Abstract
Inflammatory markers have been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in general populations. We assessed whether these associations differ by diabetes status. From a population-based cohort study (n = 62,237) we included all participants with diabetes (n = 1753) and a control group without diabetes (n = 1818). Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for possible associations with cardiovascular mortality of 4 different inflammatory markers; C-reactive protein (CRP), calprotectin, neopterin and lactoferrin. During a median follow-up of 13.9 years, 728 (20.4%) died from cardiovascular disease (CVD). After adjustment for age, sex and diabetes, the associations of all inflammatory markers with risk of cardiovascular mortality were log-linear (all P ≤ 0.017 for trend) and did not differ according to diabetes status (all P ≥ 0.53 for interaction). After further adjustments for established risk factors, only CRP remained independently associated with cardiovascular mortality. HRs were 1.22 (1.12–1.32) per standard deviation higher loge CRP concentration and 1.91 (1.50–2.43) when comparing individuals in the top versus bottom quartile. The associations of CRP, calprotectin, lactoferrin and neopterin with cardiovascular mortality did not differ by diabetes, suggesting that any potential prognostic value of these markers is independent of diabetes status.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Conventional risk factors fail to explain the variation in risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is now widely accepted that CVD has a clear inflammatory component and that low-grade chronic inflammation can accelerate the formation and progression of atherosclerosis1,2 Accordingly, a substantial number of inflammatory biomarkers have been found to be linked to cardiovascular risk in general populations and therefore suggested to be novel risk markers that can aid cardiovascular risk prediction. However, some studies have indicated that the associations of inflammatory markers and cardiovascular risk differ according to subpopulations of risk profiles such as in individuals with diabetes3,4,5,6,7. The predictive ability of inflammatory markers in relation to cardiovascular risk may therefore vary and this should be taken into consideration if implementing them as markers to aid risk stratification. The accelerated atherosclerosis caused by chronic inflammation is thought to be driven partly by the altered functions and properties of immune cells such as macrophages and neutrophils8,9. Investigating biomarkers that reflect the activity of these immune cells and their roles in CVD is therefore of interest. Three markers were included in this study, namely neopterin, lactoferrin and calprotectin, along with C-reactive protein (CRP) for comparison.
Neopterin is a metabolite produced by activated macrophages. It is abundantly expressed within coronary lesions in patients with unstable angina pectoris10, and increases in blood of patients with coronary artery disease11. Studies show that increasing concentrations of neopterin can predict cardiac events in patients with chronic stable angina12 and acute coronary syndromes13, as well as fatal cardiac events in patients with diabetes4. Lactoferrin is a glycoprotein released from secondary granules of activated neutrophils, thought to have anti-atherogenic properties, such as inhibiting expression of endothelial adhesion molecules14 and cholesterol accumulation in macrophages15. Increasing lactoferrin concentrations correlate with the degree of coronary artery stenosis in patients undergoing angiography16 and are suggested to predict fatal cardiac events in patients with diabetes3. Calprotectin, also known as myeloid-related protein 8/-14 (MRP8/14) or S100A8/A9 complex, is an acute-phase protein, mainly released from neutrophils upon cell death or cellular activation17,18. Calprotectin has been shown not only to predict cardiovascular risk19, but is also suggested to be directly involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis20. CRP, a general marker of inflammation, is extensively studied. Its association with CVD is well documented21, but a causal role of CRP in atherothrombosis has been refuted22,23.
We therefore aimed to assess the associations of these four inflammatory markers, i.e. CRP, calprotectin, neopterin and lactoferrin, with the risk of cardiovascular mortality and if the associations differ according to diabetes status. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate whether calprotectin, neopterin and lactoferrin, suggested to directly reflect the activity of immune cells, were more strongly related to cardiovascular mortality than CRP.
Methods
Study design and population
The HUNT study is a large population-based cohort, consisting of four health surveys including more than 125,000 participants from the Nord-Trøndelag county of Norway24. Our study is based on data from the second survey (HUNT2; 1995–1997). All residents aged 20 years or older were invited to participate and in total, 65,237 attended in HUNT2 (69.5% of those invited, of which > 97% were of Caucasian origin). Data were collected from participants through questionnaires, clinical examinations and blood sampling, described in detail elsewhere25. Details of the study are available on the HUNT website (http://www.ntnu.no/hunt).
