Abstract
Gender differences in mental health emerge as early as in childhood and adolescence, highlighting the potential need for gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care. However, it is unclear how gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care is implemented and whether its’ approaches are useful. Therefore, this study reviews gender-specific interventions and their effectiveness for child and adolescent mental health. Five databases were searched for articles published between 2000 and 2021. In total, 43 studies were included. Most interventions were conducted in school (n = 15) or community settings (n = 8). Substance-related disorders (n = 13) and eating disorders (n = 12) were addressed most frequently. Most interventions targeted girls (n = 31). Various gender-specific aspects were considered, including gender-specific risk and protective factors (n = 35) and needs (n = 35). Although most interventions yielded significant improvements in mental health outcomes (n = 32), only few studies reported medium or large effect sizes (n = 13). Additionally, there was a lack of strong causal evidence derived from randomized controlled trials, calling for more rigorous trials in the research field. Nevertheless, our findings indicate that gender-specific mental health care can be a promising approach to meet gender-specific mental health needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Gender, referring to the psychological, behavioral and sociocultural aspects associated with sex [1], is an important determinant for mental health outcomes and care. Several studies have revealed gender differences in terms of prevalence and clinical presentation for various mental health problems in children and adolescents such as eating disorders, anxiety disorders, conduct problems, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [2, 3]. For example, internalizing problems such as anxiety disorders occur more often among girls than boys [4], whereas externalizing problems such as conduct problems are more common in boys than in girls [5]. Furthermore, there are gender differences regarding coping strategies, symptomatology and medication [6,7,8,9]. There are also gender differences in child and adolescent mental health care regarding the frequency of service use [10], the age at referral [11], as well as in the willingness to use mental health care [12]: Compared to girls, boys are referred at a younger age [10, 11], whereas girls are more likely to obtain treatment in early adulthood [11]. Furthermore, adolescent boys are less willing to use mental health services than girls [12]. For various mental health problems, such as depressive symptoms [13, 14], substance use/abuse [15] or eating disorders [16], different risk and protective factors have been identified for girls and boys. Additionally, research on the etiology of mental health problems points towards the existence of gender-specific processes in their development [17, 18]. For example, rumination seems to contribute to the development of depression in girls, but not in boys [18].
In addition to this predominantly binary (girls vs. boys) and heteronormative view of gender differences, existing research demonstrates that transgender, gender variant or non-binary youth experience mental health problems, such as depression, suicidality and eating disorders, at an elevated rate compared to the general population [19,20,21]. Sexual and gender minorities (SGM), an umbrella term for individuals who do not identify as heterosexual or cisgender (e.g., transgender), face high levels of stigmatization and discrimination, and often adverse mental health outcomes [22].
Mental health problems emerging in these early life stages account for a large proportion of the global burden of disease [23], have economic long-term consequences [24], and often persist into adulthood [25, 26]. Additionally, research suggests that the persistence differs by gender, for instance, girls show a more persistent course of mood and anxiety disorders than boys [25]. In summary, there are several gender differences in mental health outcomes and care. Hence, considering gender aspects in child and adolescent mental health care is crucial for developing effective programs and thereby addressing gender-related mental health disparities early.
Programs that acknowledge gender roles and norms and consider and account for specific gender-related needs can be described as “gender-specific” [27, 28]. Furthermore, heteronormativity is an important gender-related aspect that should be addressed in gender-specific care [28], highlighting the need to consider not only aspects related to gender (e.g., female, transgender, etc.) but also to sexual identity (e.g., heterosexual, bisexual, etc.). Rationales for gender-specific interventions comprise (1) responding to gender-specific psychological aspects (e.g., gender-related needs and experiences), (2) providing a safe space and a supportive, empowering environment, (3) assuming a greater effectiveness of gender-specific compared to gender-non-specific interventions, and (4) thereby addressing gender disparities and contributing to the achievement of social justice [29]. Importantly, approaches that address one sex without addressing gender-specific aspects (mere single-sex interventions) are non-gender-specific programs [28].
Child and adolescent mental health care programs can also vary in the timing of intervention. A common distinction is made between prevention (before the onset of any disorder, focus on reducing risk factors and enhancing protective factors) and treatment programs (treating an already existing disorder) [30]. There are universal programs (targeting a whole population) and selective programs (targeting individuals or subgroups with a significantly higher risk of developing mental health problems) [31].
The development of gender-specific prevention programs for substance abuse began when substance abuse among girls increased in the mid-1990s, and studies showed that girls did not benefit from existing programs [15, 32]. A frequently addressed gender-specific aspect of these early programs was the focus on family relationships (a specific risk factor for girls) [15]. At this same time, the first gender-specific aggression interventions for girls were developed [32]. These treatment programs often focused on the different expression of aggression in girls vs. boys (relational vs. physical aggression) [32].
Despite these early developments, there are a few reviews of gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care for certain disorders (e.g., substance use/abuse [15]), settings (e.g., school [32]), and populations (e.g., SGM [33, 34]). However, a comprehensive review of gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care programs, without focusing on one specific mental health problem, setting, or population is lacking to better understand how their implementation and effectiveness might differ. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to provide an overview of gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care by collating and critically appraising the existing research. It aims (1) to summarize and evaluate various gender-specific mental health care programs, (2) to identify the gender-specific aspects commonly addressed in these programs and (3) to synthesize their effectiveness, in order to derive implications for clinicians and health care providers. Further objectives are to identify gaps in knowledge and research, in order to make recommendations for future research.
Methods
Eligibility Criteria
To meet inclusion criteria, publications had to: (1) be published in peer-reviewed journals or books; (2) be written in English or German (due to limited language, time and financial resources); (3) be published between January 2000 and May 2021; (4) describe or evaluate interventions for children and adolescents (M ≤ 21 years, to include also late adolescence [35], and a minority of adults, to ensure the focus on children and adolescents and simultaneously acknowledge the fact that adolescent mental health care sometimes comprises young adults); (5) describe or evaluate a specific gender-specific intervention (any kind of intervention addressing gender-specific aspects; Fig. 1); and (6) address mental health care in different settings (e.g., child and adolescent psychiatric, psychological or psychotherapeutic care; school settings). Furthermore, articles were excluded if they: (1) were news, editorials, commentaries, reviews or case reports; (2) described or evaluated a non-gender-specific intervention (Fig. 1); (3) described or evaluated a gender-affirming intervention; or (4) did not focus on mental health.
