Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia, which is predictive for functional outcomes and is, therefore, a treatment target in itself. Yet, literature on efficacy of different pharmaco-therapeutic options is inconsistent. This quantitative review provides an overview of studies that investigated potential cognitive enhancers in schizophrenia. We included pharmacological agents, which target different neurotransmitter systems and evaluated their efficacy on overall cognitive functioning and seven separate cognitive domains. In total, 93 studies with 5630 patients were included. Cognitive enhancers, when combined across all different neurotransmitter systems, which act on a large number of different mechanisms, showed a significant (yet small) positive effect size of 0.10 (k = 51, p = 0.023; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.18) on overall cognition. Cognitive enhancers were not superior to placebo for separate cognitive domains. When analyzing each neurotransmitter system separately, agents acting predominantly on the glutamatergic system showed a small significant effect on overall cognition (k = 29, Hedges’ g = 0.19, p = 0.01), as well as on working memory (k = 20, Hedges’ g = 0.13, p = 0.04). A sub-analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) showed a small effect on working memory (k = 6, Hedges’ g = 0.26, p = 0.03). Other sub-analyses were positively nonsignificant, which may partly be due to the low number of studies we could include per neurotransmitter system. Overall, this meta-analysis showed few favorable effects of cognitive enhancers for patients with schizophrenia, partly due to lack of power. There is a lack of studies involving agents acting on other than glutamatergic and cholinergic systems, especially of those targeting the dopaminergic system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia.1 A range of cognitive functions are affected in patients with schizophrenia, with a mean decrease of one to two standard deviations (SD) compared to the general population.2 Cognitive dysfunction can be present before the onset of psychotic symptoms and after the first psychosis either remains at decreased levels or declines further during the illness.3 These deficits are predictive for functional outcomes, both before and after the first psychotic episode4,5 and are, therefore, a treatment target of its own.6 Psychological as well as pharmacological treatments have been suggested for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. Cognitive remediation techniques have been investigated in depth and have shown small to medium effects, irrespective of active or passive control groups.7 Antipsychotic medication predominantly target positive symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, and disorganization, and may even have a negative impact on cognition.8
The pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunctions in schizophrenia is complex and many different neurotransmission systems are involved.9 Therefore, pharmacological agents targeting different putative mechanisms may be relevant for cognitive enhancement. Pharmacological enhancement of cognition has been a main field of research in the last decades, investigating different neurotransmitter systems and seemingly reporting as many positive as negative findings. As of yet, there is no clear picture whether any pharmacological treatment can improve cognitive functioning in schizophrenia, directly or indirectly by increasing the efficacy of other treatment modalities, and whether or not further investigation of specific cognitive enhancers, i.e., pharmacological agents targeting neurotransmitter systems that are potentially relevant for improving cognitive impairment, should be encouraged.9
Several meta-analyses and reviews have been conducted regarding potential cognitive enhancers. One of the most extensive ones was conducted by Choi et al.10 where the authors reviewed agents acting on three different neurotransmitter systems, including glutamatergic, cholinergic, and serotonergic. However, the majority of systematic reviews either includes one specific neurotransmitter system only, or do not perform meta-analytical calculations. We here aim to provide a comprehensive overview of current literature on cognitive enhancers for schizophrenia as well as answer the question if and which cognitive enhancers improve overall cognition or one of the specific cognitive domains. We summarize the efficacy of cognitive enhancers acting on seven different neurotransmitter systems (including a miscellaneous group), thereby making a distinction between the different neurotransmitter systems targeted. Even though the cognitive enhancers act on very different (and sometimes opposite) brain mechanisms, we also perform one overarching analysis including all different categories, as all drugs have the same aim, namely: to improve cognition. We only included published, high quality, double-blind studies that compared an enhancer to placebo.
For the discussion, we used the arbitrary cutoff values of effect sizes > 0.02 as clinically significant and total samples of n < 1000 for an underpowered area of research.
Results
The outcome of literature search is shown in Supplementary Material S1, demographic information on all included studies is provided in Table 1. In total, 93 studies with 5630 patients were suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis (glutamatergic: k = 27; cholinergic: k = 32; serotonergic: k = 14; dopaminergic: k = 3; GABA-ergic: k = 2; noradrenergic: k = 4; miscellaneous: k = 11) (see Table 1). The mean sample size per study sample was 28.73 (SD = 27.13, range = 4–203), mean age of the participants was 44.15 years (SD = 6.36, as reported by 91 study samples), 68.54% of the sample were men (as reported by 87 study samples) and average illness duration was 15.57 years (SD = 6.47, as reported by 63 study samples). The cognitive domains covered in the included studies are shown in Supplementary Material S2.
Overall analyses combining cognitive enhancers from different neurotransmitter systems
Combining all cognitive enhancers across different neurotransmitter systems for the efficacy on overall cognition resulted in 51 study samples, with a total of 3635 patients (see Fig. 1). Cognitive enhancers showed a very small but significant positive effect size of 0.10 over placebo treatment (p = 0.023; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.18). The number of missing null studies to render this positive result to nonsignificance was 105. The significant Q-value (Q(50) = 70.84, p = 0.028) showed that the variability among studies was higher than would be expected due to sampling error, and further examination of subgroup differences is warranted. Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I2 = 29.4%), indicating that 29% of the dispersion that reflects differences in the true effect sizes, while the remaining 71% can be attributed to random sampling error. The funnel plot and Egger’s test (t = 3.95, p < 0.001) indicated potential publication bias (see Supplementary Material 3).
In spite of their very small, yet significant effect on overall cognition, taken as a group, cognitive enhancers had no significant positive effect on any of the separate cognitive domains (see Table 2). Furthermore, meta-regression analyses showed no associations between the effect of cognitive enhancers on overall cognition and duration of treatment (z = −0.09, p = 0.929) or illness duration (z = 0.67, p = 0.505). The effect sizes for the cognitive subdomains also showed no relation between duration of treatment or illness duration (14 regressions, p-values ranging between 0.107 and 0.927).
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers targeting the glutamatergic system
Twenty-nine study samples of agents acting predominantly on the glutamatergic system were grouped into this category. Seventeen study samples evaluated the effects on overall cognition, showing a small but significant effect of 0.19 (p = 0.013) (see Fig. 1). The significant Q-value indicated that the included studies did not share the same effect size (Q(16) = 28.2, p = 0.030), while heterogeneity was low to moderate (I2 = 43.30%). The funnel plot and Egger’s test (t = 3.03, p < 0.001) indicated potential publication bias (see Supplementary Material 4). Furthermore, a very small effect was found for these agents on working memory, as compared to placebo (k = 20, Hedges’ g = 0.13, p = 0.040) (see Supplementary Material S5 and S6).
