Abstract
The procedure by means of which the occurrence time of an impending mainshock can be identified by analyzing in natural time the seismicity in the candidate area subsequent to the recording of a precursory seismic electric signals (SES) activity is reviewed. Here, we report the application of this procedure to an M W 5.4 mainshock that occurred in Greece on 17 November 2014. This mainshock (which is pretty rare since it is the strongest in that area for more than half a century) was preceded by an SES activity recorded on 27 July 2014, and the results of the natural time analysis reveal that the system approached the critical point (mainshock occurrence) early in the morning on 15 November 2014.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Earthquakes (EQs) in general exhibit complex correlations in time, space, and magnitude M, which have been investigated by several authors (Sornette 2000; Corral 2004; Davidsen and Paczuski 2005; Holliday et al. 2006; Saichev and Sornette 2006; Eichner et al. 2007; Lennartz et al. 2008, 2011; Lippiello et al. 2009, 2012; Sarlis et al. 2009, 2010; Telesca and Lovallo 2009; Bottiglieri et al. 2010; Telesca 2010; Sarlis 2011; Huang and Ding 2012; Sarlis and Christopoulos 2012; Varotsos et al. 2011c, 2012). The observed earthquake scaling laws (Turcotte 1997) indicate the existence of phenomena closely associated with the proximity of the system to a critical point, e.g., see Holliday et al. (2006), since scaling is a hallmark of criticality (Stanley 1999). Here, we take this view that mainshocks are (non-equilibrium) critical phenomena.
Major EQs are preceded by transient changes of the electric field of the Earth termed seismic electric signals (SES) (Varotsos and Alexopoulos 1984a, b). A series of such signals recorded within a short time are called SES activities (Varotsos and Lazaridou 1991; Varotsos et al. 1993, 2009; Varotsos 2005), the average leading time of which is of the order of a few months (Varotsos et al. 2011a). It has been suggested that SES are emitted when the stress in the focal area of the impending mainshock reaches a critical value (Varotsos and Alexopoulos 1984a, b, 1986; Varotsos et al. 2011b). This suggestion is strengthened by the recent finding (Varotsos et al. 2013) that the fluctuations of the order parameter of seismicity defined in the frame of natural time analysis (see the next section) minimize upon the initiation of an SES activity exhibiting long-range temporal correlations (Varotsos et al. 2014). Such minima of the fluctuations of the order parameter of seismicity have been identified before all major (M ≥ 7.6) EQs in Japan (Sarlis et al. 2013, 2015).
The identification of the occurrence time of an impending mainshock within a short time window is a challenge. This becomes possible when employing a procedure that combines SES data and natural time analysis of the seismicity (Varotsos et al. 2001, 2002a, b, 2005, 2008, 2011a; Sarlis et al. 2008; Sarlis 2013). In short, the initiation of the SES activity marks the time when the system enters the critical stage, and then the natural time analysis of the subsequent seismicity in the candidate area (which is determined on the basis of SES data, e.g., see Varotsos 2005) identifies when the system approaches the critical point, i.e., the mainshock occurrence, e.g., see Fig. 1 of Huang (2015). It is the scope of this paper to report a characteristic application of this procedure, which refers to an SES activity that was followed by a pronounced M W 5.4 mainshock in Greece on 17 November 2014, which is pretty rare as explained later.
2 Summary of the procedure to identify the occurrence time of an impending mainshock
Let us first summarize the natural time analysis (Varotsos et al. 2002a) in the case of seismicity: In a time series comprising N EQs, the natural time \(\chi_{k} = {k \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {k N}} \right. \kern-0pt} N}\) serves as an index for the occurrence of the k-th EQ. The combination of this index with the energy \(Q_{k}\) released during the k-th EQ of magnitude \(M_{k}\), i.e., the pair (\(\chi_{k} ,Q_{k}\)), is studied in natural time analysis. Alternatively, one studies the pair (\(\chi_{k} ,p_{k}\)), where \(p_{k} = {{Q_{k} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{Q_{k} } {\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N} {Q_{n} } }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N} {Q_{n} } }}\) stands for the normalized energy released during the k-th EQ. It has been found that the variance of \(\chi\) weighted for \(p_{k}\), designated by \(\kappa_{1}\), which is given by (Varotsos et al. 2001, 2002a, b, 2003a, b, 2011a):
plays a prominent role in natural time analysis. In particular, \(\kappa_{1}\) may serve as an order parameter for seismicity (Varotsos et al. 2005), and it has been empirically observed (Varotsos et al. 2001, 2002b, 2005, 2008, 2011a; Sarlis et al. 2008; Sarlis 2013) that \(\kappa_{1}\) of the seismicity in the candidate area when considering all EQs with magnitude equal to or larger than a magnitude threshold M thres subsequent to an SES activity becomes equal to 0.070 when approaching the critical point (mainshock occurrence). Note that \(Q_{k}\), and hence \(p_{k}\), for EQs is estimated through the usual relation (Kanamori 1978): \(Q_{k} \propto 10^{{1.5M_{k} }}\).
