Abstract
Surface irrigation type is one of the most widely used in the world due to its low cost investment. However it is complex method of applying water to soil, because of extreme difficult to achieve good control over the highly variable nature of the movement of water across a soil surface and its infiltration into the soil over a season. This study is attempted to optimize furrow irrigation decision variables at Wonji Shoa sugar estate using field experiment and two simulation models. The field data of experimental site was measured as input for models and simulated using the SIRMOD software and WinSRFR software package. Furrow lengths of 32 m, 48 m and 64 m, slopes of 0.05%, 0.075% and 0.1%and flow rates of 3 l/sec, 4 l/sec and 5 l/sec were analyzed with three replication using volume balance method and two simulation models. The study found optimum decision variables that gave maximum application efficiency and distribution uniformity were slope of 0.1%, furrow length of 32 m and inflow rate of 4 l/sec at cut-off time of 15.79 min. Thus, to improve the performance of furrow irrigation practice, optimal furrow length, inflow rates and cut-off time found by this study should be adopted. Findings from the study would serve as a source of information for use by policy makers and planners during the design and Operation of irrigation development programs. It does not focus on yield related optimization. So, it is open for the future research to conduct yield related optimization of the decision variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Surface irrigation is the application of water over the land for the purpose of crop production and it is the most common method of irrigation and accounts for 95% of irrigation in the world. It is also well suited for use on both small and large schemes [17, 21]. As an alternative, surface irrigation method is widely used due to low capital investment involved, low operating costs and ease of operation and maintenance [21]. Also surface irrigation systems are less affected by climatic and water quality characteristics. However, surface irrigation systems are typically less efficient in applying water than pressurized irrigation systems because of extreme difficult to achieve good control over the highly variable nature of the movement of water across a soil surface and its infiltration into the soil over a season. Therefore, the land under surface irrigation tends to be more affected by water-logging and soil salinity if adequate drainage is not provided [12].
Even though, it is unrealistic to apply irrigation without loss. These losses appears in the application of irrigation water too less or too much and too short or too large of furrow length. Deep percolation results when water is applied too long to the field and/or the variation of intake opportunity time is too large (inflow rates are too small). These two problems can be remedied by adjusting the time of cutoff (tco) and inflow rate (Qo) [42].
Availability of irrigation water itself is becoming a constraint in some sites, possibly because more farmers have started irrigating than schemes were designed to support [34]. From two selected scheme, [14] stated as the efficiency of the system depends on the strength of institutional set up of the scheme. Adequate water management for irrigated agriculture holds a considerable significance for the future of the Ethiopian agriculture. Irrigation water for Wonji-Shoa Sugar Estate scheme is supplied via a pumping station located on Awash River [9]. In Awash Basin, many industries and major cities abstract water from Awash River. This creates a risk as growing volumes of industrial effluent and urban wastewater are contaminating the water and causing scarcity by reducing the quality of surface water available for downstream users [19]. Further, [19] stated there was a high water application rate compared to irrigation water requirement of crops in most irrigated areas. Poor water management and excess of irrigation water application in turn created the problems of environmental issues (water-logging and salinization), escalating multi-sectoral water demands in the basin and conflict between upstream user (Wonji) and downstream user (Merti) [5, 16]. For this reason, water management at Wonji-Shoa Large-scale Irrigation Scheme needs critical attention which failed under low efficiency of the system because of failure in management and design [9]. Significant water savings can be achieved through improving the application of irrigation water at the field level by reducing the amount of water lost to the crop through deep percolation and surface runoff [8]. This can be achieved only by efficient irrigation systems designed at farm level combined with optimization of management decision variables like: the furrow discharge, cut of time and furrow length as decision support variables [13, 20].
Decision variables are parameters an irrigation designer uses. The variables are modified until acceptable irrigation performance is reached. These are normally the field dimensions (length and width), the flow rate and the cutoff time [21]. The main design and managing irrigation events in surface irrigation considers choosing of decision variables [21, 28]. These variables are unknown and should be specified by the optimization [23]. The optimized variables are used to modify future irrigations in order to achieve the desired level of performance [26]. Based on principal of cost minimization and irrigation efficiency maximization, [24] described the result of the calculations related to inflow rate, length of furrow, irrigation time and irrigation efficiency. The authors stated that with the minimization of cost results of minimized inflow rate and time cutoff in respect to the irrigation efficiency is maximized [32]. Also optimized the inflow rate using simulated advance and recession curves and gets 0.03m3/min/m. The authors stated that the optimized inflow rate gave satisfactory water distribution uniformity and application efficiency for three growth stages of maize: 87% and 89% for emergency stage, 75% and 60% for development stage, and 95% and 89% for maturing stage respectively. In addition, for the existing furrow length (100 m) with uniform inflow rate, [38] obtained optimum inflow rate (5 l/sec) and cut-off times (45 min) that showed better application efficiency (81.16%) and better distribution uniformity (93.43%) of Irrigation System at Tendaho Sugar Estate.