Search Strategy
The review adheres to the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [36]. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Social Science Citation Index, PsycInfo, PSYNDEX and Cochrane Library. Databases were searched by combining relevant text words and medical subject headings. We adapted the search strategies to each database (Appendix A). The search strategies covered the following topics: gender specificity, mental health care, and children and adolescents.
Electronic searches were complemented by reference list screening, citation tracking and hand searches in Google Scholar. Additionally, reviews with various focuses were screened [15, 16, 32,33,34, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46] to find gender-specific interventions which were not specifically described as “gender-specific” or with related terms and therefore not retrieved via electronic database search.
Study Selection
After removing the duplicates (with EndNote and manual checking), we transferred the records to Rayyan [47], an online software for the screening process. We identified potentially relevant articles by reviewing the titles, abstracts and keywords of all retrieved records. Three reviewers (LG, LH, MG) performed the title-abstract screening, wherein one reviewer (LH) screened all titles and abstracts and two reviewers (LG, MG) each additionally screened 10% with substantial agreement (\(\kappa\) = 0.62–0.73) [48]. The full-texts were screened by three reviewers: One reviewer (LH) assessed each full-text and two reviewers (LG, MG) each additionally assessed 13% with moderate to substantial agreement (\(\kappa\) = 0.48–0.72) [48]. Discrepancies between the raters were discussed until consensus was reached.
Data Extraction
One reviewer (LH) extracted data from the included studies using a data extraction table with the following headings: author(s) and year of publication, country, setting, intervention type, description and components, gender specificity, target group, participants, age, study design, main outcome measures, main outcomes, and rating of study quality. Two reviewers cross-checked the data extraction (LG, MG).
Critical Appraisal
The included studies were critically appraised using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (QATQS) [49]. In previous evaluations the QATQS was found to be valid and reliable [50]. The QATQS rates methodologic study quality based on six criteria: selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection method, and withdrawals and drop-outs. Each study receives a global rating as weak, moderate, or strong. Three authors independently evaluated the studies. Discrepancies were discussed and resolved through consensus.
Synthesis of Effectiveness
Effect sizes were extracted and transformed to Cohen’s d. Several studies reported data on different mental health outcomes. In these cases, the effect sizes were averaged within each study. Effect sizes were transformed with the Psychometrica online calculator [51]. Studies that reported non-significant results (without giving additional information) were set to an effect size of d = 0.00, a procedure which yields conservative effect sizes [52]. If effect sizes were reported as small, medium or large without specifying which effect sizes were computed, we applied the lower limits of d according to Cohen’s conventions [53].
Results
Searches yielded 3,627 records, of which 157 articles were potentially relevant for inclusion in this review (Fig. 2). After full-text screening, 50 publications were included, covering a total of 43 studies (Appendix B).
Study Characteristics
The included 43 articles were published between 2001 and 2020 (Table 1). Almost all studies (n = 41) were conducted in North America or Europe. The interventions were mostly carried out in school (n = 15) or community settings (n = 8). Most of the studies assessed either universal prevention programs (n = 18) or treatments (n = 16). The most commonly targeted mental health problems were related to the DSM-5 [54] diagnostic categories “Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders” (n = 13) and “Feeding and Eating Disorders” (n = 12). Target groups were predominantly girls (n = 31) and adolescents (age ≥ 12, n = 35). In total, 19 studies were clinical controlled trials (i.e., experimental clinical studies without randomization), 12 cohort studies (i.e., one-group pretest–posttest), six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), four cohort analytic studies (i.e., two-group pretest–posttest), one interrupted time series, and one mixed-methods study. The study designs were classified according to the QATQS dictionary [55]. Sample sizes ranged from 7 to 2516 participants (M = 380).
Study Quality
For two studies the study quality could not be rated because several criteria of the QATQS were not applicable. The study quality among the remaining 41 studies was heterogeneous: 14 studies (34.1%) received a weak, 19 studies (46.3%) a moderate and eight studies (19.5%) a strong rating.
Implementation of Gender-Specific Aspects
We grouped the studies depending on their targeted mental health problem as the interventions for each diagnostic category had similar gender-specific approaches. Study details and references of each intervention are presented in Appendix B.
Mood Disorders
In total, we identified three studies in the field of mood disorders [56,57,58], all studies (n = 3) targeted SGM youth of diverse sex and gender. One study each was conducted in a community [56], family [57] and individual setting [58]. All interventions were treatments for depression/suicidality [56,57,58].
Gender-specific aims of all treatments (n = 3) were to meet the mental health needs of depressed/suicidal SGM youth. Treatment programs attended to common issues and situations, such as invalidating reactions or bullying due to SGM identity [56,57,58]. Furthermore, most treatments (n = 2) addressed gender-specific risk and protective factors (e.g., family support) [56, 57], used gender-specific role models and facilitators (e.g., SGM community members) [56, 58], and provided future support and resources (e.g., allies) [56, 57].
One example is “Rainbow SPARX”, a computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression, adapted to the needs of SGM youth [58]. The gender-adapted version provides the option to create gender non-conforming avatars and addresses relevant situations (e.g., coming out) and challenges (e.g., harassment) for SGM individuals [58].
Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders
Five studies reported interventions for trauma- and stressor-related disorders [59,60,61,62,63]. The target populations were mainly girls (n = 4) [59,60,61,62]. Most interventions (n = 4) were community-based [60,61,62,63] and all interventions were treatments for sexually abused or traumatized youth [59,60,61,62,63].
All treatments (n = 5) aimed to meet gender-specific mental health needs of sexually abused or traumatized youth [59,60,61,62,63], for example by considering the heightened risk for a history of sexual abuse among incarcerated girls [59]. Additionally, most treatments (n = 4) addressed common risk (e.g., guilt and shame) and protective factors (e.g., skills and individual strengths) of these youth [59,60,61, 63].
