Abstract
Soft actuators have brought significant advancements to robotics, allowing robots to perform a diverse range of tasks across various domains. However, the increased use of soft actuators has resulted in negative environmental impacts, including material consumption, waste generation, and energy consumption. To address these challenges, research is increasingly focused on developing sustainable soft actuators (SSAs) that can provide high performance while minimizing environmental harm. This review article aims to explore the development and manufacturing of SSAs and their potential to reduce material waste and energy consumption promoting sustainability. The article examines various categories of soft actuators, such as multi-responsive ones, shape-locking variants, and biological water-responsive models, as well as their implementation through multi-material printing and, 3D and 4D printing techniques. The article also highlights the potential applications of these SSAs, including manufacturing, human–machine interaction, locomotion, and manipulation. Furthermore, the review explores various methods for reducing energy consumption and material waste in soft actuators, such as using recycled materials and eco-friendly manufacturing processes for a circular economy. Finally, the study provides a comprehensive analysis of SSAs and their potential to steer the evolution of robotics towards a more sustainable future and a circular economy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The current state of the world, impacted by climate change and widespread waste production, highlights the importance of considering the environmental impact of technological advancements. Consumer products, once they reach the end of their lifespan, are often discarded due to the difficulty in recycling their various materials and designs, which are produced inexpensively [1,2,3]. The use of rare and toxic materials, which can harm the environment if not properly disposed of, adds to the concern. The emergence of technology with a self-contained life cycle, such as easily recyclable objects, materials that are affordable and renewable, and temporary or biodegradable systems, provides new possibilities in a variety of industries, including healthcare, environmental monitoring, security, and intelligence [4,5,6].
Current advancements in robotics are often influenced by the diversity found in nature. This includes a focus on safe interaction between humans and machines, swarm robotics, and autonomous operation without a tether [7, 8]. Scientists from various fields are working to create soft and lightweight robots that mimic the fluid movements and energy efficiency of animals [9, 10]. The complexity of nature is a source of inspiration for these developments. Soft robots are drawing considerable attention due to their advantageous qualities. They can deform and maintain their mechanical strength, adapt to their surroundings without endangering humans, and manufacture more cost-effective than their rigid counterparts [11, 12]. However, the use of soft robots in our daily lives will bring up environmental worries like energy or power consumption and material waste. To solve this, we can make these robots in a way that is better for the environment, like nature does.
Soft robots face unique challenges due to the close relationship between their sensing and actuation devices and their overall function [13]. To overcome these difficulties, the development of soft actuators is crucial. These actuators should be able to respond to various stimuli, show large deformations, and still maintain their mechanical resilience [14]. These actuators have a lot of promise to be used in areas like sensors [15], artificial muscles [16], microrobots [17], and micro-manipulation [18]. The advancements are the result of extensive research into soft actuators for various industries aimed at addressing the growing demand for energy and material consumption of soft actuators in mobile devices. The future challenge for autonomous soft robots lies in combining various fields to achieve better performance and sustainability. Collaboration between experts from various disciplines, including material science, chemistry, engineering, biology, computer science, and robotics, will be necessary to successfully integrate components such as actuators, sensors, computing, and power through only one robot.
There are many insightful reviews available on various areas of soft technology, such as soft robots [19], electronic skins [20], wearable devices [21], rehabilitation exoskeletons [22], healthcare systems [23], and textile exosuits [24]. Despite the existence of literature related to soft actuators, there is a lack of research works on sustainable soft actuators (SSAs) and fabrication techniques that are explicitly tailored for low or zero power consumption, with minimal material waste. This review emphasizes the design principles and manufacturing approaches that enable the creation of soft actuators that are eco-friendly, consume less power, and produce minimal waste. The article places particular emphasis on SSAs and fabrication methods, beginning with an examination of sustainability and different approaches for reducing the environmental impact of technology. The authors then shift their focus to soft and lightweight multi-responsive and shape-locking soft actuators, which require minimal power to activate or none to maintain their position. The paper outlines the suitability of each actuator through specific examples and assesses the future growth potential of the soft actuators discussed. Notably, the evaluation of biological soft actuators stands out because of their ability to be activated by water or humidity, offering a sustainable option worth considering. Additionally, the article explores the potential of multi-material printing for soft actuators, as this technology minimizes waste production.
1.1 Why Sustainable Actuators?
Soft actuators have gained significant utilization in various industries and research disciplines in the last few decades, prompting researchers to focus extensively on this field [25,26,27,28]. The remarkable capabilities exhibited by these actuators have sparked considerable interest across different domains of study [29,30,31]. The visualization in Fig. 1a highlights the most frequently utilized keywords associated with soft actuators since 2010, providing valuable insights into the prominent areas of exploration using the visualization tool named VOSviewer. Additionally, Fig. 1b from Web of Science data presents a comprehensive overview of the percentage distribution of soft actuator development across different sections, emphasizing the diverse applications being pursued in response to specific requirements. The data elucidates that multiple fields have been actively working on the advancement of soft actuators, tailoring their designs to suit needs. This underscores the versatility and adaptability of soft actuators as a technology.
Furthermore, an intriguing trend has emerged since 2010, as evidenced by a substantial surge in the number of research endeavours focused on soft actuators (see Fig. 1c). This exponential growth attests to the escalating interest and recognition of the immense potential held by soft actuators in advancing numerous scientific and technological domains. The expanding body of research signifies the increasing significance placed on harnessing the capabilities of soft actuators to address a wide range of challenges and pave the way for innovative solutions in various fields.
Moreover, soft actuators are devices that are used to produce motion or force through the deformation of a soft material [32,33,34]. However, developed actuators consume energy to be activated or required a constant power source to hold them in the required position. Meanwhile, they require high electrical voltage like dielectric actuators to be activated [35, 36]. Hence, it is vital to reduce energy consumption for long-term tasks or develop actuators with less activation power. SSAs are those that are designed and developed to reduce their environmental impact and promote sustainability.
One of the key considerations in SSAs is the selection of materials and reduce material consumption. The materials used in these devices can significantly impact their sustainability. Sustainable materials can be used to reduce the device’s environmental impact. In addition to material selection, energy efficiency is another important factor to consider when designing SSAs [37, 38]. Soft actuators can be designed to be energy-efficient, consuming minimal energy to produce motion or force. This can be achieved by optimizing the design of the actuator and using energy-efficient control systems. Also, multi-responsive soft actuators are an alternative option to reduce power consumption due to the multi-triggering ways to activate them [39].
Another approach to achieving SSAs is to design them to be biodegradable. Soft actuators can be made from materials that are designed to decompose naturally at the end of their lifespan [40, 41]. This can help reduce the amount of waste generated by the device and promote sustainability. Manufacturing processes are also a key consideration when designing SSAs. The manufacturing processes used to produce soft actuators can impact their sustainability. Processes that use minimal energy or produce minimal waste can be employed to reduce the environmental impact of the device [42, 43]. Finally, the end-of-life management of the device can also impact its sustainability. Designing SSAs with easy disassembly and recyclability in mind can promote a circular economy and reduce waste.
While there have been advancements in developing SSAs using various methods and techniques, there are still challenges that need to be addressed and understood [44]. Researchers should find a balance between performance and sustainability when selecting materials for soft actuators. Also, energy efficiency is another critical factor in achieving SSAs. Soft actuators typically consume a considerable amount of energy to operate and designing energy-efficient soft actuators is crucial to reducing their environmental impact. This can be achieved by optimizing their design and using energy-efficient control systems [45, 46].
Moreover, durability is another challenge that must be addressed when designing SSAs. Soft actuators are often made from soft materials that can be prone to wear and tear, limiting their lifespan. Designing SSAs that can last longer and withstand repeated use is critical. This can be achieved by selecting durable materials and optimizing the design of the device to reduce stress on the materials. Designing soft actuators that can be easily disassembled, recycled, or disposed of in an environmentally friendly way is crucial for achieving sustainability [47, 48]. This requires a holistic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of the device. Meanwhile, there is currently no standardized framework for designing SSAs, making it challenging to compare different designs and assess their environmental impact. Developing a standardized framework for SSA design can help accelerate their development and adoption.
These are just a few challenges of developing SSAs. Eliminating these drawbacks will lead to advance soft actuators which are green and sustainable for a circular economy. The development of SSAs presents several significant challenges that need to be addressed to create more environmentally friendly devices. Addressing these challenges requires a multidisciplinary approach and collaboration between various stakeholders, including researchers, policymakers, and industry experts. By overcoming these challenges and eliminating the drawbacks, it is possible to develop advanced soft actuators that are more green, sustainable, and suitable for a range of applications in a circular economy. Achieving these goals would benefit the environment and improve the performance, reliability, and lifespan of soft actuators, making them a more viable option for a wide range of industries and applications. Therefore, it is crucial to continue research and development in this field to create more sustainable and efficient soft actuators in the future. In this review, we will investigate low-energy consumption, multi-responsive soft actuators, biological actuators, and manufacturing techniques of soft actuators to reduce material consumption as part of a circular economy.
1.2 Overview of Soft Actuators
Soft actuators are a type of flexible device that has been designed to mimic the motion and functionality of biological systems such as muscles, tendons, and skin [49, 50]. Unlike traditional rigid actuators, soft actuators are made of soft and flexible materials that enable them to deform and adapt to different shapes, environments, and applications [51]. The manufacturing methods for soft actuators can vary depending on the type of actuator and the materials used. There are general steps in all actuators from design to testing via different manufacturing techniques. The processes can be divided into different categories, including 3D printing [52], 4D printing [53, 54], casting and moulding [55], textile processing [56], electrospinning [57], laser cutting [58], origami/kirigami folding [59], and electrowetting [60]. Each manufacturing technology has a unique ability to produce soft actuators accordingly. The combination of soft materials, flexible design, and innovative control strategies allow soft actuators to offer new functionalities, such as the ability to adapt to different shapes and environments, improved safety, and increased comfort and human–machine interaction [61]. The field of soft actuators is continuously growing, and new developments in materials science, electronics, and control engineering are leading to the creation of more sophisticated and capable devices.
Sustainability in soft actuators encompasses various aspects, strategies, and solutions, including the use of renewable resources, recycling, and biodegradability [62]. However, the focus is to create SSAs that consume low power and material. SSAs are robotic devices that are designed to have a minimal impact on the environment. They aim to reduce energy consumption and material waste while ensuring long-term performance and reliability. To achieve this, SSAs often use environmentally friendly materials and low power-consuming technologies. By designing soft actuators with sustainability in mind, it is possible to create devices that can operate efficiently and effectively while reducing their environmental footprint.
Soft actuators are often made of materials that are less rigid than traditional actuators, making them safer to use around humans and other living creatures. Additionally, their flexible design makes them less likely to cause damage if they encounter other objects. Also, soft actuators typically use less energy than traditional rigid actuators and can be powered by a variety of energy sources, including electricity [63], pneumatic pressure [64], light [65], pH [66], humidity [67], magnetic field [68], thermal energy [69], and a combination of these. There are different ways to activate soft actuators as shown in Fig. 2a. The use of materials that are responsive to different stimuli is a promising way in the creation of soft actuators. Soft actuators and devices often utilize soft materials that are made through low-temperature fabrication processes, making the production process easier and more cost-effective. The viscoelastic properties of these materials allow them to absorb energy from impacts and smooth out any discontinuous movements or forces by dampening oscillations [70].
The materials utilized in producing soft actuators have a significant impact on their effectiveness and capabilities. There is a broad spectrum of materials that can be utilized to create soft actuators. The choice of materials depends on the specific requirements of the application, such as the type of movement or deformation desired, the energy source used, and the environment in which the actuator will operate. By utilizing these materials, it becomes possible to produce soft actuators that exhibit remarkable flexibility, strength, and the ability to generate motion and deformation with minimal energy consumption, all without requiring an actuator or motor. Materials for soft actuators are thermoplastics [71], elastomers [72], shape memory alloys (SMAs) [73], shape memory polymers (SMPs) [74], hydrogels [75], electroactive polymers (EAPs) [76], liquid metals [77], piezoelectric materials [78], magnetic materials [79], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [80, 81], graphene [82], polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [83], magnetic fluids [84], and electrospun nanofibers [85]. The classification of biodegradable and biomaterials and their mechanical properties used in SSAs are shown in Fig. 2b, c , respectively.
In recent times, with a growing emphasis on sustainability, scientists and engineers have dedicated their attention to creating SSAs that not only exhibit efficient performance but also mitigate their environmental footprint. The capacity of these actuators to replicate natural motions and deformations holds significant value in applications that necessitate meticulous and accurate movements. Nevertheless, given the urgent environmental challenges faced by the world, it becomes crucial to incorporate sustainability into the design and production of soft actuators, guaranteeing that these technological advancements adhere to eco-friendly principles [86]. The operational principles of SSAs encompass a wide range of innovative approaches. This mechanism facilitates seamless and uninterrupted movement, rendering it well-suited for applications that require meticulous control. To enhance the sustainability of soft actuators, various strategies can be implemented throughout their lifespan. Material selection stands out as a crucial factor. Choosing eco-friendly materials like biodegradable or recyclable polymers and elastomers helps decrease the environmental footprint and supports the principles of a circular economy [87]. Through the adoption of sustainable materials, the negative effects associated with the disposal and end-of-life stages of soft actuators can be minimized. The types of SSAs are briefly discussed as follows:
-
Pneumatic and hydraulic soft actuators: A prevalent principle involves the utilization of pneumatic or hydraulic actuation, where the application of air or fluid pressure induces the deformation of the flexible material. These soft actuators are composed of pliable materials like elastomers or pneumatic chambers that undergo expansion or contraction when subjected to pressure [88]. Using environmentally friendly fluids and the optimization of actuator design, pneumatic and hydraulic soft actuators can achieve actuation that is both energy-efficient and sustainable. These actuators are applied in fields such as robotics, prosthetics, and haptic interfaces, where there is a need for precise and compliant movements.
-
Shape memory soft actuators: Shape memory soft actuators integrate substances that possess shape memory properties, such as SMAs or SMPs [89, 90]. These materials can undergo reversible deformations when exposed to temperature fluctuations, enabling the actuators to demonstrate programmable and adaptable movements. By incorporating sustainable shape memory materials and reducing energy consumption during thermal actuation, these actuators present eco-conscious options for various applications, including morphing structures, adaptive textiles, and biomedical devices [89, 91].
-
Electroactive soft actuators: SSAs based on electroactive principles utilize electroactive polymers, which demonstrate substantial deformations when subjected to electrical stimuli. Examples of EAPs utilized in soft actuators include ionic polymer-metal composites, dielectric elastomers, and conductive polymers [92]. These actuators offer numerous benefits, including excellent deformability, low power consumption, and lightweight construction. To further promote sustainability, eco-friendly and biocompatible EAP materials can be employed, and energy-efficient control strategies can be adopted.
-
Magnetic soft actuators: Magnetic soft actuators employ magnetism to achieve precise control over movements and deformations. They incorporate magnetic particles or materials into a flexible matrix and utilize external magnetic fields to induce shape changes and alter properties [93]. These actuators excel in non-contact actuation, precise positioning, and the generation of significant forces and displacements, making them ideal for applications in soft robotics, biomedical devices, and haptic interfaces. Using sustainable and recyclable materials, as well as optimized actuator designs, magnetic soft actuators promote eco-friendly actuation and circular economy while maintaining exceptional controllability [94].
-
Light-responsive soft actuator: A sustainable light-responsive soft actuator is designed to achieve controlled movements and deformations using light as a stimulus. These actuators incorporate light-sensitive materials, such as photoresponsive polymers or liquid crystal elastomers, which undergo reversible changes in response to specific light wavelengths [95]. Offering advantages such as precise actuation, tunable responsiveness, and wireless control, they find applications in fields such as soft robotics, smart textiles, and responsive structures [96]. To enhance sustainability, these actuators utilize eco-friendly and recyclable materials while minimizing power consumption using energy-efficient light sources, contributing to a greener and more efficient future.
-
Humidity-responsive soft actuator: A sustainable humidity-responsive soft actuator is designed to achieve controlled movements and deformations by responding to changes in humidity levels [97]. These actuators incorporate humidity-sensitive materials, such as hydrogels or hygroscopic polymers, which undergo reversible changes in shapes or mechanical properties in response to humidity or pH variations [98]. Offering advantages such as sensitivity to small humidity changes, rapid response times, and the ability to achieve complex motions, they find applications in environmental monitoring, energy harvesting, and bio-inspired systems [99]. To enhance sustainability, these actuators utilize eco-friendly and biodegradable materials while optimizing energy efficiency, aligning with eco-conscious principles and contributing to a greener future.
These are some of the most used materials and techniques in the manufacture of soft actuators. These materials and techniques can be combined to produce soft composite actuators. The choice of materials will depend on the specific requirements of the application, such as the type of movement or deformation desired, the energy source used, the environment in which the actuator will operate, and the responses to the external stimuli.
2 Manufacturing Technologies
SSAs can be produced using a range of methods, including subtractive, forming, and additive manufacturing (AM). These techniques involve processes such as cutting, moulding, spinning, lithography, and 3D/4D printing, among others. Each technique's suitability is determined by the characteristics of the material. In the subsequent section, we will offer an overview outline of these fundamental techniques.
2.1 Moulding
Moulding is an economical technique that falls under the category of forming manufacturing methods [101]. It enables the production of several thousand parts using a single mould insert. There are five categories of moulding techniques. Since its heating and cooling cycles are short, one of the major processes is injection moulding, which is mostly used for large-scale manufacturing. The second is reaction injection moulding, which uses heat or ultraviolet (UV) light to activate polymer solidification [102]. The third process, hot embossing, entails inserting a film into a mould and creating a residual layer over time. This method is ideal for laboratory settings, as it results in lower stress levels in the polymer and has the potential for higher aspect ratios. Injection-compressed moulding, the fourth step, combines the stamping and injection moulding processes. Finally, the creation of patterns with large aspect ratios is frequently done using the popular thermoforming process. Moulding, on the other hand, is commonly employed in creating soft actuators based on pneumatic networks [103, 104]. For the construction of arrays, moulding has several advantages, including quick manufacturing, uniform surface coverage, customizable pillar diameter size, and adjustable pillar spacing. It does, however, have several limits, notably when mixing various materials and building complex constructions. It is great for materials with long solidification durations, including poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), and is more suitable for mass production than prototyping [105].
2.2 Cutting
Cutting is a mechanical process used in subtractive manufacturing, usually with blades or lasers. However, laser cutting is a more sophisticated form of cutting that has several benefits, such as greater precision, resolution, and no wear and tear [106]. To obtain the finest cut with the highest degree of precision, several variables must be tuned [107]. Laser cutting can be used to cut and engrave a wide range of polymers and metals. This method can be used in making origami and kirigami smart structures or actuators [108]. This shows that manufacturing using equipment enables better control over designs and raises the standard of fabrication in general. However, cutting, like other subtractive manufacturing techniques, is unable to combine a variety of materials.
