Abstract
Major protein components of the mammalian skin barrier are encoded by genes clustered in the Epidermal Differentiation Complex (EDC). The skin of cetaceans, i.e. whales, porpoises and dolphins, differs histologically from that of terrestrial mammals. However, the genetic regulation of their epidermal barrier is only incompletely known. Here, we investigated the EDC of cetaceans by comparative genomics. We found that important epidermal cornification proteins, such as loricrin and involucrin are conserved and subtypes of small proline-rich proteins (SPRRs) are even expanded in numbers in cetaceans. By contrast, keratinocyte proline rich protein (KPRP), skin-specific protein 32 (XP32) and late-cornified envelope (LCE) genes with the notable exception of LCE7A have been lost in cetaceans. Genes encoding proline rich 9 (PRR9) and late cornified envelope like proline rich 1 (LELP1) have degenerated in subgroups of cetaceans. These data suggest that the evolution of an aquatic lifestyle was accompanied by amplification of SPRR genes and loss of specific other epidermal differentiation genes in the phylogenetic lineage leading to cetaceans.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The skin of terrestrial tetrapods, i.e. reptiles, birds and mammals, has evolved to protect against mechanical stress and loss of water in a dry environment1,2. The barrier function of the skin is mediated by the epidermis and depends on the differentiation of keratinocytes3,4. The basal layer of the epidermis contains stem cells and proliferating cells whereas suprabasal layers consist of post-mitotic, differentiating cells. The latter activate a specific gene expression program that leads to accumulation of keratin intermediate filaments, strengthening of intercellular junctions and cross-linking of proteins to form so-called cornified envelopes or corneocytes4,5. Tight junctions and extracellular lipids complete the barrier in terrestrial mammals6,7.
Cetaceans have evolved from terrestrial and amphibious ancestors by adapting to a fully aquatic lifestyle8,9. The integument has undergone notable changes including the loss of pelage, a pronounced thickening of the epidermis and thickening of the hypodermal fat layer (blubber). The adaptations of the skin were driven by modifications and loss of genes10,11,12,13,14. As expected, the loss of hair and nails was associated with the loss of keratins and keratin-associated proteins that are expressed specifically in these skin appendages of terrestrial mammals13,14. Similarly, the alteration of keratinocyte differentiation in the epidermis, characterized by the accumulation of many cell layers, absence of a granular layer and retentiation of nuclei in the outermost layer, commonly referred to as parakeratosis, is the consequence of changes of epidermis-related genes. Examples include the loss of keratins KRT1, KRT2 and KRT1013, DSG4, DSC1, TGM5, ALOXE312, PSORS1C215, GSDMA and IL3716, and CASP1417. However, a major cluster of epidermal differentiation genes, known as the Epidermal Differentiation Complex (EDC)18,19,20, has not been fully characterized in cetaceans, perhaps due to the peculiar structure of the genes in the EDC. Among the proteins encoded by EDC genes, only S100As and S100 fused-type proteins (SFTPs) have a protein fold that can be predicted from their amino acid sequence. By contrast, so-called simple EDC (SEDC) genes, characterized by the presence of the entire coding sequence in the second of two exons, encode proteins of highly repetitive sequences that are enriched in few amino acids. For example, loricrin is extremely rich in glycine and serine and keratinocyte proline-rich protein (KPRP) is rich in proline. SFTP genes were reported to be lost, with the notable exception of FLG (filaggrin) in dolphins17, whereas only partial accounts of SEDC genes of cetaceans are available21,22.
Here, we performed comparative genomics to determine the gene composition of the EDC in cetaceans. Based on the identification of SEDC genes in phylogenetically diverse cetaceans and their next terrestrial relatives, we propose a model for the differential evolution of EDC genes in cetaceans.
Results
Identification of the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) in cetaceans
We investigated the EDC in species of cetaceans for which whole genome sequences had been published (Supplementary Tables S1). The study was focused on bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)23, vaquita (Phocoena sinus)24, and minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata scammoni)25 (Supplementary Tables S2-S4; Supplementary Fig. S1-S3). These species belong to the families of oceanic dolphins (Delphinidae), porpoises (Phocoenidae), and rorquals (Balaenopteridae), respectively. Dolphins and porpoises are toothed whales (Odontoceti) whereas rorquals are baleen whales (Mysticeti). The complete EDC was also analyzed in the genome of the blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) (Supplementary Table S5). The arrangement of genes in the EDC was compared to that in cattle (Supplementary Table S6; Supplementary Fig. S4), a fully terrestrial relative of cetaceans within the taxonomic order Cetartiodactyla, and human. A continuous sequence of the EDC locus was available for the dolphin whereas a preliminary map of the EDC including sequence gaps or positions of ambiguous sequence assembly was drawn for vaquity (porpoise) and minke whale (Fig. 1).
