Abstract
Knowledge of γ-tubulin is increasing with regard to the cellular functions of this protein beyond its participation in microtubule nucleation. γ-Tubulin expression is altered in various malignancies, and changes in the TUBG1 gene have been found in patients suffering from brain malformations. This review recapitulates the known functions of γ-tubulin in cellular homeostasis and discusses the possible influence of the protein on disease development and cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The essence of life is the self-renewal ability of cells. The birth of a cell is the result of a dynamic process in which proteins execute a reproduction program that is encoded in the DNA. In eukaryotes, this program is supported by energy obtained through compartmentalization within individual cells, which creates the need for transport and communication (signal transduction) between the intracellular compartments.1 The dynamics in this context are achieved by cytoskeleton and nucleoskeleton networks that provide the form and mechanical support for a cell, organize the genome, and assist in signal transduction, cell movement, cellular transport, and cell–cell interactions.2 The various cytoskeletal networks (i.e., actin, microtubules, and intermediate filaments) can perform transport through cellular sensory sites, such as focal adhesion macromolecules and linkers of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complexes, and in this manner transmit and coordinate a cellular response to environmental queue signals.3 These sensory sites are important signaling hubs that integrate skeletal and signal transduction proteins. Other sensory hubs include the centriole/basal body and centrosomes. A centriole is composed of a cylindrical array of microtubules.4 In dividing cells, two centrioles are embedded in a pericentriolar protein matrix (PCM) to form a centrosome. The PCM constitutes an important site that regulates microtubule nucleation and dynamics. During cell division, the link between the two centrioles is lost in the M to G1 phase transition, which allows for the replication of the centrioles. In the S phase, the inherited centrosome and genome duplicate synchronously (Fig. 1). At the onset of mitosis, the two centrosomes ensure the assembly of a bipolar mitotic spindle and the strict segregation of sister chromatids between daughter cells (Fig. 2). At the end of cell division, a mammalian daughter cell inherits one centrosome and one genome set. In yeast, the formation of microtubule-organizing centers at the telomeres induces meiotic telomere clustering.5 Together, these observations suggest that centrosomes are involved in coordinating chromosomal movements.
In resting cells, flagella, or cilia can extend from the centrioles, and such centrioles are therefore usually referred to as basal bodies.4 In both cases, a centrosome and a basal body link intermediate filaments, microtubules, and components of the actin network with signal transduction molecules.6,7,8,9 The functions of cilia and flagella are cell-type specific, but in general these organelles enable a cell to move itself or to transport fluids across the cell surface, sense environmental cues, and transmit signals to the cell interior. By doing so, cilia and flagella control our bodily processes during both development and tissue and organ homeostasis.10,11 Defects in the sensory and/or motor functions of cilia and flagella are involved in severe human diseases and syndromes, such as polycystic kidney disease (PKD), primary cilia dyskinesia, retinal degenerative disease, planar cell polarity, and Kartagener’s syndrome (situs inversus, sinusitis, and bronchiectasis), as well as developmental diseases grouped within the Bardet-Biedl syndrome, which include obesity and diabetes.11
Tubulins
Microtubules and centrosomes are highly enriched in a family of GTPases called the tubulins.12 In humans, there are five known tubulin isoforms: α-tubulin, β-tubulin, γ-tubulin, δ-tubulin, and ε-tubulin.12 In the tubulin family, the C-terminal region is the most variable area (Fig. 3a); whereas, the GTPase domain in the N-terminal region is more conserved. The protein sequence in the N-terminal region (γ-tubulin residues 1–333) of γ-tubulin exhibits 56 and 60% homology with the corresponding sequences in α- and β-tubulin, respectively.13,14 In contrast, the homologies of the C-terminal region (γ-tubulin residues 334–451) of γ-tubulin are 48% with α-tubulin and 50% with β-tubulin.
