Abstract
Treatment with single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has tremendously changed second line therapy in NSCLC. However, there are still no reliable biomarkers predicting response and survival in this group of patients. PD-L1 revealed to be a correlating, but no perfect marker. Therefore, we sought to investigate in this prospective study, whether inflammation status and cytokine profile could serve as additional biomarkers guiding treatment decision for single agent ICIs in NSCLC. 29 stage IV NSCLC patients receiving single agent PD-1 checkpoint-inhibitor in second line were prospectively enrolled. Inflammatory scores and cytokine profiles (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNFα) have been obtained before treatment and at the time of the first staging. Cytokine profiles were correlated with response and survival. Patients with signs of pre-therapeutic inflammation (elevated, NLR, SII, IL-6, IL-8) showed significantly lower response to ICI treatment and reduced PFS. Contrary, elevated levels of IFN-γ revealed to characterize a subgroup of patients, who significantly benefits from ICI treatment. Furthermore, low systemic inflammation and high levels of IFN-γ characterized patients with long term-response to ICI treatment. Pre-therapeutic assessment of inflammation and cytokine profiles has the ability to predict response and survival in NSCLC patients treated with single agent ICIs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all lung cancer diagnoses and most patients are diagnosed in advanced stage needing systemic treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have tremendously changed the treatment landscape of NSCLC during the last 5 years. Demonstrating prolonged progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to docetaxel in second-line treatment, nivolumab (regardless PDL-1 expression) and pembrolizumab (in patients with a PD-L1 expression of at least 1%) have been approved in 2015 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA)1, 2. At present, several checkpoint inhibitors are approved in first- and further lines. However, little is known about biomarkers that reliably predict response and prognosis during the treatment with ICIs. High PD-L1 expression correlates with good response to immunotherapy, but is by far not a perfect marker.
First data indicate that signs of acute neutrophilic inflammation predict poor response to ICI therapy3, 4. However, the value of inflammatory cytokines in the immune response derived from ICI treatment is poorly understood. First results indicate that markers of acute inflammation such as IL-6 or IL-8 are associated with reduced response5, 6. Furthermore, markers of lymphocytic immune response as TNF-α, IFN-γ or IL-10 have be linked to better results under ICI treatment6. However, conclusive and especially prospective data on the impact of inflammation and cytokine profiles on the success of ICI therapy in NSCLC patients are missing.
In this study, we prospectively assessed pre-therapeutic and longitudinal inflammatory profiles (common laboratory values and cytokines) of advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy in second line.
Patients and methods
Study population
We prospectively enrolled stage IV patients diagnosed and treated with second line single agent PD-1 checkpoint inhibition at our tertiary care lung cancer center between 2016 and 2019. All patients received either nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Patients’ characteristics in terms of age, gender, performance status, tumor stage, smoking status, histology, ethnicity and PD-L1 expression were assessed at baseline. Age was calculated at the time of enrollment. All patients gave their informed consent to participate at the study. The study was approved by the local ethics board [ethical board of the university of Munich (LMU)] and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Treatment and evaluation of tumor response
All patients received either nivolumab or pembrolizumab as second line treatment as approved in Germany. All patients received PET-CT or CT baseline staging before ICI treatment to confirm progression after first-line treatment and to exclude infectious or rheumatic diseases, which could lead to differences in cytokine profiles or survival. Treatment response was evaluated using CT or PET-CT based monitoring using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST, stable disease, partial or complete response and progressive disease). Patients with partial response or stable disease were classified as “responder”. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of treatment start until the date of verified progressive disease in CT or PET-CT scan.
Examined laboratory values and scores
Pre-therapeutic neutrophil-, lymphocyte- and platelet counts as well as pre-therapeutic CRP and albumin levels were obtained from laboratory measurements before initiation of treatment. Inflammation scores were calculated using the equations in Table 1.
Serum samples and cytokine measurement
Serum samples were obtained twice (before treatment start and at the time of the first staging). Blood samples were centrifuged, divided into aliquots and stored at − 20 °C. To measure cytokine concentration we used the “Human Cytokine-Inflammation (9-plex)” Kit by BioVendor. The samples were measured according the manufacturer guidelines.
