Abstract
Mood and anxiety disorders are leading causes of disability worldwide and are major contributors to the global burden of diseases. Neuropeptides, such as oxytocin and opioid peptides, are important for emotion regulation. Previous studies have demonstrated that oxytocin reduced depression- and anxiety-like behavior in male and female mice, and opioid receptor activation reduced depression-like behavior. However, it remains unclear whether the endogenous opioid system interacts with the oxytocin system to facilitate emotion regulation in male and female mice. We hypothesized that opioid receptor blockade would inhibit the anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects of oxytocin. In this study, we systemically administered naloxone, a preferential μ−opioid receptor antagonist, and then intracerebroventricularly administered oxytocin. We then tested mice on the elevated zero maze and the tail suspension tests, respective tests of anxiety- and depression-like behavior. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, naloxone potentiated the anxiolytic-like, but not the antidepressant-like, effect of oxytocin. Using a selective μ−opioid receptor antagonist, D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2, and a selective κ−opioid receptor antagonist, norbinaltorphimine, we demonstrate that μ−opioid receptor blockade potentiated the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin, whereas κ−opioid receptor blockade inhibited the oxytocin-induced anxiolytic-like effects. The present results suggest that endogenous opioids can regulate the oxytocin system to modulate anxiety-like behavior. Potential clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mood and anxiety disorders are leading causes of disability worldwide, affecting approximately 18% of adults at least once in their lifetime [1]. The neurobiological substrates that contribute to emotion regulation are diverse, leaving significant gaps in our knowledge about how they interact and how they contribute to the development of and protection against depression and anxiety disorders. Additionally, many people do not respond positively to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved pharmacological treatments [2, 3]. Thus, new studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these disorders to provide a broader spectrum of treatment options.
The central administration of oxytocin has been shown to improve preclinical stress-related measures, such as anxiety-like responses, depression-like responses, alcohol drinking, and stress-induced corticosterone levels [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Oxytocin, opioid peptides (e.g., β−endorphin and leu- and met-enkephalin) [13, 14], and their class A G-protein coupled oxytocin and μ−opioid receptors are key components of the neurocircuitry of the hypothalamus and the extended amygdala, i.e., brain regions that mediate stress and emotion regulation [15, 16].
Oxytocin release in the central nucleus of the amygdala has also been shown to gate fear responses in rodents [17,18,19], and systemic oxytocin administration has been shown to reduce alcohol drinking in a novel rodent model of comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorder [20]. In humans, studies have shown that intranasal oxytocin is effective at reducing subjective ratings related to social anxiety [21] and depression [22] when used as an adjunct to exposure therapy and escitalopram treatment, respectively.
Like oxytocin, preferential μ−opioid receptor agonists have demonstrated anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like properties in animal models [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. For example, morphine and oxycodone reduced anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze in stressed [23, 24] and stress-naïve rodents [25, 26]. Morphine, levorphanol, methadone, and tramadol produced antidepressant-like effects, i.e., decreased immobility, in the forced swim test [27,28,29,30,31]. Additionally, preclinical studies showed that an atypical antidepressant [36], tianeptine, which is a full μ−opioid receptor agonist, decreased depression- and anxiety-like behavior in rodents in the forced swim test and novelty-suppressed feeding test [32].
Previous studies demonstrated that μ−opioid receptor blockade inhibits oxytocin-mediated antinociception [37] and that μ−opioid [38] and oxytocin [39] receptors are expressed in brain regions relevant to anxiety- and depression-like behavior, and are simultaneously modulated during development [40]. Given these functional and morphological similarities between the opioid and oxytocin systems, we tested the hypothesis that the oxytocin and opioid systems interact to affect anxiety- and depression-like behavior. Specifically, we hypothesized that naloxone, a preferential μ−opioid receptor antagonist, would block the effect of oxytocin in tests of anxiety- and depression-like behavior in mice, and that the effect of naloxone would be mediated by μ−, but not κ−opioid receptors. To investigate these hypotheses, we administered naloxone (μ−opioid receptor-preferential opioid receptor antagonist) subcutaneously, D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTAP; μ−opioid receptor-selective antagonist) intracerebroventricularly, or norbinaltorphimine (κ−opioid receptor selective antagonist) intraperitoneally prior to intracerebroventricular administration of oxytocin in male and female mice. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, we found that naloxone and CTAP potentiated the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin in the elevated zero maze, whereas norbinaltorphimine blocked this effect. Naloxone in combination with oxytocin did not reduce depression-like behavior (typical immobility), but naloxone reduced other measures (atypical immobility) in the tail suspension test.
Materials & Methods
Study approval
This study was conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program Animal Care and Use Committee.
Animals
One hundred sixty male and 187 female C57Bl/6 J mice, 8-12 weeks old, weighing 18-30 g were used. Females were not ovariectomized because we learned from our previous study that oxytocin reduces anxiety-like behavior in naturally cycling females [12]. They were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and acclimated to the laboratory for at least 1 week before the experiments began. The mice were housed in same-sex groups (2-4 per cage) in plastic cages (28 cm width × 17 cm length × 12 cm height) with free access to food and water except during testing procedures. The mice were kept in a room with a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7 AM) with controlled temperature (22 ± 2°C) and humidity (50-60%). All behavioral testing occurred during the light cycle because previous work in our laboratory has shown that this produces a response on the elevated zero maze where both anxiolytic-like and anxiogenic-like effects can be detected. This is consistent with our previous study that used a similar protocol [12]. The mice were randomly assigned to experimental groups after undergoing intracerebroventricular cannulation. The sample size was determined based on our previous publication to ensure adequate power to detect a pre-specified effect size [12].
Intracerebroventricular cannulation
We conducted aseptic stereotaxic surgeries and drug administration procedures as previously described [12]. A 26-gauge, 5 mm, stainless steel guide cannula (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA) was unilaterally implanted into the lateral ventricle using the following coordinates relative to bregma: −0.1 mm (anterior/posterior), −0.9 mm (medial/lateral), −1.6 mm (dorsal/ventral). The coordinates were based on Paxinos and Franklin’s The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates [41]. The cannula was fixed to the skull using skull screws and dental acrylic and closed using a stylet and an aluminum cap. Mice were then treated with meloxicam (5 mg/kg) postoperatively to reduce inflammation and placed in a warm cage (a heating blanket at 65-70°C was placed under the recovery cage) for at least 2 h before they were returned to their housing room. The mice were allowed to recover for at least 5 days before they were tested.
Drug administration
Intracerebroventricular administration was performed as previously described [12]. After removal of the dust cap and dummy cannula, a 33-gauge infusion cannula that extended 1 mm beyond the guide cannula was inserted. The infusion cannula was attached to a polyethylene tube (PE-50; Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA) that was connected to a 10 μl Hamilton syringe driven by a microinfusion pump (KD Scientific, Holliston, MA, USA). Solutions were infused in a volume of 1-3 μl at a rate of 0.5 μl/min. The infusion cannula was left in place for at least 2 min to allow drug diffusion.
