Abstract
Risks of atherosclerotic events substantially vary even among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with extremely high risk based on life-long exposure to high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. This study aimed to examine the impact of the severe FH status defined by the International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS). Data of patients with FH (N = 1050, male = 490) who were admitted to Kanazawa University Hospital between 2000 and 2020 and who were followed up were retrospectively reviewed. The number of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including mortality associated with cardiovascular disease, acute coronary syndrome, and ischemic heart disease requiring coronary revascularization per 1000 person-years, was calculated. Hazard ratio was also calculated using Cox proportional model. Overall, 545 (51.9%) patients had severe FH. The median follow-up duration was 12.6 years. In total, 171 MACEs were recorded during the follow-up period. Severe FH was significantly associated with MACE (hazard ratio = 6.48, 95% confidence interval = 2.56–10.40, P = 1.2 × 10−5). The event rates per 1000 person-years in the primary prevention group of non-severe FH and severe FH, were 0.0 and 15.6, respectively. The event rates per 1000 person-years in the secondary prevention group of non-severe FH and severe FH, were 2.0 and 32.3, respectively. Patients with severe FH exhibited significantly higher risks in primary and secondary prevention settings. This simple criterion provides useful information for identifying patients with even higher risk who may need further management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have been the most frequent causes of death worldwide1; thus, cardiologists have been trying to risk stratify high-risk patients. In this sense, patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) caused by pathogenic mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) or its associated genes, including apolipoprotein B (APOB), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), and LDLR adaptor protein 1 (LDLRAP1), are at extremely high risk of CVDs2,3,4. However, CVD risks are considerably different even among these high-risk patients. For example, we have previously shown that classical risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and smoking, as well as emerging risk factors, such as remnant cholesterol, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], genetic variants, and subclinical atherosclerosis, were significantly associated with CVD risk even among patients with heterozygous FH (HeFH)5,6,7,8,9. Recently, the International Society of Atherosclerosis (IAS) proposed the unique concept of “severe FH” where CVD risk of HeFH appears to increase substantially10. Several studies have tried to validate the clinical effect of this status in independent FH cohorts, especially among patients under the primary prevention settings11,12. Funabashi et al. showed that a “severe FH” status was significantly associated with CVD events among Japanese patients with FH under the primary prevention settings13. However, whether this concept fits into patients under the secondary prevention settings is still unclear. Accordingly, this study aimed to reassess the clinical impact of a “severe FH” status on future CVD events among independent Japanese cohort, including patients under the secondary prevention settings.
Patients and methods
Study population
This study analyzed data collected from 2042 patients diagnosed with FH using the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) 2017 criteria14,15. These patients were admitted to Kanazawa University Hospital between 2000 and 2020 and were followed up. Some patients were excluded because of missing data (n = 491), homozygous FH (n = 6), and lost to follow-up (n = 495). Finally, 1050 patients were included in the study (Supplemental Fig. 1).
Clinical data assessment
Baseline was defined as the point when initial assessments were performed before the initiation of lipid-lowering therapies, and the follow-up was the point when latest assessments were performed. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure of ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of ≥ 90 mmHg or the use of antihypertensive medications. The definition of diabetes by the Japan Diabetes Society was used16. Smoking status was defined as current smoking status. CVD was defined as the presence of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or coronary artery revascularization. The total serum cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were determined enzymatically via automated instrumentation. LDL cholesterol levels were calculated using the Friedewald formula if the triglyceride level was < 400 mg/dL; otherwise, it was determined enzymatically. The LDL cholesterol year score was calculated as LDL cholesterol max × [age at diagnosis/statin initiation] + LDL cholesterol at inclusion × [age at inclusion − age at diagnosis/statin initiation]17. The LDL cholesterol levels during LDL apheresis therapy were calculated as follows: Caverage = Cmin + 0.73 (Cmax–Cmin), where Caverage is the mean concentration during biweekly LDL-apheresis therapy and Cmax and Cmin are the concentration just before and after a single session of LDL-apheresis18. In this study, the LDL cholesterol level 2 weeks after the use of PCSK9 inhibitor was used for patients taking this drug. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as mortality associated with CVD, acute coronary syndrome, and ischemic heart disease requiring coronary revascularization. According to IAS, severe FH was LDL cholesterol > 400 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol > 310 mg/dL plus 1 high-risk feature, or LDL cholesterol > 190 mg/dL plus high-risk features. High-risk features included age > 40 years without treatment, smoking, male sex, Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL (75 nmol/L), low-HDL cholesterol (< 1 mmol/L or 40 mg/dL), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, family history of premature CVD in first-degree relatives (age < 55 years in men and < 60 years in women), chronic kidney disease (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rare < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and body mass index > 30 kg/m2)10. High-intensity statins were defined as the maximum approved doses of strong statins on FH in Japan (rosuvastatin 20 mg, atorvastatin 40 mg, or pitavastatin 4 mg).