Statistical analysis
Metric data were displayed as means with standard deviations. PFS was compared using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test. Categorical data were analyzed by the chi-square test. As some variables showed deviations from normal distribution according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov-test, the Mann–Whitney-U-test as a non-parametric method was used to compare means of different groups. ROC analysis was used to calculate cut-off values. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression for binominal variable and a COX regression model for survival-data. A p value of < 0.05 was determined to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (version 26, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Ethical approval
The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Results
Study population
Between 2016 and 2019, we prospectively enrolled 29 stage IV NSCLC patients receiving single agent PD-1 checkpoint-inhibitor in second line. The study cohort was predominantly male (82.8%), the mean age was 64.1 years. Two thirds of patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. PD-L1 expression was stratified into three groups (0%, 1–49% and ≥ 50%) with about one third of patients in each group. Most patients were active or former smokers and about two thirds received nivolumab therapy, whereas the remaining patients were treated with pembrolizumab.
Baseline characteristics of the study cohort are summarized in Table 2.
Pre-therapeutic inflammatory scores
First, we tested whether standard blood values indicating acute inflammation and scores calculated from these values correlate with response to immunotherapy or PFS.
NLR was significantly elevated in patients with primary progressive disease (p = 0.003, Fig. 1A). We performed a ROC analysis to determine a NLR value of 5.2 to be the best cutoff for response in our cohort. Patients with NLR equal or greater than 5.2 showed significantly reduced PFS under checkpoint inhibitor treatment (median PFS 7.43 weeks [95% CI 3.37–11.49] vs. 40.0 weeks [95% CI 16.01–64.0], p < 0.001) (Fig. 1D).
SII was significantly increased in patients showing primary progression under immunotherapy (p = 0.011, Fig. 1B). The best cut-off value for SII regarding response was 1217. Patients with SII equal or higher than 1217 had significantly reduced PFS compared with patients harboring lower values (median PFS 7.51 weeks [95% CI 3.26–11.88] vs. 40.0 weeks [95% CI 11.48–68.52], p = 0.001) (Fig. 1E).
PLR was revealed to be significantly increased in patients responding to immunotherapy (p = 0.035, Fig. 1C). However, PLR levels did not show any impact on patients’ survival.
Patients responding on immunotherapy showed a trend to lower CRP levels, although this difference was not statistically significant. However, choosing the optimal cut-off (4.3 mg/dl) in our cohort, showed a significant PFS advantage in patients with low CRP values (median PFS 14.71 weeks [95% CI 4.18–25.25] vs. 7.57 weeks [95% CI 2.71–12.44], p = 0.043) (Fig. 1F).
mGPS did not discriminate between response and progressive disease or subgroups with better survival.
Pre-therapeutic cytokine profile
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) was significantly increased in patients showing primary progression under immunotherapy (p < 0.001, Fig. 2A). The best cut-off value for IL-6 regarding response was determined to be 11.6 pg/ml. Patients with IL-6 equal or higher than 11.6 pg/ml had significantly reduced PFS compared with patients harboring lower values (median PFS 5.14 weeks [95% CI 0.95–9.33] vs. 38.57 weeks [95% CI 8.45–68.69], p < 0.001) (Fig. 2D).
Interleukin-8 (IL-8) showed to be significantly elevated in patients with primary progressive disease (p = 0.006, Fig. 2B). 19.6 pg/ml revealed to be the best cutoff for response in our cohort. Patients with IL-8 equal or greater than 19.6 pg/ml showed significantly reduced PFS under checkpoint inhibitor treatment (median PFS 4.0 weeks [95% CI 2.71–5.29] vs. 19.71 weeks [95% CI 3.19–36.23], p = 0.030) (Fig. 2E).
In our cohort, the level of interleukin-10 (IL-10) did not discriminate between response and progressive disease or subgroups with better survival. ROC analysis revealed 19.4 pg/ml as best cut-off value. However, only two patients with very short PFS were allocated into the IL-10 high group so that we did not calculate statistics for the survival curves.
Patients responding to immunotherapy were characterized by significantly increased levels of Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (p < 0.001, Fig. 2C). An IFN-γ serum level of 16.7 pg/ml was determined as best cut-off in our cohort. Patients with IFN-γ equal or higher than 16.7 pg/ml had significantly improved PFS compared with patients harboring lower values (median PFS 40.0 weeks [95% CI 30.79–49.22] vs. 5.86 weeks [95% CI 2.20–9.51], p < 0.001) (Fig. 2F).
