Abstract
Background
The macrotrabecular-massive (MTM) is a special subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which has commonly a dismal prognosis. This study aimed to develop a multitask deep learning radiomics (MDLR) model for predicting MTM and HCC patients’ prognosis after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).
Methods
From June 2018 to March 2020, 158 eligible patients with HCC who underwent surgery were retrospectively enrolled in MTM related cohorts, and 752 HCC patients who underwent HAIC were included in HAIC related cohorts during the same period. DLR features were extracted from dual-phase (arterial phase and venous phase) contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the entire liver region. Then, an MDLR model was used for the simultaneous prediction of the MTM subtype and patient prognosis after HAIC. The MDLR model for prognostic risk stratification incorporated DLR signatures, clinical variables and MTM subtype.
Findings
The predictive performance of the DLR model for the MTM subtype was 0.968 in the training cohort [TC], 0.912 in the internal test cohort [ITC] and 0.773 in the external test cohort [ETC], respectively. Multivariable analysis identified portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (p = 0.012), HAIC response (p < 0.001), HAIC sessions (p < 0.001) and MTM subtype (p < 0.001) as indicators of poor prognosis. After incorporating DLR signatures, the MDLR model yielded the best performance among all models (AUC, 0.855 in the TC, 0.805 in the ITC and 0.792 in the ETC). With these variables, the MDLR model provided two risk strata for overall survival (OS) in the TC: low risk (5-year OS, 44.9%) and high risk (5-year OS, 4.9%).
Interpretation
A tool based on MDLR was developed to consider that the MTM is an important prognosis factor for HCC patients. MDLR showed outstanding performance for the prognostic risk stratification of HCC patients who underwent HAIC and may help physicians with therapeutic decision making and surveillance strategy selection in clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most common malignant tumour and ranks as the second leading cause of cancer death globally [1]. Unfortunately, > 70% of patients with HCC often have a high tumour burden when they receive the initial diagnosis [2]. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a promising option for large HCC that provides sustained local high concentrations of chemotherapy agents in the tumour [3]. It easier to obtain a high objective response rate (ORR) for large HCC with multicycle HAIC, which can enable further conversion therapy. Shi Ming et al. showed that HAIC with the FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin) yielded a better median overall survival (OS, 23.1 months) and ORR (48%) than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for large HCC (largest diameter > 7 cm) in a randomized phase III trial [4]. Moreover, immunotherapies and and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) including sorafenib and lenvatinib have present outstanding ORR and survival benefit for advanced HCC [5, 6].
The macrotrabecular-massive (MTM) subtype, as an amorphologic HCC variant with angiogenesis, has been reported to have a dismal prognosis in previous reports [7, 8]. Patients with this subtype of HCC should be specifically diagnosed before surgery, but histopathologic examinations remain lacking. A series of studies have identified intratumor necrosis or ischemia as an independent predictor of the MTM subtype. And MTM subtype could be effectively diagnosed by these features combined with intratumor fat deficiency. Moreover, compared with non-MTM-HCC, several research found that MTM-HCC was often larger with more prone to intratumor necrosis and frequently exhibit irregular rim-like arterial phase enhancement (IRE) with a stronger invasion ability [9,10,11]. Although the abovementioned MRI features could achieve high accuracy for predicting the MTM subtype in previous studies, potential selection bias resulting from interobserver variation was difficult to avoid. Over the past decade, an increasing number of quantitative and qualitative image analysis methods for the prediction of the MTM subtype have been proposed in oncological practice. For example, radiomics converts images into quantitative data in a high-throughput manner, making it a feasible and precise approach for outcome prediction. However, these analyses require the formulation of predefined criteria and manual or semiautomatic segmentation of the region of interest (i.e., the tumour and margin region) [12, 13]. However, deep learning (DL), as a data-driven approach, has been increasingly applied towards automatic design and organization based on the predictive ability of specific features instead of human performance [14, 15].
Therefore, further studies are required to support the robustness and accuracy of the DL radiomics (DLR) approach for predicting the MTM subtype and patient prognosis. The aim of our study was to develop and validate a multitask DLR-based model based on preoperative CT for predicting the MTM subtype and prognosis of HCC patients who underwent HAIC based on multimodal data integrating clinical variables, DLR score and MTM subtype.