Genetic analysis
A next-generation sequencer was used to evaluate genotypes. Briefly, the coding regions of APOB, LDLR, LDLRAP1, and PCSK9 were sequenced, as described in a previous study19. Moreover, copy number variations at LDLR were assessed using the eXome Hidden Markov Model, as described previously20. The standard American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria (“Pathogenic” or “Likely Pathogenic”) were used to determine whether the genetic variants were pathogenic21.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kanazawa University (2015-219). All procedures met the ethical standards of the Human Research Committee (institutional and national) and the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki (revised in 2008), and Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects, and all other applicable laws and guidelines in Japan. All participants provided informed consent for the genetic analysis.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as means ± standard deviations, whereas continuous variables without a normal distribution were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). All comparisons between categorical variables were performed using Fisher’s exact test or the chi-square test. Data were presented as numbers or percentages. For independent variables, Student’s t-test was used to compare the means of continuous variables, and the nonparametric Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the median values. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate categorical variables. Multivariable Cox regression hazard model was used to assess MACE-associated factors. The cumulative Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated to compare the time to the development of the first MACE. For each stratum of the prevention status, the MACE per 1000 person-years was calculated. In addition, we calculated the MACE per 1000 person-years according to the subgroups, including age (50 years or older, sex, and the attainment of LDL cholesterol treatment target where < 100 mg/dL in the primary prevention setting and < 70 mg/dL in the secondary prevention setting). P-values of < 0.05 were used to denote statistical significance.
Results
Clinical characteristics of the participants
Characteristics of the participants are illustrated in Table 1. The mean age was 49 years, and 47% were men. The median LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels at baseline were 239 and 20.4 mg/dL, respectively. We found a pathogenic variant as FH among 777 (74.0%) patients. As expected, we found significant differences in variables, including age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, baseline LDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol year score, prevalence of family history of premature CVD, prevalence of tendon xanthomas, and prevalence of prior CVD. When we divided the patients according to sex, we found several differences in several parameters, including LDL cholesterol on treatment (Supplemental Table 1). One hundred seventy one MACEs (Supplemental Table 2) were recorded during the follow-up period (median follow-up duration [interquartile range]: 12.6 [9.1–17.4] years).
LDL cholesterol year score according to the severe FH status
The LDL cholesterol year score at follow-up, which represented LDL cholesterol accumulation in patients with and without severe FH, had a normal distribution (Fig. 1A). At baseline, the median LDL cholesterol year score in the severe FH group was significantly higher than that in the non-severe FH group (14,120 [11,411–17,583] vs. 8908 [5696–11,963] mg/dL, p < 2.2 × 10–16, respectively) (Fig. 1B).
Medical therapies according to the severe FH status
Table 2 shows the follow-up medical treatments. Most patients received statins, followed by ezetimibe, and colestimide. The proportions of these combination therapies were higher in the severe FH group than in the non-severe FH group. In addition, we found that the proportion of the patients treated with high-intensity statins were significantly higher in severe FH patients. However, during treatment, the LDL cholesterol level of the severe FH group was still higher than that of the non-severe FH group.
MACE-associated factors
In this study, age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.08, p = 3.2 × 10–7, Table 3), male sex (HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.04–1.96, p = 0.02), hypertension (HR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.44–2.76, p = 2.4 × 10−5), diabetes (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.10–2.22, p = 0.001), smoking (HR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.76–3.36, p = 0.0001), LDL cholesterol at baseline (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.02, p = 0.03, per 10 mg/dL), pathogenic variants (HR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.54–3.38, p = 6.9 × 10–5), and prior CVD (HR = 3.56, 95% CI = 2.24–4.88, p = 4.2 × 10–6) were associated with MACE. Under the circumstances, a severe FH status was significantly associated with MACE (HR = 6.48, 95% CI = 2.56–10.40, p = 1.2 × 10–5).
