Abstract
Aim
The currently recommended exercise methods for patients with diabetes require strict physical fitness and are not suitable for all diabetic patients. This study aims to explore the best exercise combination for diabetic patients and to provide scientific and practical personalized exercise guidance for diabetic patients.
Subject and methods
Basic information about participants was obtained through questionnaires, physical measurements were performed, and fasting blood samples were collected. Polar area diagrams were used to analyze the relationship between different exercise habits and each index. The polar area graph showed the exercise duration with the best expected effect under a particular frequency and intensity. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to test whether there was a direct causal relationship between exercise and diabetes.
Results
Polar area diagrams showed that diabetes patients who engaged in moderate- to vigorous-intensity exercise > 60 minutes five times per week had better health indicators. The polar area graph showed that low-intensity exercise once or twice a week required more than 30 minutes to achieve the desired effect. There was no significant difference in any indicators among elderly diabetic patients with different exercise intensities.
Conclusion
Moderate- to vigorous-intensity exercise for more than 30 minutes five times a week was the most beneficial combination of exercise for diabetes. Low frequency needs to be matched with longer exercise time to achieve the desired effect at low intensity. The relationship between low frequency and long duration weakened when the exercise intensity increased. The levels of all indicators in elderly diabetic patients were unrelated to exercise intensity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects more than 440 million people worldwide and is one of the most common metabolic diseases. The Asia-Pacific region has the largest population of people with diabetes, and the prevalence of the disease has increased dramatically in the region in recent decades (Nanditha et al. 2016; Ramachandran et al. 2010). China, with a population of 1.413 billion people, is estimated to have over 120 million people affected by diabetes and currently has the most significant number of people affected by diabetes in any country (Ma 2018).
Exercise is a critical measure in the health management of diabetes. Apart from aiding in weight loss and reducing fat, it can also reduce cardiometabolic-related risk (improve blood lipid and blood pressure), reduce glycosylated hemoglobin levels, and improve insulin resistance, which is of great significance for maintaining glucose homeostasis (Balducci et al. 2014; Boulé et al. 2001; Magkos et al. 2020; Snowling and Hopkins 2006). Several studies have shown that a combination of aerobic and resistance training, i.e., combined exercise, is more effective in alleviating diabetes than aerobic or resistance training alone (Sampath et al. 2019). Therefore, many major international organizations/guidelines in this field, including the European Society of Cardiology, the American College of Sports Medicine, the Belgian Physiotherapy Association, and Exercise & Sports Science Australia, recommend combined exercise as a necessary non-pharmacological treatment for diabetes (Colberg et al. 2010; Gentzel 2013; Hordern et al. 2012; Rydén et al. 2013).
Considering only the type of exercise is not sufficient, because different combinations of exercise intensity and duration may affect the fat distribution, blood pressure, and blood glucose of patients in different ways. Some studies have shown that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has the same or even better outcomes than moderate continuous training (MCT) (Gibala and Little 2010) and is a viable alternative for a variety of conditions such as diabetes (Mitranun et al. 2014), cardiovascular disease (Dun et al. 2019), and obesity (Marquis-Gravel et al. 2015).
Although the above-recommended combination of exercises and HIIT as an exercise regimen has an excellent fat-burning effect and can effectively control diabetes, it is more demanding on the physical fitness of patients with diabetes and does not apply to all DM patients; thus it is not conducive to long-term adherence of DM patients. In addition, it is recommended that patients maintain 60% of maximum oxygen consumption when performing aerobic exercise (i.e., the heart rate during exercise should be maintained at roughly 170 minus years of age [170 − age]). The duration and frequency of exercise should be 30–60 minutes per session, once a day or 4–5 times a week. However, this recommended exercise behavior, in addition to being inaccurate/not easily estimated/not easily maintained in terms of oxygen consumption, ignores the optimal duration and frequency of exercise corresponding to the resistance training often used by overweight diabetic patients, and the recommendation lacks experimental support and is not highly credible.
