Abstract
Current evidence indicate that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play an important role in prostate cancer (PCa) development and progression. In this study, we identified CAF-related molecular subtypes and prognostic index for PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy through integrating single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data. We completed analyses using software R 3.6.3 and its suitable packages. Through single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing analysis, NDRG2, TSPAN1, PTN, APOE, OR51E2, P4HB, STEAP1 and ABCC4 were used to construct molecular subtypes and CAF-related gene prognostic index (CRGPI). These genes could clearly divide the PCa patients into two subtypes in TCGA database and the BCR risk of subtype 1 was 13.27 times higher than that of subtype 2 with statistical significance. Similar results were observed in MSKCC2010 and GSE46602 cohorts. In addtion, the molucular subtypes were the independent risk factor of PCa patients. We orchestrated CRGPI based on the above genes and divided 430 PCa patients in TCGA database into high- and low- risk groups according to the median value of this score. We found that high-risk group had significant higher risk of BCR than low-risk group (HR: 5.45). For functional analysis, protein secretion was highly enriched in subtype 2 while snare interactions in vesicular transport was highly enriched in subtype 1. In terms of tumor heterogeneity and stemness, subtype 1 showd higher levels of TMB than subtype 2. In addition, subtype 1 had significant higher activated dendritic cell score than subtype 2. Based on eight CAF-related genes, we developed two prognostic subtypes and constructed a gene prognostic index, which could predict the prognosis of PCa patients very well.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequent cancers in males and is most prevalent in males 65 and older, with over 1.4 million new cases and 375,000 deaths expected globally in 20201,2,3,4,5,6,7. In recent years, with the continuous economic and social development and the extension of the average life expectancy, the incidence of PCa was also increasing year by year8,9. Currently, the treatment approaches for PCa mainly contain radical prostatectomy, radical radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy, which depends on the patient’s disease progression4,9,10,11,12. However, about one-fourth to one-half of patients will experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical therapy, which means the return of measurable PSA3,11,13,14,15. BCR is a critical event in PCa progression. In some subgroups with specific clinical risk factors, patients with BCR are more likely to suffer clinical recurrence, metastasis and cancer-specific mortality13,16. Therefore, identification of marker signature to predict BCR in PCa patients is of great clinical significance.
Tumor microenvironment (TME) is the direct niche of the tumor and is composed of various types of cells in the metabolic environment17. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the major components of TME stroma and have an important role in tumorigenesis, proliferation, progression and invasion18,19,20,21,22. CAFs are mainly transformed by intrinsic fibroblasts or stellate cells in tissues stimulated by growth factors. In addition, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and myeloid-derived mesenchymal stem cells in tumor tissues can also differentiate into CAFs18,19,20,21. CAFs can secrete growth factors and cytokines to inhibit the function of immune cell, thereby promoting tumor progression, invasion and migration18,20. In addition, CAFs can synthesize and remodel the extracellular matrix, which forms the penetration barriers to prevent the penetration of the drug and the immune cells into the tumor tissue, thus reducing the effectiveness of the tumor therapy19,21. Several studies indicate that high density of CAFs is associated with poor BCR-free survival in PCa patients23,24. Therefore, an insight into the relationship between CAFs in PCa and tumor metastasis, proliferation, progression, and drug resistance is essential.
In our study, we constructed CAF-related gene prognostic index (CRGPI) based on 8 CAF-related genes identified by single-cell and bulk RNA transcriptome. Based on the non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithm and the 8 identified CAF-related genes, we divided these patients into two subgroups and validated its reliability in several external datasets, which could predict the prognosis of PCa patients and better guide clinical application in the future.
Methods
Data preparation
In terms of single-cell RNA sequencing level, we downloaded 453 markers related to CAFs from the tumor immunotherapy gene expression resource (TIGER) database (http://tiger.canceromics.org/#/singleCellImmune25, which contains single-cell transcriptome data of 2,116,945 immune cells from 655 samples including PCa26. For bulk RNA sequencing level, we used the PCa gene matrix and clinical features in TCGA database from our pervious study14. CAF abundance was calculated using EPIC algorithm27 owing to its higher correlation than other immune algorithms23,28 and prognosis analysis was conducted. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to caculate the CAF-related genes in TCGA database. After intersection of CAF markers and CAF-related genes, we detected the final genes using Lasso regression analysis. Subsequently, we constructed risk score using coefficients in Lasso regression and TCGA subtypes using nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) method based on these genes. CAF-related gene prognostic index (CRGPI) = − 0.108359658017165*NDRG2-0.170784032731384*TSPAN1-0.0575930783435198*PTN + 0.084664542685909*APOE-0.0308048566779615*OR51E2-0.0450336720010116*P4HB + 0.0392873624467431*STEAP1-0.0148044294523877*ABCC4. In TCGA database, 430 samples with complete BCR information were used, and the p value was smaller than 0.05 using log-rank test for BCR-free survival. Two cohorts were used externally validated the prognostic values of risk score and TCGA subtypes, including GSE4660229 and MSKCC201030,31. The clinical features of molecular subtypes were analyzed.
