Abstract
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in infants, children, and adolescents worldwide; however, despite sufficient evidence of the beneficial effects of NSAIDs in children and adolescents, there is a lack of comprehensive data in infants. The present review summarizes the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of various NSAIDs used in infants for which data are available, and includes ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, niflumic acid, meloxicam, celecoxib, parecoxib, rofecoxib, acetylsalicylic acid, and nimesulide. The efficacy of NSAIDs has been documented for a variety of conditions, such as fever and pain. NSAIDs are also the main pillars of anti-inflammatory treatment, such as in pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Limited data are available on the safety of most NSAIDs in infants. Adverse drug reactions may be renal, gastrointestinal, hematological, or immunologic. Since NSAIDs are among the most frequently used drugs in the pediatric population, safety and efficacy studies can be performed as part of normal clinical routine, even in young infants. Available data sources, such as (electronic) medical records, should be used for safety and efficacy analyses. On a larger scale, existing data sources, e.g. adverse drug reaction programs/networks, spontaneous national reporting systems, and electronic medical records should be assessed with child-specific methods in order to detect safety signals pertinent to certain pediatric age groups or disease entities. To improve the safety of NSAIDs in infants, treatment needs to be initiated with the lowest age-appropriate or weight-based dose. Duration of treatment and amount of drug used should be regularly evaluated and maximum dose limits and other recommendations by the manufacturer or expert committees should be followed. Treatment for non-chronic conditions such as fever and acute (postoperative) pain should be kept as short as possible. Patients with chronic conditions should be regularly monitored for possible adverse effects of NSAIDs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
This review summarizes the efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that are available to treat pain in infants (children < 2 years of age). |
Most information is available for ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and ketorolac. |
Most indications comprise fever and (peri- and) postoperative pain, for which these drugs have proven efficacy. |
Safety concerns are bleeding risks and gastrointestinal or renal events. |
We also summarize the use of NSAIDs for special indications, e.g. in the fields of pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases and pediatric cardiology. |
1 Introduction
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in infants (children < 2 years of age), children, and adolescents worldwide [1, 2]. Ibuprofen is one of the most frequently administered NSAIDs in infants and children for relief of pain and fever [3,4,5]. In several European countries, high rates of NSAID use among children < 4 years of age have been observed [6]. There is a lack of comprehensive data on the use of NSAIDs in infants, despite sufficient evidence of the beneficial effects of NSAIDs in children and adolescents.
Reviews have been published on the use of NSAIDs in children with an overview on NSAID risks and benefits in children of different age groups and with a focus on postoperative pain [7, 8]. We previously assessed the safety and efficacy of ibuprofen in infants younger than 6 months of age and concluded that the present safety and efficacy data support its use in infants older than 3 months with a body weight of at least 5–6 kg [9].
Based on their chemical structure and properties, NSAIDs can be classified into the following categories: (1) propionic acid derivatives (ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, naproxen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen); (2) heteroaryl acetic acid derivatives—(2a) acetic acid derivatives (diclofenac, ketorolac, tolmetin) and (2b) indole and indene acetic acid derivatives (indomethacin); (3) anthranilic acid derivatives/fenamates (mefenamic acid, niflumic acid); (4) enolic acid derivatives/oxicams (meloxicam); (5) salicylates (acetylsalicylic acid); (6) diarylheterocyclics/coxibs (celecoxib, rofecoxib, parecoxib); (7) alkanones; and (8) sulfoanilides (nimesulide) [10]. Only a fraction of these drugs is used in infants and children.
NSAIDs decrease prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) activity. ‘Classical’ NSAIDs, such as propionic acid derivatives and acetic acid derivatives, inhibit both isoforms: COX-1 and COX-2. Specific drugs were developed to preferentially block COX-2, which are mainly coxibs, as well as meloxicam and nimesulide. While it is reported that the therapeutic anti-inflammatory effect of NSAIDs is mediated through COX-2 inhibition and that the renal, gastric, hematologic, and cardiovascular adverse effects are caused through COX-1 inhibition, this concept has been revised due to the overlap in function, making the biological activity and interrelation of both enzymatic isoforms far more complex [11, 12]. Prostaglandins synthesized by both enzymatic isoforms not only contribute to many physiological processes such as regulating vascular tone and platelet function, but also to pathological processes such as inflammation [12, 13].
The present review focuses on relevant studies, which were published after the year 2000, and summarizes the current knowledge on safety and efficacy of various NSAIDs in infants, although only a few studies were exclusively performed in infants and the majority of studies also included children older than 23 months [14]. The PubMed database was searched systematically for articles published in English from January 2000 until 22 May 2020 to identify clinical trials using NSAIDs in infants. The search strategy included at first the general search string ‘(("infant"[Mesh]) AND "anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal"[Mesh]) AND "treatment outcome"[Mesh]’. In order to conduct a more diligent search, all of the drugs described in this review were combined with the two search strings ‘drug AND efficacy AND (infant OR infants)’ and ‘drug AND safety AND (infant OR infants)’. Additional literature was retrieved from the references of published studies and reviews. Studies were included if they contained original data on the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of the abovementioned NSAIDs in infants. Original publications on the development of PK models using previously published data were also included.
Studies published before the year 2000 were included if they provided data pertinent to the results of studies discussed in this review. Studies on the use of NSAIDs in preterm infants for closure of a persistent ductus arteriosus were excluded from this review, as well as studies primarily conducted in older children and adolescents. Studies on the use of metamizole (dipyrone) in infants were excluded from this analysis because metamizole is not an NSAID, although still incorrectly classified as such.
2 Pharmacokinetics of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Infants
Currently used NSAIDs in infants and young children for which recent efficacy and/or safety data are available include ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, mefenamic acid, meloxicam, celecoxib, parecoxib, rofecoxib, acetylsalicylic acid, and nimesulide. These drugs are discussed in detail in the following paragraphs and an overview of the PK (including relevant drug-metabolizing enzymes) of currently used NSAIDs in infants and children is given in Table 1.
2.1 Ibuprofen
Ibuprofen is the most widely used NSAID in infants worldwide for relief of fever and pain. It exerts its therapeutic effect when the inactive R(−) isomer is unidirectionally converted into the active S(+) isomer [15]. Ibuprofen undergoes rapid absorption, followed by a high plasma protein binding, with the R isomer having a higher protein binding affinity compared with the S isomer. It undergoes oxidative metabolism via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and CYP2C8 in the liver and is mostly renally excreted [16]. Ibuprofen is administered orally in both tablet and suspension forms but can be administered intravenously and in suppository form. PK data have been previously summarized [11, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], and since completing the current review, it is evident that PK data remain scarce for the infant population; therefore, studies that included infants combined with young children were included. In summary, most studies demonstrated similar PK data in patients with ages ranging from < 3 months to 15 years. For oral, rectal, and intravenous doses of 10 mg/kg ibuprofen, area under the curves (AUCs) were similar in all studies, with increases relative to dose. Similarly, maximum concentration (Cmax) values were consistent for rectal and oral ibuprofen, relative to dose, and, as expected, Cmax values were higher for intravenous administration. Time to reach Cmax (Tmax) values were similar for oral and rectal administration, and Tmax was reached much faster for intravenous administration. Half-life (t½) was similar for oral and intravenous administration and slightly longer for rectal administration, however the study populations were much younger (1–52 weeks of age), which may explain an increased half-life because of not yet mature clearance (CL). Similarly, CL was consistent across most studies, with a much higher CL observed in older children compared with infants and younger children. The large variation observed with volume of distribution (Vd) and CL between oral and intravenous administration was due to differences in age groups, as was demonstrated with an increase of Vd and CL with age due to differences in body size. Single dosing of 20 mg/kg rectal ibuprofen resulted in similar concentrations in infants (1 week–12 months) and adults, when administered based on weight. No dose adjustments are therefore needed in infants aged 1 week to 12 months. When CL-informed dosing was evaluated in all ages (neonates to adults), it was found that maturation occurred rapidly, with 90 and 98% of adult values reached at 1 month of life in term neonates and at 3 months of life, respectively. This supports the findings demonstrating that young children have similar PK data as adults. However, higher interindividual variability in drug metabolism of infants has been reported compared with older children [34]. Moreover, children with lower body weight had increased Cmax values and higher CL [35]. Overall, ibuprofen administered at 10 mg/kg for both oral and intravenous routes and 20 mg/kg for the rectal route is well tolerated in infants and children when based on weight. However, oral administration is preferred over rectal administration due to the risk of erratic absorption, for several reasons including expelled suppositories, and intravenous administration is also well tolerated, if required. PK data for ibuprofen dosing in infants can be reviewed in our previously published work [12].
Despite advances in physiology based PK (PBPK) and population PK (pop-PK) modeling and simulation, only two groups have focused on ibuprofen in the pediatric setting. A PBPK model developed for the prediction of ibuprofen concentrations was able to accurately predict AUC, Cmax, and Tmax [37]. Moreover, it was shown that predicted ibuprofen AUC and Cmax were higher in CYP2C9 poor metabolizers, suggesting that lower doses should be used in these poor metabolizers. Another study, using PBPK modeling, was able to predict ibuprofen concentrations [17] and was used to validate physiological parameters in a generic pediatric brain PBPK model to predict AUC plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of drugs that undergo passive transfer. This model also achieved observed and predicted ibuprofen AUC to be very similar (ratios of 0.94–1.05) [18]. This demonstrates a promising shift in approaches whereby pharmacometric modeling and simulation can be used to further enhance our understanding by using existing information to accurately simulate and identify important clinical outcomes.
2.2 Dexibuprofen
Dexibuprofen is the pharmacologically active dextrorotatory enantiomer of racemic ibuprofen. From studies in adults investigating the stereoselective properties of ibuprofen, it was suggested that dexibuprofen might possess a stronger pharmacological activity than racemic ibuprofen when administered at an equal dose while exerting a better safety profile [19,20,21]. Similarly, to ibuprofen, dexibuprofen is rapidly absorbed, is metabolized via CYP2C9 and CYP2C8, and undergoes conjugation to form glucuronides prior to being renally excreted [19]. To date, no pediatric PK data are available in the literature, therefore we do not recommend prescribing this drug to infants until further data are available.
2.3 Ketoprofen
Ketoprofen is widely used for the treatment of inflammatory and musculoskeletal conditions, pain, and fever in children [22]. It is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract [23], and the drug is highly bound to plasma proteins such as albumin, conjugated via glucuronic acid in the liver and largely excreted by the kidneys [24]. The PK of ketoprofen have been studied by Kokki et al. and can be found in Table 1.
Different ketoprofen formulations such as oral tablets, oral syrup, rectal suppositories, and intravenous and intramuscular solutions produce similar PK in infants, children, and adults. One study observed that the same milligram/kilogram body weight dose of rectal and intravenous formulations of ketoprofen may be used in both children and adults [25]. Similar doses of continuous intravenous infusions in children aged 7 months to 16 years have also been recommended because of similar PK between a loading dose and continuous intravenous infusion of ketoprofen in adults compared with small children [26]. Ketoprofen syrup had similar PK in infants aged 6–24 months compared with children aged 2–7 years [27]. Moreover, PK were similar in children aged 10–69 months when ketoprofen was administered orally or intramuscularly [28]. Ketoprofen can be measured in the CSF shortly after administration, however several studies have reported that distribution of ketoprofen in the CNS is limited [29, 30].
Overall, administration of oral, rectal, and intravenous formulations of ketoprofen has been shown to have similar PK and are well tolerated in infants and children for the treatment of fever and pain. AUC values were similar for oral administration (4.9–5.6 mg⋅h/L) at doses ranging from 0.5 to 1 mg/kg across several studies, and increased AUC values were observed for higher doses as well as for intravenous and intramuscular administration (11.6–15.4 mg⋅h/L). Cmax values were similar across all routes of administration, with one study showing a lower Cmax of 2 mg/L and two studies showing higher Cmax values of 7.4 and 15.5 mg/L, respectively, due to differences in doses. Tmax and t½ were also consistent between all studies across various routes of administration, i.e. 0.5 h and 1.3–2 h, respectively. Vd ranged from 0.12 to 0.16 L/kg, with one study showing 0.07 L/kg. CL was observed to be the same across all studies and administrations, i.e. 0.07–0.09 L/h. However, PK data in infants younger than 6 months and neonates are sparse and therefore caution is required in these populations.
2.4 Flurbiprofen
Similarly, to ketoprofen, flurbiprofen is highly bound to plasma albumin, metabolized by CYP2C9, and conjugated via glucuronic acid in the liver and largely renally excreted [31, 32]. Flurbiprofen has not been sufficiently studied in infants or young children. Two studies have reported PK data in this population. One study used either 1 mg/kg oral or 0.65 mg/kg intravenous flurbiprofen in infants and children 0.25–13 years of age, showing similar PK data [33]. It was found that flurbiprofen concentrations in the CSF were sevenfold higher than unbound plasma concentrations, suggesting potent CNS analgesic and antipyretic action. Relative to dose, another study demonstrated that similar flurbiprofen PK were observed between 50 mg oral syrup and 75 mg suppositories (48 h later). Overall, the PK were similar to adults [34]. Weight alone was a useful covariate for PK prediction in children aged 3 months–13 years. This study was also used to validate the physiological parameters in a generic pediatric brain PBPK model to predict CSF concentrations of drugs that undergo passive transfer. The model achieved, observed, and predicted flurbiprofen AUC ratios of 1 [18], further supporting the use of pharmacometric modeling and simulation in this area [38]. It should also be noted that study cohorts typically include fewer infants than children and therefore the results may be less accurate for infants. Studies in adults reported bleeding complications when used concomitantly with anticoagulants [35]. Currently, we therefore discourage the use of flurbiprofen in both infants and children until more safety and efficacy data become available [18].
2.5 Naproxen
Naproxen is used for the treatment of pain and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. The drug is rapidly absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract and is highly bound to plasma albumin. Naproxen is metabolized by CYP2C9 and also conjugated via glucuronic acid in the liver, and is largely renally excreted [31, 36]. PK data in the pediatric population are nearly non-existent, with only one study currently describing PK data (Table 1). This study also revealed that body weight is the most relevant covariate to determine dosing with naproxen in infants aged 3 months and older [39]. This study was also used to validate the physiological parameters in a pediatric plasma and CSF PBPK model, and the model achieved observed and predicted AUC ratios of 1 [35], again showing the sophistication of pharmacometric modeling and simulation.
2.6 Diclofenac
Diclofenac is an acetic acid derivative with pronounced antirheumatic, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effects. Diclofenac is well-absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract, highly bound to albumin in the plasma, and diffuses in and out of the synovial fluid. This drug is largely metabolized by CYP2C9, followed by glucuronidation, and eliminated by urinary and biliary excretion [31, 40]. When compared with adults, diclofenac shows age-related changes in CL being highest in infants aged 1–3 years (1 L/h/kg) compared with older children (4–7 years, 0.88 L/h/kg; 8–12 years, 0.79 L/h/kg) and adolescents (12–16 years, 0.70 L/h/kg) [41]. One study developed a pop-PK model, based on adult and pediatric data, to determine the recommended dose for a new diclofenac suspension (50 mg/5 mL) for acute pain in pediatric patients. Based on their simulations, the authors achieved, observed, and predicted AUC ratios of 1.0, 1.08, and 1.18 for children aged 1–3, 4–6, and 7–12 years, respectively [42]. Moreover, the highest plasma concentration variability occurred during the absorption phase and allometric size models predicted changes in CL and Vd with age [42]. A PK meta-analysis in children and adults revealed that single doses of 0.3 mg/kg intravenous, 0.5 mg/kg rectal, and 1 mg/kg oral diclofenac provide adequate analgesia in infants and children aged 1–12 years and was equivalent to 50 mg doses in adults [43]. Similarly, diclofenac 1 mg/kg with acetaminophen 15 mg/kg achieve equivalent analgesia as acetaminophen 30 mg/kg (combination therapy may use lower doses of both drugs) [38, 42, 43]. Diclofenac was more rapidly absorbed and showed a higher bioavailability and earlier maximum concentration after rectal compared with oral administration [41]. It was also shown that diclofenac penetrates the blood–brain barrier (BBB) rapidly and sufficient CSF concentrations for COX inhibition (range 0.5–4.7 µg/L) are sustained for 4 h after intravenous dosing (1 mg/kg) in 31 children aged 3 months–12 years [44]. However, no correlation between plasma and CSF diclofenac concentrations could be established. Median diclofenac plasma concentration at the time of pain return was 104 (range 70–272) µg/L. Therefore, a higher initial dose is required, or a repeated dose should be administered 3–4 h after the initial dose. Another study demonstrated 50–70% less opioid analgesic use (compared with the control group) when the dose was changed to 1.5 mg/kg intravenously followed by 2 mg/kg rectally twice daily [45]. Overall, oral, rectal, and intravenous diclofenac are well tolerated, and while the use of intramuscular diclofenac is no longer recommended due to pain and risks of infection/inflammation at the injection site, the rectal route allows drug administration to vomiting children or patients without any oral intake. PK data of oral and rectal diclofenac in children are presented in Table 1 [38, 41,42,43, 46, 47].
