Abstract
Patients with EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been greatly benefited from gefitinib, however, the therapeutic has failed due to the presence of acquired resistance. In this study, we show that gefitinib significantly induces downregulation of Sterol Regulator Element Binding (SREBP1) in therapy-sensitive cells. However, this was not observed in EGFR mutant NSCLC cells with acquired resistance. Lipidomics analysis showed that gefitinib could differently change the proportion of saturated phospholipids and unsaturated phospholipids in gefitinib-sensitive and acquired-resistant cells. Besides, levels of ROS and MDA were increased upon SREBP1 inhibition and even more upon gefitinib treatment. Importantly, inhibition of SREBP1 sensitizes EGFR-mutant therapy-resistant NSCLC to gefitinib both in vitro and in vivo models. These data suggest that sustained de novo lipogenesis through the maintenance of active SRBEP-1 is a key feature of acquired resistance to gefitinib in EGFR mutant lung cancer. Taken together, targeting SREBP1-induced lipogenesis is a promising approach to overcome acquired resistance to gefitinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Lung cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the world and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% [1]. Recently, the molecular targeted therapy has become an important treatment method in the treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC [2]. Gefitinib as the representative of the first generation of EGFR-TKI has achieved positive clinical efficacy [3]. However, drug resistance which most patients will develop after 10–14 months of administration badly limits its continual application [4]. Although the new generation of EGFR-TKIs has been developed, gefitinib is still widely used due to its lower price and being recommended as a first-line agent in patients with newly diagnosed stage IV NSCLC with EGFR-positive mutations by the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines (CSCO) 2020. Many mechanisms have been described in gefitinib-induced resistance [5,6,7,8]. Different mutational events can be selected in different drug-resistant clones from the same patient and even co-occur within the same pathological changes [9]. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the effectiveness of gefitinib, for example, co-targeting with other essential cancer pathways or key mediators of EGFR signaling itself.
One of the signaling pathways that play an essential role in multiple oncogenic processes is de novo lipogenesis [10]. In order to satisfy the rapid proliferation of tumor cells, the lipid synthesis is enhanced in many cancers [11]. It is found that lipid metabolism is very active in many tumor cells with drug resistance to targeted therapy [10, 12]. In tumor cells, the main source of lipid is the de novo synthesis. SREBP1 is an important transcription factor in the de novo synthesis of lipids [13]. It can activate fatty acid synthase (FASN), insulin-induced gene 1 (INSIG1), acyl CoA carboxylase (ACC), and stearoyl COA desaturase (SCD) [14]. It regulates the biosynthesis of phospholipids, fatty acids, and triglycerides. Abnormal activation of the lipogenetic pathway in cancer is necessary for the synthesis of phospholipids, which is an important component of cell membranes and that supports cell growth and proliferation [15, 16]. SREBP1-mediated lipid synthesis pathway mainly produces saturated fatty acids and monounsaturated fatty acids. In many tumor cells, the proportion of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids on the cell membrane increases, which makes tumor cells less susceptible to lipid peroxidation, thereby providing a survival advantage to cancer cells that were exposed to anticancer drugs and oxidative stress damage [17]. It has been reported that inhibition of SREBP-1 increases gefitinib sensitivity in lung cancer A549 and PC9 cells [18, 19]. However, the role of SREBP1 mediated lipogenesis in gefitinib-acquired resistance has not elucidated yet.
In the current study, we show that SREBP-1 mediated lipogenic pathway is a key mediator of oncogenic EGFR and that its constitutive activation contributes to gefitinib-acquired resistance in EGFR mutant lung cancer. Our findings support that the combination use of SREBP1 inhibitors is a novel strategy to overcome gefitinib-acquired resistance.
Results
De novo lipogenesis is activated in EGFR mutant NSCLC cells with gefitinib-acquired resistance
It has been shown that de novo lipogenesis is activated in lung cancer [20]. To identify the resistance-associated lipid pathway signatures, we compared PC9 cells and PC9/GR cells by lipidomics. Principal component analysis of PC9 and PC9/GR cells showed a clear difference (Fig. 1B). OPLS-DA was used to further investigate the supervised data analysis for identifying differential metabolites (Fig. 1C). It is notable that many lipid species were altered in PC9/GR cells according to normalized heatmap pictures. As SREBP1 is an important transcription factor in the de novo synthesis of lipids, we found that the protein levels of SREBP1 and its downstream targets, FASN and SCD in PC9/GR were upregulated 76%, 57%, 64 and 63%, respectively, when compared to PC9 cells (Fig. 1D). What’s more, the protein levels of pEGFR/EGFR and pAkt/Akt were upregulated in PC9/GR cells (Fig. 1E).
