Abstract
We have initiated a genome-wide transcript profiling study using the model legume Medicago truncatula to identify putative genes related to cell wall biosynthesis and regulatory function in legumes. We used the GeneChip® Medicago Genome Array to compare transcript abundance in elongating versus postelongation stem internode segments of two M. truncatula accessions and two Medicago sativa (alfalfa) clones with contrasting stem cell wall concentration and composition. Hundreds of differentially expressed probe sets between elongating and postelongation stem segments showed similar patterns of gene expression in the model legume and cultivated alfalfa. Differentially expressed genes included genes with putative functions associated with primary and secondary cell wall biosynthesis and growth. Mining of public microarray data for coexpressed genes with two marker genes for secondary cell wall synthesis identified additional candidate secondary cell wall-related genes. Coexpressed genes included protein kinases, transcription factors, and unclassified groups that were not previously reported with secondary cell wall-associated genes. M. truncatula has been recognized as an excellent model plant for legume genomics. The stem tissue transcriptome analysis, described here, indicates that M. truncatula has utility as a model plant for cell wall genomics in legumes in general and shows excellent potential for translating gene discoveries to its close relative, cultivated alfalfa, in particular. The natural variation for stem cell wall traits in Medicago may offer a new tool to study an expanded repertoire of valuable agronomic traits in related species, including woody dicots in the eurosid I clade.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plant cell wall characteristics strongly affect the availability of lignocellulosic-derived sugar for fermentation and are a major factor affecting cost and efficiency of biomass conversion to biofuels, due to the challenges of pretreatment steps [8, 34, 43]. Arabidopsis, as the primary model plant, has provided a research platform for important discoveries of genes and gene functions associated with primary and secondary cell wall biosynthesis. The genomic tools available for Arabidopsis have also been used to identify genes involved in xylem formation for application in understanding wood formation (e.g., [44, 68]). Nevertheless, it is not clear whether Arabidopsis will provide all the tools necessary for an expanded repertoire of agronomic traits of value in crop species. For instance, previous genetic analysis and transcript profiling studies suggest a role for specific fasciclin-like genes in both primary and secondary wall formation [39, 46, 55]. However, many fasciclins that are highly expressed during formation of cellulose-rich tension wood in Populus spp. appear to lack orthologs in Arabidopsis [2, 39].
Legumes have many traits that make them attractive bioenergy crops, especially as components of mixed grass swards or in crop rotations with maize. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is a potential bioenergy legume that fixes atmospheric nitrogen and produces leaf and stem coproducts: the leaf meal for livestock feed [14] and dried stems for conversion to syngas [15] and/or fermentation to ethanol [12]. A perennial crop with high biomass yields, alfalfa is the fourth most widely grown crop in the USA [5]. Nevertheless, studying alfalfa is challenging because it is a cross-pollinated autotetraploid, with complex segregation and inheritance patterns. Because of its ease of genetic manipulation and small genome size, barrel medic (Medicago truncatula) has become a model species for genomic studies of the Fabaceae, including alfalfa. In contrast to alfalfa, M. truncatula is a lesser-grown annual, diploid, and self-pollinating species. Comparative mapping among many legumes has shown a high degree of conservation of gene content and gene arrangement [9, 70], as well as a very high degree of DNA sequence homology between alfalfa and M. truncatula [60].
In previous research, four M. truncatula accessions and two alfalfa genotypes were evaluated for stem tissue morphology and cell wall characteristics to ascertain whether M. truncatula displays comparable diversity in stem cell wall traits to alfalfa [54]. One obvious morphological difference between M. truncatula and alfalfa plants relates to their stem growth habit. Perennial alfalfa plants each year produce erect stems, while the annual barrel medic forms decumbent stems. Nevertheless, cross sections of M. truncatula and alfalfa stems showed similar patterns of tissue differentiation and growth [54]. During primary growth in alfalfa, deposition of nonlignified primary walls predominates in elongating stem internodes proximal to the apical meristem. In older stem internodes of alfalfa undergoing secondary growth, synthesis of lignin- and cellulose-rich secondary wall predominate due to deposition of secondary tissues by vascular cambium [18]. During the postelongation phase, xylem vessel element and fiber cells develop lignified primary and thickened, lignified secondary walls soon after differentiation from the cambium. Phloem fiber cells also develop a thickened cellulose-rich secondary wall, but only the primary wall of phloem fibers lignifies [18]. Similarly, the range of stem cell wall composition and content among M. truncatula accessions was found to resemble that of alfalfa [54]. Statistically significant differences in cell wall composition among the four M. truncatula accessions tested indicates that naturally occurring variation in M. truncatula may be a rich resource for discovering mechanisms regulating cell wall biosynthesis. Overall, previously published results suggest that analysis of plant cell wall traits in alfalfa and other legumes would be facilitated by evaluation of M. truncatula, with well-developed genetic and genomic resources [10, 64, 67].
In Arabidopsis, secondary cell wall formation was shown to increase with increasing distance from the shoot apical meristem toward the base of the inflorescence stem [62]. Sampling of stem segments along this developmental gradient has been instrumental in uncovering plant genes responsible for cell wall biogenesis and control in Arabidopsis [7, 17]. Prassionos et al. [49] used a similar approach for sampling stem segments of hybrid aspen for transcriptome profiling. Transcript analysis of woody plants has unveiled genes involved in lignin, pectin, and cellulose biosynthesis [29, 49]. Macroarray analysis of different plant organs and stem segments has also been used to profile transcript expression patterns of cell walls in maize [26]. These efforts have uncovered many cell wall-associated genes that have putative functions in the phenylpropanoid pathway, several transcription factor (TF) gene families, cell death proteins, and transporters, among others. Additionally, proteome analysis of plant cell walls has allowed the identification of cell wall-localized proteins that have not been previously identified using transcript profiling [35, 65].
The Affymetrix Medicago genome array [1], which contains more than 52,000 probe sets from barrel medic and alfalfa, has been instrumental in the identification of biologically meaningful gene expression patterns in M. truncatula [3, 31, 60] and M. sativa [60]. In this study, we used the Affymetrix Medicago array for a genome-wide expression study in young (elongating) and old (postelongation) stem segments of the M. truncatula accessions A17 and DZA315.16 (hereafter referred to as DZA) and alfalfa clones 252 and 1283. These germplasms were chosen because they express divergent cell wall composition. Identification of differential expression profiles between stem developmental stages was instrumental in identifying genes with putative functions in primary and secondary cell wall biosynthesis and growth in the model legume and cultivated alfalfa.
