Abstract
Introduction
This study aimed to investigate anterior segment parameters of eyes, with anterior chamber depth (ACD) less than 2.8 mm and axial length greater than 25.0 mm.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included 180 myopic eyes of 180 consecutive patients with axial length greater than 25.0 mm. Patients were divided into low ACD (ACD < 2.8 mm, n = 56) and normal ACD (ACD ≥ 2.8 mm, n = 124) groups. Anterior segment parameters were measured using Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound biomicroscopy. A general linear model was used to compare parameters between the two groups, after adjusting for age and spherical equivalent.
Results
Compared with the normal ACD group, the low ACD group had lower values for the following parameters: corneal diameter, trabecular–anterior iris surface angle, angle-opening distance at 500 μm, anterior chamber volume, anterior chamber width, anterior vault, iris thickness at 500 μm, ciliary sulcus-to-sulcus diameter, distance between cornea and sulcus, trabecular–ciliary process distance, maximum ciliary body thickness, ciliary process length, relative anterior vault, relative distance between cornea and sulcus, and relative lens position (general linear model, p < 0.05). In contrast, central corneal thickness, iris curvature, lens thickness, lens vault, and iris–ciliary angle were greater in the low ACD group (general linear model, p < 0.05).
Conclusion
A smaller anterior segment, as well as a thicker and more anteriorly positioned lens, may correlate with shallow ACD in eyes with long axial length.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Why carry out this study? |
High myopia with shallow anterior chamber depth (ACD) is common among East Asian patients. Several studies have highlighted that primary angle closure can also occur in eyes with long axial length (AL). To date, few studies have investigated anterior segment characteristics of highly myopic eyes with shallow ACD, especially in patients younger than 50 years old. |
This study aimed to investigate anterior segment parameters of eyes with ACD of < 2.8 mm and AL of ≥ 25.0 mm in patients aged between 18 and 50 years. |
What was learned from the study? |
A smaller anterior segment, as well as a thicker and more anteriorly positioned lens, may contribute to shallow ACD in eyes with long axial length. |
Ciliary body and iris mechanisms may not correlate with a shallow ACD in this group of patients. |
Further longitudinal studies would be needed to clarify the anterior segment changes over time. |
Introduction
High myopia with shallow anterior chamber depth (ACD) is common among East Asian patients. It has been reported that the percentage of eyes with ACD of < 2.8 mm was 4.46% in a group of Chinese patients with myopia (mean age 25.14 ± 5.41 years) and 3.59% in patients with high or extremely high myopia [spherical equivalent (SE) < −6.0 diopters (D)] [1]. Myopia is usually regarded as exerting a protective effect against primary angle closure (PAC). However, several studies have highlighted that PAC can also occur in eyes with long axial length (AL) [2,3,4]. According to a recent report on the biometric characteristics of myopia in primary angle closure disease (PACD) in rural China, the prevalence of myopia in eyes with PACD was 41.7% at age 30–39 years, 12.3% at age 40–49 years, and 8.7% at age 50–59 years [5].
Further, the surge in refractive surgery in recent years has led to the discovery of many patients with shallow ACDs at a younger age. Likewise, the implantation of an implantable Collamer lens (ICL, STAAR Surgical, Nidau, Switzerland) can lead to a shallower anterior chamber; consequently, the suggested ACD for ICL surgery is ≥ 2.80 mm in Europe, or ≥ 3.00 mm in the USA. Nevertheless, several studies have shown that patients with high myopia and shallow ACD (i.e., < 2.8 mm) achieved satisfactory and stable visual outcomes following ICL implantation. Meanwhile, studies regarding the long-term safety of this procedure are limited [6,7,8]. Moreover, only a few studies have investigated anterior segment characteristics of highly myopic eyes with shallow ACD, especially in patients aged < 50 years, to date.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate anterior segment parameters of eyes with ACD of < 2.8 mm and AL of ≥ 25.0 mm. We believe that the results of our present study will contribute to a better understanding of eyes with low ACD and long AL.