In eukaryotic cells, a microtubule usually consists of 13 laterally associated protofilaments that form hollow tubes in the cytoplasm, axons, and mitotic spindles.15 Protofilaments are made up of α- and β-tubulin heterodimers, and flagella, cilia, and centrosomes contain various modified protofilament combinations. A microtubule in a centriole displays a ninefold radial symmetry that, in some cases, continues into the flagellum or cilium that emanates from it. The centriole architecture of microtubules is regulated by δ- and ε-tubulin.4
The γ-TUBULIN gene was first discovered in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans as a regulator of microtubule assembly,16 and it is highly conserved among species. Two γ-TUBULIN genes and one pseudogene have been described in humans.17,18 Initially, γ-tubulin was considered to be a minimally abundant protein,19 but this was a clear underestimation. γ-tubulin is a ubiquitously expressed protein that appears in abundance in both the cytosol and the nuclear compartments of cells in all mammalian tissues.13,14,20,21,22,23
Together, γ-tubulin and various γ-tubulin complex proteins (GCPs) form a ring-shaped structure in the cytosol called the γ-tubulin ring complex (γTURC) that regulates the nucleation of α- and β-tubulin dimers into unidirectionally growing microtubules.15 Additionally, γ-tubulin is enriched at the PCM and plays a role in centriole duplication.24,25,26
The cellular organization of γ-tubulin
Three main experimental set-ups have been applied to investigate the cellular function of γ-tubulins. The first of these methods is the widely used siRNA-mediated reduction of the γ-tubulin pool, which partially decreases the amount of cellular γ-tubulin. The second approach is the introduction of mutations into the protein that only affect a targeted function.13,14,23,27,28,29 The third strategy is the use of extracts from Xenopus eggs;30 in short, the egg extracts are combined with exogenously added DNA, and a reduction of γ-tubulin in the extracts is achieved by immunodepletion, although depletion of the DNA has not been performed in most experiments.30,31 Nonetheless, despite a partially reduced γ-tubulin pool, most studies have been performed in the presence of the protein, which has led to weak or null phenotypes. Consequently, all of the functions of γ-tubulin have not yet been identified.
At the cellular level, simultaneous knockdown of both γ-TUBULIN genes is lethal.32,33,34 γ-TUBULIN 1 knockout mice survive only to the morula/blastocyst stage because redundant function is provided by the activation of γ-TUBULIN 2 during the first stage of embryonic development.33 In contrast, γ-TUBULIN 2 knockout mice are viable and fertile.33 In human neuroblastoma cell lines, both neuronal development and mitochondria-induced oxidative stress result in the upregulation of γ-TUBULIN 2, which is considered to represent a pro-survival signal.35
Due to its abundance, cellular γ-tubulin is organized in a variety of structures. Part of the cellular pool is folded into γ-tubulin threads called γ-strings by the type II chaperonin CCT.36 γ-Strings are 4–6 nm in diameter23,28,36,37 and span from the cytosolic compartment through the nuclear membrane and into the chromatin. A γ-string is very thin and alone can offer little stability. However, when γ-strings occur together in large numbers in association with cellular membranes, they may reinforce and stabilize those membranes (Fig. 2). In support of this conclusion, the proper positioning and biogenesis of the Golgi apparatus depend on the interaction of γTURC with the Golgi membrane-linked GMAP-210 protein.38 Furthermore, it was recently reported that γ-tubulin becomes associated with endosomes39 and that γ-tubulin is an important mitochondrial structural component that maintains the mitochondrial network to provide the mitochondria with a cellular infrastructure.23,35 Similarly, the numerous DNA-bound γ-strings anchor the nucleus to the cytosol, and the transition between cytosolic and nuclear-associated γ-strings aids the formation of a nuclear envelope around the chromatin (Fig. 2).28,40,41,42
In addition to γ-strings, γ-tubulin forms cytosolic fibers called γ-tubules that are 20–25 nm in diameter (Fig. 2).34 In contrast to γ-strings, which are static structures, γ-tubules are temperature-sensitive polar structures that vary both in size and location and can emanate from centrosomes.34 γ-tubules differ from microtubules in that they consist of pericentrin and γTURCs, and they lack α- and β-tubulin heterodimers.34 Other γ-tubulin-rich structures include the centrosomes. This picture implies that the γ-tubulin and associated proteins in the centrosomes, the γ-tubulin in the γ-strings, and the γ-tubulin and associated proteins in the γ-tubules link together to form a cellular meshwork in both the cytosol and the nuclear compartment (Fig. 2).
