Abstract
The goal of this perspective is to review how seagrass research has evolved over the past half century to our current state of knowledge. We review how our knowledge of seagrass ecosystems changed from the pre-1970s when so little was known about seagrasses and how it progressed during the next 5 decades when seagrass knowledge rapidly expanded. Here, we concentrate on accomplishments in the areas of reproductive biology and ecology, population biology, seagrass-animal relationships, conservation and restoration, and mapping and monitoring. We also look ahead and discuss some areas that are ripe for future research, especially those employing new mapping and monitoring technologies, improved restoration methods that include multiple genetic variants, rhizosphere studies that result in a deeper understanding of microbial effects on nitrogen availability, sulfide levels and carbon sequestration, and how changing climatic regimes and tropicalization will likely affect temperate and tropical seagrass-dominated ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Seagrasses are highly productive habitat-forming foundation species that thrive in shallow estuarine and coastal regions throughout the world, with the exception of the most polar seas. The habitats provided by seagrasses are critically important, providing numerous ecosystem services that include serving as nurseries for the juveniles of many economically important fishery species and enhancing local biodiversity (Lefcheck et al. 2019; Unsworth et al. 2022). They also contribute to ecosystem function by sequestering carbon, reducing the abundance of human pathogens, and providing forage for threatened mega-herbivores like dugongs, manatees, and green turtles (Fig. 1 from Orth et al. 2006a; Beck et al. 2001; Barbier et al. 2011; Fourqurean et al. 2012; Lamb et al. 2017; Unsworth et al. 2018, 2022).
Like many other ecosystems, seagrass meadows have been in global decline throughout the twentieth century due to a multitude of factors (Waycott et al. 2009; Dunic et al. 2021) (Fig. 1). Their depth limits are controlled by light (Duarte 1991), and their high light requirements make them particularly sensitive to water quality changes (Dennison et al. 1993), so much so that they often serve as sentinels and harbingers of declining environmental conditions (Orth et al. 2006a, 2017a; Unsworth et al. 2022). However, they now face new challenges associated with accelerating global environmental change, including warming temperatures and associated tropicalization, ocean acidification, increasing coastal eutrophication, and reductions in light and dissolved oxygen concentrations (Short and Neckles 1999; Duarte 2002; Hyndes et al. 2016; Zimmerman 2021; Guerrero-Meseguer et al. 2020; Turschwell et al. 2021).
After five decades of progress in understanding their biology, ecology, and the value of the many services they provide, we have a greater understanding than ever of the continuing threats facing seagrasses worldwide. During these five decades, there have been paradigm shifts in our understanding of seagrass biology and the fundamental processes that underpin the functioning of seagrass meadows. Despite these advances, seagrass science is still a young sub-discipline, with many recent and ongoing discoveries arising from the growing number of researchers now fully engaged in seagrass study, demonstrating that we still have much to learn to properly conserve, manage, and restore these iconic ecosystems.
We review how knowledge of seagrass ecosystems progressed and expanded from the pre-1970s to the present. Next, we describe major accomplishments in seagrass science, concentrating on reproductive biology and ecology, seagrass-animal relationships, conservation and restoration, and mapping and monitoring. Finally, we offer our perspectives on areas that are ripe for future research.
A Short History of Seagrass Science and Conservation
Seagrass Research Prior to 1970
While seagrasses exist in most inhabited coastal areas of the world, peer-reviewed publications on seagrasses were rare prior to 1970 (Fig. 2). Historically, some species of seagrasses had been valued for their uses in weaving hats and baskets, home insulation, fertilizer, and roofing material (Orth et al. 2020). Eelgrass (Zostera marina) in northern European waters was long valued as habitat for a diverse faunal assemblage, which was thought to contribute to high fish production (Petersen 1918) (Fig. 3a). Although research on the basic biology and ecology of seagrasses in the early part of the twentieth century was rare, the importance of eelgrass was recognized in the 1930s when it disappeared from most areas in the North Atlantic, presumably from the “wasting disease” caused by the parasitic marine slime mold Labyrinthula sp. (Rasmussen 1977; Muehlstein et al. 1991) (Fig. 3a). Although the effects of eelgrass loss had been considered by Cottam (1934, 1935) and Cottam and Munro (1954), the ecological consequences of this dramatic loss of eelgrass were more thoroughly described and summarized much later by Rasmussen (1973, 1977), including shoreline erosion and faunal disappearance, especially the loss of the commercially important bay scallop that was once common along the east coast of the USA (Rasmussen 1977; Thayer and Stuart 1974; Oreska et al. 2017).
There was early research on seagrass-associated fishes and invertebrates in Japan and southern Europe, mainly in the form of surveys of the many and diverse inhabitants of seagrass meadows (see summaries by Kikuchi and Perez 1977; Kikuchi 1980) (Fig. 3a). Some of this work was published in the 1960s in a series of papers that compared the fauna of French Atlantic eelgrass meadows with that of Mediterranean Posidonia oceanica meadows (Ledoyer 1962, 1964, 1966, 1968; Harmelin 1964). In Japan, studies by Kikuchi (1966, 1974) and others (Kita and Harada 1962) documented the diversity of seagrass-associated animals, as well as the role of seagrass as a nursery habitat for juveniles of economically valuable fishes (Kikuchi 1980).
1970s—A Decade of Change
In the 1970s, several notable achievements launched the study of seagrass ecosystems to greater prominence. “Seagrasses of the World” by den Hartog (1970) was published in 1970 with descriptions of the biology, ecology, and systematics of all known species of seagrasses (Fig. 3b). The depth and breadth of this comprehensive, global treatment of seagrasses remain unrivaled today. In 1973, the first International Seagrass Workshop was held in Leiden, The Netherlands, with 37 scientists from 11 countries participating (Fig. 3b). The resulting workshop report served as the nucleus for the first book devoted to seagrasses and their faunal associates (McRoy and Helfferich 1977) (Fig. 3b). A second book (Phillips and McRoy 1980) was also conceived at the Leiden workshop (Fig. 3b). In 1975, the journal Aquatic Botany published its first issue, containing 13 papers on seagrass systematics, biology, and ecology contributed by 18 authors from five countries (Fig. 3b). Together, these early volumes marked a turning point for seagrass research.
The International Decade of Ocean Exploration was also launched in the 1970s and included studies of seagrasses around the world by researchers from a diversity of disciplines (Fig. 3b). Two issues of the journal Aquaculture contributed substantially to the seagrass literature (vol. 4, 1974; vol. 12(3), 1977) (Fig. 3b). During this period, Zieman (1974) described a novel leaf-marking method of measuring seagrass productivity, in which a mark at the base of seagrass leaves serves to identify new material produced during a growth interval (Fig. 3b). This new approach recognized the inaccuracies caused by storage of oxygen in seagrass leaf lacunae when measuring seagrass production via the “oxygen evolution method” and laid the foundation for decades of seagrass production studies. In addition, during this period, Cambridge (1975) described one of the first widespread losses of seagrass due to human activities in Australia’s Cockburn Sound (Fig. 3b). Finally, in 1973, two seagrass papers were presented at the Estuarine Research Federation Conference. This biennial conference (later known as the Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (CERF) conference) subsequently became a focal point for scientific presentations on seagrasses from North America and around the world. However, despite increasing attention devoted to seagrasses as a result of these seminal studies, there still were very few seagrass research papers being published (Fig. 2).
1980s to the Present—Increased Understanding and Heightened Awareness
Expanding Knowledge
Our understanding of seagrass biology and ecology expanded greatly during the past four decades and moved seagrass studies into the mainstream of marine and estuarine research. There were a number of notable events during this period. The 1983 conference of the Estuarine Research Federation (ERF) contained its first session dedicated solely to seagrasses and resulted in a special issue of the journal Estuaries that mainly focused on seagrass faunal relationships (Orth et al. 1984a, b) (Fig. 3c). The International Seagrass Biology Workshop was launched in 1993 and has occurred nearly every 2 years since then at different locations in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North and South America (Fig. 3c). As a result of these successful workshops, the World Seagrass Association was formed in 2000 to facilitate international meetings and provide a forum for the world’s seagrass research community to share information (Fig. 3c).
During these decades, several additional books on seagrasses were published (Larkum et al. 1989; Bortone 1999; Hemminga and Duarte 2000; Short and Coles 2001; Green and Short 2003; Larkum et al. 2006, 2018), and the number of papers published on seagrasses increased dramatically (Fig. 2).
Conservation Action
Conservation efforts for seagrasses have lagged behind many other aquatic and terrestrial habitats, but with the landmark publication on the value of ecosystem services by Costanza et al. in (1997), efforts to protect and conserve seagrasses began to emerge regionally and eventually worldwide. And, as the literature on seagrasses expanded and awareness of their importance increased, governmental and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) around the world began to focus attention on this important ecosystem and how to protect seagrass (Coles and Fortes 2001). In the USA, the National Estuarine Research Reserve System, a network of sites established to protect and study estuarine systems, includes 17 sites with seagrass present. In these localities, a variety of seagrass parameters are monitored annually using identical methods. Other USA federal programs also include seagrass protection or research (e.g., United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States National Park Service, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency), and many states have management agencies and policies designed to protect seagrasses. Furthermore, seagrasses are considered an important “aquatic life use” under the United States Clean Water Act (1972), and thus, federal and state water quality standards and remediation plans (e.g., Total Maximum Daily Load requirements and Watershed Implementation Plans) are specifically designed to maintain or regain this designated use. Similarly, the European Union’s Habitats Directive specifically cites seagrass meadows as special areas to preserve; in certain regions in Canada (specifically the Atlantic Coast), eelgrass is designated as an Ecologically Significant Species (DFO 2009); and seagrasses are identified in policy documents currently in place or planned in India, New Zealand, Australia, and Indonesia. In addition, non-governmental agencies around the world focus on seagrass conservation, education, and research, such as Chesapeake Bay Foundation in the USA, and “Seeds for Snapper” in Australia (Sinclair et al. 2021). Finally, many nations are seeking to incorporate seagrasses and their vast stores of sedimentary carbon into their Nationally Determined Contributions to help meet the climate mitigation goals outlined in the 2015 Paris Agreement.
The United States National Science Foundation funded National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis supported two seagrass working groups that produced significant advances in understanding the fundamental importance of seagrass systems (e.g., as nursery habitats, Beck et al. 2001) (Fig. 3c) and their global decline (Waycott et al. 2009) (Fig. 3c). In 2007, the first global assessment of extinction probability of all seagrass species was conducted at three regional workshops, based on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species criteria. Ten of 72 species of seagrass were found to be at elevated risk of extinction, and three species were considered endangered at that time (Short et al. 2011).
The United Nations Environment Program (2020) published a comprehensive report on seagrasses to raise the profile of this “forgotten ecosystem” in the global conservation community. The report recommended developing a seagrass expert group, constructing a world map of seagrasses, and advocating for financial incentives for seagrass conservation and restoration. On March 23, 2022, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution designating that day as World Seagrass Day (Fig. 3c). In addition, the United Nations included seagrasses in recent proclamations on ecosystem restoration (United Nations 2017) and science-based actions toward resilient and healthy oceans (United Nations 2017). This increasing global awareness of seagrass importance heralds a new era for seagrass research and conservation.
Topics in Seagrass Science, Restoration, and Monitoring
In the following sections, we describe some significant accomplishments in seagrass research, because of, or in fulfillment of, the efforts noted above. We describe how our understanding of certain areas of seagrass science and conservation has changed during the past five decades, including reproductive biology and ecology, plant/animal relationships, trophic ecology and food webs, restoration, and mapping and monitoring. Given the explosive growth of seagrass literature since the 1980s (Fig. 2), we have necessarily drawn from a relatively small group of published papers, and any errors of omission are our own.
Reproductive Biology and Ecology
While seagrasses can grow and spread both asexually via clonal growth and sexually via producing and dispersing seeds, much early work focused solely on clonal growth. Research showed average shoot elongation rates ranging from 2 cm year−1 for Posidonia oceanica to 356 cm year−1 for Halophila ovalis (Duarte et al. 2006). The advent of genetic analysis using microsatellites importantly revealed that clones can be large and very old, with one clone of Posidonia australis, a slow growing species in Western Australia, estimated to span an extraordinary 200 sq. km and be an astoundingly 4500 years old, making it among the oldest single eukaryotic organisms on the planet (Edgeloe et al. 2022). In the Mediterranean, clones of P. oceanica, which covered one to 15 km at different locations, were estimated to be between 80,000 and 200,000 years old (Arnaud-Haond et al. 2012). Additionally, in the Baltic, an eelgrass clone was found to cover 6400 m2 and was estimated to be more than 1000 years old (Reusch et al. 1999). While clonal growth is advantageous for stable environments and perpetuates genetic uniformity, one limitation is the inability to disperse to new environments should conditions deteriorate. Detached vegetative shoots (with their roots and rhizomes) can disperse long distances, but the extent to which, and for which species, these fragments can actually establish naturally and grow into new colonies (Hall et al. 2006; Thomson et al. 2015) remains unclear (Ewanchuk and Williams 1996). However, it is possible that the genetic uniformity of large and very old clones described above could be the result of vegetative fragments colonizing nearby locations, thereby facilitating the spread of the single clone.
The dominance of work on clonal growth hindered our understanding of the mechanisms for, extent of, and relative importance of sexual reproduction. However, during the last two decades, we have learned that sexual reproduction and seed production are important in the biology and ecology of seagrass meadows by contributing to seagrass bed establishment and maintenance, with significant achievements in understanding processes influencing successful seed germination in many species (Orth et al. 2000, 2006b; Brodersen and Ku¨hl 2023). Mechanistically, sexual reproduction was thought to occur primarily through hydrochory, the physical transport of pollen by water movement (see review by Ackerman 2006). However, exciting recent work, first demonstrated in Thalassia testudinum, showed that small invertebrates can act as pollinators (van Tussenbroek et al. 2016). Another recent demonstration of the pollination of a red algal species (Gracilaria gracilis) by the isopod Idotea balthica (Lavaut et al. 2022) suggests that pollination of both seagrasses and algae by animals, something thought to be absent in the world’s oceans (Vermeij and Grosberg 2010), may be more common than previously thought, and much remains to be learned.
The importance of sexual reproduction was first shown by early genetic studies that found many areas with higher than expected genetic diversity, suggesting that seeds contributed to meadow development (Waycott 1995; Reusch 2002). Additional evidence came from a number of studies with different seagrass species that found disturbed meadows to recover more rapidly than would be expected from solely clonal growth (Zostera marina, Plus et al. 2003; Greve et al. 2005; Thalassia testudinum, Whitfield et al. 2004; Posidonia australis, Cambridge et al. 2002; and Halophila ovalis, Preen 1995), and one study concluded that development of new Z. marina patches could have only been established from recruitment of seedlings, rather than entrapment of detached vegetative shoots (Olesen and Sand Jensen 1994). There can also be substantial genetic variability within even small portions of meadows, although the mechanisms responsible for the existence of this variation are incompletely understood (Becheler et al. 2014; Kollars et al. 2022).