2.7 Ketorolac
Ketorolac is a chiral NSAID that is used for analgesia [48] and the S-enantiomer is responsible for its pharmacological activity [49]. The drug is administered as the water soluble tromethamine salt and is available in tablets or as an intravenous injection. Ketorolac undergoes rapid absorption, with a Cmax reached between 20 and 60 min. Its oral bioavailability is estimated to range from 80 to 100%. In adults, the drug is highly protein bound (> 99%) and has a Vd (0.1–0.3 L/kg) comparable with those of other NSAIDs. The t½ is between 4 and 6 h and is moderate in comparison with other NSAIDs. Ketorolac is primarily metabolized by CYP2C9, followed by glucuronidation and renal excretion. Ketorolac is recovered in the urine mainly in its metabolite form. When intravenous ketorolac PK were studied in children aged 2 months to 16 years, it was found that from infancy CL decreased with age [50]. This study concluded that a dose of 0.5 mg/kg every 6 h was sufficient to keep trough concentrations above 0.37 mg/L, which produced sufficient analgesia postoperatively. This dosing regimen is in agreement with current practice. Recently, it was shown that S-enantiomers produce different concentrations between infants and adults, and therefore requires further research as this difference in S-enantiomer concentration may have an important effect on analgesia since the S-enantiomer is solely responsible for the analgesic effect [51]. When clinical and patient covariates were assessed for effects on PK, it was found that no covariates were statistically significant when accounted for body size [52]. Ketorolac does not readily penetrate CSF in children [33]. PK data can be found in Table 1.
2.8 Indomethacin
Indomethacin is currently used in children for the treatment of inflammation of pain from rheumatic diseases or orthopedic surgery, or pericardial effusion, and for pharmacological closure of a persistent ductus arteriosus, which was however not covered in this review (see inclusion/exclusion criteria) [53, 54]. Indomethacin is metabolized by CYP2C9 in the liver [31]. Pediatric data are summarized in Table 1.
No PK data are currently available for indomethacin in pediatrics. One study reported that 1% of indomethacin entered the CSF, as, on average, 1.9 ng/mL and 2200 ng/mL was found in the CSF and plasma, respectively, when 31 infants and children aged 4–11 months undergoing surgery received 0.35 mg/kg intravenous indomethacin. This small percentage entering the BBB may be due to the high protein binding. Nonetheless, indomethacin does enter the BBB and may also cause adverse central nervous effects, such as agitation, dizziness, vertigo or headache [53].
2.9 Fenamates
The fenamates/fenamic acids mefenamic acid, tolfenamic acid, and niflumic acid have traditionally been used for relief of pain and fever in children in several European countries, and mefenamic acid is still quite popular in Switzerland. Some evidence on their pharmacology in children was generated in the 1970s–1990s but more recent data are lacking [55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62].
2.10 Oxicams
Most of the oxicams are well absorbed into the gastrointestinal tract, highly bound to plasma proteins, metabolized by CYP2C9, and renally excreted. When meloxicam PK were assessed in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, the Cmax and AUC were observed to be 34 and 28% lower in children aged 2–6 years compared with older children, respectively; however, t½ was similar in all patients [63]. Another study investigated a meloxicam suspension (0.25 mg/kg with 15 mg maximum dose) in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and observed similar PK data as in adults, and therefore recommended doses normalized to body weight [64]. No recent studies on piroxicam PK data in children were found, whereas studies prior to the year 2000 are available [65]. No PK data were found for lornoxicam use in children and therefore we do not recommend using this drug in infants [63].
2.11 Coxibs
Coxibs, such as celecoxib, parecoxib, valdecoxib, rofecoxib, and etoricoxib, are specific inhibitors of COX-2. These COX-2 inhibitors are primarily metabolized by CYP2C9 and, to a lesser extent, by CYP3A4. The majority of the coxibs are mostly prescribed for the treatment of pain in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in children [66]. When celecoxib PK were evaluated in children, they were found to be vastly different to adult data. It was found that CL was increased twofold and t½ was half of that seen in adults [67, 68]. This difference in PK data may explain the difference in pain relief; it was reported that adults endured longer pain relief compared with children [69], which may be a result of the increased CL and shortened t½ in children. Other than the PK data reported by the rofecoxib manufacturer, very few studies have assessed rofecoxib PK data in the pediatric population. The manufacturer reported that apparent CL for an oral dose of 0.6 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg) rofecoxib in children aged 2–11 years and 25 mg in children aged 12–17 years achieved a similar AUC to that of healthy adults and higher than that of adults with rheumatoid arthritis [70]. This company also reported that apparent oral CL increased with age and body weight. Another study reported that similar PK data were obtained in children aged 3–14 years as in adults. No PK data were available for infants. Parecoxib is not currently used in children, however due to acceptable safety profiles in adults, parecoxib PK have been evaluated in children for the treatment of postoperative pain [71]. Parecoxib is only available intravenously and acts as a prodrug and is rapidly hydroxylated via CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 to the active metabolite valdecoxib [71, 72]. Therefore, the PK are only reported for valdecoxib, with two studies that have reported nearly identical PK data (Table 1). The first study demonstrated that parecoxib 0.9 mg/kg in a 2-year-old, 0.75 mg/kg in a 7-year-old, and 0.65 mg/kg in a 12-year-old child achieved the equivalence of a 40 mg dose in an average adult. This study also concluded that doses do not need to exceed 1 mg/kg, as no additional analgesia is achieved [72]. The second study generated PK data that were used to develop a pop-PK model to investigate pediatric dose prediction and duration of action. Intravenous doses of 1 mg/kg with a maximum of 40 mg in children aged 2–12.7 years simulated similar AUCs to that of adults who were administered 40 mg intravenous parecoxib. A much faster t½ was predicted in children compared with adults, however when the model predicted t½ in adults, the t½ was consistent with the literature, demonstrating a high-quality pop-PK model. This study also found that elimination CL and Vd increased with age. Etoricoxib is not currently approved for children, however in cases where it is used, it is recommended that it should not be used in children weighing < 40 kg and for not more than 5 days [73].
2.12 Salicylates
Salicylates, like salicylic acid and acetylsalicylic acid, are not widely used in infants and young children for analgesia and antipyresis, mainly because of concerns related to the possible development of Reye syndrome. However, acetylsalicylic acid is widely used as an anti-aggregant, for example after some cardiac surgeries and in the context of Kawasaki syndrome and pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS). Thus, there need to be other triggers (e.g. viral infection) for Reye syndrome in addition to treatment with salicylates, and hence no increased incidence of Reye syndrome was noted when acetylsalicylic acid was used in patients with Kawasaki disease. PK evidence in children was generated in the 1970s [74].
2.13 Sulfoanilides
Nimesulide is a preferential COX-2 inhibitor with potent analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic activities. Some evidence on its pharmacology in children was generated in the 1990s, but more recent data are lacking [75,76,77,78,79].
3 Efficacy of NSAIDs
NSAIDs have proven efficacy in several conditions in infancy. Usual dose recommendations of NSAIDs for the indications of fever and pain are summarized in Table 2.
3.1 Fever
Fever is probably the most frequent symptom prompting the use of NSAIDs in infants. The indication for antipyretic use in children is to improve the child’s comfort rather than focusing on the decrease in body temperature or even reaching normothermia [80]. Acetaminophen and NSAIDs are the most commonly administered drugs in infants and children with fever.
A recent Cochrane review analyzed 30 studies with a total of 4256 children aged 6 months–7 years to assess the efficacy of prophylactic antiepileptics and antipyretics regarding the prevention of recurrent febrile seizures [81]. Two studies were included that studied prophylactic ibuprofen and diclofenac, respectively, including 461 infants and children aged 4 months–4 years [82, 83]. Offringa et al. could not find a benefit of any of these prophylactic treatments and discouraged the use of prophylactic NSAIDs [81]. Another study in infants aged 6–24 months (n = 165) with fever also demonstrated that ketoprofen syrup is as effective and well tolerated as acetaminophen and ibuprofen [84] (see Table 3).
3.2 Acute Pain
Besides non-pharmacological measures, analgesics such as acetaminophen or NSAIDs are the first-line therapy for acute pain. Despite the popularity of opioids in the treatment of acute pain in the pediatric emergency department, NSAIDs should still play a relevant role in treating acute pediatric pain [85]. Ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, and ketorolac are used for mild to moderate pain in pediatric emergency departments, although, in most countries, not all of these medications have marketing authorization for infants [86, 87].
3.3 Postoperative Pain
A considerable amount of knowledge on the safety of NSAIDs for postoperative pain has been generated in recent years. NSAIDs are regularly part of postoperative analgesic regimens [8, 88, 89]. Kokki provided a comprehensive review on postoperative pain management in children, including dose recommendations for ibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, diclofenac, and ketorolac [8] (see Table 2). He emphasized the need for more research in children and infants, especially in infants younger than 6 years. However, he concluded that in infants aged 6 months or older, ketoprofen doses every 4–8 h, up to a maximum of 5 mg/kg over a 24-h period for 2–3 days, provide sufficient analgesia after adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy, with more rescue medication required for the latter [22].
Perioperative NSAID administration reduces the need for opioid analgesics. This opioid-sparing effect has been proven in several clinical trials as well as in children, and has been proven by meta-analyses [90,91,92]. Studied NSAIDs in children include ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, celecoxib, and rofecoxib. Most benefit was reported when multiple doses of NSAIDs were administered. NSAID administration also decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting, which is attributed to the opioid-sparing effect [91].
Several NSAIDs are available as a solution for injection enabling intravenous dosing, which is a relevant advantage for postoperative analgesic therapy. Although some manufacturers still provide dosing recommendations for intramuscular dosing, intravenous dosing should favor intramuscular dosing because intramuscular dosing is painful and may lead to erratic absorption or site infection, while intravenous dosing allows a complete and rapid absorption as well as a quick onset of action. Furthermore, administration of intramuscular NSAIDs can rarely lead to the so-called Nicolau syndrome, a severe, potentially fatal reaction [93].
In a study in 52 infants and children undergoing correction of craniosynostosis, intravenous NSAID administration (ketorolac) compared with oral administration (ibuprofen) led to significantly less postoperative nausea (odds ratio [OR] 14.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40–71.69; p = 0.010) and vomiting (OR 3.61, 95% CI 1.11–1.76; p = 0.033) [94]. Both drugs had been combined with either intravenous or oral acetaminophen, while a non-narcotic postoperative analgesic regimen was followed.
A well-studied condition in infants and children is the management of pain after tonsillectomy, for which several NSAIDs such as ibuprofen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, ketorolac and celecoxib have shown to be effective [95, 96]. Kelly et al. prospectively investigated respiratory parameters during sleep after tonsillectomy in 91 children (mean age ~ 5 years) receiving either morphine/acetaminophen or ibuprofen/acetaminophen [97]. The children who were receiving ibuprofen showed less desaturation events during sleep postoperatively compared with the morphine group, which was concluded as improvement compared with presurgery. The combination ibuprofen/acetaminophen was effective and there was no increased tonsillar bleeding, while morphine exerted an increased risk for respiratory events [97]. In the study by Murto et al. assessing pain after adenotonsillectomy, children receiving celecoxib had a significant reduction in pain scores during postoperative days 0–1 and a lower acetaminophen consumption compared with placebo [69].
NSAIDs also contribute to postoperative pain management in fast-track pediatric cardiac surgery programs, as was proven for ibuprofen, diclofenac, and ketorolac [98,99,100].
In summary, NSAIDs play a relevant role in postoperative pain management in children and infants. When combined with acetaminophen, even non-opioid analgesic regimens are possible. NSAIDs reduce postoperative opioid requirements, leading to less postoperative nausea and vomiting rates, which makes them especially suitable for pain management after day-case surgery.
3.4 Pediatric Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
Pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases (PiRDs) are chronic conditions, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, uveitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs). PiRDs are associated with chronic inflammation, pain, functional impairment, and diminished health-related quality of life [101, 102]. JIA is one of the most common PiRDs, defined as an inflammatory arthritis of unknown etiology during at least 6 weeks with onset before 16 years of age [103, 104]. Treatment options in PiRD patients include NSAIDs, conventional disease-modifying drugs (cDMARDs), and biologic disease-modifying drugs (bDMARDs) or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Treatment aims are to control signs and symptoms of active disease, prevent structural damage, avoid comorbid conditions and drug toxicities, and to optimize function, growth, development, quality of life, and social participation [105, 106]. PiRD patients typically require long-term treatment over several years, therefore drug safety is highly important.
NSAIDs are often used as first-line or adjuvant therapy in PiRD patients to treat inflammation, fever, and pain and should be available as liquid preparations for children who cannot swallow tablets [107,108,109,110]. The higher free fraction of NSAIDs in synovial fluid may account for clinical effects observed with relatively low plasma drug concentrations [111]. Ibuprofen concentrations fluctuated less in synovial fluid than in serum [112]. Children treated with a mean ibuprofen dose of 37.1 mg/kg/day reached a mean ibuprofen peak concentration of 65 µmol/L in synovial fluid 5–6 h after drug intake [112]. After 12 h, ibuprofen synovial fluid concentrations were still higher compared with serum concentrations, which were measured at 20 µmol/L [112, 113]. Naproxen concentrations in synovial fluid and membrane were 74 and 30%, respectively, of that in plasma 15 h after administration [112, 113]. Particularly in JIA patients with oligoarthritis (four or fewer affected joints) and low disease activity without joint contracture or features of poor prognosis, NSAID monotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment [114]; however, NSAID monotherapy for longer than 2 months is inadequate in pediatric patients with active arthritis and treatment escalation is recommended [114]. In the last years, the cytokine modulating effect of bDMARDs or JAK inhibitors have enabled ‘treat-to-target’ T2T strategies and have markedly improved clinical outcome, which might explain why NSAID monotherapy is nowadays less common compared with the 1990s [115]. In pediatric and adolescent patients with chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis without spine involvement, NSAIDs seem to still be the first-line treatment [116]. Furthermore, NSAIDs are used in periodic fever syndromes. NSAIDs are recommended as a symptomatic on-demand therapy during inflammatory attacks in AIDs in addition to maintenance therapy with colchicine and/or bDMARDs [117, 118]. For anterior uveitis, often associated with JIA, topical and systemic NSAID monotherapy has no demonstrable effect [119, 120]. In addition to established treatment regimens for uveitis/iridocyclitis, NSAIDs may play an adjunctive role by permitting corticosteroid dose reduction [119, 120].
To achieve the anti-inflammatory effect, higher NSAID dosages are necessary as needed for their analgesic effects [109]. Moreover, it seems that the anti-inflammatory effect of NSAIDs is time-dependent. Giannini et al. pointed out that JIA patients treated with ibuprofen show some improvement as early as 2 weeks, with continuous decrease of inflammatory disease activity until week 24 of treatment [121]. Lovell et al. postulated that the mean response time to NSAIDs is approximately 1 month and that an adequate therapeutic trial should be at least 8 weeks [122].
The choice of NSAIDs in very young patients with PiRD is often determined by whether a liquid form is available for exact dosing and administration, particularly when tablet swallowing is not possible [108, 109]. Safety and efficacy studies in PiRD patients focused on NSAIDs are scarce. The available data mainly address the PiRD subgroup JIA. Eccleston et al. performed a Cochrane review to assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse events in children and adolescents with chronic non-cancer pain treated with NSAIDs [123]. They identified seven trials with a total number of 1074 participants aged 2–18 years with JIA treated with NSAIDs for more than 3 months. All studies looked at different comparisons between acetylsalicylic acid, celecoxib, fenoprofen, ibuprofen, indomethacin, ketoprofen, meloxicam, naproxen, and rofecoxib [121, 124,125,126,127,128,129]. The authors concluded that the number of studies identified was too small for a sufficient data analysis [123].
Tolmetin is a heterocyclic acetic acid derivative. Available data suggest that tolmetin sodium has anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects in JIA and appears to be well tolerated for long-term therapy in JIA [121, 130]. Moreover, ibuprofen suspension has shown efficacy and safety at dosages of 30–40 mg/kg/day in JIA treatment [121, 130]. Naproxen is well-tolerated with long-term efficacy and tolerance, even in younger PiRD patients [131, 132]. It is one of the first-choice NSAIDs in JIA due to its twice-daily administration (advantage over ibuprofen), its availability as suspension in several countries, and its favorable adverse effect profile [109, 111, 133, 134].
Leak at al. compared naproxen 10 mg/kg/day, tolmetin 25 mg/kg/day, and diclofenac 2 mg/kg/day in 28 children diagnosed with seronegative JIA and assessed a clinical improvement for all three drugs [135]. Adverse effects were mild and typical but occurred less frequently with naproxen and tolmetin than diclofenac [135]. Ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen, fenoprofen, and tolmetin were found to be as effective as acetylsalicylic acid but were better tolerated than acetylsalicylic acid due to lower adverse events. Furthermore, they did not have a risk for Reye syndrome [10].
Foeldvari et al. performed a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind non-inferiority study for celecoxib administered at 3 mg/kg twice daily or 6 mg/kg twice daily, and naproxen 7.5 mg/kg twice daily [124]. Both celecoxib dosing regimens were at least as effective as naproxen and all treatments were generally well tolerated [124].
For rofecoxib (0.3 mg/kg/day up to 12.5 mg/day, or 0.6 mg/kg/day up to 25 mg/day) compared with naproxen (15 mg/kg/day up to 1000 mg/day), Reiff et al. showed comparable clinical effectiveness for JIA patients aged 2–17 years [125].