One example is “Project Kealahou”, providing a gender- and culturally-responsive system of care to meet the mental health needs of traumatized girls [62]. Girls can participate in prosocial activities and girls groups. The treatment, which is mainly delivered by female staff, aims to provide a safe space for this vulnerable population [62].
Feeding and Eating Disorders
We found 12 studies for eating disorders [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79], of which most were for girls (n = 10) [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75, 78, 79] and delivered in school settings (n = 10) [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71, 76,77,78,79]. Two interventions addressed mixed-gender groups (girls and boys) [64, 76, 77]. Four studies evaluated universal interventions [64, 66, 68, 69] and eight prevention programs [65, 67, 70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
First, all universal interventions (n = 4) targeted the body image by reflecting on female beauty ideals and myths, which are considered risk factors for the development of eating disorders [64, 66, 68, 69]. Additionally, most universal interventions (n = 3) taught body acceptance [64, 68, 69]. One example is “Happy Being Me”, a gender-adapted intervention for both girls and boys. The intervention reflects both female and male beauty ideals and promotes body acceptance [64].
Second, prevention programs (n = 8) focused on female beauty ideals and the sociocultural pressure to be thin as gender-specific risk factors [65, 67, 70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. One example is the universal prevention program “PriMa” that addresses several risk and protective factors for anorexia nervosa in girls, such as female beauty ideals, media literacy and body images [78, 79]. The program targets only adolescent girls, given the need for effective prevention programs in this high-risk population [78, 79].
Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct Disorders
Five studies evaluated interventions for aggression or conduct problems [80,81,82,83,84]. All interventions were treatments for girls and were delivered in residential facilities (n = 3) [80,81,82] or community settings (n = 2) [83, 84].
The gender-specific focus of all treatments (n = 5) was to attend to gender-specific issues since aggression is often expressed differently in girls compared to boys [80,81,82,83,84], with relational aggression being more pronounced among girls [80, 82]. Additionally, most studies (n = 4) evaluated programs that were explicitly developed or gender-adapted due to the lack of treatments for aggression in adolescent girls [80,81,82, 84].
One example is the intervention “A Girls’ Relationship Group” [80, 82]. The treatment takes risk and protective factors (e.g., experiences of violence and coping strategies), relational aspects of aggression, gender-specific conflicts and situations, and gender-role socialization into account. Furthermore, participating girls are empowered and positive self-images are promoted [80, 82].
Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders
In total, 13 studies investigated interventions for substance use/abuse [85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100]. Most interventions (n = 10) targeted girls [85,86,87, 90,91,92,93,94,95,96, 98,99,100]. The settings were heterogeneous, with most studies conducted in school (n = 4) [85, 86, 88, 89, 92], family (n = 4) [87, 93,94,95] or individual (n = 3) [96,97,98,99] settings. The studies comprised 12 prevention [85,86,87,88,89, 91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100] and one treatment study [90, 91].
First, most prevention programs (n = 11) addressed gender-specific risk and protective factors for substance abuse, such as stress or the mother-daughter relationship [85,86,87,88,89, 91, 93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100]. Furthermore, most studies aimed to meet gender-specific needs (n = 10) [85,86,87,88,89, 91, 94,95,96, 98,99,100]. One example is the internet-delivered prevention program for Asian American girls that addresses specific risk and protective factors (e.g., depressive moods and self-efficacy) to meet the mental health needs of this underserved minority group [87]. Additionally, the program aims to strengthen the mother-daughter relationship and addresses other common issues (e.g., body image) [87].
Second, we identified one treatment program named “HEART” which is a residential substance abuse treatment for girls [90, 91]. It focuses on the multifaceted needs, issues, and risk factors (e.g., other mental health problems, peer influence, abuse history) of these girls, considers sociocultural influences, feminist perspectives and aims to empower the participants [90, 91].
Personality Disorders
We found one study describing a treatment for personality disorders: “ACTiv” is a gender-adapted version of the dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) [101]. It is tailored to the needs and issues of adolescent boys with borderline symptoms by considering the elevated aggressiveness and impulsiveness in boys compared to girls, and by using a more action-oriented approach than the original DBT-A [101].
Other Mental Health Problems
Two interventions [102, 103] targeted other mental health problems: Hampel et al. [102] evaluated a school-based universal stress prevention program for girls and boys. Gender-specific needs, coping strategies, role models, situations and gendered stereotypes are important aspects of the program [102]. The other intervention named “Progress” is a community-based treatment program for adolescent girls with at risk-behavior. The program addresses developmental tasks and issues of adolescent girls [103].
Mental Health Care Setting
We found two studies addressing gender-specific aspects in the mental health care setting [104, 105]. Crable et al. [104] evaluated a trauma-informed training curriculum for staff members working with adolescent girls in residential care. The goal of the training is to increase the staff’s knowledge and awareness of the girls’ mental health needs and risk and protective factors [104]. Guss et al. [105] developed and added gender-related questions to clinic intake forms that included the correct name, pronouns, gender identity and birth-assigned sex. The intervention aims to better identify transgender adolescents in order to support them properly and meet their mental health needs.
Summary of Gender-Specific Aspects
In summary, gender-specific risk and protective factors (n = 35; e.g., female beauty ideals), mental health needs (n = 35; e.g., of sexually abused youth) as well as tasks, challenges and issues (n = 27; e.g., developmental tasks of adolescent girls) were the most commonly addressed gender-specific aspects in the included studies (n = 43; see Table 2 for more details on gender-specific aspects).
Effectiveness of Gender-Specific Interventions
For an overview of the effectiveness of gender-specific interventions, see Table 3. In total, 39 studies provided data on the effectiveness of the interventions regarding mental health outcomes. The applied methodology differed substantially. First, most studies that used control groups (n = 29) applied no-intervention control conditions (n = 17), and one single intervention a gender-neutral program as control condition [92]. Second, the duration between baseline and follow-up ranged from post-treatment to 8-year follow-ups. Lastly, the studies utilized various mental health measures.
