Abstract
Background
This study is the first to summarize the evidence on how the use of anti-inflammatory drugs during acute pain has an impact on the development of chronic pain.
Methods
Randomized controlled trials retrieved from nine databases included anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs or steroids) versus non-anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with acute pain and reported the incidence of chronic pain. No specified date, age, sex, or language restrictions. Subgroup analyses were performed according to pain classification, follow-up time, and medication. The GRADE method was used to evaluate quality of evidence.
Results
A total of 29 trials (5220 patients) were included. Steroids or NSAIDs did not reduce the incidence of chronic nociceptive pain. Steroid use in acute phase significantly reduced the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain. In subgroup analysis, benefits were observed for methylprednisolone and dexamethasone, with some adverse effects. Steroids or NSAIDs were statistically significant in reducing pain intensity over 1 year, but the effect size was too small, and whether the long-term effect is clinically relevant needs to be further studied.
Conclusion
Quality of the evidence was low to moderate. No drug can be recommended to prevent chronic nociceptive pain. Injections of steroids (methylprednisolone or dexamethasone) during the acute phase reduce the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain, but most included studies also used local anesthetics. The results are indirect and need to be interpreted with caution. The pooled data effect sizes for pain intensity were small, so the clinical relevance was unclear.
Study registration PROSPERO (CRD42022367030).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Once the pain lasts too long and far beyond the time for the body itself to recover, it becomes a burden (Clauw et al. 2019). The impact of even very low levels of pain on social and physical functioning is significant in terms of patients' attitudes towards their own health (Voscopoulos and Lema 2010). Chronic pain affects 8.3–13% of the population in the UK (Fayaz et al. 2016; Elliott et al. 2002). In the USA, about one in three people suffer from chronic pain, more than the number of people with cancer, diabetes and heart disease combined. It costs $635 billion a year (Gaskin and Richard 2012). The Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 again pointed out that pain and pain-related conditions are the leading causes of the global burden of disability and disease (GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators, 2017).
Chronic pain is defined as "pain which has persisted beyond normal tissue healing time (3 months)" according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) (Pain terms 1979; Treede et al. 2019). A study by Marc Parisien (Parisien et al. 2022) found that the use of anti-inflammatory drugs (steroids or NSAIDs) hindered pain recovery during acute pain phase. This study's conclusions are groundbreaking. The results should be replicated before major changes to current clinical practice can be made.
Chronic pain is a priority in post-acute and long-term care (Drake et al. 2019). Epidemiological studies have explored the risk factors for the development of chronic pain (Mills et al. 2019). While, few interventions to prevent chronic pain have been identified (Gewandter et al. 2015). No previous study has evaluated the effect of the use of anti-inflammatory drugs during the acute phase on the incidence of chronic pain. To improve the knowledge based on existing evidence, explore how the use of anti-inflammatory drugs during acute pain affects the development of chronic pain, we designed and conducted this study.
Methods
Study eligibility
Trials were eligible for inclusion if they: (1) Public published or registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, full data available, randomized, controlled, parallel designed trials with a follow-up of at least 3 months [pain lasting more than 3 months was defined as chronic pain (Treede et al. 2019)]. (2) The types of pain studied were nociceptive pain (including pain in the bones, muscles and skin, such as acute post-operative pain (APSP), etc. (Cohen et al. 2021)) or neuropathic pain [such as herpes zoster, acute lumbar radiculopathy, etc. (Finnerup et al. 2016)], with a duration of no more than 3 months before the first visit. (3) Anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs or steroids) versus any non-anti-inflammatory control. (4) Outcome measure must include the incidence of chronic pain or pain intensity. Studies were excluded if they: (1) were animal or cell experiments, (2) were nonpharmacologic or follow-up time was less than 3 months. (3) Were cancer pain, bacterial infections, visceral pain, muscle cramps and nociplastic pain. (4) The type of pain could not be accurately resolved. This study is registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42022367030). We anticipated that there would be great heterogeneity in the retrieved literature in terms of pain types and interventions, so we adjusted the original protocol before analysis including screening studies and subgroup analyses.
Search strategy
This study followed the PRISMA Statement. One investigator (HLY) searched 9 databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CBMdisc, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP. No specified date, age, sex, or language restrictions (search strategy is shown in supplementary Table 1). We also searched cited references of relevant trial reports and reviews for potentially eligible studies.
Selection of studies
After deleting the duplicate literatures through Noteexpress (v3.9.0.9588) software, two reviewers (HLY, LG) independently screened all the study by reading the title and abstract. All studies deemed eligible after reading the title and abstract were reviewed by two pairs of reviewers (HLY, BHZ, WL, TJW) to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or by consulting an adjudicator (MXH or YJZ).