2.3 Spinning
Spinning is a method of forming manufacturing that alters the shape of material without adding or removing it [109]. However, not all materials are capable of being formed into fibres. The fundamental condition for fibre creation is that the solidification process must proceed more quickly than the material's rate of relaxation. This prevents stretched liquid objects from reverting to a more energetically advantageous spherical form due to the surface tension force. Based on the process used to harden fibres after spinning, fibre-spinning methods are divided into four categories: wet, dry, melt, and gel spinning. The diameter range for wet spinning is roughly between 250 and 500 μm, and the fibres are solidified in a coagulation bath [110]. In contrast, to melt spinning, which uses extrusion to solidify a molten polymer in the air, dry spinning uses airflow to dry and solidify fibres. Gel spinning includes extending the partially dried gel to produce fibres after chilling and drying the extruded gel solution with other solvents [111]. Microfluidics is another fibre fabrication method that is a derivative of wet spinning and produces fibres in the micro range. However, the mechanical stability of the fibres obtained using this method is a current issue.
Electrospinning is a type of fibre-spinning method that falls under the category of dry and melt spinning [112]. It involves using an electrical field to draw fibres from a solution or melt, resulting in small-diameter fibres ranging from several nanometers to micrometres in size and with a high surface area. Touch spinning, which starts with the initial contact between the polymer and wire and forms a fluid connection that lengthens once the collector turns and the solvent evaporates, is another technique for creating fibres that are smaller than nanometers [113]. In addition, the fibres produced through spinning are drawn and have strongly oriented polymer chains aligned with the direction of the stretching, leading to increase strength and hardness compared to materials formed through other methods. Multicomponent fibres can be produced by spinning multiple polymers simultaneously. These fibres can exhibit bending and curling behaviour due to their asymmetric composition [114]. One illustration of such a fibre is the Janus fibre, which is composed of two substances with various softening points and is capable of changing shape when one of the polymers experiences a change in property. These fibres can be created using melt spinning and have potential applications in the creation of self-walking structures and multi-responsive soft actuators [115].
2.4 Lithography
Based on the type of irradiation, there are many lithography techniques, including photolithography, electron beam lithography, and ion beam lithography [116, 117]. Accordingly, this technique may be utilised to create multi-responsive soft actuators. In photolithography, the desired geometric pattern is created on the surface by exposing a photosensitive polymer to light through a photomask. Depending on the light's wavelength and the optics employed, the resolution can reach hundreds of nanometers. By utilising electrons or ions to irradiate an electron- or ion-sensitive material, electron and ion beam lithography may produce objects with better resolution (30–50 nm) without the need of a photomask. Self-folding tubes and intricate three-layer structures with specialised geometries for cell adhesion have been made using photolithography, which is suited for producing few-layer films [118, 119]. This approach can create multilayer structures using various polymers, but it takes a lot of time and expensive equipment.
In photolithography, materials that have been both cross-linked and fixed or removed without a half-tone are frequently utilised. By projecting structured illumination onto dry polymer films that may be photo-cross-linked using a digital mirror device system, 2D photolithography enables the production of shape-changing structures [120, 121]. The time can be varied to create lateral gradients of swelling properties, which enable different shape transformations. Photosensitive compounds, such as photoresists or active polymers, are required for photolithography. It is recommended to employ photo-cross-linkable active polymers since it eliminates the need for photoresists and simplifies the fabrication process.
2.5 3D/4D Printing
3D printing is a new and innovative technology that has allowed for the creation of multi-material and highly customized devices, including soft actuators with exceptional spatial resolution and design flexibility [122,123,124]. This innovation has created new opportunities for soft actuators and has the potential to fundamentally alter how we produce smart SSAs [125, 126]. Compared to conventional production techniques, which are often used in the industry, it is more affordable and quicker [127, 128]. A range of soft actuators necessitates dynamic changes in shape, which are not feasible with traditional 3D printing technologies. 4D printing has been developed to fulfil this demand by adding the fourth dimension of time to 3D space [129,130,131].
External energy sources like UV radiation, heat, pH, or other stimuli are the main initiators of the form change of dynamic products. 4D printing has reversibility in addition to one-way change as a feature. To create complex and reversible 4D-printed structures, it is essential to utilise the right stimulus-responsive materials that can be activated by both internal and external inputs [132]. Light, an electric field, sound waves, and magnetic fields are examples of external stimuli, whereas pH and humidity are examples of interior stimuli. Smart materials are useful in a variety of applications because of their ability to respond to stimuli and take on an infinite number of shapes [133]. For the creation of macro- and micro-scale soft robots for diverse technical applications, 4D printing technology has recently gained widespread usage [134,135,136].
Smart materials and 3D printing technologies are used in the upcoming technology of 4D printing to produce soft actuators [137]. The same 3D printing techniques such as fused deposition modelling (FDM) [138], direct ink writing (DIW) [139], inkjet printing (IJP) [140], stereolithography (SLA) [141], selective laser sintering (SLS) [142], digital light processing (DLP) [143], selective laser melting (SLM) [144], sound printing [145], and direct laser writing (DLW) [146] have been used for 3D/4D printing, but not all of them are suitable for creating soft actuators.
With the use of a beam of laser energy and a UV light source, SLA and DLP rely on light-based technology to begin the photo-polymerization of photo-sensitive materials [147]. Because of their great printing resolution and quick speed, they are ideally suited for manufacturing soft actuators [148]. SLA produces incredibly precise printed components by cross-linking photosensitive materials via photochemical processing [149], whereas DLP generates patterns using an optical mirror, guaranteeing outstanding printability. [150]. These techniques have lesser resolution than lithography techniques, however projection micro-SLA, a modified form of SLA, is excellent for creating multi-material structures, such as actuators, flowers, and grippers, because it has a high-resolution capability [151]. This method uses a projector to start photopolymerization using a virtual photomask, creating complex soft actuators with several materials and scales. [152].
Out of all the available methods, the most used one is FDM due to its feasibility. This technique involves extruding a material onto a substrate which then hardens. The nozzle is moved in the X and Y axes by a motor, while the printed layer is built up in the Z-axis by moving the nozzle upwards. This process is repeated until the final structure is completed. The 3D printer liquefier is the main element utilised in this kind of printing. The extruder on the printer consists of two parts: a cold end and a hot end. A stepper motor controls the cold end's feed rate as it extracts the material from the spool using either gear- or roller-based torque. The feedstock is then forced into the hot end, which has a heating chamber and a nozzle, by the cold end. The feedstock is melted in the liquefier, which is a component of the heating chamber. The thin plastic bead that results from pushing this liquid through the tiny nozzle sticks to the surface it is printed on. Depending on the material being printed, the nozzle's diameter is normally between 0.3 mm and 1.0 mm, and the heating technique is chosen accordingly. FDM is frequently utilised in 4D printing because it is affordable and simple to maintain [153]. Currently, research is being conducted to improve its effectiveness and compatibility with new materials. FDM is also capable of easily fabricating self-coiling and self-folding metamaterials [154]. The technology has also been updated to enable the printing of new materials [155, 156].
The IJP technique, also known as material jetting, creates 3D structures by directly extruding ink materials onto the surface using small nozzles [157]. The chemical composition of the inks, such as surface tension must satisfy specific requirements [158]. This method is excellent for developing microfluidic systems, flexible electronics, optoelectronic components, and microrobots [159]. A range of materials can be deposited using the IJP technique since it can also handle less viscous materials [160]. Insoluble nanoparticles like metal oxides and ceramics, as well as organic materials, can also be printed. The method is well-liked in the field of microfabrication since it is very accurate and affordable [161]. Droplets of photopolymer ink are directly sprayed during the polyjet printing process, where they solidify on a printer bed. This process is commonly utilised to create intelligent materials [162]. Currently, 4D-printed objects that respond to heat are produced using polyjet printing [163]. Printing various materials at once using numerous printheads is one benefit of this technique [164].
Like FDM, the DIW printing technique creates 3D structures under high pressure using a wide range of viscoelastic ink ingredients [165]. To print using the DIW method, a viscoelastic ink is extruded via a tiny nozzle and applied layer by layer. This technique is highly regarded for its capacity to finely control the inks and print structures at the meso- and microscales. Printing speed and nozzle size are two factors that affect printing resolution and accuracy. Its capability to create multi-material structures in a single step decreases total production time, energy, cost, and waste while maintaining material qualities. This is one of DIW's main benefits [166, 167]. DIW also has the potential to be used for 4D printing, which permits the creation of smart materials that can change form in response to environmental factors. DIW is a highly adaptable production method since the three-axis platform, computer, and dispenser are all interchangeable and inexpensively priced. Recent years have seen the development of DIW as a dependable method for producing a range of soft actuators and smart devices [168].
Additionally, two-photon polymerization, also known as DLW, is widely utilised at the microscale to produce extremely precise and finely detailed 3D-printed robots [169]. Multiphoton DLW is a high-resolution AM technique that utilizes a pulsed femtosecond laser to fabricate 3D photonic devices with submicron voxel resolution [170, 171]. The process involves a multiphoton polymerization process in which the laser initiates a chemical reaction in the photoresist. DLW has been used to create a range of optical components and other related elements for beam shaping, imaging, and photonic integration [172, 173]. Despite its widespread accessibility, DLW is limited by the single refractive index of the photoresist, which restricts the fabrication of microscale optics with more complex shapes and structures. Additionally, the DLW process cannot be used to create free-standing elements, which limits the formation of compound lenses and intricate waveguiding photonic networks. Femtosecond pulsed laser technology is utilized to create sub-micrometre resolution structures in liquid crystal elastomer (LCE), hydrogels, and other composites [174, 175].
3 Multi-Responsive Soft Actuator
Soft actuators represent an exciting new technology with the capacity to transform multiple industries, ranging from healthcare to robotics. One of the most notable breakthroughs in the field of SSAs is the creation of multi-responsive versions, which present numerous benefits compared to mono-responsive types [176,177,178]. The improved functionality of multi-responsive soft actuators is a crucial advantage. In contrast to mono-responsive actuators, which can only react to one stimulus, multi-responsive ones can detect and respond to a wide range of stimuli [179]. This versatility provides them with a more diverse range of capabilities than mono-responsive actuators, which allows them to undertake more complex tasks.
Multi-responsive soft actuators possess a greater degree of adaptability compared to mono-responsive actuators. Their ability to respond to multiple stimuli means they can adjust to changes in their surroundings, allowing them to function effectively in a broader range of environments. This adaptability is particularly advantageous in fields such as soft robotics, where the robots must operate in unpredictable or harsh conditions. Multi-responsive soft actuators also offer enhanced efficiency when compared to their mono-responsive counterparts. The ability to respond specifically to stimuli present in their surroundings enables them to minimize energy consumption and optimize their performance. This feature is especially beneficial in fields where energy efficiency is a top priority, environmental monitoring [180].
These advantages encompass enhanced functionality, improved control, greater adaptability, and increased efficiency. As a result, multi-responsive soft actuators are anticipated to make a significant impact on numerous industries in the future, transforming their capabilities and revolutionizing their operations. The recent focus of research has been on developing multi-responsive actuators with a wide range of manufacturing techniques that can function in a variety of settings. There are several different manufacturing techniques and smart materials available for creating multi-responsive soft actuators as mentioned in the previous section [181,182,183]. These actuators are a great choice for usage in SSAs since they may alter their size, shape, or other characteristics in response to varied inputs. As the field of multi-responsive soft actuators continues to advance, there are constantly evolving and expanding techniques available that offer exciting possibilities for developing soft actuators that are more versatile, efficient, and affordable. In this section, we will explore the development of multi-responsive actuators utilizing various techniques. The primary focus will be on evaluating their sustainability and behaviour when subjected to different stimuli.
3.1 Carbon-Based Actuators
Carbon materials like graphite, carbon spheres, CNTs, graphene, and their derivatives are considered vital functional components for multi-responsive soft actuators [184]. This is because of their distinct characteristics such as high electrical conductivity, intrinsic mechanical flexibility, and high chemical and thermal stability [185]. As a result, these materials present a viable option for several applications, particularly in the advancement of mechanical sensing and actuation. The creation of carbon-based actuators that possess both conductive and photo/electrothermal or moisture-responsive properties can provide a useful platform for mechanical sensing and actuation development [186, 187]. Furthermore, by controlling the coupling of the functional components and their interfacial structures, multiple functions can be synergized while ensuring structural stability. Thus, the research should explore effective integration methods, principles of functional component combination, and applications for these materials.
For example, Li et al. [188] used ink/PET/super-aligned carbon nanotube (IPS) to create a novel multi-responsive actuator that can react to four different stimuli such as electricity, near-infrared (NIR) light, humidity, and organic vapours (see Fig. 3a). Super-aligned carbon nanotube sheets and a PET film with an ink coating were employed as the actuator. When subjected to electrical stimulation, the actuator demonstrated quick and reversible actuation with a significant displacement-to-length ratio of 0.79. The actuator bent dramatically, reaching a considerable bending angle of 212° in 0.55 s at a speed of 646°/s when exposed to NIR light. The actuator also reacted swiftly to moisture and organic vapours, dramatically bending in less than 0.1 s when exposed to various organic solvents and instantly reverting to its original shape after removal. At a reasonably high on/off frequency of up to 17.5 Hz, the actuator might be utilised as a smart electrical control frequency switch. Also, Zhang et al. [189] created a new technique for embedding CNT onto a photo-crosslinked poly (-caprolactone) (cPCL) film using hot pressing, which allowed them to produce a soft actuator that was sensitive to several stimuli. The mechanical and thermal stability of the cPCL films were enhanced by the addition of CNT to its surface. The final multi-responsive actuator maintained its heat actuation while exhibiting good electric actuation. Furthermore, the actuator demonstrated a larger recovery force and a faster rate of recovery compared to cPCL films with just one CNT-embedded surface. It should be emphasised that reversible SMPs can lose some of their inherent actuation capability when CNT is added, therefore finding a means to include CNT without doing so is still a difficult task. Ji et al. [190] developed a soft actuator with a dual-response and self-sensing feature using a 2D metallic molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). Due to the good electrical property and network structure of CNTs, the great photothermal property of 1 T phase MoS2, the hygroscopic expansion of paper, and the thermal expansion of polyimide, this actuator responds to external voltage and light stimulation and generates quick and massive bending deformation. The MoS2-CNT composite film's piezoresistive ability was used to detect real-time bending deformation using the actuator's dual function as a flexible strain sensor. The MoS2-based actuator has been utilised to create wearable intelligent gloves that automatically close to prevent light irradiation as well as a flexible mechanical gripper that can handle delicate items with uneven forms. Additionally, the sensing capability of the MoS2-based actuator is combined to provide a gripper with an integrated sensing function. This type of actuator enhances efficiency across diverse environments and can be activated through various stimuli, ultimately minimizing material consumption in manufacturing production [191].
The environmental issues and worries about traditional plastics' non-renewability in today's world have caused a considerable focus on the development of recyclable plastics. The possibility for vitrimeric materials to possess strength, durability, and chemical resistance comparable to those of conventional thermosets while simultaneously being recyclable at the end of their useful lives has lately attracted attention [192]. This is because vitrimers have dynamic covalent crosslinks in their chemical structure, which provide stability while still being reprocessable. The new uses for vitrimers include their various shape memory capabilities, malleability, and ability to process in orthogonal directions [193, 194]. Another novel multi-responsive soft actuator is developed by Yang et al. [195]. They developed a novel SSA that was made by hot-pressing carbonized silk fabrics (CSF) into the surface of vitrimers (see Fig. 3b). The resultant thermosetting soft actuator could effectively and frequently self-heal in the presence of five stimuli, including electromagnetic waves, heat, solvent, light, and electricity, and could also react to four stimuli at once. Due to the characteristics of the vitrimer, the actuator was also durable, sustainable, recyclable, and reprocessable. This makes it a flexible and adaptable instrument for usage in a range of environmental situations. Also, Chen et al. [196] used vitrimers with exchangeable disulfide links to develop an actuator that could be reconfigured, welded, patterned, and transformed using kirigami techniques to create intricate 3D geometries. The actuator may be frequently modified for different purposes, offering a less expensive option for the preparation of new materials. These actuators are an economical and ecologically beneficial option since they work in conjunction with humidity and sunlight without extra energy input. Vitrimeric materials are categorized as polymers that can maintain their mechanical properties even after multiple processing and shaping cycles. These materials are currently considered for SSA due to their exceptional qualities that surpass traditional materials, including high durability, toughness, and recyclability [197,198,199]. Vitrimeric materials are well-suited for soft actuators accompanied by carbon materials because they can be effortlessly moulded into complex designs and can withstand frequent mechanical deformation without deteriorating. The potential for vitrimeric materials in SSAs appears to be promising, and further research in this area could lead to the emergence of innovative and sustainable technologies.
3.2 MXene-Based Actuators
MXene-based multi-responsive actuators are emerging materials that have promising potential in the realm of SSAs [185, 200]. These 2D materials are made of transition metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, which are particularly attractive for soft actuators because they have excellent electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, and surface area [201]. They may be functionalized with various compounds that can react to various stimuli, including temperature, humidity, and light, thanks to their distinctive surface chemistry [202]. In comparison to conventional actuators, MXene-based actuators have benefits including simplicity of manufacture, quick reaction times, and low operating voltages [201]. Additionally, they can be integrated with other sensors and actuators to create complex robotic systems. The MXene component also provides good thermal management performance, making the sandwich film suitable for thermal treatment of the body and thermal imaging [203]. Applications of these materials include soft robotics, microelectromechanical systems, and biomedical devices [204]. Li et al. [205] developed a flexible, electrically conductive, and multi-responsive graphene oxide (GO)/MXene Janus film using a scalable sequential vacuum filtering method. A film that could respond to humidity, light, and electricity as well as offer superior electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding capability was created because of the hydrophilic qualities of GO and MXene. The film is appropriate for application as a smart switch and soft walking robot because it can be bent to a significant degree over a wide range of RH and exhibits quick and sensitive actuation reactions to NIR light and electricity (see Fig. 4a). The film’s EMI shielding effectiveness increased to 40 dB at just 1.5 µm thickness because of the extremely conducting MXene coating. They used the Janus material to create an intelligent EMI shielding curtain and a stimulus-responsive EMI shielding system as a proof-of-concept, demonstrating the film’s ability to modify signal transmission in response to stimuli to meet shielding needs in intelligent electronics and devices [206].
