Abstracts
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and is represented by complicated biological mechanisms and complexity of brain tissue. Our understanding of the complicated molecular architecture that contributes to AD progression benefits from performing comprehensive and systemic investigations with multi-layered molecular and biological data from different brain regions. Since recently different independent studies generated various omics data in different brain regions of AD patients, multi-omics data integration can be a useful resource for better comprehensive understanding of AD. Here we present a web platform, ADAS-viewer, that provides researchers with the ability to comprehensively investigate and visualize multi-omics data from multiple brain regions of AD patients. ADAS-viewer offers means to identify functional changes in transcript and exon expression (i.e., alternative splicing) along with associated genetic or epigenetic regulatory effects. Specifically, it integrates genomic, transcriptomic, methylation, and miRNA data collected from seven different brain regions (cerebellum, temporal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, frontal pole, inferior frontal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus) across three independent cohort datasets. ADAS-viewer is particularly useful as a web-based application for analyzing and visualizing multi-omics data across multiple brain regions at both transcript and exon level, allowing the identification of candidate biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder rooted in complicated biological mechanisms and the inherent complexity of brain tissue1,2. Each area of the human brain has a unique function; for example, the parietal cortex is uniquely involved in the movement and incorporation of signals from other cortices3,4. This tissue-level complexity is reflected in transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of the brain, which feature dynamic and region-specific patterns across functionally different brain regions, including in the context of AD5,6. In particular, the regional specificity of molecular mechanisms in the brain means that neurodegenerative diseases may progress in a brain region-specific manner, and thus a genomic view of molecular status across multiple brain regions may be helpful for better understanding AD pathology.
Furthermore, not only is each type of omics profile (such as genomics, epigenomics, and transcriptomics) informative on its own, but integrated omics data can be useful for developing a broader molecular understanding of the mechanisms that underlie this complex disease7, improving our ability to elucidate the biological connections between gene expression and genetic regulation. For instance, extensive transcriptional alteration occurs during AD progression, with changes in alternative splicing (AS) resulting in remarkable changes in isoform expression4,8,9,10. In fact, the brain is among the areas that feature the greatest incidence of tissue-specific AS, and brain-specific AS patterns are known to be particularly important during neural development processes such as neuronal migration and axon guidance4,9,10. Many alternatively spliced genes have been identified in AD cases; in addition, GWAS studies have identified a large set of genetic variants associated with the onset and progression of AD4,11,12. Integration of these findings into multi-omics analyses is essential for the functional annotation of identified genetic variants.
In addition to genetic and transcriptomic data, epigenomic data from AD patients has also been made available, which allows for the integration of epigenetic elements such as methylation and miRNA expression with transcriptomic and genomic data. Epigenetic elements have been identified as potential biomarkers for AD13,14,15, with methylation in particular being tightly linked to transcript expression changes (i.e., alternative splicing as a mechanism of gene regulation)16,17. Therefore, there is both opportunity and need to develop an integrative presentation that brings together transcriptomic, genomic, and epigenomic data in order to gain insight into the molecular mechanisms at work across and within brain regions in AD.
Here, we present ADAS-viewer, a web-based statistical analysis platform with which researchers can explore multi-omics data across seven brain regions in the context of AD. ADAS-viewer features RNA-seq and WGS data collected from the cerebellum (CER), temporal cortex (TCX), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), frontal pole (FP), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), parahippocampal gyrus (PHG), and superior temporal gyrus (STG) in three independent patient cohorts of the Accelerating Medicines Partnership-Alzheimer’s Disease (AMP-AD) project (https://doi.org/10.7303/syn2580853): the Mayo Clinic18, the ROS and MAP studies (ROSMAP)19, and the Mount Sinai Brain Bank (MSBB)20. The ROSMAP dataset includes cognitively normal old adults and AD patients; meanwhile, CER and TCX data were collected from cases having progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or pathologic aging. In addition, ADAS-viewer provides a statistical test for determining associations between expression and epigenetic data collected from the DLPFC region in the ROSMAP cohort, such as transcriptomic data versus methylation or miRNA data. Finally, by incorporating clinical information such as sex, ethnicity, diagnosis, plaque mean, and Braak stage, ADAS-viewer allows the user to conduct association tests between these phenotypes and the selected multi-omics data; for example, it can evaluate differences between AD and normal groups, sex-specific molecular traits in AD, differences between AD and dementia patients, or association of transcripts/AS exons with Braak stage. We present ADAS-viewer as having potential utility for identifying biomarkers and developing further understanding of AD pathology with respect to differential alternative splicing and the genetic/epigenetic regulation of gene expression (i.e., eQTL and sQTL) across seven brain regions.