Response to immunotherapy was by trend associated with lower levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α). However, this difference was not statistically significant. Also, with the optimal cut-off of 3.6 pg/ml, there was no statistically significant difference regarding PFS when stratified by TNF-α.
Table 3 summarizes the results of the univariate analyses reported above.
Integrating the significant biomarkers of the univariate analysis (NLR, SII, PLR, IL-6, IL-8 and IFN-γ) into a multivariate logistic regression model we achieved a predictive value for response of 96.6%.
A multivariate Cox regression revealed IFN-γ as an independent marker for PFS (HR 0.92, 95% CI [0.86–0.97], p = 0.004).
To control the effect of heterogeneity in our cohort, we tested, whether the effects, we found in the total cohort, were also seen in in the subgroups Nivolumab-treatment and Pembrolizumab treatment. By trend, we saw the same results. In some cases, there was no statistical significance due to the small sample size. Importantly, we found that IL-6 was consistently significantly increased in patients with primary progression (Nivolumab-group p = 0.003 and Pembrolizumab-group p = 0.017). Furthermore, IFN-γ was significantly increased in the responder group irrespective of treatment modality (Nivolumab-group p = 0.026 and Pembrolizumab-group p = 0.004). We also analyze, if there are difference regarding the histology. Also in this case we found the same trends and consistent significance of IL-6 (adenocarcinoma-group p = 0.002 and squamous-group p = 0.038) and IFN-γ (adenocarcinoma-group p = 0.003 and squamous-group p = 0.010).
Inflammatory profile of patients with long-term benefit from single agent immunotherapy
To further characterize patients with long-term benefit from checkpoint inhibition, we compared patients with a PFS of at least 30 weeks to the group with earlier progression. In our cohort 8 patients had long-term response as defined above. This accounts for 27.6% of the total cohort being in line with the results from the pivotal studies showing that about a third of patients have long-term response.
Pre-therapeutic CRP, IL-8, IL-10 and TNFα levels did not significantly differ between the two groups.
However, patients with long-term response showed significantly lower levels of IL-6 (p < 0.001, Fig. 3A), NLR (p = 0.002, Fig. 3B) and SII (p = 0.002, Fig. 3C). Beside this, the long-term responder group was characterized by significantly higher IFNγ values (p < 0.001, Fig. 3D).
The results of the pre-therapeutic inflammation profile of long-term responders also translated into the results of the profiles examined at the time of the first response assessment. Significantly lower levels of IL-6 (p < 0.001, Fig. 4A), CRP (p < 0.001, Fig. 4B), NLR (p = 0.002, Fig. 4C), PLR (p = 0.003, Fig. 4D) and SII (p < 0.001, Fig. 4E) characterized the group of patients with long-term response.
Relevance of inflammatory profile dynamics
In a next step we sought to analyze, whether changes of dynamics of the inflammatory profile over time could indicate which patient would respond to checkpoint inhibition. Figure 5 shows the trend of means (pre-therapeutic and at time of the first staging) divided into primary disease (PD) and response (PR) respectively. We found that all markers indicating an acute systemic inflammation (IL-6, IL-8, TNFα, CRP, NLR, PLR and SII) clearly increased in patients with progressive disease. In contrast, high levels of IFNγ seemed to be a good predictor for response.
In the case of patients with, at least initial response to checkpoint inhibition the trends were not as clear as in the progressing group, indicating that interpretation of dynamics might not be as relevant in this group.
Assessment of immune related adverse events
Immune related adverse events (irAEs) were monitored during the study period. Altogether, five patients were diagnosed with irAEs (3 hypothyroidisms, 1 exacerbation of a rheumatic arthritis and one light pneumonitis). Table 4 summarizes the detected irAEs as well their severity. No irAE led to discontinuation of treatment. We found no association between appearance of irAEs, response or cytokine levels.
Discussion
Here we report the results of a prospective study evaluating the predictive and prognostic potential of pre-therapeutic and longitudinal measurement of inflammation status in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Although PD-L 1 expression correlates with response to ICI treatment, it is far from a perfect biomarker. Some patients with high PD-L1 expression do not benefit from ICI and vice versa. Furthermore, only 20–30% of treated patients have long-term response. Therefore, we sought to examine whether inflammatory scores and cytokine profiles can give additional information on patients’ response to this treatment modality.
