Abstract
Circular RNAs have been reported to play essential roles in the tumorigenesis and progression of various cancers. However, the biological processes and mechanisms involved in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. Initial RNA-sequencing data and qRT-PCR results in our cohort showed that hsa_circ_0072309 (also called circLIFR) was markedly downregulated in HCC tissues. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that higher levels of circLIFR in HCC patients correlated with favorable overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that circLIFR inhibited the proliferation and invasion abilities of HCC cells. We therefore conducted related experiments to explore the mechanism of circLIFR in HCC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization results revealed that circLIFR was mainly located in the cytoplasm, and RNA immunoprecipitation assays indicated that circLIFR was significantly enriched by Ago2 protein. These results suggested that circLIFR may function as a sponge of miRNAs to regulate HCC progression. We further conducted bioinformatics prediction as well as dual-luciferase reporter assays, and the results of which showed that circLIFR could sponge miR-624-5p to stabilize glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) expression. Loss and gain of function experiments demonstrated that regulation of the expression of miR-624-5p or GSK-3β markedly affected HCC progression induced by circLIFR. Importantly, we also proved that circLIFR could facilitate the degradation of β-catenin and prevent its translocation to the nucleus in HCC cells. Overall, our study demonstrated that circLIFR acts as a tumor suppressor in HCC by regulating miR-624-5p and inactivating the GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide [1]. Owing to the lack of early presentation of symptoms, a large number of patients are diagnosed at a late stage and miss the opportunity for radical resection [2]. Despite improvements in surgical resection and systemic therapy, the overall survival (OS) of patients with HCC remains unsatisfactory [3]. Therefore, exploring new therapeutic targets and elucidating their molecular mechanisms will contribute to improve the OS of patients with HCC.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are produced by back-splicing of exons, introns, untranslated regions, or antisense genes [4]. To date, mounting evidences reveal that circRNAs are associated with the tumorigenesis of various cancers, including HCC [5, 6]. For example, circMTO1 is downregulated in HCC tumor tissues, and is associated with favorable OS of HCC patients. Its role may be to act as a sponge for miR-9-5p, thus increasing the expression of P21 and NOX4 [7, 8]. Researchers have demonstrated that circ-TCF4.85 is upregulated in patients with HCC and promotes HCC progression by targeting miR-486-5p [9]. Xu et al. discovered that circRNA-SORE promotes sorafenib resistance by inhibiting PRP19-mediated YBX1 degradation [10]. Recently, several studies have found that hsa_circ_0072309 is significantly downregulated in various cancers, including renal, gastric, and breast cancers [11,12,13]. However, the regulation of hsa_circ_0072309 and its potential mechanisms in HCC progression have not yet been elucidated.
Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β), a serine/threonine kinase, is involved in various biological functions, including cell invasion, apoptosis, proliferation, and angiogenesis [14]. β-catenin activation has been observed in ~10–50% of HCC cases [15]. As an essential component of the β-catenin destruction complex, GSK-3β phosphorylates β-catenin and triggers its degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. A previous study demonstrated that the total protein level of GSK-3β was much lower in HCC tumor tissues than in adjacent liver tissues [16]. It has also been demonstrated that the activated form of GSK-3β (p-GSK-3β) is upregulated in 50% of HCC tissues and is associated with poorer OS [17]. Numerous circRNAs, such as hsa_circ_0003418 and hsa_circ_104348, have been demonstrated to participate in HCC progression by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [18, 19]. However, the mechanisms of circRNAs and GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway in HCC need to be further explored.
This study aimed to explore the role of hsa_circ_00072309 (circRNA derived from exons 2–5 of the LIFR gene, circLIFR) in HCC. Initially, we found that circLIFR overexpression (OE-circLIFR) inhibited the progression of HCC, while inhibition of circLIFR promoted the progression of HCC. Our results subsequently revealed that circLIFR could sponge miR-624-5p, thereby upregulating GSK-3β expression, further facilitating the degradation of β-catenin and ultimately inactivating the GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway in HCC cells. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that the circLIFR/miR-624-5p/GSK-3β axis may be a valuable therapeutic target for patients with HCC.