Mutaion landscape and functional diferences between two subtypes
RNA-sequencing profiles, genetic mutation and corresponding clinical information for PCa were downloaded from the TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.com). The data of mutations were downloaded and visualized using the maftools package in R software. Differences of mutation frequency between two subtypes were also conducted. In terms of funcational analysis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using “c2.cp.kegg.v7.4.symbols.gmt” and “h.all.v7.4.symbols.gmt” from the molecular signatures database32,33. Based on gene expression and subtypes, the minimum gene set was defined as 5 while the maximum gene set was 5000. Resampling was performed as 1000 times. P value of < 0.05 and a false discovery rate of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Tumor stemness and heterogeneity analyses
Tumor stemness indexes included differentially methylated probes-based stemness scores (DMPss), DNA methylation-based stemness scores (DNAss), enhancer elements/DNA methylation-based stemness scores (ENHss), epigenetically regulated DNA methylation-based stemness scores (EREG-METHss), epigenetically regulated RNA expression-based stemness scores (EREG.EXPss), RNA expression-based stemness scores (RNAss)34 and mRNAsi algorithm35. Tumor heterogeneity included homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), loss of heterozygosity (LOH), neoantigen (NEO), tumor ploidy, tumor purity, mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH), tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI)36,37. The results of above indicators were obtained from our previous study38,39. We compared the differences of two subtypes using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Tumor immune microenvironmen (TME)
The overall tumor microenvironment and immune components assessment were calculated by Cibersort and ESTIMATE algorithms40,41,42. The differences of 54 immune checkpoints and tumor microenvironment scores betwenn the two subytpes were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Figure 1 illustrates the study flowchart.
Statistical analysis
We completed analyses using software R 3.6.3 and its suitable packages. We exploited the Wilcoxon test in the context of abnormal distribution. Survival analysis was conducted through log-rank test and presented as Kaplan–Meier curve. Statistical significance was set as two-sided p < 0.05. Significant marks were as follows: not significance (ns), p ≥ 0.05; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Results
Single cell and bulk RNA sequencing identified CAF-related markers and constructed TCGA subtypes and CRGPI
Using EPIC algorithm, we found that CAF was significantly associated with BCR-free survival in 430 PCa patients in TCGA database (Fig. 2A). Using WGCNA, three modules were found (Fig. 2B) where grey module genes was highly associated with CAF (Fig. 2C). In terms of single cell RNA sequencing data, Fig. 2D showed good quality control and tumor tissue consisted of eight types of cells, including fibroblasts (Fig. 2E), whose markers could be seen in Fig. 2F. Subsequently, we extracted 453 CAF markers using the definition of absolute value of logFC ≥ 0.4 and p value < 0.05 (Fig. 2D–F). In TCGA database, 277 genes were related to CAF using WGCNA. 73 genes were obtained from intersection of CAF-related genes and CAF markers (Fig. 2G) and these genes were involved in focal adhesion, proteoglycans in cancer and TCG-beta signaling pathway (Fig. 2H). Through Lasso regression analysis, when lambda (λ) equals 0.03, we obtained the optimal model (Fig. 2I) and used NDRG2, TSPAN1, PTN, APOE, OR51E2, P4HB, STEAP1 and ABCC4 for subsequent analysis (Fig. 2J). These genes could clearly divide the PCa patients into two subtypes in TCGA database (Fig. 3A) and the BCR risk of subtype 1 was 13.27 times higher than that of subtype 2 with statistical significance (Fig. 3B). Similar results were observed in MSKCC2010 (Fig. 3C,D) and GSE46602 cohorts (Fig. 3E,F). The baseline comparsion showed balanced clinical features between subtype 1 and subtype 2 (Table 1). In addtion, the molucular subtypes were the independent risk factor of PCa patients (Table 2). We orchestrated CRGPI based on the above genes and divided 430 PCa patients in TCGA database into high- and low- risk groups according to the median value of this score. We found that high-risk group had significant higher risk of BCR than low-risk group (HR: 5.45; Fig. 3G). Other two cohorts showed similar results (Fig. 3H,I). The top ten genes between subtype 1 and subtype 2 were NYNRIN, PTCHD4, WNK1, CNNM4, ARFGEF1, HRAS, PYHIN1, ARHGEF2, MYOM1 and ITGB6 with statistical significance (Fig. 3J).