Methods
Plant Culture
Alfalfa and M. truncatula plants were grown in greenhouse and controlled growth chambers, respectively. Alfalfa clones 252 and 1283, which have been identified with consistent differences in stem cell wall cellulose and Klason lignin concentrations (Lamb and Jung, unpublished), were propagated from vegetative cuttings and grown in plastic pots (10 × 10 × 10 cm) containing soil/sand (1:1; v/v) in a greenhouse. When plants reached the full flower stage of development, alfalfa plants were cut back by removing the aerial herbage at 2-cm cutting height. Plants were allowed to regrow for approximately 6 weeks after cutting until they developed multiple stems. Stem segments were sampled at the late bud stage of development as described below. There were three replicates with 16 plants in each replicate. Plants were watered daily with tap water and fertilized weekly with water soluble fertilizer (20:10:20; N/P/K).
For the M. truncatula experiment, seeds of M. truncatula A17 and DZA were scarified with sand paper and pregerminated in Petri plates on moist Whatman filter paper for 3 days at 4°C and then moved to room temperature for 24 h. Germinated seeds with approximately equal radicle lengths were planted in pots (10 × 10 × 10 cm) containing Metro-mix 200 (Sun Gro Horticulture, Bellevue, WA, USA) and were grown in a growth chamber (light intensity of 300 μmol m−2 s−1, temperature cycle of 25°C and 21°C, light and dark, with a 16-h photoperiod). One week after planting, seedlings were thinned to a single plant in each pot. Plants were watered with tap water as needed and fertilized weekly with water soluble fertilizer (20:10:20; N/P/K). Stem tissues were collected at 8 weeks after planting, when plants had developed multiple stems (three to four stems on each plant) with approximately eight to ten internodes per stem. There were three biological replicates with 21 pots in each replicate.
Stem Tissue Harvest
The transition from elongating to postelongation stage of stem internode development is easily identifiable in both M. truncatula and alfalfa by differences in pliability and suppleness of stem internodes. Stiff internodes are located lower on the stem axis and very pliable internodes near the tops of the stems. After identifying the internode which was in transition between these two developmental stages, it was excised and discarded. For microarray analysis, two internodes located immediately above (young stem segments, elongating) and below (old stem segments, postelongation) the transition internode were harvested. In general, young stem segments used for microarray analysis consisted of stem segments of the first and second internodes from the shoot apical meristem. Older stem segments generally contained the fifth and sixth internodes from the shoot apical meristem. Stem segments were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for subsequent RNA extraction. The remaining stem portions from each alfalfa plant (stem segments below the postelongating stem segment) were immediately collected and dried at 60°C for determination of cell wall composition [66].
RNA Extraction and GeneChip Hybridization
Approximately 150 mg of stem tissue ground in liquid nitrogen was used for total RNA extraction using TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. During the RNA extraction, contaminating genomic DNA was removed by incubating samples with RQ1 DNase following standard procedures suggested by the supplier (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Ten micrograms of total RNA was used to produce biotin-labeled cRNA using Affymetrix kits following the manufacturer’s suggested procedures for eukaryotic reactions (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Fifteen micrograms of biotin-labeled cRNA, fragmented as suggested by Affymetrix, was hybridized to the GeneChip® Medicago Genome Array. The integrity and quality of total RNA and fragmented biotin-labeled cRNA were verified using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer RNA 6000 Nano LabChip (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). GeneChips were hybridized, washed, stained, and scanned as previously described [60].
Microarray Data Analysis
In all of the data analyses, gene expression signals corresponding to the bacterial microsymbiont probe sets were excluded. Gene expression values were calculated with the robust multi-array average [33] using quantile normalization, as provided with the Genedata Expressionist Pro version 4.5 (Genedata, San Francisco, CA, USA). Presence or absence calls of expression data for each probe set were made using MAS5 [42]. Principal components analysis (PCA) was initially used to evaluate gene expression patterns between young and old stem internodes of M. truncatula and alfalfa. PCA was conducted using the Genedata Expressionist Pro version 4.5 platform (Genedata).
Statistical analysis of the stem microarray data between young and old stem segments was based on the t test (p < 0.05) using the GeneSpring Expression analysis software version 7.3 (Agilent Technologies). Because the Medicago genome array contains a large number probe sets, p values were adjusted for multiple testing corrections to correct for occurrence of false positives [56]. For this, the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate [4] was applied using options in the GeneSpring Expression analysis software (Agilent Technologies), and the corrected values were designated as the q values. Heatmaps and expression data clustering were also generated using GeneSpring Expression analysis software (Agilent Technologies). For clustering analysis, the average linkage clustering algorithm and the upregulated correlation similarity measure were used as provided in GeneSpring software (Agilent Technologies).
To identify genes that are potentially coexpressed probe sets, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for each probe set to identify genes that showed coregulated expression patterns with CESA and COBL4 genes. For coexpression analysis, 60 publicly available Medicago GeneChip data sets collected from several organs and tissues of A17 plants [3, 31], as well as the six GeneChip data sets from young and old stem segments of A17 in this study, were analyzed using GeneSpring Expression analysis software (Agilent Technologies).
The significantly differentially expressed and uniquely expressed probe sets were categorized into putative functional categories using GeneBins, an online bioinformatics tool for classifying probe sets of the Medicago chip [24] (http:bionfinroserver.rsbs.anu.edu.au/utils/GeneBins). Functional classifications of Medicago probe sets were further refined by homology searches using the predicted protein sequences of the Medicago chip as query sequences to perform BLASTX with an E value cutoff of 10−10 against plant cell wall protein families at the Purdue University cell wall genomics site (http://cellwall.genomics.purdue.edu/) and the cell wall navigator at the University of California, Riverside [23] (http://bioweb.ucr.edu/Cellwall/index.pl). For putative transcription factors, a similar sequence homology search using BLASTX with an E value cutoff of 10−10 was also performed against the database of Arabidopsis transcription factors [27] (http://datf.cbi.pku.edu.cn). Graphical display of cellular function and regulation overviews of the microarray data were oriented using the MapMan software [61] as adapted for the Medicago genome array [66]. All microarray data in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under platform number GPL4652.
Computational and Phylogenetic Analysis
Predicted Medicago fasciclin gene sequences (MtFLAs) were downloaded from Medicago BAC sequences (www.tigr.org/tigr-scripts/medicago/IMGAG/imgag_annotator.pl?). Arabidopsis and poplar fasciclin gene sequences used for comparison were obtained from GenBank. Multiple sequence alignments were performed using ClustalW and phylogenetic trees were constructed using amino acid sequence alignments of full-length sequences of all predicted protein sequences using PHYLIP software [20]. Presence and location of signal peptide cleavage sites in MtFLA amino acid sequences were predicted using the SignalP 3.0 server at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/. The presence of a fasciclin-like domain was predicted using interproscan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/InterProScan).