To investigate whether a link exists between constitutively active SREBP1 signaling and growth of cells with gefitinib resistance, PC9, PC9/GR and H1975 cells were exposed to gefitinib for 72 h. From hereon, the gefitinib doses used for PC9 cells were 0.1 μM and 1 μM for both PC9/GR and H1975 cells, respectively. The expression of SREBP1 (mature form), FASN, and SCD in PC9 cells with gefitinib treatment were decreased 74.1%, 72.2%, and 74.4%, respectively, while this was not observed in the therapy-resistant lines (Fig. 1F). The mRNA levels of SREBP1, FASN, and SCD were decreased upon gefitinib exposure in PC9 (49.4, 60.4, 41.6, and 21.3%), but not in resistant cell lines (Fig. 1G–I). Taken together, gefitinib inhibits the activation of SREBP-1 in PC9, but not in PC9/GR or H1975 cells, which indicates that lipogenesis is sustained in therapy-resistant cells when compared to therapy-sensitive cells upon gefitinib treatment.
PCA and OPLS-DA of PC9, PC9/GR, and H1975 cells showed a clear difference upon gefitinib treatment (Fig. 2A, B). Many lipid species were altered in gefitinib treated group according to normalized heatmap pictures. PC/PE/PS/PG were the most abundant lipid species that were altered significantly and the content of most of them were downregulated in PC9 cells. However, this was not observed in PC9/GR cells and their content were even upregulated in H1975 cells (Fig. 2C). SMs were significantly altered with a different variation trend in PC9 cells. SMs were reduced apparently in PC9/GR cells, but they were increased in H1975 cells (Fig. 2D). FAs were reduced in PC9 cells, but such change was not observed in PC9/GR cells and H1975 cells (Fig. 2E). Cers were both reduced in PC9 and PC9/GR cells, but not in H1975 cells (Fig. 2F). After gefitinib treatment, saturated and monounsaturated phospholipids were decreased more significantly in PC9 cells, but not in H1975 and PC9/GR cells. For the comparison of polyunsaturated phospholipids, the decrease ratio of phospholipids with high saturation in PC9 cells was lower than that of phospholipids with low saturation, while it was opposite in PC9/GR cells (Fig. 2G). Taken together, these results suggest that gefitinib inhibits de novo lipogenesis in gefitinib-sensitive cells but not in resistant cells.
Inhibition of SREBP-1 sensitizes EGFR-TKI resistant cells to gefitinib
To investigate the effects of SREBP1 and its downstream genes on the sensitivity of EGFR-TKI resistant cells to gefitinib, we evaluated the effect of SREBP1 knockdown on FASN and SCD expression in PC9 and PC9/GR cells. SREBP1 silencing was shown to strongly reduce FASN (48.9%) and SCD (75.2%) levels in PC9/GR cells as compared to untreated cells (Fig. 3A). As expected, silencing SREBP1 also reduced the cell growth of PC9/GR upon exposure to gefitinib (Fig. 3B). To confirm whether inhibition of SREBP1 by blocking proteolytic cleavage has similar effects as silencing SREBP1 directly. Consistent with previous reports [21], treating cells with fatostatin markedly decreased the expression levels of mature form of SREBP1 in PC9/GR cells (31.8%). Similar as those observed in SREBP1 knockdown cells, fatostatin-induced inhibition of SREBP1 activation significantly reduced the expression of downstream target genes which are important for lipid biogenesis (Fig. 3C). Proliferation of PC9/GR cells was strongly inhibited with co-treatment of gefitinib and fatostatin (Fig. 3D).
In order to verify the effect of silencing SREBP1 on the major lipid components in gefitinib-resistant cells, we measured the intracellular levels of FFA, T-CHO, and TG (Fig. 3E). They were significantly decreased in SREBP1 knockdown cells, which were consistent with the results of protein expression. PCA and OPLS-DA of PC9/GR cells showed a clear difference between gef and gef + fato treatment (Fig. 3F). Chemical inhibition of SREBP1 depleted mono-unsaturated and fully saturation phospholipid species and increased membrane poly-unsaturation (Fig. 3G). These data indicate that SREBP1 inhibition sensitizes therapy-resistant NSCLC cells to gefitinib therapy.
