Abstract
A possible “exception” to Puppe’s rule regarding the intersection of skull fractures has been previously addressed due to the observation that skull fractures can pass through old and remodeled craniotomies. In a further case presented herein, however, it was shown that cranial fractures are also able to pass through recent burr holes, a phenomenon never previously described. A 63-year-old man sustained a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the right temple region, with an exit wound in the left temporal region. Twenty-five days prior, the patient had undergone parietal craniotomy for the evacuation of a subdural hematoma secondary to glioblastoma. Among the fracture lines originating from the exit wound, one traversed the craniotomy hole, terminating approximately 1.4 cm beyond its contralateral margin. This illustrates that cranial fractures possess the capability to cross “fresh” burr holes that have not undergone to bone remodeling. Consequently, the evaluation of Puppe’s rule should be reconsidered, particularly in cases of gunshot injuries, wherein fractures pass through full-thickness circular lesions (such as entry and exit wounds). The varied scenarios underscore the potential for fractures to “pass through” these burr holes if they have not themselves generated fracture lines, as may be the case with entry holes with circular lesions without fractures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Puppe’s rule, named after the forensic pathologist Puppe, who enunciated it more than 100 years ago, stands as one of the cornerstones in the interpretation of the development of skull fractures and thus of the sequence of injuries. Puppe’s rule posits that in cases of traumas produced at two different times, subsequent fractures cannot surpass pre-existing fractures and thus that the fractures resulting from a later trauma will interrupt by fractures that were already caused by the earlier traumatic event [1,2,3,4,5,6]. This theory has also been successfully applied to gunshot wound analysis, particularly in discerning between entry and exit wounds [7, 8]. Previous studies have demonstrated that gunshot wounds and associated beveling are interrupted and delimited by pre-existing fracture lines. Moreover, fractures from exit gunshot wounds stop at the edge of the entry wound [9,10,11,12]. In a recent article [13], a particular “exception” to Puppe’s rule was observed, namely that fractures in the presence of old and remodeled craniotomy holes are able to “pass through” them without stopping at the margins of the hole, hypothesizing a role of bone remodeling on energy transmission.
The present case presents a novel finding: fracture lines pass through “fresh” craniotomy holes, occurring in this instance 25 days postoperatively. Such an occurrence has not been described in the forensic literature and prompts a reevaluation of the relationship between fracture lines and cranial burr holes.
Case report
A 63-year-old man was discovered deceased in his residence by the wife after a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head. A semi-automatic ‘Glock’ pistol, lacking a bullet in its magazine, was recovered near the body, which was subsequently found on the room’s floor. The caliber of the full-metal-jacket bullet was 9 × 21 mm, with no discernible alterations. The decedent’s wife revealed his medical history, noting a diagnosis of glioblastoma and recent craniotomy surgery performed 25 days prior. The craniotomy aimed to relieve intracranial hypertension caused by the tumor and a subdural hematoma, as well as to conduct an extensive biopsy of the neoplasm. No surgical complications were reported, with the procedure executed without affecting the surrounding bone. The decedent’s deteriorating health condition had precipitated depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation.
Prior to the autopsy, the body was subjected to a CT scan with 3D reconstruction. At the autopsy, an entrance wound on the right temple and an exit wound on the left temple were found. The entry wound showed a round shape, regular margins and blackening of both skin and bone margins, indicative of a close-range firing. Internal beveling and several fracture lines were evident in the skull. The exit wound on the left temple showed a larger diameter, irregular skin margins, external beveling, and bone fragments embedded in the skin. Additionally, a drill hole with regular margins, approximately 0.8 cm in diameter, was observed in the left parietal region, positioned 9.2 cm from the central point of the exit wound. Notably, a fracture line originating from the upper margin of the exit wound extended superiorly, nearly vertically, before curving posteriorly toward the anterior margin of the drill hole, and subsequently continued along the opposite margin for approximately 1.4 cm (Figs. 1, 2 and 3). The appearance of the fracture was of a complete fracture (and therefore not a fissure) observable on both the outer and inner sides of the calvarium.
