Abstract
The purpose of current study was to evaluate different optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) metrics in eyes with diabetic retinopathy with and without diabetic macular edema (DME). In this retrospective study, macular OCTA images of eyes with non-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy were evaluated. Vascular density, vascular complexity and non-perfusion densities were compared between eyes with and without DME. One-hundred-thirty-eight eyes of 92 diabetic patients including 49 eyes with DME were included. In multivariate analysis, the presence of DME was positively associated with geometric perfusion deficit (GPD) in superficial capillary plexus (SCP), capillary non-perfusion (CNP) of SCP, and GPD in deep capillary plexus (DCP) (all P < 0.05). In eyes with DME, central foveal thickness was associated with VD ratio (SCP/DCP) (P = 0.001) and FAZ area (P = 0.001). In conclusion, in eyes with diabetic retinopathy, the presence of DME was associated with more extensive capillary non-perfusion compared to those with no macular edema.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) are the main causes of severe visual loss in adult population1,2. Several studies have reported characteristic fluorescein angiography features associated with progression of diabetic retinopathy, and development and severity of diabetic macular edema3,4,5. Fluorescein angiography (FA), however, is an invasive and time-consuming modality that needs skilled photographers. Recently, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), a non-invasive modality that provides depth-resolved images from retinal microvasculature has replaced FA in many patients6,7.
Different OCTA metrics have been shown to predict the presence and the stages of diabetic retinopathy7,8,9,10. However, studies reporting OCTA characteristics of diabetic eyes with macular edema are limited. Qualitative OCTA features have been described in eyes with DME11,12,13. In addition, OCTA changes have been reported after anti-VEGF or laser treatment8,14,15. However, research on the pattern of retinal ischemia in the setting of diabetic macular edema is limited.
The current study aims to assess different OCTA metrics in eyes with DME compared to diabetic eyes without macular edema.
Methods
This retrospective case series was conducted in Rassoul Akram Hospital and Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC.1398.078) and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Eyes with different stages of non-proliferative (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were included. Patients underwent thorough ophthalmic examination including biomicroscopy and dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy. The Best Corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (using Snellen chart) was measured, and the results were then converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR). Exclusion criteria were history of vitreoretinal surgery, history of macular photocoagulation, the presence of significant epiretinal membrane or vitreomacular traction and concurrent ocular diseases such as uveitis, glaucoma or optic neuropathy, eyes with visual acuity less than 20/200 and refractive error > + 3 and < − 3, and history of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab during the last 3 months.
Imaging protocol
Optical coherence tomography angiography images were obtained from the fovea (3 × 3 mm) of the patients with different stage of diabetic retinopathy using a RTVue XR 100 Avanti instrument (Version 2017.1.0.151, Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA). Images with poor quality or from eyes with media opacity precluding acceptable image acquisition, were excluded from the study. Eyes with central subfield retinal thickness (CST) greater than 350 µm or presence of central retinal cystoid changes were considered as having diabetic macular edema.
Automated segmentation of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) enface image was performed from internal limiting membrane (ILM) to 9 µm above the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Deep capillary plexus (DCP) boundaries were set at 9 µm above the IPL to 9 µm below the outer plexiform layer (OPL). Segmentation error correction of different retinal layers was manually performed as described elsewhere16,17. Foveal avascular zone was delineated in full retinal slab, SCP and DCP using a previously reported deep learning approach18.
For further analysis, SCP and DCP enface images were imported to into the ImageJ software (version 1.52; http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; provided in the public domain by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). In order to reduce signal noise, Frangi vesselness filter was applied to the original image. Then, the images were binarized using the value of 1.2*SD + mean decorrelation signal of the deep learning delineated FAZ area as the threshold. The binary mask images were used for measuring different OCTA metrics as follows.
Vascular density
Vascular density (VD) was defined as area of pixels occupied by retinal vessels divided by total area of the whole image.
Vascular length density and vascular diameter index
Vascular length density (VLD) index was calculated as the area of pixels occupied with skeletonized vessels divided by the total area of the image. In skeletonization, reducing the width of each vessel to a single pixel results in uniform contribution of the large and small vasculature in density measurements19.
Vascular diameter index (VDI) was calculated by dividing VLD to VD. This index is a surrogate for total vessel length in the image.
Complexity indices of retinal microvasculature
For measuring retinal vascular complexity, three different popular indices including fractal dimension (FD), vascular tortuosity index (VTI) and vascular complexity index (VCI) were calculated. Fractal dimension was calculated by FractalCount plugin of ImageJ software on skeletonized images of SCP and DCP using the box-counting method as described elsewhere20. FD shows the branching distribution of the vessels in the image21.
