Abstract
Glioma is an intracranial malignant tumor and remains largely incurable. Circular RNAs are prominent modulators in glioma progression. This study investigated the function of circular RNA DLC1 (circDLC1) in the malignant proliferation of glioma cells. circDLC1 expression in glioma tissues and cells was determined using RT-qPCR. The effect of circDLC1 on the malignant proliferation of glioma cells was analyzed using CCK-8, colony formation, and EdU staining assays. METTL3, miR-671-5p, and CTNNBIP1 expressions were determined. N6 methyladenosine (m6A) level of circDLC1 was analyzed using MeRIP. The binding relationship between miR-671-5p and circDLC1 or CTNNBIP1 was verified using RNA pull-down and dual-luciferase assays. A xenograft tumor model was established in nude mice to verify the effect of METTL3-mediated circDLC1 on glioma in vivo. circDLC1 was poorly expressed in glioma. circDLC1 overexpression suppressed glioma cell proliferation. Mechanically, METTL3-mediated m6A modification enhanced circDLC1 stability and upregulated circDLC1 expression in glioma. circDLC1 upregulated CTNNBIP1 transcription by competitively binding to miR-671-5p. METTL3 overexpression repressed the malignant proliferation of glioma via circDLC1/miR-671-5p/CTNNBIP1 in vivo. Collectively, METTL3-mediated m6A modification upregulated circDLC1 expression, and circDLC1 promoted CTNNBIP1 transcription by sponging miR-671-5p, thus repressing the malignant proliferation of glioma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Glioma is a heterogeneous group of primary malignancies of the central nervous system [1], which is notorious for its rapid cell proliferation and angiogenesis, and particularly the tumors cells are resistant to conventional treatments, resulting in poor outcomes and a high incidence of relapse [2, 3]. Glioma patients experience dismal outcomes due to the deficient knowledge of molecular pathogenesis and the lack of effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies [4]. Consequently, investigations on the molecular mechanism of glioma malignant proliferation have aroused extensive concerns.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel class of covalently linked single-stranded RNAs with a closed loop structure [5]. circRNAs are abundantly expressed in the brain tissues, indicating their critical roles in various brain diseases [6]. circRNAs exhibit differential expressions in glioma and modulate glioma progression [7]. circDLC1 is derived from exons 14, 15, and 16 of the DLC1 gene, and circDLC1 overexpression can repress the proliferation of hepatoma cells [8]. Nevertheless, the exact role of circDLC1 in glioma remains unknown.
Recently, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification is emphasized for its abundant enrichment and critical biological functions in circRNAs [9]. m6A modification emerges as methylation at the N6 position of adenosine, representing the most prevalent internal modification in eukaryotes mRNA [10]. The aberrant alternation of m6A level affects RNA maturation, transcription, translation, and metabolism, which disrupts gene expression and vital cellular processes, and ultimately leads to the initiation and progression of multiple tumors, including glioma [11]. Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) is one of the “writers” for m6A methylation that participate in regulating various cellular biological processes [12]. METTL3 is poorly expressed in glioma tissues, and METTL3 deficiency facilitates glioma cell proliferation [13]. METTL3 is implicated in the biogenesis and function of circRNAs by mediating m6A modification [9]. However, the mechanism of METTL3-mediated m6A modification on circDLC1 in glioma has not been investigated before.
Mechanistically, circRNAs can modulate the expression of genes by serving as a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) of microRNA (miRNA) [14]. miRNAs are a class of small endogenous non-coding RNAs (18–25 nt in length) [15]. miRNA affects the functions of genes involving gliomagenesis, tumor growth, therapeutic response, and prognosis, which is a prospective therapeutic tool against malignant glioma [16]. This study probed into the effect of METTL3-mediated m6A methylation of circDLC1 on the malignant proliferation of glioma cells and the downstream ceRNA mechanism of circDLC1, hoping to shed light on glioma treatment.
