Abstract
Spinal neuromodulation and activity-based rehabilitation triggers neural network reorganization and enhances sensory-motor performances involving the lower limbs, the trunk, and the upper limbs. This study reports the acute effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Neuromodulation (SCONE™, SpineX Inc.) on 12 individuals (ages 2 to 50) diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP) with Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) levels ranging from I to V. Acute spinal neuromodulation improved the postural and locomotor abilities in 11 out of the 12 patients including the ability to generate bilateral weight bearing stepping in a 2-year-old (GMFCS level IV) who was unable to step. In addition, we observed independent head-control and weight bearing standing with stimulation in a 10-year-old and a 4-year old (GMFCS level V) who were unable to hold their head up or stand without support in the absence of stimulation. All patients significantly improved in coordination of flexor and extensor motor pools and inter and intralimb joint angles while stepping on a treadmill. While it is assumed that the etiologies of the disruptive functions of CP are associated with an injury to the supraspinal networks, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that spinal neuromodulation and functionally focused activity-based therapies can form a functionally improved chronic state of reorganization of the spinal-supraspinal connectivity. We further suggest that the level of reorganization of spinal-supraspinal connectivity with neuromodulation contributed to improved locomotion by improving the coordination patterns of flexor and extensor muscles by modulating the amplitude and firing patterns of EMG burst during stepping.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cerebral palsy (CP) is one of the most common childhood motor disorders in the USA with an estimated 1.5 to 4 out of 1000 individuals born with CP [1,2,3] and over 10,000 new cases diagnosed each year. There are approximately 500,000 children under the age of 18 in USA and approximately 17 million globally currently living with CP. Medical costs are around 10 times higher for children with CP and 26 times higher for children with CP with an intellectual disability. The total lifetime care costs currently exceed $1 million [4]. CP is generally considered to be an umbrella diagnosis that includes a wide range of symptoms with heterogeneous etiologies of neural and cardiovascular origins [5]. It is generally assumed that the primary pathology of the nervous system that leads to CP is located within and among different combinations of supraspinal networks, and these pathologies can be due to multiple etiologies. In most cases, however, it appears that these supraspinal pathologies also will be necessarily manifested as spinally mediated dysfunctions, affecting multiple peripheral sensory-motor systems including midline orientation, equilibrium, posture (including trunk and head control), locomotion, and trunk and head control [6]. Also, the visual system often is impacted in children with CP, because normally, the brain and spinal networks provide a key, coherent driving factor to accommodate a 1G environment in controlling posture. But children with CP often learn faulty trunk and head alignment as a result of the dysfunctional input from the supraspinal networks to the largely normal spinal networks that can be driven by the proprioceptive system [7].
The majority of children classified as Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) Level I are expected to reach their motor potential between 7 and 9 years and thereafter remain stable until age 21 when they may experience functional decline due to pain, weakness, and stiffness [8, 9]. Presently, all available interventions are designed to manage and minimize symptoms rather than correcting the underlying dysfunctions [10, 11]. While some commonly preferred treatments such as intramuscular injection of onabotulinumtoxinA (BotoxA) reduce symptoms of spasticity, which initially may improve function, but rarely lead to significant long-term functional changes [12] and may severely limit the eventual level of recovery that theoretically is possible [13].
We have demonstrated that noninvasive stimulation of the spinal cord can lead to recovery of lower extremity [14, 15], upper extremity [16], trunk [17], breathing and coughing [18], and bladder function [19, 20] after spinal cord injury (SCI). Some features of the physiological dysfunctions seen in individuals with SCI are similar to those commonly observed in individuals with CP, i.e., poor coordination of motor pools during stepping and spasticity. Multiple neuromodulation modalities have been attempted in children with CP for recovery of sensorimotor function including combined locomotor therapy and functional electrical stimulation [21, 22] and epidural [23, 24], but transcutaneous spinal stimulation [25], similar to that used in the present study, has been shown to have a greater effect. In the present study, we have merged ideas and concepts derived from both recent clinical observations of CP and decades of studies in SCI patients [16, 26,27,28] including activity-based mechanisms during locomotor tasks and transcutaneous spinal neuromodulation [15, 27, 29]. We hypothesized that a single (acute) transcutaneous spinal neuromodulation session could facilitate locomotor function of individuals with CP by reorganizing spinal neural networks to functional states which enable spinal interneurons to translate ensembles of proprioception to temporal patterns of activity that generates highly coordinated movements. How electrical neuromodulation transforms the networks to functional states which enable them to generate these improved coordinated patterns remains unknown, but the present observations provide a very important target given its significance to the level of plasticity of spinal and supraspinal networks of individuals with CP. Thus, the objective of this study is to determine whether the acute, system-level physiological effects of transcutaneous spinal cord neuromodulation has the potential to improve locomotor function in individuals with CP as has been shown to be effective in individuals with spinal cord injuries.