In all species investigated, the highest number of EDC genes belongs to the SEDC type, characterized by the presence of the entire coding sequence within one exon26. PGLYRP3 and FLG, belonging to the SFTP-type of EDC genes, are located on the borders of the SEDC gene cluster in the dolphin and porpoise whereas, in agreement with previous reports11,17 both PGLYRP3 and FLG are absent in the minke whale (Fig. 1) and the blue whale (Supplementary Table S5). The PGLYRP3 protein of the bottlenose dolphin and vaquita is truncated relative to its orthologs and contains only one instead of two PGRP domains (Supplementary Fig. S1, S2, S4).
Among SEDC genes, two of the best characterized cornification genes of terrestrial mammals, i.e. LOR (loricrin) and IVL (involucrin)5, are conserved in cetaceans (Fig. 1), with IVL being present in the form of two gene copies in the bottlenose dolphin and the vaquita (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S5). Likewise, CRCT1 (cysteine rich C-terminal 1) was conserved in all cetaceans investigated (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S6). PRR9, LELP1, SMCP (sperm mitochondria associated cysteine rich protein) showed differential conservation (Supplementary Fig. S7) with PRR9 being intact (devoid of premature in-frame stop codons or frameshift mutations) in the dolphin (T. truncatus) and the North Pacific right whale (Eubalaena japonica) (Supplementary Fig. S7A), but not in the vaquita, minke and blue whales (Supplementary Tables S3-S5). LELP1 is intact in the minke whale whereas it contains a frameshift mutation in dolphin and vaquita (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S7B). SMCP which is an atypical EDC gene because of its expression exclusively in the testis27,28,29, is conserved in minke whale and in sperm whale but not in dolphin and porpoise (Supplementary Fig. S7C). SPRR and LCE gene families are also differentially conserved in cetaceans, as will be described in detail further below. XP32 (Skin-specific protein 32), also referred to as C1ORF68 (chromosome 1 open reading frame 68) in humans, and KPRP have been lost in cetaceans (Fig. 1). KPRP encodes a truncated protein in the amphibious relative of cetaceans, the hippopotamus (Suppl. Fig. S8), but a recent study estimated that KPRP was intact in the last common ancestor of Whippomorpha (cetaceans and hippopotamuses)30,31.
Evidence for SEDC gene expression in the skin
To test whether SEDC genes are expressed in the skin of cetaceans and to localize the borders of exons, we performed tBLASTn searches for the predicted mRNAs in the skin transcriptome database of the dolphin32 and aligned mRNA reads to the genome sequence. Expression of loricrin, involucrin, SPRR2 and CRCT1 was confirmed by the identification of intron-spanning sequence reads (Fig. 2). The intron-spanning reads confirmed the 2-exon structure of these SEDC genes in cetaceans. In addition, mRNAs corresponding to parts of exon 2 of several other EDC genes were found in the dolphin skin transcriptome (Supplementary Table S2).
Subtypes of SPRRs have expanded in copy numbers in cetaceans
In all three cetaceans analyzed in this study SPRRs formed the largest gene family within the EDC (Fig. 1). Although the precise arrangement and number of SPRR genes in cetaceans is currently unknown because of incomplete or ambiguous assembly of the genome sequence in this region (Supplementary Tables S2-S5), we could identify a higher number of SPRR genes in cetaceans (n = 16–21) than in the human EDC (n = 12). The numbers of cetacean SPRRs is close to that of the ruminants such as the cattle. However, rumen-specific type-II small proline-rich proteins with paired (PRD) repeats (SPRRII-PRDs)33,34 are absent in cetaceans.
Two subtypes of SPRR genes are uniquely expanded in cetaceans. First, the EDCs of cetaceans contain 4–8 copies of SPRR5 which is a single-copy gene in humans and cattle (Fig. 3). SPRR5 is the only SPRR with duplets of cysteine residues (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Fig. S9). The current genome sequence assembly of the bottlenose dolphin contains a cluster of at least 8 further SPRR5 genes, flanked by sequence gaps on chromosome 10 (Supplementary Fig. S10), but their annotation and location outside of the EDC (chromosome 1) is considered uncertain. Second, SPRR genes, tentatively termed SPRR-cetacean type (SPRRc), are present between SPRR2 and SPRR3 in the EDC of cetaceans but not in the EDC of cattle and human (Fig. 3B). At least three SPRRc copies are present in the minke whale and seven in bottlenose dolphin and vaquita (Fig. 1). SPRRc proteins contain 2 copies of the sequence motif, QQCKQXCXP (IUPAC-IUB code)35, which is very similar to an evolutionarily ancient motif at the amino-terminus of diverse SEDC proteins26,36 (Fig. 3B).