In another study, Liu et al. [207] created a bilayer actuator by casting MXene solution on low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film, which reacts to electric voltage, heat, and light. With 1.5 V electric voltage, the actuator could travel a significant offset distance of 20 mm. The temperature and curvature that corresponded were 32.7 °C and 0.079 mm−1, respectively. The actuator was bionic and could detect temperature variations as well as grab items like how natural flytraps do. The actuator also can walk at a pace of up to 16.52 mm/second. The soft actuator's adaptable characteristics, which may be activated by a variety of stimuli in a variety of situations and circumstances, make it very sustainable. For soft robotics, flexible actuators with high mechanical strength and multiple responsivenesses are crucial. Tang et al. [208] have created a novel Ti3C2Tx MXene-based actuator with a straightforward design and little power consumption. The biaxially oriented polypropylene layer and the bacterial cellulose layer's hygroexpansion and thermal expansion were the driving forces behind the actuator's dual-mechanism synergistic effect. Contrary to traditional actuators that employed a single actuation, this design offers an architecture that is more conducive to reversible actuation performance under electrical and NIR light stimuli. Compared to other single-mechanism soft actuators that have been described, the actuator achieved the largest bending angle (around 400°) at the lowest 4 V voltage. Being able to be driven by NIR light at a distance of 2 m, it also exhibits exceptional long-distance photoresponsiveness. Also, AgNWs/Ti3C2Tx MXene thermal actuators that could react to various stimuli, such as electricity, NIR light, and UV light, were successfully constructed by Chen et al. [209]. The excellent photothermal properties of Ti3C2Tx MXene, the great conductivity of AgNWs, the significant difference in coefficient of thermal expansion between MXene/AgNW layer and LLDPE layer, the synergistic effect of plasmonic properties between AgNWs and Ti3C2Tx MXene, and the high coefficient of thermal expansion of MXene/AgNW layer all contribute to the high effectiveness of the thermal actuator. At an operating of 2 V, the actuator could roll up for 2200° and bend 360° when exposed to NIR light with a quick response time of 0.4 s. UV radiation might also cause it to flex 360 degrees in 1.2 s. Additionally, by using fluorescent material, the thermal actuator may emit light when bent under UV light.
3.3 Bilayer Actuators
Bilayer smart materials can be used to create SSAs that are multi-responsive. Devices that may convert several types of energy into mechanical motion include bilayer multi-responsive soft actuators [212]. These gadgets have a bilayer construction, consisting of two responsive layers, that can react to different stimuli, such as electrical, thermal, and chemical ones. These devices are versatile and adaptable to various applications and environments. The bilayer structure can be composed of a variety of materials like hydrogels, polymers, and composites and consists of two layers with distinct properties, such as different thermal expansion coefficients [80, 191, 213]. The bilayer structure experiences differential expansion or contraction between the two layers in response to a stimulus, leading to bending or curling and producing mechanical motion. For example, Zhong et al. [210] introduced liquid vapour phase transitions to programmable thermochromic soft actuators (PTSAs). PTSAs were programmable thermochromic soft actuators that were susceptible to drastic volume fluctuations because of implanted low boiling point fluid that undergoes reversible liquid-to-vapour phase transitions. Additionally, they were capable of changing colour thanks to thermochromic microcapsules that were implanted (see Fig. 4b) [214]. Three alternative modes for starting shape and deformation type might be simply programmed into these actuators' "two-dimensional" design. Multiple stimuli might cause PTSAs to react. They were appropriate for use in a variety of applications, including wearable devices, because of their suitable operating temperature and stretchability. Also, Amjadi et al. [211] created a brand-new kind of bilayer actuator that could be programmed to bend and change form by leveraging the significant thermal expansion of heated polypropylene film and the significant water-soluble shrinkage of copy paper (see Fig. 4c). These bending actuators could function at low input electric power per unit area (0.14 W cm2), low input voltages (8 V), and low-temperature fluctuations (35 °C). With strong actuation and reversible behaviour, they could change shape with curvature radii up to 1.07 cm−1 and a bending angle of 360°. In addition, they could also be triggered by light or dampness. This work uses a soft gripper and a light paper wing for aerial robotics to show the adaptability of these paper actuators.
Moreover, Wang et al. [212] discussed the creation of a high-performance bilayer actuator made of a substrate made of polyethylene glycol terephthalate and a polypyrrole (PPy) layer. Due to the bilayer's synergistic deformations brought on by their significant thermal expansion mismatch as well as the coupling effect of PPy’s hygroscopicity, photothermal effect, and conductivity, the actuator displayed exceptional humidity, light, electricity, and thermal responses in addition to a significant deformation as shown in Fig. 5a. The group was successful in achieving a variety of reversible complicated deformations between 2 and 3D configurations by utilising the actuator’s multi-responsive properties and laser-engraved geometries. Additionally, they demonstrated the actuator’s potential uses in temperature-gradient-driven rapid rolling, light-induced crawling, and smart clothing with humidity control. Soft functional materials that mimic the adaptable motions of living things are becoming more popular due to the possibility of making artificial gadgets and robots that behave realistically. Chang et al. [215] created a perfluoro-sulfonic acid ionomer-based bilayer actuator that could react to a variety of stimuli (see Fig. 5b). The actuator’s high-performance actuation was made possible by combining CNT’s complete conversion characteristics, stress-mismatching structure, high negative coefficient of thermal expansion, and enormous anisotropic thermal expansion of PE polymer. The actuator also had a structural feedback loop built in, which enabled intelligent systems like self-sustaining mobility in the sunlight, self-sustaining oscillation and solar-electric production, and bionic floral responsiveness to environmental change. These various actuation techniques have exciting prospects for the creation of bio-hybrid soft robotic systems that can coexist peacefully with their surroundings.
Xing et al. [216] built a tri-layer shape memory soft actuator that could actuate and sense strains through reversible electric/moisture stimulation using a compact sandwich structure. A middle composite layer made of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) connected a hygroscopically deformable layer of PVA to a high-performance, flexible SMP layer. The PVAAgNPs flexible (PAF) SMP composite recovered quickly at an ultralow voltage (2 V) thanks to the electrothermal AgNP layer, which also had a high strain-sensing sensitivity (1.56 Gauge Factor) and a rapid reaction to deformation (110 m/s). The low-power PAF actuator was able to efficiently load and unload target items without the need for extra cooling procedures and to identify their presence and weights in real time because of a new mix of PVA, flexible SMP, and AgNPs. These findings revealed that the soft PAF actuator was well suited for SSAs and biomimetic applications, notably in automated packaging production lines for food, pharmaceutical, logistics, and other sectors. These actuators are the kind of machines that can transform different kinds of energy into mechanical motion. They are equipped with a structural feedback loop, which is a process that provides information about the output of a system and uses it to adjust their behaviour. This structural feedback loop enables the actuator to adapt to changes in its environment and perform intelligent functions. One such function is the ability to achieve self-sustainable locomotion using sunlight as its power source. This is particularly useful in fields such as robotics and autonomous vehicles where energy efficiency and sustainability are crucial factors [217]. Additionally, the actuators can generate mechanical oscillations and convert them into electrical energy, enabling them to be used as a self-sustaining power source for devices such as wearable technology and remote sensors. The actuators may also adapt to changes in their surroundings in a fashion that resembles the behaviour of plants, which is known as bionic floristic responses. For example, it can change its shape or orientation in response to changes in light, temperature, or humidity [218]. This feature has the potential to be applied in architecture to develop adaptive building materials that improve energy efficiency and comfort.
3.4 Hydrogel-Based Actuators
Hydrogels are polymer networks that can absorb water and exhibit unique properties such as high-water content and softness [219]. These properties make hydrogels useful for many applications, including drug delivery, tissue engineering, and soft robotics [220, 221]. In addition, hydrogels can have multi-responsive behaviour, which means they can react to a variety of stimuli, including pH, temperature, and ionic strength variations [222]. This multi-responsive behaviour allows for the design of hydrogel actuators that can undergo various types of mechanical deformation. By selecting specific polymers, cross-linkers, and stimuli, researchers can develop advanced hydrogels that exhibit even more complex behaviour, leading to new materials and devices that can address complex challenges in various fields [213, 223]. For example, Xiao et al. [224] created a hydrogel that is flexible and colourful and reacted to various stimuli. The N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm), acryl-6-aminocaproic acid (A6ACA), and spiropyran (SP) derivatives employed to make the hydrogel gave it the ability to deform under the influence of temperature, ferric ion (Fe3+), and chromatic phenomena (see Fig. 6a). When exposed to UV light, the hydrogel displayed the merocyanine UV absorption peak at 540 nm, which vanished in the presence of Fe3+ due to its selective chromatic response. The hydrogel was programmed to deform in the presence of Fe3+ using the ionoprinting technique. Due to its anisotropic structure, the hydrogel also displayed reversible bending deformation brought on by temperature. The hydrogel displayed programmable, spatiotemporal, and sophisticated deformation behaviours as well as colour changes when subjected to temperature and Fe3+.
As illustrated in Fig. 6b, Dallinger et al. [225] created a technique for changing polymers into conductive 3D carbon constructs with pores using a readily accessible CO2 laser engraving technology. This process, known as laser-induced graphene (LIG), has several uses in energy, actuation, and sensing. To achieve multi-responsive actuation in a humid environment, the work focuses on the coupling of LIG with a smart hydrogel named poly(N-vinylcaprolactam)-pNVCL. Initiated chemical vapour (iCVD) deposition was used to deposit a thin layer of pNVCL hydrogel over a matrix of PDMS with embedded LIG tracks to form the actuator. The ability of smart hydrogels like pNVCL to reverse their phase transition from a swelled to a collapsed state in response to various external stimuli including temperature, pH, and magnetic/electric fields is one of its special characteristics. Despite the actuator matrix being 500 times thicker than the active hydrogel layer, which is just 300 nm thick, Joule heating was able to cause a reversible bending of nearly 30° in a humid environment. Before fine-tuning the characteristics of the multi-responsive PDMS/LIG/pNVCL actuator, they also produced single-responsive variants of the actuator to examine thermoresponsive and humidity-responsive qualities. The piezoresistive PMDS/LIG composite's change in resistance was used to track the actuator's bending angle as it also displayed self-sensing capabilities. The researchers built an octopus-shaped demonstrator with four independently movable limbs to demonstrate the processing methods and material combinations.
For the in-situ polymerization of anisotropic hydrogels consisting of highly ordered lamellar networks crosslinked by metal nanostructure assemblies, Qin et al. [226] created a universal method. Amazing anisotropic mechanical, optical, de-swelling, and swelling behaviours were displayed by these hydrogels [227]. Due to the dynamic thiolate-metal interaction, the composites also exhibit quick and effective self-healing capability under NIR irradiation and low pH circumstances. Anisotropic features in the hydrogels allowed for regulated solvent-responsive mechanical actuation. By using healing-induced assembly, the integrated device could deliver more complex and intricate actuation forms, demonstrating its potential as an excellent SSAs for applications such as smart robots. The multi-responsive hydrogels could be also self-healable and responsive to changes in pH or water content, allowing for controlled changes in volume, shape, and transparency [228]. These actuators have potential applications as smart switches and shape memory materials, actuated by various environmental stimuli [229, 230]. These actuators are advantageous in safeguarding equipment in severe environments without consuming excessive energy. It is designed to endure harsh conditions that could otherwise impair its functionality, such as high temperatures and corrosive substances. Its sturdiness and resilience make it preferable to conventional actuators, which might not withstand extreme environments. This capability to withstand adverse conditions can increase the dependability and lifespan of equipment that requires reliable performance in harsh conditions. Additionally, the actuator's low energy consumption means that it has a minor impact on the overall energy consumption of the system [231]. This feature enhances the sustainability and energy efficiency of the operation, making it an appealing choice for applications where energy consumption is a concern.
4 Shape-Locking Soft Actuators
Soft actuators that can safely and effectively interact with the environment rely on programmable shape morphing. While some materials can transform from 2D sheets into 3D shapes when exposed to certain stimuli, these solutions cannot often maintain their shape without power, are restricted to predetermined configurations, or do not have enough mechanical stiffness to manipulate common objects. Shape locking is one of the advanced features of soft actuators that can be effective in reducing energy consumption. Shape locking is a technique used in soft actuators where the shape of a soft actuator is fixed using an external mechanism [232]. This allows the actuator to maintain its shape without consuming additional energy, which reduces its overall energy consumption. Additionally, by maintaining a specific shape, shape locking can increase the efficiency of the actuator, as it reduces the amount of energy required to perform a specific task. However, it is important to note that while shape locking can be effective in reducing energy consumption, it is not always the best solution for every application. There is a variety of manufacturing techniques to develop actuators with shape locking. In this section, we will look at recent developments in soft actuators with the shape-locking feature.
4.1 Electro-Based Soft Actuators
Fast reaction, precise control, and programmable deformation are just a few advantages that electro-responsive soft actuators and their derivatives have, making them ideal for cutting-edge applications [233]. The physical, chemical, and mechanical features of smart materials, such as their excellent transport movement, robustness, and transparency, have influenced their recent acceptance in the design of these kinds of actuators [234, 235]. Electrodes, electro-responsive materials, and deformable substrates or materials that are connected make up the simple design of electro-responsive soft actuators [236]. This section focuses on electro-responsive actuators that possess the ability to lock their shape in the required position. As an example, Chen et al. [237] used in situ dopamine polymerization along PVA macromolecular chains and the inclusion of ionic coordination between polymer molecular chains (PVA and polydopamine chains) and metal ions (Fe3+) to develop an adhesive and modulus tailorable interface (see Fig. 7a). To boost water tolerance and absorption, which is necessary for adjusting the adhesion and modulus of the interface, the Fe3+ cations encouraged coordination. The resultant interface was used to create a soft, ultra-thin, skin-compliant sensor that is also self-adhesive and multi-responsive with a configurable modulus for locking actuator modes and lowering power consumption. To gain a deeper understanding of the sensing ability of the on-skin sensor, the researchers measured and graphed the resistance change of the sensor when subjected to strain. This study presents a novel approach to addressing interface-related challenges in sensing and actuating.
Also, Kim et al. [238] unveiled a brand-new kind of double-layered actuator based on light- and EAP (LEAP). The LEAP actuators have a 250% increase in displacement over standard EAP actuators and can support items that are three times heavier. The LEAP actuators also have a special self-locking capability that allows the bending action to be maintained for several tens of minutes without power. These self-locking LEAP actuators can hold an item for 15 min at a 3 V working voltage and have a significant, reversible bending strain of over 2.0% (see Fig. 7b). Researchers created a multifunctional artificial muscle based on a concentric tube/rod built of polydopamine-coated LCE and low-melting-point alloy, inspired by the linked behaviour of muscles, bones, and nerves in animals [239]. This suggested artificial muscle exhibits programmable bending angle, position, and direction, deformation locking for supporting large items, and real-time angle variation monitoring.
Moreover, Aksoy et al. [240] introduced soft electromagnetic actuators that were integrated with SMP films, enabling them to deform and latch into a wide range of configurations (see Fig. 8a). The component was made up of liquid metal coils that were sandwiched between two SMP sheets and an elastomer cover. The SMP's rigidity was greatly decreased by heating it. When a magnetic field was present and current was flowing through a liquid metal coil, the device experienced substantial bending or twisting. Once the SMP was cooled, the shape was locked in, and the device could bear a load. Despite starting as a flat device, complex shapes could be achieved through this process. Also, Lalegani Dezaki et al. [241] provided details of an innovative idea for advanced bi-stable magnetorheological composite actuators (see Fig. 8b). A lightweight, bi-stable composite actuator with customizable magnetic patterns was possible because of the use of magnetorheological elastomer composites and 4D printing of conductive SMPs. The actuator was propelled by Joule heating and magnetic fields, and it might be left in the actuated position for a long time without any stimulation. The actuator had the potential used in mechanical and biological systems and had a lifting capacity of 200 g.
4.2 Pneumatic-Based Actuators
The use of pneumatic actuation is still the primary technology in soft robotics because it is lightweight, has a quick response time, and is easy to implement [242]. Pneumatic systems are cost-effective because they may be built using low-cost parts like solenoids and diaphragm pumps. These robots are composed of fibre-reinforced actuators and soft pneumatic actuators (SPAs), which comprise pneumatic networks [243]. SPAs are very flexible, safe, and capable of significant deformations. They also have strong power-to-weight ratios and are inexpensive to produce [244, 245]. Positive or negative pressures can be used to activate SPAs, and vacuum actuators are best for situations with limited volumes [246]. Based on their properties, SPAs display several sorts of movements [247,248,249]. Applications for SPAs include minimally invasive surgery, rehabilitation, helping the elderly, interacting with people and other robots, and handling delicate materials [250,251,252]. However, SPAs and robots still face challenges and limitations in terms of continuous input power to hold them in a required position. There have been developments in SPAs to make them variable stiffness and lock their shape in the required position. For example, Li et al. [253] introduced a small soft gripper that uses a variable stiffness module made of polylactic acid (PLA) and a retractable mechanism to achieve a soft-rigid hybrid action. By using the variable stiffness module, the gripper could increase its stiffness by 18 times without losing its flexibility. The variable stiffness module was divided into three regions that can be activated separately to create varying levels of flexibility, while a water-cooling system reduces the cooling time. The retractable mechanism allowed the gripper to adjust its layout, expand its workspace, and perform manipulations by opening and closing its fingers. The soft fingers, combined with the ability to adjust stiffness, can maintain their shape and grip objects with a high load, without the need for repeated heating and cooling. As illustrated in Fig. 9a, Pal et al. [254] provided a simple method for quickly producing prestressed soft actuators (PSAs) that used elastic energy storage to increase the capabilities of soft robots. PSAs were produced by pouring a silicone elastomer into moulds created by a SLA 3D printer, followed by curing in an oven at 60 °C for 45 min. The elastomer was stretched and affixed to an inextensible blend of polyester and cellulose paper soaked in a liquid prepolymer. The entire assembly was then cured to create different PSAs. The pneumatic channel of the PSAs was connected to a polyethylene tubing using a cannula, and the PSAs were actuated by pneumatic means using a regulated compressed air supply. The prestressed elastomeric layer of PSAs contains elastic energy that can be used to build grippers that can perch upside down at 116° angles and hold up to 100 times their weight without the need for any external power. Both the final shape of the PSA and its actuation sequence may be set by adjusting the direction and strength of the force utilised to prestress the elastomeric layer. Additionally, the short recovery time (of around 50 ms), made possible by the release of elastic energy held in PSAs, greatly increases the actuation rates of soft pneumatic actuators, especially following motions requiring severe deformations. The development of bistable soft robotic systems that leverage elastic energy stored in the PSAs as a source of power amplification for quick movements is another benefit of strategically prestressing PSAs. Employing these methods has proven to be extremely advantageous in terms of reducing the overall energy consumption required for tasks that span extended periods [100].
Moreover, jamming has advantages over fluidic actuation in terms of maximum stiffness and versatility, making it a popular mechanism in SPAs [255]. It allows for the creation of systems that have high stiffness variation while minimizing volume changes. This technique also assists in shape locking and reducing power consumption. Narang et al. [256] demonstrated how the nonlinear laminar jamming phenomena may link the ideas of soft robotics with traditional rigid robotics. The authors generated extremely accurate finite element models (FEMs) of multi-layer laminar jamming structures as well as a model for two-layer jamming structures that considers all stages of deformation. Shape-locking and changeable kinematics, two novel properties of laminar jamming that the authors exhibited, showed how this phenomenon may allow soft machines to act like conventional rigid robots reversibly (see Fig. 9b). To demonstrate how jamming might improve the performance of real-world soft robotic systems, the authors also constructed a simple grasper that is capable of performing both pinch grasps and wrap grasps. Also, Crowley et al. [257] built a gripper with adjustable stiffness using a technique called positive pressure layer jamming. Utilizing specialised additive printing, the gripper was constructed from two materials: a soft airtight actuation bellow and a somewhat rigid backbone. It was discovered that positive pressure layer jamming technology had a larger performance potential than traditional vacuum layer jamming because it could apply higher pressure, resulting in a 1.6 × higher payload capacity. This technology was created to modify the stiffness of the gripper. Using the positive layer jamming technique, experimental tests revealed that the soft gripper was able to modify its stiffness by 25 × factor.