The γ-tubulin meshwork as a signal transducing platform
There is substantial evidence that the centrosomes and γ-tubulin regulate the G1-to-S transition,13,14,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51 mitotic progression,52 and cytokinesis.53 These effects are achieved partly through timely changes in the location of γ-tubulin that occur in a manner that is related to cell division. In the G1 phase, most of the γ-tubulin pool is in the cytosol, and part of this cytosolic pool creates γ-tubules (Fig. 2).34 However, at the G1–S transition, the number of cytosolic γ-tubules is reduced, and there is a subsequent accumulation of γ-tubulin in the nuclear compartment and the PCM.14,24,34 During cell division, the PCM acts as signal hub that brings together various checkpoint proteins. Indeed, the PCM content changes in a cell-cycle-dependent manner and harbors various proteins involved in the signal transduction pathways that coordinate cell cycle progression and function as checkpoints. Removal or disruption of the centrosomes impairs cytokinesis and thereby causes G1 arrest,44,53,54 which might be induced by the p38-p53-p21 signal pathway (Fig. 1).48
Some of the signals that synchronize centrosome duplication with DNA replication arise from signal transduction events that occur at the centrosomes (Fig. 1). The centrosomal localization of cyclin E-Cdk2 is required for the initiation of DNA synthesis in CHO-K1 cells.50 Once DNA replication and centrosome duplication are initiated, the origin replication complex subunit Orc1 translocates from the origin of replication to the growing centrosome in a cyclin-A-dependent manner, and, in that location, Orc1 prevents cyclin-E-dependent reduplication of the centrosomes (Fig. 1).55 Moreover, early in the S-phase, SadB kinases (e.g., mSADB and hSAD1/BRSK1) mediate the phosphorylation of γ-tubulin on Ser131 and Ser385.24,27,56 The phosphorylation levels of γ-tubulin on Ser131 regulate the recruitment of γ-tubulin at the nascent centriole and facilitate the accessibility of SadB to Ser385. The latter phosphorylation site is near the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of γ-tubulin and induces a conformational change to unmask the NLS, which leads to the nuclear accumulation of γ-tubulin (Figs. 1 and 2).13,14,20,21,22,24,27 This process implies that the cytosolic and nuclear γ-tubulin pools have different conformations, which could provide the basis for the development of therapeutic compounds that target the nuclear activity of γ-tubulin. Furthermore, studies of murine NIH3T3 embryonic fibroblasts and human U2OS osteosarcoma cells have indicated that γ-tubulin is the only member of the tubulin family that has a bipartite NLS on the C terminus (Fig. 3).27 Notably, Ser385 is located at the starting region of a motif that is commonly found in DNA-binding proteins called a helix-loop-helix (Fig. 3b). This motif concurs with the DNA-binding ability of the C terminus of γ-tubulin.14
To enable the G1-to-S phase transition and cell cycle progression, in late G1, the protein retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) is inactivated to initiate the transcriptional activities of E2 promoter binding factors (E2Fs). The transcriptional activities of E2Fs are necessary to induce the expressions of target genes that are essential for centrosome duplication and DNA replication.57 In the S phase, nuclear γ-tubulin turns off the transcriptional activities of E2Fs (Fig. 1).13,14,43 Furthermore, γ-tubulin inactivates the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosomeCdh1 at the G1-to-S transition (Fig. 1).51,58
It is not only the presence or absence of centrosomes that affects cell division. In Drosophila, this process is regulated by the positioning of the centrosomes in germline stem cells,49 and the Rab11-mediated association of γ-tubulin with endosomes contributes to the organization and orientation of mitotic spindles.39 Moreover, the centrosomes contain various protein kinases that are involved in mitotic progression.59,60 During mitosis, γ-strings assist in the formation of the nuclear envelope around chromatin,28,40,41,42 whereas γTURCs regulate microtubule nucleation and mitotic progression.29,52,61,62,63
In addition to interacting with proteins that are involved in microtubule nucleation and cell cycle progression, γ-tubulin associates with Rad51, C53, BRCA1, p53, Chk2, and ATR,21,22,59,64,65,66,67,68,69 which are proteins that are involved in checkpoint activation and DNA repair. However, the involvement of γ-tubulin in DNA repair remains to be elucidated. It is plausible that the γ-tubulin meshwork could serve as a signal transduction hub that coordinates various cellular responses.