We included all the participants in HUNT2 who were defined as having diabetes (n = 2,048) either by self-reports of a diabetes diagnosis (88%), self-reported use of anti-diabetic medication, or a non-fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 11.1 mmol/L (Fig. 1). Additionally, we included an equally sized random selection of age- and sex-matched participants without diabetes from the same survey. Analyses were restricted to individuals with complete information on the inflammatory markers of interest and potential confounding factors (i.e. hypertension, smoking, body mass index, blood lipids). Participants with missing data were less than 1–3%, except for smoking status for which data were missing in 9.3% and 8.6% of individuals with and without diabetes, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). Multiple imputation was not considered necessary because of the low proportion of participants with missing values. In total, 3,571 individuals (87%), of which 49% had diabetes, were followed up on cause of death.
Follow up and outcome ascertainment
Individual person time at risk was calculated from the date of inclusion in HUNT2 (1995–97) until the date of death or end of follow up (December 31st, 2010). Participants (n = 11) who emigrated during follow-up were censored on the relevant date; otherwise there was no loss to follow-up. The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry provided information on the date and primary cause of death for all individuals. The primary outcome was death by CVD, as classified according to the International Classification of Disease code version 9 and 10 (ICD-9: 401–459.9; ICD-10: I10-99).
Other study variables
Prevalent cardiovascular disease was defined by the self-reported history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris or stroke. Self-reported smoking status was categorized into never, former or current smoking. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure of ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of ≥ 90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive medication. We calculated body mass index (BMI) as weight (kilograms) divided by the square of the height (meter), waist to hip-circumference ratio, and non-HDL cholesterol (the difference between the total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). Non-fasting blood samples were collected at inclusion and serum concentrations of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose and creatinine were analysed the same day by the available methods at that time25. Serum aliquots were stored at − 80 °C for later analysis of inflammatory markers. An in-house two-step ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for immunological quantification of lactoferrin (LF) concentrations was used as previously described26, applying rabbit anti-human LF antibodies (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). ELISAs were also used to quantify neopterin (DRG Instruments, Marburg, Germany) and calprotectin (Bühlmann MRP8/14, Bühlmann Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland). CRP was measured using a high-sensitivity latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Cardiophase hs-CRP, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). For this assay the limit of quantitation of CRP was 0.16 mg/L. Because of volume restrictions, samples were pre-diluted 1:1 with NaCl 0.9%; implying that values less than 0.16 mg/L were assigned a value of 0.32 mg/L (a linearity by dilution experiment showed a mean recovery of 106% with the 95% confidence interval (CI) 104–108%).
Statistical analyses
Descriptive data are given as means (standard deviation, SD), medians (interquartile range, IQR) or proportions (%). The Mann–Whitney U-test and X2 test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed in the overall study population (adjusting for diabetes), and separately according to diabetes status. Quantile regression (due to non-normal distribution) was used to examine whether differences in median concentrations of inflammatory markers depended on age, gender or BMI. Spearman`s rho was calculated to assess the correlation between the four inflammatory markers.
We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations of the inflammatory markers with cardiovascular mortality. All estimated associations were adjusted for attained age (as the time scale) to ensure that participants were compared to other participants of the same age. The HRs were calculated within quartiles of the distributions (non-transformed concentrations), and per SD increase (loge transformed concentrations) for each inflammatory marker. The SD for baseline loge CRP concentration was 1.07, corresponding to approximately threefold higher non-transformed concentration (i.e. e˄1.07 = 2.92). Likewise, one SD increase in loge calprotectin, loge neopterin and loge lactoferrin was approximately equivalent to a 1.7-fold, 1.9-fold and a 1.4-fold increase in their non-transformed concentrations.
Three models, where age was adjusted for by the time axis, were fitted for each inflammatory marker: Model 1 added sex and diabetes status, Model 2 added prevalent CVD, hypertension, BMI, smoking status, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and creatinine, and Model 3 added the three other inflammatory markers. Potential confounders were selected based on prior knowledge of known risk factors for CVD. The linearity of the associations was assessed across quartiles of the inflammatory markers with tests of trend. Statistical interaction between diabetes and the inflammatory markers was assessed by adding an interaction term to Model 1–3 for each marker.
