Abstract
The real-time analysis of single analytes in flow is becoming increasingly relevant in cell biology. In this work, we theoretically predict and experimentally demonstrate hydrodynamic focusing with hollow nanomechanical resonators by using an interferometric system which allows the optical probing of flowing particles and tracking of the fundamental mechanical mode of the resonator. We have characterized the hydrodynamic forces acting on the particles, which will determine their velocity depending on their diameter. By using the parameters simultaneously acquired: frequency shift, velocity and reflectivity, we can unambiguously classify flowing particles in real-time, allowing the measurement of the mass density: 1.35 ± 0.07 g·mL-1 for PMMA and 1.7 ± 0.2 g·mL-1 for silica particles, which perfectly agrees with the nominal values. Once we have tested our technique, MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cells are characterized (1.11 ± 0.08 g·mL-1) with high throughput (300 cells/minute) observing a dependency with their size, opening the door for individual cell cycle studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
High throughput sorting and characterization of individual micro and nanoparticles in physiological environments presents a matter of essential interest in many different subjects such as environmental control, clinical assays, nanotoxicology or cell biology. For these purposes, the use of microfluidic devices has been demonstrated as a robust technique for label-free passive particle sorting, performing with a throughput of up to 107 particles/min, just by taking advantage of the forces exerted by the moving fluid on the particle1. These hydrodynamic forces depend on particle shape and size, which eventually results in particles moving along with the fluid2. Despite allowing particle analysis based on geometrical properties, static microfluidic devices cannot perform particle discerning in cases of same-shaped particles composed of different materials. Therefore, it needs to be combined with other techniques (e.g. optical methods measuring refractive index) to discern among same-shaped particles3,4,5,6,7. On the other hand, nanomechanical resonators have been demonstrated as a powerful analysis tool given they can measure multiple physical properties (force8, mass9, stiffness10,11,12, optical absorption13, etc.) with extremely high sensitivity, by tracking the changes in the mechanical resonance frequency of a vibrating structure. Nevertheless, this high sensitivity is ruined by the viscous dragging forces when operated immersed in liquid due to the displaced mass during the oscillation cycle14. Suspended microchannel resonators (SMR)15 were developed to analyze particles in liquid environments overcoming the problems outlined before by merging microfluidics and nanomechanics. SMR approach consists of a nanomechanical resonator with an inner integrated microchannel, allowing the resonator to vibrate in a gaseous or vacuum environment, while analytes are characterized in the flowing liquid16. Since the viscous dragging forces vanish as the liquid now is placed inside the resonator, there is an enhancement of the buoyant mass resolution: up to 10 attograms in the current state of the art devices17 operated in vacuum.
Among the SMR devices, transparent microcapillary resonators (TMR) not only combine a nanomechanical resonator with a microfluidic channel but also allow the optical probing of the flowing particles. These devices have been demonstrated in previous works as an interesting alternative to cantilever-type SMRs for mass sensing18,19,20,21,22,23, introducing a new source of information about the particle based on its optical characterization24,25. This double mechano-optical particle detection technique has been proved in recent work as a highly reliable technique for particle discerning, even in cases of particles of similar masses. Despite this high reliability, it was still necessary to have prior information about particle size acquired by other techniques to calculate some intensive parameters of the particles, e.g. density or refractive index. In particular, density has been demonstrated as an interesting parameter for cell life-cycle characterization in previous works using SMR26,27 due to the relation of cell density with biological activity28,29,30,31. Currently existing techniques require measuring the buoyant mass of the same cell in two different-density media to measure cell density, dramatically reducing the measurement throughput. In this work, we propose the use of hydrodynamic particle focusing and multiparameter sensing to obtain information about the particle velocity (and, hence, about its size) by analyzing the mechanical frequency shift. The frequency fluctuation reaches a value of about 10–7 for integration times of about 150 ms, which implies a mass resolution of 0.6 pg and size resolution of about 100 nm. This velocity measurement is simultaneously acquired to buoyant mass and reflectivity, allowing a high-throughput triple-parameter particle characterization technique. By combining these three parameters, we can measure either size or mass density, obtaining a result of 1.35 ± 0.07 g·mL-1 for PMMA particles and 1.7 ± 0.2 g·mL-1 for silica particles, which perfectly agrees with their nominal values. Once we have tested our technique with calibration particles, we have measured the size and density of individual MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cells (1.11 ± 0.08 g·mL-1), observing a dependency with their size. These results open the door for individual cell cycle studies.
