Abstract
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a lysophospholipid that acts as an extracellular signal through the activation of cognate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). There are six known LPA receptors (LPA1–6). The first such receptor, LPA1, was identified in the embryonic brain and has been studied extensively for gene expression throughout the body, including through studies of receptor-null mice. However, identifying receptor protein expression in situ and in vivo within living cells and tissues has been difficult because of biologically low receptor expression and variable antibody specificity. To visualize native LPA1 receptor expression in situ, we generated a knock-in mouse produced by homologous recombination in murine embryonic stem (ES) cells to replace a wildtype Lpar1 allele with a mutant allele created by in-frame fusion of EGFP to the 4th exon of Lpar1 (Lpar1-EGFP knock-in allele). Homozygous knock-in mice appeared normal and the expected mendelian ratios of knock-in allele transmission were present in females and males. Histological assessments of the fetal and adult central nervous system (CNS) demonstrated expression patterns that were consistent with prior in situ hybridization studies. This new mouse line will be useful for studies of LPA1 in the developing and adult CNS, as well as other tissues, and for receptor assessments in living tissues and disease models.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Molecular cloning of the first lysophospholipid receptor was reported 25 years ago from studies of the embryonic cerebral cortex [1], which identified a receptor now known as LPA1 (gene name Lpar1 for mouse, LPAR1 for human [2]) that mediates the effects of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) [3,4,5]. In the ensuing years, other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for LPA and related lysophospholipids, including sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) were identified, revealing a rich biology with true medical relevance [5,6,7].
The identification of Lpar1 from the central nervous system (CNS) implicated a range of potential functions relevant to normal and pathological states [3, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. During embryonic development, Lpar1 was found to be expressed by neural progenitor cells (NPCs) of the ventricular zone, cells of the leptomeninges [1, 15] within the telencephalon, cells along the ventricular surface of the third ventricle [16], and at lower points in the neuraxis. Embryonic functions of Lpar1 include effects on cellular morphology [17,18,19,20], process and growth cone outgrowth [4, 19,20,21,22], electrophysiological responses [23, 24], and neurogenesis through cell survival and anti-apoptotic effects [25,26,27,28]. In the adult, Lpar1 shows prominent expression in non-neuronal cells of the brain, particularly oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells of the peripheral nervous system [26, 29,30,31]. Markedly lower levels of expression have been detected in most other brain cell types including microglia, astrocytes, endothelial, ependymal, and choroid cells, also within certain neurons, particularly under the varying conditions of development, disease, or cell culture [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Disruption of embryonic LPA1 signaling likely contributes to brain pathologies such as developmental brain disorders like hydrocephalus [16, 40] and neuropsychiatric disorders [41,42,43,44,45], including those associated with hypoxic mechanisms [46, 47]. Other nervous system diseases have been linked to defects in LPA1 signaling in adults, including neuropathic and other forms of pain [42, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55], neuroinflammation [13, 56, 57], spinal cord injury [49, 52, 58, 59], stroke [60], and neurodegenerative disorders [13, 57].
Much of what is known about the physiology and pathophysiology of LPA1 came from experimental studies of the mouse, through the targeted genetic deletion of Lpar1 [27, 55], as well as by using derivatives of the original mutant mouse to improve viability in complex strain backgrounds (maLpar1 [61]). A particular area of ambiguity has been ascertaining the biologically relevant locations of the LPA1 protein within the intact brain towards understanding cellular mechanisms. While gene expression studies by in situ hybridization (ISH) identified Lpar1 expression in NPCs [1] during embryonic brain development, and oligodendrocytes [29] in the adult brain, determining the location of receptor protein has been more challenging because of inconsistent antibody specificity and availability, low receptor expression, differences in tissue preparation, and variables related to the effects of mouse background strain that produced inconsistent, if not contradictory results. A possible solution to these challenges in mice is through gene knock-in strategies [62], wherein a wildtype allele is replaced by a modified version that enables tracking of a functional receptor tagged with an EGFP fusion protein. Here we report an Lpar1-EGFP fusion knock-in transgenic mouse line and its initial characterization within the developing and adult brain.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Animal husbandry for the Lpar1-EGFP mouse line was provided by the animal resource departments of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) and the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (SBP). Embryonic and adult mice were euthanized via isoflurane overdose per approved protocols and institutional guidelines. All animal procedures were approved and conducted in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines of TSRI and SBP.
