Abstract
Background
Public health education is a powerful tool for improving communicable disease awareness and prevention protocols. Despite the fact that health education is crucial for the advancement of COVID-19 awareness and vaccination decisions, how a teacher approaches students to learn about health education during COVID-19 vaccination is a challenging issue. This study aimed to assess the preferences for public health education during COVID-19 vaccination intervention and compare the predictors of preferences between science and non-science university students in Bangladesh.
Methods
A multi-item questionnaire was developed and an online link was conveniently sent to the encounters between 31st May, 2023 and 15th August, 2023. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to rationalize the research objective.
Results
The pooled preference for public health education was 71.3% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 67.7–74.3) vs. 81.5% (95% CI 79.3–84.7) between science and non-science students. Out of twelve predictors “vaccine agreement”, “bio-safety behavior", and “disease awareness” were significantly associated (p < 0.01, p < 0.05) with the preference for public health education in both groups. Varied effects were also observed for some predictors: vaccine “safety” and “side effects” were significant (p < 0.05, p < 0.01) in science and non-science students, respectively. To address the conflict in decisions, non-science students significantly preferred “prevention alliance” whereas science students preferred “environmental health” issues (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Public health education was more preferred by non-science university students than by science students in making COVID-19 vaccine decisions . The focus of transformative public health education should be interdisciplinary, including information on communicable diseases, public health measures, and prevention alliances, as well as information about vaccines' side effects and safety.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
For a long time, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has emerged as a leading health and humanitarian crisis and persisted with resurgent waves with new variants. The pandemic is still ongoing and likely to persist for the foreseeable future. In the meantime, a highly transmittable new variant EG.5 now makes up a plurality of COVID-19 cases in the United States of America [1, 2]. The highly transmittable variant may spread to the rest of the world quickly. A wide variety of public health measures have been put into place to prevent COVID-19 pandemic transmission across the globe. These non-pharmaceutical measures include travel bans, country lockdowns, social distancing, cancellation of public functions, and most importantly using face masks. Unintended consequences of infection prevention might have been reduced by the implementation of public health measures and protocols [3]. While developing [4, 5] and developed [6, 7] countries implemented these protective measures, they faced significant challenges, particularly when it came to reopening educational institutions during an outbreak [8].
Vaccine-based intervention was the most effective therapeutic approach to limit the diffusion of contagious Coronaviruses [9], however, there still seems to be some significant doubtful attitudes of people in their willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19 [10]. Worldwide, numerous multi-dimensional factors influence public response to COVID-19 vaccines, and the response rate varies with the regional and global context [11,12,13,14]. Roy et al., (2022) deduced that the students group had a 30% prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy globally [15]. This author also reported that several socio-psychological antecedents such as safety, efficacy, side effects, trust, communication, information source, anti-vaccination sentiments, and non-compliance with injection led to COVID-19 vaccine apprehension among students [14, 15]. In this context, inter-disciplinary educational actions in public health would be the best effective measures for improving communicable disease awareness and COVID-19 vaccination willingness among students and the adult population [16,17,18,19].
Public health education is an intellectual, psychological, and social process that includes activities for an individual to make informed decisions regarding their health, well-being, and the well-being of their families and communities [20]. Since public health education is an important way of measuring changing human beliefs and behaviors over time [21]; hence effective education could be the cornerstone in the prevention and control of infectious diseases. Health education messaging aims to build vaccine confidence by magnifying psychological understandings of vaccine-hesitant individuals [22]. In this context, evaluating students’ behavioral responses to the COVID-19 vaccine and disease consciousness would be useful in designing multidisciplinary educational strategies in the public health domain. The educational material should focus on students’ psychological perspective of vaccine hesitance and the underlying factors [23]. Education in public health, specifically, was significantly related to improving students’ adherence, attitude, and knowledge about the vaccination consequences [24, 25] as well as contributed to enhancing vaccine willingness among the general people [26,27,28,29]. A recent global view noted that education has a potential role in influencing public COVID-19 vaccine willingness [30]. It is likely that public health education would be effective in reducing the unwillingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination among students [31] and other subgroups.