We found that signs of pre-therapeutic acute inflammation were associated with poor response to ICI treatment and reduced duration of response. Pre-treatment elevated levels of NLR, SII, CRP and PLR revealed to predict poor response and reduced PFS. This is in line with previous studies showing that NLR seems to be a robust predictive marker of response to ICI treatment in several tumor entities3, 7,8,9,10. 1845 NSCLC patients from 21 studies were analyzed in a comprehensive meta-analysis showing that pre-therapeutic NLR predicts response to ICI treatment4. We identified 5.2 to be the best NLR-cut-off in our cohort. This confirms the recommended cut-off of 5 in the above cited meta-analysis4. There are also some retrospective data showing a negative prognostic influence of elevated CRP, PLR and SII in different tumor types3, 11,12,13. However, these data are not as conclusive as for NLR and a final cut-off has to be further evaluated.
In our study cohort, we found that patients with primary progression under ICI had significantly increased levels of IL-6 and IL-8, both markers of acute inflammation. This is consistent with other studies showing that both cytokines might be promising biomarkers in NSCLC immunotherapy6, 14, 15.
The relevance of acute, IL-6 driven inflammation to response on ICI is also supported by recent basic research showing that mice with high IL-6 expressing tumors have reduced survival when treated with ICI and that blockage of IL-6 reversed the anti PD-L1 resistance16, 17.
INFγ stands out against the other markers in our study. We found that increased levels of INFγ were highly predictive of a good and durable response to ICIs. This might be due to the different role of INFγ in inflammation. INFγ stimulates tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)6. Furthermore, INFγ leads to increased PD-L1 expression18, 19. Contrary to the other mentioned markers, INFγ induces lymphocyte driven immune response, hereby indicating a synergistic effect with ICI treatment. Other studies also found a positive effect of high INFγ levels on the outcome of ICI treatment20,21,22. However, a clear cut-off for INFγ needs to be evaluated in further research.
A strength of our analysis is the prospective and longitudinal measurement of inflammatory scores and cytokines. Our results show that especially patients not responding to ICI treatment can be identified by increasing levels of pro-inflammatory markers (CRP, NLR, PLR, SII, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα) over time. Therefore, it might be an important approach not to interpret only the sole pre-therapeutic values, but also the dynamics of these markers. This gets support of some recent studies showing that increasing levels of NLR23, 24, IL-65 and IL-815 under ICI treatment predict reduced response. On the other hand, increasing levels of INFγ have been found to improve response and survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICI25.
Other predictive and prognostic scores beside inflammatory scores have been evaluated to find the best tailored ICI treatment for NSCLC patients. For example, the EPSILoN or the LIPI score combine several baseline characteristics to predict response to ICIs in NSCLC26, 27. This illustrates that the search for reliable and sensitive biomarkers in ICI treatment of NSCLC is still a dynamic field.
Our study may be limited in some way. First, we report a small and, in some way, heterogeneous, cohort. The study population is predominantly male cohort. Furthermore, more patients have been treated with nivolumab than with Pembrolizumab. Another limitation might be, that we included squamous as well as non-squamous histologies. However, there are also important strengths. Our analysis is a prospective study and, therefore, stands out against the most data retrospectively evaluating predictive markers in ICI treatment. All patients were initially staged with PET-CT before starting ICI treatment. Therefore, we could exclude different causes explaining difference in cytokine profile or survival by another cause. However, a large independent and prospective validation cohort, would be desirable. Although assessment in second line, as was done for this study, would not be feasible due to a change in treatment patterns during the last years, a confirmation of this could be done prior to first line single agent immunotherapy where pembrolizumab is considered standard of care for most patients with a PD-L1 score of greater than 50%.
Nevertheless, much more research will be needed in the next years to define more precise subgroups to provide a biomarker guided treatment for patients in this setting.
Conclusion
In conclusion, pre-therapeutic assessment of inflammation and cytokine profiles has the ability to predict response and survival in NSCLC patients treated with single agent ICIs. Especially IL-6 and IFN-γ seem to be promising markers. Furthermore, dynamics of these markers might be a promising tool to characterize long-term responder.
References
Borghaei, H. et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1507643 (2015).
Herbst, R. S. et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387, 1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7 (2016).
Russo, A. et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and outcomes with Nivolumab in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A large retrospective multicenter study. Adv. Ther. 37, 1145–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01229-w (2020).