Methods
The subjects were recruited from those attending the optometry clinic of Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, for the correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism from September 2021 to February 2022. The research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures were approved by the human subjects review committee of the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. All patients provided written informed consent.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patient aged between 18 and 50 years, (2) spectacle spherical power ranging from −0.50 to −18.00 D and cylindrical power of up to −6.00 D, (3) AL ≥ 25.0 mm, (4) corneal endothelial cell density > 2000 cells/mm2, (5) no contact between the peripheral iris and the posterior trabecular meshwork on gonioscopy, and (6) intraocular pressure (IOP) < 21 mmHg. If both eyes met the criteria, one eye was randomly selected as the study eye. Patients were separated into the study group (ACD < 2.8 mm) and the control group (ACD ≥ 2.8 mm). The exclusion criteria were (1) any history of ocular diseases (kerataconus, lens opacity, retinal disease, etc.) or (2) trauma, chronic systemic diseases, or previous ocular surgeries.
All participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination under the same darkened ambient light conditions by an experienced operator, including a detailed slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment, fundus examination, IOP measurement by noncontact tonometry, manifest and cycloplegic refraction, gonioscopy, Scheimpflug camera imaging (Pentacam, Oculus GmbH) for measurements of the horizontal corneal diameter (CD), central corneal thickness (CCT), ACD (measured from the corneal endothelium to the anterior lens) and anterior chamber volume (ACV), and IOL-Master 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) for the measurements of AL.
Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM, Quantel Medical, France) measurements were performed by an experienced operator (Niu L.L.) in a light room (illumination of approximately 120 lx). The examiner was blinded to the patient grouping. The linear scanning frequency was 50 MHz, the scanning depth and width were 9 × 16 mm, and the axial and vertical resolutions were 35 and 60 μm, respectively. Examinations were performed using an eye-cup, filled with methylcellulose solution after topical oxybuprocaine hydrochloride was instilled. To control the influence of accommodation, patients were asked to fixate on a ceiling target using the contralateral eye, in the supine position. Radial scans at the 12, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock positions centered over the limbus, and the horizontal (3 o’clock to 9 o’clock) and vertical (6 o’clock to 12 o’clock) perpendicular full-view scans centered over the pupil, were obtained. Each measurement was repeated three times, and the mean values were calculated. The reliability of the procedure mentioned above has been reported in a previous study [9].
Then, all UBM images were measured manually by another well-trained examiner (Luo X.M.) blinded to the clinical data. The following parameters were measured (Fig. 1): (1) horizontal and vertical anterior chamber width (ACW, the distance between the two scleral spurs) and anterior vault (AV, the maximum perpendicular distance from the posterior corneal surface to the horizontal line between the scleral spurs) [2], (2) horizontal and vertical ciliary sulcus-to-sulcus diameter (STS) and the distance between cornea and sulcus (CSD, the maximum perpendicular distance from the corneal endothelium to the STS line), (3) lens thickness (LT) and lens vault (LV, perpendicular distance from the anterior pole of the lens to the STS line) [2], (4) angle-opening distance at 500 μm (AOD500, the distance between the posterior corneal surface and the anterior iris surface on a line perpendicular to the trabecular meshwork of 500 μm from the scleral spur), and trabecular–anterior iris surface angle (TIA, the angle between the posterior corneal surface and the anterior iris surface) [2], (5) iris–ciliary angle (ICA, the angle between the posterior iris surface and the anterior surface of the ciliary body) [10], (6) iris thickness at 500 μm (IT500, iris thickness at 500 μm from the scleral spur) and iris curvature (IC, the perpendicular distance from a line between the most central to the most peripheral points of the iris pigment epithelium to the posterior iris surface at the point of greatest convexity) [2], (7) trabecular–ciliary process distance (TCPD, a line extending from the corneal endothelium 500 μm anterior to the scleral spur toward the ciliary processes) [2], and (8) maximum ciliary body thickness (CBTmax, the distance from the innermost point of the ciliary body to the inner wall of the sclera or its extended line) and ciliary process length (CP length, the distance from the innermost point of the ciliary process to the intersection point of the iris and ciliary body) [10]. For ACW, AV, STS, CSD, and LV, the average values from the horizontal and vertical directions were obtained for the analysis. For AOD500, TIA, ICA, IT500, IC, TCPD, CBTmax, and CP length, the average values from the four quadrants were obtained for the analysis. Afterward, three relative parameters were calculated as follows: relative AV (RAV) = AV/AL, relative CSD (RCSD) = CSD/AL, and relative lens position (RLP) = (ACD + 1/2 lens thickness)/AL.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 23.0; SPSS Inc.). The normality assumption of the data was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables with normal distribution between groups were compared using the independent t-test, and data with a non-normal distribution were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Linear regression analyses were performed for indices with respect to age. A general linear model was used to compare main outcomes while adjusting for age and SE. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 56 eyes of 56 patients (17 males and 39 females) with ACDs of < 2.8 mm and ALs of ≥ 25.0 mm were included in the study group. A total of 124 eyes of 124 patients with ACDs of ≥ 2.8 mm and ALs of ≥ 25.0 mm served as the controls (44 males and 80 females). The mean ACD was 2.72 ± 0.06 mm (range 2.60–2.79 mm) for the low ACD group, and 3.16 ± 0.22 mm (range 2.80–3.75 mm) for the normal ACD group (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between ALs (low ACD group 26.85 ± 1.48 mm, normal ACD group 26.97 ± 1.45 mm, Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.889). The mean age was greater for the low ACD group (35.27 ± 6.5 years) than for the normal ACD group (31.92 ± 6.25 years, Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001). The mean SE was −9.10 ± 3.26 D for the low ACD group and −8.19 ± 2.66 D for the normal ACD group (Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.017).
