Abstract
Background
PACK-CXL (photo-activated chromophore for keratitis–corneal cross-linking) is an alternative option in treatment of corneal infections. It inhibits corneal melting by increasing the stromal resistance, besides the microbicidal effect of photo-activated riboflavin.
Methods
Corneal infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staph aureus bacteria was induced in 20 eyes of 10 rabbits after 6 weeks of corneal cross-linking in half of the eyes, while the other acted as control group. Clinical and corneal histopathological examination was done to evaluate the extent of inflammation, ulceration, organism penetration, and depth of corneal stromal affection.
Results
The control eyes developed severe inflammation compared to the cross-linked eyes. Corneal melting occurred in 6 eyes in the control versus none in cross-linked group. Histopathological examination showed that the inflammation was confined to the superficial part of the stroma with localization of the inflammation in the cross-linked eyes in contrast to the control eyes that showed deep infiltration.
Conclusion
PACK-CXL provides infection localization through increasing the corneal rigidity and resistance to enzymatic digestion, even in the absence of the riboflavin microbicidal role. So, early PACK-CXL is worth to be considered in the IK treatment algorithm.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Infectious keratitis (IK) is the major cause of global corneal blindness [1]. Different microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites, are involved. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is the usual line of treatment for IK [2]. Unfortunately, the efficacy of antibiotic treatment is declining due to an emerging trend of antimicrobial resistance in ocular infection. Complications, such as corneal melting, perforation, and endophthalmitis, may require additional surgical interventions such as tectonic or therapeutic keratoplasty to save the eye and vision [3,4,5]. However, performing either tectonic or therapeutic keratoplasty in a “hot eye” is associated with a high risk of recurrence of the disease, secondary glaucoma, and graft rejection or failure [6,7,8,9]. These problems drove the need for an alternative to the antimicrobial treatment for IK.
Corneal cross-linking (CXL) using ultraviolet light-A (UV-A) and riboflavin is a technique introduced in the 1990s to stop the progression of corneal ectatic disorders such as keratoconus [10]. It works on increasing corneal biomechanical stability and rigidity. After multiple studies, it showed long-term efficacy and safety for most corneal ectatic disorders [11,12,13].
Ultraviolet radiation has long been known for its microbicidal effect through the direct damage of the DNA and RNA of different types of microorganisms. In addition, the reactive oxygen species generated from photo-activated riboflavin have a direct effect on the microbial DNA and cell membranes culminating in a strong synergistic antimicrobial action [14,15,16]. These effects together with the increased corneal rigidity and hence resistance to proteolytic enzymatic digestion of stromal collagen have made CXL an attractive alternative in the management of IK [17]. Initially, it was used to treat advanced infectious melting corneal keratitis. In most cases, stabilization of the melting process and thus avoidance of keratoplasty was achieved [18,19,20]. Recently, CXL is used to treat early bacterial IK as a first-line treatment without any adjunctive antibiotics with favorable results for most patients [21,22,23,24,25]. At the 9th International Cross-Linking Congress in 2013, with the increase in the number of publications on CXL for the treatment of infectious keratitis, a new terminology regarding this specific use was proposed. It aims to distinguish CXL for infections from CXL for corneal ectasia. The term PACK-CXL: photo-activated chromophore for keratitis–corneal cross-linking was adopted for CXL when treating infectious keratitis [10].
Our aim of the study is to prove the mechanical role of CXL if it guards against the progression of IK and stops organism penetration through increasing corneal rigidity and resistance to proteolytic enzymatic digestion of collagen fibers even in the absence of photo-activated riboflavin microbicidal role.