Data extraction
Two paired reviewers (MYJ, JSY; HLY, LG) independently extracted this information from each study. Data extraction tables were designed to extract study characteristics and outcome information as recommended in the Cochrane Handbook (Higgins et al. 2022): year of publication, authors, journal, geographic location, funding source, design, participants, cohort size, aims and intervention, follow-up time point and outcomes. If the data of the study were represented by figures, the data were extracted by two rreviewers (HLY, LG) using data extraction software (EngaugeDigitizer 11.3). For dates not reported, the two reviewers (HLY, LG) calculated from the available data according to the conversion formula suggested in Cochrane Handbook.
Outcomes of interest
The primary outcome is the number of participants with persistent pain (three months or greater). The secondary outcomes was adverse events.
Risk of bias assessment
The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed by two researchers(MYJ, YXX) using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (Sterne et al. 2019), for risk assessment of bias in RCT. The evaluator should make a low bias risk, high bias risk and unclear judgment for each project. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or by consulting an adjudicator (XL).
Data analysis
RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis of the data. Comparisons were 2-tailed using a P < 0.05 threshold.The effect size was pooled across trials using a random (I2 < 50%) or fixed (I2 > 50%) effects model and heterogeneity was expressed using the I2 statistic. For continuous data, standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) and 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic. For dichotomous data, we calculated relative risks (RR) and 95% CI on the basis of the frequency of events in each treatment group. The results of data analysis are presented using forest plots. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing each study individually to assess the consistency and quality of the results.
Subgroup analyses
Nociceptive and neuropathic pain were divided into two subgroups for analysis. Then we divided the above two subgroups into 1–2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 1–2 years according to the different follow-up time. Finally, steroids and NSAIDs were analyzed separately. Other confounding factors affecting the analysis such as causes of pain and interventions will also be included in different subgroups for analysis.
Quality of evidence
We applied the GRADE approach to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence (Guyatt et al. 2008, b). Two independent reviewers (MXH, XL) assessed quality of the evidence from all studies and categorized it into four levels: high, moderate, low, and very low. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Result
Study selection and characteristics
A total of 3803 articles were retrieved in nine databases, and 116 articles were found through other sources such as references. After removing 779 duplicate articles, the remaining 3140 articles were screened. Finally, 29 eligible articles were included (Fig. 1). Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the studies included in the evidence synthesis. The duration of pain was less than 3 months in all participants before the first visit.
Risk of bias and grading of evidence assessment
Eighteen studies had a low risk of bias, 3 studies had an unclear risk of bias, and 8 studies had a high risk of bias (supplementary Fig. 1). Quality of the evidence was moderate overall (Table 2). The heterogeneity and imprecision of the combined effect size was the main reason for the downgrade.
Nociceptive pain
Of the 20 studies (3788 participants) involving nociceptive pain, 1 study evaluated both steroids and NSAIDs (in different group) (Romundstad et al. 2006), 9 studies evaluated steroids (Turan et al. 2015; Romundstad et al. 2006; Bogefeldt et al. 2008; Dojode 2012; Lin et al. 2010; Spijker-Huiges et al. 2014; Saied et al. 2015; Mardani-Kivi et al. 2015; Li et al. 2018), and 12 studies evaluated NSAIDs (van Helmond et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2013; Romundstad et al. 2006; Ling et al. 2016; Fransen et al. 2006; Comez et al. 2015; Bugada et al. 2015; Hancock et al. 2007; Shin et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2014; Haddad et al. 2019; Ge et al. 2021).
The number of participants with persistent pain
Steroids
Of the 9 studies involving steroids, 5 studies (1556 participants) reported the incidence of chronic pain (Turan et al. 2015; Romundstad et al. 2006; Bogefeldt et al. 2008; Saied et al. 2015; Li et al. 2018). Moderate quality evidence supports that steroid use during the acute phase of pain does not reduce the incidence of chronic nociceptive pain compared with control (RR 0.94 [95% CI 0.85–1.04], P = 0.25, I2 = 13%; Fig. 2), with no reported adverse events. Subgroup analyses of the three studies (Turan et al. 2015; Romundstad et al. 2006; Li et al. 2018) involving postoperative pain (n = 1314) showed no difference in the effect of steroids on the incidence of chronic pain compared with the control group (RR 0.98 [95% CI 0.88–1.09]; supplementary Fig. 2). Two other small sample studies (Bogefeldt et al. 2008; Saied et al. 2015) of non-postoperative pain (n = 242) showed that steroids can reduce the incidence of chronic pain, but neither reported therapeutic doses (RR 0.72 [95% CI 0.54–0.96]; supplementary Fig. 3), results need to be interpreted with caution.
The steroids evaluated included 2 methylprednisolone (125 mg/250 mg iv., single dose) (Turan et al. 2015; Romundstad et al. 2006), 1 betamethasone (1 cc local injection, duration unknown) (Saied et al. 2015), 1 dexamethasone (10 mg thoracic paravertebral block, single dose) (Li et al. 2018), 1 no specific medications and dose were not reported (Bogefeldt et al. 2008). No serious drug-related complications in the five studies. Subgroup analysis of the long-term outcomes of methylprednisolone (n = 1262) showed that a single dose (125 mg/250 mg iv.) did not reduce the incidence of chronic nociceptive pain compared with placebo (RR 0.83 [95% CI 0.46–1.50], supplementary Fig. 4).