Materials and methods
This retrospective, multi-institutional study protocol obtained approval from the Institutional Review Board of all participating hospitals and was conducted following the principles of the 1975 Helsinki Declaration. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, the requirement for written informed consent was waived.
Patient enrolment
All HCC patients were diagnosed based on the European Association for the Study of Liver (EASL) and the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) guidelines [16, 17]. Between June 2018 and March 2020, a total of 159 consecutive patients with large HCC who received surgical resection (SR) were reviewed and underwent a standard contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examination within 2 weeks before SR in a tertiary high-volume hospital. The histologic examination of tumour specimens was performed by two pathologists (reader 1, L.L., and reader 2, P.W., with 10 years of experience) by serially examining multiple pathologic specimens. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated as the metric for reproducibility evaluation. Pathologic features with both intra- and interobserver ICCs higher than 0.9 were selected. The MTM subtype was defined as a > 50% macrotrabecular architectural pattern present after haematoxylin–eosin staining.
Another cohort consisted of 1367 patients with HCC who received initial HAIC as the first-line therapy between January 2014 and May 2022. Figure 1A demonstrates the enrolment pathways of HCC patients who underwent HAIC. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) age 18–75 years; (b) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < 2; (c) Child‒Pugh class A or B liver function; and (d) management of HAIC with the FOLFOX regimen (FOLFOX-HAIC). The exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) any treatment before HAIC; (b) HCC combined with other malignancies; (c) a maximum tumour diameter ≤ 5 cm; (d) simultaneous treatment of TACE combined with HAIC; and (e) loss to follow-up after > 6 months. The reasons for using HAIC rather than surgery or systematic chemotherapy, the HAIC procedures, and criteria for protocol discontinuation are shown in supplementary information E1.1–1.3. Moreover, the preoperative CECT scan protocol is described in supplementary information E1.4.
Follow-up protocol and endpoints
In this study, enrolled patients were censored at the last follow-up (October 30, 2022). After a thorough HAIC protocol was completed, the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and contrast-enhanced CT or MRI were repeated in 3–6-month intervals, at approximately 3-month intervals in the first year and 6-month intervals thereafter. The responses to HAIC were assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced images acquired before and after HAIC. The assessment was performed independently every 4–6 weeks after initial HAIC by two radiologists (reader 1, L.Z.L., and reader 2, J.Z., with 10 years of experience) who were blinded to the HAIC procedure at the time of data collection. According to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (mRECIST), the responses were divided into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) [18]. The primary endpoint was OS, which was calculated from the date of initial treatment to the date of death from any cause or date of last follow-up. Thirty-four clinical variables were collected for analysis as predictors of HAIC prognosis and are listed in supplementary information E 1.5.
Study design
In this study, we used dual-phase (arterial phase and venous phase) CECT data collected from MTM related cohort comprising 159 patients who received SR and HAIC related cohort comprising 752 patients who received HAIC to develop and validate a multitask deep learning radiomic nomogram (MDLRN). Figure 1B–E shows the MDLRM pipeline, including the image segmentation of regions of interest (ROIs), feature extraction and selection, signature building, and model construction. The detailed automatic delineation was listed in supplementary information E 1.6. We used the clinical and CECT data from one tertiary high-volume institution as the training cohort (TC, n = 459) and internal testing cohort (ITC, n = 122) and the clinical data from 4 medical centres as the external test cohort (ETC, n = 141).
MTM-related score
The first step was a histologic-related ML scoring model for prediction of MTM status. A 3D MobileNetV1 Structure (shown in sTable 1 and sFigure 1) Deep Learning Model for prediction of MTM status was constructed to extract the High-Level Image features. Then 22 radiomics features were selected and constructed the model by XGBoost with CART base-classification [19]. There were also 6 clinical factors selected to construct the clinical model. At last, the score of three models (Clinical, Deep Learning and Radiomics, DLR-Cli) were added with weight to build a MTM-related score model. The detailed information of multi-task deep learning (MDL) model construction, MTM radiomic model construction and procedure of DLR-Cli model construction were described in supplementary methods E1.8–1.9.