Vehicle (10 mL/kg saline) or naloxone (1, 2 or 4 mg/kg/10 mL) was administered subcutaneously 5 min prior to intracerebroventricular infusion of vehicle (saline in a 2 μL volume) or oxytocin (500 ng in a 2 μL volume) for Experiments 1 and 4. Vehicle (artificial cerebrospinal fluid in a 3 μL volume) or CTAP (1, 2 or 3 μg in a 1, 2 or 3 μL volume, respectively) was administered intracerebroventricularly 45 min prior to intracerebroventricular infusion of vehicle or oxytocin, as described above, for Experiment 2. Norbinaltorphimine is not selective for κ-opioid receptors until 4-24 h after administration [42]. Thus, vehicle (10 mL/kg saline) or norbinaltorphimine (10, 20, or 30 mg/kg/10 mL) was administered intraperitoneally 24 h prior to intracerebroventricular infusion of vehicle or oxytocin for Experiment 3. Mice were tested on the elevated zero maze or the tail suspension test 15 min after intracerebroventricular administration of oxytocin. Experimental drugs or controls were assigned to separate groups (i.e., a between-subjects design) of randomly selected mice (see Fig. 1).
Elevated zero maze
The elevated zero maze test was conducted as previously reported [12]. Each mouse was allowed to explore the elevated zero maze for 5 min, and behavior was recorded using a wall-mounted Stoelting USB camera (Wood Dale, IL, USA). Behavior was analyzed in real-time by AnyMaze tracking software (Wood Dale, IL, USA). The percent time that the animal spent in the open quadrants (open zone occupancy) and number of entries into the open quadrants (open zone entries) were used as measures of anxiety-like behavior. Increases in open zone occupancy and entries were interpreted as a reduction of anxiety-like behavior.
Tail suspension test
The tail suspension test was conducted as previously reported [12]. The 6 min test began immediately after the mouse was suspended. The test was recorded using a Stoelting USB camera that was mounted to a tripod and connected to a computer. The time that the animal spent immobile without trunk curling (typical immobility duration) and with trunk curling (atypical immobility duration) were measured and summed (total immobility duration). Total and typical immobility duration were used as measures of depression-like behavior. Atypical immobility duration was measured as a potential indicator of opioid-mediated mechanism of action [27]. All measures were scored by experimenters who were blind to experimental treatments.
Histological verification of the injection site
After the final day of experimentation, the mice were euthanized by isoflurane overdose followed by cervical dislocation. Two microliters of Chicago Blue Dye solution (0.1% w/v) was microinfused through the guide cannulae. The brains were extracted and fresh frozen in isopentane on dry ice. Brains were sectioned at 50 μm until the cannula tracks and/or dye appeared. The location of the cannulae was identified using Paxinos and Watson’s The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates [43] for guidance. Brains that were accurately cannulated displayed a blue stain throughout the lateral, third, and fourth ventricles. Data from mice that were not successfully cannulated were excluded.
Statistics
The statistical analyses were conducted using Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). All data met the assumption of a normal distribution for statistical tests, and variance was similar between groups. The data were analyzed using two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs). Analyses included sex (male vs. female) × opioid antagonist pretreatment (vehicle vs. 1-4 mg/kg naloxone, 1-3 μg/mouse CTAP, 10–30 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine) in oxytocin-treated mice, sex (male vs. female) × opioid antagonist pretreatment (vehicle vs. 4 mg/kg naloxone, 3 μg/mouse CTAP, 20 or 30 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine) in vehicle-treated mice, and sex (male vs. female) × treatment (vehicle vs. oxytocin) in vehicle-pretreated mice. ANOVAs that yielded a significant main effect of treatment or significant interaction effects were further analyzed using Holm-Sidak’s multiple-comparison post hoc test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all tests. Data are expressed as means and standard errors of the means.
Results
Effect of opioid receptor antagonism on the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin in male and female mice using the elevated zero maze
To test the interaction of naloxone with oxytocin, mice were subcutaneously pretreated with vehicle or naloxone then administered vehicle or oxytocin (500 ng/mouse) 5 min later via intracerebroventricular administration. The results for open zone occupancy, entries, and distance traveled in the elevated zero maze test are shown in Fig. 2.
The two-way ANOVA comparing all oxytocin-treated groups for open zone occupancy indicated a main effect of naloxone (naloxone > vehicle; F3,61 = 7.210, p = 0.0003) but no main effect of sex (F1,61 = 2.958, p = 0.0905), and no naloxone × sex interaction (F3,61 = 0.5784, p = 0.6314). Post hoc comparisons indicated that 1 mg/kg (p = 0.0337), 2 mg/kg (p = 0.0337), and 4 mg/kg (p < 0.0001) naloxone pretreatment, combined with oxytocin, produced higher open zone occupancy compared to vehicle pretreatment. The two-way ANOVAs comparing all oxytocin-treated groups for open zone entries and total distance traveled indicated no main effect of naloxone pretreatment (entries: F3,61 = 0.7975, p = 0.5000; distance: F3,61 = 0.2259, p = 0.8780), no main effect of sex (entries: F1,61 = 0.3222, p = 0.5724; distance: F3,61 = 1.465, p = 0.2309), and no naloxone × sex interaction (entries: F3,61 = 1.126, p = 0.3456; distance: F3,61 = 1.860, p = 0.3456).
The two-way ANOVA comparing vehicle vs. oxytocin alone in vehicle-pretreated mice on the elevated zero maze indicated a main effect of oxytocin (oxytocin > vehicle; F1,39 = 13.25, p = 0.0008) and a main effect of sex (male > female; F1,39 = 11.00, p = 0.0020), but no oxytocin × sex interaction (F1,39 = 1.097, p = 0.3014), for open zone occupancy. Similar analyses comparing vehicle vs. oxytocin alone for open zone entries indicated main effects of oxytocin (oxytocin > vehicle; F1,39 = 6.407, p = 0.0155) but no main effects of sex (F1,39 = 2.613, p = 0.1140) and no oxytocin × sex interaction (F1,39 = 2.313, p = 0.1364). The analysis of total distance traveled, indicated a main effect of oxytocin (oxytocin > vehicle; F1,39 = 9.530, p = 0.0037) and a main effect of sex (male > female; F1,39 = 4.517, p = 0.0400) but no oxytocin × sex interaction (F1,39 = 2.171, p = 0.1487).