LCE genes with the exception of LCE7A have been lost in cetaceans
Besides SPRR genes, LCEs form a second large gene family in the EDC of cattle and human. By contrast, only a single LCE gene was identified in dolphin and porpoise and no LCE is present in the EDC of the minke whale (Fig. 1). Because of shared synteny and best reciprocal similarity scores, this gene was identified as ortholog of LCE7A which was previously identified in sheep34. Comparative genomics showed that LCE7A is conserved in the blue whale (Supplementary Table S5), the beluga whale and phylogenetically diverse mammals including humans (Fig. 4A). We identified LCE7A in the human EDC as an uncharacterized gene that was recently annotated in the ENSEMBL database (accession number ENSG00000285946). Comparison of nucleotide sequences of human and porpoise LCE7A showed conservation of the TATA box in the promoter, splice sites at the borders of the two exons and most of the coding sequence with the exception of the 3’-end where a frameshift leads to an elongation of the coding sequence in the porpoise (Fig. 4B). The expression of human LCE7A was confirmed by RT-PCR analysis of epidermal keratinocytes and the sequence was submitted to GenBank (accession number MW556765).
Discussion
The results of this study demonstrate that the EDC of cetaceans differs significantly from that of terrestrial mammals, suggesting that the evolution of the fully aquatic lifestyle of cetaceans was accompanied by major changes in the differentiation program of epidermal keratinocytes. The EDC contributes to protective functions of the epidermis by controlling the protein composition of the mechanically resistant keratinocytes on the skin surface and by contributing to the antimicrobial defense of the skin. Genes encoding barrier proteins such as LOR, IVL, SPRRs and CRCT1 have been conserved whereas others, such as KPRP, XP32 and most LCEs have been lost in cetaceans and yet others, such as PRR9 and LELP1 have been lost in subclades of cetaceans (Fig. 5). Important amino acid sequence features of EDC proteins, such as high contents of either glycine (in LOR), glutamine (in IVL), cysteine (in CRCT1) and proline (in SPRRs) are conserved in cetaceans, indicating that major mechanisms of skin barrier maturation have been retained during evolutionary adaptation to aquatic life. Of note, glutamine (Q), which is targeted by transglutamination during cornification, is enriched to higher levels in minke whale IVL (> 40% Q) than in any terrestrial mammal investigated (Supplementary Fig. S5).
The number of SPRRs has increased during the evolution of cetaceans, suggesting that they play special roles in whales, porpoises and dolphins. Human and mouse SPRRs are components of corneocytes and also act as scavengers of reactive oxygen species37,38. They are predominantly expressed in hyperproliferative states such as wound healing39. Interestingly, the epidermis of cetaceans shares some features with the hyperproliferative epidermis of terrestrial mammals including molecular markers such as keratin K613,40. We put forward the hypothesis that the evolution of the thick epidermis of cetaceans was associated with the constitutive expression of SPRRs possibly with particular roles of the two subtypes of SPRR that have expanded in numbers in cetaceans.
One of the most striking differences between the EDC in cetaceans and terrestrial mammals is a massive loss of LCE genes which form a large subcluster of the EDC in cattle and humans. LCE proteins accumulate by transcriptional upregulation when keratinocytes are exposed to ultraviolet radiation41 and other types of stress39, and function as structural components of corneocytes42 and antimicrobial proteins43. In this regard it is interesting that other EDC genes with antimicrobial functions such as PGLYRP411 and HRNR44 have also been lost in cetaceans. An as-yet poorly characterized LCE gene, LCE7A34 is conserved in some but not all cetaceans and, as we show here, also in the human EDC. Thus, the results of this study indicate that most LCE genes are dispensable in the aquatic environment of cetaceans and provide the basis for further investigations of LCE7A in both cetaceans and humans.
