Abstract
Some diopsid flies have sexually dimorphic eye stalks that are assumed to require considerable nutrition for growth but are advantageous in competition and courtship. According to the handicap theory, the eye span in some dimorphic species serves as a reliable signal of individual quality to an opponent. However, it is not well understood how well eye span represents energy source storage. In this study, we focused on two species: Sphyracephala detrahens, which has weak dimorphism, and Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni, which has moderate dimorphism. We found that the eye stalks of the former species contained more fat bodies than those of the latter species. When the flies were starved, the fat body cells in the eye stalks underwent autophagy. A strong positive correlation was consistently found between eye span and starvation tolerance for S. detrahens, while a weak correlation was found for C. dalmanni. Furthermore, starvation decreased the contest winning rate between S. detrahens pairs with similar eye spans. These findings suggest that the presentation of resource holding potential may be larger than the actual storage ability and that the fidelity of nutritional storage signaling varies; the signal presented by S. detrahens is more reliable than that presented by C. dalmanni.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Many animal taxa exhibit exaggerated sex-specific traits, such as peacock tail feathers, deer horns, and fish nuptial coloration. The main functions of these characteristics are believed to be related to contests or courtship1,2. One of the explanations of why such exaggerated traits have developed over time is the handicap theory3,4, which states that the development of exaggerated traits is a handicap for the individual and that the ability to bear such a characteristic reflects the high quality, such as nutritional status, of the individual. If the characteristic is associated with genetic factors, it will spread throughout the population by adaptive natural selection1,3,5,6,7. The handicap theory predicts that possession of highly exaggerated traits reveals a higher survivability, which may also positively affect the fitness of partners and descendants. In fact, many exaggerated traits show positive body size allometry, which can be obtained by ingesting a large amount of nutrients; trait exaggeration is an unrealizable handicap for individuals with poor nutrition8,9,10. However, if much of the energy obtained during the growth stage was consumed during the development of exaggerated traits, an individual would have less energy even though it exhibits exaggerated traits conducive to mating, and the degree of trait exaggeration would not reflect fertility. Therefore, the exaggerated trait displayed by an individual may not always accurately indicate the energy holding status at the time of courtship, but this discrepancy is not well studied.
In so-called stalk-eyed flies (Diptera: Diopsidae: Sphyracephalinae + Diopsinae), compound eyes protrude from the head due to a significantly elongated eye stalk. In some species, eye span is sexually dimorphic; that is, the allometric slope of eye stalks versus body length in males are steeper than that in females in dimorphic species11,12,13,14. However, many diopsid species are sexually monomorphic, and dimorphisms have evolved polyphyletically in a complicated manner in each of the two subfamilies (Sphyracephalinae and Diopsinae)13,14,15,16,17,18. Stronger sexual dimorphisms are seen in species with long, thin eye stalks and are often associated with mate choice as well as contest outcomes19,20,21,22. In this study, we used two species belonging to the two subfamilies because both were easily accessible materials for us. One species is Sphyracephala detrahens (Walker, 1860), which has weak sexual dimorphism of its short and stout eye stalks. This species engages in ritualized contests in which individuals with longer eye spans benefit irrespective of male–male, female–female, or male–female combinations23. Males with a long eye span can mate repeatedly, and females with a long eye span are frequently chosen by males21,23. The other species is Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Wiedemann, 1830), which exhibits moderate sexual dimorphism of long and thin eye stalks12,13. C. dalmanni is historically the most employed species in behavioral studies of contests and courtship. Males engage in ritualized contests influenced by eye span, and males with longer eye spans are more likely to be chosen by females20,21,24. Because these two species show distinct differences in mode of contest, courtship and degree of sexual dimorphism, it was interesting to compare their eye-stalk functions.
Whether the handicap theory can be applied to these stalk-eyed flies has been examined from various aspects. For example, individuals raised in a more nutrient-rich environment develop larger eye stalks23,25,26, which can handicap flight ability after adult emergence27,28. Moreover, both male and female individuals with longer eye spans have higher fertility23,29,30,31. Development of the eye stalk is influenced by not only environmental factors but also genetic factors32,33,34. In interindividual contests of stalk-eyed flies, individuals with a longer eye span are likely to win12,20,23. If this result is explained by the handicap theory, eye span should correlate to some extent with the energy consumption potential during the contest4,7,35. It is known that higher nutritional intake during the larval period results in the development of larger eye stalks23,25,26, but it is unknown whether the ingested nutrients are retained in adults. That is, the relationship between energy stores during contests and eye stalk sizes is unclear.