NSAIDs
Of the 12 studies involving NSAIDs, 9 studies (2015 participants) reported the incidence of chronic pain (Sun et al. 2013; Romundstad et al. 2006; Ling et al. 2016; Fransen et al. 2006; Bugada et al. 2015; Hancock et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2014; Haddad et al. 2019; Ge et al. 2021). Very-low quality evidence supports that NSAIDs use during the acute phase of pain does not reduce the incidence of chronic nociceptive pain compared with control (RR 0.80 [95% CI 0.64–1.00], P = 0.05, I2 = 54%; Fig. 3). Subgroup analysis of 8 studies (n = 1776) involving postoperative pain showed a benefit of NSAIDs in reducing the incidence of chronic pain during the one-year follow-up period (RR 0.72 [95% CI 0.55–0.96]; supplementary Fig. 5), although this benefit was observed only at the one-year time point (n = 304, P for interaction = 0.04). The quality of evidence is very low and the results need to be interpreted with caution. Only one (Hancock et al. 2007) of the 9 studies involved non-postoperative pain and subgroup analysis was not possible.
Of the 4 studies followed for 1–2 years, 3 reported parecoxib (40 mg iv.) (Ling et al. 2016; Romundstad et al. 2006; Haddad et al. 2019). Two single dose studies had no adverse effects (Haddad et al. 2019; Romundstad et al. 2006) and one study in which five doses were administered within 60-h had hypotension, dizziness, nausea and vomiting but no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups (Ling et al. 2016). Another study reported flurbiprofen axetil (50 mg iv., 2 doses within 12 h) without adverse effects (Sun et al. 2013).
The NSAIDs reported in the 9 studies included 4 parecoxib (40 mg iv., single doses/6 doses within 12 h) (Ling et al. 2016; Haddad et al. 2019; Romundstad et al. 2006; Ge et al. 2021), 2 ketorolac (30 mg iv. tid./first 24 h, 10 mg iv. tid./3 days; 2 mg single intrathecal injection) (Wang et al. 2014; Bugada et al. 2015), 1 flurbiprofen axetil (50 mg iv., 2 doses within 12 h) (Sun et al. 2013), 1 ibuprofen (400 mg po., tid./14 days) (Fransen et al. 2006), and 1 diclofenac (dose unknown po., bid./28 days) (Hancock et al. 2007). Subgroup analysis showed that neither parecoxi (n = 354, RR 0.55 [95% CI 0.29–1.06], supplementary Fig. 6) nor ketorolac (n = 251, RR 0.94 [95% CI 0.29–3.07], supplementary Fig. 7) reduced the incidence of chronic nociceptive pain.
Intensity of pain
Steroids
Of the 9 studies involving steroids, 6 studies (358 participants) reported intensity of pain (Dojode 2012; Lin et al. 2010; Spijker-Huiges et al. 2014; Saied et al. 2015; Mardani-Kivi et al. 2015; Li et al. 2018). Low quality evidence supported the use of steroids to reduce pain intensity in chronic nociceptive pain over the 6-month follow-up period (SMD − 0.46 [95% CI − 0.72 to − 0.19], P = 0.0007, I2 = 67%; Fig. 4), with no adverse effects observed. Subgroup analysis of 5 studies involving non-postoperative pain (n = 306) showed the same trend (SMD − 0.43 [95% CI − 0.71 to − 0.15]; supplementary Fig. 8). Only one (Li et al. 2018) of the 6 studies involved postoperative pain and subgroup analysis was not possible. There was considerable heterogeneity in the results. Sensitivity analysis showed that the heterogeneity was significantly reduced after removing the two studies (Dojode 2012; Mardani-Kivi et al. 2015). It may be caused by the significant difference in efficacy between the selected control groups (bupivacaine local injection, intermediate shock wave).
Reported drugs included 2 methylprednisolone (40 mg/80 mg local injection) (Dojode 2012; Mardani-Kivi et al. 2015), 2 triamcinolone (40 mg local injection/80 mg epidural injection) (Lin et al. 2010; Spijker-Huiges et al. 2014), 1 betamethasone (1 cc local injection) (Saied et al. 2015), and 1 dexamethasone (10 mg/thoracic paravertebral block, single dose) (Li et al. 2018). All six studies had small sample sizes, five of them did not report duration of medication intervention, and intervention methods in the control group varied considerably, so we did not perform subgroup analyses by drugs.