The evolutionary changes in the EDC must be evaluated in the context of changes at other genome loci, especially those involved in the regulation of the skin barrier function. It was already reported that CASP14, TGM5, DSG4 and DSC1 were lost in cetaceans12,17. In addition, many genes involved in the control of skin immune responses have been lost in cetaceans, e.g. CCL27, IL20, IL36A, IL36B, IL37, IL38, NLRP10, PYDC1 and PSORS1C215,16,45,46. It is thus possible that not only the functions of individual genes but the function of entire gene interaction networks related to cutaneous protection and defense have declined in cetaceans. Projects aimed at closing gaps in genome sequences and determining tissue transcriptomes will help to perform comprehensive analyses of the EDC and other epidermal differentiation-associated genes of cetaceans. Furthermore, it will be interesting to investigate the implications of skin adaptations in the resistance to shear stress associated with moving through the aquatic environment, wound healing and defense against microbes.
In conclusion, the EDC has undergone multiple changes during the evolution of cetaceans, indicating that the molecular composition of the epidermis is adapted to aquatic life. The functional characterization of individual epidermal differentiation genes in their normal cellular environment is not possible at present, but may be facilitated by the establishment of in vitro culture and manipulation protocols for keratinocytes of cetaceans in the future47.
Methods
Ethics statement
The Ethics Committee at the Medical University of Vienna approved the use of skin samples for the isolation and culture of human cells (EK2011/1149). All donors provided written informed consent. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Genomes and transcriptomes of cetaceans were investigated exclusively using sequences available in public databases.
Identification of EDC genes in cetaceans
EDC genes of cetaceans were identified by comparative analysis of the region between S100A9 and S100A11 genes in the genomes of cetaceans (Supplementary Tables S2–S5; Supplementary Fig. S1–S3). Orthology of genes was determined using the criteria of best reciprocal Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) hits of the encoded protein sequences and gene locus synteny. Several EDC genes were annotated in the genome sequence assemblies available in the NCBI GenBank and additional genes were identified by iterative tBLASTn searches in which amino acid sequences of newly identified cetacean EDC proteins were used as tBLASTn query sequences in the reference genome sequences and unassembled whole genome shotgun sequences (WGS) of other cetacean species. For species in which an alignment of transcriptome data to genome sequences were available in the section “Genomic regions, transcripts, and products” at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/, EDC sequence regions with evidence for transcription were scrutinized for their potential to encode proteins with typical sequence features26. Of note, several EDC genes encoding proteins with low sequence complexity were previously annotated as long-noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in GenBank. Other EDC genes had been predicted with incorrect borders of exons in GenBank and these prediction were corrected according to orthology with verified EDC genes of other species.
Comparison of sequences and mapping of gene gain and loss on phylogenetic trees
Amino acid sequences and nucleotide sequences were aligned with MultAlin with manual adjustment48. The amino acid composition of proteins was calculated with ProtParam49. The domain structure of proteins was analyzed with the NCBI tool for search of conserved domains at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi50. Origin and loss of genes during evolution were inferred from the distribution of orthologous genes in extant species according to the criterion of maximum parsimony. Evolutionary relations and estimated divergence times of the species investigated were obtained from http://www.timetree.org/51, last accessed on 20 February 2021.
RT-PCR amplification of LCE7A in human keratinocytes
Keratinocytes and fibroblasts were isolated and cultured from human skin according to a published protocol52. Keratinocytes were induced to differentiate by seeding on top of a collagen matrix containing fibroblasts and subsequent air exposure of the 3D skin models according to a published protocol52. RNA was prepared from the keratinocytes in the epidermal compartment of 3D cultures using TriFast (VWR), reverse-transcribed with the Iscript™ kit (Biorad) and subjected to PCR with intron-spanning primers specific for LCE7A (LCE7-s1, 5’-TTGCCCAGGGTTAAGAGGACA-3’ and LCE7-a1, 5’-CTTTGGTTCCTCAAAGGTCAC-3’). The PCR product was purified with the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega) and sequenced (Microsynth, Vienna, Austria).
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files. The sequence of human LCE7A is available in GenBank at accession number MW556765.
References
Alibardi, L. Adaptation to the land: The skin of reptiles in comparison to that of amphibians and endotherm amniotes. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 298, 12–41 (2003).
Matsui, T. & Amagai, M. Dissecting the formation, structure and barrier function of the stratum corneum. Int. Immunol. 27, 269–280 (2015).
Fuchs, E. & Raghavan, S. Getting under the skin of epidermal morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 199–209 (2002).
Simpson, C. L., Patel, D. M. & Green, K. J. Deconstructing the skin: Cytoarchitectural determinants of epidermal morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 565–580 (2011).