Results
Device characterization
We use a TMR of 44 µm outer diameter and 34 µm inner diameter obtained by locally elongating a 350 µm outer diameter fused silica capillary with a wall thickness of 50 µm. These pulled microcapillaries are integrated on a silicon substrate and doubly clamped with photolithographed polymeric (SU-8) pads, obtaining a free-standing region of 500 µm length, Fig. 1a, in which the hollow microchannel can mechanically oscillate in a guitar-string mode. The fabrication of the device is based on a thermal stretching technique described elsewhere24. The mechanical modes of the capillary are excited by means of a piezoelectric actuator, while its resonance frequency is tracked in real-time by means of a home-made interferometric readout system and a lock-in amplifier (Fig. 1b). This interferometric system also allows tracking the reflected light power by the fused silica resonator to obtain information about the optical properties of the flowing analytes by analyzing in real-time the scattered light24,25. Moreover, the device is pressurized by means of a nitrogen pressure pump (Fluigent INC, MFCS-EZ-07000001), which allows flow control by setting a pressure difference. In order to increase the control of the flow rate, the outlet of the device is followed by a home-made microfluidic resistance, a rectangular cross section polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) channel of 40 µm × 75 µm × 72 cm performing a microfluidic resistance of 7.8 mbar·s·nL-1, Fig. 1c. Finally, the outlet end is connected to the pump allowing to set minimum pressure difference of 5 mbar between the inlet of the TMR device and the outlet of the PDMS resistance.
Nanomechanical response
A particle flowing through the free-standing region of the device shifts the resonance frequency signal (Fig. 1d). The amplitude of this dip (Δf) depends on particle buoyant mass while its width (transit time, tT) depends on particle velocity. By assuming a constant velocity, the flowing particles, whose diameter is very small compared to the length of the suspended region, probes the mechanical mode; therefore, frequency shift signal tracked in the lock-in amplifier as a function of time for the n-th mechanical mode can be written as
Being fn(t), the frequency of the n-th flexural mode as a function of time, fn0 the natural resonance frequency of the mechanical mode of the resonator, \({\psi }_{n,max}\) the value of the normalized mechanical mode shape at its maximum amplitude, t0 the time in which the particle is in the middle of the free-standing region and \({\beta }_{n}\) the mode eigenvalue (first four eigenvalues are \({\beta }_{n}=4.7300, 7.8532, 10.9956, 14.1372\)). Blue lines in Fig. 1d show the frequency shift induced by a particle on the first four flexural modes of the TMR. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we are going to study the fundamental mode. As it was stated before, the lock-in amplifier allows us to track the capillary resonance frequency as a function of time. Therefore, fitting the temporal frequency shifts to Eq. (1) allows obtaining either particle buoyant mass through the Δf fitting parameter and the transit time, tT. The particle velocity is then straightforwardly obtained by dividing the length of the suspended region, which is set by the fabrication process, by the transit time obtained from the fitting.