ES Cell Transfection
Standard methodologies were used to establish Lpar1-EGFP knock-in ES cell lines [21, 27, 51, 55, 63,64,65]. Briefly, the targeting vector (50 mg) was linearized and mixed with 1 × 107 R1 ES cells (generously provided by Dr. Andras Nagy) in a 0.4 cm electroporation cuvette and electroporated using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser II (200 mVolts × 800 mF capacitance). The electroporated cells were allowed to recover on ice for 20 min and then plated on a feeder layer of neomycin-resistant mouse embryo fibroblasts. Twenty-four hours after plating, the ES cell media was replaced with media containing 150 mg/ml of geneticin (ThermoFisher Scientific), which was replaced daily for 7 days. After 7 days, 140 individual ES cell clones were picked and split into 96 well master plates that were frozen in fetal calf serum containing 10% DMSO and 24 well plates for DNA isolation. Appropriately recombined ES clones were isolated and injected into recipient blastocysts by the TSRI Murine Genetics Core. Southern blotting and PCR genotyping with targeted primers identified germline transmission of the knock-in transgene (Fig. 2B: A1 EGFP KI Forward: 5′-GACAAAGAGATGAGCGCCAC-3′, A1 EGFP Wt Reverse: 5′-GAGTGTCCTCATCTCCTCTG-3′, and EGFP Internal Reverse: 5′-GTGGTGCAGATGAACTTCAGG-3′).
Southern Blotting and DNA Hybridization
ES cells with homologous recombination of the Lpar1 genomic locus were identified by Southern blot hybridization [51, 55, 66, 67] of HindIII digested genomic DNA that was separated on a 0.08% 1 × TAE agarose gel and transferred to HybondTM-N membranes (Amersham), UV-crosslinked, and probed with 25 ng of a 32P-labeled 1.2 kb DNA fragment from a region of the Lpar1 locus external to 3′ end of the Lpar1-EGFP targeting construct. Blots were pre-hybridized for one hour at 42 °C in hybridization solution (0.5 M phosphate buffer pH 7.4, 50% formamide, 5 × SSPE, 1 × Denhardt’s solution, 1% SDS, and 0.1% denatured salmon sperm) followed by the addition of the denatured radiolabeled DNA probe prepared using an Agilent Random Primer Labeling Kit. Following overnight hybridization (42 °C), the blots were washed with 2 × SSPE 0.1% SDS and 0.2 × SSPE 0.1% SDS, then visualized with a GE Typhoon Phosphorimager. ES cell clones that did not have proper recombination of the Lpar1 locus were identified by a 6.7 kb band, and ES cell clones with homologous recombination events at Lpar1 were identified by the presence of a 6.7 kb wildtype band and 4.4 kb recombined band (Fig. 2A).
Tissue Preparation and Sectioning
Mutant mice were identified and validated by standard genotyping procedures. Forward 5′-ACATGGT show [QJ]CCTGCTGGAGTTC-3′ plus Lpar1 Reverse 5′-GAGTGTCCTCATCTCCTCTG-3′) of the neomycin. Cryostat sections were prepared from homozygote, heterozygote, and wildtype. Expression of the Lpar1-EGFP fusion allele was assessed by isolating embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5) heads and adult brain and lumbar spinal cord from wildtype and Lpar1-EGFP knock-in age-matched animals, which were processed for standard cryostat sectioning, fixation, and fluorescence microscopy [68,69,70,71,72,73]. In brief, samples were mounted in pre-chilled molds containing Neg-50TM (Thermo Scientific) frozen section media and then frozen on dry ice. Tissue sections were cut at 20 μm using a Leica cryostat, fixed with cold 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5 min, washed twice with PBS, mounted, and coverslipped using VECTASHIELD® HardSetTM antifade mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Tissue section, staining, and mounting was performed at the SBP histology core facility. Endogenous EGFP fluorescence in all tissues was evaluated using a KEYENCE BZ-X810 all-in-one fluorescence microscope. RNAscope [74] against mouse Lpar1 utilized commercially available probes and protocols (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Newark, CA).
Results
Construction of an Lpar1-EGFP Fusion Knock-in Construct
Mouse Lpar1 genomic DNA fragments were amplified from a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) template containing the Lpar1 genomic locus (BAC RP23-149020, Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute) using Pfx50TM DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). An amplified fragment containing Lpar1 exon 4 including a portion of the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) was used to fuse EGFP in-frame to the carboxy terminus of Lpar1 using overlap PCR. An introduced BamHI restriction enzyme site positioned between the EGFP stop codon and the start of the Lpar1 3′ UTR was used to insert a loxP flanked neomycin cassette under the control of the phosphoglycerate kinase promoter (PGK-neo). A HindIII restriction enzyme at the 5′ end of the PGK-neo cassette was inserted to allow for the identification of homologously recombined ES cell clones. Amplified Lpar1 genomic fragments were assembled in the pGEM®-T Easy Vector System (Promega) to produce an Lpar1 knock-in targeting vector with 8.2 and 1.7 kb of homologous flanking sequence on the 5′ and 3′ ends of the EGFP and PGK-neo DNA sequences.