In this study, we focused on the presence of fat body tissue inside the thick eye stalk of S. detrahens. Fat bodies are an energy source, and it was found that the larger the eye stalk is, the greater its storage capacity. However, between two individuals with similar eye spans, which had a nearly equivalent influence on the contest outcome, the amount of energy available during the contest affected the outcome of the contest. This indicates that the magnitude of the resource holding potential represented by eye span may exceed the actual energy storage ability of eye stalks. On the other hand, C. dalmanni has limited fat body tissue in its eye stalks, and the eye span of this species is not strongly related to its current energy storage capacity. These findings suggest the presence of cheaters in the ritualized contests of stalk-eyed flies: we hereafter express the individuals who possess an exaggerated ornament relative to their resource holding potential or actual fighting ability at the time of contest or mate choice as cheaters. The proportion of cheaters varies among species, as S. detrahens had a lower prevalence of cheaters than C. dalmanni, with longer eye stalks functioning as a target of precopulatory female choice as well as in ritualized contests for territories. We demonstrate the differences in the role of eye span between these two species.
Results
Large fat body presence in the eye stalks of S. detrahens but not in those of C. dalmanni
Consistent differences in the external morphologies of the eye stalks were observed between S. detrahens and C. dalmanni; the former has thick and short eye stalks, while the latter has thin and long eye stalks (Fig. 1A,E). To determine whether this difference in external morphology was accompanied by a difference in internal morphology, we dissected the eye stalks of the two species. Flat, fat body-like, white tissue was widely distributed in the eye stalks of S. detrahens along the trachea and optic nerve (Fig. 1B). Magnified observation of the cells revealed a large number of large vesicles within the cells that were thought to be lipid droplets (Fig. 1B′), which were stained with triglyceride-stainable oil red O, and these organs were considered to be fat body tissue (Fig. 1C). In the eye stalks of C. dalmanni, small amounts of similar fat body tissue were present at the base of the eye stalks (Fig. 1F). In S. detrahens, the amount of fat body tissue in the eye stalks was almost equal to the amount of abdominal fat body tissue (Fig. 1D). In C. dalmanni, the amount of abdominal fat body tissue varied among individuals, but it was always more than the amount of fat body tissue in the eye stalks (Fig. 1G,H). Based on these observations, the thick and short eye stalks of S. detrahens are clearly different from the thin and long eye stalks of C. dalmanni in terms of fat body development.
Starvation induces autophagy in both eye stalk and abdominal fat body cells
Fat body cells comprehensively store energy from sources such as sugars and fat for survival, combat, and reproduction36,37,38. If the eye stalk fat body, as well as the abdominal fat body, supplies energy for such activities, nutritional decomposition and autophagy during starvation are expected39,40,41; therefore, we examined these processes in S. detrahens. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that the starvation of well-fed flies for 48 h, with exposure to only water, resulted in the consumption of fat in the lipid droplets of fat body cells in the eye stalks (Fig. 2Aa,b). In fat body cells, autophagosomes containing glycogen granules (Fig. 2Ac) and autolysosomes responsible for the digestion of organelles (Fig. 2Ad), which are present during autophagy, were observed. Cell death, which is thought to be dependent on autophagy, was also observed (Fig. 2Ab). Observing the fat content in the entire fat body by oil red O staining revealed that the fat content decreased with prolonged starvation (Fig. 2B). In addition, lysosomes and autolysosomes, which are known to increase in quantity during autophagy, increased over time during starvation (Fig. 2C,D). All of these changes were similar between the eye stalks and abdominal fat bodies. These results suggest that the eye stalk fat body, much like the abdominal fat body, stores energy that can be utilized during periods of starvation.
Starvation tolerance and eye span are strongly correlated in S. detrahens but weakly correlated in C. dalmanni
The relationship between the amount of energy retained by adults (that is, the number of days of starvation tolerance) and eye span was investigated in males and females of S. detrahens and C. dalmanni. In male S. detrahens (upper left of Fig. 3), starvation tolerance clearly showed a strong positive correlation with eye span (r = 0.73, P = 5 × 10–6); there was also a strong correlation with body length (r = 0.56, P = 0.001), although it was not as strong as that with eye span. Since there were differences in the means and variances of the measured values between eye span and body length, it is not meaningful to compare the two in the same graphical analysis; thus, both values are represented by relative values (Z-scores) based on their respective means and standard deviations, and the graphs are presented below the graphs for actual size in each data set in Fig. 3. This conversion visually revealed that both eye span and body length correlate with starvation tolerance in almost the same manner, but it can be seen that eye span functions as a more reliable signal than body length. On the other hand, in females, shown in the upper right of Fig. 3, both the correlation between eye span and starvation tolerance (r = 0.54, P = 0.002) and the correlation between body length and starvation tolerance (r = 0.54, P = 0.002) were significant, and the contributions of eye span and body length were comparable, although neither were as strong as those of males. The results of C. dalmanni greatly contrasted with those of S. detrahens. In male C. dalmanni, there was a weak positive correlation between body length and starvation tolerance (r = 0.31, P = 0.086) and a poor correlation between eye span and starvation tolerance (r = 0.23, P = 0.212), indicating that eye span does not appear to provide a reliable signal of current energy stores. This tendency was even more pronounced in females, in which the correlation between eye span and starvation tolerance (r = 0.04, P = 0.814) and the correlation between body length and starvation tolerance (r = 0.02, P = 0.929) were very low. This suggests that neither eye span nor body length represents the current energy stores of females; that is, this trait cannot be used as a signal. In fact, it is known that eye span does not affect the outcomes of contests between female C. dalmanni42,43.