Analytical model
The particle movement is the result of the force exerted by the liquid on the surface of the particle. Therefore, hereinafter we are going to study the dependency of the hydrodynamic force on the particle size, which will allow to classify particles by their radii. In order to experimentally demonstrate this, an aqueous suspension of microparticles is introduced in the TMR device. If particles were just subjected to the dragging forces of the fluid in the flow direction, they should follow the parabolic velocity profile of a laminar flow in a cylindrical tube32. However, previous works on microfluidics1,2 have demonstrated that, within a laminar flow, each particle also suffers a displacement orthogonal to flow direction, see schematics and optical micrograph in Fig. 2a. This is the consequence of the balance between two lifting forces exerted by the fluid on the moving particle: shear gradient (centrifugal) and wall-induced lift (centripetal), Fig. 2b. In order to calculate the equilibrium position of the particles in our experiment, we perform finite element simulations (FEM, COMSOL Multiphysics) to calculate the net force on the y-direction on 6.8 µm (red curve in Fig. 2c) and 12.4 µm (blue curve in Fig. 2c) diameter spherical particles. We simulate a cylindrical tube whose dimensions mimic the experimental free-standing region and set a pressure difference between its extremes. The simulations reveal that the dominant force is always centrifugal (Fig. 2c), hence, in this configuration the particle equilibrium position is wall contact. This result is in good agreement either with previous works on inertial focusing with high particle diameter/channel width ratio33 and with our experimental observations, as seen from optical micrograph in Fig. 2a. Therefore, the randomly distributed particles introduced in the capillary tube will be subjected to lifting forces, making all particles precipitate on the capillary wall. Once precipitated, the drive and drag force on the particle reach a steady state. Assuming a Newtonian fluid (incompressible liquid and uniform viscosity) within the laminar flow regime, the drag force depends on particle velocity following the Stoke’s Law, \({F}_{stokes}=A({R}_{particle}) 6\pi \mu {R}_{particle}v\), where \({R}_{particle}\) is the radius of the particle, \(A({R}_{particle})\) a geometrical correction factor and \(v\) the particle velocity. Since our device consists of a cylindrical tube, the velocity profile follows a paraboloidal shape, which can be written in cartesian coordinates as34
where \({u}_{0}\) is the fluid velocity at the axis of the tube, and \({R}_{tube}\) the inner radius of the tube. According to Navier–Stokes equation, the pressure is then given by \(p=-\frac{4\mu {u}_{0}}{{{R}_{tube}}^{2}}z\), where \(\mu\) is the dynamic viscosity, and x, y and z the cartesian coordinates, Fig. 2b. The force exerted by the fluid on the particle can be calculated by means of the anisotropy of the integral of the stress tensor, \({\sigma }_{ij}=-p{\delta }_{ij}+\mu \left(\frac{\partial {u}_{i}}{\partial {x}_{j}}+\frac{\partial {u}_{j}}{\partial {x}_{i}}\right)\), over the surface of the sphere \({F}_{z}=\oint-{\sigma }_{zi}dS\). By assuming a flat surface instead of a spherical surface integration and neglecting the perturbation in the flow profile caused by the particle, the z-component of the hydrodynamic force, along the tube long axis, can be written as
By simply equaling the force given in Eq. (2), with the Stokes’ law, the z-component of the particle velocity is given by
Thus, the particle velocity parabolically depends on its radius (as bigger particles will be exposed to higher fluid velocities). Moreover, the fluid velocity at the axis can be related to pressure difference, \(\Delta p=-\frac{4\mu {u}_{0}}{{{R}_{tube}}^{2}}L\), implying a linear dependency between particle velocity and pressure difference. For a better understanding of the relationship between particle diameter and velocity we have performed time-dependent 2D FEM simulations of an unconstrained particle inside a tube (mimicking the experimental suspended channel). In these simulations, we set a pressure difference between the tube ends (pressure drop) with a particle in the middle of the axial position. In order to avoid convergence problems, the particle is placed 1 µm above the capillary wall. At the beginning of the time-dependent simulations, the particle starts to move increasing its velocity until it reaches a constant value, terminal velocity. This terminal velocity is experimentally measured as particle mean velocity. The simulation was run to obtain the terminal velocity for different particle diameters (ranging from 0.2 µm up to the tube inner diameter) and pressure drops (ranging from 0 up to 2 mbar), Fig. 2d. Constant pressure simulations reveal that for small particle diameter, smaller than ¾ of the tube inner diameter, the terminal velocity continuously increases with particle diameter, then, for bigger diameters, it dramatically drops (Fig. 2e). The terminal velocity dependency on the particle diameter can be understood as a balance between two opposite factors contributing to particle velocity: fluid transferring momentum to the particle (drag and drive forces equilibrium), which increases with the particle cross section, and flow rate decrease caused by the particle partially obstructing the channel, inversely proportional to the difference between tube and particle cross sections, Fig. 2e. Moreover, in constant diameter simulations while varying pressure drops, the terminal velocity linearly depends on pressure drop, indicating that the driving force increases with flow rate as expected.
