Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of using statins and ascorbic acid for the prevention of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) in patients undergoing urologic diagnostic elective contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).
Methods
This registered trial (NCT03391830) was for statin naïve patients underwent elective CECT. Patients were randomized allocated to two groups: the first group received atorvastatin 80-mg the day before the study and atorvastatin 40-mg two hours before the CECT and for continue on atorvastatin 40-mg two days after CECT; plus ascorbic acid 500 mg with atorvastatin. The other group received two tablets of placebo once/daily before the procedure and for another 3 days. The primary outcome was to assess the incidence PC-AKI.
Results
The baseline parameters were comparable between both groups. The final median (interquartile range “IQR”) serum creatinine were 0.80 (0.60, 1.00) and 0.80 (0.60, 1.00), respectively, with insignificant p-value (p = 0.8). The median (IQR) final estimated GFR were 95.2 (72.8, 108.1) and 88.6 (71.9, 111.0) mL/min in placebo and statin plus ascorbic acid groups, respectively (p = 0.48). The eGFR difference median (IQR) were − 6.46 (− 11.72, − 4.18) and − 6.57 (− 13.38, − 3.82) ml/min in placebo and statin plus ascorbic acid groups, respectively (p = 0.58). PC-AKI occurred in 11 patients (9.8%) in placebo group and in 3 patients (3%) in statin plus ascorbic acid group (p = 0.04).
Conclusions
Statin and ascorbic acid did not statistically improve neither serum creatinine nor eGFR values in patient underwent CECT. However, it can decrease the incidence of the clinically insignificant PC-AKI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Iodinated contrast materials are commonly used in the urology daily practice. It can be used for intravenous contrasted imaging studies ranging from intravenous pyelogram, contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) up to diagnostic and intervention angiography. However, the iodinated contrast has been involved in many cases of kidney injury [1].
The definition, incidence, and risks of post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) have not been clearly defined [1]. PC-AKI has been defined by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) as an increase in serum creatinine within 3 days after intravascular contrast medium (CM) administration by > 25% or 0.5 mg/dl, compared to its baseline value, without an alternate etiology [2]. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria are now being assumed as the standard for PC-AKI, defined as an increase serum creatinine increase of ≥ 1.5–1.9 times or in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3 mg/dl, compared to its baseline value [3].
The Contrast Media Safety Committee of ESUR highly recommend volume expansion with plenty of intravenous fluid over oral hydration [4]. Oral hydration was comparable and effective with the intravenous hydration in two randomized trials [5, 6].
Several medications have been advised to obviate PC-AKI. Some of them showed conflicting results regarding PC-AKI prevention such as; calcium channel blockers, mannitol, dopamine, atrial natriuretic peptide, L-arginine, selective D1 receptor partial agonist known as fenoldopam, prostaglandin E1, loop diuretic as furosemide, and endothelin receptor antagonist [2]. Novel anti-ischemic agents “trimetazidine and nicorandil”, N-acetylcysteine, ascorbic acid, and statin, in a recent meta-analysis, showed some sort of a protection in PC-AKI [7].
For patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) with a nonionic, low-osmolality contrast agent, N-acetylcysteine plus volume expansion using intravenous fluid could prevent PC-AKI in patients with chronic renal insufficiency [8]. However, oral N-acetylcysteine has mild gastrointestinal symptoms as nausea and vomiting that occurred in 23% of patients[9].
A lot of studies try to investigate medications for prevention of PC-AKI in cardiac and vascular patients. On the other hand, sparse of them investigate those medications in the field of urology [10]. The screening and prevention of PC-AKI had apparently wide variation in daily practice with some practice conflict with the literature recommendations and so further researches and areas in need of improved practice guidelines might have great opportunities [11].
In this trial, we will try to investigate the combined use of both ascorbic acid and statin for patients undergoing urologic diagnostic contrast enhanced CT and their effect of kidney injury caused by CECT.
Patients and methods
This 4-day, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, registered clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03391830) was conducted between January 2018 and January 2020 at tertiary urology center outpatients clinic for patients with serum creatinine ≤ 1.4 mg/dl, underwent elective contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). The study protocol was approved by Institutional Review Boards (R/17.06.05). Fully informed consent was obtained from all patients, in line with Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Eligible patients were statin naïve patients, or not on statin treatment for at two weeks planned for CECT. Patients with history of liver disease, rhabdomyolysis, contrast hypersensitivity, and multiple myeloma were excluded. None of the patients received metformin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, theophylline, N-acetylcysteine or iodinated contrast within the last two weeks before enrollment in the study.