Isolation of Recombined ES Cell Clones and Lpar1-EGFP Knock-in Mice
ES cell clones positive for homologous recombination were identified by Southern blotting using the external probe (Fig. 2A). Positive clones were expanded for confirmation of the recombination event, analyzed to ensure that only single integration events were present, and pathogen tested (IDEXX BioAnalytics). A single ES cell clone was selected for injection into C57BL/6 J mouse blastocysts to produce chimeric mice. Chimeric offspring were bred to C57BL/6 J animals to assay for germline transmission. Homologous recombination events were assessed by Southern blot hybridization of HindIII digested genomic DNA isolated from the offspring of chimeric mice using the external probe (Fig. 1) and by PCR genotyping.
To delete the loxP flanked PGK-neo cassette, male mice heterozygous for the Lpar1-EGFP allele were crossed to female EIIa-cre transgenic mice that are routinely used for germline deletion of loxP-flanked DNA sequences [75,76,77,78]. Mice hemizygous for the Lpar1-EGFP allele and devoid of the neomycin cassette were identified by genomic Southern blotting (Fig. 2A) and PCR (Fig. 2B, C). Mice with appropriate genotypes were used to propagate the Lpar1-EGFP line and were bred to homozygosity. Homozygous animals appeared phenotypically indistinguishable from littermate controls, showed normal Mendelian female-to-male ratios, and were fertile, allowing colony establishment with homozygous Lpar1-EGFP genotype-confirmed animals. Timed-breedings to assess embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5) brains, an age at which the ventricular zone of the embryonic cerebral cortex is prominent [1, 79, 80], were complemented by live births to produce adults for analyses.
Histological Analyses Reveal a Concordance between Lpar1-EGFP and RNAscope
Wildtype controls were compared to Lpar1-EGFP animals, wherein cryostat sections were mounted, fixed, counter-stained with 4,6-diamidino 2-phenylindole (DAPI), and observed using fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3A, B). Specific EGFP endogenous fluorescence was observed only within mutants. In embryonic specimens, EGFP was detected in the cerebral cortical ventricular zone (VZ), leptomeninges (LH), and in non-brain compartments. Compared to Lpar1 RNAscope in situ hybridization (Fig. 3C), the patterns of EGFP labeling extensively overlapped, including a relative absence of signal in the ganglionic eminence (ge), as previously observed [1, 16]. These results support the presence of higher receptor density on the cell membranes of soma expressing LPA1. Within the adult brain, strong EGFP labeling was observed within most, if not all, myelinated fiber tracts and prominently within the corpus callosum (CC), internal capsule (ic) fimbria (fi), and medial and lateral habenulae (MH, LH) (Fig. 3D–F). Notably, robust EGFP was not observed in the hippocampal formation (H) that included the dentate gyrus (dg). Further analyses supported EGFP localization surrounding cell nuclei (Fig. 4A–C), which is consistent with the membrane localization of LPA1. The spinal cord (lumbar region) was also examined (Fig. 4D, E), which revealed more diffuse EGFP signals within known myelinated fiber tracts.
Discussion
Knowledge of LPA1 protein localization under basal conditions of normal development and adult life will enable more accurate mechanisms to be identified for biological, pathophysiological, and drug discovery efforts that target LPA1. The Lpar1-EGFP knock-in mice described here express from the endogenous promoter and enhancer elements, and show no evidence of LPA1 functional loss or deficiency compared to phenotypes from constitutive [21, 27, 61] and conditional [55] Lpar1 knock-out studies. These results support the overall functionality of LPA1-EGFP fusion proteins, which is consistent with other functional LPA1 fusion proteins, including their use to determine the LPA1 crystal structure (using the modified apocytochrome c, “bRil”) [81]. The presence of EGFP in non-brain compartments (Fig. 3B) indicates that this mutant will likely be useful for many, if not all, cell types that express LPA1. Formal examination of the other cell types and tissues known to express LPA1 [12] remains an area for future work.