Results
ADAS-viewer is currently available at http://genomics.chpc.utah.edu/AD, and a tutorial is available at http://genomics.chpc.utah.edu/AD/manual/Manual.pdf. ADAS-viewer accepts as input a variety of identifiers, such as the HUGO official gene symbol, Ensembl gene id, DNA methylation cgid, miRNA id, and SNP rsid. Given a single gene as input, ADAS-viewer can be used to visualize the transcripts, SNPs, methylation sites, and miRNAs annotated to that gene (AS transcript navigator, Fig. 1a), and also provides a comprehensive summary of transcript expression per gene across the seven brain regions for both normal and Alzheimer’s disease patient groups (Fig. 1b). The second aspect of ADAS-viewer is its analysis module, which is composed of two parts, the analysis options and the visualization of the statistical results. When performing an analysis, the user can select specific transcripts, brain regions, and cases based on clinical information (Fig. 2a and b). The selected options then generate two groups that allow the investigation of correlations between differential alternative splicing and the selected phenotype (e.g. difference by gender or ethnic background). In a further analysis step, each data type (SNP, methylation status, and miRNA expression) is co-analyzed with alternative splicing. The statistical results are displayed in plots (i.e., box and regression) along with their associated p-values.
AS transcript navigator function for visualizing AS patterns
ADAS-viewer (Fig. 1a) illustrates all transcript isoforms, methylation sites, SNPs, and miRNA target sites within the selected gene. As in CAS-viewer21, which we previously developed, the gene is defined as the transcribed region based on Ensembl gene annotation (GTF of GRCh37.75). In the last transcript track, “Exon Usage” indicates representative exons, which are defined by clustering overlapped exons according to the various transcript isoforms and taking the longest exon in each cluster. The intron scaling bar in the navigator allows seamless transit between the genome browser displaying un-spliced pre-mRNA and the transcript viewer showing spliced mature transcripts. Namely, when intron scale is 0%, only exons are shown to allow easier visualization of splicing features, while a value of 100% is equivalent to the genome browser, depicting full-length introns. As introns are usually much longer than exons and the viewing window of the genome browser is limited, adjusting the scale helps users readily recognize AS events or splicing sites.
Option function for setting analysis criteria
ADAS-viewer provides users with four options for setting criteria according to their interests (Fig. 2). These are: (1) select one brain region among the seven available, (2) select alternative splicing events at the transcript level or exon level, (3) select a clinical feature by which to define two sample groups (Fig. 2a), and finally (4) select expression at the transcript level (TPM, transcripts per million) or exon level (PSI) (Fig. 2c and d). In particular, ADAS-viewer allows the separation of two groups based on clinical features such as sex, Braak Score, ethnicity, education level, dementia status, ApoE status, disease status, and more. Details of the clinical information available for each brain region are described in Supplementary Table S1.
Correlation with SNP genotype, methylation status, and miRNA target sites
ADAS-viewer presents statistical results in terms of four analysis components: “Comparisons”, “SNP”, “Methylation”, and “miRNA”. That is, users can first identify differential expression between two groups, then analyze the association between expression differences and transcriptional (SNPs and methylation) and post-transcriptional (miRNA) regulatory factors. The SNP analysis identifies eQTL and sQTL by combining transcript/exon expression with SNP genotype, while the methylation and miRNA analyses perform linear regression to correlate transcript/exon expression with methylation status or miRNA expression, respectively.
Quick start
We present a sample analysis to demonstrate how a user can easily explore the ADAS-viewer application and conduct an analysis. First, the user searches on a gene of interest using the Search page of ADAS-viewer (Fig. 3a). Next, the user sets options on the “Analysis” tab—i.e., the brain region and clinical features to consider (Fig. 3b). For the purpose of this example scenario, we search on the gene symbol CRH, select the “DLPFC” brain region, and assign groups based on disease status (“Normal” and “AD”). We then use the “Transcript Expression” mode to perform analysis with three different components (see Methods).
