RL, Humphrey JD (2005) A 2D constrained mixture model for arterial adaptations to large changes in flow, pressure and axial stretch. Math Med Biol 22:347–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/imammb/dqi014
Goecke T, Theodoridis K, Tudorache I et al (2018) In vivo performance of freeze-dried decellularized pulmonary heart valve allo- and xenografts orthotopically implanted into juvenile sheep. Acta Biomater 68:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.041
Goins A, Webb AR, Allen JB (2019) Multi-layer approaches to scaffold-based small diameter vessel engineering: a review. Mater Sci Eng C 97:896–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.067
Goldstein S, Clarke DR, Walsh SP et al (2000) Transpecies heart valve transplant: advanced studies of a bioengineered xeno-autograft. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1962–1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01812-9
Gomez D, Al Haj Zen A, Borges LF et al (2009) Syndromic and non-syndromic aneurysms of the human ascending aorta share activation of the Smad2 pathway. J Pathol 218:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2516
Gong J, Körner R, Gaitanos L, Klein R (2016) Exosomes mediate cell contact–independent ephrin-Eph signaling during axon guidance. J Cell Biol 214:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201601085
Gottlieb D, Kunal T, Emani S et al (2010) In vivo monitoring of function of autologous engineered pulmonary valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.006
Gould RA, Chin K, Santisakultarm TP et al (2012) Cyclic strain anisotropy regulates valvular interstitial cell phenotype and tissue remodeling in three-dimensional culture. Acta Biomater 8:1710–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.006
Gridley T (2007) Notch signaling in vascular development and physiology. Development 134:2709–2718. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.004184
Gross L, Kugel MA (1931) Topographic anatomy and histology of the valves in the human heart. Am J Pathol 7(445–474):7
Grote K, Flach I, Luchtefeld M et al (2003) Mechanical stretch enhances mRNA expression and proenzyme release of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) via NAD(P)H oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species. Circ Res 92:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000077044.60138.7c
Guha S, Cullen JP, Morrow D et al (2011) Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta positively regulates Notch signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells: role in cell proliferation and survival. Basic Res Cardiol 106:773–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-011-0189-5
Guido S, Tranquillo RT (1993) A methodology for the systematic and quantitative study of cell contact guidance in oriented collagen gels. Correlation of fibroblast orientation and gel birefringence—PubMed. J Cell Sci 105:317–331
Guisoni N, Martinez-Corral R, Garcia-Ojalvo J, de Navascués J (2017) Diversity of fate outcomes in cell pairs under lateral inhibition. Development 144:1177–1186. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.137950
Gupta V, Tseng H, Lawrence BD, Jane Grande-Allen K (2009) Effect of cyclic mechanical strain on glycosaminoglycan and proteoglycan synthesis by heart valve cells. Acta Biomater 5:531–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.009
Hadjivasiliou Z, Hunter GL, Baum B (2016) A new mechanism for spatial pattern formation via lateral and protrusion-mediated lateral signalling. J R Soc Interface 13:20160484. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0484
Haga M, Chen A, Gortler D et al (2003) Shear stress and cyclic strain may suppress apoptosis in endothelial cells by different pathways. Endothel J Endothel Cell Res 10:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10623320390233463
Halloran BG, Prorok GD, So BJ, Baxter BT (1995) Transforming growth factor-β1 inhibits human arterial smooth-muscle cell proliferation in a growth-rate-dependent manner. Am J Surg 170:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80284-0
Hamada H, Watanabe M, Lau HE et al (2014) Involvement of Delta/Notch signaling in zebrafish adult pigment stripe patterning. Development 141:1418–1418. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.108894
Han Y, Huang K, Yao QP, Jiang ZL (2018) Mechanobiology in vascular remodeling. Natl Sci Rev 5:933–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx153
Hariton I, DeBotton G, Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2007) Stress-driven collagen fiber remodeling in arterial walls. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 6:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-006-0049-7
Harrington JK, Chahboune H, Criscione JM et al (2011) Determining the fate of seeded cells in venous tissue-engineered vascular grafts using serial MRI. FASEB J 25:4150–4161. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-185140
Harskamp RE, Lopes RD, Baisden CE et al (2013) Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: pathophysiology, management, and future directions. Ann Surg 257:824–833. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288c38d
Haruguchi H, Teraoka S (2003) Intimal hyperplasia and hemodynamic factors in arterial bypass and arteriovenous grafts: a review. J Artif Organs 6:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-003-0232-x
He W, Nieponice A, Soletti L et al (2010) Pericyte-based human tissue engineered vascular grafts. Biomaterials 31:8235–8244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.034
Head SJ, Çelik M, Kappetein AP (2017) Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J 38:2183–2191. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx141
Heldin CH, Miyazono K, Ten Dijke P (1997) TGF-β signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature 390:465–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/37284
Helmlinger G, Geiger RV, Schreck S, Nerem RM (1991) Effects of pulsatile flow on cultured vascular endothelial cell morphology. J Biomech Eng 113:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2891226
Hennessy RS, Go JL, Hennessy RR et al (2017) Recellularization of a novel off-the-shelf valve following xenogenic implantation into the right ventricular outflow tract. PLoS ONE 12:e0181614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181614
Hess CN, Lopes RD, Gibson CM et al (2014) Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery insights from PREVENT IV. Circulation 130:1445–1451
Hibino N, McGillicuddy E, Matsumura G et al (2010) Late-term results of tissue-engineered vascular grafts in humans. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:431-436.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.057
Hibino N, Villalona G, Pietris N et al (2011) Tissue-engineered vascular grafts form neovessels that arise from regeneration of the adjacent blood vessel. FASEB J 25:2731–2739. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-182246
Hiepen C, Mendez PL, Knaus P (2020) It takes two to tango: endothelial TGFβ/BMP signaling crosstalk with mechanobiology. Cells 9:1965
Himanen J-P, Chumley MJ, Lackmann M et al (2004) Repelling class discrimination: ephrin-A5 binds to and activates EphB2 receptor signaling. Nat Neurosci 7:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1237
Hoerstrup SP, Sodian R, Daebritz S et al (2000) Functional living trileaflet heart valves grown in vitro. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-44
Hoerstrup SP, Kadner A, Melnitchouk S et al (2002) Tissue engineering of functional trileaflet heart valves from human marrow stromal cells. Circulation 106:I143-150. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000032872.55215.05
Hoerstrup SP, Cummings I, Lachat M et al (2006) Functional growth in tissue-engineered living, vascular grafts: follow-up at 100 weeks in a large animal model. Circulation 114:159–166. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001172
Holliday CJ, Ankeny RF, Jo H, Nerem RM (2011) Discovery of shear-and side-specific mRNAs and miRNAs in human aortic valvular endothelial cells. Am J Physiol - Hear Circ Physiol 301:856–867. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00117.2011
Holzapfel GA (2006) Determination of material models for arterial walls from uniaxial extension tests and histological structure. J Theor Biol 238:290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.006
Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast 61:1–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010835316564
Hopf M, Göhring W, Kohfeldt E et al (1999) Recombinant domain IV of perlecan binds to nidogens, laminin-nidogen complex, fibronectin, fibulin-2 and heparin. Eur J Biochem 259:917–926. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00127.x
Howard P, Macarak E (1989) Localization of collagen types in regional segments of the fetal bovine aorta. Lab Invest 61:548–555
Howsmon DP, Sacks MS (2021) On valve interstitial cell signaling: the link between multiscale mechanics and mechanobiology. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 12:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-020-00509-4
Hsu HJ, Lee CF, Kaunas R (2009) A dynamic stochastic model of frequency-dependent stress fiber alignment induced by cyclic stretch. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004853
Hu B, Song JT, Qu HY et al (2014) Mechanical stretch suppresses microRNA-145 expression by activating extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and upregulating angiotensin- converting enzyme to alter vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype. PLoS ONE 9:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096338