The proportional hazards assumption was evaluated by the Schoenfeld test and log (−log) plots. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and estimated associations were assessed by 95% CI.
We performed sensitivity analyses (based on Model 2) to account for potential effects of infections or ill health on baseline levels of inflammatory markers that may overestimate their associations with cardiovascular outcome. We did this by excluding participants with CRP > 10 mg/L, or participants with prevalent CVD.
Data were analysed using the software package STATA, (version 15.1, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Ethics declarations
Written informed consent was obtained upon participation. The study protocol complies with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and the present study was approved by the Norwegian Data Inspectorate and by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2017/1802).
Results
In total, 1590 (44.5%) individuals died during a median follow-up of 13.9 years. Of these, 896 (56.4%) had diabetes at inclusion. 728 (20.4%) died from cardiovascular disease (CVD), of which 415 (57%) had diabetes at inclusion. Table 1 describes the distribution of baseline characteristics of participants of the study population according to diabetes status. CRP, neopterin and lactoferrin were higher among individuals with diabetes, also when adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. The four inflammatory markers were weakly to moderately correlated (Spearman’s rho ≤ 0.61 for all combinations, p < 0.001, Supplementary Table 2).
Adjusted for age and sex, the estimated HR (95% CI) for cardiovascular mortality associated with diabetes was 1.83 (1.60–2.01). Additionally adjusted for established risk factors, the HR for individuals with diabetes was 1.70 (1.46–1.98), with insignificant changes when adding the inflammatory markers. All four inflammatory markers were positively and log-linearly associated with cardiovascular mortality (all P ≤ 0.017) after adjustment for age, sex and diabetes (Table 2). There were no significant statistical interactions between diabetes and the inflammatory markers, when adding this interaction term to the main models (all P ≥ 0.53 for interactions). When additional confounders were added, only CRP remained independently associated with cardiovascular mortality. Comparing individuals in the top quartile versus the bottom quartile, the HR was 1.91 (1.50–2.43), and per standard deviation (SD) increase in loge CRP concentration the HR was 1.22 (1.12–1.32). The associations remained practically unchanged after additional mutual adjustments for the other three inflammatory markers. In separate analyses by diabetes status, the magnitude of the associations were comparable for individuals with and without diabetes with overlapping 95% confidence intervals (Fig. 2).
In sensitivity analyses excluding participants with CRP > 10 mg/L (n = 354) the estimated associations remained similar. In analyses including only participants without prevalent CVD (n = 2733), the HRs per SD increase in loge CRP and log e calprotectin concentrations were 1.28 (1.15–1.41) and 1.14 (1.03–1.27), respectively. The results per SD increase in loge neopterin and loge lactoferrin were 1.06 (0.95–1.19) and 1.04 (0.95–1.15), respectively. There were still no significant statistical interactions of diabetes and the inflammatory markers (all P ≥ 0.37 for interaction).
Discussion
In this prospective study, individuals with diabetes had almost twice as high risk of cardiovascular mortality as individuals without diabetes, after adjusting for traditional risk factors and inflammatory markers. The initial associations of calprotectin, neopterin and lactoferrin with cardiovascular mortality were no longer statistically significant after multivariable adjustments, suggesting that these inflammatory markers are not independent of traditional risk factors. In contrast, CRP remained independently associated with cardiovascular mortality, and to a similar magnitude as found by others21,27.
Importantly, the strength of the associations between the inflammatory markers and cardiovascular mortality did not differ by diabetes status. This is in contrast to other studies suggesting different prognostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in diabetes versus non-diabetic individuals3,4,5,6,7. Two studies found that neopterin and lactoferrin were predictors of ischemic heart disease in subjects with diabetes, but not in individuals without diabetes3,4. These studies, however, were small; statistical analyses were only done in separate groups according to diabetes status and interaction was apparently not formally tested. Three other studies found that CRP was a significant predictor of CVD only among individuals without diabetes5,6,7. In these studies, statistical interaction was apparently not formally tested. In contrast, two larger meta-analyses have demonstrated that the association between CRP and cardiovascular mortality was similar in individuals with and without diabetes21,27.