Patients were randomized allocated to two groups: the first group received Lipitor (atorvastatin—Pfizer Egypt, under Authority of: Pfizer INC., USA) 80-mg the day before the study and atorvastatin 40-mg two hours before the CECT and for continue on atorvastatin 40-mg two days after CECT; plus C-Retard 500 mg (ascorbic acid—Hikma Pharma, October City, Egypt) with atorvastatin. The other group received two tablets of placebo once/daily before the procedure and for another 3 days.
The primary outcome was to assess the incidence of PC-AKI in both groups, defined as The KDIGO criteria [3]. The secondary outcome was to detect the difference in serum creatinine within 72 h after administration of contrast agent. The difference is calculated by subtracting serum creatinine value 72 h after contrast administration from baseline serum creatinine value. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated from serum creatinine values using the 4-variable equation of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) [12].
Normal saline (0.9 percent) was given intravenously at a rate of 1 ml per kilogram of body weight per hour for 12 h before and 12 h after administration of the contrast agent. All patients were encouraged to drink if they were thirsty. The dose of nonionic, low-osmolality CM (Iopromide; Ultravist-300, Schering, Berlin, Germany) was 75 ml for all patients. Serum creatinine was measured immediately before administration of the CM, and 73 h after, and one week in case of increase serum creatinine post CECT.
A per-protocol analysis is performed and includes all randomized patients who are compliant to treatment and complete their follow up. The null hypothesis assumed there is no difference between ascorbic acid and statin arm and placebo on the effect on PC-AKI.
The power of the study was calculated using the G*Power program (University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany) to determine an adequate sample size based on previous trial assuming a maximum serum creatinine differences in the statin and placebo groups [13]. Using the priori test with accuracy mode calculation and an effect size convention of 0.37 for Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, with α error probability of 0.05, provided 85% power with expected 10% dropout rate for a total sample size of 244 patients.
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®), version 22.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Qualitative data are described as numbers (percentages). Quantitative data are described as median (interquartile range). For the normally distributed variables, the independent sample t test was used for comparison between groups. The comparison of the mean scores in each group at different time intervals was carried out using the paired sample t test. Chi-square tests were used to compare the categorical data of both groups. A p ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
A total of 310 were assessed for eligibility and 244 patients meet our inclusion criteria. Of the 244 patients randomized, 31 patients lost follow-up visits and are excluded from final analysis as shown in CONSORT flowchart (Fig. 1). Patient characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly (Table 1).
The baseline median (interquartile range “IQR”) serum creatinine was 0.80 (0.60, 0.98) mg/dl in placebo group and 0.80 (0.60, 1.00) mg/dl in statin plus ascorbic acid group with insignificant p-value (p = 0.93). Using the 4-variable equation of Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), the median (IQR) baseline estimated GFR were higher in placebo group, 97.1 (80.7, 114.9) mL/min than in statin plus ascorbic acid groups, 94.6 (78.2, 120.7) mL/min and the p-value, as well, did not reach the statistical significance (p = 0.66).
The final median (interquartile range “IQR”) serum creatinine were 0.80 (0.60, 1.00) mg/dl in placebo group and 0.80 (0.60, 1.00) mg/dl in statin plus ascorbic acid group, with insignificant p-value (p = 0.8). The median (IQR) final estimated GFR were 95.2 (72.8, 108.1) mL/min in placebo group and 88.6 (71.9, 111.0) mL/min in statin plus ascorbic acid group, with insignificant p-value (p = 0.48) (Table 2).
The estimated GFR difference median (IQR) were − 6.46 (− 11.72, − 4.18) and − 6.57 (− 13.38, − 3.82) ml/min in placebo and statin plus ascorbic acid groups, respectively, with insignificant p-value (p = 0.58).
Regarding the contrast medium-induced nephropathy, defined in this trial by increase serum creatinine by 0.3 mg/dl, it occurred in 11 patients (9.8%) in placebo group and in 3 patients (3%) in statin plus ascorbic acid group, with statistical significant p-value (p = 0.04) (Table 2). The creatinine and estimated GFR difference between patients with and without acute kidney injury are shown in Fig. 2. All these patients were followed up by serial serum creatinine and all returned to their normal values.
Compared to the patients baseline values, in the placebo group, the mean ± SD serum creatinine rise from 0.80 ± 0.22 0.82 ± 0.24 mg/dl (p = 0.11). However, the mean ± SD estimated GFR decreased significantly from 100.45 ± 24.60 to 92.85 ± 24.78 ml/min (p < 0.001).
The same occurred in the statin plus ascorbic acid group, compared to the its baseline values, the mean ± SD serum creatinine rise from 0.80 ± 0.21 to 0.81 ± 0.23 mg/dl (p = 0.14). The mean ± SD estimated GFR decreased significantly from 102.27 ± 34.47 to 96.17 ± 24.31 ml/min (p = 0.003) (Table 3).