Moreover, Lalegani Dezaki et al. [258] presented a brand-new design for FDM 4D printed SMP meta-structures on meta-laminar jamming (MLJ) actuators (see Fig. 10). Through hot and cold programming, negative air pressure, and both soft and harsh robot behaviour, these SSAs might act. Since they don't require constant negative air pressure to excite the actuator, MLJ actuators offer an advantage over traditional jamming actuators. Three-point bending and compression tests were used to assess the mechanical characteristics of the SMP meta-structures, which were 4D printed in a variety of forms. Using hot air programming, the shape memory effects (SMEs) and shape recovery of the meta-structures and MLJ actuators were examined. Better performance was shown by MLJ actuators with auxetic meta-structure cores in terms of contraction and bending with 100% shape recovery after stimulation. These environmentally friendly MLJ actuators were capable of lifting loads to 200 g in weight and can grip items of a variety of sizes and forms. MLJ actuators found valuable SSAs as grippers in long-term tasks where they could securely hold objects without requiring continuous energy consumption. These actuators were designed to maintain their gripping force over extended periods, making them suitable for scenarios that demand sustained holding capabilities. By utilizing their unique mechanical properties, MLJ actuators offered an energy-efficient solution for gripping tasks, reducing overall power consumption and contributing to longer operation times. Their ability to maintain a firm grip without constant energy input made them ideal for applications that prioritize energy efficiency and long-term stability. For wearable applications, Liu et al. [259] created a reconfigurable self-sensing pneumatic artificial muscle (RSPAM). By converting the soft actuator's expansion into contraction by fabric winding, the RSPAM was a modular multi-chamber soft actuator with a high contraction ratio that avoided compressing human tissue. The RSPAM has locking capability based on positive pressure jamming and self-sensing of contraction stroke based on liquid metal. The actuator's modular construction allows for configuration changes according to the application by varying the actuator quantity and fabric length. The actuator unit may also move independently on the fabric, giving the muscle the capacity to self-adjust. At 3 bar air pressure, the RSPAM was able to provide a driving force and contraction ratio of 70.14 N and 71%, respectively. Through square-wave tracking studies with closed-loop control, the displacement self-sensing capability was confirmed. Additionally, a preliminary evaluation of the RSPAM's capacity to help elbow movement revealed that it can minimise 53.05% of muscle fatigue. By utilizing this approach, individuals and organizations can effectively minimize the amount of energy required to complete a given task over a prolonged period. This reduction in energy usage not only leads to cost savings but also contributes to sustainability efforts by reducing carbon footprint and conserving natural resources. Furthermore, this method can also extend the lifespan of machinery and equipment by mitigating the wear and tear that occurs due to prolonged usage. Consequently, implementing this approach not only reduces energy consumption but also decreases the frequency of required maintenance, thereby saving on repair costs and minimizing downtime [260].
4.3 Shape Memory Alloy-Based Actuators
SMAs are considered smart materials because of their ability to undergo electrothermal actuation with high durability. Additionally, SMA actuators have many advantages, such as low voltage requirements, biocompatibility, compact size, and quiet operation, which make them suitable for various applications [261, 262]. SMAs are a type of heat-activated smart material that utilizes the SME [263]. This implies that a high current is necessary to quickly move the actuator and create complex structures or robots. The nickel-titanium alloy (NiTi) is commonly used in SMA actuator design because of its excellent strain properties, which can reach up to 7% [264, 265]. Our study will centre around examining soft actuators that employ SMAs to achieve a particular phase-locking capability. These soft actuators are engineered to react to different stimuli and adapt to environmental changes. SMAs provide these actuators with the ability to change shape, which is valuable in numerous applications. With the ability to lock into a specific phase, these actuators can maintain a predetermined form or position, thus enhancing their accuracy and dependability. For example, Gong et al. [266] presented a solution to the challenges faced by SMA actuators, which were flexible and lightweight but had lower force density and consume excessive energy. A locking system that can mechanically maintain an actuator's contracted condition without requiring constant current was suggested as the fix. To prevent the actuator from extending in the other direction while locked, the locking mechanism was built using a ratchet structure and pawl. A bistable retractable mechanism was also used to transition between the locking and unlocking states with a single one-way actuation. This solution has the potential to overcome the limitations of SMA actuators and improve their performance in robotics applications. Additionally, since wearable robots run on batteries, it's critical to increase the effectiveness of their actuation mechanism to increase their operating time. Recently, soft wearable robots that employ fabric-type soft actuators have attracted a lot of attention. (FSAs). These actuators are soft, flexible, and light, but they need a steady stream of energy to stay actuated and support any burdens they could be carrying, like an item. Park et al. [267] created a locking-unlocking mechanism (LUM) that can maintain the FSA’s contraction condition without requiring a continuous energy supply to decrease the energy consumption needed for holding motions in FSAs. The LUM, which included a ratchet-pawl mechanism, pawl rotating actuators (PRA) with SMA springs, and a wire encoder, was fastened to the top of the FSA. The wire encoder monitors the length of the FSA contraction, and the PRA enabled the pawl to lock and unlock the ratchet. The length of the FSA might be adjusted to a certain displacement using the LUM's displacement controller. The LUM allowed FSAs to sustain loads and retain their contraction condition without having to continuously use energy. With a projected improvement of at least two times, this can greatly increase the operation time of soft wearable robots employing FSAs.
Wang et al. [268] developed a brand-new class of composite actuators that made advantage of SMA to maintain a variety of configurations without requiring constant energy input. Fusible alloy (FA) material, Ni-chrome (Ni–Cr) wires, and SMA wires were incorporated into a smart soft composite (SSC) framework to create the actuators (see Fig. 11a). Continuous deformation was possible thanks to the SMA-based SSC structures' gentle morphing capabilities. By melting the FA structures using NieCr wires, the actuator's stiffness was managed. The actuator's stiffness in low- and high-stiffness states for various applied currents and heating times of the FA structure is measured in this paper, which also provides data on the actuator's design and manufacturing process. The findings demonstrated that the actuator's maximum rigidity was more than eight times greater than its minimum stiffness. Using actuators with one or two segments, the actuator's capacity to retain its form was examined, and the findings were compared to a numerical model. Also, Akbari et al. [269] created soft composite actuators with form recovery and preservation capabilities (see Fig. 11b). The resistive and SMA wires were inserted in the actuators, together with flexible elastomeric and stiff SMP layers. These materials were utilised to print the hinges for the bending actuators, and the embedded wires were then employed to use Joule heating to modify the temperature and bending stiffness of the hinges. They utilised a nonlinear FEM to forecast the deformation of the actuators and looked at how changing the thickness of the SMP layer affected shape retention and recovery. Without the aid of any outside mechanical force, the resultant actuators are capable of significant bending deformations, can maintain their bent shape, and can regain their original shape. This technology is promising for producing soft composite actuators having adjustable rigidity since it does not require complicated manufacturing procedures.
Moreover, Patel et al. [270] created SMA-based actuators utilising two 3D-printed frames with integrated SMA coils and a pre-stretched membrane. The actuator can swiftly switch between two oppositely curved states and produce a force of 0.3 N by inducing a snap-through instability after 0.2 s of electrical activation with an input power of 21.1 ± 0.32 W. Through 580 cycles of cyclical testing, the consistency and dependability of the actuator response are confirmed. The soft bistable actuator's quick response time and small size make it ideal for use as an artificial muscle in shape-reconfigurable soft robots that can move in a variety of ways using SMA power. Three soft robots are developed to illustrate this, including a reconfigurable amphibious robot that can walk on land and swim in the water, a multimodal crawler that can crawl and leap, and a rolling robot inspired by caterpillars that can crawl and roll. An extremely compact and dynamic bistable soft actuator was also created by Huang et al. [271] to enable multimodal soft robot movement (see Fig. 11c). The actuator was made of thermally pre-stretched electrical rubber, and they investigated how actuation affected tip force, bending, and temperature. The thermal elastomer actuator comprises a U-shaped SMA wire between layers of strained and unstretched thermal elastomer. With 3.7 V lithium-polymer batteries, this design creates an actuator that weighs 3.7 g, produces a force of 0.2 N, bends with a change in curvature of 60 m in 0.15 s, and can be operated at a frequency exceeding 0.3 Hz. Accordingly, several models and combinations were created utilising this method.
Actuators, which are crucial for enabling movement in soft robots, may be created from materials that can change form in reaction to outside stimuli. The actuator may be retained in a bent position with the help of a pre-stretched elastomer, which results in a decrease in the energy needed to maintain that position. This is important in soft robotics, as these robots are often powered by batteries with limited capacity and reducing energy usage can extend their operational time. Meanwhile, to achieve energy savings, shape-locking features can also be added to secure the target position. This means that energy input is only required to initially bend the actuator, and no further energy is needed to maintain the bent position. Using the pre-stretched technique and shape-locking features can significantly reduce energy consumption in soft robotics, which is particularly useful in portable or battery-powered devices where energy usage is a concern. Overall, this simple yet effective technique can provide a way to improve the efficiency of soft robotic systems [272].
5 Biological Water-Responsive-Based Actuators
A potential class of stimuli-responsive materials known as biological water-responsive (WR) materials can alter in volume in response to changes in humidity in the environment brought on by the adsorption or desorption of water molecules [273]. As a result of this characteristic, they can utilize evaporation and humidity gradients to perform a diverse range of tasks. The development of humidity energy using WR materials is essential in addressing global energy challenges, promoting sustainable development, and reducing environmental concerns like greenhouse gas emissions. Water evaporation caused by solar radiation is a common and abundant resource on Earth's surface [274, 275]. Throughout countless years of evolution, nature has created a vast array of unique biological materials that exhibit moisture-responsive behaviour. Plants, for instance, have evolved the ability to exploit fluctuations in daily humidity levels to disperse and bury their seeds for reproduction [276,277,278,279].
Through its WR characteristics, which cause the contraction or expansion of plant fibres in a specified direction, resulting in the bending of the plant tissue, some plants can disperse their seeds and expand their species [280, 281]. Moreover, various arrangements of cellulose in the plant tissue can cause different movements [282, 283]. Actuators of this kind can function as energy harvesters or operate with low energy consumption over extended periods [284]. For these seeds to migrate across the soil surface and locate an ideal germination location, the spiral awns must tighten and release. For example, Kay et al. [285] mostly concentrated on single-stage reversible motions using shape-changing actuators, offering no guidance for attaining controlled multistage locomotion (see Fig. 12a). They developed a methodology for developing a flexible, self-propelling, and programmable robot (Hygrobot) capable of locomotion using cyclic moisture introduction and removal. The Hygrobot utilized several multi-layer mechanisms that operated in a synchronized manner with moisture changes to generate locomotion. This approach has the potential to advance research in hygroscopic self-propelled mechanisms and promote further investigations into developing more complex kinematic mechanisms requiring articulated and multi-stage actuation for direct use in architecture or robotics.
A rising number of applications, including architecture, soft robotics, and medicine, are interested in developing flexible and hinge-free compliant systems based on plant motions [286,287,288,289]. For the creation of motile technical systems using biomimetic methods, Poppinga et al. [290] explored the principles behind plant motions and offered a succinct overview of them (see Fig. 12b). These bio-inspired compliant techniques included snap-through elastic instability actuation, modular aperture designs, edge growth-driven actuation, bending scale-like structures with functional bilayer setups, and origami-like curved-folding kinematic amplification. Pinecone architecture served as inspiration for the development of new structures employing 4D printing technology that are capable of multiphase movement sequences and compliant systems that respond to inputs. Although many adaptive systems that move without the usage of any operational energy have been inspired by plants, these systems are often developed and made in the shape of streamlined bilayers.
The asymmetrical distribution of movable plant structures has been imitated and Cheng et al. [291] proposed approaches for printing bio-inspired structures with compounding processes on the mesoscale utilising extrusion-based 3D printing. The technique is illustrated in Fig. 13a by applying the idea of a twining plant (Dioscorea bulbifera) to a self-tightening splint. D. bulbifera exhibits a squeezing force on its support to offer stability against gravity by the tensioning of its stem helix. In a wrist-forearm splint without external stimuli, the function of self-tightening is prototyped after the squeezing pressures of these bio-inspired motion mechanisms are assessed. By drawing inspiration from the multi-phase motion found in hygroscopic plant structures, Tahouni et al. [292] proposed a method for physically controlling the timing and sequence of shape change in 4D-printed hygromorphic structures. They were able to control the motion's timeline by adjusting the layers' porosity, water permeability, and thickness. The authors showed numerous prototypes, including a self-locking mechanism with a multi-step self-shaping and locking function and an aperture with overlapping pieces that finished their movement sequentially to avoid collision. These techniques, however, are not restricted to 3D or 4D printing processes. Recently, Luo et al. [293] created and produced self-drilling seed carriers using wood veneer, drawing inspiration from Erodium seeds (see Fig. 13b). Due to their hygromorphic bending or coiling actuators, these carriers exhibit great stiffness (4.9 GPa when dry and 1.3 GPa when wet) and enormous bending curvatures (1,854 m−1). The carriers can transport payloads of varied sizes and substances, including biofertilizers and plant seeds as large as those of whitebark pine, and have an 80% drilling success rate on flat terrain because of their advantageous resting position. To inform the design and optimisation of the carriers, the researchers analysed experimental data and numerical simulations. This device has applications in energy harvesting, soft robotics, and sustainable structures and has the potential to increase the efficacy of aerial seeding.
The actuation capabilities and material qualities of materials are fundamentally at odds with one another, despite major research efforts to enhance the properties of WR materials and boost their actuation capabilities. This is because most materials have soft properties, and the softer the material, the more quickly the actuator can react, but the less weight it can support. On the other hand, if the material’ s stiffness is increased, the reaction time shortens and soft actuators lose flexibility and safety. Therefore, one of the biggest challenges in the development of WR materials is striking a compromise between mechanical characteristics and actuation capabilities [294]. It is necessary to integrate WR-based smart actuators with sensors, controllers, and other mechanisms to complete tasks since they may function as either an actuator or detectors [295,296,297]. For this reason, actuators must be compatible with other functionalities. However, compatibility is hindered by material properties, energy supply, and working environment. Actuators are unable to support heavy loads because of their small size and soft material. Since they only need a little amount of deformation to complete jobs in particular application settings, they are frequently utilised as sensors, such as clever switches and smart drawstrings. Wet-sensitive actuators that are integrated with other devices must also have their energy needs addressed because they operate on humidity gradients rather than a power source. Since these actuators operate in humid conditions, integrated devices must be treated for anticorrosion, water tightness, and insulation to guarantee stable functioning after being installed.
6 Multi-Material Printing of Soft Actuators
The use of multi-material AM (MMAM) can decrease the time required for production and does not add any extra cost when manufacturing complex-shaped parts [298]. It also aids in reducing material waste and consumption [299, 300]. However, only a limited number of 3D printers available commercially can produce soft actuators using multiple materials. The efficiency of soft actuators may be increased, and there is room for study into ways to lower manufacturing and material costs in multi-material printing systems. It's important to find a balance between part quality and manufacturing efficiency like production rate. Using several materials or different compositions of the same material, MMAM may increase the usefulness and complexity of 3D/4D printed components [301]. As a result, unique, valuable SSAs with enhanced characteristics can be produced. MMAM may modify a component's characteristics for a variety of scales and uses [299, 302,303,304]. While elastomers and hydrogels are the least researched multi-materials in MMAM, they provide printing challenges owing to partial melting, problems with material feeding, buckling, high viscosity, and limited gelling temperature ranges [305]. Recent research, however, has demonstrated that a variety of soft materials that are excellent for soft actuators may be printed. One method to decrease material use is, for instance, direct silicone printing [306, 307].
As illustrated in Fig. 14a, Zhang et al. [308] also created a novel method for developing FRST (fast-responding, stiffness-tunable) soft actuators. The stiffness of the actuator might be raised by up to 120 times by including a layer of SMP into the completely printed actuator body while maintaining its flexibility and adaptability. The FRST actuator could finish a softening-stiffening cycle in only 32 s thanks to a printed Joule-heating circuit and fluidic cooling microchannel that allowed quick heating and cooling rates. To show the FRST actuator's high load capacity and form adaptivity, three of them were used to build a robotic gripper that could lift and grab items ranging in weight from less than 10 grammes to as much as 1.5 kilogrammes. Also, Zhang et al. [309] created structures that could be manipulated pneumatically to construct complicated 3D shapes with powerful mechanical characteristics utilising multi-material DLP 3D printing of SMPs (see Fig. 14b). The geographical distributions of SMPs are in charge of shaping the form change. Experiments have been carried out to print several structural balloons with complex established shapes, including a surface with the contour of a human face and a structure resembling a dog. This novel 4D printing method may be helpful in applications like biomedical devices, reconfigurable structures, and metamaterials because these structures also have strong mechanical rigidity and lightweight qualities.
Centrifugal multi-material (CM) 3D printing, a brand-new DLP-based 3D printing technique that can create large-volume, heterogeneous 3D objects with programmable composition, characteristics, and functionalities at the voxel scale, was also created by Cheng et al. [310] (see Fig. 15a). The CM 3D printing technology enables non-contact, high-efficiency multi-material switching without touch, in contrast to conventional multilateral switching techniques that need direct contact to remove the leftover resin. With a printing surface of up to 180 mm × 130 mm, the printer is now able to create heterogeneous 3D structures using a variety of materials, including hydrogels, functional polymers, and even ceramics. The CM 3D printing technique has shown to be a great tool for creating soft actuators. In terms of minimising material waste, while creating soft actuators with different materials, this process provides several benefits over more conventional techniques like casting or moulding. Casting or moulding techniques cannot be used to produce these outcomes without difficulty. Also, He et al. [311] created a DLP-based multi-material 3D printing capability that combines nonconductive materials with UV-curable ionic conductive elastomers (UV-ICE) (see Fig. 15b). This method made it possible to produce a variety of 3D flexible electronic devices, such as 4D ionic conductor-activated printing, flexible capacitive sensors with high sensitivity and a broad range of measured pressures, and resistive strain and force sensors. By joining ICEs with other polymers in 3D shapes, the suggested method enables the effective realisation of multifunctional flexible machinery and gadgets. However, the manufacture of soft actuators depends on the material. Reprocessable materials can reduce material waste in an appropriate manner [312]. They can be treated and remoulded several times without losing any of their original qualities, these polymers vary from conventional ones. These gadgets are perfect for use in soft robotic applications because of their special quality. The ability to easily customise these reprocessable thermoset soft actuators allows them to be moulded or printed into a variety of forms and sizes and calibrated to get the required result. As an illustration, a two-step polymerization technique has been created to produce 3D printing reprocessable thermosets (3DPRTs), which can be reshaped into a new shape, repaired by 3D printing fresh material on the damaged region, and recycled for future uses [313]. The novel methods offer an effective response to the environmental issues brought on by the expanding usage of 3D printing materials. However, this cannot be done on all materials due to the permanent covalent networks and they cannot be reshaped, repaired, or recycled. Nevertheless, these procedures enable the reduction of material usage and minimize waste, which could be advantageous for eco-friendly and sustainable flexible actuators.