Functional enrichment, TME evaluation and tumor heterogeneity and stemness
For functional analysis, protein secretion was highly enriched in subtype 2 (Fig. 4A) while snare interactions in vesicular transport was highly enriched in subtype 1 (Fig. 4B). In terms of tumor heterogeneity and stemness, subtype 1 showd higher levels of TMB than subtype 2 (Fig. 4C). The expression levels of ICOS, CTLA4 and TNFRSF8 were significantly higher in subtype 1 than those in subtype 2 (Fig. 4D). In addition, subtype 1 had significant higher activated dendritic cell score than subtype 2 (Fig. 4D).
Discussion
CAFs have been shown to promote tumor growth and progression in a variety of ways, such as secreting extracellular matrix proteins, inducing inflammation and neovascularization, increasing angiogenesis and constructing the immunosuppressive TME18,43. In PCa, CAFs are the most abundant cells in the stroma of TME14 and play an important role in the development and invasion of PCa44,45. For instance, CAFs can secrete IL-6 to enable AR transcriptional activity in PCa cells by modulating MAPK,STAT3,and PI3K/AKT signaling, thereby inducing resistance to anti-androgen therapies44,46,47. CAFs could mediate a series of genes such as NF-κB-dependent expression of the Wnt family member WNT16B to promote EMT in PCa cells, which induced resistance to cytotoxic agents48. Moreover, the role of CAFs in PCa bone metastasis has also been reported that CAFs may promote PCa bone metastasis by fibronectin and collagen deposition and establishing protein interaction network49. The important role of CAFs in tumorigenesis and development makes us aware that target CAFs will be an attractive breakthrough in anti-cancer therapy. In our study, we identified eight CAF-related genes by combining with single-cell and bulk RNA transcriptome, including STEAP1, APOE, OR51E2, PTN, ABCC4, TSPAN1, P4HB and NDRG2. Studies on the role of STEAP1, OR51E2, PTN, ABCC4, NDRG2 have been relatively in-depth. For instance, STEAP1 is all-called six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1, which belongs to a family of metalloproteinases involved in iron and copper homeostasis and other cellular processes37. STEAP1 is overexpressed on the plasma membrane of PCa cells and is associated with PCa invasiveness and metastasis50. The possible mechanism of STEAP1 promoting tumor proliferation and metastasis is by acting as a channel for small molecules that are involved in intercellular communication50,51. Similarly,OR51E2 is a kind of olfactory receptor, which is also called prostate specific G-protein receptor 2, and is highly expressed in PCa52. Some studies reported that OR51E2 perhaps could be used as one of the biomarkers for PCa53,54,55,56. Moreover, many researchers have shown that the activation of OR51E2 can inhibit proliferation of PCa cells and induce their invasion57,58,59,60. PTN encodes pleiotrophin, which is a secreted growth factor involved in angiogenesis and tumor growth61.A recent study showed that serum pleiotrophin levels were increased in the high-risk group compared with benign and low-risk PCa patients62, which is consistent with our previous study63. The protein encoded by ABCC4 is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, which is also called multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4)64. MRP4 was reported to be associated with drug resistance of PCa in many studies65,66,67. NDRG2 is a tumor suppressor gene that suppresses tumorigenesis and metastasis and increases the sensitivity to anticancer drugs68. Several researches have reported that the overexpression of NDRG2 could suppress the invasion and metastasis of PCa cells69,70. Some researchers found that low level of NDRG2 were associated with radioresistance of PCa Cells and overexpression of NDRG2 in combination with radiotherapy might be an effective therapeutic method for PCa71,72. In summary, the function of these five genes in PCa is relatively determined. There are very few reports of TSPAN1 and P4HB in PCa. The overexpression of TSPAN1 is widely regarded as with EMT, tumor proliferation and migration, tumor growth which has been demonstrated in multiple cancer types73,74,75,76,77. In PCa, TSPAN1 was induced by androgens and upregulated in PCa tissues. TSPAN1 involved in controlling the expression of key proteins of cell migration to promote invasion and metastasis of PCa78. In addition, another study found that the knockdown of TSPAN1 in PCa cell could inhibit cell proliferation and migration79. However, the detailed mechanisms of regulating the proliferation and metastasis of PCa cells remain incompletely elucidated and require further investigation. There is only one study on the role of P4HB in PCa. Hu et al. constructed an autophagy-related gene signature containing P4HB and other genes in PCa through bioinformatic analysis80. But there are many studies on the role of P4HB in other diseases, such as bladder carcinoma, oesophageal cancer and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma81,82,83. There seems to be some debates about the role of APOE in PCa. A study showed that different apolipoprotein E genotypes may have different risks of developing PCa84. However, another study showed apolipoprotein E genotype was not associated with PCa risk85. Accurate conclusions may need to be supported by more experimental evidence. In summary, based on the eight identified genes, we divided 430 PCa patients into 2 subtypes. We observed the prognosis of subgroup 1 was significantly worse than that of subgroup 2. To better reveal the potential mechanisms of the two prognostic subtypes, we performed functional analysis, gene mutation, tumor heterogeneity and stemness, and TME assessment.