Vascular tortuosity index represents the curvature of retinal vasculature. It was calculated as the ratio of arch length (geodesic distance) to chord length (Euclidian distance) of each vessel segment in skeletonized image22.
Vascular complexity index was calculated based on binarized vessel map and vessel perimeter map. The complex morphology of retinal vasculature is measured by this unique index22. Generally, capillary drop out and non-perfusion results in less complex vascular network23.
The validity of all mentioned indices has been previously shown in different OCTA studies on diabetic patients21,22,23. Different obtained maps are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Nonperfusion indices
Two different methods were implemented for quantification of capillary non perfusion (CNP). First, as described elsewhere24, quantification of CNP percentage in whole enface SCP and DCP images was done after enhancing images for generation of vessel distance map. Morphologic filters including Gray Scale Attribute Filtering and Erosion were applied afterwards for better visualization of CNP area (Fig. 2). Additionally, a similar method was used based on Euclidean distance map obtained from skeletonized image to calculated geometric perfusion deficit (GPD, Fig. 3)25. The FAZ area delineated by DL method was excluded from nonperfusion areas.
Statistical analysis
Data entered using a SPSS software (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL). For comparing demographic variables of patients, between Macular edema and no Macular edema groups, independent t and chi-square tests were utilized. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used for analysis of the extracted densities and indices to compensate for inter-eye correlation of bilateral cases. In statistical analysis, the results were adjusted for the stage of diabetic retinopathy (NPDR vs. PDR). P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Bonferroni correction was used to address multiple comparisons.
Results
One-hundred-thirty-eight eyes of 92 diabetic patients with a mean age of 62.2 ± 9.8 years were included. Fifty-nine eyes (42.7%) had diabetic macular edema. Forty-four eyes (31.9%) had PDR and the remaining eyes were categorized as NPDR. The mean CST was 420.1 ± 115.4 and 254.1 ± 29.9 µm in eyes with and without DME, respectively (P < 0.001). Table 1 shows demographics of patients in the 2 groups.
Table 2 shows a comparison of different OCTA metrics in eyes with and without DME. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for the stage of diabetic retinopathy and Bonferroni correction, the presence of diabetic macular edema was associated with higher GPD in SCP (p < 0.001), more CNP of SCP (p = 0.002), and higher GPD in DCP (p = 0.004). Figure 4 shows an example of enface OCTA images of patients with and without DME.
When calculating the ratio of non-perfusion area of SCP to DCP, both CNP ratio (5.65 ± 5.83 vs. 7.85 ± 6.96, p = 0.728) and GPD ratio (3.61 ± 1.80 vs. 4.20 ± 1.91, p = 0.417) were lower in eyes with diabetic macular edema. In addition, VD ratio of the SCP to DCP was higher in eyes with DME (0.96 ± 0.14 vs. 0.91 ± 0.07, P = 0.180).
In eyes with DME, central foveal thickness was only associated with increased VD ratio (p = 0.001) and larger FAZ area (p = 0.001). In eyes without DME, CST was only associated with FAZ area (p < 0.001) after Bonferroni correction.
Discussion
In this study, the extent of capillary non-perfusion was higher and vessel density was lower in eyes with DME, in both SCP and DCP. We calculated the non-perfusion area based on 2 different methods to increase the accuracy of the measurements, and the results were similar24,25. Traditional staging of diabetic retinopathy based on Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), which is still the gold standard for its classification, describes the proliferative and non-proliferative stages of diabetic retinopathy26. The validity of this classification was further shown by evidence of increasing capillary non-perfusion with advancing ETDRS stage27,28. Diabetic macular edema was described in this classification as a condition that necessitates treatment with macular photocoagulation. With the advances in intravitreal pharmacological therapy, the indications, and the response of the treatment of DME have been changed. However, DME is not generally considered an ischemic process. Our results show that capillary non-perfusion and consequent ischemia are more severe in DME. It may be plausible to consider DME as a more advanced stage of diabetic retinopathy based on capillary non-perfusion.
In a previous study29, we showed that the extent of non-perfusion is higher in SCP than DCP in eyes with DR without DME. Similarly, current study shows that the non-perfusion area was more extensive in SCP. However, a lower (although non-statistically significant) capillary non-perfusion ratio (SCP to DCP) was observed in eyes with DME. In addition, severity of DME, evident as increase in CMT, was associated with a decrease in VD at DCP. This shows that in DME, the non-perfusion area in DCP is higher compared to those without macular edema. This is in line with previous studies that speculated a significant role for DCP ischemia in the pathogenesis of DME11.