Further sub-analyses were performed by grouping agents acting mainly at the glycine site (sarcosine, benzoate, glycine, d-serine, and d-cycloserine, k = 12 in total), agents targeting the AMPA receptor (k = 5) and memantine/amantadine agents (k = 6), (see Supplementary material S5). Glycine site acting agents did not show superior effects compared to placebo, which may result from insufficient statistical power. AMPA receptor agonists were more effective than placebo in improving working memory (k = 5, Hedges’ g = 0.28, p = 0.030). However, the Q-statistic was significant and heterogeneity was moderate to large (Q(3) = 8.911, p = 0.030; I2 = 66.33%), although no outliers were identified. Furthermore, the effects of memantine/amantadine on overall cognition showed a positive trend (k = 6, Hedges’ g = 0.34, p = 0.063), which could reach significance when power increases.
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers targeting the cholinergic system
Forty-three study samples targeting the cholinergic system could be included. Meta-analysis did not show superior effects of these agents compared to placebo, (see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Material S5 and S6). When excluding challenge studies (i.e., studies providing only a single dose11,12,13), results did not change. Sub-analyses were performed showing no superior effects for nicotinergic agents (three to twenty studies per domain). When subdividing into alpha 7 (three to sixteen studies per domain) and alpha 4 (zero to five studies per domain) nicotinic agonists, no significant results were found except for alpha 4 nicotinic agonists showing a more favorable outcome for placebo in problem solving (k = 5, Hedges’g = −0.175 and p = 0.027). The cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) showed a small yet significant effect on working memory (k = 6, Hedges’ g = 0.26, p = 0.031), while no significant effects were found in the sub-analyses for galantamine (two to six studies per domain).
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers targeting the serotoninergic system
Fourteen study samples evaluated cognitive enhancers that target the serotonergic system. The efficacy of these agents was not superior to placebo (see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Material S5 and S6). When performing sub-analyses for (partial) 5-HT1A agonists (zero to three studies per domain), or antidepressants (zero to five studies per domain), neither comparison reached significance.
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers targeting the dopaminergic system
For agents targeting the dopamine system, only four study samples could be included. Studies could only be combined for the domain of reasoning, the positive effect size did not reach significance (k = 4, Hedges’ g = 0.34, p = .072), which could be caused by insufficient statistical power. For overall cognition, and the domains of attention, processing speed, and visual learning and memory, only single studies were available so no mean weighed effect size could be calculated (individual effect sizes are noted in Supplementary Material S5).
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers targeting the GABA-ergic system
Three study samples could be included in the GABA-ergic system. Mean weighed effect sizes were nonsignificant for this type of cognitive enhancers as compared to placebo (see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Material S5 and S6).
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers targeting the noradrenergic system
Four study samples were included targeting the noradrenergic system, showing no significant effects on overall cognition or the separate cognitive domains (see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Material S5 and S6).
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers targeting miscellaneous receptor systems
Seventeen study samples were included in this category. The effects of these cognitive enhancers compared to placebo were nonsignificant (see Fig. 1 and Supplementary Material S5 and S6). However, when excluding challenge studies, the placebo group showed a superior effect on attention (k = 12, Hedges’ g = −0.16, p = 0.038; I2 = 0%).
Discussion
Cognitive dysfunction is a key problem in schizophrenia that largely defines global functioning. Therefore, interventions to improve cognition are needed urgently. Here, we quantitatively summarized literature on 93 studies investigating the efficacy of pharmacological treatment for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. We reviewed the efficacy of agents acting on seven categories of different neurotransmitter systems, evaluating overall cognition as well as seven cognitive subdomains.
All pharmacological agents combined
The results for cognitive enhancers of all neurotransmitter systems taken together on overall cognition showed a significant effect. Although statistical significance was reached, the small size of the effect prevents a positive recommendation for their clinical use as of yet, as the small improvement is easily outweighed by the risk of side-effects. When specific cognitive domains were analyzed, the effects were close to zero, which indicates that very small advantages are to be expected of augmentation with an enhancer.
Efficacy of glutamatergic cognitive enhancers
The glutamatergic system is one of the most investigated systems in enhancing cognition in schizophrenia. Previous meta-analyses conducted on agents acting on the glutamatergic system by Tsai et al.14 showed positive results on cognition measured by the PANSS cognitive subscale (ES = 0.28, p = 0.002), whereas a meta-analysis by Choi et al.10 did not find any effect of included agents, neither on overall cognition nor on cognitive subdomains. Another meta-analysis by Iwata et al.15 did not find superiority of glutamate positive modulators over placebo. Although they reported that AMPA receptor positive modulators did have a tendency to improve attention/vigilance, this finding did not survive statistical corrections. All three meta-analyses differed in terms of included compounds, number of studies and subjects, which might explain different results. Our meta-analysis included 13 different compounds in 27 studies with a total of 1540 patients. Thus, our meta-analysis is the largest and includes the most agents acting on the glutamatergic system compared to previous ones. Overall, we concluded that glutamatergic agents provide some beneficial effects on overall cognition and working memory, but with questionable clinical importance, given the small effect sizes of 0.19 for overall cognition and 0.13 for working memory. Sub-analyses indicated that agents acting on the AMPA site provided larger effects on working memory (ES = 0.28). In addition, memantine/amantadine might also be promising, as the medium effect size for overall cognition bordered on significance. However, more studies on these specific agents are needed for final conclusions as these sub-analyses included less than 1000 individuals and heterogeneity between the studies was indicated.
Efficacy of cholinergic cognitive enhancers
Several meta-analysis and reviews have been conducted for the cholinergic system. A recent meta-analysis by Kishi et al.16 found no significant differences between the effects of antipsychotics plus add-on anti-dementia drugs or add-on placebo on either overall cognition or cognitive subdomains. However, the meta-analysis by Kishi et al. combined cholinesterase inhibitors and glutamatergic antagonists (memantine), which makes comparisons to our sub-analysis complicated. Lewis et al.17 conducted a meta-analyses of alpha-7 nicotinic agents in neuropsychiatric disorders, were the majority of studies included schizophrenia patients. The authors found very modest beneficial effects, where only a sub-analysis of a subgroup with the most effective doses reached significance on the overall cognitive index (ES = 0.13, p = 0.02). In our meta-analysis, seven studies had two or three intervention groups with different doses. We included all investigated doses, which might explain differences in the results. In the meta-analysis by Choi et al.10 13 studies investigating cholinesterase inhibitors (ChIE) were included. The authors found a trend for a positive effect of ChEI on verbal learning and memory. Although the number of included studies for verbal learning and memory are the same, we did not replicate their results for this domain. The differences of methods between Choi et al.10 and our meta-analysis could explain this disparity in results. The review of pharmaceutical cognitive-enhancing agents in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder by Vreeker et al.18 described galantamine as promising for schizophrenia. We found a trend for significant results in processing speed.