The correlation analysis between the individual parameters and age is presented in Table 1. ACD was negatively correlated with age for both ACD groups, while IC, LT, and LV were positively correlated with age for both ACD groups (Fig. 2).
The results of the general linear model comparing the main outcomes while adjusting for age and gender are presented in Table 2. Notably, IOP was higher in the low ACD group (F = 10.844, p = 0.001). Compared with the normal ACD group, the low ACD group had lower values for the following parameters: CD, PD, TIA, AOD500, ACV, ACW, AV, IT500, STS, CSD, TCPD, CBTmax, CP length, RAV, RCSD, and RLP (p < 0.05). Conversely, the values of CCT, IC, LT, LV, and ICA were greater in the low ACD group (p < 0.05, Table 2).
Parameters regarding the dimensions of the anterior segment (CD, ACW, and STS) are summarized in Fig. 3A. Figure 3B shows the lens thickness and vault. The relative dimensions of the anterior segment (RAV, RCSD) and the relative position of the lens (RLP) are summarized in Fig. 3C. Figure 3D and E shows the parameters concerning the ciliary body and iris. Figure 3F illustrates the ICA.
Discussion
In the current study, we investigated the four recognized biometric parameters related to PAC (i.e., anterior chamber dimensions, lens thickness and vault, iris thickness and curve, and structural features of ciliary body) in a group of eyes with ACDs of < 2.8 mm and ALs of > 25.0 mm, and found that a smaller anterior segment (comprising lower CD, ACW, and STS, and more anteriorly located scleral spurs and ciliary sulcus), as well as the lens element (thicker and more anteriorly positioned lens), might be correlated with the occurrence of shallow ACD for eyes with long AL.
The smaller CD, ACW, and STS found in this study confirmed that a shallow anterior segment may be the most important and consistent biometric feature predisposing patients to a shallow ACD [11,12,13]. Meanwhile, the lower values for RAV and RCSD suggested that the anterior and posterior portions of the eyeball elongate disproportionately in these eyes. Previous studies on the development of the eyeball showed that from ages 4–17 years, the growth of the AL is mainly caused by the increasing AL of the vitreous cavity, whereas the small increase in ACD is mainly caused by the decrease in lens thickness [14]. Khokhar et al. found that, for myopic eyes with AL of > 24.5 mm, there was a disproportionate elongation of the eyeball, with very weak or no correlation between anterior biometry and AL [15]. Therefore, a long AL may not be a protective factor against shallow ACD and PAC.
Lens-induced mechanisms (i.e., LT, LV, and RLP) have been acknowledged as one of the most important predispositions to PAC [16, 17]. In the current study, the age-related LT was consistent with other studies, as measured with the same device (UBM) [10, 18], and LT was significantly greater in eyes with shallow ACD. LV is defined as a parameter that reflects the degree of protrusion of the lens into the anterior chamber, and it correlates to the thickness, shape, and position of the lens. Importantly, LV has been reported to be one of the strongest predictors for angle closure [11, 16]. The definition of RLP was first proposed [3] to reflect the relative position of the lens. An anteriorly positioned lens may result in a decreased iris–lens canal and a higher posterior–anterior chamber pressure gradient [19, 20].
Greater IC, iris area, and IT were found to be independently associated with narrow angles [12]. In the current study, we found that the IC was greater in the shallow ACD group (0.10 mm versus 0.02 mm), whereas the IT500 was thinner in the shallow ACD group. Therefore, the greater IC in this study may be ascribed to the greater LV, rather than the thicker iris. Notably, the IC values obtained in the current study were much lower than those in previous studies [11, 12], which may be attributed to the younger age of our participants. Furthermore, no plateau irises were observed in the current study. Consequently, the iris mechanism does not contribute to the shallow ACD in this group of patients.