Most of the interventions (n = 32) yielded significant improvements in mental health outcomes at post-treatment or follow-up. However, only 29 studies reported effect sizes. The effects sizes were heterogeneous: Seven studies yielded no effects (24.1%) and nine small (31.0%), four medium (13.8%) and nine large (31.0%) effect sizes. The mean effect size was medium (d = 0.55). When looking only at controlled studies (e.g., RCTs, n = 22), six studies yielded no effects (27.3%) and nine small (40.9%), three medium (13.6%), and four large (18.2%) effect sizes. The mean effect size among controlled studies was small (d = 0.37).
Most studies that yielded no effects assessed school-based universal prevention programs targeting eating disorders (n = 4). Although most of the programs (with no effects) yielded improvements on the short-term (n = 4), the effects could not be maintained at follow-up.
Large effect sizes were especially found for interventions targeting mood, trauma- and stressor-related, and personality disorders (n = 4). Interventions with these targets also showed large mean effect sizes (d = 1.26–1.75), whereas interventions targeting feeding and eating disorders yielded on average small effect sizes (d = 0.26). Especially treatment programs yielded large effects (n = 5). Treatment programs also yielded larger mean effect sizes (d = 1.10) than universal interventions (d = 0.39) and selective and universal prevention programs (d = 0.44 and d = 0.31). With regard to the settings, large effect sizes were especially yielded in clinical settings and the juvenile justice system (n = 2, d = 0.80–1.32). Additionally, uncontrolled studies such as cohort studies yielded more often large effects (n = 5) and on average larger effect sizes than controlled studies such as RCTs (d = 1.07 vs. d = 0.37). One example for an intervention yielding large effects is the culturally modified trauma-focused CBT for posttraumatic stress symptoms in war-affected adolescent girls with a history of sexual abuse evaluated by O’Callaghan et al. [60]. At the 3-month follow-up, posttraumatic stress symptoms had significantly decreased, and psychosocial functioning improved (for more details, see Appendix B, page 2). Limitations of this RCT include a small sample size (n = 52) and the fact that the intervention group could not be compared to the waitlist-group at follow-up as the waitlist-group had already received treatment at this point in time [60].
Discussion
This systematic review provides an overview of gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care. It aims at summarizing and evaluating gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care programs, identifying gender-specific aspects commonly addressed in these programs and synthesizing their effectiveness.
In total, we identified 43 studies. Most interventions were conducted in school or community settings which is in line with previous research showing that most youth with mental health problems are seen in non-healthcare settings [106, 107]. Furthermore, nearly half of the studies assessed prevention programs. We find it intriguing that gender-specific concepts play a role in the development of preventive interventions, but less so in treatment programs. Further light should be shed on whether this is a conceptual gap or whether actual gender-specific approaches are not labeled as such in the realm of treatment.
In our review, most interventions targeted substance-related and addictive disorders as well as eating disorders. Additionally, over 70% of the studies evaluated interventions exclusively for (mostly adolescent) girls. Taken together, these findings are not surprising since girls/women have traditionally been neglected in substance treatment which has resulted in the development of female-specific treatments in the last decades [15]. Regarding eating disorders, adolescent girls have been the focus of prevention programs for a long time because they are at particularly high risk [108]. This trend has contributed to the exclusion of male and SGM individuals from eating disorder prevention programs even though (particularly pre-adolescent) boys and SGM individuals have high risks, too [109]. Only two of 43 studies (one yielding a large effect, one with no effect) focused exclusively on boys, indicating a large research gap. Reasons for this research gap include the lack of awareness of male or non-female disordered eating and the emphasis in most research on anorexia nervosa, as binge eating disorders are more prevalent among males [109]. Furthermore, the focus on a small number of mental health problems provides important directions for future research.
Gender specificity was implemented differently depending on the targeted mental health problem and population. For instance, addressing family support and minority stressors seemed to be an important aspect in treating mood disorders among SGM youth [56, 58], whereas eating disorder interventions mainly targeted girls’ beauty ideals and body acceptance [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
Most of the interventions addressed several gender-specific aspects, highlighting that gender-specific interventions should consider multiple factors and experiences that intersect with each other. For example, gender norms and ideals (e.g., “thin ideal”), developmental tasks (e.g., puberty and related body changes), and resulting gender-specific mental health needs (e.g., effective prevention of eating disorders) are interconnected. On the one hand, a specific gender involves not only experiences on biological, psychological, and sociocultural levels, but also individual experiences that differ in gender groups without being specifically related to gendered roles (e.g., the role of rumination in girls’ depression) [110]. On the other hand, addressing several gender-specific aspects at once may indicate a lack of an appropriate etiological basis, otherwise required by experts in the field [32].
When looking at both controlled and uncontrolled studies, as we did in the present review, our findings indicate that most gender-specific interventions led to an improvement in mental health outcomes (particularly in mood, trauma- and stressor-related, and personality disorders). However, only 29 of the 43 studies reported effect sizes and only few studies (n = 13) yielded medium or large effects. Additionally, the outcomes regarding the effectiveness were heterogeneous and a comparison between programs was challenging because they differed in modality, duration, and setting. The studies yielded on average medium effect sizes with treatment studies yielding larger effects than universal intervention and prevention programs. This is in accordance with other reviews reporting a “hierarchy in effect sizes” for different intervention types with treatment studies yielding larger effects than prevention studies [111]. Assuming that most participants in prevention programs or universal interventions do not have severe symptoms, a reduction of symptoms or significant effects may be harder to find in these populations. This may also partially explain why universal body image programs and eating disorder prevention programs often yielded small or no effects.
However, the results regarding the effectiveness must be interpreted cautiously due to methodological deficits for some studies including lacking control groups, small sample sizes, short-term follow-ups and poor study quality. For instance, when examining only controlled studies, the average effect size was small (d = 0.37), and 27% yielded no effects. Thus, by including uncontrolled studies (for the purpose of a comprehensive review of gender-specific programs in this field), the reported improvements may be attributed to other factors. In summary, strong causal evidence (derived from RCTs) is lacking, calling for more RCTs in this research field.