Ruperto et al. showed comparable short- and long-term safety and efficacy for meloxicam oral suspension (once daily 0.125 or 0.25 mg/kg) compared with naproxen oral suspension (10 mg/kg/day divided in two doses) in the treatment of JIA [126].
Foeldvari et al. found that meloxicam suspension 0.25 mg/kg once daily observed lower concentrations in children aged 2–6 years compared with older children; however, t½ (13 h) was similar among all patients [63].
Sobel et al. assessed long-term safety and developmental data for 274 JIA patients aged 2–17 years treated with celecoxib (n = 55) and other NSAIDs (n = 219) [136]. A total of 410 patient-years were observed showing a similar rate of adverse events between the two groups and overall a low number of severe adverse events with no new safety concerns [136].
In addition, Falkner et al. assessed a comparable safety profile for celecoxib (50 or 100 mg twice daily) in comparison with naproxen (7.5 mg/kg twice daily) in JIA patients aged 2–17 years [137]. Even though indomethacin is a potent anti-inflammatory and antipyretic agent in children with JIA, it is less frequently used [10, 111].
In their review, Eccleston et al. reported adverse events by drug as follows: acetylsalicylic acid, 85/120; fenoprofen, 28/49; ibuprofen, 40/45; indomethacin, 9/30; ketoprofen, 9/30; meloxicam, 113/147; naproxen 102/202, and rofecoxib 43/209 [123]. The most common adverse effects of NSAIDs observed in patients with JIA are gastric irritation and abdominal pain [106, 131, 138, 139].
Due to the risk of dyspepsia and gastric irritation, Lovell et al. investigated the fixed combination of naproxen and esomeprazole and postulated that this treatment is well tolerated in JIA patients aged 12–16 years without new safety signals [140]. Furthermore, pseudoporphyria is often implicated in JIA patients taking NSAIDs, particularly in patients treated with naproxen [141, 142]. The prevalence for pseudoporphyria ranges between 10.9 and 12% [141,142,143]. Pseudoporphyria occurs mainly in the first 2 years of naproxen treatment, and JIA disease activity is an important risk factor [143]. Furthermore, topical NSAIDs such as diclofenac are well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of inflammatory and painful conditions [144]. For example, diclofenac sodium 4% spray administered 2, respectively 3, times with 40 mg daily can penetrate the skin in substantial amounts and synovial-tissue concentrations are 10- to 20-fold higher (median 40.9 ng/g, respectively 74.9 ng/g) than those of synovial fluid (median 3.0 ng/mL, respectively 2.7 ng/mL) or plasma (median 4.1 ng/mL, respectively 4.2 ng/mL), but until now no studies in PiRD patients exist [145].
In summary, NSAIDs are used in PiRD patients as first-line therapy for a defined time span and as an on-demand therapeutic approach. Several NSAIDs can be used to treat PiRD patients safely and effectively. Dosing recommendations for NSAIDs are heterogeneous (several dosing recommendations are summarized in Table 4). The choice of NSAIDs is based on considerations such as age, individual patient’s response, approval, dosing, availability of a pediatric formulation, comedications, and hepatic impairment, and also on disease type, disease activity, and localization of arthritis. Regular monitoring of blood count and renal function in PiRD patients receiving daily long-term NSAIDs is recommended [111].
3.5 Indications in Pediatric Cardiology
Common indications of NSAIDs in infants with congenital heart defects are postoperative pain management, anti-inflammatory treatment in patients with pericardial effusion, pericarditis, or Kawasaki disease, as well as the use of salicylates for anticoagulation. For dose recommendations, see Table 5.
NSAIDs such as diclofenac play an important role in fast-track pediatric cardiac surgery due to their opioid-sparing effect, as was demonstrated in 54 patients with a median age of 5.6 years [98]. Ketorolac reduced morphine requirements after cardiac surgery in 67 infants (median age 22.7 months) within 24 h after its first administration [99]. The safe use of ketorolac has been demonstrated in neonates and infants [146], however special caution is needed when NSAIDs are used in combination. Based on a cohort of 14 young infants, Moffett and Cabrera report that coadministration of ketorolac and acetylsalicylic acid was a significant risk factor for drug-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in the postoperative period [147].
NSAIDs are also one of the mainstays in the management of idiopathic pericarditis or pericardial effusion and could be used either alone or in combination with acetylsalicylic acid, colchicine, or corticosteroids, depending on the underlying cause of the effusion [54, 148].
Postoperative pericardial effusion occurs in about 25% of patients after congenital cardiac surgery, but its incidence also depends on the type of surgical procedure [149]. Postpericardiotomy syndrome is an inflammatory reaction of the pericardium and/or the pleura that usually occurs within 1–6 weeks after cardiac surgery and manifests with pericardial effusion and fever. It occurs in 2–30% of patients after cardiac surgery but may also occur after catheter interventions or other conditions with pericardial damage. In children, NSAIDs such as ibuprofen, diclofenac, indomethacin, and acetylsalicylic acid are established treatments for postpericardiotomy syndrome but should not be used as prophylaxis [150, 151].
Acetylsalicylic acid is one of the most frequently used antiplatelet agents in pediatric cardiology. The usual dose is 3–5 mg/kg/day, which may be decreased to 1–3 mg/kg/day if dual antiplatelet therapy is used.
Patients with congenital heart defects are at higher risk of thrombosis, especially when critically ill [152]. About 94 and 77% of patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome receive acetylsalicylic acid for thromboprophylaxis after stage 1 and stage 2 palliative surgery, respectively [153]. Shunt thrombosis can be fatal in patients with systemic-to-pulmonary shunts. Therefore, therapeutic efficacy of acetylsalicylic acid may be assessed in patients at risk for acetylsalicylic acid resistance. This condition is not yet fully understood; its etiology is multicausal and the interfering mechanisms seem to be alterations in platelet function, platelet interactions, acetylsalicylic acid bioavailability, acetylsalicylic acid efficacy, and genetic polymorphisms [154, 155]. Acetylsalicylic acid responsiveness can be measured but there is no routine laboratory monitoring of acetylsalicylic acid antiplatelet therapy [156,157,158,159,160]. There is a higher risk of thrombosis after surgical and interventional procedures, especially in patients with single-ventricle physiology (25-40%) or systemic-to-pulmonary shunts, and there also is a higher rate of acetylsalicylic acid resistance after such procedures [161]. In a retrospective analysis, standard-dose (≤ 7 mg/kg/day at that institution) was compared with high-dose (≥ 8 mg/kg/day) acetylsalicylic acid in infants < 1 year of age, after surgery for creation of a systemic-to-pulmonary shunt [162]. There was no difference in shunt thrombosis, shunt interventions, and mortality between groups but single-ventricle morphology and postoperative red blood cell transfusion were associated with shunt-related adverse events.
Kawasaki disease is an acute self-limiting febrile vasculitis of the small- and medium-sized arteries, typically in children younger than 5 years of age. Coronary artery aneurysms are a dreaded complication that can be life-threatening. Kawasaki disease is diagnosed based on clinical criteria. Complete Kawasaki disease can be diagnosed in the presence of fever for at least 5 days together with four of the following clinical features: (1) erythema and cracking lips, strawberry tongue, and/or oral/pharyngeal edema; (2) bilateral conjunctivitis; (3) rash; (4) erythema and edema of the hands/feet (acute) or desquamation (subacute); and (5) cervical lymphadenopathy [163]. Its diagnosis warrants the immediate initiation of treatment to abrogate systemic and tissue-level inflammation and to prevent thrombosis in developing coronary aneurysms [164]. Therefore, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) should be instituted as early as possible after diagnosis is established, as IVIGs administered early are effective in reducing the prevalence of the development of coronary artery abnormalities [165,166,167]. Concomitant acetylsalicylic acid is recommended every 6 h intravenously in a total daily dose of 80–100 mg/kg/day in the US, whereas a dose of 30–50 mg/kg/day is routinely used in Japan and West Europe [163, 168,169,170,171], without differences in coronary outcome [172]. There are no data to suggest that either dose of acetylsalicylic acid is superior [163]. Furthermore, it seems that some centers in Canada routinely treat their patients with lower doses of acetylsalicylic acid (3–5 mg/kg/day). In the current literature, the role and dose of acetylsalicylic acid in the treatment of the acute phase of Kawasaki disease is discussed controversially, as previously performed studies report no benefits/differences of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (3–5 mg/kg/day) compared with high-dose acetylsalicylic acid (30–50 mg/kg or 80–100 mg/kg/day) if administered in conjunction with IVIGs [173,174,175]. Other studies state that low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (3–5 mg/kg/day) was associated with three times higher odds of intravenous retreatment compared with high-dose acetylsalicylic acid (80–100 mg/kg/day), with no significant difference in duration of hospital stay or incidence of coronary artery aneurysms [171]. Despite these findings, the use of acetylsalicylic acid in Kawasaki disease is a widely accepted practice, albeit with varying dose regimens [176]. After the acute phase of Kawasaki disease in the US, West Europe and Japan, acetylsalicylic acid should be reduced to a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day and may be discontinued after 6–8 weeks if coronary aneurysms have been excluded by echocardiography [163, 168,169,170]. Patients with coronary artery aneurysms need lifelong antiplatelet therapy.
A more recent application of diclofenac is the use for prostaglandin-induced periostitis in infants receiving prostaglandin therapy to maintain a patent arterial duct. The use of diclofenac against prostaglandin adverse effects seems contradictory and there have been case reports of intrauterine duct closure after maternal intake of diclofenac [177, 178]. However, clinical practice shows efficacy of diclofenac in that indication, but prospective and controlled studies are lacking.
3.6 Other Indications
Other indications for acetylsalicylic acid in infants include stroke prevention but this is not discussed in this review [179,180,181,182,183].
4 Safety of NSAIDs in Infants
Adverse drug reactions to NSAIDs can be renal, gastrointestinal, hematologic, or immunologic. While most reactions are mild in nature, there have been reports of clinically significant morbidity and mortality after NSAID use [184]. The safety of NSAID use, especially in infants, is discussed in the following sections.
4.1 Renal Safety
Potential renal adverse effects of NSAIDs are acute renal failure, tubular interstitial nephritis, and papillary necrosis, with the latter especially being associated with long-term use. The mechanisms by which NSAIDs exert renal toxicity have been described elsewhere in detail [185].
Acute kidney failure may already occur in children after short-term drug use (~ 5 days), especially when predisposing risk factors such as dehydration, prediagnosed kidney disease (renal transplantation), and concomitant therapy with other nephrotoxic drugs are present [185, 186]. Kidney damage through NSAIDs occurs through two different mechanisms, which include (1) altered renal hemodynamics by vasoconstriction of the afferent glomerular arteriole leading to reduced renal perfusion, local hypoxia and acute tubular necrosis, and (2) tubular interstitial nephritis mediated by locally increased production of leukotrienes [187]. AKI in children occurs more frequently in critically ill children (27%) rather than in non-critically ill children (5%), and critically ill children are also at a higher risk of drug-induced AKI [188,189,190]. Drug-induced AKI among children is most frequently due to NSAIDs, antibiotics, or chemotherapeutics [187]. Several case reports and small case series have been published with a total of approximately 50 patients [185, 191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210]. NSAID use was rather short in most patients (< 1 week) and mostly (~ 75%) at recommended doses, but at least 50% of patients showed signs of decreased oral intake of fluids during NSAID use. The individual substances were ibuprofen (n = 18), niflumic acid (n = 7), naproxen (n = 5), ketorolac (n = 4), rofecoxib and diclofenac (n = 3 each), sulindac (n = 2), flurbiprofen and ketoprofen (n = 1 each), and drug combinations with ibuprofen or diclofenac (n = 7). In some cases, patients were taking other drugs with potential nephrotoxicity at the same time, e.g. antibiotics.
In their retrospective analysis, Misurac et al. found an incidence of NSAID-induced AKI of 2.7% (2.1% acute tubular necrosis, 0.6% acute interstitial nephritis) among 1015 pediatric patients admitted for AKI to one US hospital [193]. When patients with multifactorial causes of AKI were excluded, the incidence was 6.6%. The patients had been taking ibuprofen (67%), naproxen (11%), ketorolac (7%), ibuprofen/naproxen (7%), and ibuprofen/ketorolac (7%). The administered doses had been appropriate for 65% of the patients with NSAID-induced AKI, if dosing data were available. Younger patients (< 5 years) were more likely to receive renal replacement (100 vs. 0%), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (75 vs. 9%), and needed longer inpatient care (10 vs.7 days). Time to recovery was a median of 15 days (range 1–180 days), and no patients had an ongoing need for renal replacement therapy.
NSAIDs may also cause clinically non-apparent kidney injury. Levels of the biomarker urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were assessed in young children (median age 2.5–3.2 years) after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with no apparent signs of AKI, who were stratified by NSAID administration [211]. At 60–72 h after CPB, urinary NGAL levels were more than fivefold higher in patients receiving NSAIDs, suggesting urinary NGAL as an early non-invasive marker of NSAID-induced subclinical kidney injury.
Prediagnosed kidney disease is the most relevant contraindication for NSAID therapy [9, 193]. The combination therapy with other potentially nephrotoxic drugs is a relative contraindication for administering NSAIDs, but alternative treatments should be evaluated if possible in order to reduce the risk of renal damage [7, 10, 193, 212]. Dehydration, caused by fever, vomiting, and/or diarrhea, is a risk factor for renal failure and therefore signs of volume depletion, such as poor oral intake and decreased urine output, should be recognized and corrected when prescribing NSAIDs [213].
4.2 Gastrointestinal Safety
The most common adverse effects of NSAIDs occur in the gastrointestinal tract and presenting symptoms include nausea, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, diarrhea or constipation, flatulence, and vomiting. Potentially life-threatening, but very rare, adverse events in children are peptic ulcers, gastric hemorrhage, or gastric perforation.
The risk of upper gastrointestinal complications such as hematemesis, melena, or endoscopically confirmed gastroduodenal lesion during therapy with NSAIDs, oral corticosteroids, and antibiotics was assessed in a case–control study (486 cases) in children aged 15–71 months [214]. An association between the short-term use (1–8 days) of NSAIDs and an increased risk for upper gastrointestinal complications was found. The adjusted OR for ibuprofen was 3.7 (95% CI 2.3–5.9) compared with niflumic acid (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8–3.2), ketoprofen (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2–5.6), acetylsalicylic acid (OR 2.5, 95% CI 0.9–7.4), and NSAIDs overall (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.1–4.0). ORs for other NSAIDs (e.g. indomethacin) were not reported separately. The true incidence of upper gastrointestinal complications could not be calculated due to the study design, but overall risk was estimated to be low (2.4 per 10,000 children). However, the population investigated in this case–control study did not reflect the typical pediatric patient population receiving NSAID treatment, because children with upper gastrointestinal complications were compared with a control group of children with neurological disorders.
A more recent study assessed gastrointestinal complications in 51 children aged 5 months to 15 years (including 11 children < 3 years of age) after short-term use of the NSAIDs ibuprofen (68.6%), ketoprofen (9.8%), acetylsalicylic acid (7.8%), flurbiprofen, ketorolac, naproxen, niflumic acid, and nimesulide, mainly for pain and fever [215]. Hematemesis was the most frequent symptom (33.3%), followed by abdominal pain (31.3%), anemia (25%), melena (7.8%), and nausea and vomiting (1.9%). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy confirmed gastric (62%), duodenal (33%), and esophageal lesions (15%), with the proximal lesions being more prevalent in children < 3 years of age. Risk factors were concomitant drug use (37.3%, mainly antibiotics and corticosteroids), associated comorbidities (23.5%), active Helicobacter pylori gastritis (19.6%), and a family history of peptic ulcer disease (9.8%) or H. pylori infection (5.8%). About 9.8% of patients were taking gastroprotective drugs such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or H2 receptor antagonists, but NSAID therapy had a longer duration in these patients. It was further remarkable that NSAIDs were inappropriately used in 47% of patients regarding the correct weight-based dose, the number of daily doses, or the recommended age.
In summary, chronic comorbidities, the concomitant use of other medications with known gastrointestinal adverse effects (e.g. corticosteroids), H. pylori infection, a history of peptic ulcer, and long-term or high-dose NSAID therapy are also risk factors for gastrointestinal adverse events in children, as seen in adults [215,216,217]. Therefore, infants and children should also be assessed for additional risk factors and gastroprotective drug treatment with antacids, H2 blockers, or PPIs. Furthermore, H. pylori eradication should be considered in infants and children as it is already recommended for pediatric patients with PiRD during long-term treatment [218].
4.3 Hematologic Safety
NSAIDs also inhibit platelet COX, thereby blocking the formation of thromboxane A2 and impairing thromboxane-dependent platelet aggregation, leading to an increased risk for bleeding complications, e.g. in patients after major surgery.
Postoperative bleeding after tonsillectomy was assessed in a recent Cochrane review including 15 studies involving 1101 children aged up to 16 years [219]. The review revealed a non-significant increase in the risk of bleeding requiring surgical intervention (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.71–4.01). Furthermore, the frequency of perioperative bleeding events requiring non-surgical intervention was not significantly altered (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.41–2.40). Due to the rareness of relevant bleeding after tonsillectomy requiring surgical intervention, the review was limited by the insufficient data to exclude or confirm a significantly increased bleeding risk because of an insufficient number of studies and individuals studied. Ketorolac has been attributed to an increased risk of bleeding but the meta-analysis found no statistical significant difference in postoperative bleeding events requiring either surgical or non-surgical intervention when compared with other NSAIDs [219].