Results and Discussion
Chemical Composition of Alfalfa and M. truncatula Stems
Alfalfa clones 252 and 1283 were identified as part of a long-term breeding program for stem quality traits (Lamb and Jung, unpublished). Chemical composition data from plants grown in field plots over several growing seasons showed that stems of alfalfa clone 252 on average showed consistently higher cellulose (302 ± 3 g kg−1 dry matter (DM)) and Klason lignin (165 ± 1 g kg−1 DM) concentration than stems of alfalfa clone 1283 (cellulose 273 ± 2 g kg−1 DM and Klason lignin 144 ± 1 g kg−1 DM; Lamb and Jung, unpublished). Greenhouse grown mature stem tissues of these clones collected at the same time as the stem samples for the current microarray analysis also showed significant differences for almost all chemical composition variables evaluated [66]. As expected, stems of alfalfa clone 252 displayed significantly higher cellulose and Klason lignin concentration than stems of alfalfa clone 1283. Significant variations were also observed in cell wall uronic acids, arabinose, galactose, and rhamnose concentrations between the two alfalfa clones [66]. In alfalfa, these cell wall monosaccharides were previously shown to be the primary components of pectin [28], indicating that pectin content was considerably higher in stems of clone 1283 compared to stems of clone 252.
The two M. truncatula germplasms used in this study differ significantly in both stem structure and cell wall composition. Stems of A17 showed significantly higher cellulose (421 g kg−1 cell wall) and hemicellulose (154 g kg−1 cell wall) content than stems of DZA (cellulose = 387 g kg−1 cell wall and hemicellulose = 141 g kg−1 cell wall), while DZA stems showed significantly higher pectin content than A17 stems [54]. M. truncatula A17 displayed significantly longer internodes than did DZA [54], consistent with the recent report by Juliet et al. [37], who also noted a thicker stem diameter in DZA plants than stem diameter in A17 plants. In contrast, there was comparable Klason lignin content between A17 and DZA stems [54].
These four germplasms were used for identifying robust expression patterns in cell wall-related genes occurring in Medicago stems regardless of variation in cell wall content or stem growth patterns. The study also will serve as a baseline for later identification of genes underlying biological variation in cell wall synthesis.
Overview of Microarray Results
The Affymetrix Medicago genome array was utilized for global transcript profiling of young (elongating) and old (postelongation) stem segments collected from the alfalfa and M. truncatula plants described above. The alfalfa plants were greenhouse grown, while the M. truncatula plants were grown in growth chambers. Consequently, the stem microarray data were analyzed separately for alfalfa and M. truncatula. Signal intensity values were assessed for variability of gene expression data among the three biological replicates of each genotype. Correlation coefficients among the three biological replicates were very high, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99, providing adequate statistical power for identification of differentially expressed probe sets between young and old stem segments of alfalfa and M. truncatula.
Principal component analysis of the stem microarray data indicated that all three biological replicates of each genotype of M. truncatula and alfalfa clustered tightly together (Fig. 1a, b), substantiating the very high correlation coefficients seen among the three biological replicates. In M. truncatula data, the first two principal components accounted for approximately 85% of the total gene expression variation. The second principal component (PCA 2) separated two distinct clusters of data: young versus old stem segments (Fig. 1a), indicating this component represented gene expression variation based on stem developmental stages, regardless of the M. truncatula accessions used in the study. In alfalfa microarray data, a large proportion (82%) of the gene expression variation was also explained by the first two principal components. PCA 2 explained nearly 3% of the total gene expression variation. Along PCA 2, there were four identifiable clusters of gene expression data (Fig. 1b), suggesting that PCA 2 is a measure of gene expression variation between alfalfa clones as well as stem developmental stages.
The number of probe sets detected in stem segments of the two M. truncatula accessions was considerably more than the number of probe sets detected in stem segments of the two alfalfa clones. The percentages of detected probe sets in stem segments of DZA and A17 were 45% and 47% of all the probe sets on the chip, respectively (Supplemental Table S1). An average of 34% of the probe sets on the chip produced signal intensity values with stem samples from the two alfalfa clones (Supplemental Table S1). In our previous work, an average of 46% and 54% of the Medicago probe sets on the chip produced present calls when hybridized with mRNA from M. truncatula first trifoliate and young roots, respectively [60]. A lower percentage, 41% and 44%, of detected probe sets was observed for developmentally comparable alfalfa first trifoliate and young roots, respectively [60]. These results are consistent with the fact that the majority (96%) of the target probe sets were designed from nucleotide sequence information of M. truncatula A17 [1]. Only 4% of the Medicago probe sets were based on nucleotide sequences from alfalfa cDNA libraries.
Hundreds of Differentially Expressed Probe Sets in Young and Old Stem Segments Show Similar Patterns of Expression in M. truncatula and Alfalfa
There was a very high degree of overlap in the sets of probe sets detected in young and old stem segments; approximately 98% of the total probe sets detected in each Medicago germplasm were expressed in both young and old stem segments (Supplemental Table S1). A t test (p < 0.05) in combination with the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate [4] was employed for each Medicago germplasm to identify probe sets with significant transcript differences between young and old stem segments. Consistent with the total number of hybridizing probe sets, the numbers of probe sets significantly differentially expressed between young and old stem segments in both M. truncatula accessions were considerably higher than the numbers of probe sets significantly differentially expressed between young and old stem segments in the two alfalfa clones. Approximately 5,117 and 6,638 probe sets showed significantly different expression patterns between young and old stem segments of DZA and A17, respectively. Of the differentially expressed probe sets in A17 and DZA, 2,629 probe sets were in common between A17 and DZA (Fig. 2; Supplemental Table S2A). Of these, approximately 42% of differentially regulated probe sets showed increased transcript accumulation in old stem segments of A17 and DZA. A further 73 probe sets were uniquely expressed in old stem segments of both A17 and DZA, while 67 probe sets were uniquely expressed in young stem segments of both A17 and DZA.