Discussion
Post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) should be defined as ≥ 1.5–1.9 times baseline increase in serum creatinine or increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3mg/dl (The KDIGO definition of AKI) in the 48–72 h following CM administration [3]. Two large meta-analyses of 19,000 patients who had received IV CM showed PC-AKI incidences of 5.0–6.4% [3].
Published literature about post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) mainly focuses on cardiac intervention as intravascular coronary angiography and rarely focuses on patients undergoing urological elective contrast-enhanced computed tomography. In a comparative study, PC-AKI was noted in 8.3% and 29.8% in urology and cardiology patients, respectively [10]. In Weisbord et al. trial, patients with eGFRs < 60 ml/min underwent non-emergent CECT in the inpatient and outpatient, about 3.5% of them manifested an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg/dl [14].
Although the pathogenesis of PC-AKI is not fully understood, Contrast agents have direct cytotoxic effects on vascular endothelial cells, or renal tubular epithelial cells resulting in inflammation, necrosis, and apoptosis [15]. The official guidelines published by the ESUR and the American College of Radiology and both recommend prophylactic hydration (1.0–1.5 mL/kg/h) in patients at risk for AKI at least 6 h before and after CM administration [2].
Atorvastatin (statin) reduces the PC-AKI inflammatory response and apoptosis of renal tubular epithelial cells. Treatment with atorvastatin also decreases the serum expression levels of Interleukins-1b, I Interleukins-6, Interleukins-8 and Tumor necrosis factor alpha. Atorvastatin might ameliorate PC-AKI through anti-apoptosis pathway associated with the Bcl-2/caspase-3 [16].
Oxidative stress shares some role in the pathogenesis of PC-AKI. Intracellular ROS are produced when the nephrons are exposed to contrast medium. When intracellular ROS synthesis rate overcomes the rate of their excretion, leads to oxidative-antioxidant imbalance, causing lipid peroxidation of biofilm, intracellular protein degeneration, and DNA damage [17].
Vitamin C, an antioxidant, attenuates the oxidative damage caused by CM and might effectively prevent PC-AKI. It has been reported that vitamin C effectively countered oxidative damage by reducing and scavenging reactive oxygen species that damage macromolecules such as lipids, proteins, and DNA [18, 19].
The PRATO-ACS trial showed that the incidence of PC-AKI was significantly lower in the statin group (6.7%) than in controls (15.1%) with significant p = 0.003. Vitamin C plus saline administration is effective to reduce the risk of CI-AKI by 25% [20]. In our trial, PC-AKI occurred in 11 patients (9.8%) in placebo group and in 3 patients (3%) statin plus ascorbic acid group (p = 0.04).
In Tepel et al., RCT, prophylactic oral N-acetylcysteine for CKD patient with GFR < 50 ml/minute who underwent elective contrast-enhanced computed tomography prevents the reduction in renal function. In the control and N-acetylcysteine group, the mean serum creatinine concentration increased from 2.4 ± 1.3 to 2.6 ± 1.5 mg/dl (p = 0.18) and decrease from 2.5 ± 1.3 to 2.1 ± 1.3 mg/dl (p < 0.001), respectively [8].
In our RCT, the mean ± SD serum creatinine rise in both groups, from 0.80 ± 0.22 mg/dl to 0.82 ± 0.24 mg/dl (p = 0.11) and from 0.80 ± 0.21 mg/dl to 0.81 ± 0.23 mg/dl (p = 0.14), in placebo and statin plus ascorbic acid groups, respectively.
Also, the mean ± SD estimated GFR decreased significantly in both groups with better significance in the statin plus ascorbic acid group (p < 0.001) versus (p = 0.003). In placebo group, mean ± SD estimated GFR decreased significantly from 100.45 ± 24.60 to 92.85 ± 24.78 ml/min (p < 0.001). The same occurred in the statin plus ascorbic acid group, the mean ± SD estimated GFR decreased significantly from 102.27 ± 34.47 to 96.17 ± 24.31 ml/min (p = 0.003). The difference may be attributed to difference in baseline characteristics, our patients were normal serum creatinine, however, in Tepel et al. the patients were CKD patients.
We found that PC-AKI occurred in 9.8% and 3% in placebo and statin plus ascorbic acid group, respectively, according to new KDIGO criteria (serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dl), while using pre-procedure intravenous fluid. In Weibord study, 3.5% demonstrated a rise in serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg/dl. Although only 6% of outpatients received pre- and post-procedure intravenous fluid [14]. We think that may be attributed the difference in PC-AKI definition.
