Abstract
The generation of astrocytes from human induced pluripotent stem cells has been hampered by either prolonged differentiation—spanning over two months—or by shorter protocols that generate immature astrocytes, devoid of salient mature astrocytic traits pivotal for central nervous system (CNS) modeling. We directed stable hiPSC-derived neuroepithelial stem cells to human iPSC-derived Astrocytes (hiAstrocytes) with a high percentage of star-shaped cells by orchestrating an astrocytic-tuned culturing environment in 28 days. We employed RT-qPCR and ICC to validate the astrocytic commitment of the neuroepithelial stem cells. To evaluate the inflammatory phenotype, we challenged the hiAstrocytes with the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β (interleukin 1 beta) and quantitatively assessed the secretion profile of astrocyte-associated cytokines and the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1). Finally, we quantitatively assessed the capacity of hiAstrocytes to synthesize and export the antioxidant glutathione. In under 28 days, the generated cells express canonical and mature astrocytic markers, denoted by the expression of GFAP, AQP4 and ALDH1L1. In addition, the notion of a mature phenotype is reinforced by the expression of both astrocytic glutamate transporters EAAT1 and EAAT2. Thus, hiAstrocytes have a mature phenotype that encompasses traits critical in CNS modeling, including glutathione synthesis and secretion, upregulation of ICAM-1 and a cytokine secretion profile on a par with human fetal astrocytes. This protocol generates a multifaceted astrocytic model suitable for in vitro CNS disease modeling and personalized medicine.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Astrocytes have long been considered as merely cellular scaffolds—i.e., the brain’s glue. However, recent studies point out that astrocytes have a prominent role in health and disease; once considered a recycler of neurotransmitters and a supply cabinet for neurons, this star-shaped cell type assumes an ever-growing role in health and disease [1,2,3].
Astrocytes are a truly versatile brain cell type, regulating a plethora of cellular processes such as glutamate clearance, provision of antioxidants ,e.g. glutathione (GSH) to neurons and relay inflammatory signals. Additionally, astrocytes actively regulate synaptic transmission [1, 4], and they are involved in the pathophysiology of numerous neurodegenerative diseases [3].
Importantly, mouse and human astrocytes are transcriptionally and functionally different [5]. Human astrocytes are larger and have more elaborate processes than mouse astrocytes [6]. Mouse and human inflammatory responses to insults such as trauma and burn share minimal correlation [7] and, more specifically, in the CNS, mouse and human astrocytes are differentially activated by inflammatory stimuli [8] and respond very differently to oxidative stress [9]. Therapeutic interventions in mouse models inadvertently fail to translate into potential treatments in humans [10, 11]. Consequently, over 90% of CNS drug candidates in animal trials fail to successfully display the same therapeutic effects in human clinical trials [12].
The need to model interactions of the CNS necessitates reliable and sustainable (i.e., non-primary) sources of human astrocytes. The extent of information extracted from an in vitro study is limited by the model used; hence, a holistic view of astrocytes in pathology demands the concurrent existence of a spectrum of traits. In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the EAAT2 is lost in astrocytes [13], while astrocytes undergo morphological changes that extend to their processes in various pathological conditions [14,15,16,17]. Upon inflammatory stimuli, astrocytes not only secrete cytokines but also upregulate adhesion proteins such as ICAM-1 [18]. The provision of GSH is also altered in many pathological conditions [19,20,21,22,23].
To recapitulate pathological conditions in vitro, an astrocytic model, among others, should: 1) exhibit mature inflammatory responses, 2) synthesize and secrete GSH, 3) express and have functionally active EAAT1 and EAAT2 glutamate transporters and 4) have a star-like morphology. These traits are critical for astrocyte pathophysiology in brain diseases.
Stem cell technology enabled numerous differentiation protocols that generate human iPSC-derived astrocytes, bypassing the need for primary sources and bringing forth human models that can potentially capture in higher biofidelity human astrocytes than mouse models. Currently, astrocyte generation is hampered by either extensive differentiations (> 60 days) [24,25,26,27] or by shortened differentiation protocols (< 60 days) that lack a star-shaped morphology, GSH synthesis/secretion and a direct inflammatory comparison to primary astrocytes [28, 29]. More importantly, none of the reported short astrocytic protocols encompass a mature profile (in terms of GSH, glutamate functionality and ICAM-1 expression) on a par with primary astrocytes, the astrocytic source that shares the greatest in vivo proximity. There are, however, short protocols with genome editing approaches, such as the work of Neyrinck et al. [30]. Nevertheless, these approaches require extensive resources.
The use of neural precursors as a starting stage enables robust and reproducible protocols while contributing to shorter differentiation times for the generation of astrocytes. TCW et al. brought forward a compelling notion based on the motto” we are what we eat” they applied a primary astrocytic media on neural progenitors to induce astrocytic phenotype [31, 32]. However, that protocol is dependent on differentiating transient, unstable neural precursor entities, as exemplified by their limited self-renewal (up to 16 passages), a common trait of neural progenitors generated through dual-SMAD inhibition [33]. The dependence on early passages that are a transient stage could hamper reproducibility, scalability, and wide applicability of the astrocyte protocols.
This transient neural stem cell state can become stable neuroepithelial stem cells (NES) after p.20 [34]. NES are truly stable (up to at least 100 passages) [35] neural progenitors and could pose an ideal starting point for astrocyte differentiation. Our recent efforts in astrocyte generation from NES yielded GFAP-negative cells that lack EAAT2 functionality and IL-6 secretion [36, 37]. Therefore, we envisioned that we could generate mature astrocytes with in vivo-like morphology and functionality by providing an astrocytic-tuned milieu to NES. An astrocytogenic milieu comprises a suitable differentiation media, an astrocytic-tuned extracellular matrix (ECM) coating and appropriate cell-to-cell contact[38].
Here, we report on a differentiation strategy that unleashes the astrocytic potential of stable iPS-derived neuroepithelial stem cells. By day 28 and without any sorting steps, hiAstrocytes feature a star-shaped morphology, display inflammatory potency and active uptake of both astrocytic glutamate transporters (EAAT1 and EAAT2), and an mRNA and protein profile that resembles human astrocytes. Additionally, we demonstrate that hiAstrocytes synthesize and secrete glutathione. This astrocytic model can be used for CNS disease modeling since it encompasses a multitude of traits that are altered during pathological conditions.
Materials and Methods
All reagents were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA unless otherwise stated. Reagents and catalog numbers are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
All processes were done according to the manufacturer’s instructions unless otherwise stated. For all processes, DPBS refers to DPBS with Ca++ and Mg++ unless otherwise stated.
Cell Culture
Human Neuroepithelial Stem Cells
Neuroepithelial stem cells (NES) lines Control 9 [39], Control 7 [40], and AF22 [35] (detailed information for each line can be found in Supplementary Table 2) were provided by the iPS Core Facility (Karolinska Institute). All lines were cultured and passaged until p.23–24 in DMEM: F12 Glutamax supplemented with N2 1:100, B27 1:1000, 10 ng/ml bFGF (R&D Systems, MN, USA) and 10 ng/ml EGF (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) (the complete media is termed N2B27) on double-coated poly-L-ornithine (PLO) (20 ug/ml Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) and murine Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm sarcoma derived laminin (L2020, 1:500, Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) flasks. Culture vessels were coated overnight with PLO, washed thoroughly × 2 with DPBS (w/o Ca++ and Mg++) and then coated overnight with L2020; all coating dilutions were done in DPBS (w/o Ca++ and Mg++). After p.23–24, NES were cultured in N2B27 with bFGF (10 ng/ml) and low EGF (1 ng/ml). NES culturing was done in flasks (T12.5—T75), and N2B27 media with growth factors was used within one week.
NES were passaged at 1:4–1:5, every 3–4 days. Briefly, cells were washed with DPBS (w/o Ca++ and Mg++) and then incubated with trypLE for 3–4 min. Next, TrypLE was deactivated using equal volumes of defined trypsin inhibitor (DTI) and DMEM: F12 glutamax (1:1:1), spun down at 200 g for 4 min and resuspended in N2B27.
The day after passaging, bFGF (10 ng/ml) and EGF (10 ng/ml for passages up to p.# 23–24 and 1 ng/ml for the passages after p.# 23–24) were spiked in the cultures, and the day after the media was completely replenished. This motif of cell feeding was done throughout the NES culture.
Astrocyte Differentiation
On day -2, 6-well plates were coated with 0.1% (w/v) gelatin (Thermo Fisher or ScienCell) at 37 °C. On day-1, NES were passaged using trypLE for 4 min, and trypLE was deactivated by adding DTI at 1:4 (trypLE:DTI). Cells were spun down at 200 g for 3 min and resuspended in N2B27 with bFGF (10 ng/ml) and low EGF (1 ng/ml). NES were seeded at 30 K/cm2 in the gelatin-coated 6-well plates. The day after (Fig. 1b, day 0, NES C9), cells formed small aggregates or were loosely attaching. Media was carefully removed, and cells were washed once with DPBS before adding AM media supplemented with 1% AGS and 2% FBS. Media changes were done every other day, and cells were passaged 1–2 days upon reaching 95% confluency, except for the first passage, where cells were passaged on day 6. For all passages, cells were consistently seeded out at 30 K/cm2 except when stated otherwise.
All differentiations were carried out using NES with p.# > 30, except for the data presented in Supplementary Fig. 2d, where NES were p.#13. For all assays in well plates, plates were double coated with PDL (50 ug/ml) overnight, washed once with water and then coated at 37 °C with gelatin overnight.
Specifically for Supplementary Fig. 1a-f, astrocyte differentiation was done according to TCW et al. (2017). Briefly, on day -1, NES were seeded at 15 K/cm2 in N2B27 (10 ng/ml bFGF and 1 ng/ml EGF) in Matrigel-coated 6-well plates. The day after (day 0), the medium was changed to AM medium with 1% AGS and 2% FBS. Cells were passaged at 15 K/cm2 in Matrigel-coated plates once they reached 90% confluency. After 28 days, the cells were collected for qPCR analysis.