Upon the recording of an SES activity, one can estimate an area A within which the impending mainshock is expected to occur. The magnitude M of the expected EQ is estimated through the relation \(\log_{10} \left( {\frac{\Delta V}{L}} \right) \approx 0.3\;M + {\text{const}}.\), e.g., see Varotsos and Lazaridou (1991), where for a given measuring dipole of length L and a given seismic area the SES amplitude ΔV/L is found from the anomalous variation ΔV of the potential difference between the corresponding two electrodes. When area A reaches criticality, one expects in general that all its subareas have also reached criticality simultaneously. At that time, therefore, the evolution of seismicity in each of its subareas is expected to result in \(\kappa_{1}\) values close to 0.070. Assuming equipartition of probability among the subareas (Sarlis et al. 2008), the distribution Prob(\(\kappa_{1}\)) of the \(\kappa_{1}\) values of all subareas should be peaked at around 0.070 exhibiting also magnitude threshold invariance. This usually occurs a few days to around 1 week before the mainshock, thus it enables the prediction of the occurrence time of major EQs with time window of the order of a week or less.
3 Application to a recent pronounced seismic activity in Greece
The SES activity shown in Fig. 1a was recorded on 27 July 2014 at Keratea (KER) geoelectrical station, the location of which is depicted with the red bullet in Fig. 1b. On the basis of the selectivity map of this station [i.e., the map showing all seismic areas in the past that gave rise to SES recorded at this station, e.g., see Varotsos and Lazaridou (1991)] and the ratio of the SES components, the candidate area was determined (Sarlis et al. 2014). This is depicted here by the rectangle in Fig. 1b as was designated in the uppermost right part of Fig. 2 of the paper uploaded by Sarlis et al. (2014) on 7 August 2014.
We now proceed to the natural time analysis of the seismicity subsequent to the aforementioned SES activity at KER within the candidate area 37.7°N–39.0°N, 22.6°E–24.2°E. The EQ catalog of the Institute of Geodynamics of the National Observatory of Athens available on 2 February 2015 at http://www.gein.noa.gr/services/current_catalogue.php was used, e.g., see Chouliaras et al. (2013); Mignan and Chouliaras (2014). Figure 2a depicts Prob(\(\kappa_{1}\)) versus \(\kappa_{1}\) of seismicity for M thres = 2.8 (the data used are compiled in Table 1) for the period after 27 October 2014, i.e., almost three weeks before the mainshock occurrence on 17 November 2014. During this period, six smaller EQs occurred and we observe that Prob(\(\kappa_{1}\)) maximizes at \(\kappa_{1}\) = 0.070 upon the occurrence of the last EQ, i.e., the M L 2.8 EQ at 01:01 UT on 15 November 2014. It is remarkable that the same behavior is observed in Fig. 2b, where in the computation of the \(\kappa_{1}\) values, we discarded from the seismicity of the candidate area 37.7°N–39.0°N, 22.6°E–24.2°E the EQs that occurred within the subarea 37.7°N–38.3°N, 22.6°E–23.3°E. This is consistent with the fact that the latter subarea constitutes the preliminary selectivity map of the LOU station, see Fig. 1b, which however did not show any SES activity simultaneously with the one initiated on 27 July 2014 at KER station (alternatively, the area resulting from the subtraction of the above two areas could have been announced as a candidate area for the impending mainshock). To assure that this behavior exhibits also magnitude threshold invariance, we repeated the calculation that resulted in Fig. 2b, but for low magnitude thresholds (so that to have a large number of EQs). In particular, Fig. 2c–f depict the corresponding results for M thres = 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, and 2.1, respectively, which do show that Prob(\(\kappa_{1}\)) versus \(\kappa_{1}\) exhibits local maximum at \(\kappa_{1}\) = 0.070 upon the occurrence of the aforementioned EQ on 15 November 2014 (the seismic data used in order to obtain Fig. 2b–f are given in Table 2). Actually, almost three days later, i.e., at 23:05 UT on 17 November 2014, the M W (USGS) = 5.4 EQ occurred with an epicenter at 38.67°N, 23.39°E (followed by a smaller M W (USGS) 5.1 EQ at 23:09 UT with epicenter at 38.68°N, 23.24°E). It should be mentioned that EQs of such magnitude occur there very rarely. In particular, no EQ with M W (USGS) ≥ 5.4 took place within the coordinates 38.3°N–39.0°N, 23.0°E–23.8°E since 1965. In view of this very rare occurrence, it is interesting to study this case in the future by employing an approach (Moustra et al. 2011) which uses SES and a neural network (trained by relevant data of earlier cases) to predict the magnitude and the occurrence time of the forthcoming EQ.