The effect of structural features of the ciliary body on PAC remains unclear. The anterior position of the ciliary processes has been shown to be a predisposing factor for angle closure. However, the effect of ciliary body thickness on angle closure remains controversial [21]. In this study, we used TCPD and ICA to measure the position of the ciliary body and CP length, and CBTmax to measure the shape of the ciliary body [22, 23]. The smaller TCPD, CP length, and CBTmax, as well as the greater ICA for the low ACD group, seemed to indicate that the ciliary body mechanism does not contribute to the shallow ACD in this group of patients.
PAC with myopia has received increasing attention in recent years [3, 23]. Li et al. [2] compared biometric parameters between PAC with longer AL (≥ 23.5 mm) and those with shorter AL, and reported that PAC with longer AL had a flattened cornea, a more anterior position of the lens, and less anteriorly rotated ciliary body, compared with PAC with shorter AL. Loh et al. compared ACD and AL among myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia in subjects with primary angle-closure suspect and found that AL and vitreous cavity length in myopic eyes were significantly longer than in emmetropic and hyperopic eyes, while ACD was not significantly different. These results suggest that the anterior segment may be crowded in myopic eyes, similar to that in hyperopic and emmetropic eyes, despite the longer AL [24]. A 7-years cross-sectional study on the relationship between ocular biometry and severity of PAC glaucoma showed that eyes with longer AL have a higher mean deviation of the visual fields than those with shorter AL, although this difference was significant only in the female subgroup. The underlying mechanism could be that female subjects with PAC glaucoma, who have a more pronounced AL elongation, have weaker scleral support at the optic nerve, and thus a greater susceptibility to glaucomatous damage [25]. Another study found that an increase in AL was related to slower visual field progression in the inferior hemifield, and faster visual field progression for the papillomacular bundle area [26]. The mechanism of the development of glaucoma in eyes with a longer AL is still unclear, and further study is required.
One of the limitations of this study is that patients with extremely shallow ACD, apparent narrow angle, and iris bombe could have been excluded from the optometry clinic; thus, no testing was performed on them. Second, we performed UBM examinations only in an ambient lighting condition and not in a dark condition; therefore, we could not compare the dynamic changes in iris parameters in these patients.
Conclusion
We investigated the biometric parameters of eyes with ACD of < 2.8 mm and AL of ≥ 25.0 mm in a group of patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years and found that a smaller anterior segment (comprising lower CD, ACW, and STS and more anteriorly located scleral spurs and ciliary sulcus), as well as the lens element (thicker and more anteriorly positioned lens) might be correlated with the occurrence of shallow ACD in patients with high myopia.
References
Xu G, Wu G, Du Z, Zhu S, Guo Y, Yu H, Hu Y. Distribution of white-to-white corneal diameter and anterior chamber depth in Chinese myopic patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8: 732719.
Li M, Chen Y, Jiang Z, Chen X, Chen J, Sun X. What are the characteristics of primary angle closure with longer axial length? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:1354–9.
Yong KL, Gong T, Nongpiur ME, How AC, Lee HK, Cheng L, Perera SA, Aung T. Myopia in Asian subjects with primary angle closure: implications for glaucoma trends in East Asia. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:1566–71.
Henzan IM, Tomidokoro A, Uejo C, Sakai H, Sawaguchi S, Iwase A, Araie M. Ultrasound biomicroscopic configurations of the anterior ocular segment in a population-based study the Kumejima Study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1720–8 (1728 e1721).
Liang Y, Shen R, Zhou W, Fan S, Chan PP, Tham CCY, Congdon N, Friedman DS, Wang N. Prevalence and ocular biometric characteristics of myopia in primary angle closure disease in rural China: the handan eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63:19.
Niu L, Miao H, Han T, Ding L, Wang X, Zhou X. Visual outcomes of Visian ICL implantation for high myopia in patients with shallow anterior chamber depth. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19:121.
Lim DH, Lee MG, Chung ES, Chung TY. Clinical results of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in eyes with low anterior chamber depth. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(447–454): e441.
Qian T, Du J, Ren R, Zhou H, Li H, Zhang Z, Xu X. Vault-correlated efficacy and safety of Implantable Collamer Lens V4c implantation for myopia in patients with shallow anterior chamber depth. Ophthalmic Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1159/000528616.