The two-way ANOVA comparing vehicle vs. 4 mg/kg-naloxone pretreatment in vehicle-treated mice indicated a main effect of naloxone on open zone occupancy (naloxone > vehicle; F1,34 = 7.166, p = 0.0114), but not open zone entries (F1,34 = 2.826, p = 0.1019) and a trend toward significance for total distance traveled (F1,34 = 3.937, p = 0.0554). A main effect of sex was indicated for open zone occupancy (males > females; F1,34 = 4.303, p = 0.0457), but not for open zone entries (F1,34 = 1.843, p = 0.1835) nor total distance traveled (F1,34 = 1.499, p = 0.2293). These analyses did not show a naloxone × sex interaction for open zone occupancy (F1,34 = 0.1801, p = 0.6740), entries (F1,34 = 1.509, p = 0.2277), or total distance traveled (F1,34 = 0.0005886, p = 0.9808).
Altogether, the present results replicate our previous study showing that oxytocin is anxiolytic-like in male and female mice [12] and further suggest that blocking μ−opioid receptors can potentiate this effect.
Effect of μ−opioid receptor antagonism on the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin in male and female mice using the elevated zero maze
The selective μ−opioid receptor antagonist, CTAP, was tested to determine whether the effect of naloxone was mediated by μ−opioid receptors. Vehicle or CTAP (1-3 μg/mouse; intracerebroventricular infusion) was administered 45 min prior to oxytocin. The results for open zone occupancy, entries, and total distance traveled in the elevated zero maze test are shown in Fig. 3.
Two-way ANOVAs indicated a main effect of CTAP pretreatment for open zone occupancy (CTAP > vehicle; F3,70 = 9.990, p < 0.0001), but not for open zone entries (F3,70 = 1.613, p = 0.1940) or total distance traveled (F3,70 = 1.896, p = 0.1382). There were no main effects of sex (occupancy: F1,70 = 0.3252, p = 0.5703; entries: F1,70 = 0.2151, p = 0.6442; distance: F1,70 = 0.06746, p = 0.7958) and no CTAP × sex interaction (occupancy: F3,70 = 1.1021, p = 0.3885; entries: F3,70 = 0.5129, p = 0.6747; distance: F3,70 = 0.9439, p = 0.4246) for either measure. Post hoc tests indicated that 2 μg (p = 0.0043) and 3 μg (p < 0.0001) but not 1 μg (p = 0.9437) CTAP potentiated the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin.
The two-way ANOVA comparing vehicle and oxytocin treatment in vehicle-pretreated mice on open zone occupancy indicated a main effect of oxytocin (oxytocin > vehicle; occupancy: F1,41 = 23.23, p < 0.0001; entries: F1,41 = 23.28, p < 0.0001, distance: F1,41 = 35.68, p < 0.0001), no main effect of sex (occupancy: F1,41 = 0.3719, p = 0.5454; entries: F1,41 = 0.9345, p = 0.3394; distance: F1,41 = 0.9221, p = 0.3426), and no oxytocin × sex interaction effect (occupancy: F1,41 = 0.003402, p = 0.9538; entries: F1,41 = 0.1670, p = 0.6849; distance: F1,41 = 0.0004560, p = 0.9831) for the reported measures.
Two-way ANOVAs computed to analyze vehicle vs. 3 μg/mouse CTAP on open zone occupancy in vehicle-treated mice did not demonstrate a main effect of CTAP treatment (occupancy: F1,34 = 1.143, p = 0.2925; entries: F1,34 = 0.03632, p = 0.8500; distance: F1,34 = 2.083, p = 0.1581) or sex (F1,34 = 0.1795, p = 0.6745; entries: F1,34 = 0.8614, p = 0.3599; distance: F1,34 = 0.8647, p = 0.3590) or a CTAP-3 × sex interaction (occupancy: F1,34 = 1.113, p = 0.2988, entries: F1,34 = 0.03632, p = 0.8500; distance: F1,34 = 0.05011, p = 0.8242) for the reported measures.
Effect of κ−opioid receptor antagonism on the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin in male and female mice using the elevated zero maze
Previous studies suggest that like μ−opioid receptor agonists, κ−opioid receptor agonists can delay oxytocin-mediated function and inhibit oxytocin release from the neurohypophysis, whereas κ−opioid receptor antagonists, like μ−opioid receptor antagonists, had the opposite effect [44,45,46]. Thus, we determined whether κ−opioid receptor blockade contributed to the initial potentiating effect of naloxone by administering vehicle or norbinaltorphimine 24 h before vehicle or oxytocin. Males were tested with two doses of norbinaltorphimine (10, 20 mg/kg), whereas females were tested with three doses (10, 20, 30 mg/kg). The data for open zone occupancy, open zone entries, and total distance traveled in the elevated zero maze test are shown in Fig. 4.
Two-way ANOVAs using the 0, 10, and 20 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine doses were used to analyze the effects of norbinaltorphimine and test for sex × norbinaltorphimine pretreatment interactions. The two-way ANOVA indicated a main effect of norbinaltorphimine in oxytocin-treated mice for open zone occupancy (norbinaltorphimine<vehicle; F2,59 = 4.350, p = 0.0173), entries (F2,59 = 6.122, p = 0.0038), and total distance traveled (F2,59 = 4.872, p = 0.0110) but no main effect of sex (occupancy: F1,59 = 0.3830, p = 0.5384; entries: F1,59 = 0.7636, p = 0.3858; distance: F1,59 = 1.349, p = 0.2501). A norbinaltorphimine × sex interaction effect was observed for open zone entries (F2,59 = 3.158, p = 0.0498) and total distance traveled (F2,59 = 3.906, p = 0.0255), but not for open zone occupancy (F2,59 = 1.664, p = 0.1981). Post hoc comparisons of the main norbinaltorphimine effect (i.e., regardless of sex) demonstrated that 20 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine (p = 0.0132), but not 10 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine (p = 0.5152) inhibited the effect of oxytocin in the open zone occupancy. However, post hoc comparisons did not indicate an effect of 10 mg/kg (entries: p = 0.1586; distance: p = 0.2221) or 20 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine (entries: p = 0.1586; distance: p = 0.2221) on the open zone entries or total distance traveled. Post hoc tests that were conducted separately for the male and female data to follow up the norbinaltorphimine × sex interaction indicated that 20 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine (entries: p = 0.0317; distance: p = 0.0163), but not 10 mg/kg (entries: p = 0.2083; distance: p = 0.4638), decreased open zone entries and total distance traveled in males, whereas neither 10 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine (entries: p = 0.3951; distance: p = 0.2523) nor 20 mg/kg norbinaltorphimine (entries: p = 0.7976; distance: p = 0.4437) had an effect on total distance traveled in females. Note that a higher dose of norbinaltorphimine (30 mg/kg) was tested in females and appeared to have effects similar to 20 mg/kg in males.