First, to identify a transcript isoform or exon with differential expression between the user-defined groups, ADAS-viewer visualizes the distribution of transcript (TPM) or exon (PSI) expression. This plot is illustrated in Fig. 4, in which the x-axis corresponds to analysis groups (Normal and AD) and the y-axis to transcript expression of ENST00000276571 in the DLPFC. Throughout ADAS-viewer visualizations, each dot plot and boxplot respectively present detailed clinical and distribution (i.e., quantiles) information through mouse-over pop-ups. In transcriptional expression mode, it shows only outliers as dots in order to reduce computational demand. Below the plot, it presents the number of samples and selected clinical features for each group.
To test sQTLs: Once an exon has been selected by clicking in the AS transcript navigator, a zoomed-in view of the selected exon, including downstream and upstream flanking exons, is displayed in the SNP panel (Fig. 5). The user then selects the specific SNP they want to investigate and analyzes it via the “Analysis” button. This will generate a boxplot visualizing the distribution of transcript expression according to SNP genotype. As an example, Fig. 5 presents the result of an association test between the rs6159 polymorphism and ENST00000276571 expression in the DLPFC.
To test epigenetic association: As in the SNP panel, the zoomed-in exon view allows the user to select a methylation probe or miRNA and explore its association with transcript expression via the “Analysis” button. As an example, Fig. 6 illustrates the result of an association test between ENST00000276571 expression and the cg23027580 methylation probe.
Moreover, users can explore the same analyses in terms of alternative splicing under the same criteria by selecting the “Transcript Ratio” mode, which uses PSI values (see Methods) where the above examples refer to transcript expression. For instance, in Supplementary Fig. 1, we show the result of comparing the splicing rate of the 2nd exon of PRPF38B in different brain regions between AD and normal cases.
Case study
We present a case study to demonstrate the practical utility of ADAS-viewer for performing discovery analyses in the given datasets.
-
1.
Identification of an eQTL association for rs1324551 of FAS.
Using ADAS-viewer, we found that rs1324551 has an AD-related eQTL association with transcript ENST00000355740 of the Fas cell surface death receptor (FAS). Namely, expression of ENST00000355740 was increased in the brains of six AD patients with rs1324551-T, specifically in the DLPFC (p = 7.6e−16), FP (p = 7.4e−10), IFG (p = 3.3e−7), TCX (p = 4.2e−2), STG (p = 7.4e−9), and PHG (p = 8.5e−6) (Fig. 7). FAS is a well-known AD-associated gene that modulates apoptosis and neuronal loss, leading to progression of AD neuropathology22. FAS mRNA expression is known to be upregulated in the brains of AD patients23,24, and dysregulation of FAS is significantly associated with more rapid AD progression and reduced total brain size22,25. Therefore, our eQTL finding may suggest that rs1324551-T in FAS may contribute to AD progression by increasing FAS mRNA levels. Furthermore, expression of FAS mRNA in the para-hippocampal gyrus region, which is linked to dementia, tended to increase more in AD patients with severe cognitive impairment compared to those with moderate cognitive impairment (Fig. 7h).
-
2.
Identification of Braak stage-dependent transcript expression of PSENEN in AD
Braak staging is a method for classifying the degree of pathology in AD (Braak and Braak, 1991). Using ADAS-viewer, we found the expression of Presenilin enhancer 2 (PSENEN) transcript ENST00000222266 to be significantly down-regulated in cases with high Braak stage (5 and 6) in the DLPFC (p = 9.3e−3), FP (p = 1.2e−3), STG (p = 4.7e−3), and PHG (p = 2.3e−2). While there was no significant expression change in the IFG region, this AD-associated alteration was replicated in other regions of two different cohorts. Furthermore, previous studies have reported polymorphisms of PSENEN as being AD risk loci26,27.