For the alfalfa clones, approximately 1,384 and 383 probe sets were significantly differentially expressed between young and old stem segments of 252 and 1283, respectively. Of the differentially expressed probe sets in the alfalfa clones, 119 probe sets were in common to both 252 and 1283 (Fig. 2; Supplemental Table S2B). Approximately 13% of the differentially expressed probe sets showed significantly more transcript accumulation in old stem segments of the alfalfa clones. A further four probe sets were uniquely expressed in old stem segments, while 65 probe sets were uniquely expressed in young stem segments of both 252 and 1283. Overall, 52 probe sets were differentially expressed between stem segments across all four Medicago germplasms evaluated.
Functional Classification of Differentially Expressed Probe Sets and Visual Display Using MapMan Software
The differentially expressed probe sets between young and old stem segments of M. truncatula and alfalfa were assigned to functional categories as described in the “Methods”. Functional classification of the 2,629 differentially expressed probe sets in young and old stem segments of the two M. truncatula accessions showed that numerous genes have predicted roles in transcriptional regulation and signal transduction (8%), primary and secondary metabolism (19%), as well protein modification and degradation (10%). A similar functional approach was used to classify the 119 differentially regulated probe sets in stem segments of alfalfa clones 252 and 1283. The largest putative functional categories included transcriptional regulation and signal transduction (9%), primary and secondary metabolism (26%), as well as enzyme families (14%) and transport function (8%).
To gain an overview of cellular and metabolic functional categories, the transcriptional profiles of the 2,629 differentially regulated probe sets in M. truncatula stem segments were visually displayed using MapMan software [61], as modified recently for the Medicago GeneChip [66]. The overview of cellular functions presented in Supplemental Figure S1 showed that probe sets with significantly higher transcript accumulation in young stem segments were largely categorized in DNA repair and synthesis, cell division, cell cycle and cell organization, hormone-related signaling, and enzyme family classes. On the other hand, many probe sets with significantly higher transcript abundance in old stem segments of M. truncatula have predicted function in regulation of transcription, hormone-related signaling, protein modification, and degradation (Supplemental Fig. S1).
An overview of differentially regulated probe sets representing metabolism and regulatory functions in M. truncatula is presented in Fig. 3a, b. Genes with higher transcript abundance in young stem segments include many implicated in lipid and flavonoid metabolism and cell wall degradation and modification, among other metabolic classes. In contrast, genes with significantly higher transcript abundance in old stem segments of M. truncatula were implicated in cellulose synthesis, regulation of transcription (transcription factors), signaling (receptor kinases and auxin-mediated signaling), protein modification, and protein degradation (Fig. 3a, b).
Genes Associated with Wall Modification Show Enhanced Expression in Young Stem Segments of Medicago
Cell wall-related genes that were differentially expressed between young and old stem segments were identified. Those genes with significantly higher transcript abundance in young stem segments of M. truncatula and alfalfa are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. In young stem segments, most upregulated and/or preferentially expressed cell wall-related genes include expansins, beta-galactosidase, glycosyl hydrolase, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XET/XTH), proline-rich proteins, and fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins (AGP), among others. Many of the cell wall-related genes encode wall modifying proteins that play important roles in the relaxation of the rigid primary cell wall to allow elongation and extension during plant growth [11, 21, 22, 48]. We observed upregulated expression of two probe sets encoding XTHs, together with a uniquely expressed XET probe set (Mtr.45463.1.S1_at) in young stem segments of M. truncatula. There were also four expansin-like probe sets (Mtr.37590.1.S1_s_at, Mtr.9830.1.S1_at, Mtr.6653.1.S1_s_at, and Msa.1714.1.S1_at) that showed upregulated expression in young stem segments of M. truncatula. Expansins are thought to be distributed primarily over the expanding cell wall and function as cell wall loosening proteins [48]. Our observations for the increased transcript accumulation of expansins, XTHs, and XET in young stem segments are consistent with the view that these cell wall proteins are expected to be predominantly active in primary walls of elongating tissues during plant growth [11, 21, 22, 48].
A number of probe sets that were upregulated in young stem segments of M. truncatula and alfalfa belong to genes encoding hydrolytic enzyme classes that appear to be involved in cell wall break down. Such genes include several homologs of glucanases, glucosyl hydrolases, and galactosidases, whose functions are largely related to cell wall expansion through hydrolysis of the pectin matrix (Tables 1 and 2).
Expression Patterns of Selected Marker Genes for Secondary Cell Wall Deposition Support Our Stem Segments Sampling Approach
Approximately 42% of the differentially expressed probes sets showed significantly upregulated expression in old stem segments of M. truncatula. Many genes that were upregulated in old stem segments showed similarities with proteins associated with secondary cell walls including cellulose synthases (CESA), COBRA-like protein 4 precursor (COBL4), never in mitosis gene A (NIMA)-related protein kinase, peroxidise, 4-coumarate:CoA ligase, cytochrome P450, cinnamyl alchol dehydrogenase, and some fasciclin-like AGPs (Tables 3 and 4). COBL4, some members of the CESA family, as well as selected lignin biosynthesis genes, are known marker genes for secondary wall biosynthesis in plants [6, 7, 46]. Our transcript profiling results coincide well with upregulated expression patterns of such secondary cell wall marker genes in old stem segments and appears to provide strong support for our stem segment sampling approach for studying cell wall genomics in Medicago. In most previously reported studies using different stem segments, transcript abundance of secondary cell wall marker genes including those involved in lignification was the highest in older stem segments and showed a decreased pattern of expression in stem segments near the apical meristem [7, 17, 49].
In Arabidopsis, the extracellular glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchored protein COBL4 appears to participate in cell expansion and was required for cellulose biosynthesis in secondary walls [6, 7, 52, 53]. Mutation of the Arabidopsis COBL4 gene (At5g15630) by T-DNA insertion resulted in plants showing a moderate irregular xylem (irx6) phenotype with significantly reduced levels of cellulose stem strength that resulted in mutant plants with easily broken stems [7]. A rice mutant described as brittle culm1 (bc1) was found to be a functional ortholog of the AtCOBL4 gene, as mutations in the rice gene resulted in reduced cell wall thickness affecting the mechanical strength of rice plants [40]. Here, a Medicago homolog of the COBL4 gene (Mtr.5947.1.S1_at) showed more than 23- and 50-fold higher transcript abundance in old stem segments of DZA and A17 compared to young stem segments, respectively (Table 3). This probe set was also upregulated in old stem segments of both alfalfa clones.