Discussion
The examination of cranial fractures constitutes a wide-ranging and multifaceted topic within the disciplines of forensic pathology and anthropology. The correct assessment of fracture lines in the skull could be crucial to assess causes and manners of death. Furthermore, discerning the temporal sequence of multiple traumatic events that result in fracturing of a solitary cranium poses an essential yet convoluted endeavor [14,15,16,17,18]. In this context, macroscopic analysis may rely on the Puppe’s rule, as outlined previously. On the basis of a sort of exception to the presumed irrefutability of Puppe’s rule on skull fractures [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], it was shown that in an ‘unexpected’ way, skull fractures were able to pass through existing holes such as holes from previous craniotomies, the margins of which are thus largely remodeled [13]. This phenomenon was attributed to the transmission of forces facilitated by bone remodeling, resulting in fracture deformation. As a result of the previous study and on the basis of the existing literature, it was postulated that the existence of a recent burr hole with non-remodeled edges would disrupt fracture line continuity. Until then, it had never been discussed how a skull fracture behaves when it encounters a craniotomy hole. Instead, the present case provides a significant observation: cranial fractures can indeed pass through recent craniotomy burr holes, with energy transmission deforming the hole and continuing along the margins to the opposite side. This aspect of the behaviour of skull fractures in the presence of craniotomy holes has therefore only been described once before, but it is very important to emphasise that this can be observed with both recent and old burr holes and is a fundamental concept of differential diagnosis, especially when the patient’s clinical history and previous performance of possible neurosurgical operations are unknown. All this leads to the hypothesis that the specific behavior of the fracture is due to the integrity of the hole and not to its remodeling. Consequently, fractures originating from the exit hole, or from a second impact in the case of blunt force, would be interrupted at the margins of the initial entry hole (or the hole given by the first impact), since the margins of the latter are no longer “intact”, in the sense of no longer being in 360-degree continuity due to the prior development of fractures. Nevertheless, it is important to note that in cases involving penetrating injuries from small-caliber projectiles or sharp objects, the occurrence of a bone defect (hole) does not result in any additional fracture [16, 19,20,21]. In such instances, therefore, a craniotomy hole, given the regularity of its margins, can macroscopically resemble a gunshot entry wound (for example, a gunshot entry wound from small-calibre bullet).
In these cases, it must therefore be taken into account that fractures originating from a second impact could cross the hole of the first impact and thus resemble entrance hole fractures. In fact, looking at the fracture lines shown in the figures and assuming that that is an entry gunshot wound, one might mistakenly think that those fractures were caused by the effects of a direct impact.
This should definitely be pointed out and taken into account: a differential diagnosis between fractures starting at the site of trauma or fractures reaching it from a secondary site of trauma. Such a crucial issue has never been described in the literature, but it is something that must be taken into account in the complex evaluation of the origin and course of skull fractures when assessing the sequence of the injuries.
Key points
-
1.
Puppe’s rule is a fundamental principle in the evaluation of skull fracture sequences and has never been practically refuted.
-
2.
It has been shown in some cases that fractures can pass through the holes of previous craniotomies, both recent and old, thus not stopping at the edge of the hole.
-
3.
These characteristics are crucial and must be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of the origin of skull fractures.
Data availability
The Authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Geserick G, Krocker K, Wirth I. Puppe’s rule–a literature review. Arch Kriminol. 2012;229:34–43.
Madea B, Staak M. Determination of the sequence of gunshot wounds of the skull. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1988;28:321–8.
Puppe G. Traumatische Todesursachen. In: Kutner R, editor. Gerichtliche Medizin. Zwölf Vorträge. Jena: G Fischer; 1903. pp. 65–84.
Puppe G. Die gewaltsamen Todesursachen. In: Schmidtmann A, editor. Handbuch Der Gerichtlichen Medizin. Berlin: Hirschwald; 1907. pp. 90–5.
