Abstract
Radiation exposure severely damages the hematopoietic system. Although several radio-protectors have been proposed to prevent radiation-induced damage, most agents have limited efficacy. In the present study, we investigated whether mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could contribute to the expansion of hematopoietic cells and mitigate radiation-induced hematopoietic injury in vitro and in vivo. We found that co-culture with MSCs promoted hematopoietic progenitor/stem cell (HPSCs) maintenance by providing a bone marrow-like microenvironment. In addition, we showed that MSCs prevented radiation-induced damage to HPSCs, as evidenced by the lack of DNA damage and apoptosis. Intravenously injected MSCs rapidly migrated to the bone marrow (BM) and prevented loss of BM cellularity, which reduced lethality and ameliorated pancytopenia in the BM of whole body-irradiated mice. We demonstrated that MSC-derived Jagged1 attenuated radiation-induced cytotoxicity of HPSCs, and that this was mediated by Notch signaling and expression of downstream proteins Bcl2 and p63 in HPSCs. In addition, Notch2 depletion significantly reduced the MSC-mediated radio-protective effect in human- and mouse-derived HPSCs. Collectively, our data show that activation of Notch and its associated downstream signaling pathways prevent radiation-induced hematopoietic injury. Therefore, enhancing Jagged1-Notch2 signaling could provide therapeutic benefit by protecting the hematopoietic system against damage after radiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells (HPSCs) are capable of self-renewal and lineage-specific differentiation into all blood cell types1. Human HPSCs exhibit a CD34+ and CD38− phenotype and are controlled by the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment2. The majority of HPSCs exist in a quiescent state in the BM, but can be activated by external stimuli to readily proliferate and differentiate, resulting in the loss of stem cell markers3,4.
Radiation exposure is cytotoxic to the hematopoietic system as evidenced by increased accumulation of DNA damage leading to induction of apoptosis. Moreover, radiation-induced injury of the hematopoietic system results in cytotoxicity and loss of stemness, especially of HPSCs5,6. Previous studies have suggested that various radio-protectors can improve the viability of hematopoietic cells7,8,9; however, most are only effective before radiation exposure, and do not offer further protective effects after irradiation. Thus, potential therapeutic approaches are needed to restore HPSCs lost due to irradiation.
The BM contains HPSCs and various stromal cells including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)10. MSCs are non-hematopoietic, multipotent stem cells that can differentiate into various tissue types such as cartilage, bone, muscle, and neuronal lineages11. MSCs are an important component of the BM niche, and function in bone development, and maintenance, expansion, and proliferation of hematopoietic lineage cells12,13. Therefore, many studies have reported their therapeutic effect against inflammation in preclinical studies using in vivo models14,15,16. Moreover, MSCs are thought to be ideal for cell-based therapy in regenerative medicine17,18. Based on these advantages, therapies using MSCs could be applied to treat radiation-induced damage. Although previous studies have shown that MSCs protect against radiation-induced damage of the BM, intestine, and brain, the therapeutic mechanism is not well known.
Notch signaling is a developmental pathway found in both embryonic and adult tissues19. In mammals, there are five Notch ligands (Delta-like [Dll] 1, 3, and 4 and Jagged 1 and 2) and four receptors (Notch 1–4). Notch is a transmembrane receptor that is cleaved to release its intracellular domain, which directly affects the transcription of target genes20. This proteolytic cleavage is activated by a ligand–receptor interaction that leads to cleavage by the ADAM and γ-secretase complex. This process plays a critical role in regulating hematopoiesis by mediating cell–cell communication21,22. In the hematopoietic system, Notch receptors that are expressed on HPSCs interact with ligands on BM stromal cells to modulate hematopoiesis and survival23,24. Activated Notch has been reported to play an important role in the regeneration of hematopoietic cells after radiation-induced BM injury, but the associated mechanism is still unclear.
In this study, we used human- and mouse-derived HPSCs to study the mechanisms by which MSCs regulate the prevention of radiation-induced damage to the hematopoietic system. We also explored the involvement of Notch signaling in the interaction between HPSCs and MSCs. Our findings suggest that treatment with MSCs might have therapeutic potential to restore the hematopoietic system of patients exposed to radiation.
Materials and Methods
MSCs and CD34+CD38− HSCs
Human umbilical cord blood (UCB) was obtained from the umbilical vein immediately after delivery, with the informed consent of the mother; the protocol was approved by the Boramae Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science IRB (IRB No. K-1501-002-022). Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated from UCB using Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) gradient centrifugation. Next, cells were sorted from the MNCs using a magnetic cell-sorting MACS CD34+CD38− isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. CD34+CD38− cells were cultured with StemMACS HSC expansion media containing HSC Expansion Cocktail (Miltenyi Biotech). Umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs were purchased from the ATCC (Manassas, VA) and cultured with MSC growth medium MSCGM (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA).