In Bangladesh, numerous studies focused on COVID-19 vaccine willingness among students and reported a substantial reluctance to receive a vaccine [14, 32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. It was unfortunate that the general public in Bangladesh lacked adequate knowledge about COVID-19 vaccinations [39], with a low level of vaccine uptake intent [33, 40]. Tertiary students in Bangladesh adhere to a low level of risk perception, knowledge, and preventive practices regarding COVID-19 as well [4, 41]. In this regard, public health education could act as a social vaccine focusing on COVID-19 preclusion while combining prevention and treatment in a prevention alliance [42].
Despite the fact that public health education plays a crucial role in the advancement of COVID-19 awareness and vaccination decisions, students’ preference for public health education during COVID-19 vaccination was underdeveloped. At the same time, how an educator approaches students to receive health information during the country-wide vaccination campaign was a challenging public health issue. This study was designed to rationalize a research question “how public health education does support tertiary students’ COVID-19 vaccine willingness and which factors should be forecast in designing a study of a unique public health education module?” Therefore, this study aims to assess the preference for public health education of university students during COVID-19 vaccination interventions and compares the predictors of health education preferences between science and non-science students in Bangladesh.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design
This cross-sectional study used an anonymous, multi-item, closed-ended questionnaire to rationalize the study's outlined objectives. Questionnaire was deployed in Google form and data were collected using a digital platform. The convenience sampling technique employed the methods in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations for involving human subjects. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Committee” (IRC), Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology. Since no clinical experiments were conducted and data was collected and analyzed anonymously, this study was approved by the IRC as exempt. Informed consent (indirect) was obtained from all subjects during data submission. There was no external funding for the study.
2.2 Setting and participants
This analysis involved students from both science and non-science backgrounds in universities across Bangladesh. The University Grants Commission (UGC) of Bangladesh approved a total of 164 universities, including 53 public, 109 privately funded, and 2 international universities, with a combined enrollment of 30,976 students in each year. Participants who completed the survey interview were not given any cash or in-kind incentives. Indirect written consent was obtained during the data collection process. Individuals were not harmed by this study, and they were free to decline participation at any stage of the study.
2.3 Participants’ inclusion and exclusion criteria
The eligibility criteria for the participants were the following: (i) understand and agree to the study objectives, (ii) willing to provide anonymous data on health education preferences based on COVID-19 vaccination decisions, (iii) science students of the government-funded university (iv) non-science students of the government-funded university (v) science students of the privately funded university, and (v) non-science students of the privately funded university in Bangladesh. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) not agreeing to give informed consent (ii) health science students of the university (iii) college students.
2.4 Measures and survey instrument development
The potential role of health education in developing people’s bio-safety behaviors and vaccine awareness has been evident to inform research and practices in the recent public health arena [43,44,45,46,47]. Similarly the concept of health education preference during COVID-19 vaccination consequences has been conceptualized from a theoretical analysis of the relevant kinds of literature on the topic [16, 18, 42, 48]. In addition, in-field consultation was performed in selecting a few questionnaire items. Items of the questionnaire were developed in the English language and needed 15 min to complete the interview session.
The survey instrument assessed (1) the socio-demographic profiles of the participants; (2) preference for health education during COVID-19 vaccination interventions, and (3) the predictors of health education preference during the vaccine rollout.
2.5 Validity and reliability of the measurements
To ensure the validity of the study measurements, the relevant literature on the topics was conceptualized and analyzed. A panel of public health experts reviewed the suitability of the questionnaire items and assessed the relevance and intelligibility of the constructs. To confirm the validity of the instrument, pilot testing (n = 20) was conducted, and the piloted data were not included in the final analysis. The reliability of the dichotomous questionnaire in the measurement was confirmed by examining Cronbach’s alpha (α) and Kuder–Richardson (KR-20) values. Cronbach’s alpha and KR-20 were estimated to be 0.79 and 0.77, respectively, which was deemed an appropriate scale for ensuring internal consistency of the measurements.