Our trial has some limitations, we exclude patients with serum creatinine > 1.4 mg/dl. We choose serum creatinine as it is the most commonly used laboratory value as a screening test before CECT [11]. The incidence of PC-AKI increases dramatically after a threshold serum creatinine of 1.2–1.5 mg/dl is reached. So, randomised trials with large patient numbers for this category are warranted. Also, we calculate GFR using MDRD in patients without apparent basal renal disease, not the renal scintigraphy.
Conclusion
The use of statin plus ascorbic acid to prevent the post-contrast acute kidney injury did not statistically improve neither serum creatinine nor estimated glomerular filtration rate values. However, statin plus ascorbic acid can decrease the incidence of the clinically insignificant post-contrast acute kidney injury, compared to the placebo.
Data availability
Data is available after approval of ethical committee.
References
Do C (2017) Intravenous contrast: friend or foe? A review on contrast-induced nephropathy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 24(3):147–149
Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK et al (2011) Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR contrast media safety committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 21(12):2527–2541
van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, Bongartz G, Bellin M-F, Bertolotto M et al (2018) Post-contrast acute kidney injury–part 1: definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors. Eur Radiol 28(7):2845–2855
Morcos S, Thomsen H, Webb J (1999) Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Eur Radiol 9(8):1602–1613
Dussol B, Morange S, Loundoun A, Auquier P, Berland Y (2006) A randomized trial of saline hydration to prevent contrast nephropathy in chronic renal failure patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21(8):2120–2126
Taylor AJ, Hotchkiss D, Morse RW, McCabe J (1998) PREPARED: preparation for angiography in renal dysfunction: a randomized trial of inpatient vs outpatient hydration protocols for cardiac catheterization in mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction. Chest 114(6):1570–1574
Sharp AJ, Patel N, Reeves BC, Angelini GD, Fiorentino F (2019) Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in high-risk adult patients undergoing coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Open heart. 6(1):e000864
Tepel M, Van Der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W (2000) Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent–induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 343(3):180–184
Network TI (2010) A multicenter comparison of the safety of oral versus intravenous acetylcysteine for treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Clin Toxicol 48(5):424–430
Babu M, Bansal D, Mehta SB, Pillai B, Krishnamoorthy H, Attacharil T (2017) Contrast-induced nephropathy in urological imaging: a comparison with cardiology interventions. Indian J Urol 33(3):241–245
Elicker BM, Cypel YS, Weinreb JC (2006) IV contrast administration for CT: a survey of practices for the screening and prevention of contrast nephropathy. Am J Roentgenol New Ser 186(6):1651
Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang Y, Hendriksen S et al (2006) Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 145(4):247–254
Attallah N, Yassine L, Musial J, Yee J, Fisher K (2004) The potential role of statins in contrast nephropathy. Clin Nephrol 62(4):273
Weisbord SD, Mor MK, Resnick AL, Hartwig KC, Palevsky PM, Fine MJ (2008) Incidence and outcomes of contrast-induced AKI following computed tomography. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol: CJASN 3(5):1274
Zhang F, Lu Z, Wang F (2020) Advances in the pathogenesis and prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Life Sci 259:118379
He X, Li L, Tan H, Chen J, Zhou Y (2016) Atorvastatin attenuates contrast-induced nephropathy by modulating inflammatory responses through the regulation of JNK/p38/Hsp27 expression. J Pharmacol Sci 131(1):18–27
Persson PB, Hansell P, Liss P (2005) Pathophysiology of contrast medium–induced nephropathy. Kidney Int 68(1):14–22
Fukumura H, Sato M, Kezuka K, Sato I, Feng X, Okumura S et al (2012) Effect of ascorbic acid on reactive oxygen species production in chemotherapy and hyperthermia in prostate cancer cells. J Physiol Sci 62(3):251–257
Leoncini M, Toso A, Maioli M, Tropeano F, Villani S, Bellandi F (2014) Early high-dose rosuvastatin for contrast-induced nephropathy prevention in acute coronary syndrome: results from the PRATO-ACS Study (protective effect of rosuvastatin and antiplatelet therapy on contrast-induced acute kidney injury and myocardial damage in patients with acute coronary syndrome). J Am Coll Cardiol 63(1):71–79
Xu Y, Zheng X, Liang B, Gao J, Gu Z (2018) Vitamins for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a systematic review and trial sequential analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 18(5):373–386
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the patients for participating in this study.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HA: study design, and statistical analysis manuscript writing. LM: manuscript revision and editing. HM: manuscript revision and editing, EM and EAM: data collection. RH: radiology supervision. OY: study supervision manuscript revision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics declarations
The study was approved by the Institution Review Board (R/17.06.05) and was registered on (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03391830).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hashem, A., Laymon, M., Elgamal, M. et al. Randomized trial to assess the potential role of ascorbic acid and statin for post-contrast acute kidney injury prevention. Int Urol Nephrol 56, 399–405 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03806-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03806-8