Different researchers like [6, 15, 25] in Wonji/Shoa plantation estate have conducted researches focusing on performance assessment of pumps, canals and night storage reservoir. But for water use efficiency, an assessment of performance of on-farm irrigation is vital and resulted from optimization of decision variables which obtained by both numerical and simulation models. From different study, the reported result revealed that as the optimized furrow irrigation decision variables leads to increase the efficiency and the uniformity distribution of water in the furrow. The objectives of this paper is to optimize furrow irrigation decision variables (inflow rate, cutoff time and furrow length) using algebraic equation and simulation model based. The study has the potential benefit of improving irrigation efficiency and reducing stress on water resources.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental site
The field experiments were carried out at Wonji Shoa Sugar Estate, Oromiya, Ethiopia located at latitude of 80°30' to 8°35' N and longitude of 39°10' to 39°20' E at an altitude of 1540 m above mean sea level (Fig. 1). The Estate was established in 1951 G.C.by foreign private investors, Ethiopian government and Netherland’s H.V.A. Company. Wonji sugar factory is one of the first modern sugar industry in Ethiopia with initial production capacity of 140 tons of sugar per day. Then, Shoa Sugar Factory was established in 1962 with 170 tons of sugar production capacity per day. The two factories are known by the name of Wonji Shoa Sugar Factory (WSSF) and administered as one factory.
2.2 Data collection techniques/procedures
Prior to any activities, the land had sloped by machine to predetermined single (adjusted once) slope level which was adopted by organization and then, sloped furrow back leveled to zero percent by human power for experiment. After all furrows were leveled, change in elevation of each slope was calculated and drilled at downstream end of the furrow.
The primary data was collected from field focusing on furrow irrigation practices and the secondary data also was collected from the Wonji Sugar Estate of planning and plantation office. The primary data used as basic input for SIRMOD and WinSRFR models were collected from the furrows field. They were: field topography; inflow rate; furrow geometries (furrow length, depth, width spacing, bottom slope, cross sectional area and wetted perimeter); soil infiltration parameters, soil roughness, application depth and cut-off time. The required data such as furrow characteristics and soil moisture contents were collected from March to June 2020.
The experiment was prepared with aim of optimizing that furrow length, inflow rate and cut-off time of the existing system in practice. This study is experimental and observational types of research that evaluate the existing system and gives the optional improvement by conducting the experiment. The treatments applied were slopes, furrow lengths and flow rates. Each treatment has three levels with three replications. The treatment levels were 0.05, 0.075, 0.1% furrow slopes (S), 32, 48, 64 m furrow lengths (L) and 3, 4, 5 l/s flow rates (Q) depending on the maximum non erosive stream size with split-split plot design where slopes constituted the main plot factor, furrow lengths the sub-plot factors and flow rates the sub-sub-plot factors. The selection of these parameters depends on the estate background. The average slope used at the estate was 0.05%, the three of furrow length was used at the estate, and however 32 m were dominantly used. The arrangement was shown in Appendix Table 12.
Each furrow set was consisting of four furrows having 5.8 m width and flow rates were assigned randomly. The middle three furrows were used for testing of irrigation event parameters and the outer furrows used as a buffer to control the effects of lateral flow; the field layout was shown in Fig. 2.
The experiment was conducted under normal field conditions over two irrigation events. Amount of water to be applied during each event (Zreq) was determined based on soil moisture deficit level at root depth assuming equal to required depth of application during each irrigation event. The irrigation schedule is varying depends on the soil type of the field. The soil type of the study area is heavy soil type and the irrigation schedule for heavy soil at the estate is from 14 to 15 days. Furrow cross sections were determined using profile-meter and the data were used to compute infiltration parameters by volume balance analysis following procedure stated by [37]. The computed parameters values were shown in Table 1.
The procedure begins by determining basic infiltration rate (fo) from inflow outflow hydro graph, by using the following equation stated by [41]:
Next volume balance equation is defined as,
where Ao = cross sectional area of flow at inlet, (m2) Qo = inlet discharge, (m3/min) T = elapsed time since irrigation started, (min) δy =surface storage shape factor (ranged 0.70 to 0.80) δz =subsurface storage shape factor, defined as
The exponent in power advance equation, defined as
Thirdly, using two point method, the two empirical fitting parameters (a and k) are computed
where \({t}_{0.5L}\)=advance time at one-half field length,(min) tL = advance time to the end of field length, (min) L = field length, (m) V0.51 = infiltrated volume at one-half field length, (m3/m) VL = infiltrated volume at end of field length, (m3/m).
Furrow flow rates were measured using 3 inches Parshal-flumes which were placed at the upstream of the experimental plot, 5 m far from inlet furrow. Prior to the test, the PVC pipe having 75 mm, 90 mm and 110 mm diameters buried at inlet of furrow to distribute flow rates over the replication equally. During the test, advance and recession times were measured for each treatment plots combination. Stakes were driven into the soil along the furrows at fixed interval of 16 m before irrigation events. Advance times were recorded at the time when water reached at each stakes, while recession times (trec) were recorded at the times when water fully infiltrated or disappeared from the furrow bed at observation sections. After determining the depth of water retained in the soil profile, performance indicators were calculated.