Spontaneously Differentiated Cells
For spontaneously differentiated cells (SDCs), NES (p.# > 30) were detached using trypLE for 4 min, spun down at 200 g for 4 min, and were seeded out at 30 K/cm2 in double-coated PLO (20 ug/ml) and L2020 (1:100) in N2B27 (low EGF). The day after, the media was changed to DMEM: F12 glutamax with N2 1:100 and B27 1:100. After that, the media was completely changed every other day. Cells were split once during the differentiation (day 7) at 45 K/cm2 on PLO-L2020 plates. After the first passage, the media was changed every 3 to 4 days. DMEM: F12 glutamax with N2 1:100 and B27 1:100 was first warmed at 37 °C, 10 ng/ml BDNF and 10 ng/ml GDNF (both R&D Systems, MN, USA) were added to the media before complete media change. On day 28, cells were harvested.
Human Fetal Astrocytes
Human fetal astrocytes (HFA) were cultured in ScienCell Media AM supplemented with 2% FBS, 1% AGS and 1% P/S. HFAs until passage 7 were used for experiments. Cells were passaged once they reached confluency with a 1:4 ratio. Briefly, cells were washed with DPBS (w/o Ca++ and Mg++) and then incubated with trypLE for 3–4 min. Next, trypLE was deactivated using DTI 1:1 (TrypLE:DTI) spun down at 200 g for 4 min and resuspended in complete AM media.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells were initially washed with DPBS and fixed with 4% PFA (VWR, PA, USA) for 10 min at room temperature. After washing twice with DPBS, cells were incubated with blocking buffer (10% goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 in DPBS) for an hour. Primary antibody incubation was done in dilution buffer (10% blocking buffer in DPBS) overnight at 4 °C. Secondary antibody incubation was done in dilution buffer at room temperature for an hour. After 2 × washes with DPBS, cells were stained with Hoechst (1:2000) in dilution buffer. Cells were washed 3 × and imaged with ImageXpress Micro (Molecular Devices, CA, USA). Quantification of astrocytic markers and astrocytic processes was done by the Multi-Wavelength Cell Scoring and Neurite Outgrowth module, respectively. A detailed list of the antibodies used can be found in Supplementary Table 3.
mRNA Expression Analysis
Cells were collected, lysed and total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany); RNA was quantified using MySpec (VWR, PA, USA), and cDNA synthesis was carried out using the High-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit on a thermal cycler (VWR, PA, USA). TaqMan probes of interest were incubated with cDNA samples in Fast Advanced Master Mix. For all samples, GAPDH TaqMan probes were included as housekeeping gene reference. Samples were run on a BioRad CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System using the multiplex option for superior Ct quantification. Depending on the graph presented, either ΔCt or ΔΔCts were determined. Samples that lacked Ct values (e.g., RELN, GFAP for all NES lines) or had values over 35 were assigned a Ct value of 35 for the ΔΔCt analysis to be possible (or to minimize overestimation of results). PCA was done with R using the prcomp function (R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/) and hierarchical clustering with the Morpheus software using average linkage clustering, person correlation (Morpheus, https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus). A list of the TaqMan probes used can be found in Supplementary Table 4.
Glutamate Uptake
NES C9, hiAstrocytes C9 and HFA were seeded out in 96-well plates, in their respective media, at 60 K/cm2, 45 K/cm2 and 30 K/cm2, respectively. After 72 h cells were washed once with HBSS (w/ Ca++ and Mg++) and then incubated in either vehicle (DMSO) or inhibitors UCPH-101 (1.5uM, EAAT1 inhibitor) and WAY 213,613 (1uM, EAAT2 inhibitor) for 30 min in HBSS (w/ Ca++ and Mg++). After that, HBSS was changed with HBSS (w/ Ca++ and Mg++) containing 50uM of glutamic acid with either vehicle (DMSO) or inhibitors and incubated for 60 min; empty wells were also incubated with media containing 50uM of glutamic acid with either vehicle (DMSO) or inhibitors for glutamate uptake analysis. Samples were analyzed with the glutamate assay kit. Following sample collection, cells were incubated with Image-ITTMDEAD Green™. Consequently, cells were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with Hoechst (1:2000). Images were captured within 24-48 h with ImageXpress Micro 10x (Molecular Devices, CA, USA). Live dead count was assessed by the Live/Dead module.
Inflammatory Assay
NES, hiAstrocytes and HFA were seeded out in 96-well plates at 60 K/cm2, 45 K/cm2 and 30 K/cm2, respectively. After 48 h, cells were washed once with DPBS and challenged with 50 ng/ml IL-1β in their respective media; this dose is within the range that is frequently used to challenge hiPSC-derived astrocytes [26, 28, 29, 36]. For the basal conditions, cells were washed with DPBS, and media was replenished. After 24 h, samples were collected and snap-frozen. Samples were analysed using the Mesoscale system (U-PLEX plate) according to kit instructions. The condition termed “IL-1β 24 h” for analysis of ICAM-1 also followed the same procedure. Cell numbers were determined following the same procedure as in the glutamate assay.
Glutathione Assay
NES, hiAstrocytes and HFA were seeded out at 60 K/cm2, 45 K/cm2 and 30 K/cm2, respectively, in T12.5 flasks in their respective media for 48 h; cells were washed with DPBS all cells were changed to N2B27 with low EGF (1 ng/ml) and B27 without antioxidants, control media was also included in a cell-free T12.5 flask. After 24 h, media samples were collected from all cells and control media, and cells were harvested and snap-frozen. Media samples and cell suspensions were analyzed kinetically with the Glutathione assay kit (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the following modifications: the kinetic reactions were analyzed for 30 min and the calibration curve was adjusted to include more points. The cell-free media flask values were subtracted from the media samples for extracellular quantification. Deproteinized samples were reconstituted in 0.5 M NaOH, and following complete reconstitution, samples were diluted to 100 mM NaOH, and total protein content was measured using the BCA kit.
The cell number/mg protein ratio was calculated separately by manually counting cells through a hemocytometer (each sample was counted using two independent samplings). For each sampling, four squares were counted. A known number of cells were lysed according to the Glutathione assay kit procedure described above. Deproteinized samples were reconstituted and analyzed as described above.
Statistics
All statistical analyses were carried out in GraphPad Prism. Technical replicates refer to the same experimental procedure performed on different samples of the same differentiation round; biological replicates refer to the same experimental procedure repeated in “n” lines. Independent experiments refer to repeated independent differentiations, except for HFA samples, where different vials from the initial expansion were used.
Results
Neuroepithelial Stem Cells Generate Star-Shaped Astrocytes in 28 Days Under Astrocytogenic Conditions
NES are an intermediate cellular stage derived from induced pluripotent stem cells that generate neurons and glia. NES can be cryopreserved and cultured up to 100 passages without major phenotype changes. Hence, NES cells are a stable, robust starting point for neural differentiation [35].
ECM coating is pivotal and should be carefully considered for each target cell type. Stemming from the paradigm of how poly-L-ornithine specifically promotes neuronal differentiation [41], we wanted to test our hypothesis that a different coating and seeding density is required to encompass an astrocytic-boosting milieu for stable NES.
Our preliminary screening revealed that the conditions of TCW et al. 2017 [31] (Matrigel coating and 15 K/cm2 seeding density) induced astrocytic markers, to some extent, when applied to stable NES (Supplementary Fig. 1a-c). However, other mature (S100B and ALDH1L1) and functional astrocytic markers (SLC1A3) were not enriched (Supplementary Fig. 1d-f). When we replaced Matrigel with gelatin, it led to astrocytic enrichment of all tested astrocytic markers (Supplementary Fig. 1a-f). Gelatin, a denatured form of collagen, has been used for the primary isolation of astrocytes [42]; thus, we elected to use it in our differentiation strategy.
The astrocytic mRNA levels aligned with cellular morphology; TCW et al. conditions (coating and seeding density) generated a largely fibroblastic morphology (Supplementary Fig. 2a), while gelatin at cell seeding density 15 K/cm2 generated astrocytes with some processes (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Gelatin at a cell seeding density 30 K/cm2 generated a higher proportion of star-shaped cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c).
Most interestingly, when we combined higher seeding density (30 K/cm2) on gelatin, astrocytic markers were highly enriched compared to previously tested conditions (TCW et al. Matrigel coating and 15 K/cm2 seeding density, [31]), suggesting that the differentiation media is indeed only a piece of a puzzle (Supplementary Fig. 1a-f, Gelatin 30 K/cm2 vs. TCW et al. conditions). Hence, gelatin and appropriate cell-to-cell contact seem to boost astrocytic traits synergistically. Furthermore, when we applied our optimized protocol on early NES (p.#13), astrocytic markers were considerably lower compared to when applied on NES at a later passage (p.#24) (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Finally, a recent study also corroborates our findings, Alisch et al. documented that fetal neural stem cells increase their gliogenic potential by dampening neurogenic genes during successive cell division [43]. Hence, NES increase their gliogenic potential at higher passages, similarly to what has been shown for fetal neural stem cells.
We used three iPS-derived NES lines, NES C9, NES C7 and NES AF22, to further test our protocol. Two of these lines (NES C9 and NES AF22) have been previously used for astrocyte differentiation [36, 37]. Here, we differentiated NES for 28 days (Fig. 1a) using a primary astrocytic media (AM) that has been previously shown to induce astrocytic traits in various research groups [31, 32]. In this approach, the hormone (hydrocortisone and progesterone) and growth factor (bFGF and IGF-1) cocktail is tailored for astrocytic growth and maintenance [44,45,46].
On day 0, cells appeared to form small aggregated or loosely adhering cells (Fig. 1b, day 0); the day after, cells were firmly attached to the culture vessels, and cells were passaged (at 30 K/cm2) on day 6. The first 6 days are crucial for a successful astrocyte differentiation; during that time, cells assume a colony-like morphology, growing outwards. By day 7, cells lost their NES-like behavior; namely, cells did not grow in NES colonies upon passaging, appeared more elongated, and a small percentage of cells assumed a triangular morphology (Fig. 1b, day 7). By day 14, the frequency of triangular-shaped cells increased (Fig. 1b, day 14) while the growth rate decreased (compared to NES), suggesting a switch to differentiation over self-replication. By day 21, cellular processes could be detected emanating from the somata, resembling a star-shaped morphology (Fig. 1b, day 21). The proliferation rate was further reduced by day 26 (Fig. 1b, day 26), and cells transitioned to more noticeable morphological changes assuming a star-like morphology (Fig. 1b, day 27), apparent in all lines (Fig. 1c, (i) hiAstrocytes C9 (ii) hiAstrocytes C7 and (iii) hiAstrocytes AF22).