The high concordance between EGFP signals and ISH labeling supports proximity between Lpar1 mRNA and receptor protein, at least at the level of signal that can be identified by the employed techniques. This was particularly true in the embryonic brain where immature cells have relatively little cytoplasm compared to their nuclei [82], revealing EGFP signals surrounding nuclei (Fig. 4B, C). However, it is certain that minute levels of receptor protein expression, not reported by direct Lpar1-EGFP expression, are present, particularly in developing neurons and comparatively rare, but existent, neuronal expression of LPA1 that has been detected by single-cell Drop-seq transcriptomic studies [39]. Functional support for active receptors, at distal cellular locations of processes and growth cones on developing NPCs and neurons, can be seen in the effects of exogenous LPA exposure that results in process and growth cone retraction [18, 20, 22, 25, 83, 84], indicating that receptors are present in these highly polarized cells. Amplification techniques such as anti-EGFP antibodies and structured illumination microscopy [85] could better resolve the presence of low-abundance receptor signals marked by the expressed receptor fusion proteins. In the adult brain, oligodendrocytes were by far the most prominent cell type identified by early ISH studies [29]. This observation was confirmed by single-cell Drop-seq studies where the top 80+ subclusters with the highest Lpar1 expression were predominantly oligodendrocytes (and other non-neuronal cell types) [39]. The robust labeling of myelinated fiber tracts is consistent with prior ISH and single-cell transcriptome studies that identified receptor expression in oligodendrocytes, while the current images support high-density LPA1 localization within the cell membrane layers of the myelin sheaths [26, 29, 86, 87].
An area of technical and biological ambiguity that may be approached using the newly created Lpar1-EGFP knock-in mice relates to the hippocampus and LPA1’s roles in learning and memory. Multiple reports identified hippocampal phenotypes in mice null for Lpar1 [45, 88,89,90,91]. However, the cell types responsible for these phenotypes are ambiguous. One attractive cell population for future studies is the mouse adult hippocampal precursor cell [92,93,94] that was reported to show high levels of LPA1 expression based primarily upon the EGFP BAC mouse line created by the NIH GENSAT [95, 96] project. This mouse showed high EGFP expression within white matter tracts like the Lpa1-EGFP mice reported here, but also showed high EGFP expression within the dentate gyrus [94] (and other locales such as the cerebral cortex) that did not overlap with the Lpa1-EGFP expression pattern. This raises the question on which mouse model provides a more accurate description of LPA1 location.
Multiple, independent ISH analyses have uniformly been devoid of robust Lpar1 signals in the dentate gyrus including the original GENSAT ISH screen, the Allen Brain Atlas, the current report (Fig. 3), and past reports [29], as well as Drop-seq data [39] that did report a dentate gyrus neuron subcluster (Neuron_dentate_C1qI2[#4](HC)), but with low expression levels (~2 Lpar1 transcripts per million (TPM)) compared with the top brain subcluster (oligodendrocyte_Mbp[#9](TH); ~1600 Lpar1 TPM). A putative hippocampal progenitor subcluster that is not limited to the dentate gyrus (Neurogenesis_Sox4 [#13](HC)) reported somewhat higher expression (~11 Lpar1 TPM). Primary cell culture studies also reported an absence of LPA1 expression in hippocampal neurons [84].
Evidence for low LPA1 expression in the dentate gyrus vs. high EGFP expression in the BAC mice—as well as other discordant EGFP patterns—could be explained in multiple ways. A partial list includes the precise ages of brain analyses, tissue preparation, different EGFP half-life, differing mouse background strains, and mouse husbandry conditions, as well as a BAC-transgene that has unknown copy number, orientation, intactness, and integration sites. These issues might affect BAC-transgene EGFP expression under basal and challenged (e.g., cell culture, disease models) conditions. As notable, BAC-mouse lines were purposefully selected for optimal EGFP expression during line curation, which therefore selected for discrepant patterns compared to standard approaches [96] and might have forgone lesser signals more akin to those seen in the current Lpar1-EGFP mouse that employs wildtype gene regulatory elements. Use of these new Lpar1-EGFP knock-in mice should enable future clarification of hippocampal phenotypes and related issues, while providing a new experimental tool to assess LPA1 protein localization within intact tissues.
References
Hecht, J. H., Weiner, J. A., Post, S. R., & Chun, J. (1996). Ventricular zone gene-1 (vzg-1) encodes a lysophosphatidic acid receptor expressed in neurogenic regions of the developing cerebral cortex. Journal of Cell Biology, 135, 1071–1083.
Kihara, Y., Maceyka, M., Spiegel, S., & Chun, J. (2014). Lysophospholipid receptor nomenclature review: IUPHAR Review 8. British Journal of Pharmacology, 171, 3575–3594. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.12678.
Fukushima, N., Ishii, I., Contos, J. J., Weiner, J. A., & Chun, J. (2001). Lysophospholipid receptors. Annual Review Pharmacology and Toxicology, 41, 507–534.
Ishii, I., Fukushima, N., Ye, X., & Chun, J. (2004). Lysophospholipid receptors: signaling and biology. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 73, 321–354.