Hydrodynamic particle spectrometry
To experimentally demonstrate the theoretical results, we flow through the device a mixture of two different spherical microparticles suspended in an aqueous medium: 6.8 ± 0.4 µm diameter silica particle and 12.4 ± 0.2 µm diameter poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (Microparticles GmbH, Germany). This experiment is repeated applying different flow rates (i.e., different pressure differences). Both particles differ either in diameter or buoyant masses (PMMA particles are expected to present a buoyant mass 1.7 times higher than silica particles in ultrapure water), hence, we can associate each event to a certain particle type. We track the frequency shifts produced by the passing particles for different pressure drops obtaining the frequency shift and velocity of each individual particle. Given the actual dimensions and mass densities of the materials, we set a threshold to distinguish between both particle populations, every single particle producing a frequency shift lower than -65 Hz is a 12.4 µm PMMA particle, over this value the particles are 6.8 µm silica (Fig. 3a). Regarding the particle velocity, we can discern between two populations, being the slower particles those with a smaller diameter, (silica particles), while the faster particles are those with the larger diameter (PMMA particles), histograms in Fig. 3b. The velocity difference between the two particle populations becomes bigger as the pressure difference is increased. To compare experimental results and simulations we plot particle velocity as a function of flow rate, blue and red symbols in Fig. 3c for PMMA and silica particles respectively. In the case of the simulations (solid lines in Fig. 3c) the flow rate is calculated from the velocity field in the fluid while for the experiments flow rate is estimated by considering the pressure difference set and the resistance of 7.8 mbar·s·nL-1 of the capillary device connected to the PDMS resistance. Experiments and simulations are in very good agreement: for a given size, particle velocity increases linearly with the pressure difference while the ratio velocity/pressure depends on particle size.
Multiparametric particle spectrometry
The TMR and the readout system also allow tracking the reflected light power (optical signal) by the device25. Hence, when a particle passes under the illuminated region by the laser spot it produces a dip in this optical signal due to the scattered light, which can be used to obtain additional information about the particle. This dip in the optical signal consists of a double peak whose local maximum corresponds to the particle positioned in the center of the spot while its local minima correspond to the scattered light at the particle border: entering and leaving the illuminated spot area25. Hence, given the particle velocity obtained by fitting the mechanical signal, the particle diameter can be calculated by measuring the time-difference between the two local minima in the optical signal (Fig. 4a). We obtain a size distribution of 11 ± 2 µm for PMMA particles and 7 ± 2 µm for silica particles (upper chart in Fig. 4b), these values reproduce the results obtained by analyzing scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the same populations 12.4 ± 0.2 µm for PMMA particles and 6.8 ± 0.4 µm for silica particles, lower chart in Fig. 4b. The large dispersion attained due to the measurement errors inherent to the proposed methodology are still acceptable, considering that values are measured with very high throughput and in liquid environment (> 300 particles/min), compared to the SEM images that are acquired in high vacuum with very low throughput (\(\sim\) 1 image/minute). Eventually, this measuring method allows the simultaneous measurement of three different and independent parameters of every single particle (buoyant mass, particle velocity and reflectivity change, \(\Delta R/{R}_{0}\)) with extremely high throughput, up to 300 particles per minute. When plotted in a 3D scatter diagram, the previous particle mixture can be unambiguously discerned (Fig. 4c) performing a highly reliable particle discerning based on three independent parameters. The simultaneous measurement of the mass and the size of the particle allows the calculation of the mass density, giving a result of 1.35 ± 0.07 g·mL-1 for silica particles and 1.7 ± 0.2 g·mL-1 for PMMA particles, which perfectly agrees with the nominal values.
Cell mass density measurements
Mass density has been demonstrated as an interesting parameter for cell´s life-cycle characterization in previous works26,27 due to the relation of cell density with biological activity28. It is known that the cell density fluctuates during the cell cycle35. This is particularly important in human cells, where the density remains constant through the whole life-cycle except during mitosis29,30, when cells experience a rapid cell volume increase with the corresponding decrease in its mass density36. Therefore, there is a size dependency of the mass density, the larger cells showing a lower density. We have measured the density of MCF-7 (ATCC, USA) human breast adenocarcinoma cells (mean value of 1.11 ± 0.08 g·mL-1), Fig. 5, as a proof of principle of the capability of this mechano-optical technique to characterize cell density, together cell mass and cell reflectivity with high throughput. As seen from the experimental measurements, we observe a dependency of the density with cell size, which agrees with the results obtained in previous works about the variations observed during the cell life cycle35,36. This result proves the capability of the technique and opens the door for individual cell cycle studies by the multiparametric characterization proposed here.