Starvation affects the winning rate of contests between individuals with similar eye spans in S. detrahens
Previous research has found that nutritional conditions in the larval stage influence the outcome of contests unless the ingested energy is not exhausted43. However, as mentioned above, the eye span of C. dalmanni is unlikely to be a signal of current energy retention. Furthermore, insect external organs that are covered with a hard exoskeleton, such as the eye stalk, cannot change in size even if the nutritional status changes after becoming an adult. Therefore, eye span cannot represent current energy stores exactly, even in the case of S. detrahens, in which eye span and starvation tolerance showed a strong positive correlation. Accordingly, we investigated whether the rate of victories or defeats between the same two individuals would change after starvation of the initial winner. In both S. detrahens and C. dalmanni, it has been reported that contests between males with similar eye spans do not end quickly20,23 and are not influenced by eye span. In such a situation, factors other than eye span will have a strong effect on the contest outcome. Therefore, we prompted two same-sex individuals with very close eye spans to compete and analyzed how the initial winner’s winning rate changed after 24, 48, and 72 h of starvation initiation in 13 male pairs and 17 female pairs, excluding pairs in which an individual died. A highly significant effect of the starvation (and refeeding) treatments was detected for both male and female S. detrahens (GLMM; Χ22 = 93.6 and Χ24 = 198.2, respectively, both P < 10−15). Although the average winning rate of the initial winners can be decreased to 50% in the second contest if winning randomly occurs, the winning percentage of the initial winner significantly and consistently decreased with the starvation period in both the males and females (Fig. 4A,B: average winning percentages of the initial winner, males = 87% [at 0 h], 60% [at 24 h], 26% [at 48 h]; females = 79% [at 0 h], 58% [at 24 h], 42% [at 48 h], and 20% [at 72 h]). Although most males died within 72 h of the onset of starvation, females remained partially viable. When we fed the surviving females exposed to starvation for 72 h and measured their winning percentages 24 h later, their winning rates recovered to a level comparable to those before starvation (Fig. 4B). These results suggest that the winning percentage between S. detrahens individuals with similar eye spans was affected by energy stores at the time of the contest.
Discussion
Starvation-induced autophagy in the fat body cells of the eye stalk
The eye stalks of S. detrahens had an approximately comparable amount of fat body tissue as the abdomen; in contrast, the eye stalks of C. dalmanni had only a small amount of fat body tissue relative to that in the abdomen. The fat bodies of insects often accumulate in the abdomen due to its expandable structure, but they do not always show an even distribution in the abdominal cavity. Unlike vertebrates, insects do not have blood vessels for rapid and active blood flow; therefore, fat bodies generally accumulate around organs that will require a large amount of energy in the future, such as the ovaries and digestive tract39,44,45. However, it is not thought that eye stalk fat body tissue in S. detrahens nourishes neighboring organs such as the brain and compound eyes. In fact, there is no reason why S. detrahens would require more energy in the brain and compound eyes than C. dalmanni. Furthermore, the rate of increase in autophagosomes/autolysosomes in fat body cells during starvation seemed to be slightly slower in the abdomen than in the eye stalks after 72 h of starvation, but there was no obvious difference between either location, suggesting that similar roles are played by the fat bodies in both locations in terms of starvation resistance. The eye stalk fat body in S. detrahens is thought to support starvation tolerance, much like the fat body cells distributed throughout the bodies of various insects40,46,47. This is supported by the strong correlation between eye span and starvation resistance in S. detrahens. In contrast, the fat body in the head of C. dalmanni occurs only around the brain (Fig. 1F); therefore, its energy supply might be directed to a limited extent, under normal nutrient intake conditions.