Radiation exposure and in vivo MSC injection
Six-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions and were acclimated for at least 7 days before handling. The animals were exposed to whole body irradiation (IR) using an X-ray machine (X-RAD 320, N. Branford, CT, USA) at a dose rate 2 Gy/min. To analyze total blood cells, mice were exposed to IR (6 Gy) and then MSCs (1 × 106 cell/mouse) were intravenously injected into the tail vein at 3 h post-IR. Peripheral blood samples were collected in 50 mM EDTA solution via lateral tail vein incision. Complete blood counts were performed with an automatic analyzer (Hemavet, Drew Scientific, Oxford, CT, USA). To determine the effect of MSCs on mouse survival, mice were irradiated with 6 Gy and then MSCs (1 × 106 cells/mouse) or shJagged1-MSCs (1 × 106 cells/mice) were injected into the tail vein at two time points (3 h and 3 days) after IR. To detect MSCs in the mouse BM, animals were exposed to IR (6 Gy) and then carboxyfluorescein diacetate N-succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-stained MSCs (1 × 106 cells/mouse) were injected intravenously. Six days after IR, CFSE-MSCs was measured by flow cytometry and observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, Bannockburn, IL, USA). All mouse experiments were performed in accordance with the Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science IACUC-approved protocol.
Histology
Tibias were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 3 days. After fixation, bones were decalcified and dehydrated in progressive concentrations of ethanol, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. The entire tibia was then sectioned longitudinally at 3 μm per section. To measure BM cell proliferation, sections from the center of the femur were stained with Ki67, Notch2, p63 (Abcam), and Bcl2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Histologic staining was performed with hematoxylin and eosin.
ELISA assay
Blood samples were obtained from rats at days 7 and 14 post-IR. Flt3 ligand was measured using a mouse/rat Flt3 ligand Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density was measured using a microplate reader at 450 nm.
Co-culture of CD34+CD38 HSCs with MSCs
Human MSCs were seeded and grown until 80% confluency in 6-well plates. HPSCs were exposed to 137Cs γ-rays using a Gamma Cell-3000 irradiator (MDS Nordion International, Ontario, Canada) at a dose rate of 5 Gy/min. MSC medium was removed and non-irradiated or irradiated CD34+CD38− cells (1 × 105 cells per well) were added to 2 mL of HSC culture medium containing HSC Expansion Cocktail (Miltenyi Biotech). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The co-cultures were incubated for 3 and 6 days, at which HSCs were harvested and analyzed.
Apoptosis and FACS analysis
Measurement of apoptosis was performed as previously described25. To analyze cell surface marker expression in HPSCs, a FACSCanto was used (Becton & Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). To calculate the frequency of HPSCs, human derived-CD34+CD38− cells were stained with anti-human antibodies against the lineage markers CD45, CD34, and CD38 (Miltenyi). Mouse BM lineage (Lin)-cKit+Sca+ cells were also assessed by flow cytometry. To analyze apoptosis, fresh human- and mouse-derived HPSCs were exposed to IR and treated with or without Jagged1. Recombinant human and mouse Jagged1 protein was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Human HPSCs were stained with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide and analyzed using FACS. Mouse HPSCs were stained with CD45-APC and Annexin V-FITC. Experiments were repeated three times.
Immunofluorescence staining
Samples were prepared and stained as described previously25. Cells were exposed to radiation (2 or 4 Gy) for 24, 48, and 72 h. The primary antibodies used were specific for p-γH2AX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and DAPI (Sigma) was used for nuclear staining. Immunostained slides were observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica).
Real-time PCR
Total cellular RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and subjected to reverse transcription to obtain total cDNA using Power SYBR Green Master Mix based qRT PCR assays (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Real-time RT-PCR was performed with a LightCycler 489 Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using the standard settings. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH. The sequences of the primers used are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed as described previously25 using primary antibodies against the following proteins: cleaved PARP, Notch2, and Jagged1 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); p63 (Abcam); and Bcl2 and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Bone marrow cell isolation and RNAi transfection assay
Mouse BM cells were harvested by crushing two tibias and two femurs from each mouse. For isolation of mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells, we used an EasySep magnet (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, BC) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Isolated cells were cultured with DMEM (Gibco) in the presence of murine SCF (100 ng/mL), IL-3 (10 ng/mL), and IL-6 (10 ng/mL). Cytokines were purchased from Miltenyi Biotech. BM cells (1 × 105/well) were seeded into 6-well plates and transfected with 30 nM Notch2 siRNA (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA) or control non-targeting siRNA (Dharmacon) using the Magnetofection system, and 1.0 μg DNA and 1.0 μL of PolyMAG, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Chemicell, Berlin, Germany). After 12 h, cells were exposed to IR (or left untreated) and then plated with MSCs for 24 h. A lentiviral shRNA Jagged1 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Transfection was performed using Oligofectamine (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, lentivirus was generated by transfecting 293 T cells with the shRNA vector. Viral particles were added to MSC and then cell cultures were selected with puromycin (2 μg/ml).
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Mean values were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All experiments were repeated three times.