Discussion
ADAS-viewer provides researchers with the ability to effectively navigate multi-dimensional genomic data from seven brain regions and three independent cohorts in order to investigate AD pathology. This web-based application has four distinct benefits as follows:
First, researchers can systemically and comprehensively explore the molecular characteristics of AD patients in specific brain regions as well as replicate the results using multi-omics data and independent cohorts. For example, we demonstrated the utilization of multi-omics data through investigating one gene, Corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) (See the Quick Start in the Results, Figs. 3–6). Furthermore, the included datasets provide not only systemic information across the brain, but also potentially allow for replicating results based on clustering the frontal region (DLPFC; ROSMAP, FP; MSBB, and IFG; MSBB) and the temporal region (TCX, Mayo Clinic; STG, MSBB; PHG, MSBB), although these areas are not exactly the same in terms of molecular profiles. Figure 7 shows an eQTL in the FAS gene that is coincidently significant in all brain regions except CER, which region is known to not be relevant for AD. In addition, ADAS-viewer enables performing brain region-specific studies in the context of of AD. Finally, ADAS-viewer allows users to identify potential AD-specific alterations in the CER and TCX regions through comparison with PSP or pathogenic aging cases.
Second, the clinical information incorporated into ADAS-viewer (see Methods) allows researchers to carry out user-defined analyses. For instance, researchers can explore comparisons between normal and AD cases with a specific sex status, thereby identifying sex-specific eQTL/sQTL, or study the biological mechanism of AD progression through comparing AD and normal cases. For example, Supplementary Fig. 2 shows differential expression of transcript ENST00000222266 of PSENEN between AD cases having low (1-4) and high (5-6) Braak stage. This finding and similar analyses may help researchers better understand the biological mechanisms that contribute to each degree of AD pathology. Finally, differential methylation status and its effects on transcript expression can be evaluated in the context of AD and normal cases (Fig. 6).
Third, through allowing the investigation of both transcript isoforms and AS exon expression, ADAS-viewer enables researchers to readily carry out integrative analysis of RNA-seq and WGS data to identify eQTL and sQTL. In fact, our case study showed a functional role of rs1324551, which can be defined as an eQTL (Fig. 7). Also, we demonstrate that skipping of the 2nd exon of PRPF38B tends to be more frequent in AD (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Fourth, researchers can use ADAS-viewer to evaluate whether their own experimental results can be replicated in a given dataset. For example, if researchers identified genes with differential expression in an animal model, such as a mouse, they can easily use ADAS-viewer to interrogate the same genes using data from the human brain. Also, researchers investigating AD-associated SNPs identified through GWAS can use ADAS-viewer to explore their functional roles.
Although well-designed web-based tools to explore AD already exist, most of those tools focus on studying a single layer of omics data, and furthermore only support visualizing analysis results based on set criteria such as AD vs. normal patients, or within a single brain region. For example, AlzRisk28 is a database that includes epidemiologic reports and evaluates epigenetic facts. The tool exQTLServe29 does integrate multi-omics data, including RNA-seq, SNPs, and methylation, but focuses on performing association tests between transcriptional expression and SNPs or methylation in only one brain region. Meanwhile, the Allen Brain Atlas30 incorporates multiple brain regions, but only for visualizing heatmaps of transcriptional expression. Our implementation of ADAS-viewer thus provides an innovative, user-friendly platform with which researchers can explore publicly available multi-omics data and flexibly perform statistical analyses across diverse brain regions in the context of AD. ADAS-viewer will be a useful resource for testing molecular biomarkers in AD and for carrying out integrative analyses to gain a comprehensive understanding of molecular data specific to AD pathology.
While there are many advantages to ADAS-viewer, as described here, it is worth pointing out some limitations to avoid over-estimation of this tool. First, although ADAS-viewer includes RNA-seq and WGS data for all seven regions, methylation and miRNA data are currently available only for the DLPFC region and only from ROSMAP. This might change after additional data from Mayo Clinic and MSBB become publicly available. Second, other neurologic diseases such as PSP and pathologic aging can currently only be explored in the context of the CER and TCX regions and only in samples from Mayo Clinic. Third, comprehensive clinical information is not provided for the CER and TCX region data generated by Mayo Clinic; only disease status, sex, and ApoE status are available. Fourth, the bioinformatics and statistical methods applied to data analyses in ADAS-viewer are not novel, but they are well-developed methods that are widely accepted.
In conclusion, we propose a web-based and publicly available application that enables to comprehensively analyze multi-omics data in various brain regions obtained from independent studies. We present the potential discovery utility of ADAS-viewer in potential identification of biomarker underlying AD progression in which ADAS-viewer can function to intuitively visualize and comprehensively analyze multi-omics data.