The Arabidopsis genome contains a superfamily of approximately 41 predicted CESA-like genes [30, 50], and the differential expression pattern of CESA genes in primary versus secondary cell walls is well documented. Based on genetic experiments and gene-expression analyses, three Arabidopsis CESA genes (AtCesA1, AtCesA3, and AtCesA6) typify primary walls and are coexpressed during primary cell wall formation [47], while three other CESA genes (AtCesA4/IRX5, AtCeSA7/IRX3, and AtCeSA8/IRX1) are involved in cellulose biosynthesis in secondary cell walls [47, 58, 59, 62]. In Arabidopsis, mutations of certain CESA genes resulted in the collapse of the secondary cell wall of xylem (irregular xylem), indicating that CESA genes are required for biosynthesis of secondary cell walls [62]. The Medicago chip contains approximately 28 probe sets encoding CESA genes. One CESA probe set (Mtr.33499.1.S1_at) was uniquely expressed in old stem segments of both A17 and DZA, while 15 other CESA probe sets showed particularly high transcript abundance in old stem segments of A17 and DZA (Fig. 4). The remaining Medicago CESA probes showed increased transcript abundance in young stem segments.
Differentially Expressed Transcription Factors and Signal Transduction Genes Suggest Transcriptional Control of Stem Development and Growth in Medicago
Transcription factors are key global regulators of gene expression and are known to play critical roles in many biological processes, including the regulation of cell wall development in plants. In Arabidopsis, TF-encoding genes make up approximately 6% (about 1,800) of the total number of genes including about 72 WRKY family genes, more than 600 zinc finger proteins, and 199 MYB and MYB-related transcription factors [19, 27, 51, 57]. Sequencing of the M. truncatula genome is in progress. Using BLAST analysis of the available M. truncatula genome sequencing data, Udvardi et al. [63] identified about 1,084 TF genes. We found that the Affymetrix Medicago chip contains approximately 1,870 probe sets that by amino acid homology could be classified as putative TFs by established criteria (http://datf.cbi.pku.edu.cn/). Approximately 113 putative TF probe sets were significantly differentially expressed in young versus old stem segments of both A17 and DZA; approximately 65% of these TFs showed increased transcript abundance in old stem segments of M. truncatula. The differentially expressed TF probe sets in M. truncatula stems represented 35 TF families (Supplemental Table S3). In alfalfa, approximately five putative TF probe sets were differentially expressed in young versus old stem segments of both 252 and 1283. Differentially regulated TF probe sets in alfalfa stems represented bHLH (Mtr.20533.1.S1_at and Mtr.33785.1.S1_at), CAMTA (Mtr.42126.1.S1_at), and APETALA2/ethylene-responsive element binding protein family (AP2/EREBP; Mtr.2744.1.S1_at and Mtr.41294.1.S1_at) TF families.
The list of differentially expressed TF families in M. truncatula stem segments consists of several plant-specific TF families including AP2-EREBP, auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (Aux/IAA), auxin-responsive factor (ARF), GRAS, NAC, and WRKY families. The precise contribution of the differentially regulated TFs in modulating cell wall biosynthesis in Medicago stems remains to be determined, although some or all of the differentially expressed TFs may have important roles in other plant developmental processes within Medicago stems. Nevertheless, our transcript profiling results were consistent with the lists of putative wall-associated TFs identified by transcript profiling in several plant species [reviewed by 13, 69]. For instance, the Aux/IAA genes are plant-specific TF gene families that participate in auxin-regulated transcriptional control of gene expression [38, 45]. Wall synthesis during plant development and growth was shown to be influenced by endogenous levels of hormones, and additional modifications can be induced by biotic or abiotic stresses [32]. Auxin triggers a specific signal transduction pathway that influences apical dominance, vascular tissue development, cell elongation, and tissue patterning. Expression of Aux/IAA genes is auxin inducible, which is expected to provide a negative-feedback loop for auxin responses by forming homo- and hetrodimers with Aux/IAAs or other TFs such as ARF proteins. There were several ARF probe sets that were differentially regulated in Medicago stem segments.
With regard to signal transduction, at least 4% of the differentially regulated probe sets in young and old stem segments of M. truncatula and alfalfa germplasm encode genes that are implicated in signal transduction cascades. Many differentially regulated signaling genes include homologs of receptor-like protein kinases (RLKs), several GPI-anchored proteins of unknown function, many Ser/Thr protein kinase/phosphatases, and genes with interacting domains such as leucine-rich repeat (LRR) containing protein kinases, enzyme inhibitors, and proteases. RLKs and LRR domain containing RLKs have been implicated in many plant developmental processes including controlling fiber development in cotton [41].
Identification of Additional Candidate Genes for Secondary Cell Walls Through Analysis of Coexpressed Probe Sets with Selected Marker Genes
To further identify candidate genes that may have roles associated with secondary cell wall deposition in Medicago, we extended our analysis to include a large collection of publicly available M. truncatula microarray data for analysis of coexpression patterns using marker genes. Recently, similar coexpression approaches were successfully used in Arabidopsis to identify genes required for cellulose synthesis in primary or secondary cell walls [7, 46]. Marker genes associated with secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis used for the coexpression analysis included three CESA genes (AtCesA4/IRX5, AtCeSA7/IRX3, and AtCeSA8/IRX1) and COBL4 [6, 46, 59]. We used the expression profiles of a CESA gene (represented by Mtr.5123.1.S1_at), as well as a COBL4 homolog (represented by Mtr.5947.1.S1_at), as reference probe sets to identify coregulated genes in the publicly available M. truncatula microarray data. These two probe sets were selected as reference points for our analysis because (a) the deduced protein sequence of Mtr.5123.1.S1_at was the probe set that showed the greatest similarity (approximately 80% amino acid sequence identity) to AtCesA8, which is known to be required for cellulose synthesis during secondary cell wall formation [58]; (b) the deduced protein sequence of Mtr.5947.1.S1_at was the probe set with the greatest similarity (approximately 76% amino acid sequence identity) to that of AtCOBL4, which in prior studies was found to be required for secondary cell wall synthesis and was among the genes that showed a high level of coexpression with secondary cell wall-associated CESA genes [7, 46]; and (c) these two probe sets were among those with highest expression ratios in old stem segments of Medicago.