Results
UCB-derived MSCs block radiation-induced cell death of HPSCs
MSCs promote expansion and proliferation of hematopoietic cells. Thus, to confirm the effect of MSCs on hematopoietic cells, we performed co-culturing of HPSCs with BM-derived MSC (BM-MSC) or UCB-derived MSC (UCB-MSC). After 6 days, the co-cultures with MSCs had a slightly increased CD45+/CD34+ cells compared to the mono-cultured cells. In addition, the CD34+CD38− cells were significantly increased by co-culture with MSC compared with mono-cultured cells (Supplementary Figure 1A and B). Next, to determine whether BM-MSCs or UCB-MSCs mitigate radiation damage to hematopoietic cells, HPSCs were exposed to IR and then co-cultured with or without MSC. Six days after IR, the total number of CD34+CD38− cells had increased by nearly 2-fold in co-culture with UCB-MSC, compared to co-culture with BM-MSC (Supplementary Figure 2A). Moreover, analysis of apoptotic cell death revealed that UCB-MSC reduced IR-induced cell death by 80% to 32%, while BM-MSC decreased cell death by only 62% (Supplementary Figure 2B). These results showed that UCB-MSC might be better than BM-MSC as radio-protectors to rescue hematopoietic cells after IR-induced injury. Thus, we further studied the ability of UCB-MSC to inhibit radiation-induced damage to hematopoietic cells.
MSC treatment rescues defective hematopoietic functions in radiation-damaged BM
To determine whether MSCs migrate to the BM in vivo, CFSE-labeled MSCs were injected into mice after IR. We found that MSC-CFSE migration was more efficient in the BM of radiation-exposed mice compared to unexposed mice (Fig. 1A). This result showed that radiation promoted the migration of injected MSCs to the damaged BM.
To investigate whether MSC treatment can overcome radiation-induced hematopoietic cell damage in the BM, we evaluated the effects of transplanted MSCs on BM function. We observed increased cell proliferation in the damaged BM after MSC transplantation compared to that in non-transplanted controls, as assessed by Ki-67 expression, at 2 and 3 weeks after IR (Fig. 1B). A defective hematopoietic system is known to result in pancytopenia, which is a reduction of circulating peripheral blood cells. We examined whether MSC administration could affect radiation-induced pancytopenia. Peripheral blood cell counts including total white blood cells, monocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets, were significantly elevated in the MSC-transplanted mice at 3 weeks post-IR (Fig. 1C). In contrast, the level of red blood cells was not changed by MSC administration, as evidenced by a slight decrease in the non-transplanted control group. Flt3 levels were found to be negatively correlated with the number of residual hematopoietic progenitors26. We found that expression of the Flt3 ligand was greatly increased in only the radiation-exposed mice, but it was rapidly decreased in MSC-transplanted animals at 2 weeks post-IR (Fig. 1D). Taken together, these data show that MSC treatment can enhance the hematopoietic function of the radiation-damaged BM by protecting against pancytopenia.
MSCs suppress loss of stemness and apoptosis in radiation-damaged HPSCs
Because MSCs have the ability to improve BM recovery after radiation injury27, we investigated the mechanism by which this occurs. γH2AX, as a marker of DNA damage, is a useful biomarker to assess the effects of exposure to IR28. We found that the number of γH2AX foci was significantly decreased in co-cultured HPSCs, compared to mono-cultured cells (Fig. 2A). Next, we examined whether DNA damage promotes apoptosis in HPSCs; for this, HPSCs were exposed to IR and cultured with or without MSCs. Radiation exposure increased apoptosis in mono-cultured CD34+ cells by 22.8%, in contrast to only 9.8% in co-cultured CD34+ cells (Fig. 2B). In addition, upon co-culture with MSCs, apoptotic CD45+ cells were significantly decreased by nearly 4-fold compared to mono-cultured cells. We also observed that cleaved PARP, a marker of apoptosis, was decreased in co-cultured HPSCs (Fig. 2C). Thus, these results show that co-culture with MSCs attenuates radiation-induced cytotoxicity of HPSCs. To determine whether IR affects HPSC populations, hematopoietic cell markers were analyzed in mono- or co-cultured HPSCs after IR. CD34+CD38− cells were significantly increased, by approximately 2-fold, in the presence of MSCs, as compared to HPSCs alone. In addition, co-cultured HPSCs exhibited up-regulation of CD34+ expression by approximately 3-fold, compared to mono-cultured HPSCs (Fig. 2D). Therefore, MSCs protect HPSCs from radiation-induced loss of stemness, which leads to differentiation of hematopoietic lineage cells.