Two other limitations concern our search strategy. We did not include terms related to sex and gender (e.g., “boy”/“girl” or “transgender”) as adding these terms would have led to more than 20,000 additional results only in PubMed. With a more comprehensive search strategy, additional publications that do not include terms referring to “gender-specific” or “sex-specific” could have been detected. However, we were aware of this limitation and decided to use our search strategy primarily for two reasons: First, we wanted to know how gender-specific aspects are considered and thus also how “gender-specific” is currently understood in child and adolescent mental health care. Secondly, we conducted pilot searches to ensure that our search was specific, but not overly sensitive. These pilot searches revealed that adding sex- and gender-related terms produced a lot of noise and few relevant records. To counter this limitation, we also screened impactful reviews and reference lists. We found it intriguing that gender-specific interventions very often addressed mental health problems that are more prevalent in another gender group (e.g., female-specific interventions for substance disorders). We believe this could be symptomatic in areas in which regular interventions largely point to a specific gender group, maybe even with a gender-specific approach, but fail to label the interventions as gender-specific. These limitations might be addressed in future studies, for example by analyzing and comparing intervention manuals of single-gender and mixed-gender interventions. Additionally, we restricted our search to English and German publications due to limited language, financial and time resources. Consequently, publications in other languages were excluded and the samples of the included studies were mostly drawn from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) countries—highlighting the dearth of studies from more diverse countries that impacts many different research fields [112].
Another limitation resulting from time constraints is that the screening process was primarily conducted by one author, while two other authors could only screen 10–13% each in the given time. However, the authors were in constant exchange and additionally consulted with the research group.
We identified only a single study comparing a gender-specific to a non-gender-specific intervention. Consequently, this review does not allow any conclusions regarding the comparative effectiveness of gender-specific vs. non-gender-specific interventions. On the one hand, this underlines an important research gap. On the other hand, it highlights that possible superior effectiveness is not the only rationale for gender-specific care. For instance, from a consumer perspective, a safe space where youth can be empowered and supported by peers and where they can share and explore their gendered experiences is also important [113].
Our review focused on gender in child and adolescent mental health care. Moreover, other social indicators, such as ethnicity and socioeconomic status, have an important impact on child and adolescent mental health outcomes and care [114, 115]. For this reason, we reported the ethnic/racial diversity for the included studies (Appendix B). Since these different social indicators interact with each other and shape individual experiences and health outcomes (intersectionality) [116], future research should assess how other (intersecting) social indicators are addressed in gender-specific care.
There are many approaches to advance the research on gender-specific care derived from this review. Researchers and mental health professionals can
-
1.
evaluate the effectiveness of existing gender-specific interventions;
-
2.
compare the effectiveness of non-gender-specific vs. gender-specific interventions (e.g., [92]);
-
3.
adapt existing and effective interventions to gender-specific needs (e.g., [64, 76, 77]);
-
4.
develop and evaluate gender-specific interventions for other mental health problems with known gender differences (e.g., ADHD, autism);
-
5.
develop and evaluate gender-specific interventions for underserved populations (e.g., [58, 87]);
-
6.
develop and evaluate gender-specific interventions that consider different social indicators (e.g., [60, 62, 87]);
-
7.
both differentiate between gender and sex and assess sexual identities to address vulnerable SGM groups (e.g., [105]);
-
8.
be encouraged to state to which degree an intervention that they report on is gender-specific; and
-
9.
collect gender data and report gender-differentiated results in evaluation studies of interventions.
Further recommendations are directed at mental health professionals and providers who can:
-
1.
teach their staff about gender-specific risk and protective factors and mental health needs (e.g., [104]); and
-
2.
sensitize each other for their own gender-stereotyped behavior or thinking.
Summary
In conclusion, this systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the existing research on gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care. It summarizes and discusses various gender-specific programs that employed a wide range of methods. The study quality of many studies was limited and the effectiveness heterogeneous. Additionally, gender-specific interventions focused on few mental health problems. To further advance the field of gender-specific child and adolescent mental health care, researchers and mental health professionals are called upon to develop and evaluate gender-specific interventions targeting other mental health problems and populations, in order to foster gender equity in mental health.
References
American Psychological Association (2015) APA dictionary of psychology, 2nd edn. American Psychological Association, Washington
Zahn-Waxler C, Shirtcliff EA, Marceau K (2008) Disorders of childhood and adolescence: gender and psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:275–303
Klasen F, Petermann F, Meyrose A-K, Barkmann C, Otto C, Haller A-C et al (2016) Verlauf psychischer Auffälligkeiten von Kindern und Jugendlichen [The trajectory of mental health problems in children and adolescents]. Kindh Entwickl 25(1):10–20
Van Droogenbroeck F, Spruyt B, Keppens G (2018) Gender differences in mental health problems among adolescents and the role of social support: results from the Belgian health interview surveys 2008 and 2013. BMC Psychiatry 18(1):6
Verhulst FC, Achenbach TM, van der Ende J, Erol N, Lambert MC, Leung PW et al (2003) Comparisons of problems reported by youths from seven countries. Am J Psychiatry 160(8):1479–1485
Slobodin O, Davidovitch M (2019) Gender differences in objective and subjective measures of ADHD among clinic-referred children. Front Hum Neurosci 13:441
Gershon J, Gershon J (2002) A meta-analytic review of gender differences in ADHD. J Atten Disord 5(3):143–154