Results
circDLC1 was poorly expressed in glioma tissues and cells
circDLC1 is poorly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [8], but its role in glioma is unclear. Our results exhibited that circDLC1 expression was reduced in glioma tissues (p < 0.01, Fig. 1A). Also, circDLC1 was poorly expressed in glioma cells (p < 0.01, Fig. 1B). circDLC1 level had no significant change after actinomycin D or RNase R treatment, but linear DLC1 level was decreased notably (p < 0.01, Fig. 1C), indicating that circDLC1 was more stable than linear DLC1 (p < 0.01, Fig. 1D). All these demonstrated that circDLC1 was poorly expressed in glioma tissues and cells.
Overexpression of circDLC1 suppressed malignant proliferation of glioma cells
To explore the effect of circDLC1 on the malignant proliferation of glioma cells, we transfected circDLC1 pcDNA 3.1 (pc-circDLC1) into LN229 cells with relatively low circDLC1 expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 2A) and tansfected circDLC1 siRNA (si-circDLC1) into A172 cells with relatively high circDLC1 expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 2A). si-circDLC1#1 with the best intervention efficiency was selected for subsequent detection. Overexpression or silencing of circDLC1 did not affect the expression of linear DLC1 (Fig. 2A). circDLC1 overexpression decreased glioma cell proliferation and circDLC1 silencing enhanced glioma cell proliferation (p < 0.01, Fig. 2B–D). Briefly, overexpression of circDLC1 suppressed the malignant proliferation of glioma cells.
METTL3-mediated m6A modification enhances circDLC1 stability and upregulates circDLC1 expression
m6A modification exists in circDLC1 [8]. METTL3, as an m6A modifying enzyme, is poorly expressed in glioma [13, 17]. Our results exhibited that METTL3 expression was reduced in glioma tissues and cells (p < 0.05, Fig. 3A–D). The m6A level in glioma tissues and cells was consistent with the trend of METTL3 expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 3E–F). The m6A level of circDLC1 was decreased in glioma tissues and cells (p < 0.01, Fig. 3G–H). METTL3 expression was positively correlated with circDLC1 expression in glioma tissues (p < 0.01, Fig. 3I). After METTL3 pcDNA 3.1 (pc-METTL3) was transfected into glioma cells (p < 0.05, Fig. 3J–K), the m6A level in cells, circDLC1 expression, and m6A level of circDLC1 were also increased (p < 0.01, Fig. 3L–N). The half-life of circDLC1 was prolonged after METTL3 overexpression (p < 0.01, Fig. 3O). Briefly, METTL3-mediated m6A modification upregulated circDLC1 expression by increasing circDLC1 stability.
Overexpression of METTL3 annulled the promoting effect of circDLC1 silencing on the malignant proliferation of glioma cells
To verify the role of METTL3 in the regulation of glioma cells by circDLC1, we transfected three METTL3 siRNAs (si-METTL3) into LN229 cells respectively (p < 0.05, Fig. 4A, B) and selected si-METTL3#2 with the best transfection efficiency for subsequent experiments. Compared with circDLC1 overexpression alone, circDLC1 overexpression + METTL3 silencing enhanced LN229 cell proliferation; compared with circDLC1 silencing alone, METTL3 overexpression + circDLC1 silencing increased circDLC1 expression in A172 cells and decreased A172 cell proliferation (p < 0.05, Fig. 4C–F). Briefly, METTL3 overexpression annulled the promoting effect of circDLC1 silencing on glioma cell proliferation.