Results
circLIFR is downregulated in the HCC tissues
To identify the essential circRNAs in HCC progression, we performed high-throughput sequencing of tumors and adjacent tissues from five patients with HCC. Among the differentially expressed circRNAs (Table S2), we selected the most significantly downregulated hsa_circ_0072309 for further analysis (Fig. 1A). Initially, we searched the circBase (http://www.circbase.org/) database and found that hsa_circ_0072309 was derived from exons 2–5 of the LIFR gene, with a length of 580 nucleotides; therefore, we named it circLIFR. The back-splice site was identified by Sanger sequencing and was consistent with the circBase database annotation (Fig. S1A). The results in Fig. 1B revealed that the resistance of circLIFR to RNase R was greater than that of LIFR mRNA. We also treated HCC cells with actinomycin D to inhibit their transcription and found that the half-life of circLIFR was markedly greater than that of LIFR mRNA (Fig. 1C). In addition, the results of electrophoresis of PCR products verified that convergent primers could amplify linear LIFR in both complementary DNA (cDNA) and genomic DNA (gDNA), whereas divergent primers could only amplify circLIFR in cDNA (Fig. S1B). Moreover, we confirmed the expression of circLIFR in tumor and adjacent tissues from 60 pairs of patients with HCC. The results of our cohort showed that circLIFR expression was much lower in HCC tumor tissues than that in adjacent liver tissues (Fig. 1D), and higher levels of circLIFR in HCC patients correlated with favorable OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (Fig. 1E, F). We analyzed the correlation between circLIFR expression and clinical characteristics by χ2 test. The results demonstrated that higher expression of circLIFR was correlated with lower levels of alpha-foetoprotein (AFP), earlier Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage, earlier tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, smaller tumor size, and non-microvascular invasion in our cohort (Table S6). Moreover, we performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of OS and RFS in patients with HCC. The results demonstrated that TNM stage and BCLC stage were independent risk factors for OS, while no clinical characteristics in our cohort were independent risk factors for RFS (Tables S7, 8). These results demonstrated that circLIFR is downregulated in HCC and is characterized by a loop structure.
CircLIFR inhibits proliferation of HCC cells in vitro
We first examined circLIFR RNA levels in five HCC cell lines: SNU387, HepG2, Huh7, PLC/PRF/5, and Hep3B. Because of their different origin, morphology, differentiation, grade, and tumorigenicity, the expression of circLIFR differed among these cells. The results indicated that SNU387 cells had the highest level of circLIFR expression, whereas the other four HCC cell lines had relatively low levels of circLIFR expression (Fig. 2A). Therefore, SNU387 and Huh7 cells were selected for further analysis. To investigate the biological properties of circLIFR in HCC, we downregulated circLIFR in SNU387 cells using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and overexpressed circLIFR in Huh7 cells (Fig. S2B, C). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and colony formation assays demonstrated that overexpression of circLIFR suppressed the proliferation of Huh7 cells (Fig. 2B, D), whereas downregulation of circLIFR enhanced the proliferation ability of SNU387 cells (Fig. 2C, E). Subsequently, we also demonstrated that overexpression of circLIFR decreased the mobility of Huh7 cells (Fig. 2F), whereas inhibition of circLIFR promoted the mobility of SNU387 cells (Fig. 2G). Taken together, these findings demonstrated that circLIFR functions as a tumor suppressor in HCC cells.