Established risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and smoking are all associated with increased inflammation21. Obesity causes chronic-low grade inflammation, with adipose tissue serving as a significant source of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin 6 (IL-6) which in turn induces production of C-reactive protein28. Higher levels of circulating calprotectin are positively correlated with obesity, smoking, LDL-cholesterol, and inversely with HDL cholesterol29,30,31. In a previous study, we found that serum calprotectin correlated with the neutrophil count (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.56) in a healthy population32. Studies show that leucocyte count, and neutrophils in particular, correlate with cardiovascular mortality33 and some suggest that calprotectin may be the link between neutrophil count, cardiovascular risk factors and CVD31. Excluding individuals with prevalent CVD in the sensitivity analysis, strengthened the associations of calprotectin with cardiovascular mortality risk. Studies investigating the pathophysiological mechanisms of calprotectin or its components have suggested an involvement in vascular inflammation and injury34,35, and in the promotion of atherogenesis in diabetes36,37. Further studies are needed to help shed light on a potential casual role of calprotectin in atherosclerosis.
A strength of this study was the relatively large study population, the long follow-up time, and the extensive registration of variables in the HUNT2 study, which enabled us to adjust for a range of possible confounders. The study design is unique, in including all individuals with diabetes from a large population cohort. In most prospective studies that include individuals with diabetes, these individuals constitute < 5–10% of the total study population21,27. We also included four biomarkers that could be related to different aspects of inflammation.
There were some limitations to our study. No clear distinction could be made between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, although a previous study from the same cohort found that ~ 80% were classified with type 2 diabetes38. Incomplete information regarding the duration of diabetes made it impossible to adjust for this factor in the primary analyses. Since we only had data on cardiovascular mortality and not on cardiovascular events, we could not assess associations of the inflammatory markers with overall cardiovascular risk. The stability of the inflammatory markers during long-term storage may be an issue of concern, considering the samples had been stored for about 20 years before analysis. Although CRP has been shown to remain highly stable in long-term stored serum39, less is known about the stability of the other three inflammatory markers. Nevertheless, all blood samples were stored under the same conditions, enabling comparison within the study of individuals with and without diabetes. Because the inflammation markers were only measured once at the beginning of follow-up, we could not examine the possible effects of time-dependent changes in the level of inflammation. However, studies show that CRP is as consistent within individuals over time, as total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure40. Residual confounding caused by unmeasured factors as medication use, lifestyle or socioeconomic factors may affect our estimates. Including individuals with prevalent CVD could introduce bias by reverse causality, even if this variable was adjusted.
During the last two decades, several inflammatory markers have been suggested as biomarkers that can aid cardiovascular risk stratification, but very few are actually used in clinical settings. In the search for useful inflammatory risk markers, the key cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) has proven to be a stronger predictor of CVD than its downstream marker CRP41. However, high-sensitivity CRP is a well-established, inexpensive analysis, measured routinely in many clinical laboratories. In contrast to IL-6, CRP has been proposed as a tool for individual cardiovascular risk assessment in several settings42. We did not have sufficient sample volumes to include analysis of IL-6.
In summary, our study showed that the associations of the tested inflammatory markers with cardiovascular mortality did not differ by diabetes status, suggesting that any potential prognostic value of these markers is the same in a sub-population of diabetes. Only CRP remained independently associated with cardiovascular mortality following multivariable adjustment.
Data availability
Data from the HUNT Study are available upon reasonable request from the HUNT Research Centre (https://www.ntnu.edu/hunt/data), following approval from the Regional Research Ethics Committee. However, restrictions apply to the availability of the data for the present paper, which were used under license for the current study and are not publicly available, in accordance with Norwegian law.
References
Libby, P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 32, 2045–2051. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179705 (2012).
Kanter, J. E., Averill, M. M., Leboeuf, R. C. & Bornfeldt, K. E. Diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis and inflammation. Circ. Res. 103, e116-117. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.108.182642 (2008).