Huang AH, Niklason LE (2014) Engineering of arteries in vitro. Cell Mol Life Sci 71:2103–2118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1546-3
Humphrey JD (2002) Cardiovascular solid mechanics: cells, tissues, and organs. Springer Science+Business Media, New York
Humphrey JD (2006) Vascular growth and remodeling. In: Akay M (ed) Wiley encyclopedia of biomedical engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, pp 1–9
Humphrey JD, Rajagopal KR (2002) A constrained mixture model for growth and remodeling of soft tissues. Math Model Methods Appl Sci 12:407–430. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202502001714
Humphrey JD, Rajagopal KR (2003) A constrained mixture model for arterial adaptations to a sustained step change in blood flow. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2:109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-003-0033-4
Humphrey JD, Baek S, Niklason LE (2007) Biochemomechanics of cerebral vasospasm and its resolution: I. a new hypothesis and theoretical framework. Ann Biomed Eng 35:1485–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-007-9321-y
Humphrey JD, Dufresne ER, Schwartz MA (2014) Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:802–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3896
Hunter GL, Hadjivasiliou Z, Bonin H et al (2016) Coordinated control of Notch/Delta signalling and cell cycle progression drives lateral inhibition-mediated tissue patterning. Development 143:2305–2310. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.134213
Irons L, Humphrey JD (2020) Cell signaling model for arterial mechanobiology. PLOS Comput Biol 16:e1008161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008161
Irons L, Latorre M, Humphrey JD (2021) From transcript to tissue: multiscale modeling from cell signaling to matrix remodeling. Ann Biomed Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02713-8
Iso T, Hamamori Y, Kedes L (2003) Notch signaling in vascular development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23:543–553. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000060892.81529.8F
Ives CL, Eskin SG, McIntire LV (1986) Mechanical effects on endothelial cell morphology: in vitro assessment. Vitr Cell Dev Biol 22:500–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02621134
Iwasaki K, Kojima K, Kodama S et al (2008) Bioengineered three-layered robust and elastic artery using hemodynamically-equivalent pulsatile bioreactor. Circulation 118:52–57
Jahnsen ED, Trindade A, Zaun HC et al (2015) Notch1 is pan-endothelial at the onset of flow and regulated by flow. PLoS ONE 10:e0122622. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122622
Jakobsson L, Franco CA, Bentley K et al (2010) Endothelial cells dynamically compete for the tip cell position during angiogenic sprouting. Nat Cell Biol 12:943–953. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2103
Jian B, Narula N, Li QY et al (2003) Progression of aortic valve stenosis: TGF-β1 is present in calcified aortic valve cusps and promotes aortic valve interstitial cell calcification via apoptosis. Ann Thorac Surg 75:457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04312-6
Kaiser D, Freyberg MA, Friedl P (1997) Lack of hemodynamic forces triggers apoptosis in vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 231:586–590. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1997.6146
Kaiser D, Freyberg MA, Schrimpf G, Friedl P (1999) Apoptosis induced by lack of hemodynamic forces is a general endothelial feature even occurring in immortalized cell lines. Endothel J Endothel Cell Res 6:325–334. https://doi.org/10.3109/10623329909078499
Kanda K, Matsuda T, Oka T (1992) Two-dimensional orientation response of smooth muscle cells to cyclic stretching. ASAIO J 38:M382-385
Kania A, Klein R (2016) Mechanisms of ephrin–Eph signalling in development, physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:240–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2015.16
Karšaj I, Sorić J, Humphrey JD (2010) A 3-D framework for arterial growth and remodeling in response to altered hemodynamics. Int J Eng Sci 48:1357–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2010.06.033
Kasimir M-T, Rieder E, Seebacher G et al (2006) Decellularization does not eliminate thrombogenicity and inflammatory stimulation in tissue-engineered porcine heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 15:278–286
Kaushal S, Amiel GE, Guleserian KJ et al (2001) Functional small-diameter neovessels created using endothelial progenitor cells expanded ex vivo. Nat Med 7:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0901-1035
Keshavarzian M, Meyer CA, Hayenga HN (2018) Mechanobiological model of arterial growth and remodeling. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0946-y
Keshavarzian M, Meyer CA, Hayenga HN (2019) In silico tissue engineering: a coupled agent-based finite element approach. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 25:641–654. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0103
Khait I, Orsher Y, Golan O et al (2016) Quantitative analysis of delta-like 1 membrane dynamics elucidates the role of contact geometry on notch signaling. Cell Rep 14:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.040
Khosravi R, Miller KS, Best CA et al (2015) Biomechanical diversity despite mechanobiological stability in tissue engineered vascular grafts two years post-implantation. Tissue Eng Part A 21:1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0524
Khosravi R, Best CA, Allen RA et al (2016) Long-term functional efficacy of a novel electrospun poly(Glycerol Sebacate)-based arterial graft in mice. Ann Biomed Eng 44:2402–2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1545-7
Khosravi R, Ramachandra AB, Szafron JM et al (2020) A computational bio-chemo-mechanical model of in vivo tissue-engineered vascular graft development. Integr Biol 12:47–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/intbio/zyaa004
Kim S-S, Lim S-H, Hong Y-S et al (2006) Tissue engineering of heart valves in vivo using bone marrow-derived cells. Artif Organs 30:554–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00258.x
Kirkton RD, Santiago-Maysonet M, Lawson JH et al (2019) Bioengineered human acellular vessels recellularize and evolve into living blood vessels after human implantation. Sci Transl Med 11:eaau6934. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aau6934
Kluin J, Talacua H, Smits AIPM et al (2017) In situ heart valve tissue engineering using a bioresorbable elastomeric implant—from material design to 12 months follow-up in sheep. Biomaterials 125:101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.007
Koch S, Flanagan TC, Sachweh JS et al (2010) Fibrin-polylactide-based tissue-engineered vascular graft in the arterial circulation. Biomaterials 31:4731–4739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.051
Kodigepalli KM, Thatcher K, West T et al (2020) Biology and biomechanics of the heart valve extracellular matrix. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 7:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd7040057
Koobatian MT, Row S, Smith RJ Jr et al (2016) Successful endothelialization and remodeling of a cell-free small-diameter arterial graft in a large animal model. Biomaterials 76:344–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.020
Krull CE, Lansford R, Gale NW et al (1997) Interactions of Eph-related receptors and ligands confer rostrocaudal pattern to trunk neural crest migration. Curr Biol 7:571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00256-9
Ku CH, Johnson PH, Batten P et al (2006) Collagen synthesis by mesenchymal stem cells and aortic valve interstitial cells in response to mechanical stretch. Cardiovasc Res 71:548–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.03.022
Kuhl E, Maas R, Himpel G, Menzel A (2007) Computational modeling of arterial wall growth: attempts towards patient-specific simulations based on computer tomography. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 6:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-006-0062-x
L’Heureux N, Pâquet S, Labbé R et al (1998) A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel. FASEB J 12:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1096/fsb2fasebj.12.1.47
L’Heureux N, Dusserre N, Konig G et al (2006) Human tissue-engineered blood vessels for adult arterial revascularization. Nat Med 12:361–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1364
LaFoya B, Munroe JA, Mia MM et al (2016) Notch: a multi-functional integrating system of microenvironmental signals. Dev Biol 418:227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.08.023
Lamers E, Horssen RV, Riet JT et al (2010) The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. Eur Cell Mater 20:329–343. https://doi.org/10.22203/ECM.V020A27
Langer R, Vacanti JP (1993) Tissue engineering. Science 260:920–926. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8493529
Langille LB (1993) Remodeling of developing and mature arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 21:S11–S17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-199321001-00003
Langille BL, Adamson SL (1981) Relationship between blood flow direction and endothelial cell orientation at arterial branch sites in rabbits and mice. Circ Res 48:481–487. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.48.4.481