CircLIFR suppresses the growth of HCC in vivo
To further evaluate the antitumor activity of circLIFR in vivo, Huh7 cells transfected with stable overexpression of circLIFR or empty vector were used to establish a subcutaneous xenograft tumor model (Fig. 3A, B). As shown in Fig. 3C, D, the tumor weight and volume in the OE-circLIFR group were much lower than those in the control group. In addition, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining results demonstrated that the ratio of Ki-67 protein-positive cells was also much lower in the OE-circLIFR group than those in the control group (Fig. 3E). In contrast, SNU387 cells transfected with circLIFR shRNA (sh-circLIFR) exhibited tumor-promoting effects in nude mice. As presented in Fig. S3A, B, downregulation of circLIFR enhanced tumor growth in mice. The tumor weight and volume in the sh-circLIFR group were much higher than those in the control group (Fig. S3C, D). IHC staining also showed that the Ki-67 levels were much higher in the sh-circLIFR group than those in the control group (Fig. S3E). The results of orthotopic xenograft tumor models showed that OE-circLIFR group exhibited lower fluorescence intensity in the liver region (Fig. 3F), whereas inhibition of circLIFR had the opposite effect (Fig. S3F). In addition, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining indicated that the tumor margins in the OE-circLIFR group were smoother than those in the control group, whereas tumors in the sh-circLIFR group exhibited more aggressive margins than those in the control group (Figs. 3G, S3G).
CircLIFR binds to miR-624-5p in HCC cells
To further explore the mechanism of circLIFR, we conducted subcellular localization detection assays which demonstrated that circLIFR was mainly located in the cytoplasm of HCC cells (Fig. 4A, B). RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) experiments showed that circLIFR was significantly enriched by the Ago2 protein, which suggested that circLIFR could sponge miRNAs through the Ago2 protein (Figs. 4C, S4A). To investigate the downstream target miRNAs, we used two target prediction programs, miRanda (http://www.microrna.org) and starbase (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/), and detected 11 candidate targets in both programs (Fig. 4D). Next, we designed a biotin-circLIFR probe for RNA pull-down assays, the results of which revealed that miR-624-5p and miR-520a-5p were markedly enriched by circLIFR probe in Huh7 cells (Fig. 4E). Moreover, we further demonstrated that mimics of miR-624-5p reduced luciferase activity in Huh7 cells transfected with the circLIFR wild-type (WT) reporter, but not the circLIFR-MUT1 reporter, while miR-520a-5p mimics displayed no effect on luciferase activity of either the circLIFR-WT or circLIFR-MUT2 reporter (Fig. 4F–H). Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies revealed that circLIFR and miR-624-5p were mainly colocalized in the cytoplasm of HCC cells (Fig. S4B). In addition, we detected the expression of miR-624-5p in 60 pairs of HCC and adjacent normal tissue. The results in our cohort showed that 41 patients (68.3%) had higher miR-624-5p levels in HCC tumor tissues (Fig. S4C).
CircLIFR inhibits progression of HCC by sponging miR-624-5p
To verify whether circLIFR suppressed HCC progression by sponging miR-624-5p, colony formation assays were performed. These results confirmed that circLIFR overexpression inhibited the proliferative capacity of Huh7 cells, whereas miR-624-5p mimics rescued the circLIFR overexpression-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the miR-624-5p inhibitor suppressed the proliferation of SNU387 cells and restored circLIFR depletion-mediated promotion of cell proliferation (Fig. 5B). Similarly, cell migration and invasion abilities were significantly inhibited by circLIFR overexpression in Huh7 cells, while miR-624-5p mimics restored this ability to varying degrees (Fig. 5C, E). The miR-624-5p inhibitor reversed the cell mobility induced by circLIFR inhibition in SNU387 cells (Fig. 5D, F). Overall, these results suggested that circLIFR inhibits HCC progression by sponging miR-624-5p.
GSK-3β is a downstream target of miR-624-5p
Potential targets of miR-624-5p were predicted according to TarBase, Starbase, and Targetscan [20,21,22]. Fourteen common genes appeared in all three prediction programs (Fig. 6A). A recent study demonstrated that miR-624-5p regulates Wnt signaling in hepatoblastoma [23]; thus, we speculated that GSK-3β might be a target of miR-624-5p. The results of dual-luciferase reporter assays further confirmed that the miR-624-5p mimic significantly inhibited the luciferase activity of the GSK-3β WT luciferase reporter plasmid, but not of the GSK-3β mutant plasmid (Fig. 6B). Moreover, we demonstrated that miR-624-5p inhibitors increased GSK-3β expression, whereas miR-624-5p mimics decreased GSK-3β expression in Huh7 and SNU387 cells (Fig. S5A).