2.6 Outcome variable
Preference for public health education was the outcome variable. The outcome question was, “Would you prefer public health education for making COVID-19 vaccination decisions?" In this question, participants could reply whether they had a preference, not sure, and not preferred. For the binary regression analysis, the dependent variable was categorized and dichotomized into a binary variable where the acceptance intent was considered yes = 1 while the remaining two responses were transformed into otherwise = 0.
2.7 Predictor variables
Predictor or independent variables were contextualized from recent studies conducted on COVID-19 vaccination consequences in local, regional, and global contexts. Independent variables were categorized as contextual factors (socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the respondents), socio-psychological, and vaccine-related antecedents of health education preferences. The effect of these independent variables on response variables was measured by dichotomizing these values into 1 = yes response and 0 = unsure/no response.
2.8 Data management and analysis
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program was used to import the data after they were inputted into Microsoft Excel version 10. Version 25 of IBM SPSS (RRID: SCR_016479). Both dependent and independent variables underwent descriptive analysis, with results given in the form of frequency, mean, percentage, and text. To investigate any potential confounding effects of the chosen variables, binary logistic regression analysis was conducted. Variables with a P-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Model fitness was checked by the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-model fit test. Statistical significance between dependent variables and independent variables was assessed by odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. No missing data were recorded in this analysis.
3 Results
3.1 Comparative socio-demographic overview of the students
The Table 1 below compares the socio-demographic characteristics of the population of the studied groups. The investigator checked eligibility criteria and confirmed eligible participants. A total of 363 sciencestudents and 395 non-science students, who were potentially eligible, participated in and completed the survey. Most of the students were 21–23 years old (43.6% vs. 41.9%) and were in the third year of their bachelor’s degree program (31.4% vs. 30.7%). The highest 68.1% of science students participated from public universities and 69.9% of non-science students were most prevalent in public universities. Dhaka was the geographical location of the highest number of encounters (26.9% and 26.5% respectively). The COVID-19 infection-positive history was 14% vs. 18.2% while 95.3% vs. 93.4% was the vaccination status of the student respectively. In total, 55.4% and 52.2% of male participants were recruited from science and non-science groups respectively. Most of the participants were Muslims by religion (78.5% vs. 76.3%). Most importantly, 71.3% of science students and 81.5% of non-science students preferred health education during the vaccination drive.
3.2 Description of the variables
The following Table 2 describes the descriptive statistics of the study outlined variables.
3.3 Goodness-of-model fit
Table 3 shows the goodness-of-model fit for performing a binary regression analysis.
Table 3's Hosmer and Lemeshow test as well as the Omnibus tests of the model coefficients have been used to explain the model's fit quality. After assessing the underlying hypotheses, the results indicated that the omnibus tests of the model coefficients had a substantial level of significance (p < 0.05), however, the Hosmer and Lemeshow test for both models revealed an inconsequential level of significance (p > 0.05). These findings showed that the study’s samples had very good model fitness for binary logistic regression.
3.4 Predictors of health education preferences during COVID-19 vaccination services
Table 4 highlights the comparative binary regression analysis between science and non-science student groups. The pooled preference for public health education was 71.3% (95% CI 67.7–74.3) vs. 81.5% (95% CI 79.3–84.7) among science and non-science university students. Out of twelve predictors of public health education preferences“vaccine agreement”, “bio-safety” behavior, and “disease awareness” were significantly associated (p < 0.01, p < 0.05) with the preference for public health education in both groups. The students who believed that health education would be effective for increasing individual vaccine agreement (AOR 3.659 vs. AOR 2.739), help to adopt bio-safety behavior (AOR 1.030 vs. AOR 1.388), and improve communicable disease awareness (AOR 1.388 vs. AOR 1.09) during COVID-19 pandemic were more likely to prefer public health education during the COVID-19 vaccination (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). A varied effect was also observed for some predictors: vaccine “safety” (AOR 1.684) and “environmental health”(AOR 1.021) were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the preference for public health education in science students whereas these were insignificant among the non-science group. Science students who believed that vaccine safety information and knowledge of environmental health was important to enhance COVID-19 vaccine agreement during a pandemic situation were more likely to prefer public health education. Similarly, side effects (AOR: 2.592) had a highly significant and the importance of prevention alliances (AOR: 1.160) had a significant association with health education preference in non-science students group. Non-science students who thought that public health education reduces perceived side effects fear and delineates the significance of prevention alliances during COVID-19 vaccination as well as supports them to address conflict of vaccination decisions (AOR: 1.398) were more likely to prefer public health education (p < 0.01, p < 0.05) during COVID-19 vaccination drive Table 4.