2.2.1 Soil data collection
Composite of undisturbed soil samples at two soil depths, 0–30 and 30–60 cm were taken from six spots for the field experiment. The collected undisturbed soil samples were analyzed at Wonji Sugar Corporation Research Center Laboratory for bulk density determinations. Bulk soil bulk density was determined using the methodology described in [40]:
Core samplers of known volume were used and the samples weighted and placed in Oven Dry at 105 °C for 24 h. Field capacity and permanent wilting were taken from the estate as secondary data. The percentages of sand, silt and clay of the composite soil sample were determined by hydrometer analysis method. The percentages of sand, silt and clay of the composite soil sample were determined by hydrometer analysis method in the following procedure stated by [7]. The computed parameters values were shown in Table 2.
3 Procedures
-
1.
Mix 100 ml of the 5% dispersing solution and 880 ml of deionized water in a 1000 ml cylinder. This mixture is the blank. (Note: 100 ml + 880 ml = 980 ml. This blank is not diluted to 1000 ml; the other 20 ml is the volume occupied by 50 g of soil.).
-
2.
Weigh 25–50 g of soil and transfer to a dispersing cup. Record the weight of soil up to ± 0.01 g.
-
3.
Add 100-ml of 5% dispersing solution.
-
4.
Attach dispersing cup to mixer and mix the sample for 30–60 s.
-
5.
Transfer the suspension quantitatively from the dispersing cup to a 1000 ml cylinder.
-
6.
Fill to the 1000-ml mark with deionized water equilibrated to room temperature, or allow standing overnight to equilibrate.
-
7.
At the beginning of each set, record the temperature, and the hydrometer reading of the blank, using the procedure described below.
-
8.
To determine the density insert plunger into suspension, and carefully mix for 30 s. until a uniform suspension is obtained. Remove plunger (begin 40 s timer) and gently insert the hydrometer into the suspension.
-
9.
Record the hydrometer reading at 40 s. This is the amount of silt plus clay suspended. The sand has settled to the bottom of the cylinder by this time. (Repeat 8 –9 for each sample)
-
10.
Record the hydrometer reading again after 6 h, 52 min. This is the amount of clay in suspension. The silt has settled to the bottom of the cylinder by this time. Then calculate percentage of particles after hydrometer reading was corrected.
% clay = corrected hydrometer reading at 6 h, 52 min. × 100/ wt. of sample.
% silt = corrected hydrometer reading at 40 s. × 100/ wt. of sample—% clay.
% sand = 100%—% silt—% clay.
3.1 Soil physical properties
The soil samples data were taken from the field plot for determination of bulk density, soil texture and moisture content. As per the results obtained, which are presented in Table 2, the soil textural class is heavy clay type with Field capacity (FC) of 52.7% and Permanent Wilting Point (PWP) of 24.3% on weight basis.
The bulk density of the study area sampled from six spot was found to be presented in Table 3. As a result observed the average bulk density of soil was 1.10 g/cm.3
3.1.1 Soil infiltration and surface roughness
Typical value of roughness (n) was taken as 0.04 and 0.03 for first and later irrigation events, respectively.
As the result indicated the infiltration function over the two events were formed in equation Z1 and equation Z2 respectively.
where: Z1 = cumulative infiltrated depth for first irrigation event and Z2 = cumulative infiltrated depth for later irrigation event. The maximum opportunity time of the field plot was observed as 290.3 min and 296.95 min during first and later irrigation event respectively.
3.2 Surface irrigation software package
Mathematical models for the design, operation, and evaluation of various surface irrigation methods have been used in user-friendly computer programs such as the WinSRFR [4], SURDEV [21], and SIRMOD [42]. These software can be used to predict irrigation performance, for example, system uniformity and application efficiency, given certain gradients, soils, field dimensions, in-row or inter-row planting. This prediction capability may facilitate the modification of furrow irrigation operational guidelines and, if necessary, layouts/design, so that performance is comparable to more marketed irrigation systems [18].
3.2.1 SIRMOD software
SIRMOD is a comprehensive software package for simulating the hydraulics of surface irrigation systems at the field level, selecting a combination of sizing and operational parameters that maximize application efficiency and a two-point solution of the “inverse” problem allowing the computation of infiltration parameters from the input of advance data [42]. SIRMOD was developed at Utah State University to simulate both border and furrow irrigation for continuous flow irrigations as well as surge flow and cutback methodologies. It employs a full hydrodynamic model, as well as zero-inertia and kinematic-wave approximations and field experiment used to validate the model. The tool is continually being further developed [29, 33]. [35] used SIRMOD simulation model to optimize design parameters and compare the hydraulic behavior between surge flow and continuous flow of furrow irrigation for the cultivation of black tobacco in Cuba. The authors described that the variable cycles surge flow irrigation can increase the application efficiency by more than six fold and reduce the water volume by more than 80% compared to continuous flow irrigation and also verified that the model has an excellent correlation between simulated and measured advance times both for continuous and surge irrigation.