Materials and methods
This prospective interventional case–control experimental study was carried out on ten New Zealand albino rabbits of the male sex, obtained from the animal house of Kasr Alainy Hospital, Cairo University. The included rabbits weighed between 1.8 and 2.7 kg and were free from any anterior segment condition (i.e., corneal opacities from previous trauma or keratitis). We excluded any rabbits that had an underlying conjunctival infection (detected clinically or by microbiological analysis of a conjunctival swab). All animals were maintained following the National Research Council's Guide for the Care, ARRIVE guidelines, and the Egyptian guidelines for animal care. The study protocol was approved by the scientific committee of Ophthalmology department at Cairo University. Rabbits were prepped prior to inoculation for one week in “adaptation conditions” (24 °C ± 2 °C, 60 ± 5% relative humidity and 12-h light/dark cycle), one per cage, and fed a laboratory diet. Before bacterial inoculation, a conjunctival swab was obtained to ensure that no bacterial growth was detected and exclude underlying low-grade conjunctivitis was excluded. The animals were anesthetized via intramuscular injections of Ketavet® and Rompun® (each 0.25 mg/kg body weight), in addition to topical benoxinate 0.4%. The right eye of each rabbit had its central 8 mm epithelium removed and cross-linked (CSO Vega CMB X Linker, CSO Scandicci, Firenze, Italy) with riboflavin 0.1% solution drops (10 mg riboflavin5-phosphate in 10 mL of 20% dextran-T-500) applied every 3 min for 30 min, while exposed to UVA (360 nm, 3 mW/cm2) for 30 min. This corresponds to a fluence of a total of 5.8 J/cm2. After cross-linking, antibiotic OFLOX® (ofloxacin ophthalmic eye drops 0.3%, USA) was applied 3 times daily until complete re-epithelization was achieved. The left eye in each rabbit served as control. The rabbits were kept in the animal house of Cairo University and after a period of 6 weeks, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) was done for the cross-linked eye. The next day, bacterial keratitis was induced in the 20 eyes by the inoculation method. Topical corneal anesthesia was achieved by instilling a drop of benoxinate hydrochloride 0.4%. Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were obtained from the medical microbiology and Immunology department at Cairo University. The MRSA strain ATCC 33592 was isolated from blood samples, and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC (BAA-2108) strain was isolated from sputum samples. They were both obtained from the ATCC (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). We used both organisms as they have been shown to be the most common organisms in several IK studies [26]. The isolates were identified by standard bacteriological techniques. Suspensions of various isolates were prepared by culturing a specimen (i.e., a single colony) of each isolate, which was picked up from a pure culture on a plate with a standard loop and placed into 10 mL of nutrient broth. These isolates were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Specimens from the bacterial suspensions were taken with the standard loop and inoculated onto each animal’s abraded cornea after creating linear epithelial injuries with a sterile 21-gauge needle was used to. Intrastromal injection of a suspension of pure strain of P. aeruginosa was applied directly in the stroma of 10 eyes of 5 rabbits, while the other 10 eyes were injected with S. aureus bacteria. Slit lamp examination was done prior to infection and every 12 h post-infection until killing. The examination was scored according to the grading system described by Hobden et al. [27]. Briefly, scores of 0 (absent) to 4 (severe) were assigned to seven parameters: conjunctival injection, conjunctival chemosis, iritis (cell and flare), fibrin in the anterior chamber, hypopyon, stromal infiltrate, and stromal edema. The sum of the scores from each of the seven parameters reflects the degree of inflammation observed. So, the highest possible score is 28. The rabbits were killed within 72 h with the progression of the severity of infection in the control eyes.
The specimen was preserved in 10% buffered formalin and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined for evidence of inflammation in the bulbar conjunctiva, the meibomian glands, and the cornea. Histological examination was done for the extent of inflammation, epithelial changes, ulceration, organism penetration and the thickness of corneal stromal affection.
Results
Prior to infection
Following CXL, all epithelial defects healed within 2–5 days. ASOCT at week 6 showed an evident demarcation line (DL) at the anterior third to two thirds of the cornea as the example shown in Fig. 1. Before induction of infection, all rabbits had normal corneas with zero scores of inflammations.
Post-infection
Clinical examination
After 24 h of infection, all rabbits started to develop mild conjunctival injection and keratitis with superficial ulceration. Then, the inflammation in all eyes starts to worsen at a different pace. Notably, the control group without cross-linking developed the severest inflammation that necessitated killing after 72 h as shown in Fig. 2. Corneal melting occurred in 6 eyes in the control group versus none in cross-linked group. Table 1 shows the progression of Hobden score in the three groups over the 72 h.
Pathological examination
Pathological examination results showed that the ulceration, inflammation, and stromal affection were less in cross-linked subgroups (groups 1A, 1B) compared to the control (group 2).
Cross-linked eyes (groups 1A, 1B) showed that the infiltration of the inflammatory cells and the lymphocytic aggregation were confined underneath the corneal epithelium in the superficial part of the stroma with localization of inflammation and intact epithelium in the upper 30–50% of the stroma. There was minimal affection of iris and ciliary processes as shown in Fig. 3.
The control groups (group 2A, 2B) without cross-linking showed marked corneal abrasions and erosions with dense inflammatory infiltrates digesting the basement membrane, invading most of the stromal depth more than 75% of the specimens and with lymphocytic aggregation reaching the anterior chamber. There was more evident affection of iris and ciliary processes as shown in Fig. 4.