Activated Notch signaling protects hematopoietic cells from radiation-induced cytotoxicity
Notch-mediated cell-to-cell signaling is involved in differentiation and homeostasis of BM stromal cells and hematopoietic cells19. Thus, we expected that Notch signaling would be associated with the radio-protective effect of MSCs in hematopoietic cells. To determine whether interactions between HPSCs and MSCs activate Notch signaling, we analyzed the expression of Notch-associated genes such as Notch1, Notch2, Hey1, Hes1 Jagged1, Jagged2, and Dll1 in HPSCs and MSCs. The expression of Notch2 and Hes1 were greatly enhanced, by 3-fold, in co-cultured HPSCs compared to mono-cultured HPSCs. Elevated Notch2 expression also remained high after IR. In addition, the expression of Notch1 and Hey1 was increased by 2–2.5-fold upon HPSC co-culture, but levels of these markers were decreased following radiation exposure (Fig. 3A). Next, we observed that the Notch ligands Jagged1 and Dll1 were significantly up-regulated in MSCs co-cultured with HPSCs (Fig. 3B). To show that activated Notch is involved in the inhibition of apoptosis in HPSCs, the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT was used to treat mono- and co-cultured cells. As expected, radiation-induced apoptosis was attenuated in HPSCs co-cultured with MSCs compared to mono-cultured cells, whereas DAPT treatment overrode the protective effects of MSC and HPSC co-culture (Supplementary Figure 4). Moreover, the combined injection of MSCs and DAPT into mice resulted in a greater loss of BM cellularity and higher mortality compared to IR alone (Supplementary Figure 5). These results indicate that treatment with DAPT impedes the regenerative effect of MSCs, thereby promoting radiation-induced multi-organ failure. Thus, MSCs prevented IR-induced cytotoxicity to the hematopoietic system, which implies that the activation of Notch signaling is involved in this process.
Activated Notch signaling suppresses BM damage through inhibition of p63 expression
We next investigated which molecules were involved in the protective effect of Notch signaling against IR-induced cytotoxicity. p53 family members p63 and p73 are important in the cellular response to DNA damage29, and previous studies have shown that Notch signaling regulates p63 expression30. Thus, we determined whether activated Notch suppressed DNA damage through p53 family members in mono- or co-cultured HPSCs. As shown in Fig. 4A, radiation exposure increased p53, p63, and p73 expression by approximately 2.5-fold in mono-cultured cells compared to untreated cells. However, co-culture with MSCs significantly reduced TP53 and TP63 expression in HPSCs. In addition, co-cultured cells showed down-regulation of p53 associated with Bax and p21 expression, with increased expression of the anti-apoptotic genes Bcl2 and Bcl-xL (Fig. 4B). We also analyzed whether the protein expression of Notch2, p63, and Bcl2 was altered by IR and MSCs in mouse BM. IR resulted mostly in decreased Notch2 and Bcl2; in contrast, p63 expression was decreased in the MSC-injected group, which was similar to the in vitro results (Fig. 4C). Using immunofluorescence staining, we confirmed that co-localization of Notch2 and Bcl2 was up-regulated by MSC injection. IR-induced p63 expression was also decreased in MSC-injected BM of mouse (Supplementary Figure 6). Thus, MSCs enhance Notch2 expression on hematopoietic cells, which overcomes IR-induced cytotoxicity through inhibition of p63 expression.
Interaction between Jagged1 and Notch2 blocks IR-induced apoptosis of HPSCs
To determine whether the Notch ligand–receptor interaction plays an important role in HPSC differentiation, we used the Notch ligand Jagged1. We found that treatment with Jagged1 prevented the loss of CD34+CD38− cells, as compared to untreated cells (Supplementary Figure 7). This result indicates that Jagged1 attenuates the differentiation of HPSCs. In addition, Jagged1 treatment reduced IR-induced apoptosis from 84% to 41% in human HPSCs (Fig. 5A). This apoptotic rate is similar to the effect observed when we evaluated the radio-protection effect of MSCs. We also confirmed that Jagged1 increased expression of Notch2 and its associated proteins Bcl2 and p63 at the protein level, but decreased levels of cleaved PARP. In mouse HPSCs, Jagged1 also prevented radiation-induced apoptosis of CD45 cells by 52% to 33% (Fig. 5B). However, Dll1 did not significantly protect against radiation-induced cell death in human and mouse HPSCs (data not shown). Next, we depleted Notch2 using specific siRNAs to determine whether it is required for the prevention of IR damage to hematopoietic cells. Notch2 depletion significantly increased apoptosis in co-cultured HPSCs following IR. Additionally, Notch2 depletion decreased expression of Bcl2 family proteins but increased p63 and cleaved PARP in co-cultured HPSCs (Fig. 5C). Therefore, MSC-derived Jagged1 can activate Notch2 in HPSCs, which can function to reduce radiation-induced cytotoxicity to HPCs.
Knockdown of Jagged1 in MSC impedes recovery from radiation-induced BM injury
Our results show that MSC-induced Jagged1 can reduce radiation-induced cytotoxicity of hematopoietic cells in vitro. To determine whether knockdown of Jagged1 plays a major role in IR-induced BM damage, we used shRNA to deplete Jagged1 in MSC and injected MSCs or shJagged1-MSCs into mice after IR. MSC treatment resulted in restoration of mouse HPSCs (Lin−Sca+cKit+) to 1.8–2.5%, but shJagged1-MSC could not prevent radiation-induced depletion of most HSCs in the mice (Fig. 6A). Moreover, IR-exposed mice treated with MSCs showed restoration of the BM cellular content, whereas shJagged1-MSCs could not protect against loss of BM cellularity (Fig. 6B). We next investigated whether knockdown of Jagged1 in MSCs affected the survival of mice after IR. Mice received a total body irradiation dose of 6.5 Gy, which is a lethal radiation dose with 0% survival. As shown in Fig. 6C, all mice died in the IR-exposed group on day 16 post-IR. However, 43% of mice treated with MSCs while only 10% of mice treated with shJagged1-MSCs survived to 25 days after IR. This result indicates that Jagged1 majorly regulates hematopoietic damage by IR, but other MSC-induced factors may be involved. Taken together, these results indicate that Jagged1 expression by MSCs can protect against radiation-induced lethality, which suggests that MSC-based treatment could have potential therapeutic value for acute radiation syndrome.