Candi, E., Schmidt, R. & Melino, G. The cornified envelope: A model of cell death in the skin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 328–340 (2005).
Yokouchi, M. & Kubo, A. Maintenance of tight junction barrier integrity in cell turnover and skin diseases. Exp. Dermatol. 27, 876–883 (2018).
Proksch, E., Brandner, J. M. & Jensen, J. M. The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp. Dermatol. 17, 1063–10672 (2008).
McGowen, M. R., Gatesy, J. & Wildman, D. E. Molecular evolution tracks macroevolutionary transitions in Cetacea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 336–346 (2014).
Pyenson, N. D. The ecological rise of whales chronicled by the fossil record. Curr. Biol. 27, R558–R564 (2017).
Nery, M. F., Arroyo, J. I. & Opazo, J. C. Increased rate of hair keratin gene loss in the cetacean lineage. BMC Genom. 15, 869 (2014).
Huelsmann, M. et al. Genes lost during the transition from land to water in cetaceans highlight genomic changes associated with aquatic adaptations. Sci. Adv. 5, 6671 (2019).
Sharma, V. et al. A genomics approach reveals insights into the importance of gene losses for mammalian adaptations. Nat. Commun. 9, 1215 (2018).
Ehrlich, F. et al. Differential evolution of the epidermal keratin cytoskeleton in terrestrial and aquatic Mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 328–340 (2019).
Espregueira Themudo, G. et al. Losing genes: The evolutionary remodeling of cetacea skin. Front Mar Sci. 7, 592375 (2020).
Abbas Zadeh, S. et al. Phylogenetic profiling and gene expression studies implicate a primary role of PSORS1C2 in terminal differentiation of keratinocytes. Exp. Dermatol. 26, 352–358 (2017).
Lachner, J., Mlitz, V., Tschachler, E. & Eckhart, L. Epidermal cornification is preceded by the expression of a keratinocyte-specific set of pyroptosis-related genes. Sci. Rep. 7, 17446 (2017).
Strasser, B., Mlitz, V., Fischer, H., Tschachler, E. & Eckhart, L. Comparative genomics reveals conservation of filaggrin and loss of caspase-14 in dolphins. Exp. Dermatol. 24, 365–369 (2015).
Henry, J. et al. Update on the epidermal differentiation complex. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed). 17, 1517–1532 (2012).
Kypriotou, M., Huber, M. & Hohl, D. The human epidermal differentiation complex: Cornified envelope precursors, S100 proteins and the “fused genes” family. Exp. Dermatol. 21, 643–649 (2012).
Oh, I. Y. & de Guzman Strong, C. The molecular revolution in cutaneous biology: EDC and locus control. J. Invest. Dermatol. 137, e101–e104 (2017).
Kubilus, J., Phillips, S. B., Goldaber, M. A., Kvedar, J. C. & Baden, H. P. Involucrin-like proteins in non-primates. J. Invest. Dermatol. 94, 210–215 (1990).
Oh, J. W., Chung, O., Cho, Y. S., MacGregor, G. R. & Plikus, M. V. Gene loss in keratinization programs accompanies adaptation of cetacean skin to aquatic lifestyle. Exp. Dermatol. 24, 572–573 (2015).
Martinez-Viaud, K. A. et al. New de novo assembly of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) improves genome completeness and provides haplotype phasing. Gigascience. 8, 168 (2019).
Morin, P. A. et al. Reference genome and demographic history of the most endangered marine mammal, the vaquita. Mol. Ecol. Resour. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13284 (2020).
Yim, H. S. et al. Minke whale genome and aquatic adaptation in cetaceans. Nat. Genet. 46, 88–92 (2014).
Strasser, B. et al. Evolutionary origin and diversification of epidermal barrier proteins in amniotes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 3194–3205 (2014).
Aho, H. et al. Isolation, expression, and chromosomal localization of the human mitochondrial capsule selenoprotein gene (MCSP). Genomics 32, 184–190 (1996).
Hawthorne, S. K. et al. Comparative genomics of the sperm mitochondria-associated cysteine-rich protein gene. Genomics 87, 382–391 (2006).
Nayernia, K. et al. Asthenozoospermia in mice with targeted deletion of the sperm mitochondrion-associated cysteine-rich protein (Smcp) gene. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 3046–3052 (2002).
Waddell, P. J., Okada, N. & Hasegawa, M. Towards resolving the interordinal relationships of placental mammals. Syst. Biol. 48, 1–5 (1999).
