Abstract
The prognosis of high-grade gliomas, such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is extremely poor due to the highly invasive nature of these aggressive cancers. Previous work has demonstrated that TNF-weak like factor (TWEAK) induction of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway promotes the invasiveness of GBM cells in an NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK)-dependent manner. While NIK activity is predominantly regulated at the posttranslational level, we show here that NIK (MAP3K14) is upregulated at the transcriptional level in invading cell populations, with the highest NIK expression observed in the most invasive cells. GBM cells with high induction of NIK gene expression demonstrate characteristics of collective invasion, facilitating invasion of neighboring cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the E2F transcription factors E2F4 and E2F5 directly regulate NIK transcription and are required to promote GBM cell invasion in response to TWEAK. Overall, our findings demonstrate that transcriptional induction of NIK facilitates collective cell migration and invasion, thereby promoting GBM pathogenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
While glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors rarely metastasize outside of the central nervous system (CNS), their aggressive growth and persistent invasiveness into healthy brain tissue are major factors underlying resistance to conventional treatment methods such as surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy1, 2. In addition to single-cell invasion, multicellular, connected networks of GBM cells have been observed in human tumors and mouse models3,4,5. This collective invasion, defined by the coordinated movement of cells into surrounding tissue while maintaining cell–cell junctions, is a process that occurs in epithelial regeneration and during the development and remodeling of large tissue structures, including angiogenesis and neural crest cell development6,7. Collective invasion has also been identified as a significant mode of GBM cell infiltration into healthy brain tissue. During collective invasion, cells acquire leader–follower phenotypes, in which both leader (pioneer) and follower cells assume different metabolic activities and work in concert to promote tumor cell dispersion. Leader cells direct the leading edge of the tumor, migrating through the microenvironment, paving the path of invasion, and transmitting information to follower cells8, 9. However, there is an increasing body of evidence that tumor cells in collective invasion may alternate between leader and follower phenotypes, warranting further studies of this process.
Activation of NF-κB signaling pathways has been well documented in a variety of malignancies, including GBM10. We previously demonstrated that activation of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway through TNF-weak-like factor (TWEAK) is a potent inducer of GBM invasion11. Specifically, NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK; encoded by MAP3K14), an essential upstream kinase for noncanonical NF-κB activation, increases matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MT1-MMP) activity to promote invadopodia formation during GBM invasion12. NIK is predominantly regulated at the posttranslational level, whereby constitutive proteosome-dependent NIK protein turnover is attenuated in a signal-dependent manner, resulting in the accumulation of catalytically active NIK. In the current study, we show that the dynamic, signal-dependent upregulation of NIK at the transcriptional level is pronounced in cells at the leading edge of gliomaspheres, enhancing collective invasion of neighboring cells into the surrounding matrix.
Results
Induction of NIK transcription directly correlates with GBM cell invasion
We previously reported that the invasive potential of GBM cells directly correlated with elevated RelB expression and NIK-dependent activation of the noncanonical NF-κB signaling pathway. Consistent with these findings11, we observed that the invasiveness of the human-derived glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines BT25, BT114, and BT116 was significantly induced by treatment with TWEAK, whereas treatment with TNFα did not stimulate invasion (Fig. 1A). Compared to our earlier results11, we noted increased expression of RelB in BT116 cells (Suppl. Fig. 1A), consistent with the increased basal invasion observed relative to BT25 cells. Transcriptome analysis of BT25 cells treated with TWEAK or TNFα, which preferentially activates the noncanonical or canonical NF-κB pathways respectively13, 14, revealed that the expression of NIK (MAP3K14) directly correlated with GBM cell invasion and was highly induced in response to TWEAK treatment but not TNFα treatment (Fig. 1B,C). Moreover, we observed TWEAK-specific upregulation of tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factor 1 (TRAF1), a signaling adapter that interacts with and stabilizes NIK for activation of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway15. Elevated levels of integrin β3 (ITGB3), integrin subunit alpha 11 (ITGA11), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), and Fms-related tyrosine kinase (FLT1) were also observed, consistent with increased invasive and migratory potential16, 17. Furthermore, only TWEAK-treated GBM cells exhibited increased expression of integrins, as well as MMP9, all of which are associated cancer markers18,19,20,21. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of groups of genes belonging to specific diseases and functions revealed that TWEAK treatment elevated the overall expression of cancer pathways, including tumor formation, invasion, and metastasis (Fig. 1D). Additionally, RNA-seq analysis demonstrated that, relative to other MAP3 kinases and upstream regulatory kinases in the NF-κB signaling pathways, TWEAK treatment had the greatest effect on induction of NIK/MAP3K14 gene expression compared with TNF (Fig. 1E). RT-qPCR analysis verified RNA-seq results, and demonstrated TWEAK induced highest induction of MAP3K14 expression, followed by MAP3K8, and to a much lesser extent IKKB, while TNF treatment mainly induced MAP3K8 expression (Fig. 1F,G). Moreover, analysis of cells actively undergoing invasion in collagen matrices revealed that NIK/MAP3K14 was the most highly upregulated gene compared to other kinases (Fig. 1G). We also observed TWEAK-induction of NIK mRNA and invasion in other GBM cell lines, as well as mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Suppl. Fig. 1B–D).