Discussion
In the current study, we demonstrate that activated Jagged1-Notch2 signaling can overcome radiation-induced injury to hematopoietic cells through inhibition of p63 in vitro and in vivo. We found that radiation exposure resulted in severe disruption of HPSCs in the BM, thereby increasing cellular lethality. Additionally, expression of Jagged1 by MSCs enhanced expression of Notch receptors on HPSCs, leading to protection against radiation-induced cytotoxicity. Our results indicate that Notch2 activation contributes to restoration of the BM, which suggests that MSC treatment could be an attractive therapeutic strategy for patients with radiation exposure.
The main result of radiation damage is impairment of HPSCs and their associated compartments31,32. Thus, HPSC recovery could be important to ameliorate radiation-induced injury. Several chemicals or compounds have been suggested to promote recovery from radiation-induced damage to the BM7,8,9, but most exhibit toxicity and insufficient radio-protective effects33. In addition, limited therapeutic options are currently available for radiation exposure such as that resulting from radiation therapy or nuclear accidents34. Two granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-based growth factors, Neupogen and Neulasta, have recently been approved by the FDA as radio-mitigators for patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer35. However, to date, there are no FDA-approved radio-protectors for acute radiation syndrome.
A previous study by Jing et al. reported that co-culture with MSCs increased the expansion and maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells36. Specifically, three-dimensional culture of MSCs was critical to mimic the physiological microenvironment ex vivo37,38. Based on in vitro data, current clinical studies have proposed that MSC-based therapies are safe and have the potential to effectively treat hematopoietic diseases. However, knowledge regarding the mechanism of action underlying the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs is lacking. Therefore, in this study, we investigated whether treatment with MSCs could contribute to suppression of radiation-induced BM damage, and the mechanisms associated with radio-protection.
MSCs are found in and isolated from various tissues such as the BM, heart, UCB, and adipose39. In early studies, BM-derived MSCs were shown to be effective in a variety diseases, but recently UCB-MSCs were considered most suitable because of the similarity to BM-MSC, and their several advantages, including lower immunogenicity, higher in vitro expansion, noninvasive collection, and differentiation potential40. We also observed that both co-cultured with BM-MSC and UCB-MSC resulted in high proportions of CD34+ CD38− HPSCs, compared to mono-cultured cells (Supplementary Figure 1). These results indicate that MSCs contribute to HPSC maintenance, which suggests that they could be applied to the expansion of hematopoietic cells in vitro.
Notch is a transmembrane receptor that regulates important cellular signaling events such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and tissue renewal through cell–cell communication41. Notch receptors and ligands are widely expressed in the hematopoietic system, indicating that Notch has an important function in hematopoiesis42. Interaction of Notch receptors with ligands leads to cleavage and release of the Notch intracellular domain, which translocates to the nucleus and functions as a transcriptional activator. HES and HEY genes encoding basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcriptional regulators are target genes modulated by this mechanism43. In the hematopoietic system, Hes1 plays a major function among the Notch target genes in BM of HSCs differentiation44. We also observed that Hes1 are significantly increased in HPSCs co-cultured with both UCB-MSC and BM-MSC compared with mono-cultured cells. However, assessing the apoptosis rate and cell viability revealed that co-culture of HPSCs with UCB-MSCs mitigated the effects of IR better than co-culture with BM-MSC (Supplementary Figure 2). A previous study reported that senescence was achieved by UCB-MSCs more slowly than BM-MSCs, which indicates that p53 and p21 expression are involved45. In addition, we found that the expression of Hes1 was higher in HPSCs co-cultured with UCB-MSCs than co-cultured with BM-MSCs after IR (Supplementary Figure 9). Based on this study, we expected that BM-MSC could not prevent cytotoxicity of HPSCs from radiation because this cell population is more sensitive to radiation-induced senescence than UCB-MSC. Thus, we further investigated the mechanism of the radio-protective effect in the hematopoietic system using co-culture with UCB-MSC.