circDLC1 promoted CTNNBIP1 transcription by competitively binding to miR-671-5p
Next, we explored the downstream mechanism of circDLC1. circDLC1 was mainly localized in the cytoplasm of glioma cells (Fig. 5A), suggesting that circDLC1 may bind to miRNA [18]. The downstream miRNAs of circDLC1 were predicted (Supplementary Table 2 and Fig. 5B), in which miR-671-5p is highly expressed in glioma [19, 20]. The target genes of miR-671-5p were predicted and intersected (Fig. 5B), in which CTNNBIP1 is poorly expressed in glioma [21, 22]. We identified the binding sites between circDLC1 and miR-671-5p, and miR-671-5p and CTNNBIP1 through the database (Fig. 5C). Dual-luciferase and RNA pull-down assays confirmed the binding relationships between circDLC1 and miR-671-5p, and miR-671-5p and CTNNBIP1 (p < 0.01, Fig. 5D, E). circDLC1 overexpression alone decreased miR-671-5p expression and circDLC1 silencing alone increased miR-671-5p expression, while METTL3 silencing or METTL3 overexpression reduced the regulatory effect of intervention of circDLC1 on miR-671-5p expression; the transcriptional level trend of CTNNBIP1 was opposite to that of miR-671-5p (p < 0.01, Fig. 5F, G). Then, we intervened in miR-671-5p expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 5H) and found that miR-671-5p overexpression decreased the CTNNBIP1 transcriptional level in the combined treatment group, while miR-671-5p silencing increased the CTNNBIP1 transcriptional level (p < 0.01, Fig. 5I). Finally, we found that miR-671-5p expression was elevated and CTNNBIP1 expression was reduced in glioma tissues and cells (p < 0.05, Fig. 5J–L). miR-671-5p expression was negatively correlated with circDLC1 and CTNNBIP1 expression in glioma tissues, and CTNNBIP1 expression was positively correlated with circDLC1 expression (p < 0.05, Fig. 5M). Briefly, circDLC1 promoted CTNNBIP1 transcription by competitively binding to miR-671-5p.
CTNNBIP1 silencing attenuated the inhibitory effect of circDLC1 overexpression on malignant proliferation of glioma cells
Then, we verified the regulatory effect of CTNNBIP1 on glioma cells. After three CTNNBIP1 siRNAs (si-CTNNBIP1) were transfected into LN229 cells, CTNNBIP1 mRNA expression in LN229 cells was decreased (p < 0.01, Fig. 6A). We chose si-CTNNBIP1#2 and pc-circDLC1 to treat LN229 cells. Also, we transfected CTNNBIP1 pcDNA 3.1 (pc-CTNNBIP1) into A172 cells (p < 0.01, Fig. 6A), and then, pc-CTNNBIP1-treated A172 cells were transfected with si-CTNNBIP1. si-CTNNBIP1#2 + pc-circDLC1 promoted LN229 cell proliferation, while pc-CTNNBIP1 + si-circDLC1 inhibited A172 cell proliferation (p < 0.05, Fig. 6B–D). Briefly, CTNNBIP1 silencing attenuated the inhibitory effect of circDLC1 overexpression on glioma cell proliferation.
METTL3 suppressed glioma cell proliferation via the circDLC1/miR-671-5p/CTNNBIP1 axis in vivo
Finally, we verified the regulation of METTL3-mediated circDLC1 on glioma cells in vivo. METTL3 overexpression suppressed tumor growth (p < 0.01, Fig. 7A–C). Compared with the LV-oe-NC group, the LV-oe-METTL3 group showed increased METTL3 expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 7D–E), elevated m6A level and circDLC1 expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 7F–G), reduced miR-671-5p expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 7H), and enhanced CTNNBIP1 expression (p < 0.01, Fig. 7I). Briefly, METTL3 suppressed glioma cell malignant proliferation via the circDLC1/miR-671-5p/CTNNBIP1 axis in vivo.
Discussion
Glioma presents a challenging clinical situation that causes notable mortality and morbidity [1]. circRNAs regulate cell cycle, angiogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance of glioma cells [23]. This study elucidated that METTL3-mediated circDLC1 promoted CTNNBIP1 transcription by sponging miR-671-5p, thus repressing the malignant proliferation of glioma cells (Fig. 8).
Patients with lower circDLC1 expression exhibit a more advanced hepatocellular carcinoma stage [8]. Nevertheless, the role of circDLC1 in glioma remained unknown. In the present study, we found that circDLC1 was poorly expressed in glioma tissues and cells. Unlike linear RNAs, the circular structure of circRNAs contributes to their stability in tissues and ensures their capacity to participate in various biological events [24]. Actinomycin D or RNase R treatment did not change circDLC1 level but reduced linear DLC1 level significantly, indicating that circDLC1 was more stable than linear DLC1. Then, we intervened in circDLC1 expression in glioma cells and found that circDLC1 overexpression suppressed glioma cell proliferation. We were the first to demonstrate that circDLC1 expression was reduced in glioma, and circDLC1 overexpression suppressed the malignant proliferation of glioma cells.