CircLIFR upregulates GSK-3β expression and promotes degradation of β-catenin
As GSK-3β has been reported to be a critical protein that can negatively regulate β-catenin, we investigated the regulation of the circLIFR/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway. First, we demonstrated that overexpression of circLIFR significantly upregulated GSK-3β levels in Huh7 cells, whereas knockdown of circLIFR suppressed GSK-3β levels in SNU387 cells (Fig. S5B). We then confirmed that miR-624-5p mimics significantly impaired the increase in GSK-3β levels caused by circLIFR overexpression in Huh7 cells (Fig. 6C). Similar results confirmed that the miR-624-5p inhibitor restored the effect of sh-circLIFR on GSK-3β expression in SNU387 cells (Fig. 6D). Next, we evaluated the kinetics of β-catenin degradation in HCC cells when circLIFR was either upregulated or downregulated. Our results demonstrated that the degradation rate of β-catenin was significantly higher when circLIFR was overexpressed in Huh7 cells and significantly lower when circLIFR was knocked down in SNU387 cells (Fig. 6E, F). Furthermore, we confirmed that upregulation of circLIFR expression in HCC cells prevented the nuclear translocation of β-catenin, whereas circLIFR knockdown promoted the nuclear translocation of β-catenin (Fig. S5C, D). IHC staining of subcutaneous tumors for GSK-3β and β-catenin demonstrated that overexpression of circLIFR markedly increased the expression of GSK-3β but inhibited the expression of β-catenin in Huh7 cell-derived xenograft tumors. In contrast, downregulation of circLIFR significantly inhibited the expression of GSK-3β but increased the expression of β-catenin in SNU387 cell-derived xenograft tumors (Fig. S5E, F).
The effect of circLIFR on HCC progression depends on regulation of GSK-3β expression
To verify whether circLIFR exerts tumor-suppressive effects via the circLIFR/miR-624-5p/GSK-3β axis, we performed rescue assays to assess whether GSK-3β could reverse the cellular functions of circLIFR in HCC. The in vitro experiments showed that transfection with GSK-3β short interfering RNA (si-GSK-3β) rescued the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of Huh7 cells inhibited by overexpression of circLIFR (Fig. 7A, C, E), whereas overexpression of GSK-3β negatively affected the cell proliferation and mobility promoted by downregulation of circLIFR in SNU387 cells (Fig. 7B, D, F). In conclusion, these results suggested that circLIFR inhibits HCC progression via the miR-624-5p/GSK-3β axis (Fig. 8).
Discussion
Despite the improvements in systemic treatment, the OS of patients with HCC remains unsatisfactory. Therefore, exploring novel therapeutic targets and identifying their mechanisms would improve the overall prognosis of HCC. For the first time, the present study showed that circLIFR expression is markedly downregulated in HCC tumor tissues. The in vivo and in vitro experiments further verified that circLIFR could inhibit HCC progression. Moreover, we also identified that its mechanism is through regulating the miR-624-5p/GSK-3β/β-catenin axis in HCC.
Recent studies have suggested that most circRNAs are mainly located in the cytoplasm and function as sponges for miRNAs to regulate their target genes. In addition, some circRNAs are distributed in the nucleus and interact with RNA-binding proteins, thereby regulating their downstream genes [4, 24]. Our results demonstrated that circLIFR is mainly located in the cytoplasm of Huh7 and SNU387 cells, and further experiments showed that circLIFR inhibits the progression of HCC cells by sponging miR-624-5p. Similarly, Yan et al. confirmed that circLIFR is mainly located in the cytoplasm of breast cancer cells, and its mechanism involves targeting miR-492 [11]. However, a recent study demonstrated that circLIFR is predominantly located in the nucleus of bladder cancer cells, and the authors further confirmed that circLIFR could bind to MSH2 protein and act on cisplatin sensitivity [25]. Based on these contradictory results, we speculated that circLIFR exhibits a diversity of subcellular localizations in different kind of cancers.