Choi, J. W., et al. (2010). LPA receptors: subtypes and biological actions. Annual Review Pharmacology and Toxicology, 50, 157–186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105753.
Chun, J., Giovannoni, G., & Hunter, S. F. (2021). Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator therapy for multiple sclerosis: differential downstream receptor signalling and clinical profile effects. Drugs, 81, 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-020-01431-8.
Chun, J., Kihara, Y., Jonnalagadda, D., & Blaho, V. A. (2019). Fingolimod: lessons learned and new opportunities for treating multiple sclerosis and other disorders. Annual Review Pharmacology and Toxicology, 59, 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021358.
Chun, J. (1999). The first cloned and identified lysophospholipid (LP) receptor gene, vzg-1: implications for related receptors and the nervous system. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 469, 357–362.
Chun, J. (1999). Lysophospholipid receptors: implications for neural signaling. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology, 13, 151–168.
Fukushima, N., & Chun, J. (2001). The LPA receptors. Prostaglandins, 64, 21–32.
Choi, J. W., & Chun, J. (2013). Lysophospholipids and their receptors in the central nervous system. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1831, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.07.015.
Chun, J., Hla, T., Moolenaar, W. & Spiegel, S. (Eds). (2013). Lysophospholipid receptors: Signaling and biochemistry. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
Yung, Y. C., Stoddard, N. C., Mirendil, H., & Chun, J. (2015). Lysophosphatidic Acid signaling in the nervous system. Neuron, 85, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.009.
Sheng, X., Yung, Y. C., Chen, A., & Chun, J. (2015). Lysophosphatidic acid signalling in development. Development, 142, 1390–1395. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.121723.
McGiffert, C., Contos, J. J., Friedman, B., & Chun, J. (2002). Embryonic brain expression analysis of lysophospholipid receptor genes suggests roles for s1p(1) in neurogenesis and s1p(1-3) in angiogenesis. FEBS Letters, 531, 103–108.
Yung, Y. C., et al. (2011). Lysophosphatidic acid signaling may initiate fetal hydrocephalus. Science Translational Medicine, 3, 99ra87 https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002095.
Fukushima, N., Kimura, Y., & Chun, J. (1998). A single receptor encoded by vzg-1/lpA1/edg-2 couples to G proteins and mediates multiple cellular responses to lysophosphatidic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 6151–6156.
Fukushima, N., Weiner, J. A., & Chun, J. (2000). Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a novel extracellular regulator of cortical neuroblast morphology. Developmental Biology, 228, 6–18.
Fukushima, N., Ishii, I., Habara, Y., Allen, C. B., & Chun, J. (2002). Dual regulation of actin rearrangement through lysophosphatidic acid receptor in neuroblast cell lines: actin depolymerization by Ca(2+)-alpha-actinin and polymerization by rho. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 13, 2692–2705.
Fukushima, N., et al. (2002). Lysophosphatidic acid influences the morphology and motility of young, postmitotic cortical neurons. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, 20, 271–282.
Contos, J. J., et al. (2002). Characterization of lpa(2) (Edg4) and lpa(1)/lpa(2) (Edg2/Edg4) lysophosphatidic acid receptor knockout mice: signaling deficits without obvious phenotypic abnormality attributable to lpa(2). Molecular and Cellular Biology, 22, 6921–6929.
Campbell, D. S., & Holt, C. E. (2001). Chemotropic responses of retinal growth cones mediated by rapid local protein synthesis and degradation. Neuron, 32, 1013–1026.
Dubin, A. E., Bahnson, T., Weiner, J. A., Fukushima, N., & Chun, J. (1999). Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates neurotransmitter-like conductance changes that precede GABA and L-glutamate in early, presumptive cortical neuroblasts. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1371–1381.
Dubin, A. E., Herr, D. R., & Chun, J. (2010). Diversity of lysophosphatidic acid receptor-mediated intracellular calcium signaling in early cortical neurogenesis. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 7300–7309. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6151-09.2010. 30/21/7300 [pii].
Campbell, D. S., & Holt, C. E. (2003). Apoptotic pathway and MAPKs differentially regulate chemotropic responses of retinal growth cones. Neuron, 37, 939–952.
Weiner, J. A., & Chun, J. (1999). Schwann cell survival mediated by the signaling phospholipid lysophosphatidic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 5233–5238.
Contos, J. J., Fukushima, N., Weiner, J. A., Kaushal, D., & Chun, J. (2000). Requirement for the lpA1 lysophosphatidic acid receptor gene in normal suckling behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 13384–13389.
Kingsbury, M. A., Rehen, S. K., Contos, J. J., Higgins, C. M., & Chun, J. (2003). Non-proliferative effects of lysophosphatidic acid enhance cortical growth and folding. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1292–1299.