4 Discussion
For public preparedness against the outbreak of infectious diseases, public health education has been recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an effective measure to prevent outbreaks of communicable diseases. Disease outbreaks and public health emergencies require education to play a vital role in the active response by providing well-established tools, especially in the absence of specific drugs or vaccines. [48, 49]. In order to slow down and control the spread of COVID-19 infection, public health education and awareness play a critical role in making students adhere to appropriate bio-safety behaviors such as social distance and maintaining the necessary hygiene habits.
The vaccine-based therapies are among the greatest achievements in medical science because they saved millions from emerging infectious diseases within a few decades [50], however, vaccine hesitancy or vaccine reluctance has been recognized as one of the biggest public health challenges [51]. Public resistance to scientific claims about vaccine data was believed to be a result of public ignorance (or misunderstanding) of science [52]. While investigations into the COVID-19 vaccine response were underway, numerous modeling studies were conducted to synthesize the potential factors influencing public vaccination decisions. Global disparities in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance existed in which several socio-psychological antecedents were associated with the COVID-19 vaccine decision across the continents [53]. This study thus examined students’ preference for public health education during the country-wide COVID-19 vaccination intervention and identified the key predictors associated with students' preference for public health education.
This study demonstrated that the comparative pooled preference for public health education of university science and non-science students was 71.3% vs. 81.5%. A study in the USA reported that effective educational messages increased 38.8% of vaccinated people against influenza vaccination services [54] and the Hepatitis B vaccination rate was raised significantly after educational activities in Saudi Arabia [55]. Lack of available data on vaccine safety, efficacy, effectiveness, and side effects fears would lead to long-term hesitancy of a newly promoted vaccine. Nonetheless, safety and efficacy regarding the CIVID-19 vaccine were among the predictors shaping students’ [14, 33, 34, 36] and general people’s [35, 40, 56, 57] attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination in Bangladesh. Consequently, students were more likely to be fascinated by learning about the safety profile, efficacy information, and consequences of COVID-19 vaccination. During the pandemic, two terms, 'efficacy' and 'effectiveness’ were widely discussed and endorsed across various social networks in the global context, particularly concerning Vero Cell from China. Despite two different formulas being employed to calculate efficacy and effectiveness, from a learner’s viewpoint, most people understand “efficacy” as the vaccine's ability to produce desired positive effects, such as preventing illness or reducing symptom severity. A person who believes in the vaccine’s efficacy means they are convinced it functions as intended. Moreover, most individuals also comprehend vaccine effectiveness as the vaccine's capability to protect against a specific disease under real-world conditions. Consequently, efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine was the most common concern of COVID-19 vaccination willingness among the education sector in many countries [32, 58, 59]
The fear of post-vaccination side effects was a common concern among students considering COVID-19 vaccination in global [60, 61] as well as national vaccination drive among students [32] and general population [57]. To ensure successful vaccination campaigns and public health initiatives in Bangladesh, it is imperative to understand and address concerns about the side effects of vaccines in the context of a global crisis. University students who believed that public health education would be the appropriate tool to disseminate information about side effect facts of vaccines were more likely to prefer public health education and wanted to be familiar with vaccine data including perceived side effects. It has been evident that public health measures and non-pharmaceutical interventions were effective in reducing the transmission of COVID-19 in Bangladesh [62]. A wide variety of public health measures have been utilized to limit COVID-19 transmission worldwide, such as travel bans, country lockdowns, social distancing, and mask use. Other preventive measures includ frequent hand washing, sanitizing surfaces, and practicing good respiratory hygiene by covering mouth and nose when coughing or sneezing. These non-pharmaceutical measures, however, face challenges in Bangladesh [41], a developing country with one of the densest populations in the world. Although Bangladesh has taken multiple steps to slow the COVID-19 epidemic's rapid expansion, such broad population control programs affected life-style, attitudes, behavioral patterns, and perceptions even after vaccine uptake [38]. However, widespread application modes of these measures and long-term compliance with bio-safety behavior were the major challenges in adopting non-pharmaceutical measures. As a result, university education must include a unique topic on public health measures, including their comprehensive application and effective use to contend with the next pandemic. Accordingly, this study found that non-science students were more likely to be interested in learning about the benefits and implications of public health measures during COVID-19 vaccination.