Prognosis according to the severe FH status
Overall, the severe FH group showed significantly worse prognosis than the non-severe FH group (Fig. 2). When the patients were divided into two groups according to the prevention status (primary or secondary), the severe FH group showed significantly worse prognosis than the non-severe FH group in both primary and secondary prevention status settings (Fig. 3). The event rates per 1,000 person-years in the primary prevention group of the non-severe FH and severe FH were 0.0 and 15.6, respectively. The event rates per 1000 person-years in the secondary prevention group of the non-severe FH and severe FH were 2.0 and 32.3, respectively (Fig. 4). The event rates in the subgroups, including age (50 years or older, sex, and the attainment of LDL cholesterol treatment target where < 100 mg/dL in the primary prevention setting and < 70 mg/dL in the secondary prevention setting) among severe FH patients were illustrated in Fig. 5. We found that the event rate of younger group of non-severe FH and severe FH group were 0.8 and 5.2, respectively, and the event rate of older group of non-severe FH and severe FH group were 7.4 and 35.2, respectively. And the event rate of female of non-severe FH and severe FH group were 3.3 and 15.4, respectively, and the event rate of male group of non-severe FH and severe FH group were 10.2 and 31.3, respectively. And the event rate of patients who attained LDL cholesterol treatment target of non-severe FH and severe FH group were 2.3 and 6.9, respectively, and the event rate of the patients who did not of non-severe FH and severe FH group were 10.4 and 39.8, respectively.
Discussion
This study investigated the clinical impact of a “severe FH” status on future CVD events in an independent Japanese cohort, including patients under the secondary prevention setting. In this study, a severe FH status was significantly associated with MACEs both in the primary and secondary prevention settings. In fact, we found that the prognosis of the non-severe FH group was quite good.
The most important aspect of this disease is early diagnosis because earlier diagnosis and starting treatments lead to their better prognosis22,23. Thus, JAS complied and updated the clinical guidelines of FH for adults (aged ≥ 15 years) and children (aged ≤ 15 years), stipulating the diagnostic criteria and LDL cholesterol treatment targets24,25. We anticipate that the diagnostic rate of FH will increase because the new version of the clinical criteria of FH accepts genetic testing of FH, which is now covered by the Japanese national health insurance. However, uniform treatment target goals of LDL cholesterol for all patients with this disease are sometimes inadequate to prevent cardiovascular events. Numerous clinical situations such as hypertension, diabetes, and smoking; other biomarkers, such as triglycerides, remnant cholesterol, and Lp(a); genetic factors other than FH-associated genes; and subclinical atherosclerosis have been associated with further increased risk among patients with FH5,6,7,8,9. For further risk discriminations among patients with FH, several scores, or classifications such as the Montreal-FH-SCORE, SAFEHEART-RE, and so-called severe FH have been established10,26,27. Among them, a “severe FH” status appears to work quite well to identify patients with super high risk. Form the viewpoint of precision medicine, patients at super high risk must be identified, and LDL-cholesterol lowering together with interventions for modifiable additional risk factors must be intensified. In this study, we validated that patients with severe FH under the primary prevention setting had significantly higher risk for MACE than those with non-FH, and that the same is true in patients under the secondary prevention setting. Accordingly, we need to reshape our treatment strategy for patients with FH according to the severe FH status. In addition, we found the gender-gap in LDL cholesterol treatment where LDL cholesterol level in female was significantly higher than that of male. Moreover, we found that the use of high-intensity statins among patients with FH, including severe FH was inadequate. Importantly, we found that the severe patients who attained LDL cholesterol treatment target had better prognosis compared with those who did not. Accordingly, we need to intensify LDL cholesterol treatment in severe FH patients who did not attain LDL cholesterol treatment target.
This study had several limitations. First, this was a single-center retrospective study, and thus our findings might not be applicable to other patients. However, we believe that this is the largest study at least in Japan with a reasonable sample size. Second, we could not account for changes in treatments, including LDL-lowering therapies in detail during the study period. Third, some patients were excluded from the analysis because of missing data or lost to follow-up, which could have affected the results.
Conclusions
Patients with severe FH exhibited significant higher risks in the primary and secondary prevention settings. This simple criterion provides useful information to identify patients who have even higher risk and may need further managements.
Data availability
The datasets used in the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Tsao, C. W. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123 (2023).
Mabuchi, H. Half a century tales of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in Japan. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 24, 189–207 (2017).
Brandts, J. & Ray, K. K. Familial hypercholesterolemia: JACC focus seminar 4/4. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 78, 1831–1843 (2021).
Nohara, A. et al. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 28, 665–678 (2021).