Weiner, J. A., Hecht, J. H., & Chun, J. (1998). Lysophosphatidic acid receptor gene vzg-1/lpA1/edg-2 is expressed by mature oligodendrocytes during myelination in the postnatal murine brain. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 398, 587–598.
Weiner, J. A., Fukushima, N., Contos, J. J., Scherer, S. S., & Chun, J. (2001). Regulation of Schwann cell morphology and adhesion by receptor-mediated lysophosphatidic acid signaling. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 7069–7078.
Gonzalez de San Roman, E. et al. (2015). Anatomical location of LPA activation and LPA phospholipid precursors in rodent and human brain. Journal of Neurochemistry, https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13112.
Moller, T., Contos, J. J., Musante, D. B., Chun, J., & Ransom, B. R. (2001). Expression and function of lysophosphatidic acid receptors in cultured rodent microglial cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276, 25946–25952.
Rao, T. S., et al. (2003). Pharmacological characterization of lysophospholipid receptor signal transduction pathways in rat cerebrocortical astrocytes. Brain Research, 990, 182–194. S0006899303035273 [pii].
Rao, T. S., et al. (2004). Growth factor pre-treatment differentially regulates phosphoinositide turnover downstream of lysophospholipid receptor and metabotropic glutamate receptors in cultured rat cerebrocortical astrocytes. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 22, 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.03.005S0736574804000310. [pii].
de Sampaio, E. S. T. C., et al. (2008). Lysophosphatidic acid receptor-dependent secondary effects via astrocytes promote neuronal differentiation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283, 7470–7479. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M707758200. M707758200 [pii].
Shano, S., Moriyama, R., Chun, J., & Fukushima, N. (2008). Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates astrocyte proliferation through LPA1. Neurochemistry International, 52, 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2007.07.004. S0197-0186(07)00197-0 [pii].
Ueda, H., et al. (2018). Involvement of lysophosphatidic acid-induced astrocyte activation underlying the maintenance of partial sciatic nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain. Pain, 159, 2170–2178. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001316.
Ramakers, G. J., & Moolenaar, W. H. (1998). Regulation of astrocyte morphology by RhoA and lysophosphatidic acid. Experimental Cell Research, 245, 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1998.4224.
Saunders, A., et al. (2018). Molecular diversity and specializations among the cells of the adult mouse brain. Cell, 174, 1015–1030 e1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.028.
Lummis, N. C., et al. (2019). LPA1/3 overactivation induces neonatal posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus through ependymal loss and ciliary dysfunction. Science Advances, 5, eaax2011 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax2011.
Mirendil, H., et al. (2015). LPA signaling initiates schizophrenia-like brain and behavioral changes in a mouse model of prenatal brain hemorrhage. Translational Psychiatry, 5, e541 https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.33.
Lin, M. E., Herr, D. R., & Chun, J. (2010). Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors: signaling properties and disease relevance. Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators, 91, 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2009.02.002. S1098-8823(09)00005-7 [pii].
Pedraza, C., et al. (2014). Fear extinction and acute stress reactivity reveal a role of LPA(1) receptor in regulating emotional-like behaviors. Brain Structure & Function, 219, 1659–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-013-0592-9.
Moreno-Fernandez, R. D., et al. (2017). maLPA1-null mice as an endophenotype of anxious depression. Translational Psychiatry, 7, e1077 https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2017.24.
Tabbai, S., et al. (2019). Effects of the LPA1 receptor deficiency and stress on the hippocampal LPA species in mice. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 12, 146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2019.00146.
Teo, S. T., Yung, Y. C., Herr, D. R., & Chun, J. (2009). Lysophosphatidic acid in vascular development and disease. IUBMB Life, 61, 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.220.
Herr, K. J., Herr, D. R., Lee, C. W., Noguchi, K., & Chun, J. (2011). Stereotyped fetal brain disorganization is induced by hypoxia and requires lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 (LPA1) signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 15444–15449. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106129108.
Inoue, M., et al. (2004). Initiation of neuropathic pain requires lysophosphatidic acid receptor signaling. Nature Medicine, 10, 712–718.
Inoue, M., Yamaguchi, A., Kawakami, M., Chun, J., & Ueda, H. (2006). Loss of spinal substance P pain transmission under the condition of LPA1 receptor-mediated neuropathic pain. Molecular Pain, 2, 25.
Inoue, M., Ma, L., Aoki, J., Chun, J., & Ueda, H. (2008). Autotaxin, a synthetic enzyme of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), mediates the induction of nerve-injured neuropathic pain. Molecular Pain, 4, 6 https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-4-6. 1744-8069-4-6 [pii].
