Abstract
Dealing consistently with risk and uncertainty across the IPCC reports is a difficult challenge. Huge practical difficulties arise from the Panel’s scale and interdisciplinary context, the complexity of the climate change issue and its political context. The key question of this paper is if the observed differences in the handling of uncertainties by the three IPCC Working Groups can be clarified. To address this question, the paper reviews a few key issues on the foundations of uncertainty analysis, and summarizes the history of the treatment of uncertainty by the IPCC. One of the key findings is that there is reason to agree to disagree: the fundamental differences between the issues covered by the IPCC’s three interdisciplinary Working Groups, between the type of information available, and between the dominant paradigms of the practitioners, legitimately lead to different approaches. We argue that properly using the IPCC’s Guidance Notes for Lead Authors for addressing uncertainty, adding a pedigree analysis for key findings, and particularly communicating the diverse nature of uncertainty to the users of the assessment would increase the quality of the assessment. This approach would provide information about the nature of the uncertainties in addition to their magnitude and the confidence assessors have in their findings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ACIA (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment) (2004) Impacts of a warming Arctic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Allen M, Raper S, Mitchell J (2001) Uncertainty in the IPCC’s third assessment report. Sci 293(5529):430–433
Allen MR, Booth BBB, Frame DJ, Gregory JM, Kettleborough JA, Smith LA, Stainforth DA, Scoot PA (2004) Observational constraints on future climate: distinguishing robust from model-dependent statement of uncertainty in climate forecasting. In: Manning M, Petit M, Easterling D, Murphy J, Patwardhan A, Rogner H, Swart R, Yohe G (eds) IPCC workshop report: describing scientific uncertainties in climate change to support analysis of risk and of options. IPCC, Geneva
AuYeung F, Haywood JB, Schafer A (2001) Future light-duty vehicles: predicting their fuel consumption and carbon-reduction potential. SAE Paper 2001-01-1081. Presented at the SAE 2001 World Congress, Detroit, MI, March 5–8, 2001
Briscoe M (2004) Communicating uncertainties in the science of climate change: an overview of efforts to reduce miscommunication between the research community, policy makers and the public. International Centre for Technology Assessment
Craye M (2006) Personal communication. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy
Craye M, Funtowicz S, van der Sluijs JP (2005) A reflexive approach to dealing with uncertainties in environmental health risk science and policy. Int J Risk Assess Manage 5(2–4):216–236
De Finetti B (1937) La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses Sources Subjectives, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7, Paris, pp 1–68
Edwards PN (1999) Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: data-laden models, model-filtered data. Sci Cult 8:437–472
Ellsberg D (2001) Risk, ambiguity and decision. Studies in Philosophy, Routledge
Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Giles J (2002) Scientific uncertainty: when doubt is a sure thing. Nature 418:476–478
Gruebler A, Nakicenovic N (2001) Identifying dangers in an uncertain climate: we need to research all the potential outcomes, not try to guess which is likeliest to occur. Nature 412:15
Ha-Duong M (2005) Scenarios, probability and possible futures. Pre- and post-print documents halshs-00003925_v1, HAL, CCSd/CNRS
IPCC (2005) Guidance notes for lead authors of the IPCC fourth assessment report on addressing uncertainties. http://www.ipcc.ch/activity/uncertaintyguidancenote.pdf
IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007 – the physical science basis; contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007 – impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
IPCC (2007c) Climate change 2007 – mitigation of climate change; contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
ISO/IEC (2002) Guide 73:2002 risk management – vocabulary – guidelines for use in standards. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Janssen PHM, Petersen AC, van der Sluijs JP, Risbey JS, Ravetz JR (2003) RIVM/MNP guidance for uncertainty assessment and communication: quickscan hints & actions list. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaaldepot/Guidance_QS-HA.pdf
Janssen PHM, Petersen AC, van der Sluijs JP, Risbey JS, Ravetz JR (2005) A guidance for assessing and communicating uncertainties. Water Sci Tech 52:125–131
Kandlikar M, Risbey J, Dessai S (2005) Representing and communicating deep uncertainty in climate change assessment. Comptes Rendus Geoscience 337(4):443–455
Kloprogge P, van der Sluijs JP, Petersen AC (2005) A method for the analysis of assumptions in assessments: exploring the value-ladenness of two indicators in the fifth Dutch environmental outlook, MNP Report 550002010. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven
Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, Boston, MA
Kriegler E, Held H (2005) Utilizing belief functions for the estimation of future climate change. Int J Approx Reasoning 39:185–209
Manning M (2003) The difficulty of communicating uncertainty. Clim Change 61:9–16
Manning M, Petit M (2004) A concept paper for the AR4 cross cutting theme: uncertainties and risk. IPCC, Geneva
Manning M, Petit M, Easterling D, Murphy J, Patwardhan A, Rogner H, Swart R, Yohe G (2004) IPCC workshop report: describing scientific uncertainties in climate change to support analysis of risk and of options. IPCC, Geneva
McIntyre S, McKitrick R (2003) Corrections to the Mann, et al. (1998) proxy data base and Northern Hemisphere average temperature series. Energy Environ 14:751–771
McIntyre S, McKitrick R (2005) The M&M critique of MBH98 northern hemisphere climate index: update and implications. Energy Environ 16:69–100
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: general synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Moss RH, Schneider SH (2000) Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting. IPCC Supporting Material, IPCC, Geneva
Nakicenovic N et al (2005) Special report on emission scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Nimier V (2004) Information evaluation: a formalization of operational recommendations. Proceedings of the seventh international conference on information fusion, in Stockholm, Sweden, 28 June to 1 July 2004. http://www.fusion2004.foi.se/proc.html
NRC (National Research Council) (2006) Surface temperature reconstructions for the last 2,000 years. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Parker W (2005) Improving the treatment of uncertainty in IPCC assessments. Unpublished manuscript. http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~parkerw/papers/ParkerUncertaintyIPCC.pdf
Patt A (2008) Sources of climate change uncertainty and different response to assessed likelihood. Glob Environ Change (in press)
Patt A, Dessai S (2005) Communicating uncertainty: lessons learned and suggestions for climate change assessment. Compte Rendus Geosci 337:427–441
Patt A, Schrag D, Dessai S (2004) Communicating probabilities with words: potential pitfalls and biases. In: Manning M, Petit M, Easterling D, Murphy J, Patwardhan A, Rogner H, Swart R, Yohe G (eds) IPCC workshop report: describing scientific uncertainties in climate change to support analysis of risk and of options. IPCC, Geneva
Patt AG, Schrag D (2003) Using specific language to describe risk and probability. Clim Change 61:17–30
Petersen AC (2000) Philosophy of climate science. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:265–271
Petersen AC (2006) Simulating nature: a philosophical study of computer-model uncertainties and their role in climate science and policy advice, Het Spinhuis, Apeldoorn/Antwerpen. http://hdl.handle.net/1871/11385
Pittock BA, Jones RN, Mitchell CD (2001) Probabilities will help us plan for climate change. Nature 413:249
Popper KR (1959) The propensity interpretation of probability. Brit J Phil Sci 10:25–42
Price L, de la Rue du Can S, Sinton J, Worrell E (2006) Sectoral trends in global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBLN-56144, Berkeley, CA, USA
Raes F, Swart R (2007) Climate assessment: what’s next. Science 318:1386
Reilly J, Stone PH, Forest CE, Webster MD, Jacoby HD, Prinn RG (2001) Uncertainty and climate change assessments. Science 293(5529):430–433
Risbey J (2004) Agency and the assignment of probabilities to greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. Clim Change 67:37–42
Risbey JS, Kandlikar M (2007) Expressions of likelihood and confidence in the IPCC uncertainty assessment process. Clim Change 85:19–31
Savage LJ (1954) The foundations of statistics. Dover, 0-486-62349-1
Schneider S (2001) What is ‘dangerous’ climate change? Nature 411:17–19
Schneider S (2002) Can we estimate the likelihood of climate change at 2100? Climate Change 52:441–451
Smithson M (1989) Ignorance and uncertainty: emerging paradigms. Springer, New York
Tonn B (2005) Imprecise probabilities and scenarios. Futures 37:767–757
Van der Sluijs JP, Craye M, Funtowicz S, Kloprogge P, Ravetz J, Risbey J (2005) Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Anal 25(2):481–492
Van der Sluijs JP, Petersen AC, Janssen PH, Risbey JS, Ravetz JR (2008) Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions. Environ Res Lett 3(024008):9
Von Mises R (1957) Probability, statistics and truth. Dover, New York
Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, van Asselt MBA, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integ Assess 4:5–17
Walley P (1991) Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London
Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventative paradigm. Global Environ Change 2:111–127
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Swart, R., Bernstein, L., Ha-Duong, M. et al. Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Climatic Change 92, 1–29 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9444-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9444-7