Numerous studies have shown that many miRNAs are dysregulated in HCC [26]. Here, we confirmed the interaction between circLIFR and miR-624-5p, and rescue experiments validated that miR-624-5p mimics abrogate circLIFR-induced tumor suppression in HCC. To date, few studies have revealed the exact role of miR-624-5p in cancers. miR-624-5p is overexpressed in tumor tissues and could be a risk factor for early tumor metastasis in osteosarcoma [27]. According to another study, miR-624-5p showed much lower expression in hepatoblastoma tissues and functioned as an effective tumor suppressor [23]. These studies implied that miR-624-5p participates in different biological processes in various malignancies. The results of our investigation revealed that miR-624-5p might stimulate the progression of HCC, but its expression levels and clinical significance in HCC need to be further explored.
Activation of the β-catenin signaling pathway promotes cell proliferation and metastasis in various cancers, including HCC. Recently, it has been shown that some circRNAs regulate HCC progression by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. For example, circ-DENND4C can increase TCF4 expression by competitively sponging miR-195-5p, thereby promoting nuclear translocation of β-catenin [28]. Similarly, circRNA-SORE acts as a sponge for miRNAs, thus increasing the expression of Wnt2b to promote sorafenib resistance in HCC cells [29]. The GSK-3β protein is known to negatively regulate β-catenin by phosphorylation, thus allowing its degradation by ubiquitin. A recent study showed that GSK-3β protein levels are significantly reduced in HCC, and HCC patients with low levels of GSK-3β are associated with poor OS [16]. Our study found that miR-624-5p can directly target GSK-3β and downregulate its expression, whereas circLIFR upregulates GSK-3β expression by sponging miR-624-5p. In addition, we proved that circLIFR could facilitate the degradation of β-catenin and prevent its translocation to the nucleus in HCC cells. These results demonstrated that circLIFR could upregulate GSK-3β expression and inactivate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, thereby expanding the knowledge about the molecular mechanism of HCC progression.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our results revealed that circLIFR is markedly downregulated in HCC tumor tissues and can suppress HCC progression. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that circLIFR could upregulate GSK-3β expression by sponging miR-624-5p, thereby inhibiting HCC progression. Taken together, our findings indicated that the circLIFR/miR-624-5p/GSK-3β axis may be a meaningful target for the further clinical treatment of HCC.
Materials and methods
Clinical specimens and cell lines
From 2015 to 2017, surgical tissues of patients with HCC were obtained at the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China). The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) Patients were confirmed to have HCC by postoperative histopathology. (2) Patients did not receive radiofrequency ablation, chemotherapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation or targeted drugs before surgery. (3) Patients without a history of other tumors. (4) Informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to specimen collection. The exclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) Patients were diagnosed with cholangiocellular carcinoma or mixed hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas. (2) Patients with incomplete clinical information or follow-up data. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are presented in Table S5. Huh7, HepG2, and SUN387 cell lines were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). PLC/PRF/5 and Hep3B cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). The cell lines were authenticated by Short Tandem Repeat profiling and were confirmed mycoplasma-free after PCR. All cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco BRL) or DMEM (Gibco BRL, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.
RNA-sequencing and bioinformatic analysis
Total RNA isolated from HCC tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) was assessed using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer pico-RNA chips (Agilent, CA, USA). During circRNA sequencing, DNase I (Epicenter) was used to remove DNA contamination. Ribosomal RNA was removed using an Epicenter Ribo-zero rRNA Removal Kit (Epicenter, USA), and RNase R digestion (Epicenter, USA) was subsequently performed to remove linear RNA. circRNA libraries were constructed with the NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The Illumina sequencing data were used to analyze the expression of circRNAs in tumors and adjacent tissues, using the limma package. Significantly differentially expressed circRNAs were defined as adjusted P < 0.05, and fold-change ≥ 2 or ≤0.5. A heatmap of the differentially expressed genes was generated using Cluster 3.0 software.