Prognostic score for survival after HAIC
In the next step, we built and validated a MDLRN integrated a MTM related biomarker, DL score extracted from tumor and other clinical information for prediction of OS in the 752 patients in OS cohorts. The same 3D MobileNetV1 multi-task model was used for multi-task OS predictions, which was described in supplementary information E1.6. The predicted MTM-score, DL-score, pre- and post-operative clinical variables were then integrated into a new Cox-PH model to obtain a precise estimation of the survival time of an individual patient received HAIC.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the survival and rms packages of R software version 3.6.3 (http://www.r-project.org/). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies with percentages and compared using the chi-squared test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of variables and identify independent significant risk factors. The OS curves of different subgroups were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test, and the AUCs of different models were compared by the DeLong test. The predictive parameters, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were also calculated to assess model performance.
All tests of significance were two-sided, and a p value < 0.05 was interpreted to carry statistical significance.
Results
Baseline characteristics
In MTM related cohort, 74.2% (118/159) of patients were diagnosed pathologically with the MTM subtype. The baseline characteristics stratified by MTM status are shown in Table 1. Among all variables, age < 65 years and Edmondson-Steiner grade III–IV were found to be more prevalent in the MTM group than in the non-MTM group (p = 0.032, < 0.001). Other variables showed a similar distribution between the two groups. In HAIC related cohorts, a total of 752 treatment-naïve patients with HCC (80 females and 672 males; mean age, 54.2 ± 11.8 years) met the inclusion criteria. The clinicopathologic characteristics of the HCC patients who underwent HAIC in the three cohorts are outlined in Table 2. At the final follow-up, the mortality rates were 61.1% (299/489) in the TC, 71.3% (87/122) in the VC, and 35.5% (50/141) in the EVC. The baseline characteristics of the abovementioned two cohorts are shown in sTable 2.
Hand-crafted radiomic and DL feature analysis
Based on the segmented liver images, a total of 5610 pre-defined radiomic features and 4132 DL features were extracted from each phase of CECT. After feature selection, 10 in AP and 12 in PP were selected as significant pre-defined radiomic features. Among all ML classifiers, XGBoost outperformed other 3 classifiers and was selected to build radiomics scores. Most of the selected pre-defined radiomic features were GLCM features, which might be related to the heterogeneity of HCC. Besides, all DL features in AP and PP were chosen to build DL scores for further analysis. Prognostic performance comparison between various of models and staging system was shown in Table 3.
MTM-related score
The baseline characteristics of patients with MTM subtype were listed in sTable 3. In the TC, the deep learning radiomics (DLR) risk score was lower in the MTM group than in the non-MTM group (mean, 0.834 ± 0.097 vs. 0.177 ± 0.089; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that an AFP level > 400 ng/ml and the DLR risk score were independent indicators for the MTM subtype. The comparison of predictive performance among four different models (clinical, radiomics, DLR, and DLR-Cli) in three cohorts and the AUC, SENS, SPEC, PPV, and NPV data of each model are shown in sTable 4. Among all models, the DLR-Cli model showed optimal discrimination, achieving AUCs of 0.967 in the TC, 0.912 in the IVC and 0.773 in the EVC, respectively. The results of the DeLong test indicated a significant difference in performance between the clinical model and the DLR-Cli model (p < 0.001 in TC, p < 0.001 in IVC and p < 0.001 in EVC).
The development and validation of the MDLRN
Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative parameters, including PVTT (HR, 1.42) and DLR risk score (HR, 0.11), and postoperative parameters, including OR, HAIC sessions and MTM score, were independent risk factors for poor OS (sTable 5). The detailed performance of MDL for OS listed in sTable 6. These independently associated risk factors were used to develop the MDLRN (Fig. 2A, B), described by the formula: HR = 1.38 × PVTT + 0.54 × OR + 0.74 × HAIC sessions + 2.44 × MTM + 0.10 × DLR score. For each tumour grade, a higher total point value indicated a worse OS. The bootstrapped calibration curves plotted with 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were well matched with the idealized 45° line for the MDLRN in the three cohorts (Fig. 2C–H). To add clinical convenience, a user-friendly online application (https://prehaicnomogramforhcc.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/) was developed.
The AUCs of the preoperative MDLRN for predicting the OS of HCC patients who underwent HAIC in the TC, IVC and EVC were 0.80, 0.71 and 0.74, respectively. In addition, the AUCs of the postoperative MDLRN for predicting OS in the TC, IVC and EVC were 0.84, 0.78 and 0.79, respectively. In this study, we found that the MDLRN improved the prognostic prediction of HCC patients who underwent HAIC compared with rival models and staging systems (AJCC [American Joint Committee on Cancer], BCLC [Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer] stage, CLIP [Cancer of the Liver Italian Program] classification, HKLC [Hong Kong Liver Cancer] stage) in the three cohorts (Fig. 3).