Research over the last two decades, notably with Zostera marina and Posidonia australis, has shown that these two species have a number of dispersal mechanisms that can move seeds 10 to 100 s of kilometer from the parent plant (Fig. 3c), (e.g., floating fruits or intact flowering shoots with viable seeds, Fig. 4 from Kendrick et al. 2012; Orth et al. 2006b). Both biotic (by ingestion and excretion of viable seeds by vertebrates) and abiotic (by wind and currents) processes have been shown to be important for seed dispersal (Fig. 4 from Kendrick et al. 2012; Harwell and Orth 2002: Sumoski and Orth 2012; Ruiz-Montoya et al. 2012, 2015; Tol et al. 2017), and in one case with Halodule wrightii, a significant distance attributed to active dispersal agents (Tavares et al. 2023). A surprising observation was that some seeds do not move far after settling on the sediment surface, remaining near the parent plant (Orth et al. 1994; Manley et al. 2015; Hosokawa et al. 2015; Li et al. 2018; Kendrick et al. 2019a). Bioturbation and physical processes appear to contribute to seed retention, rapid burial, or loss of settled seeds (Luckenbach and Orth 1999; Delefosse and Kristensen 2012; Blackburn and Orth 2013; Statton et al. 2017). Similar to the fate of seeds in the terrestrial environment (Janzen 1970), predation can result in significant loss of seagrass seeds (Fishman and Orth 1996; Orth et al. 2006c).
Seagrass-Animal Relationships
Animal Communities
Many early studies of seagrass inhabitants in Japan and Europe (see references above) were primarily descriptive, highlighting the richness and abundance of the seagrass-associated faunal community, and demonstrating that seagrasses supported a much more diverse and abundant faunal assemblage than nearby unvegetated habitats (Orth et al. 1984a, b). During the 1970s, many experiments were conducted to attempt to elucidate mechanisms that could explain these differences, such as evaluations of the protection seagrass could provide prey from their predators (Orth et al. 1984a, b). For example, Heck and Orth (1980), building on the experimental results of Nelson (1979) and Stoner (1979), hypothesized that seagrass epifauna density increased with seagrass leaf area by reducing foraging success of larger fish, but only up to the point where shoot densities were so high that meadows became anoxic at night due to increased respiration. At the same time, observational surveys attempted to discern general trends in the macroecology of seagrass and associated fauna over latitudinal scales (Virnstein et al. 1984).
Experiments over the next several decades showed that the relationship between plant cover and animal abundance had been oversimplified by early studies. The large number of manipulative experiments over this time period, both from the field and the laboratory, revealed latitudinally dependent complex interactions that determine animal abundance (Heck and Wilson 1987; Reynolds et al. 2018) (Fig. 5). These interactions involve not just plant characteristics (e.g., surface area, shoot density, biomass, morphology, chemical exudates, or arrangement of shoots; (Heck and Orth 2006)), but also characteristics of the meadow, such as patchiness, size and shapes of patches, edges vs. interiors, and depth (Bologna and Heck 1999; Hovel and Lipcius 2001; Boström et al. 2006; Yeager et al. 2016; Hyndes et al. 2018; Whippo et al. 2018; Stark et al. 2020). In addition, animal characteristics (e.g., behavior, reproductive strategy, size of prey and their coloration, predator foraging behavior, and even larval supply) were found to be important in defining distributional patterns (Orth 1975, 1992; Main 1985, 1987; James and Heck 1994; Yeager et al. 2019). Finally, physical characteristics of the environment can be equally important (e.g., salinity, sediment type, currents, season; Orth 1973; Irlandi and Peterson 1991; Stark et al. 2020).
Heck (2019) summarized how scientific understanding evolved concerning the role of seagrass biomass in protecting small invertebrates from predation. Early experiments documenting positive relationships between seagrass biomass and survivorship of small invertebrate prey were largely carried out in laboratory mesocosms with a single predator present (e.g., Nelson 1979; Heck and Thoman 1984). These lab results were confounded by the decreasing rate that the predator encountered prey as vegetation biomass increased. In nature, as seagrass density increases, so does the abundance of both predators and prey (Heck and Orth 1980; Wyda et al. 2002). Subsequent experiments that allowed numbers of both predators and prey to increase with vegetation density found that although the presence of vegetation improved survival of prey, there was no major effect of the density of the vegetation (Fig. 6; Mattila et al. 2008; Canion and Heck 2009; Scheinin et al. 2011). Therefore, sparse seagrass densities provided the same relative degree of shelter from predation as did high densities, with the consequence that sparse patches of seagrass also deserve protection and preservation. A related conclusion about the value of small, sparse patches of seagrass in supporting diverse animal assemblages has been shown experimentally by both Lefcheck et al. (2016) and Gagnon et al. (2021).
Seagrass Epiphytic Grazers
Another major advance during the past 40 years has been the recognition of the functional importance of epifauna to seagrass meadow health. Historically, while it was recognized that grazing by mobile epifauna regulated abundance of epiphytic organisms, little attention was paid to the possible indirect effects of small mesograzers. However, this changed dramatically following research in the 1980s that suggested that removal of epiphytic cover could have an indirect, positive influences on seagrass growth (van Montfrans et al. 1984; Neckles et al. 1993). This finding led to increasing interest in the role that small grazers played in seagrass meadows around the world (e.g., Duffy et al. 2003; Moksnes et al. 2008; Baden et al. 2010). An important meta-analysis reported that mesograzer abundance explained at least as much, if not more, variance in the abundance of light-blocking epiphytes on seagrass leaves as nutrient concentrations (Fig. 3c; Hughes et al. 2004). This was further rigorously tested in the Zostera Experimental Network (ZEN), a global network of researchers studying eelgrass-epifauna (Fig. 3c), (Reynolds et al. 2018; Duffy et al. 2015). These and earlier experiments have consistently shown that food web alterations (e.g., trophic cascades caused by overfishing) can indirectly produce changes in mesograzer abundance that alter the abundance of epiphytes and, ultimately, seagrass health (Douglass et al. 2007; cf Fig. 7, Heck and Valentine 2007; Valentine and Duffy 2006; Valentine and Heck 2020; Gagnon et al. 2021). More diverse seagrass assemblages than those usually occurring in temperate eelgrass meadows also show important top-down effects of food web alterations (Fig. 7), although the food webs of these assemblages can include omnivorous organisms that consume both mesograzers and epiphytic algae, such as pinfish (Lagodon rhomboides), and produce more complicated outcomes (Heck et al. 2000; see review by Duffy et al. 2014).
Seagrasses as Nursery Habitats
The impressive faunal abundance and diversity in seagrass meadows uncovered by initial studies led to the statement in many subsequent papers that seagrass beds were nurseries for a variety of fish and invertebrates with complex life cycles. However, it later became apparent that there was no clear definition of nursery habitat. This issue was resolved by Beck et al. (2001) who defined a nursery as a habitat for juveniles of a particular species if its contribution, per unit area, to the production of individuals that recruit to adult populations is greater, on average, than the production from other habitats in which juveniles occur (Fig. 3c). This definition has not been without its critics (Dahlgren et al. 2006; Sheaves et al. 2006; Fodrie et al. 2009; Sheaves 2009), who proposed the concept of a “seascape nursery,” that includes not only one, but several habitats, that are used during different portions of a species’ life cycle (Boström et al. 2011; Litvin et al. 2018; Nagelkerken et al. 2015). Most studies of the nursery role in the last two decades have focused on measuring and comparing proxies of production, including density, growth rates, and survivorship, between purported nursery and non-nursery habitats, with literature reviews concluding that structured habitats are crucial to many species of invertebrates and fish, with mangroves and seagrasses emerging as especially important nursery habitats (Heck et al. 2003; Igulu et al. 2014; McDevitt-Irwin et al. 2016; Lefcheck et al. 2019). Documenting the contribution of potential nursery habitats to adult populations remains challenging and usually requires sustained, complicated efforts, such as those that identify the relative importance of putative nursery habitats by matching the otolith chemistries of adult and juvenile fishes over several years (cf. Fodrie et al. 2020).
Food Webs and Energy Flux
Early studies (e.g., Kikuchi and Peres 1977; Kikuchi 1980) established the commonly held belief that, despite their enormous productivity, little seagrass production was consumed by herbivores. Instead, most seagrass production was thought to enter detrital food webs that formed the energetic base of seagrass ecosystems (see review by Mateo et al. 2006). Stable isotope data later showed that seagrass food webs are supported in large part by the consumption of micro algae growing on seagrass leaves and exposed rhizomes, as well as associated green, brown, and red algae, that are consumed by a variety of invertebrate herbivores, rather than by decaying seagrass biomass (e.g., Kitting et al. 1984). However, in contrast to the belief that living seagrass was not often consumed, as early as 1980, Ogden (1980) described how tropical seagrass was consumed by a variety of urchins, fish, and turtles. Since then, seagrass herbivory has been shown to occur commonly in a variety of locations, including the Mediterranean Sea (Tomas et al. 2005; Vergés et al. 2008; Prado et al. 2007), the Gulf of Mexico (Valentine and Heck 1991, 2020; Rodriguez and Heck 2020), the tropical Pacific (Unsworth et al. 2007; Christianen et al. 2014), and the Indian Ocean (Mariani and Alcoverro 1999; Kelkar et al. 2013a, b; Vanderklift et al. 2021). This work demonstrates that a great deal of energy moves through seagrass meadow food webs via direct consumption of living seagrass leaf tissue, especially in lower latitudes (Valentine and Heck 2020).
Restoration
The science of restoring seagrasses, while a young field of research based on the number of published accounts (Fig. 8; Duarte et al. 2020), apparently had its roots in the late 1930s, after the disappearance of eelgrass in the USA and Europe, and it included some of the first attempts to plant both eelgrass plants and seeds (Addy 1947a, b). Interest in seagrass transplanting occurred in the 1960s and 1970s, with an emphasis on techniques and possible uses for rehabilitating lost or damaged seagrass beds and also as its use as a tool to better understand the biology of seagrasses (Fuss and Kelly 1969; Kelly and Hall 1971; Phillips 1974, 1980; Ranwell et al. 1974; Thorhaug 1974). A significant step in the restoration of seagrasses occurred in 1998 with the publication of the guide for the conservation and restoration of seagrasses in USA (Fonseca et al. 1998) (Fig. 3c). Since that publication appeared, the number of restoration attempts has increased dramatically (Fig. 8; Duarte et al. 2020), as well as a variety of new and innovative methods for transplanting seagrass (Calumpong and Fonseca 2001). These advances include guidelines for seagrass restoration (Short et al. 2002; van Katwijk et al. 2009), incorporating seeds rather than adult plants (Orth et al. 2006b; van Katwijk et al. 2020), positive interactions in restoring seagrasses (Valdez et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2021), animals to enhance restoration (Sievers et al. 2022), multiple plantings of different species (Williams et al. 2017), or modifying planting designs by clumping plants to ameliorate physical stresses (Temmink et al. 2020).
Restoration efforts have been mainly in the USA (van Katwijk et al. 2016; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022), Europe (van Katwijk et al. 2016), and Australia (Statton et al. 2018; Tan et al. 2020). However, an analysis of many of these attempts found that most failed to produce significant increases in seagrass coverage. Exceptions occurred for large-scale efforts that incorporated many shoots or propagules (van Katwijk et al. 2016), and suggesting a minimum threshold size was required for successful restoration. This was the case in a large-scale seed-based eelgrass restoration effort in Virginia’s coastal lagoons (Orth et al. 2020). There, over two decades, more than 70 million seeds were broadcast into 516 individual plots into four bays, resulting in establishment and subsequent spread of eelgrass to eventually cover nearly 3612 ha of eelgrass. Coupled with this expansion were documented increases in numerous ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration, animal abundance and biomass, and increased water clarity (Orth et al. 2020). Notable increases in seagrass abundance have resulted from water quality improvements, in numerous locations, such as North America (Greening et al. 2014; Lefcheck et al. 2018), and in Europe (de Los Santos et al. 2019; Dunic et al. 2021), suggesting that seagrasses have the potential to rebound without active restoration if those negative factors preventing survival can be reversed.
Distribution Aspects
Seagrass beds are now being monitored and mapped throughout the world using both field-based and remotely sensed methodologies. The use of remote sensing tools for mapping and monitoring seagrass was recognized over 40 years ago (Kelly 1980) (Fig. 3c), yet initially remote sensing was rarely used to monitor seagrass populations. However, several long-term aerial monitoring programs in the USA were established during this period, and they have provided a valuable record of changes in seagrass cover over large spatial and temporal scales (in Tampa Bay, Greening et al. 2014; in Chesapeake Bay, Lefcheck et al. 2018; in Indian River Lagoon, Morris et al. 2022; and in Florida Bay, Wilson et al. 2020). The availability of mapped seagrass data at many sites over two or more successive periods was instrumental in documenting the worldwide decline of seagrass (Waycott et al. 2009). Monitoring, especially aerial monitoring, has provided important evidence of direct impacts to seagrass, such as by propellers and anchors, dredging, commercial fishing activities, and vessel groundings (Sargent et al. 1995; Walker et al. 1989; Dunton and Schonberg 2002; Whitfield et al. 2004; Neckles at el. 2005; Orth et al. 2002, 2017a, b), and indirect impacts from aquaculture operations have increased over time (Orth et al. 2017a). Dramatic advances in sensor spectral and spatial resolution technologies, mounted on fixed-wing aircraft and satellites, have increasingly been used to accurately measure seagrass distribution and abundance throughout the world (Hossain et al. 2015; Phinn et al. 2008, 2018; Lyons et al. 2011, 2012; Hill et al. 2014; Zimmerman 2021; Fernandes et al. 2022; Carter et al. 2021; McKenzie et al. 2022; Traganos et al. 2022).
Most field-based and remote-sensing monitoring occurs at local levels, but two long-term studies have unified sites around the world into global monitoring networks involving researchers and community volunteers from around the world: SeagrassNet (https://www.seagrassnet.org/), started in 2001, comprises 126 sites in 36 countries, and Seagrass Watch (https://www.seagrasswatch.org/), started in 1998, comprises 418 sites in 26 countries. Both programs incorporate standardized protocols to make worldwide data comparable. More recently, programs like the Indo-Pacific Seagrass Network (https://indopacificseagrass.network/) seek to expand these efforts to incorporate understudied regions, such as those in Eastern Africa and Indian Ocean.
Future Needs
There remains much to be done to better understand the basic biology and ecology of many seagrass species. Some recent papers have listed priority areas for future research in seagrass meadows (York et al. 2017; Larkum et al. 2018; Unsworth et al. 2019, 2022). Below, we highlight some areas that seem to be especially worthy of future in-depth study.
Conservation and Restoration
The science of seagrass restoration (Fig. 3d) has been rapidly incorporating new technologies and new advances in understanding the genetic diversity of different donor populations and the relevance of phenotypic plasticity in seagrass restoration (Hughes and Stachowicz 2004; Procaccini et al. 2007; Hughes et al. 2008; Sinclair et al. 2014; Evans et al. 2017; Pazzaglia et al. 2021a, b). This has been especially true with efforts to restore seagrasses increasing over the last couple of decades (Saunders et al. 2020; Duarte et al. 2020). Future efforts may entail land or water-based nurseries to minimize impacts to donor populations (e.g., rewilding, van Katwijk et al. 2020). However, this should be approached with caution given the possibility of loss of genetic diversity in successively grown generations in nurseries (Conrady et al. 2023). Restoration efforts may also need to examine the importance of scale as larger planting may be more successful, especially if it involves positive species interactions (van Katwijk et al. 2016; Valdez et al. 2020). Finally, restoration activities need to better understand the role of microbes and stressor dynamics and how they can be used to enhance success and decrease recovery times (Wu et al. 2017; Fuggle et al. 2023).