Zhang, N., Jiang, J., Tang, S. & Sun, G. Predictive value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 85, 106677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106677 (2020).
Keegan, A. et al. Plasma IL-6 changes correlate to PD-1 inhibitor responses in NSCLC. J. Immunother. Cancer https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-000678 (2020).
Lim, J. U. & Yoon, H. K. Potential predictive value of change in inflammatory cytokines levels subsequent to initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cytokine 138, 155363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155363 (2020).
Capone, M. et al. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR could predict overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with Nivolumab. J. Immunother. Cancer 6, 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0383-1 (2018).
Bartlett, E. K. et al. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with treatment failure and death in patients who have melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. Cancer 126, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32506 (2020).
Ishihara, H. et al. Predictive impact of peripheral blood markers and C-reactive protein in Nivolumab therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Target Oncol. 14, 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-019-00660-6 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may predict the outcomes of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Front Oncol. 10, 654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00654 (2020).
Suzuki, K. et al. C-reactive protein and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are prognostic biomarkers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01528-5 (2020).
Liu, J. et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio can predict clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 33, e22964. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22964 (2019).
Riedl, J. M. et al. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in immune checkpoint inhibitor response and progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A bi-center study. Cancers (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12082319 (2020).
Oyanagi, J. et al. Predictive value of serum protein levels in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. Lung Cancer 132, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.03.020 (2019).
Sanmamed, M. F. et al. Changes in serum interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels reflect and predict response to anti-PD-1 treatment in melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 28, 1988–1995. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx190 (2017).
Li, J. et al. Targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) sensitizes anti-PD-L1 treatment in a colorectal cancer preclinical model. Med. Sci. Monit. 24, 5501–5508. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.907439 (2018).
Mace, T. A. et al. IL-6 and PD-L1 antibody blockade combination therapy reduces tumour progression in murine models of pancreatic cancer. Gut 67, 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311585 (2018).
Lee, S. J. et al. Interferon regulatory factor-1 is prerequisite to the constitutive expression and IFN-gamma-induced upregulation of B7–H1 (CD274). FEBS Lett. 580, 755–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.12.093 (2006).
Taube, J. M. et al. Colocalization of inflammatory response with B7–h1 expression in human melanocytic lesions supports an adaptive resistance mechanism of immune escape. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 127ra137. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003689 (2012).
Kanai, T. et al. Significance of quantitative interferon-gamma levels in non-small-cell lung cancer patients’ response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Anticancer Res. 40, 2787–2793. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14251 (2020).
Hirashima, T. et al. The levels of interferon-gamma release as a biomarker for non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Anticancer Res. 39, 6231–6240. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13832 (2019).
Ayers, M. et al. IFN-gamma-related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2930–2940. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI91190 (2017).
Li, M. et al. Change in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio during immunotherapy treatment is a non-linear predictor of patient outcomes in advanced cancers. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 145, 2541–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02982-4 (2019).
Vinal, D. et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. Clin. Transl. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02509-1 (2020).
Boutsikou, E. et al. Tumour necrosis factor, interferon-gamma and interleukins as predictive markers of antiprogrammed cell-death protein-1 treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A pragmatic approach in clinical practice. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 10, 1758835918768238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835918768238 (2018).
Prelaj, A. et al. EPSILoN: A prognostic score for immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A validation cohort. Cancers (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121954 (2019).
Mezquita, L. et al. Association of the lung immune prognostic index with immune checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 4, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4771 (2018).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The study was funded by a research Grant from the K. L. Weigand’sche Stiftung (Ludwig Maximillian’s Universität).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.K.G. and AT., R.K. conducted the studies, participated in collecting data, and drafted the manuscript. D.K.G., A.T., J.W. and K.K. performed the statistical analysis and participated in its design. D.K.G., A.T., R.K., K.K., L.S., J.W. and J.B. participated in the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The following authors have received compensation for advisory and speaking roles from the named companies: DK-G: AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda, MSD, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS AT: AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda, MSD, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kauffmann-Guerrero, D., Kahnert, K., Kiefl, R. et al. Systemic inflammation and pro-inflammatory cytokine profile predict response to checkpoint inhibitor treatment in NSCLC: a prospective study. Sci Rep 11, 10919 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90397-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90397-y
- Springer Nature Limited