Springer, M. S. et al. Genomic and anatomical comparisons of skin support independent adaptation to life in water by cetaceans and hippos. Curr. Biol. S0960–9822(21), 00301–00308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.02.057 (2021).
Neely, M. G. et al. Skin transcriptomes of common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the northern Gulf of Mexico and southeastern US Atlantic coasts. Mar. Genom. 38, 45–58 (2018).
Wang, L., Baldwin, R. L. & Jesse, B. W. Identification of two cDNA clones encoding small proline-rich proteins expressed in sheep ruminal epithelium. Biochem. J. 317, 225–233 (1996).
Jiang, Y. et al. The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism. Science 344, 1168–1173 (2014).
IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN). Nomenclature and symbolism for amino acids and peptides. Recommendations 1983. Eur J Biochem. 138:9–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb07877.x (1984).
Holthaus, K. B. et al. Comparative genomics identifies epidermal proteins associated with the evolution of the turtle shell. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 726–737 (2016).
Steinert, P. M. & Marekov, L. N. The proteins elafin, filaggrin, keratin intermediate filaments, loricrin, and small proline-rich proteins 1 and 2 are isodipeptide cross-linked components of the human epidermal cornified cell envelope. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17702–17711 (1995).
Vermeij, W. P., Alia, A. & Backendorf, C. ROS quenching potential of the epidermal cornified cell envelope. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 1435–1441 (2011).
de Koning, H. D. et al. Expression profile of cornified envelope structural proteins and keratinocyte differentiation-regulating proteins during skin barrier repair. Br. J. Dermatol. 166, 1245–1254 (2012).
Eckhart, L., Ehrlich, F. & Tschachler, E. A stress response program at the origin of evolutionary innovation in the skin. Evol. Bioinform. Online. 15, 1176934319862246 (2019).
Jackson, B. et al. Late cornified envelope family in differentiating epithelia–response to calcium and ultraviolet irradiation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 124, 1062–1070 (2005).
Ishitsuka, Y. et al. Lce1 family members are Nrf2-target genes that are induced to compensate for the loss of loricrin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 136, 1656–1663 (2016).
Niehues, H. et al. Psoriasis-associated late cornified envelope (LCE) proteins have antibacterial activity. J. Invest. Dermatol. 137, 2380 (2017).
Gerstel, U. et al. Hornerin contains a linked series of ribosome-targeting peptide antibiotics. Sci. Rep. 8, 16158 (2018).
Lopes-Marques, M. et al. Cetacea are natural knockouts for IL20. Immunogenetics 70, 681–687 (2018).
Lopes-Marques, M. et al. Convergent inactivation of the skin-specific C-C motif chemokine ligand 27 in mammalian evolution. Immunogenetics 71, 363–372 (2019).
Lam, E. K., Allen, K. N., Torres-Velarde, J. M. & Vázquez-Medina, J. P. Functional studies with primary cells provide a system for genome-to-phenome investigations in marine mammals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 60, 348–360 (2020).
Corpet, F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 10881–10890 (1988).
Artimo, P. et al. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W597-603 (2012).
Marchler-Bauer, A. & Bryant, S. H. CD-Search: Protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W327–W331 (2004).
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Suleski, M. & Hedges, S. B. TimeTree: A resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times. Mol Biol Evol. 34, 1812–1819 (2017).
Mlitz, V. et al. The expression of the endogenous mTORC1 inhibitor sestrin 2 is induced by UVB and balanced with the expression level of sestrin 1. PLoS ONE 11, e0166832 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We thank Wolfgang Sipos and Veronika Mlitz for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P23801, P28004 and P32777.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.B.H., E.T. and L.E. conceived the study, K.B.H., J.L. and B.E. performed experiments, K.B.H., J.L., B.E., and L.E. analyzed the results, K.B.H. and L.E. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Holthaus, K.B., Lachner, J., Ebner, B. et al. Gene duplications and gene loss in the epidermal differentiation complex during the evolutionary land-to-water transition of cetaceans. Sci Rep 11, 12334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91863-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91863-3
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Interactions between avian viruses and skin in farm birds
Veterinary Research (2024)
-
Evolution of ion channels in cetaceans: a natural experiment in the tree of life
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Comparative genomics of sirenians reveals evolution of filaggrin and caspase-14 upon adaptation of the epidermis to aquatic life
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Comparative genomics of monotremes provides insights into the early evolution of mammalian epidermal differentiation genes
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Decay of Skin-Specific Gene Modules in Pangolins
Journal of Molecular Evolution (2023)