Qualitative differences in fighting behaviors between the two species considering the cheaters and reliable signalers
There are conflicting interpretations of the meaning of signals displayed by individuals with exaggerated traits toward conspecifics. The Fisherian runaway hypothesis suggests that an exaggerated trait does not necessarily reflect the quality of the individual but provides benefits by being preferred by the opposite sex48,49. The handicap theory, on the other hand, suggests that the signal represents the quality of the individual since the growth of large traits requires sufficient energy retention, which is consistent with the theory of natural selection1,3,4,5,7. In fact, it is difficult to find an example case that can be explained solely by the runaway hypothesis, and the handicap theory is widely supported in the results of many behavioral studies7. In the case of courtship behavior, the signals sent to the opposite sex are considered to represent the information for holding good genetic quality in the signaler, but in the case of intra-sexual competition, it is reasonable to consider that the signals sent to rivals are to represent the energy storage ability. Then, the significance in the signals by the eye span is considered to be different between courtship and contest although both should correlate to various degrees and may not be independent. Unlike female C. dalmanni, female S. detrahens do not choose males according to their eye span; rather, males who have a long eye span tend to gain territory with a good food supply by winning contests and thus have an increased chance of mating with females, and both sexes tend to have high fertility when their eye spans are large23. A similar relationship between eye span and fertility in both sexes has also been shown in C. dalmanni29,30,31. These results suggest that the handicap theory can be applied to stalk-eyed flies as a whole reproductive population. However, the observed discordance between the eye spans and actual current energy stores (stamina) clearly indicates that some individuals can behave as cheaters in intra-sexual competition (male-male or female-female contests), piggybacking on the handicap mechanism to increase their fitness. The general and spontaneous occurrence of cheaters is theoretically predicted to be a real-life situation5,50,51, but in this study, it was recognized in the comparison between the two stalk-eyed fly species. The eye span in S. detrahens has the potential to signal an individual’s energy storage status to its opponent fairly accurately; however, this is not the case for C. dalmanni. This can be interpreted as the former conforming relatively well to the handicap theory, while the evolution of the latter may also include runaway processes via female choice. In other words, in ritualized contests, the winning rate in C. dalmanni does not reflect the amount of energy that can be invested in the altercation, and it is predicted that a large proportion of individuals who do not conform to the reliable signal system will win by bluffing. A previous report found that some genetic variants in C. dalmanni resulted in large eye spans regardless of larval nutrition, which may also be consistent with this expectation32,33,34.
Difference in the significance of the eye span signal between the two species of stalk-eyed flies
The difference in mating behaviors between C. dalmanni and S. detrahens may contribute to the abundance of cheaters. As mentioned previously, S. detrahens females do not choose males according to eye span; rather, males choose individual females. Therefore, males do not form harems, and the energy currently possessed by males determines the number of consecutive matings in which they engage23. On the other hand, since the territory of an individual is small, even a male who loses a contest may get a new chance to mate immediately after the defeat. In contrast, in C. dalmanni, females actively choose males with long eye stalks, and males that have very long eye stalks form harems to ensure numerous mating opportunities21,22. Therefore, in terms of mating behavior, winning a territorial competition with another male is of great benefit, even if victory is achieved only once. On the other hand, due to the nature of harems, defeated males lose the opportunity to encounter many females, which is a great disadvantage. For this reason, it is conceivable that in C. dalmanni, there is greater value in investing energy in eye stalk extension during the pupal stage than in storing energy accumulated in the larval stage until the adult stage considering the chance of future harem formation. In fact, in this species, body length has a weak correlation with starvation tolerance, and it has been inferred that the energy possessed in the pupal stage is invested in eye stalk formation. This may be supported by the fact that the amount of fat in the abdomens of adults varies greatly from individual to individual. The eye span of C. dalmanni shows visible sexual dimorphism, which is consistent with the observed tendency for exaggerated male traits in various polygynous species, although exceptions can be found2,52,53,54,55.
Eye spans display the limit of energy that can be retained, leading to the presence of cheaters
Although eye span can be a major factor in winning contests in S. detrahens23, the outcomes of contests between individuals with similar eye spans (Fig. 4) have shown that a larger eye span is not always conducive to winning, and the outcome can be affected by current energy stores. However, even if an individual is well nourished, it is difficult for individuals with very short eye spans to win contests. Although the behaviors of flies with smaller eye spans may differ from those of individuals with standard eye spans24,56, the fact that eye span represents the maximum amount of energy that can be stored rather than actual current energy stores may be the ultimate cause of their defeat. If this prediction is correct, all individuals, not only those with small eye spans, display the maximum amount of energy they can possibly possess, and individuals who are not currently well nourished will inevitably become cheaters that deceive opponents to varying degrees to increase their chance of winning. Therefore, a certain proportion of cheaters should always be present in populations of various stalk-eyed fly species, which may cause the correlation between eye span and reproductive capacity to remain below a certain level. Furthermore, as shown in the present study on S. detrahens and C. dalmanni, the frequency of cheaters could evolve variably depending on the mating mode of each species. It would be assumed that the frequency of cheaters will increase if the possession of an exaggerated trait results in a greater reproductive benefit, such as those in harem mating systems. How is the proportion of cheaters among individuals conforming to the handicap theory generally determined? If the benefit (increased fitness) gained by a similar signal intensity differs between the two species, then the species that obtains a greater benefit will have more cheaters due to utility maximization. Because the great benefit of winning is worth the challenge, many individuals would participate in competitions even with frequent defeats. A computer simulation study showed that more individuals with low resource holding potential tend to be cheaters when the value (fitness benefit) of the resource is higher50,51. This result is consistent with the different mating systems of the two species: in the harem mating system of C. dalmanni, possession of an exaggerated trait can result in a greater reproductive benefit.