3.2.2 WinSRFR software
WinSRFR is a software package for the hydraulic analysis of surface irrigation systems. Intended users are irrigation specialists, consultants, extension agents, researchers, university level instructors and students, and farmers with moderate to advanced knowledge of surface irrigation hydraulics. The software offers four analytical functionalities, which are identified as WinSRFR Worlds. These functionalities are: Event Analysis, Simulation, Physical Design and Operations Analysis. With furrows, simulations consider only a single furrow and, therefore, neighboring furrows are assumed identical. Any variation in properties from furrow to furrow must be modeled separately. Outputs include the advance and recession curves, flow and depth hydrographs at specified locations, water surface profiles at specified times, and a variety of performance measures such as application efficiency, distribution uniformity, and adequacy of the irrigation [4, 31] optimized closed-end furrow irrigation design based on field and simulated advance data and described that the WinSRFR software were in agreement with measured values, and the absolute error average values of Ea, Du, and Es of all the irrigation furrows were 6.87%, 7.67%, and 6.15%, respectively.
According to the findings of [39], full hydrodynamic and zero inertia models were very powerful in simulation process. For increasing of field slope until amount of 0.01 full hydrodynamic and zero inertia models had not any difference but for more increasing of slope due to the increasing of velocity, accuracy of zero inertia model dropped. This study was conducted simulation of furrow irrigation by volume balance, Zero Inertia and full hydrodynamic model, and using SIRMOD software compared with WinSRFR software for prediction of irrigation performance.
3.3 Calibration of the model
The model was calibrated by using calibration parameters such as manning’s roughness coefficient’n’ stated by [37]. The calibrated value of SIRMOD model presented in Appendix Table 13.
The most effective way to evaluate these systems is via use of a calibrated hydraulic simulation model. The role of field measurement is to collect enough information in order to calibrate this model so it can be as true as possible to the actual irrigation. As the result viewed in Appendix Table 13, the average surface roughness of the field was of 0.16 and 0.10 at first and later irrigation, respectively.
3.4 Suitability of surface irrigation models
To evaluate the suitability of the surface irrigation models, three criteria were chosen to analyses the degree of the goodness fit. These criteria taken from [10] stated as follows:
-
1.
The coefficient of determination (R2)
$$ R^{2} = \frac{{\left[ {\left( {\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {o_{i - } \mathop o\limits^{^{\prime}} } \right)*(p_{i} - \mathop p\limits^{^{\prime}} } \right)} \right]^{2} }}{{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {o_{i - } \mathop o\limits^{^{\prime}} } \right)^{2} *\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {p_{i} - \mathop p\limits^{^{\prime}} } \right)^{2} }} $$(12) -
2.
The value of R2 ranges from 0.0 to 1.0, indicating a better agreement for the values close to 1.0. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)
$$RMSE=\sqrt{\frac{{\sum }_{i=1}^{n}{\left({o}_{i-}{p}_{i}\right)}^{2}}{n} }$$(13)The RMSE has minimum value of 0.0, with a better agreement close to 0.
-
3.
Standard error (SE)
$$ SE = \sqrt {\frac{{\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {o_{i - } p_{i} } \right)^{2} }}{{\mathop p\limits^{^{\prime}} }}} $$(14)
where Ao = cross sectional area of flow at inlet,(m2) Qo = inlet discharge, (m3/min) T = elapsed time since irrigation started, (min) δy =surface storage shape factor (ranged 0.70 to 0.80), δz = subsurface storage shape factor, t0.5L =advance time at one-half field length,(min) tL = advance time to the end of field length, (min) L = field length, (m) V0.51 = infiltrated volume at one-half field length, (m3/m) VL = infiltrated volume at end of field length, (m3/m) Z1 = cumulative infiltrated depth for first irrigation event and Z2 = cumulative infiltrated depth for later irrigation event n—Number of observations Oi—ith value of the observed measurement Pi—ith value of the predicted measurement Ō—Mean of the observed values Ṕ—Mean of the predicted values.
4 Results and discussions
4.1 Hydraulic performance evaluation of existing furrow irrigation system
Existing irrigation system was carefully evaluated to identify that may be effective and feasible in improving the systems’ performance. As early stated, the dominant soil type of the estate was heavy clay soil. Two fields were selected for furrow length of 32 m and 48 m and all input parameters were measured accordingly. The soil physical characteristics of the field like soil texture, field capacity, permanent wilting point, bulk density and soil moisture content, before irrigation event, were presented in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.
The results revealed that the heavy clay soil had particle size distribution of 10%, 17% and 73% for sand, silt and clay, respectively, with required application depth of 14 mm computed before irrigation events, by assuming required application depth equal to soil moisture deficit. The hydraulic performance of the field was evaluated over the irrigation events by using WinSRFR software package.