In order to solve the above two problems, we can, firstly, find the optimal combination of exercise that patients with diabetes more readily accept to guide them in their exercise routine. Secondly, specific exercise routines (such as walking, climbing stairs, brisk walking, and jogging) can be converted into low, moderate, or high exercise intensities to replace the calculation of oxygen consumption, thus eliminating the need for patients to measure how much oxygen they consume. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the relationship between different exercise behaviors and various indicators of DM in 3867 diabetic patients through a cross-sectional study, and to find the optimal combination of exercise frequency, exercise duration, and exercise intensity by analyzing the effect of each exercise behavior on the indicators as well as the recommended exercise duration to relieve diabetes symptoms at different exercise frequencies and intensities. It fully respects the preference of diabetic patients in exercise choice, simplifies the process of measuring their exercise intensity, and is more readily accepted by diabetic patients; at the same time, it can provide scientific and practical personalized exercise guidance for diabetic patients, promote the transformation of disease treatment to health management, and thus improve the health literacy and survival quality of diabetic patients.
Methods
Study subjects and data sources
The data for this cross-sectional study were obtained from the physical examination data and questionnaire results from the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from 2020 to 2021 (n = 103,649). Informed written consent was obtained from all participants, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (no. 22206). The duplicates, blanks, abnormalities, and data that did not meet the nadir criteria (n = 57,324) were removed, leaving 46,325 participants, including 3867 diabetic patients and 42,458 healthy people. The inclusion criteria for diabetic patients were as follows: (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) self-reported prior diagnoses by healthcare professionals; (3) fasting blood glucose ≥ 7 mmol/L; (4) concentration of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 6.5% or higher; (5) no history of other metabolic, hormonal, orthopedic, or cardiovascular diseases, and no current use of prescription drugs. The inclusion criteria for healthy people were as follows: (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) no history of diabetes, hypertension, or other chronic diseases; (3) fasting blood glucose < 7 mmol/L; (4) HbA1c concentration lower than 7.0%; (5) no history of other metabolic, hormonal, orthopedic, or cardiovascular diseases, and no current use of prescription drugs (Dalong 2021).
Questionnaire data
The participants' basic information, lifestyle habits, mental status, and exercise behavior were obtained (Table 1). Basic information included name, gender, ethnicity, marriage, education level, occupation, personal medical history, family history, and allergy history; lifestyle habits included smoking habits (daily/frequent/non-smoking/quit smoking), drinking habits (drinking/non-drinking/abstaining from drinking for more than 1 year), sleeping habits (good/fair/poor), and eating habits (good/fair/poor). Among them, good or bad eating habits were evaluated by the scores for six specific behaviors, including eating three meals on time, frequent midnight snacking, overeating, dietary taste, dietary habits, and staple food structure. One point was recorded for each of the following: not being able to eat on time more than three times a week, eating midnight snacks more than once a week, overeating, salty dietary taste, or poor dietary habits (preferring to eat pickled, smoked, high fat, dessert, spicy, hot, fast food). A total score of 0–1 was defined as “good,” 2–3 was defined as “fair,” and 4–6 was defined as “poor.” Mental status was rated by the frequency of eight emotional displays: “moody,” “easily excited and angered,” “nervous,” “impatient,” “lacking enthusiasm,” “anxious,” “depressed,” and “having difficulty concentrating.” There were three answers: “often” with 2 points, “occasionally” with 1 point, and “never” with 0 points. A total score of 0–2 was defined as “good,” 4–9 as “fair,” and 10–18 as “poor.”
Exercise behavior includes exercise frequency (1–2 times per week, 3–5 times per week, > 5 times per week), exercise duration (< 30 minutes, 30–60 minutes, > 60 minutes), and exercise intensity (low intensity, moderate intensity, high intensity). Exercise intensity is judged based on the maximum heart rate percentage of exercise (Guoping et al. 2023). Low intensity is defined as a maximum heart rate percentage < 64%, regular heartbeat, and respiration; exercise methods include walking. Medium intensity is defined as a maximum heart rate percentage of 64–76%, and heartbeat and respiration are accelerated but not rapid; exercise methods include brisk walking, jogging, swimming, cycling, Tai Chi, yoga, ballroom dancing, and strength exercise. High intensity is defined as a maximum heart rate percentage > 76%, rapid heartbeat and breathing, and muscle pain; exercise methods include aerobics, running, fast climbing, stair climbing, and ball games.