What does the weak correlation between trait size and starvation tolerance in females mean?
A weak correlation between trait size and starvation tolerance in females was found in both species. In C. dalmanni females in particular, not even a weak correlation was observed. This may be related to the lack of correlation between eye span and winning percentage in C. dalmanni females42,43. Three possible causes for this finding are as follows. (1) The eye span of C. dalmanni females is a gender load characteristic that is passed on due to trait exaggeration in males, because females share the same genes as males. The finding that many genes with sex-biased expression in eye imaginal discs are translocated to the sex chromosome57 and positive correlations between male and female eye spans among various species of stalk-eyed flies may be related to this phenomenon13. However, as many Diopsidae species show sexual monomorphy with regards to eye span13,14,15,16,17,18, their eye stalks are considered to have functions for other than contest and courtship even in females. (2) Females with long eye stalks are preferred by males, but long eye stalks induce a smaller benefit to females than to males, so they have gradually stopped evolving. (3) Female nutrition is mainly invested in promoting oogenesis, so energy allocation to contests is not high. There are few reasons to dispute these causes, so it is predicted that, in reality, these phenomena may explain the complex reasons for weak correlation between eye span and starvation tolerance in females.
Methods
Husbandry of S. detrahens and C. dalmanni
Wild individuals of S. detrahens were captured near the shores of several rivers on Ishigaki Island in Okinawa Prefecture (Japan) for several years after 2017 as described58. Wild individuals of C. dalmanni were captured in a tropical rainforest in the eastern area of Langkawi Island (Malaysia) in April 2018. Rearing methods for both species of stalk-eyed flies have been described previously23. In brief, dozens of adult individuals were maintained in large plastic dishes (245 × 245 × 25 mm, Nunc Inc. #240835) with supplies of water, commercially available semidried Ficus fruits (for adult provision), and royal jelly (for adult and larval provision). Numerous pin holes were bored into the lids of the dishes for aeration. The royal jelly was served on dried Sphagnum leaves (product of New Zealand, Nissin Garden Mate Co., #500) soaked with 20% (v/v) undiluted royal jelly supplemented with 0.05% (w/v) butyl parahydroxybenzoate (Antimold). To move adult flies in and out of the plastic dishes, the flies were exposed to carbon dioxide for a short period (less than one minute), resulting in anaesthetization.
Microscopic examination of fat bodies stained with DAPI/phalloidin, oil red O, or LysoTracker
The fat bodies in the eye stalks and abdomen were dissected and fixed with 4% formaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min at room temperature. Then, the formaldehyde was removed by washing with PBS several times.
To visualize the distribution of the fat bodies in the eye stalks and the morphology of their cells, rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probe, 1:200 dilution) was used to stain filamentous actin (-associated plasma membrane), and 4′6-diamidino-2-phenyl indole (DAPI, Sigma, 0.1 µg/ml) was used to stain nuclei.
To visualize neutral triglycerides and lipids in the lipid droplets, fixed fat bodies were soaked in 0.2% oil red O in 60% isopropanol for 20 min at room temperature and then washed with PBS.
To visualize lysosomes and autolysosomes, which increase during autophagy, unfixed fat bodies were soaked in a solution of LysoTracker Red (DND-99, Molecular Probes, 1:100 dilution) for 15 min at room temperature and then washed with PBS. Simultaneously, nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (Molecular Probe, 1:500 dilution).