Latif N, Sarathchandra P, Taylor PM et al (2005) Localization and pattern of expression of extracellular matrix components in human heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 14:218–227
Latif N, Sarathchandra P, Chester AH, Yacoub MH (2015) Expression of smoothmuscle cellmarkers and co-activators in calcified aortic valves. Eur Heart J 36:1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht547
Latorre M, Humphrey JD (2018) A mechanobiologically equilibrated constrained mixture model for growth and remodeling of soft tissues. ZAMM—J Appl Math Mech / Zeitschrift Für Angew Math Und Mech 98:2048–2071. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201700302
Lawson JH, Glickman MH, Ilzecki M et al (2016) Bioengineered human acellular vessels for dialysis access in patients with end-stage renal disease: two phase 2 single-arm trials. Lancet 387:2026–2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00557-2
LeBon L, Lee TV, Sprinzak D et al (2014) Fringe proteins modulate Notch-ligand cis and trans interactions to specify signaling states. Elife 3:e02950. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02950
Leclech C, Villard C (2020) Cellular and subcellular contact guidance on microfabricated substrates. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:1–30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.551505
Lee AY, Mahler N, Best C et al (2014) Regenerative implants for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Transl Res 163:321–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2014.01.014
Leung DY, Glagov S, Mathews MB (1976) Cyclic stretching stimulates synthesis of matrix components by arterial smooth muscle cells in vitro. Science 191:475–477
Levesque MJ, Nerem RM (1985) The elongation and orientation of cultured endothelial cells in response to shear stress. J Biomech Eng 107:341–347. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138567
Levesque MJ, Nerem RM, Sprague EA (1990) Vascular endottielial cell proliferation in culture and the influence of flow. Biomaterials 11:702–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(90)90031-K
Li Z, Kong W (2020) Cellular signaling in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cell Signal 70:109575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2020.109575
Li W, Chen Q, Mills I, Sumpio BE (2003) Involvement of S6 kinase and p38 mitogen activated protein kinase pathways in strain-induced alignment and proliferation of bovine aortic smooth muscle cells. J Cell Physiol 195:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.10230
Li S, Huang NF, Hsu S (2005) Mechanotransduction in endothelial cell migration. J Cell Biochem 96:1110–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.20614
Li R, Baek KI, Chang C-C et al (2019) Mechanosensitive pathways involved in cardiovascular development and homeostasis in Zebrafish. J Vasc Res 56:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501883
Lichtenberg A, Tudorache I, Cebotari S et al (2006) Preclinical testing of tissue-engineered heart valves re-endothelialized under simulated physiological conditions. Circulation 114:I559-1565
Lim WY, Lloyd G, Bhattacharyya S (2017) Mechanical and surgical bioprosthetic valve thrombosis. Heart 103:1934–1941. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311856
Lintas V, Fioretta ES, Motta SE et al (2018) Development of a novel human cell-derived tissue-engineered heart valve for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an in vitro and in vivo feasibility study. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 11:470–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-018-9821-1
Liu XM, Ensenat D, Wang H et al (2003) Physiologic cyclic stretch inhibits apoptosis in vascular endothelium. FEBS Lett 541:52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00285-0
Liu AC, Joag VR, Gotlieb AI (2007a) The emerging role of valve interstitial cell phenotypes in regulating heart valve pathobiology. Am J Pathol 171:1407–1418. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2007.070251
Liu JY, Swartz DD, Peng HF et al (2007b) Functional tissue-engineered blood vessels from bone marrow progenitor cells. Cardiovasc Res 75:618–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.04.018
Liu B, Qu MJ, Qin KR et al (2008) Role of cyclic strain frequency in regulating the alignment of vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Biophys J 94:1497–1507. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.098574
Liu X, Huang X, Chen L et al (2015) Mechanical stretch promotes matrix metalloproteinase-2 and prolyl-4-hydroxylase α1 production in human aortic smooth muscle cells via Akt-p38 MAPK-JNK signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 62:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2015.02.009
Loerakker S, Argento G, Oomens CWJ, Baaijens FPT (2013) Effects of valve geometry and tissue anisotropy on the radial stretch and coaptation area of tissue-engineered heart valves. J Biomech 46:1792–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.015
Loerakker S, Obbink-Huizer C, Baaijens FPT (2014) A physically motivated constitutive model for cell-mediated compaction and collagen remodeling in soft tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13:985–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0549-1
Loerakker S, Ristori T, Baaijens FPT (2016) A computational analysis of cell-mediated compaction and collagen remodeling in tissue-engineered heart valves. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 58:173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.001
Loerakker S, Stassen OMJA, ter Huurne FM et al (2018) Mechanosensitivity of Jagged-Notch signaling can induce a switch-type behavior in vascular homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E3682–E3691. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715277115
Loeys BL, Schwarze U, Holm T et al (2006) Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-β receptor. N Engl J Med 355:788–798. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa055695
MacGrogan D, Münch J, de la Pompa JL (2018) Notch and interacting signalling pathways in cardiac development, disease, and regeneration. Nat Rev Cardiol 15:685–704. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0100-2
Mack JJ, Mosqueiro TS, Archer BJ et al (2017) NOTCH1 is a mechanosensor in adult arteries. Nat Commun 8:1620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01741-8
Mahler GJ, Frendl CM, Cao Q, Butcher JT (2014) Effects of shear stress pattern and magnitude on mesenchymal transformation and invasion of aortic valve endothelial cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:2326–2337. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25291
Mann BK, Schmedlen RH, West JL (2001) Tethered-TGF-β increases extracellular matrix production of vascular smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 22:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00196-4
Marino M, Pontrelli G, Vairo G, Wriggers P (2017) A chemo-mechano-biological formulation for the effects of biochemical alterations on arterial mechanics: the role of molecular transport and multiscale tissue remodelling. J R Soc Interface 14:20170615. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0615
Maron BJ, Hutchins GM (1974) The development of the semilunar valves in the human heart. Am J Pathol 74:331–340
Marosfoi M, Langan ET, Strittmatter L et al (2017) In situ tissue engineering: endothelial growth patterns as a function of flow diverter design. J Neurointerv Surg 9:994–998. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012669
Martin-Garrido A, Williams HC, Lee M et al (2013) Transforming growth factor β inhibits platelet derived growth factor-induced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via akt-independent, smad-mediated cyclin D1 downregulation. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079657
Mata-Greenwood E, Meyrick B, Steinhorn RH et al (2003) Alterations in TGF-β1 expression in lambs with increased pulmonary blood flow and pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol—Lung Cell Mol Physiol 285:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00171.2002
Mata-Greenwood E, Grobe A, Kumar S et al (2005) Cyclic stretch increases VEGF expression in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells via TGF-β1 and reactive oxygen species: a requirement for NAD(P)H oxidase. Am J Physiol—Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289:288–298. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00417.2004
Mazine A, El-Hamamsy I, Verma S et al (2018) Ross procedure in adults for cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 72:2761–2777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2200
McAllister TN, Maruszewski M, Garrido SA et al (2009) Effectiveness of haemodialysis access with an autologous tissue-engineered vascular graft: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet 373:1440–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60248-8
McNichols B, Spratt JR, George J et al (2021) Coronary artery bypass: review of surgical techniques and impact on long-term revascularization outcomes. Cardiol Ther. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00211-z
Meza D, Abejar L, Rubenstein DA, Yin W (2016) A Shearing-stretching device that can apply physiological fluid shear stress and cyclic stretch concurrently to endothelial cells. J Biomech Eng 138:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032550
Michaelis UR (2014) Mechanisms of endothelial cell migration. Cell Mol Life Sci 71:4131–4148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1678-0