Our analysis revealed 213 probe sets that were coexpressed (R 2 ≥ 0.7) with COBL4 and/or CESA probe sets (Supplemental Table S4), including those with putative functions associated with cellulose synthesis, cell wall structural components including fasciclin-like AGPs, laccases, peroxidases, and putative signaling and regulators such as no apical meristem (NAM)-like (NAC-like), WRKY, and MYB family transcription factors as well as several receptor like protein kinases (Table 5). Although the coexpressed probe sets implicated in signal response and TF genes have not been investigated experimentally, many of the coexpressed genes suggest novel finds among secondary cell wall-associated genes in Medicago. Our list of coexpressed genes included those that were previously reported to be secondary cell wall coregulated genes [7, 46]. For example, several Medicago fasciclins (MtFLA) were coexpressed with both marker CESA and COBL4 probe sets (Table 5). In previous studies, two Arabidopsis genes, AtFLA11 (At5g03170) and AtFLA12 (At5g60490), were among those that were most highly coexpressed with AtCesA genes required for secondary cell wall formation [7, 46]. Arabidopsis contains at least 21 fasciclin-like genes [36], and a mutation in the fasciclin domain of one of the fasciclin-like genes (AtFLA4) resulted in aberrant cell expansion in Arabidopsis [55]. Plant fasciclins are a subgroup of AGPs that contain unique fasciclin domains that also occur in proteins from bacteria, mammals, sea urchins, and yeast and are thought to be involved in cell adhesion [16, 36]. Fasciclin-like AGPs were highly abundant in Populus spp. with strong preferential expression in xylem cells during formation of cellulose-rich tension wood [2, 39]. Nevertheless, many poplar fasciclins appear to lack orthologs in the Arabidopsis genome [2, 39].
The Medicago chip contains approximately 17 probe sets encoding fasciclin-like genes (MtFLAs). Of these, 11 probe sets were designed from sequences based on gene predictions of the M. truncatula genome sequencing project. The coding sequence of MtFLAs, for which the complete sequence information is available, ranges in size from 931 to 1,971 nucleotides. Our analysis showed that many of the MtFLAs appear to contain several shared features: (a) an N-terminal signal peptide sequence, (ii) 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions, (c) a fasciclin domain, and (d) absence of introns. The exception was a gene represented by probe set Mtr.48645.1.S1_at that displayed two fasciclin domains along the coding sequence and contained a single intron of 673 nucleotides. Proteins encoded by some of the MtFLAs also contained one or two transmembrane domains at their N- and/or C-terminal regions.
In an attempt to construct a MtFLA expression atlas, the tissue-specific and developmental regulated expression patterns of all 17 MtFLAs on the chip were evaluated using the publicly available Medicago microarray data [3, 31] and data from this study. Three expression clusters were evident (Fig. 5). The first expression cluster comprised nine MtFLA probes sets that showed particularly high transcript abundance (more than tenfold difference) in old stem segments compared to young stem segments. Interestingly, these probe sets showed highly coregulated expression patterns with COBL4 and CESA genes (Table 5) and also showed very strong gene expression in petioles, stems, and young roots of 4-week-old A17 plants (Fig. 5). Very strong gene expression by members of this clade was also observed in young nodules of A17 roots at 4 days postinoculation (pi) with Sinorhizobium meliloti, presumably because the young nodule samples also contained some root tissues attached to the nodules. However, very low expression was observed in nodule samples at 10 and 14 days pi, as well as in mature nodules. The second expression cluster comprised three MtFLA probe sets (Mtr.17362.1.S1_at, Mtr.50904.S1_at, Mtr.48994.S1_at) that showed 1.5- to twofold more transcript abundance in old stem segments compared to young stem segments. These probes also showed enhanced gene expression in petioles and stems of 4-week-old A17 plants. The third expression cluster consisted of those MtFLAs (Mtr.17392.1.S1_at, Mtr.37610.1.S1_s_at, Mtr.42768.1.S1_at, Mtr.42950.1.S1_at, and Mtr.48645.1.S1_at) with considerably downregulated expression in old stem segments, indicating enhanced transcript abundance predominantly in young stem segments of A17. Members of this expression cluster also showed downregulated expression in roots, petioles, and stems of 4-week-old A17 plants. These results are consistent with previous genetic analysis and transcript profiling studies that suggested a role for fasciclin-like AGPs in both primary and secondary wall formation [39, 46, 55]. There is limited information in the functional importance of fasciclins in plants.
The phylogenetic position of MtFLAs was compared with FLAs homologs in the poplar and Arabidopsis genomes. We performed multiple sequence alignments of deduced amino acid sequences of 11 MtFLAs for which a complete coding sequence is available, along with the amino acid sequences of Arabidopsis and poplar fasciclins. Amino acid sequences of known classical AGPs were included for comparison in phylogenetic tree construction. In the phylogenetic tree, classical AGPs formed a tight cluster that was distinct from FLAs, while FLAs were clustered in about five subclades (Supplemental Figure S2). In two subclades, which contained one or no Arabidopsis FLAs, numerous MtFLAs were clustered very closely with poplar fasciclins (Supplemental Figure S2).
Conclusions
As an experimental system, the genus Medicago has the advantages of a model plant with ample genetic and genomic resources (M. truncatula) and a cultivated crop (M. sativa) with its economic importance as a forage plant, ability to improve soil fertility status, and potential to be a bioenergy feedstock. The large number of differentially regulated cell wall-related genes in M. truncatula will be valuable for exploring genetic systems controlling primary and secondary cell wall deposition in plants and may facilitate gene discovery and improvement of biomass production of quality traits in cultivated alfalfa or related dicots.
The phylogenetic grouping of the Eudicots shows that the eurosid I clade, in addition to Fabales (legumes), contains the Malpighiales (where polar and willow are placed), among many other woody species [25]. By contrast, Arabidopsis in the Brassicales lineage is found in a different branch of plant species with the Rosids, the eurosid II clade. Beyond legumes, M. truncatula may have utility as a genetic model for cell wall development in closely related woody dicots and offers a new approach to study an expanded repertoire of agronomic traits of value in other crops. Multiple model plants and a systems approach will be needed to decipher the regulation of cell wall biogenesis in plants. It is probable that M. truncatula could help to fill in the knowledge gap concerning divergent genes that cannot be addressed in Arabidopsis. Moreover, M. truncatula, a short-lived annual, will facilitate experimental analysis of gene function that would be difficult in woody dicots including poplar, due to their long generation times.