There was a main effect of oxytocin treatment on open zone occupancy for vehicle-pretreated mice (oxytocin > vehicle; F1,37 = 23.41, p < 0.0001), but no effect of sex (F1,37 = 1.361, p = 0.2508) and no oxytocin × sex interaction (F1,37 = 1.511, p = 0.2267). For measures of open zone entries and total distance traveled, a main effect of oxytocin (oxytocin > vehicle; entries: F1,37 = 22.15, p < 0.0001; distance: F1,37 = 23.62, p < 0.0001) and an oxytocin × sex interaction (entries: F1,37 = 7.153, p = 0.0111; distance: F1,37 = 4.694, p = 0.0368) but no main effect of sex (entries: F1,37 = 0.2335, p = 0.6318; distance: F1,37 = 1.399, p = 0.2444), were observed. Post hoc tests indicated that oxytocin increased open zone entries in males (p < 0.0001) but not in females (p = 0.1110) and total distance traveled in males (p = 0.0001) and in females (p = 0.0369).
There was no main effect of norbinaltorphimine pretreatment alone (occupancy: F1,32 = 2.032, p = 0.1637; entries: F1,32 = 2.947, p = 0.0957; distance: F1,32 = 0.2622, p = 0.6122) and no norbinaltorphimine × sex interaction (occupancy: F1,32 = 0.4665, p = 0.4995; entries: F1,32 = 1.156, p = 0.2904; distance: F1,32 = 1.946, p = 0.1727) in vehicle-treated mice. However, a main effect of sex (males < females; occupancy: F1,32 = 4.304, p = 0.0462; entries: F1,32 = 6.811, p = 0.0137; distance: F1,32 = 9.940, p = 0.0035) was demonstrated for each measure reported.
These data suggest that blockade of κ−opioid receptors has an opposite effect of μ−opioid receptor blockade on the anxiolytic-like effects of oxytocin in male mice.
Effect of opioid receptor antagonism on the antidepressant-like effect of oxytocin in male and female mice using the tail suspension test
We also tested the hypothesis that opioid receptor blockade would affect the antidepressant-like effect of oxytocin. We administered vehicle or naloxone subcutaneously 5 min prior to intracerebroventricular administration of vehicle or oxytocin. The data for total, typical, and atypical immobility duration in the tail suspension test are shown in Fig. 5.
A main effect of oxytocin treatment was demonstrated by comparing vehicle vs. oxytocin in vehicle-pretreated mice such that oxytocin decreased total (F1,35 = 32.96, p < 0.0001) and typical (F1,35 = 62.52, p < 0.0001) immobility duration and increased atypical immobility duration (F1,35 = 10.85, p = 0.0023). There was no main effect of sex (total: F1,35 = 0.3308, p = 0.5689; typical: F1,35 = 0.1672, p = 0.6851; atypical: F1,35 = 0.05623, p = 0.8139) and no oxytocin × sex interaction (total: F1,35 = 0.9328, p = 0.3408; typical: F1,35 = 0.4942, p = 0.4867; atypical: F1,35 = 0.1400, p = 0.7106).
No main effect of naloxone pretreatment was observed in oxytocin-treated mice on total (F3, 71 = 0.9545, p = 0.4191) or typical (F3, 71 = 0.3614, p = 0.7811) immobility duration. However, we observed a main effect of naloxone pretreatment on atypical immobility duration in oxytocin-treated mice (naloxone < vehicle; F3, 71 = 3.701, p = 0.0155). We did not observe a main effect of sex (total: F1, 71 = 1.325, p = 0.2536; typical: F1, 71 = 3.900, p = 0.0522; atypical: F1, 71 = 1.712, p = 0.1949) or naloxone × sex interaction (total: F3, 71 = 0.5508, p = 0.6493; typical: F3, 71 = 0.1111, p = 0.9533; atypical: F3, 71 = 1.352, p = 0.2646) for either of the reported measures. Post hoc tests of the combined male and female data demonstrated that the 4 mg/kg dose of naloxone increased atypical immobility duration (p = 0.0058), whereas the 1 mg/kg (p = 0.0920) and 2 mg/kg (p = 0.0546) doses did not increase atypical immobility duration but demonstrated a trend toward statistical significance.
The vehicle vs. 4 mg/kg naloxone comparison in vehicle-treated mice showed no main effect of naloxone pretreatment (total: F1,31 = 0.6412, p = 0.4294; typical: F1,31 = 0.7300, p = 0.3994; atypical: F1,31 = 2.447, p = 0.1279) or sex (total: F1,31 = 0.2367, p = 0.6300; typical: F1,31 = 0.1920, p = 0.6643; atypical: F1,31 = 2.447, p = 0.1279) and no naloxone × sex interaction (total: F1,31 = 0.004605, p = 0.9463; typical: F1,31 = 0.01403, p = 0.9065; atypical: F1,31 = 2.447, p = 0.1279).
These data suggest that μ−opioid receptor blockade could potentiate the anxiolytic- but not the antidepressant-like effect of oxytocin, suggesting that these behaviors are mediated by different mechanisms. That naloxone could block oxytocin-induced atypical immobility duration further supports this dissociation and suggests that oxytocin may recruit an opioidergic mechanism or that oxytocin may share a downstream mechanism with the μ−opioid receptor.
Discussion
Consistent with previous data from our laboratory [12] and others [4, 47, 48], we demonstrated that intracerebroventricular oxytocin administration reduced measures of anxiety- and depression-like behavior in male and female mice. We then showed that μ−opioid receptor blockade potentiated the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin, whereas κ−opioid receptor blockade, inhibited the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin. μ−Opioid receptor blockade with naloxone had no effect on depression-like behavior (typical immobility duration in the tail suspension test) per se. However, naloxone blocked an atypical immobility curling response that is suggested to be opioid-mediated [34]. Altogether, the present study shows a functional interaction between the opioid and oxytocin systems in anxiety- and depression-like behaviors.
The effects of naloxone in the present study are consistent with reports of naloxone potentiating the effect of FDA-approved anxiolytic drugs and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56], which suggests a consistent role of μ−opioid receptor antagonists in modulating anxiolytic-like behavior. For example, when coadministered with subeffective doses of benzodiazepines, i.e., positive allosteric modulators at the GABA receptor, naloxone (10 mg/kg intraperitoneally) potentiated their anxiolytic-like effect in the elevated plus maze [50,51,52,53,54,55]. Note, however, that others demonstrated an attenuation of the anxiolytic-like effects of benzodiazepines with naloxone in rodents [56,57,58]. Further, in the present study, CTAP, a selective μ−opioid receptor antagonist, administered intracerebroventricularly potentiated the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin, demonstrating that the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin is potentiated by blocking the central action of endogenous opioids at μ−opioid receptors.