In conclusion, some small beneficial effects for cognition might be achieved by ChEI, especially in the working memory domain, although the meta-analysis show moderate heterogeneity and a modest sample size (n = 364). More research is needed on the effects of galantamine on cognition as the effect size for several domains were above 0.2 but the meta-analysis for this drug was also underpowered.
Efficacy of serotonergic cognitive enhancers
For the serotonergic system, a previous meta-analysis by Choi et al.,10 including five studies of 5HT1A receptor agonists and one study of 5HT2A antagonist mianserin, did not find any favorable effects of these agents. However, a previous meta-analysis by Vernon et al.19 on antidepressants for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia included 11 studies with agents acting predominantly on the serotonergic system and found a small effect on composite cognition score as well as a small effect on executive function (ES = 0.10, p = 0.01 and ES = 0.17, p = 0.02, respectively). In line with Vernon et al.,19 we found no positive effects on other analyzed domains. In conclusion, very small effect sizes and lack of statistical significance indicate that targeting the serotonergic system alone might not result in sufficient cognitive enhancement in patients with schizophrenia, with the possible exception of the attention domain (ES = 0.23).
Efficacy of dopaminergic cognitive enhancers
Too few studies were suitable for inclusion to investigate dopaminergic substances as a venue to improve other than reasoning cognitive domains and, therefore, no conclusions can be made at this point. This is very unfortunate, as the dopaminergic system, especially the frontal D1 system is thought to be central to the cognitive dysfunction seen in schizophrenia.20 Thus, further research on dopaminergic enhancers such as methylphenidate, is needed urgently.
Efficacy of GABA-ergic cognitive enhancers
For the GABA-ergic system the investigated agent is described as being selective for GABAA α2 and α3 receptors subunits and should not be sedating, however, this effect cannot be completely excluded and could therefore have influenced our results. GABA hypofunction is thought to underlie at least part of the cognitive impairment seen in schizophrenia.21 Results from our meta-analysis should be considered with much caution as only five domains with eighty two patients in each were analyzed.
Efficacy of noradrenergic cognitive enhancers
Both norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (atomoxetine, reboxetine) and stimulation of α2A receptors (guanfacine, clonidine) or blockade of α2C or α1 receptors have been suggested as putative mechanisms for cognitive enhancement.22,23 However, individual studies included in our meta-analysis, found no beneficial effects of norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (atomoxetine, reboxetine), whereas guanfacine showed some efficacy. Results from our meta-analysis are underpowered for this neurotransmitter system, as only three domains with seventy to seventy five patients per domain were analyzed.
Efficacy of cognitive enhancers of the miscellaneous category
No beneficial effects for the miscellaneous group or modafinil/armodafinil subgroup were found. Recent reviews on modafinil and armodafinil24 and modafinil alone25 reported beneficial effects in single dose studies for some cognitive domains, in particular working memory. All, except one of the reviewed studies with longer treatment duration found no beneficial effects of modafinil/armodafinil on cognition. Our results are based on longer treatment duration studies and indicate no beneficial effects of modafinil/armodafinil for cognition in patients with schizophrenia in a longer time frame.
Limitations
Combining pharmacological agents across different neurotransmitter systems increases heterogeneity among studies; however multiple neurotransmitter systems are involved in cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia and all these different classes of drugs have the same aim (i.e., to improve cognition). Therefore, we believe that a combined overall effect does provide valuable information about cognitive enhancers as a group. Most included studies investigating cognitive enhancers are relatively small and generally include older individuals in their chronic phase of illness, while effects may be better in an earlier stage. Furthermore, most studies provide experimental treatment of short duration and use performance-based measures of cognition. While older chronic patients may not benefit from the drugs targeting cognitive functions, short duration of treatment might not be enough for the changes to be clinically visible. The choice of cognitive measurements and selection of composite scores for overall cognitive functioning might lack sensitivity to detect subtle changes. If we had also included subjective measures of cognition (for example, using the PANSS item on cognition), effect sizes may have been larger, but the results could also have been more difficult to interpret.
Grouping of the different agents according to their presumed mechanism of action is rather challenging as some of them have several different putative receptor targets (for example tropisetron, mirtazapine, modafinil) or the mechanisms are not well known. Yet, given the large diversity in cognitive enhancers that has been studied in schizophrenia, some grouping is necessary to draw any meaningful conclusions, as few compounds have been used in multiple studies. Accordingly, our strategy was to start the analysis with broad categories based on the putative predominant neurotransmitter systems involved. However, as some of the potential enhancers act very differently on the same neurotransmitter system (e.g., the glutamate category include both glycine site NMDA receptor agonists and NMDA receptor antagonists), we broke the analyses further down into more selective categories whenever sample sizes permit.
Another possible limitation is our inclusion of single dose studies. Although not similar to treatment studies, we think that these studies do provide valuable data. Nevertheless, for those analyses where these were included, we performed a sensitivity analysis after excluding single dose studies.
Different cognitive tests are used in the studies. Issues concerning test batteries, such as practice effects, ceiling or floor effects, placebo effects,26 or sensitivity of the test may have influenced the results. However, these are well known issues and suggestions for future studies are provided elsewhere.26
Finally, this meta-analysis focused on schizophrenia, schizophreniform and schizoaffective disorder. Schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) was not included as it is categorized among the personality disorders in DSM5. SPD does however share some of the cognitive deficits seen in patients with schizophrenia, although to a lesser extent. Indeed, several studies of cognitive enhancers in patients with SPD have shown positive results.27,28 If SPD had been included in the present meta-analysis the combined effect sizes might accordingly become somewhat larger.
Directions for future research
Given the limitations mentioned above, future studies should consider the following recommendations:
1. Using the optimal dose
Some of the agents have a very narrow therapeutic window, where too much or too little does not improve cognition but may in fact worsen it (e.g., agents stimulating D1R29,30), while for other agents the optimal therapeutic dose is still uncertain.17,31 For substances such as d-serine, tropisetron, reboxetine, modafinil, armodafinil dose finding in small groups is the first necessary step before large scale RCTs should be started.