Visualization interpretability
The learned feature maps of MobileNetV1 are shown in Fig. 4 and detailed patient information in sTable 7. To better explore the hidden patterns the network learned, heatmaps were divided into prediction groups for 1/2/3/ > 3-year death/survival. According to their imaging features, the examples were divided into MTM and non-MTM subtypes. Overall, the whole intensity of the feature map in the predicted non-MTM group was lower than that in the predicted MTM group, which seems to indicate the natural pathological characteristics of HCC. Moreover, heatmaps showed that the better survival group had a high intensity, which indicated that the MTM subtype was an important factor for prognostic analysis.
Survival risk stratification
To facilitate the clinical application of the MDLRN, we divided the HCC patients who underwent HAIC into two risk groups, including a high-risk group and a low-risk group, according to MDLRN risk scores. We identified the HR cut-off values for the pre- and post-MDLRN (−1.40 and −0.26) in the TC and verified them in the ITC and ETC, respectively. This pragmatic visualization of the risk level could help decide the HAIC strategy for HCC patients. According to the cut-off risk scores for the pre-MDLRN, in the TC, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 89.0%, 52.9% and 34.3% in the low-risk group, respectively, which were better than the corresponding rates in the high-risk groups (37.2%, 5.5% and 5.5%) (p < 0.001) (Fig. 5A). Similarly, the cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates among the high-risk and low-risk groups were also significantly different in the other two test cohorts (both, p < 0.001) (Fig. 5B, C). According to the cut-off risk scores for the post-MDLRN, in the TC, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 91.2%, 55.4% and 25.1% in the low-risk group, respectively, which were better than the rates in the high-risk group (35.7%, 3.8% and 3.8%, respectively) (p < 0.001) (Fig. 5D). Similarly, the cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates among the high-risk and low-risk groups were also significantly different in the other two test cohorts (both, p < 0.001) (Fig. 5E, F). In brief, more deaths were more commonly found during the follow-up period in high-risk patients than in low-risk patients; a higher proportion of low-risk patients received potentially curative therapy (liver transplant, repeat liver resection, or ablation) than high-risk patients.
Discussion
According to current guidelines, the standard treatment for advanced HCC is sorafenib. HAIC is now being applied, mostly in Asia. However, large randomized trials are still lacking. In the EACH and other previous studies, the value of systemic chemotherapy with the FOLFOX regimen for the treatment of advanced HCC was confirmed [20,21,22]. The continuous infusion of chemotherapeutic drugs by hepatic intra-arterial therapy contributed to the adequate local drug concentration for targeted tumours. Previous studies have reported an encouraging safety profile and antitumour activity when treating locally advanced HCC with FOLFOX–HAIC [23, 24]. However, high-level tumour heterogeneity at the histologic, genomic, and molecular levels results in a certain range of individualized differences in the prognosis of HCC patients who undergo HAIC. Therefore, we developed and validated an MDLRN integrating clinical variables, DLR score and histologic features to provide indicators for selecting HAIC and therapeutic strategies in large HCC.
The MDLRN was constructed by a multiple-task deep learning model, clinical factors and radiomics features. The multiple-task deep learning model was constructed by MobileNetV1 feature extraction and 5 classification tasks (MTM prediction, 1-, 2-, 3- and greater than 3-years OS. Multitask deep learning has taken the pathological features of the MTM subtype into consideration. Thus, the same extraction module was used in the MTM scoring task and OS scoring tasks, further demonstrating the relationship between MTM and OS. Moreover, the postoperative pathological features could be predicted by the preoperative model, which can improve the performance of the preoperative model.
In this study, we aimed to identify a certain histologic subtype of HCC, which was defined as the MTM subtype. Notably, the incidence of this histologic subtype increased with increasing tumour diameter in previous studies. In MTM related cohort with 159 patients who underwent SR, 74.2% (118/159) of patients were diagnosed pathologically with the MTM subtype. We developed a DLR-based model for predicting the MTM subtype that showed outstanding performance (AUC, 0.98 in the TC, 0.84 in the IVC and 0.72 in the EVC). In addition, our results showed that a high serum AFP level was an independent predictor of the MTM subtype [11], which was consistent with previous reports. However, no incremental increase in value was observed with the addition of the DLR model to predict the MTM subtype. We also showed that a low baseline DLR score for MTM status was associated with OS (HR, 0.85; p < 0.001) in patients with large HCC who underwent HAIC, indicating its potential clinical application.