Downregulation of SREBP1-induced lipid peroxidation in gefitinib-resistant cells
To better understand the mechanism underlying the relationship between SREBP1 and lipid peroxidation [12], we measured the levels of ROS and MDA. Levels of MDA increased upon exposure to fatostatin or silencing SREBP1. Co-treatment with fatostatin and gefitinib resulted in a further increase in MDA levels (Fig. 4A, B). MDA is a direct by-product of lipid peroxidation. ROS has been linked to membrane lipid peroxidation, which results in the accumulation of toxic by-products [22]. The levels of ROS were significantly increased upon inhibition of SREBP1 (Fig. 4C, D). Under combined fatostatin and gefitinib, the addition of antioxidant partially rescued cell viability (Fig. 4E). These findings indicate that SREBP1 inhibition sensitizes cells to gefitinib partly through alterations of lipid peroxidation.
SREBP-1 inhibition sensitizes carcinoma to gefitinib in vivo
To further confirm the therapeutic benefit of fatostatin combined with gefitinib in gefitinib-resistant lung cancer, we used the xenograft models generated by grafting PC9/GR cells in nude mice. The results showed that combination of fatostatin with gefitinib could significantly suppress xenograft tumor growth, while gefitinib alone failed to inhibit tumor growth effectively during 17 d of continuous administration. The average tumor weight of gefitinib alone treatment group was 619.9 ± 76.7 mg, which was not statistically different from that of the control group, while administration of fatostatin combined with gefitinib reduced the average tumor weight to 310.2 ± 97.7 mg. Fatostatin alone also reduced tumor weight, however, the effect was more significant in the combined group (Fig. 5A–C). Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining re-confirmed that fatostatin could augments the antitumor effect of gefitinib in vivo (Fig. 5F).
Compared with the control group, the expressions of SREBP1 and downstream FASN and SCD levels did not show significant change after gefitinib was given to mice xenografted with PC9/GR cells. However, fatostatin downregulated the expression of SREBP1 and downstream target genes, whether or not combined with gefitinib (Fig. 5D, E; Fato: 11.9, 44.2, 48.7, and 61.9%; Gef + Fato:10.8, 39.4, 44.3, and 92.8%). Phospholipidomic analysis of the various treatment revealed a correlation between the changes in the poly-unsaturation of phospholipids and anti-tumor growth response (Fig. 5G, H). These data all demonstrated that inhibition of SREBP1 could strengthen the effect of gefitinib on gefitinib-resistant NSCLC cells.
Discussion
For NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation, gefitinib is the first-line treatment recommended by NCCN, with significant therapeutic effect [23]. However, with prolonged time of treatment, most patients will develop acquired drug resistance [24]. Therefore, the biggest challenge of targeted therapy in clinical practice is to overcome the problem of drug resistance. One of the effective ways to overcome drug resistance is to identify and exploit of vulnerabilities, which are activated by and act downstream of such oncogenic pathways. Previous studies have shown that the de novo synthesis of endogenous lipids is very active in many drug-resistant tumor cells [12, 25,26,27]. Here, we showed that SRBEP-1 is a key feature of acquired resistance to gefitinib in EGFR mutant lung cancer and that inhibition of SREBP-1 can overcome gefitinib-acquired resistance. This study explored the mechanism of gefitinib-acquired resistance in lung cancer from the perspective of de novo lipogenesis, so as to provide a new direction to overcome gefitinib resistance.