The estate applies 75 l/sec of flow rate per six furrows through tube at inlet of field. Each furrow inlet receives 12.5 l/sec according to the estate application. The two existing field number (16 and 108) of application efficiency and distribution uniformity were 43% and 86% for field number 16 and 25% and 44% for field number 108, respectively. The results of evaluation were presented in Table 6. From selected field for evaluation of the existing system, the findings presented in Table 6 demonstrate that the existing furrow systems were inefficient with the value of application efficiency and distribution uniformity of 43% and 86% for field number 16 and 25% and 44% for field number 108, respectively which doesn’t fit the typical values. [30] stated that the typical application efficiency range was between 60 and 80%. So, the system needs improvement to get the required efficient. The water distribution profile from an irrigation event of existing was indicated in Fig. 3. The Evaluation of existing system analyzed by WinSRFR software package in Fig. 3 showed that the recession time delayed because of high application of inflow rate which is 75 l/sec per furrow set (6 furrows). In addition, the water advanced the down end field quickly; the reason is that high flow rate used to increase gravity force that drives flow. The deep percolation of the result became high with heavy clay soil type because of the end condition of the field is closed and there is no surface runoff loss occurred. The only chance for loss was deep percolation.
The results came from insufficient design variables (furrow length and slope) and low level of management on-field practice. Since the irrigators assigned at each field number have different management skills, the irrigation efficiency at each field was varying. There was over irrigation resulting in high deep percolation loss. From less performance systems, maximum yield of production is unexpected. According to [2] findings, the relative yield has direct relationship with storage efficiency of the system. For this reason, the system should be improved to save water use (application efficiency) and to give maximum yield production (storage efficiency). Bautista [3], also stated that low efficiency of the system was resulted from poor design or management.
Different researchers tried to recommend the way to improve the inefficient system [1], found that, optimizing irrigation efficiency can be possible through changes in irrigation operation and field design, which may lead water saving by reducing deep drainage losses and can enhance the efficiency of the system [28, 43], reported that application efficiency of the system can be increased by shortening the field length and decreasing of the inflow rate [38]. Also stated that efficient furrow irrigation can be ensured by selecting proper combination of decision variable. Application efficiency was affected by the rate of supply, bed slope, infiltration rate of soil, storage capacity of the root zone and land leveling.
4.2 Measurement of advance and recession time
Before any measurement was undertaken, the pharshall flume was installed at 5 m from furrow inlet. The measurement was taken at 2 min initially and increased 5 min and 10 min until the required head has reached. The relationship between stream size and head of 3-inch pharshall flume was taken from [22]. After required stream size reached the four tubes installed at inlet furrow were opened at the same time. The time of advance water front was recorded by stopwatch at 16 m interval of distance starting from application of water to the inlet furrow along the length of 32 m, 48 m and 64 m.
The stream was cutoff when waterfront reached to the end of the furrows. The recorded advance and recession times of waterfront in experimental plot during both irrigation events were recorded. The advance relationships between the first and later irrigation events were developed by EXCEL software and presented in Fig. 4. The result revealed in Fig. 4 that the advance time of the first irrigation event was delayed than the later irrigation event because of the fact that there was, at first, high infiltration than the later and at later there was moisture of the first irrigation that led water to fast to the end of the field.
4.3 Optimal hydraulic performance parameters
The hydraulic performance indicators of the field were evaluated by assuming calculated target application equal with soil moisture deficit. The required parameters these are furrow geometry, computed infiltration parameters, furrow slope were inserted in the WinSRFR and SIRMOD soft ware package as per their guidelines. The author selected the two latest software packages to simulate the system.
The simulation model for WinSRFR was restricted to use Zero Inertia model because of the end condition of the furrow is blocked; it is not applicable in Kinematic wave model. According to result indicated in Table 7, the maximum application efficiency of 86% and 34% was obtained by S3L1Q2 treatment in first and later irrigation, respectively. As the Performance indicators result observed in Table 7, the efficiency of the later irrigation has decreased due to less requirement depth which is based on soil moisture deficit with the same amount of applied water. The result agreed with [36] findings which stated that the application efficiency varies between irrigation events [28]. Also found that the later irrigation event had less application efficiency than that of first irrigation event.
After running the SIRMOD model, the simulated values of application efficiency, distribution uniformity, requirement efficiency, runoff and deep percolation loss percentages were obtained by feeding the inputs which were collected from field measurement in SIRMOD software. These predicted hydraulic performance indicators of the full Hydrodynamic and Zero Inertia were summarized in Table 8 with maximum application efficiency of 77.72%. As the result indicated in Table 8, the performance using full hydrodynamic and Zero inertia solution models were almost the same. But as the slope increased, the relation was far each other which agree with [39] findings.