This study developed and validated an MDLRN for predicting the OS of patients with large HCC receiving initial HAIC based on CECT data from 752 patients in OS cohort, and the model could accurately stratify patients with large HCC into two prognostic subgroups with significantly different OS. In this study, three attempts were made, as follows: first, we built the MDLRN comprising preoperative and postoperative clinical variables, DLR signatures and MTM subtype for the prediction of OS; second, the entire liver parenchyma was automatically segmented as an ROI using the ResU-Net algorithm for feature extraction; third, we provided an MDLRN-based system as a visualized web tool to recommend suitable patients with large HCCs for HAIC treatment, achieving a good predictive performance (AUC, 0.87 in IVC; AUC, 0.83 in the EVC).
The DLR analysis highlighted the potential important roles of tumour burden and distribution in the entire liver parenchyma as well as the tumour microenvironment (TME) in prognostic prediction. Exposure of the targeted tumours to chemotherapy drugs over multiple cycles is closely related to treatment response [25]. Previous studies have suggested that a larger tumour burden and more dispersed distribution both weaken the effect of chemotherapy [4]. Similarly, our DLR visualization results were consistent with the abovementioned hypothesis. The predicted death group had a higher intensity heatmap than the predicted survival group, suggesting the importance of tumour burden and distribution. Moreover, previous studies exploring the mechanisms of conventional chemotherapy resistance have revealed the involvement of TME components and seem to explain the relationship between the status of the TME and the response to chemotherapy [26, 27]. In our heatmap, a higher intensity distribution may be consistent with TME component assembly, including for the ECM, proteoglycans, immune cells and hypoxic environment. This hypothesis needs further experimental research on the underlying mechanism.
The MDLRN based on preoperative DLR scores and clinical parameters should be useful for patient stratification before HAIC, allowing clinicians to optimize treatment, such as switches to SR and LT. Once the patients undergoes HAIC, the post-MDLRN, which was built with postoperative clinical parameters, including number of sessions of HAIC, response to HAIC and predicted MTM subtype, has significantly higher predictive performance and can be used to design individualized surveillance and therapeutic strategies. Through patient stratification performed by the MDLRN, an intensive surveillance regimen, and even some aggressive or expensive preventive and adjuvant therapies, including preventive multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs] and programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 therapies, can be considered to prolong the OS of high-risk patients [28, 29]. On the other hand, low-risk patients may receive less intensive surveillance regimens and more prudent consideration of aggressive or expensive preventive therapies after HAIC to reduce the probability of negative effects and the high cost of these examinations and therapies.
There are some limitations to our study. First, selection bias is unavoidable in observational studies and may affect the real outcomes. Second, we did not perform manual delineation of the tumour area to extract features. Whether the predictive ability of the MDLRN model would significantly improve over that of a model based on the entire tumour ROI remains to be further tested in external cohorts. Third, as time progresses, the therapeutic techniques for HCC are constantly being updated and improved, such as the adjustment of HAIC chemotherapy drug regimens and the improvement of HAIC combined with molecular targeted drugs. This will have a certain degree of impact on outcome prediction and is inevitable Fourth, clinical information regarding complications during and after HAIC and TKI treatment were not analysed, warranting further investigation. Given these limitations, the MDLRN model requires further validation as an OS stratification tool for HAIC in patients with HCC before being applied in other study settings.
In conclusion, MTM is an important prognosis factor for HCC patients which was taken into consideration for building the multitask DLR method. The model could predict the prognosis of HCC patients who underwent HAIC and showed excellent performance in two test cohorts, demonstrating its robustness and effectiveness. Therefore, this tool may help physicians with therapeutic decision making and surveillance strategy selection in clinical practice.