Miller KS, Khosravi R, Breuer CK, Humphrey JD (2015) A hypothesis-driven parametric study of effects of polymeric scaffold properties on tissue engineered neovessel formation. Acta Biomater 11:283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.046
Miller JR, Henn MC, Lancaster TS et al (2016) Pulmonary valve replacement with small intestine submucosa-extracellular matrix in a porcine model. World J Pediatr Congenit Hear Surg 7:475–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135116651113
Miragoli M, Yacoub MH, El-Hamamsy I et al (2014) Side-specific mechanical properties of valve endothelial cells. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol 307:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00228.2013
Mirensky TL, Nelson GN, Brennan MP et al (2009) Tissue-engineered arterial grafts: long-term results after implantation in a small animal model. J Pediatr Surg 44:1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.035
Misfeld M, Sievers HH (2007) Heart valve macro- and microstructure. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362:1421–1436. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2125
Miyazaki Y, Soliman O, Abdelghani M et al (2017) Acute performance of a novel restorative transcatheter aortic valve: preclinical results. EuroIntervention 13:e1410–e1417. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00554
Model LS, Hall MR, Wong DJ et al (2014) Arterial shear stress reduces Eph-B4 expression in adult human veins. Yale J Biol Med 87:359–371
Mohamied Y, Rowland EM, Bailey EL et al (2015) Change of direction in the biomechanics of atherosclerosis. Ann Biomed Eng 43:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1095-4
Mol A, Smits AI, Bouten CVC, Baaijens FPT (2009) Tissue engineering of heart valves: advances and current challenges. Expert Rev Med Devices 6:259–275. https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.09.12
Mongkoldhumrongkul N, Latif N, Yacoub MH, Chester AH (2018) Effect of side-specific valvular shear stress on the content of extracellular matrix in aortic valves. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 9:151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-016-0280-z
Moretti M, Prina-Mello A, Reid AJ, Barron V, Prendergast PJ (2004) Prendergast Endothelial cell alignment on cyclically-stretched silicone surfaces. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 15(10):1159–1164. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000046400.18607.72
Morisaki N, Kawano M, Koyama N et al (1991) Effects of transforming growth factor-β1 on growth of aortic smooth muscle cells Influences of interaction with growth factors, cell state, cell phenotype, and cell cycle. Atherosclerosis 88:227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(91)90085-H
Morrow D, Sweeney C, Birney YA et al (2005) Cyclic strain inhibits notch receptor signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Circ Res 96:567–575. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000159182.98874.43
Morrow D, Cullen JP, Cahill PA, Redmond EM (2007) Cyclic strain regulates the Notch/CBF-1 signaling pathway in endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27:1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.142778
Motta SE, Fioretta ES, Dijkman PE et al (2018) Development of an off-the-shelf tissue-engineered sinus valve for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement: a proof-of-concept study. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 11:182–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-018-9800-6
Motta SE, Lintas V, Fioretta ES et al (2019) Human cell-derived tissue-engineered heart valve with integrated Valsalva sinuses: towards native-like transcatheter pulmonary valve replacements. npj Regen Med 4:14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-019-0077-4
Mulberry N, Edelstein-Keshet L (2020) Self-organized multicellular structures from simple cell signaling: a computational model. Phys Biol 17:066003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/abb2dc
Nakajima Y, Yamagishi T, Hokari S, Nakamura H (2000) Mechanisms involved in valvuloseptal endocardial cushion formation in early cardiogenesis: roles of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). Anat Rec 258:119–127
Nandagopal N, Santat LA, Elowitz MB (2019) Cis-activation in the Notch signaling pathway. Elife 8:1–34. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37880
Nappi F, Avtaar Singh SS, Acar C (2020) Biomechanical future of the growing pulmonary autograft in Ross operation. Transl Pediatr 9:137–143. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2020.03.02
Nappi F, Spadaccio C, Acar C, El-Hamamsy I (2020b) Lights and shadows on the ross procedure: biological solutions for biological problems. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 32:815–822. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.04.006
Negishi M, Lu D, Zhang YQ et al (2001) Upregulatory expression of furin and transforming growth factor-β by fluid shear stress in vascular endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21:785–790. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.21.5.785
Neidert MR, Tranquillo RT (2006) Tissue-engineered valves with commissural alignment. Tissue Eng 12:891–903. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.891
Nerem RM (2000) Tissue engineering a blood vessel substitute: the role of biomechanics. Yonsei Med J 41:735–739
Nerem RM, Levesque MJ, Cornhill JF (1981) Vascular endothelial morphology as an indicator of the pattern of blood flow. J Biomech Eng 103:172–176. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138275
Nicklas D, Saiz L (2013) Computational modelling of Smad-mediated negative feedback and crosstalk in the TGF-β superfamily network. J R Soc Interface 10:20130363. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0363
Nieponice A, Soletti L, Guan J et al (2010) In Vivo assessment of a tissue-engineered vascular graft combining a biodegradable elastomeric scaffold and muscle-derived stem cells in a rat model. Tissue Eng—Part A 16:1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0427
Niethamer TK, Bush JO (2019) Getting direction(s): the Eph/ephrin signaling system in cell positioning. Dev Biol 447:42–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.01.012
Niklason LE, Lawson JH (2020) Bioengineered human blood vessels. Science 370:eaaw8682. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw8682
Niklason LE, Gao J, Abbott WM et al (1999) Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science 284:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5413.489
O’Callaghan CJ, Williams B (2000) Mechanical strain-induced extracellular matrix production by human vascular smooth muscle cells: role of TGF-β1. Hypertension 36:319–324
O’Connell MK, Murthy S, Phan S et al (2008) The three-dimensional micro- and nanostructure of the aortic medial lamellar unit measured using 3D confocal and electron microscopy imaging. Matrix Biol 27:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2007.10.008
Ohno M, Cooke JP, Dzau VJ, Gibbons GH (1995) Fluid shear stress induces endothelial transforming growth factor Beta-1 transcription and production: modulation by potassium channel blockade. J Clin Invest 95:1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117787
Olausson M, Patil PB, Kuna VK et al (2012) Transplantation of an allogeneic vein bioengineered with autologous stem cells: a proof-of-concept study. Lancet 380:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60633-3
Olausson M, Kuna VK, Travnikova G et al (2014) In vivo application of tissue-engineered veins using autologous peripheral whole blood: a proof of concept study. EBioMedicine 1:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2014.09.001
Oshima M, Oshima H, Taketo MM (1996) TGF-β receptor type II deficiency results in defects of yolk sac hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Dev Biol 179:297–302. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1996.0259
Owens GK, Geisterfer AAT, Wei-Hwa Yang Y, Komoriya A (1988) Transforming growth factor-β-induced growth inhibition and cellular hypertrophy in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol 107:771–780. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.107.2.771
Owens GK, Kumar MS, Wamhoff BR (2004) Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev 84:767–801. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00041.2003
Pashneh-Tala S, MacNeil S, Claeyssens F (2016) The tissue-engineered vascular graft—past, present, and future. Tissue Eng—Part B Rev 22:68–100. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0100
Petrovic J, Formosa-Jordan P, Luna-Escalante JC et al (2014) Ligand-dependent Notch signaling strength orchestrates lateral induction and lateral inhibition in the developing inner ear. Development 141:2313–2324. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.108100
Phng L-K, Gerhardt H (2009) Angiogenesis: a team effort coordinated by notch. Dev Cell 16:196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.015
Polacheck WJ, Kutys ML, Yang J et al (2017) A non-canonical Notch complex regulates adherens junctions and vascular barrier function. Nature 552:258–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24998
Ponzi D, Flinn MV, Muehlenbein MP, Nepomnaschy PA (2020) Hormones and human developmental plasticity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 505:110721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2020.110721