4 Conclusion
A pronounced M W (USGS) = 5.4 EQ was strongly felt at Athens, Greece, on 17 November 2014. This is pretty rare since it is the strongest EQ that occurred in that area since 1965. The procedure based on natural time analysis of the seismicity subsequent to an SES activity recorded on 27 July 2014 at the KER station close to Athens revealed that the system approached the critical point (mainshock occurrence) just a few days before, i.e., on 15 November 2014.
References
Bottiglieri M, de Arcangelis L, Godano C, Lippiello E (2010) Multiple-time scaling and universal behavior of the earthquake interevent time distribution. Phys Rev Lett 104:158501
Chouliaras G, Melis NS, Drakatos G, Makropoulos K (2013) Operational network improvements and increased reporting in the NOA (Greece) seismicity catalog. Adv Geosci 36:7–9
Corral A (2004) Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in the temporal occurrence of earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 92:108501
Davidsen J, Paczuski M (2005) Analysis of the spatial distribution between successive earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 94:048501
Eichner JF, Kantelhardt JW, Bunde A, Havlin S (2007) Statistics of return intervals in long-term correlated records. Phys Rev E 75:011128
Holliday JR, Rundle JB, Turcotte DL, Klein W, Tiampo KF, Donnellan A (2006) Space-time clustering and correlations of major earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 97:238501
Huang Q (2015) Forecasting the epicenter of a future major earthquake. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:944–945
Huang Q, Ding X (2012) Spatiotemporal variations of seismic quiescence prior to the 2011 M 9.0 Tohoku earthquake revealed by an improved region-time-length algorithm. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:1878–1883
Kanamori H (1978) Quantification of earthquakes. Nature 271:411–414
Lennartz S, Livina VN, Bunde A, Havlin S (2008) Long-term memory in earthquakes and the distribution of interoccurrence times. EPL 81:69001
Lennartz S, Bunde A, Turcotte DL (2011) Modelling seismic catalogues by cascade models: do we need long-term magnitude correlations? Geophys J Int 184:1214–1222
Lippiello E, de Arcangelis L, Godano C (2009) Role of static stress diffusion in the spatiotemporal organization of aftershocks. Phys Rev Lett 103:038501
Lippiello E, Godano C, de Arcangelis L (2012) The earthquake magnitude is influenced by previous seismicity. Geophys Res Lett 39:L05309
Mignan A, Chouliaras G (2014) Fifty years of seismic network performance in Greece (1964–2013): spatiotemporal evolution of the completeness magnitude. Seismol Res Lett 85:657–667
Moustra M, Avraamides M, Christodoulou C (2011) Artificial neural networks for earthquake prediction using time series magnitude data or seismic electric signals. Expert Syst Appl 38:15032–15039
Saichev A, Sornette D (2006) “Universal” distribution of inter earthquake times explained. Phys Rev Lett 97:078501
Sarlis NV (2011) Magnitude correlations in global seismicity. Phys Rev E 84:022101
Sarlis NV (2013) On the recent seismic activity in North-Eastern Aegean Sea including the M w 5.8 earthquake on 8 January 2013. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B 89:438–445
Sarlis NV, Christopoulos S-RG (2012) Natural time analysis of the Centennial earthquake catalog. Chaos 22:023123
Sarlis NV, Skordas ES, Lazaridou MS, Varotsos PA (2008) Investigation of seismicity after the initiation of a seismic electric signal activity until the main shock. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B 84:331–343
Sarlis NV, Skordas ES, Varotsos PA (2009) Multiplicative cascades and seismicity in natural time. Phys Rev E 80:022102
Sarlis NV, Skordas ES, Varotsos PA (2010) Nonextensivity and natural time: the case of seismicity. Phys Rev E 82:021110
Sarlis NV, Skordas ES, Varotsos PA, Nagao T, Kamogawa M, Tanaka H, Uyeda S (2013) Minimum of the order parameter fluctuations of seismicity before major earthquakes in Japan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:13734–13738
Sarlis NV, Varotsos PA and Skordas ES (2014). Fluctuation theorem and natural time analysis, arXiv:1301.7634v7 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (7 Aug 2014)
Sarlis NV, Skordas ES, Varotsos PA, Nagao T, Kamogawa H, Uyeda S (2015) Spatiotemporal variations of seismicity before major earthquakes in the Japanese area and their relation with the epicentral locations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:986–989