The stained specimens were observed under a VHX-2000 digital microscope (Keyence) and a C1Si (Nikon) or FV3000 (Olympus) laser confocal microscope. We also used the differential interference imaging system associated with the FV3000 system for the observation of lipid droplets. Quantification of LysoTracker-positive puncta per cell was performed by calculating the number of puncta in the 3D reconstitutions of the laser confocal images of fat bodies divided by the number of nuclei counterstained with Hoechst 33258. The value per nucleus was doubled to convert to the value per cell because the adult fat body cells are binucleate (Fig. 1B).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Fat bodies obtained by dissection, as described above, were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde/0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 4 °C overnight. After washing with 0.1 M phosphate buffer three times, the tissues were subsequently fixed with 2% OsO4/0.1 M phosphate buffer. After fixation, a small piece of tissue was embedded in Quetol-812 resin (Nisshin-EM), and ultrathin sectioning (70-nm thickness) was performed; the sections were stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 15 min at room temperature followed by washing with H2O and secondary staining with lead stain solution (Signa-Aldrich) for 3 min at room temperature. TEM photographs were obtained using a JEM-1400Plus instrument (JEOL) with an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.
Measurement of eye span length
By using a VHX-2000 digital microscope (Keyence), eye span lengths were quantified as the linear distance between the left and right outer edges of the compound eyes. Although each eye span was measured only once, measurement error could be neglected because the relative standard error of eye span was 0.35% when a representative sample was measured 20 times in various possible positions.
Quantification of starvation tolerance
Fully fed individuals were transferred into individual transparent plastic vials for Drosophila culture (Hightech Co., 9.5 cm × ϕ2.2 cm), which comprised a solidified mixture of 5 ml of 1% agar (S-6, Ina Food Co., Ltd.) in deionized water. Multiple vials were aligned in an upright position and kept at 25 °C, and a RICOH GXR digital camera captured time-lapsed images of the side view of the vials in 10-min intervals for several days. When a fly fell to the surface of the agar and did not move thereafter, it was considered dead, and the time was recorded. Calculation of the correlation coefficient (r) and P values for the relationship between eye span/body length and starvation tolerance, in addition to linear approximation with Model 1 (OLS) regression, was carried out in Microsoft Excel ver.16.0.15128.20248 (Microsoft Corporation, https://microsoft-excel.en.softonic.com/).
Observation of contests between fed and starved S. detrahens individuals with similar eye spans
Dozens of individuals with a moderate eye span were selected, and individual numbers were assigned to males and females separately, with the lowest number assigned to the individual with the shortest eye span. Males and females with consecutive numbers representing similar eye spans were defined as a pair to be contested. All the actual ratios of the eye spans between two matched individuals were less than 1.03. This ratio was established because the effect of starvation was more apparent when the difference in the eye span between two individuals was small, resulting in a winning probability of approximately 0.5, especially for males23. Two matched flies (male vs. male or female vs. female) were placed in a Petri dish after being anesthetized with carbon dioxide gas. After the flies were sufficiently awake, videos were recorded by a JVC Everio R video camera for 2 h. The cessation of locomotion in both individuals in a face-to-face orientation was defined as the beginning of a contest. Then, backwards or sideways movements were defined as the loser’s motions. When both individuals showed backwards motion at the same time, the contest was declared a draw. The winning percentage was calculated by dividing the number of wins by the number of competitions, including draws. After the initial contests, starvation of the winners was initiated, and the winning rates of the fixed pairs were measured at 24-h intervals. In the case of the females, at 72 h of starvation, the initial winners were fed, and their winning rates were calculated after an additional 24 h. The records of pairs in which one individual died within 48 h were excluded in the calculation of winning rates. Contests comprising fewer than 4 competitions were also excluded to avoid incidental fluctuations in the winning rate. The following analyses were conducted using R software version 4.0.259. To analyze the effects of starvation on the winning rate (weighted by the number of competitions), generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were fitted using the “glmer()” function in the “lme4” package60 by incorporating contestant-pair identity as a random effect factor. A binomial error structure and a logistic link function were used. We examined the significance of starvation and refeeding treatments (a fixed effect factor) based on a likelihood ratio test between the full (with the fixed factor) and null (with only the random factor) models. When a significant treatment effect was detected, the same analysis was applied for post hoc pairwise multiple comparisons between starvation (and refeeding) time points. Significance thresholds in multiple comparisons were corrected using the false discovery rate61.
References
Berglund, A., Bisazza, A. & Pilastro, A. Armaments and ornaments: An evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 385–399 (1996).
Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J. H. Truth in advertising: The kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am. Nat. 124, 309–323 (1984).
Zahavi, A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975).
Zahavi, A. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J. Theor. Biol. 67, 603–605 (1977).
Grafen, A. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144, 517–546 (1990).
Biernaskie, J. M., Perry, J. C. & Grafen, A. A general model of biological signals, from cues to handicaps. Evol. Lett. 2, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.57 (2018).
Zahavi, A. & Zahavi, A. The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle. (Oxford University Press, 1997).
Bonduriansky, R. Sexual selection and allometry: A critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61, 838–849 (2007).