Multi-material multi-nozzle 3D (MM3D) printing is a technique Skylar-Scott et al. [314] created that could produce soft voxelated matter with predetermined composition, function, and structure at the voxel size (see Fig. 16a). Their MM3D printheads could fluidly transition between up to eight different materials, making it possible to print intricate patterns with a volume that was close to the cube of the nozzle diameter. They used epoxy and silicone elastomer inks of different stiffnesses to make a Miura origami design and a soft robot that moves like a millipede. The variety of voxelated materials that might be designed and produced in intricate designs is substantially increased by this technique. While preserving the mechanical properties of a flexible actuator, this method is ideal for reducing material waste and consumption. Larson et al. [315] also introduced a brand-new technique known as rotational multi-material 3D printing (RM-3DP), which enables subvoxel control over the local orientation of azimuthally heterogeneous architected filaments. They have produced helical filaments with programmable helix angle, layer thickness, and interface area between multiple materials inside a certain cylindrical voxel by continuously spinning a multi-material nozzle with a controllable ratio of angular-to-translational velocity. Using this method, they were able to create artificial muscles that could contract and relax. These muscles were made of helical dielectric rubber actuators and hierarchical lattices, which had stiff springs and helical struts that were architecturally designed. This additive manufacturing technology offers a fresh approach to manufacturing multifunctional, bioinspired, architectural materials.
Magnetic materials may also be used in a variety of sectors, such as soft robotics, actuators, metamaterials, and medicinal devices [316]. When exposed to a magnetic field, these materials may change shape quickly and reversibly and move dynamically [317]. Hard magnetic particles found in magnetic SMPs (M-SMPs) have demonstrated greater shape manipulation capabilities. They are capable of shape locking and reprogrammable, untethered, quick, and reversible shape alterations in a single material system [318]. To investigate the increased multimodal shape transformation and adjustable features of M-SMPs, Ma et al. [319] created a printing method (see Fig. 16b). Through coordinated thermal and magnetic actuation, they showed several deformation modes with different shape configurations. This method makes it possible to create active metamaterials with customizable physical characteristics, such as a change in the Poisson's ratio. The M-MSP metamaterials’ multiphysics response allows them to switch between a variety of global mechanical behaviours, including growth, shrinkage, shear, and bending [320].
Meanwhile, traditional methods of creating synthetic morphing structures have struggled to balance the speed of shape change with geometric complexity. Using a 3D printing feedstock composed of PLA, thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), and Fe3O4 particles, Liu et al. [321] created SMPs with strong mechanical characteristics and magneto-responsive behaviour. According to the findings, the 3D-printed material had a uniform distribution of magnetic particles throughout polymer mixes and showed strong tensile strength and modulus. Heat and magnetic fields might be used to trigger the printed actuators. Additionally, it possessed a high efficiency of heat generation by magnetic particles as seen by its outstanding form fix ratio, recovery ratio, and quick magnetic reaction within 40 s. The scientists created and printed intelligent structures, such as honeycomb and bionic flower-like forms, that could be programmed by an outside force and fully recovered under a contactless magnetic field. Three pedals with various Fe3O4 composites might be used to regulate the layer-by-layer restoration of the flower-bud structure.
The development of a novel method by Lalegani Dezaki et al. [322] that coupled magneto-electroactive SMP composite structures with FDM 4D printing technology allowed the construction of a variety of forms and shapes with a focus on sustainability (see Fig. 16c). These composite constructions had a short reaction time and may be remotely controlled by electricity, making them an effective choice. Low-cost 4D-printed SMPC structures might attain different stable forms and repeatedly switch between programmed temporary and permanent configurations by being remotely programmed at high temperatures. This allowed for the creation of many designs inside a single structure without wasting material. This strategy is predicated on an understanding of the magnetic response, SMPC physics, and FDM production principles. The shape morphing of magneto-electroactive SMPC structures is investigated by FDM printing of adaptive structures with 1D/2D-to-2D-to-3D shapeshifting. Characterization investigations are carried out to determine how to manage the structure with a low magnetic field. In industries like packing, this technology has the potential to lower material waste and boost productivity.
Although there have been significant advancements in MMAM soft actuators, there are still several areas that require further investigation. These actuators are typically soft and flexible, which means they possess multiple degrees of freedom. Therefore, more research is needed on the control aspect of MAMM soft actuators and their material properties. System identification, dynamics modelling, and creating precise models that accurately depict the large-deflection dynamics of such actuators are all areas that need more research. A viable study area may also focus on self-folding structures and automatic control features that prevent self-collision or self-blocking. The mechanical characteristics of 3D printed soft actuators can be improved by employing innovative biocompatible materials for high-resolution 3D printing, such as bio-gel materials and composite layers of various materials. Finally, the utilisation of 3D scanners may drastically cut down on the processing time for creating complex and atypical geometries like prosthetic fingers.
7 Discussion
The movement of robots requires effective communication between the robot and its surroundings. In the past, robots have relied on stiff components and precise controls to generate force and control motion. However, soft robots are now challenging this conventional approach by utilizing flexible bodies and creating new strategies for robotic movement. This article highlights some of the techniques used to reduce the amount of materials and energy used in soft actuators, which can range in size from micrometres to centimetres and beyond. The latest and most significant findings were presented, emphasizing the fundamental concepts of soft actuators with low energy consumption and the ability to respond to multiple stimuli. A broad range of materials and approaches were examined to develop SSAs. The discussed soft actuators were constructed from polymers, fluids, papers, biological substances, or combinations of these materials. Each material had its strengths and weaknesses, and they showed promise for specific applications, such as medical or manufacturing industries.
Up until now, the primary way of activating soft actuators has been through different stimuli based on their characteristics. However, many soft actuators still require a rigid energy source and continuous control systems to generate the necessary forces for their intended movements [323]. There is potential for multi-responsive soft actuators that react to external stimuli like light, temperature, or electric fields to become wireless and sustainable, but there are still obstacles that need to be resolved such as limited scalability, sensitivity to environmental factors, and limited force output. Multi-responsive soft actuators represent a revolutionary new technology that has the potential to revolutionize numerous fields, including healthcare and robotics. These highly adaptable actuators offer greater flexibility than their mono-responsive counterparts, as they can recognize and respond to a wider variety of stimuli. Additionally, Soft actuators possess advanced features such as shape locking that can help in decreasing energy usage. Shape locking technique enables the actuator to sustain its form without requiring extra energy, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the actuator and lowering its overall energy consumption.
They improve efficiency by reducing energy consumption and optimizing performance. As an example, the process of shape locking allows these actuators to maintain their shape without the need for additional energy, which can improve their efficiency and decrease overall energy consumption. By utilizing shape locking, soft actuators can save energy and hold their shape for a longer period. For example, a soft robotic gripper that uses shape locking to maintain its grasp on an object can hold onto it without consuming energy to keep it closed. This can significantly reduce the energy consumption of the gripper and prolong its lifespan [324]. In terms of sustainability, these soft actuators have numerous advantages, including their ability to adapt to changing environments, their energy efficiency, and their use of smart materials that minimize waste during production. However, the production of these devices still requires the use of certain resources and energy, which can have negative environmental impacts. To ensure that the benefits of these actuators are not outweighed by their environmental costs, it is critical to consider their entire life cycle, including disposal and opportunities for recycling or reuse [325].
Moreover, WR materials that draw inspiration from biological systems have significant potential in several fields, including energy harvesting, soft robotics, medicine, and architecture. They possess a unique ability to volumetrically expand, or contract based on changes in environmental humidity, allowing them to utilize humidity gradients and evaporation phenomena to perform a range of functions. Furthermore, these materials can be leveraged to develop humidity energy, which is critical in addressing global energy challenges and promoting sustainable development and circular economy. These materials depend on the contraction and relaxation of fibres or cellulose arrangements to move across the soil surface and reach an optimal position for germination [326]. These actuators offer several advantages over conventional actuators. They use water or humidity as their primary energy source, which is readily available and renewable, making them a sustainable and environmentally friendly option, and require minimal energy to operate as they rely on ambient humidity changes rather than external power sources to move. Additionally, their adaptability to their environment, biocompatibility, and responsiveness to humidity changes make them versatile for various applications. There is still a basic problem, though, in that the actuation ability and material characteristics of WR materials are at odds. This is true despite major research efforts to improve material properties and boost actuation ability. Because the majority of WR materials are intrinsically brittle, they cannot support severe weights yet the actuator reacts swiftly. The flexibility and safety of soft actuators will be impacted by increasing the stiffness of WR materials, which will also speed up reaction times. As a result, a significant challenge in the development of WR materials is striking a compromise between mechanical characteristics and actuation abilities. Also, there are still some challenges to overcome, as external humidity gradients are complex and constantly changing, making it challenging to precisely control actuators, including their direction and distance of movement. Therefore, a new approach to stably control humidity gradients without consuming additional energy is required, as neither of the current control methods is perfect.
Furthermore, MMAM's realisation will be a pivotal moment for soft actuators. By modifying the thermal, electrical, mechanical, optical, and multifunctional aspects of components, MMAM opens up new possibilities for the design, complexity, and usefulness of soft actuators with better qualities. Potentially, MMAM may be utilised in soft actuators to combine the benefits of many materials, enabling the quick creation of high-quality structures with unique features. When compared to 3D printing with a single material, MMAM printing is more ecologically friendly, capable of producing cutting-edge 4D soft structures, and yields actuators that are stronger and more durable. MMAM may minimise waste materials and offer sustainability for soft actuators, which is important for production since it reduces material consumption and wastage. Alternative materials including elastomers and hydrogels have not been extensively researched, whereas research has mostly concentrated on specific polymer and metal-based multi-materials. In other instances, researchers have taken use of the drawbacks of connecting materials to introduce flaws into components because the advantages of using various materials in MMAM may not always provide acceptable results. Due to the diverse materials' variances in qualities like heat conductivity, melting temperatures, and expansion coefficients, regulating the additive manufacturing process can be difficult. Before MMAM processing, non-uniform qualities in intended multi-material components require work in material design, characterisation, chemical composition, and manufacturing restrictions. Other difficulties with MMAM include limited production throughput, poor scalability and surface quality, insufficient interfacial bonding, and significant cross-contamination. The lack of design rules on material compatibility and multi-material 3D printability makes it extremely difficult for AM procedures intended for single-material components to be used for MM components.
Although the techniques and features mentioned earlier are widely utilized to create SSAs, it is essential to acknowledge that there are other approaches to accomplish this as well. Researchers have delved into the use of biodegradable and recyclable materials in making soft actuators, while others have explored new manufacturing methods like 3D printing or microfabrication. Moreover, advances in materials science and engineering have led to the development of novel materials that provide improved sustainability and functionality for soft actuator applications. Thus, it is evident that there are numerous techniques and features to generate SSAs, and researchers should continue to investigate these options to propel the field forward.
8 Conclusion
The development of lightweight and flexible robots that primarily use renewable, environmentally friendly, and recyclable parts has increased in tandem with the movement towards SSAs. These developments help soft robotics in a variety of ways, including lowering weight, material, and energy requirements, encouraging autonomous operation, enabling in vivo deployment, and removing waste problems. Materials scientists are focused on developing sustainable materials that can perform at a high level while keeping production costs low, which will enable these materials to be used in state-of-the-art prototypes. Research goals include creating highly stretchable yet biodegradable actuators that are produced using eco-friendly fabrication methods like MMAM. However, fully integrating these components into autonomous robots presents significant challenges and requires the rethinking of energy consumption and their design. Reduced complexity, self-healing, or biodegradable component designs are advantageous for ideas like repair, disassembly, reuse, and refabrication. Future inventions must include sustainability, which will enable a wide range of potential uses in many ecological niches. In the end, low-energy manufacture of technological items and easier recycling processes will be made possible by renewable, affordable, and conveniently accessible resources. Robotics will play a significant part in this endeavour, but more research is required to close the gap to high-performance solutions or offer whole new routes for sustainable technological development.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M., & Giallanza, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies for manufacturing sustainability: a systematic review and future research directions. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5725. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125725
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Rab, S. (2021). Role of additive manufacturing applications towards environmental sustainability. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, 4(4), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.07.005
Mohammad Ebrahimi, S., & Koh, L. (2021). Manufacturing sustainability: Institutional theory and life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126787
Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: An exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150
Vuković, M., & Thalmann, S. (2022). Causal discovery in manufacturing: a structured literature review. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp6010010
Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Shen, J., Zhang, F., He, J., et al. (2023). Bioinspired hydrogel actuator for soft robotics: Opportunity and challenges. Nano Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101764
Armanini, C., Boyer, F., Mathew, A. T., Duriez, C., & Renda, F. (2023). Soft robots modeling: a structured overview. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2022.3231360
Kang, H. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, S., Kim, H., Park, J. H., Son, J. Y., et al. (2016). Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3(1), 111–128.
Iida, F., & Laschi, C. (2011). Soft robotics: Challenges and perspectives. Procedia Computer Science, 7, 99–102.
Kim, S., Laschi, C., & Trimmer, B. (2013). Soft robotics: A bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends in Biotechnology, 31(5), 287–294.
Cianchetti, M., Laschi, C., Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2018). Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nature Reviews Materials, 3(6), 143–153.
Manti, M., Cacucciolo, V., & Cianchetti, M. (2016). Stiffening in soft robotics: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(3), 93–106.
Zhang, S., Ke, X., Jiang, Q., Chai, Z., Wu, Z., & Ding, H. (2022). Fabrication and functionality integration technologies for Small-Scale soft robots. Advanced Materials, 34(52), 2200671.
Hines, L., Petersen, K., Lum, G. Z., & Sitti, M. (2017). Soft actuators for small-scale robotics. Advanced Materials, 29(13), 1603483.
Dilibal, S., Sahin, H., Danquah, J. O., Emon, M. O. F., & Choi, J. (2021). Additively manufactured custom soft gripper with embedded soft force sensors for an industrial robot. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 22(4), 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00479-0
Wang, J., Gao, D., & Lee, P. S. (2021). Recent progress in artificial muscles for interactive soft robotics. Advanced Materials, 33(19), 2003088.
Gao, Y., Wei, F., Chao, Y., & Yao, L. (2021). Bioinspired soft microrobots actuated by magnetic field. Biomedical Microdevices, 23(4), 52.
Xu, T., Yu, J., Yan, X., Choi, H., & Zhang, L. (2015). Magnetic actuation based motion control for microrobots: an overview. Micromachines, 6(9), 1346–1364.
Stella, F., & Hughes, J. (2023). The science of soft robot design: a review of motivations, methods and enabling technologies. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 1059026.
Chen, S., & Huang, W. (2023). A review related to MXene preparation and its sensor arrays of electronic skins. Analyst (London), 148(3), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2an01143c
Gonzalez-Vazquez, A., Garcia, L., Kilby, J., & McNair, P. (2023). Soft wearable rehabilitation robots with artificial muscles based on smart materials: a review. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 5(4), 2200159.
Morris, L., Diteesawat, R. S., Rahman, N., Turton, A., Cramp, M., & Rossiter, J. (2023). The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20(1), 18.
Huang, H., Lyu, Y., & Nan, K. (2023). Soft robot-enabled controlled release of oral drug formulations. Soft Matter, 19(7), 1269–1281. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2sm01624a
Beemer, M., Dils, C., & Nachtigall, T. Second skins: Exploring the challenges and opportunities for designing adaptable garments using E-textile. 9.
Kim, K., & Bae, J. (2023). Lifetime prediction of silicone and direct ink writing-based soft sensors under cyclic strain. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 10(2), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-022-00469-1
Hwang, J. S., Heo, J. S., Park, J. E., Park, J. H., Lim, E. S., Kim, S. W., et al. (2021). Design and fabrication of a disposable nanoactuator using 3D printing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 22(9), 1609–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00563-5
Cho, Y., Hwang, J., Park, M., & Kim, B. H. (2022). Fabrication methods for microscale 3D structures on silicon carbide. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 23(12), 1477–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00717-z
Bai, H., Qin, W., Jia, S., Ren, L., An, Y., & Bao, J. (2021). A new type of 3D printing molding equipment: overall structural design and the numerical simulation for the flow field characteristics of its screw module. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 22(10), 1639–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00564-4
Gwon, M., Park, G., Hong, D., Park, Y., Han, S., Kang, D., et al. (2022). Soft directional adhesion gripper fabricated by 3D printing process for gripping flexible printed circuit boards. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, 9(4), 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00368-x
Shin, J. H., Park, J. G., Kim, D. I., & Yoon, H. S. (2021). A universal soft gripper with the optimized fin ray finger. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, 8(3), 889–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00348-1
Liu, Y., Shang, S., Mo, S., Wang, P., & Wang, H. (2021). Eco-friendly strategies for the material and fabrication of wearable sensors. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing - Green Technology, 8(4), 1323–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00285-5
Liu, Z., Liu, Y. D., Shi, Q., & Liang, Y. (2021). Electroactive dielectric polymer gels as new-generation soft actuators: A review. Journal of Materials Science, 56(27), 14943–14963.
Lv, P., Lu, X., Wang, L., & Feng, W. (2021). Nanocellulose-Based functional materials: from chiral photonics to soft actuator and energy storage. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202104991
Chen, S., Tan, M. W. M., Gong, X., & Lee, P. S. (2022). Low-Voltage soft actuators for interactive Human-Machine interfaces. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 4(2), 2100075.
Jang, Y., Nabae, H., Endo, G., & Suzumori, K. (2022). Analysis of the multi-balloon dielectric elastomer actuator for traveling wave motion. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 333, 113243.
Zhu, Y., Liu, N., Chen, Z., He, H., Wang, Z., Gu, Z., et al. (2023). 3D-printed high-frequency dielectric elastomer actuator toward insect-scale ultrafast soft robot. ACS Materials Letters, 5(3), 704–714.
Li, Y., Liu, W., Gao, X., Zou, T., Deng, P., Zhao, J., et al. (2023). Carbon nanomaterials-PEDOT: PSS based electrochemical ionic soft actuators: Recent development in design and applications. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 354, 114277.
Feng, M., Yang, D., Majidi, C., & Gu, G. (2023). High-speed and low-energy actuation for pneumatic soft robots with internal exhaust air recirculation. Advanced Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202200257
Liu, J., Jiang, L., He, S., Zhang, J., & Shao, W. (2022). Recent progress in PNIPAM-based multi-responsive actuators: A mini-review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 433, 133496.