An emerging worldwide challenge for seagrasses is the rapid expansion of aquaculture of shrimp, bivalves, and fish that require placing cages and other structures in shallow waters often occupied by, or adjacent to, seagrasses (Orth et al. 2017a; Smith et al. 2018; Ferriss et al. 2019; Boudouresque et al. 2020; Herrera et al. 2022; Howarth et al. 2022). These aquaculture activities require an understanding of the levels and severity of disturbances they produce on seagrasses and their ecosystem services, as well as an understanding of the tradeoffs necessary to protect seagrasses while maintaining economically important aquaculture activities, especially in developing countries (Herrerea et al. 2022).
Nursery Role for Fish with Complex Life Histories
Definitive evaluations of the nursery role of seagrass meadows for fish species with complex life cycles remain elusive. The most promising approach involves comparing the otolith chemistry between adult fish in adult habitats and juvenile fishes in putative nursery habitats (Gillanders et al. 2003). If the chemistry of the early otolith growth bands of the adults match one of the potential nursery areas, this indicates from which potential nursery area adult individuals originated. As noted above, this type of study has not often been done, as it is costly and extremely labor intensive. Many species that use nearshore seagrass nursery habitats move offshore as adults and are part of very large, panmictic populations, necessitating enormous sample sizes to assess the isotopic contribution of particular potential nurseries. Additional complications emerge from the potential for water chemistry in nursery areas to vary from year to year, owing to differential inputs of elements from surrounding watersheds that can alter their abundance in otoliths, thereby making it important for studies to last more than one annual cycle (Kraus and Secor 2005; Fodrie et al. 2020). Until simpler methods for quantifying relative nursery values, there remains high value in studies that identify the most productive of the different potential nursery habitats and prioritize their protection and conservation.
Distribution Aspects
The 2020 United Nations Report and several recent review papers (Unsworth et al. 2019, 2022) all stress the need to protect seagrasses, and note that the first step in this process is to understand their distribution and abundance by developing maps of seagrass cover and then, if possible, conducting repeated mapping surveys at different scales to better understand their temporal dynamics (Neckles et al. 2012; Coffer et al. 2023). Current monitoring methods include in situ observations, aerial imagery, and satellite imagery (Hossain et al. 2015; Lønborg et al. 2022). Recent advances in remote sensing include higher resolution sensors and the deployment of multiple relatively inexpensive, small satellites, such as those deployed by Planet Earth (https://www.planet.com/) (Fig. 3d), and automated methods, including machine learning and object-based classification. These advances promise to reduce the need for manual interpretation and improve accuracy, which should have the ability to advance the monitoring of seagrass meadows worldwide (Roelfsema et al. 2014, 2015; Ha et al. 2020; McKenzie et al. 2022; Tahara et al. 2022). While satellites provide coverage for many areas that are otherwise not monitored, they often do not capture data over large swaths of open ocean where many small islands occur that have significant seagrass populations. Recently, drones and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) have been added to the toolbox researchers have as options for monitoring and mapping seagrass (Lønborg et al. 2022). The selection of an appropriate monitoring method is often driven by factors specific to the location being surveyed and the questions being raised by researchers and managers. Machine learning developments are reducing the bottleneck between the large amount of imagery being collected and its analysis (e.g., for kelps, Mahmood et al. 2020). In addition to these direct monitoring methods, species distribution modeling may be useful as a mapping technique. This modeling approach uses associated data to predict the location of suitable habitat across large spatial scales and has been used to identify potential seagrass habitat (e.g. Bittner et al. 2020). These new tools may provide more efficient means to map and monitor the significant populations of seagrasses that likely exist in relatively unstudied areas around the world, as well as providing new insight in areas where seagrass research is showing significant advances (e.g., China).
Rhizosphere Dynamics
Many studies in the past several decades have demonstrated the negative effects of high sediment sulfide levels on the performance of several temperate and tropical seagrass species (Apostolaki et al. 2018) (Fig. 3d). Sulfide in the rhizosphere can become elevated in association with water column hypoxia, light reduction, sediment organic enrichment, and a variety of other factors (Borum et al. 2005; Holmer et al. 2009, 2014; Kilminster et al. 2014). One mechanism preventing sulfide accumulation in the rhizosphere is the release of oxygen from young root tips, which corresponds with decreased abundance of potential sulphate-reducing bacteria and decreased sulfide concentrations near young roots (Martin et al. 2019; Scholz et al. 2021).
Relevant to rhizosphere sulfide levels, lucinid bivalves, commonly associated with different species of seagrasses since at least the Eocene (Reynolds et al. 2007), contain sulfur oxidizing bacteria that reduce hydrogen sulfide in the rhizosphere and help maintain conditions favorable for seagrass growth and survival (Reynolds et al. 2007; van der Heide et al. 2012). Recent studies have shown that the strength of lucinid–seagrass (Thalassia testudinum) facilitation increases under stressful environmental conditions, such as reduced light availability or enhanced porewater sulfide levels, and these results support incorporating interspecific facilitation into seagrass conservation and restoration strategies (e.g., de Fouw et al. 2016; Chin et al. 2021). In addition, a paper by Martin et al. (2020) found lucinid endosymbiotic bacteria associated with seagrass roots in the absence of lucinids, indicating that much remains to be understood about the relationships between sulfur oxidizing bacteria and seagrasses.
Few studies have documented the extent to which seagrasses are able to mobilize their roots to forage for nutrients and use nutrient “hotspots” to develop dense root mats (see Furman et al. 2016 for an example). However, there are several examples of filter feeding bivalve associations with seagrass roots and rhizomes that indicate that bivalve excretory products provide nutrients to seagrass roots, while the roots and rhizomes, in turn, provide protection for the bivalves from crabs and other potential predators (Peterson and Heck 1999, 2001). More studies with additional species of seagrasses are needed to better understand the factors determining root growth and foraging to acquire nutrients.
In addition, a recent experimental study has documented the value of root-associated microbiota in Zostera muelleri meadows to alleviate negative effects of nutrient-enriched stress (Fuggle et al. 2023). Functions performed by microbial taxa enriched by nutrients included sulfide oxidation and denitrification, suggesting that seagrass restoration may be improved by enhancing beneficial root-associated assemblages (Fuggle et al. 2023).
Finally, almost completely uninvestigated, with the exception of studies of the consumption of belowground tissues of small seagrasses by mega-herbivorous dugongs (Preen 1995), is the extent to which roots and rhizomes might be fed upon by infaunal invertebrates such as polychaetes. Work on terrestrial grasslands and agricultural fields has shown that belowground consumption of roots and rhizomes is common and can be consequential (e.g., Johnson and Rasmann 2015). To date, the lack of reports of belowground consumption of roots or rhizomes of seagrasses may only reflect a lack of investigation.
Population Biology
Over the years, efforts have been made to study seagrass population biology and make predictions about the growth trajectories of seagrass populations (e.g., the “reconstructive technique” used by Duarte et al. 1994; Durako and Duarte 1997; Short and Duarte 2001; Fourqurean et al. 2003; Marba and Walker 1999), but sufficiently accurate methods remain to be developed. One major unsolved problem in employing modeling to predict seagrass population trajectories is the difficulty in determining the number of individual clones in a given area. In the past few decades, it has become possible to determine both the size and number of clones, but results are dependent on sampling density and distance between replicates (e.g., Sinclair et al. 2014; Edgeloe et al. 2022), and the inability to rapidly identify individual clones in the field remains a significant obstacle.
Carbon Sequestration
Another area of intense investigation and a growing body of literature is the degree to which seagrass meadows sequester carbon, and the likelihood that this carbon will be mobilized or retained when seagrass die-offs occur (Fig. 3d) (Fourqurean et al. 2012; Macreadie et al. 2014). It is clear that healthy seagrass meadows can sequester large amounts of carbon, but the ongoing loss of seagrass meadows globally (Waycott et al. 2009; Rohr et al. 2018; Dunic et al. 2021) raises the unanswered question of whether, and how quickly, seagrass carbon buried in the rhizosphere might be liberated to the atmosphere and add to the accumulation of greenhouse gasses. Adding complexity to understanding how seagrass meadows factor into the global carbon budget is the recent discovery that seagrass meadows are significant emitters of methane (Schorn et al. 2022), a powerful greenhouse gas that could mitigate some of the benefits that the large amount of organic matter buried in the sediments of seagrass meadows could provide. In addition, ecosystem calcification can result in CO2 emissions that far exceed organic carbon burial in areas, such as many tropical locations, where calcification rates exceed primary production and burial (Howard et al. 2018; Van Dam et al. 2021). Clearly, work is needed to more fully understand the net effect of seagrass meadows on greenhouse gasses and its relation to our changing climate.
Effects of Climate Change
Climate change has the potential to alter the dynamics of seagrass assemblages worldwide in both negative and positive ways (Short and Neckles 1999; Duarte 2002; Hyndes et al. 2016; Zimmerman et al. 2017; Zimmerman 2021), and there are likely to be winners and losers. The most immediate effects of increasing water temperatures will likely occur at the boundaries of species’ distributions and eventually lead to general mortality of temperate species and their replacement by tropical species (Fig. 3d) (Moore and Jarvis 2008; Jorda et al. 2012; Valle et al. 2014; Hyndes et al. 2016; Chefaoui et al. 2018; Duarte et al. 2020; Turschwell et al. 2021). Hyndes et al. (2016) suggest that the new temperate species assemblages will not initially resemble either the original temperate or tropical assemblages, and the biodiversity of seagrass meadows may increase substantially until a new equilibrium in the number of species of plants and animals is reached. We also note that seagrasses have evolved under climatic conditions considerably harsher than those of today, with much higher CO2 concentrations (Orth et al. 2006a), and thus might benefit from future higher CO2 levels under certain circumstances (Zimmerman 2021).
Marine heat waves have recently caused massive declines of seagrasses in Shark Bay, Australia, and are likely to become more frequent in the future (Kendrick et al. 2019b). And recent data from Canada suggest that sub-arctic eelgrass populations are not immune to climate warming (Leblanc et al. 2022). In coastal estuaries, additional runoff from increased precipitation has the potential to alter salinities, as well as water clarity, and to negatively influence those seagrass species such as eelgrass that have estuarine populations (Lefcheck et al. 2017). Range expansions and contractions of certain species are certain to occur as evidenced in Florida and Korea (Virnstein and Hall 2009; Kim et al. 2009), although time scales of expansion may ultimately depend on biotic and abiotic factors that influence propagule dispersal (see above). One potential positive influence seagrass that may have in the climate change scenario is reducing ocean acidification effects on bivalve aquaculture (Garner et al. 2022).
Climate change can also influence faunal species distributions, and such changes may have indirect, but large, effects on seagrass distribution and abundance. For example, herbivory is particularly intense in marine environments, with nearly 70% of benthic production being consumed by grazers (Poore et al. 2012). As tropical herbivores expand their ranges poleward in association with warming temperatures, they can and do impose powerful effects on marine communities (Fourqurean et al. 2019). The disappearance of kelp (Ecklonia spp.) and Sargassum spp. beds in southern Japan represents one of the best-documented cases of how this can happen. Several thousand hectares of temperate macroalgal-dominated substrate were overgrazed by rabbitfish (Siganus spp.) and parrotfish (Calotomus japonicus) and converted to rocky barrens, which were subsequently colonized by reef-building corals (Serisawa et al. 2004). Similarly, in southeastern and southwestern Australia, kelp declines, and the appearance of algal turfs followed increased herbivory by tropical fish grazers (Vergés et al. 2016; Wernberg et al. 2016; Zarco-Perello et al. 2019). And in the southern Mediterranean, rabbitfish immigrating from the Red Sea have become increasingly abundant and macroalgae less so (Vergés et al. 2014).
Temperate seagrass meadows are also undergoing tropicalization and experiencing the effects of poleward moving tropical herbivores, although predictions of the expected ecological changes in response to increases in tropically associated herbivores remain to be tested (Heck et al. 2015; Hyndes et al. 2016). Many temperate areas now experience fewer freezes than in the past, and tropical parrot fish and rabbit fish, as well as green turtles, are moving poleward and becoming established in warmer temperate areas (Fodrie et al. 2010; Heck et al. 2015; Rodriguez and Heck 2020, 2021). These herbivores have the potential to reduce the abundance and height of temperate seagrass canopies, reducing formerly lush meadows to the height of freshly mowed lawns, or even to permanently unvegetated substrates (Heck et al. 2015; Hyndes et al. 2016; Rodriguez and Heck 2021; Rodriguez et al. 2022).
Restoration activities will have to be re-evaluated to consider climate change. Locations at the historic latitudinal boundaries of a seagrass species’ distribution may no longer support long-term survival of those species (e.g., Zostera marina in Chesapeake Bay and North Carolina, USA, Posidonia oceanica in the Mediterranean). Alternatively, areas where restoration success was unlikely may become possible restoration sites, such as northern latitudes that are now free of permanent ice. In some areas, planting genetically distinct genotypes adapted to higher temperatures may become necessary.
Concluding Remarks
Scientific understanding of the biology and ecology of seagrass meadows has advanced tremendously since the pioneering work of researchers in the 1960s and 1970s. We now understand the major role that seagrasses play as foundation habitats in coastal waters and have developed estimates of the value of the services they provide, including those of their nursery habitat role, the provision of habitat for rare and endangered species, and many others. The recognized importance of seagrass-provided services has facilitated the global recognition of the value of seagrasses and the importance of seagrass conservation and restoration.
In addition, we now recognize the importance of sexual reproduction and the role of seed dispersal in the development of new meadows distant from parent populations. We also have evidence that small invertebrate species can pollinate seagrass flowers, something completely unanticipated until recently. The elucidation of the full genomes of Zostera muelleri (Lee et al. 2016) and Z. marina (Olsen et al. 2016) (Fig. 3c) opened the door to a multitude of new research in seagrass evolutionary biology, and our ability to determine the genetic identities of donor populations (Lee et al. 2018). And the importance of genetic diversity has facilitated the success of seagrass restoration, something necessitated by the massive decline of seagrass meadows during recorded history.
We have also seen a paradigm shift from the understanding that seagrass detritus was the major source of energy for seagrass-inhabiting animals to the recognition that consumption of algae by mesograzers and living seagrass leaves by macrograzers are much larger pathways for energy flux than the detrital one. And we have learned that important rhizosphere interactions between seagrasses and macrofauna, as well as between seagrasses and microbes, occur, even if we have only begun to understand the details of these interactions.
Recognition of the value of seagrass meadows has led to a remarkable increase in mapping and monitoring of seagrass beds worldwide. Advanced technologies, such as the multiple, small satellites from sources such as Planet Earth, and automated mapping and machine learning tools are making it possible to provide accurate maps of seagrass beds for research managers and other conservationists. At small scales, drones are proving invaluable in examining and mapping features of seagrass beds.
Many advancements in seagrass science noted above have come from research in the USA, Europe, Australia, and Japan, likely due to the significant funding available in these countries. But now, we have both increasing capacity and a strong need to investigate seagrasses outside these areas, particularly in places where people rely on seagrass habitats for meeting basic needs, such as for subsistence fishing. The next generation of seagrass science needs to emphasize inclusion of researchers active in these understudied areas, facilitate open data sharing and knowledge transfer at scientific meetings, and develop Communities of Practice (CoP) for mapping and monitoring.