After observing elevated NIK transcription and invasion upon TWEAK treatment, we investigated potential paracrine effects among GBM cells during invasion. We found that BT116 cells underwent increased invasion when treated with conditioned media (Control CM) from highly invasive BT25 cells compared with unconditioned media. This increased invasion was dependent on NIK, as it was not observed when BT116 cells were cultured with conditioned media from NIK knockout BT25 cells (NIK KO CM). Furthermore, conditioned media from NIK KO cells rescued with ectopic expression of murine NIK (NIK KO-mNIK CM) restored induction of invasion (Suppl. Fig. 1E,F). Consistent with the results from media treatments, direct coculture of BT25 and BT114 cells increased the cell invasion/migration of the BT114 cells compared to cells cultured alone (Suppl. Fig. 1G). These results demonstrate that transcriptional induction of NIK is associated with elevated GBM invasiveness that is propagated by signal-specific, NIK-dependent paracrine signaling.
NIK expression is upregulated in highly invasive GBM cells and promotes collective invasion
To monitor the induction of NIK transcription during invasion in vivo, we generated BT116 GBM cells stably expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) under the promoter of NIK (pNIK-RFP). Analysis of invading BT116 pNIK-RFP cells revealed a general induction of NIK expression in invading cells (red signal from monolayer pseudocolored white) (Fig. 2A), with the farthest invading cells exhibiting the highest RFP intensity or highest expression of NIK (Fig. 2B). Treatment of BT116 pNIK-RFP cells with TWEAK further increased NIK expression (RFP signal-red/yellow), with RFP-positive cells invading farther under either untreated (NT) or TWEAK-treated conditions (Fig. 2C).
To evaluate collective invasion and leader–follower phenotypes in a 3-dimensional view, we performed invasion assays of GBMtumor spheres, which better mimic cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions. Imaging of collagen-embedded BT116 pNIK-RFP spheres revealed an increase in pNIK-RFP expression upon TWEAK treatment (Fig. 2D), with the highest pNIK-RFP expression observed among the most invasive cells at the leading edge of the sphere (Fig. 2E, Suppl. Fig. 2A). Consistent with single-cell invasion assays, the induction of NIK expression directly correlated with the migration and dispersion of cells from GBM spheres, which was enhanced upon TWEAK treatment (Fig. 2F) compared to the invasion of similar-sized spheres from the untreated group (Fig. 2G). Cells with a high pNIK-RFP signal were observed among cells undergoing collective invasion at the sphere peripheries (Fig. 2H). These results demonstrate that cells with the highest TWEAK-induced NIK expression directly correlated with the most invasive GBM cells, facilitating collective invasion, consistent with increased invasion and metastasis gene signatures.