Methods
The study was approved by an external Investigational Review Board (Integreview IRB). All study participants (or their parents in case of a minor) signed the informed consent form and consented to their data to be used for future publications and presentations. The patient demographic and pathologies are summarized in Table 1. The inclusion criteria included (1) individuals above the age of 2 years of age and (2) diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP). The exclusion criteria included (1) selective dorsal root rhizotomy, (2) intramuscular Botox injection in the preceding 12 months, (3) current antispastic medications, (4) unhealed fractures or contractures that would prevent them from performing functional tasks, and (5) tendon-lengthening surgeries.
SCONE™ Therapy
Spinal stimulation was delivered over the course of a single 30-min session using a proprietary device SCONE™ (SpineX Inc, Los Angeles, CA) (Parag Gad 2019). The stimulation waveform consisted of two alternating pulses of opposite polarities separated by a 1-µS delay to form a delayed biphasic waveform. The pulses consisted of a high-frequency biphasic carrier pulse (10 kHz) combined with a low-frequency (30 Hz) burst pulse each with a pulse width of 1 ms. Stimulation was applied using an adhesive hydrogel electrode between T11–12 and L1–2 serving as the cathode and two adhesive hydrogel electrodes over bilateral iliac crests as the anodes (Supplemental Fig. 1). Patients were assessed both without and with neuromodulation at different parameters to test the changes in stepping patterns. However, at all times, the stimulation intensity was maintained at ~ 20–25% below the threshold that induced a motor response [15, 17, 29,30,31]. All patients were able to communicate with the parents and research team if they experienced any pain or discomfort either due to the spinal neuromodulation or due to the locomotor procedures. None of the patients reported any pain or discomfort during the stimulation and were blinded from the stimulation parameters at any given time during the testing procedures. While the patients could feel the stimulation pulses initially, they were unable to clearly distinguish between intensities or even the presence of stimulation after a brief period of accommodation. The stimulation intensities used for each patient are listed in Table 1.
Data Collection
Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from nine out of the twelve participants from select lower extremity muscles using surface EMG electrodes (LabChart and PowerLab; ADInstruments). Electronic Goniometers were bilaterally placed on hip and/or knee joints to record joint angular displacements. Video recordings were completed in all 12 patients and video plus EMG in 5 patients. EMG recordings were not performed in 3 patients (P5, P7, and P10) due to the visible apprehension seemingly attributable to the size of the recording electrodes and wires as well as their low level of postural stability. Data were recorded and sampled at a frequency of 10 kHz and were analyzed using LabChart software. Video data were recorded on LabChart and synchronized with the EMG files.
Locomotor Assessment
For patients who were unable to perform functional tasks such as standing or stepping, the primary outcome was the ability to voluntarily initiate these activities without any external assistance. For patients who were capable of stepping on a treadmill, the primary outcome was to assess EMG and kinematic patterns representing improved coordination and reduced co-contractions. Each patient was tested on a treadmill at the same speed and body weight support (patient 1 and 5) without and with stimulation. The speed of the treadmill was set to ensure patients were capable of stepping at a comfortable speed. Since patients 7 and 10 were unable to hold their head up or stand upright without external support, they were only tested for the ability to sit upright with the head erect and when transitioning from sit to stand.