Puppe G. Atlas und Grundriss Der Gerichtlichen Medizin. Lehmann’s Medizinische Handatlanten. Volume 1. München: J.F. Lehmann’s; 1908.
Puppe G. Über Priorität Der Schädelbrüche. Arztl Sachverst Zt. 1914;20:307–9.
Madea B, Henssge C, Lockhoven HB. Priorität Bei Mehrfachen Schussverletzungen Des Schädels [Priority of multiple gunshot injuries of the skull]. Z Rechtsmed. 1986;97:213–8.
Viel G, Gehl A, Sperhake JP. Intersecting fractures of the skull and gunshot wounds. Case report and literature review. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009;5:22–7. https://doi.org/10. 1007/ s12024-008-9062-8.
Quatrehomme G, Işcan MY. Characteristics of gunshot wounds in the skull. J Forensic Sci. 1999;44:568–76.
Quatrehomme G, Işcan MY. Bevelling in exit gunshot wounds in bones. Forensic Sci Int. 1997;89(97):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379.
Quatrehomme G, Işcan MY. Gunshot wounds to the skull: comparison of entries and exits. Forensic Sci Int. 1998;94(98):141–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379.
Berryman HE. (2019) A systematic approach to the interpretation of gunshot wound trauma to the cranium. Forensic Sci Int 301:306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.019.
Amadasi A, Franceschetti L, Magli F, Cappella A, Muccino EA, Bisogni K, Mazzarelli D, Cattaneo C. Two peculiar cases of cranial fractures running through craniotomy burr holes: may this be a kind of exception to the puppe rule. Int J Legal Med. 2022;136(4):1177–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02804-2.
Dodd MJ. Bone injury, the skull and the concept of beveling. In: Dodd MJ, editor. Terminal ballistics. CRC; 2006. pp. 104–10.
Dixon DS. Pattern of intersecting fractures and direction of fire. J Forensic Sci. 1984;29:651–4.
Clemedson CJ, Falconer B, Frankenberg L, Jönsson A, Wennerstrand J. Head injuries caused by small-calibre, high velocity bullets. An experimental study. Z Rechtsmed. 1973;73:103–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882332.
Amadasi A, Franceschetti L, Rizzetto F, Battistini A. Depressed fractures of the skull due to direct kick and the contribution of 3D CT reconstruction. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2024;69:102443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102443.
Franceschetti L, Mazzucchi A, Magli F, Collini F, Gaudio D, Cattaneo C. Are cranial peri-mortem fractures identifiable in cremated remains? A study on 38 known cases. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021;49:101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101850.
Allen IV, Kirk J, Maynard RL, Cooper GK, Scott R, Crockard A. An ultrastructural study of experimental high velocity penetrating head injury. Acta Neuropathol. 1983;59:277–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691493.
Hart GO. Fracture pattern interpretation in the skull: differentiating blunt force from ballistics trauma using concentric fractures. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:1276–81.
Amadasi A, Mazzarelli D, Merli D, Brandone A, Cattaneo C. Characteristics and frequency of chipping effects in Near-Contact Gunshot wounds. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62:786–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13312.
Funding
Not applicable.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Alberto Amadasi and Larissa Amadasi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Alberto Amadasi and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Conceptualization: Alberto Amadasi; Methodology: Alberto Amadasi, Lorenzo Franceschetti; Formal analysis and investigation: Larissa Amadasi; Writing - original draft preparation: Alberto Amadasi; Writing - review and editing: Lorenzo Franceschetti and Larissa Amadasi; Supervision: Lars Oesterhelweg.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was performed with human cadavers. This article does not contain any studies with (living) human participants or animals performed by any of the Authors. The data were acquired as part of a forensic judicial investigation.
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Amadasi, A., Franceschetti, L., Amadasi, L. et al. Exception to the Puppe’s rule reloaded and a warning in the interpretation of skull fractures: they run even through recent craniotomy burr holes. Forensic Sci Med Pathol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00829-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00829-0