2. Including young patients
Most of the studies include chronic patients in a stable phase of their illness. As chronic patients are usually older, brain plasticity is likely to be more limited. Since plasticity is highly associated with cognitive functions, future studies should include a younger population, specifically when investigating systems mediating neuroplasticity, such as the GABAergic and glutamatergic system.
3. Treat at least 6 months
MATRICS recommends phase III clinical trials of at least 6 month duration to be able to determine efficacy and endurance.32 However, most of the trials are significantly shorter. Thus, negative findings may stem from insufficient duration of treatment.
4. Investigating more homogeneous groups
Patients with schizophrenia display a heterogeneous clinical picture that is likely to reflect different pathologies at the brain level. Therefore drugs might have differential effects for subgroups of patients. Disentangling the different pathologies underlying cognitive deficiencies should be a target to better stratify the different cognitive enhancers in subgroups of patients that share some common “biomarkers”. Such biomarkers could be detected with EEG coherence measures (for the GABA system), with Event Related Potentials on EEG (for example for the noradrenergic system) or with the Short Latency Afferent Inhibition test (a combination of TMS over the motor cortex and an EMG read out, a reflection of cholinergic innervation).33
Taken as a group, we found a significant (small) effect of cognitive enhancers in patients with schizophrenia. For specific agents, few positive results emerged. Yet, enhancers acting on the glutamatergic system showed a small positive effect on overall cognition and working memory, while treatment with ChIE had a significant positive effect on working memory, albeit with a small effect size. Results favoring placebo might represent chance findings, yet the possibility that alpha4 agents, ChIE and GABAergic agents might actually worsen some cognitive functions cannot be rejected. There is still a major lack of reports on agents acting on other systems, especially the dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems. Important issues such as dose, treatment duration, including a younger population and subtyping heterogeneous samples should be taken into consideration when planning future studies.
Methods
Neurotransmitter systems
In our systematic search we included different pharmacological agents, targeting the following neurotransmitter systems:
-
(i)
The glutamatergic system: glycine, d-serine, d-cycloserine, CX516, amantadine, memantine, pregnenolone, minocycline, l-carnosine, lamotrigine, benzoate, Org 25935, sarcosine;
-
(ii)
The cholinergic system: nicotine, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, DMXB-A, tropisetron, varenicline, AZD3480, TC-5619, ABT-126;
-
(iii)
The serotonergic system: tandospirone, mianserin, mirtazapine, citalopram, buspirone, ondansetron, duloxetine, latrepirdine, fluvoxamine, ANV-211;
-
(iv)
The dopaminergic system: d-amphetamine, entacapone, DAR-0100A;
-
(v)
The GABA-ergic system: MK-0777;
-
(vi)
The noradrenergic system: atomoxetine, reboxetine, guanfacine;
-
(vii)
Miscellaneous-including agents that do not specifically target the aforementioned neurotransmitter systems, or that target multiple systems, or for which the exact target system is not well known: davunetide, rosiglitazone, raloxifene, sildenafil, armodafinil, modafinil.
Literature search
The meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement.34 A systematic search for studies published in peer-reviewed journals was conducted in PubMed (Medline), Psychinfo, EmBase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Combinations of the following search terms were used: ‘‘schizophrenia’’, ‘‘schizoaffective’’, ‘‘schizophreniform’’, ‘‘psychosis’’, ‘‘cognition’’, ‘‘cognitive’’, ‘‘enhancers’’, ‘‘enhancement’’, ‘‘glutamatergic’’, ‘‘glutamate’’, ‘‘NMDA’’, ‘‘AMPA’’, ‘‘cholinergic’’, ‘‘acetylcholine’’, ‘‘acetylcholinesterase’’, ‘‘nicotinergic’’, ‘‘muscarinergic’’, ‘‘serotonin’’, ‘‘serotonergic’’, ‘‘dopamine’’, ‘‘dopaminergic’’ ‘‘D1’’, ‘‘COMT’’, ‘‘noradrenaline’’, ‘‘noradrenergic’’, ‘‘GABA-ergic’’, ‘‘GABA’’, and the individual names of cognitive enhancers as mentioned in 2.1, with no year or language limits. The literature search was conducted by three authors (C.R., J.D.J., and S.M.), where at least two of them searched independently for relevant publications. Titles, abstracts, and then relevant full-text papers were examined. Consensus was reached between the authors in cases of discrepancy. Cross references from the relevant papers were searched for additional publications. If necessary, corresponding authors were contacted to provide details needed for study inclusion in the meta-analyses.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
-
1.
Randomized, placebo-controlled studies measuring the effect of pharmacological agents on cognition.
-
2.
Studies including patients with schizophrenia, schizophreniform, schizoaffective, delusional, or psychotic disorder not otherwise specified according to the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental Disorders (DSM-III[-R], DSM-IV[R], DSM-V), or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 or -10).
-
3.
Cognitive functioning is measured with neuropsychological tests.
-
4.
Studies reporting sufficient information to compute common effect size (ES) statistics (i.e., means, mean changes, SDs, exact F-, p-, t-, or z-values) or corresponding authors provided these data upon request.
Exclusion criteria
-
1.
Studies evaluating cognition solely based on more subjective measures, such as an item from the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)35 interview.
-
2.
Studies investigating a combination of two interventions, where the non-pharmacological enhancer component of the intervention was not controlled for in the control condition (e.g., pharmacological enhancer + cognitive training vs. placebo).
-
3.
Studies providing post-means only.
-
4.
In case of multiple reports from the same study only one was included.
-
5.
Although antipsychotic medication may also have a positive effect on cognition, this class of drugs was not included in this review as they are generally not taken to belong to the group of “cognitive enhancers”.
Outcome measures
The current meta-analysis focused on cognitive outcomes specifically. First, we evaluated the effects of cognitive enhancers on overall cognition by including composite scores as provided by a cognitive test battery (for example Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)36 total score or MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)37 total score) or as calculated by the authors. Second, individual neuropsychological tests were grouped into seven cognitive domains, relevant for schizophrenia: 1. attention/vigilance, 2. processing speed (PS), 3. reasoning, 4. verbal learning and memory, 5. visual learning and memory, and 6. working memory (WM) [as recommended by MATRICS (Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia)], in addition to 7. verbal fluency (as measured by the majority of included studies). When a study applied multiple cognitive tests to assess the same cognitive domain, the primary outcome measure as defined by the authors was included in the meta-analysis. When the authors did not define the primary outcome, we selected the test most relevant to our defined cognitive domains. If studies reported multiple outcomes for a single cognitive test (for example, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) resulting in the number of completed categories, but also preservative errors), the outcome most commonly used across studies was used.