Data Analysis and Statistics
Joint angle excursions were calculated by identifying the stance and swing phases. Integrated EMG data are reported by calculating the area under the curve of the filtered, rectified signal for each step cycle. To calculate the level of co-contraction, we quantified the joint probability distribution (JPD) plots of all data points (resolution 0.1 ms) from two antagonistic muscles (TA and Sol) of the filtered EMG during a series of 15 consecutive step cycles. These data points were divided into 4 quadrants with the axes drawn at 20% of the max amplitude (of the linear envelope of rectified EMG trace) for each muscle. The total number of data points in quadrants 2 and 4 representing alternating activity between antagonistic muscles were summed and compared between stimulation off vs on. The coefficient of correlation was calculated by measuring the correlation between joint angles of each normalized step cycle with the normalized mean step cycle as previously published [32]. Paired t-tests were used to compare the group mean data without and with stimulation. All statistical significances are reported at P < 0.05.
Results
The patients were first tested without stimulation for either stepping on the treadmill at their comfortable speed, sitting upright, or transitioning from sitting to standing. After a brief rest, they were then tested with stimulation at T11–12 and L1–2 for the same tasks. The intensity of the stimulation was unknown to the patient and was maintained at a sub-motor threshold intensity [30]. Patient P1 was unable to step on the treadmill without stimulation and demonstrated occasional and uncoordinated bursts in his lower extremity muscles. He could however step bilaterally with stimulation on with robust alternating EMG bursting activity in all his lower extremity muscles (Fig. 1, Supplementary video 1). Patients (P2-P6, P8, P9, P11, and P12) were capable of stepping without stimulation and demonstrated consistent bursting activity in all lower extremity muscles with significant levels of co-contraction of agonist-antagonistic muscles (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 2). The overall kinetics and kinematics represented by the change in EMG activity and joint angle excursions were similar between stimulation off and on (Fig. 3A). A key difference was noted in the interlimb and intralimb coordination and the consistency of stepping as reflected in the increased coefficient of correlation with fewer variations in joint angles (hip and knee) between consecutive cycles with stimulation on vs off (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3B, C). While the area under the curve for joint angles (hip-knee and knee-knee) showed a trend toward a decrease with stimulation on vs off; these changes were not significant (Fig. 3D), perhaps, because the overall angular excursions remained the same (Fig. 3A). However, the patients were able to take longer steps in the presence vs absence of stimulation (0.88 ± 0.005 s vs 0.973 ± 0.036 s, P < 0.05). In addition, antagonistic muscles (TA vs soleus) showed significantly lower levels of co-contraction (Fig. 3E). The mean percent data points representative of alternating activity (Quadrant 2 + 4) was significantly higher with stimulation on vs off representing a decreased level of co-contraction between antagonistic muscles, a representation of decreased spasticity as well as considerably improved levels of coordination of agonist-antagonistic motor pools (Fig. 3E, F, and G). Patient 7 who was only tested for upright sitting and standing due to complete lack of head control was capable of performing the functional tasks for longer periods of time with increased levels of control (10–12 s vs 45–60 s) with stimulation on compared to off (Supplementary video 2).
Discussion
The present data suggest that the supraspinal connectivity to the spinal neural networks in individuals with CP has developed into an incomplete and/or abnormal physiological state [33, 34]. It seems rather clear that the abnormality in the brain sends disruptive signals to the spinal networks that, in turn, generates poorly coordinated movements. We hypothesized that this abnormal supraspinal-spinal loop can be functionally minimized, largely via proprioception projecting normal signals to spinal networks enabling the automaticity and feedforwardness [35] of the spinal cord which translates the sensory input into a more normal motor action (Fig. 4) [36]. Finally, we predict that this more normal action derived from proprioception in the presence of spinal neuromodulation can be learned via activity-dependent changes (rehabilitation). One could question, or at least be surprised, as to how the outcomes of the interventional strategies used for CP are similar to those observed with spinal cord injury (SCI). Both dysfunctions, however, have evolved from abnormal spinal-supraspinal connections, but both can be acutely driven toward normality by proper posture, proprioception, and spinal neuromodulation [15,16,17, 19, 36,37,38].
