Abstract
Background
Skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) is a highly lethal cancer, ranking among the top four deadliest cancers. This underscores the urgent need for novel biomarkers for SKCM diagnosis and prognosis. Anoikis plays a vital role in cancer growth and metastasis, and this study aims to investigate its prognostic value and mechanism of action in SKCM.
Methods
Utilizing consensus clustering, the SKCM samples were categorized into two distinct clusters A and B based on anoikis-related genes (ANRGs), with the B group exhibiting lower disease-specific survival (DSS). Gene set enrichment between distinct clusters was examined using Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis.
Results
We created a predictive model based on three anoikis-related differently expressed genes (DEGs), specifically, FASLG, IGF1, and PIK3R2. Moreover, the mechanism of these prognostic genes within the model was investigated at the cellular level using the single-cell sequencing dataset GSE115978. This analysis revealed that the FASLG gene was highly expressed on cluster 1 of Exhausted CD8( +) T (Tex) cells.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have established a novel classification system for SKCM based on anoikis, which carries substantial clinical implications for SKCM patients. Notably, the elevated expression of the FASLG gene on cluster 1 of Tex cells could significantly impact SKCM prognosis through anoikis, thus offering a promising target for the development of immunotherapy for SKCM.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) has been a significant global public health challenge, standing as the most malignant among skin cancers [1,2,3]. While SKCM is more common in regions like Australia, its prevalence and mortality are predicted to increase over the next 20 years; for example, a study in 2020 forecast, the number of new SKCM cases might reach 205,000 by the year 2040, with a nearly 70% increase in mortality [4, 5]. The survival of normal epithelial endothelial cells relies on anchorage-dependent intercellular and cell-to-stroma communication. An apoptotic process, known as anoikis, occurs when normal epithelial or solid tumor cells lose contact with their original location and enter the bloodstream [6,7,8,9].
Anoikis plays a role in carcinogenesis and is a critical target in various cancer treatment strategies. In the context of melanoma, LIPT1, which is associated with copper-mediated cell death (cuproptosis), may represent a promising therapeutic target for this disease [1]. Additionally, markers of iron-mediated cell death (i.e., ferroptosis), such as CYBB, have also been identified in melanoma[10]. While anoikis to some extent prevents metastasis similar to cuproptosis and ferroptosis, cancer cells that develop resistant to anoikis will become more aggressive, which brings challenges in treatment [11]. Therefore, the molecular regulators that lead to this resistance are of great interest in cancer therapy.
Studies in lung cancer models have shown that monoclonal antibodies and chemically synthesized drugs can effectively inhibit tumor metastasis by activating the anoikis pathway [12]. Arecoline, an alkaloid derived from the betel nut Areca catechu. (Bing-Lang) and used to treat hepatocellular cancer, induces anoikis in HA22T/VGH cells by inhibiting STAT3 and increasing RhoA/Rock activation [13]. Previous research has demonstrated that the BH3-only subgroup of the BCL2 protein family inhibits metastatic breast cancer by modulating anoikis and exerting a distinct inhibitory effect during breast homeostasis [14]. Additionally, targeting tumor-associated MUC1 has been found to overcome anoikis-resistance in pancreatic cancer [15]. Although anoikis is an important factor in cancer, the relevance of anoikis to SKCM remains understudied.
Our study aims to investigate the landscape of anoikis-related genes (ANRGs) in SKCM. We have developed risk models for ANGRs to predict prognosis and response to immunotherapy in SKCM patients. Additionally, we identified FASLG as a potential immuno therapeutic target for SKCM using single-cell sequencing analysis.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Gene expression and clinical data
We obtained RNA sequencing data and corresponding clinical information from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) data portal (https://www.gtexportal.org/home/datasets/). We downloaded 214 RNA sequencing data of SKCM samples from dataset GSE65904 in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, with total RNA extracted from fresh-frozen melanoma tumors. The genome-wide expression profiling was performed using Illlumina Human HT-12V4.0 BeadChip arrays by standard methods. We identified 640 anoikis-related genes (ANRGs) through comprehensive searches on two authoritative sources: GeneCards (accessible at https://www.genecards.org/Search/Keyword?queryString=anoikis) and Harmonizome (https://maayanlab.cloud/Harmonizome/search?t=all&q=anoikis). Detailed listings of these genes can be found in Supplementary Table 1 and 2. Furthermore, we acquired patient data from several public databases, thereby negating the necessity for ethical approval in this aspect of our research.
