Abstract
Purpose of Review
To review recent international and domestic definitions, considerations, and treatment algorithms for statin intolerance, and specifically, statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS).
Recent Findings
Multiple organizations around the world have produced guidance documents to aid clinicians on managing statin intolerance. A common theme resides among all the guidance documents that most patients can tolerate statins. For those patients who cannot, healthcare teams need to evaluate, rechallenge, educate, and ensure adequate reduction of atherogenic lipoproteins.
Summary
Statin therapy remains the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapies to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and reduce mortality and morbidity. The common theme throughout all these guidance documents is the importance of statin therapy to reduce ASCVD and continual adherence to treatment. Because adverse events occur and inhibit patients from achieving adequate lowering of their atherogenic lipoproteins, trial and rechallenge of statin therapy, as well as addition of non-statin therapies, especially in high-risk patients, is also undisputed. The main differences stem from laboratory monitoring and the classification of the severity of the adverse effect. Future research should focus on consistently diagnosing SAMS so that these patients can be easily identified in the electronic health records.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Reducing levels of atherogenic lipoproteins has been shown to decrease risk of clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Statin therapy remains the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapy and is generally well tolerated; however, occasionally patients experience adverse effects, often called statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). These symptoms include, but are not limited to, muscle pain, weakness, cramps, and fatigue. The incidence of these symptoms has been reported to be as high as 5-30% in the literature [1,2,3]. In clinical trials, the incidence of patient reported muscle-related complications has been reported to be as low as 3% [4•, 5•, 6, 7•, 8•, 9••]. The discrepancy may be explained by the “nocebo” effect, in which the expectation of harm results in perceived side effects that may be unrelated to the pharmacological effects of the drug [8•]. There is wide variation in the incidence of statin intolerance but often these patients can still be managed with some dose of statin therapy. Complete statin intolerance, or inability to take any dose of statin therapy, is uncommon and affects less than 5% of patients [8•]. The benefits of statin therapy greatly outweigh the potential adverse effects and so a concerted effort by the healthcare team should be made to ensure individuals at risk of ASCVD continue statin therapy. Statin intolerance guidance documents have been created to assist with re-initiating statin therapy in individuals reporting statin intolerance, which include suggestions such as giving lower or intermittent doses, among other strategies.
This review provides an overview of statin intolerance guidance documents from Latin America, Europe, Canada, and the USA. Table 1 provides the definitions on statin intolerance from each guidance.
Latin America Guidance
In 2016, the Luso-Latin American Consortium (LLAC) released a consensus definition, and guidance on the management of SAMS (Table 1) [4•]. The LLAC definition of statin intolerance includes pharmacologic criteria, symptoms, and etiology. Figure 1 describes the guidance algorithm for statin intolerance.
The guidance reports the seven SAMS standards (SAMS 0 to SAMS 6) ranging from asymptomatic increases in creatinine kinase (CK) < 4× upper limit of normal (ULN) to necrotizing autoimmune myositis [4•]. The LLAC uses an elevation of CK > 7× ULN or any CK value ≥ 1000 IU/L as the cut point for changing clinical management in statin users. LLAC recommends frequent monitoring of CK if statin therapy is altered or halted based on CK elevation and/or intolerable muscle symptoms. For patients with small increases in CK (< 4× ULN) or asymptomatic patients with CK increases between 4 and 7× ULN, a withdrawal period is not necessary, and the same statin may be restarted at a lower dose, or a different statin may be initiated. If CK elevation between 4 and 7× ULN is accompanied by intolerable muscle symptoms, the guidance recommends statin discontinuation for 4-6 weeks before rechallenging with a low-dose statin and careful monitoring of CK. However, regardless of symptom presence, if CK elevations > 7× ULN, the statin should be discontinued for 4-6 weeks, and a new CK measurement should be obtained prior to re-initiating therapy. In cases where CK levels remain elevated after a washout period, patients should be more thoroughly evaluated for secondary causes via thorough clinical and laboratory evaluation. Of note, all treatment strategies that include a discontinuation are followed by a rechallenge, either with the same statin, and dose, or with a different one.