Role of γ-tubulin in disease
Thus, γ-tubulin is associated with various checkpoint proteins and plays a role in regulating cell division, which suggests that the γ-tubulin meshwork is involved in cancer development.21,22,59,64,65,66,67,68,69 Moreover, centrosome amplification is correlated with high-tumor histological grade, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis.70,71,72 Furthermore, in various tumors and cell lines (medulloblastoma, myelomas, non-small cell carcinoma, breast cancer, gliomas, and glioblastoma), the localization pattern and expression levels of γ-tubulin are altered.73,74,75,76,77,78 Those observations imply that increased levels of γ-tubulin may lead to a more complex γ-tubulin meshwork and thereby favor tumor progression.
Intriguingly, in various tumors (i.e., retinoblastoma and bladder, breast, colorectal, and small cell lung carcinomas [SCLCs]), γ-tubulin and RB1 moderate each other’s expression, and, in the absence of γ-tubulin and RB1, the uncontrolled transcriptional activities of E2Fs upregulate apoptotic genes that cause cell death.13,14 In some tumor types, the RB1 gene is deleted or carries somatic mutations. Furthermore, the RB1 pathway is frequently silenced in multiple malignancies, such as prostate, bladder, colon, small cell lung, and breast cancers and in retinoblastoma osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and lymphoblastic leukemia.13,43,79,80,81,82,83,84 Thus, the inhibition of γ-tubulin has been suggested as a strategy for broad-range targeted anti-cancer therapy for RB1-deficient tumors.13,14,43 Indeed, the citral analogue citral dimethyl acetal (CDA) and the approved drug dimethylfumarate (DMF) target the nuclear activity of γ-tubulin, and both of these agents exhibit antitumorigenic activity in vivo.43,85 Notably, DMF has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and psoriasis and has few side effects when used for these purposes.86,87 In contrast, the microtubule-depolymerizing drugs colchicine and gatastatin affect the functions of γ-tubulin,34,88,89 but these agents have numerous side effects that are related to their depolymerizing influence on the microtubules. Colchicine is used to treat gout and familial Mediterranean fever.90
Interestingly, spontaneous mutations in TUBG1 are associated with lissencephaly and microcephaly, which are two of the most common brain malformations that can lead to mental retardation and neurological morbidity in children.91,92 TUBG1 gene mutations in this context cause changes in the amino acids Tyr92Cys, Thr331Pro, and Leu387Pro. Notably, in yeast cells, the Tyr92Cys mutation affects microtubule positioning; whereas, the Leu387Pro mutation in the DNA-binding domain of γ-tubulin (Fig. 3) influences nuclear positioning, which highlights the importance of the γ-tubulin meshwork in cellular homeostasis and the influence of this network on disease development.
Conclusion
Our knowledge is limited regarding to the functions of γ-tubulin beyond the role of this protein in microtubule nucleation and possible use as a therapeutic target. This review summarizes the known functions of γ-tubulin in cellular homeostasis, and considers the possibility that this protein has an influence on disease development and can be used in cancer treatment. However, further research is needed to elucidate many aspects of the functions of γ-tubulin and how they are associated with the occurrence of disease, for example, in terms of the immune system and the development and functions of cilia, flagella, and the brain. Today, various chemotherapies are focused on the impairment of microtubule function to reduce tumor growth,93,94 and these agents are prescribed for a broad range of malignancies, including lung, breast, gastric, esophageal, bladder, and prostate cancers, Kaposi sarcoma, and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.94 Unfortunately, the effectiveness of microtubule-targeting drugs for cancer therapy is limited due to drug resistance and severe side effects in treated patients.94 Most microtubule-targeting compounds are inhibitors of α- and β-tubulin.94
Accordingly, knowledge of the functions and regulation of the γ-tubulin meshwork in cell division, the immune system, and the development of the brain will pave the way for establishing novel broad-range targeted therapies that cause fewer side effects. Thus, understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate the dynamics of the γ-tubulin meshwork is clearly a prerequisite for the development of such new drugs.
References
Bornens, M. Organelle positioning and cell polarity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 874–886 (2008).
Ananthakrishnan, R. & Ehrlicher, A. The forces behind cell movement. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 3, 303–317 (2007).
Simon, D. N. & Wilson, K. L. The nucleoskeleton as a genome-associated dynamic ‘network of networks’. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 695–708 (2011).
Gonczy, P. Towards a molecular architecture of centriole assembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 425–435 (2012).
Yoshida, M. et al. Microtubule-organizing center formation at telomeres induces meiotic telomere clustering. J. Cell Biol. 200, 385–395 (2013).