Sornette D (2000) Critical phenomena in the natural sciences: chaos, fractals, selforganization, and disorder: concepts and tools. Springer, Berlin
Stanley HE (1999) Scaling, universality, and renormalization: three pillars of modern critical phenomena. Rev Mod Phys 71:S358–S366
Telesca L (2010) Analysis of Italian seismicity by using a non-extensive approach. Tectonophysics 494:155–162
Telesca L, Lovallo M (2009) Non-uniform scaling features in central Italy seismicity: a non-linear approach in investigating seismic patterns and detection of possible earthquake precursors. Geophys Res Lett 36:L01308
Turcotte DL (1997) Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Varotsos P (2005) The Physics of Seismic Electric Signals. Terrapub, Tokyo
Varotsos P, Alexopoulos K (1984a) Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, I. Tectonophysics 110:73–98
Varotsos P, Alexopoulos K (1984b) Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, II. Determination of epicenter and magnitude. Tectonophysics 110:99–125
Varotsos P, Alexopoulos K (1986) Thermodynamics of Point Defects and their Relation with Bulk Properties. North Holland, Amsterdam
Varotsos P, Lazaridou M (1991) Latest aspects of earthquake prediction in Greece based on seismic electric signals. Tectonophysics 188:321–347
Varotsos P, Alexopoulos K, Lazaridou M (1993) Latest aspects of earthquake prediction in Greece based on seismic electric signals, II. Tectonophysics 224:1–37
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2001) Spatio-temporal complexity aspects on the interrelation between seismic electric signals and seismicity. Pract Athens Acad 76:294–321
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2002a) Long range correlations in the signals that precede rupture. Phys Rev E 66:011902
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2002b) Seismic electric signals and seismicity: on a tentative interrelation between their spectral content. Acta Geophys Pol 50:337–354
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2003a) Attempt to distinguish electric signals of a dichotomous nature. Phys Rev E 68:031106
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2003b) Long-range correlations in the electric signals the precede rupture: further investigations. Phys Rev E 67:021109
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Tanaka HK, Skordas ES (2005) Similarity of fluctuations in correlated systems: the case of seismicity. Phys Rev E 72:041103
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES, Lazaridou MS (2008) Fluctuations, under time reversal, of the natural time and the entropy distinguish similar looking electric signals of different dynamics. J Appl Phys 103:014906
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2009) Detrended fluctuation analysis of the magnetic and electric field variations that precede rupture. Chaos 19:023114
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2011a) Natural time analysis: the new view of time: precursory seismic electric signals, earthquakes and other complex time-series. Springer, Berlin
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2011b) Scale-specific order parameter fluctuations of seismicity in natural time before mainshocks. EPL 96:59002
Varotsos P, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES, Uyeda S, Kamogawa M (2011c) Natural time analysis of critical phenomena. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:11361–11364
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2012) Scale-specific order parameter fluctuations of seismicity before mainshocks: natural time and detrended fluctuation analysis. EPL 99:59001
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES, Lazaridou MS (2013) Seismic electric signals: an additional fact showing their physical interconnection with seismicity. Tectonophysics 589:116–125
Varotsos PA, Sarlis NV, Skordas ES (2014) Study of the temporal correlations in the magnitude time series before major earthquakes in Japan. J Geophys Res Space Phys 119:9192–9206
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the continuous supervision and technical support of the geoelectrical stations of the SES telemetric network by Basil Dimitropoulos, Spyros Tzigkos and George Lampithianakis.
Financial support
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Varotsos, P.A., Sarlis, N.V., Skordas, E.S. et al. Identifying the occurrence time of an impending mainshock: a very recent case. Earthq Sci 28, 215–222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-015-0122-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-015-0122-3