In this study, we firstly compared the lipid groups of gefitinib-sensitive cell PC-9 and gefitinib-resistant cell PC9/GR, and found that there were significant differences in lipid groups between them. Further identification of the differential lipids resulted in 29 differential lipids, including 9 PCs, 8 PEs, 4 PGs, 4 FFAs, 2 SMs, and 2 Cers. As SREBP1 is an important transcription factor in the de novo synthesis of lipids [28], then we investigated the expression of SREBP1, FASN, and SCD, and found that they were highly expressed in drug-resistant cells, suggesting that the drug resistance of PC9/GR cells may be related to lipid metabolism. Next, we analyzed the lipid group of sensitive cells and drug-resistant cells after the treatment of gefitinib, and found that the lipid group changed significantly in these cells. The lipid levels of PC9 cells, such as Cer, SM, PG, PE, PI, PS, and FFA, were significantly changed with gefitinib treatment. PC and PE are the two types of phospholipids with the highest content in cells and are the most important structural lipids in biofilms [29]. The change in stability of phospholipid itself is the main cause of impaired cell function. Changes in the composition of the biofilm will reduce the membrane fluidity and increase the membrane permeability, thus damaging the structure and function [30]. This study for the first time found that the content of phospholipids such as PC and PE in gefitinib-sensitive PC9 cells were significantly decreased with gefitinib treatment, while the corresponding content of phospholipids in gefitinib-resistant PC9/GR cells did not decrease significantly or showed a slight increase trend. It suggested that gefitinib may inhibit the proliferation of PC9 cells by changing the composition of membrane phospholipids, but had little influence on PC9/GR cells. In gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutant cells, the content of fatty acids decreased after gefitinib treatment, indicating that lipid synthesis was blocked. However, in gefitinib-resistant EGFR mutant cells, lipid synthesis sustained, which was similar to the situation in BRAF targeted drug-resistant cells [12].
Fatty acids are divided into saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids according to the presence and number of double bonds on the R chain. In normal cells, fatty acids are generally absorbed by exogenous sources, while tumor cells are generally obtained by de novo synthesis of lipid [31]. In this study, we found that gefitinib could change the proportion of saturated phospholipids and unsaturated phospholipids in gefitinib-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. It has been reported that tumor cells can increase membrane lipid saturation through de novo lipogenesis, thus reducing the sensitivity of tumor cells to oxidative stress and common chemotherapeutic drugs [17]. These results suggest that the sustained de novo lipogenesis in gefitinib-resistant cells may affect the effect of gefitinib on its membrane phospholipids, making it less susceptible to oxidative stress and insensitive to gefitinib.
Previous studies have shown that SREBP1 and its downstream targets are highly expressed in many cancers [32,33,34,35,36]. Activation of SREBP-1 to synthesize lipids is thought to be required to maintain rapid proliferation of tumor cells [37]. It has been reported that lipogenesis also contributes to the resistance to cell death by altering membrane lipid composition and sensitive to lipid peroxidation [12, 38,39,40]. In gefitinib-sensitive PC9 cells, gefitinib caused a decrease in lipogenesis and attenuated the expression of SREBP1, mSREBP1, FASN, and SCD. However, this was not observed in gefitinib-resistant PC9/GR cells, which showed sustained levels of lipogenesis in the presence of gefitinib [41]. Together with our observation that inhibition of SREBP1 in gefitinib-resistant PC9/GR cells decreases cell growth and makes them sensitize to gefitinib in vitro and in vivo. These findings indicate that SREBP1-mediated lipogenesis is a central pathway acting downstream of mutant EGFR. SREBPs family is encoded by srebf1 and srebf2 genes [42]. Whether SREBP2 plays a role in the development of drug resistance in lung cancer cells remains to be further explored.
Our data reveals the key role of SREBP1 mediated lipogenesis in gefitinib-acquired resistance, supporting the increased interest in lipogenesis inhibition as a novel anti-neoplastic strategy. These findings imply that the combination use of SREBP1 inhibitors and gefitinib might be a new therapeutic strategy for clinical treatment of advanced lung cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and reagents
H1975 (Cellcook Biotech, Guangzhou, China), PC9 and PC9/GR cells (Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China) were cultured in RMPI 1640 Medium (Corning, NY, USA) containing 10% FBS (Hyclone, Utah, USA) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Gibco, NY, USA). Resistance of PC9/GR cells to gefitinib was experimentally confirmed (Fig. 1A). Cell lines were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 95% air and 5% CO2. BCA protein quantification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA); Anti-SREBP1 (WB: 1:1000), Anti-SCD (WB: 1:1000), Anti-Ki67 (IHC: 1:50) (BBI Life Sciences, Shanghai, China); Anti-FASN (WB: 1:1000), Anti-β-Actin (WB: 1:1000), Anti-EGFR (WB: 1:1000), Anti-pEGFR (WB: 1:1000), Anti-Akt (WB: 1:1000), Anti-pAkt (WB: 1:1000) (CST, MA, USA).
Proliferation assay
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well. After 24 h, the cells or siRNA-transfected cells were treated with various concentrations of compounds and incubate for 72 h. Cell viability was determined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blot analysis
Proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to a PVDF membrane and detected using the appropriate primary and secondary antibodies before visualization with a Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate Kit (Millipore). Visualization was performed with Image Quant LAS-4000 (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) using image Multi-Gauge Software (Fujifilm). Quantification was performed by Image J.