2.2 Acquisition of prognostic signatures
We analyzed the expression of ANRGs in normal and tumor tissues differentially with |log2FoldChange| (|log2FC|) ≥ 1.5 and adjusted p < 0.05 using transcriptome data from 557 normal and 472 tumor tissues, combining GTEx and TCGA-SKCM data. After excluding patients with incomplete follow-up information, we included 656 patients in subsequent analyses. Finally, utilizing disease-specific survival (DSS) as the clinical outcome time, we identified 14 prognosis-related ANRGs by performing a Univariate Cox analysis of differentially expressed genes. We considered a one-way Cox with a p < 0.05 as a prognostic gene.
2.3 Visualization of prognostic genes
Copy number variations (CNV) data were obtained from TCGA-SKCM and visualized using the Maftool R package [16]. Additionally, the protein–protein interaction network (PPI) corresponding to 14 genes was obtained through the website (https://string-db.org/) and visualized using the GeneMANIA website (http://genemania.org/).
2.4 Consensus clustering analysis
We performed cluster analysis using the R package ConsensionClusterPlus, performed 1000 times for 80% of the samples to ensure data stability. An empirical cumulative distribution function plot was used to identify the optimal number of clusters. Ultimately, we chose k = 2. We analyzed the Kaplan–Meier (K–M) survival curves of clusters A and B using the survminer [17] and survival packages [18]. We also downscaled the results of consensus cluster analysis using principal component analysis (PCA), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP). The prognostic genes and clinicopathological characteristics in clusters A and B were presented using the pheatmap package [19]. We utilized the single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) algorithm to analyze the content of 23 immune cell infiltrations between clusters A and B [20]. To examine the 20 most significantly enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signaling pathways and the top five active KEGG signaling pathways in Cluster A, we used Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA).
2.5 Establishment and validation of risk model based on prognostic anoikis-related genes
We randomly divided the samples into training and validation datasets in a 1:1 ratio. In the training dataset, prognosis-related differently expressed genes (DEGs) were used to perform the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis using the “glmnet” R package. The risk score was calculated using the following model [21].
The training, validation, and all datasets calculated the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. We visualized the expression of genes in the prognostic model using heat maps in the high-risk and low-risk groups. We utilized Sankey diagrams to illustrate their relationships. We also displayed the relationship between the risk values of patients in the two clusters using box plots.
We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression models to explore the independent prognostic value of the risk score. Finally, the clinical information and risk score were constructed as column line plots to predict the probability of patient survival.
2.6 Stratified analysis based on clinicopathological features
To assess the usefulness of the risk score as an independent prognostic variable, Cox regression models were used in combination with other clinical characteristics [age (> 65 vs. ≤ 65 years), gender (female vs. male), M (M1 vs. MO), N (N0-1 vs. N2-3), and T (T0-2 vs. T3-4)]. The clinical and pathological staging and grading follow the guidelines of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Eighth Edition. To further assess the prognostic capability, we conducted a stratification analysis to determine if the risk score maintained its ability to analyze DSS among different subgroups following the stratified order analysis based on clinicopathological characteristics. The heatmap was used to evaluate the prognostic capability further.
2.7 Predicting drug sensitivity in SKCM
In the Cancer Treatment Response Portal (CTRP), the “oncoPredict” package was utilized to predict the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of glioma samples to various antitumor drugs. Spearman correlation analysis was then performed on IC50 values and risk scores to identify sensitive and resistant drugs (p < 0.05) [22].
2.8 Immunocell analysis
Using CIBERSORT, we assessed the content of 22 immune cells between high- and low-risk groups and subsequently analyzed the correlation between immune cells, risk score, and three prognosis-related SKCM anoikis-related DEGs by Spearman.