Construction and stable transfection of circRNA plasmids
OE-circLIFR lentivirus or control lentivirus was purchased from Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Si-GSK-3β and shRNA targeting the back-splice site of circLIFR were designed and synthesized by IGE Biotechnology Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). To construct cell lines stably overexpressing circLIFR or with knocked down circLIFR, HCC cells were transfected with OE-circLIFR lentivirus or sh-circLIFR lentivirus, respectively, followed by positive selection using 2 μg/mL puromycin (Solarbio Life Sciences, Beijing, China) after 24 h. The oligonucleotide sequences are listed in Table S3.
Nucleic acid electrophoresis
The PCR products of gDNA and cDNA were detected using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis at 110 V for 20 min and detected by UV light irradiation. GL DNA Marker 2000 (AGbio, China) was used as a DNA size standard DNA marker.
RNase R and Actinomycin D assays
Total RNA was extracted using an RNA purification kit (EZBioscience, USA) and separated into two equivalent fractions. One fraction containing 5 μg of RNA was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in the presence of RNase R, whereas the other fraction was incubated in the absence of RNase R, as a control. Both RNA samples were then used for qRT-PCR. The actinomycin D assay was performed by addition of 2 μg/mL actinomycin D (APExBIO, Boston, USA) to Huh7 and SNU387 cells, followed by analysis of circLIFR and linear LIFR mRNA stability by qRT-PCR.
Cell proliferation, Transwell, western blot, and qRT-PCR assays
Colony formation assay, CCK-8 assay, Transwell assay, western blotting assay, and qRT-PCR were conducted as described in our previous studies [30, 31], and also showed in the Supplementary Materials.
Animal experiments
A total of 6 × 106 Huh7 OE-circLIFR, Huh7 vector, SNU387 sh-circLIFR, or SNU387 vector cells were randomly injected into the backs of male BALB/c nude mice aged 3–5 weeks. The sample size for each group was selected based on the premise that significant differences could be detected between groups. Tumor volumes were measured weekly using digital calipers in a blinded manner. Four to six weeks later, the mice were sacrificed, and subcutaneous tumors were harvested, weighed, and fixed in formaldehyde for IHC staining. To establish an orthotopic xenograft tumor model, 2 × 106 luciferase-expressing Huh7 OE-circLIFR, Huh7 vector, SNU387 sh-circLIFR, or SNU387 vector cells were randomly implanted into the right liver parenchyma of BALB/c male nude mice aged 3–5 weeks. The sample size was selected based on feasibility and cost. Bioluminescence images were examined once a week by the Xenogen IVIS Spectrum Imaging System (Xenogen, CA, USA) in a blinded manner. After 4 weeks, mouse livers were harvested for tissue sectioning. Animal experiments were approved by the Bioethics Committee of Sun Yat-Sen University.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
Huh7 and SNU387 cells (1 × 103) were seeded in 24-well plates, fixed with paraformaldehyde, and then incubated with 0.5% Triton X 100. The cells were then pre-hybridized using a fluorescent in situ hybridization kit (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China). Subsequently, a Cy3-labeled circLIFR probe (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) and a FAM-labeled miR-624-5p probe (IGE Biotechnology, Guangzhou, China) were hybridized with HCC cells at 37 °C overnight. Finally, nuclei were stained with DAPI (CWBio, Beijing, China) and photographed. Probe sequences are listed in Table S3.