HiAstrocytes have a Distinct Astrocytic mRNA Expression Profile that Differs from Spontaneously Differentiated Cells
As a first characterization of the hiAstrocytes, we used RT-qPCR and compared them to human fetal cortical astrocytes (HFA) at low passage (p.3). In hiAstrocytes C9, the so-called gliogenic switch, Nuclear factor IA (NFIA)[47], was upregulated during the differentiation while the neuronal progenitor marker DCX was downregulated (Fig. 2a), denoting glial commitment. Most astrocytic markers such as CD44 and ALDH1L1 were on a par with the expression levels in HFA, while AQP4 and S100B were significantly enriched in hiAstrocytes, in contrast to HFA (Fig. 2b). Interestingly, NES and HFA had the same expression level of the astrocytic marker S100B (Fig. 2b). HiAstrocytes C7 and AF22 had an expression pattern comparable to hiAstrocytes C9 (Fig. 2c).
The canonical astrocytic marker GFAP was highly upregulated in hiAstrocytes and was expressed at similar levels as in HFA. Interestingly, changes in GFAP expression are associated with inflammatory conditions [48,49,50]. Hence, GFAP expression is crucial for accurate modeling in vitro.
Next, we sought to unveil the transcriptomic differences between the hiAstrocytes, and cells generated by spontaneous differentiation of the NES lines. Spontaneously differentiated cells (SDCs) were generated by growth factor withdrawal for 28 days on PLO-L2020 (Supplementary Fig. 3a). We elected to use PLO-L2020 for two reasons; gelatin does not support NES proliferation or spontaneous differentiation since neural stem cells do not adhere well to gelatin [51]. Secondly, we wanted to evaluate the confounding effects of media and coating on astrocytic markers.
NFIA was, upregulated in all cell lines in both hiAstrocytes and SDCs, while CD44 expression was restricted to the hiAstrocytes (all lines) and SDCs AF22 (Fig. 2c). As expected, DCX was upregulated in all lines in SDCs; conversely, DCX was downregulated in hiAstrocytes (all lines). GFAP was highly upregulated in hiAstrocytes (all lines), while GFAP expression varied in SDCs. SDCs in AF22 showed higher GFAP expression than SDCs C9 or C7. The differential expression of GFAP and CD44 in SDCs suggests a mixture of neurons and glia in SDCs AF22, while there is a neuronal enrichment in SDCs C9 and C7. In other studies, spontaneously differentiated NES AF22 has generated 86% neuronal cells[40] while NES C7 generated 76.4–90% neuronal cells[40, 52].
PCA of 18 genes analyzed by RT-qPCR showed a distinct separation between SDCs and hiAstrocytes, denoting the impact of the differentiation strategy on enriching astrocytic fate (Fig. 2d). HiAstrocytes clustered closer to HFA than NES or SDCs. Specifically, hiAstrocytes C7 and AF22 clustered closer to HFA than hiAstrocytes C9, while NES and SDCs had distinct clusters further away from HFA. Hierarchical clustering revealed that hiAstrocytes from all three lines clustered with HFA and were distinct from SDCs (Fig. 2e). We further elaborate on the line mRNA, protein, and functional differences in the discussion.
We also assessed the regionality of NES and hiAstrocytes. Gene expression analysis of two regionality markers, RELN and SLIT1 (spinal cord markers, [53]), revealed that, strikingly, the NES lines have a different dorsoventral identity (Supplementary Fig. 3b). While all lines had no or insignificant expression of RELN, NES C7 seems to have a distinct regional identity denoted by the SLIT1 expression, which remained almost unchanged during astrocyte differentiation, denoting a regionally patterned precursor that gives rise to specifically VA3 astrocytes. In hiAstrocytes C9, RELN and SLIT1 were upregulated, while in hiAstrocytes AF22, there was a very low expression (RELN Ct = 33, SLIT Ct = 32). HFA also had a similar RELN expression pattern (Ct = 32), while SLIT1 was not detected.
Quantification of Astrocytic Markers and Processes Shows a Superior Protein and Phenotypic Profile Compared to HFA
To further assess the hiAstrocyte cellular phenotype, we performed immunocytochemistry and stained hiAstrocytes C9, C7, AF22 and HFA for the common astrocytic markers S100B, CD44, GFAP, AQP4, ALDH1L1 and the cytoskeletal marker VIMENTIN. All hiAstrocytes lines and HFA stained positive for CD44 (Fig. 3a), and all models reached almost 100% CD44+ cells (Fig. 3b). HiAstrocytes C9, C7, AF22 and HFA stained negatively for the neuronal marker DCX (Supplementary Fig. 3c).
HFA were 24% GFAP+ while hiAstrocytes C9, C7 and AF22 were 20%, 46% and 14% GFAP+, respectively (Fig. 3b). Quantification of ALDH1L1 revealed a low percentage (16%) of positive cells in HFA, while the quantification among the three lines was consistently higher than this, with hiAstrocytes C7 having the highest percentage of positive cells (83%) followed by hiAstrocytes C9 (64%) and AF22 (49%). HiAstrocytes from all three lines were positive for AQP4 with almost 100% positive cells (hiAstrocytes C9/C7/AF22, 96%/98%/96%), while HFA had a lower percentage of AQP4-positive cells (16%).
While hiAstrocytes and HFA were positive for S100B+, hiAstrocytes had a higher percentage of S100B+ astrocytes (hiAstrocytes C9/C7/AF22 vs. HFA, 99%/96%/97% vs. 84%). Intensity analysis of each population showed that hiAstrocytes C9 and C7 populations had higher average intensity per cell than HFA, as denoted by the shift in the violin plots (Fig. 3c). NES C9, NES C7 and NES AF22 stained positive for VIMENTIN only (Supplementary Fig. 4).
We further assessed the morphology of hiAstrocytes; a star-shaped morphology is likely to be important for in vitro disease modelling. For example, astrocytes remodel their processes and orient them towards lesions formed after head trauma or hemorrhage [14, 17]. Additionally, in transgenic AD animals, astrocytes exhibit reduced complexity in their processes [16] and in epilepsy, astrocytic processes appear thicker and longer [15]. We stained hiAstrocytes (C9, C7 and AF22, Fig. 4a) and HFA (Fig. 4b) with VIMENTIN to quantify astrocytic processes. HiAstrocytes had a higher percentage of cells with elaborate processes than HFA; specifically, HiAstrocytes C9 had the highest percentage of cells with multiple processes (69%, > = 3, supplementary Fig. 5a). HiAstrocytes C7 and AF22 hovered around 55% and 41%, respectively, while HFA had only 18% cells with multiple processes.
On the higher end of the number of processes (> = 5), hiAstrocytes C9 showed the highest percentage (37%) of multiple processes (> = 5, Fig. 4c), followed by hiAstrocytes C7 (20%) and AF22 (13%) (> = 5, Fig. 4c). In contrast, only 2% of HFA exhibited multiple processes (> = 5, Fig. 4c).
HiAstrocytes Exhibit Functional EAAT1- and EAAT2-Mediated Glutamate Uptake
Glutamate clearance is a fundamental process of astrocytes and is disturbed in pathological conditions. For example, in ALS, the glutamate transporter EAAT2 is lost in astrocytes suggesting a causal relationship between neuronal excitotoxicity and EAAT2 loss in astrocytes [13]; additionally, loss of functionality of glutamate transporters is associated with various other neurological disorders [54,55,56]. Hence, we next sought to characterize the glutamate uptake capacity of hiAstrocytes, a critical in vivo functionality of astrocytes. NES C9 showed 7.24 nmol glutamate uptake per million cells, while hiAstrocytes C9 showed more than a tenfold increase in glutamate uptake than NES (80.51 nmol per million cells, p < 0.0001, Fig. 5a). HiAstrocytes C9 showed four times higher glutamate uptake rate than HFA (20.03 nmol per million cells, p < 0.0001, Fig. 5a).
We used the non-substrate compounds UCPH-101 (UCPH) and WAY213613 (WAY) to inhibit the two astrocytic glutamate transporters EAAT1 and EAAT2, respectively. Both inhibitors significantly blocked glutamate uptake in hiAstrocytes compared to vehicle (vehicle vs. UCPH, 80.51 vs. 7.08 nmol per million cells, p < 0.0001 and vehicle vs. WAY, 80.51 vs. 52.89 nmol per million cells, p = 0.0057, Fig. 5a). In HFA, even though EAAT1 inhibition (UCPH) lowered glutamate uptake compared to vehicle (vehicle vs. UCPH, 20.00 vs. 5.14 nmol per million cells), it was not significant (p = 0.3117). HFA did not exhibit functional EAAT2 uptake with the WAY213613 inhibitor.
Further characterization of those transporters through RT-qPCR and ICC revealed that in hiAstrocytes C9 SLC1A2, the gene encoding for the EAAT2 transporter was highly upregulated (Fig. 5b) compared to HFA, which showed a slight downregulation (hiAstrocytes C9 vs. HFA, ΔΔCt 6.46 vs. -1.12). The transporter SLC1A3 had almost the same expression pattern in both cell populations. ICC of the two glutamate transporters showed that both hiAstrocytes and HFA are EAAT1+. HiAstrocytes stained positive for EAAT2 while HFA were weakly stained (Fig. 5c).
HiAstrocytes C7 and AF22 had glutamate uptake on par with HFA (hiAstrocytes C7/ hiAstrocytes AF22/ HFA, 16.12/ 17.33/ 20.00 nmol per million cells, supplementary Fig. 5b). Inhibition with UCPH decreased the uptake in hiAstrocytes C7; however, it did not reach significance (vehicle vs. UCPH, 16.12 vs. 8.68 nmol per million cells, p = 0.9585). HiAstrocytes C7 did not show EAAT2-mediated uptake (vehicle vs. WAY, 16.12 vs. 20.02 nmol per million cells. HiAstrocytes AF22 did not show any EAAT1-mediated uptake of glutamate (vehicle vs. UCPH, 17.33 vs. 21.61 nmol per million cells. Even though hiAstrocytes AF22 showed a reduced uptake when inhibited with WAY, it did not reach significance (vehicle vs. WAY, 17.33 vs. 11.49, p = 0.9903, Supplementary Fig. 5b).
HiAstrocytes Harbor Unique Inflammatory Potency and Antioxidant Properties
A vital aspect of a differentiated cell’s repertoire is its capacity to respond to inflammatory agents, which should be on par with the in vivo counterpart, in our case, HFA. That is an important aspect of modeling brain pathologies in vitro. Therefore, we elected to challenge hiAstrocytes and HFA with IL-1b [57] and measured the secretion of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Interleukin 8 (IL-8) [58].