Inhibition of NIK activity reduces GBM cell invasion
Next, we evaluated whether NIK catalytic activity was required to promote GBM invasion. Treatment of cells with mangiferin, a natural inhibitor of NIK22,23,24, significantly attenuated TWEAK-stimulated invasion to levels comparable with untreated or TNF-treated conditions (Fig. 3A,B). Mangiferin was verified to inhibit activation of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway by TWEAK treatment in GBM cells, as seen with a reduction in p100-p52 processing and RelB (Fig. 3C). Mangiferin also inhibited TWEAK-induced NIK transcription (Suppl. Fig. 2B). Although mangiferin inhibited NIK and the noncanonical NF-κB pathway, it did not affect cell proliferation (Suppl. Fig. 2C). These data suggest therapeutic potential of inhibiting NIK to attenuate GBM invasion.
E2F4 and E2F5 regulate NIK gene expression
The mechanisms underlying the regulation of NIK gene expression are not fully understood. A recent study identified MAP3K14 (NIK) as a significantly upregulated gene in human osteosarcoma cells with E2F activation25, and analysis of the NIK promoter revealed the presence of E2F binding sites (Suppl. Fig. 3D). Thus, we next investigated whether E2F transcription factors played a role in early NIK gene expression in response to TWEAK treatment in GBM cells. We observed that TWEAK treatment increased nuclear E2F4 and E2F5 protein levels, with E2F4 having greater nuclear translocation in BT25 cells and E2F5 in BT114 cells (Fig. 4A). We also found that overexpression of E2F5, but not E2F1, increased NIK transcript levels (Suppl. Fig. 3A). E2F4 and E2F5 single and double knockout cell lines generated by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing exhibited a significant reduction in NIK protein levels when treated with TWEAK and MG132 to inhibit proteosome-dependent degradation (Fig. 4B, Suppl. Fig. 3B). Moreover, E2F4/5 double knockout cells (E2F DKO) exhibited reduced p52/RelB nuclear translocation, demonstrating impaired activation of NIK-driven noncanonical NF-κB signaling (Suppl. Fig. 3C).
Next, we investigated whether E2F proteins directly regulate NIK transcription. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analyses demonstrated that antibodies specific to E2F4 and E2F5, but not IgG, were bound to certain regions of the NIK promoter (Fig. 4C, Suppl. Fig. 3D,E). Additionally, qPCR analysis of E2F-DKO cells showed significantly attenuated induction of NIK mRNA expression even with TWEAK treatment (Fig. 4D). Reduced NIK expression in E2F DKO cells proved to have functional consequences, as these cells were poorly invasive, even after TWEAK treatment (Fig. 4E), which was restored with ectopic expression of NIK (NIK OE) in E2F DKO cells (Fig. 4F). Overall, these data establish a novel role for E2F regulation of NIK transcription in a stimulated state and thus affect the cell’s overall ability to invade (Suppl. Fig. 3F).
Discussion
While posttranscriptional regulation of NIK protein stability is important for controlling the activation of NF-κB signaling, in this study, we report that signal-specific transcriptional upregulation of NIK is strongly associated with enhanced collective invasion of GBM cells (Fig. 1). RNA-seq and qPCR analyses demonstrated that NIK induction occurred early (≤ 4 h) and was sustained with TWEAK treatment as well as in invading cells but occurred to a significantly lesser extent with TNFα at later time points (24 h). Using a NIK promoter-controlled reporter construct (pNIK-RFP) as a readout for NIK gene expression levels, we demonstrated that TWEAK-induced NIK transcription directly correlates with cell invasion and the acquisition of leader–follower cells seen in collective invasion (Fig. 2H). Indeed, we observed that the most invasive cells expressed the highest levels pNIK-RFP, suggesting a direct correlation between increased NIK gene expression and invasive potential (Fig. 2). Our data showing that conditioned media from NIK KO GBM cells was unable to stimulate invasion, while conditioned media from NIK KO-mNIK cells rescued invasion, suggests that NIK-dependent paracrine signaling propagates a collective leader–follower cell phenotype during cell invasion. Furthermore, although prior studies have shown that E2F regulates cIAPs, and E2F1 directly promotes MAP3K14 gene expression in osteosarcoma cells25,26,27, we report for the first time that the E2F transcription factors, E2F4 and E2F5, play a key role in regulating NIK transcription and expression in GBM cells. Overall, these data reveal critical roles for the regulation of NIK at the transcriptional level in propagating collective cell invasion.