Studies comparing the OCTA metrics between eyes with and without DME are scarce in the literature. In a prospective study by Sun et al.13 the development of DME was associated with decreased vascular density in SCP. AttaAllah et al.30 reported that eyes with DME had larger FAZ area and lower VD at DCP in comparison to eyes without DME. None of these studies reported the measurements of CNP or GPD area. Although the VD may indirectly indicate the perfusion status of the capillary plexus, the measurements of CNP and GPD directly show the status of perfusion. In our investigation, several additional image processing and deep learning techniques for measurement of OCTA metrics including VDI, FD, VTI, CNP and GPD were used to assess different aspects of non-perfusion in OCTA.
The segmentation error is one of the major sources of bias in quantitative measurements16,31 of OCTA images. In this study, the segmentation error was corrected manually in OCTA images. Despite this, some eyes with severe macular edema associated with disorganization of retinal layers may fail to be completely corrected. It might be speculated that the presence of cystoid spaces in different capillary plexuses might displace the vascular network laterally and affect the visualization of microvasculature. However, it is shown that reperfusion usually does not occur after the resolution of DME, therefore, to some extent the capillary drop out is authentic and not the result of artifacts associated with cystoid spaces32.
In this study, we analyzed the complexity indices of retinal microvasculature, including, FD, VTI and VCI. Previous studies have shown that vascular complexity indices are valuable measures in differentiating stages of DR22,33. Our results showed that VTI at SCP and DCP, VDI at DCP, and FD at SCP were different between DME and no DME groups. The difference, however, did not remain significant in multivariate analysis. Future studies with larger sample size may find an association between vascular characteristics and macular edema.
This study has several limitations. The study design was retrospective and sample size was not large enough to detect small differences between the groups. In addition, we did not evaluate the subcategories of NPDR, longitudinal changes in diabetic retinopathy and the changes after treatment in DME. Also, we did not assess structural changes in OCT b scans as it is shown that the inner retinal layers disorganization and paracentral acute middle maculopathy are related to macular ischemia in different levels of capillary plexuses34. Despite recent advances in OCTA software, many of artifacts cannot be readily fixed with present technologies29. Although low-quality images were excluded from this study and segmentation error was manually corrected, other forms of artifacts, especially due to cysts could have affected our measurements. Another drawback is the absence of baseline data regarding metabolic control among our patients. The intermediate capillary plexus (ICP) is also not discernible by the current Optovue device, and future studies can be conducted to assess the effect of DME on ICP.
In conclusion, this study evaluated a large set of OCTA variables and showed a possible role for non-perfusion in macular edema. Future longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our results.
References
Leasher, J. L. et al. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by diabetic retinopathy: A meta-analysis from 1990 to 2010. Diabetes Care 39, 1643–1649 (2016).
Congdon, N. G. Important causes of visual impairment in the world today. JAMA 290, 2057 (2003).
Fang, M. et al. Classification of regions of nonperfusion on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography in patients with diabetic macular edema. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 206, 74–81 (2019).
Fan, W. et al. Distribution of nonperfusion area on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography in eyes with diabetic macular edema: DAVE study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 180, 110–116 (2017).
Fan, W. et al. Severity of diabetic macular edema correlates with retinal vascular bed area on ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography. Retina 40, 1029–1037 (2020).
Falavarjani, K. G. & Sarraf, D. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the retina and choroid; current applications and future directions. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 29, 1–4 (2017).
Khadamy, J., Aghdam, K. & Falavarjani, K. An update on optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 13, 487 (2018).
Ghasemi Falavarjani, K. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of the foveal avascular zone and macular vessel density after anti-VEGF therapy in eyes with diabetic macular edema and retinal vein occlusion. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, 30 (2017).
Safi, H. et al. Quantitative analysis of optical coherence tomography angiography metrics in diabetic retinopathy. Ther. Adv. Ophthalmol. 12, 251584141989745 (2020).
Hwang, T. S. et al. Automated quantification of nonperfusion areas in 3 vascular plexuses with optical coherence tomography angiography in eyes of patients with diabetes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 136, 929 (2018).
Spaide, R. F. Retinal vascular cystoid macular edema. Retina 36, 1823–1842 (2016).
de Carlo, T. E. et al. Distinguishing diabetic macular edema from capillary nonperfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina 47, 108–114 (2016).
Sun, Z. et al. OCT angiography metrics predict progression of diabetic retinopathy and development of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 126, 1675–1684 (2019).
Vujosevic, S. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography changes after subthreshold micropulse yellow laser in diabetic macular edema. Retina 40, 312–321 (2020).