We first quantified the cytokine secretion of hiAstrocytes, quantification of IL-8 revealed that hiAstrocytes (all lines) and HFA responded to IL-1β by secreting IL-8 at a significant level compared to their basal conditions (p < 0.0001, Fig. 6a). IL-6 quantification showed that HFA and hiAstrocytes C7 had the highest secretion (56 pg and 47 pg per 1000 cells, respectively, Fig. 6b). HiAstrocytes C9 secreted 8 pg per 1000 cells, while hiAstrocytes AF22 secreted 0.171 pg per 1000 cells. IL-1β-challenged HFA, hiAstrocytes C9 and C7 had significantly higher IL-6 secretion compared to their basal conditions (p < 0.0001), while IL-6 secretion in hiAstrocytes AF22 challenged with IL-1β was not significantly higher compared to their basal conditions (Basal: 0.013 vs. IL-1β 0.171 pg per 1000 cells, Fig. 6b).
Apart from inflammatory cytokine secretion upon stimulation, e.g., astrocytes can also express ICAM-1 in inflammatory conditions [18] such as MS [59], brain injury and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [60]. ICAM-1 expression under inflammatory conditions constitutes a mature immune response and exemplifies the immunomodulating capacity of astrocytes in the CNS. Upregulation and ICAM-1 ligation on astrocytes elicit a cascade of reactions, e.g., secretion of cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNFa) [61] and IL-6 [62]. Hence, we stained for ICAM-1 in basal and inflammatory conditions (IL-1β). ICC revealed that all lines and HFA showed weak staining of ICAM-1 in basal conditions, while when incubated with IL1-β for 24 h, the majority of cells were ICAM-1+ (Fig. 6c). Specifically, quantification of the ICC showed that in basal conditions, all hiAstrocytes and HFA had less than 10% ICAM-1+ (Fig. 6d). Upon inflammatory stimuli, hiAstrocytes C9 and C7 had the higher percentage of ICAM-1+ cells, 84% and 83%, respectively. HFA had slightly fewer positive cells, amounting to 75% ICAM-1+. HiAstrocytes AF22 had the lowest number of ICAM-1+, 61%.
Astrocytes synthesize and secrete GSH [63, 64], shielding CNS cells from oxidative stress, which is also reflected in the high astrocytic GSH content of ~ 8 mM [65]. Interestingly, GSH availability is altered in traumatic brain injury [19] and autism [20, 21], while GSH efflux is impaired in AD [22, 23]. A largely unexplored astrocytic aspect in stem cell-derived astrocytes is the capacity of astrocytes in vivo to protect the CNS against oxidative stress through GSH. Astrocytes have a very high GSH [65] that they continuously replenish since they constantly provide GSH precursors to neurons and brain endothelial cells [66].
We measured the total GSH content of NES, hiAstrocytes and HFA, and we also sampled the medium extracellularly to assess 1) the intracellular content of hiAstrocytes and how it compared to HFA GSH levels and 2) whether they can export it and thus extend their capacity to protect neighbouring cells against reactive oxygen species.
Our analysis showed that all hiAstrocytes showed significantly higher intracellular total GSH than the undifferentiated NES (p < 0.0001, Fig. 6e). When compared to HFA, hiAstrocytes had higher total GSH intracellularly, while HFA had 4.42 nmol total GSH per million cells, hiAstrocytes C9, C7 and AF22 showed 10.33 (p < 0.0001), 9.18 (p < 0.0001) and 7.68 nmol (p = 0.0014) total GSH per million cells, respectively.
Measurements of total extracellular GSH (Fig. 6f) revealed that all hiAstrocytes exported considerably more total GSH than their NES counterparts. While all NES lines hovered between 1.1–2.2 nmol total GSH per million cells, hiAstrocytes C9, C7 and AF22 showed a remarkable increase ranging from 11.2 to 16.6 nmol total GSH (p < 0.0001, Fig. 6f). The total extracellular GSH in hiAstrocytes C9 and AF22 was almost eight times higher than their respective NES lines. HiAstrocytes C7 showed an increase amounting to 10 times more than NES C7. Extracellular values of hiAstrocytes were on par with HFA.
Discussion
Over the past years, there has been a plethora of astrocytic differentiation protocols reported, some more elaborate and time-consuming than others, spanning over many months or sorting steps [24, 28, 67]. Our differentiation strategy relies on creating an astrocytogenic milieu that brings forth astrocytic traits in only 28 days. The differentiation protocol we report is advantageous for CNS disease modeling, considering the simplicity and relatively cost-effective reagents and, most importantly, the cellular phenotype generated. We created the astrocytogenic milieu by combining an astrocytic-tuned ECM component, culture medium and cell-to-cell communication (regulated via seeding density) to generate functional and morphologically star-shaped astrocytes.
Collagen is an interesting ECM molecule; collagen is not abundant in the bulk ECM of the CNS [68] and is mainly restricted in the basement membrane and meninges. However, in vitro studies unveiled that astrocytes express and secrete fibrillar collagen-like proteins, which is inhibited in vivo by EGF signaling and meningeal cells [69, 70]. Interestingly, when fetal astrocytes were cultured in a 3D collagen gel, they assumed a star-like morphology instead of the elongated phenotype that is ubiquitous in conventional culturing environment [71]. This work shows how gelatin – a denatured formed of collagen – combined with a growth media designed to promote and sustain astrocytes creates an environment that can guide NES into functional star-shaped astrocytes with a mature phenotype. However, gelatin alone is too simplistic to fully recapitulate the very elaborate ECM during brain development. Nevertheless, our data suggest that gelatin, much like PLO for neurons[41], enhances astrocytic commitment in vitro.
Stable neural stem cells lines are crucial for the robustness and reproducibility of differentiations. Long-term neuroepithelial stem cells are stable neural precursors that can be cryopreserved and are a compelling starting point for neuronal and glial generation[35]. Conversely, unstable neural precursors usually ensue a limited life span and an unpredictable proliferation rate that limits their usefulness as a starting point to yield mature neurons or astrocytes.
Our previous work compared an astrocyte differentiation protocol and other astrocyte-like cells to human primary adult astrocytes per industry ethical policy [36]. However, fetal astrocytes are a more relevant model to compare human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived astrocytes. Adult human astrocytes have undergone a developmental process that is very challenging to recapitulate in vitro; hence, astrocytic differentiations are most likely to generate astrocytes that have developmental proximity to human fetal astrocytes than to adult human astrocytes. Nonetheless, in vitro expansion of primary astrocytes follows an adaptation mechanism that may ensue a transcriptomic shift (i.e., dedifferentiation) similar to what has been seen with other CNS primary cells such as brain endothelial cells [72]. Hence, leveraging the potential of iPS technology, we created an astrocytic model that outperforms the model with the highest-to-date in vivo relevance, the HFA.
Our differentiation strategy generates astrocytes that resemble HFA both on an mRNA and protein level. HiAstrocytes and HFA are not in the same cluster in the PCA plot, albeit hierarchical clustering reveals that hiAstrocytes cluster with HFA and not with SDCs. We postulate that the reasons behind that deviation are: 1) the different developmental stages, 2) different regionality, and 3) stress and alternations of the cellular phenotype associated with the acute isolation of primary cells [73].
One clear example of the difference between hiAstrocytes and HFA is the expression of S100B. The S100B enrichment in hiAstrocytes corroborates our ICC data, where hiAstrocytes have a higher percentage of S100B+ cells than HFA. Interestingly, hiAstrocytes had a higher average intensity of S100B+ cells (per cell) than HFA. That could denote a developmental stage that surpasses the developmental stage of commercially available HFA (18–20 GW). In mice, S100B expression of GFAP+ astrocytes is associated with a mature state that lacks neural stem cell traits [74]. In humans, the transition from fetal to mature astrocytes is characterized by S100B upregulation [5]; moreover, the higher percentage of AQP4+ and ALDH1L1+ in hiAstrocytes reinforces the notion that hiAstrocytes have a developmental stage that transcends the 20 GW developmental stage of HFA [5].
Secondly, a largely unaddressed issue in most hiPSC-derived astrocyte protocols is the regionality of astrocytes. When modeling CNS diseases that affect specific brain regions, such as ALS, the proper regionality of astrocytes is a crucial component in attaining in vivo relevance. The importance of regionality in CNS diseases modeling is also exemplified by the region-dependent glutamate transporters' expression[75]. Transcriptomic analysis of two regionality markers associated with the spinal cord, RELN and SLIT1 [53, 76, 77], revealed that the hiAstrocytes have a distinct regional identity; specifically, hiAstrocytes C9 appeared to be either a mixture of VA1, VA2 astrocytes or VA3. Interestingly, NES C7 was the only NES line that showed expression of SLIT1, which persisted during the differentiation associating hiAstrocytes C7 with ventrally located VA3 population. AF22 hiAstrocytes did not show expression of either RELN or SLIT1, suggesting a more anterior regional identity. HFA did not express any of these markers since these astrocytes were isolated from the cortex. However, more regionality markers should be explored to pinpoint the regionality of hiAstrocytes accurately. To what extent neural patterning affects the anteroposterior and dorsoventral identity of hiAstrocytes remains to be seen. Bradly et al. [78] showed that the regionality of neural stem cells influences the gene expression of downstream differentiation to astrocytes; hence, astrocytes derived from differentially patterned NES lines cannot possibly cluster very tightly owing to differential expression patterns in various regions of the brain.
The non-overlapping clusters in the PCA echo the differences mentioned above between hiAstrocytes and HFA; perhaps the inclusion of primary astrocytes of different parts of the brain would better associate with hiAstrocytes. Albeit having a different regional identity, all hiAstrocytes stained positive for the canonical astrocytic markers, S100B, AQP4, ALDH1L1 and CD44. Interestingly, the generated cells are GFAP+ which was not observed in our previous protocol to generate astrocytes from long-term proliferating NES [36, 37, 40]. NES (all lines) did not stain for any of these markers but were positive for VIMENTIN (Supplementary Fig. 4).