Our study found protein secretion was highly enriched in subtype 2 while snare interactions in vesicular transport was highly enriched in subtype 1.Snare is all-called soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors, which plays an important role in tumor invasion, chemo-resistance, autophagy, apoptosis, and phosphorylation of kinases essential for cancer cell biogenesis86. Snare can promote close proximity between vesicles and cell membrane to form a fusion pore after contact, which can mediate the transport of material between vesicles and cells86,87. Therefore, the enrichment of snare interactions in vesicular transport pathway in cluster 1 may indicate a higher level of proliferation and invasion demand for PCa cells in cluster 1, correlating with a worse prognosis. In contrast, we observed that protein secretion was mainly enriched in subtype 2 and we speculated it may be related to the increasing androgen signaling. Compared with hormone-naive metastatic PCa, hormone-refractory metastatic PCa showed a marked decrease of androgen signaling and protein biosynthesis, which possibly meant the decrease of androgen signaling and protein biosynthesis was responsible for PCa progression and higher malignancy of tumor cells88. This is agreement with our study showing patients in subtype 2 have better prognosis. Additionally, the difference of TMB between subtype 1 and subtype 2 may also explain why the prognosis of subtype 1 is much worse than subtype 2. We observed TMB of subtype 1 was significantly higher than subtype 2. TMB refers to the total number of mutations present in a single tumor specimen, which can be used to predict the tumor response to immunotherapy in a variety of tumors89. Patients with high TMB usually mean that tumor cells carry more tumor antigens on their surface, which are therefore vulnerable to being killed by activated immune cells89,90. In PCa, high TMB level was significantly associated with older age, positive lymph node, higher international Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, advanced stage and poor BCR-free survival91. In metastatic castration-resistant PCa, ICIs were more effective than taxanes for patients with high TMB(10 mt/Mb or greater)92. These two studies showed PCa patients with higher TMB were associated with bad prognosis and better effect of immunotherapy, which was consistent with our study and may explain the poor prognosis of subgroup 1 to some extent. Furthermore, we compared the differences in the common immune checkpoints between subtype 1 and 2 and found the expression of ICOS, CTLA4 and TNFRSF8 were significantly elevated in subtype 1.It is well known that a significant mechanism of tumor cells evading immunosurveillance is activation of immune checkpoint pathways, which can suppress antitumor immune response93. CTLA-4 has been widely studied in tumors. High expression of CTLA-4 was observed to be associated with a worse prognosis in many cancers, including PCa, and the intervention of CTLA-4 blockers could improve prognosis of patients94,95,96,97,98. High expression of CTLA-4 can inhibit T cell activation by competing with CD28, regulating the inhibitory function of Treg cells and controlling adhesion and motility, which in turn leads to immunosuppression of tumors. Similarly, ICOS is an activating costimulatory immune checkpoint expressed on activated T cells, which participate in regulating T cell activation and adaptive immune responses. Mo L et al. adopt a combination approach of ICOS positive Treg cells depletion with tumor cell vaccine in mouse PCa model and found ICOS blocking could deplete the tumor-infiltrated ICOS positive Treg cells99. These findings may well explain our results, because high expression of CTLA-4 and ICOS may mean stronger immunosuppression, which then leads to a worse prognosis of the subtype 1 patients. Moreover,TNFRSF8 is an important therapeutic target for the treatment of malignant lymphomas, but there are few studies on TNFRSF8 in nonlymphoid tumors100. Only a recent study showed higher plasma TNFRSF8 were associated with shorter PFS in patients received androgen deprivation therapy plus cabozantinib101. More evidence is needed regarding whether the high expression of TNFRSF8 is associated with poor prognosis.
Intriguingly, we observed in the comparison of dendritic cells activated, subtype 1 was lower than subtype 2. The median difference between the two groups was 0 (0–0.002), and the difference was statistically significant. There are already many evidences that dendritic cells plays an important role in antitumor immunity102. Dendritic cells can capture tumor antigens that are released from tumor cells and present them to T cells, eventually resulting in the generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs)103. This may indicate that with increasing dendritic cells activation, the antigen presentation function is increasing, and then the number and function of CTLs is increasing, ultimately leading to a stronger antitumor immune response. In addition, the success of Sipuleucel-T (a dendritic cell based immunotherapy) in prostate tumor therapy reflects the great value of immunotherapy targeting dendritic cells104. In PCa, there have been a phase 3 trial showing that Sipuleucel-T significantly improve overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa105.These studies are consistent with our results and reveal the important role of dendritic cells activated in the prognosis of patients with PCa.