NSAIDs
Of the 12 studies involving NSAIDs, 5 studies (1270 participants) reported intensity of pain (van Helmond et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2013; Fransen et al. 2006; Comez et al. 2015; Shin et al. 2013). Moderate quality evidence supported the use of NSAIDs to reduce pain intensity in chronic nociceptive pain over the 6-month follow-up period (SMD − 0.29 [95% CI − 0.54 to − 0.04], P = 0.02, I2 = 75%; Fig. 4), with bleeding as an adverse effect (ibuprofen 400 mg po., tid./14 days). Sensitivity analysis showed that heterogeneity was significantly reduced after excluding one studies (Fransen et al. 2006), from 75 to 61%. The other four studies were all administered by injection, and this study was administered by oral administration, which may be the cause of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis of 4 studies involving postoperative pain (n = 1212) showed the same trend (SMD − 0.31 [95% CI − 0.59 to − 0.03]; supplementary Fig. 9). Only one (Shin et al. 2013) of the 5 studies involved non-postoperative pain and subgroup analysis was not possible.
Reported drugs included dexketoprofen (50 mg iv., 2 doses within 24 h) (Comez et al. 2015), flurbiprofen axetil (50 mg iv., 2 dose within 12 h) (Sun et al. 2013), parecoxib (40 mg iv., 2 dose within 12 h) + celecoxib (200 mg po., qd./5 days) (van Helmond et al. 2016), ibuprofen (400 mg po., tid./14 days) (Fransen et al. 2006) and diclofenac (75 mg im., duration unknow) (Shin et al. 2013). Subgroup analyses could not be performed to combine data for individual drugs.
Neuropathic pain
Of the 11 studies (1553 participants) involving neuropathic pain, 10 studies evaluated steroids (Benoldi et al. 1991; van Wijck et al. 2006; Makharita et al. 2012, 2015; Spijker-Huiges et al. 2014; Goldberg et al. 2015; Cui et al. 2017, 2018; El-Sayed et al. 2021; Ni et al. 2017) and only 1 study evaluated NSAIDs (Shin et al. 2013).
The number of participants with persistent pain
Of the 10 studies involving steroids, 9 studies (1432 participants) reported the incidence of chronic pain (Benoldi et al. 1991; van Wijck et al. 2006; Makharita et al. 2012, 2015; Goldberg et al. 2015; Cui et al. 2017, 2018; El-Sayed et al. 2021; Ni et al. 2017). Low quality evidence supports a significant reduction (53% lower) in the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain with the use of steroids in the acute phase compared with the control group during the 6-month follow-up period (RR 0.47 [95% CI 0.36–0.62], P < 0.0001, I2 = 72%; Fig. 5). Adverse reactions included insomnia, nervousness, increased appetite, dyspepsia, dizziness, headache, arthralgia, and arthralgia. The pooled results showed great heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis showed that the heterogeneity was reduced to 65% when one study (Goldberg et al. 2015) was removed. This study looked at the effect of oral prednisone on acute radiculopathy, whereas the other studies were all acute herpes zoster and most were administered in combination with local anesthetic injections. Subgroup analysis of 8 studies (Benoldi et al. 1991; van Wijck et al. 2006; Makharita et al. 2012, 2015; Cui et al. 2017, 2018; El-Sayed et al. 2021; Ni et al. 2017) involving acute herpes zoster (n = 1163) showed that steroids significantly reduced the incidence of chronic pain (67% lower) over a 6-month follow-up period compared with usual care(RR 0.33 [95% CI 0.24–0.48]; supplementary Fig. 10).
The drugs reported included 4 methylprednisolone [40 mg intracutaneous injection, single (Cui et al. 2018) or 4 doses within 1 week (Cui et al. 2017)/erector spinae plane block, single (El-Sayed et al. 2021); 80 mg epidural injection, single dose (van Wijck et al. 2006)], 2 dexamethasone [8 mg paravertebral injection, single or 2 doses (Makharita et al. 2012, 2015)], prednisone [35 mg po., single dose for 10 days and reduced to 0 over next 21 days (Benoldi et al. 1991); 60 mg,40 mg, 20 mg, each dose for 5 days (Goldberg et al. 2015)] and 1 triamcinolone [10 mg subcutaneous injection, 3 doses within 3 weeks (Ni et al. 2017)]. With the exception of oral prednisone, steroid injections were combined with local anesthetics. This makes it difficult to evaluate the effect of a single steroid on the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain and downgrades the quality of evidence from moderate to low. Subgroup analyses (supplementary Figs. 11 and 12) showed that both methylprednisolone (n = 828, RR 0.52 [95% CI 0.38–0.73]) and dexamethasone (n = 199, RR 0.33 [95% CI 0.22–0.51]) combined with local anesthetic injection significantly reduced the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain and adverse effects of dizziness, headache, back pain, and somnolence were observed. However, adverse effects such as insomnia, nervus, increased appetite, dyspepsia, headache, and arthralgia were observed with multiple doses of oral prednisone, while no significant clinical benefit was observed (n = 305, RR 0.77 [95% CI 0.55–1.09], supplementary Fig. 13).