A noticeable difference between the NES lines in SDCs was the different populations they generated. NES C9 and C7 were biased towards neuronal commitment, while NES AF22 generated a mixture of glial and neuronal populations. Our data for NES corroborates other studies’ findings; specifically, NES AF22 produced a mixture of glial and neuronal populations upon growth factor withdrawal (86% neuronal vs. 14% glia) [40]. Additionally, spontaneous differentiation of NES C7 has been show to produce varying degrees of neuronal population (76.4–90% neuronal) [40, 52]. According to our results, NES AF22 should have a higher capacity for astrocyte differentiation than NES C7. However, NES AF22 underperformed compared to NES C9 and NES C7. Similar to what we report here, NES AF22 has previously underperformed compared to other lines when differentiated towards an astrocytic lineage [36]. We postulate that these differences could be attributed either to the different neural inductions used to generate the lines (NES C9 and C7: a variant of dual-SMAD and NES AF22: spontaneous neural induction) or to the type of reprogramming of the corresponding hiPSC lines (iPS C9 [79] and C7 [80] non-integrating Sendai virus and hiPSC AF22 integrating lentivirus). The former could be a plausible reason since differences in neural inductions have been shown to affect astrocytic potential [66].
The morphology of astrocytes is another salient feature of this cell type, mirroring their physiological/pathological state. A noteworthy pathological condition is schizophrenia, where researchers have shown that astrocytes in schizophrenia have a lower number of astrocytic processes than healthy astrocytes [81]. A star-shaped morphology has been greatly elusive in shorter differentiation protocols [31, 36] and is only possible to attain after prolonged differentiation ~ 5 months, as Oksanen al. [25] documented or when transplanting hiPSC-derived astrocytes in mice [82]. HiAstrocytes showed a star-like morphology and had more complex morphologies (processes > = 3, 41—69%, line depended, Supplementary Fig. 5a) than HFA (18%), making this differentiation strategy ideal for CNS disease modeling in vitro where astrocytic processes are affected by pathological conditions [14,15,16].
EAAT1 expression and functionality has been documented previously in NES-derived astrocytes [36]. HiAstrocytes C9 showed specific EAAT1 glutamate uptake and had a similar expression pattern to HFA. EAAT2 is not expressed in HFA in vitro [83], and its expression is induced by co-culturing primary astrocytes with neurons [84, 85] or brain endothelial cells [86]. Interestingly, our results show that EAAT2 was significantly upregulated in hiAstrocytes C9 compared to HFA, without using molecular inducers such as Ceftriaxone [83] or co-culturing with other CNS cells. The glutamate assay and the specific EAAT2 inhibitor, WAY213613, revealed that hiAstrocytes C9 had functional EAAT2-mediated transporters. We postulate that the differentiation strategy, more specifically, the high density that cells are kept before each passage and the presence of bFGF in the differentiation media, work synergistically toward EAAT2 expression and functionality. Notch signaling has been shown to increase GLT-1 expression in mice [86], and the same has been shown for bFGF [87]. Other groups have shown EAAT2 expression in iPS-derived astrocytes [27, 67, 88], and here we report on an astrocytic model that shows specific EAAT2 expression and functionality. EAAT2 has gained attention since studies suggest that excitotoxicity-induced neuronal death is closely correlated with neurological disorders [54] such as ALS and AD [13, 55, 56]. In autism, the significance of EAAT2 over EAAT1 has been documented in a mouse model [89]. Thus, EAAT2 expression and functionality are pivotal when attempting to model in vitro these neurological disorders. Ceftriaxone is one candidate that showed promising results in vitro and in animal models in increasing GLT-1 expression [90, 91]. Even though this specific compound failed in clinical trials, compounds that modulate EAAT2 expression are still a plausible therapeutic route for ALS [92]. The other two lines performed similarly to HFA. NES AF22 has been shown to have limited capacity for astrocytic potential [36, 93]. On the mRNA level, SLC1A2 and SLC1A3 in hiAstrocytes C9 were highly upregulated compared to hiAstrocytes C7 and AF22 (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Specifically, for SLC1A2, hiAstrocytes C9 showed 40-fold upregulation from the NES stage, while hiAstrocytes C7 and hiAstrocytes AF22 showed an 8-fold and 15-fold upregulation, respectively. HiAstrocytes C9 was the only line that showed an upregulation of SLC1A3 (8-fold upregulation). The expression levels of SLC1A3 remained generally stable during the differentiation, with a 1.5-fold increase in hiAstrocytes C7 and no change in hiAstrocytes AF22.
HiAstrocytes C7, hiAstrocytes AF22 and HFA had similar expression patterns, translating into a glutamate uptake in the same order of magnitude (16–20 nmol per million cells, Supplementary Fig. 5b). The expression level differences of glutamate transporters between the lines are also reflected in the amount of glutamate uptake. In this study, a 60 min assay was developed; a longer assay could be needed for lines that do not upregulate glutamate transporters significantly; hence, glutamate assays should be developed after considering the expression levels of glutamate transporters in each line.
Regardless, caution should be taken when choosing lines for downstream glutamate uptake assays. The type of neural induction and reprogramming of the parental lines could interfere with potential downstream functionality in glutamate clearance. Expression levels of glutamate transporters can give a lead in cellular functionality.
HiAstrocytes exhibited strong inflammatory potency. Upon IL-1b simulation, hiAstrocytes secreted IL-6 and IL-8. Other reports have also shown IL-6 and IL-8 secretion for hiPSC-derived astrocytes [24, 26, 28]. In our study, we quantitatively analyzed and compared cytokine secretion between hiPSC-derived astrocytes and primary fetal astrocytes. This differentiation study is unique because our results showed that hiAstrocytes C9 and C7 secreted IL-8 and IL-6 at comparable levels to HFA. Hence, this differentiation strategy is well-suited for studies of astrocytic involvement during neuroinflammation since hiAstrocytes performed similarly to HFA.
Importantly, upon IL-1b stimulation, hiAstrocytes expressed ICAM-1, suggesting that hiAstrocytes have a mature inflammatory phenotype. Additionally, NES (all lines) were not responsive when challenged with IL-1β staining negative for ICAM-1 (Supplementary Fig. 6a). ICAM-1 expression has never been shown before in a hiPSC-derived astrocytic model. ICAM-1 is expressed in pathological conditions such as MS [59], brain injury and AD[60]. Specifically, in MS, ICAM-1 on astrocytes directly communicates with infiltrating leukocytes [62, 94] and microglia [95]. ICAM-1 upregulation is also an important link in the relay of inflammatory stimuli between contact-mediated and secreted cytokines; activation of ICAM-1 has been shown to elicit TNFa and IL-6 secretion in astrocytes [61, 62].
The intracellular GSH content of hiAstrocytes and HFA is on par with studies on primary astrocytes (Supplementary Fig. 6b), ranging from 16 to 50 nmol/mg protein [96,97,98]. HiAstrocytes C9 and C7 hovered around the higher end of that range (57 nmol/mg protein), while hiAstrocytes AF22 and HFA had lower GSH content, 35 and 24 nmol/mg protein, respectively. Our differentiation approach generates astrocytes that exhibit superior export of GSH compared to other hiPSC-derived astrocytes. One other study that measured extracellular GSH in hiAstrocytes documented ~ 8.13 nmol/mg protein [25], while our study generated astrocytes that exported at least six times more GSH (Supplementary Fig. 6c and 6d). The rate of GSH export is hiAstrocytes ranged between 2.9 to 3.8 nmol GSH/ (h x mg protein) (Supplementary Fig. 6e). HFA showed an export rate of 2.9 nmol GSH / (h x mg protein).
Interestingly, our values are in the range of previous studies in rat primary astrocytes, 3.2 nmol / (h x mg protein) [99]. HiAstrocytes C9 and C7 exhibited ~ 7 times more GSH export than their respective NES lines, and hiAstrocytes AF22 ~ 10 times more GSH than NES AF22 (in nmol GSH / million cells). Astrocytes continuously synthesize GSH; the highest consumption of GSH occurs in the form of GSH export. Hence, astrocytes need to continuously synthesize GSH to compensate for exported GSH. The intracellular content of GSH is defined by 1) the rate that cells synthesize GSH from precursor molecules and 2) the rate that cells export GSH. Contemplating the similar export rates between hiAstrocytes and HFA and considering that all cells were cultured in the same media (i.e., same availability of GSH precursors), hiAstrocytes showed 2 to 3 times more GSH content in 24 h compared to HFA. This difference suggests that HFA lag and cannot fully compensate for the GSH export; hence, hiAstrocytes have a superior capacity to mitigate insults and reactive oxygen species.
The strategic location of astrocytes in the brain, covering over 90% of the brain's blood vessels with their processes, makes astrocytes the first line of defense against xenobiotics and toxins that enter the brain. Neurons cannot synthesize GSH independently and rely on astrocytes as a GSH source [100]. Moreover, astrocyte-secreted GSH counteracts the detrimental effects of an insult to the blood–brain barrier [66]. ROS are prevalent in many, if not all, neurological conditions [101,102,103,104,105]; are they part of the etiology or disease progression? Are astrocytes the cause or the domino factor in disease progression? GSH cycle disturbances can potentially shed light on this front.
Astrocytes harbor in their immune response a repertoire that transcends mere cytokine secretion; astrocytic responses are characterized by a cascade of reactions that involve morphological rearrangement of their processes and expression of adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1), loss of glutamate transporters and GSH redox balance shift. Consequently, this hiPSC-derived astrocytic protocol constitutes a multifaceted in vitro model that may serve as a powerful tool enabling pathological cues to surface and potentially further deepen our knowledge of how astrocytes are involved in the etiology, onset, and progression of CNS pathological conditions.
Conclusions
We report on specific astrocytic traits that have not been assembled before in a hiPSC-derived astrocyte generation. This conveniently short differentiation protocol based on comparably affordable reagents and a stable neural precursor may contribute to the generation of CNS disease models with improved biofidelity and the advancement of personalized medicine.
Availability of data and materials
Data analyzed in the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Alzheimer’s disease
- ALS:
-
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- AM:
-
Astrocyte media
- CNS:
-
Central Nervous System
- DTI:
-
Defined trypsin inhibitor
- ECM:
-
Extracellular matrix
- GSH:
-
Glutathione
- HFA:
-
Human fetal astrocytes
- hiAstrocytes:
-
Human iPS-derived Astrocytes
- hiPSCs:
-
Human induced pluripotent stem cells
- ICAM-1:
-
Intercellular adhesion molecule 1
- IL-1β:
-
Interleukin 1 beta
- IL-6:
-
Interleukin 6
- IL-8:
-
Interleukin 8
- MS:
-
Multiple sclerosis
- NES:
-
Neuroepithelial stem cells
- PLO:
-
Poly-L-ornithine
- TNFa:
-
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha
References
Araque, A., Parpura, V., Sanzgiri, R. P., Haydon, P. G., Araque, A., Parpura, V., et al. (1999). Tripartite synapses: Glia, the unacknowledged partner. Trends in Neurosciences. Elsevier, 22, 208–215.