Finally, it has become clear to us over our 50 years as seagrass scientists that there is no substitute for experiencing the natural environment first-hand. Others have explained the critical importance of understanding the natural history of the organisms inhabiting the ecosystems being investigated (Dayton 2003; Able 2016). New technologies and new methods of data analysis are helping to better understand the details of seagrass biology and ecology. However, nothing can replace experience in the field and its value in the formulation of interesting and relevant hypotheses and ways to test them. This has been and continues to be the gold standard for ecological research. It also is important to emphasize that a great deal of important marine and terrestrial ecology has been done in the past, and there is much to learn from this prior work. Currently, obtaining older papers can be difficult, and journals that limit the number of references included in published papers are leading us to waste time relearning lessons from the past. It is good advice for all serious students of marine ecology to thoroughly search the entire body of existing literature before beginning a research project. There is a world of great research that has been done as noted by the number of new publications reported in Fig. 2, and much can be accomplished by building on this foundation.
References
Able, K.W. 2016. Natural history: An approach whose time has come, passed and need to be resurrected. ICES Journal of Marine Science 73: 2150–2155.
Ackerman, J.D. 2006. Sexual reproduction of seagrasses: pollination in the marine context. Pp. 89–109. In: A. W. D. Larkum, R. J. Orth, and C. M. Duarte (eds). Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation. Springer. The Netherlands. 691 pp.
Addy, C.E. 1947a. Eel Grass Planting Guide. Maryland Conservationist 24: 16–17.
Addy, C.E. 1947b. Germination of eelgrass seed. Journal of Wildlife Management 8: 279.
Apostolaki, E.T., M. Holmer, V. Santinelli, and I. Karakassis. 2018. Species-specific response to sulfide intrusion in native and exotic Mediterranean seagrasses under stress. Marine Environmental Research 134: 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.12.00.
Arnaud-Haond, S., C.M. Duarte, E. Diaz-Almela, N. Marbà, T. Sintes, and E.A. Serrão. 2012. Implications of extreme life span in clonal organisms: Millenary clones in meadows of the threatened seagrass Posidonia oceanica. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030454.
Baden, S., C. Boström, S. Tobiasson, H. Arponen, and P.-O. Moksnes. 2010. Relative importance of trophic interactions and nutrient enrichment in seagrass ecosystems: A broad-scale field experiment in the Baltic-Skagerrak area. Limnology and Oceanography 55: 1435–1448.
Barbier, E.B., S.D. Hacker, C. Kennedy, E.W. Koch, A.C. Stier, and B.R. Silliman. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs 81: 169–193.
Becheler, R., E. Benkara, Y. Moalic, C. Hily, and S. Arnaud-Haond. 2014. Scaling of processes shaping the clonal dynamics and genetic mosaic of seagrasses through temporal genetic monitoring. Heredity 112: 114–121.
Beck, M.W., K.L. Heck Jr., K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gilanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan, and M.P. Weinstein. 2001. Towards better identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51: 633–641.
Bittner, R., E. Roesler, and M. Barnes. 2020. Using species distribution models to guide seagrass management. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 240: 106790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106790.
Blackburn, N.J., and R.J. Orth. 2013. Seed burial in Zostera marina (eelgrass): The role of infauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 474: 135–145. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10103.
Bologna, P.A.X., and K.L. Heck Jr. 1999. Differential predation and growth rates of bay scallops within a seagrass habitat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 239: 299–314.
Bortone, S.A. (editor). 1999. Seagrasses: monitoring, ecology, physiology and management. CRC Press. 336 pages.
Borum, N., O. Pederson, T.M. Greve, T.A. Frankovitch, J.C. Zieman, J.W. Fourqurean, and C.J. Madden. 2005. The potential role of plant oxygen and sulphide dynamics in die-off events of the tropical seagrass, Thalassia testudinum. Journal of Ecology 93: 148–158.
Boström, C., E.L. Jackson, and C.A. Simenstad. 2006. Seagrass landscapes and their effects on associated fauna: A review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 68: 383–403.
Boström, C., S.J. Pittman, C. Simenstad, and R.T. Kneib. 2011. Seascape ecology of coastal biogenic habitats: Advances, gaps, and challenges. Marine Ecology Progress Series 427: 191–208.
Boudouresque, C-F., A. Blanfuné, G. Pergent, C. Pergent-Martini, M Perret-Boudouresque, and T. Thibaut.. 2020. Impacts of marine and lagoon aquaculture on macrophytes in Mediterranean benthic ecosystems. Frontiers in Marine Science 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00218.
Brodersen, K.E., and M. Ku¨hl. 2023. Photosynthetic capacity in seagrass seeds and early-stage seedlings of Zostera marina. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18986.
Calumpong, H. and M. Fonseca 2001. Seagrass transplantation and other seagrass restoration methods. pp.425–444. In: Short, F.T. and R.G Coles (eds.). Global Seagrass Research Methods. Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam. 482 pp.
Cambridge, M.L. 1975. Seagrasses of south-western Australia with special reference to the ecology of Posidonia australis Hook f. in a polluted environment. Aquatic Botany 1: 149–161.
Cambridge, M.L., G.R. Bastyan, and D.I. Walker. 2002. Recovery of Posidonia meadows in Oyster Harbour, southwestern Australia. Bulletin of Marine Science 71: 1279–1289.
Canion, C.R., and K.L. Heck Jr. 2009. Effect of habitat complexity on predation success: Re-evaluating the current paradigm in seagrass beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 393: 37–46.
Carter, A.B., S.A. McKenna, M.A. Rasheed, C. Collier, L. McKenzie, R. Pitcher, and R. Coles. 2021. Synthesizing 35 years of seagrass spatial data from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, Queensland, Australia. Limnology and Oceanography Letters 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10193
Chefaoui, R.M., C.M. Duarte, and E.A. Serrão. 2018. Dramatic loss of seagrass habitat under projected climate change in the Mediterranean Sea. Global Change Biology 24: 4919–4928.https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14401
Chin, D.W., J. de Fouw, T. van der Heide, B.V. Cahill, K. Katcher, V.J. Paul, J.E. Campbell, and B.J. Peterson. 2021. Facilitation of a tropical seagrass by a chemosymbiotic bivalve increases with environmental stress. Journal of Ecology 109: 204–217.
Christianen, M.J.A., P.M.J. Herman, T.J. Bouma, L.P.M. Lamers, M.M. van Katwijk, T. van Der Heide, P.J. Mumby, B.R. Silliman, S.I. Engelhard, M. van De Kerk, W. Kiswara, and J. van De Koppel. 2014. Habitat collapse due to overgrazing threatens turtle conservation in marine protected areas. Proceedings of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences 281 (1777): 20133011. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2890.
Clean Water Act. 1972. Public Law 92–500.
Coffer, M.W., D.D. Graybill, P.J. Whitman, B.A. Schaeffer, W.B. Salls, R.C. Zimmerman, V. Hill, M.C. Lebrasse, J. Li, D.J. Keith, J. Kaldy, P. Colarusso, G. Raulerson, D. Ward, and W.J. Kenworthy. 2023. Providing a framework for seagrass mapping in United States coastal ecosystems using high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117669.
Coles, R. and M. Fortes. 2001. Protecting seagrass: approaches and methods. pp. 445–463. In F.T. Short and R.G. Coles (eds.). Global Seagrass Research Methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 482 pp.
Conrady, M. C. Lampei, O. Bossdorf, N. Hölzel, S. Michalski, W. Durka, and A. Bucharova. 2023. Plants cultivated for ecosystem restoration can evolve toward a domestication syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(20): e2219664120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.22196641
Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260.
Cottam, C. 1934. Past periods of eelgrass scarcity. Rhodora 36: 261–264.
Cottam, C. 1935. Further notes on past periods of eelgrass scarcity. Rhodora 37: 269–271.
Cottam, C., and D.A. Munro. 1954. Eelgrass status and environmental relations. Journal of Wildlife Management 18: 449–460.
Dahlgren, C.P., G.T. Kellison, A.J. Adams, B.M. Gillanders, M.S. Kendall, C.A. Layman, and J.E. Serafy. 2006. Marine nurseries and effective juvenile habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 312: 291–295.
Dayton, P.K. 2003. The importance of the natural sciences to conservation. American Naturalist 162: 1–13.
de Los Santos, C.B., D. Krause-Jensen, T. Alcoverro, N. Marbà, C.M. Duarte, M.M. van Katwijk, M. Pérez, J. Romero, J.L. Sánchez-Lizaso, G. Roca, E. Jankowska, J.L. Pérez-Lloréns, J. Fournier, M. Montefalcone, G. Pergent, J.M. Ruiz, S. Cabaço, K. Cook, R.J. Wilkes, F.E. Moy, G. Muñoz-Ramos Trayter, X.S. Arañó, D.J. de Jong, Y. Fernández-Torquemada, I. Auby, J.J. Vergara, and R. Santos. 2019. Recent trend reversal for declining European seagrass meadows. Nature Communications 10: 1–8.
de Fouw, J., M.A. Sidi Cheikh, M.J. Christianen, K.J. van der Reijden, M. van der Geest, T. Piersma, A.J. Smolders, H. Olff, L.P. Lamers, J.A. van Gils, and T. van der Heide. 2016. Drought, mutualism breakdown, and landscape-scale degradation of seagrass beds. Current Biology 26: 1051–1056.
Delefosse, M., and E. Kristensen. 2012. Burial of Zostera marina seeds in sediment inhabited by three polychaetes: Laboratory and field studies. Journal Sea Research 71: 41–49.
den Hartog, C. 1970. The seagrasses of the world. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dennison, W.C., R.J. Orth, K.A. Moore, J.C. Stevenson, V. Carter, S. Kollar, P. Bergstrom, and R.A. Batiuk. 1993. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation. BioScience 43: 86–94.
DFO. 2009. Does eelgrass (Zostera marina) meet the criteria as an ecologically significant species? DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Advisory Report 2009/018.
Douglass, J.G., J.E. Duffy, A.C. Spivak, and J.P. Richardson. 2007. Nutrient versus consumer control of community structure in a Chesapeake Bay eelgrass habitat. Marine Ecology Progress Series 348: 71–83.
Duarte, C.M. 1991. Seagrass depth limits. Aquatic Botany 40: 363–377.
Duarte, C.M. 2002. The future of seagrass meadows. Environmental Conservation 29: 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000127.
Duarte, C.M., N. Marba, N. Agawin, J. Cebrian, S. Ennquez, M.D. Fortes, M.E. Gallegos, M. Merino, B. Olesen, K. Sand-Jensen, J. Uri, and J. Vermaat. 1994. Reconstruction of seagrass dynamics: Age determinations and associated tools for the seagrass ecologist. Marine Ecology Progress Series 107: 195–220.
Duarte, C.M., J.W. Fourqurean, D. Krause-Jensen, and B. Olsen. 2006. Dynamics of seagrass stability and change. pp. 271–294. In: A.W.D. Larkum, R.J. Orth, and C.M. Duarte (eds). Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation. Springer. The Netherlands. 691 pp.
Duarte, C.M., S. Agusti, E. Barbier, G.L. Britten, J.C. Castilla, R.W. Jean-Pierre Gattuso, T.P. Fulweiler, N. Hughes, C.E. Knowlton, H.K. Lovelock, M. Lotze, E. Predragovic, C. Roberts. Poloczanska, and B. Worm. 2020. Rebuilding marine life. Nature 580: 39–51.
Duffy, J.E., J.P. Richardson, and E.A. Canuel. 2003. Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds. Ecology Letters 6: 637–645.
Duffy, J.E., A.R. Hughes, and P-O. Moksnes. 2014. Ecology of seagrass communities. pp. 271–297. In: Bertness M.D., J. Bruno, B.R. Silliman, and J.J. Stachowicz (eds.). Marine Community Ecology and Conservation. Sinauer, Sunderland MA.
Duffy, J.E., P.L. Reynolds, C. Boström, J.A. Coyer, M. Cusson, S. Donadi, J.G. Douglass, J.S. Eklof, A.H. Engelen, B.K. Eriksson, S. Fredriksen, L. Gamfeldt, C. Gustafsson, G. Hoarau, M. Hori, K. Hovel, K. Iken, J.S. Lefcheck, P.-O. Moksnes, M. Nakaoka, M.I. O’Connor, J.L. Olsen, J.P. Richardson, J.L. Ruesink, E.E. Sotka, J. Thormar, M.A. Whalen, and J.J. Stachowicz. 2015. Biodiversity mediates top–down control in eelgrass ecosystems: A global comparative-experimental approach. Ecology Letters 18: 696–705.
Dunic, J.C., C.J. Brown, R.M. Connolly, M.P. Turschwell, and I.M. Côté. 2021. Long-term declines and recovery of meadow area across the world’s seagrass bioregions. Global Change Biology 27: 4096–4106. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15684.
Dunton, K.H., and S.V. Schonberg. 2002. Assessment of propeller scarring in seagrass beds on the south Texas Coast. Journal of Coastal Research SI 37: 100–110.
Durako, M.J. and C.M. Duarte. 1997. On the use of reconstructive aging techniques for assessing seagrass demography: a critique of the model test of Jensen et al. 1996. Marine Ecology Progress Series 146: 297–303.
Edgeloe, J.M., A.A. Severn-Ellis, P.E. Bayer, S. Mehravi, M.F. Breed, S.L. Krauss, J. Batley, G.A. Kendrick, and E.A. Sinclair. 2022. Extensive polyploid clonality was a successful strategy for seagrass to expand into a newly submerged environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 20220538. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0538.
Ewanchuk, P.J., and S.L. Williams. 1996. Survival and re-establishment of vegetative fragments of eelgrass (Zostera marina). Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1584–1590.
Evans, S.M., E.A. Sinclair, A.G.B. Poore, K.F. Bain, and A. Vergés. 2017. Assessing the effect of genetic diversity on the early establishment of the threatened seagrass Posidonia australis using a reciprocal-transplant experiment. Restoration Ecology 26: 570–580.
Fernandes, M.B., A. Hennessy, W.B. Law, R. Daly, S. Gaylard, M. Lewis, and K. Clarke. 2022. Landsat historical records reveal large-scale dynamics and enduring recovery of seagrasses in an impacted seascape. Science of the Total Environment 813: 152646.
Ferriss, B.E., L.L. Conway-Cranos, B.L. Sanderson, and L. Hoberecht. 2019. Bivalve aquaculture and eelgrass: A global meta-analysis. Aquaculture 498: 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.08.046.
Fishman, J.R., and R.J. Orth. 1996. Effects of predation on Zostera marina seed abundance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 198: 11–26.
Fodrie, F.J., L.A. Levin, and A.J. Lucas. 2009. Use of population fitness to evaluate the nursery function of juvenile habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 385: 39–49.
Fodrie, F.J., K.L. Heck Jr., S.P. Powers, W.M. Graham, and K.L. Robinson. 2010. Climate-related, decadal-scale assemblage changes in seagrass-associated fishes in northern Gulf of Mexico. Global Change Biology 16: 48–59.