Braun-Scharm H (2003) Geschlechtsspezifische Ausprägung depressiver Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter [Gender-specific expression of depressive disorders in childhood and adolescence]. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 151(6):628–632
Zito JM, Safer DJ, dosReis S, Gardner JF, Boles M, Lynch F (2000) Trends in the prescribing of psychotropic medications to preschoolers. JAMA 283(8):1025–1030
Cuffe SP, Waller JL, Addy CL, McKeown RE, Jackson KL, Moloo J et al (2001) A longitudinal study of adolescent mental health service use. J Behav Health Serv Res 28(1):1–11
Griffin JA, Cicchetti D, Leaf PJ (1993) Characteristics of youths identified from a psychiatric case register as first-time users of services. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 44(1):62–65
Chandra A, Minkovitz CS (2006) Stigma starts early: Gender differences in teen willingness to use mental health services. J Adolesc Health 38(6):754.e1-754.e8
Kaman A, Otto C, Klasen F, Westenhöfer J, Reiss F, Hölling H et al (2021) Risk and resource factors for depressive symptoms during adolescence and emerging adulthood: a 5-year follow-up using population-based data of the BELLA study. J Affect Disord 280(Pt A):258–266
Schraedley MAPK, Gotlib IH, Hayward C (1999) Gender differences in correlates of depressive symptoms in adolescents. J Adolesc Health 25(2):98–108
Kumpfer KL, Smith P, Summerhays JF (2008) A wakeup call to the prevention field: are prevention programs for substance use effective for girls? Subst Use Misuse 43(8–9):978–1001
Le LK, Barendregt JJ, Hay P, Mihalopoulos C (2017) Prevention of eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 53:46–58
Sontag LM, Graber JA (2010) Coping with perceived peer stress: gender-specific and common pathways to symptoms of psychopathology. Dev Psychol 46(6):1605–1620
Krause ED, Vélez CE, Woo R, Hoffmann B, Freres DR, Abenavoli RM et al (2017) Rumination, depression, and gender in early adolescence: a longitudinal study of a bidirectional model. J Early Adolesc 38(7):923–946
Connolly MD, Zervos MJ, Barone CJ, Johnson CC, Joseph CL (2016) The mental health of transgender youth: advances in understanding. J Adolesc Health 59(5):489–495
Levitan N, Barkmann C, Richter-Appelt H, Schulte-Markwort M, Becker-Hebly I (2019) Risk factors for psychological functioning in German adolescents with gender dysphoria: poor peer relations and general family functioning. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 28(11):1487–1498
Becerra-Culqui TA, Liu Y, Nash R, Cromwell L, Flanders WD, Getahun D et al (2018) Mental health of transgender and gender nonconforming youth compared with their peers. Pediatrics 141(5):e20173845
Meyer IH (2015) Resilience in the study of minority stress and health of sexual and gender minorities. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers 2(3):209–213
Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O et al (2011) Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. Lancet 378(9801):1515–1525
Fatori D, Salum G, Itria A, Pan P, Alvarenga P, Rohde LA et al (2018) The economic impact of subthreshold and clinical childhood mental disorders. J Ment Health 27(6):588–594
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE (2005) Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62(6):593–602
Otto C, Reiss F, Voss C, Wüstner A, Meyrose A-K, Hölling H et al (2020) Mental health and well-being from childhood to adulthood: design, methods and results of the 11-year follow-up of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 30(10):1559–1577
Pederson A, Greaves L, Poole N (2015) Gender-transformative health promotion for women: a framework for action. Health Promot Int 30(1):140–150
World Health Organization (2011) Gender mainstreaming for health managers: a practical approach. World Health Organization, Geneva
Piller S, Gibly J, Peled E (2019) The value and rationale of gender-specific intervention with at-risk adolescent girls. Child Fam Soc Work 24(1):69–76
National Research Council, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2009) Defining the scope of prevention. In: Oconnell ME, Boat T, Warner KE (eds) Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: progress and possibilities. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
World Health Organization (2004) Prevention of mental disorders: Effective interventions and policy options: summary report. World Health Organization, Geneva
Friedrich AA, Mendez LMR, Mihalas ST (2010) Gender as a factor in school-based mental health service delivery. School Psych Rev 39(1):122–136
Coulter RWS, Egan JE, Kinsky S, Friedman MR, Eckstrand KL, Frankeberger J et al (2019) Mental health, drug, and violence interventions for sexual/gender minorities: a systematic review. Pediatrics 144(3):e20183367
Bochicchio L, Reeder K, Ivanoff A, Pope H, Stefancic A (2022) Psychotherapeutic interventions for LGBTQ + youth: a systematic review. J LGBT Youth 19(2):152–179
Spano S. Stages of adolescent development [cited 2022 July 21]. Available from: http://www.actforyouth.net/resources/rf/rf_stages_0504.pdf.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71
Merry SN, McDowell HH, Hetrick SE, Cox GR, Brudevold-Iversen T, Bir JJ et al (2004) Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15:CD03380
Chesney-Lind M, Morash M, Stevens T (2008) Girls troubles, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: a review. Aust N Z J Criminol 41(1):162–189
Bendall S, Eastwood O, Cox G, Farrelly-Rosch A, Nicoll H, Peters W et al (2020) A systematic review and synthesis of trauma-informed care within outpatient and counseling health settings for young people. Child Maltreat 26(3):313–324
Kiss L, Quinlan-Davidson M, Pasquero L, Tejero PO, Hogg C, Theis J et al (2020) Male and LGBT survivors of sexual violence in conflict situations: a realist review of health interventions in low-and middle-income countries. Confl Health 14:11
Moynihan M, Pitcher C, Saewyc E (2018) Interventions that foster healing among sexually exploited children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Child Sex Abus 27(4):403–423
Leve LD, Chamberlain P, Kim HK (2015) Risks, outcomes, and evidence-based interventions for girls in the US juvenile justice system. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 18(3):252–279
Zahn MA, Day JC, Mihalic SF, Tichavsky L (2009) Determining what works for girls in the juvenile justice system: a summary of evaluation evidence. Crime Delinq 55(2):266–293
Hobaica S, Alman A, Jackowich S, Kwon P (2018) Empirically based psychological interventions with sexual minority youth: a systematic review. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers 5(3):313–323
Clarke AM, Kuosmanen T, Barry MM (2015) A systematic review of online youth mental health promotion and prevention interventions. J Youth Adolesc 44(1):90–113