Intensity of pain
Of the 10 studies involving steroids, 6 studies (721 participants) reported intensity of pain (Makharita et al. 2012, 2015; Spijker-Huiges et al. 2014; Goldberg et al. 2015; Cui et al. 2017, 2018). Moderate quality evidence supports the use of steroids in the acute phase to reduce pain intensity, with statistically significant differences compared with controls (MD − 0.61 [95% CI − 0.77 to − 0.45], P < 0.0001, I2 = 38%; Fig. 5). Subgroup analysis of 4 studies (Makharita et al. 2012, 2015; Cui et al. 2017, 2018) involving acute herpes zoster (n = 1163; MD − 0.76 [95% CI − 1.04 to − 0.48]; supplementary Fig. 14) and 2 studies (Spijker-Huiges et al. 2014; Goldberg et al. 2015) involving acute radiculopathy (n = 332; MD − 0.67 [95% CI − 1.19 to − 0.16]; supplementary Fig. 15) showed the same trend. However, the pooled effect sizes were small, and whether the long-term benefits are clinically relevant is difficult to determine.
The drugs reported included 2 methylprednisolone (40 mg intracutaneous injection, single (Cui et al. 2017)/4 doses within 1 week (Cui et al. 2018)), 2 dexamethasone (8 mg paravertebral injection, single (Makharita et al. 2012)/2 doses (Makharita et al. 2015)), 1 prednisone (60 mg,40 mg, 20 mg, each dose for 5 days) (Goldberg et al. 2015) and 1 triamcinolone (80 mg epidural injection, unknown duration) (Spijker-Huiges et al. 2014). Subgroup analysis (supplementary Figs. 16 and 17) showed that both methylprednisolone (n = 190, MD − 0.97 [95% CI − 1.32 to − 0.61]) and dexamethasone (n = 199, MD − 0.61 [95% CI − 0.95 to − 0.26]) combined with local anesthetic injection could reduce the intensity of neuropathic pain during the 6-month follow-up period, and the adverse effects included sleepiness and lower limb edema. Individual studies of triamcinolone acetonide and prednisone could not be combined for data.
Discussion
Summary of evidence
Within 29 (n = 5220) randomized controlled trials, APSP was the main research model for nociceptive pain (n = 3788) and acute herpes zoster is for neuropathic pain (n = 1553). The synthesis of available evidence suggests that neither steroids (moderate quality) nor NSAIDs (very low quality) can be recommended to prevent chronic nociceptive pain during the acute phase of pain. The use of steroids in the acute phase significantly reduced the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain (53% lower, low quality). There are insufficient data to assess the association between NSAIDs and neuropathic pain. Both steroids (low quality) and NSAIDs (moderate quality) reduce pain intensity, but the combined effect sizes are small and there is substantial heterogeneity. Whether the long-term effect is clinically relevant needs to be further studied.
Subgroup analyses by cause of pain (postoperative or non-postoperative pain; acute herpes zoster or acute radiculopathy) showed the same trend as described above. Subgroup analyses showed that methylprednisolone (40 or 80 mg) and dexamethasone (8 mg) combined with local anesthesia injections significantly reduced the incidence and intensity of chronic neuropathic pain, with adverse effects including dizziness, headache, back pain, and somnolence. Administration methods include epidural injection, intradermal injection and paravertebral injection. Neither methylprednisolone (125 mg or 250 mg iv.), parecoxib (40mgiv.), nor ketorolac (30 mg iv./2 mg intradural injection) reduced the incidence of chronic nociceptive pain. Due to limitations in the number and design of the studies, we were unable to do separate subgroup analyses for all drugs.
Limitations of previous studies
Previous studies have discussed the relationship between anti-inflammatory drugs and chronic nociceptive pain, mainly using postoperative pain as a research model. The study by Ian Gilron et al. (Carley et al. 2021), which reviewed the evidence for the use of drugs to prevent chronic nociceptive pain after surgery, showed that none of the drugs studied to date could be recommended. Compared with similar degrees of nociceptive pain, neuropathic pain might be associated with greater decrements in quality of life (Saavedra-Hernández et al. 2012; Spahr et al. 2017). However, there is little evidence summarizing the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain. Many epidemiological studies have explored the risk factors for the development of chronic pain, while some factors can identify the individuals who are at risk of developing chronic pain, few interventions to prevent chronic pain have been identified (Gewandter et al. 2015).
Strengths and limitations of the study
There are some limitations to this meta-analysis. Twelve different drugs were used in the included studies, including five steroids and seven NSAIDs, and some were administered in different ways and for different durations. This leads to heterogeneity in partially integrated data, which is one of the main reasons for lowering the level of evidence. Studies of injectable administration in the treatment of neuropathic pain have all combined local anesthetics, making it difficult to assess the effect of steroids on the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain. We reduced the level of evidence due to indirectness. The incidence of chronic pain was not a primary outcome in some studies, which may be at risk for selective reporting. For pain intensity, the effect size in the pooled data was small and, although statistically significant, may not be clinically relevant. The small number of disease types included in the study is also a limitation of this study, with nociceptive pain mainly APSP and neuropathic pain mainly acute herpes zoster. Whether the conclusions can be generalized to pain caused by other diseases needs to be cautious. Some studies did not report the potential safety issues of the drug intervention, which was an impediment to conducting quantitative assessments to weigh the benefit–risk trade-offs. In the process of disease development, the patient's psychological factors, age, gender, etc. can also affect pain, but the current research has no way to evaluate or effectively eliminate the influence of these confounding factors.