The LLAC endorses that for all patients with CK elevations and/or muscle symptoms, the highest tolerated dose of statins should be kept, and ezetimibe should be the first therapeutic addition. If statin and ezetimibe therapy is insufficient to achieve specific lipid targets, complementary therapy with bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, or phytosterols may be considered. However, the LLAC does not endorse either the use of niacin as add-on lipid-lowering therapy or intermittent statin dosing. The LLAC noted that variability in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with intermittent statin dosing was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and therefore found the recommendation inadequate. This guidance was published prior to the outcome data for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies.
Patient centeredness has been a central component of managing SAMS, especially when attempting to avoid the “nocebo” effect to prevent negative expectations and to counter existing bias. The LLAC guidance references that previous studies have shown that the “nocebo” effect is attenuated when multiple choices of treatment are made available to the patient, and patients are given the opportunity to choose the option they most prefer. The LLAC was effectively able to detail SAMS, while providing guidance to maximize statin adherence and mitigate the risk of muscle injury.
European Guidance
In 2015, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Consensus Panel released recommendations for assessing, evaluating the cause of, and managing patients with SAMS (Table 1) [5•]. The EAS proposed a clinical definition that bases the probability of SAMS being caused by statins on the patients’ symptoms, and their temporal relationship with statin initiation, discontinuation (or dechallenge), and repetitive rechallenge [5•]. While the EAS recognized that this clinical definition might not be appropriate for regulatory purposes, they suggest that by focusing more on clinical diagnostic criteria, and providing a structured work-up, individuals with “clinically relevant” SAMS can be offered alternative regimens that will address both the patient’s symptoms and their ASCVD risk [5•]. Figure 2 describes the guidance algorithm for statin intolerance.
The EAS Consensus Panel further differentiates SAMS by CK levels to provide more individualized management [5•]. Most patients that report muscle symptoms have normal or mild/moderately elevated CK levels (<4× ULN), but the differentiation of CK level and ASCVD risk can assist in deciding if statin therapy should be continued [5•]. For example, patients reporting muscle symptoms who have normal or mildly elevated CK levels but only a low ASCVD risk may not warrant statin therapy and instead can receive counseling on lifestyle changes, such as blood pressure control and low-fat diet, whereas for patients with normal or mildly elevated CK levels, and high ASCVD risk, there should be an in-depth discussion of the benefits of continuing statin therapy despite muscle symptoms. It is especially apparent in these cases how the EAS Consensus Panel’s detailed, clinically based, SAMS definition and therapeutic flowchart for management provides helpful tools in clinical practice.
If patients are found to have true SAMS and are not at their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, then other additional therapies should be employed. The panel suggests a vegetarian diet, ezetimibe, nutraceuticals including psyllium and plant stanols, bile acid sequestrants, and fibrates. This guidance was published prior to the outcome data for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies. This guidance discusses the possible underlying pathophysiological causes of SAMS. While current research indicates that it is possible statins decrease mitochondrial function, attenuate energy production, and alter muscle protein degradation, the EAS Consensus Panel suggests that further research into the pathophysiology of SAMS could present new therapeutic potential [5•].
In 2017, the EAS Consensus Panel provided an update to their statement on SAMS, where they further stressed the importance of allocating adequate time to managing patients at high risk of cardiovascular events who are also experiencing muscle symptoms [6]. Time is needed to explain the benefits of statin therapy, provide reassurance, and assess statin dechallenge/rechallenge, which is crucial for differentiating true SAMS [6].
Canadian Guidance
In 2016, the Canadian Consensus Working Group (CCWG) published a comprehensive statin-intolerance definition that integrates a practical concept of “goal-inhibiting statin intolerance” (GISI) (Table 1) [7•]. The CCWG defines statin intolerance as a clinical syndrome marked by the presence of adverse effects after a trial of two different statins; specifically, the CCWG recommends utilizing atorvastatin (10-80 mg) and rosuvastatin (5-40 mg) in initial rounds of therapy. The CCWG explains myalgia, cognitive dysfunction, glycemic control, and gastrointestinal effects among the most common adverse effects of statin therapy [7•].
Specific to SAMS, the CCWG emphasizes the importance of obtaining baseline CK levels prior to statin therapy; discouraging patients from taking supplements to avoid anticipated myalgia symptoms; and appropriately using these data in conjunction with CK metrics according to ethnicity and sex [4•].