CP patients demonstrate improper and perhaps incomplete functional connectivity between the brain and the spinal cord (Fig. 4). Since a relatively “normal” level and target-specific connectivity is needed to accommodate a 1-G environment, the dysfunctional brain-spinal cord connectivity results in the patient learning an abnormal gait and posture to accommodate gravity. Spinal neuromodulation changes the physiological states and the functional connections of the brain and spinal networks. The present observations of patients with CP over a wide range of age groups (2 to 50 years) and severity of dysfunction (GMFCS level I to V) are important, first, because the similarities at systems-level mechanisms of acutely reorganizing spinal-supraspinal networks generated improved coordination of motor pools in stepping are similar to that observed with SCI for multiple motor functions. Secondly, the similarities of the acute effects of both SCI and CP provide strong evidence that similar mechanisms could be relevant in achieving long-term neuroplasticity with the repetitive presentation of similar interventional parameters [36]. The acute changes in coordination of motor pools and reduced variability in stepping reported here provide strong evidence that noninvasive spinal neuromodulation can lead to positive chronic effects. It is interesting to note that the greatest improvements in functional performance during acute spinal neuromodulation were observed in either the youngest individuals or ones that were most severely affected (GMFCS IV and V) whereas the oldest reported minimal change in sensation and performance with a single exposure to neuromodulation.
The importance of these results is that it provides a lead to a novel strategy with a strong biological logic that might make it possible to realize a transformation similar to that which is occurring with spinal cord injury. Thus, we hypothesized that spinal neuromodulation in concert with proprioceptive-driven activity-dependent mechanisms of spinal networks can transform the supraspinal-spinal dysfunctional connectivity of CP into highly functional connections, characterized by a more normal agonist–antagonist coordination pattern. Unlike traditional approaches (such as functional electrical stimulation, which are designed to directly induce muscle contractions), spinal neuromodulation can be used to modulate the excitability of spinal networks below the motor threshold to a more functional physiological state when engaged primarily by more normal patterns of proprioception. We propose that these continuous ensembles of proprioception can be translated automatically with considerable precision by the spinal networks. Based on the more normal signals generated by these spinal networks. With repetitive treatments, more normal signals are projected supraspinally to movement control centers in the brain, which further restores [23] sensorimotor functions (Fig. 4). Although improvement of multiple behaviors derived from supraspinal networks following spinal injury has been clearly manifested physiologically, the spinal-supraspinal networks through which this effect is mediated have only recently become of great importance. In essence, transcutaneous spinal neuromodulation appears to facilitate neuroplasticity and can lead to bidirectional transformations of neural connections among brain-spinal cord-muscle-spinal cord-brain connectomes [39].
One of the most common spontaneous perceptions expressed by patients with CP (including the ones reported here) when initially receiving epidural or transcutaneous spinal neuromodulation, regardless of whether it was an individual with a SCI, stroke, or CP and regardless of the task being attempted, was that it was “easier” to perform and was able to perform tasks for longer periods of time with less fatigue. Another self-reported comment has been an increase in level of awareness and “sensation of stepping,” “feeling lighter” while walking on the treadmill with stimulation. Interestingly, in the first published report by Herman and colleagues in 2002 [40] and subsequently by Harkema and colleagues in 2011 [28], exploring the possibility of restoring motor function after a severe spinal cord injury, the patient’s perception was that it was easier to walk in the presence of epidural stimulation. The mechanisms by which the widely different means of neuromodulation are applied and the types of patients with different dysfunctions and the regaining of an array of sensation need to be further explored more quantitatively. There has been strikingly little effort to attempt to understand the mechanisms of recovering sensations, although there are increasingly important clues as to its fundamental importance in recovering motor function. It is also important to emphasize that while the brain-spinal cord re-connectivity can be functionally (behaviorally) substantial, the anatomical equivalent is completely unknown.
Clinically, these results suggest that the supraspinal and spinal networks are highly responsive to activity-dependent mechanisms that help drive more aligned posture, particularly when administered in concert with spinal neuromodulation [41] [42, 43]. We propose that acute spinal neuromodulation in children with CP can enable a persistent drive for functionally useful reorganization of spinal and supraspinal networks to emerge, similar to that which has been reported for stepping [31], standing [15], upper limb [16, 44], trunk stability [17], normalization of blood pressure function [45], breathing [18], bladder, bowel, and sexual function [19, 20, 46]. These observations have occurred in almost every patient who had been spinally injured for at least 1 year with complete paralysis before receiving spinal neuromodulation and some form of activity-dependent intervention. It is interesting to note the similarity in response between CP and SCI patients considering the difference in pathologies. This is supported by the facts that the electrophysiological basis of our approach is similar, i.e., (1) enabling the proprioceptive system to drive motor function and (2) re-establish appropriate connections between spinal and supraspinal centers. The results observed in CP may be further enhanced considering a stronger anatomical connection between brain and spinal cord. However, the apparent problem with the greater connectivity in CP compared to SCI is the high degree of functionally aberrant supraspinal-spinal connections, given the spastic-like behavior and the abnormal EMG patterns (Capellini et al., 2020 and Edgerton et al., 2021).