Physical measurements and assessment
Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight (kg/m2). Physical measurements included height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, right upper arm systolic blood pressure, and right upper arm diastolic blood pressure, measured using the same method and instruments. The standard assessment criteria for these indicators were as follows: BMI (18.5–23.9 kg/m2); waist circumference (men < 85 cm; women < 80 cm); hip circumference (men 85–105 cm; women 75–80 cm) (Youfa 2022); right upper arm systolic blood pressure (90–140 mmHg); right upper arm diastolic blood pressure (60–90 mmHg) (Jing 2021).
Blood measurement and evaluation
Fasting blood samples were collected after overnight fasting to provide total cholesterol (Tch), triglyceride, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels. These indicators were evaluated as follows: Tch (normal: < 5.2 mmol/L; borderline high: 5.2–6.1 mmol/L; high: ≥ 6.1 mmol/L), triglycerides (low: < 0.56 mmol/L; normal: 0.56–1.70 mmol/L; high: ≥ 1.70 mmol/L), HDL-C (low: ≤ 1.04 mmol/L; normal: 1.04–1.55 mmol/L; high: ≥ 1.55 mmol/L), LDL-C (optimal: 1.8–2.6 mmol/L; near optimal: 2.6–3.4 mmol/L; borderline high: 3.4–4.1 mmol/L; high: ≥ 4.1 mmol/L), FPG (normal: 3.89–6.10 mmol/L; borderline high: 6.10–7.00 mmol/L; high: ≥ 7.00 mmol/L) (Junren et al. 2016).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (28.0.0.0) and R (3.6.3) software. The chi-square test was used to detect whether there were differences in demographic characteristics, living habits, and health status between healthy people and diabetic patients. Demographic characteristics included gender (male/female), race (Han/ethnic minorities), marital status (married including cohabitation/unmarried); living habits included smoking habits (daily/often/never/quit smoking), drinking habits (drinking/never drinking/quit drinking for more than 1 year), eating habits (good/fair/poor), and sleeping habits (good/fair/poor). Health status included mental status (good/fair/poor), BMI classification (underweight/normal/overweight/obese), and Tch (normal, borderline high, high), triglyceride (low, normal, high), HDL-C (low, normal, high), LDL-C (optimal, near optimal, borderline high, high), and FPG levels (normal, borderline high, high). The non-parametric Mann–Whitney test was used to analyze various continuous indicators (height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, right upper arm systolic blood pressure, right upper arm diastolic blood pressure, hip circumference, Tch, triglyceride, HDL-C, LDL-C, HDL-C/Tch ratio, and FPG) in healthy people and diabetic patients. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine whether there were statistical differences in various continuous indicators under different exercise frequency, duration, and intensity combinations in diabetic patients. Polar area diagrams were used to show the levels of each index under different exercise behaviors. The polar area graph was used to show the best exercise duration at a given frequency and intensity. According to age stratification (young and middle-aged < 60 years old/elderly > 60 years old), the differences in different exercise behaviors were compared between groups.
Mendelian randomization analysis
We applied the Mendelian randomization (MR) method, using two datasets (ebi-a-GCST007517 and ukb-b-8764) from OpenGWAS (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/) for a two-sample MR analysis to test whether there is a direct causal relationship between exercise and type 2 diabetes. The ebi-a-GCST007517 dataset included 298,957 patients with type 2 diabetes, and the ukb-b-8764 dataset included 460,376 participants from the UK Biobank who had been physically active for the last 4 weeks. Causal estimation by MR analysis is not valid without fulfilling three critical assumptions: (1) the variables are correlated with the risk factor of interest (correlation assumption), (2) they share no common cause with the outcome (independence assumption), and (3) they do not affect the results except through the risk factor (exclusion restriction assumption) (Davies et al. 2018).
The importance level of the entire genome is defined as p < 5*10−8, which satisfies the correlation hypothesis and correlates the instrumental variables with the results. We calculated F-statistics using the previous equation and estimated the intensity per single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (Papadimitriou et al. 2020). In the random-effects meta-analysis, an inverse-variance weighting (IVW) method combines SNP exposure and SNP results from coefficients to estimate causal effects (Deng et al. 2022). Several sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the presence of pluripotency in causal estimation. Cochran's Q was calculated to examine the heterogeneity of individual causal effects. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate the presence of pluripotency.