The concept of perceived information inconsistency refers to a person's perception of discrepancies, contradictions, or conflicting information across various sources or channels related to a specific topic, event, or concept [63]. Vaccine inconsistency occurs when the public perceives a conflict or inconsistency among different sources, including the media, health authorities, and public discourse, regarding vaccine effectiveness, safety, side effects, and other relevant factors [64, 65]. Information about the safety or unsafe indicators of COVID-19 vaccines is also accessible, such as, multiple vaccines have demonstrated over 90% effectiveness in preventing severe cases while some COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to rare adverse events such as myocarditis (heart inflammation), blood clotting disorders, or vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. However, the occurrence of these events is extremely rare, and for most individuals, the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. It is possible that certain individuals may be concerned about potential long-term effects that may manifest over time after experiencing COVID-19 vaccines. The proliferation of misinformation and disinformation about COVID-19 vaccines has contributed to uncertainties and doubts regarding their safety, causing some individuals to refrain from vaccine willingness in many countries [66,67,68]. Therefore, health information sources were identified as a significant predictor of students’ preferences for public health education during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
Since a sizable portion of the public lacks the tools to understand about vaccination, hence, educational campaigns and awareness programs may be a perfect psychological approach to overcome misinformation, rumors, and other negative traits [69, 70]. It was one of the fundamental strategies for infectious disease prevention to educate individuals about vaccine safety, side effects, and efficacy in order to boost trust in vaccines [71]. A sustained level of confidence in the immunization process was developed even among vaccine-hesitant individuals through public health education messaging [72, 73]. It is thus essential that the community becomes aware of the importance of transformative education systems, so that students receive clear, relevant health education that transcends bio-safety and vaccination behaviors.
4.1 Strengths and limitations
Public health education has a significant positive impact on students’ vaccination care and makes them individual critical thinkers who gain new knowledge about health outcomes. This is the first study to examine the preferences for health education of students during the country-wide COVID-19 vaccination programs in a developing country. This study applied a new analytical tool to explore the key predators of health education preferences. A significant strength of our study is that it analyzed data from students in age groups between 18 and 30 years old. The significance of community protective measures was found to be a predictor of health education; hence the prospective community health benefits during communicable disease exposure have been established. The importance of prevention alliances among public health measures and vaccine therapy other than the dependency of vaccine therapy on students was demonstrated. The findings will add new value to the existing field of health education research. The identification of various antecedents of health education preferences such as disease awareness, the importance of public health measures, health psychology, and environmental health, along with vaccine information thus calls for a unique health curriculum mapping in higher educational settings. This study established that health education would be the best-preferred approach to building COVID-19 vaccine confidence among people.
This study has some specific limitations. This study is cross-sectional, so causal associations between the investigated factors cannot be determined. The results may be overstated or understated based on self-reported feedback. Secondly, the study’s sample size was not adequate to represent complete insight into the overall population size. Therefore, generalization of the study results to other parts of the country and overseas should be taken with caution.