2.9 Single-cell sequencing analysis
We analyzed the melanoma tumor single-cell sequencing dataset GSE115978, containing 7186 cell samples from 31 melanoma tumors, using the Tumor Immune Single Cell Hub 2 (TISCH2) database (http://tisch.comp-genomics.org/). We obtained cellular descending analysis profiles and annotated cell subpopulations. We also queried the expression of risk model genes on the cell subpopulations and drew violin maps.
2.10 Statistical analysis
The chi-square test was applied to compare categorical variables. Kaplan–Meier (K-M) curves were utilized to compare DSS between different groups, and the risk model was developed using univariate Cox and LASSO regression. We employed univariate and multivariate Cox regression models to investigate the independent prognostic efficacy of the risk model. The Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test was employed to compare immune cell infiltration between the two groups. We determined statistical significance at p < 0.05 and used R software (version 4.2.0) for statistical analyses.
3 Results
3.1 Identification of prognosis-related anoikis-related genes
We filtered with |LogFC|> 1.5 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs), resulting in a heatmap (Fig. 1A) and a volcano plot (Fig. 1B, Supplementary Table 3). Integrating TCGA and GEO expression data and conducting batch correction to extract differential gene expression, we obtained 14 prognostic ANRGs, including DAPK2, BIRC5, IGF1, PIK3CG, MMP9, FASLG, PRKCQ, HAVCR2, SPIB, PIK3R2, CDC25C, LCK, SPTA1, and IKZF3 (Fig. 1C). The correlation between these genes is displayed in Fig. 1D. Copy number increases more frequently than deletion frequency in genes like PIK3CG, SPTA1, FASLG, MMP9, BIRC5, IGF1R, DAPK2, and LCK. The copy number increase frequency of IKZF3, PIK3R2, SPIB, CDC25C, HAVCR2, and IGF1 genes is fewer than the deletion frequency (Fig. 1E). The copy number circle map (Fig. 1F) depicts the distribution of related genes on the chromosome. Using the STRING database, we ran a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis to illustrate the relationship between these nodes of anoikis-related genes (Fig. 1G). We then used GeneMANIA to build a network of 14 prognostic genes and their 20 interacting genes closely associated with anoikis (Fig. 1H). These results describe the landscape of ANRGs-related genes in SKCM.
3.2 Construction of gene subtypes
In this study, we utilized 14 prognosis-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (p < 0.01) for Consensus Clustering using the Consensus Cluster Plus R software package to investigate the role of anoikis-related genes in SKCM. K-means clustering classified the patients into two clusters (Fig. 2A). We selected the number of clusters k from 2 to 9, which was chosen to be 2 (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. 1A B). According to the K-M survival curve, the prognosis of the two subtypes was significantly different. Our research revealed that patients with subtype B had a significantly better prognosis than those with subtype A (Fig. 2C, p < 0.001). The accuracy of this clustering was verified using PCA, t-SNE, and UMAP (Figs. 2D–F). Through the analysis of a heat map of the expression of ANRGs and the related clinicopathological characteristics of two subtypes, it was found that three genes (PIK3R2, BIRC5, and CDC25C) were up-regulated in subtype A, while the rest were down-regulated (Fig. 2G). These genes may modify these cells via anoikis, thereby impacting the immune infiltration of melanoma patients (Fig. 2H). The differential enrichment of KEGG pathways between clusters B and A was investigated using the GSVA package, and the general distribution of 14 ANRGs in the clusters was evaluated. Cluster B exhibited significantly higher levels of enrichment in 20 KEGG pathways, including primary immunodeficiency, leishmania infection, viral myocarditis, and asthma (Fig. 2I), suggesting that anoikis may influence prognosis by affecting these KEGG pathways. GSEA analysis revealed that subtype A was considerably enriched in five pathways: antigen processing and presentation, autoimmune thyroid disease, cell adhesion molecules cams, chemokine signaling pathway, and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (Fig. 2J).