Analyses and sub-analyses
In the overall analyses, whenever possible all identified study samples were included for each of the defined outcome measures (i.e., cognitive domains). Subsequently, study samples were grouped according to the neurotransmitter system of the cognitive enhancer studied (as described in section 2.1). Sub-analyses for pharmacological agents acting on the same or relevant pathway were conducted only when at least three different studies were identified, and by grouping the study samples for each specific/relevant pathway.
Calculations
Effect sizes were computed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0, Biostat.38 Hedges’s g was used to quantify effect sizes (ES) for the mean difference between change scores (end of treatment minus baseline) of the intervention group vs. placebo group. Although change scores are subject to increased error variance, we preferred these over pre- and post-treatment scores to avoid overestimation of the true effect size because of the pre- and -post-treatment correlation. When change scores were not provided by the authors, pre- and post-treatment scores were used. If not reported, pre- and post-treatment means and standard deviations (SDs), or exact F-, t- or p-values were used. Some studies had more than one follow-up time-point. Therefore, the last follow-up time-point of active treatment of the study sample was used. Single dose (i.e., challenge) studies were included only if they had pre- and post-assessments and analyses were run with and without these studies. Studies with multiple treatment groups (for example, different doses) and one placebo group were entered as individual study samples (k). As these treatment groups are dependent due to sharing a control group and the effective sample size is inflated,38 analyses that yielded significant results were repeated by splitting the shared placebo group into two or three groups with smaller sample size.
Studies were combined to calculate a mean weighted ES for each cognitive outcome measure, using a random effects model. Effect sizes were interpreted according to Cohen,39 with an ES of 0.2 indicating a small, 0.5 medium, and > 0.8 a large effect. To investigate whether studies could be combined to share a common population effect size, the Q-value and I2–statistic were evaluated for each analysis. The Q-statistic tests the existence of heterogeneity, and displays a chi-square distribution with k-1 degrees of freedom (k = number of studies), where Q-values higher than the degrees of freedom indicate significant between-studies variability. I2 reflects which proportion of the observed variance reflects differences in true effect sizes rather than sampling error, ranging from 0 to 100%. Values of 25%, 50%, and 75% can be interpreted as low, moderate, and high, respectively.40 Potential outlier studies were evaluated when heterogeneity exceeded 50%, which were defined as standardized residual z‐scores of effect sizes exceeding ± 1.96 (p < 0.05, two-tailed).
When interpreting meta-analytic outcomes, the possibility of an upward bias of the calculated effect sizes due to the omission of unpublished, nonsignificant studies must be taken into account.41 Potential publication bias was investigated by means of a visual inspection of the funnel plot and Egger’s test42 was evaluated when appropriate (i.e., analysis included a range of study sizes, with at least one of ‘‘medium’’ size (p < .05 two-tailed). Moreover, the fail-safe number of studies (NR) was calculated, providing an estimate of how many unpublished null findings would be needed to reduce an observed overall significant result to nonsignificance (the fail-safe number should be 5k + 10 or higher (k = number of studies in a meta-analysis) to rule out a file drawer problem.41
Data availability
The manuscript reports meta-analytic data based on individual original studies. The extracted data for the meta-analytic calculations are available upon request.
References
Green, M. F. et al. Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: the NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria. Biol. Psychiatry 56, 301–307 (2004).
Keefe, R. S. & Fenton, W. S. How should DSM-V criteria for schizophrenia include cognitive impairment? Schizophr. Bull. 33, 912–920 (2007).
Kahn, R. S. & Keefe, R. S. Schizophrenia is a cognitive illness: time for a change in focus. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 1107–1112 (2013).
Chang, W. C., Hui, C. L., Chan, S. K., Lee, E. H. & Chen, E. Y. Impact of avolition and cognitive impairment on functional outcome in first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorder: a prospective one-year follow-up study. Schizophr. Res. 170, 318–321 (2016).
Strassnig, M. T. et al. Determinants of different aspects of everyday outcome in schizophrenia: The roles of negative symptoms, cognition, and functional capacity. Schizophr. Res. 165, 76–82 (2015).
Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Braff, D. L. & Mintz, J. Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the “right stuff. Schizophr. Bull. 26, 119–136 (2000).
Wykes, T., Huddy, V., Cellard, C., McGurk, S. R. & Czobor, P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 472–485 (2011).
Husa, A. P. et al. Lifetime antipsychotic medication and cognitive performance in schizophrenia at age 43 years in a general population birth cohort. Psychiatry Res. 247, 130–138 (2017).
Keefe, R. S. et al. Clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia: what have we learned so far? Schizophr. Bull. 39, 417–435 (2013).
Choi, K. H., Wykes, T. & Kurtz, M. M. Adjunctive pharmacotherapy for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: meta-analytical investigation of efficacy. Brit J. Psychiat. 203, 172–178 (2013).
Smith, R. C., Singh, A., Infante, M., Khandat, A. & Kloos, A. Effects of cigarette smoking and nicotine nasal spray on psychiatric symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 27, 479–497 (2002).
Smith, R. C. et al. Effects of nicotine nasal spray on cognitive function in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 31, 637–643 (2006).
Barr, R. S. et al. The effects of transdermal nicotine on cognition in nonsmokers with schizophrenia and nonpsychiatric controls. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 33, 480–490 (2008).
Tsai, G. E. & Lin, P. Y. Strategies to Enhance N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Schizophrenia, a Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr. Pharm. Des. 16, 522–537 (2010).
Iwata, Y. et al. Effects of glutamate positive modulators on cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials. Mol. Psychiatry 20, 1151–1160 (2015).
Kishi, T. Anti-dementia drugs for psychopathology and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol 21, 748–757 (2018).
Lewis, A. S., van Schalkwyk, G. I. & Bloch, M. H. Alpha-7 nicotinic agonists for cognitive deficits in neuropsychiatric disorders: A translational meta-analysis of rodent and human studies. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 75, 45–53 (2017).
Vreeker, A., van Bergen, A. H. & Kahn, R. S. Cognitive enhancing agents in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.: J. Eur. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 25, 969–1002 (2015).
Vernon, J. A. et al. Antidepressants for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr. Res. 159, 385–394 (2014).
Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Castner, S. A., Svensson, T. H., Siever, L. J. & Williams, G. V. Targeting the dopamine D1 receptor in schizophrenia: insights for cognitive dysfunction. Psychopharmacol. (Berl.) 174, 3–16 (2004).
Lewis, D. A., Hashimoto, T. & Volk, D. W. Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 312–324 (2005).