Methods
Data
RNA-seq data
We downloaded RNA-seq data (BAM files) collected across seven brain regions (CER, TCX, DLPFC, FP, IFG, PHG, and STG) from the Synapse database (www.synapse.org, accessed on 10 April 2019). The data were generated from three independent cohorts in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership-Alzheimer’s Disease (AMP-AD) project: Mayo Clinic (synapse id, CER: syn5049298 and TCX: syn3163039), the ROS and MAP (ROSMAP) studies (syn3388564), and the Mount Sinai Brain Bank (MSBB) (syn7416949). Detailed information on each brain region and individual demographics are given in Supplementary Table S1. To remove biases originating from the use of different reference versions and mapping parameters for each respective cohort, we converted each mapped BAM file into a FASTQ file using samtools v.1.931, and then re-mapped the converted FASTQ files onto the hg19 human reference genome using STAR aligner v.2.532. For our gene model (i.e., exon, intron, and transcript information), we used a GTF file obtained from Ensembl (GRCh37.75 based on hg 19, ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-75/gtf/homo_sapiens, accessed on Oct. 13, 2018). We estimated transcript expression in terms of TPM using RSEM v.1.3.033.
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) data
We obtained the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data as per-chromosome VCF files generated from a joint analysis of the three cohorts (synapse id: syn11707419, accessed on 10 June 2019); these files included variants called across the cohorts. The raw WGS data was mapped to the GRCh37 human reference using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA-MEM v0.7.8), duplicate reads were marked using Picard tools v1.83, and the data processed through the steps of local realignment around indels, base quality score recalibration (BQSR), and variant calling using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK v3.4.0).
Methylation and miRNA data
We downloaded methylation and miRNA data collected from the DLPFC region in the ROSMAP cohort (synapse id: syn3387325, accessed on 10 April 2019), which were generated using the Illumina InfiniumHumanMethylation450 bead chip assay and the NanoString nCounter miRNA expression assay, respectively. The methylation dataset was adjusted for age, sex, and experimental batch, and the miRNA dataset was normalized and corrected by Combat with the cartridges as batches.
miRNA target sites
We complied miRNA target sites in the 3’ UTRs of genes by integrating target databases generated from two different methods, including an experimentally validated and computationally predicted dataset we have previously published34; these databases were (1) miRTarBase35, including miRNA-target interactions experimentally validated via reporter assay and western blots; (2) TargetScan (Release 7.0)36, sites computationally predicted through conserved complementarity; and (3) MicroRNA.org37, sites computationally predicted using the miRanda algorithm. To reduce false positive target predictions, we first obtained all relations between miRNAs and mRNAs documented in miRTarBase. Then, we defined the targeted genomic coordinates for each relation using TargetScan and MicroRNA.org. Finally, we selected those miRNA target sites occurring within 3’UTR regions according to the Ensembl reference annotation (GRCh37.75). This process yielded 402,676 unique miRNA-target pairs associated with 1,388 miRNAs and 9,720 genes.
Clinical information
We obtained clinical information for the three cohorts included in this study: (1) Mayo Clinic: syn5049298 and syn3163039, (2) ROSMAP: syn3157322, and (3) MSBB: syn7392158. Users of ADAS-viewer may divide these datasets for inter-group comparisons or set criteria to analyze the data based on sex, Braak score, ethnicity, education level, dementia status, ApoE status, disease status, and more. Details on the available information are given in Table S1.
Specifics on how many samples from each omics dataset are included in ADAS-viewer are available at http://genomics.chpc.utah.edu/AD/manual/Data.pdf.
Statistical methods
Calculation of PSI expression ratio between two groups of transcripts
ADAS-viewer provides for analyses on the basis of either transcript expression (as TPM) or exon expression (as percent spliced in, PSI) in the context of AS events such as exon skipping, intron retention, alternative 5′ splice site use, and alternative 3′ splice site use. PSI values can be calculated using TPM values, and are estimated in a three-step process: (1) separating transcripts of a single gene into two groups: one with the splicing event and the other without; (2) summarizing expression (TPM) for each group, and (3) taking the ratio of the sums of the two groups as the PSI value. In other words, PSI (ψt) is estimated according to the equation proposed by IVAS38, a Bioconductor package for investigating alternative splicing, as follows:
where Xi and Xs indicate the transcript group with and without the alternatively spliced exon, respectively. ADAS-viewer uses this PSI value to perform analyses using WGS, methylation, and miRNA data.