Discussion
In this work we have proposed a multiparametric particle spectroscopy method using suspended microcapillary resonators just by tracking the first flexural mode. We have theoretically and experimentally demonstrated that, despite being introduced with a random spatial distribution in the capillary device, particles will be eventually ordered in the sensing region as they will precipitate on the capillary wall as a consequence of lifting forces appearing. Additionally, drag and drive forces will determine the velocity of the particle depending on the pressure difference and the particle diameter, allowing to univocally relate particle velocity and diameter. Finally, we have tested these principles by measuring mixtures of particles of different diameters. Moreover, the device and the readout system employed in this work allows the optical probing of the flowing particles, which finally provides a triple parameter particle sensing. Simultaneous measurement of the buoyant mass through the frequency tracking and the particle size by means of its velocity and optical signal may be used to obtain information about the density of the flowing particles with high throughput, of up to 300 cells/min. We measured density variations of MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cells, opening the door for individual cell cycle studies.
Methods
Cell culture
The cell lines MCF-7 from ATCC (USA) were grown in a mixture of DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium) (Life Technologies Corporation, USA), 10% FBS, 500 U/mL penicillin and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin. Prior the measurements, the cells were trypsinized and resuspended, after soft centrifugation, in a volume of PBS with a 5% of DMSO, see reference 25 for further details.
References
Hur, S. C., Tse, H. T. K. & Di Carlo, D. Sheathless inertial cell ordering for extreme throughput flow cytometry. Lab Chip 10, 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1039/B919495A (2010).
Amini, H., Lee, W. & Di Carlo, D. Inertial microfluidic physics. Lab Chip 14, 2739–2761. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC00128A (2014).
Hamza, B. et al. Optofluidic real-time cell sorter for longitudinal CTC studies in mouse models of cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 2232. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814102116 (2019).
Liang, X. J., Liu, A. Q., Lim, C. S., Ayi, T. C. & Yap, P. H. Determining refractive index of single living cell using an integrated microchip. Sens. Actuators, A 133, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.06.045 (2007).
Leblanc-Hotte, A. et al. On-chip refractive index cytometry for whole-cell deformability discrimination. Lab Chip 19, 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8LC00938D (2019).
Urbanska, M. et al. A comparison of microfluidic methods for high-throughput cell deformability measurements. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0818-8 (2020).
Suzuki, Y. et al. Label-free chemical imaging flow cytometry by high-speed multicolor stimulated Raman scattering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 116, 15842–15848. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902322116%JProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences (2019).
8de Lépinay, L. M. et al. A universal and ultrasensitive vectorial nanomechanical sensor for imaging 2D force fields. Nature Nanotechnology 12, 156–162, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.193 (2017).
Olcum, S., Cermak, N., Wasserman, S. C. & Manalis, S. R. High-speed multiple-mode mass-sensing resolves dynamic nanoscale mass distributions. Nat. Commun. 6, 7070–7077. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8070 (2015).
Malvar, O. et al. Mass and stiffness spectrometry of nanoparticles and whole intact bacteria by multimode nanomechanical resonators. Nat. Commun. 7, 13452. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13452 (2016).
Kang, J. H. et al. Noninvasive monitoring of single-cell mechanics by acoustic scattering. Nat. Methods 16, 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0326-x (2019).
12Dominguez, C. M. et al. Effect of water-DNA interactions on elastic properties of DNA self-assembled monolayers. Scientific Reports 7, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00605-x (2017).
Ramos, D., Malvar, O., Davis, Z. J., Tamayo, J. & Calleja, M. Nanomechanical plasmon spectroscopy of single gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 18, 7165–7170. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03236 (2018).
14Ramos, D., Mertens, J., Calleja, M. & Tamayo, J. Phototermal self-excitation of nanomechanical resonators in liquids. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2917718 (2008).
De Pastina, A. & Villanueva, L. G. Suspended micro/nano channel resonators: a review. J. Micromech. Microeng. 30, 043001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6439/ab6df1 (2020).
Gagino, M. et al. Suspended nanochannel resonator arrays with piezoresistive sensors for high-throughput weighing of nanoparticles in solution. ACS Sensors 5, 1230–1238. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c00394 (2020).
Lee, J., Shen, W., Payer, K., Burg, T. P. & Manalis, S. R. Toward attogram mass measurements in solution with suspended nanochannel resonators. Nano Lett. 10, 2537–2542. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl101107u (2010).
Ko, J., Lee, D., Lee, B. J., Kauh, S. K. & Lee, J. Micropipette resonator enabling targeted aspiration and mass measurement of single particles and cells. ACS Sensors 4, 3275–3282. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b01843 (2019).