Trevor, K. T., McGuire, J. G. & Leonova, E. V. Association of vimentin intermediate filaments with the centrosome. J. Cell Sci. 108(Pt 1), 343–356 (1995).
Wang, W., Chen, L., Ding, Y., Jin, J. & Liao, K. Centrosome separation driven by actin-microfilaments during mitosis is mediated by centrosome-associated tyrosine-phosphorylated cortactin. J. Cell Sci. 121, 1334–1343 (2008).
Malone, C. J. et al. The C. elegans hook protein, ZYG-12, mediates the essential attachment between the centrosome and nucleus. Cell 115, 825–836 (2003).
Farina, F. et al. The centrosome is an actin-organizing centre. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 65–75 (2016).
Lancaster, M. A. & Gleeson, J. G. The primary cilium as a cellular signaling center: lessons from disease. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19, 220–229 (2009).
Sloboda, R. D. & Rosenbaum, J. L. Making sense of cilia and flagella. J. Cell Biol. 179, 575–582 (2007).
Dutcher, S. K. The tubulin fraternity: Alpha to eta. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 49–54 (2001).
Ehlen, A. et al. Tumors with nonfunctional retinoblastoma protein are killed by reduced gamma-tubulin levels. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 17241–17247 (2012).
Hoog, G., Zarrizi, R., von Stedingk, K., Jonsson, K. & Alvarado-Kristensson, M. Nuclear localization of gamma-tubulin affects E2F transcriptional activity and S-phase progression. FASEB J. 25, 3815–3827 (2011).
Kollman, J. M., Polka, J. K., Zelter, A., Davis, T. N. & Agard, D. A. Microtubule nucleating gamma-TuSC assembles structures with 13-fold microtubule-like symmetry. Nature 466, 879–882 (2010).
Weil, C. F., Oakley, C. E. & Oakley, B. R. Isolation of mip (microtubule-interacting protein) mutations of Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 2963–2968 (1986).
Zheng, Y., Jung, M. K. & Oakley, B. R. Gamma-tubulin is present in Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens and is associated with the centrosome. Cell 65, 817–823 (1991).
Wise, D. O., Krahe, R. & Oakley, B. R. The gamma-tubulin gene family in humans. Genomics 67, 164–170 (2000).
Oakley, B. R., Oakley, C. E., Yoon, Y. & Jung, M. K. Gamma-tubulin is a component of the spindle pole body that is essential for microtubule function in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 61, 1289–1301 (1990).
Draberova, E. et al. Overexpression and nucleolar localization of gamma-tubulin small complex proteins GCP2 and GCP3 in glioblastoma. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 74, 723–742 (2015).
Horejsi, B. et al. Nuclear gamma-tubulin associates with nucleoli and interacts with tumor suppressor protein C53. J. Cell Physiol. 227, 367–382 (2012).
Lesca, C. et al. DNA damage induce gamma-tubulin-RAD51 nuclear complexes in mammalian cells. Oncogene 24, 5165–5172 (2005).
Lindstrom, L. et al. The GTPase domain of gamma-tubulin is required for normal mitochondrial function and spatial organization. Commun. Biol., https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0037-3 (2018).
Alvarado-Kristensson, M., Rodriguez, M. J., Silio, V., Valpuesta, J. M. & Carrera, A. C. SADB phosphorylation of gamma-tubulin regulates centrosome duplication. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1081–1092 (2009).
Kim, H. K. et al. De novo formation of basal bodies in Naegleria gruberi: regulation by phosphorylation. J. Cell Biol. 169, 719–724 (2005).
Ruiz, F., Beisson, J., Rossier, J. & Dupuis-Williams, P. Basal body duplication in Paramecium requires gamma-tubulin. Curr. Biol. 9, 43–46 (1999).
Eklund, G., Lang, S., Glindre, J., Ehlen, A. & Alvarado-Kristensson, M. The nuclear localization of gamma-tubulin is regulated by SadB-mediated phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 21360–21373 (2014).
Rossello, C. A., Lindstrom, L., Glindre, J., Eklund, G. & Alvarado-Kristensson, M. Gamma-tubulin coordinates nuclear envelope assembly around chromatin. Heliyon 2, e00166 (2016).
Hendrickson, T. W., Yao, J., Bhadury, S., Corbett, A. H. & Joshi, H. C. Conditional mutations in gamma-tubulin reveal its involvement in chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 2469–2481 (2001).