The biogenesis and functions of circRNAs can be mediated by m6A modification [25]. circDLC1 is regulated by m6A modification in hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis [8]. The reduction of m6A level in glioma can be partially attributed to the decreased METTL3 level [17]. METTL3 is a well-studied RNA methyltransferase that executes an m6A-dependent modification of circRNAs implicated in carcinogenesis [26, 27]. Our results exhibited that the m6A level, METTL3 expression, and m6A level of circDLC1 were reduced in glioma tissues and cells. METTL3 expression showed a positive correlation with circDLC1 in glioma tissues. Consensus m6A motifs are abundant in circRNAs and METTL3 enhances m6A-driven RNA translation [28]. We demonstrated that METTL3-mediated m6A modification increased circDLC1 expression by enhancing circDLC1 stability. METTL3 downregulation underlies a potential mechanism of glioma tumorigenesis [13]. METTL3 knockdown dramatically facilitates glioblastoma stem cell growth, self-renewal, and tumor progression [29]. Similarly, we showed that METTL3 overexpression annulled the promoting effect of circDLC1 silencing on glioma cell proliferation.
circRNAs modulate gene expression by functioning as miRNA sponges [14]. miR-671-5p is encoded by a gene localized at 7q36.1, which is amplified in glioblastoma multiforme [20]. miR-671-5p is highly expressed in glioblastoma cells and facilitates the proliferation and reduces the apoptosis of glioblastoma cells [21]. CTNNBIP1 serves as a tumor suppressor and is demonstrated to be diminished in glioma [22]. We demonstrated that miR-671-5p expression was elevated and CTNNBIP1 expression was declined in glioma tissues and cells, and circDLC1 promoted CTNNBIP1 transcription by binding to miR-671-5p. CTNNBIP1 downregulation is related to unfavorable prognosis, high histological grade, and advanced glioma progression [21]. Consistently, we found that CTNNBIP1 silencing attenuated the inhibitory effect of circDLC1 overexpression on glioma cell proliferation. Finally, we verified the regulatory mechanism of METTL3-mediated circDLC1 in vivo. The reduction of METTL3-mediated m6A modification results in the in vivo growth of glioma cells [13]. Our results exhibited that METTL3 overexpression repressed tumor growth, elevated m6A level and circDLC1 expression, reduced miR-671-5p expression, and enhanced CTNNBIP1 expression. Briefly, METTL3 suppressed the glioma cell proliferation via the circDLC1/miR-671-5p/CTNNBIP1 axis in vivo.
To sum up, METTL3-mediated m6A modification upregulated circDLC1 expression by enhancing the stability of circDLC1, thereby promoting the competitive binding of circDLC1 and miR-671-5p, facilitating the transcription of CTNNBIP1, and eventually repressing the malignant proliferation of glioma cells. This study first reported circDLC1 expression patterns in glioma and elucidated its effect on the malignant proliferation of glioma cells. However, this study only explored the role of the miR-671-5p/CTNNBIP1 axis downstream of circDLC1, and there are still many miRNAs downstream of circDLC1 to be explored. Whether circDLC1 is also affected by other m6A modifying enzymes needs to be further studied. In addition, we only detected the effect of the change of CTNNBIP1 transcription level on the malignant proliferation of glioma cells, and the effect of the change of CTNNBIP1 protein level is not clear. In the future, we will verify the effect of CTNNBIP1 protein level on glioma cell proliferation and explore other possible mechanisms of circDLC1.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University and in accordance with Helsinki Declaration. The animal experiments were approved by the Experimental Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. All patients had signed the written informed consent. All the animal experiments were implemented based on the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [30].