Using maternal and social behavior models, studies involving opioid receptor agonists and antagonists have demonstrated a similar profile of opioid system interactions [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. For example, in late pregnancy in rats (i.e., 1-2 days before gestation), naloxone (5 mg/kg; subcutaneous) increased plasma oxytocin concentrations by disinhibiting its release from the neurohypophysis [59,60,61], whereas morphine, a μ−opioid receptor agonist, reduced plasma oxytocin levels [62]. These results support an inhibitory role of endogenous opioids on the oxytocin system in the hypothalamus. A recent report on male and female rhesus macaques demonstrated that naloxone (0.5-2 mg; intranasal) enhanced measures of social attention and cognition when coadministered with oxytocin (24 IU, intranasal) [66]. Additionally, a case study of a 13-year-old boy showed that naltrexone (100 mg/day; oral) and oxytocin (6 IU every 1-3 days; intranasal) combination therapy improved hypothalamic-associated obesity [67]. Altogether, these studies support the hypothesis that μ−opioid receptor antagonism may enhance the efficacy of oxytocin on multiple biological measures.
We also investigated whether blockade of κ−opioid receptors had similar or different effects on the anxiolytic-like effects of oxytocin. κ−opioid receptors are highly expressed in emotion-mediating brain structures, and naloxone and CTAP can bind to κ−opioid receptors, albeit with significantly reduced affinity and potency compared to their binding affinity to μ−opioid receptors. In the present study, we observed that norbinaltorphimine inhibited the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin. This inhibitory effect of norbinaltorphimine supports the well-established hypothesis that κ−opioid receptors mediate effects opposite of μ-opioid receptors, such as dysphoria and dysphoric-like behavior [43, 68,69,70,71].
These results are consistent with our previous report showing that oxytocin reduces anxiety-like behavior in both males and females, with a more pronounced effect in males [12]. We also demonstrated in the previous study that oxytocin was more effective in females in proestrus/estrus compared with females in metestrus/estrus and in ovariectomized females that were supplemented or not with estrogen and progesterone. As such, follow-up studies could investigate whether opioid receptor antagonism would have similar effects in females with various hormonal status. Note that in the present study, µ-opioid receptor antagonists potentiated the effect of oxytocin in both sexes. This may suggest a sex difference in the regulation of oxytocin and/or oxytocin receptor-expressing neurons in male and female mice by opioids and has implications for possible future clinical use.
As demonstrated in our previous study, oxytocin reduced measures of depression-like behavior (i.e., total and typical immobility duration). We also reported that oxytocin increased the atypical immobility response, an additional measure that captures the amount of time that mice spend immobile while the trunk is curled. This atypical immobility behavior phenotype is noteworthy as this behavior is not common in drug-naïve mice. In an early report [27], naloxone (0.5-2 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) blocked curling behavior without affecting typical immobility duration, indicative of an opioid receptor-mediated mechanism. This report also demonstrated that antidepressants that inhibit norepinephrine and/or serotonin reuptake (e.g., imipramine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, desipramine, and citalopram) did not affect atypical immobility, a sub-phenotype of curling, suggesting that the opioids have different or additional mechanisms than typical selective norepinephrine and/or serotonin reuptake inhibitors [27]. Consistent with our results, opioids selectively increased atypical mobility and immobility (curling), while decreasing typical immobility duration, regardless of whether they inhibited monoamine reuptake (levorphanol, -methadone) or not (morphine). Likewise, other studies replicated this effect by showing that some plant extracts that have antidepressant-like activity can decrease typical immobility while increasing atypical mobility and immobility duration [72,73,74,75,76].
As such, the present findings showing a blockade of oxytocin-induced curling with naloxone further support the hypothesis that like opioids, oxytocin recruits a different mechanism to produce atypical immobility in the tail suspension test. A survey of the literature suggests that the atypical behavior phenotype may be mediated by downstream activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). First, both opioids [77,78,79] and oxytocin [80, 81] acutely activate the MAPK pathway. Second, acute inflammation, which also triggers MAPK activation [82, 83], is distinguished by curling (atypical mobility and immobility) in mice [84, 85]. Finally, naloxone inhibits MAPK activation, which may explain its inhibition of atypical immobility [86]. This potential role for MAPK activation should be further explored; this may give further insight into the cellular mechanism of oxytocin and opioid receptors.
Multiple mechanisms can be hypothesized to explain the interaction of naloxone, CTAP, and norbinaltorphimine with oxytocin on anxiety-like behavior in the elevated zero maze. First, we hypothesize that naloxone and CTAP increase the release of oxytocin and the activity of oxytocin neurons in the hypothalamus, as shown in earlier studies [87,88,89,90]. These studies established that μ−opioid receptors have regulatory control over oxytocin receptors in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus. Second, we hypothesize that naloxone and CTAP can directly or indirectly increase the responsiveness of oxytocin receptor-expressing neurons in the extended amygdala, whereas norbinaltorphimine can decrease the responsiveness of these neurons. Previous studies have demonstrated that oxytocin, μ−, and κ−opioid receptors are expressed on GABAergic neurons in the amygdala [18, 91] and predominantly couple inhibitory G-proteins [92, 93]. Others have demonstrated that κ−opioid receptors may bind to stimulatory G-proteins [92] and that oxytocin receptors predominantly couple stimulatory G-proteins [94, 95]. Altogether, these data suggest that μ−opioid receptor antagonists, such as naloxone and CTAP, may disinhibit GABAergic neurons allowing for increased responsiveness to oxytocin in the amygdala. κ−Opioid receptor antagonists may inhibit GABAergic neurons and thus decrease responsiveness to oxytocin in this region. As in the hypothalamus, this suggests a regulatory control of amygdala neurons.
Such intriguing interactions between opioid receptor antagonists and oxytocin outlined in our study may be of clinical relevance given that naltrexone is an FDA-approved medication for the treatment of alcohol use disorders [96], which presents high comorbidity with mood and anxiety disorders, and oxytocin is currently under study for the same indication (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03878316). This is particularly important given the need for new pharmacotherapeutics for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorders [97]. Of interest would be clinical trials that are designed to investigate the combined effects of oxytocin and naltrexone [98].
In conclusion, we provide novel evidence for an interaction between the endogenous opioid and oxytocin systems in both male and female mice. Our data demonstrate that the blockade of μ−opioid receptors potentiated the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin, whereas the blockade of κ−opioid receptors inhibited the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin, suggesting that the μ− and κ−opioid receptor systems differentially modulate the function of oxytocin with respect to anxiety-like behavior. In addition, we demonstrate a key difference in pharmacological mechanisms underlying our behavioral tests such that naloxone potentiated the effect of oxytocin on anxiety-like behavior but not on depression-like behavior. Altogether, this study highlights the importance of the opioid and oxytocin interaction for emotion regulation and supports differences in neural mechanisms underlying depression and anxiety.