While spinal neuromodulation has been explored in children with CP, these data are unique as these is the first to demonstrate the electrophysiological changes possible within one session of stimulation to reorganize a nonfunctional or dysfunctional brain-spinal network to a new functional physiological state. In addition, it lays the foundation for when these tasks are performed repetitively, a learning phenomenon can emerge, which facilitates regaining a range of movements requiring greater skill, power, and endurance. Also, the present observations are consistent with the neuromodulation changing the physiological states of spinal and supraspinal networks in a way that enables the nervous system to choose from an infinite number of potential movements. In essence, this enables the person with CP to engage strict guidance from proprioceptive input as occurs normally, to drive the spinal networks [47].
We emphasize this latter point because the more effective spinal neuromodulation strategy after SCI has been to use below motor threshold levels of neuromodulation, as much as possible to enable the patient to perform a wide range of movements, by choice, not by electrically induced movements defined by the experimenter or the technical device used [43]. Supra-motor threshold levels of stimulation reduce the control by the spinal interneuronal networks, the sites at which most of the coordination of motor pools and spinal learning normally occurs. The acute reduction in co-contraction between antagonistic muscles with neuromodulation was observed in all patients. This acute effect highlights the potential importance of engaging activity-dependent mechanisms to minimize the impact of functionally aberrant connections that may be formed in the brain and spinal cord [48, 49]. In addition, it highlights the need for more long-term activity-based neurorehabilitation therapy especially for the older individuals for whom there may be a greater persistence of aberrant connections which often lead to persistent spasticity, a manifestation of poor coordination.
References
1.Arneson CL, Durkin MS, Benedict RE, Kirby RS, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Van Naarden Braun K, et al. Prevalence of cerebral palsy: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, three sites, United States, 2004. Disability and health journal. 2009;2(1):45-8.
Paneth N, Hong T, Korzeniewski S. The descriptive epidemiology of cerebral palsy. Clinics in perinatology. 2006;33(2):251-67.
Winter S, Autry A, Boyle C, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Trends in the prevalence of cerebral palsy in a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2002;110(6):1220-5.
Kruse M, Michelsen SI, Flachs EM, Bronnum-Hansen H, Madsen M, Uldall P. Lifetime costs of cerebral palsy. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2009;51(8):622-8.
Sanger T. Movement disorders in cerebral palsy. Journal of Pediatric Neurology. 2015.
Smith AT, Gorassini MA. Hyperexcitability of brain stem pathways in cerebral palsy. Journal of neurophysiology. 2018;120(3):1428-37.
Curtis DJ, Butler P, Saavedra S, Bencke J, Kallemose T, Sonne-Holm S, et al. The central role of trunk control in the gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2015;57(4):351-7.
Findlay B, Switzer L, Narayanan U, Chen S, Fehlings D. Investigating the impact of pain, age, Gross Motor Function Classification System, and sex on health-related quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2016;58(3):292-7.
Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Hanna SE, Palisano RJ, Russell DJ, Raina P, et al. Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. Jama. 2002;288(11):1357-63.
Choi JY, Kim SK, Park ES. The Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injections on Gross Motor Function for Lower Limb Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Toxins. 2019;11(11).
Dewar R, Love S, Johnston LM. Exercise interventions improve postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2015;57(6):504-20.
Tedroff K, Hagglund G, Miller F. Long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2020;62(5):554-62.
Graham D, Aquilina K, Mankad K, Wimalasundera N. Selective dorsal rhizotomy: current state of practice and the role of imaging. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery. 2018;8(2):209-18.
Gerasimenko YP, Lu DC, Modaber M, Zdunowski S, Gad P, Sayenko DG, et al. Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(24):1968-80.