As a result of optimization by SIRMOD viewed in Table 8, the high application efficiency of 77.72% was recorded at furrow length of 48 m, furrow stream of 4 l/s, furrow slope of 0.075% and at 43 min cutoff time (treatment S2L2Q2). The second maximum application efficiency (70.72%) was observed by treatment S3L1Q2, but the first maximum application efficiency in volume balance and in WinSRFR model. Therefore, the treatment S3L1Q2 was taken as optimum treatment comparing to other treatments over the three models (WinSRFR, SIRMOD and Volume balance).
The application efficiency simulated in the SIRMOD software under zero inertia and hydrodynamic models of furrow irrigation with closed end boundary condition was similar in comparison with WinSRFR software. Distribution uniformity and storage efficiency were also good indicating the same trend as that of application efficiency. The treatment S3L1Q2 screen output by SIRMOD model was viewed in Fig. 5.
4.4 Validation of WinSRFR simulation model
The whole computation of the best fit evaluation of experimental based and WinSRFR model based was presented in Appendix Table 14 and the output of the computation summarized in Table 9.
According to the criteria selected and computed, the coefficient of determination (R2) value (0.95) was closer to unity which fills the standard of best fit. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) value of 4.78 far from zero which indicate less agreement to best fit and Standard error (SE) value of 0.11 closer to zero that agree to best fit standard. As the result indicates, the WinSRFR model best fit with Experimental based result by Coefficient of determination (R2) and Standard error (SE) criteria.
4.5 Validation of SIRMOD simulation model
The same evaluation criteria to SIRMOD and Experimental based was taken and the computation was tabulated in Appendix Table 15. The output of computed best fit evaluation criteria were summarized in Table 10.
For the performance evaluation criterion considered, the result obtained from the SIRMOD model were coefficient of determination (R2) 0.68, Root mean Square Error (RMSE) 58.97 and standard error (SE) 1.87. According to the result indicated the SIRMOD model was less agreed with experimental based of application efficiency relative to WinSRFR model because of, the model has a tendency to over predict the volume infiltrated. Even in free drainage end condition Hornbuckle, (2001) found that SIRMOD model poorly correlated (R2 = 0.448) between predicted and measured outflow so, in closed end condition which has no outflow, the model can predict over the amount of water infiltrated. In addition, [27] also reported the WinSRFR model had carried out the simulation of application efficiency with a three-percent error and with higher accuracy than SIRMOD model.
4.6 Water saving
Significant savings can be achieved through improving the application of irrigation water at the field level. The key is to improve the efficiency of irrigation by providing just enough irrigation water to match the available storage in the root zone, thus reducing the amount of water lost to the crop through deep percolation and surface runoff [8]. The result of Table 11 revealed that 42.3% and 60.3% of water can be saved by the optimized decision variables. Water saving observed in Table 11 was differing from field number to field number due to different management level of the irrigators over the field. Thus, the estate can save average of 51.3% of water from two fields and can irrigate 0.51 ha additional land according to [11] reported that from 30.62% of water saving, 0.31 ha of land could be irrigated.
5 Conclusion
In this study, to improve the efficiency of the irrigation system for sugarcane fields, optimum decision variables were determined. According to result obtained, the application efficiencies of existing furrow irrigation were in the ranges of 25% to 43% for furrow lengths 48 m and 32 m, respectively, that indicate less performance of the system due to excess application of water and less management skills of irrigators during irrigation events. Even the irrigator management experience were different from one field to another that leads unequal water saving. The more experienced irrigator manages irrigation water effectively and save more water. Thus, the existing furrow irrigation has revealed inefficient performance which needs careful design of the furrow geometry and good management practices. The measured data of experimental site was inserted in the SIRMOD software and WinSRFR software package. Furrow lengths of 32 m, 48 m, and 64 m, slopes of 0.05%, 0.075% and 0.1%, and flow rates of 3 l/sec, 4 l/sec and 5 l/sec were analyzed using volume balance method and simulation model.
It was observed that first irrigation event treatments had better application efficiencies than that of later irrigation event treatments. Maximum values simulated by WinSRFR model were 86% and 34% for first irrigation event and later irrigation event treatments, respectively. This is due to decrease of water required depth in later case with the same application of flow rate which increases deep percolation. The optimum decision variables were observed that gave maximum application efficiency which reflects the overall use of water. From the study, interaction factor that gave performance indicators above the recommended was S3L1Q2 which is third level of slope which is 0.1%, first level of length (32 m), and second level of flow rate (4 l/sec). The interaction gave maximum values during both irrigation events. The optimum design factor of the system was found that furrow length of 32 m which was already abundantly used at the estate and furrow slope of 0.1% which needs improvement. In addition the management factors were also found from this study. The management factors which on-field operators (irrigators) should care were flow rate of 4 l/sec and cutoff time of 15.79 min. The authors’ findings demonstrate that the optimum decision variables are the key recommendation to improve the existing irrigation system. Additionally, many efforts are underway to establish Basin Information Systems (BISs) in major river basins at present. However, these need to be conveyed to a centralized system at federal level that collects water data from different sources including Regional Water Bureaus (RWBs). Data should then be synthesized and translated into useful information for decision making purposes at federal, basin and sub-basin level coupled with investments into capacity building on data management and analysis as well as the necessary software and hardware. Therefore, the outcome of this study may serve as a source of information for use by policy makers and planners during the design and operation of irrigation development programs. In addition, provide motivation for a designer to implement remedial measures if a design is not up to standard.