3.3 Construction of the prognostic model
After the GEO and TCGA merging, the overall dataset was randomly divided into training and validation datasets (at a 5:5 ratio) to construct the prognostic model. Specific parameters of the risk score were obtained from the training set, and the risk score was calculated using the following formula:
Based on the median risk score, SKCM patients in the train dataset, validation dataset, and all datasets were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups, and it was found that the prognosis differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.001). The K-M survival curves for the training dataset, validation dataset, and all datasets demonstrated that patients in the low-risk group had a significantly better prognosis than those in the high-risk group (p < 0.001), indicating that the risk score can be used as a prognostic indicator (Fig. 3A–C).
The area under the time-dependent ROC for 1, 3, and 5 years was greater than 0.6 for the training dataset, indicating that our model predicts patient survival with high accuracy (Fig. 3D–F). Additionally, a heat map was generated to show the expression of PIK3R2, IGF1, and FASLG in the high-risk and low-risk groups in the prognostic model (Fig. 3G). The association between the two clusters, the high-risk and low-risk groups, and the final survival status was demonstrated by plotting the Sankey diagram (Fig. 3H). It can be observed that Cluster A predominantly consists of individuals with a high risk, while Cluster B exhibits an opposite pattern; however, their prognosis does not exhibit any significant differences. When conducting risk difference analysis, the risk scores were found to be significantly higher in cluster A (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3I). Furthermore, the independent prognostic analysis showed that the risk score could be an independent prognostic factor for additional clinical features (Fig. 3J). Using risk scores and staging, column line plots were generated to analyze the probability of survival for 1-, 3-, and 5-year time-dependent ROC curves (Fig. 3K and Supplementary Fig. 2).
3.4 Correlations between ANRGs and prognosis in SKCM patients
We performed a stratified survival analysis of clinicopathological factors for patients in TCGA-SKCM, including age (> 65 years vs. ≤ 65 years) (Fig. 4A, B), gender (female vs. male) (Fig. 4C, D), N (N0-1 vs. N2-3) (Fig. 4I, J), T (T0-2 vs. T3-4) (Fig. 4K, L), and M (M0 vs. M1). Age (Fig. 4E, F) and gender (Fig. 4G, H) were stratified for analysis in the GSE65904 patients, who only provided age and gender information. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that, except for the M1 group (p 0.05), the high-risk group had a lower DSS than the low-risk group (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 3B). Additionally, it is hypothesized that the M1 group is related to the small sample size due to the trend (Supplementary Fig. 3B).
3.5 Comparison of drug sensitivity between high- and low-risk groups
We evaluated 150 drugs based on the IC50 concentration difference between the high-risk and low-risk groups. In the high-risk group, we chose BI-2536 (Fig. 5A), ERK_2440 (Fig. 5B), ERK-6604 (Fig. 5C), Lapatinib (Fig. 5D), NVP-ADW742 (Fig. 5E), and SB505124 (Fig. 5F). In the low-risk group, we selected six drugs: 5-fluorouracil (Fig. 5G), AGI-5198 (Fig. 5H), AGI-6780 (Fig. 5I), alisertib (Fig. 5J), BMS_345541 (Fig. 5K), and AMG-319 (Fig. 5L).
3.6 Immune activity with different risk scores and Single-cell sequencing analysis
The infiltration levels of 22 immune cell phenotypes in high-risk and low-risk groups were examined. The infiltration of M0 macrophages, M2 macrophages, resting Mast cells, activated Mast cells, follicular helper T cells, Tregs, resting natural killer (NK) cells, and activated Dendritic cells was significantly higher in the high-risk group. However, the infiltration of B memory cells, Plasma cells, CD8( +) T cells, activated CD4( +) T memory cells, resting CD4( +) T memory cells, gamma delta T cells, activated NK cells, M1 macrophages, and resting Dendritic cells was much lower in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (p < 0.05) (Fig. 6A). The prognostic model was constructed using three genes, including IGF1, FASLG, and PIK3R2, which exhibit varying expression patterns between high- and low-risk groups and are strongly associated with multiple immune cell infiltrations (p < 0.05) (Fig. 6B). Using single-cell data analysis, we downscaled 7186 cells into 23 subpopulations (Fig. 6C) and subsequently annotated them into nine major cell types (Fig. 6D). Our findings revealed that the FASLG gene was predominantly expressed in Exhausted CD8( +) T (Tex) cells, NK, and Tprolif cell subpopulations (Figs. 6E and F), with CD8( +) T cells showing the highest level of connection with FASLG (Fig. 6B). The cell dimensionality reduction map indicated that FASLG was most abundant in the c1 cluster. T-cell depletion refers to the impaired states in antigen-specific CD8( +) T cells, which persist but fail to eradicate the pathogenic danger [23].