Fodrie, F.J., K.L. Heck Jr., C.F.T. Andrus, and S.P. Powers. 2020. Determinants of the nursery role of seagrass meadows in the sub-tropical Gulf of Mexico: Inshore–offshore connectivity for snapper and grouper. Marine Ecology Progress Series 647: 135–147.
Fonseca, M.S., W.J. Kenworthy, and G.W. Thayer. 1998. Guidelines for the conservation and restoration of seagrasses in the United States and adjacent waters. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 12. NOAA Coastal Ocean Office, Silver Spring, MD.
Fourqurean, J.W., N. Marbà, and C.M. Duarte. 2003. Elucidating seagrass population dynamics: Theory, constraints and practice. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 2070–2074.
Fourqurean, J.W., C.M. Duarte, H. Kennedy, N. Marbà, M. Holmer, M.A. Mateo, E.T. Apostolaki, G.A. Kendrick, D. Krause-Jensen, K.J. McGlathery, and O. Serrano. 2012. Seagrass ecosystems as a globally significant carbon stock. Nature Geoscience 5: 505–509.
Fourqurean, J.W., S.A. Manuel, K.A. Coates, S.C. Massey, and W.J. Kenworthy. 2019. Decadal monitoring in Bermuda shows a widespread loss of seagrasses attributable to overgrazing by the green sea turtle Chelonia mydas. Estuaries and Coasts 42: 1524–1540.
Fuggle, R., P. Gribben, and E. Marzinelli. 2023. Experimental evidence root-associated microbes mediate seagrass response to environmental stress. Journal of Ecology 5: 1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14081.
Fuss, C.M., and I.A. Kelly. 1969. Survival and growth of seagrasses transplanted under artificial conditions. Bulletin of Marine Science 19: 351–365.
Furman, B.T., L.J. Jackson, and B.J. Peterson. 2016. Edaphic resource foraging by Zostera marina (L.) patches. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 486: 214–221.
Gagnon, K., C. Gustafsson, T. Salo, F. Rossi, S. Gunell, J.P. Richardson, P.L. Reynolds, J.E. Duffy, and C. Boström. 2021. Role of food web interactions in promoting resilience to nutrient enrichment in a brackish water eelgrass (Zostera marina) ecosystem. Limnology and Oceanography 66: 2810–2826.
Garner, N., P.M. Ross, L.J. Falkenberg, J.R. Seymour, N. Siboni, and E. Scanes. 2022. Can seagrass modify the effects of ocean acidification on oysters? Marine Pollution Bulletin 177: 113438.
Gillanders, B.M., K.W. Able, J.A. Brown, D.B. Eggleston, and P.F. Sheridan. 2003. Evidence of connectivity between juvenile and adult habitats for mobile marine fauna: An important component of nurseries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 247: 281–295.
Green, E.P., and F.T. Short. 2003. World Atlas of Seagrasses, 324. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre: University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Greening, H., A. Janicki, E.T. Sherwood, R. Pribble, and J.O.R. Johansson. 2014. Ecosystem responses to long-term nutrient management in an urban estuary: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 151: A1–A16.
Greve, T.M., D. Krause-Jensen, M.D. Rasmussen, and P.B. Christensen. 2005. Means of rapid eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) recolonization in former dieback areas. Aquatic Botany 76: 291–297.
Guerrero-Meseguer, L., T. Cox, C. Sanz-Lázaro, S. Schmid, L. Enzor, K. Major, F. Gazeau, and J. Cebrian. 2020. Does ocean acidification benefit seagrasses in a mesohaline environment? A mesocosm experiment in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Estuaries and Coasts 43: 1377–1393.
Ha, N.T., M. Manley-Harris, T.D. Pham, and I. Hawes. 2020. A comparative assessment of ensemble-based machine learning and maximum likelihood methods for mapping seagrass using Sentinel-2 imagery in Tauranga Harbor. New Zealand. Remote Sensing 12 (3): 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030355.
Hall, L.M., M.D. Hanisak, and R.W. Virnstein. 2006. Fragments of the seagrasses Halodule wrightii and Halophila johnsonii as potential recruits in Indian River Lagoon, Florida. Marine Ecology Progress Series 310: 109–117.
Harwell, M.C., and R.J. Orth. 2002. Long distance dispersal potential in a marine macrophyte. Ecology 83: 3319–3330.
Harmelin, H.L. 1964. Etude de l’endofaune de “mattes” d’herbiers de Posidonia oceanica Delile. Rec Trav Sta Mar Endoume 31(fasc. 47).
Heck, K.L., Jr. 2019. Seagrass ecosystems: a career long quest to understand their inner workings. Gulf Caribbean Research 30. https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.3001.06.
Heck, K.L., Jr., and R.J. Orth. 1980. Seagrass habitats: The roles of habitat complexity, competition and predation in structuring associated fish and motile macroinvertebrate assemblages. In Estuarine Perspectives, ed. V.S. Kennedy, 449–464. New York: Academic Press Inc.
Heck, K.L., Jr., and T.A. Thoman. 1984. The nursery role of seagrass meadows in the upper and lower reaches of the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 7: 70–92.
Heck, K.L., Jr., and K.W. Wilson. 1987. Predation rates on decapod crustaceans in latitudinally separated communities: A study of spatial and temporal variation using tethering techniques. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 107: 87–100.
Heck, K.L., J.R. Pennock, J.F. Valentine, L.D. Coen, and S.A. Sklenar. 2000. Effects of nutrient enrichment and small predator density on seagrass ecosystems: An experimental assessment. Limnology and Oceanography 45: 1041–1057.
Heck K.L., Jr. and R.J. Orth. 2006. Predation in seagrass beds. pp. 537–550. In: A.W.D. Larkum, R.J. Orth, and C.M. Duarte (eds.). Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation. Springer. The Netherlands. 691 pp.
Heck, K.L., Jr., F.J. Fodrie, S. Madsen, C.J. Baillie, and D.A. Byron. 2015. Seagrass consumption by native and a tropically associated fish species: Potential impacts of the tropicalization of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 520: 165-173 519. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11104.
Heck, K.L., Jr., G. Hays, and R.J. Orth. 2003. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253: 123–136.
Heck, K.L., Jr., and J.F. Valentine. 2007. The primacy of top-down effects in shallow benthic ecosystems. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02819384.
Hemminga, M.A. and C.M. Duarte. 2000. Seagrass Ecology. Cambridge University Press. 298pp.
Herrera, M., A. Tubío, P. Pita, E. Vázquez, C. Olabarria, C.M. Duarte and S. Villasante. 2022. Trade-offs and synergies between seagrass ecosystems and fishing activities: a global literature review. Frontiers in Marine Science 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.781713.
Hill, V.J., R.C. Zimmerman, W.P. Bissett, H. Dierssen, and D.D.R. Kohler. 2014. Evaluating light availability, seagrass biomass, and productivity using hyperspectral airborne remote sensing in Saint Joseph’s Bay, Florida. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 1467–1489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9764-3.
Holmer, M., O. Pederson, and D. Krause-Jensen. 2009. Sulfide intrusion in the tropical seagrasses Thalassia testudinum and Syringodium filiforme. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 85: 319–326.
Holmer, M.O. and H. Hasler-Sheetal. 2014. Sulfide intrusion in seagrasses assessed by stable sulfur isotopes—a synthesis of current results. Frontiers in Marine Science | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2014.00064
Hossain, M.S., J.S. Bujang, M.H. Zakaria, and M. Hashim. 2015. The application of remote sensing to seagrass ecosystems: An overview and future research prospects. International Journal of Remote Sensing 36: 61–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.990649.
Hosokawa, S., M. Nakaoka, E. Miyoshi, and T. Kuwae. 2015. Seed dispersal in the seagrass Zostera marina is mostly within the parent bed in a protected bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 523: 41–56.
Hovel, K.A., and R.N. Lipcius. 2001. Habitat fragmentation in a seagrass landscape: Patch size and complexity control blue crab survival. Ecology 82: 1814–1829.
Howard, J.L., J.C. Creed, M.V.P. Aguiar, and J.W. Fourqurean. 2018. CO2 released by carbonate sediment production in some coastal areas may offset the benefits of seagrass “Blue Carbon” storage. Limnology and Oceanography 63: 160–172.
Howarth, L.M., L.M. Lewis-McCrea, L.M. Kellogg, E.T. Apostolaki, and G.K. Reid. 2022. Aquaculture and eelgrass Zostera marina interactions in temperate ecosystems. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 14: 15–34.
Hughes, A.R., and J. Stachowicz. 2004. Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 8998–9002.
Hughes, A.R., K.J. Bando, L.F. Rodriguez, and S.L. Williams. 2004. Relative effects of grazers and nutrients on seagrasses: A meta-analysis approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series 282: 87–99.
Hughes, A.R., B.D. Inouye, M.T.J. Johnson, N. Underwood, and M. Vellend. 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology Letters 11: 609–623.
Hyndes, G.A., K.L. Heck, A. Vergés, E.S. Harvey, G.A. Kendrick, P.S. Lavery, K. McMahon, R.J. Orth, A. Pearce, M. Vanderklift, T. Wernberg, S. Whiting, and S. Wilson. 2016. Accelerating tropicalization and the transformation of temperate seagrass meadows. BioScience 66: 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw111.
Hyndes, G.A., P. Francour, P. Guidetti, K.L. Heck, and G. Jenkins. 2018. The roles of seagrasses in structuring associated fish assemblages and fisheries. pp. 589–628. In: Larkum, A., G. Kendrick, and P. Ralph (eds.) Seagrasses of Australia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71354-0_18
Igulu, M.M., I. Nagelkerken, M. Dorenbosch, M.G.G. Grol, A.R. Harborne, I.A. Kimirei, P.B. Mumby, A.D. Olds, and Y.D. Mgaya. 2014. Mangrove habitat use by juvenile reef fish: Meta-analysis reveals that tidal regime matters more than biogeographic region. PLoS ONE 9: e114715.
Irlandi, E.A., and C.H. Peterson. 1991. Modification of animal habitat by large plants: Mechanisms by which seagrasses influence clam growth. Oecologia 87: 307–318.
James, P.L., and K.L. Heck Jr. 1994. The effects of habitat complexity and light intensity on ambush predation within a simulated seagrass habitat. Journal of Experimental Biology and Marine Ecology 176: 187–200.
Janzen, D.H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in the tropics. American Naturalist 104: 501–528.
Johnson, S.N., and S. Rasmann. 2015. Root-feeding insects and their interactions with organisms in the rhizosphere. Annual Reviews of Entomology 60: 517535.
Jorda, G., N. Marba, and C.M. Duarte. 2012. Mediterranean seagrass vulnerable to regional climate warming. Nature Climate Change 2: 821–824.
Kelkar, N., R. Arthur, N. Marbà, and T. Alcoverro. 2013a. Greener pastures? High-density feeding aggregations of green turtles precipitate species shifts in seagrass meadows. Journal of Ecology 101: 1158–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12122.
Kelkar, N., R. Arthur, N. Marba, and T. Alcoverro. 2013b. Green turtle herbivory dominates the fate of seagrass primary production in the Lakshadweep islands (Indian Ocean). Marine Ecology Progress Series 485: 235–243.
Kelly, M.G. 1980. Remote sensing of seagrass beds. pp. 69–85. In Handbook of seagrass biology: An ecosystem perspective, ed. R.C. Phillips and C.P. McRoy, 353. New York: Garland STPM Press.
Kendrick, G.A., M. Waycott, T.J.B. Carruthers, M.L. Cambridge, R. Hovey, S.L. Krauss, P.S. Lavery, D.H. Les, R.J. Lowe, O.M.I. Vidal, J.L.S. Ooi, R.J. Orth, D.O. Rivers, L. Ruiz-Montoya, E.A. Sinclair, J. Statton, J.K. van Dijk, and J.J. Verduin. 2012. The central role of dispersal in the maintenance and persistence of seagrass populations. BioScience 62: 56–65.
Kendrick, G.A., A.W. Pomeroy, R.J. Orth, M.L. Cambridge, J. Shaw, L. Kotula, and R.J. Lowe. 2019a. A novel adaptation facilitates seed establishment under marine turbulent flows. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56202-7.
Kendrick, G.A., R.J. Nowicki, Y.S. Olsen, S. Strydom, M.W. Fraser, E.A. Sinclair, J. Statton, R.K. Hovey, J.A. Thomson, D.A. Burkholder, K.M. McMahon, K. Kilminster, Y. Hetzel, J. Fourqurean, M.R. Heithaus, and R.J. Orth. 2019b. A systematic review of how multiple stressors from an extreme event drove ecosystem-wide loss of resilience in an iconic seagrass community. Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00455.
Kelly, J.A., C.M. Fuss, and J.R. Hall. 1971. The transplanting and survival of turtle grass, Thalassia testudinum, in Boca Ciega Bay Florida. Fishery Bulletin 69: 273–280.
Kikuchi, T. 1966. An ecological study on animal communities of the Zostera belt in Tomioka Bay, Amakusa, Kyusha. Publication Amakusa Marine Biology Laboratory 1: 1–106.
Kikuchi, T. 1974. Japanese contributions on consumer ecology in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) beds, with special reference to trophic relationships and resources in inshore fisheries. Aquaculture 4: 145–160.
Kikuchi, T. 1980. Fauna1 relationships in temperate seagrass beds. pp. 153–172. In Handbook of seagrass biology: An ecosystem perspective, ed. R.C. Phillips and C.P. McRoy, 353. New York: Garland STPM Press.
Kikuchi, T., and J.M. Peres. 1977. Consumer ecology of seagrass beds. pp. 147–194. In Seagrass ecosystems: A scientific perspective, ed. C.P. McRoy and C. Helfferich, 314. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Kilminster, K., V. Forbes, and M. Holmer. 2014. Development of a ‘sediment stress’ functional-level indicator for the seagrass Halophila ovalis. Ecological Indicators 36: 280–289.
Kim, J.B., J.-I. Park, C.-S. Jung, and P-YLee and K-S Lee. 2009. Distributional range extension of the seagrass Halophila nipponica into coastal waters off the Korean peninsula. Aquatic Botany 90: 269–272.
Kita, T., and E. Harada. 1962. Studies on epiphytic communities, 1. The abundance and distribution of microalgae and small animals on the Zostera blades. Publication of the Seto Marine Biology Laboratory 10: 245–257.
Kitting, K.L., B. Fry, and M.D. Morgan. 1984. Detection of inconspicuous epiphytic algae supporting food webs in seagrass meadows. Oecologia 62: 145–149.
Kollars, N.M., J.M. Abbott, and J.J. Stachowicz. 2022. Hidden biodiversity: spatial mosaics of eelgrass genotypic diversity at the centimeter to meadow scale. Ecology 103: e3813. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3813.
Kraus, R.T., and D.H. Secor. 2005. Application of the nursery-role hypothesis to an estuarine fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 291: 301–305.
Lamb, J.B., J.A.J.M. van de Water, D.G. Bourne, C. Altier, M.Y. Hein, E.A. Fiorenza, N. Abu, J. Jompa, and C.D. Harvell. 2017. Seagrass ecosystems reduce exposure to bacterial pathogens of humans, fishes, and invertebrates. Science 355: 731–733.
Larkum, A.W.D., A.J. McComb and S.A. Shepherd (editors). 1989. Biology of Seagrasses. Elsevier. Amsterdam. 841 pp.