Putti M, de Jong SMJ, Stassen OMJA et al (2019a) A supramolecular platform for the introduction of fc-fusion bioactive proteins on biomaterial surfaces. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1:2044–2054. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00334
Putti M, Stassen OMJA, Schotman MJG et al (2019b) Influence of the assembly state on the functionality of a supramolecular jagged1-mimicking peptide additive. ACS Omega 4:8178–8187. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00869
Qi YX, Jiang J, Jiang XH et al (2011) PDGF-BB and TGF-β1 on cross-talk between endothelial and smooth muscle cells in vascular remodeling induced by low shear stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:1908–1913. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019219108
Rabkin-Aikawa E, Farber M, Aikawa M, Schoen FJ (2004) Dynamic and reversible changes of interstitial cell phenotype during remodeling of cardiac valves. J Hear Valve Dis 13:841–847
Rachev A, Gleason RL (2011) Theoretical study on the effects of pressure-induced remodeling on geometry and mechanical non-homogeneity of conduit arteries. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-010-0219-5
Ramsauer M, D’Amore PA (2007) Contextual role for angiopoietins and TGFβ1 in blood vessel stabilization. J Cell Sci 120:1810–1817. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.003533
Ray A, Lee O, Win Z et al (2017) Anisotropic forces from spatially constrained focal adhesions mediate contact guidance directed cell migration. Nat Commun 81(8):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14923
Reimer J, Syedain Z, Haynie B et al (2017) Implantation of a tissue-engineered tubular heart valve in growing lambs. Ann Biomed Eng 45:439–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1605-7
Reusch P, Wagdy H, Reusch R et al (1996) Mechanical strain increases smooth muscle and decreases nonmuscle myosin expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 79:1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.79.5.1046
Riahi R, Sun J, Wang S et al (2015) Notch1–Dll4 signalling and mechanical force regulate leader cell formation during collective cell migration. Nat Commun 6:6556. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7556
Ristori T, Obbink-Huizer C, Oomens CWJ et al (2016) Efficient computational simulation of actin stress fiber remodeling. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 19:1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2016.1140748
Ristori T, Bouten CVC, Baaijens FPT, Loerakker S (2018a) Predicting and understanding collagen remodeling in human native heart valves during early development. Acta Biomater 80:203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.040
Ristori T, Notermans TMW, Foolen J et al (2018b) Modelling the combined effects of collagen and cyclic strain on cellular orientation in collagenous tissues. Sci Rep 8:8518. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26989-y
Ristori T, Stassen OMJA, Sahlgren CM, Loerakker S (2020) Lateral induction limits the impact of cell connectivity on Notch signaling in arterial walls. Int j Numer Method Biomed Eng 36:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3323
Rodriguez EK, Hoger A, McCulloch AD (1994) Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues. J Biomech 27:455–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)90021-3
Rodríguez AI, Csányi G, Ranayhossaini DJ et al (2015) MEF2B-Nox1 signaling is critical for stretch-induced phenotypic modulation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 35:430–438. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304936
Roh JD, Sawh-Martinez R, Brennan MP et al (2010) Tissue-engineered vascular grafts transform into mature blood vessels via an inflammation-mediated process of vascular remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:4669–4674. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911465107
Rohani N, Canty L, Luu O et al (2011) EphrinB/EphB signaling controls embryonic germ layer separation by contact-induced cell detachment. PLoS Biol 9:e1000597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000597
Rohani N, Parmeggiani A, Winklbauer R, Fagotto F (2014) Variable combinations of specific ephrin ligand/eph receptor pairs control embryonic tissue separation. PLoS Biol 12:e1001955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001955
Rostama B, Peterson SM, Vary CPH, Liaw L (2014) Notch signal integration in the vasculature during remodeling. Vascul Pharmacol 63:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2014.10.003
Roux E, Bougaran P, Dufourcq P, Couffinhal T (2020) Fluid shear stress sensing by the endothelial layer. Front Physiol 11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00861
Row S, Peng H, Schlaich EM et al (2015) Arterial grafts exhibiting unprecedented cellular infiltration and remodeling in vivo: the role of cells in the vascular wall. Biomaterials 50:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.045
Rutkovskiy A, Malashicheva A, Sullivan G et al (2017) Valve interstitial cells: the key to understanding the pathophysiology of heart valve calcification. J Am Heart Assoc 6:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006339
Sacks MS, David Merryman W, Schmidt DE (2009) On the biomechanics of heart valve function. J Biomech 42:1804–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.015
Sacks MS, Drach A, Lee CH et al (2019) On the simulation of mitral valve function in health, disease, and treatment. J Biomech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043552
Sarkar S, Salacinski HJ, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM (2006) The mechanical properties of infrainguinal vascular bypass grafts: their role in influencing patency. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31:627–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.01.006
Sauren AAHJ, Kuijpers W, van Steenhoven AA, Veldpaus FE (1980) Aortic valve histology and its relation with mechanics-Preliminary report. J Biomech 13:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(80)90183-9
Schenke-Layland K, Opitz F, Gross M et al (2003) Complete dynamic repopulation of decellularized heart valves by application of defined physical signals—an in vitro study. Cardiovasc Res 60:497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.09.002
Schmidt D, Dijkman PE, Driessen-Mol A et al (2010) Minimally-invasive implantation of living tissue engineered heart valves: a comprehensive approach from autologous vascular cells to stem cells. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.024
Schmierer B, Hill CS (2007) TGFβ-SMAD signal transduction: molecular specificity and functional flexibility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:970–982. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2297
Schoen FJ (2008) Evolving concepts of cardiac valve dynamics: the continuum of development, functional structure, pathobiology, and tissue engineering. Circulation 118:1864–1880. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.805911
Schoen FJ, Levy RJ (1999) Tissue heart valves: current challenges and future research perspectives. J Biomed Mater Res 47:439–465
Schulick AH, Taylor AJ, Zuo W et al (1998) Overexpression of transforming growth factor β1 in arterial endothelium causes hyperplasia, apoptosis, and cartilaginous metaplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:6983–6988. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.12.6983
Schutte SC, Chen Z, Brockbank KGM, Nerem RM (2010) Cyclic strain improves strength and function of a collagen-based tissue-engineered vascular media. Tissue Eng—Part A 16:3149–3157. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0009
Schwartz SM, Majesky MW, Murry CE (1995) The intima: development and monoclonal responses to injury. Atherosclerosis 118:S125–S140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(95)90080-2
Seay U, Sedding D, Krick S et al (2005) Transforming growth factor-β-dependent growth inhibition in primary vascular smooth muscle cells is p38-dependent. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 315:1005–1012. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.105.091249
Seliktar D, Black RA, Vito RP, Nerem RM (2000) Dynamic mechanical conditioning of collagen-gel blood vessel constructs induces remodeling in vitro. Ann Biomed Eng 28:351–362. https://doi.org/10.1114/1.275
Seo KW, Lee SJ, Kim YH et al (2013) Mechanical stretch increases MMP-2 production in vascular smooth muscle cells via activation of PDGFR-β/Akt signaling pathway. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070437
Shaya O, Binshtok U, Hersch M et al (2017) Cell-cell contact area affects notch signaling and notch-dependent patterning. Dev Cell 40:505-511.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.009
Shi Y, Massagué J (2003) Mechanisms of TGF-β signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113:685–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00432-X
Shi Z-D, Tarbell JM (2011) Fluid flow mechanotransduction in vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. Ann Biomed Eng 39:1608–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0309-2
Shinoka T, Breuer CK, Tanel RE et al (1995) Heart valves: valve in a lamb model leaflet. Ann Thorac Surg 60:S513–S516
Shinoka T, Shum-Tim D, Ma PX et al (1998) Creation of viable pulmonary artery autografts through tissue engineering. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:536–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70315-0
Shinoka T, Matsumura G, Hibino N et al (2005) Midterm clinical result of tissue-engineered vascular autografts seeded with autologous bone marrow cells. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.12.047