Schwartz C, Drexl K, Fischer A, Fumi M, Löwe B, Naab S et al (2019) Universal prevention in eating disorders: a systematic narrative review of recent studies. Ment Health Prev 14(11):200162
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5(1):210
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174
Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 June 16]. Available from: https://www.ephpp.ca/PDF/Quality%20Assessment%20Tool_2010_2.pdf
Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG (2012) Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract 18(1):12–18
Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Berechnung von Effektstärken [Calculation of effect sizes]. 2016 [cited 2021 August 17]. Available from: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html
Turner HM, Bernard RM (2006) Calculating and synthesizing effect sizes. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord 33:42–55
Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Association, Washington
Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) (2009) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies Dictionary [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2022 October 25]. Available from: https://www.ephpp.ca/PDF/QADictionary_dec2009.pdf
Craig SL, Austin A (2016) The AFFIRM open pilot feasibility study: a brief affirmative cognitive behavioral coping skills group intervention for sexual and gender minority youth. Child Youth Serv Rev 64:136–144
Diamond GM, Diamond GS, Levy S, Closs C, Ladipo T, Siqueland L (2012) Attachment-based family therapy for suicidal lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents: a treatment development study and open trial with preliminary findings. Psychotherapy (Chic) 49(1):62–71
Lucassen MFG, Merry SN, Hatcher S, Frampton CMA (2015) Rainbow SPARX: a novel approach to addressing depression in sexual minority youth. Cogn Behav Pract 22(2):203–216
Arnold EM, Kirk RS, Roberts AC, Griffith DP, Meadows K, Julian J (2003) Treatment of incarcerated, sexually-abused adolescent females: An outcome study. J Child Sex Abus 12(1):123–139
O’Callaghan P, McMullen J, Shannon C, Rafferty H, Black A (2013) A randomized controlled trial of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for sexually exploited, war-affected Congolese girls. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 52(4):359–369
Smith DK, Chamberlain P, Deblinger E (2012) Adapting multidimensional treatment foster care for the treatment of co-occurring trauma and delinquency in adolescent girls. J Child Adolesc Trauma 5(3):224–238
Suarez E, Jackson DS, Slavin LA, Michels MS, McGeehan KM (2014) Project Kealahou: improving hawai ‘i’s system of care for at-risk girls and young women through gender-responsive, trauma-informed care. Hawai’i J Med Public Health 73(12):387–392
Whaling KM, der Sarkissian A, Sharkey J, Akoni LC (2020) Featured counter-trafficking program: resiliency interventions for sexual exploitation (RISE). Child Abuse Negl 100:104139
Bird EL, Halliwell E, Diedrichs PC, Harcourt D (2013) Happy Being Me in the UK: a controlled evaluation of a school-based body image intervention with pre-adolescent children. Body Image 10(3):326–334
Favaro A, Zanetti T, Huon G, Santonastaso P (2005) Engaging teachers in an eating disorder preventive intervention. Int J Eat Disord 38(1):73–77
Halliwell E, Diedrichs PC (2014) Testing a dissonance body image intervention among young girls. Health Psychol 33(2):201–204
López-Guimerà G, Sánchez-Carracedo D, Fauquet J, Portell M, Raich RM (2011) Impact of a school-based disordered eating prevention program in adolescent girls: general and specific effects depending on adherence to the interactive activities. Span J Psychol 14(1):293–303
McVey GL, Davis R (2002) A program to promote positive body image: a 1-year follow-up evaluation. J Early Adolesc 22(1):96–108
McVey GL, Davis R, Tweed S, Shaw BF (2004) Evaluation of a school-based program designed to improve body image satisfaction, global self-esteem, and eating attitudes and behaviors: a replication study. Int J Eat Disord 36(1):1–11
Raich RM, Sánchez-Carracedo D, López-Guimerà G, Portell M, Moncada A, Fauquet J (2008) A controlled assessment of school-based preventive programs for reducing eating disorder risk factors in adolescent Spanish girls. Eat Disord 16(3):255–272
Stewart DA, Carter JC, Drinkwater J, Hainsworth J, Fairburn CG (2001) Modification of eating attitudes and behavior in adolescent girls: a controlled study. Int J Eat Disord 29(2):107–118
Stice E, Shaw H, Burton E, Wade E (2006) Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: a randomized efficacy trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 74(2):263–275
Stice E, Marti CN, Spoor S, Presnell K, Shaw H (2008) Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: long-term effects from a randomized efficacy trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 76(2):329–340
Stice E, Rohde P, Gau J, Shaw H (2009) An effectiveness trial of a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for high-risk adolescent girls. J Consult Clin Psychol 77(5):825–834
Stice E, Rohde P, Shaw H, Gau J (2011) An effectiveness trial of a selected dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for female high school students: Long-term effects. J Consult Clin Psychol 79(4):500–508
Weigel A, Gumz A, Uhlenbusch N, Wegscheider K, Romer G, Löwe B (2015) Preventing eating disorders with an interactive gender-adapted intervention program in schools: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 15:21
Gumz A, Weigel A, Daubmann A, Wegscheider K, Romer G, Löwe B (2017) Efficacy of a prevention program for eating disorders in schools: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 17(1):293
Wick K, Brix C, Bormann B, Sowa M, Strauss B, Berger U (2011) Real-world effectiveness of a German school-based intervention for primary prevention of anorexia nervosa in preadolescent girls. Prev Med 52(2):152–158
Adametz L, Richter F, Strauss B, Walther M, Wick K, Berger U (2017) Long-term effectiveness of a school-based primary prevention program for anorexia nervosa: a 7-to 8-year follow-up. Eat Behav 25:42–50
Cummings AL, Hoffman S, Leschied AW (2004) A psychoeducational group for aggressive adolescent girls. J Spec Group Work 29(3):285–299
Goldstein NE, Giallella CL, Haney-Caron E, Peterson L, Serico J, Kemp K et al (2018) Juvenile Justice Anger Management (JJAM) Treatment for girls: results of a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Serv 15(4):386–397
Hoffman S, Cummings AL, Leschied AW (2004) Treating aggression in high-risk adolescent girls: a preliminary evaluation. Canad J Couns 38(2):59–74
Pepler D, Walsh M, Yuile A, Levene K, Jiang D, Vaughan A et al (2010) Bridging the gender gap: interventions with aggressive girls and their parents. Prev Sci 11(3):229–238