Larkum A.W.D., R.J. Orth, and C.M. Duarte (editors). 2006. Seagrasses: biology, ecology and conservation. Springer. The Netherlands. 691 pp.
Larkum, A.W.D., G.A. Kendrick, and P.J. Ralph, eds. 2018. Seagrasses of Australia, 797. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Lavaut, E., M.-L. Guillemin, S. Colin, A. Faure, J. Coudret, C. Destombe, and M. Valero. 2022. Pollinators of the sea: A discovery of animal-mediated fertilization in seaweed. Science 377: 528–530.
Leblanc, M.-L., M.I. O’Connor, Z.Z.A. Kuzyk, F. Noisette, K.E. Davis, E. Rabbitskin, L.-L. Sam, U. Neumeier, R. Costanzo, J.K. Ehn, D. Babb, C.J. Idrobo, J.-P. Gilbert, B. Leblon, and M.M. Humphries. 2022. Limited recovery following a massive seagrass decline in subarctic eastern Canada. Global Change Biology 29: 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16499.
Ledoyer, M. 1962. Etude de la faune vagile des herbiers de superficiels de Zosteracees et de quelques biotopes d’algues infralittorales. Rev. Trav. Sta. Mar. Endoume 25: 117–236.
Ledoyer, M. 1964. La faune vagile des herbiers de Zostera marina et le quelques biotopes d’algues infralittorales dans la zone intertidale en Manche et comparaison avec de milieux Mediterraneens identifique. Recl. Trav Station Marine Endoune 34: 227–240.
Ledoyer, M. 1966. Ecologie de la faune vagile des biotopes Mediteraneens accessibles en scaphandre autonome II : Donnees analystiques sur les herbiers de phnanerogames (I). Rev. Trav. Sta. Mar. Endoume 41: 135–164.
Ledoyer, M. 1968. Ecologie de la fuane vagile des biotopes Mediterranees accessibles en scaphandre autonome. IV. Synthese de l’etude ecologique. Rev. Trav. Sta. Mar. Endoume 44: 125–296. 1968.
Lee, H.T., A.A. Golicz, P.E. Bayer, Y. Jiao, H. Tang, A.H. Paterson, M. Schliep, G. Sablok, R.R. Krishnaraj, C.-K.K. Chan, J. Batley, G.A. Kendrick, A.W.D. Larkum, P.J. Ralph, and D. Edwards. 2016. The genome of a southern hemisphere seagrass species (Zostera muelleri). Plant Physiology 172: 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00868.
Lee, H.T., A.A. Golicz, P.E. Bayer, C.-K.K. Chan, J. Batley, G.A. Kendrick, and D. Edwards. 2018. Genomic comparison of two independent seagrass return to the sea events. Journal of Experimental Botany 69: 3689–3702.
Lefcheck, J.S., S.R. Marion, A.V. Lombana, and R.J. Orth. 2016. Faunal communities are invariant to fragmentation in experimental seagrass landscapes. PloS ONE 11(5): e0156550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156550.
Lefcheck, J.S., D.J. Wilcox, R.R. Murphy, S.R. Marion, and R.J. Orth. 2017. Multiple stressors threaten the imperiled coastal foundation species eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Chesapeake Bay, USA. Global Change Biology 23: 3474–3483.
Lefcheck, J.S., R.J. Orth, W.C. Dennison, D.J. Wilcox, R.R. Murphy, J. Keisman, C. Gurbisz, M. Hannam, J.B. Landry, K.A. Moore, C.J. Patrick, J. Testa, D.E. Weller, and R.A. Batiuk. 2018. Long-term nutrient reductions lead to the unprecedented recovery of a temperate coastal region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115: 3658–3662. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715798115.
Lefcheck, J.S., B.B. Hughes, A.J. Johnson, B.W. Pfirrmann, D.B. Rasher, A.R. Smyth, B.L. Williams, M.W. Beck, and R.J. Orth. 2019. Are coastal habitats important nurseries? A meta-analysis. Conservation Letters e:12645 https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12645.
Li, C.-J., W.-T. Li, P. Ma, X. Zhang, and Y. Li. 2018. Spatial and temporal patterns of seed dispersal in eelgrass Zostera marina: A case study in Moon Lake, Shandong, China. Aquatic Botany 151: 9–18.
Litvin, S.Y., M.P. Weinstein, M. Sheaves, and I. Nagelkerken. 2018. What makes nearshore habitats nurseries for nekton? An emerging view of the nursery role hypothesis. Estuaries and Coasts 41: 1539–1350.
Lønborg, C., A. Thomasberger, P. Stæhr, A. Stockmarr, S. Sengupta, M. Rasmussen, L. Tangaa Nielsen, L. Hansen, and K. Timmermann. 2022. Submerged aquatic vegetation: Overview of monitoring techniques used for the identification and determination of spatial distribution in European coastal waters. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 18 (4): 892–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4552.
Lyons, M., S. Phinn, and C. Roelfsema. 2011. Integrating quickbird multi-spectral satellite and field data: Mapping bathymetry, seagrass cover, seagrass species and change in Moreton Bay, Australia in 2004 and 2007. Remote Sensing 3: 42–64.
Lyons, M., S. Phinn, and C. Roelfsema. 2012. Long term land cover and seagrass mapping using Landsat and object-based image analysis from 1972 to 2010 in the coastal environment of South East Queensland, Australia. ISPRS Journal Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 71: 34–46.
Luckenbach, M.L., and R.J. Orth. 1999. Effects of a deposit-feeding invertebrate on the entrapment of Zostera marina L. seeds. Aquatic Botany 62: 235–247.
Macreadie, P.I., M.E. Baird, S.M. Trevathan-Tackett, A.W.D. Larkum, and P.J. Ralph. 2014. Quantifying and modelling the carbon sequestration capacity of seagrass meadows–a critical assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 83: 430–439.
Mahmood, A., A.G. Ospina, M. Bennamoun, S. An, F. Sohel, F. Boussaid, R. Hovey, R. Fisher, and G. Kendrick. 2020. Hierarchical classification of kelps utilizing deep residual features. Sensors 20: 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020447.
Main, K.L. 1985. The influence of prey identity and size on selection of prey by two marine fishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 88: 145–152.
Main, K.L. 1987. Predator avoidance in seagrass meadows: Prey behavior, microhabitat selection, and cryptic coloration. Ecology 68: 170–180.
Manley, S.R., R.J. Orth, and L. Ruiz-Montoya. 2015. The roles of dispersal and predation in determining seedling recruitment patterns in a foundational marine angiosperm. Marine Ecology Progress Series 533: 109–120. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11363.
Marba, N., and D.I. Walker. 1999. Growth, flowering, and population dynamics of temperate Western Australian seagrasses. Marine Ecology Progress Series 184: 105–118.
Mariani, S., and T. Alcoverro. 1999. A multiple-choice feeding preference experiment utilizing seagrasses with a natural population of herbivorous fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 189: 295–299.
Martin, B.C., J. Bougoure, M.H. Ryan, W. Bennett, T.D. Colmer, N.K. Joyce, Y.S. Olsen, and G.A. Kendrick. 2019. Oxygen loss from seagrass roots coincides with colonization of sulphide oxidizing cable bacteria and reduces sulphide stress. The ISME Journal 13: 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0308-5.
Martin, B.C., J.A. Middleton, M.W. Fraser, I.P.G. Marshall, V.V. Scholz, B. Hausl, and H. Schmidt. 2020. Cutting out the middle clam: Lucinid endosymbiotic bacteria are also associated with seagrass roots worldwide. The ISME Journal 14: 2901–2905.
Mateo, M.A., J. Cebrian, K. Dunton, and T. Mutchler. 2006. Carbon flux in seagrass ecosystems. pp. 159–191. In Seagrasses: Biology, ecology and conservation, ed. A.W.D. Larkum, R.J. Orth, and C.M. Duarte, 691. The Netherlands: Springer.
Mattila, J., K.L. Heck Jr., E. Millstein, E. Miller, C. Gustafsson, S. Williams, and D. Byron. 2008. Increased habitat structure may not always provide increased refuge from predation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 361: 15–20.
McDevitt-Irwin, J.M., J.C. Iacarella, and J.K. Baum. 2016. Reassessing the nursery role of seagrass habitats from temperate to tropical regions: A meta-analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 557: 133–143.
McKenzie, L.J., L.A. Langlois, and C.M. Roelfsema. 2022. Improving approaches to mapping seagrass within the Great Barrier Reef: From field to spaceborne earth observation. Remote Sensing 14 (11): 2604. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs141126042.
McRoy, C.P., and C. Helfferich, eds. 1977. Seagrass ecosystems: A scientific perspective, 314. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Moksnes, P.-O., M. Gullström, K. Tryman, and S. Baden. 2008. Trophic cascades in a temperate seagrass community. Oikos 117: 763–777.
Moore, K.A., and J.C. Jarvis. 2008. Environmental factors affecting recent summertime eelgrass diebacks in the lower Chesapeake Bay: Implications for long-term persistence. Journal of Coastal Research 10055: 135–147.
Morris, L.J., L.M. Hall, C.A. Jacoby, R.H. Chamberlain, M.D. Hanisak, J.D. Miller, and R.D. Virnstein. 2022. Seagrass in a changing estuary, the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, United States. Frontiers in Marine Science https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.789818.
Muehlstein, L.K., D. Porter, and F.T. Short. 1991. Labyrinthula zosterae sp. nov., the causative agent of wasting disease of eelgrass. Zostera Marina. Mycologia 83: 180–191.
Nagelkerken, I., M. Sheaves, R. Baker, and R.M. Connolly. 2015. The seascape nursery: A novel spatial approach to identify and manage nurseries for coastal marine fauna. Fish and Fisheries 16: 362–371.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. An approach for assessing U.S. Gulf Coast ecosystem restoration: a Gulf Research Program Environmental Monitoring Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26335.
Neckles, H.A., R.L. Wetzel, and R.J. Orth. 1993. Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyton-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics. Oecologia 93: 285–295.
Neckles, H.A., F.T. Short, S. Barker, and B.S. Kopp. 2005. Disturbance of eelgrass, Zostera marina, by commercial mussel Mytilus edulis harvesting in Maine: Dredging impacts, and habitat recovery. Marine Ecology Progress Series 285: 57–73.
Neckles, H.A., B.S. Kopp, B.J. Peterson, and B.S. Pooler. 2012. Integrating scales of seagrass monitoring to meet conservation needs. Estuaries and Coasts 35: 23–46.
Nelson, W.G. 1979. Experimental studies of selective predation on amphipods: Consequences for amphipod distribution and abundance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology Ecology 38: 225–245.
Ogden, J.C. Faunal relationships in Caribbean seagrass beds. pp. 173–198. In: Phillips, R.C. and C.P. McRoy (eds.). 1980. Handbook of seagrass biology: an ecosystem perspective. Garland STPM Press, New York. 353pp.
Olesen, B., and K. Sand-Jensen. 1994. Patch dynamics of eelgrass, Zostera marina. Marine Ecology Progress Series 106: 147–156.
Olsen, J.L., P. Rouzé, B. Verhelst, Y.-C. Lin, T. Bayer, J. Collen, E. Dattolo, E. De Paoli, S. Dittami, F. Maumus, G. Michel, A. Kersting, C. Lauritano, R. Lohaus, M. Töpel, T. Tonon, K. Vanneste, M. Amirebrahimi, J. Brakel, C. Boström, M. Chovatia, J. Grimwood, J.W. Jenkins, A. Jueterbock, A. Mraz, W.T. Stam, H. Tice, E. Bornberg-Bauer, P.J. Green, G.A. Pearson, G. Procaccini, C.M. Duarte, J. Schmutz, T.B.H. Reusch, and Y. Van de Peer. 2016. The genome of the seagrass Zostera marina reveals angiosperm adaptation to the sea. Nature 530: 331–335.
Oreska, M.P.J., B. Truitt, R.J. Orth, and M.W. Luckenbach. 2017. The bay scallop Argopecten irradians, industry collapse in Virginia and its implications for the successful seagrass-scallop management. Marine Policy 75: 116–124.
Orth, R.J. 1973. Benthic infauna of eelgrass, Zostera marina, beds. Chesapeake Science 14: 258–269.
Orth, R.J. 1975. Destruction of eelgrass, Zostera marina, by the cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, in the Chesapeake Bay, Virginia. Chesapeake Science 16: 205–208.
Orth, R.J. 1992. A perspective on plant-animal interactions in seagrasses: physical and biological determinants influencing plant and animal abundance. pp. 147–164. In: D. M. John, S. J. Hawkins, and J. H. Price (eds.). Plant-animal interactions in the marine benthos. Systematics Ass. Spec. Vol. No. 46. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 570 pp.
Orth, R.J., K.L. Heck, Jr., and M.P. Weinstein. (eds.). 1984a. Faunal relationships in seagrass and marsh ecosystems. Estuaries 7: 276–470.
Orth, R.J., K.L. Heck Jr., and J. van Montfrans. 1984b. Faunal communities in seagrass beds: A review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator-prey relationships. Estuaries 7: 339–350.
Orth, R.J., M.L. Luckenbach, and K.A. Moore. 1994. Seed dispersal in a marine macrophyte: Implications for colonization and restoration. Ecology 75: 1927–1939.
Orth, R.J., M.C. Harwell, E.M. Bailey, A. Bartholomew, J.T. Jaward, A.V. Lombana, K.A. Moore, J.M. Rhode, and H.E. Woods. 2000. A review of issues in seagrass seed dormancy and germination: Implications for conservation and restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 220: 277–288.
Orth, R.J., J.R. Fishman, D.J. Wilcox, and K.A. Moore. 2002. Identification and management of fishing gear impacts in a recovering seagrass system in the coastal bays of the Delmarva Peninsula, USA. Journal. Coastal Research Special IssUe No. 37: 111–129.
Orth, R.J., T.J.B. Carruthers, W.C. Dennison, C.M. Duarte, J.W. Fourqurean, K.L. Heck, A.R. Hughes, and G.A., W.J. Kendrick, S. Kenworthy, F.T. Olyarnik, M. Waycott. Short, and S.L. Williams. 2006a. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. BioScience 56: 987–996.
Orth, R.J., M.C. Harwell, and G.J. Inglis. 2006b. Ecology of seagrass seeds and dispersal strategies. pp. 111–133. In Seagrasses: Biology, ecology and conservation, ed. A.W.D. Larkum, R.J. Orth, and C.M. Duarte, 691. The Netherlands: Springer.
Orth, R.J., G.A. Kendrick, and S.R. Marion. 2006c. Predation on Posidonia australis seeds in seagrass habitats of Rottnest Island, Western Australia: Patterns and predators. Marine Ecology Progress Series 313: 105–114.
Orth, R.J., W.C. Dennison, J.S. Lefcheck, C. Gurbisz, M. Hannam, J. Keisman, J.B. Landry, K.A. Moore, R.R. Murphy, C.J. Patrick, J. Testa, D.E. Weller, and D.J. Wilcox. 2017a. Submersed aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: Sentinel species in a changing world. BioScience 67: 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix058.
Orth, R.J., J.S. Lefcheck, and D.J. Wilcox. 2017b. Boat propeller scarring of seagrass beds in lower Chesapeake Bay, USA: Patterns, causes, recovery, and management. Estuaries and Coasts 40: 1666–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0239-9.