Barres, B. A. (2008). The Mystery and Magic of Glia: A Perspective on Their Roles in Health and Disease. Neuron. Elsevier, 60, 430–440.
Liddelow, S. A., Guttenplan, K. A., Clarke, L. E., Bennett, F. C., Bohlen, C. J., Schirmer, L., et al. (2017). Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. Nature Publishing Group, 541, 481–487.
Perea, G., Navarrete, M., & Araque, A. (2009). Tripartite synapses: Astrocytes process and control synaptic information. Trends in Neurosciences., 32, 421–431.
Zhang, Y., Sloan, S. A., Clarke, L. E., Caneda, C., Plaza, C. A., Blumenthal, P. D., et al. (2016). Purification and Characterization of Progenitor and Mature Human Astrocytes Reveals Transcriptional and Functional Differences with Mouse. Neuron, 89, 37–53.
Oberheim, N. A., Takano, T., Han, X., He, W., Lin, J. H. C., Wang, F., et al. (2009). Uniquely Hominid Features of Adult Human Astrocytes. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 3276–3287.
Seok, J., Warren, H. S., Cuenca, A. G., Mindrinos, M. N., Baker, H. V., Xu, W., et al. (2013). Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. PNAS. National Academy of Sciences, 110, 3507–3512.
Tarassishin, L., Suh, H.-S., & Lee, S. C. (2014). LPS and IL-1 differentially activate mouse and human astrocytes: Role of CD14. Glia, 62, 999–1013.
Li, J., Pan, L., Pembroke, W. G., Rexach, J. E., Godoy, M. I., Condro, M. C., et al. (2021). Conservation and divergence of vulnerability and responses to stressors between human and mouse astrocytes. Nature Communications, 12, 3958.
Sriram, S., & Steiner, I. (2005). Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: A misleading model of multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 58, 939–945.
Benatar, M. (2007). Lost in translation: Treatment trials in the SOD1 mouse and in human ALS. Neurobiology of Disease., 26, 1–13.
Hay, M., Thomas, D. W., Craighead, J. L., Economides, C., & Rosenthal, J. (2014). Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nature Biotechnology, 32, 40–51.
Rothstein, J. D., Kammen, M. V., Levey, A. I., Martin, L. J., & Kuncl, R. W. (1995). Selective loss of glial glutamate transporter GLT-1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annals of Neurology., 38, 73–84.
Schiweck, J., Eickholt, B. J., & Murk, K. (2018). Important Shapeshifter: Mechanisms Allowing Astrocytes to Respond to the Changing Nervous System During Development. Injury and Disease. Front Cell Neurosci., 12, 261.
Oberheim, N. A., Tian, G.-F., Han, X., Peng, W., Takano, T., Ransom, B., et al. (2008). Loss of astrocytic domain organization in the epileptic brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 3264–3276.
Rodríguez, J. J., Olabarria, M., Chvatal, A., & Verkhratsky, A. (2009). Astroglia in dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Death & Differentiation. Nature Publishing Group, 16, 378–85.
Kanemaru, K., Kubota, J., Sekiya, H., Hirose, K., Okubo, Y., & Iino, M. (2013). Calcium-dependent N-cadherin up-regulation mediates reactive astrogliosis and neuroprotection after brain injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America National Academy of Sciences, 110, 11612.
Frohman, E. M., Frohman, T. C., Dustin, M. L., Vayuvegula, B., Choi, B., Gupta, A., et al. (1989). The induction of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) expression on human fetal astrocytes by interferon-λ, tumor necrosis factor α, lymphotoxin, and interleukin-1: Relevance to intracerebral antigen presentation. Journal of Neuroimmunology., 23, 117–124.
Harris, J. L., Yeh, H.-W., Choi, I.-Y., Lee, P., Berman, N. E., Swerdlow, R. H., et al. (2012). Altered neurochemical profile after traumatic brain injury: 1H-MRS biomarkers of pathological mechanisms. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 32, 2122–2134.
Gu, F., Chauhan, V., Kaur, K., Brown, W. T., LaFauci, G., Wegiel, J., et al. (2013). Alterations in mitochondrial DNA copy number and the activities of electron transport chain complexes and pyruvate dehydrogenase in the frontal cortex from subjects with autism. Transl Psychiatry., 3, e299.
Rose, S., Melnyk, S., Pavliv, O., Bai, S., Nick, T. G., Frye, R. E., et al. (2012). Evidence of oxidative damage and inflammation associated with low glutathione redox status in the autism brain. Transl Psychiatry., 2, e134.
Sultana, R., & Butterfield, D. A. (2004). Oxidatively Modified GST and MRP1 in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain: Implications for Accumulation of Reactive Lipid Peroxidation Products. Neurochemical Research, 29, 2215–2220.
Lovell, M. A., Xie, C., & Markesbery, W. R. (1998). Decreased glutathione transferase activity in brain and ventricular fluid in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology, 51, 1562–1566.
Holmqvist, S., Brouwer, M., Djelloul, M., Diaz, A. G., Devine, M. J., Hammarberg, A., et al. (2015). Generation of human pluripotent stem cell reporter lines for the isolation of and reporting on astrocytes generated from ventral midbrain and ventral spinal cord neural progenitors. Stem Cell Research., 15, 203–220.
Oksanen, M., Petersen, A. J., Naumenko, N., Puttonen, K., Lehtonen, Š, Gubert Olivé, M., et al. (2017). PSEN1 Mutant iPSC-Derived Model Reveals Severe Astrocyte Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. Stem Cell Reports., 9, 1885–1897.
Perriot, S., Mathias, A., Perriard, G., Canales, M., Jonkmans, N., Merienne, N., et al. (2018). Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Astrocytes Are Differentially Activated by Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Cytokines. Stem Cell Reports., 11, 1199–1210.
Roybon, L., Lamas, N. J., Garcia-Diaz, A., Yang, E. J., Sattler, R., Jackson-Lewis, V., et al. (2013). Human Stem Cell-Derived Spinal Cord Astrocytes with Defined Mature or Reactive Phenotypes. Cell Reports., 4, 1035–1048.
Santos, R., Vadodaria, K. C., Jaeger, B. N., Mei, A., Lefcochilos-Fogelquist, S., Mendes, A. P. D., et al. (2017). Differentiation of Inflammation-Responsive Astrocytes from Glial Progenitors Generated from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports., 8, 1757–1769.
Zhou, Q., Viollet, C., Efthymiou, A., Khayrullina, G., Moritz, K. E., Wilkerson, M. D., et al. (2019). Neuroinflammatory astrocytes generated from cord blood-derived human induced pluripotent stem cells. Journal of Neuroinflammation., 16, 164.
Neyrinck, K., Van Den Daele, J., Vervliet, T., De Smedt, J., Wierda, K., Nijs, M., et al. (2021). SOX9-induced Generation of Functional Astrocytes Supporting Neuronal Maturation in an All-human System. Stem Cell Rev and Rep., 17, 1855–1873.
Tcw, J., Wang, M., Pimenova, A. A., Bowles, K. R., Hartley, B. J., Lacin, E., et al. (2017). An Efficient Platform for Astrocyte Differentiation from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports., 9, 600–614.
Soubannier, V., Maussion, G., Chaineau, M., Sigutova, V., Rouleau, G., Durcan, T. M., et al. (2020). Characterization of human iPSC-derived astrocytes with potential for disease modeling and drug discovery. Neuroscience Letters., 731, 135028.
Galiakberova, A. A., & Dashinimaev, E. B. (2020). Neural Stem Cells and Methods for Their Generation From Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in vitro. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology., 8, 815.
Koch, P., Opitz, T., Steinbeck, J. A., Ladewig, J., & Brüstle, O. (2009). A rosette-type, self-renewing human ES cell-derived neural stem cell with potential for in vitro instruction and synaptic integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 106, 3225–3230.
Falk, A., Koch, P., Kesavan, J., Takashima, Y., Ladewig, J., Alexander, M., et al. (2012). Capture of Neuroepithelial-Like Stem Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells Provides a Versatile System for In Vitro Production of Human Neurons. PLOS ONE. Public Library of Science, 7, e29597.
Lundin, A., Delsing, L., Clausen, M., Ricchiuto, P., Sanchez, J., Sabirsh, A., et al. (2018). Human iPS-Derived Astroglia from a Stable Neural Precursor State Show Improved Functionality Compared with Conventional Astrocytic Models. Stem Cell Reports., 10, 1030–1045.
Lundin, A., Ricchiuto, P., Clausen, M., Hicks, R., Falk, A., & Herland, A. (2020). hiPS-Derived Astroglia Model Shows Temporal Transcriptomic Profile Related to Human Neural Development and Glia Competence Acquisition of a Maturing Astrocytic Identity. Advanced Biosystems., 4, 1900226.
Li, J., Khankan, R. R., Caneda, C., Godoy, M. I., Haney, M. S., Krawczyk, M. C., et al. (2019). Astrocyte-to-astrocyte contact and a positive feedback loop of growth factor signaling regulate astrocyte maturation. Glia, 67, 1571–1597.
Navarro, A.M,, Pronk, R.J., Geest, A.T. van der, Oliynyk, G., Nordgren, A., Arsenian-Henriksson, M., et al. p53 controls genomic stability and temporal differentiation of human neural stem cells and affects neural organization in human brain organoids. Cell Death & Disease [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 8];11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC6978389/.
Lam, M., Sanosaka, T., Lundin, A., Imaizumi, K., Etal, D., Karlsson, F. H., et al. (2019). Single-cell study of neural stem cells derived from human iPSCs reveals distinct progenitor populations with neurogenic and gliogenic potential. Genes to Cells., 24, 836–847.
Ge, H., Tan, L., Wu, P., Yin, Y., Liu, X., Meng, H., et al. (2015). Poly-L-ornithine promotes preferred differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells via ERK signalling pathway. Science and Reports, 5, 15535.
Sinyuk, M., Williams, J. L. (2020) Dissection and Isolation of Murine Glia from Multiple Central Nervous System Regions. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments). e61345.