Currently, the primary mechanisms of regressive tumor effects are PD-1 and, more recently, additional pathways such as Lag-3, TIGIT, and Tim-3, which directly target and reinvigorate Tex cells [24]. We further explored the cellular communication between cluster 1 of Tex (Tex-C1) cells and other cells individually (Fig. 6G), with network nodes representing cell types, network edge thickness indicating the total number of ligand-receptor pairings, and line colors corresponding to ligand cell types. Our results showed that Kras-signaling-up, coagulation, myogenesis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition were down-regulated in Tex-C1 cells (Fig. 6H). Furthermore, KEGG enrichment analysis of Tex-C1 cells revealed that the lysosome and melanogenesis signaling pathways were down-regulated (Fig. 6I). These findings suggest that FASLG in SKCM is involved in the mechanism of Tex-C1 cell activity via these signaling pathways.
4 Discussion
Cell–matrix adhesion plays a pivotal role in maintaining cellular homeostasis. Disruptions in this process can lead to cell death or even induce apoptosis, commonly referred to as “anoikis” in most non-transformed cell types [7, 8, 25]. Anoikis evasion is frequently observed in cancer cells during metastasis and dissemination [9, 26]. Therefore, the restoration or induction of anoikis sensitivity represents a crucial therapeutic strategy for reducing tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential [27, 28]. The impact of certain genes associated with anoikis on the metastasis and dissemination of cancer cells has been demonstrated, rendering them potential targets for cancer intervention researches. For instance, TM9SF4 induces autophagy by suppressing mTOR phosphorylation, thereby enhancing anoikis resistance and metastatic potential in prostate cancer cells [29]. Similarly, PLAUR promotes resistance to anoikis and facilitates gastric cancer cell metastasis [30]. Therefore, this study aims to identify potential therapeutic targets by conducting a comprehensive screening of anoikis-related genes in patients diagnosed with SKCM.
We finally identified 14 prognosis-related SKCM anoikis-related DEGs. Cluster B obtained by clustering with those 14 genes is significantly enriched in primary immunodeficiency. Cutaneous melanoma is recognized as an immunogenic tumor, and its occurrence in individuals with compromised immune systems has been extensively documented, such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection/AIDS patients [31]. Our results suggest that these genes may influence cutaneous melanoma in terms of immune deficiency. Additionally, we have constructed a prognostic model incorporating a risk score consisting of three genes, IGF1, PIK3R2, and FASLG, for predicting the prognosis of SKCM. Previous studies has established associations between these three genes and the carcinogenesis and pathogenesis of cancer. IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor) is a growth factor closely associated with insulin, which has been found to mediate resistance to anoikis in melanoma cells [32, 33]. Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase regulatory subunit 2 (PIK3R2) acts as a negative inhibitor of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Its expression increases with advanced stages of melanoma tumor [34], exacerbating and it worsens melanoma by stimulating the PI3K/AKT/NF-B pathway [35]. Co-targeting miR-126-3p and miR-221-3p inhibits lung cancer development and metastasis by suppressing PIK3R2 and PTEN [36]. The human FASLG (FasL) gene belongs to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family, is located on chromosome 1 in the q23 region. The interaction between FASLG and FAS activates RIPK1, leading to necrosome formation that trigger necroptosis in tumor cells, potentially indicating breast cancer [37]. MiR-21 and its targets FASLG and B-cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2) are implicated in the malignant progression of MNNG-induced gastric cancer [38]. Our study suggests that these three genes may also play an vital role in skin SKCM, through association with anoikis.