Lee, J., Moon, B. G., Cho, A. R. & Yoon, Y. H. Optical coherence tomography angiography of DME and its association with anti-VEGF treatment response. Ophthalmology 123, 2368–2375 (2016).
GhasemiFalavarjani, K. et al. Effect of segmentation error correction on optical coherence tomography angiography measurements in healthy subjects and diabetic macular oedema. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 104, 162–166 (2020).
Ghasemi Falavarjani, K., Mirshahi, R., Ghasemizadeh, S. & Sardarinia, M. Stepwise segmentation error correction in optical coherence tomography angiography images of patients with diabetic macular edema. Ther. Adv. Ophthalmol. 12, 251584142094793 (2020).
Mirshahi, R. et al. Foveal avascular zone segmentation in optical coherence tomography angiography images using a deep learning approach. Sci. Rep. 11, 1031 (2021).
Pramil, V., Levine, E. S. & Waheed, N. K. Macular vessel density in diabetic retinopathy patients: How can we accurately measure and what can it tell us?. Clin. Ophthalmol. 15, 1517–1527 (2021).
Masters, B. R. Fractal analysis of the vascular tree in the human retina. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6, 427–452 (2004).
Bhardwaj, S. et al. Value of fractal analysis of optical coherence tomography angiography in various stages of diabetic retinopathy. Retina 38, 1816–1823 (2018).
Alam, M., Le, D., Lim, J. I. & Yao, X. Vascular complexity analysis in optical coherence tomography angiography of diabetic retinopathy. Retina 41, 538–545 (2021).
Chu, Z. et al. Quantitative assessment of the retinal microvasculature using optical coherence tomography angiography. J. Biomed. Opt. 21, 066008 (2016).
Mirshahi, R. et al. Macular microvascular changes after intravitreal bevacizumab injection in diabetic macular edema. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 56, 57–65 (2021).
Chen, S., Moult, E. M., Zangwill, L. M., Weinreb, R. N. & Fujimoto, J. G. Geometric perfusion deficits: A novel OCT angiography biomarker for diabetic retinopathy based on oxygen diffusion. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 222, 256–270 (2021).
Solomon, S. D. & Goldberg, M. F. ETDRS grading of diabetic retinopathy: Still the gold standard?. Ophthalmic Res. 62, 190–195 (2019).
Antaki, F., Coussa, R. G., Mikhail, M., Archambault, C. & Lederer, D. E. The prognostic value of peripheral retinal nonperfusion in diabetic retinopathy using ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 258, 2681–2690 (2020).
Nicholson, L. et al. Retinal nonperfusion characteristics on ultra-widefield angiography in eyes with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 137, 626 (2019).
Falavarjani, K. G. et al. Spatial distribution of diabetic capillary non-perfusion. Microcirculation https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12719 (2021).
AttaAllah, H. R., Mohamed, A. A. M. & Ali, M. A. Macular vessels density in diabetic retinopathy: Quantitative assessment using optical coherence tomography angiography. Int. Ophthalmol. 39, 1845–1859 (2019).
Anvari, P., Ashrafkhorasani, M., Habibi, A. & Ghasemi Falavarjani, K. Artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i2.9091 (2021).
Mané, V. et al. Correlation between cystoid spaces in chronic diabetic macular edema and capillary nonperfusion detected by optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 36, S102–S110 (2016).
Fayed, A. E., Abdelbaki, A. M., El Zawahry, O. M. & Fawzi, A. A. Optical coherence tomography angiography reveals progressive worsening of retinal vascular geometry in diabetic retinopathy and improved geometry after panretinal photocoagulation. PLoS ONE 14, e0226629 (2019).
Coscas, G., Lupidi, M., Coscas, F., Chhablani, J. & Cagini, C. Optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy subjects and diabetic patients. Ophthalmologica 239, 61–73 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by a grant from National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD No. 996473).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.M., and K.G.F. conceived the research design. R.M. performed the image processing tasks. S.A.A., P.Y., S.C., K.F., and R.M. assisted in data acquisition, performed statistical analysis, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. E.K.P., H.R.E., and K.G.F. provided valuable comments and advice and revised the various drafts of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mirshahi, R., Riazi-Esfahani, H., Khalili Pour, E. et al. Differentiating features of OCT angiography in diabetic macular edema. Sci Rep 11, 23398 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02859-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02859-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Association between the response of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection and systemic factors of diabetic macular edema
BMC Ophthalmology (2024)
-
Macular vascular and photoreceptor changes for diabetic macular edema at early stage
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Automated machine learning–based classification of proliferative and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography vascular density maps
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2023)