Friedman, J. I., Stewart, D. G. & Gorman, J. M. Potential noradrenergic targets for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. Cns. Spectr. 9, 350–355 (2004).
Arnsten, A. F. Adrenergic targets for the treatment of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacol. (Berl.) 174, 25–31 (2004).
Wittkampf, L. C., Arends, J., Timmerman, L. & Lancel, M. A review of modafinil and armodafinil as add-on therapy in antipsychotic-treated patients with schizophrenia. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2, 115–125 (2012).
Scoriels, L., Jones, P. B. & Sahakian, B. J. Modafinil effects on cognition and emotion in schizophrenia and its neurochemical modulation in the brain. Neuropharmacology 64, 168–184 (2013).
Goldberg, T. E., Keefe, R. S., Goldman, R. S., Robinson, D. G. & Harvey, P. D. Circumstances under which practice does not make perfect: a review of the practice effect literature in schizophrenia and its relevance to clinical treatment studies. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 35, 1053–1062 (2010).
Graff, F. S., McClure, M. M. & Siever, L. J. Remediation and Cognitive Enhancers in Schizotypal Personality Disorder. Curr. Treat. Options Psychiatry 1, 369–375 (2014).
Rosell, D. R. et al. Effects of the D1 dopamine receptor agonist dihydrexidine (DAR-0100A) on working memory in schizotypal personality disorder. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 40, 446–453 (2015).
Arnsten, A. F. Catecholamine regulation of the prefrontal cortex. J. Psychopharmacol. 11, 151–162 (1997).
Mattay, V. S. et al. Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 6186–6191 (2003).
Zhang, X. Y. et al. Short-term tropisetron treatment and cognitive and P50 auditory gating deficits in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 169, 974–981 (2012).
Buchanan, R. W. et al. A summary of the FDA-NIMH-MATRICS workshop on clinical trial design for neurocognitive drugs for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 31, 5–19 (2005).
Sommer, I. E., Kleijer, H. & Hugdahl, K. Toward personalized treatment of hallucinations. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 31, 237–245 (2018).
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Group, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, 1006–1012 (2009).
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A. & Opler, L. A. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 13, 261–276 (1987).
Keefe, R. S. et al. The brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia: reliability, sensitivity, and comparison with a standard neurocognitive battery. Schizophr. Res. 68, 283–297 (2004).
Nuechterlein, K. H. et al. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 203–213 (2008).
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. & Rothstein, H. Introduction to Metaanalysis. (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2009).
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edn. (Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1988).
Higgins, E. T., Chen Idson, L., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S. & Molden, D. C. Transfer of value from fit. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 1140–1153 (2003).
Rosenthal, R. The “File Drawer Problem” and Tolerance for Null Results. Psychol. Bull. 86, 638–641 (1979).
Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Schneider, M. & Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315, 629–634 (1997).
Tsai, G., Yang, P., Chung, L. C., Lange, N. & Coyle, J. T. D-serine added to antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 44, 1081–1089 (1998).
Goff, D. C. et al. A placebo-controlled trial of D-cycloserine added to conventional neuroleptics in patients with schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 56, 21–27 (1999).
Tsai, G. E. et al. D-serine added to clozapine for the treatment of schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 1822–1825 (1999).
Goff, D. C. et al. A placebo-controlled pilot study of the ampakine CX516 added to clozapine in schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 21, 484–487 (2001).
Duncan, E. J. et al. Effects of D-cycloserine on negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 71, 239–248 (2004).
Silver, H., Goodman, C., Isakov, V., Knoll, G. & Modai, I. A double-blind, cross-over comparison of the effects of amantadine or placebo on visuomotor and cognitive function in medicated schizophrenia patients. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20, 319–326 (2005).
Buchanan, R. W. et al. The Cognitive and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Trial (CONSIST): the efficacy of glutamatergic agents for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 1593–1602 (2007).
Zoccali, R. et al. The effect of lamotrigine augmentation of clozapine in a sample of treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Schizophr. Res. 93, 109–116 (2007).
Goff, D. C. et al. A placebo-controlled add-on trial of the Ampakine, CX516, for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 33, 465–472 (2008).
Goff, D. C. et al. Once-weekly D-cycloserine effects on negative symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia: an exploratory study. Schizophr. Res. 106, 320–327 (2008).
de Lucena, D. et al. Improvement of negative and positive symptoms in treatment-refractory schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with memantine as add-on therapy to clozapine. J. Clin. Psychiatry 70, 1416–1423 (2009).
Lieberman, J. A. et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of memantine as adjunctive treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 34, 1322–1329 (2009).
Marx, C. E. et al. Proof-of-concept trial with the neurosteroid pregnenolone targeting cognitive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 34, 1885–1903 (2009).
Levkovitz, Y. et al. A double-blind, randomized study of minocycline for the treatment of negative and cognitive symptoms in early-phase schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychiatry 71, 138–149 (2010).
Chengappa, K. N. et al. A preliminary, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of L-carnosine to improve cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 142, 145–152 (2012).
Lee, J. G. et al. Adjunctive memantine therapy for cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia: a placebo-controlled pilot study. Psychiatry Investig. 9, 166–173 (2012).
Weiser, M. et al. A multicenter, add-on randomized controlled trial of low-dose d-serine for negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychiatry 73, e728–e734 (2012).
Vayisoglu, S. et al. Lamotrigine augmentation in patients with schizophrenia who show partial response to clozapine treatment. Schizophr. Res. 143, 207–214 (2013).
D’Souza, D. C. et al. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the combination of D-serine and computerized cognitive retraining in schizophrenia: an international collaborative pilot study. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 38, 492–503 (2013).
Lane, H. Y. et al. Add-on treatment of benzoate for schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of D-amino acid oxidase inhibitor. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 1267–1275 (2013).
Liu, F. et al. Minocycline supplementation for treatment of negative symptoms in early-phase schizophrenia: a double blind, randomized, controlled trial. Schizophr. Res. 153, 169–176 (2014).
Schoemaker, J. H., Jansen, W. T., Schipper, J. & Szegedi, A. The selective glycine uptake inhibitor org 25935 as an adjunctive treatment to atypical antipsychotics in predominant persistent negative symptoms of schizophrenia: results from the GIANT trial. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 34, 190–198 (2014).
Kelly, D. L. et al. Adjunctive minocycline in clozapine-treated schizophrenia patients with persistent symptoms. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 35, 374–381 (2015).