We demonstrate that NIK promotes invasion in a noncanonical NF-κB-dependent manner in response to treatment with TWEAK. However, this does not exclude possible involvement of the canonical NF-κB pathway in regulating cancer invasion through independent or complementary mechanisms. Furthermore, we have previously demonstrated that NIK promotes mitochondrial fission and trafficking to the periphery of GBM cells during cell migration in a manner that is independent of IKKα/β and downstream NF-κB signaling28, suggesting that increased NIK transcription in lead invading cells may facilitate mitochondrial energy dynamics that support collective invasion.
A hallmark of invasion is alteration of the extracellular matrix to facilitate cell mobility, which includes changes in the dynamics of such proteins as e-cadherins, integrins or matrix metalloproteinases. In conjugation to promoting invasion, NIK has also been shown to regulate matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) by reducing phosphorylated MMP14, or its active form, seen in cells lacking NIK, where the opposite held true in cells expressing a constitutively active form of NIK12. RNA-seq analysis revealed elevated MMP9 expression in glioma cells stimulated with TWEAK, which has been associated with cancer biomarkers18. Furthermore, as collective invasion maintains cell-to-cell contact through the extracellular matrix, it has been shown that stabilization of integrins is associated with increased collective invasion of solid tumors29, coinciding with an increase in integrin alpha 11 and integrin beta 3 gene expression in highly invading, TWEAK-treated cells. Integrin alpha 11 and integrin beta 3 have also been linked to increased tumor progression in other cancer types19,20,21. RNA-seq disease pathway analysis also highlighted TWEAK-treated glioma cells as having higher activation of cell–cell junctions and tumor development, invasion, and metastasis. Elevated matrix metalloprotease, integrin, and tumor progression is consistent with a leader phenotype displayed by NIK-expressing cells during collective invasion.
NIK and NF-κB dysregulation are highly correlated with the induction of disease and malignancies30,31,32. Several studies have demonstrated an increase in NIK expression in various cancer models. Of these studies, increased NIK expression was observed in breast cancer, lymphomas, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, and GBMs11, 33,34,35,36. Our lab has demonstrated that NIK has a role in promoting brain tumor cell invasiveness and tumor growth in vivo through regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and metabolic homeostasis28, 37. Given the pro-tumorigenic role NIK has in cancer and our studies suggesting that upregulation of NIK gene expression by cytokines in the tumor microenvironment can robustly trigger invasion, the inhibition of NIK may prove a promising therapeutic target for primary as well as recurrent, invasive or metastatic tumors22, 38,39,40.
Materials and methods
Reagents
TNFα (ProSpec CYT-223) and TWEAK (PeproTech 31006) were used at 10 ng/mL, mangiferin was obtained from Mangiferia indica leaves (M3547-100MG, Sigma Aldrich), collagen type I (354249) was purchased from Corning, and DiD and DiO were purchased from Invitrogen.
Cell lines
BT25, BT114 and BT116 cell lines were obtained from human GBM patients as previously described41. These cell lines were maintained as spheroids in neural stem cell medium containing DMEM/F-12, 1 × B-27 supplement minus vitamin A, 1 × GlutaMAX, 25 ng/mL EGF, 25 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and 1 × penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies).
Plasmids
For NIK overexpression, mouse (mNIK) cDNA was cloned into pLenti6-V5-DEST (Addgene, Cambridge, MA) using the GATE-WAYTM Cloning System (Invitrogen). For pNIK-tagRFP, the promoter of NIK was purchased from Genecopoeia (HPRM17530) and cloned into a lentiviral plasmid.
CRISPR-Cas9 gene knockout
BT25, BT114, and BT116 cells were transduced with a mixture of LentiCrispR-v2 carrying three gRNAs for each target. The gRNA sequences for human NIK E2F4 and E2F5 are shown in Supplemental Table 1.