Riggin et al. conducted a meta-analysis of 18 studies (participants: 1747 children, 1446 adults) and found no increased risk of bleeding in those using NSAIDs after tonsillectomy [220]. NSAID use in children was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding, most severe bleeding, secondary bleeding, readmission or surgical intervention (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.65–1.74), with the bleeding risk even lower than in the population overall (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.90–1.88). No significant differences were described for the individual NSAIDs.
A more recent retrospective study compared a postoperative analgesic regimen of ibuprofen 5–10 mg/kg and acetaminophen with opioids and acetaminophen in 2180 children (449 in the ibuprofen + acetaminophen group) with a mean age of 9.5 ± 3.4 years undergoing intracapsular tonsillectomy [221]. The incidence of postoperative bleeding requiring surgical intervention was higher in the NSAID group compared with the opioid group (1.6 vs. 0.5%, p = 0.01; OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.1–10.1), as were the rates of primary (2 vs. 0.12%, p < 0.0001) and secondary postoperative hemorrhage (3.8 vs. 1.1%, p < 0.0001; OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7–7.2). Bias might have been introduced by ketorolac that was administered to 39.4% of patients in the NSAID group, and 2.5% of patients who received additional ketorolac experienced primary postoperative bleeding compared with 1.7% of patients in the NSAID group who did not receive ketorolac. Pain scores were not evaluated during the study but the rate of emergency department visits or admissions for pain did not differ between groups.
Liu and Ulualp retrospectively analyzed 583 patients aged 1–18 years (mean 7 ± 3 years) receiving alternating ibuprofen/acetaminophen post tonsillectomy. They reported that 9.6% of patients reported inadequate pain control and 4.1% of patients experienced postoperative bleeding that in 1.5% of patients required surgical intervention [96].
A retrospective database review evaluated postoperative bleeding after alternating ibuprofen and acetaminophen after brain tumor surgery in 51 patients aged 1–16 years [222]. Patients were postoperatively treated with 10 mg/kg ibuprofen every 4–6 h, alternating every ~ 2 h with 10 mg/kg acetaminophen administered every 4 h. Besides the fact that this dosing regimen exceeded the maximum recommended dose of ibuprofen (30 mg/kg/day) if taken over 24 h, only one patient (1.9%) had moderate postoperative hemorrhage in the tumor cavity, and nine patients (17.6%) had a small amount of blood in the tumor resection cavity in postoperative imaging studies performed, on average, 1.4 days after surgery.
These studies are in line with the review by Romsing et al. who compared preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative NSAID safety in children undergoing a variety of surgeries [223]. The timing of NSAID administration did not seem to affect postoperative hemorrhage. A higher bleeding risk was reported for ketorolac and indomethacin based on four studies that reported a significantly higher bleeding risk for NSAIDs compared with the control groups [223,224,225,226,227].
In particular, neonates and young infants are at a significantly increased risk for postoperative bleeding after ketorolac therapy [228]. Aldrink et al. report associations between age, serum creatinine, and enteral feeding regarding the bleeding risk during ketorolac therapy (see Table 6).
It has been observed in adults that ibuprofen and other NSAIDs lead to a relevant pharmacodynamic drug–drug interaction regarding the inhibition of platelet aggregation by acetylsalicylic acid [229]. This phenomenon has been observed for ibuprofen, indomethacin, naproxen, and tiaprofenic acid, but not for diclofenac, sulindac, meloxicam, celecoxib, etoricoxib, and rofecoxib [229,230,231]. Ibuprofen and naproxen inhibited the anti-thrombocyte effect of acetylsalicylic acid, even below the non-response threshold, in a recent adult ex vivo study [231]. Therefore, it is recommended for adults that ibuprofen and other NSAIDs with this interaction potential should not be combined. This pharmacodynamic interaction has not been described in infants to date but may play a role in infants with congenital heart disease (e.g. with stents or vascular grafts). Based on the few available studies in adults, it should be considered whether diclofenac would be an alternative with less interaction potential, but the pharmacodynamic interaction between NSAIDs and acetylsalicylic acid should be studied in children before any conclusions for infants can be made.
In summary, physiological hemostasis can be impaired depending on the type of surgery. However, NSAIDs seem to affect postoperative bleeding but the data still remain inconclusive. NSAIDs can be considered as well tolerated postoperative analgesics among children undergoing surgery but attention should be paid to the type and duration of surgical procedure, bleeding complications already present intraoperatively, and the choice of NSAID for postoperative pain management, including postoperative monitoring for pain and bleeding complications. Based on the available data, we recommend using NSAIDs with a reportedly higher bleeding risk, such as acetic acid derivatives, only in the clinical setting where appropriate postoperative surveillance is possible.
4.4 Immunologic Safety
4.4.1 NSAID-Induced Hypersensitivity
Hypersensitivity reactions are frequently reported adverse effects and may present as non-specific allergic reactions, various skin reactions such as pruritus or urticaria, angioedema or anaphylaxis, and respiratory tract reactivity. Hypersensitivity reactions towards NSAIDs can be classified based on two mechanisms: (1) cross-intolerance hypersensitivity reactions, which are more frequent, and (2) selective hypersensitivity reactions [232].
Cross-intolerance hypersensitivity reactions comprise NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease, NSAID-exacerbated cutaneous disease, and NSAID-induced urticarial angioedema, which usually occur within 6 h after drug exposure. These reactions are caused by a non-immunologic mechanism due to COX-1 inhibition, leading to an imbalance of arachidonic acid metabolism through both the lipoxygenase and COX pathways. By inhibiting the COX pathway, arachidonic acid metabolites are diverted to the lipooxygenase pathway, leading to an increase in the synthesis of proinflammatory leukotrienes [232, 233]. This cross-intolerance may occur for every NSAID, including acetylsalicylic acid, independent of its structural class. This is of particular interest since NSAIDs are a unique class of drugs in that they are defined primarily by their mechanism of action and not by their physicochemical properties. In fact, as described above, there is notable chemical heterogeneity among the different compounds.
In contrast, selective, or compound-specific, hypersensitivity reactions are caused by a single agent and cross-reactivity is rare. These include selective NSAID-induced urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis, which are not directly related to COX inhibition. These reactions are likely immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated and occur within 1 h of drug intake, and delayed-type hypersensitivity (type IV) reactions which are cell-mediated and usually manifest within up to 48 h after drug intake [232]. Previous drug exposure towards the culprit drug is a prerequisite for selective hypersensitivity reactions. This also explains why compound-specific hypersensitivity is more common among NSAIDs than for other drug classes with more homogenous physicochemical properties.
There are only scarce data regarding NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions in children and infants, besides NSAID-induced asthma, but cross-intolerance occurs more frequently than selective hypersensitivity in children [184, 234, 235]. Zambonino et al. found a higher rate of positive drug provocation tests for ibuprofen compared with other analgesic agents in children with a history of NSAID hypersensitivity (percentage positivity: ibuprofen, 53.4%; acetylsalicylic acid, 37%; metamizole, 14%; acetaminophen, 8.2%). There is evidence that cross-intolerance is associated with atopy. Angioedema was the most prevalent symptom in that study.
Hypersensitivity to NSAIDs can be safely diagnosed by drug provocation tests, but different phenotypes that do not fit into the current classification might exist [232, 234, 236, 237].
4.4.2 Asthma
Although NSAID hypersensitivity reactions, including NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease, have already been discussed in this review, the following paragraph focuses specifically on NSAID-exacerbated asthma because of its relevance and the general prevalence of asthma in childhood.
For ibuprofen, a recent multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial in young children has shown that there was no difference in the incidence of asthma exacerbations (defined as exacerbations that led to treatment with systemic glucocorticoids) or worse asthma control between patients taking as-needed ibuprofen or as-needed acetaminophen [233, 238]. The 300 patients aged 12–59 months were prediagnosed with mild persistent asthma and were assigned to receive either ibuprofen or acetaminophen for antipyresis or analgesia for a period of 48 weeks. The children in the ibuprofen group had a mean of 0.87 exacerbations (95% CI 0.69–1.10) over 46 weeks of follow-up compared with a mean of 0.81 asthma exacerbations (95% CI 0.65–1.02) in the acetaminophen group (relative rate with acetaminophen vs. ibuprofen 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.28; p = 0.67). The true relative rate compared with placebo remains unknown, and the possibility that both ibuprofen use and acetaminophen use may also be associated with increases in asthma exacerbation cannot be excluded because the study did not include a placebo group for ethical reasons [239, 240]. However, similar results have been found in earlier studies, such as the Boston University Fever Study, as well as reviews [241, 242].
A nationwide retrospective analysis of Taiwanese pediatric patients comparing children during anti-asthmatic and NSAID therapy (index group, assessed medications: ibuprofen, diclofenac, mefenamic acid, naproxen, acetylsalicylic acid, flurbiprofen, and ketoprofen) with those during anti-asthmatic therapy only suggested a higher risk of hospitalization for asthma exacerbation in the index group (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.30–1.53) [243]. A probable correlation was found between short-term use of acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen and diclofenac but no association with long-term NSAID use. In the study by Standing et al., diclofenac was not avoided in asthmatic patients and the incidence of diclofenac-induced bronchospasm in asthmatic children was estimated at < 2.7% [244].
Asthma has also been reported as a significant adverse drug reaction in another retrospective study using data gathered through an adverse drug reaction program at an Australian children’s hospital; one patient died due to severe exacerbation of asthma during rofecoxib therapy for joint pain [184].
The SOS project, a population-based analysis of NSAID use in children in four European countries (Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, and the UK) using seven databases calculated incidence rates (IRs) for serious adverse events, such as asthma exacerbation, anaphylactic shock, upper gastrointestinal complications, stroke, heart failure, acute renal injury, Reye syndrome, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, acute liver injury, and acute myocardial infarction [6]. The dataset consisted of 7.7 million children up to 18 years of age with 29.6 million person-years (11.5% relating to infants < 2 years of age) of observation. Asthma exacerbation was the serious adverse event with the highest IR of 82/100,000 person-years.
4.4.3 Bacterial Infections
A possible association between ibuprofen and invasive group A streptococcal infections in children with varicella was reported by Lesko et al., but there was a lack of data supporting a causal relationship in a case–control study including 52 patients with invasive group A streptococcal infections [80, 245]. In contrast, Dubos et al. found that persistence or recurrence of fever ≥ 38.5 °C for ≥ 3 days after the beginning of the varicella infection and the use of NSAIDs (not including acetylsalicylic acid) were independent risk factors associated with severe secondary bacterial skin infections (OR 8.5%, 95% CI 2.3–28.1 and OR 4.8%, 95% CI 1.6–14.4) in multivariate analysis of their data [246]. Infants < 2 years of age had a significantly and independently lower risk than the overall population aged up to 9 years. The association of NSAIDs with potential soft tissue infections in children with varicella led to recommendations to avoid NSAIDs in children with varicella [213].
An epidemiological study reported an increased incidence of severe bacterial infections after exposure to NSAIDs for fever, pain, and inflammation, in the center studied [247]. A number or 32 children were admitted with bacterial infections after NSAID use over the previous 15 days, requiring surgical therapy in seven patients (22%). In cases where causative agents could be identified (56% of cases), these were Staphylococcus aureus, group A streptococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenza (non-B type). Previously administered NSAIDs included mainly ibuprofen (94%), morniflumate (6%), and combinations of ibuprofen/acetylsalicylic acid and ibuprofen/morniflumate. A ‘possible’ causality was concluded for previous NSAID use and severe bacterial infections [247].
A more recent case control study (ChANCE – Children, Antibiotic, NSAIDs and Childhood Empyema) also reported an increased risk of empyema associated with exposure to NSAIDs (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.4–5.58) administered for antipyresis during a viral infection, which was lowered by concomitant antibiotic treatment [248]. While viral infections are a risk factor for bacterial infections, the involvement of NSAIDs in this process still remains to be studied, but suppression of the body’s inflammatory response to infection by NSAIDs is plausible [249].
Similar observations have been made in children and adults. A causal relationship of NSAIDs and complicated pneumonia has been suggested based on weak evidence but has not yet been investigated [250,251,252,253]. Besides the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, experimental data suggest that NSAIDs exert a depressive effect on neutrophil functions (chemotaxis, adhesion, aggregation, degranulation), which would support the theory that based on a previous attenuation of the immune system by viral infections, NSAIDs may cause a certain extent of immune depression that may allow the invasion of pathogens [254]. This would explain that NSAID administration masks the initial symptoms of pneumonia to a certain extent, delaying diagnosis and treatment. Byington et al. hypothesize that NSAIDs interfere with the infection in its initial stages (modification of neutrophil and alveolar macrophage functionality, alteration of inflammatory processes linked to arachidonic acid derivatives) and symptom control by NSAIDs, delaying the diagnosis of empyema [253, 254].
Little et al. reported in two trials that ibuprofen use was associated with an increase in both reconsultations with progression of symptoms and in complications, and with worse control of severe symptoms [255, 256]. The discussion has even come so far as to say that NSAIDs should not be used at all in acute respiratory infections [249].
Le Bourgeois et al. discussed the pathogenesis of empyema and the role of viral infections in this process and concluded that NSAIDs should not be recommended as first-line antipyretic treatment during acute viral infections in children because of their as yet unknown role in the pathogenesis of complicated bacterial infections [248]. Despite this recommendation, NSAIDs account for the most commonly used antipyretics in children worldwide and are partly sold over-the-counter for this indication [1, 3, 4].
As recommended by pediatric practitioners and as stated in the Summary of Product Characteristics, medical advice should be sought in infants aged 3–6 months if symptoms worsen, or not later than 24 h if symptoms persist, and in infants and children older than 6 months of age if symptoms worsen or the drug is required for more than 3 days, as NSAIDs might also alleviate symptoms of bacterial infections, suppress the physiological immune response, and thus delay the diagnosis. Following these recommendations should ensure that relevant bacterial infections should be detected early.
While Le Bourgeois et al. discouraged the use of NSAIDs as first-line antipyretics in infants with acute viral infections, we cannot give a clear recommendation to avoid them in this population. We would like to emphasize rational drug use in infants and to administer antipyretics for the child’s comfort only and not to achieve normothermia. We would also draw attention to the recommendation that NSAIDs for antipyresis are indicated for short-term use only.
4.4.4 Vaccinations
Fever is the most common adverse effect of vaccinations in infancy [257]. In contrast to acetaminophen, ibuprofen was shown to not affect the immunogenicity of a 10-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine, and could therefore be considered as the primary antipyretic during vaccination courses in infancy [258]. Furthermore, the immune response to an inactivated influenza vaccine was not blunted when infants and children aged 6–47 months received antipyretics (ibuprofen vs. acetaminophen) vs. placebo [259].
4.4.5 Diabetes
The TEDDY (The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young) study aims at identifying environmental triggers of type 1 diabetes in children who are genetically at risk [260]. Since NSAIDs have been shown to lower blood glucose, markers for islet autoimmunity were assessed in about 8000 infants and children until 6 years of having received antipyretics (acetaminophen/NSAIDs) while < 2.5 years of age [261]. No relevant hazard ratios could be reported for the seroconversion to persistent islet autoimmunity after NSAID use.
5 Discussion of the Specific NSAIDs, and Overall Conclusion
5.1 Ibuprofen and Propionic Acid Derivatives
In summary, most evidence on safety and efficacy is available for ibuprofen (see Table 3). Orally administered ibuprofen is reliable and well tolerated for up to 3 days in infants aged 3 months and older with a body weight above 5–6 kg when special attention is given to the hydration of the patient [9, 17, 262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280]. One study reported that infants had an increased risk of adverse events when taking oral ibuprofen compared with acetaminophen alone, but very low risks of adverse events were reported overall; this is consistent with our previous findings and several other large studies [272, 281]. Further details on PK data for ibuprofen dosing in infants can be found in previous works [9, 12, 17, 262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280].
Kokki et al. have extensively studied ketoprofen in relation to its PK, efficacy, and safety in infants and children for the treatment of fever, (peri- and postoperative) pain, and inflammatory conditions [22, 25,26,27,28,29,30, 84]. They report that intravenous ketoprofen was superior to oral ketoprofen in the perioperative setting, while oral ketoprofen has shown efficacy in the treatment of JIA. Reported adverse events are similar to other NSAIDs. In a dose-finding study in febrile children, an oral dose of 0.5 mg/kg was found to achieve sufficient antipyresis [84]. Ketoprofen is approved for use in children in many countries but should not be used in infants younger than 6 months of age [22].
Dexibuprofen has been investigated in ~ 450 Asian children, showing a similar efficacy and safety profile as ibuprofen [282,283,284]. There is currently no benefit of dexibuprofen over ibuprofen in children due to the limited available data. Therefore, we do not recommend its use in infants until supporting data are available from adult studies that show the superiority of enantio-selective NSAIDs with a favorable safety profile facilitating such studies in children. Data on the safety and efficacy of flurbiprofen in infants and children are scarce. A pediatric case of anaphylaxis has been recently published [285]. One case of psychiatric adverse effects in a 2-year-old infant has also been reported [286]. UK Poison Information Service data report significantly more CNS toxicity with naproxen overdosing when compared with ibuprofen (adjusted OR 3.12) or diclofenac (adjusted OR 2.37) overdosing [287]. Therefore, naproxen is generally not recommended in children but may be used for specific indications, e.g. in PiRD.