Conclusions
Based on eight CAF-related genes, we developed two prognostic subtypes and constructed a gene prognostic index, which could predict the prognosis of PCa patients very well. Meanwhile, our study also provides a valuable resource for understanding the underlying mechanisms of PCa progression, and provides valuable insights into the management of the BCR in PCa.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA (https://www.cancer.gov/tcga) and GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, accession number: GSE116918 and GSE46602) repositories.
References
Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA 71(3), 209–49 (2021).
Feng, D. et al. A gene prognostic index from cellular senescence predicting metastasis and radioresistance for prostate cancer. J. Transl. Med. 20(1), 252 (2022).
Feng, D. et al. A gene prognostic index associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition predicting biochemical recurrence and tumor chemoresistance for prostate cancer. Front. Oncol. 11, 805571 (2021).
Feng, D. et al. Mitochondria dysfunction-mediated molecular subtypes and gene prognostic index for prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Front. Oncol. 12, 858479 (2022).
Weitao Zheng, D. F. et al. The role of cGAS-STING in age-related diseases from mechanisms to therapies. Aging Dis. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2023.0117 (2023).
Megerian, M. F. et al. Melatonin and prostate cancer: Anti-tumor roles and therapeutic application. Aging Dis. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2022.1010 (2022).
Zhengshuai Song Q.C., Bin Guo, Ye Zhao, Xuechao Li, Ning Lou, Chenxi Zhu, Gang Luo, Song Peng, Guohao Li, Ke Chen, Yong Wang, Hailong Ruan, Yonglian Guo. Overexpression of RACGAP1 by E2F1 Promotes Neuroendocrine Differentiation of Prostate Cancer by Stabilizing EZH2 Expression. Aging and Disease (2023).
Daniyal, M. et al. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 15(22), 9575–9578 (2014).
Feng, D. et al. Identification of a novel nomogram to predict progression based on the circadian clock and insights into the tumor immune microenvironment in prostate cancer. Front. Immunol. 13, 777724 (2022).
Litwin, M. S. & Tan, H.-J. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: A review. JAMA 317(24), 2532 (2017).
Feng, D. et al. A Ferroptosis-related gene prognostic index associated with biochemical recurrence and radiation resistance for patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiotherapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 803766 (2022).
Feng, D. et al. Developing an immune-related gene prognostic index associated with progression and providing new insights into the tumor immune microenvironment of prostate cancer. Immunology 166(2), 197–209 (2022).
Van den Broeck, T. et al. Prognostic value of biochemical recurrence following treatment with curative intent for prostate cancer: A systematic review. Eur. Urol. 75(6), 967–987 (2019).
Feng, D. et al. Energy metabolism-related gene prognostic index predicts biochemical recurrence for patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Front. Immunol. 13, 839362 (2022).
Feng, D. et al. Immune-related gene index predicts metastasis for prostate cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 12(1), 8 (2023).
Roobol, M. J. & Carlsson, S. V. Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening. Nat. Rev. Urol. 10(1), 38–48 (2013).
Xing, S., Hu, K. & Wang, Y. Tumor immune microenvironment and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: Update and new challenges. Aging Dis. 13(6), 1615–1632 (2022).
Sahai, E. et al. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20(3), 174–186 (2020).
Räsänen, K. & Vaheri, A. Activation of fibroblasts in cancer stroma. Exp. Cell Res. 316(17), 2713–2722 (2010).
Nakagawa, H. et al. Role of cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts in metastatic colon cancer to the liver and their expression profiles. Oncogene 23(44), 7366–7377 (2004).
Kalluri, R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16(9), 582–598 (2016).
Yang, Y. et al. HIF-1alpha promotes the migration and invasion of cancer-associated fibroblasts by miR-210. Aging Dis. 12(7), 1794–1807 (2021).
Feng, D., Xiong, Q., Wei, Q. & Yang, L. Cellular landscape of tumour microenvironment in prostate cancer. Immunology https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13456 (2022).
Wu, Z. et al. Clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of cancer-associated fibroblasts in prostate cancer patients. Urol. Oncol. 39(7), 433.e17-e23 (2021).
Chen, Z. et al. TIGER: A web portal of tumor immunotherapy gene expression resource. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.08.004 (2022).
Chen, S. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals transcriptomic remodellings in distinct cell types that contribute to human prostate cancer progression. Nat. Cell Biol. 23(1), 87–98 (2021).
Racle, J., de Jonge, K., Baumgaertner, P., Speiser, D. E. & Gfeller, D. Simultaneous enumeration of cancer and immune cell types from bulk tumor gene expression data. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26476 (2017).