Shoji T, Shinoka T (2018) Tissue engineered vascular grafts for pediatric cardiac surgery. Transl Pediatr 7:188–195. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2018.02.01
Simon P, Kasimir MT, Seebacher G et al (2003) Early failure of the tissue engineered porcine heart valve SYNERGRAFTTM in pediatric patients. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 23:1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00094-0
Sinha R, Le Gac S, Verdonschot N et al (2016) Endothelial cell alignment as a result of anisotropic strain and flow induced shear stress combinations. Sci Rep 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29510
Sjöqvist M, Andersson ER (2019) Do as I say, Not(ch) as I do: lateral control of cell fate. Dev Biol 447:58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.09.032
Skalak R (1981) Growth as a finite displacement field. In: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Finite Elasticity. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 347–355
Skalak R, Dasgupta G, Moss M et al (1982) Analytical description of growth. J Theor Biol 94:555–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(82)90301-0
Soares ALF, Oomens CWJ, Baaijens FPT (2014) A computational model to describe the collagen orientation in statically cultured engineered tissues. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 17:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2012.680192
Sodian R, Hoerstrup SP, Sperling JS et al (2000a) Early in vivo experience with tissue-engineered trileaflet heart valves. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-22
Sodian R, Hoerstrup SP, Sperling JS et al (2000b) Tissue engineering of heart valves: in vitro experiences. Ann Thorac Surg 70:140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01255-8
Sodian R, Schaefermeier P, Abegg-Zips S et al (2010) Use of human umbilical cord blood-derived progenitor cells for tissue-engineered heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg 89:819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.11.058
Soletti L, Hong Y, Guan J et al (2010) A bilayered elastomeric scaffold for tissue engineering of small diameter vascular grafts. Acta Biomater 6:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.026
Soliman O, Miyazaki Y, Abdelghani M et al (2017) Midterm performance of a novel restorative pulmonary valved conduit: preclinical results. EuroIntervention 13:e1418–e1427. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00553
Song RH, Kocharyan HK, Fortunato JE et al (2000) Increased flow and shear stress enhance in vivo transforming growth factor-β1 after experimental arterial injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:923–930. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.20.4.923
Song JT, Hu B, Qu HY et al (2012a) Mechanical stretch modulates MicroRNA 21 expression, participating in proliferation and apoptosis in cultured human aortic smooth muscle cells. PLoS ONE 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047657
Song L, Duan P, Guo P et al (2012b) Downregulation of miR-223 and miR-153 mediates mechanical stretch-stimulated proliferation of venous smooth muscle cells via activation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. Arch Biochem Biophys 528:204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2012.08.015
Sorescu GP, Sykes M, Weiss D et al (2003) Bone morphogenic protein 4 produced in endothelial cells by oscillatory shear stress stimulates an inflammatory response. J Biol Chem 278:31128–31135. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300703200
Sotoudeh M, Li YS, Yajima N et al (2002) Induction of apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells by mechanical stretch. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol 282:1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00744.2001
Souilhol C, Serbanovic-Canic J, Fragiadaki M et al (2020) Endothelial responses to shear stress in atherosclerosis: a novel role for developmental genes. Nat Rev Cardiol 17:52–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-019-0239-5
Sprinzak D, Lakhanpal A, LeBon L et al (2010) Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature 465:86–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08959
Sprinzak D, Lakhanpal A, LeBon L et al (2011) Mutual inactivation of notch receptors and ligands facilitates developmental patterning. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002069
Standley PR, Obards TJ, Martina CL (1999) Cyclic stretch regulates autocrine IGF-I in vascular smooth muscle cells: Implications in vascular hyperplasia. Am J Physiol 276:697–705. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1999.276.4.e697
Standley PR, Camaratta A, Nolan BP et al (2002) Cyclic stretch induces vascular smooth muscle cell alignment via NO signaling. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol 283:1907–1914. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01043.2001
Stanley AG, Patel H, Knight AL, Williams B (2000) Mechanical strain-induced human vascular matrix synthesis: the role of angiotensin II. JRAAS J Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst 1:32–35. https://doi.org/10.3317/jraas.2000.007
Stassen OMJA, Ristori T, Sahlgren CM (2020) Notch in mechanotransduction—from molecular mechanosensitivity to tissue mechanostasis. J Cell Sci 133:jcs250738. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.250738
Steinhoff G, Stock U, Karim N et al (2000) Tissue engineering of pulmonary heart valves on allogenic acellular matrix conduits: in vivo restoration of valve tissue. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-50
Stenmark KR, Yeager ME, El Kasmi KC et al (2013) The adventitia: essential regulator of vascular wall structure and function. Annu Rev Physiol 75:23–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183802
Stock UA, Nagashima M, Khalil PN et al (2000) Tissue-engineered valved conduits in the pulmonary circulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:732–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70008-0
Stouffer GA, Owens GK (1994) TGF-β promotes proliferation of cultured SMC via both PDGF-AA-dependent and PDGF-AA-independent mechanisms. J Clin Invest 93:2048–2055. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117199
Su BY, Shontz KM, Flavahan NA, Nowicki PT (2006) The effect of phenotype on mechanical stretch-induced vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis. J Vasc Res 43:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091102
Sucosky P, Balachandran K, Elhammali A et al (2009) Altered shear stress stimulates upregulation of endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in a BMP-4- and TGF-β1-dependent pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29:254–260. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.176347
Sugiura T, Tara S, Nakayama H et al (2016) Novel bioresorbable vascular graft with sponge-type scaffold as a small-diameter arterial graft. Ann Thorac Surg 102:720–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.110
Sugiura T, Tara S, Nakayama H et al (2017) Fast-degrading bioresorbable arterial vascular graft with high cellular infiltration inhibits calcification of the graft. J Vasc Surg 66:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.096
Sumpio BE, Banes AJ (1988) Response of porcine aortic smooth muscle cells to cyclic tensional deformation in culture. J Surg Res 44:696–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4804(88)90103-5
Sumpio BE, Banes AJ, Levin LG, Johnson G (1987) Mechanical stress stimulates aortic endothelial cells to proliferate. J Vasc Surg 6:252–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(87)90037-1
Sumpio BE, Banes AJ, Buckley M, Johnson G (1988a) Alterations in aortic endothelial cell morphology and cytoskeletal protein synthesis during cyclic tensional deformation. J Vasc Surg 7:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(88)90386-2
Sumpio BE, Banes AJ, Link WG, Johnson G (1988b) Enhanced collagen production by smooth muscle cells during repetitive mechanical stretching. Arch Surg 123:1233–1236. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400340059010
Sutherland FWH, Perry TE, Yu Y et al (2005) From stem cells to viable autologous semilunar heart valve. Circulation 111:2783–2791. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.498378
Suwanabol PA, Seedial SM, Shi X et al (2012) Transforming growth factor-β increases vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation through the Smad3 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinases pathways. J Vasc Surg 56:446-454.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.038
Swartz DD, Russell JA, Andreadis ST (2005) Engineering of fibrin-based functional and implantable small-diameter blood vessels. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol 288:1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00479.2004
Syedain Z, Reimer J, Schmidt J et al (2015) 6-Month aortic valve implantation of an off-the-shelf tissue-engineered valve in sheep. Biomaterials 73:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.016
Syedain Z, Reimer J, Lahti M et al (2016) Tissue engineering of acellular vascular grafts capable of somatic growth in young lambs. Nat Commun 7:12951. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12951
Szafron JM, Breuer CK, Wang Y, Humphrey JD (2017) Stress analysis-driven design of bilayered scaffolds for tissue-engineered vascular grafts. J Biomech Eng 139:121008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037856