References
World Health Organization. World Health Organization; (2017).
Malhi GS, Mann JJ. Depression. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2018;392:2299–312.
Craske MG, Stein MB. Anxiety. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2016;388:3048–59.
Ring RH, Malberg JE, Potestio L, Ping J, Boikess S, Luo B, et al. Anxiolytic-like activity of oxytocin in male mice: behavioral and autonomic evidence, therapeutic implications. Psychopharmacology. 2006;185:218–25.
Windle RJ, Shanks N, Lightman SL, Ingram CD. Central oxytocin administration reduces stress-induced corticosterone release and anxiety behavior in rats. Endocrinology. 1997;138:2829–34.
Uvnäs-Moberg K, Ahlenius S, Hillegaart V, Alster P. High doses of oxytocin cause sedation and low doses cause an anxiolytic-like effect in male rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994;49:101–6.
Yoshida M, Takayanagi Y, Inoue K, Kimura T, Young LJ, Onaka T, et al. Evidence that oxytocin exerts anxiolytic effects via oxytocin receptor expressed in serotonergic neurons in mice. J Neurosci. 2009;29:2259–71.
Ring RH, Schechter LE, Leonard SK, Dwyer JM, Platt BJ, Graf R, et al. Receptor and behavioral pharmacology of WAY-267464, a non-peptide oxytocin receptor agonist. Neuropharmacology. 2010;58:69–77.
Lukas M, Neumann ID. Social preference and maternal defeat-induced social avoidance in virgin female rats: sex differences in involvement of brain oxytocin and vasopressin. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;234:101–7.
Lukas M, Toth I, Reber SO, Slattery DA, Veenema AH, Neumann ID. The neuropeptide oxytocin facilitates pro-social behavior and prevents social avoidance in rats and mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:2159–68.
Tunstall BJ, Kirson D, Zallar LJ, McConnell SA, Vendruscolo JC, Ho CP, et al. Oxytocin blocks enhanced motivation for alcohol in alcohol dependence and blocks alcohol effects on GABAergic transmission in the central amygdala. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e2006421.
Nisbett KE, Gonzalez LA, Teruel M, Carter CS, Vendruscolo LF, Ragozzino ME, et al. Sex and hormonal status influence the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin in mice. Neurobiol Stress. 2023;26:100567.
Zingg HH, Laporte SA. The oxytocin receptor. Trends in Endocrinology &. Metabolism 2003;14:222–7.
Stein C. Opioid receptors. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:433–51.
Neumann ID. Involvement of the brain oxytocin system in stress coping: interactions with the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Prog Brain Res. 2002;139:147–62.
Pechnick R. Effects of opioids on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1993;33:353–82.
Knobloch HS, Charlet A, Hoffmann LC, Eliava M, Khrulev S, Cetin AH, et al. Evoked axonal oxytocin release in the central amygdala attenuates fear response. Neuron. 2012;73:553–66.
van den Burg EH, Stoop R. Neuropeptide signalling in the central nucleus of the amygdala. Cell tissue Res. 2019;375:93–101.
Viviani D, Charlet A, van den Burg E, Robinet C, Hurni N, Abatis M, et al. Oxytocin selectively gates fear responses through distinct outputs from the central amygdala. Science. 2011;333:104–7.
Becker HC, Lopez MF, King CE, Griffin WC. Oxytocin reduces sensitized stress–induced alcohol relapse in a model of posttraumatic stress disorder and alcohol use disorder comorbidity. Biol Psychiatry. 2023;94:215–25.
Guastella AJ, Howard AL, Dadds MR, Mitchell P, Carson DS. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal oxytocin as an adjunct to exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34:917–23.
Scantamburlo G, Ansseau M, Geenen V, Legros J-J. Intranasal oxytocin as an adjunct to escitalopram in major depression. J neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23:E5–E.
Anand R, Gulati K, Ray A. Pharmacological evidence for the role of nitric oxide in the modulation of stress-induced anxiety by morphine in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012;676:71–4.
Joshi JC, Ray A, Gulati K. Effects of morphine on stress induced anxiety in rats: role of nitric oxide and Hsp70. Physiol Behav. 2015;139:393–6.
Bruijnzeel AW, Behnood-Rod A, Malphurs W, Chellian R, Caudle RM, Febo M, et al. Oxycodone decreases anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus-maze test in male and female rats. Behav Pharmacol. 2022;33:418–26.
Rezayof A, Hosseini S-S, Zarrindast M-R. Effects of morphine on rat behaviour in the elevated plus maze: the role of central amygdala dopamine receptors. Behav Brain Res. 2009;202:171–8.
Berrocoso E, Ikeda K, Sora I, Uhl GR, Sánchez-Blázquez P, Mico JA. Active behaviours produced by antidepressants and opioids in the mouse tail suspension test. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16:151–62.
Rojas-Corrales M, Berrocoso E, Gibert-Rahola J, Mico J. Antidepressant-like effects of tramadol and other central analgesics with activity on monoamines reuptake, in helpless rats. Life Sci. 2002;72:143–52.
Zomkowski AD, Santos AR, Rodrigues AL. Evidence for the involvement of the opioid system in the agmatine antidepressant-like effect in the forced swimming test. Neurosci Lett. 2005;381:279–83.
Browne CA, van Nest DS, Lucki I. Antidepressant-like effects of buprenorphine in rats are strain dependent. Behav Brain Res. 2015;278:385–92.
Falcon E, Maier K, Robinson SA, Hill-Smith TE, Lucki I. Effects of buprenorphine on behavioral tests for antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs in mice. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232:907–15.
Samuels BA, Nautiyal KM, Kruegel AC, Levinstein MR, Magalong VM, Gassaway MM, et al. The behavioral effects of the antidepressant tianeptine require the mu-opioid receptor. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42:2052–63.
Pekarskaya EA, Holt ES, Gingrich JA, Ansorge MS, Javitch JA, Canetta SE. Tianeptine, but not fluoxetine, decreases avoidant behavior in a mouse model of early developmental exposure to fluoxetine. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–13.
Venzala E, García-García AL, Elizalde N, Delagrange P, Tordera RM. Chronic social defeat stress model: behavioral features, antidepressant action, and interaction with biological risk factors. Psychopharmacology. 2012;224:313–25.
Mutlu O, Gumuslu E, Ulak G, Celikyurt IK, Kokturk S, Kır HM, et al. Effects of fluoxetine, tianeptine and olanzapine on unpredictable chronic mild stress-induced depression-like behavior in mice. Life Sci. 2012;91:1252–62.