Identification of differentially expressed transcripts and exon
ADAS-viewer enables users to identify transcripts or exons that are differentially expressed across seven brain regions between two user-specified groups defined based on clinical information such as sex, age, ethnicity, or disease status. The significance of the between-group difference is evaluated using Welch’s two-sample t-test.
Identification of genetic elements associated with expressions
ADAS-viewer provides functions for investigating the association of genetic variants with expression of transcripts or exons in the seven included brain regions through the integration of WGS and RNA-seq data. In other words, users can use ADAS-viewer to identify expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and splicing quantitative trait loci (sQTL). Such associations are identified by performing a linear regression test between transcript or exon expression (i.e., TPM or PSI) and the genotype of a given SNP.
Identification of epigenetic elements associated with expressions
ADAS-viewer applies linear regression to correlate expression (i.e., TPM or PSI) with methylation level or miRNA expression, thereby identifying transcriptome-associated epigenetic factors. The significance of these correlations is evaluated using Welch’s two-sample t-test.
Data availability
Mayo clinic dataset: https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn555040418
ROSMAP dataset: https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn321904519
MSBB dataset: https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn315943820
miRTarBase: http://mirtarbase.cuhk.edu.cn/php/index.php35
TargetScan: http://www.targetscan.org/vert_7236
MicroRNA.org: http://www.microrna.org37
Code availability
The html, java script, and R codes are available at Github (https://github.com/younghee93/ADAS).
References
Perl, D. P. Neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Mt Sinai J. Med 77, 32–42 (2010).
Bassett, D. S. & Gazzaniga, M. S. Understanding complexity in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 200–209 (2011).
Katsuki, F. & Constantinidis, C. Unique and shared roles of the posterior parietal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in cognitive functions. Front Integr. Neurosci. 6, 17 (2012).
Mills, J. D. et al. RNA-Seq analysis of the parietal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease reveals alternatively spliced isoforms related to lipid metabolism. Neurosci. Lett. 536, 90–95 (2013).
Xu, J. et al. Regional protein expression in human Alzheimer’s brain correlates with disease severity. Commun. Biol. 2, 43 (2019).
Freer, R. et al. A protein homeostasis signature in healthy brains recapitulates tissue vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600947 (2016).
Zanfardino, M. et al. Bringing radiomics into a multi-omics framework for a comprehensive genotype-phenotype characterization of oncological diseases. J. Transl. Med. 17, 337 (2019).
Cuccurese, M., Russo, G., Russo, A. & Pietropaolo, C. Alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay regulate mammalian ribosomal gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 5965–5977 (2005).
Weyn-Vanhentenryck, S. M. et al. Precise temporal regulation of alternative splicing during neural development. Nat. Commun. 9, 2189 (2018).
Su, C. H., D, D. & Tarn, W. Y. Alternative splicing in neurogenesis and brain development. Front Mol. Biosci. 5, 12 (2018).
Marioni, R. E. et al. GWAS on family history of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Psychiatry 8, 99 (2018).
Shen, L. & Jia, J. An overview of genome-wide association studies in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Bull. 32, 183–190 (2016).
Cogswell, J. P. et al. Identification of miRNA changes in Alzheimer’s disease brain and CSF yields putative biomarkers and insights into disease pathways. J. Alzheimers Dis. 14, 27–41 (2008).
Pogue, A. I. & Lukiw, W. J. Up-regulated pro-inflammatory microRNAs (miRNAs) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 38, 1021–1031 (2018).
Fransquet, P. D. & Ryan, J. Micro RNA as a potential blood-based epigenetic biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Biochem 58, 5–14 (2018).
Moore, L. D., Le, T. & Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 23–38 (2013).
Lev Maor, G., Yearim, A. & Ast, G. The alternative role of DNA methylation in splicing regulation. Trends Genet. 31, 274–280 (2015).
Allen, M. et al. Human whole genome genotype and transcriptome data for Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases. Sci. Data 3, 160089 (2016).