Emlen, D. J., Warren, I. A., Johns, A., Dworkin, I. & Lavine, L. C. A mechanism of extreme growth and reliable signaling in sexually selected ornaments and weapons. Science 337, 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224286 (2012).
Warren, I. A., Gotoh, H., Dworkin, I. M., Emlen, D. J. & Lavine, L. C. A general mechanism for conditional expression of exaggerated sexually-selected traits. BioEssays 35, 889–899 (2013).
Burkhardt, D. & De la Motte, I. Selective pressures, variability, and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Naturwissenschaften 72, 204–206 (1985).
Wilkinson, G. S. & Dodson, G. N. Function and evolution of antlers and eye stalks in flies In The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (eds. Choe, J. & Crespi, B.) 310–328 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Baker, R. H. & Wilkinson, G. S. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55, 1373–1385 (2001).
Feijen, H. R. & Feijen, C. 64 DIOPSIDAE In Manual of Afrotropical Diptera. Volume 3. Brachycera–Cyclorrhapha, Excluding Calyptratae (eds. Kirk-Spriggs, A. H. & Sinclair, B. J.). SURICATA, vol. 8, 1523–1543 (2021).
Feijen, H. R. Diopsidae. Volume IX, Cyclorrhapha III (Schizophora other than Calyptratae), Part 12. In Flies of the Nearctic Region (ed. Griffiths, G. C. D.) (1989).
Baker, R. & Meier, R. A cladistic analysis of Diopsidae (Diptera) based on morphological and DNA sequence data. Insect Syst. Evol. 33, 325–336 (2002).
Yeates, D. K. & Wiegmann, B. M. Phylogeny and evolution of Diptera: recent insights and new perspectives. In The Evolutionary Biology of Flies (eds Yeates, D. K. & Wiegmann, B. M.) 14–44 (Columbia University Press, 2005).
Feijen, H. R. & Feijen, C. A revision of the genus Teleopsis Rondani (Diptera, Diopsidae) in Sri Lanka with descriptions of two new species and a review of the other stalk-eyed flies from the island. ZooKeys 946, 113 (2020).
Chapman, T., Pomiankowski, A. & Fowler, K. Stalk-eyed flies. Curr. Biol. 15, R533-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.015 (2005).
Panhuis, T. M. & Wilkinson, G. S. Exaggerated male eye span influences contest outcome in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 221–227 (1999).
Wilkinson, G. S., Kahler, H. & Baker, R. H. Evolution of female mating preferences in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. 9, 525–533 (1998).
Burkhardt, D. & de la Motte, I. How stalk-eyed flies eye stalk-eyed flies: Observations and measurements of the eyes of Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diopsidae, Diptera). J. Comp. Physiol. 151, 407–421 (1983).
Takeda, K. et al. Handicap theory is applied to females but not males in relation to mate choice in the stalk-eyed fly Sphyracephala detrahens. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12 (2020).
Hingle, A., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Size-dependent mate preference in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Anim. Behav. 61, 589–595 (2001).
Cotton, S., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Condition dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution 58, 1038–1046 (2004).
Cotton, S., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Heightened condition dependence is not a general feature of male eyespan in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera: Diopsidae). J. Evol. Biol. 17, 1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00754.x (2004).
Ribak, G. & Swallow, J. G. Free flight maneuvers of stalk-eyed flies: Do eye-stalks affect aerial turning behavior?. J. Comp. Physiol. A 193, 1065–1079 (2007).
Swallow, J. G., Wilkinson, G. S. & Marden, J. H. Aerial performance of stalk-eyed flies that differ in eye span. J. Comp. Physiol. B 170, 481–487 (2000).
Baker, R. H. et al. Accessory gland size influences time to sexual maturity and mating frequency in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Behav. Ecol. 14, 607–611 (2003).
Rogers, D. W., Denniff, M., Chapman, T., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Male sexual ornament size is positively associated with reproductive morphology and enhanced fertility in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 236. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-236 (2008).
Cotton, S., Small, J., Hashim, R. & Pomiankowski, A. Eyespan reflects reproductive quality in wild stalk-eyed flies. Evol. Ecol. 24, 83–95 (2010).
Wilkinson, G. S. Artificial sexual selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Genet. Res. 62, 213–222 (1993).
Wilkinson, G. S., Presgraves, D. C. & Crymes, L. Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391, 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/34640 (1998).
David, P., Bjorksten, T., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406, 186–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/35018079 (2000).
Parker, G. A. Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J. Theor. Biol. 47, 223–243 (1974).
Li, S., Yu, X. & Feng, Q. Fat body biology in the last decade. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 64, 315–333 (2019).