Pull-down assay with biotin-labeled circLIFR probes
Sense and antisense biotin-labeled probes targeting the back-splice sites of circLIFR were synthesized by RiboBio (RiboBio, China). Pull-down assay was performed using Chromatin Isolation by RNA Purification Kit (Millipore, USA). Briefly, 1 × 107 Huh7 cells were harvested for each reaction (antisense and sense) and then incubated with 3% formaldehyde. The cell precipitate was collected and lysed with lysis buffer. Subsequently, the supernatant was hybridized with sense or antisense probes in hybridization buffer for 6 h at 37 °C. Next, the probe was bound to RNA and shaken with 100 μL streptavidin magnetic beads (Millipore, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C. Finally, RNA was extracted and purified for PCR. The sense and antisense probes are provided in Table S3.
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)
RIP assay was performed with a Magna RIP Kit (Millipore, USA). Briefly, 2 × 107 of Huh7 cells were collected and lysed. Magnetic beads conjugated with anti-Ago2 (03-110) (Millipore, USA), or anti-IgG (03-110) (Millipore, USA) were mixed with the cell lysate supernatant before incubation overnight. Subsequently, the magnetic beads were washed five times and incubated with proteinase K at 55 °C for 30 min. Finally, isolated RNA was extracted, purified, and subjected to qRT-PCR analysis.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis (presented as mean ± standard deviation) was performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0, using Student’s t test and two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression. P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences.
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in this study are presented in the paper. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding authors.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
Ferrante ND, Pillai A, Singal AG. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;16:506–16.
Xu XF, Xing H, Han J, Li ZL, Lau WY, Zhou YH, et al. Risk Factors, patterns, and outcomes of late recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study from China. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:209–17.
Papatsirou M, Artemaki PI, Karousi P, Scorilas A, Kontos CK. Circular RNAs: emerging regulators of the major signaling pathways involved in cancer progression. Cancers. 2021;13:11.
Shen H, Liu B, Xu J, Zhang B, Wang Y, Shi L, et al. Circular RNAs: characteristics, biogenesis, mechanisms and functions in liver cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:134.
Wang P, Xu LL, Zheng XB, Hu YT, Zhang JF, Ren SS, et al. Correlation between the expressions of circular RNAs in peripheral venous blood and clinicopathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:338.
Han D, Li J, Wang H, Su X, Hou J, Gu Y, et al. Circular RNA circMTO1 acts as the sponge of microRNA-9 to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Hepatology. 2017;66:1151–64.
Li D, Zhang J, Yang J, Wang J, Zhang R, Li J, et al. CircMTO1 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression via the miR-541-5p/ZIC1 axis by regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cell Death Dis. 2021;13:12.
Gao J, Dai C, Yu X, Yin XB, Zhou F. Circ-TCF4.85 silencing inhibits cancer progression through microRNA-486-5p-targeted inhibition of ABCF2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2020;14:447–61.
Xu J, Ji L, Liang Y, Wan Z, Zheng W, Song X, et al. CircRNA-SORE mediates sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by stabilizing YBX1. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:298.
Yan L, Zheng M, Wang H. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0072309 inhibits proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells via targeting miR-492. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:1033–41.
Guo X, Qin M, Hong H, Xue X, Fang J, Jiang L, et al. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0072309 inhibits the proliferation, invasion and migration of gastric cancer cells via inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling by activating PPARγ/PTEN signaling. Mol Med Rep. 2021;23:5.
Chen T, Shao S, Li W, Liu Y, Cao Y. The circular RNA hsa-circ-0072309 plays anti-tumour roles by sponging miR-100 through the deactivation of PI3K/AKT and mTOR pathways in the renal carcinoma cell lines. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47:3638–48.
Domoto T, Pyko IV, Furuta T, Miyashita K, Uehara M, Shimasaki T, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase-3β is a pivotal mediator of cancer invasion and resistance to therapy. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1363–72.
Li Q, Sun M, Wang M, Feng M, Yang F, Li L, et al. Dysregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by protein kinases in hepatocellular carcinoma and its therapeutic application. Cancer Sci 2021;112:1695–706.
Huang KT, Huang YH, Li P, He B, Chen ZK, Yu X, et al. Correlation between tuberous sclerosis complex 2 and glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta levels, and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by hepatectomy. Hepatol Res. 2014;44:1142–50.
