Abstract
Peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring is recommended in the management of asthma. However, compliance is poor, and this is often attributed to the burden of measurement and recording. The Smart Peak Flow (SPF) device and app allow self-measuring and self-monitoring of PEF. Compliance with self-monitoring was promising in 399 UK users, calling for research to confirm these results and explore its potential as an intervention to improve self-monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The peak expiratory flow (PEF) is an objective measure of lung function that has been widely used in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma1. Despite this, adherence levels to PEF monitoring have been shown to be as low as 9%2 and PEF “diary fabrication” as high as 60%3.
Patient education, regular reviews and feedback to patients4 improve adherence to PEF monitoring; however, the utility of PEF in clinical practice is hampered by a reliance on patients to manually document their PEF, leading to unreliable data recording and poor patient engagement. In view of this, the use of peak flow in clinical practice is not widespread. We hypothesized that an electronic PEF meter that automatically saves data onto a paired app will lead to improved adherence to PEF readings.
The Smart Peak Flow (SPF) device and app5 allow self-measuring and self-monitoring of PEF. To maximize adherence to PEF monitoring, additional app functionalities that users can select include: (1) PEF reminders, (2) immediate charting, (3) motivating messages, (4) challenges and rewards and (5) sharing of measurement results and charts with family members or health-care professionals via easily generated PDF of the measurements charts. The SPF can be purchased online by members of the public; the cost of the device is comparable with traditional PEF meters6.
A total of 750 free devices were supplied by the SPF UK distributor to 35 clinics directly or through clinicians attending UK annual respiratory conferences. In all, 250 SPF devices were kept by nurses, technicians and doctors to test, while 500 were offered to patients at clinicians’ discretion during outpatient appointments. One hundred and thirty-three of these patients subsequently downloaded the SPF app and measured at least one PEF.
SPF devices were distributed online through Kickstarter7 (a global crowdfunding platform) since 2017, while online sales started in February 2019, resulting in 266 UK individuals who purchased the device measured at least one PEF.
Of the 399 UK users who either bought or were supplied a free device, 64% were female, with an overall mean age across genders of 36.7 years (SD 17.3).
Between June 2018 and September 2019, users generated a total of 11,632 peak flow measurements.
After 3 months, 32% of users took at least one peak flow measure a day, with 63% measuring their peak flow at least twice a week. After 6 months, 28% of users took at least a peak flow measure a day, with 67% measuring their peak flow at least once a week (Fig. 1).
Although no research evidence is available as yet, we speculate that these results could be partly explained by the higher motivation to self-monitor peak flow in users who self-funded the device or received support/encouragement to PEF monitoring by health-care professionals. Nonetheless, among participants who downloaded the SPF app, adherence is higher than reported rates to manual PEF meters1,2. Research is needed to confirm PEF adherence results, compare adherence before and after the introduction of the SPF device, the usability and acceptability of the SPF system for both patients with asthma and health-care professionals and its potential as an intervention to improve self-monitoring.
Methods
Peak flow measurements are recorded using a turbine transduction system8 and backed up anonymously in secure cloud storage. In order to use the SPF system, users download the SPF app on their mobile phones and agree to the terms and conditions stated in the Privacy Policy. The Policy includes a statement informing participants about anonymized data collection of their app use, with the purpose of understanding the SPF impact on health through clinical research.
Ethics declarations
The manuscript was examined by the Institutional Research Ethics Board and Caldicott Guardian at Queen Mary University of London and was exempt from full review.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient consent restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Asthma: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management. NICE Guideline. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng80 (2017).
Garrett, J., Fenwick, J. M., Taylor, G., Mitchell, E. & Rea, H. Peak expiratory flow meters (PEFMs)—who uses them and how and does education affect the pattern of utilisation? Aust. N. Z. J. Med. 24, 521–529 (1994).
Côté, J., Cartier, A., Malo, J. L., Rouleau, M. & Boulet, L. P. Compliance with peak expiratory flow monitoring in home management of asthma. Chest 113, 968–972 (1998).
Powell, H. & Gibson, P. Options for self-management education for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD004107 (2003).
The Smart Peak Flow Team. www.smartpeakflow.co.uk (2020).
The Smart Peak Flow Team. https://smartpeakflow.co.uk/product/smart-peak-flow-meter/ (2020).
The Smart Peak Flow Team. Kickstarter—Asthma control in your pocket. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1694930916/smart-peak-flowtm-asthma-control-in-your-pocket (2018).
VanZeller, C., Williams, A. & Pollock, I. Comparison of bench test results measuring the accuracy of peak flow meters. BMC Pulm. Med. 19, 74 (2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.A. contributed to the study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and initial manuscript drafting. C.J.G. and A.D.S. contributed to data interpretation, manuscript discussion and revision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
T.A. is Founder and CEO at Smart Respiratory Products Ltd.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Antalffy, T., De Simoni, A. & Griffiths, C.J. Promising peak flow diary compliance with an electronic peak flow meter and linked smartphone app. npj Prim. Care Respir. Med. 30, 19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-0178-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-0178-y
- Springer Nature Limited