Sturm, G. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of transcriptome-based cell-type quantification methods for immuno-oncology. Bioinformatics 35(14), i436–i445 (2019).
Mortensen, M. M. et al. Expression profiling of prostate cancer tissue delineates genes associated with recurrence after prostatectomy. Sci. Rep. 5, 16018 (2015).
Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2(5), 401–404 (2012).
Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6(269), l1 (2013).
Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27(12), 1739–40 (2011).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102(43), 15545–15550 (2005).
Huang, T. X. & Fu, L. The immune landscape of esophageal cancer. Cancer Commun. (Lond). 39(1), 79 (2019).
Malta, T. M. et al. machine learning identifies stemness features associated with oncogenic dedifferentiation. Cell 173(2), 338–54 e15 (2018).
Bonneville, R. et al. Landscape of microsatellite instability across 39 cancer types. JCO Precis. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.17.00073 (2017).
Thorsson, V. et al. The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity 48(4), 812–30 e14 (2018).
Feng, D. et al. A pan-cancer analysis of the oncogenic role of leucine zipper protein 2 in human cancer. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 11(1), 55 (2022).
Zhu, W. et al. A pan-cancer analysis of the oncogenic role of zinc finger protein 419 in human cancer. Front. Oncol. 12, 1042118 (2022).
Yoshihara, K. et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat. Commun. 4, 2612 (2013).
Zeng, D. et al. IOBR: Multi-omics immuno-oncology biological research to decode tumor microenvironment and signatures. Front. Immunol. 12, 687975 (2021).
Newman, A. M. et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods 12(5), 453–457 (2015).
Biffi, G. & Tuveson, D. A. Diversity and biology of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Physiol. Rev. 101(1), 147–76 (2021).
Bonollo, F., Thalmann, G. N., Kruithof-de Julio, M. & Karkampouna, S. The role of cancer-associated fibroblasts in prostate cancer tumorigenesis. Cancers 12(7), 1887 (2020).
Chiarugi, P., Paoli, P. & Cirri, P. Tumor microenvironment and metabolism in prostate cancer. Semin. Oncol. 41(2), 267–280 (2014).
Ishii, K. et al. Interleukin-6 induces VEGF secretion from prostate cancer cells in a manner independent of androgen receptor activation. Prostate 78(11), 849–856 (2018).
Yang, L. et al. Interleukin-6 differentially regulates androgen receptor transactivation via PI3K-Akt, STAT3, and MAPK, three distinct signal pathways in prostate cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 305(3), 462–469 (2003).
Sun, Y. et al. Treatment-induced damage to the tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B. Nat. Med. 18(9), 1359–1368 (2012).
Özdemir, B. C. et al. The molecular signature of the stroma response in prostate cancer-induced osteoblastic bone metastasis highlights expansion of hematopoietic and prostate epithelial stem cell niches. PLoS One 9(12), e114530 (2014).
Xu, M. et al. STEAP1–4 (six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1–4) and their clinical implications for prostate cancer. Cancers 14(16), 4034 (2022).
Challita-Eid, P. M. et al. Monoclonal antibodies to six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate-1 inhibit intercellular communication in vitro and growth of human tumor xenografts in vivo. Can. Res. 67(12), 5798–5805 (2007).
Abaffy, T. et al. A testosterone metabolite 19-hydroxyandrostenedione induces neuroendocrine trans-differentiation of prostate cancer cells via an ectopic olfactory receptor. Front. Oncol. 8, 162 (2018).
Rodriguez, M., Siwko, S. & Liu, M. Prostate-specific G-protein coupled receptor, an emerging biomarker regulating inflammation and prostate cancer invasion. Curr. Mol. Med. 16(6), 526–532 (2016).
Souza, MFd. et al. Circulating mRNAs and miRNAs as candidate markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Plos One 12(9), e0184094 (2017).
Rigau, M. et al. PSGR and PCA3 as biomarkers for the detection of prostate cancer in urine: Urine assay for the detection of prostate cancer. Prostate 70(16), 1760–1767 (2010).
Wang, J. et al. The prostate-specific G-protein coupled receptors PSGR and PSGR2 are prostate cancer biomarkers that are complementary to α-methylacyl-CoA racemase. Prostate 66(8), 847–857 (2006).
Pronin, A. & Slepak, V. Ectopically expressed olfactory receptors OR51E1 and OR51E2 suppress proliferation and promote cell death in a prostate cancer cell line. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100475 (2021).
Li, Y. et al. Exosome carrying PSGR promotes stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of low aggressive prostate cancer cells. Life Sci. 264, 118638 (2021).