Measurements of cellular fatty acid, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels
The levels of cellular fatty acids (FFA), cholesterol (T-CHO), and triglyceride (TG) were quantified by the Free Fatty Acid Quantification Kit, Cholesterol Quantification Kit, and Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Jiangsu, China) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol.
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (TaKaRa Biotech, Kyoto, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Kit with gDNA eraser (TaKaRa Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences of primers are as follows: SREBP1: forward primer 5′-ACAGTGACTTCCCTGGCCTAT-3′; reverse primer 5′-GCATGGACGGGTACATCTTCAA-3′. FASN: forward primer 5′-AAGGACCTGT-CTAGGTTTGATGC-3′; reverse primer 5′-TGGCTTCATAGGTGACTTCCA-3′. SCD: forward primer 5′-TCTAGCTCCTATACCACCACCA-3′; reverse primer 5′-TCGTCTCCAACTTATCTCCTCC-3′ (BBI Life Sciences, Shanghai, China). SYBR Premix Ex-Taq ™ II Kit (TaKaRa Biotech) in a 7500 real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). Relative mRNA expression was calculated by the delta delta Ct method.
Analysis of intact phospholipid species by ESI-MS/MS
Cells were rinsed twice with 1 mL PBS, and 1 mL methanol were added into the plates. The cells were detached using a cell scraper and transferred into 15 mL tubes. Cells were mixed with 2.75 mL CHCl3/H2O (8:3, v/v). The mixture was vigorously vortexed for 3 min and centrifugated at 4000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The lower organic phase was collected respectively, and transferred into a clean tube, dried under nitrogen flow at room temperature, and stored at −80 °C until analysis. The residuals were resuspended using 300 μL acetonitrile/isopropanol (1:1, v/v) for further UHPLC-ESI-MS analysis. Phospholipids were analyzed by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) on AB SCIEX Triple TOFTM 5600+ (Foster City, CA), a hybrid triple quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer, which is equipped with a Duo Spray Ion Source. The data were acquired using Analyst® TF 1.7 software (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA).
The software SIMCA 14.1 (Umetrics AB, Sweden) was used for multivariate analysis of the original peak table data. After Parato transformation, firstly, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to construct PCA (reflecting the discrete trend between groups) model. Orthogonal partial least-squares Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) was used for supervised data Analysis. Variable Importance on Projection (VIP) value and confidence interval of VIP value in OPLS-DA model were selected to obtain differential metabolites (VIP > 1.5).
Animal experiment
Male athymic BALB/c nude mice (3–4 weeks old) were purchased from Guangdong Province Medical Animal Center and fed and monitored under specific pathogen-free conditions. All animal protocols were approved by the Animal Research Committee at Sun Yat-sen University, and all treatments were administered in compliance with the National Institute of Health and Nutrition Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. PC9/GR human lung cancer cells (3 × 107 in 1 ml) were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of all mice and when tumor size reached 100 mm3, mice were randomly grouping and they were blindly administered daily by oral gavage. Mice were divided into four groups (six mice in each): (1) vehicle control; (2) 20 mg/kg fatostatin; (3) 25 mg/kg gefitinib; and (4) 25 mg/kg gefitinib and 20 mg/kg fatostatin. Fatostatin or vehicle (30% PEG (Sigma) in saline) was administered an hour after gefitinib or vehicle (1% Tween 80 (Amersham) in saline). Body weights and tumor measurements were determined every two days, and tumor volume was calculated using the formula V = (length × width2)/2. Animals were sacrificed and tumors were collected at the experimental endpoint, and tumors were excised for western blot and immunohistochemistry. According to the general number of experimental animals, there were six mice in each group.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining
Animal tumor tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm. Tumors slides were deparaffinized and hydrated using a graded series of xylene and ethanol solutions and washed with PBS. Antigen was retrieved in citrate buffer, and sections were immersed in 3% H2O2 to remove endogenous peroxidase activity. Then slides were incubated with primary antibodies of Ki-67 (1:50) overnight. Horseradish-peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit IgG (CST) was subjected to DAB staining (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). After developing, all sections were observed by microscope (40×) and analyzed using the Image Pro Plus software (v.6.0) program.