RNA sequencing
1 × 106 BT25 GBM cells harvested in untreated, TWEAK-treated (10 ng/mL for 4 h) and TNFα-treated (10 ng/mL for 30 min) conditions along with stable transgenic BT25 NIK KO cells. Duplicates of cell pellets were shipped on dry ice to Azenta by Genewiz (South Plainfield, NJ, USA), where RNA was isolated, and they conducted sequencing and constructed the sequencing library. For sequencing, HiSeq 2 × 150 bp was used. Sequence reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v.0.36. The trimmed reads were mapped to the Homo sapiens GRCh38 reference genome using the STAR aligner v.2.5.2b. Unique gene hit counts were calculated by using featureCounts from the Subread package v.1.5.2. The hit counts were summarized and reported using the gene_id feature in the annotation file. Only unique reads that fell within exon regions were counted. DESeq2 files were uploaded to Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (IPA; QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA) for dataset comparisons and to analyze altered genes that were statistically significant compared to wild type. IPA software was also used to analyze overall changes in disease function pathways related to identified gene families. GraphPad Prism (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to generate volcano plots and heatmaps.
Immunoblot assays
Cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Pierce, #89900, Rockford, IL) with a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific). Equal amounts of protein were mixed with NuPage 4X LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen, NP0008) containing reducing agent and denatured at 100 °C for 7 min. Proteins were separated by 8–12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, #162- 0115). The membranes were blocked for 1 h with 5% nonfat dry milk in 0.1% Tween-20/TBS (TBST) or Odyssey blocking buffer (LI-COR Biosciences, 927-40000) and incubated with primary antibodies from Cell Signaling Technology (CST) or Santa Cruz (SC): NIK CST4994, RelB CST4922, Lamin A CST 4777, NFKB2 CST4882, E2F3 SC56665, E2F4 SC69686 E2F5 SC374268, and Actin SC69879.
Immunofluorescence staining
Collagen-embedded spheroids were seeded on eight-well chamber slides (#80827, Ibidi, Munich, Germany) or 96 half-area well plates and allowed to adhere for 2 h. During spheroid and monolayer invasion live cell imaging, cells were labeled with DiO or DiD for 30 min at 37 °C before washing three times in media. Cells were allowed to invade for 48 to 72 h, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized for 20 min with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS. Cells were incubated overnight in 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA in PBS at 4 °C. Cells were then incubated in 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were counterstained with the nuclear stain DAPI (Invitrogen, P36931).
Three-dimensional collagen invasion assay
Monolayer invasion assays were performed as previously described28. Briefly, collagen type I (Corning, NY) was diluted to 2 mg/ml in DMEM/F-12 medium (1 × Pen/Strep), and matrices were polymerized in 96-well plates. A total of 4 × 105 cells cultured in NSCs or NSCs + 10% serum were seeded in triplicate in 100 μl DMEM/F-12 (1 × Pen/Strep, 1 × Glutamax) without growth factors or serum. Cells were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde solution after 48 h of invasion and stained with 0.1% toluidine blue. Invasion density was quantified by counting cells below the plane of the monolayer by bright-field light microscopy using a 10 × 10 ocular grid at 10 × or 20 × magnification corresponding to a 1 mm 2 field. Numbers in at least three equivalent, random fields were counted (n = 3 wells each) and normalized to the corresponding control. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Live cell invasion assays were performed using GBM cells. The cells were collected and centrifuged at 1.0 rcf for 2.5 min, and the medium was removed and disassociated with accutase for 9 min at room temperature before centrifugation at 1.0 rcf for 2.5 min. Accutase was removed, and cells were resuspended in NSC media and then quantified. Approximately 2.0 × 106 cells were transferred into a 15 mL conical tube, and media was added to 2 mL with 12 µL of DiO added. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with DiO, followed by centrifugation at 1.0 rcf for 2 min. Cells were washed three times in NSC media before requantification. Cells were either used for monolayer invasion assay at 40,000 cells/well or 1.2 × 106 cells were incubated for one week at 37 °C in NSC media before being embedded into 2.0 mg/ml collagen matrix.
After spheroid formation, spheres were collected at 1.0 rcf for 2.0 min and resuspended in 2 mL of fresh media. The collagen matrix was prepared, approximately 60 µL of resuspended spheres was added to the matrix, and 18 µL of spheres embedded in collagen was added to each well. Collagen was allowed to solidify for 2 h at 37 °C before taking initial images. Images were acquired over a 72-h time course.