References
Affymetrix GeneChip Medicago Genome Array. http://www.affymetrix.com/products/arrays/specific/medicago.affx
Andersson-Gunneras S, Mellerowicz EJ, Love J, Segerman B, Ohmiya Y et al (2006) Biosynthesis of cellulose-enriched tension wood in Populus: global analysis of transcripts and metabolites identifies biochemical and developmental regulators in secondary wall biosynthesis. Plant J 45:144–165
Benedito VA, Torres-Jerez I, Murray JD et al (2008) A gene expression atlas of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J 55:504–513
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57:289–300
Bouton JH (2007) The economic benefits of forage improvement in the United States. Euphytica 154:263–270
Brady SM, Song S, Dhugga KS et al (2007) Combining expression and comparative evolutionary analysis. Plant Physiol 143:172–187
Brown DM, Zeef LAH, Ellis J et al (2005) Identification of novel genes in Arabidopsis involved in secondary cell wall formation using expression profiling and reverse genetics. Plant Cell 17:2281–2295
Chen F, Dixon RA (2007) Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat Biotechnol 25:759–761
Choi HK, Kim D, Uhm T et al (2004) A sequence-based genetic map of Medicago truncatula and comparison of marker co-linearity with Medicago sativa. Genetics 166:1463–1502
Cook DR (1999) Medicago truncatula—a model in the making!. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2:301–304
Cosgrove DJ (2005) Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:850–861
Dale BE (1983) Biomass refining: protein and ethanol from alfalfa. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 22:466–472
Demura T, Fukuda H (2006) Transcriptional regulation in wood formation. Trends Plant Sci 12:64–70
DiCostanzo A, Zehnder CM, Akayezu JM et al (1999) Use of alfalfa leaf meal in ruminant diets. In: 60th Minnesota Nutrition Conference, Bloomington, Minnesota, 20–22 Sept 1999, pp 64–75
Downing M, Volk TA, Schmidt DA (2004) Development of new generation cooperatives in agriculture for renewable energy research, development, and demonstration projects. Biomass Bioenergy 28:425–434
Elkins T, Hortsch M, Bieber AJ et al (1990) Drosophilla Fasciclin I is a novel homophilic adhesion molecule that along with fasciclin III can medicate cell sorting. Cell Biol 110:1825–1832
Ehlting J, Mattheus N, Aeschliman DS et al (2005) Global transcript profiling of primary stems from Arabidopsis thaliana identifies candidate genes for missing links in lignin biosynthesis and transcriptional regulators of fiber differentiation. Plant J 42:618–640
Engels FM, Jung HG (1998) Alfalfa stem tissues: cell-wall development and lignification. Ann Bot 82:561–568
Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Robatzek S, Somssich IE (2000) The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 5:199–206
Felsenstein J (1995) PHYLIP (phylogenetic inference package), version 3.57c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Fry SC (2004) Primary cell wall metabolism: tracking the careers of wall polymers in living plant cells. New Phytol 161:641–675
Genovesi V, Fornale S, Fry SC et al (2008) ZmXTH1, a new xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase in maize, affects cell wall structure and composition in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 59:875–889
Girke T, Lauricha J, Tran H et al (2004) The cell wall navigator database. A systems-based approach to organism-unrestricted mining of protein families involved in cell wall metabolism. Plant Physiol 136:3003–3008
Goffard N, Weiller G, GeneBins (2007) A database for classifying gene expression data, with applications to plant genome arrays. BMC Bioinformatics 8:87. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-87
Groover AT (2006) What genes make a tree a tree? Trends Plant Sci 10:210–214
Guillaumie S, San-Clemente H, Deswarte C et al (2007) MAIZEWALL. Database and developmental gene expression profiling of cell wall biosynthesis and assembly in maize. Plant Physiol 143:339–363
Guo A, He K, Liu D et al (2005) DATF: a database of Arabidopsis transcription factors. Bioinformatics 21:2568–2569
Hatfield RD (1991) Alfalfa-stem pectins: enzymic degradation and structural characterization of a buffer-soluble fraction. Carbohydrate Res 212:177–186
Hertzberg M, Aspeborg H, Schrader J et al (2001) A transcriptional roadmap to wood formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:14732–14737
Holland N, Holland D, Helentjaris T et al (2000) A comparative analysis of the plant cellulose synthase (CESA) gene family. Plant Physiol 123:1313–1324
Holmes P, Goffard N, Weiller GF et al (2008) Transcriptional profiling of Medicago truncatula meristematic root cells. BMC Plant Biol 8:21. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-21
Humphery TV, Bonetta DT, Goring DR (2007) Tansley review: sentinels at the wall: cell wall receptors and sensors. New Phytol 176:7–21
Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F et al (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4:249–264
Jackson LA, Shadle GL, Zhou R et al (2008) Improving saccharification efficiency of alfalfa stems through modification of the terminal stages of monolingol biosysntheisis. Bioenergy Res 1:180–192
Jamet E, Canut H, Bourdart B, Pont-Lezica R (2006) Cell wall proteins: a new insight through proteomics. Trends Plant Sci 11:33–39
Johnson KL, Jones BJ, Bacic A, Schult CJ (2003) The fasciclin-like arabiongalactan proteins of Arabidopsis. A multigene family of putative cell adhesion molecules. Plant Physiol 133:1911–1925
Juliet B, Huguet T, Cardon F et al (2007) Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing aerial morphogenesis in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Theor Appl Genet 114:1391–1406
Kalluri UC, Difazio SP, Brunner AM, Tuskan GA (2007) Genome-wide analysis of Aux/IAA and ARF gene families in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Plant Biol 7:59
Lafarguette F, Leplè JC, Dèjardin A et al (2004) Poplar genes encoding fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins are highly expressed in tension wood. New Phytol 164:107–121
Li Y, Qian Q, Zhou Y et al (2003) BRITTLE CULM1, which encodes a COBRA-like protein, affects the mechanical properties of rice plants. Plant Cell 15:2020–2031
Li YL, Sun J, Xia GX (2005) Cloning and characterization of a gene for an LRR receptor-like protein kinase associated with cotton fiber development. Mol Gen Genet 273:217–234
Liu WM, Mei R, Di X et al (2002) Analysis of high density expression microarrays with signed-rank call algorithm. Bioinformatics 18:1593–1599
McCann M, Carpita NC (2008) Designing the deconstruction of plant cell walls. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:314–320
Nieminen KM, Kauppinen L, Helariutta Y (2004) A weed for wood? Arabidopsis as a genetic model for xylem development. Plant Physiol 135:653–659
Overvoorde PJ, Okushima Y, Alonso JM et al (2005) Functional genomic analysis of the auxin/indole-3-acetic acid gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 17:3282–3300
Persson S, Wei H, Milne J et al (2005) Identification of genes required for cellulose synthesis by regression analysis of public microarray data set. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:8633–8638