Felix, M. A., Antony, C., Wright, M. & Maro, B. Centrosome assembly in vitro: role of gamma-tubulin recruitment in Xenopus sperm aster formation. J. Cell Biol. 124, 19–31 (1994).
Stearns, T. & Kirschner, M. In vitro reconstitution of centrosome assembly and function: the central role of gamma-tubulin. Cell 76, 623–637 (1994).
Wang, T. et al. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science 350, 1096–1101 (2015).
Yuba-Kubo, A., Kubo, A., Hata, M. & Tsukita, S. Gene knockout analysis of two gamma-tubulin isoforms in mice. Dev. Biol. 282, 361–373 (2005).
Lindstrom, L. & Alvarado-Kristensson, M. Characterization of gamma-tubulin filaments in mammalian cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1865, 158–171 (2017).
Draberova, E. et al. Differential expression of human gamma-tubulin isotypes during neuronal development and oxidative stress points to a gamma-tubulin-2 prosurvival function. FASEB J. 31, 1828–1846 (2017).
Pouchucq, L., Lobos-Ruiz, P., Araya, G., Valpuesta, J. M. & Monasterio, O. The chaperonin CCT promotes the formation of fibrillar aggregates of gamma-tubulin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1866, 519–526 (2018).
Chumova, J. et al. gamma-Tubulin has a conserved intrinsic property of self-polymerization into double stranded filaments and fibrillar networks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1865, 734–748 (2018).
Rios, R. M., Sanchis, A., Tassin, A. M., Fedriani, C. & Bornens, M. GMAP-210 recruits gamma-tubulin complexes to cis-Golgi membranes and is required for Golgi ribbon formation. Cell 118, 323–335 (2004).
Hehnly, H. & Doxsey, S. Rab11 endosomes contribute to mitotic spindle organization and orientation. Dev. Cell 28, 497–507 (2014).
Batzenschlager, M. et al. The GIP gamma-tubulin complex-associated proteins are involved in nuclear architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 480 (2013).
Xue, J. Z., Woo, E. M., Postow, L., Chait, B. T. & Funabiki, H. Chromatin-bound Xenopus Dppa2 shapes the nucleus by locally inhibiting microtubule assembly. Dev. Cell 27, 47–59 (2013).
Yokoyama, H. et al. The nucleoporin MEL-28 promotes RanGTP-dependent gamma-tubulin recruitment and microtubule nucleation in mitotic spindle formation. Nat. Commun. 5, 3270 (2014).
Lindstrom, L. et al. Therapeutic targeting of nuclear gamma-tubulin in RB1-negative tumors. Mol. Cancer Res. 13, 1073–1082 (2015).
Hinchcliffe, E. H., Miller, F. J., Cham, M., Khodjakov, A. & Sluder, G. Requirement of a centrosomal activity for cell cycle progression through G1 into S phase. Science 291, 1547–1550 (2001).
Balczon, R., Simerly, C., Takahashi, D. & Schatten, G. Arrest of cell cycle progression during first interphase in murine zygotes microinjected with anti-PCM-1 antibodies. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 52, 183–192 (2002).
Matsumoto, Y. & Maller, J. L. A centrosomal localization signal in cyclin E required for Cdk2-independent S phase entry. Science 306, 885–888 (2004).
Srsen, V., Gnadt, N., Dammermann, A. & Merdes, A. Inhibition of centrosome protein assembly leads to p53-dependent exit from the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 174, 625–630 (2006).
Mikule, K. et al. Loss of centrosome integrity induces p38-p53-p21-dependent G1-S arrest. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 160–170 (2007).
Cheng, J. et al. Centrosome misorientation reduces stem cell division during ageing. Nature 456, 599–604 (2008).
Ferguson, R. L. & Maller, J. L. Centrosomal localization of cyclin E-Cdk2 is required for initiation of DNA synthesis. Curr. Biol. 20, 856–860 (2010).
Nayak, T. et al. Gamma-tubulin regulates the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome during interphase. J. Cell Biol. 190, 317–330 (2010).
Muller, H., Fogeron, M. L., Lehmann, V., Lehrach, H. & Lange, B. M. A centrosome-independent role for gamma-TuRC proteins in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Science 314, 654–657 (2006).