Lin, M. E., Rivera, R. R., & Chun, J. (2012). Targeted deletion of LPA5 identifies novel roles for lysophosphatidic acid signaling in development of neuropathic pain. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287, 17608–17617. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.330183.
Santos-Nogueira, E., et al. (2015). Activation of lysophosphatidic acid receptor type 1 contributes to pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. J Neurosci, 35, 10224–10235. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4703-14.2015.
Srikanth, M., et al. (2018). Lysophosphatidic acid and its receptor LPA1 mediate carrageenan induced inflammatory pain in mice. Eur J Pharmacol, 841, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.10.005.
Gonzalez-Gil, I., et al. (2020). A novel agonist of the type 1 lysophosphatidic acid receptor (LPA1), UCM-05194, shows efficacy in neuropathic pain amelioration. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 63, 2372–2390. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01287.
Rivera, R. R., Lin, M. E., Bornhop, E. C., & Chun, J. (2020). Conditional Lpar1 gene targeting identifies cell types mediating neuropathic pain. The FASEB Journal, 34, 8833–8842. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000317R.
Fransson, J., et al. (2021). Activation of Macrophages by Lysophosphatidic Acid through the Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1 as a Novel Mechanism in Multiple Sclerosis Pathogenesis. Molecular Neurobiology, 58, 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-02130-x.
Yung, Y. C., Stoddard, N. C., & Chun, J. (2014). LPA receptor signaling: pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Journal of Lipid Research, 55, 1192–1214. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R046458.
Xie, W., Matsumoto, M., Chun, J., & Ueda, H. (2008). Involvement of LPA1 receptor signaling in the reorganization of spinal input through Abeta-fibers in mice with partial sciatic nerve injury. Molecular Pain, 4, 46 https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-4-46. 1744-8069-4-46 [pii].
Suardiaz, M., et al. (2016). Spinal cord compression injury in lysophosphatidic acid 1 receptor-null mice promotes maladaptive pronociceptive descending control. European Journal of Pain, 20, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.695.
Gaire, B. P., Sapkota, A. & Choi, J. W. (2020). BMS-986020, a Specific LPA1 antagonist, provides neuroprotection against ischemic stroke in mice. Antioxidants (Basel), 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9111097.
Estivill-Torrus, G., et al. (2008). Absence of LPA1 signaling results in defective cortical development. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 938–950. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm132. bhm132 [pii].
Manis, J. P. (2007). Knock out, knock in, knock down–genetically manipulated mice and the Nobel Prize. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 2426–2429. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0707712.
Ishii, I., et al. (2002). Marked perinatal lethality and cellular signaling deficits in mice null for the two sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors, S1P(2)/LP(B2)/EDG-5 and S1P(3)/LP(B3)/EDG-3. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 25152–25159.
Ishii, I., et al. (2001). Selective loss of sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling with no obvious phenotypic abnormality in mice lacking its G protein-coupled receptor, LP(B3)/EDG-3. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276, 33697–33704.
Bain, G., et al. (1997). E2A deficiency leads to abnormalities in alphabeta T-cell development and to rapid development of T-cell lymphomas. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 17, 4782–4791.
Contos, J. J., & Chun, J. (2000). Genomic characterization of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor gene, lp(A2)/Edg4, and identification of a frameshift mutation in a previously characterized cDNA. Genomics, 64, 155–169.
Contos, J. J., & Chun, J. (1998). Complete cDNA sequence, genomic structure, and chromosomal localization of the LPA receptor gene, lpA1/vzg-1/Gpcr26. Genomics, 51, 364–378.
Rehen, S. K., et al. (2001). Chromosomal variation in neurons of the developing and adult mammalian nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 98, 13361–13366.
Weiner, J. A., & Chun, J. (1997). Maternally derived immunoglobulin light chain is present in the fetal mammalian CNS. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 3148–3156.
Chun, J. J., & Shatz, C. J. (1988). Redistribution of synaptic vesicle antigens is correlated with the disappearance of a transient synaptic zone in the developing cerebral cortex. Neuron, 1, 297–310.
Kingsbury, M. A., Rehen, S. K., Contos, J. J., Higgins, C. M., & Chun, J. (2003). Non-proliferative effects of lysophosphatidic acid enhance cortical growth and folding. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1292–1299.
Kaushal, D., et al. (2003). Alteration of gene expression by chromosome loss in the postnatal mouse brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5599–5606.
Kingsbury, M. A., et al. (2005). Aneuploid neurons are functionally active and integrated into brain circuitry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science United States of America, 102, 6143–6147.