Lin, C. Y. et al. Adjunctive sarcosine plus benzoate improved cognitive function in chronic schizophrenia patients with constant clinical symptoms: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. World J. Biol. Psychiatry.: Off. J. World Fed. Soc. Biol. Psychiatry. 18, 357–368 (2017).
Veerman, S. R., Schulte, P. F., Smith, J. D. & de Haan, L. Memantine augmentation in clozapine-refractory schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Psychol. Med. 46, 1909–1921 (2016).
Kantrowitz, J. T. et al. Improvement in mismatch negativity generation during d-serine treatment in schizophrenia: Correlation with symptoms. Schizophr. Res. 191, 70–79 (2017).
Mazinani, R., Nejati, S. & Khodaei, M. Effects of memantine added to risperidone on the symptoms of schizophrenia: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Psychiatry Res. 247, 291–295 (2017).
Friedman, J. I. et al. A double blind placebo controlled trial of donepezil adjunctive treatment to risperidone for the cognitive impairment of schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 51, 349–357 (2002).
Tugal, O., Yazici, K. M., Anil Yagcioglu, A. E. & Gogus, A. A double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over trial of adjunctive donepezil for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. / Off. Sci. J. Coll. Int. Neuropsychopharmacol. 7, 117–123 (2004).
Kumari, V., Aasen, I., ffytche, D., Williams, S. C. & Sharma, T. Neural correlates of adjunctive rivastigmine treatment to antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind fMRI study. Neuroimage 29, 545–556 (2006).
Schubert, M. H., Young, K. A. & Hicks, P. B. Galantamine improves cognition in schizophrenic patients stabilized on risperidone. Biol. Psychiatry 60, 530–533 (2006).
Fagerlund, B., Soholm, B., Fink-Jensen, A., Lublin, H. & Glenthoj, B. Y. Effects of donepezil adjunctive treatment to ziprasidone on cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 30, 3–12 (2007).
Kohler, C. G. et al. No effect of donepezil on neurocognition and social cognition in young persons with stable schizophrenia. Cogn. NeuroPsychiatry 12, 412–421 (2007).
Lee, B. J., Lee, J. G. & Kim, Y. H. A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil as an adjunct to haloperidol for treating cognitive impairments in patients with chronic schizophrenia. J. Psychopharmacol. 21, 421–427 (2007).
Lee, S. W., Lee, J. G., Lee, B. J. & Kim, Y. H. A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine adjunctive treatment to conventional antipsychotics for the cognitive impairments in chronic schizophrenia. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 22, 63–68 (2007).
Akhondzadeh, S. et al. A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil adjunctive treatment to risperidone in chronic and stable schizophrenia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 32, 1810–1815 (2008).
Buchanan, R. W. et al. Galantamine for the treatment of cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 82–89 (2008).
Dyer, M. A. et al. High-dose galantamine augmentation inferior to placebo on attention, inhibitory control and working memory performance in nonsmokers with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 102, 88–95 (2008).
Freedman, R. et al. Initial phase 2 trial of a nicotinic agonist in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 1040–1047 (2008).
Keefe, R. S. et al. Efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: significant placebo/practice effects in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 33, 1217–1228 (2008).
Shiina, A. et al. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tropisetron in patients with schizophrenia. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 9, 27 (2010).
Hong, L. E. et al. Effects of moderate-dose treatment with varenicline on neurobiological and cognitive biomarkers in smokers and nonsmokers with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 1195–1206 (2011).
Lindenmayer, J. P. & Khan, A. Galantamine augmentation of long-acting injectable risperidone for cognitive impairments in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 125, 267–277 (2011).
Velligan, D. et al. Assessment of the effects of AZD3480 on cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 134, 59–64 (2012).
Shim, J. C. et al. Adjunctive varenicline treatment with antipsychotic medications for cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 37, 660–668 (2012).
Deutsch, S. I. et al. Targeting alpha-7 nicotinic neurotransmission in schizophrenia: a novel agonist strategy. Schizophr. Res. 148, 138–144 (2013).
Lieberman, J. A. et al. A randomized exploratory trial of an alpha-7 nicotinic receptor agonist (TC-5619) for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 38, 968–975 (2013).
Umbricht, D. et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study investigating the nicotinic alpha7 agonist, RG3487, for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 39, 1568–1577 (2014).
Zhu, W. et al. Adjunctive treatment for cognitive impairment in patients with chronic schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 10, 1317–1323 (2014).
Keefe, R. S. et al. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Encenicline, an alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonist, as a Treatment for Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 40, 3053–3060 (2015).
Walling, D. et al. Phase 2 Trial of an Alpha-7 Nicotinic Receptor Agonist (TC-5619) in Negative and Cognitive Symptoms of Schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 42, 335–343 (2016).
Haig, G. M., Bain, E. E., Robieson, W. Z., Baker, J. D. & Othman, A. A. A randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of ABT-126, a selective alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, in the treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 173, 827–835 (2016).
Haig, G., Wang, D., Othman, A. A. & Zhao, J. The alpha7 nicotinic agonist ABT-126 in the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia in nonsmokers: Results from a randomized controlled phase 2b study. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 41, 2893–2902 (2016).
Shoja Shafti, S. & Azizi Khoei, A. Effectiveness of rivastigmine on positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia: a double-blind clinical trial. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 6, 308–316 (2016).
Buchanan, R. W. et al. A randomized clinical trial of oxytocin or galantamine for the treatment of negative symptoms and cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 37, 394–400 (2017).
Sumiyoshi, T. et al. Enhancement of cognitive performance in schizophrenia by addition of tandospirone to neuroleptic treatment. Am. J. Psychiatry 158, 1722–1725 (2001).
Poyurovsky, M. et al. Effect of the 5-HT2 antagonist mianserin on cognitive dysfunction in chronic schizophrenia patients: an add-on, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.: J. Eur. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 13, 123–128 (2003).
Friedman, J. I. et al. The effect of citalopram adjunctive treatment added to atypical antipsychotic medications for cognitive performance in patients with schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 25, 237–242 (2005).
Sumiyoshi, T. et al. Effect of buspirone, a serotonin1A partial agonist, on cognitive function in schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Schizophr. Res. 95, 158–168 (2007).
Akhondzadeh, S. et al. Added ondansetron for stable schizophrenia: a double blind, placebo controlled trial. Schizophr. Res. 107, 206–212 (2009).
Berk, M. et al. Mirtazapine add-on therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia with atypical antipsychotics: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 24, 233–238 (2009).
Piskulic, D., Olver, J. S., Maruff, P. & Norman, T. R. Treatment of cognitive dysfunction in chronic schizophrenia by augmentation of atypical antipsychotics with buspirone, a partial 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 24, 437–446 (2009).