This study focuses on how the use of anti-inflammatory drugs during the acute phase of pain affects the incidence of chronic pain and has several strengths. (1) This is the most recent review of the effects of acute-phase anti-inflammatory drug therapy on the incidence of chronic pain; (2) we conducted a comprehensive search of eligible RCTs in all languages, with no specified date, age, sex, or language restrictions, and also searched citations of relevant trial reports and reviews for potentially eligible studies; (3) all factors that may affect the results were considered in the analysis of the data. Subgroup analyses were designed according to the characteristics of the available studies, including pain type, follow-up time, drug, dose, and duration and (4) this review follows the PRISMA statement, and the procedures throughout the review process are rigorous and reproducible.
Interpreting the findings
For neuropathic pain, analgesic antidepressants and antiepileptic drugs are first-line medications based on many placebo-controlled trials that are of moderate and high quality (Finnerup et al. 2015; Derry et al. 2013, 2014). However, there is still no consensus on the effectiveness of the prevention of chronic neuropathic pain. The current data show that the combination of anti-inflammatory drugs (methylprednisolone and dexamethasone) in the acute phase of neuropathic pain may provide greater benefits to patients. But most steroids are combined with a local anesthetic, making the results indirect. Specifically designed single-drug intervention RCTs with long follow-up are needed. Effects of inflammatory response and other factors can last for a period of time (days or weeks), and studies of a single-shot drug intervention may be difficult to find valuable results.
Conclusion
The quality of evidence was low to moderate. Steroids or NSAIDs have analgesic effects in the acute phase but do not reduce the incidence of chronic nociceptive pain. For neuropathic pain, steroids use in the acute phase significantly reduced the incidence of chronic pain at 3–6 months (by 53%). Only methylprednisolone and dexamethasone had an observed benefit, with some adverse effects. However, the evidence is indirect and needs to be interpreted with caution.
Data availability
The analytic dataset is available on request by contacting the corresponding author.
References
Benoldi D, Mirizzi S, Zucchi A, Allegra F (1991) Prevention of post-herpetic neuralgia. Evaluation of treatment with oral prednisone, oral acyclovir, and radiotherapy. Int J Dermatol 30(4):288–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1991.tb04642.x
Bogefeldt J, Grunnesjö MI, Svärdsudd K, Blomberg S (2008) Sick leave reductions from a comprehensive manual therapy programme for low back pain: the Gotland Low Back Pain Study. Clin Rehabil 22(6):529–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215507087294
Bugada D, Lavand’homme P, Ambrosoli AL, Klersy C, Braschi A, Fanelli G, Saccani Jotti GM, Allegri M, SIMPAR Group (2015) Effect of postoperative analgesia on acute and persistent postherniotomy pain: a randomized study. J Clin Anesth 27(8):658–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.06.008
Carley ME, Chaparro LE, Choinière M, Kehlet H, Moore RA, Van Den Kerkhof E, Gilron I (2021) Pharmacotherapy for the prevention of chronic pain after surgery in adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 135(2):304–325. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003837
Clauw DJ, Essex MN, Pitman V, Jones KD (2019) Reframing chronic pain as a disease, not a symptom: rationale and implications for pain management. Postgrad Med 131(3):185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2019.1574403
Cohen SP, Vase L, Hooten WM (2021) Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances. Lancet (london, England) 397(10289):2082–2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00393-7
Comez M, Celik M, Dostbil A, Aksoy M, Ahiskalioglu A, Erdem AF, Aydin Y, İnce İ (2015) The effect of pre-emptive intravenous Dexketoprofen + thoracal epidural analgesia on the chronic post-thoracotomy pain. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(5):8101–8107
Cui JZ, Zhang XB, Zhu P, Zhao ZB, Geng ZS, Zhang YH, Tian L, Luan HF, Feng JY (2017) Effect of repetitive intracutaneous injections with local anesthetics and steroids for acute thoracic herpes zoster and incidence of postherpetic neuralgia. Pain Med (malden, Mass.) 18(8):1566–1572. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw190
Cui JZ, Zhang JW, Yan F, Yang XN, Wang XL, Zhao ZB, Zhang XB, Geng ZS (2018) Effect of single intra-cutaneous injection for acute thoracic herpes zoster and incidence of postherpetic neuralgia. Pain Manag Nurs 19(2):186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.09.002
Derry S, Sven-Rice A, Cole P, Tan T, Moore RA (2013) Topical capsaicin (high concentration) for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013(7):CD007393. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007393
Derry S, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA, Quinlan J (2014) Topical lidocaine for neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014(7):CD010958. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010958.pub2
Dojode CM (2012) A randomised control trial to evaluate the efficacy of autologous blood injection versus local corticosteroid injection for treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Bone Joint Res 1(8):192–197. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.18.2000095
Drake C, Wald HL, Eber LB, Trojanowski JI, Nearing KA, Boxer RS (2019) Research priorities in post-acute and long-term care: results of a stakeholder needs assessment. J Am Med Dir Assoc 20(7):911–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.02.018
Elliott AM, Smith BH, Hannaford PC, Smith WC, Chambers WA (2002) The course of chronic pain in the community: results of a 4-year follow-up study. Pain 99(1–2):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00138-0