Tada, H. et al. Impact of clinical signs and genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia on the prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia. Eur. Heart J. 38(20), 1573–1579. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx004 (2017).
Tada, H. et al. Assessment of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia by coronary computed tomography angiography. Am. J. Cardiol. 115(6), 724–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.034 (2015).
Tada, H. et al. Assessments of carotid artery plaque burden in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Am. J. Cardiol. 120(11), 1955–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.08.012 (2017).
Tada, H. et al. Remnant-like particles and coronary artery disease in familial hypercholesterolemia. Clin. Chim. Acta 482, 120–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.04.007 (2018).
Tada, H. et al. Synergistic effect of lipoprotein (a) and C-reactive protein on prognosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Am. J. Prev. Cardiol. 11(12), 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100428 (2022).
Santos, R. D. et al. Defining severe familial hypercholesterolaemia and the implications for clinical management: A consensus statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Panel. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 4(10), 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30041-9 (2016) (Erratum. In: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Aug; 4(8):e8).
Pérez-Calahorra, S. et al. Value of the definition of severe familial hypercholesterolemia for stratification of heterozygous patients. Am. J. Cardiol. 119(5), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.025 (2017).
Humphries, S. E. et al. Coronary heart disease mortality in severe vs. non-severe familial hypercholesterolaemia in the Simon Broome Register. Atherosclerosis 281, 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.11.014 (2019).
Funabashi, S. et al. Substantially elevated atherosclerotic risks in Japanese severe familial hypercholesterolemia defined by the international atherosclerosis society. JACC Asia 1(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.07.004 (2021).
Harada-Shiba, M. et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 25, 751–770 (2018).
Harada-Shiba, M. et al. Guidance for pediatric familial hypercholesterolemia 2017. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 25, 539–553 (2018).
Araki, E. et al. Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2019. J. Diabetes Investig. 11, 1020–1076 (2020).
Tada, H. et al. Effect of cumulative exposure to low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol on cardiovascular events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Circ. J. 85, 2073–2078 (2021).
Kroon, A. A., vant-Hof, M. A., Demacker, P. N. & Stalenhoef, A. F. The rebound of lipoproteins after LDL-apheresis Kinetics and estimation of mean lipoprotein levels. Atherosclerosis 152, 519–526 (2000).
Tada, H. et al. Oligogenic familial hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol, and coronary artery disease. J. Clin. Lipidol. 12, 1436–1444 (2018).
Yamamoto, T. et al. Challenges in detecting genomic copy number aberrations using next-generation sequencing data and the eXome Hidden Markov Model: A clinical exome-first diagnostic approach. Hum Genome Var. 3, 16025 (2016).
Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 17, 405–424 (2015).
Tada, H. et al. Prognostic impact of cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia on cardiovascular events. J. Clin. Lipidol. 15, 358–365 (2021).
Tada, H. et al. Early diagnosis and treatments in childhood are associated with better prognosis in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Am. J. Prev. Cardiol. 19(12), 100434 (2022).
Harada-Shiba, M. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adult familial hypercholesterolemia 2022. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.CR005 (2023).
Harada-Shiba, M. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric familial hypercholesterolemia 2022. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.CR006 (2023).
Paquette, M., Dufour, R. & Baass, A. The Montreal-FH-SCORE: A new score to predict cardiovascular events in familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Clin. Lipidol. 11(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2016.10.004 (2017).
Gallo, A. et al. SAFEHEART risk-equation and cholesterol-year-score are powerful predictors of cardiovascular events in French patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 306, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.06.011 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank Ms. Kazuko Honda and Mr. Sachio Yamamoto for their outstanding technical assistance.
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (20H03927, 21H03179, and 22H03330); a grant from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan (Sciences Research Grant for Research on Rare and Intractable Diseases) and Japanese Circulation Society (project for genome analysis in CVD); and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (20314864 and 22672854) to Dr. Hayato Tada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study conception: H.T. and M.K.; data collection: H.T., A.N., A.N., S.U., K.S., K.H., N.F., M.T., and M.K. Analysis and interpretation of results: H.T., A.N., and M.K.; draft preparation: H.T., A.N., A.N., S.U., K.S., K.H., N.F., M.T., and M.K. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tada, H., Nohara, A., Usui, S. et al. Impact of the severe familial hypercholesterolemia status on atherosclerotic risks. Sci Rep 13, 19782 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47147-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47147-z
- Springer Nature Limited