Discussion
Recently, evidence is accumulating proving that PACK-CXL has become a possible effective alternative to standard current antibiotic therapy in treating corneal infections. It may reduce the worldwide burden of microbial resistance to therapeutic agents [28]. That is why for the past years, researchers have started paying more attention to studying its efficacy in IK treatment with variable severity. In this study, we tried to prove the long-term mechanical effect of CXL in localizing the infection to the anterior stroma hindering the penetration of the organisms. This was applied by induction of infection 6 weeks after CXL procedure in an experimental rabbit model. Thus, we assume that the antimicrobial effect of riboflavin is abolished.
The clinical manifestations of both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus IK were markedly decreased by the prior CXL procedure. Additionally, the microscopic findings came to confirm the limitation of the infection and its consequent inflammation to the anterior portion of the stroma confirming the mechanical role of CXL in halting infection. This acts by creating additional chemical bonds inside the corneal stroma and photo-polymerization that increases the rigidity of the corneal collagen [29].
Many studies proved the efficacy of PACK-CXL in S. aureus IK as Tal et al. reported that CXL had a curative effect both as a stand‐alone treatment and in combination with medical therapy [30]. Also, Kozobolis et al. reported favorable clinical outcomes after PACK-CXL in 2 patients with combined bullous keratopathy and ulcerative keratitis [31].
The progression of corneal melting is influenced by the elaboration of excessive tissue degradative proteases [32, 33]. One group of these proteases is the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). MMPs are regularly shown to have a role both in infectious and non-infectious causes of corneal tissue destruction. In this study, we reported a reduction in corneal melting complications. Similarly, early studies by Iseli et al. reported regression of the corneal melting process after PACK-CXL in 5 patients with therapy-resistant bacterial or fungal ulcerative keratitis [34]. Also, Makdoumi et al. used PACK-CXL as primary therapy in patients with bacterial keratitis and reported prevention of progression of melting in all cases [35]. In addition, Panda et al. used PACK-CXL to treat patients with antimicrobial-refractory associated corneal melting. The melting regressed, and emergency keratoplasty was avoided in all 7 eyes [36]. PACK-CXL was proven also to be an alternative to antimicrobial drugs for first-line or only treatment of early to moderate infectious keratitis of bacterial, fungal or mixed microbial origin by Hafezi et al. through a multicentered trial published early in 2022 [37].
Treatment with PACK-CXL halts corneal melting and improves infectious keratitis through at least 2 mechanisms, and these probably work in synergy. First, it is well established that pathogens that cause corneal melting may act by enzymatic digestion [38, 39]. Because PACK-CXL increases tissue resistance to enzymatic digestion, the cross-linking procedure may help the corneal stroma resist proteolysis by enzymes from polymorphonuclear leukocytes participating in the inflammatory process [40]. A fortified stroma also may block the penetration or the effect of toxins from the pathogenic organism. Second, the phenomenon of apoptosis induced by PACK-CXL likely not only kills keratocytes but also kills microbes, which decelerates the infectious process [41]. Previous studies supported this latter antimicrobial mechanism. However, in this study, we can support the first assumption as we abolished the antimicrobial effect of riboflavin with very favorable results.
On the other hand, the positive outcomes obtained in this study are opposed by others as Prajna NV et al. reported that patients who underwent CXL were no more likely to re-epithelialize by 3 weeks or 3 months, they had no improvement in infiltrate or scar size, and they even had worse final visual acuity [42]. Also, some published studies reported that the PACK-CXL procedure is not effective in managing fungal keratitis [43, 44]. Their negative results could be attributed to the fact that a sufficient concentration of riboflavin in corneal stroma is crucial to get a biomechanical effect of corneal CXL [45, 46]. Furthermore, the majority of earlier research focused on resistant kinds of ocular infections in which antimicrobial drugs were given for long periods and in which the infections had failed to resolve. In these instances, the PACK-CXL strategy was not applied until the infections had advanced to a late stage and significantly damaged the cornea [47]. As these studies did not elucidate the baseline ulcer size and the ultraviolet (UV) fluence setting employed in their study, Hafezi et al. again refuted their theory. Given that the Dresden protocol was their presumptive method, it may not be sufficient for treating infectious keratitis, whether it is bacterial or fungal in origin, as it was developed for ectatic corneas guaranteeing safety in order to protect corneal endothelium cells [48].
Similar to previous reports on the efficacy of PACK-CXL in IK treatment, we conclude that PACK-CXL provides satisfactory limitation of infection and resistance to the proteolytic effect against melting. The inclusion of early PACK-CXL treatment in the IK treatment algorithm is considered to be appropriate in localizing the tissues’ inflammation and damage. However, we did not do any microbiological evaluation of the bacterial burden as colony-forming unit (CFU) in the follow-up which is a limitation in this study.