Image acquisition
Images were acquired with a Nikon TI A1R inverted confocal microscope with a CFI60 Plan Apochromat Lambda 10 × objective lens. Images were acquired with the following scan parameters: a "frame" scan mode of 1024 × 1024 pixels with a 16 bit depth and a grating of 3 rotations. Three-dimensional projections were obtained through Z stack images with 0.4700 µm between each image.
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from cells by a Purelink™ RNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies). cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using iScript reverse transcription supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) following the manufacturer's protocol. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) with a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The primers used are listed in Supplemental Table 2. The expression of mRNA was normalized to GAPDH expression levels. All experiments were performed at least three times with three replicates per sample.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).
References
Hoelzinger, D. B., Demuth, T. & Berens, M. E. Autocrine factors that sustain glioma invasion and paracrine biology in the brain microenvironment. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99, 1583–1593 (2007).
Zhang, X. et al. Malignant intracranial high grade glioma and current treatment strategy. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 19, 101–108 (2019).
Gritsenko, P. G. et al. P120-catenin dependent collective brain infiltration by glioma cell networks. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 97–107 (2020).
Osswald, M. et al. Brain tumour cells interconnect to a functional and resistant network. Nature 528, 93–98 (2015).
Peglion, F. et al. PTEN inhibits AMPK to control collective migration. Nat. Commun. 13, 4528 (2022).
Friedl, P., Locker, J., Sahai, E. & Segall, J. E. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 777–783 (2012).
Medwig, T. N. & Matus, D. Q. Breaking down barriers: The evolution of cell invasion. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 47, 33–40 (2017).
Khalil, A. A. & Friedl, P. Determinants of leader cells in collective cell migration. Integr. Biol. 2, 568–574 (2010).
Vilchez Mercedes, S. A. et al. Decoding leader cells in collective cancer invasion. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 592–604 (2021).
Raychaudhuri, B., Han, Y., Lu, T. & Vogelbaum, M. A. Aberrant constitutive activation of nuclear factor kappaB in glioblastoma multiforme drives invasive phenotype. J. Neurooncol. 85, 39–47 (2007).
Cherry, E. M., Lee, D. W., Jung, J.-U. & Sitcheran, R. Tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) promotes glioma cell invasion through induction of NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) and noncanonical NF-κB signaling. Mol. Cancer 14, 9 (2015).
Duran, C. L. et al. NIK regulates MT1-MMP activity and promotes glioma cell invasion independently of the canonical NF-κB pathway. Oncogenesis 5, e231–e231 (2016).
Hayden, M. S. & Ghosh, S. Regulation of NF-κB by TNF family cytokines. Semin. Immunol. 26, 253–266 (2014).
Saitoh, T. et al. TWEAK induces NF-kappaB2 p100 processing and long lasting NF-kappaB activation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 36005–36012 (2003).
Choudhary, S. et al. Inducible tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor-1 expression couples the canonical to the non-canonical NF-κB pathway in TNF stimulation. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 14612–14623 (2013).
Jiang, K. et al. Fms related tyrosine kinase 1 (Flt1) functions as an oncogene and regulates glioblastoma cell metastasis by regulating sonic hedgehog signaling. Am. J. Cancer Res. 7, 1164–1176 (2017).
Wang, M., Shen, S., Hou, F. & Yan, Y. Pathophysiological roles of integrins in gliomas from the perspective of glioma stem cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.962481 (2022).
Huang, H. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as a cancer biomarker and MMP-9 biosensors: Recent advances. Sensors 18, 3249 (2018).
Navab, R. et al. Integrin α11β1 regulates cancer stromal stiffness and promotes tumorigenicity and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene 35, 1899–1908 (2016).
Ando, T. et al. Integrin α11 in non–small cell lung cancer is associated with tumor progression and postoperative recurrence. Cancer Sci 111, 200–208 (2020).
Pan, B., Guo, J., Liao, Q. & Zhao, Y. β1 and β3 integrins in breast, prostate and pancreatic cancer: A novel implication. Oncol. Lett. 15, 5412–5416 (2018).
Takeda, T. et al. Mangiferin, a novel nuclear factor kappa B-inducing kinase inhibitor, suppresses metastasis and tumor growth in a mouse metastatic melanoma model. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 306, 105–112 (2016).