For this study only two models were used (SIRMOD and WinSRFR models) to evaluated and designed hydraulic performance parameters of furrow irrigation. Future studies should consider comparison of different surface irrigation simulation software packages depending on their inputs and accessibility as that may enhance prediction of the hydraulic performance of furrow irrigation.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AE:
-
Application efficiency
- DF:
-
Deep percolation fraction
- DU:
-
Distribution uniformity
- E S:
-
Storage efficiency
- ESC:
-
Ethiopian sugar corporation
- FAO:
-
Food and agricultural organization
- ILRI:
-
International livestock research institute
- MOA:
-
Ministry of agriculture
- RAM:
-
Readily available moisture
- RD:
-
Root depth
- SCS:
-
Soil conservation services
- SMD:
-
Soil moisture deficit
- TAM:
-
Total available moisture
- TAW:
-
Total available water
- Tco:
-
Cut-off time
- USDA:
-
United State development agricultural
- VBM:
-
Volume balance model
References
Akbar G, Raine S, McHugh AD, Hamilton G, Hussain Q. Strategies to improve the irrigation efficiency of raised beds on small farms. Sarhad J Agricu. 2017;33(4):615–23.
Bal S. Optimization model for furrow irrigated maize crop. J Res Innov ManageSci. 2016;2(1):2454–6542.
Bautista E. Improving the hydraulic performance of surface irrigation systems. Surface irrigation Workshop, University of California Kearney Agricultural Center. USDA-ARS U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center.2016
Bautista E, James L. Schlegel, Theodor S. and Strelkoff. WinSRFR 4.1, Software and User Manual. Maricopa, AZ USA: USDA-ARS US. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center 2012.
Beatrice M, Calow R, Tucker J, Parker H, Alamirew T, Kebede S, Alemseged T, Gudina A. Building adaptive water resources management in Ethiopia. Overseas Dev Inst. 2015;1:1–100.
Beshir A and Bekele S. Analysis of irrigation systems using comparative performance indicators: a case study of two large scale irrigation systems in the upper Awash basin 2006.
Bouyoucos GJ. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron J. 1962;54:464–5.
Burton M. 2010. Mangement. In: NF. Wilford, (eds) Irrigation Management Principles and Practices Itchen Stoke: Printed and bound in the UK by CPI
Dejen ZA. Hydraulic and operational performance of irrigation schemes in view of water saving and sustainability PHD Thesis 2015.
Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A. Field evaluation of various mathematical models for furrow and border irrigation systems. Soil Water Res. 2011;6(2):91–101.
Efriem T, GebreKiros G. Performance evaluation of furrow irrigation system on pepper (Melka-Shote) production at Tanqua Abergelle District Tigray, Ethiopia Ethiopian. J Water Sci Technol. 2019;1:37–51.
FAO. Guidelines for Water Management and Irrigation Development. Wallington: International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage HR Ldt Institute of Hydrology; 2007.
Flores CI, Holzapfel EA, Lagos O. A dynamic decision support system for farm water management in surface irrigation: model development and application. Chilean J Agric Res. 2010;70(2):278–86.
Geleto M, Dananto M, Tadele D. Performance evaluation of selected surface irrigation schemes in kachabira woreda, SNNPRS, Ethiopia. Appl Res J Enviro Eng. 2018;1(1):1–13.
Girma A. Characterization and performance evaluation of irrigation water delivery system at wonji/shoa sugarcane plantation. Msc. Thesis. 2014.
Girma MM, Awulachew SB. Irrigation practices in ethiopia: characteristics of selected irrigation schemes international water management institute. Colombo: IWMI Working; 2007.
Gra-Mac Distributing Company. The different types of irrigation systems explained. 2018.
Griggiths B and Lecler NI. Irrigation System Evaluation. 2001
Hailu D, Selassie DF, Mengiste Y, G/Yohannes A, Shimelis T, Mekonen N and Ayele T. The study of water use and treated wastewater discharge charge .report on charge system for irrigation water abstraction and use. Addis Ababa. 2018.
Holzapfel EA, Pannunzio A, Lorite I, Silva de Oliveira AS, Farkas I. Design and management of irrigation systems. Hilean J Agric Res. 2009;69(Suppl 1):17–25.
Jurriëns M, Zerihun D, Boonstra J, Feyen J. SURDEV: Surface irrigation software design, operation, and evaluation of basin, border, and furrow irrigation. Wageningen: International institute for land reclamation and improvement/ILRI; 2001.
Kandiah A. Guide for measurement of irrigation water using parsha ll flumes and siphons. Addis Ababa Technical Bulletin No.1 Irrigation Agronomy Section .Melka water research station institute of agricultural research 1981.