Kasper S, McEwen BS. Neurobiological and clinical effects of the antidepressant tianeptine. CNS drugs. 2008;22:15–26.
Gao L, Yu L-C. Involvement of opioid receptors in the oxytocin-induced antinociception in the central nervous system of rats. Regul Pept. 2004;120:53–8.
Bale TL, Davis AM, Auger AP, Dorsa DM, McCarthy MM. CNS region-specific oxytocin receptor expression: importance in regulation of anxiety and sex behavior. J Neurosci. 2001;21:2546–52.
Erbs E, Faget L, Scherrer G, Matifas A, Filliol D, Vonesch J-L, et al. A mu–delta opioid receptor brain atlas reveals neuronal co-occurrence in subcortical networks. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220:677–702.
Osman A, Zuffa S, Walton G, Fagbodun E, Zanos P, Georgiou P, et al. Post-weaning A1/A2 β-casein milk intake modulates depressive-like behavior, brain μ-opioid receptors, and the metabolome of rats. Iscience. 2021;24:103048.
Paxinos G, Franklin KB. Paxinos and Franklin’s the mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic press; (2019).
Endoh T, Matsuura H, Tanaka C, Nagase H. Nor-binaltorphimine: a potent and selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist with long-lasting activity in vivo. Arch Int de Pharmacodynamie et de therapie. 1992;316:30–42.
Bruchas MR, Land BB, Lemos JC, Chavkin C. CRF1-R activation of the dynorphin/kappa opioid system in the mouse basolateral amygdala mediates anxiety-like behavior. PloS one. 2009;4:e8528.
Douglas A, Clarke G, MacMillan S, Bull P, Neumann I, Way S, et al. Effects of the κ‐opioid agonist U50, 488 on parturition in rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;109:251–8.
Leng G, Dye S, Bicknell RJ. Kappa-opioid restraint of oxytocin secretion: plasticity through pregnancy. Neuroendocrinology. 1997;66:378–83.
Russell J, Coombes J, Leng G, Bicknell R. Morphine tolerance and inhibition of oxytocin secretion by kappa‐opioids acting on the rat neurohypophysis. J Physiol. 1993;469:365–86.
Kent K, Arientyl V, Khachatryan MM, Wood RI. Oxytocin Induces a Conditioned Social Preference in Female Mice. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013;25:803–10.
McCarthy MM, McDonald CH, Brooks PJ, Goldman D. An anxiolytic action of oxytocin is enhanced by estrogen in the mouse. Physiol Behav. 1996;60:1209–15.
Agmo A, Tarasco C. Interactions between naloxone and GABA in the control of locomotor activity in the rat. J Neural Transm. 1985;61:137–49.
Silva RH, Frussa-Filho R. Naltrexone potentiates both amnestic and anxiolytic effects of chlordiazepoxide in mice. Life Sci. 2002;72:721–30.
Frussa-Filho R, Barbosa-Junior H, Silva R, Da Cunha C, Mello C. Naltrexone potentiates the anxiolytic effects of chlordiazepoxide in rats exposed to novel environments. Psychopharmacology. 1999;147:168–73.
Belzung C, Dubreuil D. Naloxone potentiates the anxiolytic but not the amnestic action of chlordiazepoxide in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Pharmacol. 1998;9:691–8.
Belzung C, Ågmo A. Naloxone potentiates the effects of subeffective doses of anxiolytic agents in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;323:133–6.
Belzung C, Le Guisquet AM, Ågmo A. Anxiolytic-like effects of meprobamate: interactions with an opiate antagonist in Swiss and BALB/c mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2000;65:465–74.
Belzung C, Barreau S, Ågmo A. Naloxone potentiates anxiolytic-like actions of diazepam, pentobarbital and meprobamate but not those of Ro19-8022 in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;394:289–94.
Koob G, Strecker R, Bloom F. Effects of naloxone on the anticonflict properties of alcohol and chlordiazepoxide. Subst alcohol actions/misuse. 1980;1:447–57.
Ågmo A, Galvan A, Heredia A, Morales M. Naloxone blocks the antianxiety but not the motor effects of benzodiazepines and pentobarbital: experimental studies and literature review. Psychopharmacology. 1995;120:186–94.
Ågmo A, Belzung C, Deloire X, Grassin M, Lewis S. Blockade of anxiolytic-like actions of chlordiazepoxide by naloxone in the elevated plus-maze: Comparisons between Swiss, C57BL/6, and BALB/c mice. Psychobiology. 1999;27:105–13.
Hartman RD, Rosella-Dampman LM, Emmert SE, Summy-Long JY. Inhibition of release of neurohypophysial hormones by endogenous opioid peptides in pregnant and parurient rats. Brain Res. 1986;382:352–9.
Douglas A, Dye S, Leng G, Russell J, Bicknell R. Endogenous opioid regulation of oxytocin secretion through pregnancy in the rat. J Neuroendocrinol. 1993;5:307–14.
Leng G, Mansfield S, Bicknell R, Blackburn R, Brown D, Chapman C, et al. Endogenous opioid actions and effects of environmental disturbance on parturition and oxytocin secretion in rats. Reproduction. 1988;84:345–56.
Pumford K, Leng G, Russell J. Morphine actions on supraoptic oxytocin neurones in anaesthetized rats: tolerance after icv morphine infusion. J Physiol. 1991;440:437–54.
Clarke G, Wood P, Merrick L, Lincoln D. Opiate inhibition of peptide release from the neurohumoral terminals of hypothalamic neurones. Nature. 1979;282:746–8.
Evans R, Olley J, Rice G, Abrahams J. Effects of subacute opioid administration during late pregnancy in the rat on the initiation, duration and outcome of parturition and maternal levels of oxytocin and arginine vasopressin. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1989;16:169–78.
Russell J, Gosden R, Humphreys E, Cutting R, Fitzsimons N, Johnston V, et al. Interruption of parturition in rats by morphine: a result of inhibition of oxytocin secretion. J Endocrinol. 1989;121:521–36.
Dal Monte O, Piva M, Anderson KM, Tringides M, Holmes AJ, Chang SW. Oxytocin under opioid antagonism leads to supralinear enhancement of social attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:5247–52.
Hsu EA, Miller JL, Perez FA, Roth CL. Oxytocin and naltrexone successfully treat hypothalamic obesity in a boy post-craniopharyngioma resection. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:370–5.
Van’t Veer A, Carlezon WA. Role of kappa-opioid receptors in stress and anxiety-related behavior. Psychopharmacology. 2013;229:435–52.
Gillett K, Harshberger E, Valdez GR. Protracted withdrawal from ethanol and enhanced responsiveness stress: regulation via the dynorphin/kappa opioid receptor system. Alcohol. 2013;47:359–65.