Jovancevic, N. et al. Odorant receptor 51E2 agonist β-ionone regulates RPE cell migration and proliferation. Front. Physiol. 8, 888 (2017).
Neuhaus, E. M. et al. Activation of an olfactory receptor inhibits proliferation of prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284(24), 16218–16225 (2009).
Polytarchou, C. et al. Nitric oxide stimulates migration of human endothelial and prostate cancer cells through up-regulation of pleiotrophin expression and its receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase β/ζ. Int. J. Cancer 124(8), 1785–1793 (2009).
Liu, S. et al. Discovery of PTN as a serum-based biomarker of pro-metastatic prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer 124(5), 896–900 (2021).
Feng, D. C. et al. Identification of senescence-related molecular subtypes and key genes for prostate cancer. Asian J. Androl. 25, 223–229 (2022).
Ritter, C. A. et al. Cellular export of drugs and signaling molecules by the ATP-binding cassette transporters MRP4 (ABCC4) and MRP5 (ABCC5). Drug Metab. Rev. 37(1), 253–78 (2005).
Oprea-Lager, D. E. et al. ABCC4 Decreases docetaxel and not cabazitaxel efficacy in prostate cancer cells in vitro. Anticancer Res. 33(2), 387–91 (2013).
Huang, H. et al. Increased ABCC4 expression induced by ERRα leads to docetaxel resistance via efflux of docetaxel in prostate cancer. Front. Oncol. 10, 1474 (2020).
Ho, L. L. et al. Androgen regulation of multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4/ABCC4) in prostate cancer. Prostate 68(13), 1421–1429 (2008).
Lee, K. W., Lim, S. & Kim, K. D. The function of N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) as a negative regulator in tumor cell metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(16), 9365 (2022).
Gao, L. et al. Suppression of invasion and metastasis of prostate cancer cells by overexpression of NDRG2 gene. Cancer Lett. 310(1), 94–100 (2011).
Moradi Monfared, M. et al. NDRG2 regulates the expression of genes involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition of prostate cancer cells. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 44(2), 118–126 (2019).
Wang, W., Liu, M., Guan, Y. & Wu, Q. Hypoxia-responsive Mir-301a and Mir-301b promote radioresistance of prostate cancer cells via downregulating NDRG2. Med. Sci. Monit. 22, 2126–2132 (2016).
Alizadeh Zarei, M. et al. Synergistic effects of NDRG2 overexpression and radiotherapy on cell death of human prostate LNCaP cells. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 7(3), 257–264 (2017).
Garcia-Mayea, Y. et al. TSPAN1, a novel tetraspanin member highly involved in carcinogenesis and chemoresistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1877(1), 188674 (2022).
Wang, Y. et al. Tetraspanin 1 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma via PI3K/AKT signaling. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37(1), 300 (2018).
Zhang, X. et al. TSPAN1 upregulates MMP2 to promote pancreatic cancer cell migration and invasion via PLCγ. Oncol. Rep. 41(4), 2117–2125 (2019).
Wang, G.-L. et al. The effect of NET-1 on the proliferation, migration and endocytosis of the SMMC-7721 HCC cell line. Oncol. Rep. 27(6), 1944–1952 (2012).
Garcia-Mayea, Y. et al. TSPAN1: A novel protein involved in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma chemoresistance. Cancers 12(11), E3269 (2020).
Munkley, J. et al. The cancer-associated cell migration protein TSPAN1 is under control of androgens and its upregulation increases prostate cancer cell migration. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 5249 (2017).
Xu, F. et al. Decreased TSPAN1 promotes prostate cancer progression and is a marker for early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Oncotarget 7(39), 63294–63305 (2016).
Hu, D. et al. Development of an autophagy-related gene expression signature for prognosis prediction in prostate cancer patients. J. Transl. Med. 18(1), 160 (2020).
Wu, Y. et al. P4HB: A novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for bladder carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 21(2), 95 (2021).
Gao, X. et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from oesophageal cancer containing P4HB promote muscle wasting via regulating PHGDH/Bcl-2/caspase-3 pathway. J. Extracell.r Vesicles 10(5), e12060 (2021).
Xie, L. et al. Autophagy-related gene P4HB: A novel diagnosis and prognosis marker for kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. Aging 12(2), 1828–1842 (2020).
Yencilek, F. et al. Apolipoprotein E genotypes in patients with prostate cancer. Anticancer Res. 36(2), 707–711 (2016).
Liu, H., Shui, I. M., Platz, E. A., Mucci, L. A. & Giovannucci, E. L. No association of apoe genotype with risk of prostate cancer: A nested case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 24(10), 1632–1634 (2015).
Meng, J. & Wang, J. Role of SNARE proteins in tumourigenesis and their potential as targets for novel anti-cancer therapeutics. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1856(1), 1–12 (2015).