Kaveh OAA, Mohammad S. Developing an optimal design model of furrow irrigation based on the minimum cost and maximum irrigation efficiency. Int Bulletin Water Res Dev. 2015;12(7):1–7.
Kaveh OAA, Eslamian S, Amoushahi-Khouzani M, Marani-Barzani M, Soltani M, Kazemi M, Gandomkar A, Dehghan S, Dalezios NR, Singh VP, Yihdego Y, Rajaei-Rizi F, Norouzi H, Shirvani-Dastgerdi HR, Jamshidi A, Malekian A, Majidifar Z, Ghane M. Guidelines to optimal design of furrow irrigation based on plants, soil and furrow specifications. Int J Const Res Civil Eng. 2017;3(4):20–39.
Kedir Y. Estimation of conveyance losses of Wonji-Shoa sugarcane irrigation scheme, Ethiopia. J Envir Earth Sci. 2015;5(17):2224–3216.
Koech R, Gillies M and Smith R. Simulation modeling in surface irrigation systems. Southern region engineering conference. Toowoomba, Australia. 2010.
Masoumeh F, Soheila F, Pejman P. Field evaluation and analysis of furrow irrigation by SIRMOD and WinSRFR models. J Envir Water Eng. 2018;4(3):207–15.
Mazarei R, Mohammadi AS, Naseri AA, Ebrahimian H, Izadpanah Z. Optimization of furrow irrigation performance of sugarcane fields based on inflow and geometric parameters using winSRFR in Southwest of Iran. Agric Water Manage. 2019;228:105899.
McClymont D. Development of a decision support system for furrow and border irrigation a dissertation for the award of doctor of philosophy. Sydney: University of Southern Queensland; 2007.
Narayanan K, Abate B. Studies on hydraulic performance of furrow irrigation to optimise design parameters suitable to onion field in Hawassa. Ethiopia J Sci Dev. 2014;2(2):23–39.
Nie WB, Fei LJ, Ma XY. Applied closed-end furrow irrigation optimized design based on field and simulated advance data. J Agr Sci Tech. 2014;16:395–408.
Okereke NAA, Duru JO, Nwachukwu BA, Madubuike CN. Determination of design inflow rate in furrow irrigation using simulated advance and recession curves. Niger J Technol. 2005;24:1.
Playán E, Rodríguez J.A. and García-Navarro P. A simulation model for level furrows: I Analysis of field experiments.2000
Ripple Small-scale irrigation in the Ethiopian highlands .What potential for poverty reduction and climate adaptation? 2010.
Rodríguez JA, Díaz A, Reyes JA, Pujols R. Comparison between surge irrigation and conventional furrow irrigation for covered black tobacco cultivation in a Ferralsol soil. Span J Agric Res. 2004;2(3):445–58.
Solomon M. Evaluation of irrigation scheduling and field application performance of hydro-flume furrow irrigation at metahara sugar estate.Arbaminch University Master’s thesis. 2010.
Shonka TG, Gullie G. Determining the optimum decision variables and rescheduling the irrigation system of tendaho sugar estate Ethiopia. Irrigat Drainage Sys Eng. 2017;6(3):200.
Tufa CA, Sime and Ayana M. Optimizing Furrow Irrigation Decision Parameters Using WinSRFR Model: The Case of Batu Degaga Small Scale Irrigation Scheme. Adama Science and Technology University. Master’s thesis. 2020.
Valipour M. Comparison of surface irrigation simulation models: full hydrodynamic, zero inertia, and kinematic wave. J Agricu Sci. 2012. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n12p68.
Walker WR. Guidelines for designing and evaluating surface irrigation systems. 1989.
Walker WR and Skogerboe GV. Surface Irrigation Theory and Practice. Logan, Utah State University: Prentice-Hall, INC., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 1987.
Walker WR. SIRMOD III: Surface Irrigation Simulation. Evaluation and Design: Logan Utah State University; 2003.
Xu J, Cai H, Saddique Q, Wang X, Li L, Ma C, Lu Y. Evaluation and optimization of border irrigation in different irrigation seasons based on temporal variation of infiltration and roughness. J Agr Water Manage. 2019;214:64–77.
Acknowledgements
This study is a product of countless individuals whose thoughts, ideas, perspectives, and work have given the author. First of all, the author(s) acknowledges the Almighty GOD for his priceless help and his protection. Next, the author(s) acknowledge the diligent contributions of Mekonen Ayana, Gebremeskel Aregay, Belay Yadeta, Damis Tsega, Dejene Tadese, Qabso Adamu and Wonji sugar corporation estate, Wonji sugar corporation research center and all sugar plantation members who providing the necessary input data and kind collaboration during the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Adamu, T., Ayana, M. & Aregay, G. Optimization of furrow irrigation decision variables: the case of wonji shoa sugar estate, Ethiopia. Discov Water 2, 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-022-00016-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-022-00016-8