Szafron JM, Khosravi R, Reinhardt J et al (2018) Immuno-driven and mechano-mediated neotissue formation in tissue engineered vascular grafts. Ann Biomed Eng 46:1938–1950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2086-7
Szafron JM, Ramachandra AB, Breuer CK et al (2019) Optimization of tissue-engineered vascular graft design using computational modeling. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 25:561–570. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0086
Taber LA (2001) Biomechanics of cardiovascular development. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 3:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.1
Taber LA, Humphrey JD (2001) Stress-modulated growth, residual stress, and vascular heterogeneity. J Biomech Eng 123:528–535. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1412451
Tada S, Tarbell JM (2000) Interstitial flow through the internal elastic lamina affects shear stress on arterial smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Circ Physiol 278:H1589–H1597. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.5.H1589
Tada S, Tarbell JM (2002) Flow through internal elastic lamina affects shear stress on smooth muscle cells (3D simulations). Am J Physiol Circ Physiol 282:H576–H584. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00751.2001
Talacua H, Smits AIPM, Muylaert DEP et al (2015) In situ tissue engineering of functional small-diameter blood vessels by host circulating cells only. Tissue Eng Part A 21:2583–2594. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0066
Tallquist MD, Soriano P, Klinghoffer RA (1999) Growth factor signaling pathways in vascular development. Oncogene 18:7917–7932. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203216
Tamiello C, Buskermolen ABC, Baaijens FPT et al (2016) Heading in the right direction : understanding cellular orientation responses to complex biophysical environments. Cell Mol Bioeng 9:12–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-015-0422-7
Tang Y, Urs S, Boucher J et al (2010) Notch and transforming growth factor-β(TGFβ) signaling pathways cooperatively regulate vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation. J Biol Chem 285:17556–17563. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.076414
Tara S, Kurobe H, Maxfield MW et al (2015) Evaluation of remodeling process in small-diameter cell-free tissue-engineered arterial graft. J Vasc Surg 62:734–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.011
Tarbell JM, Weinbaum S, Kamm RD (2005) Cellular fluid mechanics and mechanotransduction. Ann Biomed Eng 33:1719–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-8775-z
Tarrahi I, Colombo M, Hartman EMJ et al (2020) Impact of bioresorbable scaffold design characteristics on local haemodynamic forces: an ex vivo assessment with computational fluid dynamics simulations. EuroIntervention 16:e930–e937. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00657
Taylor HB, Khuong A, Wu Z et al (2017) Cell segregation and border sharpening by Eph receptor–ephrin-mediated heterotypic repulsion. J R Soc Interface 14:20170338. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0338
Theodoridis K, Tudorache I, Calistru A et al (2015) Successful matrix guided tissue regeneration of decellularized pulmonary heart valve allografts in elderly sheep. Biomaterials 52:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.023
Thoumine O, Nerem R, Girard P (1995a) Changes in organization and composition of the extracellular matrix underlying cultured endothelial cells exposed to laminar steady shear stress - PubMed. Lab Invest 73:565–576
Thoumine O, Nerem RM, Girard FR (1995b) Oscillatory shear stress and hydrostatic pressure modulate cell-matrix attachment proteins in cultured endothelial cells. Vitr Cell Dev Biol—Anim 31:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02631337
Tillman BW, Yazdani SK, Neff LP et al (2012) Bioengineered vascular access maintains structural integrity in response to arteriovenous flow and repeated needle puncture. J Vasc Surg 56:783–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.030
Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale CP et al (2020) European society of cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2019. Eur Heart J 41:12–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz859
Tock J, Van Putten V, Stenmark KR, Nemenoff RA (2003) Induction of SM-α-actin expression by mechanical strain in adult vascular smooth muscle cells is mediated through activation of JNK and p38 MAP kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 301:1116–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00087-1
Topper JN, Cai J, Falb D, Gimbrone MA (1996) Identification of vascular endothelial genes differentially responsive to fluid mechanical stimuli: cyclooxygenase-2, manganese superoxide dismutase, and endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase are selectively up-regulated by steady laminar shear stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:10417–10422. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.19.10417
Tóth B, Ben-Moshe S, Gavish A et al (2017) Early commitment and robust differentiation in colonic crypts. Mol Syst Biol 13:902. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20167283
Tremblay C, Ruel J, Bourget JM et al (2014) A new construction technique for tissue-engineered heart valves using the self-assembly method. Tissue Eng—Part C Methods 20:905–915. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0698
Tu J, Li Y, Hu Z (2014) Notch1 and 4 signaling responds to an increasing vascular wall shear stress in a rat model of arteriovenous malformations. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/368082
Tudorache I, Theodoridis K, Baraki H et al (2016) Decellularized aortic allografts versus pulmonary autografts for aortic valve replacement in the growing sheep model: haemodynamic and morphological results at 20 months after implantation. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 49:1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv362
Upchurch GR, Loscalzo J, Banes AJ (1997) Changes in the amplitude of cyclic lead biphasically modulate endothelial cell DNA synthesis and division. Vasc Med 2:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X9700200104
Valentín A, Humphrey JD (2009) Evaluation of fundamental hypotheses underlying constrained mixture models of arterial growth and remodelling. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 367:3585–3606. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0113
Valentín A, Cardamone L, Baek S, Humphrey J (2009) Complementary vasoactivity and matrix remodelling in arterial adaptations to altered flow and pressure. J R Soc Interface 6:293–306. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0254
Valentín A, Humphrey JD, Holzapfel GA (2011) A multi-layered computational model of coupled elastin degradation, vasoactive dysfunction, and collagenous stiffening in aortic aging. Ann Biomed Eng 39:2027–2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0287-4
Van De Laar IMBH, Oldenburg RA, Pals G et al (2011) Mutations in SMAD3 cause a syndromic form of aortic aneurysms and dissections with early-onset osteoarthritis. Nat Genet 43:121–126
van Engeland NCA, Suarez Rodriguez F, Rivero-Müller A et al (2019) Vimentin regulates Notch signaling strength and arterial remodeling in response to hemodynamic stress. Sci Rep 9:12415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48218-w
van Haaften E, Bouten C, Kurniawan N (2017) Vascular mechanobiology: towards control of in situ regeneration. Cells 6:19. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells6030019
van Rijswijk JW, Talacua H, Mulder K et al (2020) Failure of decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosa as a heart valved conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 160:e201–e215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.164
Vasilopoulos G, Painter KJ (2016) Pattern formation in discrete cell tissues under long range filopodia-based direct cell to cell contact. Math Biosci 273:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2015.12.008
Vega R, Carretero M, Travasso RDM, Bonilla LL (2020) Notch signaling and taxis mechanisms regulate early stage angiogenesis: a mathematical and computational model. PLOS Comput Biol 16:e1006919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006919
Vesely I (1997) The role of elastin in aortic valve mechanics. J Biomech 31:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00122-X
Vesely I (1998) The role of elastin in aortic valve mechanics. J Biomech 31:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00122-X
Vesely I, Noseworthy R (1992) Micromechanics of the fibrosa and the ventricularis in aortic valve leaflets. J Biomech. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(92)90249-Z
Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ et al (2020) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation 141:E139–E596. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757
Visser VL, Zaytseva P, Motta SE et al (2021) Computational modelling to reduce outcome variability in tissue-engineered heart valves. Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab034
Vizan P, Miller DSJ, Gori I et al (2013) Controlling long-term signaling: receptor dynamics determine attenuation and refractory behavior of the tgf- pathway. Sci Signal 6:ra106–ra106. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2004416