References
Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP (2001) Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bull World Health Organ 79:214–221
Ting DSJ, Ho CS, Deshmukh R, Said DG, Dua HS (2021) Infectious keratitis: an update on epidemiology, causative microorganisms, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance. Eye 35(4):1084–1101
Asbell PA, Sanfilippo CM, Pillar CM, DeCory HH, Sahm DF, Morris TW (2015) Antibiotic resistance among ocular pathogens in the United States: five-year results from the antibiotic resistance monitoring in ocular microorganisms (ARMOR)surveillance study. JAMAOphthalmol 133:1445–1454
Lalitha P, Manoharan G, Karpagam R et al (2017) Trends in antibiotic resistance in bacterial keratitis isolates from South India. BrJ Ophthalmol 101:108–113
Ung L, Bispo PJ, Shanbhag SS, Gilmore MS, Chodosh J (2019) The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance. Surv Ophthalmol 64:255–271
Khor WB, Prajna VN, Garg P et al (2018) The asia cornea society infectious keratitis study: a prospective multicenter study of infectious keratitis in asia. Am J Ophthalmol 195:161–170
Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T et al (2006) Microbial keratitis predisposing factors and morbidity. Ophthalmology 113:109–116
Henry CR, Flynn HW Jr, Miller D, Forster RK, Alfonso EC (2012) Infectious keratitis progressing to endophthalmitis: a 15-year study of microbiology, associated factors, and clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology 119:2443–2449
Hossain P, Tourkmani AK, Kazakos D, Jones M, Anderson D (2018) Emergency corneal grafting in the UK: a 6-year analysis of the UK Transplant Registry. Br J Ophthalmol 102:26–30
Tabibian D, Mazzotta C, Hafezi F (2016) PACK-CXL: corneal cross-linking in infectious keratitis. Eye and Vis 3:11
Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T (2010) Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol 149:585–593
Hashemi H, Seyedian MA, Miraftab M, Fotouhi A, Asgari S (2013) Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet a irradiation for keratoconus: long-term results. Ophthalmology 120:1515–1520
Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S et al (2018) Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet a light for pediatric keratoconus: ten-year results. Cornea 37:560–566
Kumar V, Lockerbie O, Keil SD et al (2004) Riboflavin and UV-light based pathogen reduction: extent and consequence of DNA damage at the molecular level. Photochem Photobiol 80:15–21
Naseem I, Ahmad M, Hadi SM (1988) Effect of alkylated and intercalated DNA on the generation of superoxide anion by riboflavin. Biosci Rep 8:485–492
Tsugita A, Okada Y, Uehara K (1965) Photosensitized inactivation of ribonucleic acids in the presence of riboflavin. Biochim Biophys Acta 103:360–363
Garg P, Das S, Roy A (2017) Collagen cross-linking for microbial keratitis. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 24:18–23
Vinciguerra R, Rosetta P, Romano MR, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P (2013) Treatment of refractory infectious keratitis with corneal collagen cross-linking window absorption. Cornea 32(6):e139–e140
Abbouda A, Estrada AV, Rodriguez AE, Alió JL (2014) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography in evaluation of severe fungal keratitis infections treated by corneal crosslinking. Eur J Ophthalmol 24(3):320–324
Zhang ZY (2013) Corneal cross-linking for the treatment of fungal keratitis. Cornea 32(2):217–218
Müller L, Thiel MA, Kipfer-Kauer AI, Kaufmann C (2012) Corneal cross-linking as supplementary treatment option in melting keratitis: a case series. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 229(4):411–415
Tam ALC, Côté E, Saldanha M, Lichtinger A, Slomovic AR (2017) Bacterial keratitis in toronto: a 16-year review of the microorganisms isolated and the resistance patterns observed. Cornea 36(12):1528–1534
Price MO, Tenkman LR, Schrier A, Fairchild KM, Trokel SL, Price FW Jr (2012) Photoactivated riboflavin treatment of infectious keratitis using collagen cross-linking technology. J Refract Surg 28(10):706–713
Sağlk A, Ucakhan OO, Kanpolat A (2013) Ultraviolet A and riboflavin therapy as an adjunct in corneal ulcer refractory to medical treatment. Eye Contact Lens 39(6):413–415
Ting DSJ, Henein C, Said DG, Dua HS (2019) Photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis–Corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ocul Surf 17(4):624–634
Ting DSJ, Ho CS, Cairns J et al (2021) 12-year analysis of incidence, microbiological profiles and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of infectious keratitis: the nottingham infectious keratitis study. Br J Ophthalmol 105(3):328–333