We used a complementary weighting method, assuming that at least 50% of instrumental variables were valid, ranking the MR estimates for each instrumental variable to give valid MR estimates (Bowden et al. 2016). The TwoSampleMR (version 0.5.6) package was used for statistical analyses in R software (version 4.1.0).
Ethics statement
The present study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (approval no. 22206). Informed consent was submitted by all participants when they were enrolled.
Results
Participant characteristics
A total of 46,325 participants were included in our study, including 3867 with diabetes and 42,458 healthy persons. The two groups were statistically different in three aspects: demographic characteristics, living habits, and health status (Table 2). Regarding demographic characteristics, we found that the number of men with diabetes was significantly greater than the number of women (p < 0.01), accounting for 77.11% of the diabetic population in this study. At the same time, we found that 97.39% of diabetic patients were married. In terms of living habits, we found that diabetic patients tended to prefer smoking (p < 0.01) and drinking (p < 0.01), but their eating habits were better than those of healthy people, which may be related to diabetic patients paying more attention to diet management. Diabetic patients were more likely to have poor sleep quality than healthy people (p < 0.01). Regarding health status, we found that patients with diabetes had better mental status than healthy people. However, according to the BMI classification, we found that patients with diabetes were more likely to be overweight and obese (DM: 71.6%, healthy: 41.4%, p < 0.01), and more likely to have elevated Tch (DM: 47.94%, healthy: 35.21%, p < 0.01), triglyceride (DM: 61.91%, healthy: 30.18%, p < 0.01) and LDL-C (DM: 25.83%, healthy: 22.15%, p < 0.01). And more diabetic patients had low HDL-C (DM: 28.06%, healthy: 13.77%, p < 0.01). The percentage of diabetic patients with normal FPG was only 4.37%, much lower than that of healthy people (Table 2).
Non-parametric Mann–Whitney tests showed that the average BMI and triglyceride and FPG levels of diabetic patients in this study exceeded the normal standard (18.5–23.9, 0.56–1.70 mmol/L, 3.89–6.10 mmol/L). The mean values of other indicators were maintained at appropriate levels in the diabetic population. However, most of the indicators were higher in diabetic patients than in the healthy population (including height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and Tch). The results showed highly significant statistical differences (p < 0.01) (Supplementary table 1). The results of the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test (Supplementary Table 2) showed that except for LDL-C (p = 0.681 > 0.05), the indicators were significantly different among the groups with different exercise habits (p < 0.01).
The best combination of exercises for diabetes
The physical appearance and blood pressure, blood lipid, and blood glucose measurements for different exercise combinations are shown as averages in Fig. 2. We found that the combination of exercise > 3 times a week showed significant differences compared with no exercise, regardless of the duration and intensity of each exercise session (p < 0.05) (Table 3). BMI, waist circumference, and hip circumference showed that the best combination was > 5 times a week, > 60 minutes of intense exercise (Fig. 1a). Nevertheless, the exercise groups of > 60 minutes, 30–60 minutes, and < 30 minutes did not exhibit significant differences between groups (p > 0.05), and the group differences between the high-intensity, moderate, and low-intensity groups were not significant (p > 0.05) (Table 3). Therefore, exercising > 5 times a week was associated with smaller waist and hip circumference and lower BMI. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values remained at normal levels (90–139 mmHg and 60–89 mmHg) in all groups, so they could not be used to evaluate the effect of exercise (Fig. 1b).
From the perspective of Tch and triglyceride, the best combination for blood lipid control was high intensity, > 5 times a week, > 60 minutes each time. In terms of HDL-C, the best combination was moderate intensity, > 60 minutes five times a week (Fig. 1c). There was no significant difference between the high-intensity group and the moderate- and low-intensity groups (p > 0.05) (Table 3). As shown in Supplementary Table 2, there was no significant difference in LDL-C levels among all groups (p = 0.681). Therefore, exercising > 5 times a week for > 30 minutes each time can effectively control blood lipid levels, regardless of the intensity.
The optimal combination of glycemic control, measured by FPG, was high intensity for 30–60 minutes and > 5 times per week (Fig. 1d). However, there was no significant difference between the group who exercised > 5 times per week and the group who exercised 3–5 times per week (p > 0.05), or between the group who exercised 30–60 minutes per time and the group who exercised > 60 minutes per time (p > 0.05). However, there was a highly significant difference between the group that exercised for 30–60 minutes and the group that exercised for < 30 minutes per session (p = 0.003), and there was no significant difference between the high-intensity group and either the moderate-intensity or the low-intensity group (Table 3). Therefore, exercising > 3 times a week for > 30 minutes each time can effectively control blood glucose, regardless of the intensity.