Orth, R. J., J. S. Lefcheck, K. S. McGlathery, L. Aoki, M. L. Luckenbach, K. A. Moore, M. P. J. Oreska, R. Snyder, D. J. Wilcox, and B. Lusk. 2020. Restoration of seagrass habitat leads to rapid recovery of coastal ecosystem services. Sciences Advances 6(41): eabc6434. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc643.
Pazzaglia, J., T.B.H. Reusch, A. Terlizzi, L. Marín-Guirao, and G. Procaccini. 2021a. Phenotypic plasticity under rapid global changes: The intrinsic force for future seagrasses survival. Evolutionary Applications 14: 1181–1201.
Pazzaglia, J., H.M. Nguyen, A. Santillán-Sarmiento, M. Ruocco, E. Dattolo, L. Marín-Guirao, and G. Procaccini. 2021b. The genetic component of seagrass restoration: What we know and the way Forwards. Water 13: 829.
Petersen, C.G.L. 1918. The sea bottom and its production of fish foods; a survey of the work done in connection with valuation of Danish waters from 1883–1917. Report Danish Biology Station 25: 1–62.
Peterson, B.J., and K.L. Heck Jr. 1999. The potential for suspension feeding bivalves to increase seagrass productivity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 240: 37–52.
Peterson, B.J., and K.L. Heck Jr. 2001. Positive interactions between suspension-feeding bivalves and seagrass - a facultative mutualism. Marine Ecology Progress Series 213: 143–155.
Phillips, R.C. 1974. Transplantation of seagrasses, with special emphasis on eelgrass, Zostera marina L. Aquaculture 4: 161–176.
Phillips, R.C. 1980. Transplanting methods. pp41–56. In Handbook of seagrass biology: An ecosystem perspective, ed. R.C. Phillips and C.P. McRoy, 353. New York: Garland STPM Press.
Phillips, R.C., and C.P. McRoy, eds. 1980. Handbook of seagrass biology: An ecosystem perspective, 353. New York: Garland STPM Press.
Phinn, S., C. Roelfsema, A. Dekker, V. Brando, and J. Anstee. 2008. Mapping seagrass species, cover and biomass in shallow waters: An assessment of satellite multi-spectral and airborne hyper-spectral imaging systems in Moreton Bay (Australia). Remote Sensing of the Environment 112: 3413–3425.
Phinn, S., C. Roelfsema, E. Kovacs, R. Canto, M. Lyons, M. Saunders. and P. Maxwell. 2018. Mapping, monitoring and modelling seagrass using remote sensing techniques. pp. 445- 487. In: A.W.D. Larkum, G.A. Kendrick, and P. J. Ralph (eds.). Seagrasses of Australia. Springer International Publishing AG. 797 pp.
Planet Earth. https://www.planet.com/.
Plus, M., J.-M. Deslous-Paoli, and F. Dagault. 2003. Seagrass (Zostera marina L.) bed recolonization after anoxia-induced full mortality. Aquatic Botany 77: 121–134.
Poore, A.G.B., A.H. Campbell, R. Coleman, G.J. Edgar, V. Jormalainen, P. Reynolds, E.E. Sotka, J.J. Stachowicz, R. Taylor, M.A. Vanderklift, and J.E. Duffy. 2012. Global patterns in the impact of marine herbivores on benthic primary producers. Ecology Letters 15: 912–922.
Prado, P., F. Tomas, T. Alcoverro, and J. Romero. 2007. Extensive direct measurements of Posidonia oceanica defoliation confirm the importance of herbivory in temperate seagrass meadows. Marine Ecology Progress Series 340: 63–71.
Preen, A. 1995. Impacts of dugong foraging on seagrass habitats: Observational and experimental evidence for cultivation grazing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 124: 201–213.
Procaccini, G., J.L. Olsen, and T.B. Reusch. 2007. Contribution of genetics and genomics to seagrass biology and conservation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350: 234–259.
Ranwell, D.S., D.W. Wyer, L.A. Boorman, J.M. Pizzey, and R.J. Waters. 1974. Zostera transplants in Norfolk and Suffolk, Great Britain. Aquaculture 4: 185–198.
Rasmussen, E. 1973. Systematic and ecology of the Isefjord Marine fauna (Denmark), with a survey of the eelgrass (Zostera) vegetation and its communities. Ophelia 11: 1–495.
Rasmussen, E. 1977. The wasting disease of eelgrass (Zostera marina) and its effects on environmental factors and fauna. pp. 1–51. In Seagrass ecosystems: A scientific perspective, ed. C.P. McCoy and C. Helfferich, 314. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Reusch, T.B.H., W.T. Stam, and J.L. Olsen. 1999. Size and estimated age of genets in eelgrass, Zostera marina, assessed with microsatellite markers. Marine Biology 133: 519–525.
Reusch, T.B.H. 2002. Microsatellites reveal high population connectivity in eelgrass (Zostera marina) in two contrasting coastal areas. Limnology and Oceanography 47: 78–85.
Reynolds, P., J. Stachowicz, K. Hovel, C. Boström, K. Boyer, M. Cusson, J. Eklöf, F. Engel, A. Engelen, B.K. Eriksson, F. Fodrie, J. Griffin, C. Hereu, M. Hori, T. Hanley, M. Ivanov, P. Jorgensen, C. Kruschel, K.-S. Lee, K. McGlathery, P.-O. Moksnes, M. Nakaoka, F. Tomas Nash, M. O’Connor, N. O’Connor, R. Orth, F. Rossi, J. Ruesink, E. Sotka, R. Unsworth, M. Whalen, and J. Duffy. 2018. Latitude, temperature and habitat complexity predict predation pressure in eelgrass beds across the Northern Hemisphere. Ecology 99: 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2064.
Reynolds, L.K., P. Berg, and J.C. Zieman. 2007. Lucinid clam influence on the biogeochemistry of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum sediments. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 482–490.
Rodriguez, A.R., and K.L. Heck Jr. 2020. Green turtle herbivory and its effects on the warm, temperate seagrass meadows of St. Joseph Bay, Florida (USA). Marine Ecology Progress Series 639: 37–51.
Rodriguez, A.R., and K.L. Heck Jr. 2021. Approaching a tipping point? Herbivore carrying capacity estimates in a rapidly changing, seagrass-dominated Florida Bay. Estuaries and Coasts 44: 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00866-2.
Rodriguez, A.R., C. Marco-Méndez, J. Campbell, and K.L. Heck. 2022. Effects of varying types and amounts of herbivory and nutrient enrichment on a tropicalizing seagrass meadow. Frontiers in Marine Science 9: 892219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.892219.
Roelfsema, C.M., M. Lyons, E.M. Kovacs, P. Maxwell, M.I. Saunders, J. Samper-Villarreal, and S.R. Phinn. 2014. Multi-temporal mapping of seagrass cover, species and biomass: A semi-automated object-based image analysis approach. Remote Sensing of Environment 150: 172–187.
Roelfsema, C., M. Lyons, M. Dunbabin, E.M. Kovacs. and S. Phinn. 2015. Integrating field survey data with satellite image data to improve shallow water seagrass maps: the role of AUV and snorkeller surveys? Remote Sensing Letters 6: 135144. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2015.1013643.
Röhr, M., and E, M. Holmer, J.K. Baum, M. Björk, K. Boyer, D. Chin, L. Chalifour, S. Cimon, M. Cusson, M. Dahl, D. Deyanova, J. E. Duffy J.S. Eklöf, J. K. Geyer, J. N. Griffin, M. Gullström, C. M. Hereu, M. Hori, K.A. Hovel, A. R. Hughes, P. Jorgensen, S. Kiriakopolos P.-O. Moksnes, M. Nakaoka, M.I. O’Connor, B. Peterson, K. Reiss, P. L. Reynolds, F. Rossi, J. Ruesink, R. Santos, J.J. Stachowicz, F. Tomas, K.-S. Lee, R.K. F. Unsworth, and C. Boström. 2018. Blue carbon storage capacity of temperate eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 32: 1457–1475. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB005941.
Ruiz-Montoya, L., R.J. Lowe, K.P. Van Niel, and G.A. Kendrick. 2012. The role of hydrodynamics on seed dispersal in seagrasses. Limnology and Oceanography 57: 1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.5.1257.
Ruiz-Montoya, L., R.J. Lowe, and G.A. Kendrick. 2015. Contemporary connectivity is sustained by wind and current-driven seed dispersal among seagrass meadows. Ecology 3: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-015-0034-9.
Sargent, F.J., T.J. Leary, D.W. Crewz, and C.R. Kruer. 1995. Scarring of Florida’s seagrasses: assessment and management options. FMRI Technical Report TR-1. Florida Marine Research Institute. St. Petersburg, Florida. 37 p.
Saunders, M.I., C. Doropoulos, E. Bayraktarov, R.C. Babcock, D. Gorman, A.M. Eger, M.L. Vozz, C.L. Gillies, M.A. Vanderklift, A.D.L. Steven, R.H. Bustamante, and B.R. Silliman. 2020. Bright spots in coastal marine ecosystem restoration. Current Biology 30: R1500–R1510.
Scheinin, M., S.B. Scyphers, L. Kauppi, K.L. Heck Jr., and J. Mattila. 2011. The relationship between vegetation density and its protective value depends on the densities and traits of prey and predators. Oikos 121: 1093–1102.
Scholz, V.C., B.C. Martin, R. Meyer, A. Schramm, M.W. Fraser, L.P. Nielse, G.A. Kendrick, N. Risgaard-Petersen, L. Burdorf, and I.P.G. Marshall. 2021. Cable bacteria at oxygen-releasing roots of aquatic plants: Diversity, drivers, and putative consequences of a widespread plant-microbe association. New Phytologist 232: 2138–2151. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17415.
Schorn, S., S. Ahmerkamp, E. Bullock, M. Weber, C. Lott, M. Liebeke, G. Lavik, M.M.M. Kuypers, J.S. Graf, and J. Milucka. 2022. Diverse methylotrophic methanogenic archaea cause high methane emissions from seagrass meadows. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (9): e2106628119.
Serisawa, Y., Z. Imoto, T. Ishikawa, and M. Ohno. 2004. Decline of the Ecklonia cava population associated with increased seawater temperatures in Tosa Bay, southern Japan. Fisheries Science 70: 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0919-9268.2004.00788.x.
Sheaves, M. 2009. Consequences of ecological connectivity: The coastal ecosystem mosaic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 391: 107–115.
Sheaves, M., R. Baker, and R. Johnston. 2006. Marine nurseries and effective juvenile habitats: An alternative view. Marine Ecology Progress Series 318: 303–306.
Short, F.T., and H.A. Neckles. 1999. The effects of global climate change on seagrasses. Aquatic Botany 63: 169–196.
Short, F.T., R.C. Davis, B.S. Kopp, C.A. Short, and D.M. Burdick. 2002. Site-selection model for optimal transplantation of eelgrass Zostera marina in the northeastern US. Marine Ecology Progress Series 227: 253–267.
Short, F.T. and R.G Coles (editors). 2001. Global seagrass research methods. Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam. 482 pp.
Short, F.T., and C.M. Duarte. 2001. Methods for the measurement of seagrass growth and production. pp. 155–182. In 2001, ed. F.T. Short and R.G. Coles, 482. Amsterdam: Global Seagrass Research Methods. Elsevier Science B.V.
Short, F.T., P. Polidoro, S.R. Livingstone, K.E. Carpenter, S. Bandeira, J.K. Bujang, H. Calumpong, T. Carruthers, R. Coles, W. Denniso, P. Erftmeijer, M. Fortes, A. Freeman, T. Jagtap, A.H. Kamal, G. Kendrick, J. Kenworthy, Y. La Nafie, I. Nasution, R. Orth, A. Prathep, J. Sanciengco, B. van Tussenbroek, S. Vergara, M. Waycott, and J. Zieman. 2011. Extinction risk assessment of the world’s seagrass species. Biological Conservation 144: 1961–1971.
Sievers, M., C.J. Brown, C.A. Buelow, R. Hale, A. Ostrowski, M.I. Saunders, B.R. Silliman, S.E. Swearer, M.P. Turschwell, S.R. Valdez, and R.M. Connolly. 2022. Greater consideration of animals will enhance coastal restoration outcomes. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac088.
Sinclair, E.A., S.L. Krauss, J. Anthony, R. Hovey, and G.A. Kendrick. 2014. The interaction of environment and genetic diversity within meadows of the seagrass Posidonia australis (Posidoniaceae). Marine Ecology Progress Series 506: 87–98.
Sinclair, E.A., C.D.H. Sherman, J. Statton, C. Copeland, A. Matthews, M. Waycott, K.-J. van Dijk, A. Vergés, L. Kajlich, I.M. McLeod, and G.A. Kendrick. 2021. Advances in approaches to seagrass restoration in Australia. Ecological Management and Restoration 22: 10–21.
Smith, C.S., M. Ito, M. Namba, and M. Nakaoka 2018. Oyster aquaculture impacts Zostera marina epibiont community composition in Akkeshi-ko estuary, Japan. PLoS One 13(5): e0197753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197753.
Sumoski, S., and R.J. Orth. 2012. Biotic dispersal potential in Zostera marina (eelgrass). Marine Ecology Progress Series 471: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10145.
Stark, K.A., P.L. Thompson, J. Yakimishym, L. Lee, E.M. Adamczyk, M. Hessing-Lewis, and M.I. O’Connor. 2020. Beyond a single patch: Local and regional processes explain diversity patterns in a seagrass epifaunal metacommunity. Marine Ecology Progress Series 655: 91–106.
Statton, J., L. Ruiz-Montoya, R.J. Orth, K.W. Dixon, and G.A. Kendrick. 2017. Identifying critical recruitment bottlenecks limiting seedling establishment in a degraded seagrass ecosystem. Scientific Reports 7: 14786. 1038/s41598–017–13833-y.
Statton J., K. W. Dixon, A. D. Irving, E. L. Jackson, G. A. Kendrick, R. J. Orth, and E. A. Sinclair. 2018. Decline and restoration ecology of Australian seagrasses. Pp 665–704. In: A. W. D. Larkum, G. Kendrick, and P. Ralph (eds.). Seagrasses of Australia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71354-0_20.
Stoner, A.W. 1979. Species-specific predation on amphipod crustacea by the pinfish Lagodon rhomboides: Mediation by macrophyte standing crop. Marine Biology 55: 201–207.
Tahara, S., K. Sudo, T. Yamakita, and M. Nakaoka. 2022. Species level mapping of a seagrass bed using an unmanned aerial vehicle and deep learning technique. PeerJ 10: e14017. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14017.
Tan, Y.M., O. Dalby, G.A. Kendrick, J. Statton, E.A. Sinclair, M.W. Fraser, P.I. Macreadie, C.L. Gillies, R.A. Coleman, M. Waycott, K-J.van Dijk, A. Vergés, J.D. Ross, M.L. Campbell, F.E. Matheson, E.L. Jackson, A.D. Irving, L.L. Govers, R.M. Connolly, I.M. McLeod, M.A. Rasheed, H. Kirkman, M.R. Flindt, T. Lange, A.D. Miller, and C.D.H. Sherman. 2020. Seagrass restoration is possible: insights and lessons from Australia and New Zealand. Frontiers in Marine Science 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00617.