Stroganov, V., Al-Hussein, M., Sommer, J., Janke, A., Zakharchenko, S., & Ionov, L. (2015). Reversible thermosensitive biodegradable polymeric actuators based on confined crystallization. Nano Letters, 15(3), 1786–1790. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5045023
Kim, J., Park, H., & Yoon, C. (2022). Advances in biodegradable soft robots. Polymers, 14(21), 4574. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214574
Soni, A., Das, P. K., Hashmi, A. W., Yusuf, M., Kamyab, H., & Chelliapan, S. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of utilizing municipal solid waste as alternative building materials for sustainable development goals: a review. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100706
Khairul Akter, M. M., Haq, U. N., Islam, M. M., & Uddin, M. A. (2022). Textile-apparel manufacturing and material waste management in the circular economy: a conceptual model to achieve sustainable development goal (SDG) 12 for bangladesh. Cleaner Environmental Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2022.100070
Miriyev, A., Stack, K., & Lipson, H. (2017). Soft material for soft actuators. Nature Communications, 8(1), 596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00685-3
Chen, F., & Wang, M. Y. (2020). Design optimization of soft robots: A review of the state of the art. IEES. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2020.3024280
Runge, G., Peters, J., & Raatz, A. Design optimization of soft pneumatic actuators using genetic algorithms. - 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), pp. 393–400.
Heiden, A., Preninger, D., Lehner, L., Baumgartner, M., Drack, M., Woritzka, E., et al. (2022). 3D printing of resilient biogels for omnidirectional and exteroceptive soft actuators. Science Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abk2119
Tan, Y. J. (2022). Harnessing the circular economy to develop sustainable soft robots. Science Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abn8147
Higueras-Ruiz, D. R., Nishikawa, K., Feigenbaum, H., & Shafer, M. (2021). What is an artificial muscle? A comparison of soft actuators to biological muscles. Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 17(1), 011001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ac3adf
Won, P., Kim, K. K., Kim, H., Park, J. J., Ha, I., Shin, J., et al. (2021). Transparent soft actuators/sensors and camouflage skins for imperceptible soft robotics. Advanced Materials, 33(19), 2002397. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002397
Li, M., Pal, A., Aghakhani, A., Pena-Francesch, A., & Sitti, M. (2022). Soft actuators for real-world applications. Nature Reviews Materials, 7(3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00389-7
Zolfagharian, A., Kouzani, A. Z., Khoo, S. Y., Moghadam, A. A. A., Gibson, I., & Kaynak, A. (2016). Evolution of 3D printed soft actuators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 250, 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2016.09.028
Khalid, M. Y., Arif, Z. U., Ahmed, W., Umer, R., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2022). 4D printing: technological developments in robotics applications. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.113670
Mohammadi, M., Zolfagharian, A., Bodaghi, M., Xiang, Y., & Kouzani, A. Z. (2022). 4D printing of soft orthoses for tremor suppression. Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 5(4), 786–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00199-y
Jones, T. J., Jambon-Puillet, E., Marthelot, J., & Brun, P. (2021). Bubble casting soft robotics. Nature, 599(7884), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04029-6
Fu, C., Xia, Z., Hurren, C., Nilghaz, A., & Wang, X. (2022). Textiles in soft robots: current progress and future trends. Biosensors Bioelectronics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113690
Yu, Y., Wang, J., Han, X., Yang, S., An, G., & Lu, C. (2023). Fiber-shaped soft actuators: Fabrication, actuation mechanism and application. Advanced Fiber Materials. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-022-00254-4
Hao, Y., Zhang, S., Fang, B., Sun, F., Liu, H., & Li, H. (2022). A review of smart materials for the boost of soft actuators, soft sensors, and robotics applications. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 35(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00707-2
Ai, C., Chen, Y., Xu, L., Li, H., Liu, C., Shang, F., et al. (2021). Current development on origami/kirigami-inspired structure of creased patterns toward robotics. Advanced Engineering Materials, 23(10), 2100473. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202100473
Cole, T., & Tang, S. (2022). Liquid metals as soft electromechanical actuators. Materials Advances, 3(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ma00885d
Yin, R., Wang, D., Zhao, S., Lou, Z., & Shen, G. (2021). Wearable sensors-enabled human-machine interaction systems: from design to application. Advanced Functional Materials, 31(11), 2008936. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202008936
Chen, W., Sun, B., Biehl, P., & Zhang, K. (2022). Cellulose-based soft actuators. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 307(6), 2200072. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202200072
Ma, Z., & Sameoto, D. (2022). A review of electrically driven soft actuators for soft robotics. Micromachines, 13(11), 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111881
Lalegani Dezaki, M., Bodaghi, M., Serjouei, A., Afazov, S., & Zolfagharian, A. (2023). Soft pneumatic actuators with controllable stiffness by bio-inspired lattice chambers and fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Advanced Engineering Materials, 25(6), 2200797. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202200797
Bhatti, M. R. A., Kernin, A., Tausif, M., Zhang, H., Papageorgiou, D., Bilotti, E., et al. (2022). Light-driven actuation in synthetic polymers: a review from fundamental concepts to applications. Advanced Optical Materials, 10(10), 2102186. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202102186
Nie, M., Huang, C., & Du, X. (2021). Recent advances in colour-tunable soft actuators. Nanoscale, 13(5), 278–2791. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr07907c
Tan, H., Yu, X., Tu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2019). Humidity-driven soft actuator built up layer-by-layer and theoretical insight into its mechanism of energy conversion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 10(18), 5542–5551. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02249
Lalegani Dezaki, M., & Bodaghi, M. (2022). Soft magneto-responsive shape memory foam composite actuators. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 307(11), 2200490. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202200490
Mo, K., He, M., Cao, X., & Chang, C. (2020). Direct current electric field induced gradient hydrogel actuators with rapid thermo-responsive performance as soft manipulators. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 8(8), 2756–2763. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC06407A
Nandan, S., Sharma, D., & Sharma, A. K. (2023). Viscoelastic effects on the nonlinear oscillations of hard-magnetic soft actuators. Journal of Applied Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056816
Zhou, F., Zhang, M., Cao, X., Zhang, Z., Chen, X., Xiao, Y., et al. (2019). Fabrication and modeling of dielectric elastomer soft actuator with 3D printed thermoplastic frame. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 292, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.02.017
Marechal, L., Balland, P., Lindenroth, L., Petrou, F., Kontovounisios, C., & Bello, F. (2021). Toward a common framework and database of materials for soft robotics. Soft Robotics, 8(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2019.0115
Rodrigue, H., Wang, W., Han, M., Kim, T. J. Y., & Ahn, S. (2017). An overview of shape memory alloy-coupled actuators and robots. Soft Robotics, 4(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2016.0008
Khalid, M. Y., Arif, Z. U., Noroozi, R., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2022). 4D printing of shape memory polymer composites: A review on fabrication techniques, applications, and future perspectives. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 81, 759–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.035
Inamuddin, Boddula, R., Asiri, A. M., & Rajan, L. (2020). Conducting polymer/hydrogel systems as soft actuators. Actuators (pp. 211–252)
Wang, R., Zhang, C., Tan, W., Yang, J., Lin, D., & Liu, L. (2023). Electroactive polymer-based soft actuator with integrated functions of multi-degree-of-freedom motion and perception. Soft Robotics, 10(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2021.0104
Kwon, K. Y., Truong, V. K., Krisnadi, F., Im, S., Ma, J., Mehrabian, N., et al. (2021). Surface modification of gallium-based liquid metals: Mechanisms and applications in biomedical sensors and soft actuators. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 3(3), 2000159. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000159
Shouji, Y., Sekine, T., Ito, K., Ito, N., Yasuda, T., Wang, Y., et al. (2023). Fast response, high-power tunable ultrathin soft actuator by functional piezoelectric material composite for haptic device application. Advanced Electronic Materials, n/a,. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202201040
Tang, D., Zhang, C., Sun, H., Dai, H., Xie, J., Fu, J., et al. (2021). Origami-inspired magnetic-driven soft actuators with programmable designs and multiple applications. Nano Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106424
Amjadi, M., & Sitti, M. (2018). Self-sensing paper actuators based on Graphite-Carbon nanotube hybrid films. Advanced Science, 5(7), 1800239. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201800239
Kim, H., Yoo, H., Shin, S., Cho, J., Han, S., & Lee, I. (2023). Development of a TPU/CNT/cu composite conductive filament with a high CNT concentration. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 24(2), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00712-4
Xu, Y., Fei, Q., Page, M., Zhao, G., Ling, Y., Chen, D., et al. (2021). Laser-induced graphene for bioelectronics and soft actuators. Nano Research, 14(9), 3033–3050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3441-9
Wen, N., Jiang, B., Wang, X., Shang, Z., Jiang, D., Zhang, L., et al. (2020). Overview of polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposite hydrogels for electro-skin, actuator, supercapacitor and fuel cell. The Chemical Record, 20(8), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202000001
McDonald, K. J., Kinnicutt, L., Moran, A. M., & Ranzani, T. (2022). Modulation of magnetorheological fluid flow in soft robots using electropermanent magnets. IEES. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3147873
D’Anniballe, R., Zucchelli, A., & Carloni, R. (2022). The effect of morphology on poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene-chlorotrifluoroethylene)-based soft actuators: Films and electrospun aligned nanofiber mats. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2021.113255
Chun, H. D., Taylor, N. K., & Stokes, A. A. (2023). Energy-based abstraction for soft robotic system development. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 5(4), 2000264. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000264
Rumley, R., Preninger, P., Shagan Shomron, S. S., Rothemund, R., Hartmann, H., Baumgartner, B., et al. (2023). Biodegradable electrohydraulic actuators for sustainable soft robots. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adf5551
Orozco, F., Horvat, D., Miola, M., Moreno-Villoslada, I., Picchioni, F., & Bose, R. K. (2023). Electroactive thermo-pneumatic soft actuator with self-healing features: A critical evaluation. Soft Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2022.0170
Narayane, D., Taiwade, R. V., & Sahu, K. (2023). Review on development and performance of shape memory alloy/polyimide thin-film composites. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 38(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.2105872
Ren, L., Wu, Q., Liu, Q., Hao, P., Tang, J., Li, J., et al. (2023). Stiffness-tunable and self-sensing integrated soft machines based on 4D printed conductive shape memory composites. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111851
Oladapo, B. I., Kayode, J. F., Akinyoola, J. O., & Ikumapayi, O. M. (2023). Shape memory polymer review for flexible artificial intelligence materials of biomedical. Materials Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126930
Yang, Y., & Jiao, P. (2023). Nanomaterials and nanotechnology for biomedical soft robots. Materials Today Advances. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100338
Lin, D., Yang, F., Gong, D., & Li, R. (2023). Bio-inspired magnetic-driven folded diaphragm for biomimetic robot. Nature Communications, 14(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-35905-6
Yang, Z., Yang, H., Cao, Y., Cui, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). Magnetically actuated continuum medical robots: a review. Advanced Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202200416
Sol, J. A. H. P., Douma, R. F., Schenning, A. P. H. J., & Debije, M. G. (2023). 4D printed light-responsive patterned liquid crystal elastomer actuators using a single structural color ink. Advanced Materials Technologies, 8(3), 2200970. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202200970
Shao, Y., Long, F., Zhao, Z., Fang, M., Jing, H., Guo, J., et al. (2023). 4D printing light-driven soft actuators based on liquid-vapor phase transition composites with inherent sensing capability. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140271
Yue, X., Dong, C., Wang, Y., Cui, Z., Ren, Z., & Guan, Z. (2023). Three birds with one stone: design and synthesis of polyurethane actuator for executing heat, light and humidity triggered deformation. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141290
Zeng, W., Jiang, C., & Wu, D. (2023). Heterogeneity regulation of bilayer polysaccharide hydrogels for integrating pH- and humidity-responsive actuators and sensors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 15(12), 16097–16108. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c01244
Mandal, A., & Chatterjee, K. (2023). Emerging trends in humidity-responsive 4D bioprinting. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140550
Hartmann, F., Baumgartner, M., & Kaltenbrunner, M. (2021). Becoming sustainable, the new frontier in soft robotics. Advanced Materials, 33(19), 2004413. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004413
Heckele, M., & Schomburg, W. K. (2003). Review on micro molding of thermoplastic polymers. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 14(3), R1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/14/3/R01
Apsite, I., Salehi, S., & Ionov, L. (2022). Materials for smart soft actuator systems. Chemical Reviews, 122(1), 1349–1415. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00453
Mosadegh, B., Polygerinos, P., Keplinger, C., Wennstedt, S., Shepherd, R. F., Gupta, U., et al. (2014). Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Advanced Functional Materials, 24(15), 2163–2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201303288
Shepherd, R. F., Ilievski, F., Choi, W., Morin, S. A., Stokes, A. A., Mazzeo, A. D., et al. (2011). Multigait soft robot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(51), 20400–20403. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116564108
Aouraghe, M. A., Mengjie, Z., Qiu, Y., & Fujun, X. (2021). Low-voltage activating, fast responding electro-thermal actuator based on carbon nanotube film/PDMS composites. Advanced Fiber Materials, 3(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-020-00060-w
Choudhury, I. A., & Shirley, S. (2010). Laser cutting of polymeric materials: An experimental investigation. Optics & Laser Technology, 42(3), 503–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2009.09.006
Ghavidel, A. K., Lawrence, J., & Moradi, M. (2023). Influence of the different nanostructures of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene/carbon nanotubes nanocomposites on laser cutting properties: Machining and chemical aspects. Optics & Laser Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108973
Ling, Y., Pang, W., Li, X., Goswami, S., Xu, Z., Stroman, D., et al. (2020). Laser-induced graphene for electrothermally controlled, mechanically guided, 3D assembly and Human-Soft actuators interaction. Advanced Materials, 32(17), 1908475. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201908475
Wong, C. C., Dean, T. A., & Lin, J. (2003). A review of spinning, shear forming and flow forming processes. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43(14), 1419–1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00172-X
Tamayol, A., Akbari, M., Annabi, N., Paul, A., Khademhosseini, A., & Juncker, D. (2013). Fiber-based tissue engineering: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Biotechnology Advances, 31(5), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.007
Kuo, C. J., & Lan, W. L. (2014). 5 - gel spinning of synthetic polymer fibres. In D. Zhang (Ed.), Advances in filament yarn spinning of textiles and polymers (pp. 100–112). Woodhead Publishing.
Collins, G., Federici, J., Imura, Y., & Catalani, L. (2012). Charge generation, charge transport, and residual charge in the electrospinning of polymers: A review of issues and complications. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3682464
Tokarev, A., Asheghali, D., Griffiths, I. M., Trotsenko, O., Gruzd, A., Lin, X., et al. (2015). Touch- and brush-spinning of nanofibers. Advanced Materials, 27(41), 6526–6532. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201502768
Stoychev, G., Razavi, M. J., Wang, X., & Ionov, L. (2017). 4D origami by smart embroidery. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 38(18), 1700213. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201700213
Ionov, L., Stoychev, G., Jehnichen, D., & Sommer, J. U. (2017). Reversibly actuating solid janus polymeric fibers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(5), 4873–4881. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b13084
Acikgoz, C., Hempenius, M. A., Huskens, J., & Vancso, G. J. (2011). Polymers in conventional and alternative lithography for the fabrication of nanostructures. European Polymer Journal, 47(11), 2033–2052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.07.025
Tyagi, M., Pan, J., & Jager, E. W. H. (2019). Novel fabrication of soft microactuators with morphological computing using soft lithography. Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 5(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-019-0092-z
Stroganov, V., Pant, J., Stoychev, G., Janke, A., Jehnichen, D., Fery, A., et al. (2018). 4D biofabrication: 3D cell patterning using shape-changing films. Advanced Functional Materials, 28(11), 1706248. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706248
Buguin, A., Li, M., Silberzan, P., Ladoux, B., & Keller, P. (2006). Micro-actuators: When artificial muscles made of nematic liquid crystal elastomers meet soft lithography. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128(4), 1088–1089. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0575070
Na, J., Bende, N. P., Bae, J., Santangelo, C. D., & Hayward, R. C. (2016). Grayscale gel lithography for programmed buckling of non-euclidean hydrogel plates. Soft Matter, 12(22), 4985–5499. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sm00714g
Na, J., Evans, A. A., Bae, J., Chiappelli, M. C., Santangelo, C. D., Lang, R. J., et al. (2015). Programming reversibly self-folding origami with micropatterned photo-crosslinkable polymer trilayers. Advanced Materials, 27(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201403510
Jandyal, A., Chaturvedi, I., Wazir, I., Raina, A., & Ul Haq, M. I. (2022). 3D printing – a review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.004
Khare, V., Sonkaria, S., Lee, G., Ahn, S., & Chu, W. (2017). From 3D to 4D printing – design, material and fabrication for multi-functional multi-materials. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(3), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0035-9
Yap, Y. L., Sing, S. L., & Yeong, W. Y. (2020). A review of 3D printing processes and materials for soft robotics. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 26(8), 1345–1361. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2019-0302
Gul, J. Z., Sajid, M., Rehman, M. M., Siddiqui, G. U., Shah, I., Kim, K., et al. (2018). 3D printing for soft robotics – a review. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 19(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2018.1431862
Zolfagharian, A., Gharaie, S., Kouzani, A. Z., Lakhi, M., Ranjbar, S., Lalegani Dezaki, M., et al. (2022). Silicon-based soft parallel robots 4D printing and multiphysics analysis. Smart Materials and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac976c
Liu, Z., Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., Li, T., & Zhang, H. Sustainability of 3D printing: A critical review and recommendations.