5 Conclusions
Refusal attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines among students are a global public health challenge. An academician should address students’ vaccine-receptive behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic to discover a multi-disciplinary health curriculum. Transformative health education improves students’ knowledge of infectious diseases and promotes the development of appropriate behaviors toward communicable disease prevention and control. Since health education enhances students’ vaccine willingness, hence comprehensive knowledge on several aspects such as infectious disease information, bio-safety awareness, the significance of combined preventive values (vaccination and preventive measures), along with health safety and side effects information should be the fundamental parts of health education modules. This study contributed to innovations and education policy reforms that improve diversity, equity, and inclusion in tertiary education systems in the post-pandemic era. Public health education programs aimed at promoting the COVID-19 vaccine by examining the underlying factors of COVID-19 vaccine willingness have practical implications for global vaccine policy development. Policymakers need to incorporate these multicultural topics of public health education preferences into their strategic plans for transformative health education policy reform. Future research should focus on understanding the impact of incorporating multicultural topics into public health education on health outcomes and health disparities as well as evaluating the effectiveness of different strategies for implementing these topics in educational settings, in order to provide policymakers with evidence-based recommendations for effective policy reform in near real-time.
Data availability
All data used for analysis in this manuscript is available from the corresponding author or first author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- COVID-19:
-
Coronavirus disease-2019
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
- SARS-CoV-2:
-
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2
- 2019-nCoV:
-
2019-Novel coronavirus
- CDC:
-
Centers for disease control and prevention
- CI:
-
Confidence Interval
- LMICs:
-
Low-and-middle income countries
References
EG, W., Initial risk evaluation. 9 Aug 2023.
Mahase E. Covid-19 what do we know about XBB 15 and should we be worried? London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2023.
Dadras O, et al. Effects of COVID-19 prevention procedures on other common infections: a systematic review. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(1):67.
Ahmed HM. Adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures among male medical students Egypt. J Egypt Publ Health Assoc. 2022;97(1):8.
Lahiri A, et al. Effectiveness of preventive measures against COVID-19: a systematic review: of in silico: modeling studies in Indian context. Ind J Publ Health. 2020;64(6):156–67.
Kabasakal E, et al. COVID-19 fear and compliance in preventive measures precautions in workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94:1239–47.
Meier K, et al. Public perspectives on protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy: a survey study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8): e0236917.
Lo Moro G, et al. Reopening schools during the COVID-19 pandemic: overview and rapid systematic review of guidelines and recommendations on preventive measures and the management of cases. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2020;17(23):8839.
Eroglu B, et al. A narrative review of COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccines. 2021;10(1):62.
Dror AA, et al. Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(8):775–9.
Roy DN, et al. Potential factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3): e0265496.
Al-Jayyousi GF, et al. Factors influencing public attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination: a scoping review informed by the socio-ecological model. Vaccines. 2021;9(6):548.
Truong J, et al. What factors promote vaccine hesitancy or acceptance during pandemics? a systematic review and thematic analysis. Health Promot Int. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab105.
Roy DN, et al. Potential factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among university students in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional comparative study. Epidemiol Infect. 2023;151: e11.
Roy DN, et al. Prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in students: a global systematic review. F1000Research. 2022;11:928.
Abebe H, Shitu S, Mose A. Understanding of COVID-19 vaccine knowledge, attitude, acceptance, and determinates of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among adult population in Ethiopia. Infection and drug resistance: Oxfordshire; 2021. p. 2015–25.
Lazcano-Ponce E, Alpuche-Aranda C. Public health literacy in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic emergency. Salud Públ De México. 2020;62(3):331–40.
Kim H-Y, Shin S-H, Lee E-H. Effects of health belief, knowledge, and attitude toward COVID-19 on prevention behavior in health college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1898.
Kalanjati VP, et al. Health literacy on COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccinations in Indonesia F 1000research. London: Faculty of 1000 Ltd; 2022. p. 11.
Cleary HP. Health education: the role and functions of the specialist and the generalist. Rev Saude Publ. 1988;22:64–72.
Chinnakali P, et al. Level of awareness about tuberculosis in urban slums: implications for advocacy and communication strategy planning in the national program. Lung India. 2013;30(2):139–42.