Lee, M.-H., et al. (2019). Somatic APP gene recombination in Alzheimer’s disease and normal neurons (vol 563, pg 639, 2018). Nature, 566, E6–E6.
McWhirter, J. R., Goulding, M., Weiner, J. A., Chun, J., & Murre, C. (1997). A novel fibroblast growth factor gene expressed in the developing nervous system is a downstream target of the chimeric homeodomain oncoprotein E2A-Pbx1. Development, 124, 3221–3232.
Kim, J., & Kaartinen, V. (2008). Generation of mice with a conditional allele for Trim33. Genesis, 46, 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20401.
Xu, X., et al. (2001). Direct removal in the mouse of a floxed neo gene from a three-loxP conditional knockout allele by two novel approaches. Genesis, 30, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/gene.1025.
Lakso, M., et al. (1996). Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 5860–5865. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.12.5860.
Blaschke, A. J., Staley, K., & Chun, J. (1996). Widespread programmed cell death in proliferative and postmitotic regions of the fetal cerebral cortex. Development, 122, 1165–1174.
Blaschke, A. J., Weiner, J. A., & Chun, J. (1998). Programmed cell death is a universal feature of embryonic and postnatal neuroproliferative regions throughout the central nervous system. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 396, 39–50.
Chrencik, J. E., et al. (2015). Crystal structure of antagonist bound human lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1. Cell, 161, 1633–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.002.
Bayer, S. A. & Altman, J. (1991) Neocortical development. Raven Press, Ltd.
Fukushima, N., Shano, S., Moriyama, R., & Chun, J. (2007). Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates neuronal differentiation of cortical neuroblasts through the LPA1-G(i/o) pathway. Neurochemistry International, 50, 302–307.
Suckau, O., et al. (2019). LPA1, LPA2, LPA4, and LPA6 receptor expression during mouse brain development. Developmental Dynamics, 248, 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.23.
Bushman, D. M. et al. (2015). Genomic mosaicism with increased amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene copy number in single neurons from sporadic Alzheimer’s disease brains. eLife, 4, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05116.
Garcia-Diaz, B., et al. (2015). Loss of lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA1 alters oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination in the mouse cerebral cortex. Brain Structure & Function, 220, 3701–3720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0885-7.
Anliker, B., et al. (2013). Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and its receptor, LPA1, influence embryonic schwann cell migration, myelination, and cell-to-axon segregation. Glia, 61, 2009–2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22572.
Castilla-Ortega, E., et al. (2011). Aggravation of chronic stress effects on hippocampal neurogenesis and spatial memory in LPA(1) receptor knockout mice. PLoS ONE, 6, e25522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025522.
Castilla-Ortega, E., et al. (2012). Hippocampal c-Fos activation in normal and LPA(1)-null mice after two object recognition tasks with different memory demands. Behavioural Brain Research, 232, 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.018.
Garcia-Fernandez, M., et al. (2012). Chronic immobilization in the malpar1 knockout mice increases oxidative stress in the hippocampus. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 122, 583–589. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207454.2012.693998.
Castilla-Ortega, E., et al. (2013). Reduced wheel running and blunted effects of voluntary exercise in LPA1-null mice: the importance of assessing the amount of running in transgenic mice studies. Neuroscience Research, 77, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2013.09.004.
Walter, J., Keiner, S., Witte, O. W., & Redecker, C. (2011). Age-related effects on hippocampal precursor cell subpopulations and neurogenesis. Neurobiol Aging, 32, 1906–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.11.011.
Cope, E. C. et al. (2020). Adult-born neurons in the hippocampus are essential for social memory maintenance. eNeuro 7, https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0182-20.2020.
Walker, T. L., et al. (2016). Lysophosphatidic acid receptor is a functional marker of adult hippocampal precursor cells. Stem Cell Reports, 6, 552–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.03.002.
Heintz, N. (2004). Gene expression nervous system atlas (GENSAT). Nature Neuroscience, 7, 483. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0504-483.
Gong, S., et al. (2003). A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes. Nature, 425, 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02033.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Andras Nagy for providing the ES cell line and Dr. Gwendolyn Kaeser for editorial assistance. Federal and non-federal support was provided by the Department of Defense W81XWH-17-1-0455 (J.C.), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01NS084398 (J.C.), and the Clause Scholarship Program in Neurodegeneration and Aging (P.S.P.). We dedicate this paper to the good health and happy retirement of Dr. Viswanathan Natarajan. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rivera, R., Williams, N.A., Kennedy, G.G. et al. Generation of an Lpar1-EGFP Fusion Knock-in Transgenic Mouse Line. Cell Biochem Biophys 79, 619–627 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-021-01033-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-021-01033-5