De Jager, P. L. et al. A multi-omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and Alzheimer’s disease research. Sci. Data 5, 180142 (2018).
Wang, M. et al. The Mount Sinai cohort of large-scale genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Data 5, 180185 (2018).
Han, S. J. et al. Association of thigh muscle mass with insulin resistance and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japanese Americans. Diabetes Metab. J., https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2018.0022 (2018).
Erten-Lyons, D., Jacobson, A., Kramer, P., Grupe, A. & Kaye, J. The FAS gene, brain volume, and disease progression in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 6, 118–124 (2010).
Su, J. H. et al. Fas and Fas ligand are associated with neuritic degeneration in the AD brain and participate in beta-amyloid-induced neuronal death. Neurobiol. Dis. 12, 182–193 (2003).
Colangelo, V. et al. Gene expression profiling of 12633 genes in Alzheimer hippocampal CA1: transcription and neurotrophic factor down-regulation and up-regulation of apoptotic and pro-inflammatory signaling. J. Neurosci. Res. 70, 462–473 (2002).
Hensel, A., Wolf, H., Busse, A., Arendt, T. & Gertz, H. J. Association between global brain volume and the rate of cognitive change in elderly humans without dementia. Dement Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 19, 213–221 (2005).
Jia, L. et al. Genetic association between polymorphisms of Pen2 gene and late onset Alzheimer’s disease in the North Chinese population. Brain Res. 1141, 10–14 (2007).
Andreoli, V. et al. Presenilin enhancer-2 gene: identification of a novel promoter mutation in a patient with early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7, 574–578 (2011).
Weuve J, M.M., Blacker D. The AlzRisk Database. Alzheimer Research Forum. Available at: http://www.alzforum.org. Accessed 10 oct 2019.
Ng, B. et al. An xQTL map integrates the genetic architecture of the human brain’s transcriptome and epigenome. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1418–1426 (2017).
Miller, J. A. et al. Neuropathological and transcriptomic characteristics of the aged brain. Elife 6, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31126 (2017).
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).
Zheng, Z. et al. Genetic diversity, population structure, and botanical variety of 320 global peanut accessions revealed through tunable genotyping-by-sequencing. Sci. Rep. 8, 14500 (2018).
Chou, C. H. et al. miRTarBase 2016: updates to the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions database. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D239–D247 (2016).
Lewis, B. P., Burge, C. B. & Bartel, D. P. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120, 15–20 (2005).
Betel, D., Wilson, M., Gabow, A., Marks, D. S. & Sander, C. The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D149–D153 (2008).
Han, S., Jung, H., Lee, K., Kim, H. & Kim, S. Genome wide discovery of genetic variants affecting alternative splicing patterns in human using bioinformatics method. Genes Genomics 39, 453–459 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The support and resources from the Center for High-Performance Computing and Vice President’s Clinical and Translational Research Scholar Program at the University of Utah are gratefully acknowledged. This research was supported by development funding for Younghee Lee from the Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, RAG063250A, R03 AG063250, R03 AG054936, and R01 LM012535. This research was also supported by the Collaborative Genome Program for Fostering New Post-Genome Industry of the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (NRF-2017M3C9A6047623), South Korea, the MSIT under the Information Technology Research Center (ITRC) support program (IITP-2018-2018-0-01833), supervised by the Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (IITP), South Korea, and 2020R1F1A106888711 funded by NRF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors substantially contributed to this work. S.H. and Y.L. were involved in study conception and design. S.H., J.S., and Y.L. conceived the software and wrote manuscript. S.H. wrote visualization and analyses code used in the software. S.H., J.S., H.J., J.R., H.M., K.N., and I.K. were involved in data preparation and statistical analyses. All authors drafted report and prepared figures and tables, involving in reviewing and editing of the manuscript and approved it. All of the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, S., Shin, J., Jung, H. et al. ADAS-viewer: web-based application for integrative analysis of multi-omics data in Alzheimer’s disease. npj Syst Biol Appl 7, 18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-021-00177-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-021-00177-7
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Development of a Secure Web-Based Medical Imaging Analysis Platform: The AWESOMME Project
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine (2024)
-
TREM2 splice isoforms generate soluble TREM2 species that disrupt long-term potentiation
Genome Medicine (2023)