Arede M, et al. Combating vaccine hesitancy: teaching the next generation to navigate through the post truth era. Front Publ Health. 2019;6: 428784.
Barello S, et al. ‘Vaccine hesitancy’among university students in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35:781–3.
Afonso N, Kavanagh M, Swanberg S. Improvement in attitudes toward influenza vaccination in medical students following an integrated curricular intervention. Vaccine. 2014;32(4):502–6.
Marotta C, et al. Improvement in vaccination knowledge among health students following an integrated extra curricular intervention, an explorative study in the University of Palermo. J Prev Med Hyg. 2017;58(2):E93.
Latkin C, et al. A longitudinal study of vaccine hesitancy attitudes and social influence as predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(5):2043102.
Vikram K, Vanneman R, Desai S. Linkages between maternal education and childhood immunization in India. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(2):331–9.
Davies C, et al. ‘Is it like one of those infectious kind of things?’The importance of educating young people about HPV and HPV vaccination at school. In: Gender and Sexuality in Education and Health. Routledge; 2019. p. 22–41.
Kester LM, et al. The effects of a brief educational intervention on human papillomavirus knowledge and intention to initiate HPV vaccination in 18–26 year old young adults. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:S9–12.
Lupu D, Tiganasu R. Does education influence COVID-19 vaccination? a global view heliyon. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2024.
Yao M, et al. The role of health education in vaccination nursing. J Healthc Engin. 2022;2022(1):6078846.
Roy DN, et al. Sociopsychological determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among the students’ of higher secondary schools in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. Psychol Sch. 2023;61(2):568–81.
Hossain E, et al. COVID-19 vaccine-taking hesitancy among Bangladeshi people: knowledge, perceptions and attitude perspective. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(11):4028–37.
Hoque A, et al. Awareness and likelihood of accepting COVID-19 vaccines among the university students of Bangladesh. Int J Public Health. 2022;11(2):558–65.
Lee C, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among Bangladeshi adults: understanding predictors of vaccine intention to inform vaccine policy. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(1): e0261929.
Roy DN, Azam MS, Islam E. Multi-dimensional potential factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine booster acceptance and hesitancy among university academic community in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional comparative study. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(4): e0281395.
Rahman MM, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccine among university students of Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(6): e0270684.
Hossain ME, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptability among public university students in Bangladesh: highlighting knowledge, perceptions, and attitude. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(12):5089–98.
Hossain ME, et al. Scaling the changes in lifestyle, attitude, and behavioral patterns among COVID-19 vaccinated people: insights from Bangladesh. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(1):2022920.
Roy DN, et al. Potential factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among Bangladeshi people: a cross-sectional study. VirusDisease. 2022;33(3):251–60.
Ether SA, et al. A cross-sectional study of COVID-19-related knowledge, risk perceptions, and preventive practices among pharmacy students in Bangladesh. SAGE Open Medicine. 2022;10:20503121211073016.
Okan O, et al. Health literacy as a social vaccine in the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Promot Int. 2023;38(4):197.
Gagnon D, Dubé È. Literature review on effective strategies to improve vaccine acceptance and uptake. Ottawa: Canadian Public Health Association CAN-Vax; 2019.
Fu LY, et al. Educational interventions to increase HPV vaccination acceptance: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2014;32(17):1901–20.
Lorini C, et al. Health literacy and vaccination: a systematic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(2):478–88.
Solhi M, et al. The role of health education on emerging diseases a systematic review. J Health Educ Res and Develop. 2017;5(229):10–4172.
Mogaka, E.N., et al., Effectiveness of an educational intervention to increase human papillomavirus knowledge in high-risk populations: a systematic review. Univ Toronto Med J. 2019. 96(3).
Li, W., et al., Public health education for parents during the outbreak of COVID-19: a rapid review. Annals of translational medicine. 2020. 8(10).
Gray DJ, et al. Health-education to prevent COVID-19 in schoolchildren: a call to action. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(04):142–4.