El-Sayed MA, Zanaty O, Shafshak W, Abdelmaksoud R, Eldine HG (2021) Role of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block in management of acute herpes zoster pain and incidence of post-herpetic neuralgia. Egypt J Anaesth 37(1):343–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2021.1955517
Fayaz A, Croft P, Langford RM, Donaldson LJ, Jones GT (2016) Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies. BMJ Open 6(6):e010364. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010364
Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, Gilron I, Haanpää M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Kamerman PR, Lund K, Moore A, Raja SN, Rice AS, Rowbotham M, Sena E, Siddall P, Smith BH, Wallace M (2015) Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 14(2):162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0
Finnerup NB, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, Baron R, Bennett DLH, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, Freeman R, Hansson P, Nurmikko T, Raja SN, Rice ASC, Serra J, Smith BH, Treede RD, Jensen TS (2016) Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain 157(8):1599–1606. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492
Fransen M, Anderson C, Douglas J, MacMahon S, Neal B, Norton R, Woodward M, Cameron ID, Crawford R, Lo SK, Tregonning G, Windolf M, HIPAID Collaborative Group (2006) Safety and efficacy of routine postoperative ibuprofen for pain and disability related to ectopic bone formation after hip replacement surgery (HIPAID): randomised controlled trial. BMJ (clin Res Ed) 333(7567):519. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38925.471146.4F
Gaskin DJ, Richard P (2012) The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain 13(8):715–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2012.03.009
GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (2017) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet (london, England) 390(10100):1211–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2
Ge X, Pan Y, Jin D, Wang Y, Ge S (2021) Effect of perioperative use of parecoxib on chronic post-surgical pain in elderly patients after hepatectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 22(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-021-00501-1
Gewandter JS, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Fillingim RB, Gilron I, Markman JD, Oaklander AL, Polydefkis MJ, Raja SN, Robinson JP, Woolf CJ, Ziegler D, Ashburn MA, Burke LB, Cowan P, George SZ, Goli V, Graff OX, Iyengar S, Walco GA (2015) Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 156(7):1184–1197. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000191
Goldberg H, Firtch W, Tyburski M, Pressman A, Ackerson L, Hamilton L, Smith W, Carver R, Maratukulam A, Won LA, Carragee E, Avins AL (2015) Oral steroids for acute radiculopathy due to a herniated lumbar disk: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313(19):1915–1923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.4468
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group (2008a) What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ (clin Res Ed) 336(7651):995–998. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group (2008b) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (clin Res Ed) 336(7650):924–926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
Haddad F, Jaoua H, Mrabet A, Bousselmi J, Ben Fadhel K (2019) Parecoxib in laparoscopic surgery for simple vesicular lithiasis. Tunis Med 97(12):1338–1344
Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, McLachlan AJ, Cooper CW, Day RO, Spindler MF, McAuley JH (2007) Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (london, England) 370(9599):1638–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61686-9
Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li TJ, Page M, Welch V (2022) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 6.3. The Cochrane Collaboration. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
Li XL, Zhang Y, Dai T, Wan L, Ding GN (2018) The effects of preoperative single-dose thoracic paravertebral block on acute and chronic pain after thoracotomy: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Medicine 97(24):e11181. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011181
Lin YC, Tu YK, Chen SS, Lin IL, Chen SC, Guo HR (2010) Comparison between botulinum toxin and corticosteroid injection in the treatment of acute and subacute tennis elbow: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89(8):653–659. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181cf564d
Ling XM, Fang F, Zhang XG, Ding M, Liu QA, Cang J (2016) Effect of parecoxib combined with thoracic epidural analgesia on pain after thoracotomy. J Thorac Dis 8(5):880–887. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.03.45
Makharita MY, Amr YM, El-Bayoumy Y (2012) Effect of early stellate ganglion blockade for facial pain from acute herpes zoster and incidence of postherpetic neuralgia. Pain Physician 15(6):467–474
Makharita MY, Amr YM, El-Bayoumy Y (2015) Single paravertebral injection for acute thoracic herpes zoster: a randomized controlled trial. Pain Pract 15(3):229–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12179
Mardani-Kivi M, Karimi Mobarakeh M, Hassanzadeh Z, Mirbolook A, Asadi K, Ettehad H, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K, Fallah-Alipour K (2015) Treatment outcomes of corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shock wave therapy as two primary therapeutic methods for acute plantar fasciitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Foot Ankle Surg 54(6):1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.026
Mills SEE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH (2019) Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br J Anaesth 123(2):e273–e283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.023