Clinical sample collection
We collected the tumor tissues of 40 patients (at an average age of 54.35 ± 9.52; 21 males and 19 females) with primary glioma and corresponding adjacent tissues in The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from June 2016 to June 2018 and stored in liquid nitrogen at –80 °C. None patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before. The histological features of collected tissues were independently diagnosed by two pathologists.
Cell culture
Human glioma cell lines (T98G, LN229, A172, and LN18) and healthy glioma cell line (HEB) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia, USA). All cells were subjected to short tandem repeat (STR) identification and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone, South Logan, UT, USA) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Cell treatment
Three siRNAs specifically targeting circDLC1, circDLC1 pcDNA 3.1, three siRNAs specifically targeting METTL3, METTL3 pcDNA 3.1, three siRNAs specifically targeting catenin beta interacting protein 1 (CTNNBIP1), CTNNBIP1 pcDNA 3.1, miR-671-5p mimic, miR-671-5p inhibitor, and their negative controls (NCs) were designed and synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Finally, these vectors were transfected into A172 or LN229 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Cell-counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay
A172 and LN229 cells were seeded into 96-well plates (2000 cells/well) and cultured for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. Each well was added with 10 μL CCK-8 reagent (Beyotime, Beijing, China) for 2-h incubation at 37 °C. The absorbance at the wavelength of 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Philadelphia, PA, USA).
Colony formation assay
A172 or LN229 cells (200–300 cells) were seeded into the petri dish in humidified air at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 10 days. After the removal of the complete medium, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min. Colony cells were counted under an optical microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
5-ethynyl-2ʹ-deoxyuridine (EdU) staining
A172 and LN229 cells were seeded into 96-well plates (20,000 cells) and cultured in the medium (100 μL/well, ThermoFisher) containing 50 μM EdU for 2 h (5% CO2, 37 °C). Briefly, the cells were treated with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and stained with 100 μL Apollo dye solution (Ribobio) for 30 min. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (ThermoFisher) for 30 min, followed by observation under the fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The final results are presented as a percentage.
Actinomycin D treatment
A172 or LN229 cells were seeded into 24-well plates (5 × 105 cells/well). After 24 h, the cells were treated with 1 μg/mL actinomycin D. The relative RNA expressions of circDLC1 and DLC1 were analyzed using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).
RNase R treatment assay
The total RNA of A172 and LN229 cells (3 μg) was incubated with 10 U RNase R (20 U/μL, Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA) at 37 °C for 30 min and at 75 °C for 10 min to deactivate the RNase R, followed by RT-qPCR.
m6A level detection
The m6A level in total RNA was measured using m6A RNA methylation quantitative kit (ab185912, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). Firstly, RNA was coated in the detection well at 37 °C for 90 min, then added with capture antibody (50 μL), detection antibody (50 μL), and enhancer solution (50 μL) respectively, and incubated at room temperature for 60 min. Finally, the chromogenic solution was added for signal detection and absorbance measurement. The m6A level was measured using the colorimetry method (450 nm).
m6A RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) assay
MeRIP was performed using Magna MeRIP m6A kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) to detect the m6A level of circDLC1. Briefly, 3 μg anti-m6A antibody (ab208577, Abcam) was incubated with protein A/G magnetic beads at 4 °C overnight. Then, the conjugate was incubated with RNA in the IP buffer containing RNase inhibitor and protease inhibitor. RNA was isolated and detected using RT-qPCR.
Nuclear/cytosol fractionation assay
After rinsing with pre-cooled phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 1 × 106 A172 or LN229 cells were resuspended in 1 mL RLN buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 0.14 M NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% IGEPAL CA-630, and 1 mM DTT), incubated on ice for 5 min, and then homogenized. The cytoplasm was the supernatant after centrifugation. The precipitate was resuspended in 1 mL RSB buffer, homogenized, and centrifuged to remove the residual cytoplasm. The preliminary nucleus was resuspended in 3 mL 2 M RSB (2 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF) and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 45 min. The isolated circDLC1 was subjected to RT-qPCR analysis, with U6 and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as nuclear and cytoplasmic controls, respectively [31].