Malvar, O. et al. Highly sensitive measurement of liquid density in air using suspended microcapillary resonators. Sensors (Basel) 15, 7650–7657. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150407650 (2015).
20Lee, D. et al. Pulled microcapillary tube resonators with electrical readout for mass sensing applications. Scientific Reports 6, 33799–33807, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33799(2016)
Martín-Pérez, A., Ramos, D., Tamayo, J. & Calleja, M. in 2019 20th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems & Eurosensors XXXIII (TRANSDUCERS & EUROSENSORS XXXIII). 2146–2149.
Pastina, A. D., Maillard, D. & Villanueva, L. G. Fabrication of suspended microchannel resonators with integrated piezoelectric transduction. Microelectron. Eng. 192, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2018.02.011 (2018).
Calmo, R. et al. Monolithic glass suspended microchannel resonators for enhanced mass sensing of liquids. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 283, 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.019 (2019).
Martín-Pérez, A., Ramos, D., Tamayo, J. & Calleja, M. Coherent optical transduction of suspended microcapillary resonators for multi-parameter sensing applications. Sensors 19, 5069–5078 (2019).
Martín-Pérez, A. et al. Mechano-optical analysis of single cells with transparent microcapillary resonators. ACS Sens. 4, 3325–3332. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b02038 (2019).
Bryan, A. K. et al. Measuring single cell mass, volume, and density with dual suspended microchannel resonators. Lab Chip 14, 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3LC51022K (2014).
Byun, S., Hecht, V. C. & Manalis, S. R. Characterizing cellular biophysical responses to stress by relating density, deformability, and size. Biophys J 109, 1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.038 (2015).
Baldwin, W. W. & Kubitschek, H. E. Buoyant density variation during the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 158, 701 (1984).
Son, S. et al. Resonant microchannel volume and mass measurements show that suspended cells swell during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 211, 757–763. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201505058 (2015).
Zlotek-Zlotkiewicz, E., Monnier, S., Cappello, G., Le Berre, M. & Piel, M. Optical volume and mass measurements show that mammalian cells swell during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 211, 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201505056 (2015).
Damania, D. et al. Network signatures of nuclear and cytoplasmic density alterations in a model of pre and postmetastatic colorectal cancer. J. Biomed. Opt. 19, 016016 (2014).
SegrÉ, G. & Silberberg, A. Radial particle displacements in poiseuille flow of suspensions. Nature 189, 209–210. https://doi.org/10.1038/189209a0 (1961).
Di Carlo, D., Edd, J. F., Humphry, K. J., Stone, H. A. & Toner, M. Particle segregation and dynamics in confined flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 094503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.094503 (2009).
Landau, L. D. Fluid mechanics 2nd edn. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987).
Grover, W. H. et al. Measuring single-cell density. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 10992–10996. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104651108 (2011).
Neurohr, G. E. & Amon, A. Relevance and regulation of cell density. Trends Cell Biol. 30, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2019.12.006 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under European Research Council Grant 681275-LIQUIDMASS-ERC-CoG-2015, project CELLTANGLE reference RTI2018-099369-B-I00, project MOMPs reference TEC2017-89765-R, Asociación Elena Torres (contract OTR04893) and FERO Foundation (Grant OTR06145). The service from the Micro and Nanofabrication Laboratory (MiNa) and X-SEM Laboratory, is funded by MCIU (CSIC13-4E-1794) and EU (FEDER, FSE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.R., J.T. and M.C. conceived and designed the work. S.G.-L., M.L.Y. and P.M.K. chose the cell lines, performed the cell culture and cell preparation experiments. A.M.-P., D.R. fabricated and characterized the devices and performed the microparticle and cell experiments. D.R. and A.M.-P. performed the simulations. D.R., A.M.-P., and M.C. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors analyzed the data, discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Martín-Pérez, A., Ramos, D., Yubero, M.L. et al. Hydrodynamic assisted multiparametric particle spectrometry. Sci Rep 11, 3535 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82708-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82708-0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Nanomechanical hydrodynamic force sensing using suspended microfluidic channels
Microsystems & Nanoengineering (2023)
-
Cellular and biomolecular detection based on suspended microchannel resonators
Biomedical Engineering Letters (2021)