Ni J, Wang X, Tang Y, Yang L, Zeng Y, Guo Y (2017) Subcutaneous injection of triamcinolone and lidocaine to prevent postherpetic neuralgia. Pain Physician 20(5):397–403
Pain terms (1979) Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Recommended by the IASP Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain 6(3):249
Parisien M, Lima LV, Dagostino C, El-Hachem N, Drury GL, Grant AV, Huising J, Verma V, Meloto CB, Silva JR, Dutra GGS, Markova T, Dang H, Tessier PA, Slade GD, Nackley AG, Ghasemlou N, Mogil JS, Allegri M, Diatchenko L (2022) Acute inflammatory response via neutrophil activation protects against the development of chronic pain. Sci Transl Med 14(644):eabj9954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abj9954
Romundstad L, Breivik H, Roald H, Skolleborg K, Romundstad PR, Stubhaug A (2006) Chronic pain and sensory changes after augmentation mammoplasty: long term effects of preincisional administration of methylprednisolone. Pain 124(1–2):92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2006.03.020
Saavedra-Hernández M, Castro-Sánchez AM, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Cleland JA, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Arroyo-Morales M (2012) The contribution of previous episodes of pain, pain intensity, physical impairment, and pain-related fear to disability in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 91(12):1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31827449a5
Saied A, Heshmati A, Sadeghifar A, Mousavi AA, Arabnejad F, Pooladsanj A (2015) Prophylactic corticosteroid injection in ulnar wrist pain in distal radius fracture. Indian J Orthop 49(4):393–397. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.159595
Shin JS, Ha IH, Lee J, Choi Y, Kim MR, Park BY, Shin BC, Lee MS (2013) Effects of motion style acupuncture treatment in acute low back pain patients with severe disability: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, comparative effectiveness trial. Pain 154(7):1030–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.013
Spahr N, Hodkinson D, Jolly K, Williams S, Howard M, Thacker M (2017) Distinguishing between nociceptive and neuropathic components in chronic low back pain using behavioural evaluation and sensory examination. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 27:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2016.12.006
Spijker-Huiges A, Winters JC, van Wijhe M, Groenier K (2014) Steroid injections added to the usual treatment of lumbar radicular syndrome: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in general practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:341. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-341
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (clin Res Ed) 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
Sun M, Liao Q, Wen L, Yan X, Zhang F, Ouyang W (2013) Effect of perioperative intravenous flurbiprofen axetil on chronic postmastectomy pain. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban = J Cent South Univ Med Sci 38(7):653–660. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2013.07.001
Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB, Giamberardino MA, Kaasa S, Korwisi B, Kosek E, Lavand’homme P, Nicholas M, Perrot S, Scholz J, Schug S, Smith BH, Wang SJ (2019) Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain 160(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384
Turan A, Belley-Cote EP, Vincent J, Sessler DI, Devereaux PJ, Yusuf S, van Oostveen R, Cordova G, Yared JP, Yu H, Legare JF, Royse A, Rochon A, Nasr V, Ayad S, Quantz M, Lamy A, Whitlock RP (2015) Methylprednisolone does not reduce persistent pain after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 123(6):1404–1410. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000915
van Helmond N, Steegers MA, Filippini-de Moor GP, Vissers KC, Wilder-Smith OH (2016) Hyperalgesia and persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial with perioperative COX-2 inhibition. PLoS ONE 11(12):e0166601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166601
van Wijck AJ, Opstelten W, Moons KG, van Essen GA, Stolker RJ, Kalkman CJ, Verheij TJ (2006) The PINE study of epidural steroids and local anaesthetics to prevent postherpetic neuralgia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (london, England) 367(9506):219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68032-X
Voscopoulos C, Lema M (2010) When does acute pain become chronic? Br J Anaesth 105(Suppl 1):i69–i85. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq323
Wang L, Bauer M, Curry R, Larsson A, Sessler DI, Eisenach JC (2014) Intrathecal ketorolac does not improve acute or chronic pain after hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth 28(5):790–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1798-6
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Yu Xudong, Dr. Liu Tong, Dr. Liu Yunze (Beijing University of Chinese Medicine) and Dr. Feng Tianxiao (Wangjing Hospital affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences), provided critical suggestions for the manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. HLY and MXH conceived the study. The literature search and screening data were done by HLY, LG, BHZ, WL, TJW. Data extraction was performed by HLY, LG, MYJ, JSY and DBW. Risk of bias and quality assessment was performed by MYJ, YXX, YJZ and MXH. HLY and LG analyzed and interpreted data. HLY wrote the manuscript. XL, YJZ and MXH supervised the study. All authors read and approved the fnal manuscript. HLY and LG contributed equally to this work. YJZ and MXH contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Huo, L., Liu, G., Deng, B. et al. Effect of use of NSAIDs or steroids during the acute phase of pain on the incidence of chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Inflammopharmacol 32, 1039–1058 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-023-01405-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-023-01405-8