Vengen, I. T., Dale, A. C., Wiseth, R., Midthjell, K. & Videm, V. Lactoferrin is a novel predictor of fatal ischemic heart disease in diabetes mellitus type 2: Long-term follow-up of the HUNT 1 study. Atherosclerosis 212, 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.06.008 (2010).
Vengen, I. T., Dale, A. C., Wiseth, R., Midthjell, K. & Videm, V. Neopterin predicts the risk for fatal ischemic heart disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term follow-up of the HUNT 1 study. Atherosclerosis 207, 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.04.003 (2009).
Sakkinen, P. et al. C-reactive protein and myocardial infarction. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 55, 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00502-9 (2002).
Best, L. G. et al. C-reactive protein as a predictor of cardiovascular risk in a population with a high prevalence of diabetes: The Strong Heart Study. Circulation 112, 1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.104.489260 (2005).
Biasucci, L. M. et al. Different apparent prognostic value of hsCRP in type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes. Clin. Chem. 55, 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.119156 (2009).
Galkina, E. & Ley, K. Immune and inflammatory mechanisms of atherosclerosis (*). Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132620 (2009).
Silvestre-Roig, C., Braster, Q., Ortega-Gomez, A. & Soehnlein, O. Neutrophils as regulators of cardiovascular inflammation. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 17, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-019-0326-7 (2020).
Adachi, T. et al. Neopterin is associated with plaque inflammation and destabilisation in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions. Heart 93, 1537–1541. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.109736 (2007).
Murr, C. et al. Immune activation and inflammation in patients with cardiovascular disease are associated with higher phenylalanine to tyrosine ratios: The ludwigshafen risk and cardiovascular health study. J. Amino Acids 2014, 783730. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/783730 (2014).
Avanzas, P., Arroyo-Espliguero, R., Quiles, J., Roy, D. & Kaski, J. C. Elevated serum neopterin predicts future adverse cardiac events in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Eur. Heart J. 26, 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi111 (2005).
Ray, K. K. et al. Long-term prognostic value of neopterin: A novel marker of monocyte activation in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 115, 3071–3078. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.666511 (2007).
Baveye, S. et al. Human lactoferrin interacts with soluble CD14 and inhibits expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, E-selectin and ICAM-1, induced by the CD14-lipopolysaccharide complex. Infect. Immun. 68, 6519–6525. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.68.12.6519-6525.2000 (2000).
Vasilyev, V. B. et al. Binding of lactoferrin to the surface of low-density lipoproteins modified by myeloperoxidase prevents intracellular cholesterol accumulation by human blood monocytes. Biochem. Cell Biol. 99, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1139/bcb-2020-0141 (2021).
Videm, V., Wiseth, R., Gunnes, S., Madsen, H. O. & Garred, P. Multiple inflammatory markers in patients with significant coronary artery disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 118, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.07.005 (2007).
Voganatsi, A., Panyutich, A., Miyasaki, K. T. & Murthy, R. K. Mechanism of extracellular release of human neutrophil calprotectin complex. J. Leukoc. Biol. 70, 130–134 (2001).
Tardif, M. R. et al. Secretion of S100A8, S100A9, and S100A12 by neutrophils involves reactive oxygen species and potassium efflux. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 296149. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/296149 (2015).
Kunutsor, S. K. et al. Plasma calprotectin and risk of cardiovascular disease: Findings from the PREVEND prospective cohort study. Atherosclerosis 275, 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.06.817 (2018).
Morrow, D. A. et al. Myeloid-related protein 8/14 and the risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction after an acute coronary syndrome in the pravastatin or atorvastatin evaluation and infection therapy: Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) trial. Am. Heart J. 155, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.018 (2008).
Kaptoge, S. et al. C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: An individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet 375, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61717-7 (2010).
Wensley, F. et al. Association between C reactive protein and coronary heart disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis based on individual participant data. BMJ 342, d548. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d548 (2011).
Dehghan, A. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in >80 000 subjects identifies multiple loci for C-reactive protein levels. Circulation 123, 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.948570 (2011).
Krokstad, S. et al. Cohort profile: The HUNT Study, Norway. Int. J. Epidemiol. 42, 968–977. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys095 (2013).