In this study, the prognostic model developed using both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the risk score serves as an independent predictive factor for SKCM. This suggests that risk score is an important predictor in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Moreover, it demonstrates consistent prognostic value when stratifying clinicopathological parameters. We identified 150 prognostic drugs, including BI-2536, Lapatinib, AGI-6780. The dihydropteridinone derivative BI-2536 exhibits potent inhibition of Plk-1, a protein kinase that is overexpressed in approximately 80% of human tumors and associated with a poor prognosis [39, 40]. BI-2536 is widely used to treat non-small cell lung cancer [41], breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers and melanoma [42], due to the ability of interfering mitosis [43]. Studies demonstrated that lapatinib exhibits potential for the treatment of both breast cancer and gastric cancer [44,45,46]. Furthermore, the efficacy of lapatinib in melanoma, particularly among high-risk patients, shows promising results [46, 47]. AGI-6780 is an IDH inhibitor that has demonstrated benefits in patients with chronic granulocytic leukemia by inhibiting acquired resistance to imatinib mesylate (IMA) and adriamycin (ADR). However, the existing literature on these drugs in melanoma treatment is limited, and our study suggests their potential efficacy in cutaneous melanoma therapy. And further investigation is required evaluate its effectiveness in melanoma [48].
Anoikis heavily relise on the Fas/Fas ligand cell death pathway [49]. Similarly, it has been demonstrated that Fas/Fas ligand interactions predominantly mediate anoikis in endothelial cells, while their role in epithelial cells remains less evident [50]. Although FASLG is abundantly expressed in melanoma patients, its involvement in malignant cells apoptosis remains unclear [51]. However, certain studies suggest that a potential protective role of this gene based on univariate Cox regression analysis; nevertheless, further investigation is required to confirm its association with anoikis [52]. A correlation analysis between these three genes and risk scores with immune cells revealed FASLG as having the strongest association with Tex cells. Through evaluation of single-cell sequencing data (GSE115978), we observed predominant expression of FASLG in Tex-C1 cells. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed six downregulated pathways in Tex-C1 cells, including kras-signaling, coagulation, myogenesis, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, the lysosome, and melanogenesis.
A correlation analysis of three genes and risk scores with immune cells found that FASLG had the highest connection with Tex cells. We evaluated single-cell sequencing data (GSE115978) and found that FASLG was primarily expressed in Tex-C1 cells. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed six downregulated pathways in Tex-C1 cells, including kras-signaling, coagulation, myogenesis, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, the lysosome, and melanogenesis.
The process of Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) involves the loss of is a cellular process wherein epithelial cells lose their polarity and intercellular adherence in epithelial cells, leading to the acquisition and acquireof migratory and invasive capacities, ultimately transforming into mesenchymal stem cells capable of differentiatingthat can differentiate into various cell types. The manifestation of EMT phenotype is commonly associated with advanced cancer staging and poor prognosis. Moreover, Fas signaling has been identified to as an induce of EMT and a promoter of enhance gastrointestinal (GI) cancer metastasis [53]. Conversely, Tex-C1 cells may impact, on the other hand, may influence melanoma prognosis by downregulating the melanogenesis pathway through upregulated expression of increased FASLG expression. However, further investigation is warranted required to elucidate explore the interaction between the FASLG gene, anoikis, and SKCM.
5 Conclusion
In conclusion, our study classified melanoma into two subgroups, wherein the B subtype exhibited higher disease-specific survival (DSS) and immune cell infiltration. We also developed a predictive model for SKCM based on PIK3R2, IGF1, and FASLG, which could potentially predict DSS survival time for SKCM patients. Additionally, the high expression of FASLG on Tex-C1 cells suggests that targeting FASLG could be a plausible therapeutic approach for anoikis against Tex-C1 cells.
Data availability
The datasets analyzed and established during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Lv H, et al. Comprehensive analysis of cuproptosis-related genes in immune infiltration and prognosis in melanoma. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:930041.
Long GV, et al. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet. 2023;402(10400):485–502.
Rebecca VW, Somasundaram R, Herlyn M. Pre-clinical modeling of cutaneous melanoma. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2858.