Söllner, T. H. & Rothman, J. E. Molecular machinery mediating vesicle budding, docking and fusion. Cell Struct. Funct. 21(5), 407–412 (1996).
Tomlins, S. A. et al. Integrative molecular concept modeling of prostate cancer progression. Nat. Genet. 39(1), 41–51 (2007).
Chan, T. A. et al. Development of tumor mutation burden as an immunotherapy biomarker: Utility for the oncology clinic. Ann. Oncol. 30(1), 44–56 (2019).
Jardim, D. L., Goodman, A., de Melo, G. D. & Kurzrock, R. The challenges of tumor mutational burden as an immunotherapy biomarker. Cancer Cell 39(2), 154–173 (2021).
Luo, C., Chen, J. & Chen, L. Exploration of gene expression profiles and immune microenvironment between high and low tumor mutation burden groups in prostate cancer. Int. Immunopharmacol. 86, 106709 (2020).
Graf, R. P. et al. Comparative effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors vs chemotherapy by tumor mutational burden in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 5(3), e225394 (2022).
Darvin, P., Toor, S. M., Sasidharan Nair, V. & Elkord, E. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: Recent progress and potential biomarkers. Exp. Mol. Med. 50(12), 1–11 (2018).
Kern, R. & Panis, C. CTLA-4 expression and its clinical significance in breast cancer. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 69(1), 16 (2021).
Larkin, J. et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 373(1), 23–34 (2015).
Liu, J.-N. et al. Clinical implications of aberrant PD-1 and CTLA4 expression for cancer immunity and prognosis: A pan-cancer study. Front. Immunol. 11, 2048 (2020).
Liang, J. et al. Sex difference in response to non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: An updated meta-analysis. Ann. Med. 54(1), 2606–2616 (2022).
Carosella, E. D., Ploussard, G., LeMaoult, J. & Desgrandchamps, F. A systematic review of immunotherapy in urologic cancer: Evolving roles for targeting of CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, and HLA-G. Eur. Urol. 68(2), 267–279 (2015).
Mo, L. et al. Depletion of regulatory T cells by anti-ICOS antibody enhances anti-tumor immunity of tumor cell vaccine in prostate cancer. Vaccine 35(43), 5932–5938 (2017).
Kumar, A. & Younes, A. Role of CD30 targeting in malignant lymphoma. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 15(2), 210–225 (2014).
Corn, P. G. et al. A phase II study of cabozantinib and androgen ablation in patients with hormone-naïve metastatic prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 26(5), 990–999 (2020).
Anguille, S., Smits, E. L., Lion, E., van Tendeloo, V. F. & Berneman, Z. N. Clinical use of dendritic cells for cancer therapy. Lancet Oncol. 15(7), e257–e267 (2014).
Palucka, K. & Banchereau, J. Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12(4), 265–277 (2012).
Thomas-Kaskel, A.-K., Waller, C. F., Schultze-Seemann, W. & Veelken, H. Immunotherapy with dendritic cells for prostate cancer. Int. J. Cancer 121(3), 467–473 (2007).
Kantoff, P. W. et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363(5), 411–422 (2010).
Funding
This program was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81974099, 82170785, 81974098, 82170784), programs from Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (Grant Nos. 2021YFH0172), Young Investigator Award of Sichuan University 2017 (Grant No. 2017SCU04A17), Technology Innovation Research and Development Project of Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (2019-YF05-00296-SN), Sichuan University–Panzhihua science and technology cooperation special fund (2020CDPZH-4). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to publish.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.C.F., J.W. and Y.L.Q. proposed the project, conducted data analysis, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript; Q.W. and W.R.W. conducted data analysis, interpreted the data; P.H. and L.Y. supervised the project, and interpreted the data. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Qian, Y., Feng, D., Wang, J. et al. Establishment of cancer-associated fibroblasts-related subtypes and prognostic index for prostate cancer through single-cell and bulk RNA transcriptome. Sci Rep 13, 9016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36125-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36125-0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The multifaceted role of the stroma in the healthy prostate and prostate cancer
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
-
The implications of single-cell RNA-seq analysis in prostate cancer: unraveling tumor heterogeneity, therapeutic implications and pathways towards personalized therapy
Military Medical Research (2024)
-
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) gene signatures predict outcomes in breast and prostate tumor patients
Journal of Translational Medicine (2024)
-
Integrative multi-omics analysis unveils stemness-associated molecular subtypes in prostate cancer and pan-cancer: prognostic and therapeutic significance
Journal of Translational Medicine (2023)
-
Prolyl 4-hydroxylase subunit beta (P4HB) could serve as a prognostic and radiosensitivity biomarker for prostate cancer patients
European Journal of Medical Research (2023)