Lalegani Dezaki, M., Serjouei, A., Zolfagharian, A., Fotouhi, M., Moradi, M., Ariffin, M. K. A., et al. (2022). A review on additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing of directed energy deposition (DED) process. Advanced Powder Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmate.2022.100054
Lee, J., Kim, H., Choi, J., & Lee, I. H. (2017). A review on 3D printed smart devices for 4D printing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(3), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0042-x
Chung, S., Song, S. E., & Cho, Y. T. (2017). Effective software solutions for 4D printing: A review and proposal. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0041-y
Shin, D., Kim, T., & Kim, D. (2017). Review of 4D printing materials and their properties. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(3), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-017-0040-z
Choi, J., Kwon, O., Jo, W., Lee, H. J., Moon, M. (2015). 4D printing technology A review. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0039
Ahmed, A., Arya, S., Gupta, V., Furukawa, H., & Khosla, A. (2021). 4D printing: Fundamentals, materials, applications and challenges. Polymer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123926
de Marco, C., Pané, S., & Nelson, B. J. (2018). 4D printing and robotics. Science Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aau0449
Zolfagharian, A., Kaynak, A., & Kouzani, A. (2020). Closed-loop 4D-printed soft robots. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108411
Adam, G., Benouhiba, A., Rabenorosoa, K., Clévy, C., & Cappelleri, D. J. (2021). 4D printing: Enabling technology for microrobotics applications. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 3(5), 2000216. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000216
Zhang, Z., Demir, K. G., & Gu, G. X. (2019). Developments in 4D-printing: A review on current smart materials, technologies, and applications. International Journal of Smart and Nano Materials, 10(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2019.1591541
Lalegani Dezaki, M., Mohd Ariffin, M. K. A., & Hatami, S. (2021). An overview of fused deposition modelling (FDM): Research, development and process optimisation. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 27(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0230
Saadi, M. A. S. R., Maguire, A., Pottackal, N. T., Thakur, M. S. H., Ikram, M. M., Hart, A. J., et al. (2022). Direct ink writing: A 3D printing technology for diverse materials. Advanced Materials, 34(28), 2108855. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202108855
Gao, M., Li, L., & Song, Y. (2017). Inkjet printing wearable electronic devices. Journal of Materials Chemistry, C. Materials for Optical and Electronic Devices, 5(12), 2971–2993. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tc00038c
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021). 3D/4D printing of polymers: Fused deposition modelling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA). Polymers, 13(18), 3101. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183101
Charoo, N. A., Barakh Ali, S. F., Mohamed, E. M., Kuttolamadom, M. A., Ozkan, T., Khan, M. A., et al. (2020). Selective laser sintering 3D printing – an overview of the technology and pharmaceutical applications. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 46(6), 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2020.1764027
Ge, Q., Jian, B., & Li, H. (2022). Shaping soft materials via digital light processing-based 3D printing: A review. Forces in Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100074
Jia, H., Sun, H., Wang, H., Wu, Y., & Wang, H. (2021). Scanning strategy in selective laser melting (SLM): A review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 113(9), 2413–2435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06810-3
Habibi, M., Foroughi, S., Karamzadeh, V., & Packirisamy, M. (2022). Direct sound printing. Nature. Communications, 13(1), 1800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29395-1
Wu, Z., Qi, Y., Yin, X., Yang, X., Chen, C., Yu, J., et al. (2019). Polymer-based device fabrication and applications using direct laser writing technology. Polymers, 11(3), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11030553
Ge, L., Dong, L., Wang, D., Ge, Q., & Gu, G. (2018). A digital light processing 3D printer for fast and high-precision fabrication of soft pneumatic actuators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 273, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.02.041
Mazurek-Budzyńska, M., Behl, M., Neumann, R., & Lendlein, A. (2022). 4D-actuators by 3D-printing combined with water-based curing. Materials Today Communications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102966
Alshahrani, H. A. (2021). Review of 4D printing materials and reinforced composites: Behaviors, applications and challenges. Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 6(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2021.03.006
Askari, M., Afzali Naniz, M., Kouhi, M., Saberi, A., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2021). Recent progress in extrusion 3D bioprinting of hydrogel biomaterials for tissue regeneration: A comprehensive review with focus on advanced fabrication techniques. Biomaterials Science, 9(3), 535–573. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00973c
Garces, I. T., & Ayranci, C. (2020). Active control of 4D prints: towards 4D printed reliable actuators and sensors. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.111717
Ge, Q., Li, Z., Wang, Z., Kowsari, K., Zhang, W., He, X., et al. (2020). Projection micro stereolithography based 3D printing and its applications. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ab8d9a
Carrell, J., Gruss, G., & Gomez, E. (2020). Four-dimensional printing using fused-deposition modeling: A review. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 26(5), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2018-0305
Bodaghi, M., Damanpack, A. R., & Liao, W. H. (2017). Adaptive metamaterials by functionally graded 4D printing. Materials & Design, 135, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.069
Moradi, M., Lalegani Dezaki, M., Kheyri, E., Rasouli, S. A., Aghaee Attar, M., & Bodaghi, M. (2023). Simultaneous FDM 4D printing and magnetizing of iron-filled polylactic acid polymers. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170425
Kausar, A., Ahmad, I., Zhao, T., Aldaghri, O., & Eisa, M. H. (2023). Polymer/graphene nanocomposites via 3D and 4D Printing—Design and technical potential. Processes, 11(3), 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030868
Sachyani Keneth, E., Kamyshny, A., Totaro, M., Beccai, L., & Magdassi, S. (2021). 3D printing materials for soft robotics. Advanced Materials, 33(19), 2003387. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202003387
Sánchez‐Somolinos, C. (2020). 4D printing: An enabling technology for soft robotics. Mechanically responsive materials for soft robotics (pp. 347–362)
Pei, E. (2014). 4D printing: dawn of an emerging technology cycle. Assembly Automation, 34(4), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-07-2014-062
Falahati, M., Ahmadvand, P., Safaee, S., Chang, Y., Lyu, Z., Chen, R., et al. (2020). Smart polymers and nanocomposites for 3D and 4D printing. Materials Today (Kidlington, England), 40, 215–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2020.06.001
Dilag, J., Chen, T., Li, S., & Bateman, S. A. (2019). Design and direct additive manufacturing of three-dimensional surface micro-structures using material jetting technologies. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.009
Bharani Kumar, S., Sekar, S. D., Sivakumar, G., Srinivas, J., Lavanya, R., & Suresh, G. (2021). Modern concepts and application of soft robotics in 4D printing. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2054/1/012056
Walczak, R., Kawa, B., & Adamski, K. (2019). Inkjet 3D printed microfluidic device for growing seed root and stalk mechanical characterization. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.111557
Yang, H., Lim, J. C., Liu, Y., Qi, X., Yap, Y. L., Dikshit, V., et al. (2017). Performance evaluation of ProJet multi-material jetting 3D printer. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 12(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1242915
Zhou, L., Fu, J., & He, Y. (2020). A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials. Advanced Functional Materials, 30(28), 2000187. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000187
Yan, J., Huang, S., Lim, Y. V., Xu, T., Kong, D., Li, X., et al. (2022). Direct-ink writing 3D printed energy storage devices: From material selectivity, design and optimization strategies to diverse applications. Materials Today, 54, 110–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2022.03.014
Ching, T., Li, Y., Karyappa, R., Ohno, A., Toh, Y., & Hashimoto, M. (2019). Fabrication of integrated microfluidic devices by direct ink writing (DIW) 3D printing. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.05.086
Zhu, H., He, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Jiang, C. (2022). Mechanically-guided 4D printing of magnetoresponsive soft materials across different length scale. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 4(3), 2100137. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202100137
Alsharhan, AT., M Young, O., Xu, X., Stair, A. J., & Sochol, R. D. (2021). Integrated 3D printed microfluidic circuitry and soft microrobotic actuators via in situ direct laser writing. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 31 (4), 044001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6439/abec1c
Mahmood, M. A., & Popescu, A. C. (2021). 3D printing at micro-level: Laser-induced forward transfer and two-photon polymerization. Polymers, 13(13), 2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13132034
Selimis, A., Mironov, V., & Farsari, M. (2015). Direct laser writing: Principles and materials for scaffold 3D printing. Microelectronic Engineering, 132, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2014.10.001
Aladese, A. D., & Jeong, H. (2021). Recent developments in 3D printing of droplet-based microfluidics. BioChip Journal, 15(4), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-021-00032-1
Jeong, H. Y., An, S., & Jun, Y. C. (2022). Light activation of 3D-printed structures: From millimeter to sub-micrometer scale. Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 11(3), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2021-0652
Xu, W., Jambhulkar, S., Zhu, Y., Ravichandran, D., Kakarla, M., Vernon, B., et al. (2021). 3D printing for polymer/particle-based processing: A review. Composites Part B: Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109102
Bhattacharjee, N., Urrios, A., Kang, S., & Folch, A. (2016). The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics. Lab on a Chip, 16(1), 172–1742. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc00163g
Bowen, J. J., Rose, M. A., & Morin, S. A. (2021). Surface molding of multi-stimuli-responsive microgel actuators. MRS Bulletin, 46(4), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-021-00077-5
Peng, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Shape changing hydrogels and their applications as soft actuators. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 56(19), 1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24724
Liu, Y., Shang, S., Mo, S., Wang, P., Yin, B., & Wei, J. (2021). Soft actuators built from cellulose paper: A review on actuation, material, fabrication, and applications. Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 6(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2021.06.004
Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Wu, Q., Chen, M., Huang, G., Zheng, J., et al. (2020). Three-dimensional programmable, reconfigurable, and recyclable biomass soft actuators enabled by designing an inverse opal-mimetic structure with exchangeable interfacial crosslinks. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 12(13), 15757–15764. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c02722
Kumar, K., Knie, C., Bleger, D., Peletier, M. A., Frieich, H. B., Hecht, S., et al. (2016). A chaotic self-oscillating sunlight-driven polymer actuator. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11975
Liang, Z., Jiang, S., Jiang, H., Zhao, X., Jin, B., Chen, G., et al. (2023). Arbitrarily and repeatedly programmable multi-layer soft actuators via “stress-caching.” Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139054
Sambyal, P., Mahato, M., Taseer, A. K., Yoo, H., Garai, M., Nguyen, V. H., et al. (2023). Magnetically and electrically responsive soft actuator derived from ferromagnetic bimetallic organic framework. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202207140
Lee, J. E., Sun, Y., Sun, Y., Manchester, I. R., & Naguib, H. E. (2022). Design of multi-stimuli responsive hybrid pneumatic – magnetic soft actuator with novel channel integration. Applied Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101681
Zhou, W., Xiao, P., & Chen, T. (2023). Carbon-based janus films toward flexible sensors, soft actuators, and beyond. Accounts of Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/accountsmr.2c00213
Iqbal, A., Hassan, T., Gao, Z., Shahzad, F., & Koo, C. M. (2023). MXene-incorporated 1D/2D nano-carbons for electromagnetic shielding: A review. Carbon, 203, 542–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.11.104
Chang, L., Wang, D., Jiang, A., & Hu, Y. (2022). Soft actuators based on carbon nanomaterials. ChemPlusChem (Weinheim, Germany),. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.202100437
Yang, Y., & Shen, Y. (2021). Light-Driven Carbon-Based soft materials: Principle, robotization, and application. Advanced Optical Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202100035
Li, J., Mou, L., Zhang, R., Sun, J., Wang, R., An, B., et al. (2019). Multi-responsive and multi-motion bimorph actuator based on super-aligned carbon nanotube sheets. Carbon, 148, 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.014
Zhang, Q., Wang, M., Ao, H., Luo, H., Deng, X., & Wan, Y. (2021). Embedding carbon nanotube to the surfaces of poly(ε-caprolactone) film for multi-responsive actuations. Polymer Testing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107086
Ji, Q., Jing, Z., Shen, J., Hu, Y., Chang, L., Lu, L., et al. (2021). Dual-responsive soft actuators with integrated sensing function based on 1T-MoS2 composite. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 3(7), 2000240. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000240
Zhang, Y., Ma, J., Liu, S., Han, D., Liu, Y., Chen, Z., et al. (2020). A “Yin”-“Yang” complementarity strategy for design and fabrication of dual-responsive bimorph actuators. Nano Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104302
Zheng, J., Png, Z. M., Ng, S. H., Tham, G. X., Ye, E., Goh, S. S., et al. (2021). Vitrimers: current research trends and their emerging applications. Materials Today, 51, 586–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.07.003
Liu, T., Zhao, B., & Zhang, J. (2020). Recent development of repairable, malleable and recyclable thermosetting polymers through dynamic transesterification. Polymer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122392
Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Ji, Y., & Wei, Y. (2021). Functional epoxy vitrimers and composites. Progress in Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100710
Yang, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, S., Wei, Y., He, X., Wang, J., et al. (2021). Vitrimer-based soft actuators with multiple responsiveness and self-healing ability triggered by multiple stimuli. Matter, 4(10), 3354–3365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.08.009
Chen, Q., Qian, X., Xu, Y., Yang, Y., Wei, Y., & Ji, Y. (2019). Harnessing the Day-Night rhythm of humidity and sunlight into mechanical work using recyclable and reprogrammable soft actuators. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 11(32), 29290–29297. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b09324
Tang, D., Zhang, L., Zhang, X., Xu, L., Li, K., & Zhang, A. (2022). Bio-mimetic actuators of a photothermal-responsive vitrimer liquid crystal elastomer with robust, self-healing, shape memory, and reconfigurable properties. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(1), 1929–1939. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c19595
Chen, Q., Li, Y., Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Qian, X., Wei, Y., et al. (2019). Durable liquid-crystalline vitrimer actuators. Chemical Science (Cambridge), 10(10), 3025–3030. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sc05358h
Shaukat, U., Rossegger, E., & Schlögl, S. (2021). Thiol–acrylate based vitrimers: From their structure–property relationship to the additive manufacturing of self-healable soft active devices. Polymer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124110
Liu, H., Liu, R., Chen, K., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Cui, X., et al. (2023). Bioinspired gradient structured soft actuators: From fabrication to application. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141966
Xu, L., Xue, F., Zheng, H., Ji, Q., Qiu, C., Chen, Z., et al. (2022). An insect larvae inspired MXene-based jumping actuator with controllable motion powered by light. Nano Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107848
Iravani, S., & Varma, R. S. (2022). Nature-inspired MXene nanocomposites with unique properties and multifunctional potentials. Matter, 5(11), 3574–3576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2022.10.006
Li, W., Sang, M., Liu, S., Wang, B., Cao, X., Liu, G., et al. (2022). Dual-mode biomimetic soft actuator with electrothermal and magneto-responsive performance. Composites Part B: Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109880
Wang, L., Li, N., Zhang, Y., Di, P., Li, M., Lu, M., et al. (2022). Flexible multiresponse-actuated nacre-like MXene nanocomposite for wearable human-machine interfacing. Matter, 5(10), 3417–3431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.052
Li, L., Zhao, S., Luo, X., Zhang, H., & Yu, Z. (2021). Smart MXene-based janus films with multi-responsive actuation capability and high electromagnetic interference shielding performances. Carbon, 175, 594–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.090
Chathuranga, H., Marriam, I., Chen, S., Zhang, Z., MacLeod, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2022). Multistimulus-responsive graphene oxide/Fe3O4/starch soft actuators. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(14), 16772–16779. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c03486
Liu, W., Cheng, Y., Liu, N., Yue, Y., Lei, D., Su, T., et al. (2021). Bionic MXene actuator with multiresponsive modes. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129288
Tang, Z., Zhu, W., Mao, Y., Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Huang, P., et al. (2022). Multiresponsive Ti3C2Tx MXene-based actuators enabled by dual-mechanism synergism for soft robotics. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(18), 21474–21485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c03157
Chen, G., Li, J., Li, N., Guo, C., Jin, P., Chen, L., et al. (2023). AgNWs/Ti3C2Tx MXene-based multi-responsive actuators for programmable smart devices. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.133576
Zhong, Y., Tang, W., Zhang, C., Jiao, Z., Wu, D., Liu, W., et al. (2022). Programmable thermochromic soft actuators with “two dimensional” bilayer architectures for soft robotics. Nano Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107741
Amjadi, M., & Sitti, M. (2016). High-performance multiresponsive paper actuators. ACS Nano, 10(11), 10202–10210. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b05545
Wang, X., Li, L., Liu, E., Wang, J., Han, X., Cao, Y., et al. (2021). High-performance multiresponsive bilayer actuators based on micro-/nanostructured polypyrrole for robust smart devices. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 4(5), 5349–5359. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c00689
Wang, X., Huang, H., Liu, H., Rehfeldt, F., Wang, X., & Zhang, K. (2019). Multi-responsive bilayer hydrogel actuators with programmable and precisely tunable motions. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 220(6), 1800562. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201800562
Liu, Z., Bisoyi, H. K., Huang, Y., Wang, M., Yang, H., & Li, Q. (2022). Thermo- and mechanochromic camouflage and self-healing in biomimetic soft actuators based on liquid crystal elastomers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202115755
Chang, L., Wang, D., Huang, Z., Wang, C., Torop, J., Li, B., et al. (2023). A versatile ionomer-based soft actuator with multi-stimulus responses, self-sustainable locomotion, and photoelectric conversion. Advanced Functional Materials, 33(6), 2212341. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202212341
Xing, S., Wang, P., Liu, S., Xu, Y., Zheng, R., Deng, Z., et al. (2020). A shape-memory soft actuator integrated with reversible electric/moisture actuating and strain sensing. Composites Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108133
Kim, J. H., Pyo, J., & Kim, T. (2020). Highly mobile levitating soft actuator driven by multistimuli-responses. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 7(21), 2001051. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202001051
Huang, L., Xie, X., Huang, H., Zhu, J., Yu, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2020). Electrospun polyamide-6 nanofiber for hierarchically structured and multi-responsive actuator. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.111793
Le, X., Lu, W., Zhang, J., & Chen, T. (2019). Recent progress in biomimetic anisotropic hydrogel actuators. Advanced Science, 6(5), 1801584. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201801584
Zhang, A., Wang, F., Chen, L., Wei, X., Xue, M., Yang, F., et al. (2021). 3D printing hydrogels for actuators: A review. Chinese Chemical Letters, 32(10), 2923–2932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.073
Lee, Y., Song, W. J., & Sun, J. (2020). Hydrogel soft robotics. Materials Today Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100258
Cho, K., Kang, D., Lee, H., & Koh, W. (2022). Multi-stimuli responsive and reversible soft actuator engineered by layered fibrous matrix and hydrogel micropatterns. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130879
Zhang, X., Xu, X., Chen, L., Zhang, C., & Liao, L. (2020). Multi-responsive hydrogel actuator with photo-switchable color changing behaviors. Dyes and Pigments. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.108042
Xiao, X., Yang, G., Chen, A., Zheng, Z., Zhang, C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Multi-responsive chromatic hydrogel exhibiting reversible shape deformations. Dyes and Pigments. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110364
Dallinger, A., Kindlhofer, P., Greco, F., & Coclite, A. M. (2021). Multiresponsive soft actuators based on a thermoresponsive hydrogel and embedded laser-induced graphene. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 3(4), 1809–1818. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.0c01385
Qin, H., Zhang, T., Li, N., Cong, H., & Yu, S. (2019). Anisotropic and self-healing hydrogels with multi-responsive actuating capability. Nature Communications, 10(1), 2202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10243-8
Yang, H., Lu, H., Miao, Y., Cong, Y., Ke, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2022). Non-swelling, super-tough, self-healing, and multi-responsive hydrogels based on micellar crosslinking for smart switch and shape memory. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138346
Chen, Y., Wang, W., Wu, D., Zeng, H., Hall, D. G., & Narain, R. (2019). Multiresponsive and self-healing hydrogel via formation of Polymer-Nanogel interfacial dynamic benzoxaborole esters at physiological pH. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 11(47), 44742–44750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b16139
Cheng, Y., Ren, K., Huang, C., & Wei, J. (2019). Self-healing graphene oxide-based nanocomposite hydrogels serve as near-infrared light-driven valves. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.126908
Zhang, F., Xiong, L., Ai, Y., Liang, Z., & Liang, Q. (2018). Stretchable multiresponsive hydrogel with actuatable, shape memory, and self-healing properties. Advanced Science, 5(8), 1800450. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201800450
Li, W., Lin, K., Chen, L., Yang, D., Ge, Q., & Wang, Z. (2023). Self-powered wireless flexible ionogel wearable devices. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 15(11), 14768–14776. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c19744
Lalegani Dezaki, M., & Bodaghi, M. (2023). Magnetically controlled bio-inspired elastomeric actuators with high mechanical energy storage. Soft Matter, 19(16), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3sm00266g
Yarali, E., Baniasadi, M., Zolfagharian, A., Chavoshi, M., Arefi, F., Hossain, M., et al. (2022). Magneto-/ electro-responsive polymers toward manufacturing, characterization, and biomedical/ soft robotic applications. Applied Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101306
Yarali, E., Noroozi, R., Yousefi, A., Bodaghi, M., & Baghani, M. (2020). Multi-trigger thermo-electro-mechanical soft actuators under large deformations. Polymers, 12(2), 489. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020489
An, Y., & Okuzaki, H. (2020). Novel electro-active shape memory polymers for soft actuators. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 59(6), 061002. https://doi.org/10.35848/1347-4065/ab8e08
Zhang, Y., Li, J., Zhou, H., Liu, Y., Han, D., & Sun, H. (2021). Electro-responsive actuators based on graphene. The Innovation, 2(4), 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100168
Chen, S., Zeng, S., Liu, S., Liu, H., Zheng, R., White, K. L., et al. (2019). A biomimetic interface with high adhesion, tailorable modulus for on-skin sensors, and low-power actuators. Chemistry of Materials, 31(21), 8708–8716. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02274
Kim, S. J., Kim, O., & Park, M. J. (2018). True low-power self-locking soft actuators. Advanced Materials, 30(12), 1706547. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201706547
Liu, H., Tian, H., Li, X., Chen, X., Zhang, K., Shi, H., et al. (2022). Shape-programmable, deformation-locking, and self-sensing artificial muscle based on liquid crystal elastomer and low–melting point alloy. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn5722
Aksoy, B., & Shea, H. (2022). Multistable shape programming of variable-stiffness electromagnetic devices. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk0543
Lalegani Dezaki, M., & Bodaghi, M. (2023). Magnetorheological elastomer-based 4D printed electroactive composite actuators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.114063
Zolfagharian, A., Mahmud, M. A. P., Gharaie, S., Bodaghi, M., Kouzani, A. Z., & Kaynak, A. (2020). 3D/4D-printed bending-type soft pneumatic actuators: Fabrication, modelling, and control. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 15(4), 373–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1795209
Xavier, M. S., Tawk, C. D., Zolfagharian, A., Pinskier, J., Howard, D., Young, T., et al. (2022). Soft pneumatic actuators: a review of design fabrication modeling sensing control and applications. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179589
Zongxing, L., Wanxin, L., & Liping, Z. (2020). Research development of soft manipulator: a review. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 12(8), 1687814020950094. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020950094
Wang, X., Zhou, H., Kang, H., Au, W., & Chen, C. (2021). Bio-inspired soft bistable actuator with dual actuations. Smart Materials and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac2e19
Lee, J., & Rodrigue, H. (2019). Efficiency of origami-based vacuum pneumatic artificial muscle for off-grid operation. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 6(4), 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00142-0
Al-Rubaiai, M., Pinto, T., Qian, C., & Tan, X. (2019). Soft actuators with stiffness and shape modulation using 3D-printed conductive polylactic acid material. Soft Robotics, 6(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2018.0056
Yi Sun, Yun Seong Song, & Paik, J. Characterization of silicone rubber based soft pneumatic actuators. - 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4446–4453.