Data availability
The in-house developed medical database of this study is publicly accessible at:http://www.yunedc.cn/#/login
Change history
17 January 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01754-y
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249
Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM et al (2018) Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 68:723–750
Kobayashi K, Ogasawara S, Takahashi A et al (2022) Evolution of survival impact of molecular target agents in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 11:48–60
Li QJ, He MK, Chen HW, Fang WQ, Zhou YM, Xu L et al (2022) Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus transarterial chemoembolization for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 40:150–160
Sun H, Yang H, Mao Y (2023) Personalized treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of targeted medicine and bioengineering. Front Pharmacol 5(14):1150151
Sacco R, Faggioni L, Bargellini I, Ginanni B, Battaglia V, Romano A, Bertini M, Bresci G, Bartolozzi C (2013) Assessment of response to sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using perfusion computed tomography: results of a pilot study. Dig Liver Dis 45(9):776–781
Yang Y, Mao S, Fang J et al (2023) Macrotrabecular-massive subtype-based nomogram to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 35:505–511
Shan Y, Yu X, Yang Y et al (2022) Nomogram for the preoperative prediction of the macrotrabecular-massive subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 9:717–728
Feng Z, Li H, Liu Q et al (2023) CT radiomics to predict macrotrabecular-massive subtype and immune status in hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 307:e221291
Mulé S, Galletto Pregliasco A, Tenenhaus A et al (2020) Multiphase liver MRI for identifying the macrotrabecular-massive subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 295:562–571
Ziol M, Poté N, Amaddeo G et al (2018) Macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma: a distinctive histological subtype with clinical relevance. Hepatology 68:103–112
Harding-Theobald E, Louissaint J, Maraj B et al (2021) Systematic review: radiomics for the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 54(7):890–901
Ventura D, Schindler P, Masthoff M et al (2023) Radiomics of tumor heterogeneity in 18F-FDG-PET-CT for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibition in therapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancers 15(8):2297
Muñoz-Martínez S, Iserte G, Sanduzzi-Zamparelli M, Llarch N, Reig M (2021) Current pharmacological treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Opin Pharmacol 60:141–148
An C, Li D, Li S et al (2021) Deep learning radiomics of dual-energy computed tomography for predicting lymph node metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49:1187–1199
Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR et al (2018) AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67:358–380
European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu, European association for the study of the liver EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236
Kuroda H, Oikawa T, Ninomiya M et al (2022) Objective response by mRECIST to initial lenvatinib therapy is an independent factor contributing to deep response in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization sequential therapy. Liver Cancer 11:383–396
Chen YS, Liu CF, Sung MI, Lin SJ, Tsai WH (2023) Machine learning approach for prediction of the test results of gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulation: model building and implementation. Diagnostics 13(9):1550
You H, Liu X, Guo J, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Li C (2022) Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sequential ablation treatment in large hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia 39:1097–1105
Ueshima K, Ogasawara S, Ikeda M et al (2020) Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 9:583–595
Lyu N, Lin Y, Kong Y et al (2018) FOXAI: a phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 67:395–396
Obi S, Sato S, Kawai T (2015) Current status of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Liver Cancer 4:188–199
Tsai WL, Sun WC, Chen WC et al (2020) Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus transcatheter arterial embolization for patients with huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine 99:e21489
Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K et al (2018) Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med 24:541–550
Han S, Bi S, Guo T et al (2022) Nano co-delivery of plumbagin and dihydrotanshinone I reverses immunosuppressive TME of liver cancer. J Control Release 348:250–263
Liu L, Zhang R, Deng J et al (2022) Construction of TME and Identification of crosstalk between malignant cells and macrophages by SPP1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 71:121–136
Gan L, Lang M, Tian X et al (2023) A retrospective analysis of conversion therapy with lenvatinib, sintilimab, and arterially-directed therapy in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 10:673–686
An C, Fu Y, Li W, Zuo M, Wu P (2023) Postprogression treatment of lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Cancer 129(14):2235–2244
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the instrumental and technical support of M.D. Xiao Li
Funding
His work was supported by the National Natural Science Fund of China (Grant No. 66201459, 82202282). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XH contributed to Conception and design. XH and RW contributed to Development of methodology; CA, WY, KL, CL, YF contributed to acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.); CA contributed to analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis; CA and RW contributed to writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript; WL contributed to administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases; CL contributed to study supervision.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Ethical approval
This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (B2022-11-01) and was conducted following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.
Consent to participate
Yes.
Consent for publication
Yes.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: The affiliations of the fifth and ninth author were published incorrectly and have been corrected now.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
He, X., Li, K., Wei, R. et al. A multitask deep learning radiomics model for predicting the macrotrabecular-massive subtype and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Radiol med 128, 1508–1520 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01719-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01719-1