Sayenko D, Rath M, Ferguson AR, Burdick J, Havton L, Edgerton VRPD, et al. Self-assisted standing enabled by non-invasive spinal stimulation after spinal cord injury. Journal of neurotrauma. 2018.
Gad P, Lee S, Terrafranca N, Zhong H, Turner A, Gerasimenko Y, et al. Non-Invasive Activation of Cervical Spinal Networks after Severe Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(18):2145-58.
Rath M, Vette AH, Ramasubramaniam S, Li K, Burdick J, Edgerton VR, et al. Trunk Stability Enabled by Noninvasive Spinal Electrical Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(21):2540-53.
Gad PN, Kreydin E, Zhong H, Edgerton VR. Enabling respiratory control after severe chronic tetraplegia: An exploratory case study. Journal of neurophysiology. 2020.
Gad PN, Kreydin E, Zhong H, Latack K, Edgerton VR. Non-invasive Neuromodulation of Spinal Cord Restores Lower Urinary Tract Function After Paralysis. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:432.
Kreydin E, Zhong H, Latack K, Ye S, Edgerton VR, Gad P. Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Neuromodulator (TESCoN) Improves Symptoms of Overactive Bladder. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2020;14:1.
Armstrong EL, Boyd RN, Kentish MJ, Carty CP, Horan SA. Effects of a training programme of functional electrical stimulation (FES) powered cycling, recreational cycling and goal-directed exercise training on children with cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ open. 2019;9(6):e024881.
Nikityuk IE, Moshonkina TR, Shcherbakova NA, Vissarionov SV, Umnov VV, Rozhdestvenskii VY, et al. [Effects of locomotor training and functional electrical stimulation on postural function in children with severe cerebral palsy]. Fiziologiia cheloveka. 2016;42(3):37-46.
Hugenholtz H, Humphreys P, McIntyre WM, Spasoff RA, Steel K. Cervical spinal cord stimulation for spasticity in cerebral palsy. Neurosurgery. 1988;22(4):707-14.
Dekopov AV, Shabalov VA, Tomsky AA, Hit MV, Salova EM. Chronic Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Cerebral and Spinal Spasticity. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. 2015;93(2):133-9.
Solopova IA, Sukhotina IA, Zhvansky DS, Ikoeva GA, Vissarionov SV, Baindurashvili AG, et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on motor functions in children with cerebral palsy. Neuroscience letters. 2017;639:192-8.
Edgerton VR, Tillakaratne NJ, Bigbee AJ, de Leon RD, Roy RR. Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. Annual review of neuroscience. 2004;27:145-67.
Gad P, Roy RR, Choe J, Zhong H, Nandra MS, Tai YC, et al. Electrophysiological mapping of rat sensorimotor lumbosacral spinal networks after complete paralysis. Prog Brain Res. 2015;218:199-212.
Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, et al. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011;377(9781):1938-47.
Gad P, Gerasimenko Y, Zdunowski S, Turner A, Sayenko D, Lu DC, et al. Weight Bearing Over-ground Stepping in an Exoskeleton with Non-invasive Spinal Cord Neuromodulation after Motor Complete Paraplegia. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:333.
Gad P, Choe J, Shah P, Garcia-Alias G, Rath M, Gerasimenko Y, et al. Sub-threshold spinal cord stimulation facilitates spontaneous motor activity in spinal rats. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2013;10:108.
Parag Gad YG, V Reggie Edgerton. Tetraplegia to Overground Stepping Using Non-Invasive Spinal Neuromodulation. 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). 2019:89–92.
Shah PK, Garcia-Alias G, Choe J, Gad P, Gerasimenko Y, Tillakaratne N, et al. Use of quadrupedal step training to re-engage spinal interneuronal networks and improve locomotor function after spinal cord injury. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2013;136(Pt 11):3362-77.
Shuman BR, Goudriaan M, Desloovere K, Schwartz MH, Steele KM. Muscle synergies demonstrate only minimal changes after treatment in cerebral palsy. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2019;16(1):46.
Cappellini G, Sylos-Labini F, MacLellan MJ, Assenza C, Libernini L, Morelli D, et al. Locomotor patterns during obstacle avoidance in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of neurophysiology. 2020;124(2):574-90.