In conclusion, for people with diabetes, exercise > 5 times a week and > 30 minutes each time, regardless of the intensity, can lead to a decrease in waist and hip circumference, BMI, and blood lipid and glucose levels.
The polar graph (Fig. 2) showed that low-intensity exercise 1–2 times a week required 30–60 minutes or more per exercise session to achieve the desired effect. However, in moderate and high exercise intensity conditions, it did not require a long exercise time, which may be related to the compensation of increased exercise intensity. However, more intensive exercise (≥ 5 times per week) was associated with more beneficial effects (lower BMI, Tch, triglyceride, FPG; smaller waist circumference, hip circumference; higher HDL-C level).
The results for group differences in different exercise behaviors between young and middle-aged diabetic patients and elderly diabetic patients stratified by age are shown in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4. It is worth noting that our data showed that there were no significant differences in any indicator among different exercise intensity groups in elderly diabetic patients aged over 60 years (Supplementary Table 4).
A direct causal relationship between exercise and diabetes
Inverse variance weighting (p = 0.027, OR = 0.18, 95% CI) and weighted median (p = 0.023, OR = 0.15, 95% CI) showed that exercise reduced the prevalence of diabetes by a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis (Fig. 3). The heterogeneity (Q = 2.37, p = 0.30) and level pleiotropy (p = 0.37) were tested. Our results confirm a direct causal relationship between exercise and diabetes and that exercise is a protective factor for diabetes.
Discussion
Our results suggest that exercise > 5 times a week and > 30 minutes each time has a good effect on reducing waist and hip circumference, lowering BMI and blood lipids, and controlling blood glucose, which is similar to the findings of Faulkner et al., who recommended 30 minutes per day (≥5 times a week; moderate intensity) of aerobic and strength exercise to improve blood glucose (such as lowering glucose levels without causing hypoglycemia) and cardiovascular parameters (such as lowering exaggerated resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure) (Balducci et al. 2014; Farinha et al. 2018; Faulkner et al. 2014).
However, Hamasaki et al. found that only about 30% of diabetic patients reached the recommended level of physical activity, and a common reason for not exercising was lack of time (Hamasaki 2018). Considering that a large proportion of diabetic patients cannot exercise more than five times per week, we also analyzed the problem of how to schedule exercise under conditions of limited exercise frequency and exercise intensity. We found that if a person is only fit for low-intensity exercise, and the amount of time they exercise is minimal (only one or two times per week), then they should consider extending the duration of exercise each time. In this case, 30–60 minutes and > 60 minutes of exercise are good choices. However, if there are more opportunities to exercise every week, each exercise session can be shortened. Low frequency is closely related to long duration, and high frequency is closely related to short duration. In order to achieve better hypoglycemic effects in low-intensity exercise, it is suggested that diabetic patients choose the appropriate time for daily exercise according to their conditions. Blindly extending a workout may result in disproportionate effort and results.
In addition, we found that with the increase in exercise intensity, the association between low frequency and long duration weakened, which may be due to the exercise intensity itself, suggesting that diabetic patients with limited exercise times per week can save much time by increasing exercise intensity if their physical conditions permit. Interestingly, we found that under the condition of high intensity and high frequency of exercise (> 5 times per week), a longer duration of exercise was still required to achieve the best effect, which may be related to the physical fitness of patients who chose this exercise behavior. Exercise intensity, frequency, and duration are more likely preferred by people with diabetes who are physically fit. Our data show that this type of exercise is associated with healthier body composition, lipid content, and glucose levels. There was no significant difference in each index among different exercise intensity groups in elderly diabetic patients, suggesting that it is not necessary to pursue a high-intensity exercise regimen when choosing an exercise mode in elderly diabetic patients.