Patients who do not reach their lipid-lowering goals due to discontinuation of statin therapy precipitated by statin-associated adverse effects are designated as GISI. Additionally, the CCWG describes “goal-inhibiting statin resistance” (GISR) as a phenomenon in patients who do not achieve expected benchmarks of lipid lowering through the use of maximally tolerated statin doses. The differentiation of these terms helps explain when a lack of statin efficacy (GISR) prevents achievement of lipid-lowering goals, whereas situations when patients do not reach lipid-lowering benchmarks due to statin-associated adverse effects are defined as GISI. Figure 3 provides the recommended course of action for patients that meet the criteria of CCWG [4•].
Common throughout the CCWG statement is the theme of establishing trust with patients during the entirety of assessment for statin use and subsequent management. The first pillar to goal-inhibiting statin intolerance management is identifying and explaining the strong indications that exist for statin use. Once indication for therapy is established, the group emphasized the importance of understanding risk factors that may predispose patients to experience statin-associated adverse effects and limit statin use, while continually integrating lifestyle modification goals into the overall management of the patient. Non-modifiable risk factors that may predispose patients to statin-associated adverse effects include ages above 80 years old, female sex, family history of myopathies with or without statin therapy, and Asian ethnicity [7•]. Modifiable risk factors that may predispose patients to statin-associated adverse effects include a high statin dose, alcohol and illicit drug use disorders, and several classes of medications [7•]. The CCWG explains that dietary counseling suggests the consumption of phytosterol-containing foods in combination with statin therapy may help patients reach their lipid-lowering goals, while also discouraging patients from taking over the counter supplements to avoid myalgia symptoms. Moreover, the group posits that patients should complete laboratory testing at the initiation of statin therapy and at the first follow-up visit after statin initiation to establish an understanding of a patient’s baseline and response related to statin therapy. Sensible laboratory testing and follow-up helps build trust with patients and is a critical step of goal-inhibiting statin intolerance management.
United States Guidance
In 2014, the National Lipid Association (NLA) created a definition of statin intolerance that included the concept of “real or perceived,” which at the time, was missing from other definitions [10]. In 2022, the definition was updated further to include a continuum of statin intolerance (Table 1) [8•]. As newer therapies have been added to the armamentarium of lipid therapy, the idea of complete and partial intolerance has become even more clinically relevant. Partially intolerant patients can still tolerate some statin dose, however, due to an adverse effect, not a dose that is high enough to achieve adequate lowering of their atherogenic lipoproteins.
The guidance further described other therapeutic options to decrease atherogenic lipoproteins. As well as described the “nocebo” effect as a possible reason for intolerance, however, according to the writing group, should not be a reason to delay additional therapy, especially in high-risk patients. However, once additional therapy is initiated, finding a tolerable statin regimen should still be a goal of care, as complete statin intolerance is very rare.
In 2022, the NLA published a guidance on SAMS [9••]. It defines SAMS as “all muscle symptoms temporally related to statin use but without regard to causality” [9••]. The perspective describes patient-centered clinical and communication strategies to mitigate SAMS and provides recommendations to improve statin adherence and patient outcomes [9••]. It recommends four treatment strategies: (1) optimize lifestyle interventions, (2) mitigate risk factors associated with muscle symptoms, (3) alter statin dose to improve tolerability, and (4) use non-statin medications (Fig. 4) [9••].
Similarities and Differences Among Statin Intolerance Guidance
An overview of the similarities and differences among the statin intolerance guidance documents is available in Table 2. The United States guidance on statin intolerance was the most recently published, while others were almost 5 years old. The year of publication accounted for some of the differences among the guidance documents. The Latin American, European, and Canadian guidance were published prior to the outcome studies for the PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies. Recent publications have shown PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies as an effective addition to lowering LDL-C and reduce ASCVD risk, when added to statin therapy [11, 12]. None of the guidance documents recommends the use of niacin. There are significant differences in the recommendations for the utilization of CK monitoring. All guidance documents provide recommendations for challenge and rechallenge of statin therapy but differ in the intervals and quantity. Both the European and Canadian guidance recommend phytosterols, and all do not recommend the use of coenzyme Q10. All guidance documents but the European mention the nocebo effect.