5.2 Diclofenac and Acetic Acid Derivatives
An overview on the efficacy and safety of oral and rectal diclofenac is given in Table 6 [42, 244, 288,289,290]. It was consistently shown that children and infants will not benefit from doses higher than 1 mg/kg [38, 43]. In the study by Standing et al., diclofenac-induced bronchospasm in asthmatic children was shown to be < 2.7%, therefore caution in this population needs to be taken [244]. Vons et al. reported children undergoing adenotonsillectomy experienced significant pain for up to 2 postoperative days when treated with acetaminophen and diclofenac, and no pain after seven days; however, a different technique (adenoidectomy) and analgesic (acetaminophen) was used in the group that reported better pain relief [95]. Another study reported that children undergoing adenoidectomy experienced fewer sequelae compared with adenotonsillectomy [291], therefore the efficacy of diclofenac may not directly be comparable in the previous study, but rather an effect of the type of intervention.
Lee at al. showed that effective antipyresis was achieved with 2 mg/kg diclofenac administered intramuscularly, and that infants < 24 months of age had a more rapid onset of antipyresis compared with children <60 months of age [289]. Rectal diclofenac provided more effective antipyresis compared with rectal acetaminophen in children aged 1–6 years [290] and can be used for children suffering from vomiting or patients being on nihil per os’ status [292]. In the postoperative setting, rectal diclofenac allowed earlier solid intake in children aged 3–14 years after tonsillectomy, suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect compared with acetaminophen [288]. A prospective observational study in children focusing on adverse drug reactions after diclofenac suggested that the common adverse drug reactions of diclofenac in children when used for acute pain are similar to those in adults [244].
Ketorolac has recently experienced a renaissance for use in postoperative pain in children, especially in the US, but was withdrawn from some European markets (or recommended dosages had been reduced) in the 1990s due to increased risks of bleeding.
5.3 Fenamates
Mefenamic acid has been reported to exert renal, gastrointestinal, hematologic, and CNS toxicity (especially convulsions for the latter), when overdosed [293, 294]. Recent analyses from national poison information services confirm a higher risk of CNS toxicity when overdosed compared with other NSAIDs [287, 295]. Swiss data report an incidence of seizures after overdosed mefenamic acid in 51/470 patients (10.9%, 95% CI 8.4–14.0%), with a higher incidence in adolescents (23.9%) than in adults (5.7%) [295]. Kamour et al. found a higher adjusted OR for convulsions when overdosing with mefenamic acid (adjusted OR 81.5, 95% CI 27.8–238.8) compared with overdosing with other NSAIDs, in the UK database. About 19.7% (91/461) of patients who had overdosed with mefenamic acid experienced CNS toxicity, with 9.1% (42/461) experiencing seizures [287].
Regarding the safety of niflumic acid, there were reports in the 1990s regarding renal and cutaneous adverse effects [198, 296], and there has been controversy regarding the risk of mucocutaneous reactions after niflumic acid use in children. Menniti-Ippolito et al. reported an (adjusted) OR of 4.9 (95% CI 1.9–12.8) compared with, for example, acetaminophen in a case–control study of 22 children aged 10 months–10 years exposed to niflumic acid [297]. Based on a retrospective cohort study of 32,150 children aged 0–14 years, Sturkenboom et al. reported an adjusted RR of niflumic acid for severe and mild mucocutaneous reactions of 0.5 (95% CI 0.23–1.27) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.79–1.11), respectively. Younger children aged ≤ 3 years had a slightly higher adjusted RR of 0.7 (95% CI 0.2–2.2) compared with children aged > 3 years (0.2, 95% CI 0.0–1.6). This is particularly interesting as the study also reported that 57% of children receiving niflumic acid were 3 years of age or younger [298]. The studies are summarized in Table 7 [297, 298].
Fenamates are understudied in children regarding their safety, as the use of fenamates in children has declined over the past decades. There have been reports of kidney failure and gastrointestinal, hematologic, and neurologic complications. The most compelling risk is that of CNS toxicity when overdosed compared with other NSAIDs. Therefore, we discourage the use of these drugs as first-line analgesics/antipyretics in the presence of better studied alternatives, such as ibuprofen [198, 294, 299, 300] (Table 8).
5.4 Oxicams and Coxibs
The use of oxicams and coxibs should be reserved for indications in PiRD. Due to safety concerns, parecoxib was not approved for use in the US, but in the European Union, such as etoricoxib. Valdecoxib and rofecoxib were withdrawn from the US market in 2004/2005 due to an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events.
There are only a few reports on the efficacy and safety of coxibs in children, which are summarized in Table 9. Furthermore, it was reported that rofecoxib and celecoxib were used to regulate urine output in infants with congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus [301, 302]. In these cases, COX-2 inhibitor-mediated effects, such as reduction in renal medullary blood flow and reduced GFR, were used to reduce urinary sodium and water excretion.
Based on the available knowledge, we recommend to avoid the use of coxibs in children, if possible, or to limit their use to specific indications (e.g. pediatric inflammatory rheumatological disease) during appropriate safety monitoring.
5.5 Salicylates
Acetylsalicylic acid should not be the first choice in infants except for specific indications, e.g. in children with heart conditions or Kawasaki disease, but not generally as an antipyretic because of the risk of Reye syndrome.
Acetylsalicylic acid is used for pediatric pain or as antiplatelet agent but its use was discouraged due to the risk of Reye syndrome [303], a rare but potentially fatal disease that is associated with the use of acetylsalicylic acid in young children. It is usually diagnosed by exclusion. Based on viral infection, immune-mediated processes are suspected to cause mitochondrial damage, modified by genetic and exogenous factors such as drugs or toxins, leading to the clinical symptoms of hepatopathy and encephalopathy. No causal relationship has been proven for acetylsalicylic acid and Reye syndrome, and only observational studies showed an association between reduced acetylsalicylic acid sales (81 mg tablets) and a decrease in Reye incidence, but it is not clear whether reduced pediatric acetylsalicylic acid use has led to a reduction in Reye syndrome cases [303, 304]. The etiology of Reye syndrome still needs to be elucidated, however there is no increased incidence of Reye syndrome in patients with Kawasaki disease who are taking high-dose acetylsalicylic acid (30–100 mg/kg/day) [304].
The antipyretic efficacy of acetylsalicylic acid was proven in studies in the 1980s but the drug is not preferably used in Western countries for this indication [305, 306].
Acetylsalicylic acid is one of the most frequently used agents for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill children (46% of cases) [152]; however, there was the limitation that only 12.4% of patients in that study received thromboprophylaxis, and only 34.7% of patients who were indicated to receive prophylaxis, based on consensus recommendations. Cyanotic congenital heart disease strongly predicted the administration of thromboprophylaxis (OR 7.35, p < 0.001). Thromboprophylaxis was most frequently administered to infants and adolescents.
Acetylsalicylic acid should be continued to be used for pediatric thromboprophylaxis at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day when used alone, or 1–3 mg/kg/day when used in combination with other antiplatelet agents, e.g. P2Y12 inhibitors such as clopidogrel.
5.6 Sulfoanilides
Nimesulide was studied in children and infants with asthma and fever in relation to its safety and efficacy (see Table 10) [307,308,309,310], and was attributed to having at least an equal, or faster and longer-lasting, antipyretic effect compared with acetaminophen, as well as anti-inflammatory properties for pediatric asthma. Adverse effects include those that NSAIDs are known for, but most relevant were reports on nimesulide-induced liver injury, also involving pediatric patients [309, 311, 312]. Consequently, nimesulide was withdrawn from some European markets from the year 2002 onwards, and its use has been restricted in some countries, e.g. in India to patients older than 12 years of age after a controversial discussion [311, 313]. Nimesulide is still available in several countries within the EU and in Russia, as well as Southeast Asian and South American countries, since it is regarded as a particularly valuable and safe option for the treatment of several conditions in adults, when used appropriately [314]. Since better-studied alternatives are available for children, we strongly discourage the use of nimesulide in children and infants.
5.7 Limitations
This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of NSAIDs in infants. The main limitation of our review is that the discussed studies are heterogeneous in terms of study design, clinical setting, and studied clinical conditions. In some of the mentioned retrospective cohort studies assessing safety, no doses of the administered drugs were reported. Other studies also included young children and school children, therefore the reported data could be skewed towards this population.
5.8 Conclusion
Caution should be exerted when NSAIDs are coadministered with corticosteroids (increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding) or nephrotoxic drugs (increased risk of renal damage). The immunological effect of NSAIDs still remains unclear regarding their use during viral infections and varicella because of their as yet unknown role in the pathogenesis of complicated bacterial infections. There are conflicting data regarding the risk of postoperative bleeding but, in general, the use of NSAIDs appears to be well tolerated in the pediatric postoperative setting.
6 Conclusion
There has been an increase in knowledge regarding the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs in infants and children over the past 20 years; however, despite NSAIDs being among the most frequently administered drugs in children, they are not among the most studied. Safety and efficacy studies might be conducted within the clinical routine, as well as in infants. Available data sources, such as (electronic) medical records, should be used for safety and efficacy analyses. On a wider level, existing data sources, e.g. adverse drug reaction programs/networks, spontaneous national reporting systems, and electronic medical records, should be assessed with child-specific methods in order to detect safety signals pertinent to certain pediatric age groups or disease entities [6, 315, 316].
To improve NSAID safety in infants, therapy should be initiated with the lowest age-appropriate or weight-based dose. Duration of treatment and drug doses used should be regularly evaluated and maximum dose limits and other recommendations by the manufacturer or expert committees should be followed. Treatment for non-chronic conditions such as fever and acute (postoperative) pain should be kept as short as possible. Patients with chronic conditions should be regularly monitored for NSAID adverse effects.
Change history
21 November 2022
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note
References
Trajanovska M, Manias E, Cranswick N, Johnston L. Use of over-the-counter medicines for young children in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010;46(1–2):5–9.
Ferreira TR, Lopes LC. Analysis of analgesic, antipyretic, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in pediatric prescriptions. Jornal de pediatria. 2016;92(1):81–7.
Tomlin AM, Woods DJ, Lloyd HS, Tilyard MW. Trends in outpatient prescription medicine use in New Zealand children 2010–2015: a national population-based study. Paediatr Drugs. 2018;20(5):465–74.
Rauch E, Lagler FB, Herkner H, Gall W, Sauermann R, Hetz S, et al. A survey of medicine use in children and adolescents in Austria. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(10):1479–87.
Eustace N, O’Hare B. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in infants. A survey of members of the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007;17(5):464–9.
Valkhoff VE, Schade R, t Jong GW, Romio S, Schuemie MJ, Arfe A, et al. Population-based analysis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use among children in four European countries in the SOS project: what size of data platforms and which study designs do we need to assess safety issues? BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:192.
Jacqz-Aigrain E, Anderson BJ. Pain control: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11(4):251–9.
Kokki H. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative pain: a focus on children. Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(2):103–23.
Ziesenitz VC, Zutter A, Erb TO, van den Anker JN. Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen in infants aged between 3 and 6 months. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19(4):277–90.
Litalien C, Jacqz-Aigrain E. Risks and benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children: a comparison with paracetamol. Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(11):817–58.
Radi ZA, Khan KN. Cardio-renal safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Toxicol Sci. 2019;44(6):373–91.
Parente L, Perretti M. Advances in the pathophysiology of constitutive and inducible cyclooxygenases: two enzymes in the spotlight. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;65(2):153–9.
Aranda JV, Salomone F, Valencia GB, Beharry KD. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in newborns and infants. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017;64(6):1327–40.
European Medicines Agency. ICH topic E11 clinical investigation of medicinal products in the paediatric population. 2001. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002926.pdf.
Davies NM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen. The first 30 years. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;34(2):101–54.
Hao H, Wang G, Sun J. Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen and involved mechanisms. Drug Metab Rev. 2005;37(1):215–34.
Har-Even R, Stepensky D, Britzi M, Soback S, Chaim AB, Brandriss N, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of ibuprofen in pediatric patients and antipyretic effect: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling analysis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(9):1023–30.
Verscheijden LFM, Koenderink JB, de Wildt SN, Russel FGM. Development of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic pediatric brain model for prediction of cerebrospinal fluid drug concentrations and the influence of meningitis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(6): e1007117.
Zheng C, Hao H, Wang G, Sang G, Sun J, Li P, et al. Chiral separation of ibuprofen and chiral pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese volunteers. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2008;33(1):45–51.
Zamani O, Bottcher E, Rieger JD, Mitterhuber J, Hawel R, Stallinger S, et al. Comparison of safety, efficacy and tolerability of dexibuprofen and ibuprofen in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014;126(11–12):368–75.
Dionne RA, McCullagh L. Enhanced analgesia and suppression of plasma beta-endorphin by the S(+)-isomer of ibuprofen. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;63(6):694–701.
Kokki H. Ketoprofen pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability in pediatric patients. Paediatr Drugs. 2010;12(5):313–29.
Dahlgren D, Lennernas H. Intestinal permeability and drug absorption: predictive experimental, computational and in vivo approaches. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(8):411.
Hersh EV, Dionne RA. Nonopioid analgesics pharmacology and therapeutics for dentistry, 7th edn. 2017. p. 257–75.
Kokki H, Karvinen M, Suhonen P. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and rectal ketoprofen in young children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(4):373–9.
Kokki H, Karvinen M, Jekunen A. Pharmacokinetics of a 24-hour intravenous ketoprofen infusion in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46(2):194–8.
Kokki H, Le Liboux A, Jekunen A, Montay G, Heikkinen M. Pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen syrup in small children. J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;40(4):354–9.
Kokki H, Tuomilehto H, Karvinen M. Pharmacokinetics of ketoprofen following oral and intramuscular administration in young children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;57(9):643–7.
Kokki H, Karvinen M, Jekunen A. Diffusion of ketoprofen into the cerebrospinal fluid of young children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12(4):313–6.
Mannila A, Kokki H, Heikkinen M, Laisalmi M, Lehtonen M, Louhisto HL, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid distribution of ketoprofen after intravenous administration in young children. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(7):737–43.
Wyatt JE, Pettit WL, Harirforoosh S. Pharmacogenetics of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pharmacogenomics J. 2012;12(6):462–7.
Davies NM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of flurbiprofen and its enantiomers. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995;28(2):100–14.
Kumpulainen E, Valitalo P, Kokki M, Lehtonen M, Hooker A, Ranta VP, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of flurbiprofen in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70(4):557–66.
Scaroni C, Mazzoni PL, D’Amico E, Benvenuti C, Hind ID. Pharmacokinetics of oral and rectal flurbiprofen in children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;27(3):367–9.
Dean L. Flurbiprofen therapy and CYP2C9 genotype. In: Pratt VM, McLeod HL, Rubinstein WS, Scott SA, Dean LC, Kattman BL, et al., editors. Medical genetics summaries. Bethesda: 2012.
Naproxen and piproxen. the international encyclopedia of adverse drug reactions and interactions. In: Meyler's side effects of drugs, 16th edn. 2016. p. 27–32.
Abduljalil K, Grist EPM, Johnson TN, Jamei M, Edwards D, Rostami-Hodjegan A. Predicting the PK/PD of ibuprofen in children. Rostock: VKliPhA; 2012.
Hannam JA, Anderson BJ, Mahadevan M, Holford NH. Postoperative analgesia using diclofenac and acetaminophen in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(9):953–61.
Valitalo P, Kumpulainen E, Manner M, Kokki M, Lehtonen M, Hooker AC, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of naproxen in children. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52(10):1516–26.
Novartis. Voltaren® (diclofenac sodium enteric-coated tablets) tablets of 75 mg—Rx only—prescribing information 2009.
van der Marel CD, Anderson BJ, Romsing J, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Tibboel D. Diclofenac and metabolite pharmacokinetics in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(6):443–51.
Standing JF, Howard RF, Johnson A, Savage I, Wong IC. Population pharmacokinetics of oral diclofenac for acute pain in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;66(6):846–53.
Standing JF, Tibboel D, Korpela R, Olkkola KT. Diclofenac pharmacokinetic meta-analysis and dose recommendations for surgical pain in children aged 1–12 years. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21(3):316–24.
Kokki H, Kumpulainen E, Laisalmi M, Savolainen J, Rautio J, Lehtonen M. Diclofenac readily penetrates the cerebrospinal fluid in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65(6):879–84.
Vuori A, Salo M, Viljanto J, Pajulo O, Pulkki K, Nevalainen T. Effects of post-operative pain treatment using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics, opioids or epidural blockade on systemic and local immune responses in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(6):738–49.
Korpela R, Olkkola KT. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous diclofenac sodium in children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;38(3):293–5.
Azuma F. The clinical efficacy and plasma concentration of a 25 mg suppository of diclofenac sodium in children with post-tonsillectomy pain and inflammation. Practica Otologica. 1982;75:1445–53.
Brocks DR, Jamali F. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ketorolac tromethamine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992;23(6):415–27.