Yaqub O, et al. Attitudes to vaccination: a critical review. Soc Sci Med. 2014;112:1–11.
Nuwarda RF, et al. Vaccine hesitancy: contemporary issues and historical background. Vaccines. 2022;10(10):1595.
Goldenberg MJ. Public misunderstanding of science? reframing the problem of vaccine hesitancy. Perspect Sci. 2016;24(5):552–81.
Roy DN, et al. Global disparities in COVID-19 vaccine booster dose (VBD) acceptance and hesitancy: an updated narrative review. vaccine: X. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2024. p. 100480.
Hofstetter AM, et al. Impacting delayed pediatric influenza vaccination: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(4):392–401.
Al-Thaqafy MS, et al. Improvement of the low knowledge, attitude and practice of hepatitis B virus infection among Saudi national guard personnel after educational intervention. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:1–7.
Rehman H, et al. Impact of rumors, conspiracy and intuition about covid-19 vaccine in Karachi, Pakistan. RADS J Pharm Allied Health Sci. 2023;1(2):86–93.
Roy DN, Huda MN, Azam MS. Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among rural community in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional survey based study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(5):2064685.
Jain J, et al. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students in India. Epidemiol Infect. 2021;149:e132.
Tavolacci MP, Dechelotte P, Ladner J. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and resistancy among university students in France. Vaccines. 2021;9(6):654.
Kanyike AM, et al. Acceptance of the coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine among medical students in Uganda. Tropical Med Health. 2021;49(1):1–11.
Almalki MJ, et al. Acceptability of the COVID-19 vaccine and its determinants among university students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Vaccines. 2021;9(9):943.
Ferdous MZ, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh: an online-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10): e0239254.
Nagler RH, Yzer MC, Rothman AJ. Effects of media exposure to conflicting information about mammography: results from a population-based survey experiment. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53(10):896–908.
Zhao X, et al. How information repertoire affects vaccine hesitancy: processes of information verification and cognitive elaboration. Health Commun. 2024;39(1):62–72.
Lin CA, Xu X, Dam L. Information source dependence, presumed media influence, risk knowledge, and vaccination intention. Atlantic J Commun. 2021;29(2):53–64.
Lucia VC, Kelekar A, Afonso NM. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students. J Public Health. 2021;43(3):445–9.
Riad A, et al. Global prevalence and drivers of dental students’ COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines. 2021;9(6):566.
Saied SM, et al. Vaccine hesitancy: Beliefs and barriers associated with COVID-19 vaccination among Egyptian medical students. J Med Virol. 2021;93(7):4280–91.
Roozenbeek J, Van Der Linden S. How to combat health misinformation: a psychological approach. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Sage CA; 2022. p. 569–75.
Bronstein MV, Vinogradov S. Education alone is insufficient to combat online medical misinformation. EMBO Rep. 2021;22(3): e52282.
Paakkari L, Okan O. COVID-19: health literacy is an underestimated problem. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(5):e249–50.
Lazarus JV, et al. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med. 2021;27(2):225–8.
Montagni I, et al. Acceptance of a Covid-19 vaccine is associated with ability to detect fake news and health literacy. J Public Health. 2021;43(4):695–702.
Acknowledgements
Authors are greatly acknowledging to all participants submitted the required data.
Funding
This work was not supported by any public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
"DNR conceptualized and designed the study. Also performed data acquisition, statistical analysis, data interpretation, wrote the main manuscript text and prepared tables 1-4. MSA conceptualized, supervised, and revised the final version critically. EI conceptualized, designed,validated, supervised, and edited the original draft. All authors have approved the final article version submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Approved by the Ethical Review Committee.
Consent for publication
All participants provided informed consent before study participation. Participants who provided consent were included in the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this manuscript.
Reporting guidelines
STROBE checklist for a cross-sectional study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, D.N., Azam, M. & Islam, E. Expressed preferences for public health education of students during COVID-19 vaccination intervention: a cross-sectional comparative study. Discov Educ 3, 89 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00159-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00159-x