Previous studies have shown that Notch activation during ex-vivo expansion of HPSCs might be directly correlated with the capacity to regulate cell cycle and hematopoietic recovery under conditions of stress46. Moreover, recent studies reported that different Notch ligands affect specificity by interacting with Notch receptors; however, distinct functions for each ligand in many tissues are still unknown47,48. We found that Notch1, Notch2, Hes1 and Hey1 expression are significantly up-regulated compared to mono-cultured cells after radiation exposure. We also demonstrated that up-regulation of Jagged1 and Dll1 in MSCs can activate Notch2 on HPSCs, resulting in up-regulation of CD34 in CD34+CD38− cells and inhibition of cell division. A previous study reported that treatment with the soluble Notch ligand Dll1 mitigated IR-induced hematopoietic damage through colony-stimulating factor 2 receptor beta 249. However, we did not observe radio-protective effects in Dll1-treated HPSCs (data not shown). A previous study by Radtke et al. demonstrated that Jagged1-mediated Notch signaling was dispensable for HSC self-renewal and differentiation46. Lu and colleagues showed that endothelial cell-secreted Jagged1 and its binding to receptors activated Notch signaling50. Moreover, the Notch2-Jagged1 interaction has been reported to regulate erythropoiesis through stem cell factor signaling51. We also found that treatment with Jagged1 activates Notch2 and overcomes radiation-induced DNA damage and apoptosis in hematopoietic cells. We confirmed that knockdown of Notch2 using siRNA increased radiation-induced cytotoxicity in hematopoietic cells.
Recent studies have shown that Fringe glycosyltransferases are associated with Notch signaling, regulating the interaction between receptors and ligands52. In mammalian, three Fringe family genes have been identified as Lunatic Fringe (Lfng), Manic Fringe (Mfng) and Radical Fringe (Rfng)52. All Fringe genes are involved in the differentiation of T and B cells. Although IR exposure greatly reduced Fringe genes expression in HPSCs, expression of Lfng and Mfng were restored by Jagged1 treatment compared to Dll1 treatment (Supplementary Figure 10). A previous study by Singh et al. reported that Jagged1 and Mfng play important role in regulating Notch function during hematopoietic development53. Taken together, MSC-derived Jagged1 can significantly promote Notch2 signaling, which is not only important for HPSC maintenance, but also for mitigating radiation-induced damage.
DNA damage is a major cause of radiation-induced injury of the hematopoietic system. Activated p53 promotes DNA damage and cell death, which is dependent on the up-regulation of p63 and p7329. The structural organization of p63 and p73 is similar to p53, however, each family member is also controlled by some specific genes54,55. A previous study by Horsley et al. revealed that repression of Notch signaling promoted p6330. In addition, the interaction between Notch and p63 regulates cancer growth56 and epidermal differentiation57. In our results, p53 family members were significantly increased by IR, but co-culture with MSC significantly reduced p63 expression in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 4). We also confirmed that treatment with Jagged1 decreased p63 expression by IR, whereas knockdown of Notch2 increased p63 in HPSCs under co-culture conditions.
The interaction of Bcl2 and the p53 gene regulates apoptosis. Chen et al. reported that Notch ligand increased the phosphorylation of STAT3 and Erk1/2 and up-regulated the expression of Bcl249. The switch from survival to apoptosis is regulated by Bcl2 family proteins in irradiated HSCs28. We found that expression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl2 family genes including Bcl2 and Bcl-xL was increased in co-cultured HPSCs, and remained active after exposure to IR. In addition, Jagged1 induced Bcl2 activation and p63 inhibition, which facilitated prevention of apoptosis by IR. In contrast, Notch2 depletion significantly reduced the radio-protective effect of MSC on HPSCs through down-regulation of Bcl2. This result implies that activated Jagged1-Notch2 interaction could decrease IR-induced p63 expression, thus limiting DNA damage in the hematopoietic system. A previous study showed that silencing Jagged1 inhibited cell growth and proliferation in vitro and in vivo58. Our in vivo data showed that MSC administration ameliorated radiation-induced BM failure and improved survival in mice, but Jagged1 knockdown of MSC was not able to prevent BM suppression and mortality (Fig. 6). Taken together, among Notch ligands, Jagged1 plays an important role in blocking radiation-induced damage of the hematopoietic system.
In conclusion, activated Jagged1 expression on MSCs enhances Notch2 signaling, which may prevent apoptosis of HSCs in vitro and improve hematopoietic recovery and reduce mortality in vivo. In addition, Notch2 reduces IR-induced p63 expression, leading to up-regulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl2 protein expression. We suggest that the activation of Notch by MSCs could be a successful strategy to treat patients with radiation exposure.
References
Warr, M. R., Pietras, E. M. & Passegue, E. Mechanisms controlling hematopoietic stem cell functions during normal hematopoiesis and hematological malignancies. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine 3, 681–701, https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.145 (2011).
Morrison, S. J. & Scadden, D. T. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 505, 327–334, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12984 (2014).
Baldridge, M. T., King, K. Y., Boles, N. C., Weksberg, D. C. & Goodell, M. A. Quiescent haematopoietic stem cells are activated by IFN-gamma in response to chronic infection. Nature 465, 793–797, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09135 (2010).
Cao, X. et al. Irradiation induces bone injury by damaging bone marrow microenvironment for stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 1609–1614, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015350108 (2011).
Mauch, P. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell compartment: acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 31, 1319–1339, https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(94)00430-s (1995).
Rogakou, E. P., Pilch, D. R., Orr, A. H., Ivanova, V. S. & Bonner, W. M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. The Journal of biological chemistry 273, 5858–5868 (1998).
Wang, B. et al. Sodium orthovanadate (vanadate), a potent mitigator of radiation-induced damage to the hematopoietic system in mice. Journal of radiation research 54, 620–629, https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs140 (2013).