Persson S, Paredez A, Carroll A et al (2007) Genetic evidence for three unique components in primary cell-wall cellulose synthase complexes in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:15566–15571
Pien S, Wyrzykowska J, McQueen-Mason S, Smart C, Fleming A (2001) Local expression of expansin induces the entire process of leaf development and modifies leaf shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:11812–11817
Prassinos C, Ko JH, Yang J, Han KH (2005) Transcriptome profiling of vertical stem segments provides insights into the genetic regulation of secondary growth in hybrid Aspen trees. Plant Cell Physiol 46:1213–1225
Richmond TA, Somerville CR (2000) The cellulose synthase superfamily. Plant Physiol 124:495–498
Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G et al (2000) Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science 290:2105–2110
Roudier F, Fernandex AG, Fujita M et al (2005) COBRA, an Arabidopsis extracellular glycosyl-phosphatidyl inositol-anchored protein, specifically controls highly anisotropic expansion through its involvement in cellulose microfibril orientation. Plant Cell 17:1749–1763
Schindelman G, Morikami A, Jung J et al (2001) COBRA encodes a putative GPI-anchored protein, which is polarly localized and necessary for oriented cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 15:1115–1127
Schnurr JA, Jung HJG, Samac DA (2007) A comparative study of alfalfa and Medicago truncatula stem traits: morphology, chemical composition, and ruminal digestibility. Crop Sci 47:1672–1680
Shi H, Kim Y, Guo Y et al (2003) The Arabidopsis SOS5 locus encodes a putative cell surface adhesion protein and is required for normal cell expansion. Plant Cell 15:19–32
Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:9440–9445
Strack R, Werber M, Weisshaar B (2001) The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:447–456
Taylor NG, Laurie S, Turner SR (2000) Multiple cellulose synthase catalytic subunits are required for cellulose synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12:2529–2539
Taylor NG, Howells RM, Huttly AK et al (2003) Interactions among three distinct CESA proteins essential for cellulose synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:1450–1455
Tesfaye M, Silverstein KAT, Bucciarelli et al (2006) The Affymetrix Medicago GeneChip Array is applicable for transcript analysis of alfalfa. Functional Plant Biol 33:783–788
Thimm O, Blaesing O, Gibon Y et al (2004) MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 37:914–939
Turner SR, Somerville CR (1997) Collapsed xylem phenotype of Arabidopsis identified mutants deficient in cellulose deposition in the secondary cell wall. Plant Cell 9:689–701
Udvardi MK, Kakar K, Wandrey M et al (2007) Legume transcription factors: global regulators of plant development and response to the environment. Plant Physiol 144:538–549
VandenBosch KA, Stacey G (2003) Summaries of legume genomics projects from around the globe: community resources for crops and models. Plant Physiol 131:840–865
Watson B, Lei Z, Dixon RA, Sumner LW (2005) Proteomics of Medicago sativa cell walls. Phytochemistry 65:1709–1720
Yang S, Xu WW, Tesfaye M et al. Single-feature polymorphism discovery in the transcriptome of tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant Genome (submitted)
Young ND, Cannon SB, Sato S et al (2005) Sequencing the gene spaces of Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol 137:1174–1181
Zhao C, Johnson BJ, Kositsup B, Beers EP (2000) Exploiting secondary growth in Arabidopsis. Construction of xylem and bark cDNA libraries and cloning of three xylem endopeptidases. Plant Physiol 123:1185–1196
Zhong R, Ye ZH (2007) Regulation of cell wall biosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:564–572
Zhu H, Choi H-K, Cook DR, Shoemaker RC (2005) Bridging model and crop legumes through comparative genomics. Plant Physiol 137:1189–1196
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Kevin Silverstein of the Department of Plant Biology and Dr. Wayne Xu of the Super Computing Institute, University of Minnesota, for bioinformatics assistance. We also thank Renee Schirmer, Ted Jeo, and Keith Henjum of USDA-ARS for assistance during alfalfa stem harvest. Mention of a trade mark, propriety product, or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the University of Minnesota or the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products and vendors that might also be suitable.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplemental Table S1
Summary statistics of detected probe sets in M. truncatula and M. sativa stem segments (XLS 22 kb)
Supplemental Table S2A
A list of differentially regulated probe sets in young and old stem segments of M. truncatula accessions A17 and DZA (XLS 694 kb)
Supplemental Table S2B
A list of differentially regulated probe sets in young and old stem segments of alfalfa clones 252 and 1283 (XLS 52 kb)
Supplemental Table S3
A list of differentially expressed TF Family in young and old stem segments of M. truncatula accessions A17 and DZA (XLS 22 kb)
Supplemental Table S4
Complete list of most highly coexpressed probe sets for COBL4 and CESA genes using publicly available microarray data for M. truncatula A17 (XLS 132 kb)
Supplemental Figure S1
Overview of cellular functions with frequency distributions. Expression ratios expressed as old/young stem internodes were log2 transformed and probe sets with less than ±0.33 fold change on a log2 scale (−0.33 ∼ 0.33) are grouped in the central white bar, and probe sets that showed up-regulated expression in young and old internodes are shown as a series of red and blue bars, respectively (GIF 841 kb)
Supplemental Figure S2
Phylogenetic tree of putative fasciclins-like (FLAs) genes. Aligned amino acid sequences of M. truncatula FLAs along with Arabidopsis and Populus spp. FLAs were used for a neighbor-joining tree construction using 100 bootstraps resamplings. Classical AGPs from A. thaliana were used for comparison to outgroup the tree. MtF M. truncatula FLAs, PF popular FLAs, AtF A. thaliana FLAs, AtA classical AGPs from A. thaliana. GenBank accession numbers for Arabidopsis FLAs were AT5G03170, AT2G04780, AT5G03170, AT5G44130, AT3G52370, AT5G06390, AT3G11700, AT1G15190, AT5G06920, AT5G55730, AT3G60900, AT4G31370, AT2G24450, AT5G60490, AT2G35860, AT2G45470, AT3G12660, AT5G40940, AT4G12730, AT2G20520, and AT1G03870; for Populus FLAs were AAT37958.1, AAT37957.1, AAT37956.1, AAT37955.1, AAT37954.1, AAT37953.1, AAT37952.1, AAT37951.1, AAT37950.1, AAT37949.1, AAT37948.1, AAT37947.1, AAT37946.1, AAT37945.1, and AAT37944.1; and for Arabidopsis AGPs were AT3G57690, AT3G13520, AT5G64310, AT1G35230, AT5G65390, AT3G01700, AT2G23130, AT1G68725, AT5G40730, AT5G53250, AT3G61640, and AT5G56540 (PPT 101 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Tesfaye, M., Yang, S.S., Lamb, J.F.S. et al. Medicago truncatula as a Model for Dicot Cell Wall Development. Bioenerg. Res. 2, 59–76 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9034-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9034-1