Wittmann W, Schunk E, Rosskothen I, Gaburro S, Singewald N, Herzog H, et al. Prodynorphin-derived peptides are critical modulators of anxiety and regulate neurochemistry and corticosterone. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:775–85.
Knoll AT, Meloni EG, Thomas JB, Carroll FI, Carlezon WA. Anxiolytic-like effects of κ-opioid receptor antagonists in models of unlearned and learned fear in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. 2007;323:838–45.
Kukuia KK, Asiedu-Gyekye IJ, Woode E, Biney RP, Addae E. Phytotherapy of experimental depression: Kalanchoe integra Var. Crenata (Andr.) Cuf leaf extract. J Pharm Bioal Sci. 2015;7:26.
Iman S, Saleem U, Ahmad B. Pharmacological Screening of Mangifera indica Seeds for Antidepressant-like Action Along with a Mechanistic Study. ACS omega. 2020;5:26924–32.
Adongo DW, Kukuia KKE, Mante PK, Ameyaw EO, Woode E. Antidepressant-like effect of the leaves of Pseudospondias microcarpa in mice: evidence for the involvement of the serotoninergic system, NMDA receptor complex, and nitric oxide pathway. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:397943.
Billah MM, Chowdhury AS, Nawrin K, Mostaq S, Rayhan MA, Tushar RR. Serotonergic and noradrenergic response of ethanol extract; opioidergic response of ethyl acetate extract of Dicranopteris linearis L. leaf. Clin Phytosci. 2021;7:1–7.
Hassan AM, Jain P, Reichmann F, Mayerhofer R, Farzi A, Schuligoi R, et al. Repeated predictable stress causes resilience against colitis-induced behavioral changes in mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:386.
Kramer HK, Simon EJ. μ and δ-opioid receptor agonists induce mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation in the absence of receptor internalization. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:1707–19.
Gutstein HB, Rubie EA, Mansour A, Akil H, Woodgett JR. Opioid effects on mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 1997;87:1118–26.
Hawes BE, Fried S, Yao X, Weig B, Graziano MP. Nociceptin (ORL‐1) and μ‐Opioid Receptors Mediate Mitogen‐Activated Protein Kinase Activation in CHO Cells Through a Gi‐Coupled Signaling Pathway: Evidence for Distinct Mechanisms of Agonist‐Mediated Desensitization. J Neurochem. 1998;71:1024–33.
Molnár M, Rigó J Jr, Romero R, Hertelendy F. Oxytocin activates mitogen-activated protein kinase and up-regulates cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin production in human myometrial cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:42–9.
Ohmichi M, Koike K, Nohara A, Kanda Y, Sakamoto Y, Zhang ZX, et al. Oxytocin stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in cultured human puerperal uterine myometrial cells. Endocrinology. 1995;136:2082–7.
Ryan GB, Majno G. Acute inflammation. A review. Am J Pathol. 1977;86:183.
Korhonen R, Turpeinen T, Taimi V, Nieminen R, Goulas A, Moilanen E. Attenuation of the acute inflammatory response by dual specificity phosphatase 1 by inhibition of p38 MAP kinase. Mol Immunol. 2011;48:2059–68.
Renault J, Gheusi G, Aubert A. Changes in social exploration of a lipopolysaccharides-treated conspecific in mice: role of environmental cues. Brain Behav Immun. 2008;22:1201–7.
Pierre S-R, Lemmens MA, Figueiredo-Pereira ME. Subchronic infusion of the product of inflammation prostaglandin J2 models sporadic Parkinson’s disease in mice. J neuroinflam. 2009;6:1–12.
Tsai R-Y, Tai Y-H, Tzeng J-I, Lin S-L, Shen C-H, Yang C-P, et al. Ultra-low dose naloxone restores the antinociceptive effect of morphine in pertussis toxin–treated rats and prevents glutamate transporter downregulation by suppressing the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Neuroscience. 2009;159:1244–56.
Bicknell R, and Zhao B Secretory terminals of oxytocin release as a site of opioid modulation. Brain opioid systems in reproduction Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1989;285–307.
Bicknell RJ, Chapman C, Leng G. Effects of opioid agonists and antagonists on oxytocin and vasopressin release in vitro. Neuroendocrinology. 1985;41:142–8.
Shibuki K, Leng G, Way S. Effects of naloxone and of intraperitoneal hypertonic saline upon oxytocin release and upon supraoptic neuronal activity. Neurosci Lett. 1988;88:75–80.
Douglas A, Neumann I, Meeren H, Leng G, Johnstone L, Munro G, et al. Central endogenous opioid inhibition of supraoptic oxytocin neurons in pregnant rats. J Neurosci. 1995;15:5049–57.
Veinante P, Stoeckel M-E, Freund-Mercier M-J. GABA-and peptide-immunoreactivities co-localize in the rat central extended amygdala. Neuroreport. 1997;8:2985–9.
Bruchas MR, Chavkin C. Kinase cascades and ligand-directed signaling at the kappa opioid receptor. Psychopharmacology. 2010;210:137–47.
Lamberts JT, Traynor JR. Opioid receptor interacting proteins and the control of opioid signaling. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19:7333–47.
Busnelli M, Chini B. Molecular basis of oxytocin receptor signalling in the brain: what we know and what we need to know. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2018;35:3–29.
Jurek B, Neumann ID. The oxytocin receptor: from intracellular signaling to behavior. Physiol Rev. 2018;98:1805–908.
Mason BJ. Looking Back, Looking Forward: Current Medications and Innovative Potential Medications to Treat Alcohol Use Disorder. Alcohol Res: Curr Rev. 2022;42:11.
Bailey A, Berwick DC, Camarini R, and Scavone C. Wiley Online Library (2022);1475–7.
Zimmermann S, Thomas BC, Krisam J, Limprecht R, Klose C, Stenger M, et al. ON-ICE trial: Investigation of the combined effects of oxytocin and naltrexone on stress-induced and alcohol cue-induced craving in alcohol use disorder–Study protocol of a phase II randomised double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group trial. BMJ open. 2022;12:e059672.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the University of Illinois Chicago Graduate College Pathway Inclusive Faculty Fellowship, the National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research. The authors thank the following for their support: Dr. Sue C. Carter of the University of Virginia Department of Psychology, Dr. Jonathan J. Art of the University of Illinois Chicago Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, and Dr. Michael E. Ragozzino of the University of Illinois Chicago Department of Psychology for their guidance, Luis Gonzalez of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program for data evaluation assistance, and Marc Raley of National Institute on Drug Abuse Visual Media for graphic design assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nisbett, K.E., Vendruscolo, L.F. & Koob, G.F. µ-Opioid receptor antagonism facilitates the anxiolytic-like effect of oxytocin in mice. Transl Psychiatry 14, 125 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02830-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02830-1
- Springer Nature Limited