Takeda, T. et al. Mangiferin induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cell lines by suppressing the activation of nuclear factor kappa B-inducing kinase. Chem. Biol. Interact. 251, 26–33 (2016).
Gold-Smith, F., Fernandez, A. & Bishop, K. Mangiferin and cancer: Mechanisms of action. Nutrients 8, 396 (2016).
Stanelle, J., Stiewe, T., Theseling, C. C., Peter, M. & Pützer, B. M. Gene expression changes in response to E2F1 activation. Nucl. Acids Res 30, 1859–1867 (2002).
Allègre, J. et al. E2F1 binds to the peptide-binding groove within the BIR3 domain of cIAP1 and requires cIAP1 for chromatin binding. PLoS ONE 13, e0206253 (2018).
Cartier, J. et al. Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein-1 (cIAP1) can regulate E2F1 transcription factor-mediated control of cyclin transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 26406–26417 (2011).
Jung, J.-U. et al. NIK/MAP3K14 regulates mitochondrial dynamics and trafficking to promote cell invasion. Curr. Biol. 26, 3288–3302 (2016).
Haeger, A. et al. Collective cancer invasion forms an integrin-dependent radioresistant niche. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20181184 (2019).
Maubach, G., Feige, M. H., Lim, M. C. C. & Naumann, M. NF-kappaB-inducing kinase in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Rev. Cancer 1871, 40–49 (2019).
Pflug, K. M. & Sitcheran, R. Targeting NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) in immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 8470 (2020).
Valiño-Rivas, L. et al. NIK as a druggable mediator of tissue injury. Trends Mol. Med. 25, 341–360 (2019).
Zhang, X. et al. Expression of NF-κB-inducing kinase in breast carcinoma tissue and its clinical significance. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8, 14824–14829 (2015).
Otto, C. et al. Genetic lesions of the TRAF3 and MAP3K14 genes in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 157, 702–708 (2012).
Doppler, H., Liou, G. Y. & Storz, P. Downregulation of TRAF2 mediates NIK-induced pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenicity. PLoS ONE 8, e53676 (2013).
Teng, H., Xue, L., Wang, Y., Ding, X. & Li, J. Nuclear factor κB -inducing kinase is a diagnostic marker of gastric cancer. Medicine 99, e18864 (2020).
Kamradt, M. L. et al. NIK promotes metabolic adaptation of glioblastoma cells to bioenergetic stress. Cell Death Dis. 12, 1–18 (2021).
Ranuncolo, S. M., Pittaluga, S., Evbuomwan, M. O., Jaffe, E. S. & Lewis, B. A. Hodgkin lymphoma requires stabilized NIK and constitutive RelB expression for survival. Blood 120, 3756–3763 (2012).
Pippione, A. C. et al. N-Acetyl-3-aminopyrazoles block the non-canonical NF-kB cascade by selectively inhibiting NIK. MedChemComm 9, 963–968 (2018).
Gupta, S. C., Sundaram, C., Reuter, S. & Aggarwal, B. B. Inhibiting NF-κB activation by small molecules as a therapeutic strategy. BBA Gene Regul. Mech. 1799, 775–787 (2010).
Kelly, J. J. P. et al. Proliferation of human glioblastoma stem cells occurs independently of exogenous mitogens. Stem Cells 27, 1722–1733 (2009).
Funding
The Project is funded by R01NS082554 (NIH) and RP160842 (CPRIT) to RS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, K.M. and R.S.; methodology, K.M., D.W.L., K.M.P. and L.H.; formal analysis, K.M., D.W.L. and L.H.; data curation, K.M., D.W.L. and L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.M.P.; writing—review and editing, K.M.P. and R.S.; visualization, K.M., D.W.L., K.M.P. and R.S.; supervision, R.S.; funding acquisition, R.S. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pflug, K.M., Lee, D.W., McFadden, K. et al. Transcriptional induction of NF-κB-inducing kinase by E2F4/5 facilitates collective invasion of GBM cells. Sci Rep 13, 13093 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38996-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38996-9
- Springer Nature Limited