Gerasimenko Y, Sayenko D, Gad P, Liu CT, Tillakaratne NJK, Roy RR, et al. Feed-Forwardness of Spinal Networks in Posture and Locomotion. Neuroscientist. 2017;23(5):441-53.
V Reggie Edgerton SH, Parag Gad. Engaging spinal networks to mitigate supraspinal dysfunction after CP. Frontiers in Systems Neurosciences. 2021.
Reid LB, Rose SE, Boyd RN. Rehabilitation and neuroplasticity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Nature reviews Neurology. 2015;11(7):390-400.
Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Badawi N. Optimising motor learning in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a pilot study. BMC pediatrics. 2015;15:30.
Edgerton VR, Gad P. Is the vagus nerve our neural connectome? Elife. 2018;7.
Herman R, He J, D'Luzansky S, Willis W, Dilli S. Spinal cord stimulation facilitates functional walking in a chronic, incomplete spinal cord injured. Spinal cord. 2002;40(2):65-8.
Fong AJ, Roy RR, Ichiyama RM, Lavrov I, Courtine G, Gerasimenko Y, et al. Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face. Progress in brain research. 2009;175:393-418.
Sayenko VREYPGPGDG. Basic concepts underlying activity- dependent mechanisms in the rehabilitation of sensory-motor function after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Medicine. 2018;Chapter 54:897 to 911.
Taccola G, Sayenko D, Gad P, Gerasimenko Y, Edgerton VR. And yet it moves: Recovery of volitional control after spinal cord injury. Prog Neurobiol. 2018;160:64-81.
Inanici F, Samejima S, Gad P, Edgerton VR, Hofstetter CP, Moritz CT. Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation Promotes Long-Term Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018;26(6):1272-8.
Phillips AA, Squair JW, Sayenko DG, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko Y, Krassioukov AV. An Autonomic Neuroprosthesis: Noninvasive Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation Restores Autonomic Cardiovascular Function in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. Journal of neurotrauma. 2018;35(3):446-51.
Gad P, Evgeniy Kreydin, Hui Zhong, and V. Reggie Edgerton. Training the bladder how to void: A noninvasive spinal neuromodulation case study. 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). 2021.
Taccola G, Gad P, Culaclii S, Wang PM, Liu W, Edgerton VR. Acute neuromodulation restores spinally-induced motor responses after severe spinal cord injury. Experimental neurology. 2020;327:113246.
de Leon RD, Tamaki H, Hodgson JA, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Hindlimb locomotor and postural training modulates glycinergic inhibition in the spinal cord of the adult spinal cat. Journal of neurophysiology. 1999;82(1):359-69.
Chen B, Li Y, Yu B, Zhang Z, Brommer B, Williams PR, et al. Reactivation of Dormant Relay Pathways in Injured Spinal Cord by KCC2 Manipulations. Cell. 2018;174(6):1599.
Acknowledgements
To perform the experiments and observations, extraordinary dedication, compliance, and accommodations of the patients and parents, siblings, and therapist were necessary. We would also like to acknowledge the team at Abilities Recovery Center (ARC) for letting us use their facilities.
Required Author Forms
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.
Funding
The authors declare that this study received funding from Walkabout Foundation, Dana & Albert R. Broccoli Charitable Foundation and Nanette, Burt Forester, including matching by PwC LLP, Roberta Wilson, The West Coast Consortium for Technology & Innovation in Pediatrics (CTIP) and the Brain Recovery Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
V.R.E, holds shareholder interest in NeuroRecovery Technologies and hold certain inventorship rights on intellectual property licensed by The Regents of the University of California to NeuroRecovery Technologies and its subsidiaries. V.R.E and PG holds shareholder interest in SpineX Inc. and hold certain inventorship rights on intellectual property licensed by The Regents of the University of California to SpineX Inc.
Disclaimer
The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file4 (MP4 25908 kb)
Supplementary file5 (MP4 64083 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gad, P., Hastings, S., Zhong, H. et al. Transcutaneous Spinal Neuromodulation Reorganizes Neural Networks in Patients with Cerebral Palsy. Neurotherapeutics 18, 1953–1962 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-021-01087-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-021-01087-6