Arnold M, et al. Global burden of cutaneous melanoma in 2020 and projections to 2040. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(5):495–503.
Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020.
Taddei ML, et al. Anoikis: an emerging hallmark in health and diseases. J Pathol. 2012;226(2):380–93.
Gilmore AP. Anoikis. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12(Suppl 2):1473–7.
Frisch SM, Ruoslahti E. Integrins and anoikis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9(5):701–6.
Frisch SM, Screaton RA. Anoikis mechanisms. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001;13(5):555–62.
Ping S, et al. Identification and validation of a ferroptosis-related gene signature for predicting survival in skin cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Med. 2022;11(18):3529–41.
Lu J, Tan M, Cai Q. The Warburg effect in tumor progression: mitochondrial oxidative metabolism as an anti-metastasis mechanism. Cancer Lett. 2015;356(2 Pt A):156–64.
Wang J, et al. Anoikis-associated lung cancer metastasis: mechanisms and therapies. Cancers. 2022;14(19):4791.
Hu B, et al. Preventive and therapeutic effects of chinese herbal compounds against hepatocellular carcinoma. Molecules. 2016;21(2):142.
Oudenaarden CRL, van de Ven RAH, Derksen PWB. Re-inforcing the cell death army in the fight against breast cancer. J Cell Sci. 2018;131(16): jcs212563.
Bose M, et al. Targeting tumor-associated MUC1 overcomes anoikis-resistance in pancreatic cancer. Transl Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2022.08.010.
Mayakonda A, et al. Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res. 2018;28(11):1747–56.
Kassambara A. et al. survminer: drawing survival curves using’ggplot2’. R package version 0.4. 9. 2021. 2021.
Therneau TM. A package for survival analysis in R. New York, USA. 2019.
Kolde R. Pheatmap: pretty heatmaps. R Package Vers. 2012;1(2):726.
Hänzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinform. 2013;14(1):1–15.
Tibshirani R. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model. Stat Med. 1997;16(4):385–95.
Maeser D, Gruener RF, Huang RS. oncoPredict: an R package for predicting in vivo or cancer patient drug response and biomarkers from cell line screening data. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22(6):bbab260.
Dolina JS, et al. CD8(+) T Cell exhaustion in cancer. Front Immunol. 2021;12:715234.
McLane LM, Abdel-Hakeem MS, Wherry EJ. CD8 T Cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection and cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37:457–95.
Chiarugi P, Giannoni E. Anoikis: a necessary death program for anchorage-dependent cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;76(11):1352–64.
Frisch SM, Francis H. Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 1994;124(4):619–26.
Jenning S, et al. Bit1 in anoikis resistance and tumor metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2013;333(2):147–51.
Hong KP, et al. Therapeutic effect of anti CEACAM6 monoclonal antibody against lung adenocarcinoma by enhancing anoikis sensitivity. Biomaterials. 2015;67:32–41.
Yu Y, et al. CircCEMIP promotes anoikis-resistance by enhancing protective autophagy in prostate cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022;41(1):188.
Zhang T, et al. TCF7L2 promotes anoikis resistance and metastasis of gastric cancer by transcriptionally activating PLAUR. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(11):4560–77.
Kubica AW, Brewer JD. Melanoma in immunosuppressed patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(10):991–1003.
Hilmi C, et al. IGF1 promotes resistance to apoptosis in melanoma cells through an increased expression of BCL2, BCL-X(L), and survivin. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(6):1499–505.
Luey BC, May FE. Insulin-like growth factors are essential to prevent anoikis in oestrogen-responsive breast cancer cells: importance of the type I IGF receptor and PI3-kinase/Akt pathway. Mol Cancer. 2016;15:8.
Vallejo-Díaz J, et al. The opposing roles of PIK3R1/p85α and PIK3R2/p85β in cancer. Trends Cancer. 2019;5(4):233–44.
Wang J, et al. PIK3R2 predicts poor outcomes for patients with melanoma and contributes to the malignant progression via PI3K/AKT/NF-κB axis. Clin Transl Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-022-03036-x.