Dual-luciferase assay
Wild-type (WT) circDLC1 or CTNNBIP1 containing miR-671-5p binding sequence was synthesized and inserted into the pmirGLO vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and named circDLC1 WT or CTNNBIP1 WT. Mutant-type (MUT) circDLC1 or CTNNBIP1 containing miR-671-5p mutant binding sequence was synthesized and inserted into the pmirGLO vector, named circDLC1 MUT or CTNNBIP1 MUT. The constructed plasmids were co-transfected with miR-671-5p mimic or mimic NC into A172 and LN229 cells using Lipofectamine 3000, respectively. The luciferase activity was measured after 48 h using a luciferase detection kit (Promega).
RNA pull-down assay
miR-671-5p and miR-NC were biotinylated using the biotin RNA Labeling Mix (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and transcribed using T7/SP6 RN polymerase (Roche). Then, biotin-labeled miR-671-5p (bio-miR-671-5p) and bio-miR-NC were treated with RNase free DNase I (Promega) and RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Redwood City, CA, USA). Next, M-280 streptavidin magnetic beads were incubated with bio-miR-671-5p or bio-miR-NC at room temperature for 4 h, and then with A172 and LN229 cell lysates. The RNA binding to bio-miR-671-5p or bio-miR-NC was extracted with TRIzol reagent for RT-qPCR.
Xenograft tumor experiments
Male BALB/c nude mice (aged 6 weeks old; weighing 20 g) purchased from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China) [SYXK (Beijing) 2017-0033] were raised in a standard animal room and maintained under a 12-h light/dark cycle, with food and water provided ad libitum. LN229 cells were infected with the lentiviral overexpression vector of METTL3 (LV-oe-METTL3) or NC (LV-oe-NC) obtained from Genechem (Shanghai, China). Afterward, puromycin was used to screen the stably expressed cells. Before the experiment, the nude mice were weighed and numbered. The researchers divided them into two groups using the random number method. LN229 cells (5 × 105) were injected into the posterior flank of mice subcutaneously and tumor growth was observed. The health status of mice was detected every 3 days and the the tumor size was measured. The tumor volume was calculated: volume (mm3) = (length × width2)/2. The mice were sacrificed by intraperitoneal injection of 1% pentobarbital sodium (150 mg/kg) 21 days after injection. The tumors were removed and weighed. During the experiment, the researchers tried their best to reduce the number of nude mice and the pain of nude mice, and there was no animal death in the whole process. To ensure the reliability of experimental data, the tumor tissues of 6 mice in each group were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin for immunohistochemistry. The tumor tissues of the remaining six mice were used to detect the expression of cytokines in the tumor homogenate using RT-qPCR.
Immunohistochemistry
The tumor tissue of mice was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 4 μm sections. After dewaxing and dehydration, the sections were incubated with METTL3 antibody (ab195352, Abcam) and Ki67 antibody (ab15580, Abcam) at 4 °C overnight. After PBS washing, the sections were incubated with the secondary antibody (ab6721, Abcam) at 37 °C for 20 min. After 2,4-diaminobutyric acid development (10 min) and hematoxylin counterstaining (3 min), the sections were dehydrated with gradient alcohol, cleared with xylene, and sealed with neutral resin. The sections were observed by professionals under a microscope using a double-blind method. Five visual fields were randomly selected from the section, and the positive rate of each visual field was calculated [32].
Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and 2 μg RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript RT kit (Invitrogen). RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Premix ExTaqTM (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) and Applied Biosystems 7300 system (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR primers are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The relative expression was calculated using the 2–ΔΔCt method [33], with GAPDH and U6 as internal references [34].
Western blot
Total protein was extracted using radio-immunoprecipitation assay buffer. The extract was centrifuged at 4 °C and 12,000 × g for 15 min and the protein concentration was determined using bicinchoninic acid kits (Beyotime). The protein was separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h and incubated with the primary antibodies METTL3 (ab195352, 1:1000, Abcam) and GAPDH (ab9485, 1:2000, Abcam) at 4 °C overnight. Following tris-buffered saline-tween buffer washing, the membranes were incubated with the secondary antibody (ab6721, 1:2000, Abcam) at 37 °C for 1 h. NIH Image J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) was used to analyze the gray value, with GAPDH as internal reference.