Martinel Lamas, D. J. et al. Protection of radiation-induced damage to the hematopoietic system, small intestine and salivary glands in rats by JNJ7777120 compound, a histamine H4 ligand. PloS one 8, e69106, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069106 (2013).
Xu, G. et al. Metformin ameliorates ionizing irradiation-induced long-term hematopoietic stem cell injury in mice. Free radical biology & medicine 87, 15–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.05.045 (2015).
Scadden, D. T. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature 441, 1075–1079, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04957 (2006).
Pittenger, M. F. et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science (New York, N.Y.) 284, 143–147 (1999).
Ludwig, A. et al. Functional potentials of human hematopoietic progenitor cells are maintained by mesenchymal stromal cells and not impaired by plerixafor. Cytotherapy 16, 111–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.07.007 (2014).
Oodi, A. et al. Expression of P16 cell cycle inhibitor in human cord blood CD34+ expanded cells following co-culture with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 17, 334–340, https://doi.org/10.1179/1607845412y.0000000009 (2012).
Kavanagh, H. & Mahon, B. P. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells prevent allergic airway inflammation by inducing murine regulatory T cells. Allergy 66, 523–531, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02509.x (2011).
Zanone, M. M. et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate cellular immune response to islet antigen glutamic acid decarboxylase in type 1 diabetes. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 95, 3788–3797, https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2350 (2010).
Gonzalez, M. A., Gonzalez-Rey, E., Rico, L., Buscher, D. & Delgado, M. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate experimental colitis by inhibiting inflammatory and autoimmune responses. Gastroenterology 136, 978–989, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.041 (2009).
Williams, A. R. & Hare, J. M. Mesenchymal stem cells: biology, pathophysiology, translational findings, and therapeutic implications for cardiac disease. Circulation research 109, 923–940, https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.111.243147 (2011).
Horwitz, E. M. et al. Isolated allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells engraft and stimulate growth in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: Implications for cell therapy of bone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 8932–8937, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.132252399 (2002).
Liu, J., Sato, C., Cerletti, M. & Wagers, A. Notch signaling in the regulation of stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Current topics in developmental biology 92, 367–409, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0070-2153(10)92012-7 (2010).
Kopan, R. & Ilagan, M. X. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 137, 216–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.045 (2009).
Milner, L. A. et al. Inhibition of granulocytic differentiation by mNotch1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 13014–13019 (1996).
Bigas, A., Martin, D. I. & Milner, L. A. Notch1 and Notch2 inhibit myeloid differentiation in response to different cytokines. Molecular and cellular biology 18, 2324–2333 (1998).
Milner, L. A., Kopan, R., Martin, D. I. & Bernstein, I. D. A human homologue of the Drosophila developmental gene, Notch, is expressed in CD34+ hematopoietic precursors. Blood 83, 2057–2062 (1994).
Calvi, L. M. et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature 425, 841–846, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02040 (2003).
Kim, A., Seong, K. M., Kang, H. J., Park, S. & Lee, S. S. Inhibition of Lyn is a promising treatment for mantle cell lymphoma with bortezomib resistance. Oncotarget 6, 38225–38238, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5425 (2015).
Prat, M. et al. Radiation-induced increase in plasma Flt3 ligand concentration in mice: evidence for the implication of several cell types. Radiation research 163, 408–417 (2005).
Lange, C. et al. Radiation rescue: mesenchymal stromal cells protect from lethal irradiation. PloS one 6, e14486, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014486 (2011).
Redon, C. E., Dickey, J. S., Bonner, W. M. & Sedelnikova, O. A. gamma-H2AX as a biomarker of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and artificial skin. Advances in space research: the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) 43, 1171–1178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.10.011 (2009).
Flores, E. R. et al. p63 and p73 are required for p53-dependent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Nature 416, 560–564, https://doi.org/10.1038/416560a (2002).
Tadeu, A. M. & Horsley, V. Notch signaling represses p63 expression in the developing surface ectoderm. Development (Cambridge, England) 140, 3777–3786, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.093948 (2013).
Singh, V. K., Newman, V. L. & Seed, T. M. Colony-stimulating factors for the treatment of the hematopoietic component of the acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS): a review. Cytokine 71, 22–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2014.08.003 (2015).
Herodin, F., Bourin, P., Mayol, J. F., Lataillade, J. J. & Drouet, M. Short-term injection of antiapoptotic cytokine combinations soon after lethal gamma -irradiation promotes survival. Blood 101, 2609–2616, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-06-1634 (2003).
Koukourakis, M. I. Radiation damage and radioprotectants: new concepts in the era of molecular medicine. The British journal of radiology 85, 313–330, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/16386034 (2012).
Gorin, N. C. et al. Consensus conference on European preparedness for haematological and other medical management of mass radiation accidents. Annals of hematology 85, 671–679, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-006-0153-x (2006).
Waselenko, J. K. et al. Medical management of the acute radiation syndrome: recommendations of the Strategic National Stockpile Radiation Working Group. Annals of internal medicine 140, 1037–1051 (2004).