Alisch, M., Kerkering, J., Crowley, T., Rosiewicz, K., Paul, F., & Siffrin, V. (2021). Identification of the gliogenic state of human neural stem cells to optimize in vitro astrocyte differentiation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods., 361, 109284.
Michler-Stuke, A., Wolff, J. R., & Bottenstein, J. E. (1984). Factors influencing astrocyte growth and development in defined media. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience., 2, 575–584.
Haselbacher, G., Groscurth, P., Otten, U., Vedder, H., Lutz, U., Sonderegger, P., et al. (1989). Long-term cultivation of cryopreserved human fetal brain cells in a chemically defined medium. Journal of Neuroscience Methods., 30, 121–131.
Codeluppi, S., Gregory, E. N., Kjell, J., Wigerblad, G., Olson, L., & Svensson, C. I. (2011). Influence of rat substrain and growth conditions on the characteristics of primary cultures of adult rat spinal cord astrocytes. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 197, 118–127.
Tchieu, J., Calder, E. L., Guttikonda, S. R., Gutzwiller, E. M., Aromolaran, K. A., Steinbeck, J. A., et al. (2019). NFIA is a gliogenic switch enabling rapid derivation of functional human astrocytes from pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotechnology. Nature Publishing Group, 37, 267–275.
Li, T., Chen, X., Zhang, C., Zhang, Y., & Yao, W. (2019). An update on reactive astrocytes in chronic pain. Journal of Neuroinflammation., 16, 140.
Escartin, C., Galea, E., Lakatos, A., O’Callaghan, J. P., Petzold, G. C., Serrano-Pozo, A., et al. (2021). Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nature Neuroscience, 24, 312–325.
Colombo, E., & Farina, C. (2016). Astrocytes: Key Regulators of Neuroinflammation. Trends in Immunology., 37, 608–620.
Lee, S.-W., Lee, H. J., Hwang, H. S., Ko, K., Han, D. W., & Ko, K. (2015). Optimization of Matrigel-based culture for expansion of neural stem cells. Animal Cells and Systems., 19, 175–180.
Lam, M., Moslem, M., Bryois, J., Pronk, R. J., Uhlin, E., Ellström, I. D., et al. (2019). Single cell analysis of autism patient with bi-allelic NRXN1-alpha deletion reveals skewed fate choice in neural progenitors and impaired neuronal functionality. Experimental Cell Research., 383, 111469.
Hochstim, C., Deneen, B., Lukaszewicz, A., Zhou, Q., & Anderson, D. J. (2008). Identification of Positionally Distinct Astrocyte Subtypes whose Identities Are Specified by a Homeodomain Code. Cell. Elsevier, 133, 510–522.
Pajarillo, E., Rizor, A., Lee, J., Aschner, M., & Leea, E. (2019). The role of astrocytic glutamate transporters GLT-1 and GLAST in neurological disorders: potential targets for neurotherapeutics. Neuropharmacology., 161, 107559.
Takahashi, K., Kong, Q., Lin, Y., Stouffer, N., Schulte, D. A., Lai, L., et al. (2015). Restored glial glutamate transporter EAAT2 function as a potential therapeutic approach for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 212, 319–332.
Garcia-Esparcia, P., Diaz-Lucena, D., Ainciburu, M., Torrejón-Escribano, B., Carmona, M., Llorens, F., et al. (2018). Glutamate Transporter GLT1 Expression in Alzheimer Disease and Dementia With Lewy Bodies. Front Aging Neurosci., 10, 122.
Lin, C.-C., & Edelson, B. T. (2017). New Insights into the Role of IL-1β in EAE and MS. The Journal of Immunology, 198, 4553–4560.
Choi, S. S., Lee, H. J., Lim, I., Satoh, J., & Kim, S. U. (2014). Human Astrocytes: Secretome Profiles of Cytokines and Chemokines. PLOS ONE, 9, e92325.
Brosnan, C. F., Cannella, B., Battistini, L., & Raine, C. S. (1995). Cytokine localization in multiple sclerosis lesions: Correlation with adhesion molecule expression and reactive nitrogen species. Neurology, 45, S16-21.
Müller, N. (2019). The Role of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 in the Pathogenesis of Psychiatric Disorders. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10, 1251.
Etienne-Manneville, S., Chaverot, N., Strosberg, A. D., & Couraud, P.-O. (1999). ICAM-1-Coupled Signaling Pathways in Astrocytes Converge to Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein Phosphorylation and TNF-α Secretion. The Journal of Immunology, 163, 668–74.
Lee, S. J., Drabik, K., Wagoner, N. J. V., Lee, S., Choi, C., Dong, Y., et al. (2000). ICAM-1-Induced Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Astrocytes: Involvement of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways. The Journal of Immunology, 165, 4658–66.
Sagara, J., Makino, N., & Bannai, S. (1996). Glutathione Efflux from Cultured Astrocytes. Journal of Neurochemistry., 66, 1876–1881.
Yudkoff, M., Pleasure, D., Cregar, L., Lin, Z.-P., Nissim, I., Stern, J., et al. (1990). Glutathione Turnover in Cultured Astrocytes: Studies with [15N]Glutamate. Journal of Neurochemistry., 55, 137–145.
Dringen, R., & Hamprecht, B. (1998). Glutathione Restoration as Indicator for Cellular Metabolism of Astroglial Cells. DNE. Karger Publishers, 20, 401–407.
Huang, S.-F., Othman, A., Koshkin, A., Fischer, S., Fischer, D., Zamboni, N., et al. (2020). Astrocyte glutathione maintains endothelial barrier stability. Redox Biology., 34, 101576.
Leventoux, N., Morimoto, S., Imaizumi, K., Sato, Y., Takahashi, S., Mashima, K., et al. (2020). Human Astrocytes Model Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cells, 9, 2680.
Zimmermann, D. R., & Dours-Zimmermann, M. T. (2008). Extracellular matrix of the central nervous system: From neglect to challenge. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 130, 635–653.
Heck, N., Garwood, J., Schütte, K., Fawcett, J., & Faissner, A. (2003). Astrocytes in culture express fibrillar collagen. Glia, 41, 382–392.
Heck, N., Garwood, J., Dobbertin, A., Calco, V., Sirko, S., Mittmann, T., et al. (2007). Evidence for distinct leptomeningeal cell-dependent paracrine and EGF-linked autocrine regulatory pathways for suppression of fibrillar collagens in astrocytes. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience., 36, 71–85.
Placone, A. F., McGuiggan, P. M., Bergles, D. E., Guerrero-Cazares, H., Quiñones-Hinojosa, A., & Searson, P. C. (2015). Human Astrocytes Develop Physiological Morphology and Remain Quiescent in a Novel 3D Matrix. Biomaterials, 42, 134–143.
Sabbagh, M. F., Heng, J. S., Luo, C., Castanon, R. G., Nery, J. R., Rattner, A., et al. (2018). Transcriptional and epigenomic landscapes of CNS and non-CNS vascular endothelial cells. Dejana E, Stainier DY, Dejana E, editors. eLife, 7, e36187.
Lange, S. C., Bak, L. K., Waagepetersen, H. S., Schousboe, A., & Norenberg, M. D. (2012). Primary cultures of astrocytes: Their value in understanding astrocytes in health and disease. Neurochemical Research, 37, 2569–2588.
Raponi, E., Agenes, F., Delphin, C., Assard, N., Baudier, J., Legraverend, C., et al. (2007). S100B expression defines a state in which GFAP-expressing cells lose their neural stem cell potential and acquire a more mature developmental stage. Glia, 55, 165–177.
Bar-Peled, O., Ben-Hur, H., Biegon, A., Groner, Y., Dewhurst, S., Furuta, A., et al. (1997). Distribution of Glutamate Transporter Subtypes During Human Brain Development. Journal of Neurochemistry., 69, 2571–2580.
Rowitch, D. H., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2010). Developmental genetics of vertebrate glial–cell specification. Nature. Nature Publishing Group, 468, 214–222.
Clarke, B. E., Taha, D. M., Tyzack, G. E., & Patani, R. (2021). Regionally encoded functional heterogeneity of astrocytes in health and disease: A perspective. Glia, 69, 20–27.
Bradley, R. A., Shireman, J., McFalls, C., Choi, J., Canfield, S. G., Dong, Y., et al. (2019). Regionally specified human pluripotent stem cell-derived astrocytes exhibit different molecular signatures and functional properties. Development., 146, dev170910.
Uhlin, E., Rönnholm, H., Day, K., Kele, M., Tammimies, K., Bölte, S., et al. (2017). Derivation of human iPS cell lines from monozygotic twins in defined and xeno free conditions. Stem Cell Research., 18, 22–25.
Kele, M., Day, K., Rönnholm, H., Schuster, J., Dahl, N., & Falk, A. (2016). Generation of human iPS cell line CTL07-II from human fibroblasts, under defined and xeno-free conditions. Stem Cell Research., 17, 474–478.
Windrem, M. S., Osipovitch, M., Liu, Z., Bates, J., Chandler-Militello, D., Zou, L., et al. (2017). Human iPSC Glial Mouse Chimeras Reveal Glial Contributions to Schizophrenia. Cell Stem Cell, 21, 195-208.e6.
Preman, P., Julia, T. C. W., Calafate, S., Snellinx, A., Alfonso-Triguero, M., Corthout, N., et al. (2021). Human iPSC-derived astrocytes transplanted into the mouse brain undergo morphological changes in response to amyloid-β plaques. Molecular Neurodegeneration., 16, 68.
Lee, S.-G., Su, Z.-Z., Emdad, L., Gupta, P., Sarkar, D., Borjabad, A., et al. (2008). Mechanism of Ceftriaxone Induction of Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter-2 Expression and Glutamate Uptake in Primary Human Astrocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283, 13116–13123.
Swanson, R. A., Liu, J., Miller, J. W., Rothstein, J. D., Farrell, K., Stein, B. A., et al. (1997). Neuronal regulation of glutamate transporter subtype expression in astrocytes. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 932–940.
Schlag, B. D., Vondrasek, J. R., Munir, M., Kalandadze, A., Zelenaia, O. A., Rothstein, J. D., et al. (1998). Regulation of the glial Na+-dependent glutamate transporters by cyclic AMP analogs and neurons. Molecular Pharmacology, 53, 355–369.