Bioinformatics analysis
The downstream miRNAs of circDLC1 were predicted through the Starbase database (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/index.php) [35]. The downstream genes of miR-671-5p were predicted through the Starbase database, Targetscan database (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_71/) [36], RNA22 v2 database (https://cm.jefferson.edu/rna22/Precomputed/) [37], and miRDB database (http://mirdb.org/index.html) [38].
Statistical analysis
Data analysis and map plotting were performed using the SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The data complied with the assumption of normality and homogeneity of variance. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The t-test was adopted for comparisons between two groups. One-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed for the comparisons among multiple groups, following Tukey’s multiple comparison test. A value of p < 0.01 indicated a significant difference.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ludwig K, Kornblum HI. Molecular markers in glioma. J Neurooncol. 2017;134:505–12.
Ostrom QT, Bauchet L, Davis FG, Deltour I, Fisher JL, Langer CE, et al. The epidemiology of glioma in adults: a “state of the science” review. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16:896–913.
Xu S, Tang L, Li X, Fan F, Liu Z. Immunotherapy for glioma: current management and future application. Cancer Lett. 2020;476:1–12.
Alifieris C, Trafalis DT. Glioblastoma multiforme: pathogenesis and treatment. Pharm Ther. 2015;152:63–82.
Chen LL. The biogenesis and emerging roles of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17:205–11.
Rybak-Wolf A, Stottmeister C, Glazar P, Jens M, Pino N, Giusti S, et al. Circular RNAs in the mammalian brain are highly abundant, conserved, and dynamically expressed. Mol Cell. 2015;58:870–85.
Hao Z, Hu S, Liu Z, Song W, Zhao Y, Li M. Circular RNAs: functions and prospects in glioma. J Mol Neurosci. 2019;67:72–81.
Liu H, Lan T, Li H, Xu L, Chen X, Liao H, et al. Circular RNA circDLC1 inhibits MMP1-mediated liver cancer progression via interaction with HuR. Theranostics. 2021;11:1396–411.
Zhang L, Hou C, Chen C, Guo Y, Yuan W, Yin D, et al. The role of N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) modification in the regulation of circRNAs. Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:105.
Liu ZX, Li LM, Sun HL, Liu SM. Link between m6A modification and cancers. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:89.
Zhang Y, Geng X, Li Q, Xu J, Tan Y, Xiao M, et al. m6A modification in RNA: biogenesis, functions and roles in gliomas. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:192.
Zeng C, Huang W, Li Y, Weng H. Roles of METTL3 in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic targeting. J. Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:117.
Ji JW, Zhang YD, Lai YJ, Huang CG. Mettl3 regulates the proliferation, migration and invasion of glioma cells by inhibiting PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharm Sci. 2020;24:3818–28.
Qi X, Zhang DH, Wu N, Xiao JH, Wang X, Ma W. ceRNA in cancer: possible functions and clinical implications. J Med Genet. 2015;52:710–8.
Carbonell T, Gomes AV. MicroRNAs in the regulation of cellular redox status and its implications in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Redox Biol. 2020;36:101607.
Wang BC, Ma J. Role of microRNAs in malignant glioma. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128:1238–44.
Li F, Zhang C, Zhang G. m6A RNA methylation controls proliferation of human glioma cells by influencing cell apoptosis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2019;159:119–25.
Panda AC. Circular RNAs Act as miRNA Sponges. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1087:67–79.
Li X, Diao H. Circular RNA circ_0001946 acts as a competing endogenous RNA to inhibit glioblastoma progression by modulating miR-671-5p and CDR1. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:13807–19.
Barbagallo D, Condorelli A, Ragusa M, Salito L, Sammito M, Banelli B, et al. Dysregulated miR-671-5p/CDR1-AS/CDR1/VSNL1 axis is involved in glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget. 2016;7:4746–59.