Gromley, A. et al. A novel human protein of the maternal centriole is required for the final stages of cytokinesis and entry into S phase. J. Cell Biol. 161, 535–545 (2003).
Khodjakov, A. & Rieder, C. L. Centrosomes enhance the fidelity of cytokinesis in vertebrates and are required for cell cycle progression. J. Cell Biol. 153, 237–242 (2001).
Hemerly, A. S., Prasanth, S. G., Siddiqui, K. & Stillman, B. Orc1 controls centriole and centrosome copy number in human cells. Science 323, 789–793 (2009).
Carrera, A. C. & Alvarado-Kristensson, M. SADB kinases license centrosome replication. Cell Cycle 8, 4005–4006 (2009).
Meraldi, P., Lukas, J., Fry, A. M., Bartek, J. & Nigg, E. A. Centrosome duplication in mammalian somatic cells requires E2F and Cdk2-cyclin A. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 88–93 (1999).
Edgerton-Morgan, H. & Oakley, B. R. gamma-Tubulin plays a key role in inactivating APC/C(Cdh1) at the G(1)-S boundary. J. Cell Biol. 198, 785–791 (2012).
Chouinard, G., Clement, I., Lafontaine, J., Rodier, F. & Schmitt, E. Cell cycle-dependent localization of CHK2 at centrosomes during mitosis. Cell Div. 8, 7 (2013).
Oshimori, N., Ohsugi, M. & Yamamoto, T. The Plk1 target Kizuna stabilizes mitotic centrosomes to ensure spindle bipolarity. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1095–1101 (2006).
Mayer, C., Filopei, J., Batac, J., Alford, L. & Paluh, J. L. An extended anaphase signaling pathway for Mad2p includes microtubule organizing center proteins and multiple motor-dependent transitions. Cell Cycle 5, 1456–1463 (2006).
Prigozhina, N. L., Walker, R. A., Oakley, C. E. & Oakley, B. R. Gamma-tubulin and the C-terminal motor domain kinesin-like protein, KLPA, function in the establishment of spindle bipolarity in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 3161–3174 (2001).
Prigozhina, N. L. et al. gamma-tubulin plays an essential role in the coordination of mitotic events. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 1374–1386 (2004).
Hsu, L. C. & White, R. L. BRCA1 is associated with the centrosome during mitosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12983–12988 (1998).
Hubert, T., Vandekerckhove, J. & Gettemans, J. Cdk1 and BRCA1 target gamma-tubulin to microtubule domains. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 414, 240–245 (2011).
Starita, L. M. et al. BRCA1-dependent ubiquitination of gamma-tubulin regulates centrosome number. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 8457–8466 (2004).
Zhang, S., Hemmerich, P. & Grosse, F. Centrosomal localization of DNA damage checkpoint proteins. J. Cell Biochem. 101, 451–465 (2007).
Morris, V. B., Brammall, J., Noble, J. & Reddel, R. p53 localizes to the centrosomes and spindles of mitotic cells in the embryonic chick epiblast, human cell lines, and a human primary culture: an immunofluorescence study. Exp. Cell Res. 256, 122–130 (2000).
Kanai, M. et al. Involvement of poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase 1 and poly(ADP-Ribosyl)ation in regulation of centrosome function. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 2451–2462 (2003).
Lingle, W. L. et al. Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1978–1983 (2002).
Kronenwett, U. et al. Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas based on genomic instability. Cancer Res. 64, 904–909 (2004).
Guo, H. Q. et al. Analysis of the cellular centrosome in fine-needle aspirations of the breast. Breast Cancer Res. 9, R48 (2007).
Caracciolo, V. et al. Differential expression and cellular distribution of gamma-tubulin and betaIII-tubulin in medulloblastomas and human medulloblastoma cell lines. J. Cell Physiol. 223, 519–529 (2010).
Cho, E. H., Whipple, R. A., Matrone, M. A., Balzer, E. M. & Martin, S. S. Delocalization of gamma-tubulin due to increased solubility in human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Biol. Ther. 9, 66–76 (2010).
Maounis, N. F. et al. Overexpression of gamma-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer. Histol. Histopathol. 27, 1183–1194 (2012).
Dementyeva, E. et al. Clinical implication of centrosome amplification and expression of centrosomal functional genes in multiple myeloma. J. Transl. Med. 11, 77 (2013).
Niu, Y. et al. Increased expression of centrosomal alpha, gamma-tubulin in atypical ductal hyperplasia and carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Sci. 100, 580–587 (2009).