Cohen MN, Christians U, Henthorn T, Vu Tran Z, Moll V, Zuk J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of single-dose intravenous ketorolac in infants aged 2–11 months. Anesth Analg. 2011;112(3):655–60.
McLay JS, Engelhardt T, Mohammed BS, Cameron G, Cohen MN, Galinkin JL, et al. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous ketorolac in children aged 2 months to 16 years: a population analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28(2):80–6.
Cloesmeijer ME, van Esdonk MJ, Lynn AM, Smits A, Tibboel D, Daali Y, et al. Impact of enantiomer-specific changes in pharmacokinetics between infants and adults on the target concentration of racemic ketorolac: A pooled analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;87:1443–54.
Lynn AM, Bradford H, Kantor ED, Andrew M, Vicini P, Anderson GD. Ketorolac tromethamine: stereo-specific pharmacokinetics and single-dose use in postoperative infants aged 2–6 months. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21(3):325–34.
Mannila A, Kumpulainen E, Lehtonen M, Heikkinen M, Laisalmi M, Salo T, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of indomethacin in children after intravenous administration. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;47(1):94–100.
Imazio M, Brucato A, Pluymaekers N, Breda L, Calabri G, Cantarini L, et al. Recurrent pericarditis in children and adolescents: a multicentre cohort study. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016;17(9):707–12.
Manach Y, Ditisheim A. Double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial of the efficacy and tolerance of morniflumate suppositories in the treatment of tonsillitis in children. J Int Med Res. 1990;18(1):30–6.
Sentilhes C, Delon R. Comparative test of the anti-inflammatory effect of niflumic acid by rectal administration in children. Rev Odontostomatol (Paris). 1976;5(6):491–4.
Niopas I, Georgarakis M, Sidi-Frangandrea V, Chrisanthopoulos C, Liara E. Pharmacokinetics of tolfenamic acid in pediatric patients after single oral dose. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1995;20(4):293–6.
Haliotis FA, Tzortzinis AA, Papanastasiou DA. Use of tolfenamic acid in febrile children with and without glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997;35(3):103–6.
Salzberg R, Giambonini S, Maurizio M, Roulet D, Zahn J, Monti T. A double-blind comparison of nimesulide and mefenamic acid in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections in children. Drugs. 1993;46(Suppl 1):208–11.
Weiss CF, Harris ST, Barrow WB, Buchanan RA. Mefanamic acid–an antipyretic for use in children. J Pediatr. 1968;72(6):867–70.
Fehlhaber C, Lempp R, Schmid-La RD. Analgesic and antipyretic effect of mefenaminic acid in children and adolescents. Med Welt. 1967;15(28):1655–8.
Keinanen S, Simila S, Kouvalainen K. Oral antipyretic therapy: evaluation of the N-aryl-anthranilic acid derivatives mefenamic acid, tolfenamic acid and flufenamic acid. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1978;13(5):331–44.
Foeldvari I, Burgos-Vargas R, Thon A, Tuerck D. High response rate in the phase I/II study of meloxicam in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(5):1079–83.
Burgos-Vargas R, Foeldvari I, Thon A, Linke R, Tuerck D. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44(8):866–72.
Dix P, Prosser DP, Streete P. A pharmacokinetic study of piroxicam in children. Anaesthesia. 2004;59(10):984–7.
Turner S, Ford V. Role of the selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors in children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2004;89(2):ep46–9.
Stempak D, Gammon J, Klein J, Koren G, Baruchel S. Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of celecoxib in children. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;72(5):490–7.
Krishnaswami S, Hutmacher MM, Robbins JL, Bello A, West C, Bloom BJ. Dosing celecoxib in pediatric patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52(8):1134–49.
Murto K, Lamontagne C, McFaul C, MacCormick J, Ramakko KA, Aglipay M, et al. Celecoxib pharmacogenetics and pediatric adenotonsillectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled study. Can J Anaesth Journal canadien d’anesthesie. 2015;62(7):785–97.
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. asoMC, INC., Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889, USA. Revised: XX/20XX, Vioxx (Rofecoxib): uses, dosage, side effects, interactions, warning.
Hullett B, Salman S, O’Halloran SJ, Peirce D, Davies K, Ilett KF. Development of a population pharmacokinetic model for parecoxib and its active metabolite valdecoxib after parenteral parecoxib administration in children. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(5):1124–33.
Tan L, Taylor E, Hannam JA, Salkeld L, Salman S, Anderson BJ. Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effectiveness of intravenous parecoxib for tonsillectomy +/− adenoidectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26(12):1126–35.
Loh W, Lim HH, Rao R, Goh A, Ong LX, Chiang WC. Tolerance to etoricoxib in children with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity. Asia Pac Allergy. 2015;5(1):40–6.
Levy G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of aspirin. Pediatrics. 1978;62(5 Pt 2 Suppl):867–72.
Olive G, Rey E. Effect of age and disease on the pharmacokinetics of nimesulide. Drugs. 1993;46(Suppl 1):73–8.
Bernareggi A. Clinical pharmacokinetics of nimesulide. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;35(4):247–74.
Scharli AF, Brulhart K, Monti T. Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic study with nimesulide suppositories in children with post-operative pain and inflammation. J Int Med Res. 1990;18(4):315–21.
Ugazio AG, Guarnaccia S, Berardi M, Renzetti I. Clinical and pharmacokinetic study of nimesulide in children. Drugs. 1993;46(Suppl 1):215–8.
Rajeshwari K, Dubey AP. Nimesulide. Indian Pediatr. 1997;34(2):119–22.
Section on Clinical P, Therapeutics, Committee on D, Sullivan JE, Farrar HC. Fever and antipyretic use in children. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):580–7.
Offringa M, Newton R, Cozijnsen MA, Nevitt SJ. Prophylactic drug management for febrile seizures in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD003031.
Strengell T, Uhari M, Tarkka R, Uusimaa J, Alen R, Lautala P, et al. Antipyretic agents for preventing recurrences of febrile seizures: randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(9):799–804.
van Stuijvenberg M, Derksen-Lubsen G, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD, Moll HA. Randomized, controlled trial of ibuprofen syrup administered during febrile illnesses to prevent febrile seizure recurrences. Pediatrics. 1998;102(5):E51.
Kokki H, Kokki M. Dose-finding studies of ketoprofen in the management of fever in children: report on two randomized, single-blind, comparator-controlled, single-dose, multicentre, phase II studies. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(4):251–8.
Mazer-Amirshahi M, Mullins PM, Rasooly IR, van den Anker J, Pines JM. Trends in prescription opioid use in pediatric emergency department patients. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014;30(4):230–5.
Krauss BS, Calligaris L, Green SM, Barbi E. Current concepts in management of pain in children in the emergency department. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):83–92.
Mak WY, Yuen V, Irwin M, Hui T. Pharmacotherapy for acute pain in children: current practice and recent advances. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011;12(6):865–81.
Brasher C, Gafsous B, Dugue S, Thiollier A, Kinderf J, Nivoche Y, et al. Postoperative pain management in children and infants: an update. Paediatr Drugs. 2014;16(2):129–40.
Lonnqvist PA, Morton NS. Postoperative analgesia in infants and children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(1):59–68.
Wong I, St John-Green C, Walker SM. Opioid-sparing effects of perioperative paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23(6):475–95.
Michelet D, Andreu-Gallien J, Bensalah T, Hilly J, Wood C, Nivoche Y, et al. A meta-analysis of the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for pediatric postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(2):393–406.
Zhu A, Benzon HA, Anderson TA. Evidence for the efficacy of systemic opioid-sparing analgesics in pediatric surgical populations: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(5):1569–87.
Lardelli PF, Jermini LMM, Milani GP, Peeters G, Ramelli GP, Zgraggen L, et al. Nicolau syndrome caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Systematic literature review. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74(10): e13567.
Fearon JA, Dimas V, Ditthakasem K, Herbert MA. A Randomized controlled trial of oral versus intravenous administration of a nonnarcotic analgesia protocol following pediatric craniosynostosis corrections on nausea and vomiting rates. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(6):1951–3.
Vons KM, Bijker JB, Verwijs EW, Majoor MH, de Graaff JC. Postoperative pain during the first week after adenoidectomy and guillotine adenotonsillectomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(5):476–82.
Liu C, Ulualp SO. Outcomes of an alternating ibuprofen and acetaminophen regimen for pain relief after tonsillectomy in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(10):777–81.
Kelly LE, Sommer DD, Ramakrishna J, Hoffbauer S, Arbab-Tafti S, Reid D, et al. Morphine or ibuprofen for post-tonsillectomy analgesia: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):307–13.
Iodice FG, Thomas M, Walker I, Garside V, Elliott MJ. Analgesia in fast-track paediatric cardiac patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(3):610–3.
Savva DA, Kishk OA, Morgan JA, Biggs JM, Seung H, Bauer C. Post-operative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use for pain in infant and paediatric cardiac surgery patients. Cardiol Young. 2019;29(12):1440–4.
Dawkins TN, Barclay CA, Gardiner RL, Krawczeski CD. Safety of intravenous use of ketorolac in infants following cardiothoracic surgery. Cardiol Young. 2009;19(1):105–8.
Shaw KL, Southwood TR, Duffy CM, McDonagh JE. Health-related quality of life in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(2):199–207.
Amine B, Rostom S, Benbouazza K, Abouqal R, Hajjaj-Hassouni N. Health related quality of life survey about children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2009;29(3):275–9.
Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2):390–2.
Ravelli A, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet. 2007;369(9563):767–78.
Ravelli A, Consolaro A, Horneff G, Laxer RM, Lovell DJ, Wulffraat NM, et al. Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(6):819–28.
Dueckers G, Guellac N, Arbogast M, Dannecker G, Foeldvari I, Frosch M, et al. Evidence and consensus based GKJR guidelines for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Immunol. 2012;142(2):176–93.
Weiss JE, Luca NJ, Boneparth A, Stinson J. Assessment and management of pain in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Paediatr Drugs. 2014;16(6):473–81.
Cellucci T, Guzman J, Petty RE, Batthish M, Benseler SM, Ellsworth JE, et al. Management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis 2015: a position statement from the pediatric committee of the Canadian Rheumatology Association. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(10):1773–6.
DeWitt EM, Sherry DD, Cron RQ. Pediatric rheumatology for the adult rheumatologist I: therapy and dosing for pediatric rheumatic disorders. J Clin Rheumatol. 2005;11(1):21–33.
Blazina S, Markelj G, Avramovic MZ, Toplak N, Avcin T. Management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a clinical guide. Paediatr Drugs. 2016;18(6):397–412.
Cassidy JPRLRL, CB. Textbook of pediatric rheumatology, 6th edn. Elsevier. 2011. p. 73.
Makela AL, Lempiainen M, Ylijoki H. Ibuprofen levels in serum and synovial fluid. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1981;39:15–7.
Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS. Naproxen up to date: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy and use in rheumatic diseases and pain states. Drugs. 1979;18(4):241–77.
Beukelman T, Patkar NM, Saag KG, Tolleson-Rinehart S, Cron RQ, DeWitt EM, et al. 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(4):465–82.
Kochar R, Walsh KM, Jain A, Spalding SJ, Hashkes PJ. Decreased use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the era of modern aggressive treatment. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(10):3055–60.
Taddio A, Ferrara G, Insalaco A, Pardeo M, Gregori M, Finetti M, et al. Dealing with chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis: a practical approach. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15(1):87.
ter Haar NM, Oswald M, Jeyaratnam J, Anton J, Barron KS, Brogan PA, et al. Recommendations for the management of autoinflammatory diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(9):1636–44.
Ozen S, Demirkaya E, Erer B, Livneh A, Ben-Chetrit E, Giancane G, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of familial Mediterranean fever. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(4):644–51.
Constantin T, Foeldvari I, Anton J, de Boer J, Czitrom-Guillaume S, Edelsten C, et al. Consensus-based recommendations for the management of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SHARE initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(8):1107–17.
Olson NY, Lindsley CB, Godfrey WA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy in chronic childhood iridocyclitis. Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(12):1289–92.
Giannini EH, Brewer EJ, Miller ML, Gibbas D, Passo MH, Hoyeraal HM, et al. Ibuprofen suspension in the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group. J Pediatr. 1990;117(4):645–52.
Lovell DJ, Giannini EH, Brewer EJ Jr. Time course of response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(12):1433–7.
Eccleston C, Cooper TE, Fisher E, Anderson B, Wilkinson NM. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD012537.
Foeldvari I, Szer IS, Zemel LS, Lovell DJ, Giannini EH, Robbins JL, et al. A prospective study comparing celecoxib with naproxen in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(1):174–82.
Reiff A, Lovell DJ, Adelsberg JV, Kiss MH, Goodman S, Zavaler MF, et al. Evaluation of the comparative efficacy and tolerability of rofecoxib and naproxen in children and adolescents with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week randomized controlled clinical trial with a 52-week open-label extension. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(5):985–95.
Ruperto N, Nikishina I, Pachanov ED, Shachbazian Y, Prieur AM, Mouy R, et al. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of two doses of meloxicam compared with naproxen in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: short- and long-term efficacy and safety results. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(2):563–72.
Moran H, Hanna DB, Ansell BM, Hall M, Engler C. Naproxen in juvenile chronic polyarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979;38(2):152–4.
Bhettay E, Thomson AJ. Double-blind study of ketoprofen and indomethacin in juvenile chronic arthritis. S Afr Med J. 1978;54(7):276–8.
Brewer EJ, Giannini EH, Baum J, Bernstein B, Fink CW, Emery HM, et al. Aspirin and fenoprofen (Nalfon) in the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis results of the double blind-trial. A segment II study. J Rheumatol. 1982;9(1):123–8.
Levinson JE, Baum J, Brewer E Jr, Fink C, Hanson V, Schaller J. Comparison of tolmetin sodium and aspirin in the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Pediatr. 1977;91(5):799–804.
Laxer RM, Silverman ED, St-Cyr C, Tran MT, Lingam G. A six-month open safety assessment of a naproxen suspension formulation in the therapy of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Ther. 1988;10(4):381–7.
Nicholls A, Hazleman B, Todd RM, Murray-Leslie C, Kuhnen H, Cain AR. Long-term evaluation of naproxen suspension in juvenile chronic arthritis. Curr Med Res Opin. 1982;8(3):204–7.
Mier R, Lovell D, Bowyer S, Passo M, Rennebohm R, Schikler K, et al. Medication choices in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumat. 1996;2(5):262–7.
Wahezi DM, Ilowite NT. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an update on current pharmacotherapy and future perspectives. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14(8):975–89.
Leak AM, Richter MR, Clemens LE, Hall MA, Ansell BM. A crossover study of naproxen, diclofenac and tolmetin in seronegative juvenile chronic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1988;6(2):157–60.
Sobel RE, Lovell DJ, Brunner HI, Weiss JE, Morris PW, Gottlieb BS, et al. Safety of celecoxib and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results of the Phase 4 registry. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2014;12:29.
Falkner B, Berger M, Bhadra Brown P, Iorga D, Nickeson RW, Zemel L. The effects of celecoxib or naproxen on blood pressure in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2015;9:55–62.
Mulberg AE, Linz C, Bern E, Tucker L, Verhave M, Grand RJ. Identification of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal injury in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Pediatr. 1993;122(4):647–9.
Dowd JE, Cimaz R, Fink CW. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal injury in children. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(9):1225–31.
Lovell DJ, Dare JA, Francis-Sedlak M, Ball J, LaMoreaux BD, Von Scheven E, et al. A 6-month, multicenter, open-label study of fixed dose naproxen/esomeprazole in adolescent patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018;16(1):41.
Lang BA, Finlayson LA. Naproxen-induced pseudoporphyria in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Pediatr. 1994;124(4):639–42.
De Silva B, Banney L, Uttley W, Luqmani R, Schofield O. Pseudoporphyria and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2000;17(6):480–3.
Schad SG, Kraus A, Haubitz I, Trcka J, Hamm H, Girschick HJ. Early onset pauciarticular arthritis is the major risk factor for naproxen-induced pseudoporphyria in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(1):R10.
Zacher J, Altman R, Bellamy N, Bruhlmann P, Da Silva J, Huskisson E, et al. Topical diclofenac and its role in pain and inflammation: an evidence-based review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(4):925–50.
Efe T, Sagnak E, Roessler PP, Getgood A, Patzer T, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, et al. Penetration of topical diclofenac sodium 4% spray gel into the synovial tissue and synovial fluid of the knee: a randomised clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(2):345–50.
Moffett BS, Wann TI, Carberry KE, Mott AR. Safety of ketorolac in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(4):424–8.
Moffett BS, Cabrera A. Ketorolac-associated renal morbidity: risk factors in cardiac surgical infants. Cardiol Young. 2013;23(5):752–4.
Shakti D, Hehn R, Gauvreau K, Sundel RP, Newburger JW. Idiopathic pericarditis and pericardial effusion in children: contemporary epidemiology and management. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(6): e001483.
Cheung EW, Ho SA, Tang KK, Chau AK, Chiu CS, Cheung YF. Pericardial effusion after open heart surgery for congenital heart disease. Heart. 2003;89(7):780–3.
Cantinotti M, Spadoni I, Assanta N, Crocetti M, Marotta M, Arcieri L, et al. Controversies in the prophylaxis and treatment of postsurgical pericardial syndromes: a critical review with a special emphasis on paediatric age. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2014;15(12):847–54.