Walsh MM, Pepler DJ, Levene KS (2002) A model intervention for girls with disruptive behaviour disorders: the Earlscourt Girls Connection. Canad J Couns 36(4):297–311
Elliot DL, Goldberg L, Moe EL, Defrancesco CA, Durham MB, McGinnis W et al (2008) Long-term outcomes of the ATHENA (Athletes Targeting Healthy Exercise & Nutrition Alternatives) program for female high school athletes. J Alcohol Drug Educ 52(2):73–92
Elliot DL, Goldberg L, Moe EL, Defrancesco CA, Durham MB, Hix-Small H (2004) Preventing substance use and disordered eating: initial outcomes of the ATHENA (athletes targeting healthy exercise and nutrition alternatives) program. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158(11):1043–1049
Fang L, Schinke SP (2013) Two-year outcomes of a randomized, family-based substance use prevention trial for Asian American adolescent girls. Psychol Addict Behav 27(3):788–798
Goldberg L, MacKinnon DP, Elliot DL, Moe EL, Clarke G, Cheong J (2000) The adolescents training and learning to avoid steroids program: preventing drug use and promoting health behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154(4):332–338
Hinz A (2007) Prävention durch Unterstützung bei der Bewältigung geschlechts-spezifischer Entwicklungsaufgaben [Prevention through support in addressing gender-specific developmental tasks]. Z Pädagog Psychol 21(2):145–155
Roberts-Lewis AC, Welch-Brewer CL, Jackson MS, Pharr OM, Parker S (2010) Female juvenile offenders with HEART: preliminary findings of an intervention model for female juvenile offenders with substance use problems. J Drug Issues 40(3):611–625
Welch CL, Roberts-Lewis AC, Parker S (2009) Incorporating gender specific approaches for incarcerated female adolescents: multilevel risk model for practice. J Offender Rehabil 48(1):67–83
Schinke SP, Schwinn T (2005) Gender-specific computer-based intervention for preventing drug abuse among girls. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 31(4):609–616
Schinke SP, Cole KC, Fang L (2009) Gender-specific intervention to reduce underage drinking among early adolescent girls: a test of a computer-mediated, mother-daughter program. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 70(1):70–77
Schinke SP, Fang L, Cole KC (2009) Preventing substance use among adolescent girls: 1-year outcomes of a computerized, mother–daughter program. Addict Behav 34(12):1060–1064
Schinke SP, Fang L, Cole KC, Cohen-Cutler S (2011) Preventing substance use among Black and Hispanic adolescent girls: Results from a computer-delivered, mother–daughter intervention approach. Subst Use Misuse 46(1):35–45
Schwinn TM, Schinke SP, Di Noia J (2010) Preventing drug abuse among adolescent girls: outcome data from an internet-based intervention. Prev Sci 11(1):24–32
Schwinn TM, Thom B, Schinke SP, Hopkins J (2015) Preventing drug use among sexual-minority youths: findings from a tailored, web-based intervention. J Adolesc Health 56(5):571–573
Schwinn TM, Schinke SP, Hopkins J, Keller B, Liu X (2018) An online drug abuse prevention program for adolescent girls: posttest and 1-year outcomes. J Youth Adolesc 47(3):490–500
Schwinn TM, Schinke SP, Keller B, Hopkins J (2019) Two-and three-year follow-up from a gender-specific, web-based drug abuse prevention program for adolescent girls. Addict Behav 93:86–92
Walker SC, Duong M, Hayes C, Berliner L, Leve LD, Atkins DC et al (2019) A tailored cognitive behavioral program for juvenile justice-referred females at risk of substance use and delinquency: a pilot quasi-experimental trial. PLoS ONE 14(11):e0224363
Heider J, Fleck A, Peteler C, Anker S, Lieb S, Behrens M et al (2017) Dialektisch-Behaviorale Therapie für männliche Jugendliche mit Symptomen einer Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung [Dialectical behavior therapy for male adolescents with symptoms of borderline personality disorder]. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr 66(2):104–120
Hampel P, Jahr A, Backhaus O (2008) Geschlechtsspezifisches Anti-Stress-Training in der Schule [Gender-specific anti-stress training at school]. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr 57(1):20–38
Turner LK, Werner-Wilson RJ (2008) Phenomenological experience of girls in a single-sex day treatment group. J Fem Fam Ther 20(3):220–250
Crable AR, Underwood LA, Parks-Savage A, Maclin V (2013) An examination of a gender-specific and trauma-informed training curriculum: implications for providers. Int J Behav Consult Ther 7(4):30–37
Guss CE, Eiduson R, Khan A, Dumont O, Forman SF, Gordon AR (2020) “It’d Be Great to Have the Options There”: a mixed-methods study of gender identity questions on clinic forms in a primary care setting. J Adolesc Health 67(4):590–596
Benjet C (2009) Gender sensitive psychiatric care for children and adolescents. Contemporary Topics in Women's Mental Health: Global perspectives in a changing society. Wiley, Hoboken
World Health Organization (2005) Atlas: child and adolescent mental health resources: global concerns, implications for the future. World Health Organization, Geneva
Rosenvinge JH, Pettersen G (2015) Epidemiology of eating disorders, part I: introduction to the series and a historical panorama. Adv Eat Disord 3(1):76–90
Cohn L, Murray SB, Walen A, Wooldridge T (2016) Including the excluded: Males and gender minorities in eating disorder prevention. Eat Disord 24(1):114–120
Judd F, Armstrong S, Kulkarni J (2009) Gender-sensitive mental health care. Australas Psychiatry 17(2):105–111
Werner-Seidler A, Perry Y, Calear AL, Newby JM, Christensen H (2017) School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs for young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 51:30–47
Klein V, Savaş Ö, Conley TD (2022) How WEIRD and Androcentric Is Sex Research? Global Inequities in Study Populations. J Sex Res 59(7):810–817
Strömbäck M, Malmgren-Olsson E-B, Wiklund M (2013) ‘Girls need to strengthen each other as a group’: experiences from a gender-sensitive stress management intervention by youth-friendly Swedish health services – a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 13(1):907
Reiss F (2013) Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 90:24–31
Flores G (2010) Technical report—racial and ethnic disparities in the health and health care of children. Pediatrics 125(4):e979–e1020
Crenshaw K (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev 43(6):1241–1299
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health (ZMVI1-2520FSB901). The German Federal Ministry of Health had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Herrmann, L., Reiss, F., Becker-Hebly, I. et al. Systematic Review of Gender-Specific Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-023-01506-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-023-01506-z