Qiao G, Le Y, Li J, Wang L, Shen F. Glycogen synthase kinase-3β is associated with the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and may mediate the influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus on hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e105624.
Chen H, Liu S, Li M, Huang P, Li X. circ_0003418 inhibits tumorigenesis and cisplatin chemoresistance through Wnt/β-catenin pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:9539–49.
Huang G, Liang M, Liu H, Huang J, Li P, Wang C, et al. CircRNA hsa_circRNA_104348 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through modulating miR-187-3p/RTKN2 axis and activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:1065.
Karagkouni D, Paraskevopoulou MD, Chatzopoulos S, Vlachos IS, Tastsoglou S, Kanellos I, et al. DIANA-TarBase v8: a decade-long collection of experimentally supported miRNA-gene interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D239–45.
Agarwal V, Bell GW, Nam JW, Bartel DP. Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife. 2015;4:e05005
Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH, Yang JH. starBase v2.0: decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D92–7.
Indersie E, Lesjean S, Hooks KB, Sagliocco F, Ernault T, Cairo S, et al. MicroRNA therapy inhibits hepatoblastoma growth in vivo by targeting β-catenin and Wnt signaling. Hepatol Commun. 2017;1:168–83.
Qiu L, Xu H, Ji M, Shang D, Lu Z, Wu Y, et al. Circular RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: Biomarkers, functions and mechanisms. Life Sci. 2019;231:116660.
Zhang H, Xiao X, Wei W, Huang C, Wang M, Wang L, et al. CircLIFR synergizes with MSH2 to attenuate chemoresistance via MutSα/ATM-p73 axis in bladder cancer. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:70.
Wang Y, Tian Y. miRNA for diagnosis and clinical implications of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2016;46:89–99.
Luo Y, Liu W, Tang P, Jiang D, Gu C, Huang Y, et al. miR-624-5p promoted tumorigenesis and metastasis by suppressing hippo signaling through targeting PTPRB in osteosarcoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:488.
Liu X, Yang L, Jiang D, Lu W, Zhang Y. Circ-DENND4C up-regulates TCF4 expression to modulate hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and apoptosis via activating Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:295.
Xu J, Wan Z, Tang M, Lin Z, Jiang S, Ji L, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine-modified CircRNA-SORE sustains sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating β-catenin signaling. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:163.
Tan W, Lin Z, Chen X, Li W, Zhu S, Wei Y, et al. miR-126-3p contributes to sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma via downregulating SPRED1. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9:38.
Tan W, Luo X, Li W, Zhong J, Cao J, Zhu S, et al. TNF-α is a potential therapeutic target to overcome sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. EBioMedicine. 2019;40:446–56.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81972263, 82072714, and 82103221), Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (2020B1111170004), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M683094).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YC and CS designed the experiment and provided funding for the project; LY and YW conducted most of the experiments; WT wrote the paper and prepared all figures; ZX, XM, and QW collected the clinical tissues and analyzed the data. WL, ZZ, and HL edited and reviewed the paper. All authors have read and approved the final paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
All sample tissue collections were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. Animal experiments were approved by the Bioethics Committee of Sun Yat-Sen University and were performed according to the National Institutes of Health guidelines (approval number SYSU-IACUC-2021-B0113).
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, L., Tan, W., Wei, Y. et al. CircLIFR suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression by sponging miR-624-5p and inactivating the GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis 13, 464 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04887-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04887-6
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
CircNUP54 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via facilitating HuR cytoplasmic export and stabilizing BIRC3 mRNA
Cell Death & Disease (2024)
-
Circular RNA circLIFR suppresses papillary thyroid cancer progression by modulating the miR-429/TIMP2 axis
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (2024)
-
hsa_circ_0072309 Inhibits Oncogenesis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Epigenetic Activation of its Host Gene
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (2024)
-
Roles of non-coding RNAs in the metabolism and pathogenesis of bladder cancer
Human Cell (2023)