Statistical analysis
All results were expressed as means ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism 8 and all data are analyzed by two-tailed student’s t-test. Values of P < 0.05 were considered as being statistically significant.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Natl Hlth Comm People’s R. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary lung cancer 2018. Chin J Cancer Res. 2019;31:1–28.
da Cunha Santos G, Shepherd FA, Tsao MS. EGFR mutations and lung cancer. Annu Rev Pathol: Mechanisms Dis. 2011;6:49–69.
Wu Y-L, Cheng Y, Zhou X, Lee KH, Nakagawa K, Niho S, et al. Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1454–66.
Liao ZX, Huang KY, Kempson IM, Li HJ, Tseng SJ, Yang PC. Nanomodified strategies to overcome EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. J Controlled Release. 2020;324:482–92.
Yeung YT, Yin S, Lu B, Fan S, Yang R, Bai R, et al. Losmapimod overcomes gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer by preventing tetraploidization. Ebiomedicine. 2018;28:51–61.
Liu ZW, Gao WM. Leptomycin B reduces primary and acquired resistance of gefitinib in lung cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017;335:16–27.
Li J, Wang XH, Hu J, Shi M, Zhang L, Chen H. Combined treatment with N-acetylcysteine and gefitinib overcomes drug resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC cell line. Cancer Med. 2020;9:1495–502.
Jeong I, Song J, Bae SY, Lee SK. Overcoming the intrinsic gefitinib-resistance via downregulation of AXL in Non-small cell lung cancer. J Cancer Prev. 2019;24:217–23.
Ma YX, Xin S, Lin QG, Zhuang W, Zhao YY, Zhu X, et al. The analysis of pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic impact on gefitinib efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: results from a prospective cohort study. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:13.
Cao Y. Adipocyte and lipid metabolism in cancer drug resistance. J Clin Investig. 2019;129:3006–17.
Luo X, Cheng C, Tan Z, Li N, Tang M, Yang L, et al. Emerging roles of lipid metabolism in cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:76.
Talebi A, Dehairs J, Rambow F, Rogiers A, Nittner D, Derua R, et al. Sustained SREBP-1-dependent lipogenesis as a key mediator of resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy. Nat Commun. 2018;9:11.
Shimano H, Sato R. SREBP-regulated lipid metabolism: convergent physiology - divergent pathophysiology. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13:710–30.
Cheng CM, Geng F, Cheng X, Guo DL. Lipid metabolism reprogramming and its potential targets in cancer. Cancer Commun. 2018;38:14.
Beckers A, Organe S, Tinunermans L, Scheys K, Peeters A, Brusselmans K, et al. Chemical inhibition of Acetyl-CoA carboxylase induces growth arrest and cytotoxicity selectively in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8180–7.
De Schrijver E, Brusselmans K, Heyns W, Verhoeven G, Swinnen JV. RNA interference-mediated silencing of the fatty acid synthase gene attenuates growth and induces morphological changes and apoptosis of LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3799–804.
Rysman E, Brusselmans K, Scheys K, Timmermans L, Derua R, Munck S, et al. De novo lipogenesis protects cancer cells from free radicals and chemotherapeutics by promoting membrane lipid saturation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:8117–26.
Zhang B, Wu J, Guo P, Wang Y, Fang Z, Tian J, et al. Down-regulation of SREBP via PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibits the proliferation and invasion of non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Oncotargets Ther. 2020;13:8951–61.
Li J, Yan H, Zhao L, Jia W, Yang H, Liu L, et al. Inhibition of SREBP increases gefitinib sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:52392–403.
Ruiz CF, Montal ED, Haley JA, Bott AJ, Haley JD. SREBP1 regulates mitochondrial metabolism in oncogenicKRASexpressing NSCLC. Faseb J. 2020;34:10574–89.
Li X, Chen Y-T, Hu P, Huang W-C. Fatostatin displays high antitumor activity in prostate cancer by blocking SREBP-regulated metabolic pathways and androgen receptor signaling. Mol Cancer Therapeutics. 2014;13:855–66.
Ayala A, Munoz MF, Argueelles S. Lipid peroxidation: production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:360438.
Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aggarwal C, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 1.2020 featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17:1464–72.
Gong H, Li Y, Yuan Y, Li W, Zhang H, Zhang Z. et al. EZH2 inhibitors reverse resistance to gefitinib in primary EGFR wild-type lung cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:1189
Castillo AF, Orlando UD, Maloberti PM, Prada JG, Dattilo MA, Solano AR, et al. New inhibitor targeting Acyl-CoA synthetase 4 reduces breast and prostate tumor growth, therapeutic resistance and steroidogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:2893–910.