Jing, D. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells in co-culture with mesenchymal stromal cells–modeling the niche compartments in vitro. Haematologica 95, 542–550, https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2009.010736 (2010).
Wilson, A. & Trumpp, A. Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nature reviews. Immunology 6, 93–106, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1779 (2006).
Fuchs, E., Tumbar, T. & Guasch, G. Socializing with the neighbors: stem cells and their niche. Cell 116, 769–778 (2004).
Madrigal, M., Rao, K. S. & Riordan, N. H. A review of therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell secretions and induction of secretory modification by different culture methods. Journal of translational medicine 12, 260, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-014-0260-8 (2014).
Kim, J. Y., Jeon, H. B., Yang, Y. S., Oh, W. & Chang, J. W. Application of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in disease models. World journal of stem cells 2, 34–38, https://doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v2.i2.34 (2010).
Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D. & Lake, R. J. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science (New York, N.Y.) 284, 770–776 (1999).
Kojika, S. & Griffin, J. D. Notch receptors and hematopoiesis. Experimental hematology 29, 1041–1052 (2001).
Iso, T., Kedes, L. & Hamamori, Y. HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway. Journal of cellular physiology 194, 237–255, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.10208 (2003).
Kunisato, A. et al. HES-1 preserves purified hematopoietic stem cells ex vivo and accumulates side population cells in vivo. Blood 101, 1777–1783, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-07-2051 (2003).
Jin, H. J. et al. Comparative analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood as sources of cell therapy. International journal of molecular sciences 14, 17986–18001, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140917986 (2013).
Mancini, S. J. et al. Jagged1-dependent Notch signaling is dispensable for hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Blood 105, 2340–2342, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-08-3207 (2005).
Hicks, C. et al. Fringe differentially modulates Jagged1 and Delta1 signalling through Notch1 and Notch2. Nature cell biology 2, 515–520, https://doi.org/10.1038/35019553 (2000).
Lindsell, C. E., Boulter, J., diSibio, G., Gossler, A. & Weinmaster, G. Expression patterns of Jagged, Delta1, Notch1, Notch2, and Notch3 genes identify ligand-receptor pairs that may function in neural development. Molecular and cellular neurosciences 8, 14–27, https://doi.org/10.1006/mcne.1996.0040 (1996).
Chen, J. J. et al. Disruption of Notch signaling aggravates irradiation-induced bone marrow injury, which is ameliorated by a soluble Dll1 ligand through Csf2rb2 upregulation. Sci Rep 6, 26003, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26003 (2016).
Lu, J. et al. Endothelial cells promote the colorectal cancer stem cell phenotype through a soluble form of Jagged-1. Cancer cell 23, 171–185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.12.021 (2013).
Zeuner, A. et al. The Notch2-Jagged1 interaction mediates stem cell factor signaling in erythropoiesis. Cell death and differentiation 18, 371–380, https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2010.110 (2011).
Moloney, D. J. et al. Fringe is a glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch. Nature 406, 369–375, https://doi.org/10.1038/35019000 (2000).
Singh, N., Phillips, R. A., Iscove, N. N. & Egan, S. E. Expression of notch receptors, notch ligands, and fringe genes in hematopoiesis. Experimental hematology 28, 527–534 (2000).
Sasaki, Y. et al. The p53 family member genes are involved in the Notch signal pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry 277, 719–724, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M108080200 (2002).
Yang, A. et al. Genome-wide mapping indicates that p73 and p63 co-occupy target sites and have similar dna-binding profiles in vivo. PloS one 5, e11572, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011572 (2010).
Dotto, G. P. Crosstalk of Notch with p53 and p63 in cancer growth control. Nature reviews. Cancer 9, 587–595, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2675 (2009).
Candi, E. et al. DeltaNp63 regulates thymic development through enhanced expression of FgfR2 and Jag2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 11999–12004, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703458104 (2007).
Dai, Y. et al. Silencing of Jagged1 inhibits cell growth and invasion in colorectal cancer. Cell death & disease 5, e1170, https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2014.137 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), funded by Ministry of Science and ICT (MIST), Republic of Korea (50535-2018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study concept and design: A.K.; acquisition of data: A.K., S.S. and M.K.; drafting of the manuscript: A.K.; material and technical support: J.M. and S.S.; study supervision: S.P. All authors have approved the final draft of this manuscript that was submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, A., Shim, S., Kim, MJ. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated Notch2 activation overcomes radiation-induced injury of the hematopoietic system. Sci Rep 8, 9277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27666-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27666-w
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Protection of the hematopoietic system against radiation-induced damage: drugs, mechanisms, and developments
Archives of Pharmacal Research (2022)
-
Increased expression of secreted frizzled related protein 1 (SFRP1) predicts ampullary adenocarcinoma recurrence
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Bone marrow stromal cell therapy improves survival after radiation injury but does not restore endogenous hematopoiesis
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Use of MSCs and MSC-Educated Macrophages to Mitigate Hematopoietic Acute Radiation Syndrome
Current Stem Cell Reports (2020)
-
Targets for protection and mitigation of radiation injury
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2020)