Gill PJ, Forbes K, Coe JY. The effect of short-term prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid on the incidence of postpericardiotomy syndrome after surgical closure of atrial septal defects. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009;30(8):1061–7.
Faustino EV, Hanson S, Spinella PC, Tucci M, O’Brien SH, Nunez AR, et al. A multinational study of thromboprophylaxis practice in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(5):1232–40.
Ramachandran P, King E, Nebbia A, Beekman RH, Anderson JB. Variability of antithrombotics use in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and its variants following first- and second-stage palliation surgery: a national report using the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative registry. Cardiol Young. 2017;27(4):731–8.
Heistein LC, Scott WA, Zellers TM, Fixler DE, Ramaciotti C, Journeycake JM, et al. Aspirin resistance in children with heart disease at risk for thromboembolism: prevalence and possible mechanisms. Pediatr Cardiol. 2008;29(2):285–91.
Cholette JM, Mamikonian L, Alfieris GM, Blumberg N, Lerner NB. Aspirin resistance following pediatric cardiac surgery. Thromb Res. 2010;126(3):200–6.
Romlin BS, Wahlander H, Stromvall-Larsson E, Synnergren M, Baghaei F, Jeppsson A. Monitoring of acetyl salicylic acid-induced platelet inhibition with impedance aggregometry in children with systemic-to-pulmonary shunts. Cardiol Young. 2013;23(2):225–32.
Emani S, Zurakowski D, Mulone M, DiNardo JA, Trenor CC 3rd, Emani SM. Platelet testing to guide aspirin dose adjustment in pediatric patients after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154(5):1723–30.
Emani S, Trainor B, Zurakowski D, Baird CW, Fynn-Thompson FE, Pigula FA, et al. Aspirin unresponsiveness predicts thrombosis in high-risk pediatric patients after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(3):810–4 (discussion 4–6).
Schmugge M, Speer O, Kroiss S, Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Rand ML, et al. Monitoring aspirin therapy in children after interventional cardiac catheterization: laboratory measures, dose response, and clinical outcomes. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174(7):933–41.
Truong DT, Johnson JT, Bailly DK, Clawson JR, Sheng X, Burch PT, et al. Platelet inhibition in shunted infants on aspirin at short and midterm follow-up. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(2):401–9.
Mir A, Frank S, Journeycake J, Wolovitis J, Guleserian K, Heistein L, et al. Aspirin resistance in single-ventricle physiology: aspirin prophylaxis is not adequate to inhibit platelets in the immediate postoperative period. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(6):2158–64.
Saini A, Joshi AD, Cowan KM, Wayne Gatewood C, Kumar STK, Allen J, et al. High acetylsalicylic acid dosing in infants after modified Blalock–Taussig shunt. Cardiol Young. 2019;29(3):389–97.
McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: a scientific statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(17):e927–99.
Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Burns JC. Kawasaki disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(14):1738–49.
Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Burns JC, Beiser AS, Chung KJ, Duffy CE, et al. The treatment of Kawasaki syndrome with intravenous gamma globulin. N Engl J Med. 1986;315(6):341–7.
Terai M, Shulman ST. Prevalence of coronary artery abnormalities in Kawasaki disease is highly dependent on gamma globulin dose but independent of salicylate dose. J Pediatr. 1997;131(6):888–93.
Furusho K, Kamiya T, Nakano H, Kiyosawa N, Shinomiya K, Hayashidera T, et al. High-dose intravenous gammaglobulin for Kawasaki disease. Lancet. 1984;2(8411):1055–8.
Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Gerber MA, Gewitz MH, Tani LY, Burns JC, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: a statement for health professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association. Pediatrics. 2004;114(6):1708–33.
Research Committee of the Japanese Society of Pediatric C, Cardiac Surgery Committee for Development of Guidelines for Medical Treatment of Acute Kawasaki D. Guidelines for medical treatment of acute Kawasaki disease: report of the Research Committee of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery (2012 revised version). Pediatr Int. 2014;56(2):135–58.
de Graeff N, Groot N, Ozen S, Eleftheriou D, Avcin T, Bader-Meunier B, et al. European consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Kawasaki disease—the SHARE initiative. Rheumatology. 2019;58(4):672–82.
Dhanrajani A, Chan M, Pau S, Ellsworth J, Petty R, Guzman J. Aspirin dose in Kawasaki disease: the ongoing battle. Arthritis Care Res. 2018;70(10):1536–40.
Ogata S, Tremoulet AH, Sato Y, Ueda K, Shimizu C, Sun X, et al. Coronary artery outcomes among children with Kawasaki disease in the United States and Japan. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(4):3825–8.
Dallaire F, Fortier-Morissette Z, Blais S, Dhanrajani A, Basodan D, Renaud C, et al. Aspirin dose and prevention of coronary abnormalities in Kawasaki disease. Pediatrics. 2017;139(6).
Huang X, Huang P, Zhang L, Xie X, Xia S, Gong F, et al. Is aspirin necessary in the acute phase of Kawasaki disease? J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54(6):661–4.
Rahbarimanesh A, Taghavi-Goodarzi M, Mohammadinejad P, Zoughi J, Amiri J, Moridpour K. Comparison of high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in the management of Kawasaki disease. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81(12):1403.
Yim D, Curtis N, Cheung M, Burgner D. An update on Kawasaki disease II: clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49(8):614–23.
Mas C, Menahem S. Premature in utero closure of the ductus arteriosus following maternal ingestion of sodium diclofenac. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;39(1):106–7.
Rein AJ, Nadjari M, Elchalal U, Nir A. Contraction of the fetal ductus arteriosus induced by diclofenac. Case report. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1999;14(1):24–5.
Rahman M, Donnangelo LL, Neal D, Mogali K, Decker M, Ahmed MM. Effects of perioperative acetyl salicylic acid on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(1):41–7.
Strater R, Kurnik K, Heller C, Schobess R, Luigs P, Nowak-Gottl U. Aspirin versus low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin: antithrombotic therapy in pediatric ischemic stroke patients: a prospective follow-up study. Stroke. 2001;32(11):2554–8.
Bay MJ, Kossoff EH, Lehmann CU, Zabel TA, Comi AM. Survey of aspirin use in Sturge–Weber syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(6):692–702.
Boelman C, Shroff M, Yau I, Bjornson B, Richrdson S, deVeber G, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention in bacterial meningitis in children. J Pediatr. 2014;165(4):799–806.
Nowak-Gottl U, Gunther G, Kurnik K, Strater R, Kirkham F. Arterial ischemic stroke in neonates, infants, and children: an overview of underlying conditions, imaging methods, and treatment modalities. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29(4):405–14.
Titchen T, Cranswick N, Beggs S. Adverse drug reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, COX-2 inhibitors and paracetamol in a paediatric hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59(6):718–23.
Ulinski T, Guigonis V, Dunan O, Bensman A. Acute renal failure after treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163(3):148–50.
Leroy S, Mosca A, Landre-Peigne C, Cosson MA, Pons G. Ibuprofen in childhood: evidence-based review of efficacy and safety. Arch Pediatr. 2007;14(5):477–84.
Oni L, Hawcutt DB, Turner MA, Beresford MW, McWilliam S, Barton C, et al. Optimising the use of medicines to reduce acute kidney injury in children and babies. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;174:55–62.
Kaddourah A, Basu RK, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL, Investigators A. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(1):11–20.
McGregor TL, Jones DP, Wang L, Danciu I, Bridges BC, Fleming GM, et al. Acute kidney injury incidence in noncritically ill hospitalized children, adolescents, and young adults: a retrospective observational study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(3):384–90.
Kwiatkowski DM, Sutherland SM. Acute kidney injury in pediatric patients. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017;31(3):427–39.
Nakahura T, Griswold W, Lemire J, Mendoza S, Reznik V. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in adolescence. J Adolesc Health. 1998;23(5):307–10.
Becker-Cohen R, Frishberg Y. Severe reversible renal failure due to naproxen-associated acute interstitial nephritis. Eur J Pediatr. 2001;160(5):293–5.
Misurac JM, Knoderer CA, Leiser JD, Nailescu C, Wilson AC, Andreoli SP. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are an important cause of acute kidney injury in children. J Pediatr. 2013;162(6):1153–9 (9 e1).
Oikonomopoulou N, Martinez Lopez AB, Urbano Villaescusa J, Molina Molina MDC, Butragueno Laiseca L, Barraca Nunez D, et al. Acute renal damage secondary to acute tubulointerstitial nephritis drug use. Case report. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2017;88(6):787–91.
Del Vecchio MT, Sundel ER. Alternating antipyretics: is this an alternative? Pediatrics. 2001;108(5):1236–7.
Kallanagowdar C, LeBreton A, Aviles DH. Acute renal failure. Clin Pediatr. 2006;45(8):771–3.
Krause I, Cleper R, Eisenstein B, Davidovits M. Acute renal failure, associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in healthy children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005;20(9):1295–8.
Lantz B, Cochat P, Bouchet JL, Fischbach M. Short-term niflumic-acid-induced acute renal failure in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(9):1234–9.
McIntire SC, Rubenstein RC, Gartner JC Jr, Gilboa N, Ellis D. Acute flank pain and reversible renal dysfunction associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Pediatrics. 1993;92(3):459–60.
Moghal NE, Hegde S, Eastham KM. Ibuprofen and acute renal failure in a toddler. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(3):276–7.
Schaller S, Kaplan BS. Acute nonoliguric renal failure in children associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1998;14(6):416–8.
Wattad A, Feehan T, Shepard FM, Youngberg G. A unique complication of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Pediatrics. 1994;93(4):693.
Wong W, Coward RJ, Morris MC. Ibuprofen induced acute renal failure in an infant. N Z Med J. 2001;114(1140):431.
Zaffanello M, Brugnara M, Angeli S, Cuzzolin L. Acute non-oliguric kidney failure and cholestatic hepatitis induced by ibuprofen and acetaminophen: a case report. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(5):903–5.
Kim J, Gazarian M, Verjee Z, Johnson D. Acute renal insufficiency in ibuprofen overdose. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1995;11(2):107–8.
Kovacevic L, Bernstein J, Valentini RP, Imam A, Gupta N, Mattoo TK. Renal papillary necrosis induced by naproxen. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18(8):826–9.
Kulling PE, Backman EA, Skagius AS, Beckman EA. Renal impairment after acute diclofenac, naproxen, and sulindac overdoses. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1995;33(2):173–7.
Buck ML, Norwood VF. Ketorolac-induced acute renal failure in a previously healthy adolescent. Pediatrics. 1996;98(2 Pt 1):294–6.
John CM, Shukla R, Jones CA. Using NSAID in volume depleted children can precipitate acute renal failure. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(6):524–6.
Fletcher JT, Graf N, Scarman A, Saleh H, Alexander SI. Nephrotoxicity with cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor use in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006;21(12):1893–7.
Nehus E, Kaddourah A, Bennett M, Pyles O, Devarajan P. Subclinical kidney injury in children receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after cardiac surgery. J Pediatr. 2017;189:175–80.
Rainsford KD. Ibuprofen: pharmacology, efficacy and safety. Inflammopharmacology. 2009;17(6):275–342.
Rodieux F, Piguet V, Desmeules J, Samer CF. Safety issues of pharmacological acute pain treatment in children. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(5):1130–8.
Bianciotto M, Chiappini E, Raffaldi I, Gabiano C, Tovo PA, Sollai S, et al. Drug use and upper gastrointestinal complications in children: a case–control study. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(3):218–21.
Cardile S, Martinelli M, Barabino A, Gandullia P, Oliva S, Di Nardo G, et al. Italian survey on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal bleeding in children. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2016;22(5):1877–83.
Lanza FL, Chan FK, Quigley EM, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of G. Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(3):728–38.
Boukthir S, Mazigh SM, Kalach N, Bouyahya O, Sammoud A. The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and Helicobacter pylori infection on the gastric mucosa in children with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26(2):227–30.
Higgins GC. Complications of treatments for pediatric rheumatic diseases. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018;65(4):827–54.
Lewis SR, Nicholson A, Cardwell ME, Siviter G, Smith AF. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and perioperative bleeding in paediatric tonsillectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;18(7):C003591.
Riggin L, Ramakrishna J, Sommer DD, Koren G. A 2013 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 randomized controlled trials; no apparent effects of non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents on the risk of bleeding after tonsillectomy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2013;38(2):115–29.
D’Souza JN, Schmidt RJ, Xie L, Adelman JP, Nardone HC. Postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of bleeding in pediatric intracapsular tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79(9):1472–6.
Bauer DF, Waters AM, Tubbs RS, Rozzelle CJ, Wellons JC 3rd, Blount JP, et al. Safety and utility of scheduled nonnarcotic analgesic medications in children undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(2):353–5 (discussion 5–6).
Romsing J, Walther-Larsen S. Peri-operative use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children: analgesic efficacy and bleeding. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(7):673–83.
Rusy LM, Houck CS, Sullivan LJ, Ohlms LA, Jones DT, McGill TJ, et al. A double-blind evaluation of ketorolac tromethamine versus acetaminophen in pediatric tonsillectomy: analgesia and bleeding. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(2):226–9.
Gallagher JE, Blauth J, Fornadley JA. Perioperative ketorolac tromethamine and postoperative hemorrhage in cases of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Laryngoscope. 1995;105(6):606–9.
Maunuksela EL, Olkkola KT, Korpela R. Intravenous indomethacin as postoperative analgesic in children: acute effects on blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature and bleeding. Ann Clin Res. 1987;19(5):359–63.
Gunter JB, Varughese AM, Harrington JF, Wittkugel EP, Patankar SS, Matar MM, et al. Recovery and complications after tonsillectomy in children: a comparison of ketorolac and morphine. Anesth Analg. 1995;81(6):1136–41.
Aldrink JH, Ma M, Wang W, Caniano DA, Wispe J, Puthoff T. Safety of ketorolac in surgical neonates and infants 0 to 3 months old. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(6):1081–5.
Catella-Lawson F, Reilly MP, Kapoor SC, Cucchiara AJ, DeMarco S, Tournier B, et al. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors and the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(25):1809–17.
Gladding PA, Webster MW, Farrell HB, Zeng IS, Park R, Ruijne N. The antiplatelet effect of six non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and their pharmacodynamic interaction with aspirin in healthy volunteers. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101(7):1060–3.
Meek IL, Vonkeman HE, Kasemier J, Movig KL, van de Laar MA. Interference of NSAIDs with the thrombocyte inhibitory effect of aspirin: a placebo-controlled, ex vivo, serial placebo-controlled serial crossover study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(3):365–71.
Caffarelli C, Franceschini F, Caimmi D, Mori F, Diaferio L, Di Mauro D, et al. SIAIP position paper: provocation challenge to antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children. Ital J Pediatr. 2018;44(1):147.
Kauffman RE, Lieh-Lai M. Ibuprofen and increased morbidity in children with asthma: fact or fiction? Paediatr Drugs. 2004;6(5):267–72.
Zambonino MA, Torres MJ, Munoz C, Requena G, Mayorga C, Posadas T, et al. Drug provocation tests in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013;24(2):151–9.
Cavkaytar O, du Toit G, Caimmi D. Characteristics of NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions in childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019;30(1):25–35.
Yilmaz O, Ertoy Karagol IH, Bakirtas A, Topal E, Celik GE, Demirsoy MS, et al. Challenge-proven nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity in children. Allergy. 2013;68(12):1555–61.
Arikoglu T, Aslan G, Yildirim DD, Batmaz SB, Kuyucu S. Discrepancies in the diagnosis and classification of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity reactions in children. Allergol Int. 2017;66(3):418–24.
Sheehan WJ, Mauger DT, Paul IM, Moy JN, Boehmer SJ, Szefler SJ, et al. Acetaminophen versus ibuprofen in young children with mild persistent asthma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(7):619–30.
Sheehan WJ, Phipatanakul W. Acetaminophen versus ibuprofen in mild persistent asthma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(21):2099–100.
Uzoigwe CE, Ali OH. Acetaminophen versus ibuprofen in mild persistent asthma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(21):2099.
Kanabar D, Dale S, Rawat M. A review of ibuprofen and acetaminophen use in febrile children and the occurrence of asthma-related symptoms. Clin Ther. 2007;29(12):2716–23.
Lesko SM, Louik C, Vezina RM, Mitchell AA. Asthma morbidity after the short-term use of ibuprofen in children. Pediatrics. 2002;109(2):E20.
Lo PC, Tsai YT, Lin SK, Lai JN. Risk of asthma exacerbation associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in childhood asthma: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(41): e5109.
Standing JF, Ooi K, Keady S, Howard RF, Savage I, Wong IC. Prospective observational study of adverse drug reactions to diclofenac in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;68(2):243–51.
Lesko SM, O’Brien KL, Schwartz B, Vezina R, Mitchell AA. Invasive group A streptococcal infection and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use among children with primary varicella. Pediatrics. 2001;107(5):1108–15.
Dubos F, Hue V, Grandbastien B, Catteau B, Martinot A. Bacterial skin infections in children hospitalized with varicella: a possible negative impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(1):26–30.
Leroy S, Marc E, Bavoux F, Treluyer JM, Gendrel D, Breart G, et al. Hospitalization for severe bacterial infections in children after exposure to NSAIDs: a prospective adverse drug reaction reporting study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(3):179–85.