Tavares, A.I., J. Assis, P.D. Larkin, J.C. Creed, K. Magalhães, P. Horta, A. Engelen, N. Cardoso, C. Barbosa, S. Pontes, A. Regalla, C. Almada, R. Ferreira, B.M. Abdoul, S. Ebaye, M. Bourweiss, C.V.-D. dos Santos, A.R. Patrício, A. Teodósio, R. Santos, G.A. Pearson, and E.A. Serrao. 2023. Long range gene flow beyond predictions from oceanographic transport in a tropical marine foundation species. Scientific Reports 13: 9112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36367-y.
Temmink, R.J.M., M.J.A. Christianen, G.S. Fivash, C. Angelini, C. Boström, K. Didderen, S.M. Engel, N. Esteban, J.L. Gaeckle, K. Gagnon, L.L. Govers, E. Infantes, M.M. van Katwijk, S. Kipson, L.P.M. Lamers, W. Lengkeek, B.R. Silliman, B.I. van Tussenbroek, R.K.F. Unsworth, S.M. Yaakub, T.J. Bouma, and T. van der Heide. 2020. Mimicry of emergent traits amplifies coastal restoration success. Nature Communications 11: 1–9.
Thayer, G.W., and H.H. Stuart. 1974. The bay scallop makes its bed of seagrass. Marine Fisheries Review 36: 27–30.
Thomson, A.C.G., P.H. York, T.M. Smith, C.D.H. Sherman, D.J. Booth, M.J. Keough, D.J. Ross, and P.I. Macreadie. 2015. Seagrass viviparous propagules as a potential long-distance dispersal mechanism. Estuaries and Coasts 38: 927–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9850-1.
Thorhaug, A. 1974. Transplantation of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum Konig. Aquaculture 4: 177–183.
Tol, S.J., J.C. Jarvis, P.H. York, A. Grech, B.C. Congdon, and R.G. Coles. 2017. Long distance biotic dispersal of tropical seagrass seeds by marine mega-herbivores. Scientific Reports 7: 1–8.
Tomas, F., X. Turon, and J. Romero. 2005. Seasonal and small-scale spatial variability of herbivory pressure on the temperate seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Marine Ecology Progress Series 301: 94–107.
Traganos, D., A.P. Pertiwi, C.B. Lee, A. Blume, D. Poursanidis, and A. Shapiro. 2022. Earth observation for ecosystem accounting: Spatially explicit national seagrass extent and carbon stock in Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar”. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.287.
Turschwell, M.P. R.M. Connolly, J.C. Dunic, M. Sievers, C.A. Buelow, R.M. Pearson, V.J.D. Tulloch, I.M.Côté, R.K.F. Unsworth, C.J. Collier, and C.J. Brown. 2021 Anthropogenic pressures and life history predict trajectories of seagrass meadow extent at a global scale. 2021. Proceedings of the. National Academy of Sciences 118 No. 45 e2110802118.
[UN] United Nations. 2017. Global Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development United Nations A/RES/71/313.
[UNEP] United Nations Environment Programme. 2020. Out of the Blue: The Value of Seagrasses to the Environment and to People. World Seagrass Association.
Unsworth, R.F.K., E. Wylie, D.J. Smith, and J.J. Bell. 2007. Diel trophic structuring of seagrass bed fish assemblages in the Wakatobi Marine National Park, Indonesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72: 81–88.
Unsworth, R.K.F., L.J. McKenzie, C.J. Collier, L.C. Cullen-Unsworth, C.M. Duarte, J.S. Eklo, J.C. Jarvis, B.L. Jones, and L.M. Nordlund. 2019. Global challenges for seagrass conservation. Ambio 48: 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1115-y.
Unsworth, R.K.F., L.M. Nordlund, and L.C. Cullen-Unsworth. 2018. Seagrass meadows support global fisheries production. Conservation Letters 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12566
Unsworth, R.K.F., L.C. Cullen-Unsworth, B.L. Jones, and R.J. Lilley. 2022. The planetary role of seagrass conservation. Science 377: 609–613.
Valdez, S.R., Y.S. Zhang, T. van der Heide, M.A. Vanderklift, F. Tarquinio, R.J. Orth, and B.R. Silliman. 2020. Positive ecological interactions and the success of seagrass restoration. Frontiers in Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00091.
Valentine, J.F., and K.L. Heck Jr. 1991. The role of sea urchin grazing in regulating subtropical seagrass meadows: Evidence from field manipulations in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 154: 215–230.
Valentine, J.F., and K.L. Heck Jr. 2020. Herbivory in seagrass meadows: An evolving paradigm. Estuaries and Coasts 44: 491–505.
Valentine, J.F., and J.E. Duffy. 2006. The central role of grazing in seagrass ecology. pp. 463–501. In: A. W. D. Larkum, R. J. Orth, and C. M. Duarte (eds). Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation. Springer. The Netherlands. 691 pp.
Valle, M., G. Chust, A. del Campo, M.S. Wisz, S.M. Olsen, J.M. Garmendia, and A. Borja. 2014. Projecting future distribution of the seagrass Zostera noltii under global warming and sea level rise. Biological Conservation 170: 74–85.
van Dam, B.R., M.A. Zeller, C. Lopes, A. R. Smyth, M. E. Böttcher, C. L. Osburn, T. Zimmerman, D. Pröfrock, J.W. Fourqurean, and H. Thomas. 2021. Calcification-driven CO2 emissions exceed “Blue Carbon” sequestration in a carbonate seagrass meadow. Science Advances 7: eabj1372.
van der Heide, T., L.L. Govers, J. de Fouw, H. Olff, M. van der Geest, M.M. van Katwijk, and J.A. van Gils. 2012. A three-stage symbiosis forms the foundation of seagrass ecosystems. Science 336: 1432–1434.
Vanderklift, M.A., R.D. Pillans, M. Hutton, L. De Wever, G.A. Kendrick, A. Zavala-Perez, A. Vergés, R. Garthwin, D. Oades, P. McCarthy, K. George, T. Sampi, D. George, C. Sampi, Z. Edgar, K. Dougal, and A. Howard. 2021. High rates of herbivory in remote northwest Australian seagrass meadows by rabbitfish and green turtles. Marine Ecology Progress Series 665: 63–73.
van Katwijk, M.M., A.R. Bos, V.N. de Jonge, L.S.A.M. Hanssen, D.C.R. Hermus, and D.J. de Jong. 2009. Guidelines for seagrass restoration: Importance of habitat selection and donor population, spreading of risks, and ecosystem engineering effects. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58: 179–188.
van Katwijk, M.M., A. Thorhaug, N. Marbà, R.J. Orth, C.M. Duarte, G.A. Kendrick, I.H.J. Althuizen, E. Balestri, G. Bernard, M.L. Cambridge, A. Cunha, C. Durance, W. Giesen, Q. Han, S. Hosokawa, W. Kiswara, T. Komatsu, C. Lardicci, K.-S. Lee, A. Meinesz, M. Nakaoka, K.R. O’Brien, E.I. Paling, C. Pickerell, A.M.A. Ransijn, and J.J. Verduin. 2016. Global analysis of seagrass restoration: The importance of large-scale planting. Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 567–578.
van Katwijk, M.M., B.I. van Tussenbroek, S.V. Hanssen, A.J. Hendriks, and L. Hanssen. 2020. Rewilding the sea with domesticated seagrass. BioScience 71: 1171–1178.
van Montfrans, J., R.L. Wetzel, and R.J. Orth. 1984. Epiphyte-grazer relationships in seagrass meadows: Consequences for seagrass growth and production. Estuaries 7: 289–309.
van Tussenbroek, B.I., N. Villamil, J. Márquez-Guzmán, R. Wong, L. Monroy-Velázquez, and V. Solis-Weiss. 2016. Experimental evidence of pollination in marine flowers by invertebrate fauna. Nature Communications 7: 12980. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12980.
Vergés, A., M. Perez, T. Alcoverro, and J. Romero. 2008. Compensation and resistance to herbivory in seagrasses: Induced responses to simulated consumption by fish. Oecologia 155: 751–760.
Vergés, A., P.D. Steinberg, M.E. Hay, A.G.B. Poore, A.H. Campbell, E. Ballesteros, K.L. Heck Jr., D.J. Booth, M.A. Coleman, D.A. Feary, W. Figueira, T. Langlois, E.M. Marzinelli, T. Mizerek, P.J. Mumby, Y. Nakamura, M. Roughan, E. van Sebille, A.S. Gupta, D.A. Smale, F. Tomas, T. Wernberg, and S.K. Wilson. 2014. The tropicalization of temperate marine ecosystems: Climate-mediated changes in herbivory and community phase shifts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281: 20140846. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0846.
Vergés, A., Doropoulos, C., Malcolm, H. A., Skye, M., Garcia-Pizá, M., Marzinelli, E. M., A.H.Campbell, E. Ballesteros, A.S. Hoey, A. Vila-Concejo, Y-M. Bozec, and P.D. Steinberg. 2016. Long-term empirical evidence of ocean warming leading to tropicalization of fish 621 communities, increased herbivory, and loss of kelp. Proceedings of the. National Academy of Sciences 113: 13791–13796.
Vermeij, G.J., and R.K. Grosberg. 2010. The great divergence: When did diversity on land exceed that in the sea. Integrative and Comparative Biology 50: 675–682.
Virnstein, R.W., W.G. Nelson, F.G. Lewis, and R.K. Howard. 1984. Latitudinal patterns in seagrass epifauna: Do patterns exist, and can they be explained? Estuaries 7: 310–330.
Virnstein, R.W., and L.M. Hall. 2009. Northern range extension of the seagrasses Halophila johnsonii and Halophila decipiens along the east coast of Florida, USA. Aquatic Botany 90: 89–92.
Walker, D.I., R.J. Lukatelich, G. Bastyan, and A.J. McComb. 1989. Effect of boat moorings on seagrass beds near Perth, Western Australia. Aquatic Botany 36: 69–77.
Waycott, M. 1995. Assessment of genetic diversity and clonality in the seagrass Posidonia australis using RAPD and allozyme analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 116: 289–295.
Waycott, M., C.M. Duarte, T.J.B. Carruthers, R.J. Orth, W.C. Dennison, S. Olyarnik, A. Calladine, J.W. Fourqurean, K.L. Heck, A.R. Hughes, G.A. Kendrick, W.J. Kenworthy, F.T. Short, and S.L. Williams. 2009. Accelerating loss of seagrass across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 12377–12381.
Wernberg, T., S. Bennett, R.C. Babcock, T. de Bettignies, K. Cure, M. Depczynski, F. Dufois, J. Fromont, C. Fulton, R.K. Hovey, E.S. Harvey, T.H. Holmes, G.A. Kendrick, B. Radford, J. Santa-Garcon, B.J. Saunders, D.A. Smale, M.S. Thomsen, C.A. Tuckett, F. Tuya, M.A. Vanderklift, and S. Wilson. 2016. Climate-driven regime shift of a temperate marine ecosystem. Science 353: 169–635.
Whippo, R., N.S. Knight, C. Prentice, J. Christiani, M.R. Siegle, and M.I. O’Connor. 2018. Epifaunal diversity patterns within and among seagrass meadows suggest landscape‐scale biodiversity processes. Ecosphere 9.11: e02490.
Whitfield, P.E., W.J. Kenworthy, M.J. Durako, K.K. Hammerstrom, and M.F. Merello. 2004. Recruitment of Thalassia testidunum seedlings into physically disturbed seagrass beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 267: 121–131.
Williams, S.L., R. Ambo-Rappe, C. Sur, J.M. Abbott, and S.R. Limbong. 2017. Species richness accelerates marine ecosystem restoration in the Coral Triangle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114: 11986–11991.
Wilson, S.S., B.T. Furman, M.O. Hall, and J.W. Fourqurean. 2020. Assessment of Hurricane Irma impacts on South Florida seagrass communities using long-term monitoring programs. Estuaries and Coasts 45: 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00623-0.
Wu, P.P.-Y., K. Mengersen, K. McMahon, G.A. Kendrick, K. Chartrand, P.H. York, M.A. Rasheed, and M.J. Caley. 2017. Timing anthropogenic stressors to mitigate their impact on marine ecosystem resilience. Nature Communications 8: 1263.
Wyda, J.C., L.A. Deegan, J.E. Hughes, and M.J. Weaver. 2002. The response of fishes to submerged aquatic vegetation complexity in two ecoregions of the mid-Atlantic bight: Buzzards Bay and Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 25: 86–100.
Yeager, Y.A., D.A. Keller, T.R. Burns, A.S. Pool, and F.J. Fodrie. 2016. Threshold effects of habitat fragmentation on fish diversity at landscapes scales. Ecology 97: 2157–2166.
Yeager, Y.A., J.K. Geyer, and F.J. Fodrie. 2019. Trait sensitivities to seagrass fragmentation across spatial scales shape benthic community structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 88: 1743–1754.
York, P.H., T.M. Smith, R.G. Coles, S.A. McKenna, R.M. Connolly, A.D. Irving, E.L. Jackson, K. McMahon, J.W. Runcie, C.D.H. Sherman, B.K. Sullivan, S.M. Revathan-Tackett, K.E. Brodersen, A.B. Carter, C.J. Ewers, P.S. Lavery, C.M. Roelfsema, E.A. Sinclair, S. Strydom, J.E. Tanner, K.-J. van Dijk, F.Y. Warry, M. Waycott, and S. Whitehead. 2017. Identifying knowledge gaps in seagrass research and management: An Australian perspective. Marine Environmental Research 127: 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.06.006.
Zarco-Perello, S., T.J. Langlois, T. Holmes, M.A. Vanderklift, and T. Wernberg. 2019. Overwintering tropical herbivores accelerate detritus production on temperate reefs. Proceeding of the Royal Society, B 286: 20192046. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2046.
Zhang, Y.S., R.K. Gittman, S.E. Donaher, S.N. Trackenberg, T. van der Heide and B.R. Silliman. 2021. Inclusion of intra- and interspecific facilitation expands the theoretical framework for seagrass restoration. Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 645673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.645673.
Zieman, J.C. 1974. Methods for the study of the growth and production of turtle grass, Thalassia testudinum König. Aquaculture 4: 139–143.
Zimmerman, R.C., V.J. Hill, B. Celebi, M. Jinuntuya, D. Ruble, M. Smith, T. Cedeno, and W.M. Swingle. 2017. Experimental impacts of climate warming and ocean carbonation on eelgrass (Zostera marina L.). Marine Ecology Progress Series 566: 1–15.
Zimmerman, R.C. 2021. Scaling up: Predicting the impacts of climate change on seagrass ecosystems. Estuaries and Coasts 44: 558–576.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dottie Bryon, Alyson Hall, Marc Hensel, Gary Kendrick, Jonathan Lefcheck, Chris Patrick, Dave Wilcox, and John Valentine for many helpful comments on drafts of this manuscript. We are indebted to Alyson Hall for helping in developing Fig. 3 for this manuscript. We appreciate the very helpful reviews by Drs. Hilary Neckles and Jay Stachowitz. We especially thank the Coastal Estuarine Research Federation for choosing us as the recipients of the 2021 Odum Award for Lifetime Achievement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Melisa C. Wong
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Orth, R.J., Heck Jr., K.L. The Dynamics of Seagrass Ecosystems: History, Past Accomplishments, and Future Prospects. Estuaries and Coasts 46, 1653–1676 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-023-01252-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-023-01252-4