Di Paolo D, et al. Cotargeting of miR-126-3p and miR-221-3p inhibits PIK3R2 and PTEN, reducing lung cancer growth and metastasis by blocking AKT and CXCR4 signalling. Mol Oncol. 2021;15(11):2969–88.
Yu H, et al. Immunotherapy landscape analyses of necroptosis characteristics for breast cancer patients. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):328.
Yang Q, et al. miR-21 regulates N-methyl-N-nitro-N′-nitrosoguanidine-induced gastric tumorigenesis by targeting FASLG and BTG2. Toxicol Lett. 2014;228(3):147–56.
Strebhardt K, Ullrich A. Targeting polo-like kinase 1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(4):321–30.
Yap TA, et al. Targeting cell cycle kinases and kinesins in anticancer drug development. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2007;2(4):539–60.
Sebastian M, et al. The efficacy and safety of BI 2536, a novel Plk-1 inhibitor, in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer who had relapsed after, or failed, chemotherapy: results from an open-label, randomized phase II clinical trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(7):1060–7.
Steegmaier M, et al. BI 2536, a potent and selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1, inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Curr Biol. 2007;17(4):316–22.
Schoffski P, et al. Multicentric parallel phase II trial of the polo-like kinase 1 inhibitor BI 2536 in patients with advanced head and neck cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, soft tissue sarcoma and melanoma. The first protocol of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Network Of Core Institutes (NOCI). Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(12):2206–15.
Xu B, et al. Pyrotinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (PHOEBE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(3):351–60.
Janjigian YY. Lapatinib in gastric cancer: what is the logical next step? J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(5):401–3.
Bilancia D, et al. Lapatinib in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(Suppl 6):vi26-30.
Stirrups R. Lapatinib with chemotherapy for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(8): e400.
Liu W, et al. DIA-based proteomics identifies IDH2 as a targetable regulator of acquired drug resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2022;21(2):100187.
Puviani M, et al. Fas ligand in pemphigus sera induces keratinocyte apoptosis through the activation of caspase-8. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120(1):164–7.
Aoudjit F, Vuori K. Matrix attachment regulates Fas-induced apoptosis in endothelial cells: a role for c-flip and implications for anoikis. J Cell Biol. 2001;152(3):633–43.
Ugurel S, et al. Increased soluble CD95 (sFas/CD95) serum level correlates with poor prognosis in melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(5):1282–6.
Niu Z, et al. Development and validation of a novel survival model for cutaneous melanoma based on necroptosis-related genes. Front Oncol. 2022;12:852803.
Zheng H, et al. miR-23a inhibits E-cadherin expression and is regulated by AP-1 and NFAT4 complex during Fas-induced EMT in gastrointestinal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(1):173–83.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was financially supported by no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Methodology, XL; software, XL; validation, XL; formal analysis, HZ; investigation, HD; resources, HD; data curation, HZ; writing—original draft preparation, XL; writing—review and editing, HD and HZ; visualization, HZ; supervision, HD. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Since the data comes from public databases, ethical approval is not required.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The writers indicated that their work was not influenced by competing financial interests or personal connection.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
12672_2024_926_MOESM2_ESM.tif
Supplementary file 2 (TIF 987 KB) Supplementary Figure 2: Accuracy of Nomogram to Predict Disease-Specific Survival for 1, 3, and 5 Years (A). Correlation between Nomogram Prediction Time and Cumulative Hazard (B).
12672_2024_926_MOESM3_ESM.tif
Supplementary file 3 (TIF 899 KB) Supplementary Figure 3: Disease-Specific Survival in SKCM for M0 (A) and M1 (B) Patients in the High- and Low-Risk Groups.
12672_2024_926_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary file 4 (XLSX 64 KB) Supplementary Table 1: Anoikis-Related Genes in GeneCards-SearchResults. Supplementary Table 2: Anoikis-Related Genes in Harmonizome. Supplementary Table 3: Differentially expressed Anoikis gene.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Zhang, HY. & Deng, HA. Transcriptome and single-cell transcriptomics reveal prognostic value and potential mechanism of anoikis in skin cutaneous melanoma. Discov Onc 15, 70 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-00926-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-00926-0