Firouzeh, A., Salerno, M., & Paik, J. Soft pneumatic actuator with adjustable stiffness layers for multi-DoF actuation. - 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1117–1124.
Tawk, C., & Alici, G. (2021). A review of 3D-printable soft pneumatic actuators and sensors: research challenges and opportunities. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 3(6), 2000223. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000223
Su, H., Hou, X., Zhang, X., Qi, W., Cai, S., Xiong, X., et al. (2022). Pneumatic soft robots: challenges and benefits. Actuators, 11(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/act11030092
Pan, M., Yuan, C., Liang, X., Dong, T., Liu, T., Zhang, J., et al. (2022). Soft actuators and robotic devices for rehabilitation and assistance. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 4(4), 2100140. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202100140
Li, L., Xie, F., Wang, T., Wang, G., Tian, Y., Jin, T., et al. (2022). Stiffness-tunable soft gripper with soft-rigid hybrid actuation for versatile manipulations. Soft Robotics, 9(6), 1108–1119. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2021.0025
Pal, A., Goswami, D., & Martinez, R. V. (2020). Elastic energy storage enables rapid and programmable actuation in soft machines. Advanced Functional Materials, 30(1), 1906603. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201906603
Fitzgerald, S. G., Delaney, G. W., & Howard, D. (2020). A review of jamming actuation in soft robotics. Actuators, 9(4), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/act9040104
Narang, Y. S., Vlassak, J. J., & Howe, R. D. (2018). Mechanically versatile soft machines through laminar jamming. Advanced Functional Materials, 28(17), 1707136. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201707136
Crowley, G. B., Zeng, X., & Su, H. (2022). A 3D printed soft robotic gripper with a variable stiffness enabled by a novel positive pressure layer jamming technology. IEEE Robotic Automa Lett. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3157448
Lalegani Dezaki, M., & Bodaghi, M. (2023). Shape memory meta-laminar jamming actuators fabricated by 4D printing. Soft Matter, 19(12), 2186–2223. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3sm00106g
Liu, J., Ma, Z., Wang, Y., & Zuo, S. (2022). Reconfigurable self-sensing pneumatic artificial muscle with locking ability based on modular multi-chamber soft actuator. IEES. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3189154
Wang, S., Zhang, R., Haggerty, D. A., Naclerio, N. D., & Hawkes, E. W. A dexterous tip-extending robot with variable-length shape-locking. - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 9035–9041.
Lee, H., Kim, M., Lee, G., Kim, C., & Ahn, S. (2018). Shape memory alloy (SMA)-based microscale actuators with 60% deformation rate and 1.6 kHz actuation speed. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201801023
Kheirikhah, M. M., Rabiee, S., & Edalat, M. E. A review of shape memory alloy actuators in robotics. RoboCup 2010: Robot soccer world cup XIV (pp. 206-217). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Lalegani Dezaki, M., Bodaghi, M., Serjouei, A., Afazov, S., & Zolfagharian, A. (2022). Adaptive reversible composite-based shape memory alloy soft actuators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.113779
Nespoli, A., Besseghini, S., Pittaccio, S., Villa, E., & Viscuso, S. (2010). The high potential of shape memory alloys in developing miniature mechanical devices: A review on shape memory alloy mini-actuators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 158(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.12.020
Hasan, M. M., & Baxevanis, T. (2022). Structural fatigue and fracture of shape memory alloy actuators: Current status and perspectives. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 33(12), 1475–1486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X211057216
Gong, Y. J., Hwang, S. T., Yang, S. Y., Kim, K., Park, J. H., Jung, H., et al. (2022). Retractable locking system driven by shape memory alloy actuator for lightweight soft robotic application. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3213489
Park, S. J., Jeong, J., Won, M., & Park, C. H. (2019). Locking–unlocking mechanism actuated by SMA springs to improve the energy efficiency of fabric-type soft actuators. Smart Materials and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab49be
Wang, W., Rodrigue, H., & Ahn, S. (2015). Smart soft composite actuator with shape retention capability using embedded fusible alloy structures. Composites Part B: Engineering, 78, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.007
Akbari, S., Sakhaei, A. H., Panjwani, S., Kowsari, K., & Ge, Q. (2021). Shape memory alloy based 3D printed composite actuators with variable stiffness and large reversible deformation. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2021.112598
Patel, D. K., Huang, X., Luo, Y., Mungekar, M., Jawed, M. K., Yao, L., et al. (2023). Highly dynamic bistable soft actuator for reconfigurable multimodal soft robots. Advanced Materials Technologies, 8(2), 2201259. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202201259
Huang, X., Kumar, K., Jawed, M. K., Mohammadi Nasab, A., Ye, Z., Shan, W., et al. (2019). Highly dynamic shape memory alloy actuator for fast moving soft robots. Advanced Materials Technologies, 4(4), 1800540. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201800540
Jongwoo Kim, Dae-Young Lee, Sa-Reum Kim, & Kyu-Jin Cho. A self-deployable origami structure with locking mechanism induced by buckling effect. - 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3166–3171.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, R., Tan, W., Gu, Y., Yu, X., et al. (2022). Development and challenges of smart actuators based on water-responsive materials. Soft Matter, 18(31), 5725–5741. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SM00519K
Park, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Water-responsive materials for sustainable energy applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 8(31), 15227–15244. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA02896G
Sun, L., Che, L., Li, M., Neal, W. G., Leng, X., Long, Y., et al. (2023). Zero-waste emission design of sustainable and programmable actuators. SusMat. https://doi.org/10.1002/sus2.120
Burgert, I., & Fratzl, P. (2009). Actuation systems in plants as prototypes for bioinspired devices. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367(1893), 1541–1557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0003
Plaza, N., Zelinka, S. L., Stone, D. S., & Jakes, J. E. (2013). Plant-based torsional actuator with memory. Smart Materials and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/072001
Li, W., Matsuhisa, N., Liu, Z., Wang, M., Luo, Y., Cai, P., et al. (2021). An on-demand plant-based actuator created using conformable electrodes. Nature Electronics, 4(2), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00530-4
Isnard, S., Cobb, A. R., Holbrook, N. M., Zwieniecki, M., & Dumais, J. (2009). Tensioning the helix: A mechanism for force generation in twining plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1667), 2643–2650. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0380
Ha, J., Choi, S. M., Shin, B., Lee, M., Jung, W., & Kim, H. (2020). Hygroresponsive coiling of seed awns and soft actuators. Extreme Mechanics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2020.100746
Elbaum, R., Zaltzman, L., Burgert, I., & Fratzl, P. (2007). The role of wheat awns in the seed dispersal unit. Science, 316(5826), 884–886. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140097
Erb, R. M., Sander, J. S., Grisch, R., & Studart, A. R. (2013). Self-shaping composites with programmable bioinspired microstructures. Nature Communications, 4(1), 1712. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2666
Dawson, C., Vincent, J. F. V., & Rocca, A. (1997). How pine cones open. Nature, 390(6661), 668. https://doi.org/10.1038/37745
Wang, Q., Wu, Z., Li, J., Wei, J., Guo, J., & Yin, M. (2022). Spontaneous and continuous actuators driven by fluctuations in ambient humidity for energy-harvesting applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(34), 38972–38980. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c11944
Kay, R., Nitièma, K., & Correa, D. (2020). The bio-inspired design of a self-propelling robot driven by changes in humidity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th eCAADe Conference, https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2020.2.233
Evangelista, D., Hotton, S., & Dumais, J. (2011). The mechanics of explosive dispersal and self-burial in the seeds of the filaree, erodium cicutarium (geraniaceae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 214(4), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.050567
Harrington, M. J., Razghandi, K., Ditsch, F., Guiducci, L., Rueggeberg, M., Dunlop, J. W. C., et al. (2011). Origami-like unfolding of hydro-actuated ice plant seed capsules. Nature Communications, 2(1), 337. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1336
Chua, L. S. (2013). A review on plant-based rutin extraction methods and its pharmacological activities. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 150(3), 805–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.10.036
Iravani, S., & Varma, R. S. (2019). Plants and plant-based polymers as scaffolds for tissue engineering. Green Chemistry, 21(18), 4839–4867. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9GC02391G
Poppinga, S., Correa, D., Bruchmann, B., Menges, A., & Speck, T. (2020). Plant movements as concept generators for the development of biomimetic compliant mechanisms. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 60(4), 886–895. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa028
Cheng, T., Thielen, M., Poppinga, S., Tahouni, Y., Wood, D., Steinberg, T., et al. (2021). Bio-inspired motion mechanisms: Computational design and material programming of self-adjusting 4D-printed wearable systems. Advanced Science, 8(13), 2100411. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100411
Tahouni, Y., Krüger, F., Poppinga, S., Wood, D., Pfaff, M., Rühe, J., et al. (2021). Programming sequential motion steps in 4D-printed hygromorphs by architected mesostructure and differential hygro-responsiveness. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ac0c8e
Luo, D., Maheshwari, A., Danielescu, A., Li, J., Yang, Y., Tao, Y., et al. (2023). Autonomous self-burying seed carriers for aerial seeding. Nature, 614(7948), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05656-3
Le Duigou, A., Fruleux, T., Matsuzaki, R., Chabaud, G., Ueda, M., & Castro, M. (2021). 4D printing of continuous flax-fibre based shape-changing hygromorph biocomposites: Towards sustainable metamaterials. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110158
Kim, H., & Kwon, S. (2013). Water-responsive polymer composites on the move. Science, 339(6116), 150–151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232733
Liang, W., Liu, H., Wang, K., Qian, Z., Ren, L., & Ren, L. (2020). Comparative study of robotic artificial actuators and biological muscle. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 12(6), 1687814020933409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020933409
Ren, L., Li, B., Wei, G., Wang, K., Song, Z., Wei, Y., et al. (2021) Biology and bioinspiration of soft robotics: Actuation sensing and system integration. iScience https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103075
Li, F., Macdonald, N. P., Guijt, R. M., & Breadmore, M. C. (2019). Increasing the functionalities of 3D printed microchemical devices by single material, multimaterial, and print-pause-print 3D printing. Lab on a Chip, 19(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8LC00826D
Xu, X., Tan, Y. H., Ding, J., & Guan, C. (2022). 3D printing of next-generation electrochemical energy storage devices: From multiscale to multimaterial. Energy & Environmental Materials, 5(2), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12175
Nazir, A., Gokcekaya, O., Md Masum Billah, K., Ertugrul, O., Jiang, J., Sun, J., et al. (2023). Multi-material additive manufacturing: A systematic review of design, properties, applications, challenges, and 3D printing of materials and cellular metamaterials. Materials & Design https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111661
García-Collado, A., Blanco, J. M., Gupta, M. K., & Dorado-Vicente, R. (2022). Advances in polymers based multi-material additive-manufacturing techniques: State-of-art review on properties and applications. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102577
Boulaala, M., Elmessaoudi, D., Buj-Corral, I., El Mesbahi, J., Ezbakhe, O., Astito, A., et al. (2020). Towards design of mechanical part and electronic control of multi-material/multicolor fused deposition modeling 3D printing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 110(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05847-0
Zheng, Y., Zhang, W., Baca Lopez, D. M., & Ahmad, R. (2021). Scientometric analysis and systematic review of multi-material additive manufacturing of polymers. Polymers, 13(12), 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13121957
Šakalys, R., Mohammadlou, B. S., & Raghavendra, R. (2022). Fabrication of multi-material electronic components applying non-contact printing technologies: A review. Results in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100578
Ge, Q., Chen, Z., Cheng, J., Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., Li, H., et al. (2021). 3D printing of highly stretchable hydrogel with diverse UV curable polymers. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba4261
Cafferty, B. J., Campbell, V. E., Rothemund, P., Preston, D. J., Ainla, A., Fulleringer, N., et al. (2019). Fabricating 3D structures by combining 2D printing and relaxation of strain. Advanced Materials Technologies, 4(1), 1800299. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201800299
Yirmibesoglu, O. D., Morrow, J., Walker, S., Gosrich, W., Canizares, R., Kim, H., et al. Direct 3D printing of silicone elastomer soft robots and their performance comparison with molded counterparts.-2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), pp. 295–302.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, N., Hingorani, H., Ding, N., Wang, D., Yuan, C., et al. (2019). Fast-response, stiffness-tunable soft actuator by hybrid multimaterial 3D printing. Advanced Functional Materials, 29(15), 1806698. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201806698
Zhang, Q., Kuang, X., Weng, S., Yue, L., Roach, D. J., Fang, D., et al. (2021). Shape-memory balloon structures by pneumatic multi-material 4D printing. Advanced Functional Materials, 31(21), 2010872. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202010872
Cheng, J., Wang, R., Sun, Z., Liu, Q., He, X., Li, H., et al. (2022). Centrifugal multimaterial 3D printing of multifunctional heterogeneous objects. Nature Communications, 13(1), 7931. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35622-6
He, X., Cheng, J., Li, Z., Ye, H., Wei, X., Li, H., et al. (2023). Multimaterial three-dimensional printing of ultraviolet-curable ionic conductive elastomers with diverse polymers for multifunctional flexible electronics. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 15(2), 3455–3466. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c18954
Yuan, T., Zhang, L., Li, T., Tu, R., & Sodano, H. A. (2020). 3D printing of a self-healing, high strength, and reprocessable thermoset. Polymer Chemistry, 11(40), 6441–6452. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0PY00819B
Zhang, B., Kowsari, K., Serjouei, A., Dunn, M. L., & Ge, Q. (2018). Reprocessable thermosets for sustainable three-dimensional printing. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1831. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04292-8
Skylar-Scott, M. A., Mueller, J., Visser, C. W., & Lewis, J. A. (2019). Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. Nature, 575(7782), 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1736-8
Larson, N. M., Mueller, J., Chortos, A., Davidson, Z. S., Clarke, D. R., & Lewis, J. A. (2023). Rotational multimaterial printing of filaments with subvoxel control. Nature, 613(7945), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05490-7
Périgo, E. A., Jacimovic, J., García Ferré, F., & Scherf, L. M. (2019). Additive manufacturing of magnetic materials. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100870
Zhang, C., Li, X., Jiang, L., Tang, D., Xu, H., Zhao, P., et al. (2021). 3D printing of functional magnetic materials: From design to applications. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202102777
van Vilsteren, S. J. M., Yarmand, H., & Ghodrat, S. (2021). Review of magnetic shape memory polymers and magnetic soft materials. Magnetochemistry, 7(9), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry7090123
Ma, C., Wu, S., Ze, Q., Kuang, X., Zhang, R., Qi, H. J., et al. (2021). Magnetic multimaterial printing for multimodal shape transformation with tunable properties and shiftable mechanical behaviors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 13(11), 12639–12648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c13863
Zhang, J., Yin, Z., Ren, L., Liu, Q., Ren, L., Yang, X., et al. (2022). Advances in 4D printed shape memory polymers: From 3D printing, smart excitation, and response to applications. Advanced Materials Technologies, 7(9), 2101568. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202101568
Liu, H., Wang, F., Wu, W., Dong, X., & Sang, L. (2023). 4D printing of mechanically robust PLA/TPU/Fe3O4 magneto-responsive shape memory polymers for smart structures. Composites. Part B, Engineering https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110382
Lalegani Dezaki, M., & Bodaghi, M. (2023). Sustainable 4D printing of magneto-electroactive shape memory polymer composites. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 126(1–2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11101-0
El-Atab, N., Mishra, R. B., Al-Modaf, F., Joharji, L., Alsharif, A. A., Alamoudi, H., et al. (2020). Soft actuators for soft robotic applications: A review. Advanced Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000128
Arif, Z. U., Khalid, M. Y., Sheikh, M. F., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2022). Biopolymeric sustainable materials and their emerging applications. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108159
Khalid, M. Y., Arif, Z. U., Ahmed, W., & Arshad, H. (2022). Recent trends in recycling and reusing techniques of different plastic polymers and their composite materials. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00382
Khalid, M. Y., & Arif, Z. U. (2022). Novel biopolymer-based sustainable composites for food packaging applications: a narrative review. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100892
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This paper is an invited paper (Invited Review).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lalegani Dezaki, M., Bodaghi, M. A Review of Recent Manufacturing Technologies for Sustainable Soft Actuators. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 10, 1661–1710 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-023-00533-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-023-00533-4