Arrese, E. L. & Soulages, J. L. Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 207–225 (2010).
Skowronek, P., Wójcik, Ł & Strachecka, A. Fat body—Multifunctional insect tissue. Insects 12, 547 (2021).
Roma, G. C., Bueno, O. C. & Camargo-Mathias, M. I. Morpho-physiological analysis of the insect fat body: A review. Micron 41, 395–401 (2010).
Scott, R. C., Schuldiner, O. & Neufeld, T. P. Role and regulation of starvation-induced autophagy in the Drosophila fat body. Dev. Cell 7, 167–178 (2004).
de Oliveira, V. P. & Cruz-Landim, C. Morphology and function of insect fat body cells: A review. Biociências 11, 195–205 (2003).
Al-khairulla, H., Warburton, D. & Knell, R. J. Do the eyestalks of female diopsid flies have a function in intrasexual aggressive encounters?. J. Insect Behav. 16, 679–686 (2003).
Bath, E., Wigby, S., Vincent, C., Tobias, J. A. & Seddon, N. Condition, not eyespan, predicts contest outcome in female stalk-eyed flies, Teleopsis dalmanni. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1826–1836 (2015).
Chapman, R. F. & Chapman, R. F. The Insects: Structure and Function. (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Zhao, X. & Karpac, J. The Drosophila midgut and the systemic coordination of lipid-dependent energy homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 41, 100–105 (2020).
Park, M. S., Park, P. & Takeda, M. Roles of fat body trophocytes, mycetocytes and urocytes in the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana under starvation conditions: An ultrastructural study. Arthropod. Struct. Dev. 42, 287–295 (2013).
Romanelli, D., Casati, B., Franzetti, E. & Tettamanti, G. A molecular view of autophagy in Lepidoptera. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 1–11 (2014).
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition. (Oxford University Press, 1930).
Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 4th ed. (Blackwell, 1997).
Szalai, F. & Szamado, S. Honest and cheating strategies in a simple model of aggressive communication. Anim. Behav. 78, 949–959 (2009).
Számadó, S. When honesty and cheating pay off: The evolution of honest and dishonest equilibria in a conventional signalling game. BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 1–13 (2017).
Andersson, M. Sexual Selection. (Princeton University Press, 1994).
Plavcan, J. M. Sexual dimorphism in primate evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 116, 25–53 (2001).
Frayer, D. W. & Wolpoff, M. H. Sexual dimorphism. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 14, 429–473 (1985).
Griffin, M. J., Holwell, G. I. & Symonds, M. R. Insect harem polygyny: When is a harem not a harem?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 1–11 (2019).
Wilkinson, G. S. & Reillo, P. R. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 255, 1–6 (1994).
Wilkinson, G. S., Johns, P. M., Metheny, J. D. & Baker, R. H. Sex-biased gene expression during head development in a sexually dimorphic stalk-eyed fly. PLoS One 8, e59826 (2013).
Ôhara, K. First record of the family Diopsidae from Japan (Diptera, Brachycera). Bull. Tokushima Pref. Museum 3, 39–47 (1993).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2020).
Bates, D. Fitting linear models in R: Using the lme4 package. R News 5, 27–30 (2005).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).
Acknowledgements
We thank Yo Sato, Kakeru Yamaguchi, and Sota Kakita for collecting S. detrahens individuals from their natural habitat and Kodai Sato for his help taking the time-lapse images of contests between fed and starved individuals. We also thank Kiyomi Kakizawa for providing us with information about the natural habitat of C. dalmanni on Lankawi Is. We thank Tokai Electron Microscopy Inc. for taking the TEM images of the eye stalk fat body cells. We also thank an anonymous reviewer for a number of helpful comments especially on the taxonomy and sexual dimorphism in the Diopsid flies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.Mi. discovered a difference in the size of the fat bodies in eye stalks between S. detrahens and C. dalmanni. He also observed and quantified starvation-induced autophagy in fat body cells and found a correlation of eye span with starvation tolerance in female S. detrahens. R.F. carried out similar experiments in male S. detrahens and both sexes of C. dalmanni. K.T. tested the effect of starvation on the winning rate in contests between individuals with similar eye spans in S. detrahens. A.Mo. measured eye spans and body lengths in individuals of both species. Y.K. statistically analyzed the contest results and supported writing the manuscript. C.Y.L. contributed to providing C. dalmanni individuals from natural habitats. T.A.Y. supervised the project and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Miki, A., Fukuda, R., Takeda, K. et al. Differences in energy source storage in eye stalks between two species of stalk-eyed flies, Sphyracephala detrahens and Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Sci Rep 12, 9981 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13887-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13887-7
- Springer Nature Limited