Hobden JA, Hill JM, Engel LS, O’Callaghan RJ (1993) Age and therapeutic outcome of experimental pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis treated with ciprofloxacin, prednisolone, and flurbiprofen. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37(9):1856–1859
Tabibian D, Richoz O, Hafezi F (2015) PACK-CXL: corneal cross-linking for treatment of infectious keratitis. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 10(1):77–80
Gkika M, Labiris G, Kozobolis V (2011) Corneal collagen cross-linking using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A irradiation: a review of clinical and experimental studies. Int Ophthalmol 31(4):309–319
Tal K, Gal-Or O, Pillar S, Zahavi A, Rock O, Bahar I (2015) Efficacy of primary collagen cross-linking with photoactivated chromophore (PACK-CXL) for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus-induced corneal ulcers. Cornea 34:1281–1286
Kozobolis V, Labiris G, Gkika M et al (2010) UV-A collagen cross-linking treatment of bullous keratopathy combined with corneal ulcer. Cornea 29:235–238
Fini ME, Girard MT, Matsubara M (1992) Collagenolytic/gelatinolytic enzymes in corneal wound healing. Acta Ophthalmol 202:26–33
Smith VA, Hoh HB, Easty DL (1999) Role of ocular matrix metalloproteinases in peripheral ulcerative keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 83(12):1376–1383
Iseli HP, Thiel MA, Hafezi F, Kampmeier J, Seiler T (2008) Ultraviolet A/riboflavin corneal cross-linking for infectious keratitis associated with corneal melts. Cornea 27:590–594
Makdoumi K, Mortensen J, Crafoord S (2010) Infectious keratitis treated with corneal crosslinking. Cornea 29:1353–1358
Panda A, Krishna SN, Kumar S (2012) Photo-activated riboflavin therapy of refractory corneal ulcers. Cornea 31:1210–1213
Hafezi F, Hosny M, Shetty R et al (2022) PACK-CXL vs antimicrobial therapy for bacterial, fungal, and mixed infectious keratitis: a prospective randomized phase 3 trial. Eye Vis 9(1):2
Hobden JA (2002) Pseudomonas aeruginosa proteases and corneal virulence. DNA Cell Biol 21:391–396
Matsumoto K (2004) Role of bacterial proteases in pseudomonal and serratial keratitis. Biol Chem 385:1007–1016
Spoerl E, Wollensak G, Seiler T (2004) Increased resistance of crosslinked cornea against enzymatic digestion. Curr Eye Res 29:35–40
Salomao MQ, Chaurasia SS, Sinha-Roy A et al (2011) Corneal wound healing after ultraviolet-A/riboflavin collagen crosslinking: a rabbit study. J Refract Surg 27:401–407
Prajna NV, Radhakrishnan N, Lalitha P et al (2020) Cross-linking-assisted infection reduction: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of adjuvant cross-linking on outcomes in fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology 127(2):159–166
Escarião ACSL, Ribeiro ES, Jorge PA, Leite ECS, Brandt CT (2013) Therapeutic effect of corneal crosslinking on infectious keratitis. Rev Bras Oftalmol 72:366–437
Uddaraju M, Mascarenhas J, Das MR et al (2015) Corneal cross-linking as an adjuvant therapy in the management of recalcitrant deep stromal fungal keratitis: a randomized trial. Am J Ophthalmol 160(131–134):e5
Mastropasqua L, Lanzini M, Curcio C et al (2014) Structural modifications and tissue response after standard epi-off and iontophoretic corneal crosslinking with different irradiation procedures. Investig Ophthalmol Visl Sci 55(4):2526–2533
Mastropasqua L, Nubile M, Calienno R et al (2014) Corneal cross-linking: intrastromal riboflavin concentration in iontophoresis-assisted imbibition versus traditional and transepithelial techniques. Am J Ophthalmol 157(3):623.e1-630.e1
Alshehri JM, Caballero-Lima D, Hillarby MC, Shawcross SG, Brahma A, Carley F, Read ND, Radhakrishnan H (2016) evaluation of corneal cross-linking for treatment of fungal keratitis: using confocal laser scanning microscopy on an ex vivo human corneal model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57(14):6367–6373
Hafezi F, Torres-Netto EA, Hillen MJP, Prajna R et al (2020) Cross-linking-assisted infection reduction: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of adjuvant cross-linking on outcomes in fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology. 127:159–166
Acknowledgements
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). No funding was received for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This report was approved by the ethical committee of the ophthalmology department at Cairo University and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Marrie, A., Abdullatif , A.M., Gamal El Dine, S. et al. Corneal cross-linking guards against infectious keratitis: an experimental model. Int Ophthalmol 43, 1241–1248 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02522-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02522-z