Holmen, J. The Nord-Trøndelag health study 1995–97 (HUNT 2). Norsk Epidemiologi https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v13i1.305 (2011).
Hegnhøj, J. & Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, O. B. An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for measurements of lactoferrin in duodenal aspirates and other biological fluids. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 45, 489–495. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365518509155248 (1985).
Kengne, A. P., Batty, G. D., Hamer, M., Stamatakis, E. & Czernichow, S. Association of C-reactive protein with cardiovascular disease mortality according to diabetes status: pooled analyses of 25,979 participants from four U.K. prospective cohort studies. Diabetes Care 35, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1588 (2012).
Ouchi, N., Parker, J. L., Lugus, J. J. & Walsh, K. Adipokines in inflammation and metabolic disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2921 (2011).
Pedersen, L. et al. Plasma calprotectin and its association with cardiovascular disease manifestations, obesity and the metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 14, 196. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-196 (2014).
Catalán, V. et al. Increased levels of calprotectin in obesity are related to macrophage content: Impact on inflammation and effect of weight loss. Mol. Med. 17, 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.2119/molmed.2011.00144 (2011).
Cotoi, O. S. et al. Plasma S100A8/A9 correlates with blood neutrophil counts, traditional risk factors, and cardiovascular disease in middle-aged healthy individuals. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 34, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.113.302432 (2014).
Åsberg, A., Løfblad, L., Felic, A. & Hov, G. G. Measuring calprotectin in plasma and blood with a fully automated turbidimetric assay. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 79, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2018.1550810 (2019).
Welsh, C. et al. Association of total and differential leukocyte counts with cardiovascular disease and mortality in the UK biobank. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 38, 1415–1423. https://doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.118.310945 (2018).
Viemann, D. et al. MRP8/MRP14 impairs endothelial integrity and induces a caspase-dependent and -independent cell death program. Blood 109, 2453–2460. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-08-040444 (2007).
Croce, K. et al. Myeloid-related protein-8/14 is critical for the biological response to vascular injury. Circulation 120, 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814582 (2009).
Kraakman, M. J. et al. Neutrophil-derived S100 calcium-binding proteins A8/A9 promote reticulated thrombocytosis and atherogenesis in diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 2133–2147. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci92450 (2017).
Nagareddy, P. R. et al. Hyperglycemia promotes myelopoiesis and impairs the resolution of atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 17, 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.001 (2013).
Midthjell, K. et al. Rapid changes in the prevalence of obesity and known diabetes in an adult Norwegian population. The Nord-Trondelag Health Surveys: 1984–1986 and 1995–1997. Diabetes Care 22, 1813–1820. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.11.1813 (1999).
Doumatey, A. P., Zhou, J., Adeyemo, A. & Rotimi, C. High sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) remains highly stable in long-term archived human serum. Clin. Biochem. 47, 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.12.014 (2014).
Danesh, J. et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032804 (2004).
Lowe, G. et al. Circulating inflammatory markers and the risk of vascular complications and mortality in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease or risk factors: The ADVANCE study. Diabetes 63, 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.2337/db12-1625 (2014).
Pearson, T. A. et al. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation 107, 499–511 (2003).
Acknowledgements
The HUNT study is a collaboration between the HUNT Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU—Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Nord-Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Health Authority, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.L., V.V., G.G.H. and A.Å. were responsible for the study concept and design. L.L. and V.V. were responsible for the acquisition and analysis of data. L.L. interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. V.V., G.G.H. and A.Å. revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Løfblad, L., Hov, G.G., Åsberg, A. et al. Inflammatory markers and risk of cardiovascular mortality in relation to diabetes status in the HUNT study. Sci Rep 11, 15644 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94995-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94995-8
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Persistent epigenetic signals propel a senescence-associated secretory phenotype and trained innate immunity in CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells from diabetic patients
Cardiovascular Diabetology (2024)
-
Superoxide dismutases: marker in predicting reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (2024)
-
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in aging and the role of advanced cardiovascular imaging
npj Cardiovascular Health (2024)
-
Trends in Diabetes Medication Taking and Incidence of Depression in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study from 2010 to 2018
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2024)
-
Low-grade inflammation as a risk factor for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes
Cardiovascular Diabetology (2021)