Lee, M. L., Martinez-Lozada, Z., Krizman, E. N., & Robinson, M. B. (2017). Brain endothelial cells induce astrocytic expression of the glutamate transporter GLT-1 by a Notch-dependent mechanism. Journal of Neurochemistry, 143, 489–506.
Savchenko, E., Teku, G. N., Boza-Serrano, A., Russ, K., Berns, M., Deierborg, T., et al. (2019). FGF family members differentially regulate maturation and proliferation of stem cell-derived astrocytes. Science and Reports, 9, 9610.
Shaltouki, A., Peng, J., Liu, Q., Rao, M. S., & Zeng, X. (2013). Efficient Generation of Astrocytes from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells in Defined Conditions. Stem Cells., 31, 941–952.
Bristot Silvestrin, R., Bambini-Junior, V., Galland, F., Daniele Bobermim, L., Quincozes- Santos, A., Torres Abib, R., et al. (2013). Animal model of autism induced by prenatal exposure to valproate: Altered glutamate metabolism in the hippocampus. Brain Research., 1495, 52–60.
Rothstein, J. D., Patel, S., Regan, M. R., Haenggeli, C., Huang, Y. H., Bergles, D. E., et al. (2005). Beta-lactam antibiotics offer neuroprotection by increasing glutamate transporter expression. Nature, 433, 73–77.
Colton, C. K., Kong, Q., Lai, L., Zhu, M. X., Seyb, K. I., Cuny, G. D., et al. (2010). Identification of translational activators of glial glutamate transporter EAAT2 through cell-based high-throughput screening: An approach to prevent excitotoxicity. Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 15, 653–662.
Rosenblum, L. T., & Trotti, D. (2017). EAAT2 and the molecular signature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Adv Neurobiol., 16, 117–136.
Yasui, T., Uezono, N., Nakashima, H., Noguchi, H., Matsuda, T., Noda-Andoh, T., et al. (2017). Hypoxia Epigenetically Confers Astrocytic Differentiation Potential on Human Pluripotent Cell-Derived Neural Precursor Cells. Stem Cell Reports., 8, 1743–1756.
Héry, C., Sébire, G., Peudenier, S., & Tardieu, M. (1995). Adhesion to human neurons and astrocytes of monocytes: The role of interaction of CR3 and ICAM-1 and modulation by cytokines. Journal of Neuroimmunology, 57, 101–109.
Akiyama, H., Kawamata, T., Yamada, T., Tooyama, I., Ishii, T., & McGeer, P. L. (1993). Expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 by a subset of astrocytes in Alzheimer disease and some other degenerative neurological disorders. Acta Neuropathologica, 85, 628–634.
Raps, S. P., Lai, J. C. K., Hertz, L., & Cooper, A. J. L. (1989). Glutathione is present in high concentrations in cultured astrocytes but not in cultured neurons. Brain Research., 493, 398–401.
Devesa, A., O’Connor, J., Garciá, C., Puertes, I. R., & Viña, J. R. (1993). Glutathione metabolism in primary astrocyte cultures: flow cytometric evidence of heterogeneous distribution of GSH content. Brain Research., 618, 181–189.
Dringen, R. (2000). Metabolism and functions of glutathione in brain. Progress in Neurobiology., 62, 649–671.
Dringen, R., Kranich, O., & Hamprecht, B. (1997). The γ-Glutamyl Transpeptidase Inhibitor Acivicin Preserves Glutathione Released by Astroglial Cells in Culture. Neurochemical Research, 22, 727–733.
Wang, X. F., & Cynader, M. S. (2000). Astrocytes Provide Cysteine to Neurons by Releasing Glutathione. Journal of Neurochemistry., 74, 1434–1442.
Bains, J. S., & Shaw, C. A. (1997). Neurodegenerative disorders in humans: The role of glutathione in oxidative stress-mediated neuronal death. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews, 25, 335–358.
Cadet, J. L., & Brannock, C. (1998). Invited Review Free radicals and the pathobiology of brain dopamine systems. Neurochemistry International., 32, 117–131.
Li, J., Wuliji, O., Li, W., Jiang, Z.-G., & Ghanbari, H. A. (2013). Oxidative Stress and Neurodegenerative Disorders. Int J Mol Sci., 14, 24438–75.
Popa-Wagner, A., Mitran, S., Sivanesan, S., Chang, E., & Buga, A.-M. (2013). ROS and Brain Diseases: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. Hindawi, 2013, e963520.
Fang, C., Gu, L., Smerin, D., Mao, S., & Xiong, X. (2017). The Interrelation between Reactive Oxygen Species and Autophagy in Neurological Disorders. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. Hindawi, 2017, e8495160.
Liddell, J. R., Hoepken, H. H., Crack, P. J., Robinson, S. R., & Dringen, R. (2006). Glutathione peroxidase 1 and glutathione are required to protect mouse astrocytes from iron-mediated hydrogen peroxide toxicity. Journal of Neuroscience Research., 84, 578–586.
Nadadhur, A. G., Leferink, P. S., Holmes, D., Hinz, L., Cornelissen-Steijger, P., Gasparotto, L., et al. (2018). Patterning factors during neural progenitor induction determine regional identity and differentiation potential in vitro. Stem Cell Research., 32, 25–34.
Acknowledgements
We thank the iPS core and the Biomedicum Imaging Core (BIC) at Karolinska Institute for access to their service.
We also thank Thomas E. Winkler for sharing his knowledge in statistics and Isabelle Matthiesen for the help with cell culture.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. This work was supported by AIMES – Center for the Advancement of Integrated Medical and Engineering Sciences (www.aimes.se), Karolinska Institutet (1-249/2019), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (VF-2019-0110) and Getinge AB (4-1599/2018). PN and AH acknowledges funding from the Swedish Research Council (2019–01803).
DV and AH acknowledges funding from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (no. 2015–0178 and 2020.0206), and KTH – Royal Institute of Technology.
DV, PN and AH acknowledge resources from AIMES – Center for Integrated Medical and Engineering Science, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute and Carl Bennet AB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DV: Conceptualization; methodology; investigation; analysis and visualization; writing – original draft.
PN: Validation; methodology; writing review & editing
AH: Conceptualization; methodology; resources, writing review & editing, Supervision and Administration.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
12015_2022_10376_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary Figure 1 Evaluation of astrocyte differentiation strategies using qPCR analysis. mRNA expression of astrocytic markers a) GFAP b) CD44 c) SOX9 d) S100B e) ALDH1L1 and f) SLC1A3 for differentiated NES C9 on Matrigel and 15K/cm2 (TCW et al. 2017 conditions, Matrigel and 15K/cm2 seeding density) and on gelatin in seeding densities 15 and 30K/cm2, all data retrieved after 28 days of parallel differentiations in the specified conditions. All conditions originated from the same NES culture. (n=1 independent experiment). Supplementary Figure 2 Comparison of the various differentiation strategies and passage impact on astrocytic commitment. Brightfield images after 28 days of differentiation of NES C7 in AM medium under conditions a) Matrigel and 15K/cm2 seeding density (TCW et al. conditions), gelatin with b) seeding density 15K/cm2, and c) 30K/cm2. Scale bar 100 μm. d) mRNA expression comparison of astrocytic markers between astrocyte differentiations from early passage (p.#13) and later passage NES (p.#24). ΔΔCt analysis was done using NES from the specific line at the corresponding passage (n=1 independent experiment). Supplementary Figure 3 Characterization of SDCs and hiAstrocytes a) Brightfield images after 28 days of spontaneous differentiation of i) NES C9 (SDCs C9) ii) NES C7 (SDCs C7) and iii) NES AF22 (SDCs AF22). Scale bar 100 μm. b) Relative expression (2ΔCt) of SLIT1 (y-axis) and RELN (x-axis) for hiAstrocytes, NES lines and HFA c) DCX staining of hiAstrocytes C9, C7, AF22 and HFA. Scale bar 50 μm. Supplementary Figure 4 ICC of the NES lines used in this study. ICC images of NES lines NES C9, C7 and AF22 for the astrocytic markers S100B, CD44, GFAP, ALDH1L1. Scale bar 50 μm (20x). Supplementary Figure 5 Quantification of astrocytic processes and glutamate uptake a) Quantification of astrocytic processes of HiAstrocytes C9 (pink), C7 (green), AF22 (purple) and HFA (black), reuse of data from Fig. 4b to exemplify the more elaborate processes of hiAstrocytes vs. HFA. Each dot represents an average of four fields of view (10x). b) Glutamate uptake assay for HFA (black), hiAstrocytes C9 (pink), hiAstrocytes C7 (green) and hiAstrocytes AF22 (purple), n = 3 technical replicates. Error bars represent ±SD. HFA and hiAstrocytes data points were reused from Figure 5a for comparison with hiAstrocytes C7 and AF22. c) mRNA expression of glutamate transporters SLC1A2 and SLC1A3 for hiAstrocytes HFA (black), hiAstrocytes C9 (pink), hiAstrocytes (green) and hiAstrocytes AF22 (purple), n = 3 technical replicates. Error bars represent ±SD. ΔΔCt values for hiAstrocytes were determined by using the respective NES line as a reference, ΔΔCt values for HFA were determined by using the average ΔCts of the 3 NES lines. Supplementary Figure 6 Characterization of immune potency of NES and quantification of glutathione levels of hiAstrocytes and HFA. a) ICAM-1 staining for basal and inflammatory conditions for NES C9, C7 and AF22. Scale bar 50 μm. b) Total intracellular and c) total extracellular glutathione content for hiAstrocytes C9, C7, AF22 and HFA normalized by total protein content, n=3 technical replicates. Error bars represent ±SD. Statistical analysis was done using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. d) Comparison with the work from Oksanen et al. (2017), n = 3 biological replicates, the dot in Oksanen study is the mean of the obtained values (n=14 biological replicates) in their study derived by dividing by the molecular weight of glutathione. The glutathione determination in Oksanen et al. (2017) was done according to Liddell et al. (2006) [106], while in this study, a glutathione assay kit was used (Sigma-Aldrich). e) Glutathione efflux rate of hiAstrocytes C9, C7, AF22 and HFA.(PDF 9254 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Voulgaris, D., Nikolakopoulou, P. & Herland, A. Generation of Human iPSC-Derived Astrocytes with a mature star-shaped phenotype for CNS modeling. Stem Cell Rev and Rep 18, 2494–2512 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-022-10376-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-022-10376-2