Tong YQ, Liu B, Zheng HY, Gu J, Liu H, Li F, et al. MiR-215, an activator of the CTNNBIP1/beta-catenin pathway, is a marker of poor prognosis in human glioma. Oncotarget. 2015;6:25024–33.
Guo M, Zhang X, Wang G, Sun J, Jiang Z, Khadarian K, et al. miR-603 promotes glioma cell growth via Wnt/beta-catenin pathway by inhibiting WIF1 and CTNNBIP1. Cancer Lett. 2015;360:76–86.
Geng X, Zhang Y, Li Q, Xi W, Yu W, Shi L, et al. Screening and functional prediction of differentially expressed circular RNAs in human glioma of different grades. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;13:1989–2014.
Jiang Y, Zhou J, Zhao J, Zhang H, Li L, Li H, et al. The U2AF2 /circRNA ARF1/miR-342-3p/ISL2 feedback loop regulates angiogenesis in glioma stem cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39:182.
Di Timoteo G, Dattilo D, Centron-Broco A, Colantoni A, Guarnacci M, Rossi F, et al. Modulation of circRNA metabolism by m(6)A modification. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107641.
Yi YC, Chen XY, Zhang J, Zhu JS. Novel insights into the interplay between m(6)A modification and noncoding RNAs in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:121.
Lin S, Choe J, Du P, Triboulet R, Gregory RI. The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2016;62:335–45.
Yang Y, Fan X, Mao M, Song X, Wu P, Zhang Y, et al. Extensive translation of circular RNAs driven by N(6)-methyladenosine. Cell Res. 2017;27:626–41.
Cui Q, Shi H, Ye P, Li L, Qu Q, Sun G, et al. m(6)A RNA methylation regulates the self-renewal and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Rep. 2017;18:2622–34.
National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edn. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.
Wu J, Li R, Li L, Gu Y, Zhan H, Zhou C, et al. MYC-activated lncRNA HNF1A-AS1 overexpression facilitates glioma progression via cooperating with miR-32-5p/SOX4 axis. Cancer Med. 2020;9:6387–98.
Cheng R, Chen Y, Zhou H, Wang B, Du Q, Chen Y. B7-H3 expression and its correlation with clinicopathologic features, angiogenesis, and prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. APMIS. 2018;126:396–402.
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.
Liu Z, Guo S, Sun H, Bai Y, Song Z, Liu X. Circular RNA CircHIPK3 elevates CCND2 expression and promotes cell proliferation and invasion Through miR-124 in glioma. Front Genet. 2020;11:1013.
Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH, Yang JH. starBase v2.0: decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D92–7.
Agarwal V, Bell GW, Nam JW, Bartel DP. Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife. 2015;4:e05005.
Miranda KC, Huynh T, Tay Y, Ang YS, Tam WL, Thomson AM, et al. A pattern-based method for the identification of MicroRNA binding sites and their corresponding heteroduplexes. Cell. 2006;126:1203–17.
Chen Y, Wang X. miRDB: an online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D127–131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
QSW and LZC have given substantial contributions to the conception and the design of the manuscript; XFY, WBZ, and WLX contributed to acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors have participated to drafting the manuscript, QSW revised it critically. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University and in accordance with Helsinki Declaration. The animal experiments were approved by the Experimental Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. All patients had signed the written informed consent. All the animal experiments were implemented based on the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [32].
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Q., Yin, X., Zhao, W. et al. Molecular mechanism of m6A methylation of circDLC1 mediated by RNA methyltransferase METTL3 in the malignant proliferation of glioma cells. Cell Death Discov. 8, 229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-022-00979-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-022-00979-6
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Cross-talk between circRNAs and m6A modifications in solid tumors
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
-
Methyltransferase-like proteins in cancer biology and potential therapeutic targeting
Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2023)
-
Insights into the regulatory role of RNA methylation modifications in glioma
Journal of Translational Medicine (2023)
-
m6A-modified circRNAs: detections, mechanisms, and prospects in cancers
Molecular Medicine (2022)