Katsetos, C. D. et al. Altered cellular distribution and subcellular sorting of gamma-tubulin in diffuse astrocytic gliomas and human glioblastoma cell lines. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 65, 465–477 (2006).
Molenaar, J. J. et al. Cyclin D1 and CDK4 activity contribute to the undifferentiated phenotype in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 68, 2599–2609 (2008).
Zhang, J. et al. Key pathways are frequently mutated in high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Blood 118, 3080–3087 (2011).
Hurst, C. D., Tomlinson, D. C., Williams, S. V., Platt, F. M. & Knowles, M. A. Inactivation of the Rb pathway and overexpression of both isoforms of E2F3 are obligate events in bladder tumours with 6p22 amplification. Oncogene 27, 2716–2727 (2008).
Grasemann, C. et al. Gains and overexpression identify DEK and E2F3 as targets of chromosome 6p gains in retinoblastoma. Oncogene 24, 6441–6449 (2005).
Imai, M. A., Oda, Y., Oda, M., Nakanishi, I. & Kawahara, E. Overexpression of E2F1 associated with LOH at RB locus and hyperphosphorylation of RB in non-small cell lung carcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 130, 320–326 (2004).
Gauthier, M. L. et al. Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors. Cancer Cell 12, 479–491 (2007).
Loewe, R. et al. Dimethylfumarate impairs melanoma growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 66, 11888–11896 (2006).
Linker, R. A. & Gold, R. Dimethylfumarate for treatment of multiple sclerosis: mechanism of action, effectiveness, and side effects. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 13, 394 (2013).
Mrowietz, U. & Asadullah, K. Dimethylfumarate for psoriasis: More than a dietary curiosity. Trends Mol. Med. 11, 43–48 (2005).
Chinen, T. et al. The gamma-tubulin-specific inhibitor gatastatin reveals temporal requirements of microtubule nucleation during the cell cycle. Nat. Commun. 6, 8722 (2015).
Friesen, D. E. et al. Discovery of small molecule inhibitors that interact with gamma-tubulin. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 79, 639–652 (2012).
Finkelstein, Y. et al. Colchicine poisoning: the dark side of an ancient drug. Clin. Toxicol. 48, 407–414 (2010).
Poirier, K. et al. Mutations in TUBG1, DYNC1H1, KIF5C and KIF2A cause malformations of cortical development and microcephaly. Nat. Genet. 45, 639–647 (2013).
Bahi-Buisson, N. et al. The wide spectrum of tubulinopathies: what are the key features for the diagnosis? Brain 137, 1676–1700 (2014).
Hotchkiss, K. A. et al. Inhibition of endothelial cell function in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo by docetaxel (Taxotere): association with impaired repositioning of the microtubule organizing center. Mol. Cancer Ther. 1, 1191–1200 (2002).
Zhou, J. & Giannakakou, P. Targeting microtubules for cancer chemotherapy. Curr. Med. Chem. AntiCancer Agents 5, 65–71 (2005).
Aldaz, H., Rice, L. M., Stearns, T. & Agard, D. A. Insights into microtubule nucleation from the crystal structure of human gamma-tubulin. Nature 435, 523–527 (2005).
Acknowledgements
The author apologizes for not citing many studies concerning γ-tubulin due to space limitations. The author thanks Patricia Ödman for editorial assistance. The work described was funded in part by the Swedish Cancer Society (CAN 2016/3669), Skane University Hospital in Malmö Cancer Research Fund (20151209), the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation (PR2016-0084), and the Crafoordska Foundation (20170530).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Alvarado-Kristensson, M. γ-tubulin as a signal-transducing molecule and meshwork with therapeutic potential. Sig Transduct Target Ther 3, 24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-018-0021-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-018-0021-x
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
tubg1 Somatic Mutants Show Tubulinopathy-Associated Neurodevelopmental Phenotypes in a Zebrafish Model
Molecular Neurobiology (2024)
-
Prediction of anti-microtubular target proteins of tubulins and their interacting proteins using Gene Ontology tools
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (2023)
-
Upregulation of TUBG1 expression promotes hepatocellular carcinoma development
Medical Oncology (2023)
-
The γ-tubulin meshwork assists in the recruitment of PCNA to chromatin in mammalian cells
Communications Biology (2021)