Conclusions
The common theme throughout all these guidance documents is the importance of statin therapy to reduce ASCVD and continual adherence to treatment. Because AEs occur and inhibit patients from achieving adequate lowering of their atherogenic lipoproteins, trial and rechallenge of statin therapy, as well as addition of non-statin therapies, especially in high-risk patients, is also undisputed. The main differences stem from laboratory monitoring and the classification of the severity of the adverse effect. A common theme resides among all the guidance documents that most patients can tolerate statins. For those patients who cannot, healthcare teams need to evaluate, rechallenge, educate, and ensure adequate reduction of atherogenic lipoproteins.
Data Availability
All data generated during and analyzed during this study are included in the published article.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Zhang H, Plutzky J, Skentzos S, Morrison F, Mar P, Shubina M, et al. Discontinuation of statins in routine care settings: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(7):526–34. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00004.
Mampuya WM, Frid D, Rocco M, Huang J, Brennan DM, Hazen SL, et al. Treatment strategies in patients with statin intolerance: the Cleveland Clinic experience. Am Heart J. 2013;166(3):597–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.004.
Jacobson TA, Cheeley MK, Jones PH, La Forge R, Maki KC, López JAG, et al. The STatin Adverse Treatment Experience Survey: experience of patients reporting side effects of statin therapy. J Clin Lipidol. 2019;13(3):415–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2019.04.011.
• Sposito AC, Faria Neto JR, Carvalho LS, Lorenzatti A, Cafferata A, Elikir G, et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: position paper from the Luso-Latin American Consortium. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(2):239–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2016.1252740. Findings from the Luso-Latin American Consortium on statin-associated muscle sypmtoms provide an understanding of the natural history and incidence.
• Stroes ES, Thompson PD, Corsini A, Vladutiu GD, Raal FJ, Ray KK, et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy-European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel Statement on Assessment. Aetiology and Management. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(17):1012–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv043. Findings from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel on statin intolerance recommend a structured evaluation to identify individuals with statin intolerance muscle symptoms.
Stock JK. Update on SAMS: statin-associated muscle symptoms. Atherosclerosis. 2018;269:260–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.12.032.
• Mancini GB, Baker S, Bergeron J, Fitchett D, Frohlich J, Genest J, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of statin adverse effects and intolerance: Canadian Consensus Working Group Update (2016). Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(7 Suppl):S35–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.003. Findings from the Canadian Consensus Working group on statin intolerance include structured framework for identifying, avoiding, evaluating, and managing statin intolerance.
• Cheeley MK, Saseen JJ, Agarwala A, Ravilla S, Ciffone N, Jacobson TA, et al. NLA scientific statement on statin intolerance: a new definition and key considerations for ASCVD risk reduction in the statin intolerant patient. J Clin Lipidol. 2022;16(4):361–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2022.05.068. Findings from this scientific statement by the National Lipid Association provide an updated definition of statin intolerance.
•• Warden BA, Guyton JR, Kovacs AC, Durham JA, Jones LK, Dixon DL, et al. Assessment and management of statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS): A clinical perspective from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol. 2023;17(1):19–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2022.09.001. Findings from this clinical perspective provide clinicians guidance on treatment strategies for statin-associated muscle symptoms including optimizing lifestyle interventions, modulating risk factors, optimizing statin tolerability, and use of non-statin therapies.
Guyton JR, Bays HE, Grundy SM, Jacobson TA. The National Lipid Association Statin Intolerance P. An assessment by the Statin Intolerance Panel: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8(3 Suppl):S72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2014.03.002.
Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1615664.
Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097–107. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801174.
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R61HL161775, R33HL161775, and R01HL148246. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by M.K.C., K.C., C.L., T.J.S., and L.K.J. The first draft of the manuscript was written by K.C., C.L., and T.J.S. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Mary Katherine Cheeley is a podcast host for ReachMD.
Katarina Clegg reports no conflicts of interest.
Connor Lockridge reports no conflicts of interest.
Tyler J. Schubert reports no conflicts of interest.
Laney K. Jones is a consultant for Novartis Corporation.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cheeley, M.K., Clegg, K., Lockridge, C. et al. Statin Intolerance: an Overview of US and International Guidance. Curr Atheroscler Rep 25, 517–526 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01124-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01124-z