Merino Salvador M, Gomez de Cedron M, Moreno Rubio J, Falagan Martinez S, Sanchez Martinez R, Casado E. et al. Lipid metabolism and lung cancer (vol 112, pg 31, 2017). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol.2019;133:45
Huang C, Freter C. Lipid metabolism, apoptosis and cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:924–49.
Oishi Y, Spann NJ, Link VM, Muse ED, Strid T, Edillor C, et al. SREBP1 contributes to resolution of pro-inflammatory TLR4 signaling by reprogramming fatty acid metabolism. Cell Metab. 2017;25:412–27.
Gibellini F, Smith TK. The Kennedy pathway-de novo synthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine. Iubmb Life. 2010;62:414–28.
Fajardo VA, McMeekin L, LeBlanc PJ. Influence of phospholipid species on membrane fluidity: a meta-analysis for a novel phospholipid fluidity index. J Membr Biol. 2011;244:97–103.
Currie E, Schulze A, Zechner R, Walther TC, Farese RV. Cellular fatty acid metabolism and cancer. Cell Metab. 2013;18:153–61.
Guo S, Ma B, Jiang X, Li X, Jia Y. Astragalus polysaccharides inhibits tumorigenesis and lipid metabolism through miR-138-5p/SIRT1/SREBP1 pathway in prostate cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:598.
Li CL, Peng XW, Lv J, Zou HC, Liu JQ, Zhang K, et al. SREBP1 as a potential biomarker predicts levothyroxine efficacy of differentiated thyroid cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;123:8.
Zhou CC, Ma QY. High glucose microenvironment accelerates tumor growth via SREBP1-autophagy axis in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2019;48:1563–1563.
Zhang N, Zhang H, Liu Y, Su P, Zhang J, Wang X, et al. SREBP1, targeted by miR-18a-5p, modulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer via forming a co-repressor complex with Snail and HDAC1/2. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:843–59.
Perone Y, Farrugia AJ, Rodriguez-Meira A, Gyorffy B, Ion C, Uggetti A, et al. SREBP1 drives keratin-80-dependent cytoskeletal changes and invasive behavior in endocrine-resistant ER alpha breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2115.
Cheng CM, Ru P, Geng F, Liu JF, Yoo JY, Wu XN, et al. Glucose-mediated N-glycosylation of SCAP is essential for SREBP-1 activation and tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:569–81.
Zhao GY, Cardenas H, Matei D. Ovarian cancer-why lipids matter. Cancers. 2019;11:16.
Li N, Sancak Y, Frasor J, Atilla-Gokcumen GE. A protective role for triacylglycerols during apoptosis. Biochemistry. 2018;57:72–80.
Rosa A, Isola R, Pollastro F, Caria P, Appendino G, Nieddu M. The dietary flavonoid eupatilin attenuatesin vitrolipid peroxidation and targets lipid profile in cancer HeLa cells. Food Funct. 2020;11:5179–91.
Cohen MH, Williams GA, Sridhara R, Chen G, McGuinn WD, Morse D, et al. United States Food and Drug Administration drug approval summary: Gefitinib (ZD1839; Iressa) tablets. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1212–8.
Bengoechea-Alonso MT, Ericsson J. The phosphorylation-dependent regulation of nuclear SREBP1 during mitosis links lipid metabolism and cell growth. Cell Cycle. 2016;15:2753–65.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81573658) and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Construction Foundation (2017B030314030 and 2020B1212060034).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing, Visualization. LZ: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Visualization. DW: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation. SJ: Methodology, Validation, Investigation. DC: Validation, Investigation. ZZ: Methodology, Investigation. MH: Resources, Writing–review and editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. JJ: Resources, Writing– review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, C., Zhang, L., Wang, D. et al. Lipidomics reveals that sustained SREBP-1-dependent lipogenesis is a key mediator of gefitinib-acquired resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Cell Death Discov. 7, 353 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00744-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00744-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Single cell lineage tracing reveals clonal dynamics of anti-EGFR therapy resistance in triple negative breast cancer
Genome Medicine (2024)
-
Targeting glucosylceramide synthase induces antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects in osimertinib-resistant NSCLC cell models
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in malignant tumors: molecular mechanisms and future perspective
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2022)