Among 46,325 subjects, 69.77% of diabetic patients adhered to an exercise routine, which was higher than that of healthy people (58.70%), indicating that diabetic patients had a more vital awareness of cultivating exercise habits, which may be related to the fact that diabetic patients received more physical exercise advice. Our survey results showed that only 1.89% of diabetic patients had the habit of strength exercise in daily life, and only 4.76% of healthy people had the habit of strength exercise. More people chose easy exercise methods such as walking and jogging that did not need professional equipment. This means that although many studies have shown that the combination of aerobic training and resistance training may be the most effective way to alleviate diabetes (Balducci et al. 2004; Cuff et al. 2003; Reddy et al. 2019; Schwingshackl et al. 2014), the proportion of the number of people shows that resistance training has not been adopted and applied by many people, suggesting that we need to carry out more combined training education for diabetic patients.
In our study, we collected the forms of exercise selected by patients with diabetes and classified the exercise intensity according to the percentage of maximum heart rate. It also found the best combination of exercise frequency, intensity, and duration for diabetic patients, providing scientific and practical personalized exercise guidance for diabetic patients. Our results suggest that exercising > 5 times a week and > 30 minutes each time has a good effect on reducing waist and hip circumference, lowering BMI and blood lipids, and controlling blood glucose. Furthermore, it is unnecessary to pursue a high-intensity exercise mode when choosing exercise mode in elderly diabetic patients.
Our study also had some limitations. We did not consider the effects of blood pressure, lipid-lowering, and hypoglycemic drugs. We looked at people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, but we did not perform a separate analysis of those two types of diabetes. The characteristics of cross-sectional studies prevent us from determining a causal relationship between the DM index and exercise pattern selection. Therefore, we performed a two-sample MR on two OpenGWAS datasets. The results showed a direct causal relationship between exercise and diabetes risk. However, the etiological link between exercise behavior and diabetes is not clear here, and further experiments will be needed to verify this in the future. The sample size in our study was small. However, based on a small sample, we have performed our analysis as rigorously as possible. The results of the MR analysis can also be used to verify our analysis. Further experiments may be needed to confirm our results.
Exercise can help individuals slim down and shape up, reduce fat, and lower sugar, but a high level of exercise does not directly affect lowering blood pressure. Exercising > 5 times a week and > 30 minutes was the most practical combination of exercise for diabetes relief. Low exercise frequency must be paired with longer exercise duration at low exercise intensities to achieve the desired effect. The association between low exercise frequency and long exercise duration decreases as exercise intensity increases. The levels of all indicators in elderly diabetic patients were unrelated to exercise intensity.
Data availability (data transparency)
Data and material are available from the authors.
Code availability
Code is available from the authors.
References
Balducci S, Leonetti F, Di Mario U, Fallucca F (2004) Is a long-term aerobic plus resistance training program feasible for and effective on metabolic profiles in type 2 diabetic patients? Diabetes Care 27:841–842. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.3.841
Balducci S et al (2014) Physical exercise as therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 30(Suppl 1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2514
Boulé NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP, Wells GA, Sigal RJ (2001) Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 286:1218–1227. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.10.1218
Bowden J, Davey SG, Haycock PC, Burgess S (2016) Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol 40:304–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21965
Colberg SR et al (2010) Exercise and type 2 diabetes: the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement. Diabetes Care 33:e147–e167. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-9990
Cuff DJ, Meneilly GS, Martin A, Ignaszewski A, Tildesley HD, Frohlich JJ (2003) Effective exercise modality to reduce insulin resistance in women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:2977–2982. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.11.2977
Dalong Z (2021) Guideline for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China(2020 edition)(Part 1). Chinese Diabetes Society 41:668–695. https://doi.org/10.19538/j.nk2021080106
Davies NM, Holmes MV, Davey SG (2018) Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ 362:k601. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k601
Deng MG, Cui HT, Lan YB, Nie JQ, Liang YH, Chai C (2022) Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A two-sample Mendelian Randomization analysis in the European population. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13:964132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.964132
Dun Y et al (2019) High-intensity interval training improves metabolic syndrome and body composition in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation patients with myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Diabetol 18:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-019-0907-0