Walker GA, Masters KS, Shah DN et al (2004) Valvular myofibroblast activation by transforming growth factor-β: Implications for pathological extracellular matrix remodeling in heart valve disease. Circ Res 95:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000136520.07995.aa
Walshe TE, Dela Paz NG, D’Amore PA (2013) The role of shear-induced transforming growth factor-β signaling in the endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 33:2608–2617. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302161
Wan XJ, Zhao HC, Zhang P et al (2015) Involvement of BK channel in differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells induced by mechanical stretch. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 59:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2014.11.011
Wang JH, Goldschmidt-Clermont P, Wille J, Yin FC (2001) Specificity of endothelial cell reorientation in response to cyclic mechanical stretching. J Biomech 34(12):1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00150-6
Wang X-L, Fu A, Raghavakaimal S, Lee H-C (2007) Proteomic analysis of vascular endothelial cells in response to laminar shear stress. Proteomics 7:588–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600568
Wang L, Wang C, Wu S et al (2020) Influence of the mechanical properties of biomaterials on degradability, cell behaviors and signaling pathways: current progress and challenges. Biomater Sci 8:2714–2733. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00269k
Watanabe M, Shin’oka T, Tohyama S et al (2001) Tissue-engineered vascular autograft: inferior vena cava replacement in a dog model. Tissue Eng 7:429–439. https://doi.org/10.1089/10763270152436481
Weber B, Scherman J, Emmert MY et al (2011) Injectable living marrow stromal cell-based autologous tissue engineered heart valves: first experiences with a one-step intervention in primates. Eur Heart J 32:2830–2840. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr059
Weber B, Emmert MY, Behr L et al (2012) Prenatally engineered autologous amniotic fluid stem cell-based heart valves in the fetal circulation. Biomaterials 33:4031–4043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.087
Weber B, Dijkman PE, Scherman J et al (2013) Off-the-shelf human decellularized tissue-engineered heart valves in a non-human primate model. Biomaterials 34:7269–7280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.059
Wechezak A, Viggers R, Sauvage L (1985) Fibronectin and F-actin redistribution in cultured endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. Lab Invest 53:639–647
Weinbaum S, Tarbell JM, Damiano ER (2007) The structure and function of the endothelial glycocalyx layer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9:121–167. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151959
Welke KF, Wu YX, Grunkemeier GL et al (2011) Long-term results after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve implantation, with attention to the impact of age. Heart Surg Forum 14:E160–E165. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20101140
Wen F, Wong HK, Tay CY et al (2014) Induction of myogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells cultured on notch agonist (jagged-1) modified biodegradable scaffold surface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1652–1661. https://doi.org/10.1021/am4045635
Wernig F, Mayr M, Xu Q (2003) Mechanical stretch-induced apoptosis in smooth muscle cells is mediated by β1-integrin signaling pathways. Hypertension 41:903–911. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000062882.42265.88
Wilson E, Mai Q, Sudhir K et al (1993) Mechanical strain induces growth of vascular smooth muscle cells via autocrine action of PDGF. J Cell Biol 123:741–747. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.123.3.741
Wissing TB, Bonito V, Bouten CVC, Smits AIPM (2017) Biomaterial-driven in situ cardiovascular tissue engineering—a multi-disciplinary perspective. npj Regen Med 2:18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-017-0023-2
Wolinsky H, Glagov S (1967) Nature of species differences in the medial distribution of aortic vasa vasorum in mammals. Circ Res 20:409–421. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.20.4.409
Wolkers WF, Hilfiker A (2021) Freeze-drying of decellularized heart valves for off-the-shelf availability. In: Wolkers WF, Oldenhof H (eds) Cryopreservation and freeze-drying protocols. methods in molecular biology, vol 218. Humana, New York, pp 731–739
Wong SY, Chiam K-H, Lim CT, Matsudaira P (2010) Computational model of cell positioning: directed and collective migration in the intestinal crypt epithelium. J R Soc Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0018.focus
Woodell JE, LaBerge M, Langan EM, Hilderman RH (2003) In vitro strain-induced endothelial cell dysfunction determined by DNA synthesis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 217:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1243/095441103762597692
Wu Z, Luo H, Thorin E et al (2012) Possible role of Efnb1 protein, a ligand of eph receptor tyrosine kinases, in modulating blood pressure. J Biol Chem 287:15557–15569. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.340869
Wu Y-L, Szafron JM, Blum KM et al (2020) Electrospun tissue-engineered arterial graft thickness affects long-term composition and mechanics. Tissue Eng Part A 00:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0166
Wystrychowski W, McAllister TN, Zagalski K et al (2014) First human use of an allogeneic tissue-engineered vascular graft for hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 60:1353–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.018
Xu Q, Mellitzer G, Robinson V, Wilkinson DG (1999) In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 399:267–271. https://doi.org/10.1038/20452
Xue C, Zhang T, Xie X et al (2017) Substrate stiffness regulates arterial-venous differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells via the Ras/Mek pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Cell Res 1864:1799–1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.07.006
Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S et al (1988) A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature 332:411–415. https://doi.org/10.1038/332411a0
Yang X, Wei J, Lei D et al (2016) Appropriate density of PCL nano-fiber sheath promoted muscular remodeling of PGS/PCL grafts in arterial circulation. Biomaterials 88:34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.026
Yao QP, Zhang P, Qi YX et al (2014) The role of SIRT6 in the differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells in response to cyclic strain. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 49:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2014.01.016
Yoshigi M, Clark EB, Yost HJ (2003) Quantification of stretch-induced cytoskeletal remodeling in vascular endothelial cells by image processing. Cytometry 55A(2):109–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.10076
Zafar F, Hinton RB, Moore RA et al (2015) Physiological growth, remodeling potential, and preserved function of a novel bioprosthetic tricuspid valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:877–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1091
Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Bharadvaj BK et al (1983) Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circ Res 53:502–514. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.53.4.502
Zhao S, Suciu A, Ziegler T et al (1995) Synergistic effects of fluid shear stress and cyclic circumferential stretch on vascular endothelial cell morphology and cytoskeleton. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 15:1781–1786. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.15.10.1781
Zhou J, Lee PL, Tsai CS et al (2012) Force-specific activation of Smad1/5 regulates vascular endothelial cell cycle progression in response to disturbed flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:7770–7775. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205476109
Zhou J, Lee PL, Lee CI et al (2013) BMP receptor-integrin interaction mediates responses of vascular endothelial Smad1/5 and proliferation to disturbed flow. J Thromb Haemost 11:741–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12159
Zhu M, Wang Z, Zhang J et al (2015) Circumferentially aligned fibers guided functional neoartery regeneration in vivo. Biomaterials 61:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.024
Zi Z, Chapnick DA, Liu X (2012) Dynamics of TGF-β/Smad signaling. FEBS Lett 586:1921–1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2012.03.063
Zilla P, Brink J, Human P, Bezuidenhout D (2008) Prosthetic heart valves: catering for the few. Biomaterials 29:385–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.033
Zohorsky K, Mequanint K (2020) Designing biomaterials to modulate notch signaling in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0182
Funding
This work has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC StG MechanoSignaling [Grant Agreement No. 802967] (S.L., C.K., and J.v.A.) and ERC CoG ForceMorph [Grant Agreement No. 771168] (C.S.)). Furthermore, T.R. was supported by the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) under REA Grant Agreement No. 846617 (Angio-NYT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Karakaya, C., van Asten, J.G.M., Ristori, T. et al. Mechano-regulated cell–cell signaling in the context of cardiovascular tissue engineering. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 21, 5–54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01521-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01521-w