Zhang X, Chen X, Wang X, Yuan F, Zhou X. Analysis of intraocular positions of posterior implantable collamer lens by full-scale ultrasound biomicroscopy. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:114.
Chen Q, Tan W, Lei X, Pan C, Jin L, Zeng Q, Wang Z. Clinical prediction of excessive vault after implantable collamer lens implantation using ciliary body morphology. J Refract Surg. 2020;36:380–7.
Wang B, Cao K, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Congdon N, Wang T. Analyzing anatomical factors contributing to angle closure based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging. Curr Eye Res. 2022;47:256–61.
Wang B, Sakata LM, Friedman DS, Chan YH, He M, Lavanya R, Wong TY, Aung T. Quantitative iris parameters and association with narrow angles. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:11–7.
Atalay E, Nongpiur ME, Baskaran M, Sharma S, Perera SA, Aung T. Biometric factors associated with acute primary angle closure: comparison of the affected and fellow eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:5320–5.
Rauscher FG, Francke M, Hiemisch A, Kiess W, Michael R. Ocular biometry in children and adolescents from 4 to 17 years: a cross-sectional study in central Germany. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41:496–511.
Khokhar S, Takkar B, Agarwal E, Gaur N, Ravani R, Venkatesh P. Biometric evaluation of myopic eyes without posterior staphyloma: disproportionate ocular growth. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:2427–34.
Nongpiur ME, He M, Amerasinghe N, Friedman DS, Tay WT, Baskaran M, Smith SD, Wong TY, Aung T. Lens vault, thickness, and position in Chinese subjects with angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:474–9.
Ozaki M, Nongpiur ME, Aung T, He M, Mizoguchi T. Increased lens vault as a risk factor for angle closure: confirmation in a Japanese population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:1863–8.
Li X, Chang P, Li Z, Qian S, Zhu Z, Wang Q, Yun EZ. Agreement between anterior segment parameters obtained by a new ultrasound biomicroscopy and a swept-source Fourier-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020;17:1333–40.
Coh P, Moghimi S, Chen RI, Hsu CH, MasisSolano M, Porco T, Lin SC. Lens position parameters as predictors of intraocular pressure reduction after cataract surgery in glaucomatous versus nonglaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:2593–9.
Pathak-Ray V. Relative lens position: the long and short of it. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:2249–51.
Chen SY, Wu LL. Effect of anatomic features of ciliary body on primary angle closure. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2018;54:716–20.
Lin S, Zuo C, Liu Y, Xiao H, Fang L, Su Y, Chen L, Lin M, Ling Y, Liu X. Ocular biometry of primary angle-closure disease in younger patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8: 772578.
Mohamed-Noor J, Abd-Salam D. Refractive errors and biometry of primary angle-closure disease in a mixed Malaysian population. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10:1246–50.
Loh CC, Kamaruddin H, Bastion MC, Husain R, Mohd Isa H, Md DN. Evaluation of refractive status and ocular biometric parameters in primary angle closure disease. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64:246–52.
Li S, Shao M, Wan Y, Tang B, Sun X, Cao W. Relationship between ocular biometry and severity of primary angle-closure glaucoma: relevance for predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. EPMA J. 2019;10:261–71.
Yanagisawa M, Yamashita T, Matsuura M, Fujino Y, Murata H, Asaoka R. Changes in axial length and progression of visual field damage in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:407–17.
Acknowledgements
Funding
This study, and the journal’s Rapid Service Fee, was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81770955).
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work, and have given final approval to the version to be published.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Yishan Qian; Methodology: Xueli Chen and Xiumei Luo; Formal analysis and investigation: Lingling Niu and Xiumei Luo; Writing—original draft preparation: Yishan Qian; Writing—review and editing: Xingtao Zhou, Xiaoying Wang; Funding acquisition: Xingtao Zhou; Supervision: Xingtao Zhou.
Disclosures
Lingling Niu, Xiumei Luo, Xueli Chen, Xiaoying Wang, Yishan Qian and Xingtao Zhou declare that they have no actual or potential conflicts of interest related to this submission.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China. No. 0521/2021), and was conducted in compliance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its later amendments. All subjects provided informed consents to participate in the study and for the publication of the manuscript.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Niu, L., Luo, X., Chen, X. et al. Anterior Segment Characteristics of Eyes with Anterior Chamber Depth Less than 2.8 mm and Axial Length Greater than 25 mm. Ophthalmol Ther 12, 1195–1206 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00666-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00666-4