Stenberg, J. H. et al. Effects of add-on mirtazapine on neurocognition in schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. / Off. Sci. J. Coll. Int. Neuropsychopharmacol. 13, 433–441 (2010).
Mico, U. et al. Duloxetine as adjunctive treatment to clozapine in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 26, 303–310 (2011).
Morozova, M. A., Beniashvili, A. G., Lepilkina, T. A. & Rupchev, G. E. Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized efficacy and safety trial of add-on treatment of dimebon plus risperidone in schizophrenic patients during transition from acute psychotic episode to remission. Psychiatr. Danub. 24, 159–166 (2012).
Niitsu, T. et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluvoxamine in patients with schizophrenia: a preliminary study. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 32, 593–601 (2012).
Morozova, M. A. et al. Add-on clinical effects of selective antagonist of 5HT6 receptors AVN-211 (CD-008-0173) in patients with schizophrenia stabilized on antipsychotic treatment: pilot study. CNS Spectr. 19, 316–323 (2014).
Sheikhmoonesi, F., Zarghami, M., Bahari Saravi, S. F., Khalilian, A. & Ala, S. A triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to examine the efficacy of buspirone added to typical antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. J. Res. Med. Sci.: Off. J. Isfahan Univ. Med. Sci. 20, 140–145 (2015).
Samadi, R., Soluti, S., Daneshmand, R., Assari, S. & Manteghi, A. A. Efficacy of risperidone augmentation with ondansetron in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 42, 14–23 (2017).
Pietrzak, R. H., Snyder, P. J. & Maruff, P. Use of an acute challenge with d-amphetamine to model cognitive improvement in chronic schizophrenia. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 25, 353–358 (2010).
Kaphzan, H., Ben-Shachar, D. & Klein, E. Entacapone augmentation of antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenic patients with negative symptoms; a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. / Off. Sci. J. Coll. Int. Neuropsychopharmacol. 17, 337–340 (2014).
Girgis, R. R. et al. A proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial of DAR-0100A, a dopamine-1 receptor agonist, for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. J. Psychopharmacol. 30, 428–435 (2016).
Lewis, D. A. et al. Subunit-selective modulation of GABA type A receptor neurotransmission and cognition in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 1585–1593 (2008).
Buchanan, R. W. et al. A randomized clinical trial of MK-0777 for the treatment of cognitive impairments in people with schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 69, 442–449 (2011).
Friedman, J. I. et al. Guanfacine treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol.: Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 25, 402–409 (2001).
Friedman, J. I. et al. A pilot study of adjunctive atomoxetine treatment to second-generation antipsychotics for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 28, 59–63 (2008).
Kelly, D. L. et al. A randomized double-blind trial of atomoxetine for cognitive impairments in 32 people with schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychiatry 70, 518–525 (2009).
Poyurovsky, M., Faragian, S., Fuchs, C. & Pashinian, A. Effect of the selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine on cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia patients: an add-on, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Isr. J. Psychiatry Relat. Sci. 46, 213–220 (2009).
Sevy, S. et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modafinil for fatigue and cognition in schizophrenia patients treated with psychotropic medications. J. Clin. Psychiatry 66, 839–843 (2005).
Pierre, J. M., Peloian, J. H., Wirshing, D. A., Wirshing, W. C. & Marder, S. R. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of modafinil for negative symptoms in schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychiatry 68, 705–710 (2007).
Goff, D. C. et al. A placebo-controlled study of sildenafil effects on cognition in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacol. (Berl.) 202, 411–417 (2009).
Kane, J. M. et al. Armodafinil as adjunctive therapy in adults with cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia: a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 71, 1475–1481 (2010).
Bobo, W. V., Woodward, N. D., Sim, M. Y., Jayathilake, K. & Meltzer, H. Y. The effect of adjunctive armodafinil on cognitive performance and psychopathology in antipsychotic-treated patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Schizophr. Res. 130, 106–113 (2011).
Javitt, D. C. et al. Effect of the neuroprotective peptide davunetide (AL-108) on cognition and functional capacity in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 136, 25–31 (2012).
Kane, J. M., Yang, R. & Youakim, J. M. Adjunctive armodafinil for negative symptoms in adults with schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Schizophr. Res. 135, 116–122 (2012).
Yi, Z. et al. Rosiglitazone and cognitive function in clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia: a pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 200, 79–82 (2012).
Lohr, J. B. et al. Modafinil improves antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism but not excessive daytime sleepiness, psychiatric symptoms or cognition in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Schizophr. Res. 150, 289–296 (2013).
Huerta-Ramos, E. et al. Effects of raloxifene on cognition in postmenopausal women with schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.: J. Eur. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 24, 223–231 (2014).
Lees, J. et al. Modafinil and cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia and healthy volunteers: the effects of test battery in a randomised controlled trial. Psychol. Med. 47, 2358–2368 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This research was sponsored by a grant from the Dutch Brain foundations (Hersenstichting, Zorg voor Denken). Contribution of co-author Kenneth Hugdahl was funded by ERC Advanced Grant # 693124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.S. designed the study and drafted the manuscript. I.E.S. conceived the idea and supervised this study. M.B. helped to design the study, conducted statistical analysis and drafted the method section. M.P. helped to design the study and advised in organizing the data. W.U.L. conducted statistical analysis and drafted the method section. C.R., J.D.J. and S.M. were responsible for acquisition of data and helped with the statistical analysis. B.O., E.J., K.H., and R.K. contributed to the interpretation of data and critically reviewed the content of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors revised and edited the paper and approved the completed version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Iris Sommer has received consultant fees from Gabather. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sinkeviciute, I., Begemann, M., Prikken, M. et al. Efficacy of different types of cognitive enhancers for patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. npj Schizophr 4, 22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-018-0064-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-018-0064-6
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation with concurrent cognitive performance targeting posterior parietal cortex vs prefrontal cortex on working memory in schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial
Translational Psychiatry (2024)
-
Drug targeting in psychiatric disorders — how to overcome the loss in translation?
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2024)
-
Cognitive subgroups of affective and non-affective psychosis show differences in medication and cortico-subcortical brain networks
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Working memory processing deficit associated with a nonlinear response pattern of the anterior cingulate cortex in first-episode and drug-naïve schizophrenia
Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
-
Activation of prefrontal parvalbumin interneurons ameliorates working memory deficit even under clinically comparable antipsychotic treatment in a mouse model of schizophrenia
Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)