Le Bourgeois M, Ferroni A, Leruez-Ville M, Varon E, Thumerelle C, Bremont F, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug without antibiotics for acute viral infection increases the empyema risk in children: a matched case–control study. J Pediatr. 2016;175(47–53): e3.
Little P. Ibuprofen use in viral infection is associated with subsequent empyema. J Pediatr. 2017;180:291–4.
Basille D, Plouvier N, Trouve C, Duhaut P, Andrejak C, Jounieaux V. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may worsen the course of community-acquired pneumonia: a cohort study. Lung. 2017;195(2):201–8.
Voiriot G, Dury S, Parrot A, Mayaud C, Fartoukh M. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may affect the presentation and course of community-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 2011;139(2):387–94.
Elemraid MA, Thomas MF, Blain AP, Rushton SP, Spencer DA, Gennery AR, et al. Risk factors for the development of pleural empyema in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(7):721–6.
Byington CL, Spencer LY, Johnson TA, Pavia AT, Allen D, Mason EO, et al. An epidemiological investigation of a sustained high rate of pediatric parapneumonic empyema: risk factors and microbiological associations. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(4):434–40.
Mikaeloff Y, Kezouh A, Suissa S. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the risk of severe skin and soft tissue complications in patients with varicella or zoster disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65(2):203–9.
Little P, Moore M, Kelly J, Williamson I, Leydon G, McDermott L, et al. Ibuprofen, paracetamol, and steam for patients with respiratory tract infections in primary care: pragmatic randomised factorial trial. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2013;25(347): f6041.
Little P, Stuart B, Andreou P, McDermott L, Joseph J, Mullee M, et al. Primary care randomised controlled trial of a tailored interactive website for the self-management of respiratory infections (Internet Doctor). BMJ Open. 2016;6(4): e009769.
Maglione MA, Das L, Raaen L, Smith A, Chari R, Newberry S, et al. Safety of vaccines used for routine immunization of US children: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014;134(2):325–37.
Falup-Pecurariu O, Man SC, Neamtu ML, Chicin G, Baciu G, Pitic C, et al. Effects of prophylactic ibuprofen and paracetamol administration on the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugated vaccine (PHiD-CV) co-administered with DTPa-combined vaccines in children: an open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(3):649–60.
Walter EB, Hornik CP, Grohskopf L, McGee CE, Todd CA, Museru OI, et al. The effect of antipyretics on immune response and fever following receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine in young children. Vaccine. 2017;35(48 Pt B):6664–71.
Lundgren M, Steed LJ, Tamura R, Jonsdottir B, Gesualdo P, Crouch C, et al. Analgesic antipyretic use among young children in the TEDDY study: no association with islet autoimmunity. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):127.
Mork NL, Robertson RP. Effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in conventional dosage on glucose homeostasis in patients with diabetes. West J Med. 1983;139(1):46–9.
Díez-Domingo J, Planelles MV, Baldó JM, Ballester A, Núnez F, Jubert A, et al. Ibuprofen prophylaxis for adverse reactions to diphteria-tetanus-pertussis vaccination: a randomized trial. Curr Ther Res. 1998;59(8):579–88.
Joshi YM, Sovani VB, Joshi VV, Navrange JR, Benakappa DG, Shivananda P, et al. Comparative evaluation of the antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen and paracetamol. Indian Pediatr. 1990;27(8):803–6.
McIntyre J, Hull D. Comparing efficacy and tolerability of ibuprofen and paracetamol in fever. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74(2):164–7.
Sidler J, Frey B, Baerlocher K. A double-blind comparison of ibuprofen and paracetamol in juvenile pyrexia. Br J Clin Pract Suppl. 1990;70:22–5.
Simila S, Kouvalainen K, Keinanen S. Oral antipyretic therapy. Scand J Rheumatol. 1976;5(2):81–3.
Wilson G, Guerra AJ, Santos NT. Comparative study of the antipyretic effect of ibuprofen (oral suspension) and paracetamol (suppositories) in paediatrics. J Int Med Res. 1984;12(4):250–4.
Wilson JT, Brown RD, Kearns GL, Eichler VF, Johnson VA, Bertrand KM, et al. Single-dose, placebo-controlled comparative study of ibuprofen and acetaminophen antipyresis in children. J Pediatr. 1991;119(5):803–11.
Ashraf E, Ford L, Geetha R, Cooper S. Safety profile of ibuprofen suspension in young children. Inflammopharmacology. 1999;7(3):219–25.
Autret-Leca E, Gibb IA, Goulder MA. Ibuprofen versus paracetamol in pediatric fever: objective and subjective findings from a randomized, blinded study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(9):2205–11.
Hadas D, Youngster I, Cohen A, Leibovitch E, Shavit I, Erez I, et al. Premarketing surveillance of ibuprofen suppositories in febrile children. Clin Pediatr. 2011;50(3):196–9.
Lesko SM, Mitchell AA. The safety of acetaminophen and ibuprofen among children younger than two years old. Pediatrics. 1999;104(4): e39.
Brown RD, Wilson JT, Kearns GL, Eichler VF, Johnson VA, Bertrand KM. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in febrile children. J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;32(3):231–41.
Kauffman RE, Nelson MV. Effect of age on ibuprofen pharmacokinetics and antipyretic response. J Pediatr. 1992;121(6):969–73.
Kelley MT, Walson PD, Edge JH, Cox S, Mortensen ME. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ibuprofen isomers and acetaminophen in febrile children. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992;52(2):181–9.
Nahata MC, Durrell DE, Powell DA, Gupta N. Pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen in febrile children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;40(4):427–8.
Rey E, Pariente-Khayat A, Gouyet L, Vauzelle-Kervroedan F, Pons G, D’Athis P, et al. Stereoselective disposition of ibuprofen enantiomers in infants. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;38(4):373–5.
Kyllonen M, Olkkola KT, Seppala T, Ryhanen P. Perioperative pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers after rectal administration. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(7):566–73.
AB Pharmacia. Study Report for Study 573-CHC-9127-001. Open label pharmacokinetic study of a single dose ibuprofen suppository in children with fever. 5 December 2003 [cited 11 Jan 2017]. Available at: http://art45-paediatric-studies-docs.ema.europa.eu/GROUP%20I/ibuprofen/ibuprofen%20573-CHC-9127-001.pdf.
Deputy Division Director Review. NDA 22348 Supplement 005. Caldolor pediatric indication. Reference ID: 3849398. 19 November 2015 [cited 11 Jan 2017]. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/UCM480294.pdf.
Walsh P, Rothenberg SJ, Bang H. Safety of ibuprofen in infants younger than six months: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6): e0199493.
Yoon JS, Jeong DC, Oh JW, Lee KY, Lee HS, Koh YY, et al. The effects and safety of dexibuprofen compared with ibuprofen in febrile children caused by upper respiratory tract infection. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;66(6):854–60.
Kim CK, Callaway Z, Choung JT, Yu JH, Shim KS, Kwon EM, et al. Dexibuprofen for fever in children with upper respiratory tract infection. Pediatr Int. 2013;55(4):443–9.
Choi SJ, Moon S, Choi UY, Chun YH, Lee JH, Rhim JW, et al. The antipyretic efficacy and safety of propacetamol compared with dexibuprofen in febrile children: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative, phase 3 clinical trial. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):201.
Giovannini M, Sarti L, Barni S, Pucci N, Novembre E, Mori F. Anaphylaxis to over-the-counter flurbiprofen in a child. Pharmacology. 2017;99(3–4):121–3.
Doi M, Seki M, Furuichi Y. Psychiatric adverse reaction to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a child. Pediatr Int. 2019;61(7):730–1.
Kamour A, Crichton S, Cooper G, Lupton DJ, Eddleston M, Vale JA, et al. Central nervous system toxicity of mefenamic acid overdose compared with other NSAIDs: an analysis of cases reported to the United Kingdom National Poisons Information Service. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(4):855–62.
Tawalbeh MI, Nawasreh OO, Husban AM. Comparative study of diclofenac sodium and paracetamol for treatment of pain after adenotonsillectomy in children. Saudi Med J. 2001;22(2):121–3.
Lee JY, Cho JH, Shin MC, Ohk TG, Lee HY, Park CW. Single intramuscular injection of diclofenac sodium in febrile pediatric patients. Indian J Pharmacol. 2015;47(3):275–9.
Sharif MR, Haji Rezaei M, Aalinezhad M, Sarami G, Rangraz M. Rectal diclofenac versus rectal paracetamol: comparison of antipyretic effectiveness in children. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(1): e27932.
Holzmann D, Kaufmann T, Boesch M. On the decision of outpatient adenoidectomy and adenotonsillectomy in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;53(1):9–16.
Jannin V, Lemagnen G, Gueroult P, Larrouture D, Tuleu C. Rectal route in the 21st century to treat children. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;73:34–49.
Smolinske SC, Hall AH, Vandenberg SA, Spoerke DG, McBride PV. Toxic effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in overdose. An overview of recent evidence on clinical effects and dose-response relationships. Drug Saf. 1990;5(4):252–74.
Balasubramanian S, Sumanth A. Mefenamic acid—role as antipyretic. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47(5):453.
Reichert C, Reichert P, Monnet-Tschudi F, Kupferschmidt H, Ceschi A, Rauber-Luthy C. Seizures after single-agent overdose with pharmaceutical drugs: analysis of cases reported to a poison center. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2014;52(6):629–34.
de Suremain N, Le Roux P, Smith-Xiberras F, Briquet MT, Le Luyer B. Drug eruptions by niflumic acid. Arch Pediatr. 1995;2(7):698.
Menniti-Ippolito F, Sagliocca L, Da Cas R, Saggiomo G, Di Nardo R, Traversa G. Niflumic acid and cutaneous reactions in children. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84(5):430–1.
Sturkenboom M, Nicolosi A, Cantarutti L, Mannino S, Picelli G, Scamarcia A, et al. Incidence of mucocutaneous reactions in children treated with niflumic acid, other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or nonopioid analgesics. Pediatrics. 2005;116(1):e26-33.
Dewan P, Gupta P. 50 years ago in the journal of pediatrics: mefenamic acid: an antipyretic for use in children. J Pediatr. 2018;198:66.
Onay OS, Ercoban HS, Bayrakci US, Melek E, Cengiz N, Baskin E. Acute, reversible nonoliguric renal failure in two children associated with analgesic-antipyretic drugs. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25(4):263–6.
Soylu A, Kasap B, Ogun N, Ozturk Y, Turkmen M, Hoefsloot L, et al. Efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors in a case of congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005;20(12):1814–7.
Pattaragarn A, Alon US. Treatment of congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus by hydrochlorothiazide and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18(10):1073–6.
Schror K. Aspirin and Reye syndrome: a review of the evidence. Paediatr Drugs. 2007;9(3):195–204.
Arrowsmith JB, Kennedy DL, Kuritsky JN, Faich GA. National patterns of aspirin use and Reye syndrome reporting, United States, 1980 to 1985. Pediatrics. 1987;79(6):858–63.
Vigano A, Dalla Villa A, Cecchini I, Biasini GC, Principi N. Correlation between dosage and antipyretic effect of aspirin in children. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;31(3):359–61.
Yaffe SJ. Comparative efficacy of aspirin and acetaminophen in the reduction of fever in children. Arch Internal Med. 1981;141(3 Spec No):286–92.
Kapoor SK, Sharma J, Batra B, Paul E, Anand K, Sharma D. Comparison of antipyretic effect of nimesulide and paracetamol in children attending a secondary level hospital. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39(5):473–7.
Harish J, Chowdhary SK, Narasimhan KL, Mahajan JK, Rao KL. Efficacy of nimesulide in pain relief after day care surgery. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39(2):178–82.
Lal A, Gomber S, Talukdar B. Antipyretic effects of nimesulide, paracetamol and ibuprofen-paracetamol. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67(12):865–70.
Sethi GR, Sharma S, Batra V, Sharma DR. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of nimesulide administered orally in acute bronchial asthma. Am J Ther. 2002;9(4):281–7.
Wang Y, Zeng Y, Xu F. Drug safety issues of nimesulide in China—nimesulide-induced liver injury. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(7):778–9.
Kwon J, Kim S, Yoo H, Lee E. Nimesulide-induced hepatotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1): e0209264.
Gupta P, Sachdev HP. Safety of oral use of nimesulide in children: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Indian Pediatr. 2003;40(6):518–31.
Kress HG, Baltov A, Basinski A, Berghea F, Castellsague J, Codreanu C, et al. Acute pain: a multifaceted challenge—the role of nimesulide. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(1):23–36.
Osokogu OU, Fregonese F, Ferrajolo C, Verhamme K, de Bie S, t Jong G, et al. Pediatric drug safety signal detection: a new drug-event reference set for performance testing of data-mining methods and systems. Drug Saf. 2015;38(2):207–17.
Osokogu OU, Dodd C, Pacurariu A, Kaguelidou F, Weibel D, Sturkenboom MC. Drug safety monitoring in children: performance of signal detection algorithms and impact of age stratification. Drug Saf. 2016;39(9):873–81.
Khalil SN, Hahn BJ, Chumpitazi CE, Rock AD, Kaelin BA, Macias CG. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-comparator trial to determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous ibuprofen for treatment of fever in hospitalized pediatric patients. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):42.
Prescilla RP, Frattarelli DAC, Haritos D, Aranda JV, Edwards DJ. Pharmacokinetics of rofecoxib in children with sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2004;26(10):661–4.
Korpela R, Silvola J, Laakso E, Meretoja OA. Oral naproxen but not oral paracetamol reduces the need for rescue analgesic after adenoidectomy in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51(6):726–30.
Messeri A, Busoni P, Noccioli B, Murolo S, Ivani G, Grossetti R, et al. Analgesic efficacy and tolerability of ketoprofen lysine salt vs paracetamol in common paediatric surgery. A randomized, single-blind, parallel, multicentre trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13(7):574–8.
Celebi S, Hacimustafaoglu M, Aygun D, Arisoy ES, Karali Y, Akgoz S, et al. Antipyretic effect of ketoprofen. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76(3):287–91.
Senel S, Erkek N, Karacan CD. Comparison of acetaminophen and ketoprofen in febrile children: a single dose randomized clinical trial. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79(2):213–7.
Beland MJ, Paquet M, Gibbons JE, Tchervenkov CI, Dobell AR. Pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery in children and effects of aspirin for prevention. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65(18):1238–41.
Giglia TM, Massicotte MP, Tweddell JS, Barst RJ, Bauman M, Erickson CC, et al. Prevention and treatment of thrombosis in pediatric and congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128(24):2622–703.
The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne. Clinical practice guidelines—Kawasaki disease. 2017 [cited 12 May 2020]. Available at: https://www.rch.org.au/clinicalguide/guideline_index/Kawasaki_disease/.
Monagle P, Chan AKC, Goldenberg NA, Ichord RN, Jurneycake JM, Nowak-Gottl U, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e737S-e801S.
Keidan I, Zaslansky R, Eviatar E, Segal S, Sarfaty SM. Intraoperative ketorolac is an effective substitute for fentanyl in children undergoing outpatient adenotonsillectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(4):318–23.
Gupta A, Daggett C, Drant S, Rivero N, Lewis A. Prospective randomized trial of ketorolac after congenital heart surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(4):454–7.
Gupta A, Daggett C, Ludwick J, Wells W, Lewis A. Ketorolac after congenital heart surgery: does it increase the risk of significant bleeding complications? Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(2):139–42.
Kay RM, Directo MP, Leathers M, Myung K, Skaggs DL. Complications of ketorolac use in children undergoing operative fracture care. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(7):655–8.
Kay RM, Leathers M, Directo MP, Myung K, Skaggs DL. Perioperative ketorolac use in children undergoing lower extremity osteotomies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(7):783–6.
Richardson MD, Palmeri NO, Williams SA, Torok MR, O’Neill BR, Handler MH, et al. Routine perioperative ketorolac administration is not associated with hemorrhage in pediatric neurosurgery patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(1):107–15.
Pickering AE, Bridge HS, Nolan J, Stoddart PA. Double-blind, placebo-controlled analgesic study of ibuprofen or rofecoxib in combination with paracetamol for tonsillectomy in children. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(1):72–7.
Gude P, Rieckert C, Bissantz N, Weber TP, Vogelsang H, Dazert S, et al. Need of analgetics in children aged 2–12 years after tonsil surgery. Laryngorhinootologie. 2018;97(7):465–73.
Smolen JS. Treat-to-target: rationale and strategies. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(4 Suppl 73):S2-6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Victoria C. Ziesenitz, Tatjana Welzel, Madelé van Dyk, Patrick Saur, Matthias Gorenflo, and Johannes N. van den Anker have no conflicts of interest in relation to this manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Authors contributions
VCZ and JvdA conceptualized the manuscript, VCZ and TW wrote the manuscript, MvD contributed to the pharmacokinetic section and table 1, PS and MG contributed to the sections on pain management and pediatric cardiology, and JvdA critically reviewed the manuscript.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Additional information
The Original online version of this article was revised: The Open Access funding information was missed and published in the original version.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ziesenitz, V.C., Welzel, T., van Dyk, M. et al. Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years. Pediatr Drugs 24, 603–655 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-022-00514-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-022-00514-1