Farinha JB, Dos SG, Vargas J, Viana LL, De Souza A, Reischak-Oliveira A (2018) Capillary glycaemia responses to strength exercises performed before or after high-intensity interval exercise in Type 1 diabetes under real-life settings. Complement Ther Med 40:116–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2018.08.004
Faulkner MS, Michaliszyn SF, Hepworth JT, Wheeler MD (2014) Personalized exercise for adolescents with diabetes or obesity. Biol Res Nurs 16:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800413500064
Gentzel JB (2013) On "exercise assessment and prescription in patients with type 2 diabetes..." Hansen D, Peeters S, Zwaenepoel B, et al. Phys Ther. 2013;93:597-610 Phys Ther 93:1141-1142. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.2013.93.8.1141
Gibala MJ, Little JP (2010) Just HIT it! A time-efficient exercise strategy to improve muscle insulin sensitivity. J Physiol 588:3341–3342. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.196303
Guoping L, Zhengzhen W, Yuefeng H (2023) Expert Consensus on Exercise Prescription in China (2023). Chin J Sports Med 42:3–13. https://doi.org/10.16038/j.1000-6710.2023.01.012
Hamasaki H (2018) Interval Exercise Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev 14:129–137. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573399812666161101103655
Hordern MD, Dunstan DW, Prins JB, Baker MK, Singh MA, Coombes JS (2012) Exercise prescription for patients with type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes: a position statement from Exercise and Sport Science Australia. J Sci Med Sport 15:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.005
Jing L (2021) National clinical practice guidelines on the management of hypertension in primary health care in China (2020). Chin J Front Med (electronic edition) 13:26–37. https://doi.org/10.12037/YXQY.2021.04-06
Junren Z, Runlin G, Shuiping Z, Guoping L, Dong Z, Jianjun L (2016) Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of dyslipidemia in Adults in China. Chinese Circul J 31:937–953
Ma R (2018) Epidemiology of diabetes and diabetic complications in China. Diabetologia 61:1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4557-7
Magkos F, Hjorth MF, Astrup A (2020) Diet and exercise in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 16:545–555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-020-0381-5
Marquis-Gravel G, Hayami D, Juneau M, Nigam A, Guilbeault V, Latour É, Gayda M (2015) Intensive lifestyle intervention including high-intensity interval training program improves insulin resistance and fasting plasma glucose in obese patients. Prev Med Rep 2:314–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.015
Mitranun W, Deerochanawong C, Tanaka H, Suksom D (2014) Continuous vs interval training on glycemic control and macro- and microvascular reactivity in type 2 diabetic patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports 24:e69–e76. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12112
Nanditha A et al (2016) Diabetes in Asia and the Pacific: Implications for the Global Epidemic. Diabetes Care 39:472–485. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1536
Papadimitriou N et al (2020) Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis. Nat Commun 11:597. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14389-
Ramachandran A, Ma RC, Snehalatha C (2010) Diabetes Asia Lancet 375:408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60937-5
Reddy R, Wittenberg A, Castle JR, El YJ, Winters-Stone K, Gillingham M, Jacobs PG (2019) Effect of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Can. J Diabetes 43:406–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.08.193
Rydén L et al (2013) ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J 34:3035–3087. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht108
Sampath KA et al (2019) Exercise and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 62:98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.001
Schwingshackl L, Missbach B, Dias S, König J, Hoffmann G (2014) Impact of different training modalities on glycaemic control and blood lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetologia 57:1789–1797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3303-z
Snowling NJ, Hopkins WG (2006) Effects of different modes of exercise training on glucose control and risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 29:2518–2527. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-1317
Youfa W (2022) Expert consensus on obesity prevention and treatment in China. Chin J Epidemiol 23:321–339. https://doi.org/10.16506/j.1009-6639.2022.05.001
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Changsha Province, Hunan(kq2208347) and Guangzhou Science and Technology Projects(202002020046).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception or design: Yanhui Lin; Yuxin Sun; Ziran Zhang
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Yanhui Lin; Yuxin Sun; Ziran Zhang; Fanye Wu
Drafting the work or revising: Yanhui Lin, Yuxin Sun; Tong Wu; Zhengran Li; Fanke Meng; Min Fu
Final approval of the manuscript: Yanhui Lin; Fanke Meng; Min Fu
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (No. 22206)
Consent to participate
Informed written consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
All the authors consent for data or images of the article to be published.
Conflicts of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(XLSX 19 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, Z. et al. A cross-sectional study of optimal exercise combinations for type 2 diabetes. J Public Health (Berl.) 32, 1347–1357 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01904-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01904-6